1
|
Blay JY, Penel N, Valentin T, Anract P, Duffaud F, Dufresne A, Verret B, Cordoba A, Italiano A, Brahmi M, Henon C, Amouyel T, Ray-Coquard I, Ferron G, Boudou-Rouquette P, Tlemsani C, Salas S, Rochwerger R, Faron M, Bompas E, Ducassou A, Gangloff D, Gouin F, Firmin N, Piperno-Neumann S, Rios M, Ropars M, Kurtz JE, Le Nail LR, Bertucci F, Carrere S, Llacer C, Watson S, Bonvalot S, Leroux A, Perrin C, Gantzer J, Pracht M, Narciso B, Monneur A, Lebbe C, Hervieu A, Saada-Bouzid E, Dubray-Longeras P, Fiorenza F, Chaigneau L, Nevieres ZM, Soibinet P, Bouché O, Guillemet C, Spano JP, Ruzic JC, Isambert N, Vaz G, Meeus P, Karanian M, Ngo C, Coindre JM, De Pinieux G, Le Loarer F, Ducimetiere F, Chemin C, Morelle M, Toulmonde M, Le Cesne A. Improved nationwide survival of sarcoma patients with a network of reference centers. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:351-363. [PMID: 38246351 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We investigated the impact of the implementation of a network of reference centers for sarcomas (NETSARC) on the care and survival of sarcoma patients in France since 2010. PATIENTS AND METHODS NETSARC (netsarc.org) is a network of 26 reference sarcoma centers with specialized multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTBs), funded by the French National Cancer Institute (INCa) since 2010. Its aims are to improve the quality of diagnosis and care of sarcoma patients. Patients' characteristics, treatments, and outcomes are collected in a nationwide database. The objective of this analysis was to compare the survival of patients in three periods: 2010-2012 (non-exhaustive), 2013-2015, and 2016-2020. RESULTS A total of 43 975 patients with sarcomas, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), or connective tissue tumors of intermediate malignancy were included in the NETSARC+ database since 2010 (n = 9266 before 2013, n = 12 274 between 2013 and 2015, n = 22 435 in 2016-2020). Median age was 56 years, 50.5% were women, and 13.2% had metastasis at diagnosis. Overall survival was significantly superior in the period 2016-2020 versus 2013-2015 versus 2010-2012 for the entire population, for patients >18 years of age, and for both metastatic and non-metastatic patients in univariate and multivariate analyses (P < 0.0001). Over the three periods, we observed a significantly improved compliance to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) nationwide: the proportion of patients biopsied before surgery increased from 62.9% to 72.6%; the percentage of patients presented to NETSARC MDTBs before first surgery increased from 31.7% to 44.4% (P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients with R0 resection on first surgery increased (from 36.1% to 46.6%), while R2 resection rate decreased (from 10.9% to 7.9%), with a better compliance and improvement in NETSARC centers. CONCLUSIONS The implementation of the national reference network for sarcoma was associated with an improvement of overall survival and compliance to guidelines nationwide in sarcoma patients. Referral to expert networks for sarcoma patients should be encouraged, though a better compliance to CPGs can still be achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Y Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon.
| | - N Penel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille
| | - T Valentin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud & IUCT Oncopole Toulouse, Toulouse
| | - P Anract
- Department of Orthopedics, Hôpital Cochin Saint Vincent de Paul, Paris
| | - F Duffaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, La Timone University Hospital, Marseille
| | - A Dufresne
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - B Verret
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - A Cordoba
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille
| | - A Italiano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux
| | - M Brahmi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - C Henon
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - T Amouyel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille
| | - I Ray-Coquard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - G Ferron
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud & IUCT Oncopole Toulouse, Toulouse
| | | | - C Tlemsani
- Department of Orthopedics, Hôpital Cochin Saint Vincent de Paul, Paris
| | - S Salas
- Department of Medical Oncology, La Timone University Hospital, Marseille
| | - R Rochwerger
- Department of Medical Oncology, La Timone University Hospital, Marseille
| | - M Faron
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - E Bompas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cochin Hospital, Paris; Department of Medical Oncology, Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes St. Herblain
| | - A Ducassou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud & IUCT Oncopole Toulouse, Toulouse
| | - D Gangloff
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud & IUCT Oncopole Toulouse, Toulouse
| | - F Gouin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Service Orthopedie, CHU Nantes, Nantes
| | - N Firmin
- Department of Medical & Surgical & Radiotherapy Oncology ICM, Montpellier
| | - S Piperno-Neumann
- INSERM U1194, IRCM, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier; Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris; Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris
| | - M Rios
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy
| | - M Ropars
- Department of Orthopedics, CHU Rennes, Rennes
| | | | | | - F Bertucci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille
| | - S Carrere
- Service Orthopedie, CHU Nantes, Nantes
| | - C Llacer
- Service Orthopedie, CHU Nantes, Nantes
| | - S Watson
- Department of Medical & Surgical & Radiotherapy Oncology ICM, Montpellier
| | - S Bonvalot
- Department of Medical & Surgical & Radiotherapy Oncology ICM, Montpellier
| | - A Leroux
- INSERM U1194, IRCM, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier
| | - C Perrin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eugene Marquis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rennes
| | - J Gantzer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy
| | - M Pracht
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eugene Marquis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rennes
| | - B Narciso
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tours
| | - A Monneur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille
| | - C Lebbe
- Department of Dermatology, INSERM U976 University Paris Diderot Saint Louis Hospital, Paris; Department of CIC, INSERM U976 University Paris Diderot Saint Louis Hospital, Paris
| | - A Hervieu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon
| | - E Saada-Bouzid
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice
| | - P Dubray-Longeras
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand
| | - F Fiorenza
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, CHU Limoges, Limoges
| | - L Chaigneau
- Department of Medicine, CHU Besancon, Besancon
| | | | - P Soibinet
- Department of Medicine, Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen
| | - O Bouché
- Department of Gastroenterology, CHU Reims, Reims
| | - C Guillemet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre J Godinot Reims, Reims
| | - J P Spano
- Department of Oncology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétriere, Paris
| | - J C Ruzic
- Departement d'oncologie, CHU, La Reunion
| | - N Isambert
- Service d'oncologie, CHU Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - G Vaz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - P Meeus
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - M Karanian
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - C Ngo
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - J M Coindre
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux
| | | | - F Le Loarer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux
| | - F Ducimetiere
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - C Chemin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - M Morelle
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - M Toulmonde
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux
| | - A Le Cesne
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gantzer J, Toulmonde M, Severac F, Chamseddine AN, Charon-Barra C, Vinson C, Hervieu A, Bourgmayer A, Bertucci F, Ryckewaert T, Valentin T, Firmin N, Chaigneau L, Bompas E, Follana P, Rioux-Leclercq N, Soibinet-Oudot P, Bozec L, Le Loarer F, Weingertner N, Chevreau C, Duffaud F, Blay JY, Kurtz JE, Schöffski P, Brahmi M, Malouf GG. PEC-PRO: A new prognostic score from a series of 87 patients with localized perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms (PEComas) treated with curative intent. Cancer 2024. [PMID: 38470379 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms (PEComas) encompass a heterogeneous family of mesenchymal tumors. Previously described clinicopathologic features aimed at distinguishing benign from malignant variants but lacked prognostic value. METHODS This retrospective analysis examined clinicopathologic data from patients who had localized PEComa across French Sarcoma Network centers. The authors analyzed 12 clinicopathologic features in a Cox proportional hazard framework to derive a multivariate prognostic risk model for event-free survival (EFS). They built the PEComa prognostic score (PEC-PRO), in which scores ranged from 0 to 5, based on the coefficients of the multivariate model. Three groups were identified: low risk (score = 0), intermediate risk (score = 1), and high risk (score ≥ 2). RESULTS Analyzing 87 patients who had a median 46-month follow-up (interquartile range, 20-74 months), the median EFS was 96.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 47.1 months to not applicable), with 2-year and 5-year EFS rates of 64.7% and 58%, respectively. The median overall survival was unreached, with 2-year and 5-year overall survival rates of 82.3% and 69.3%, respectively. The simplified Folpe classification did not correlate with EFS. Multivariate analysis identified three factors affecting EFS: positive surgical margins (hazard ratio [HR], 5.17; 95% CI, 1.65-16.24; p = .008), necrosis (HR, 3.94; 95% CI, 1.16-13.43; p = .030), and male sex (HR, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.19-8.27; p = 0.023). Four variables were retained in the prognostic model. Patients with low-risk PEC-PRO scores had a 2-year EFS rate of 93.7% (95% CI, 83.8%-100.0%), those with intermediate-risk PEC-PRO scores had a 2-year EFS rate of 67.4% (95% CI, 53.9%-80.9%), and those with high-risk PEC-PRO scores had a 2-year EFS rate of 2.3% (95% CI, 0.0%-18.3%). CONCLUSIONS The PEC-PRO score reliably predicts the risk of postoperative recurrence in patients with localized PEComa. It has the potential to improve follow-up strategies but requires validation in a prospective trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justine Gantzer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Strasbourg-Europe, Strasbourg, France
| | - Maud Toulmonde
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - François Severac
- Department of Public Health, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Ali N Chamseddine
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Charles Vinson
- Department of Pathology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Alice Hervieu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Agathe Bourgmayer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Strasbourg-Europe, Strasbourg, France
| | - François Bertucci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseilles, France
| | | | - Thibaud Valentin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Nelly Firmin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Loïc Chaigneau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Regional du Cancer en Franche-Comté, Besançon, France
| | - Emmanuelle Bompas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, France
| | - Philippe Follana
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | | | | | - Laurence Bozec
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | | | - Noëlle Weingertner
- Department of Pathology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Christine Chevreau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Florence Duffaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Marseilles, Marseilles, France
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Jean-Emmanuel Kurtz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Strasbourg-Europe, Strasbourg, France
| | - Patrick Schöffski
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mehdi Brahmi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Gabriel G Malouf
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Strasbourg-Europe, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Blay JY, Tlemsani C, Toulmonde M, Italiano A, Rios M, Bompas E, Valentin T, Duffaud F, Le Nail LR, Watson S, Firmin N, Dubray-Longeras P, Ropars M, Perrin C, Hervieu A, Lebbe C, Saada-Bouzid E, Soibinet P, Fiorenza F, Bertucci F, Boudou P, Vaz G, Bonvalot S, Honoré C, Marec-Berard P, Minard V, Cleirec M, Biau D, Meeus P, Babinet A, Dumaine V, Carriere S, Fau M, Decanter G, Gouin F, Ngo C, Le Loarer F, Karanian M, Meurgey A, Dufresne A, Brahmi M, Chemin-Airiau C, Ducimetiere F, Penel N, Le Cesne A. Sclerosing Epithelioid Fibrosarcoma (SEF) versus Low Grade Fibromyxoid Sarcoma (LGFMS): Presentation and outcome in the nationwide NETSARC+ series of 330 patients over 13 years. Eur J Cancer 2024; 196:113454. [PMID: 38008029 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/28/2023]
Abstract
Sclerosing Epithelioid Fibrosarcoma (SEF) and Low Grade Fibromyxoid Sarcoma (LGFMS) are ultrarare sarcomas sharing common translocations whose natural history are not well known. We report on the nationwide exhaustive series of 330 patients with SEF or LGFMS in NETSARC+ since 2010. PATIENTS AND METHODS NETSARC (netsarc.org) is a network of 26 reference sarcoma centers with specialized multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTB). Since 2010, (i) pathological review has been mandatory for sarcoma,and (ii) tumour/patients' characteristics have been collected in the NETSARC+ nationwide database. The characteristics of patients with SEF and LGFMS and their outcome are compared. RESULTS 35/73 (48%) and 125/257(49%) of patients with SEF and LGFMS were female. More visceral, bone and trunk primary sites were observed in SEF (p < 0.001). 30% of SEF vs 4% of LGFMS patients had metastasis at diagnosis (p < 0.0001). Median size of the primary tumor was 51 mm (range 10-90) for LGFMS vs 80 (20-320) for SEF (p < 0.001). Median age for LGFMS patients was 12 years younger than that of SEF patients (43 [range 4-98] vs 55 [range 10-91], p < 0.001). Neoadjuvant treatment was more often given to SEF (16% vs 9%, p = 0.05). More patients with LGFMS were operated first in reference centers (51% vs 26%, p < 0.001). The R0 rate on the operative specimen was 41% in LGFMS vs 16% in SEF (p < 0.001). Median event-free survival (EFS) of patients with SEF and LGFMS were 32 vs 136 months (p < 0.0001). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Fifty-months OS was 93% vs 81% for LGFMS vs SEF (p = 0.05). Median OS was 77 months after first relapse, similar for SEF and LGFMS. In multivariate analysis, age, tumor size, metastasis at diagnosis were independent prognostic factors for OS in LGFMS. CONCLUSIONS Although sharing close molecular alterations, SEF and LGFMS have a different natural history, clinical presentation and outcome, with a higher risk of metastatic relapse in SEF. Survival after relapse is longer than with other sarcomas, and similar for SEF and LGFMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Y Blay
- Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France.
