Mitochondrial Aconitase ACO2 Links Iron Homeostasis with Tumorigenicity in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The ability of a patient tumor to engraft an immunodeficient mouse is the strongest known independent indicator of poor prognosis in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Analysis of primary NSCLC proteomes revealed low-level expression of mitochondrial aconitase (ACO2) in the more aggressive, engrafting tumors. Knockdown of ACO2 protein expression transformed immortalized lung epithelial cells, whereas upregulation of ACO2 in transformed NSCLC cells inhibited cell proliferation in vitro and tumor growth in vivo. High level ACO2 increased iron response element binding protein 1 (IRP1) and the intracellular labile iron pool. Impaired cellular proliferation associated with high level ACO2 was reversed by treatment of cells with an iron chelator, whereas increased cell proliferation associated with low level ACO2 was suppressed by treatment of cells with iron. Expression of CDGSH iron-sulfur (FeS) domain-containing protein 1 [CISD1; also known as mitoNEET (mNT)] was modulated by ACO2 expression level and inhibition of mNT by RNA interference or by treatment of cells with pioglitazone also increased iron and cell death. Hence, ACO2 is identified as a regulator of iron homeostasis and mNT is implicated as a target in aggressive NSCLC.

IMPLICATIONS

FeS cluster-associated proteins including ACO2, mNT (encoded by CISD1), and IRP1 (encoded by ACO1) are part of an "ACO2-Iron Axis" that regulates iron homeostasis and is a determinant of a particularly aggressive subset of NSCLC.

Updated analysis of the efficacy and safety of entrectinib in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic NTRK fusion-positive (NTRK-fp) solid tumors

3099

Background: NTRK gene fusions, coding for chimeric TRK proteins, are oncogenic drivers in many solid tumors. In an integrated analysis of three phase 1/2 trials (ALKA-372-001 [EudraCT 2012-000148-88]; STARTRK-1 [NCT02097810]; STARTRK-2 [NCT02568267]), entrectinib, a potent CNS-active TRK inhibitor, showed durable systemic and intracranial responses in pts with NTRK-fp solid tumors. We report updated data from a larger cohort with longer follow-up (clinical cutoff 2 Aug 2021). Methods: Pts with locally advanced/metastatic NTRK-fp solid tumors and ≥12 months’ follow-up from first tumor assessment were efficacy evaluable. The safety cohort also included pts from TAPISTRY (NCT04589845). Tumor responses were assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) per RECIST v1.1 at Week 4 and every 8 weeks thereafter. Primary endpoints: objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DoR). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), intracranial (IC)-ORR and safety were also assessed. Results: The efficacy-evaluable cohort comprised 150 adults (vs 121 previously) with 17 different solid tumor types. Median age was 58.5 years; 91% of pts had ECOG PS 0–1 and 37% had received ≥2 prior lines of therapy. Median survival follow-up was 30.6 months. ORR was 61.3% (n = 92/150; 95% CI: 53.1–69.2), including 25 complete responses. Responses were observed in all tumor types with n>1 (Table). Median DoR, PFS and OS were 20.0 months (95% CI 13.2–31.1), 13.8 months (95% CI 10.1–20.0), and 37.1 months (95% CI 27.2–not estimable [NE]), respectively. In pts with and without investigator-assessed baseline CNS metastases (n = 31 / n = 119), ORR was 61.3% (95% CI 42.2–78.2) and 61.3% (95% CI 52.0–70.1) respectively. IC-ORR was 69.2% (n = 9/13) in pts with BICR-assessed measurable CNS metastases; median IC-DoR was 17.2 months (7.4–NE). In the safety population (N = 235: all treated pts), most treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were grade 1/2 and not serious; the most frequent were dysgeusia (36.6%), diarrhea (29.8%) and weight increase (28.5%). TRAEs led to dose interruption, reduction and discontinuation in 32.8%, 24.3% and 7.2% of pts, respectively. Conclusions: In this updated analysis, entrectinib continued to demonstrate deep and durable responses and was well tolerated in pts with NTRK-fp solid tumors with or without baseline CNS metastases. Clinical trial information: STARTRK-2 [NCT02568267]. [Table: see text]

Updated Integrated Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Entrectinib in Patients With NTRK Fusion-Positive Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

Entrectinib potently inhibits tropomyosin receptor kinases (TRKAs)/B/C and ROS1, and previously induced deep [objective response rate (ORR) 57.4%] and durable [median duration of response (DoR) 10.4 months] responses in adults with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors from three phase I/II trials. This article expands prior reports with additional patients and longer follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with locally advanced/metastatic NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors and ≥12 months' follow-up were included. Primary endpoints were ORR and DoR by blinded independent central review (BICR); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), intracranial efficacy, and safety. The safety-evaluable populations included all patients who had received ≥1 entrectinib dose.

RESULTS

At clinical cut-off (August 31, 2020), the efficacy-evaluable population comprised 121 adults with 14 tumor types and ≥30 histologies. Median follow-up was 25.8 months; 61.2% of patients had a complete (n = 19) or partial response (n = 55). Median DoR was 20.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 13.0-38.2]; median PFS was 13.8 months (95% CI, 10.1-19.9). In 11 patients with BICR-assessed measurable central nervous system (CNS) disease, intracranial ORR was 63.6% (95% CI, 30.8-89.1) and median intracranial DoR was 22.1 (95% CI, 7.4-not estimable) months. The safety profile of entrectinib in adults and pediatric patients was aligned with previous reports. Most treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were grade 1/2 and manageable/reversible with dose modifications. TRAE-related discontinuations occurred in 8.3% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

With additional clinical experience, entrectinib continues to demonstrate durable systemic and intracranial responses and can address the unmet need of a CNS-active treatment in patients with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors.

Cobimetinib plus atezolizumab in BRAFV600 wild-type melanoma: primary results from the randomized phase III IMspire170 study

BACKGROUND

Emerging data suggest that the combination of MEK inhibitors and immunotherapeutic agents may result in improved efficacy in melanoma. We evaluated whether combining MEK inhibition and immune checkpoint inhibition was more efficacious than immune checkpoint inhibition alone in patients with previously untreated BRAF^V600 wild-type advanced melanoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

IMspire170 was an international, randomized, open-label, phase III study. Patients were randomized 1 : 1 to receive cobimetinib (60 mg, days 1-21) plus anti-programmed death-ligand 1 atezolizumab (840 mg every 2 weeks) in 28-day cycles or anti-programmed death-1 pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) alone until loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by an independent review committee in the intention-to-treat population.

