Binimetinib in combination with nivolumab or nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with previously treated microsatellite-stable metastatic colorectal cancer with RAS mutations in an open-label phase 1b/2 study

BACKGROUND

In patients with previously treated RAS-mutated microsatellite-stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), a multicenter open-label phase 1b/2 trial was conducted to define the safety and efficacy of the MEK1/MEK2 inhibitor binimetinib in combination with the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) nivolumab (anti-PD-1) or nivolumab and another ICI, ipilimumab (anti-CTLA4).

METHODS

In phase 1b, participants were randomly assigned to Arm 1A (binimetinib 45 mg twice daily [BID] plus nivolumab 480 mg once every 4 weeks [Q4W]) or Arm 1B (binimetinib 45 mg BID plus nivolumab 480 mg Q4W and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every 8 weeks [Q8W]) to determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of binimetinib. The MTD/RP2D was defined as the highest dosage combination that did not cause medically unacceptable dose-limiting toxicities in more than 35% of treated participants in Cycle 1. During phase 2, participants were randomly assigned to Arm 2A (binimetinib MTD/RP2D plus nivolumab) or Arm 2B (binimetinib MTD/RP2D plus nivolumab and ipilimumab) to assess the safety and clinical activity of these combinations.

RESULTS

In phase 1b, 21 participants were randomized to Arm 1A or Arm 1B; during phase 2, 54 participants were randomized to Arm 2A or Arm 2B. The binimetinib MTD/RP2D was determined to be 45 mg BID. In phase 2, no participants receiving binimetinib plus nivolumab achieved a response. Of the 27 participants receiving binimetinib, nivolumab, and ipilimumab, the overall response rate was 7.4% (90% CI: 1.3, 21.5). Out of 75 participants overall, 74 (98.7%) reported treatment-related adverse events (AEs), of whom 17 (22.7%) reported treatment-related serious AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

The RP2D binimetinib regimen had a safety profile similar to previous binimetinib studies or nivolumab and ipilimumab combination studies. There was a lack of clinical benefit with either drug combination. Therefore, these data do not support further development of binimetinib in combination with nivolumab or nivolumab and ipilimumab in RAS-mutated MSS mCRC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03271047 (09/01/2017).

SEAMARK: phase II study of first-line encorafenib and cetuximab plus pembrolizumab for MSI-H/dMMR BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC

Patients with both BRAF V600E mutations and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have poor prognosis. Currently, there are no specifically targeted first-line treatment options indicated for patients with mCRC whose tumors harbor both molecular aberrations. Pembrolizumab is a checkpoint inhibitor approved for the treatment of MSI-H/dMMR mCRC, and the BRAF inhibitor encorafenib, in combination with cetuximab, is approved for previously treated BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC. Combination of pembrolizumab with encorafenib and cetuximab may synergistically enhance antitumor activity in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant, MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. SEAMARK is a randomized phase II study comparing the efficacy of the combination of pembrolizumab with encorafenib and cetuximab versus pembrolizumab alone in patients with previously untreated BRAF V600E-mutant, MSI-H/dMMR mCRC.

Modified FOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab with and without nivolumab for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: phase 2 results from the CheckMate 9X8 randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Standard first-line therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) include fluoropyrimidine-containing regimens with oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan and a biologic agent. Immunotherapy may enhance antitumor activity in combination with standard therapies in patients with mCRC. Here, we present phase 2 results of nivolumab plus standard-of-care therapy (SOC; 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin/bevacizumab) versus SOC in the first-line treatment of patients with mCRC (CheckMate 9X8).

METHODS

CheckMate 9X8 was a multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 2/3 trial. Eligible patients were at least 18 years of age with unresectable mCRC and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive nivolumab 240 mg plus SOC or SOC alone every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1. Secondary endpoints included PFS by investigator assessment; objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate, duration of response, and time to response, all by BICR and investigator assessments; overall survival; and safety. Preplanned exploratory biomarker analyses were also performed.