| | | | - M Toulmonde
- Departement of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - A Italiano
- Departement of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - M Rios
- Institut Cancerologie Lorraine, Centre Alexis Vautrin, Nancy, France
| | - E Bompas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancerologie Ouest Nantes, France
| | - T Valentin
- Institut Claudius Regaud & Institut Universitaire de Cancerologie, Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - F Duffaud
- La Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France
| | | | - S Watson
- Dept of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie & INSERM U830, Institut Curie Research Center, Paris, France
| | - N Firmin
- Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | - M Ropars
- Eugene Marquis Comprehensive Cancer Center, France
| | | | - A Hervieu
- Centre George Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - C Lebbe
- Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - E Saada-Bouzid
- Dermato-Oncology Unit, Saint Louis Hospital, Paris, France
| | | | | | - F Bertucci
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | | | - G Vaz
- Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | | | - C Honoré
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - P Marec-Berard
- Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - V Minard
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | | | - D Biau
- Hopital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - P Meeus
- Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | | | | | - S Carriere
- Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - M Fau
- Departement of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - G Decanter
- Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - Metrics: Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, F-59000 Lille, France; Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - F Gouin
- Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - C Ngo
- Departement of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - M Karanian
- Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - A Meurgey
- Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - A Dufresne
- Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - M Brahmi
- Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - C Chemin-Airiau
- Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - F Ducimetiere
- Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France.
| | - N Penel
- Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - Metrics: Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, F-59000 Lille, France; Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Roussot N, Fumet JD, Limagne E, Thibaudin M, Hervieu A, Hennequin A, Zanetta S, Dalens L, Fourrier T, Galland L, Jacob P, Bertaut A, Rederstorff E, Chevalier C, Ghirardi S, Gilbert E, Khoukaz A, Martin E, Nicolet C, Quivrin M, Thibouw D, Vulquin N, Truc G, Rouffiac M, Ghiringhelli F, Mirjolet C. A phase I study of the combination of atezolizumab, tiragolumab, and stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with metastatic multiorgan cancer. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:1080. [PMID: 37946136 PMCID: PMC10633948 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11534-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunotherapy targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway is a standard of care in a number of metastatic malignancies, but less than a fifth of patients are expected to respond to ICIs (Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors). In a clinical trial, combining the anti-TIGIT (T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains) Mab (monoclonal antibody) tiragolumab with atezolizumab improved outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer. In preclinical models, SBRT (Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy) could increase expression levels of the inhibitory co-receptors TIGIT and PD-L1. We aim to assess the combination of tiragolumab with atezolizumab and SBRT in metastatic, previously treated by ICIs, non-small cell lung cancer, head and neck cancer, bladder cancer, and renal cell cancer. METHODS This phase I study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05259319) will assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of atezolizumab with tiragolumab and stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with histologically proven metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell cancer, bladder cancer, and head and neck cancer previously treated. First part: 2 different schedules of SBRT in association with a fixed dose of atezolizumab and tiragolumab will be investigated only with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients (cohort 1). The expansion cohorts phase will be a multicentric, open-label study at the recommended scheme of administration and enroll additional patients with metastatic bladder cancer, renal cell cancer, and head and neck cancer (cohort 2, 3 and 4). Patients will be treated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, intercurrent conditions that preclude continuation of treatment, or patient refusal in the absence of progression or intolerance. The primary endpoint of the first phase is the safety of the combination in a sequential or concomitant scheme and to determine the expansion cohorts phase recommended scheme of administration. The primary endpoint of phase II is to evaluate the efficacy of tiragolumab + atezolizumab + SBRT in terms of 6-month PFS (Progression-Free Survival). Ancillary analyses will be performed with peripheral and intratumoral immune biomarker assessments. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05259319, since February 28th, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Roussot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, Dijon, 21000, France
- Cancer Biology Transfer Platform, Dijon, France
- University of Burgundy-Franche Comté, Dijon, France
- UMR INSERM 1231, Dijon, France
| | - Jean-David Fumet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, Dijon, 21000, France.
- Cancer Biology Transfer Platform, Dijon, France.
| | - Emeric Limagne
- Cancer Biology Transfer Platform, Dijon, France
- GIMI Genetic and Immunology Medical Institute, Dijon, France
- University of Burgundy-Franche Comté, Dijon, France
- UMR INSERM 1231, Dijon, France
| | - Marion Thibaudin
- Cancer Biology Transfer Platform, Dijon, France
- GIMI Genetic and Immunology Medical Institute, Dijon, France
- UMR INSERM 1231, Dijon, France
| | - Alice Hervieu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, Dijon, 21000, France
| | - Audrey Hennequin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, Dijon, 21000, France
| | - Sylvie Zanetta
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, Dijon, 21000, France
| | - Lorraine Dalens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, Dijon, 21000, France
| | - Théo Fourrier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, Dijon, 21000, France
| | - Loick Galland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, Dijon, 21000, France
| | - Pierre Jacob
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, Dijon, 21000, France
| | - Aurélie Bertaut
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Center GF Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Emilie Rederstorff
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Center GF Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | - Sarah Ghirardi
- Department of Radiotherapy, Center GF Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Elodie Gilbert
- Department of Radiotherapy, Center GF Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Azzat Khoukaz
- Department of Radiotherapy, Center GF Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Etienne Martin
- Department of Radiotherapy, Center GF Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | - Magali Quivrin
- Department of Radiotherapy, Center GF Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - David Thibouw
- Department of Radiotherapy, Center GF Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Noémie Vulquin
- Department of Radiotherapy, Center GF Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Gilles Truc
- Department of Radiotherapy, Center GF Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Magali Rouffiac
- Department of Radiotherapy, Center GF Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Francois Ghiringhelli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, Dijon, 21000, France
- Cancer Biology Transfer Platform, Dijon, France
- GIMI Genetic and Immunology Medical Institute, Dijon, France
- University of Burgundy-Franche Comté, Dijon, France
- UMR INSERM 1231, Dijon, France
| | - Céline Mirjolet
- UMR INSERM 1231, Dijon, France
- Radiation Oncology Department, Preclinical Radiation Therapy and Radiobiology Unit, Center GF Leclerc, Unicancer, Dijon, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Blay JY, Piperno-Neumann S, Watson S, Dufresne A, Valentin T, Duffaud F, Toulmonde M, Italiano A, Bertucci F, Tlemsani C, Firmin N, Bompas E, Perrin C, Ropars M, Saada-Bouzid E, Dubray-Longeras P, Hervieu A, Lebbe C, Gantzer J, Chaigneau L, Fiorenza F, Rios M, Isambert N, Soibinet P, Boudou-Roquette P, Verret B, Ferron G, Ryckewaert T, Lebellec L, Brahmi M, Gouin F, Meeus P, Vaz G, Le Loarer F, Karanian M, De Pinieux G, Ducimetiere F, Chemin C, Morelle M, Le Cesne A, Penel N. Epithelioid hemangio-endothelioma (EHE) in NETSARC: The nationwide series of 267 patients over 12 years. Eur J Cancer 2023; 192:113262. [PMID: 37625241 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Revised: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
EPITHELIOID HEMANGIOENDOTHELIOMA A NATIONWIDE STUDY: Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is an ultrarare sarcoma whose natural history and treatment is not well defined. We report on the presentation and outcome of 267 patients with EHE in the NETSARC+ network since 2010 in France. PATIENTS AND METHODS NETSARC (netsarc.org) is a network of 26 reference sarcoma centres with specialised multidisciplinary tumour boards (MDTB), funded by the French National Cancer Institute (NCI), Institut National du Cancer (INCA). Since 2010, presentation to an MDTB and second pathological review are mandatory for sarcoma patients. Patients' characteristics are collected in a nationwide database regularly monitored with stable incidence since 2013. The characteristics of patients with EHE at diagnosis are presented as well as progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and outcome under treatment. RESULTS Two hundred and sixty-seven patients with EHE were included in the NETSARC+ database since 2010. Median age in the series was 51 (range 10-90) years, 58% were women. Median tumour size was 37 mm (4-220). Forty-eight percent, 42%, and 10% were visceral, soft parts, or bone primaries. The most frequent sites were liver (28%), lung (13%). 40% were reported to have systemic (i.e. multifocal or metastatic disease) at diagnosis. With a median follow-up of 20 months, OS and PFS rates at 24 months were 82% and 67%, with 10-year projected OS and PFS of 62% and 21% respectively. Male and M+ patients at diagnosis had a significantly worse OS, but not PFS. Local treatment was associated with a favourable survival in localised but not in patients with advanced stage at diagnosis. For 23 patients receiving medical treatment, PFS and OS were 50.2% and 33.2% at 60 months were respectively. CONCLUSIONS EHE is a frequently metastatic sarcoma at diagnosis with a unique natural history. This study shows in a nationwide series over 12 years that most patients progressed but are still alive at 10 years, both in localised and metastatic stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Y Blay
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Léon Bérard and Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France.
| | - S Piperno-Neumann
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie and INSERM U830, Institut Curie Research Center, Paris, France
| | - S Watson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie and INSERM U830, Institut Curie Research Center, Paris, France
| | - A Dufresne
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Léon Bérard and Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - T Valentin
- Department of Medical oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud and Institut Universitaire de Cancerologie, Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - F Duffaud
- Department of Medical oncology, La Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - M Toulmonde
- Departement of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - A Italiano
- Departement of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - F Bertucci
- Department of Medical oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - C Tlemsani
- Department of Medical oncology, Hôpital Cochin-Saint-Vincent de Paul, Paris, France
| | - N Firmin
- Department of Medical oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - E Bompas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancerologie Ouest, Nantes, France
| | - C Perrin
- Department of Medical oncology, Eugene Marquis Comprehensive Cancer Center and CHU, Rennes, France
| | - M Ropars
- Department of Medical oncology, Eugene Marquis Comprehensive Cancer Center and CHU, Rennes, France
| | - E Saada-Bouzid
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - P Dubray-Longeras
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - A Hervieu
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Jean Perrin/ERTICa EA 4677, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - C Lebbe
- Department of Medical oncology, Oncology Unit, Saint Louis Hospital, Paris, France
| | - J Gantzer
- Department of Medicine, ICANS, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - L Chaigneau
- Department of Medical oncology, CHU Besancon, Besançon, France
| | - F Fiorenza
- Department of Medical oncology, CHU Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - M Rios
- Department of Medical oncology, Institut Cancerologie Lorraine, Centre Alexis Vautrin, Nancy, France
| | - N Isambert
- Department of Medical oncology, CHU, Poitiers, France
| | - P Soibinet
- Department of Medical oncology, Institut J Godinot Reims, Reims, France
| | - P Boudou-Roquette
- Department of Medical oncology, Hôpital Cochin-Saint-Vincent de Paul, Paris, France
| | - B Verret
- Department of Medical oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - G Ferron
- Department of Medical oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud and Institut Universitaire de Cancerologie, Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - T Ryckewaert
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, and Université de Lille ULR 2694, Lille, France
| | - L Lebellec
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, and Université de Lille ULR 2694, Lille, France
| | - M Brahmi
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Léon Bérard and Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - F Gouin
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Léon Bérard and Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - P Meeus
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Léon Bérard and Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - G Vaz
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Léon Bérard and Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - F Le Loarer
- Departement of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - M Karanian
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Léon Bérard and Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - G De Pinieux
- Department of Medical oncology, CHU Tours, Tours, France
| | - F Ducimetiere
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Léon Bérard and Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - C Chemin
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Léon Bérard and Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - M Morelle
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Léon Bérard and Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - A Le Cesne
- Department of Medical oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - N Penel
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, and Université de Lille ULR 2694, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Geoffrois L, Harlé A, Sahki N, Sikanja A, Granel-Brocard F, Hervieu A, Mortier L, Jeudy G, Michel C, Nardin C, Huin-Schohn C, Merlin JL. Personalized follow-up of circulating DNA in resected stage III/IV melanoma: PERCIMEL multicentric prospective study protocol. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:554. [PMID: 37328818 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11029-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With more than 15,000 new cases /year in France and 2,000 deaths, cutaneous melanoma represents approximately 4% of incidental cancers and 1.2% of cancer related deaths. In locally advanced (stage III) or resectable metastatic (stage IV) melanomas, medical adjuvant treatment is proposed and recent advances had shown the benefit of anti-PD1/PDL1 and anti-CTLA4 immunotherapy as well as anti-BRAF and anti-MEK targeted therapy in BRAF V600 mutated tumors. However, the recurence rate at one year is approximately 30% and justify extensive research of predictive biomarkers. If in metastatic disease, the follow-up of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been demonstrated, its interest in adjuvant setting remains to be precised, especially because of a lower detection rate. Further, the definition of a molecular response could prove useful to personalized treatment. METHODS PERCIMEL is an open prospective multicentric study executed through collaboration of the Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine (non-profit comprehensive cancer center) and 6 French university and community hospitals. A total of 165 patients with resected stage III and IV melanoma, eligible to adjuvant imunotherapy or anti-BRAF/MEK kinase inhibitors will be included. The primary endpoint is the presence of ctDNA, 2 to 3 weeks after surgery, defined as mutated ctDNA copy number calculated as the allelic fraction of a clonal mutation relative to total ctDNA. Secondary endpoints are recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival and specific survival. We will follow ctDNA along treatment, quantitatively through ctDNA mutated copy number variation, qualitatively through the presence of cfDNA and its clonal evolution. Relative and absolute variations of ctDNA during follow-up will be also analyzed. PERCIMEL study aims at provide scientific evidence that ctDNA quantitative and qualitative variations can be used to predict the recurrence of patients with melanoma treated with adjuvant immunotherapy or kinase inhibitors, thus defining the notion of molecular recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lionnel Geoffrois
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
| | - Alexandre Harlé
- Biopathology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, CNRS UMR7039 CRAN Université de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
| | - Nassim Sahki
- Methodology Biostatistics Unit, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
| | - Aleksandra Sikanja
- Clinical Research Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
| | | | - Alice Hervieu
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Laurent Mortier
- Dermatology Department CHRU Lille, Inserm U1189, Université de Lille, Lille, France
| | | | - Catherine Michel
- Dermatology Department, GHR Mulhouse Sud Alsace, Mulhouse, France
| | - Charlée Nardin
- Dermatology Department CHU Besançon, Inserm 1098 RIGHT Université Franche Comté, Besançon, France
| | - Cécile Huin-Schohn
- Clinical Research Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
| | - Jean-Louis Merlin
- Biopathology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, CNRS UMR7039 CRAN Université de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France.