RESULTS

Between 11 December 2017, and 29 January 2019, 446 patients were randomized to receive cobimetinib plus atezolizumab (n = 222) or pembrolizumab (n = 224). Median follow-up was 7.1 months [interquartile range (IQR) 4.8-9.9] for cobimetinib plus atezolizumab and 7.2 months (IQR 4.9-10.1) for pembrolizumab. Median PFS was 5.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.8-7.2] with cobimetinib plus atezolizumab versus 5.7 months (95% CI 3.7-9.6) with pembrolizumab [stratified hazard ratio 1.15 (95% CI 0.88-1.50); P = 0.30]. Hazard ratios for PFS were consistent across prespecified subgroups. In exploratory biomarker analyses, higher tumor mutational burden was associated with improved clinical outcomes in both treatment arms. The most common grade 3-5 adverse events (AEs) were increased blood creatine phosphokinase (10.0% with cobimetinib plus atezolizumab versus 0.9% with pembrolizumab), diarrhea (7.7% versus 1.9%), rash (6.8% versus 0.9%), hypertension (6.4% versus 3.7%), and dermatitis acneiform (5.0% versus 0). Serious AEs occurred in 44.1% of patients with cobimetinib plus atezolizumab and 20.8% with pembrolizumab.

CONCLUSION

Cobimetinib plus atezolizumab did not improve PFS compared with pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with BRAF^V600 wild-type advanced melanoma.

Efficacy and safety of entrectinib in patients (pts) with NTRK-fusion positive (NTRK-fp) solid tumors: An updated integrated analysis

3605

Background: NTRK gene fusions lead to transcription of chimeric TRK proteins with overexpressed kinase function. Entrectinib is a potent inhibitor of TRKA/B/C. In phase 1/2 studies (ALKA, STARTRK-1, STARTRK-2; EudraCT 2012-000148-88; NCT02097810; NCT02568267), entrectinib was effective in pts with NTRK-fp solid tumors. We present updated data in a larger population with longer follow-up. Methods: In this integrated analysis of adult pts from 3 phase 1/2 trials (data cut-off 31 Oct 2018), tumors were assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) with RECIST v1.1 (end of cycle 1; then every 8 wks). Primary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), efficacy in pts with/without baseline CNS disease, and safety. Results: There were 74 evaluable pts with advanced/metastatic NTRK-fp solid tumors (Table). Median duration of survival follow-up in all pts was 14.2 mo (range 0.1–29.7). BICR ORR was 63.5% (95% CI 51.5–74.4), with 5 complete responses (6.8%). Median BICR DOR was 12.9 mo (95% CI 9.3–NE); median BICR PFS was 11.2 mo (95% CI 8.0–15.7); median OS was 23.9 mo (16.0–NE). In pts with no baseline CNS disease (investigator-assessed; n=55), BICR ORR was 65.5% (95% CI 51.4–77.8) and median BICR DOR in responders was 12.9 mo (95% CI 9.3–NE). In pts with baseline CNS disease (investigator-assessed; n=19), BICR ORR was 57.9% (95% CI 33.5–79.8) and median BICR DOR in responders was 6.0 mo (95% CI 4.2–NE). Safety was in line with that previously reported; the most common ≥grade 3 treatment-related AEs were weight gain (8, 7.1%), anemia (8, 7.1%), and fatigue (7, 6.2%). Conclusions: In this updated analysis, including more pts and longer follow-up, entrectinib continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful responses in pts with NTRK-fp solid tumors, with and without baseline CNS disease. Clinical trial information: NCT02097810, NCT02568267 . [Table: see text]

Pan-Cancer Efficacy of Vemurafenib in BRAF V600-Mutant Non-Melanoma Cancers

BRAF V600 mutations occur in a wide range of tumor types, and RAF inhibition has become standard in several of these cancers. Despite this progress, BRAF V600 mutations have historically been considered a clear demonstration of tumor lineage context-dependent oncogene addiction, based predominantly on the insensitivity to RAF inhibition in colorectal cancer. However, the true broader activity of RAF inhibition pan-cancer remains incompletely understood. To address this, we conducted a multicohort "basket" study of the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib in non-melanoma BRAF V600 mutation-positive solid tumors. In total, 172 patients with 26 unique cancer types were treated, achieving an overall response rate of 33% and median duration of response of 13 months. Responses were observed in 13 unique cancer types, including historically treatment-refractory tumor types such as cholangiocarcinoma, sarcoma, glioma, neuroendocrine carcinoma, and salivary gland carcinomas. Collectively, these data demonstrate that single-agent BRAF inhibition has broader clinical activity than previously recognized. SIGNIFICANCE: These data suggest that BRAF V600 mutations lead to oncogene addiction and are clinically actionable in a broad range of non-melanoma cancers, including tumor types in which RAF inhibition is not currently considered standard of care.See related commentary by Ribas and Lo, p. 640.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 627.

Vemurafenib for BRAF V600-Mutant Erdheim-Chester Disease and Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis: Analysis of Data From the Histology-Independent, Phase 2, Open-label VE-BASKET Study

Importance

The histiocytic neoplasms Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) and Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) are highly enriched for BRAF V600 mutations and have been previously shown to be responsive to treatment with vemurafenib, an inhibitor of the BRAF V600 kinase. However, the long-term efficacy and safety of prolonged vemurafenib use in these patients are not defined. Here we analyze the final efficacy and safety data for vemurafenib in patients with ECD and LCH enrolled in the VE-BASKET study.

Objective

To determine the efficacy and safety of vemurafenib in adults with ECD or LCH enrolled in the VE-BASKET study.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The VE-BASKET study was an open-label, nonrandomized, multicohort study for patients with nonmelanoma cancers harboring the BRAF V600 mutation. Patients with BRAF V600-mutant ECD or LCH were enrolled in an "other solid tumor" cohort of the VE-BASKET study, and they were enrolled in the present study.

Interventions

Patients received vemurafenib, 960 mg, twice daily continuously until disease progression, study withdrawal, or occurrence of intolerable adverse effects.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST, version 1.1). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), metabolic response by modified positron-emission tomography (PET) Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET/computed tomography (CT), and safety.