RESULTS

From February 2018 through April 2019, 310 patients were enrolled, of which 195 patients were randomized to nivolumab plus SOC (n=127) or SOC (n=68). At 21.5-month minimum follow-up, PFS with nivolumab plus SOC versus SOC did not meet the prespecified threshold for statistical significance; median PFS by BICR was 11.9 months in both arms (HR, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.53 to 1.23); p=0.30). Higher PFS rates after 12 months (18 months: 28% vs 9%), higher ORR (60% vs 46%), and durable responses (median 12.9 vs 9.3 months) were observed with nivolumab plus SOC versus SOC. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 75% versus 48% of patients; no new safety signals were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The CheckMate 9X8 trial investigating first-line nivolumab plus SOC versus SOC in patients with mCRC did not meet its primary endpoint of PFS by BICR. Nivolumab plus SOC showed numerically higher PFS rates after 12 months, a higher response rate, and more durable responses compared with SOC alone, with acceptable safety. Further investigation to identify subgroups of patients with mCRC that may benefit from nivolumab plus SOC versus SOC in the first-line setting is warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03414983.

Negative Hyperselection of Patients with HER2+ and RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Receiving Dual HER2 Blockade: the PRESSING-HER2 Study

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the negative prognostic impact of a panel of genomic alterations (PRESSING-HER2 panel) and lack of HER2 amplification by next-generation sequencing (NGS) in patients with HER2+, RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer receiving dual HER2 blockade.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The PRESSING-HER2 panel of HER2 mutations/rearrangements and RTK/MAPK mutations/amplifications was assessed by NGS. HER2 amplification was confirmed by NGS if copy-number variation (CNV) was ≥ 6. With a case-control design, hypothesizing 30% and 5% PRESSING-HER2 positivity in resistant [progression-free survival (PFS) <4 months and no RECIST response] versus sensitive cohorts, respectively, 35 patients were needed per group.

RESULTS

PRESSING-HER2 alterations included HER2 mutations/rearrangements, EGFR amplification, and BRAF mutations and had a prevalence of 27% (9/33) and 3% (1/35) in resistant versus sensitive patients (P = 0.005) and 63% predictive accuracy. Overall, HER2 nonamplified status by NGS had 10% prevalence. Median PFS and overall survival (OS) were worse in PRESSING-HER2+ versus negative (2.2 vs. 5.3 months, P < 0.001; 5.4 vs. 14.9 months, P = 0.001) and in HER2 nonamplified versus amplified (1.6 vs. 5.2 months, P < 0.001; 7.4 vs. 12.4 months, P = 0.157). These results were confirmed in multivariable analyses [PRESSING-HER2 positivity: PFS HR = 3.06, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.40-6.69, P = 0.005; OS HR = 2.93, 95% CI, 1.32-6.48, P = 0.007]. Combining PRESSING-HER2 and HER2 CNV increased the predictive accuracy to 75%.

CONCLUSIONS

PRESSING-HER2 panel and HER2 nonamplified status by NGS warrant validation as potential predictive markers in this setting. See related commentary by Raghav et al., p. 260.

First-in-human study of naporafenib (LXH254) with or without spartalizumab in adult patients with advanced solid tumors harboring MAPK signaling pathway alterations

BACKGROUND

We investigated naporafenib (LXH254), a pan-RAF kinase inhibitor, with or without spartalizumab, in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring MAPK pathway alterations.

METHODS

This first-in-human phase 1 study had two dose-escalation arms: single-agent naporafenib (starting at 100 mg once-daily [QD]) and naporafenib (starting at the recommended dose/regimen)/spartalizumab (400 mg every 4 weeks). The naporafenib/spartalizumab dose-expansion part enrolled patients with KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and NRAS-mutated melanoma. The primary objectives were to establish the maximum tolerated doses (MTD)/recommended doses for expansion (RDE) and evaluate tolerability and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 142 patients were included in the naporafenib dose-escalation (n = 87), naporafenib/spartalizumab dose-escalation (n = 12) and naporafenib/spartalizumab dose-expansion (n = 43) arms. The MTD/RDE of naporafenib was 600 mg twice-daily (BID). In naporafenib escalation, five patients experienced 7 dose-limiting toxicities: decreased platelet count (1200 mg QD); neuralgia, maculopapular rash, pruritus (600 mg BID); increased blood bilirubin, hyponatremia, peripheral sensory neuropathy (800 mg BID). No DLTs occurred in the naporafenib/spartalizumab arm: the RDE was established at 400 mg BID. The most common treatment-related adverse events were rash and dermatitis acneiform (each 24.1%; naporafenib), nausea and pruritus (each 33.3%; naporafenib/spartalizumab; escalation) and rash (39.5%; naporafenib/spartalizumab; expansion). Naporafenib reduced DUSP6 expression in tumors. Two partial responses (PRs) occurred in naporafenib escalation, and 1 complete response and 3 PRs in the naporafenib/spartalizumab NRAS-mutated melanoma and KRAS-mutated NSCLC arms, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Naporafenib, with or without spartalizumab, showed an acceptable safety profile, pharmacodynamic activity and limited antitumor activity. Additional naporafenib combination therapies are currently under investigation.