- Clinical Research Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Le Cesne A, Chevreau C, Perrin C, Italiano A, Hervieu A, Blay JY, Piperno-Neumann S, Saada-Bouzid E, Bertucci F, Firmin N, Kalbacher E, Narciso B, Schiffler C, Yara S, Jimenez M, Bouvier C, Vidal V, Chabaud S, Duffaud F. Regorafenib in patients with relapsed advanced or metastatic chordoma: results of a non-comparative, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre phase II study. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101569. [PMID: 37285716 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2023] [Revised: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND REGOBONE multicohort study explored the efficacy and safety of regorafenib for patients with advanced bone sarcomas; this report details the cohort of patients with relapsed advanced or metastatic chordoma. METHODS Patients with relapsed chordoma progressing despite 0-2 prior lines of systemic therapy, were randomised (2 : 1) to receive regorafenib (160 mg/day, 21/28 days) or placebo. Patients on placebo could cross over to receive regorafenib after centrally-confirmed progression. The primary endpoint was the progression-free rate at 6 months (PFR-6) (by RECIST 1.1). With one-sided α of 0.05, and 80% power, at least 10/24 progression-free patients at 6 months (PFR-6) were needed for success. RESULTS From March 2016 to February 2020, 27 patients were enrolled. A total of 23 patients were assessable for efficacy: 7 on placebo, 16 on regorafenib, 16 were men, median age was 66 (32-85) years. At 6 months, in the regorafenib arm, 1 patient was not assessable, 6/14 were non-progressive (PFR-6: 42.9%; one-sided 95% CI = 20.6) 3/14 discontinued regorafenib due to toxicity; and in the placebo arm, 2/5 patients were non-progressive (PFR-6: 40.0%; one-sided 95% CI = 7.6), 2 were non-assessable. Median progression-free survival was 8.2 months (95% CI 4.5-12.9 months) on regorafenib and 10.1 months (95% CI 0.8 months-non evaluable [NE]) on placebo. Median overall survival rates were 28.3 months (95% CI 14.8 months-NE) on regorafenib but not reached in placebo arm. Four placebo patients crossed over to receive regorafenib after centrally-confirmed progression. The most common grade ≥3 regorafenib-related adverse events were hand-foot skin reaction (22%), hypertension (22%), pain (22%), and diarrhoea (17%), with no toxic death. CONCLUSION This study failed to show any signal of benefit for regorafenib in patients with advanced/metastatic recurrent chordoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Le Cesne
- Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
| | - C Chevreau
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Oncopole, Toulouse
| | - C Perrin
- Medical Oncology Unit, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes
| | - A Italiano
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux
| | - A Hervieu
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Georges Francois Leclerc, Dijon
| | - J Y Blay
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyons. https://twitter.com/jeanyvesblay
| | | | - E Saada-Bouzid
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice
| | - F Bertucci
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille
| | - N Firmin
- Medical Oncologie Department, Centre Valdorelle, Montpellier
| | - E Kalbacher
- Medical Oncology Department, CHU J Minjoz, Besançon
| | - B Narciso
- Medical Oncology Department, CHU Bretonneau, Tours
| | - C Schiffler
- Department of Statistics, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyons
| | | | | | - C Bouvier
- Aix Marseille Univ, APHM Hopital La Timone, Pathology Department, Marseille
| | - V Vidal
- Aix Marseille Univ, APHM Hopital La Timone, Radiology Department, Marseille
| | - S Chabaud
- Department of Statistics, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyons
| | - F Duffaud
- Aix Marseille University (AMU), APHM Hopital La Timone, Medical Oncology Unit, APHM, Marseille, France.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fumet JD, Isambert N, Hervieu A, Zanetta S, Guion JF, Hennequin A, Rederstorff E, Bertaut A, Ghiringhelli F. Corrigendum to "Phase Ib/II trial evaluating the safety, tolerability and immunological activity of durvalumab (MEDI4736) (anti-PD-L1) plus tremelimumab (anti-CTLA-4) combined with FOLFOX in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer": [ESMO Open 3 (2018) e000375]. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101185. [PMID: 36868156 PMCID: PMC10006516 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/05/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-David Fumet
- Department of Medical, Oncology, Center Georges Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France; Research Platform in Biological Oncology, Georges Francois Leclerc Center, Dijon, France; University of Burgundy-Franche Comté, Dijon, France.
| | - Nicolas Isambert
- Department of Medical, Oncology, Center Georges Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Alice Hervieu
- Department of Medical, Oncology, Center Georges Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Sylvie Zanetta
- Department of Medical, Oncology, Center Georges Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Jean-Florian Guion
- Department of Medical, Oncology, Center Georges Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Audrey Hennequin
- Department of Medical, Oncology, Center Georges Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Emilie Rederstorff
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Georges, François Leclerc Center, Dijon, France
| | - Aurélie Bertaut
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Georges, François Leclerc Center, Dijon, France
| | - Francois Ghiringhelli
- Department of Medical, Oncology, Center Georges Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France; Research Platform in Biological Oncology, Georges Francois Leclerc Center, Dijon, France; University of Burgundy-Franche Comté, Dijon, France; INSERM UMR1231, Dijon, France; GIMI Genetic and Immunology, Medical Institute, Dijon, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Reardon DA, Idbaih A, Vieito M, Tabatabai G, Stradella A, Ghiringhelli F, Burger MC, Mildenberger I, González M, Hervieu A, Martin MG, Renovanz M, Touat M, Wen PY, Wick A, Gouttefangeas C, Maia A, Bonny C, Fagerberg J, Wick W. CTIM-17. EO2401 THERAPEUTIC VACCINE FOR PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA: PHASE 1/2 ROSALIE STUDY (NCT04116658). Neuro Oncol 2022. [PMCID: PMC9660704 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac209.249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
EO2401 includes microbial-derived, synthetically produced HLA-A2 restricted peptides with molecular mimicry to antigens (IL13Rα2, BIRC5 and FOXM1) upregulated in glioblastoma, and the CD4 helper peptide UCP2. Patients with glioblastoma at first progression received EO2401 (300µg/peptide, q2weeks x4 then q4weeks), EO2401+nivolumab (3mg/kg q2weeks), or E02401+nivolumab+bevacizumab (10mg/kg q2weeks). Cohort-1 included EO2401x2 then EO2401+nivolumab. EO2401+nivolumab was evaluated in Cohort-2a, as adjuvant treatment in Cohort-2b, and as neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatment in Cohort-2c. Cohort-3 assessed EO2401+nivolumab+bevacizumab. Part 1 included 40 patients (Cohort-1/3, Cohort-2a/23, Cohort-2b/3, Cohort-3/11). Part 2 allowed low-dose-bevacizumab (5mg/kg q2weeks) for symptomatic edema and enrolled 38 patients (Cohort-1/18, Cohort-2a/15, Cohort-2b/3; and recruiting Cohort-2c/2 target 6, Cohort-3/0 target 15).Safety assessment of part 1 showed EO2401+nivolumab+/-bevacizumab to be well tolerated with EO2401 associated toxicity limited to local administration site reactions (48%; all grade 1-2). The nivolumab-/bevacizumab-toxicity was consistent with historical single-agent data. Strong CD8 T cell ELISPOT responses against the 3 vaccine peptides and cross-reactivity against targeted antigens was demonstrated in the majority of evaluable patients. Immune response was confirmed with tetramer staining of specific CD8 either ex vivo or after in vitro stimulation. For part 1, median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median survival (mOS) for EO2401+nivolumab (Cohorts-1/2/2b, n=29 median follow-up [mFU] 14.0 months) were 1.8 and 10.6 months. Patients on EO2401+nivolumab+bevacizumab (n = 11 mFU 9.6 m) had mPFS 5.5 months and 9 patients alive 7-12.4 months. Objective Response Rate/Disease Control Rate for EO2401+nivolumab and EO2401+nivolumab+bevacizumab was 10%/34% and 55%/82%.Median treatment duration for Cohort-2a part 1 was 6.1 weeks (1/23 on treatment), while it was 10.0 weeks (8/15 on treatment) for Cohort-2a part 2. Overall, in part 2, 36% received low-dose-bevacizumab.EO2401 generated strong immune responses and was well tolerated. Addition of standard bevacizumab to EO2401+nivolumab improved PFS and tumor response. Symptom driven low-dose-bevacizumab supported longer treatment durations. Outcome of study part 2 will be presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ahmed Idbaih
- Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, ICM, Hôpital Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière , Paris , France
| | - Maria Vieito
- Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) , Barcelona , Spain
| | - Ghazaleh Tabatabai
- Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research , Tübingen , Germany
| | - Agostina Stradella
- Institut Catala D'Oncologia - Hospital Duran i Reynals , Barcelona , Spain
| | | | - Michael C Burger
- Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt Goethe-Universität , Frankfurt , Germany
| | - Iris Mildenberger
- Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg , Mannheim , Germany
| | | | | | - Marta Gil Martin
- Institut Catala D'Oncologia - Hospital Duran i Reynals , Barcelona , Spain
| | - Mirjam Renovanz
- Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research , Tübingen , Germany
| | - Mehdi Touat
- Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix , Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, F-75013, Paris , France
| | | | - Antje Wick
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg, and Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuro-Oncology, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ). , Heidelberg , Germany
| | | | - Ana Maia
- Department of Immunology, Eberhard-Karls-University , Tübingen , Germany
| | | | | | - Wolfgang Wick
- Neurology Clinic and National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg , Baden-Wurttemberg , Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Skowron F, Mouret S, Seigneurin A, Montaudié H, Maubec E, Grange F, Quéreux G, Celerier P, Adle A, Dalac S, De Quatrebarbes J, Zehou O, Safia A, Muller P, Modiano P, Misery L, Litrowski N, Brunet Possenti F, Mortier L, Bens G, Hervieu A, Leduc N, Jouary T, Lesage C, Beneton N, Le Corre Y, Geoffrois L, Thomas-Beaulieu D, Khammari A, Wierzbicka-Hainaut E, Leccia M. La pandémie COVID-19 est associée à des mélanomes diagnostiqués à un stade plus avancé. Annales de Dermatologie et de Vénéréologie - FMC 2022. [PMCID: PMC9748166 DOI: 10.1016/j.fander.2022.09.173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
11
|
Chaigneau L, Jary M, Nerich V, Hervieu A, Aubry S, Charon Barra C, Meynard G, Neumann F, Kalbacher E, Isambert N. Real-World Experience of efficacy and safety of trabectedin in patients with soft tissue sarcoma: a bicentric retrospective analysis. Oncology 2022; 100:633-644. [DOI: 10.1159/000527602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a rare and heterogenous group of tumors, with poor prognostic, judging from their frequency to relapse. Few drugs are available after the conventional first line regimen. Since 2007, trabectedin got approval after failure of anthracyclines and ifosfamide, for advanced or metastatic STS. This led to a FDA approval in 2015, but real-world evidence are still required, complementary to the pivotal phase II and III trials.
Methods: One hundred twenty-six patients with STS, treated by trabectedin between 2002 and 2019 were analysed in this retrospective study, in two French centers. The effects of trabectedin on survival, response, and toxicity, were described. All patients were tested for toxicities, and efficacy was assessed in patients exposed to at least 2 cycles of trabectedin.
Results: Three median cycles were administered per patient (1-79). Among the 113 patients analysed for efficacy, the median progression free survival was 3.0 months [CI95%: 2.3 – 4.8], with an overall survival of 12.3 months [CI95%: 10.2 – 16.9]. The rate of disease control was 46% at the end of treatment. Myxoid liposarcoma (n = 11) was the histology subtype that benefited most from this chemotherapy with median progression free survival and overall survival of 13.3 months [CI95%: 2.3 – 18.7] and 27.8 months [CI95%: 3.2 – 64.7], respectively. Adverse events were manageable.
Discussion and Conclusion: Efficacy of trabectedin is confirmed in terms of clinical benefit and low toxicity, especially for myxoid liposarcoma. Combinatory regimen are under clinical trials to optimize the place of this chemotherapy.