Results

A total of 26 patients from the VE-BASKET trial (22 with ECD, 4 with LCH) were included in the present study (14 women and 12 men; median age, 61 years; age range, 51-74 years). The confirmed ORR was 61.5% (95% CI, 40.6%-79.8%) in the overall cohort and 54.5% (95% CI, 32.2%-75.6%) in patients with ECD. All evaluable patients achieved stable disease or better. The median PFS and OS had not been reached in the overall cohort at study closure despite a median follow-up of 28.8 months; 2-year PFS was 86% (95% CI, 72%-100%), and 2-year OS was 96% (95% CI, 87%-100%). All 15 patients evaluated by FDG-PET/CT achieved a metabolic response, including 12 patients (80%) with a complete metabolic response. The most common adverse events (AEs) in the overall cohort included arthralgia, maculopapular rash, fatigue, alopecia, prolonged QT interval, skin papilloma, and hyperkeratosis. Hypertension and dermatologic AEs occurred at higher rates than those reported in metastatic melanoma.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, vemurafenib had prolonged efficacy in patients with BRAF V600-mutant ECD and LCH and warrants consideration as a new standard of care for these patients.

Phase Ib study of atezolizumab combined with cobimetinib in patients with solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Preclinical evidence suggests that MEK inhibition promotes accumulation and survival of intratumoral tumor-specific T cells and can synergize with immune checkpoint inhibition. We investigated the safety and clinical activity of combining a MEK inhibitor, cobimetinib, and a programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor, atezolizumab, in patients with solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase I/Ib study treated PD-L1/PD-1-naive patients with solid tumors in a dose-escalation stage and then in multiple, indication-specific dose-expansion cohorts. In most patients, cobimetinib was dosed once daily orally for 21 days on, 7 days off. Atezolizumab was dosed at 800 mg intravenously every 2 weeks. The primary objectives were safety and tolerability. Secondary end points included objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Between 27 December 2013 and 9 May 2016, 152 patients were enrolled. As of 4 September 2017, 150 patients received ≥1 dose of atezolizumab, including 14 in the dose-escalation cohorts and 136 in the dose-expansion cohorts. Patients had metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC; n = 84), melanoma (n = 22), non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC; n = 28), and other solid tumors (n = 16). The most common all-grade treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea (67%), rash (48%), and fatigue (40%), similar to those with single-agent cobimetinib and atezolizumab. One (<1%) treatment-related grade 5 AE occurred (sepsis). Forty-five (30%) and 23 patients (15%) had AEs that led to discontinuation of cobimetinib and atezolizumab, respectively. Confirmed responses were observed in 7 of 84 patients (8%) with mCRC (6 responders were microsatellite low/stable, 1 was microsatellite instable), 9 of 22 patients (41%) with melanoma, and 5 of 28 patients (18%) with NSCLC. Clinical activity was independent of KRAS/BRAF status across diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

Atezolizumab plus cobimetinib had manageable safety and clinical activity irrespective of KRAS/BRAF status. Although potential synergistic activity was seen in mCRC, this was not confirmed in a subsequent phase III study.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT01988896 (the investigators in the NCT01988896 study are listed in the supplementary Appendix, available at Annals of Oncology online).

Efficacy of Vemurafenib in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With BRAF V600 Mutation: An Open-Label, Single-Arm Cohort of the Histology-Independent VE-BASKET Study

PURPOSE

To study whether BRAF V600 mutations in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may indicate sensitivity to the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib, we included a cohort of patients with NSCLC in the vemurafenib basket (VE-BASKET) study. On the basis of observed early clinical activity, we expanded the cohort of patients with NSCLC. We present results from this cohort.

METHODS

This open-label, histology-independent, phase II study included six prespecified cohorts, including patients with NSCLC, and a seventh all-comers cohort. Patients received vemurafenib (960 mg two times per day) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point of the final analysis was objective response rate (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1). Secondary end points included progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Because the prespecified clinical benefit endpoint was met in the initial NSCLC cohort, the cohort was expanded.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients with BRAF V600–mutant NSCLC were enrolled and treated: 13% (n = 8) had received no prior systemic therapy, and 87% (n = 54) had received prior therapies. The objective response rate was 37.1% (95% CI, 25.2% to 50.3%) overall, 37.5% (95% CI, 8.5% to 75.5%) in previously untreated patients, and 37.0% (24.3% to 51.3%) in previously treated patients. Median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (95% CI, 5.2 to 9.0 months), and median overall survival was 15.4 months (95% CI, 9.6 to 22.8 months). The most common all-grade adverse event was nausea (40%). The safety profile of vemurafenib was similar to that observed in melanoma studies.

CONCLUSION

Vemurafenib showed promising activity in patients with NSCLC harboring BRAF V600 mutations. The safety profile of vemurafenib was similar to previous observations in patients with melanoma. Our results suggest a role for single-agent BRAF inhibition in patients with NSCLC and BRAF V600 mutations.

BRAF Inhibition in BRAFV600-Mutant Gliomas: Results From the VE-BASKET Study

Purpose

BRAF^V600 mutations are frequently found in several glioma subtypes, including pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA) and ganglioglioma and much less commonly in glioblastoma. We sought to determine the activity of vemurafenib, a selective inhibitor of BRAF^V600, in patients with gliomas that harbor this mutation.

Patients and Methods

The VE-BASKET study was an open-label, nonrandomized, multicohort study for BRAF^V600-mutant nonmelanoma cancers. Patients with BRAF^V600-mutant glioma received vemurafenib 960 mg twice per day continuously until disease progression, withdrawal, or intolerable adverse effects. Key end points included confirmed objective response rate by RECIST version 1.1, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety.

Results

Twenty-four patients (median age, 32 years; 18 female and six male patients) with glioma, including malignant diffuse glioma (n = 11; six glioblastoma and five anaplastic astrocytoma), PXA (n = 7), anaplastic ganglioglioma (n = 3), pilocytic astrocytoma (n = 2), and high-grade glioma, not otherwise specified (n = 1), were treated. Confirmed objective response rate was 25% (95% CI, 10% to 47%) and median progression-free survival was 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 9.6 months). In malignant diffuse glioma, best response included one partial response and five patients with stable disease, two of whom had disease stabilization that lasted more than 1 year. In PXA, best response included one complete response, two partial responses, and three patients with stable disease. Additional partial responses were observed in patients with pilocytic astrocytoma and anaplastic ganglioglioma (one each). The safety profile of vemurafenib was generally consistent with that of previously published studies.