Medical oncology workload, workforce census, and needs in Spain: two nationwide studies by the Spanish Society of medical oncology

PURPOSE

Growing complexity and demand for cancer care entail increased challenges for Medical Oncology (MO). The Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) has promoted studies to provide updated data to estimate the need for medical oncologists in 2040 and to analyse current professional standing of young medical oncologists.

METHODS

Two national, online surveys were conducted. The first (2021) targeted 146 Heads of MO Departments, and the second (2022), 775 young medical oncologists who had completed their MO residency between 2014 and 2021. Participants were contacted individually, and data were processed anonymously.

RESULTS

Participation rates reached 78.8% and 48.8%, respectively. The updated data suggest that 87-110 new medical oncologist full-time equivalents (FTEs) should be recruited each year to achieve an optimal ratio of 110-130 new cases per medical oncologist FTE by 2040. The professional standing analysis reveals that 9.1% of medical oncologists trained in Spain do not work in clinical care in the country, with tremendous employment instability (only 15.2% have a permanent contract). A high percentage of young medical oncologists have contemplated career paths other than clinical care (64.5%) or working in other countries (51.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Optimal ratios of medical oncologists must be achieved to tackle the evolution of MO workloads and challenges in comprehensive cancer care. However, the incorporation and permanence of medical oncologists in the national healthcare system in Spain could be compromised by their current sub-optimal professional standing.

Phase Ib/II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Binimetinib (MEK162) Plus Panitumumab for Mutant or Wild-Type RAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Activating RAS gene mutations occur in approximately 55% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and are associated with poorer clinical outcomes due to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) blockade resistance. Combined EGFR and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) inhibition may extend response to EGFR inhibition and overcome acquired resistance. This phase Ib/II dose escalation trial evaluated the safety and activity of dual inhibition with binimetinib (MEK1/2 inhibitor) and panitumumab (EGFR inhibitor [EGFRi]) in patients with RAS mutant or BRAF wild type (WT)/RAS WT mCRC.

METHODS

Phase Ib dose escalation started with binimetinib 45 mg twice daily plus panitumumab 6 mg/kg administered every 2 weeks. In the phase II study, patients with measurable mCRC were enrolled into 4 groups based on previous anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy and RAS mutational status.

RESULTS

No patients in the phase Ib portion (n = 10) had a response; 70% of patients had stable disease. In the phase II portion (n = 43), overall response rate (ORR, confirmed) was 2.3% with one partial response in the RAS WT group, DCR was 30.2%, and median progression-free survival was 1.8 months (95%CI, 1.6-3.3). All patients experienced ≥1 adverse event, with the most common being diarrhea (71.7%), vomiting (52.8%), nausea (50.9%), fatigue (49.1%), dermatitis acneiform (43.4%), and rash (41.5%). Most patients required treatment interruption or dose reduction due to difficulties tolerating treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of binimetinib and panitumumab had substantial toxicity and limited clinical activity for patients with mutant or WT RAS mCRC, independent of EGFRi treatment history (Trial registration: NCT01927341).

BRAF V600E/RAS Mutations and Lynch Syndrome in Patients With MSI-H/dMMR Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

We pooled data from 2 cohorts of immune checkpoint inhibitors-treated microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer patients to evaluate the prognostic value of RAS/BRAFV600E mutations and Lynch syndrome (LS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were defined as LS-linked if germline mutation was detected and as sporadic if loss of MLH1/PMS2 expression with BRAFV600E mutation and/or MLH1 promoter hypermethylation, or biallelic somatic MMR genes mutations were found. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were adjusted on prognostic modifiers selected on unadjusted analysis (P < .2) if limited number of events.