Collapse
|
12
|
Sanfilippo R, Hayward RL, Musoro J, Benson C, Leahy MG, Brunello A, Blay JY, Steeghs N, Desar IME, Ali N, Hervieu A, Thway K, Marreaud S, Litiere S, Kasper B. Activity of Cabazitaxel in Metastatic or Inoperable Locally Advanced Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma: A Phase 2 Study of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (STBSG). JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:1420-1425. [PMID: 35980618 PMCID: PMC9389439 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.3218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Treatment options for patients with unresectable and/or metastatic dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) are limited. New drugs are required. Objective To assess whether cabazitaxel demonstrated sufficient antitumor activity in patients with metastatic or inoperable locally advanced DDLPS to justify further investigation in a phase 3 setting. Design, Setting, and Participants This international multicenter, open-label single-arm phase 2 trial was conducted at 10 institutions in 4 European countries from March 2015 to March 2019. Eligible patients had to have metastatic or locally advanced histologically proven DDLPS with evidence of disease progression within the past 6 months and had to have received no more than 1 previous line of chemotherapy. Interventions After mandatory central review of tumor blocks, if the DDLPS diagnosis was confirmed, patients started treatment within 72 hours after registration. Cabazitaxel was administered at a dose of 25 mg/m2 IV infusion over 1 hour every 21 days until intolerance, progression, or withdrawal of consent. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 12 weeks per RECIST 1.1. Based on a Simon 2-stage design, at least 4 of 17 (stage 1) and 11 of 37 (stage 2) eligible and evaluable patients who were progression free at 12 weeks were needed. The final analysis report was completed on November 17, 2021. Results Forty patients were registered, with 2 patients being ineligible. The number of cycles ranged from 1 to 30, with a median of 5; 26 patients (65%) received at least 4 cycles of cabazitaxel. Progression-free survival at 12 weeks was 55%, achieving the primary study end point. At a median follow-up of 21.6 months, median PFS was 6 months and median OS 21 months. Response rate (RR) was 8% with 1 clinical response (CR) and 2 partial responses (PR). Twenty-three (60.5%) patients had a stable disease (SD). Disease control (PR+SD) was achieved in 26 patients (68%). Conclusions and Relevance This nonrandomized phase 2 clinical trial met its primary end point, with 21 of 38 patients (55%) being progression free at 12 weeks. These results suggest important activity of cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic or inoperable locally advanced DDLPS. The drug is worth being further studied in these tumors in a phase 3 setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Sanfilippo
- Medical Oncology Unit 2, Medical Oncology Dpt, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Antonella Brunello
- Medical Oncology Unit 1, Department of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Centre Léon Bérard, & Univ Claude Bernard Lyon I, Unicancer, Lyon, France
| | | | | | - Nasim Ali
- Clatterbrige Cancer Centre, Wirral, United Kingdom
| | | | - Khin Thway
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Bernd Kasper
- Mannheim Cancer Center (MCC), University of Heidelberg, Mannheim University Medical Center, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rodon J, Arkenau HT, Funchain P, Hervieu A, Gao L, Liu M, Halim A, Mina M, Takahashi O, Benhadji K, Delaloge S. 467P Dose escalation of TAS-117 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
14
|
Rodón J, Funchain P, Laetsch TW, Arkenau HT, Hervieu A, Singer CF, Murciano-Goroff YR, Chawla SP, Anthony K, Yamamiya I, Liu M, Halim AB, Benhadji KA, Takahashi O, Delaloge S. A phase II study of TAS-117 in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring germline PTEN-inactivating mutations. Future Oncol 2022; 18:3377-3387. [PMID: 36039910 PMCID: PMC10334253 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-0305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PTEN acts as a potent tumor suppressor within the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. Germline mutations in the PTEN gene are a hallmark of PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome, which includes Cowden syndrome, where they appear to elevate lifetime risk of cancer. Targeted AKT directed therapy has been proposed as an effective approach in cancer patients having germline PTEN mutations. The mechanism of action, safety and dosing regimen for the novel allosteric AKT inhibitor TAS-117 have been explored in a phase I study in Japan in which activity was observed against certain tumor types. Here we describe the study protocol of an international, two-part phase II study evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and antitumor activity of TAS-117 in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring germline PTEN-inactivating mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordi Rodón
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | - Theodore W Laetsch
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, & University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, UK, & Cancer Institute, University College London, London, W1G 6AD, UK
| | | | - Christian F Singer
- Dept of OB/GYN & Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | | | - Sant P Chawla
- Sarcoma Oncology Research Center, Santa Monica, CA 90403, USA
| | - Kristin Anthony
- The PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome Foundation, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA
| | | | - Mei Liu
- Taiho Oncology, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ladoire S, Rederstorff E, Goussot V, Parnalland S, Briot N, Ballot E, Truntzer C, Ayati S, Bengrine-Lefevre L, Bremaud N, Coudert B, Desmoulins I, Favier L, Fraisse C, Fumet JD, Hennequin A, Hervieu A, Ilie S, Kaderbhai C, Lagrange A, Martin N, Mazilu I, Mayeur D, Palmier R, Simonet-Lamm AL, Vincent J, Zanetta S, Arnould L, Coutant C, Bertaut A, Ghiringhelli F. Parallel evolution and differences in seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibody between patients with cancer and health care workers in a tertiary cancer centre during the first and second wave of COVID-19 pandemic: canSEROcov-II cross-sectional study. Eur J Cancer 2022; 165:13-24. [PMID: 35189537 PMCID: PMC8806022 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background Patients with cancer are a population at high risk of severe infection from SARS-CoV-2. Patients with cancer regularly attend specialised healthcare centres for management and treatment, where they are in contact with healthcare workers (HCWs). Numerous recommendations target both patients with cancer and HCWs to minimise the spread of SARS-CoV-2 during these interactions. Objective To investigate the parallel evolution of the COVID-19 epidemic in these 2 populations over time, we studied the seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies after both the first and second waves of the pandemic, and in both cancer patients and HCWs from a single specialised anti-cancer centre. Factors associated with seropositivity were identified in both populations. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study after the second wave of the COVID pandemic in France. All participants were invited to undergo serological testing for SARS-CoV-2 and complete a questionnaire collecting data about their working conditions (for HCWs) or medical management (for patients) during this period. Results after the second wave were compared to those of a previous study among 1011 patients with cancer and 663 HCWs performed in the same centre after the first wave, using the same evaluations. Findings We included 502 HCWs and 507 patients with cancer. Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was higher after the second wave than after the first wave in both HCWs (15.1% versus 1.8%; p < 0.001), and patients (4.1% versus 1.7%; p = 0.038). By multivariate analysis, the factors found to be associated with seropositivity after the second wave for HCWs were: working in direct patient care (p = 0.050); having worked in a dedicated COVID-19 unit (p = 0.0036); contact with a person with COVID-19-positive in the workplace (p = 0.0118) or outside of the workplace (p = 0.0297). Among patients with cancer, only a contact with someone who tested positive for COVID-19 was found to be significantly associated with positive serology. The proportion of reported contacts with individuals with COVID-19-positive was significantly lower among patients with cancer than among HCWs (7.6% versus 40.7%, respectively; p < 0.0001) Interpretation Between the first and second waves of the epidemic in France, the seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies increased to a lesser extent among patients with cancer than among their HCWs, possibly due to better self-protection, notably social distancing. The risk factors for infection identified among HCWs plead in favour of numerous intra-hospital contaminations, especially for HCWs in contact with high-risk patients. This underlines the compelling need to pursue efforts to implement strict hygiene and personal protection measures (including vaccination) to protect HCWs and patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvain Ladoire
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Research Platform in Biological Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Centre de Recherche INSERM LNC-UMR1231, Dijon, France; University of Burgundy-Franche Comté, France.
| | - Emilie Rederstorff
- Clinical Research Center (CRC), Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Vincent Goussot
- Department of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Sophie Parnalland
- Clinical Research Center (CRC), Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Nathalie Briot
- Methodology and Biostatistics Unit, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Elise Ballot
- Research Platform in Biological Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Centre de Recherche INSERM LNC-UMR1231, Dijon, France; Bioinformatic Core Facility Georges-François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France
| | - Caroline Truntzer
- Research Platform in Biological Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Centre de Recherche INSERM LNC-UMR1231, Dijon, France; Bioinformatic Core Facility Georges-François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France
| | - Siavoshe Ayati
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | - Nathalie Bremaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Bruno Coudert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Isabelle Desmoulins
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Laure Favier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Cléa Fraisse
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Jean-David Fumet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Audrey Hennequin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Alice Hervieu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Silvia Ilie
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Courèche Kaderbhai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Aurélie Lagrange
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Nils Martin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Irina Mazilu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Didier Mayeur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Rémi Palmier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | - Julie Vincent
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Sylvie Zanetta
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Laurent Arnould
- Research Platform in Biological Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Department of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Charles Coutant
- University of Burgundy-Franche Comté, France; Department of Oncologic Surgery, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Aurélie Bertaut
- Methodology and Biostatistics Unit, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - François Ghiringhelli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Research Platform in Biological Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Centre de Recherche INSERM LNC-UMR1231, Dijon, France; University of Burgundy-Franche Comté, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Oberlé M, Jamme P, Mansard S, Machet L, Hervieu A, Kramkimel N, Greliak A, Jarrousse AS, Derangère V, Dudoignon D, Descarpentries C, Mortier L. Response to BRAF and MEK Inhibitors in BRAF Thr599dup-Mutated Melanoma. JCO Precis Oncol 2022; 6:e2100417. [PMID: 35319964 DOI: 10.1200/po.21.00417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Marion Oberlé
- Service de Dermatologie, Hôpital C. Huriez, CHU de Lille, Lille, Hauts-de-France, France
| | - Philippe Jamme
- Service de Dermatologie, Hôpital C. Huriez, CHU de Lille, Lille, Hauts-de-France, France
| | | | - Laurent Machet
- Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Tours, Université de Tours, Inserm U1253, Tours, France
| | - Alice Hervieu
- CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Georges-François Leclerc Centre, CGFL, Dijon, France
| | | | - Anna Greliak
- Service de Dermatologie, Hôpital Saint-Vincent de Paul, Université Catholique, Lille, France
| | - Anne Sophie Jarrousse
- Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, CHU Estaing Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,Department of Pathology, CHU Estaing Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Valentin Derangère
- Plateforme de transfert en biologie cancérologique, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - David Dudoignon
- Hôpital Cochin, Service de Médecine nucléaire, Paris, France
| | - Clotilde Descarpentries
- Service de biochimie et de Biologie moléculaire Hormonologie Metabolism Nutrition Oncology, Centre de biologie et pathologie, CHU de Lille, Lille, France.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (Hormonology Metabolism Nutrition Oncology), CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | - Laurent Mortier
- Service de Dermatologie, Hôpital C. Huriez, CHU de Lille, Lille, Hauts-de-France, France
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Besse B, Baik C, Springfeld C, Hervieu A, Moreno V, Bazhenova L, Lin JJ, Camidge DR, Solomon B, Velcheti V, van der Wekken AJ, Felip E, Uprety D, Trone D, Stopatschinskaja S, Cho BC, Drilon A. Abstract P02-01: Repotrectinib in patients with NTRK fusion-positive advanced solid tumors: update from the registrational phase 2 TRIDENT-1 trial. Mol Cancer Ther 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.targ-21-p02-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: NTRK fusions drive a broad range of solid tumors. Two FDA approved TRK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have demonstrated efficacy in patients (pts) with NTRK fusion+ advanced solid tumors; however, emergent TRK solvent front (SF) and gatekeeper resistance mutations occur. Repotrectinib is a next-generation ROS1/TRK TKI with potency against wildtype and mutant forms of ROS1 and TRK. In preclinical studies, repotrectinib was more potent than larotrectinib, entrectinib, and selitrectinib against wildtype TRK, SF and gatekeeper mutations. Early interim data from the Phase 1/2 TRIDENT-1 trial led to Fast Track designation by the FDA for repotrectinib in TRK TKI-pretreated pts. This abstract is an updated analysis of this population and the first presentation of repotrectinib activity in TRK TKI-naïve pts. Methods: Pts with NTRK fusion+ advanced solid tumors were enrolled into the ongoing registrational Phase 2 TRIDENT-1 trial (NCT03093116). Pts with no prior TRK TKIs were enrolled into Expansion Cohort 5 (EXP-5) and pts who received up to 2 lines of prior TRK TKIs were enrolled into EXP-6. Prior chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy were allowed in both cohorts. The primary endpoint is cORR by Blinded Independent Central Review using RECIST v1.1. Results: As of efficacy data cutoff date of 28 July 2021, 8 pts in EXP-5 and 19 pts in EXP-6 had at least 2 post-baseline scans and were evaluable for efficacy analysis. Median age was 63 y (range 33–80) in EXP-5 and 50 y (range 23–81) in EXP-6; median number of prior lines of chemo/immunotherapy was 1 (range 0–2) in EXP-5 and 1 (range 0–4) in EXP-6. In EXP-6, 79% (15/19) of pts received 1 prior TRK TKI. Confirmed responses were reported by physician assessment. In EXP-5, cORR was 63% (5 of 8 pts; 95% CI: 24–91%) with DOR from 1.9+ to 7.4+ months (mo). In EXP-6, cORR was 47% (9 of 19 pts; 95% CI: 24–71%) with DOR from 1.9+ to 15.1 mo. In 10 pts enrolled in EXP-6 with a SF mutation, the cORR was 60% (6 of 10 pts; 95% CI: 26–88%). Median duration of treatment was 6.3 mo (range 0.9–13.4+) in EXP-5 and 8.1 mo (range 1.1–20.8) in EXP-6. An updated safety analysis for Phase 1 and Phase 2 (n=243) based on a data cut-off date of 4 May 2021 was conducted. Repotrectinib was generally well tolerated. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) observed in ≥20% of patients were dizziness (62%), dysgeusia (43%), constipation (33%), dyspnea (30%), paresthesia (28%), anemia (26%), and fatigue (26%). The majority (77%) of dizziness TEAEs were Grade 1 and 4% were Grade 3; none of the dizziness events led to treatment discontinuation. Dose modifications remained infrequent (24% of pts had a dose reduction and 10% of pts discontinued study drug due to a TEAE). Conclusions: Repotrectinib is a next-generation ROS1 and TRK inhibitor. In an ongoing registrational Phase 2 trial, repotrectinib demonstrated efficacy in TRK TKI-naïve and TKI-pretreated pts and was generally well tolerated. Enrollment in the multi-cohort Phase 2 trial is ongoing.