Conclusion

Vemurafenib demonstrated evidence of durable antitumor activity in some patients with BRAF^V600-mutant gliomas, although efficacy seemed to vary qualitatively by histologic subtype. Additional study is needed to determine the optimal use of vemurafenib in patients with primary brain tumors and to identify the mechanisms driving differential responses across histologic subsets.

A phase Ib study of safety and clinical activity of atezolizumab (A) and cobimetinib (C) in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

560

Background: The majority of pts with mCRC have microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors with minimal response to PD-L1/PD-1 blockade. MEK inhibition upregulates tumor major histocompatibility complex-I expression, promotes intratumoral T-cell accumulation and improves anti–PD-L1 responses (Ebert, Immunity. 2016), supporting clinical evaluation of combined anti–PD-L1 (A) plus MEKi (C) in pts with mCRC. Methods: Pts with chemotherapy-refractory or locally advanced mCRC were evaluated. A was administered IV q2w at 800 mg. C was dosed PO daily at 20 to 60 mg during dose escalation and 60 mg during dose expansion (14/14 or 21/7 d on/off schedule). Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Investigator-assessed ORR and PFS by RECIST v1.1 and OS were secondary endpoints. Microsatellite instability (MSI) status was locally reported and centrally confirmed by NGS-based scoring. Results: As of May 10, 2017, 84 pts (57 KRASmt, 25 KRASwt, 2 unknown) were enrolled and evaluable. 66 pts had received 5+ prior therapies; 38 had known MSI status at baseline (MSS [n = 29], MSI-low [n = 8], MSI-H [n = 1]). A + C combination was tolerable. Treatment-related Gr 1-2 and Gr 3-4 AEs occurred at 60% and 37%, respectively. The most frequent related Gr 3-4 AEs were increased blood CPK, rash, diarrhea and fatigue (5% each). No treatment-related Gr 5 AEs occurred. 13% and 24% of pts experienced AEs leading to A and C withdrawal, respectively. Median follow-up was 14.3 mo (range, 0.5-29.8). Confirmed PR was observed in 7 pts (8%; locally reported MSS [n = 3], MSI-low [n = 1], MSI unknown [n = 3]). Median DOR was 14.8 mo (95% CI: 6.0, NE); DCR (PR + SD) was 31%. Median PFS was 1.9 mo (95% CI: 1.8, 2.3); median OS was 10.0 mo (95% CI: 6.2, 14.1). The 6-mo and 1-y OS rates were 65% (95% CI: 54, 76) and 46% (95% CI: 34, 58), respectively. Molecular determinants and immune biomarkers of response will be presented. Conclusions: A + C demonstrated a tolerable safety profile and improvements in OS vs those reported with SOC in heavily pretreated pts with mCRC. Objective responses observed in pts with MSS/MSI-low mCRC were durable, suggesting benefit of this novel combination in a pt population refractory to immune therapies. Clinical trial information: NCT01988896.

A phase II trial of lenalidomide plus rituximab in previously untreated follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL): CALGB 50803 (Alliance)

BACKGROUND

This multicenter, phase II trial tested the tolerability and efficacy of lenalidomide plus rituximab in patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma (FL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with grade 1-3a FL, stage 3-4 or bulky stage 2, FL international prognostic index (FLIPI) 0-2, and no prior therapy were eligible to receive rituximab 375 mg/m2 weekly during cycle 1 and day 1 of cycles 4, 6, 8, and 10, plus lenalidomide 20-25 mg on days 1-21 for twelve 28-day cycles. The primary objectives were to evaluate response rates [complete (CR) and overall] and time to progression. Secondary objectives included toxicity, response according to polymorphisms in FcgR2A and FcgR3A, and changes in circulating pro-angiogenic cells.

RESULTS

From October 2010 to September 2011, 66 patients were enrolled. Median age was 53 years, 34 were female, 15 had bulky disease, 21 were FLIPI 0-1, 43 FLIPI 2, and 2 FLIPI 3. One patient withdrew before receiving treatment. Fifty-one patients completed 12 cycles of lenalidomide. Reasons for discontinuation included withdrawal (n = 6), adverse events (n = 6), progression (n = 2). Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity included neutropenia (21%), lymphopenia (9%), and thrombocytopenia (2%), infection (11%), and rash (8%). Grade 1-2 toxicity included fatigue (78%), diarrhea (37%), rash (32%), and febrile neutropenia in one patient. The overall response rate was 95%; the CR rate was 72% (95% confidence interval, 60% to 83%). With a median follow-up of 5 years, the 2- and 5-year progression-free survival were 86% and 70%, respectively, and the 5-year overall survival was 100%. There was no association between CR rate or PFS and FLIPI, histological grade, bulky disease, FcgR2A/FcgR3A polymorphism, or change in circulating endothelial cell/hematopoietic progenitor cell.

CONCLUSION

Lenalidomide plus rituximab was associated with low rates of grade 3-4 toxicity, yielded a CR rate and PFS similar to chemotherapy-based treatment and may represent a reasonable alternative to immunochemotherapy in previously untreated FL.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT01145495.

Prognostic and predictive effects of TP53 co-mutation in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

INTRODUCTION

TP53 mutations are common in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and have been reported as prognostic of poor outcome. The impact of TP53 co-mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated NSCLC is unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tissue from 105 patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre was analyzed by next-generation or Sanger sequencing to determine TP53 mutational status. Associations between TP53 status and baseline patient and tumor characteristics, treatments and outcomes (relapse-free survival [RFS] after surgical resection, overall survival [OS], overall response rate [ORR] and progression-free survival [PFS] on EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors [TKIs]), were investigated.

RESULTS

Dual TP53/EGFR mutations were found in 43/105 patients (41%). Among 76 patients who underwent surgical resection, neither RFS (HR 0.99, CI 0.56-1.75, p=0.96) nor OS (HR 1.39, CI 0.70-2.77; p=0.35) was associated with TP53 status. Sixty patients (24 TP53 MUT; 36 TP53 WT) received first-generation EGFR TKIs for advanced disease. ORR was not significantly different (TP53 MUT 54%, WT 66%, p=0.42). There was a non-significant trend towards shorter PFS on EGFR TKIs with TP53 mutation (HR 1.74, CI 0.98-3.10, p=0.06). When limited to TP53 missense mutations (n=17), PFS was significantly shorter (HR 1.91, CI 1.01-3.60, p=0.04). Among 11 evaluable patients treated with T790M inhibitors, ORR was not significantly different (TP53 MUT 3/3 [100%], WT 7/8 [88%]).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with dual TP53/EGFR mutations, especially missense mutations, had marginally lower response rates and shorter PFS when treated with EGFR TKI therapy. Larger datasets are required to validate these observations.