RESULTS

Of 466 included patients, 305 (65.4%) and 161 (34.5%) received, respectively, anti-PD1 alone and anti-PD1+anti-CTLA4 in the total population, 111 (24.0%) were treated in first-line; 129 (28.8%) were BRAFV600E-mutated and 153 (32.8%) RAS-mutated. Median follow-up was 20.9 months. In adjusted analysis of the whole population (PFS/OS events = 186/133), no associations with PFS and OS were observed for BRAFV600E-mutated (PFS HR= 1.20, P = .372; OS HR = 1.06, P = .811) and RAS-mutated patients (PFS HR = 0.93, P = .712, OS HR = 0.75, P = .202). In adjusted analysis in the Lynch/sporadic status-assigned population (n = 242; PFS/OS events = 80/54), LS-liked patients had an improved PFS compared to sporadic cases (HR = 0.49, P = .036). The adjusted HR for OS was 0.56 with no significance (P = .143). No adjustment on BRAFV600E mutation was done due to collinearity.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort, RAS/BRAFV600E mutations were not associated with survival while LS conferred an improved PFS.

Predictive Impact of RNF43 Mutations in Patients With Proficient Mismatch Repair/Microsatellite Stable BRAFV600E-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With Target Therapy or Chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Target therapy (TT) with encorafenib plus cetuximab is a standard option in patients with BRAFV600E-mutated (mut) pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Recently, mutations in RNF43, encoding a negative regulator of the WNT pathway, were associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with proficient mismatch repair/microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) BRAFV600E-mut mCRC treated with TT. Here, we explored the effect of RNF43 mutations on the efficacy of second-line TT versus standard chemotherapy (CT).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of patients with pMMR/MSS BRAFV600E-mut tumors, available RNF43 mutational status, and treated with second-line TT or oxaliplatin- and/or irinotecan-based CT was analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-two patients with pMMR/MSS BRAFV600E-mut mCRC were included. RNF43 was found mut in 34 (26%) cases. Among RNF43 mutants, TT was associated with longer PFS (7.7 v 3.0 months; P = .002) and higher overall response rate (ORR; 45% v 0%; P = .009) compared with CT. Conversely, among RNF43 wild-type (wt) patients, only a trend for longer PFS (4.5 v 3.7 months; P = .064) favoring TT, with no differences in ORR (P = .14), was observed. After excluding 36 patients receiving TT in third line or beyond, a longer OS (19.4 v 10.1 months; P = .022) and a numerically OS advantage (10.6 v 6.6 months; P = .068) were reported for TT both in the RNF43-mut and in the RNF43 wt groups. However, no interaction effect was reported between RNF43 mutational status and treatment in ORR (Pinteraction = .96), PFS (Pinteraction = .13), and OS (Pinteraction = .44).

CONCLUSION

Patients with pMMR/MSS BRAFV600E-mut mCRC achieve benefit from TT versus CT independently of RNF43 mutational status, although a higher magnitude of benefit from TT is observed in RNF43-mut tumors. These findings deserve confirmation in concluded and ongoing randomized trials.

Unravelling the Complexity of Colorectal Cancer: Heterogeneity, Clonal Evolution, and Clinical Implications

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a global health concern and a leading cause of death worldwide. The disease's course and response to treatment are significantly influenced by its heterogeneity, both within a single lesion and between primary and metastatic sites. Biomarkers, such as mutations in KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF, provide valuable guidance for treatment decisions in patients with metastatic CRC. While high concordance exists between mutational status in primary and metastatic lesions, some heterogeneity may be present. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis has proven invaluable in identifying genetic heterogeneity and predicting prognosis in RAS-mutated metastatic CRC patients. Tumor heterogeneity can arise from genetic and non-genetic factors, affecting tumor development and response to therapy. To comprehend and address clonal evolution and intratumoral heterogeneity, comprehensive genomic studies employing techniques such as next-generation sequencing and computational analysis are essential. Liquid biopsy, notably through analysis of ctDNA, enables real-time clonal evolution and treatment response monitoring. However, challenges remain in standardizing procedures and accurately characterizing tumor subpopulations. Various models elucidate the origin of CRC heterogeneity, highlighting the intricate molecular pathways involved. This review focuses on intrapatient cancer heterogeneity and genetic clonal evolution in metastatic CRC, with an emphasis on clinical applications.