Citation Format: Benjamin Besse, Christina Baik, Christoph Springfeld, Alice Hervieu, Victor Moreno, Lyudmila Bazhenova, Jessica J. Lin, D. Ross Camidge, Benjamin Solomon, Vamsidhar Velcheti, Anthonie J. van der Wekken, Enriqueta Felip, Dipesh Uprety, Denise Trone, Shanna Stopatschinskaja, Byoung Chul Cho, Alexander Drilon. Repotrectinib in patients with NTRK fusion-positive advanced solid tumors: update from the registrational phase 2 TRIDENT-1 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2021 Oct 7-10. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2021;20(12 Suppl):Abstract nr P02-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Besse
- 1Paris-Saclay University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Villejuif, France,
| | - Christina Baik
- 2University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA,
| | - Christoph Springfeld
- 3Heidelberg University Hospital, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany,
| | | | - Victor Moreno
- 5Fundación Jiménez Díaz - START Madrid, Madrid, Spain,
| | | | - Jessica J. Lin
- 7Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,
| | - D. Ross Camidge
- 8University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO,
| | | | | | | | - Enriqueta Felip
- 12Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain,
| | | | | | | | - Byoung Chul Cho
- 15Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic of,
| | - Alexander Drilon
- 16Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bellio H, Bertaut A, Hervieu A, Zanetta S, Hennequin A, Vincent J, Palmier R, Bengrine-Lefevre L, Ghiringhelli F, Fumet JD. Phase I Dose-Escalation Trial of an Innovative Chemotherapy Regimen Combining a Fractionated Dose of Irinotecan Plus Bevacizumab, Oxaliplatin, 5-Fluorouracil, and Folinic Acid (bFOLFIRINOX-3) in Chemorefractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13215472. [PMID: 34771635 PMCID: PMC8582415 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13215472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 10/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Treatment of non-resectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) involves chemotherapy based on 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan and monoclonal antibodies targeting VEGF or EGFR. After an initial progression, it is usual to change the chemotherapy regimen and targeted therapy, with rather moderate results. Several studies have focused on the interest of using again already used molecules and rechallenge with oxaliplatin and irinotecan bi fractionation (FOLFIRI3) have previously shown efficacy in chemorefractory patients, but desynchronized triplet chemotherapy was never tested. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new regimen so-called: FOLFIRINOX-3 bevacizumab in chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Abstract The care of metastatic colorectal cancers is based on combination chemotherapies including 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and monoclonal antibodies targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor or vascular endothelial growth factor. The regimen is determined based on the patient’s molecular biology and general condition. Irinotecan bifractionation showed efficacy in chemorefractory patients in a previous study, FOLFIRI-3, but a desynchronized triplet has never been tested. The aim of bFOLFIRINOX-3 is to determine the safety, tolerance, and efficacy of a new regimen (FOLFIRINOX-3 bevacizumab) in chemorefractory patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of FOLFIRINOX-3 bevacizumab in chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). A standard phase I, “3 + 3” design study was performed. The standard protocol comprised simplified FOLFOX 4 (folinic acid 400 mg/m2), 5-fluorouracil (a 400 mg/m2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m2 for 46 h), oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) and irinotecan (administered before and after 5-fluorouracil infusion), plus bevacizumab (5 mg/kg). In a “3 + 3” design, three different doses of irinotecan were tested: 60, 70 and 90 mg/m2. The primary endpoint was the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of irinotecan. The secondary endpoints included the objective response (at 8 and 16 weeks) according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria and progression free survival. Thirteen patients were enrolled, and twelve patients were finally evaluated for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The dose level defined was 70 mg/m2 irinotecan. A total of three DLTs were observed (grade 3 diarrhea): two DLTs at the 90 mg/m2 dose level and one at the 70 mg/m2 dose level. The most frequently described adverse events were asthenia (93%), diarrhea (77%), nausea (62%) and peripheral sensory neuropathy (46%). The most frequent biological event was thrombopenia (54%). Regarding efficacy, among the 11 evaluable patients, no progression was observed at 8 weeks, and the partial response rate was 18.2%. At 16 weeks, a partial response rate of 27.3% was observed, and five patients had a stable disease. The new regimen of bFOLFIRINOX-3 with irinotecan at 70 mg/m2 was well tolerated. In chemorefractory patients, this protocol shows a high response rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hélène Bellio
- Platform of Transfer in Biological Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center—UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000 Dijon, France; (A.B.); (A.H.); (S.Z.); (A.H.); (J.V.); (R.P.); (L.B.-L.); (F.G.)
- Department of Medical Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center—UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000 Dijon, France
- Maison de L’université Esplanade Erasme, University of Burgundy-Franche Comté, 21000 Dijon, France
- Correspondence: (H.B.); (J.-D.F.)
| | - Aurélie Bertaut
- Platform of Transfer in Biological Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center—UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000 Dijon, France; (A.B.); (A.H.); (S.Z.); (A.H.); (J.V.); (R.P.); (L.B.-L.); (F.G.)
- Department of Medical Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center—UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000 Dijon, France
- Maison de L’université Esplanade Erasme, University of Burgundy-Franche Comté, 21000 Dijon, France
| | - Alice Hervieu
- Platform of Transfer in Biological Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center—UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000 Dijon, France; (A.B.); (A.H.); (S.Z.); (A.H.); (J.V.); (R.P.); (L.B.-L.); (F.G.)
- Department of Medical Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center—UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000 Dijon, France
- Maison de L’université Esplanade Erasme, University of Burgundy-Franche Comté, 21000 Dijon, France
| | - Sylvie Zanetta
- Platform of Transfer in Biological Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center—UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000 Dijon, France; (A.B.); (A.H.); (S.Z.); (A.H.); (J.V.); (R.P.); (L.B.-L.); (F.G.)
- Department of Medical Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center—UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000 Dijon, France
- Maison de L’université Esplanade Erasme, University of Burgundy-Franche Comté, 21000 Dijon, France
| | - Audrey Hennequin
- Platform of Transfer in Biological Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center—UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000 Dijon, France; (A.B.); (A.H.); (S.Z.); (A.H.); (J.V.); (R.P.); (L.B.-L.); (F.G.)
- Department of Medical Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center—UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000 Dijon, France
- Maison de L’université Esplanade Erasme, University of Burgundy-Franche Comté, 21000 Dijon, France
| | - Julie Vincent
- Platform of Transfer in Biological Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center—UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000 Dijon, France; (A.B.); (A.H.); (S.Z.); (A.H.); (J.V.); (R.P.); (L.B.-L.); (F.G.)
- Department of Medical Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center—UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000 Dijon, France
- Maison de L’université Esplanade Erasme, University of Burgundy-Franche Comté, 21000 Dijon, France
| | - Rémi Palmier
- Platform of Transfer in Biological Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center—UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000 Dijon, France; (A.B.); (A.H.); (S.Z.); (A.H.); (J.V.); (R.P.); (L.B.-L.); (F.G.)
- Department of Medical Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center—UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000 Dijon, France
- Maison de L’université Esplanade Erasme, University of Burgundy-Franche Comté, 21000 Dijon, France
| | - Leila Bengrine-Lefevre
- Platform of Transfer in Biological Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center—UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000 Dijon, France; (A.B.); (A.H.); (S.Z.); (A.H.); (J.V.); (R.P.); (L.B.-L.); (F.G.)
- Department of Medical Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center—UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000 Dijon, France
- Maison de L’université Esplanade Erasme, University of Burgundy-Franche Comté, 21000 Dijon, France
| | - François Ghiringhelli
- Platform of Transfer in Biological Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center—UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000 Dijon, France; (A.B.); (A.H.); (S.Z.); (A.H.); (J.V.); (R.P.); (L.B.-L.); (F.G.)
- Department of Medical Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center—UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000 Dijon, France
- Maison de L’université Esplanade Erasme, University of Burgundy-Franche Comté, 21000 Dijon, France
- UMR INSERM 1231, 7 Boulevard Jeanne d’Arc, 21000 Dijon, France
| | - Jean-David Fumet
- Platform of Transfer in Biological Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center—UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000 Dijon, France; (A.B.); (A.H.); (S.Z.); (A.H.); (J.V.); (R.P.); (L.B.-L.); (F.G.)
- Department of Medical Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center—UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000 Dijon, France
- Maison de L’université Esplanade Erasme, University of Burgundy-Franche Comté, 21000 Dijon, France
- Correspondence: (H.B.); (J.-D.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sanfilippo R, Hayward RL, Musoro J, Benson C, Leahy MG, Brunello A, Blay JY, Steeghs N, Desar I, Ali N, Hervieu A, Thway K, Marreaud S, Litiere S, Kasper B. Updated results of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) phase 2 trial 1202 cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic or inoperable locally advanced dedifferentiated liposarcoma. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.11518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
11518 Background: Treatment options for patients with unresectable and/or metastatic dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) are limited. The most effective agents include doxorubicin, ifosfamide, trabectedin and eribulin, but, in general, objective response rates (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS) are modest. Cabazitaxel exerts its effect through inhibition of microtubular disassembly and has been shown to be relatively safe, effective and well-tolerated. EORTC 1202 assessed whether cabazitaxel demonstrated sufficient antitumor activity in patients with metastatic or inoperable locally advanced DD LPS to justify further investigation in a phase III setting. Methods: This was an international multi-center, open label single arm phase II trial. The clinical cut-off date for the primary analysis was performed on August 31, 2020. Data base lock was performed on February 2, 2021. Eligible patients with metastatic or inoperable locally advanced DD LPS, after a centralized pathological review, were treated with cabazitaxel 25mg/m² IV infusion over 1 hour every 21 days. Primary endpoint was PFS rate at 12 weeks assessed by local investigator per RECIST 1.1. Based on a Simon two-stage design, at least 4 out of 17 (Stage 1) and 11 out of 37 (Stage 2) eligible and evaluable patients who are progression-free at 12 weeks were needed. Currently, a centralized radiological assessment is ongoing. Results: Forty patients were registered by 10 institutions in 4 countries between March 2015 and March 2019, with 2 patients being ineligible. One patient was still on treatment at the clinical cut-off date. The number of cycles ranged from 1 to 30, with a median of 5; 26 patients (65%) received at least 4 cycles of cabazitaxel. PFS at 12 weeks was 55% (conditional 1-sided 95% CI 40.8-100), achieving the primary study endpoint. The median FU was 21.6 months, median PFS was 6 months and median OS 21 months. RR was 8% with one CR and two PR. Twenty-three(60.5%) pts had a SD. Disease control (PR+SD) was achieved in 26 patients (68%). The most common cabazitaxel -related grade >3 adverse events in all 40 registered patients were Neutrophil count decreased (50%), febrile neutropenia (25%), fatigue (12.5%), and anemia (10%). There were no cabazitaxel-related deaths. Conclusions: EORTC 1202 met its primary endpoint, with 21/38 pts (55%) being progression-free at 12 weeks. Results of this trial confirm activity of cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic or inoperable locally advanced DD LPS and looks interesting if compared to the other available options and experimental drugs recently reported in this patient population. Clinical trial information: NCT01913652.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Antonella Brunello
- Medical Oncology Unit 1, Department of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | | | | | - Ingrid Desar
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Nasim Ali
- Clatterbrige Cancer Centre, Wirral, United Kingdom
| | | | - Khin Thway
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sandrine Marreaud
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Bernd Kasper
- Mannheim University Medical Center, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Fumet JD, Hervieu A, Hennequin A, Zanetta S, Bertaut A, Ghiringhelli F. Phase I dose-escalation study of desynchronized irinotecan plus bevacizumab, oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and folinic acid (bFOLFIRINOX-3) administration in chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.e15573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e15573 Background: Treatment of non-resectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) involves chemotherapy based on 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan and monoclonal antibodies targeting VEGF or EGFR. Rechallenge with oxaliplatin and irinotecan bi fractionation (FOLFIRI3) have previously shown efficacy in chemorefractory patients but desynchronized triplet chemotherapy was never tested. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new regimen so-called: FOLFIRINOX-3 bevacizumab in chemorefractory mCRC. Methods: A phase I study to test bFOLFIRINOX 3 regimen was designed using Standard “3 + 3” design for dose escalation. Patients enrolled, >18years and ECOG 0 or 1, have a pathologically confirmed mCRC and experienced treatment failure after standard chemotherapy that include 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan. Absence of residual neuropathy and previous grade 3 irinotecan related toxicity was manditory. Regimen tested consisted of bevacizumab (5mg/kg) plus simplified FOLFOX4 (folinic acid (400mg/m2), 5-fluorouracil (400mg/m2 bolus followed by 2400mg/m2 for 46h), oxaliplatin (85mg/m2) and irinotecan (administered before and after infusional 5-fluorouracil). Three irinotecan levels were planned at 60, 70 and 90 mg/m² (day 1 and day 3). Dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were identified during the first 2 cycles. Primary endpoint was assessment of maximum tolerable dose trough evaluation of acute toxicities (CTCAE v4.03). Secondary endpoints included objective response (RECIST 1.1), progression free survival, overall survival and late toxicity. Results: Thirteen patients received experimental treatment on this study. The RP2D was irinotecan 70mg/m² day 1 and day 3. Two patients experienced DLTs (G3 diarhea ) at dose level 90mg/m² and one DLT occured (G3 diarrhea) at 70mg/m² level. The most common drug-related adverse events (all grades) were fatigue (92.3%), diarrhea (76.9%), nausea (61.5%), peripheral neuropathy (61.5%), thrombopenia (46.1%) and anemia (15.3%). Among 11 response-evaluable patients, we noticed 4 partial responses, 7 stable disease and no progression as best response. Conclusions: The combination of bFOLFIRINOX-3 at the RP2D of 70mg/m² day 1 and day 3. was well tolerated and feseably. The regimen resulted in high response rate in chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Phase II is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03795311.