Efficacy of vemurafenib in patients (pts) with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutation

9074

Background: BRAFV600 mutations occur in 1–2% of pts with NSCLC. We previously reported the efficacy of vemurafenib, a selective BRAFV600 inhibitor, in BRAF mutation-positive non-melanoma tumors (VE-BASKET study). We now present final data for the expanded NSCLC cohort. Methods: This open-label, histology-independent, phase 2 study included 6 prespecified cohorts (including NSCLC) plus one ‘all-others’ cohort. Pts received vemurafenib (960 mg bid) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (RECIST v1.1). Secondary endpoints included best overall response rate, duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Because the pre-specified clinical benefit endpoint was met in the initial NSCLC cohort, the cohort was expanded. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01524978. Results: Database lock was 12 Jan 2017. Of 208 pts enrolled at 25 centers worldwide, 62 pts had NSCLC: median age 65 years; 56% male; 13% had no prior systemic therapy; 50% had ≥2 prior therapies. Responses were seen in previously treated and untreated pts (Table). The most common all-grade adverse event (AE) was nausea (40%); grade 3–5 AEs included keratoacanthoma (15%) and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin (15%). Six pts discontinued vemurafenib due to AEs; two had non-treatment-related fatal AEs. Conclusions: Vemurafenib showed evidence of encouraging efficacy in pts with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutation, with prolonged PFS in previously untreated pts; median OS was not estimable due to ongoing responses. The safety profile of vemurafenib was similar to that seen in melanoma studies. Our results suggest a role for BRAF inhibition in NSCLC with BRAF mutations. Clinical trial information: NCT01524978. [Table: see text]

Atezolizumab (A) + cobimetinib (C) in metastatic melanoma (mel): Updated safety and clinical activity

3057

Background: A, an anti–programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibody, inhibits PD-L1/programmed death-1 (PD-1) and PD-L1/B7.1 binding and shows promising clinical activity in patients (pts) with cutaneous mel (objective response rate [ORR] 33%; median progression-free survival [mPFS] 5.5 months; Hodi et al SMR 2014). C promotes intratumoral T-cell infiltration, major histocompatibility complex 1 upregulation, and PD-L1 expression via targeted MEK inhibition in preclinical models (Ebert et al Immunity 2016) and tumor biopsy specimens (Bendell et al ASCO 2016). Therefore, clinical benefits may be enhanced by combining A + C vs A. This Phase Ib dose-escalation and -expansion study (NCT01988896) suggested higher ORR/disease control rate (DCR, ORR + stable disease) and longer PFS may be achieved with A + C vs A or C alone in mel. We present updated safety and efficacy data. Methods: Oral C, escalated 20 mg→40 mg→60 mg, was given qd for 21 days followed by 7 days off. Intravenous (IV) A was given at 800 mg q2w. Tumor-specific expansion cohorts were enrolled at maximum tolerated doses (C 60 mg/d 21/7; A 800 mg IV q2w). No prior anti–PD-L1 or –PD-1 therapy was allowed. Results: Data cut-off was Oct 12, 2016; 22 patients were safety-evaluable (two ocular, 20 non-ocular [ten each BRAF-mutant and -wild-type]). Median safety follow-up was 14.4 months (range 2.1–23.2). Adverse events (AEs) were experienced in all pts (diarrhea [20 pts, 90.9%] and rash [15 pts, 68.2%] were most common); related grade (G)3–4 AEs in 54.5% (diarrhea [three pts, 13.6%] and dermatitis acneiform [two pts, 9.1%] were most common; no related G5 AEs); related serious AEs in 13.6%. All were manageable. One pt discontinued A + C due to an AE. RECIST v1.1-confirmed ORR was 45.0% in pts with non-ocular mel (median duration of response was not reached); DCR was 75.0%; mPFS was 12.0 months (95% CI 2.8–not evaluable). ORR was similar for pts with BRAF-mutant and wild-type mel. Conclusions: Updated results confirm previous findings that suggest higher ORR/DCR and longer PFS may be achieved with A + C vs A or C monotherapy for mel. Together with biomarker data from other cohorts, our data suggest that the immune contexture may be altered by C, enhancing A activity. Clinical trial information: NCT01988896.

Vemurafenib in patients with BRAFV600 mutant glioma: A cohort of the histology-independent VE-basket study

2004

Background: Recurrent malignant gliomas (MG) are a universally fatal disease in desperate need of better therapies. Pleiomorphic xanthoastrocytomas (PXA) and juvenile pilocytic astrocytomas (JPA) typically have better outcomes, although when recurrent, also represent an aggressive disease with no proven effective chemotherapy. BRAFV600 alterations have been identified in a substantial proportion of gliomas, including glioblastoma (GBM), astrocytoma, PXA, and JPA. The phase 2, open-label, histology-independent VE-BASKET study of vemurafenib, a selective BRAFV600 kinase inhibitor, in patients with BRAF mutation-positive non-melanoma tumors, included those with gliomas in the ‘all-others’ cohort. We now report final data for patients with recurrent gliomas. Methods: Patients received vemurafenib (960 mg bid) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed response rate; secondary endpoints included clinical benefit rate (confirmed complete or partial response or stable disease lasting ≥6 months), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01524978. Results: 24 patients (median age 32 years; 18 female, 6 male) with glioma were treated, including mg (n = 11; 6 GBM and 5 anaplastic astrocytoma [AA]), PXA (n = 7), anaplastic ganglioglioma (AG, n = 3), JPA (n = 2), and unknown (n = 1). In patients with mg (n = 11), best response included PR (n = 1; AA), SD (n = 5), PD (n = 3), and unknown (n = 2). Two patients with mg had durable SD lasting 12.9 months (GBM) and 14.9 months (AA). In patients with PXA (n = 7), best response included CR (n = 1), PR (n = 2), SD (n = 3), and PD (n = 1). Additionally, 1 patient with JPA and 1 with AG achieved a PR. The most frequent AEs included arthralgia (67%), melanocytic nevus (38%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (38%), photosensitivity reaction (38%) and alopecia (33%). Conclusions: Vemurafenib demonstrated activity in patients with BRAFV600 mutant glioma. The safety profile was similar to that seen in previous melanoma studies. Survival data will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT01524978.