Fruquintinib versus placebo in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (FRESCO-2): an international, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of effective systemic therapy options for patients with advanced, chemotherapy-refractory colorectal cancer. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib, a highly selective and potent oral inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs) 1, 2, and 3, in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

METHODS

We conducted an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study (FRESCO-2) at 124 hospitals and cancer centres across 14 countries. We included patients aged 18 years or older (≥20 years in Japan) with histologically or cytologically documented metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma who had received all current standard approved cytotoxic and targeted therapies and progressed on or were intolerant to trifluridine-tipiracil or regorafenib, or both. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive fruquintinib (5 mg capsule) or matched placebo orally once daily on days 1-21 in 28-day cycles, plus best supportive care. Stratification factors were previous trifluridine-tipiracil or regorafenib, or both, RAS mutation status, and duration of metastatic disease. Patients, investigators, study site personnel, and sponsors, except for selected sponsor pharmacovigilance personnel, were masked to study group assignments. The primary endpoint was overall survival, defined as the time from randomisation to death from any cause. A non-binding futility analysis was done when approximately one-third of the expected overall survival events had occurred. Final analysis occurred after 480 overall survival events. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04322539, and EudraCT, 2020-000158-88, and is ongoing but not recruiting.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 12, 2020, and Dec 2, 2021, 934 patients were assessed for eligibility and 691 were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive fruquintinib (n=461) or placebo (n=230). Patients had received a median of 4 lines (IQR 3-6) of previous systemic therapy for metastatic disease, and 502 (73%) of 691 patients had received more than 3 lines. Median overall survival was 7·4 months (95% CI 6·7-8·2) in the fruquintinib group versus 4·8 months (4·0-5·8) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·66, 95% CI 0·55-0·80; p<0·0001). Grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 286 (63%) of 456 patients who received fruquintinib and 116 (50%) of 230 who received placebo; the most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in the fruquintinib group included hypertension (n=62 [14%]), asthenia (n=35 [8%]), and hand-foot syndrome (n=29 [6%]). There was one treatment-related death in each group (intestinal perforation in the fruquintinib group and cardiac arrest in the placebo group).

INTERPRETATION

Fruquintinib treatment resulted in a significant and clinically meaningful benefit in overall survival compared with placebo in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. These data support the use of fruquintinib as a global treatment option for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Ongoing analysis of the quality of life data will further establish the clinical benefit of fruquintinib in this patient population.

FUNDING

HUTCHMED.

Final results of DESTINY-CRC01 investigating trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer

DESTINY-CRC01 (NCT03384940) was a multicenter, open-label, phase 2 trial assessing the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in patients with HER2-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) that progressed after ≥2 prior regimens; results of the primary analysis are published. Patients received T-DXd 6.4 mg/kg every 3 weeks and were assigned to either: cohort A (HER2-positive, immunohistochemistry [IHC] 3+ or IHC 2+/in situ hybridization [ISH]+), cohort B (IHC 2+/ISH-), or cohort C (IHC 1+). Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by independent central review in cohort A. Secondary endpoints included ORR (cohorts B and C), duration of response, disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, pharmacokinetics, and safety of T-DXd. 86 patients were enrolled (53 in cohort A, 15 in cohort B, and 18 in cohort C). Results of the primary analysis are published, reporting an ORR of 45.3% in cohort A. Here, we report the final results. No responses occurred in cohorts B or C. Median progression-free survival, overall survival, and duration of response were 6.9, 15.5, and 7.0 months, respectively. Overall serum exposure (cycle 1) of T-DXd, total anti-HER2 antibody, and DXd were similar regardless of HER2 status. Most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were decreased neutrophil count and anemia. Adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis occurred in 8 patients (9.3%). These findings support the continued exploration of T-DXd in HER2-positive mCRC.