Collapse
|
21
|
Ladoire S, Goussot V, Redersdorff E, Cueff A, Ballot E, Truntzer C, Ayati S, Bengrine-Lefevre L, Bremaud N, Coudert B, Desmoulins I, Favier L, Fraisse C, Fumet JD, Hanu R, Hennequin A, Hervieu A, Ilie S, Kaderbhai C, Lagrange A, Martin N, Mazilu I, Mayeur D, Palmier R, Simonet-Lamm AL, Vincent J, Zanetta S, Arnould L, Coutant C, Bertaut A, Ghiringhelli F. Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 among the staff and patients of a French cancer centre after first lockdown: The canSEROcov study. Eur J Cancer 2021; 148:359-370. [PMID: 33780664 PMCID: PMC7914029 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.02.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Revised: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Background In view of the potential gravity of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection for patients with cancer, epidemiological data are vital to assess virus circulation among patients and staff of cancer centres. We performed a prospective study to investigate seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among staff and patients with cancer at a large cancer centre, at the end of the period of first national lockdown in France and to determine factors associated with the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods After the first lockdown, all medical and non-medical staff, as well as all patients attending the medical oncology department were invited to undergo serological testing for SARS-CoV-2 between 11 May and 30 June 2020. All participants were also invited to complete a questionnaire collecting data about their living and working conditions, and for patients, medical management during lockdown. Findings A total of 1,674 subjects (663 staff members, 1011 patients) were included. Seroprevalence was low in both staff (1.8%) and patients (1.7%), despite more features of high risk for severe forms among patients. None of the risk factors tested in our analysis (working or living conditions, comorbidities, management characteristics during lockdown) was found to be statistically associated with seroprevalence in either staff or patients. There was no significant difference in the proportion of symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects between staff and patients. Only fever, loss of smell, and loss of taste were significantly more frequent among seropositive patients, in both staff and patients. Interpretation We report very low seroprevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in the staff (caregiving and non-caregiving) and patients of a large cancer care centre in which strict hygiene, personal protection, and social distancing measures were implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvain Ladoire
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Research Platform in Biological Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Centre de Recherche INSERM LNC-UMR1231, Dijon, France; University of Burgundy-Franche Comté, France.
| | - Vincent Goussot
- Department of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Emilie Redersdorff
- Clinical Research Center (CRC), Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Adele Cueff
- Methodology and Biostatistics Unit, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Elise Ballot
- Research Platform in Biological Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Centre de Recherche INSERM LNC-UMR1231, Dijon, France; Bioinformatic Core Facility Georges, François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France
| | - Caroline Truntzer
- Research Platform in Biological Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Centre de Recherche INSERM LNC-UMR1231, Dijon, France; Bioinformatic Core Facility Georges, François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France
| | - Siavoshe Ayati
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | - Nathalie Bremaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Bruno Coudert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Isabelle Desmoulins
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Laure Favier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Cléa Fraisse
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Jean-David Fumet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Roxana Hanu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Audrey Hennequin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Alice Hervieu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Silvia Ilie
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Courèche Kaderbhai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Aurélie Lagrange
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Nils Martin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Irina Mazilu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Didier Mayeur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Rémi Palmier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | - Julie Vincent
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Sylvie Zanetta
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Laurent Arnould
- Research Platform in Biological Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Department of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Charles Coutant
- University of Burgundy-Franche Comté, France; Department of Oncologic Surgery, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Aurélie Bertaut
- Methodology and Biostatistics Unit, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - François Ghiringhelli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Research Platform in Biological Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Centre de Recherche INSERM LNC-UMR1231, Dijon, France; University of Burgundy-Franche Comté, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gonçalves A, de La Motte Rouge T, Bruno A, Isambert N, Hervieu A, Legrand F, Cropet C. 555P Metronomic oral vinorelbine (MOV) combined with tremelimumab (T) + durvalumab (D) in advanced solid tumours (AST): Dose finding results. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
23
|
Goussault R, Frénard C, Maubec E, Muller P, Martin L, Legoupil D, Aubin F, De Quatrebarbes J, Jouary T, Hervieu A, Machet L, Varey E, Lecerf P, Vrignaud F, Khammari A, Dréno B. Machine learning models to predict the response to anti-cancer therapy in metastatic melanoma patients. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e14071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e14071 Background: Machine learning methods are new artificial intelligence tools with promising applications in healthcare. We developed and validated 4 machine learning models to predict the response to immunotherapy and targeted therapy in stage IIIc or IV melanoma patients. Methods: This work was conducted on data from 10 centers participating in the French network for Research and Clinical Investigation on Melanoma (RIC-Mel), launched in 2012. Thus, 935 patients, corresponding to 1978 systemic treatments have been extracted from RIC-Mel database. The following data were considered: age, sex, Breslow, melanoma type, ulceration, spontaneous regression, mitotic index, number of invaded lymph nodes, extracapsular extension, mutational status, melanoma stage, number of metastasis sites, lines of treatments, and time between first melanoma excision and metastatic relapse. Treatment response: complete response, partial response, stable disease, defined as class 1 and progressive disease as class 2. We split this cohort/database into a training set (80%) and test set (20%). The algorithm performances were evaluated on the test set by the percentage of treatments correctly classified in class 1 or 2. Four machine learning algorithms (linear model, random forest, XGBoost and LightGBM) were compared in terms of performance and interpretation for both types of treatments. Results: The accuracies of the best models for immunotherapy (LightGBM) and targeted therapy (random forest) were respectively 66% and 65%. The most significant variables for building the models were respectively: stage (IIIc or IV), response to previous treatments lines, age, number of metastasis sites and time between first melanoma excision and metastatic relapse. Conclusions: We present here the first machine learning models to predict the response to immunotherapy and targeted therapy in stage IIIc or IV melanoma patients. The most predictive variables are coherent with the literature. Future development will include data from 18FDG-PET/CT imaging and other predictive markers recently identified, as circulating DNA to improve the models performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romain Goussault
- Dermatology department, Nantes University, CHU Nantes, CIC 1413, CRCINA, Nantes, France
| | - Cécile Frénard
- Dermatology department, Nantes University, CHU Nantes, CIC 1413, CRCINA, Nantes, France
| | - Eve Maubec
- AP-HP Dermatology Department, Hôpital Avicenne, Université Paris 13, Bobigny, France
| | - Philippe Muller
- Dermatology department, CHR Metz-Thionville, Thionville, France
| | - Ludovic Martin
- Dermatology and Venereology department, CHU d'Angers, Angers, France
| | | | - Francois Aubin
- Dermatology department, CHU de Besançon, Inserm 1098, Besançon, France
| | | | - Thomas Jouary
- Department of Medical Oncology, CH de Pau, Pau, France
| | - Alice Hervieu
- Department of Medical Oncology, CLCC Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | - Emilie Varey
- Dermatology department, Nantes University, CHU Nantes, CIC 1413, CRCINA, Nantes, France
| | | | - Florence Vrignaud
- Clinical Investigation Centre CIC1413, INSERM, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Amir Khammari
- Dermatology department, Nantes University, CHU Nantes, CIC 1413, CRCINA, Nantes, France
| | - Brigitte Dréno
- Dermatology department, Nantes University, CHU Nantes, CIC 1413, CRCINA, Nantes, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chanteloup G, Cordonnier M, Isambert N, Bertaut A, Hervieu A, Hennequin A, Luu M, Zanetta S, Coudert B, Bengrine L, Desmoulins I, Favier L, Lagrange A, Pages PB, Gutierrez I, Lherminier J, Avoscan L, Jankowski C, Rébé C, Chevriaux A, Padeano MM, Coutant C, Ladoire S, Causeret S, Arnould L, Charon-Barra C, Cottet V, Blanc J, Binquet C, Bardou M, Garrido C, Gobbo J. Monitoring HSP70 exosomes in cancer patients' follow up: a clinical prospective pilot study. J Extracell Vesicles 2020; 9:1766192. [PMID: 32595915 PMCID: PMC7301715 DOI: 10.1080/20013078.2020.1766192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Revised: 03/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Exosomes are nanovesicles released by all cells that can be found in the blood. A key point for their use as potential biomarkers in cancer is to differentiate tumour-derived exosomes from other circulating nanovesicles. Heat shock protein-70 (HSP70) has been shown to be abundantly expressed by cancer cells and to be associated with bad prognosis. We previously showed that exosomes derived from cancer cells carried HSP70 in the membrane while those from non-cancerous cells did not. In this work, we opened a prospective clinical pilot study including breast and lung cancer patients to determine whether it was possible to detect and quantify HSP70 exosomes in the blood of patients with solid cancers. We found that circulating exosomal HSP70 levels, but not soluble HSP70, reflected HSP70 content within the tumour biopsies. Circulating HSP70 exosomes increased in metastatic patients compared to non-metastatic patients or healthy volunteers. Further, we demonstrated that HSP70-exosome levels correlated with the disease status and, when compared with circulating tumour cells, were more sensitive tumour dissemination predictors. Finally, our case studies indicated that HSP70-exosome levels inversely correlated with response to the therapy and that, therefore, monitoring changes in circulating exosomal HSP70 might be useful to predict tumour response and clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaëtan Chanteloup
- Inserm, UMR 1231, label d’Excellence Ligue National contre le Cancer and Laboratoire d’Excellence LipSTIC, Dijon, France
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France
| | - Marine Cordonnier
- Inserm, UMR 1231, label d’Excellence Ligue National contre le Cancer and Laboratoire d’Excellence LipSTIC, Dijon, France
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France
| | - Nicolas Isambert
- Inserm U-1084, Pôle Régional de Cancérologie, CHU de Poitiers Poitiers Cedex – France, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Aurélie Bertaut
- CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Georges-François Leclerc Centre, CGFL, Dijon, France
| | - Alice Hervieu
- CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Georges-François Leclerc Centre, CGFL, Dijon, France
| | - Audrey Hennequin
- CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Georges-François Leclerc Centre, CGFL, Dijon, France
| | - Maxime Luu
- Centre d’investigation Clinique INSERM 1432, CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Sylvie Zanetta
- CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Georges-François Leclerc Centre, CGFL, Dijon, France
| | - Bruno Coudert
- CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Georges-François Leclerc Centre, CGFL, Dijon, France
| | - Leila Bengrine
- CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Georges-François Leclerc Centre, CGFL, Dijon, France
| | | | - Laure Favier
- CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Georges-François Leclerc Centre, CGFL, Dijon, France
| | - Aurélie Lagrange
- CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Georges-François Leclerc Centre, CGFL, Dijon, France
| | | | - Ivan Gutierrez
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France
| | - Jeanine Lherminier
- INRA, UMR1347 Agroécologie, ERL CNRS 6300, Plateforme DImaCell, Centre de Microscopie INRA/Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Laure Avoscan
- INRA, UMR1347 Agroécologie, ERL CNRS 6300, Plateforme DImaCell, Centre de Microscopie INRA/Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | | | - Cédric Rébé
- CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Georges-François Leclerc Centre, CGFL, Dijon, France
| | | | | | - Charles Coutant
- CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Georges-François Leclerc Centre, CGFL, Dijon, France
| | - Sylvain Ladoire
- CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Georges-François Leclerc Centre, CGFL, Dijon, France
| | - Sylvain Causeret
- CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Georges-François Leclerc Centre, CGFL, Dijon, France
| | - Laurent Arnould
- CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Georges-François Leclerc Centre, CGFL, Dijon, France
| | | | - Vanessa Cottet
- Centre d’investigation Clinique INSERM 1432, CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Julie Blanc
- CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Georges-François Leclerc Centre, CGFL, Dijon, France
| | - Christine Binquet
- Centre d’investigation Clinique INSERM 1432, CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Marc Bardou
- Centre d’investigation Clinique INSERM 1432, CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Carmen Garrido
- Inserm, UMR 1231, label d’Excellence Ligue National contre le Cancer and Laboratoire d’Excellence LipSTIC, Dijon, France
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France
- CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Georges-François Leclerc Centre, CGFL, Dijon, France
| | - Jessica Gobbo
- Inserm, UMR 1231, label d’Excellence Ligue National contre le Cancer and Laboratoire d’Excellence LipSTIC, Dijon, France
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France
- CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Georges-François Leclerc Centre, CGFL, Dijon, France
- Centre d’investigation Clinique INSERM 1432, CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sanfilippo R, Hayward RL, Musoro J, Benson C, Leahy MG, Brunello A, Blay JY, Steeghs N, Desar IM, Ali N, Hervieu A, Thway K, Marreaud S, Litiere S, Gelderblom H. Activity of cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic or inoperable locally advanced dedifferentiated liposarcoma: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Phase II trial 1202. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.11556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
11556 Background: The optimal treatment for patients with advanced dedifferentiated (DD) liposarcoma (LPS) remains uncertain. Single agents which are most effective include doxorubicin and ifosfamide but, as with soft tissue sarcomas (STS) in general, objective response rates (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS) are very modest. Cabazitaxel exerts its effect through inhibition of microtubular disassembly and has been shown to be relatively safe, effective and well-tolerated. EORTC 1202 assessed whether cabazitaxel demonstrated sufficient antitumor activity in patients with metastatic or inoperable locally advanced DD LPS to justify further investigation in a phase III setting. Methods: This was an international multi-center, open label single arm phase II trial. Eligible patients with metastatic or inoperable locally advanced DD LPS were treated with cabazitaxel 25mg/m² IV infusion over 1 hour every 21 days. Primary endpoint was PFS rate at 12 weeks assessed by local investigator per RECIST 1.1. Based on a Simon two-stage design, at least 4 out of 17 (Stage 1) and 11 out of 37 (Stage 2) eligible and evaluable patients who are progression-free at 12 weeks were needed. Results: Forty patients were registered by 10 institutions in 4 countries between March 2015 and March 2019, with 2 patients being ineligible. Among the 38 eligible patients who started treatment, 3 (7.5 %) were still on treatment at the time of analysis. The number of cycles ranged from 1 to 30, with a median of 5; 26 patients (65%) received at least 4 cycles of cabazitaxel. Among the first 17 (Stage 1) and 37 (Stage 2), 11 and 20 patients were progression-free at 12 weeks respectively, satisfying the study decision rules. The PFS rate at 12 weeks for all 38 eligible patients was 52.6% (conditional 1-sided 95 % CI 38.3 – 100). Two patients (5.3%) achieved a confirmed partial response (PR) and 23 stable disease (SD) (60.5%). Disease control (PR+SD) was achieved in 25 patients (65.8%). Median PFS was 7.4 months (95%CI 2.8-10.3). The most common cabazitaxel -related grade >3 adverse events in all 40 registered patients were neutropenia (60%), febrile neutropenia (25%), fatigue (12.5%), and anemia (10%). There were no cabazitaxel-related deaths. Conclusions: EORTC 1202 met its primary endpoint, with 20/37 pts (54%) being progression-free at 12 weeks. Results of this trial confirm activity of cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic or inoperable locally advanced DD LPS and warrant further exploration of the drug. Clinical trial information: NCT01913652 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Antonella Brunello
- Medical Oncology Unit 1, Department of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Nasim Ali
- Clatterbrige Cancer Centre, Wirral, United Kingdom
| | | | - Khin Thway
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Hans Gelderblom
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Réda M, Richard C, Niogret J, Fumet JD, Bertaut A, Blanc J, Truntzer C, Desmoulins I, Ladoire S, Bengrine-Lefevre L, Isambert N, Hervieu A, Lepage C, Foucher P, Borg C, Arnould L, Nambot S, Faivre L, Boidot R, Ghiringhelli F. Metastatic cancer whole-exome sequencing in daily practice. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz268.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
27
|
De Angelis F, Guy F, Bertaut A, Méjean N, Varbedian O, Hervieu A, Truc G, Thibouw D, Barra CC, Fraisse J, Burnier P, Isambert N, Causeret S. Limbs and trunk soft tissue sarcoma systematic local and remote monitoring by MRI and thoraco-abdomino-pelvic scanner: A single-centre retrospective study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45:1274-1280. [PMID: 30765271 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2018] [Revised: 01/25/2019] [Accepted: 02/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare malignant tumors that require management by an expert center. Monitoring modalities are not consensual. The objective of our study is to report systematic radiological monitoring data obtained by local MRI and by thoracic-abdominal-pelvic computed tomography (TAP CT). MATERIAL AND METHODS 113 consecutive patients managed at "Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon", between 2008 and 2016, for an initially localized STS were included. Patient follow-up consisted of a local MRI and a TAP CT. Follow-up exams schedule was initially every 4 months during 2 years, followed by every 6 months during 3 years and finally every year during 5 years. RESULTS Median follow-up time was 37.2 months [min = 2.4 - max = 111.6]. After 5 years of surveillance, local recurrence (LR) rate was 8.8% and diagnosed by imaging in 60% of cases. No deep LR was clinically found. Median LR diagnosis time was 23.9 months [min = 2.0 - max = 52.4]. 50% of patients locally treated for their LR were alive without recurrence. Metastatic recurrence (MR) rate was 31%. 42.8% had extra-pulmonary involvement and 17.1% had exclusive extrathoracic metastases. The median time to diagnosis of MR was 17.4 months [min = 2.7- max = 77.2]. High-grade tumors relapsed more (20.4%) and earlier (all before the 5th year) than low grade. CONCLUSION Local MRI seems particularly suitable for monitoring deep tumors. In addition, the systematic monitoring by TAP CT highlighted a limited number of cases of exclusive extrathoracic metastases. The schedule of local and remote monitoring should primarily be adjusted to tumor grade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floriane De Angelis
- Department of Radiology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000, Dijon, France; Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 14 rue Paul Gaffarel, 21000, Dijon, France.