Atezolizumab (A) + cobimetinib (C) + vemurafenib (V) in BRAFV600-mutant metastatic melanoma (mel): Updated safety and clinical activity

3063

Background: Targeted inhibition of MEK with C and BRAF with V in BRAFV600-mutant mel can lead to both anticancer immune activation and direct tumor cell death. A, an anti–PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, inhibits PD-L1/PD-1 signaling. Combining C + V with A may enhance antitumor activity, potentially leading to improved clinical responses and durability. Preliminary data from this phase Ib study (NCT01656642) showed that A + C + V had a manageable safety profile and promising antitumor activity in patients (pts) with untreated BRAFV600-mutant unresectable/metastatic mel, with increases in CD8-positive T-cell infiltration observed after C + V (Sullivan et al SMR 2016). We present updated safety and efficacy data. Methods: Pts received A + C + V after a 28-day run-in with C + V. A was given at 800 mg q2w, C at 60 mg qd for the first 21 days of each 28-day cycle, and V at 960 mg bid during day 1–21 of run-in and 720 mg thereafter. Safety was evaluated in pts who had ≥1 dose of A; efficacy, in pts who had ≥1 dose of A by the data cutoff date and received ≥1 dose of A, C, or V by the dosed-by date. Results: Thirty-four patients were treated and evaluated for both safety and efficacy. Median survival follow-up was 7.1 months (range 2.5–19.9). Elevated AST/ALT, diarrhea, arthralgia, fatigue, photosensitivity, pyrexia, nausea, flu-like symptoms, maculopapular rash, and pruritus were reported as A- and/or C- and/or V-related in > 20% of pts at any grade (G). A/C/V-related G3–4 adverse events (AEs) were seen in 15 pts (44.1%) with the triple combination (none G5). Three serious AEs were A-related. All AEs were manageable and reversible. Elevated ALT/AST (three pts each) and rash (one pt) led to discontinuation of any drug. Unconfirmed RECIST V1.1 responses were observed in 29 pts (85.3%; six complete, 23 partial). Three pts with confirmed partial responses had resolution of target lesions. Twenty of the 29 responding patients continue to respond at the time of the data cutoff. Conclusions: Updated results confirm preliminary findings that A + C + V has a manageable safety profile and promising antitumor activity in pts with BRAFV600-mutant metastatic mel. Continued exploration of A + C + V is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01656642.

Hazards and incidents: Detection and learning in radiation medicine, a comparison of 2 educational interventions

PURPOSE

Interprofessional, educational live simulations were compared with group discussion-based exercises in terms of their ability to improve radiation medicine trainees' ability to detect hazards and incidents and understand behaviors that may prevent them.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Trainees and recent graduates of radiation therapy, medical physics, and radiation oncology programs were recruited and randomized to either a simulation-based or group discussion-based training intervention. Participants engaged in hazard and incident detection, analysis, and a discussion of potential preventive measures and the concept of the "highly reliable team." A video examination tool modeled on actual incidents, using 5-minute videos created by faculty, students, and volunteers, was created to test hazard and incident recognition ability before and after training. Hazard and incident detection sensitivity and specificity analyses were conducted, and a survey of the participants' and facilitators' perceptions was conducted.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven participants were assigned to the simulation (n = 15) or discussion group (n = 12). Hazard and incident-detection sensitivity ranged from 0.04 to 0.56 before and 0.04 to 0.35 after training for the discussion and simulation groups, respectively. The pre- and posttraining difference in sensitivity between groups was 0.03 (P = .75) for the minimum and 0.33 (P = .034) for the maximum reaction time. Participant perceptions of the training's educational value in a variety of domains ranged from a mean score of 6.58 to 8.17 and 7 to 8.07 for the discussion and simulation groups, respectively. Differences were not statistically significant. Twenty-six of the 27 participants indicated that they would recommend this event to a colleague.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants' ability to detect hazards and incidents as portrayed in 5-minute videos in this study was low both before and after training, and simulation-based training was not superior to discussion-based training. However, levels of satisfaction and perceptions of the training's educational value were high, especially with simulation-based training.

Improved detection of clinically relevant wound bacteria using autofluorescence image-guided sampling in diabetic foot ulcers

Clinical wound assessment involves microbiological swabbing of wounds to identify and quantify bacterial species, and to determine microbial susceptibility to antibiotics. The Levine swabbing technique may be suboptimal because it samples only the wound bed, missing other diagnostically relevant areas of the wound, which may contain clinically significant bacteria. Thus, there is a clinical need to improve the reliability of microbiological wound sampling. To address this, a handheld portable autofluorescence (AF) imaging device that detects bacteria in real time, without contrast agents, was developed. Here, we report the results of a clinical study evaluating the use of real-time AF imaging to visualise bacteria in and around the wound bed and to guide swabbing during the clinical assessment of diabetic foot ulcers, compared with the Levine technique. We investigated 33 diabetic foot ulcers (n = 31 patients) and found that AF imaging more accurately identified the presence of moderate and/or heavy bacterial load compared with the Levine technique (accuracy 78% versus 52%, P = 0·048; adjusted diagnostic odds ratio 7·67, P < 0·00022 versus 3·07, P = 0·066) and maximised the effectiveness of bacterial load sampling, with no significant impact on clinical workflow. AF imaging may help clinicians better identify the wound areas with clinically significant bacteria, and maximise sampling of treatment-relevant pathogens.

Effects of Combined Treatment with Ionizing Radiation and the PARP Inhibitor Olaparib in BRCA Mutant and Wild Type Patient-Derived Pancreatic Cancer Xenografts

Background

The BRCA2 gene product plays an important role in DNA double strand break repair. Therefore, we asked whether radiation sensitivity of pancreatic cancers developing in individuals with germline BRCA2 mutations can be enhanced by agents that inhibit poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP).

Methods

We compared the sensitivity of two patient-derived pancreatic cancer xenografts, expressing a truncated or wild type BRCA 2, to ionizing radiation alone or in combination with olaparib (AZD-2281). Animals were treated with either a single dose of 12Gy, 7 days of olaparib or 7 days of olaparib followed by a single dose of 12Gy. Response was assessed by tumour growth delay and the activation of damage response pathways.

Results

The BRCA2 mutated and wild type tumours showed similar radiation sensitivity, and treatment with olaparib did not further sensitize either model when compared to IR alone.

Conclusions

While PARP inhibition has been shown to be effective in BRCA-mutated breast and ovarian cancers, it is less well established in pancreatic cancer patients. Our results show no radiosensitization in a germline BRCA 2 mutant and suggest that combining PARP inhibition and IR may not be beneficial in BRCA 2 related pancreatic tumors.

MATE2 Expression Is Associated with Cancer Cell Response to Metformin

BACKGROUND

There is great interest in repurposing the commonly prescribed anti-diabetic drug metformin for cancer therapy. Intracellular uptake and retention of metformin is affected by the expression of organic cation transporters (OCT) 1-3 and by multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) 1-2. Inside cells, metformin inhibits mitochondrial function, which leads to reduced oxygen consumption and inhibition of proliferation. Reduced oxygen consumption can lead to improved tumor oxygenation and radiation response.

PURPOSE

Here we sought to determine if there is an association between the effects of metformin on inhibiting oxygen consumption, proliferation and expression of OCTs and MATEs in a panel of 19 cancer cell lines.

RESULTS

There was relatively large variability in the anti-proliferative response of different cell lines to metformin, with a subset of cell lines being very resistant. In contrast, all cell lines demonstrated sensitivity to the inhibition of oxygen consumption by metformin, with relatively small variation. The expression of OCT1 correlated with expression of both OCT2 and OCT3. OCT1 and OCT2 were relatively uniformly expressed, whereas expression of OCT3, MATE1 and MATE2 showed substantial variation across lines. There were statistically significant associations between resistance to inhibition of proliferation and MATE2 expression, as well as between sensitivity to inhibition of oxygen consumption and OCT3 expression. One cell line (LNCaP) with high OCT3 and low MATE2 expression in concert, had substantially higher intracellular metformin concentration than other cell lines, and was exquisitely sensitive to both anti-proliferative and anti-respiratory effects. In all other cell lines, the concentration of metformin required to inhibit oxygen consumption acutely in vitro was substantially higher than that achieved in the plasma of diabetic patients. However, administering anti-diabetic doses of metformin to tumor-bearing mice resulted in intratumoral accumulation of metformin and reduced hypoxic tumor fractions.

CONCLUSIONS

All cancer cells are susceptible to inhibition of oxygen consumption by metformin, which results in reduced hypoxic tumor fractions beneficial for the response to radiotherapy. High MATE2 expression may result in resistance to the anti-proliferative effect of metformin and should be considered as a negative predictive biomarker in clinical trials.

Patient-Derived Xenograft Establishment from Human Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Purpose: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare but aggressive disease with few therapeutic options. The tumor-stromal interface is important in MPM, but this is lost in cell lines, the main model used for preclinical studies. We sought to characterize MPM patient-derived xenografts (PDX) to determine their suitability as preclinical models and whether tumors that engraft reflect a more aggressive biological phenotype.Experimental Design: Fresh tumors were harvested from extrapleural pneumonectomy, decortication, or biopsy samples of 50 MPM patients and implanted subcutaneously into immunodeficient mice and serially passaged for up to five generations. We correlated selected mesothelioma biomarkers between PDX and patient tumors, and PDX establishment with the clinical pathologic features of the patients, including their survival. DNA of nine PDXs was profiled using the OncoScan FFPE Express platform. Ten PDXs were treated with cisplatin and pemetrexed.Results: A PDX was formed in 20 of 50 (40%) tumors implanted. Histologically, PDX models closely resembled the parent tumor. PDX models formed despite preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In multivariable analysis, patients whose tumors formed a PDX had significantly poorer survival when the model was adjusted for preoperative treatment (HR, 2.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-5.52; P = 0.028). Among 10 models treated with cisplatin, seven demonstrated growth inhibition. Genomic abnormalities seen in nine PDX models were similar to that previously reported.Conclusions: Patients whose tumors form PDX models have poorer clinical outcomes. MPM PDX tumors closely resemble the genotype and phenotype of parent tumors, making them valuable models for preclinical studies. Clin Cancer Res; 23(4); 1060-7. ©2016 AACR.

Predictive value of molecular remissions postconsolidation chemotherapy in patients with Core Binding Factor Acute Myeloid Leukemia (CBF-AML) - a single center analysis

We analyzed the outcome of 80 sequential patients with core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia and evaluated the influence of molecular monitoring by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. With a median follow-up of 5 years, the estimated 5-year relapse-free survival and overall survival were 58% and 66%, respectively. Patients who were in molecular remission at the completion of consolidation chemotherapy had a 21% risk of relapse, while the relapse risk for those in molecular remission at the end of 2 years was 5.5%. Our data indicate that postconsolidation molecular remission does not necessarily preclude disease relapse and further monitoring is required. In contrast, molecular negativity by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction at the end of 2 years is associated with a low risk of relapse.

Phase 1/2 Study of the Addition of Cisplatin to Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Image Guided High-Precision Radiation Therapy for Completely Resected Gastric Cancer

PURPOSE

Locoregional recurrence is common after surgery for gastric cancer. Adjuvant therapy improves outcomes but with toxicity. This phase 1/2 study investigated infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in combination with biweekly cisplatin delivered concurrently with image guided high-precision radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eligible patients had completely resected stage IB to IV (Union for International Cancer Control TNM 6th edition) nonmetastatic gastric adenocarcinoma. Treatment constituted 12 weeks of infusional 5-FU (200 mg/m²/day) with cisplatin added in a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation protocol (0, 20, 30, and 40 mg/m²) during weeks 1, 3, 5, and 7, and an additional week 9 dose in the final cohort. Radiation therapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions) was delivered during weeks 3 to 7. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined in phase 1 and confirmed in phase 2.

RESULTS

Among the 55 patients (median age, 54 years; range 28-77 years; 55% male), the median follow-up time was 3.0 years (range, 0.3-5.3 years). Five patients in phase 1 experienced dose-limiting toxicity, and MTD was determined as 4 cycles of 40 mg/m² cisplatin. Twenty-seven patients were treated at MTD. Acute grade 3 to 4 toxicity rate was 37.0% at MTD and 29.1% across all dose levels. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Fourteen patients experienced recurrent disease. The 2-year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival were 85% and 74%, respectively. Median OS has not been reached. Quality of life (QOL) was impaired during treatment, but most scores recovered by 4 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Cisplatin can be safely delivered with 5-FU-based chemoradiation therapy. Acute toxicity was acceptable, and patient-reported QOL showed the regimen was tolerable. Outcomes are encouraging and justify further study of this regimen.