| | - France Guy
- Department of Radiology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000, Dijon, France
| | - Aurélie Bertaut
- Department of Statistic, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000, Dijon, France
| | - Nathalie Méjean
- Department of Radiology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000, Dijon, France
| | - Olivier Varbedian
- Department of Radiology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000, Dijon, France
| | - Alice Hervieu
- Department of Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000, Dijon, France
| | - Gilles Truc
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000, Dijon, France
| | - David Thibouw
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000, Dijon, France
| | - Céline Charon Barra
- Department of Anatomopathology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000, Dijon, France
| | - Jean Fraisse
- Department of Surgery, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000, Dijon, France
| | - Pierre Burnier
- Department of Surgery, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000, Dijon, France
| | - Nicolas Isambert
- Department of Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000, Dijon, France
| | - Sylvain Causeret
- Department of Surgery, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000, Dijon, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Fumet JD, Isambert N, Hervieu A, Zanetta S, Guion JF, Hennequin A, Rederstorff E, Bertaut A, Ghiringhelli F. Evaluation of the safety and the tolerability of durvalumab plus tremelimumab combined with FOLFOX in metastatic colorectal cancer (MEDITREME). Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy487.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
29
|
Isambert N, Hervieu A, Rébé C, Hennequin A, Borg C, Zanetta S, Chevriaux A, Richard C, Derangère V, Limagne E, Blanc J, Bertaut A, Ghiringhelli F. Fluorouracil and bevacizumab plus anakinra for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard therapies (IRAFU): a single-arm phase 2 study. Oncoimmunology 2018; 7:e1474319. [PMID: 30228942 PMCID: PMC6140586 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2018.1474319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2018] [Revised: 04/27/2018] [Accepted: 04/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
In preclinical models, IL-1β inhibition could enhance the efficacy of fluorouracil (5-FU). In this phase 2 study, we assessed the activity and safety of 5-FU plus bevacizumab and anakinra (an IL-1β and α inhibitor) in patients with metastatic colorectal (mCRC) refractory to chemotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy. Eligible patients had unresectable mCRC; were refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, anti-VEGF therapy, and anti-EGFR therapy (for tumors with wild-type KRAS). Patients were treated with a simplified acid folinic plus 5-FU regimen and bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) both administered by intravenous infusion for 30 min every 2 weeks. Anakinra (100 mg) was injected subcutaneously once daily. The primary endpoint was the 2-month response rate determined upon CHOI criteria. Thirty two patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were enrolled. Five patients demonstrated response (Choi criteria) and 22 patients had stable disease as the best 2-month overall response. Median progression-free and overall survival were 5.4 (95% CI, 3.6-6.6) and 14.5 months (95% CI, 9-20.6) respectively. Twenty patients experienced grade 3 toxicity. No grade 4 or 5 toxicity related to therapy occurred. The most common grade 3 adverse events were neutropenia in 8 (25%) patients, digestive side effects in 7 (21.9%) patients and hypertension in 6 (18.75%) patients. No treatment-related deaths or serious adverse events were reported.5-FU plus bevacizumab and anakinra has promising activity and a manageable safety profile, suggesting that this combination might become a potential treatment option for patients with refractory mCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Isambert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Alice Hervieu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Cedric Rébé
- Platform of Transfer in Biological Oncology, Dijon, France
| | - Audrey Hennequin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Christophe Borg
- University Hospital of Besançon and CIC-BT506, Besancon, France
| | - Sylvie Zanetta
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | | | | | - Emeric Limagne
- Platform of Transfer in Biological Oncology, Dijon, France
| | - Julie Blanc
- Unit of Methodology and Biostatistics, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Aurélie Bertaut
- Unit of Methodology and Biostatistics, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - François Ghiringhelli
- Platform of Transfer in Biological Oncology, Dijon, France.,Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, CADIR Team INSERM. CRI-1231, Dijon, France.,University of Burgundy and Franche Comté, Dijon, France
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Fumet JD, Isambert N, Hervieu A, Zanetta S, Guion JF, Hennequin A, Rederstorff E, Bertaut A, Ghiringhelli F. Phase Ib/II trial evaluating the safety, tolerability and immunological activity of durvalumab (MEDI4736) (anti-PD-L1) plus tremelimumab (anti-CTLA-4) combined with FOLFOX in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. ESMO Open 2018; 3:e000375. [PMID: 29942666 PMCID: PMC6012564 DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2018-000375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2018] [Revised: 04/25/2018] [Accepted: 04/27/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND 5-Fluorouracil plus irinotecan or oxaliplatin alone or in association with target therapy are standard first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1/PD-L1 demonstrated efficacy on mCRC with microsatellite instability but remain ineffective alone in microsatellite stable tumour. 5-Fluorouracil and oxaliplatin were known to present immunogenic properties. Durvalumab (D) is a human monoclonal antibody (mAb) that inhibits binding of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) to its receptor. Tremelimumab (T) is a mAb directed against the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4). This study is designed to evaluate whether the addition of PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibition to oxaliplatin, fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFOX) increases treatment efficacy. METHODS This phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03202758) will assess the efficacy and safety of FOLFOX/D/T association in patients with mCRC (n=48). Good performance status patients (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group <2) with untreated, RAS mutational status mCRC will be eligible. Prior adjuvant therapy is allowed provided recurrence is >6 months postcompletion. There is a safety lead in nine patients receiving FOLFOX/D/T. Assuming no safety concerns the study will go on to include 39 additional patients. Patients will receive folinic acid (400 mg/m²)/5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m² as bolus followed by 2400 mg/m2 as a 46-hour infusion)/oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) every 14 days with D (750 mg) D1 every 14 days and T (75 mg) D1 every 28 days. After six cycles of FOLFOX only D/T will continue until disease progression, death, intolerable toxicity, or patient/investigator decision to stop. Primary endpoint is safety and efficacy according to progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints include overall response rate and quality of life. Hypothesis is that a PFS of 50% at 6 months is insufficient and a PFS of 70.7% is expected (with α=10%, β=10%). Blood, plasma and tumour tissue will be collected and assessed for potential prognostic and predictive biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-David Fumet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center Georges Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France
- Research Platform in Biological Oncology, Georges Francois Leclerc Center, Dijon, France
- University of Burgundy-Franche Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Nicolas Isambert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center Georges Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Alice Hervieu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center Georges Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Sylvie Zanetta
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center Georges Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Jean-Florian Guion
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center Georges Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Audrey Hennequin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center Georges Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Emilie Rederstorff
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Georges François Leclerc Center, Dijon, France
| | - Aurélie Bertaut
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Georges François Leclerc Center, Dijon, France
| | - Francois Ghiringhelli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center Georges Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France
- Research Platform in Biological Oncology, Georges Francois Leclerc Center, Dijon, France
- University of Burgundy-Franche Comté, Dijon, France
- INSERM UMR1231, Dijon, France
- GIMI Genetic and Immunology Medical Institute, Dijon, France
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Isambert N, Hervieu A, Hennequin A, Borg C, Rebe C, Derangere V, Richard C, Blanc J, Bertaut A, Ghiringhelli F. 5-fluorouracil plus bevacizumab plus anakinra for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard therapies (IRAFU): An investigator-initiated, open-label, single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 study. J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.e15540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Isambert
- Service d'oncologie médicale CLCC Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | | | - Christophe Borg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Besancon University Hospital, Besancon, France
| | - Cedric Rebe
- Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Valentin Derangere
- Research Platform in Biological Oncology, Center GF Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Corentin Richard
- Research Platform in Biological Oncology, Center GF Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Julie Blanc
- Georges-François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Angevin E, Spitaleri G, Rodon J, Dotti K, Isambert N, Salvagni S, Moreno V, Assadourian S, Gomez C, Harnois M, Hollebecque A, Azaro A, Hervieu A, Rihawi K, De Marinis F. A first-in-human phase I study of SAR125844, a selective MET tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumours with MET amplification. Eur J Cancer 2017; 87:131-139. [PMID: 29145039 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2017] [Accepted: 10/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Dysregulated MET signalling is implicated in oncogenesis. The safety and preliminary efficacy of a highly selective MET kinase inhibitor (SAR125844) was investigated in patients with advanced solid tumours and MET dysregulation. METHODS This was a phase I dose-escalation (3 + 3 design [50-740 mg/m2]) and dose-expansion study. In the dose escalation, patients had high total MET (t-MET) expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or MET amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridisation. In the dose expansion, patients had MET amplification (including a subset of patients with non-small cell lung cancer [NSCLC]) or phosphorylated-MET (p-MET) expression (IHC). Objectives were determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of once-weekly intravenous SAR125844 based on dose-limiting toxicities; safety and pharmacokinetic profile; preliminary efficacy of SAR125844 MTD in the expansion cohort. RESULTS In total, 72 patients were enrolled: dose escalation, N = 33; dose expansion, N = 39; 570 mg/m2 was established as the MTD. Most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were asthenia/fatigue (58.3%), nausea (31.9%), and abdominal pain, constipation, and dyspnea (27.8% for each); 58.3% of patients reported grade 3 AEs (19.4% were treatment related). Of the 29 evaluable patients with MET amplification treated at 570 mg/m2, five achieved a partial response, including four of 22 with NSCLC; 17 patients had stable disease. No response was observed in patients with high p-MET solid tumours. There was no correlation between tumour response and t-MET status or MET gene copy number. CONCLUSION The MTD of once-weekly SAR125844 was 570 mg/m2; SAR125844 was well tolerated, with significant antitumour activity in patients with MET-amplified NSCLC. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT01391533.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Angevin
- Drug Development Department, Département d'Innovation Thérapeutique et des Essais Précoces (DITEP), Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, F-94805, France.
| | - Gianluca Spitaleri
- Thoracic Oncology Division, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
| | - Jordi Rodon
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, P. Vall d'Hebron 119-129, Barcelona, 08035, Spain.
| | - Katia Dotti
- Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy.
| | - Nicolas Isambert
- Centre Georges-François Leclerc, 1 Rue du Professeur Marion, 21000, Dijon, France.
| | - Stefania Salvagni
- Oncologia Medica, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital Bologna, Via Pietro Albertoni, 15, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Victor Moreno
- START MADRID - FJD., Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, vda. Reyes Católicos, 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | | | | | - Antoine Hollebecque
- Drug Development Department, Département d'Innovation Thérapeutique et des Essais Précoces (DITEP), Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, F-94805, France.