Abstract P6-09-10: All-cause survival estimates compared to observed survival in older women with breast cancer in CALGB 49907 and 369901 (Alliance A151503)

Background: Older adults represent 50% or more of all newly diagnosed cancer patients annually; these patients have multiple morbidities, complicating treatment decision-making.. Discussions about the risks and benefits of cancer treatments might be improved by having data on estimated all-cause survival. ePrognosis (http://eprognosis.ucsf.edu/carey2.php) is an online tool validated in older adults without cancer. We compared survival estimates using ePrognosis to observed survival in a population of women with early stage breast cancer who volunteered for cooperative group studies.

Methods: Participants in CALGB 49907 (n=194) and 369901 (n=809) who were age 70+ were included (total n=1003). Both studies had comparable eligibility: primary, newly diagnosed, invasive, non-metastatic breast cancer. In 49907, eligibly also included PS 0-2; in 369901 there were no PS restrictions, but women who failed a screening cognitive exam were excluded. The Carey 2-year Index from ePrognosis was used to estimate all-cause 2-year survival, based on age, sex, and daily function. Function (needing help from another person to bath and shop for groceries, difficulty walking several blocks and pushing or pulling a heavy object) was derived from the EORTC QLC-30. The Carey index from ePrognosis generates scores from 1-10, with higher scores indicating higher probability of death. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to obtain point estimates and confidence intervals for the observed 2-yr survival. A two sided z-test was used to test the hypothesis that the observed survival rate is equivalent to the predicted survival rate.

Results: At two years from study entry, 921 women were alive; 56 had died, and 26 were lost to follow-up/withdrawn. The population was, on average, 76 years old (SD 4.8), primarily white (89.3%), and the majority had hormone receptor positive tumors (79.4%). In our population, the Carey 2-years index predicated survival was not significantly different than observed rates in the 0-2 points and underestimated the survival rates for patients who had 3-6 points and 7-10 points.

ePrognosis Prediction49907 & 369901 PatientsPointsPredicted Probability of SurvivalNNumber of DeathsObserved Probability of Overall Survival at 2 years (%, 95% CI)p-value0-295%5332595% (93-97%)0.7433-688%4272394% (92-96%)&lt;0.0017-1064%43881% (65-90%)0.017

Conclusions: In this population of older women with breast cancer, using a few readily available data items, ePrognosis provided accurate survival estimates for women with a low probability of death (0-2 points) and underestimated all-cause survival in women with an increased probability of death (3-10 points). Further studies are needed to assess the validity of this tool in samples of cancer patients with higher risks of 2-year mortality. Extended follow-up to validate the tools in predicting 5- and 10-year all-cause and non-cancer mortality risk will further contribute to decision making in older patients.

Citation Format: Kimmick G, Pitcher B, Mandelblatt J, Clapp J, Ballman K, Barginear M, Freedman R, Artz A, Klepin H, Lafky J, Hopkins J, Winer E, Hudis C, Muss H, Cohen H, Jatoi A, Hurria A. All-cause survival estimates compared to observed survival in older women with breast cancer in CALGB 49907 and 369901 (Alliance A151503). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-09-10.

Prospective evaluation of quality of life (QOL) during a phase I/II study of adjuvant chemotherapy with image-guided high-precision radiotherapy for completely resected gastric cancer

164

Background: Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy improves overall and relapse free survival in patients with completely resected gastric cancer, but confers toxicity. This prospective phase I/II clinical trial assessed the toxicity, efficacy and QOL when adding bi-weekly cisplatin to adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Phase I data showed promising outcomes with acceptable toxicity. Methods: Treatment comprised 45 Gy in 25 fractions of image-guided 3D-CRT or IMRT concurrently with weeks 3-7 of 12 weeks of infusional 5-FU. Cisplatin (up to bi-weekly) was added in a standard dose-escalation protocol. Patients completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline, end of radiotherapy, 4 weeks post chemotherapy and at 1 and 2 years. Results: Among 55 participants (mean age 54, range 28 to 77; 55% male; median follow-up 3.03 years), QOL compliance ranged from 93% at baseline to 70% at 4 weeks post-treatment. Maximal tolerable dose of cisplatin was 40 mg/m2 bi-weekly for 4 cycles. OS and DFS rates are 85% and 74% respectively at 2 years. Mean scores for global QOL (median difference = -25, p < 0.0001), role and social functioning, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and appetite declined at completion of radiation; physical functioning showed a statistically significant decline of borderline clinical importance (median difference = -6.7, p <.0001). All scales recovered by 4 weeks after chemotherapy except fatigue, which returned to baseline by one year. Conclusions: Adjuvant gastric chemoradiotherapy incorporating cisplatin worsened global QOL, fatigue, nausea and vomiting and appetite. Most scales recovered by 4 weeks post-chemotherapy. This regimen is tolerable not only by observer rated toxicity, but also by patient reported QOL measures. Clinical trial information: NCT00188266.

A proposal for cellularity assessment for EGFR mutational analysis with a correlation with DNA yield and evaluation of the number of sections obtained from cell blocks for immunohistochemistry in non-small cell lung carcinoma

Aims

Different approaches have been described for reporting specimen adequacy for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation analysis. We aimed: (1) to conduct cellularity assessment and to investigate its association with DNA yield, (2) to compare the H&E slides taken before and after the thick sections (curls) obtained for EGFR testing and (3) to evaluate the number of ancillary studies performed.

Methods

Cell block (CB) slides of 110 non-small cell lung carcinoma cases submitted to EGFR analysis from 2010 to 2012 were reviewed for total cellularity (ranges 1–100, 100–250, 250–500, 500–750, 750–1000 and >1000 cells), tumour cellularity (ranges 1–50, 50–100, 100–300 and >300 cells) and the percentage of tumour cells. Precurl and postcurl H&E slides were compared using the three criteria. The number of immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers and special stains and DNA yield were recorded.

Results

DNA yield was significantly associated with the total cellularity, number and percentage of tumour cells. For 46 cases with precurl and postcurl slides, only three (6.5%) were classified as being different and in two of them the postcurl slide had greater cellularity than the precurl. IHC was performed in 83 cases, with a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 11 markers (median of 3) per case.

Conclusions

An association between the total cellularity and the tumour cellularity with the DNA yield was demonstrated using the ranges described. Evaluation of a postcurl slide is an unnecessary practice. The majority of the CB had sufficient material for ancillary studies (up to 11 markers) and mutation testing.