| | - Analia Azaro
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, P. Vall d'Hebron 119-129, Barcelona, 08035, Spain.
| | - Alice Hervieu
- Centre Georges-François Leclerc, 1 Rue du Professeur Marion, 21000, Dijon, France.
| | - Karim Rihawi
- Oncologia Medica, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital Bologna, Via Pietro Albertoni, 15, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Filippo De Marinis
- Thoracic Oncology Division, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Guerin M, Rezai K, Isambert N, Campone M, Autret A, Pakradouni J, Provansal M, Camerlo J, Sabatier R, Bertucci F, Charafe-Jauffret E, Hervieu A, Extra JM, Viens P, Lokiec F, Boher JM, Gonçalves A. PIKHER2: A phase IB study evaluating buparlisib in combination with lapatinib in trastuzumab-resistant HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2017; 86:28-36. [PMID: 28950146 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.08.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2017] [Revised: 08/22/2017] [Accepted: 08/23/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway is frequently activated in HER2-positive breast cancer and may play a major role in resistance to trastuzumab. Buparlisib is a pan-class-I PI3K inhibitor with potent and selective activity against wild-type and mutant PI3K p110 isoforms. PATIENTS AND METHODS PIKHER2 phase IB study aimed primarily to determine a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and propose a recommended phase II dose (RP2D) for buparlisib in combination with lapatinib in HER2-positive, trastuzumab-resistant, advanced breast cancer. Oral buparlisib (40, 60 or 80 mg) and lapatinib (750, 1000 or 1250 mg) were administered daily. A modified continuous reassessment method using an adaptive Bayesian model guided the dose escalation of both agents. Secondary end-points included antitumour activity and pharmacokinetic (PK) assessments. RESULTS A total of 24 patients were treated across five dose levels. Dose-limiting toxicities included transaminases elevation, vomiting, stomatitis, hyperglycemia and diarrhoea. MTD was declared at buparlisib 80 mg/d + lapatinib 1250 mg/d, but toxicities and early treatment discontinuation rate beyond cycle 1 led to select buparlisib 80 mg + lapatinib 1000 mg/d as the RP2D. Main drug-related adverse events included diarrhoea, nausea, skin rash, asthenia, depression, anxiety and transaminases increase. There was no significant evidence for drug-drug PK interaction. Disease control rate was 79% [95% confidence interval [CI] 57-92%], one patient obtained a complete remission, and six additional patients experienced stable disease for ≥ 24 weeks (clinical benefit rate of 29% [95% CI 12-51%]). CONCLUSION Combining buparlisib and lapatinib in HER2-positive trastuzumab-resistant advanced breast cancer was feasible. Preliminary evidence of antitumour activity was observed in this heavily pre-treated population. TRIAL REGISTRATION ID NCT01589861.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathilde Guerin
- Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Medical Oncology, CRCM, Marseille, France
| | - Keyvan Rezai
- Institut Curie - Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France
| | | | | | - Aurélie Autret
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Clinical Research and Innovations, Marseille, France
| | - Jihane Pakradouni
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Clinical Research and Innovations, Marseille, France
| | - Magali Provansal
- Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Medical Oncology, CRCM, Marseille, France
| | - Jacques Camerlo
- Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Medical Oncology, CRCM, Marseille, France
| | - Renaud Sabatier
- Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Medical Oncology, CRCM, Marseille, France
| | - François Bertucci
- Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Medical Oncology, CRCM, Marseille, France
| | - Emmanuelle Charafe-Jauffret
- Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Biopathology, CRCM, Marseille, France
| | | | - Jean-Marc Extra
- Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Medical Oncology, CRCM, Marseille, France
| | - Patrice Viens
- Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Medical Oncology, CRCM, Marseille, France
| | | | - Jean-Marie Boher
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Clinical Research and Innovations, Marseille, France; Aix Marseille University, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de La Santé & Traitement de L'Information Médicale, Marseille, France
| | - Anthony Gonçalves
- Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Medical Oncology, CRCM, Marseille, France.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Gonçalves A, Guerin M, Isambert N, Campone M, Resai K, Autret A, Pakradouni J, Robert A, Provansal M, Charafe-Jauffret E, Sabatier R, Hervieu A, Extra JM, Viens P, Lokiec F, Boher JM. Abstract A118: PIKHER2: A phase Ib study evaluating oral BKM120 in combination with lapatinib in trastuzumab-resistant HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 2015. [DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.targ-15-a118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-pathway is frequently activated in HER2-positive breast cancer and may play a major role in resistance to trastuzumab. Lapatinib is a dual anti-HER2/EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor with clinical activity after trastuzumab failure in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC). BKM120 is a pan-class I PI3K inhibitor with potent and selective activity against wild-type and mutant PI3K p110α. PIKHER2 phase Ib study aimed primarily to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and propose a recommended phase II dose (RP2D) for BKM120 in combination with lapatinib in HER2-positive, trastuzumab-resistant, ABC. Secondary objectives included safety, antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics and biomarker assessments. Methods: PIKHER2 was a multi-center study, enrolling HER2 positive (IHC 3+ or FISH positive) ABC, with disease progressing either while on trastuzumab for metastatic disease or within 12 months of the last infusion for patients who received trastuzumab as adjuvant/neoadjuvant treatment. Oral BKM120 (B; 40, 60 or 80 mg) and lapatinib (L; 750, 1000 or 1250 mg) were administered daily. A modified CRM using an adaptive Bayesian model guided the dose escalation of both agents. PIK3CA mutational status and PTEN/hormone receptor expression IHC was evaluated on available tumor tissue. Results: A total of 24 HER2-positive ABC pts, with a median number of previous lines of cytotoxics = 2 (1-5) and previous lines of anti-HER2 = 2 (1-6) for advanced stage, were treated across 5 dose-levels (B,40 + L,750; B, 60 + L,750; B,80 + L,750; B,80 + L,1000; B,80 + L,1250). Following cycle 1, 5 pts experienced DLTs: G3 ALT elevation, G3 vomiting, G3 stomatitis, G3 hyperglycemia and G3 diarrhea. MTD was reached at B,80 + L,1250 but toxicities and early treatment discontinuation beyond cycle 1 led us to select B,80 + L,1000 as the RP2D. Main drug-related adverse events were: diarrhea (83% of pts, G3 in 21%), nausea/vomiting (83% of pts, G3 in 4%), skin toxicity (75% of pts, G3 in 21%), asthenia (70% of patients, no G3), depression (58% of pts, G3 in 4%), anxiety (42% of pts, no G3), transaminases increase (29% of pts, G3 in 17%). B and L PK parameters values were consistent with those already published for both drugs. A large inter-individual variability was observed for both drugs. There was no significant evidence for drug-drug PK interaction. Disease control rate (DCR) was 79% [57-92%], one patient obtained a complete remission and 6 additional patients experienced stable disease for ≥ 24 weeks (clinical benefit rate, CBR of 29% [12-51%]). PIK3CA mutations and PTEN loss were observed in 4 of 14 and 1 of 21 patients, respectively. DCR and CBR were higher in hormone receptor-negative tumors. Conclusion: Combining BKM120 and lapatinib in HER2-positive trastuzumab-resistant was feasible. Preliminary evidences of antitumor activity were observed in this heavily pre-treated population.
Citation Format: Anthony Gonçalves, Mathilde Guerin, Nicolas Isambert, Mario Campone, Keyvan Resai, Aurélie Autret, Jihane Pakradouni, Alexie Robert, Magali Provansal, Emmanuelle Charafe-Jauffret, Renaud Sabatier, Alice Hervieu, Jean-Marc Extra, Patrice Viens, François Lokiec, Jean-Marie Boher. PIKHER2: A phase Ib study evaluating oral BKM120 in combination with lapatinib in trastuzumab-resistant HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2015 Nov 5-9; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2015;14(12 Suppl 2):Abstract nr A118.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Mario Campone
- 3Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, France
| | - Keyvan Resai
- 4Institut Curie - Centre René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Jeudy G, Dalac-Rat S, Bonniaud B, Hervieu A, Petrella T, Collet E, Vabres P. Successful switch to dabrafenib after vemurafenib-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis. Br J Dermatol 2015; 172:1454-5. [PMID: 25384395 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.13522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- G Jeudy
- Service de Dermatologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 21000, Dijon, France.
| | - S Dalac-Rat
- Service de Dermatologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 21000, Dijon, France
| | - B Bonniaud
- Service de Dermatologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 21000, Dijon, France
| | - A Hervieu
- Service de Dermatologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 21000, Dijon, France
| | - T Petrella
- Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 21000, Dijon, France
| | - E Collet
- Service de Dermatologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 21000, Dijon, France
| | - P Vabres
- Service de Dermatologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 21000, Dijon, France
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Jeudy G, Dalac-Rat S, Bonniaud B, Hervieu A, Petrella T, Collet E, Vabres P. Syndrome de Lyell sous vémurafénib : substitution par dabrafénib sans récidive. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annder.2014.09.592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
37
|
Abstract
Melanoma is a highly chemoresistant and metastatic tumor that, in the absence of BRAF mutations, is generally treated with the alkylating agent dacarbazine (DTIC). We discovered that DTIC upregulates the expression of NKG2D ligands on tumor cells, leading to the activation of natural killer (NK) and CD8+ T cells. These observations underscore the immunogenic properties of DTIC and provide a rationale to combine DTIC with immunotherapeutic agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Hervieu
- INSERM; U866; Dijon, France ; Dermatology Unit; Dijon-CHU Hospital; Dijon, France ; Université de Bourgogne; Dijon, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mignot G, Hervieu A, Vabres P, Dalac S, Jeudy G, Bel B, Apetoh L, Ghiringhelli F. Prospective study of the evolution of blood lymphoid immune parameters during dacarbazine chemotherapy in metastatic and locally advanced melanoma patients. PLoS One 2014; 9:e105907. [PMID: 25170840 PMCID: PMC4149472 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2014] [Accepted: 07/29/2014] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The importance of immune responses in the control of melanoma growth is well known. However, the implication of these antitumor immune responses in the efficacy of dacarbazine, a cytotoxic drug classically used in the treatment of melanoma, remains poorly understood in humans. Methods In this prospective observational study, we performed an immunomonitoring of eleven metastatic or locally advanced patients treated with dacarbazine as a first line of treatment. We assessed by flow cytometry lymphoid populations and their activation state; we also isolated NK cells to perform in vitro cytotoxicity tests. Results We found that chemotherapy induces lymphopenia and that a significantly higher numbers of naïve CD4+ T cells and lower proportion of Treg before chemotherapy are associated with disease control after dacarbazine treatment. Interestingly, NK cell cytotoxicity against dacarbazine-pretreated melanoma cells is only observed in NK cells from patients who achieved disease control. Conclusion Together, our data pinpoint that some immune factors could help to predict the response of melanoma patients to dacarbazine. Future larger scale studies are warranted to test their validity as prediction markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grégoire Mignot
- INSERM, UMR866, Dijon, France
- Faculté de Médecine, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Alice Hervieu
- INSERM, UMR866, Dijon, France
- Faculté de Médecine, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- Service de Dermatologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire le Bocage, Dijon, France
| | - Pierre Vabres
- Faculté de Médecine, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- Service de Dermatologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire le Bocage, Dijon, France
| | - Sophie Dalac
- Service de Dermatologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire le Bocage, Dijon, France
| | - Geraldine Jeudy
- Service de Dermatologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire le Bocage, Dijon, France
| | - Blandine Bel
- Service de Dermatologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire le Bocage, Dijon, France
| | - Lionel Apetoh
- INSERM, UMR866, Dijon, France
- Faculté de Médecine, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- Oncologie médicale, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - François Ghiringhelli
- INSERM, UMR866, Dijon, France
- Faculté de Médecine, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- Oncologie médicale, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Hervieu A, Joffre C, Leung Z, Kermorgant S. 476: Understanding and targeting PI3K pathway downstream of Met oncogenic mutant. Eur J Cancer 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(14)50424-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
40
|
Bernigaud C, Collet E, Jeudy G, Hervieu A, Bruyère R, Djerad H, Couderc B, Combret S, Allanore L, Aubriot MH, Vabres P. Toxicité cutanée grave au docétaxel (Taxotère®) au cours d’une infection VIH : rôle des interactions médicamenteuses. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annder.2013.09.369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
41
|
Hervieu A, Rébé C, Végran F, Chalmin F, Bruchard M, Vabres P, Apetoh L, Ghiringhelli F, Mignot G. Dacarbazine-mediated upregulation of NKG2D ligands on tumor cells activates NK and CD8 T cells and restrains melanoma growth. J Invest Dermatol 2012; 133:499-508. [PMID: 22951720 DOI: 10.1038/jid.2012.273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Dacarbazine (DTIC) is a cytotoxic drug widely used for melanoma treatment. However, the putative contribution of anticancer immune responses in the efficacy of DTIC has not been evaluated. By testing how DTIC affects host immune responses to cancer in a mouse model of melanoma, we unexpectedly found that both natural killer (NK) and CD8(+) T cells were indispensable for DTIC therapeutic effect. Although DTIC did not directly affect immune cells, it triggered the upregulation of NKG2D ligands on tumor cells, leading to NK cell activation and IFNγ secretion in mice and humans. NK cell-derived IFNγ subsequently favored upregulation of major histocompatibility complex class I molecules on tumor cells, rendering them sensitive to cytotoxic CD8(+) T cells. Accordingly, DTIC markedly enhanced cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 inhibition efficacy in vivo in an NK-dependent manner. These results underscore the immunogenic properties of DTIC and provide a rationale to combine DTIC with immunotherapeutic agents that relieve immunosuppression in vivo.
Collapse
|