Plasmatic BRAF-V600E allele fraction as a prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with BRAF combinatorial treatments

BACKGROUND

Combination of a BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) and an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), with or without a MEK inhibitor (MEKi), improves survival in BRAF-V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) over standard chemotherapy. However, responses are heterogeneous and there are no available biomarkers to assess patient prognosis or guide doublet- or triplet-based regimens. In order to better characterize the clinical heterogeneity observed, we assessed the prognostic and predictive role of the plasmatic BRAF allele fraction (AF) for these combinations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective discovery cohort including 47 BRAF-V600E-mutant patients treated with BRAFi-anti-EGFR ± MEKi in clinical trials and real-world practice was evaluated. Results were validated in an independent multicenter cohort (n= 29). Plasmatic BRAF-V600E AF cut-off at baseline was defined in the discovery cohort with droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). All patients had tissue-confirmed BRAF-V600E mutations.

RESULTS

Patients with high AF have major frequency of liver metastases and more metastatic sites. In the discovery cohort, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 4.4 and 10.1 months, respectively. Patients with high BRAF AF (≥2%, n = 23) showed worse PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 2.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.55-5.69; P = 0.001] and worse OS (HR 3.28, 95% CI 1.58-6.81; P = 0.001) than low-BRAF AF patients (<2%, n = 24). In the multivariable analysis, BRAF AF levels maintained independent significance. In the validation cohort, high BRAF AF was associated with worse PFS (HR 3.83, 95% CI 1.60-9.17; P = 0.002) and a trend toward worse OS was observed (HR 1.86, 95% CI 0.80-4.34; P = 0.15). An exploratory analysis of predictive value showed that high-BRAF AF patients (n = 35) benefited more from triplet therapy than low-BRAF AF patients (n = 41; PFS and OS interaction tests, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Plasmatic BRAF AF determined by ddPCR is a reliable surrogate of tumor burden and aggressiveness in BRAF-V600E-mutant mCRC treated with a BRAFi plus an anti-EGFR with or without a MEKi and identifies patients who may benefit from treatment intensification. Our results warrant further validation of plasmatic BRAF AF to refine clinical stratification and guide treatment strategies.

ANCHOR CRC: Results From a Single-Arm, Phase II Study of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib and Cetuximab in Previously Untreated BRAFV600E-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

PURPOSE

The positive BEACON colorectal cancer (CRC) safety lead-in, evaluating encorafenib + cetuximab + binimetinib in previously treated patients with BRAFV600E-mutated metastatic CRC (mCRC), prompted the design of the phase II ANCHOR CRC study (ClinicalTrails.gov identifier: NCT03693170). ANCHOR CRC aimed to evaluate efficacy, safety, and quality of life with first-line encorafenib + binimetinib + cetuximab in BRAFV600E-mutated mCRC.

METHODS

In this multicenter, open-label, single-arm study, patients with BRAFV600E-mutated mCRC received oral encorafenib 300 mg once daily and binimetinib 45 mg twice daily in 28-day cycles, plus intravenous cetuximab 400 mg/m2 once on day 1 of cycle 1, then 250 mg/m2 once weekly for the first seven cycles, and 500 mg/m2 once on Days 1 and 15 from cycle 8 onward. The primary end point was locally assessed confirmed objective response rate (cORR), and secondary end points included centrally assessed cORR, progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), quality of life, and safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

Among 95 patients, the locally assessed cORR was 47.4% (95% CI, 37.0 to 57.9) with all partial responses. Since the lower limit of the 95% CI exceeded 30%, the primary end point was met. With a median follow-up duration of 20.1 months, the median progression-free survival on the basis of local assessments was 5.8 months and the median OS was 18.3 months. Treatment was well tolerated, with no unexpected toxicities. Using Patient Global Impression of Changes, substantial improvement in symptoms was consistently reported in ≥ 30% of patients from cycle 3 to cycle 10.

CONCLUSION

The ANCHOR CRC study showed that the scientifically driven combination of encorafenib + binimetinib + cetuximab was active in the first-line setting of BRAFV600E-mutated mCRC with a manageable safety profile. Further first-line evaluation is ongoing (ClinicalTrails.gov identifier: NCT04607421).

Trifluridine-Tipiracil and Bevacizumab in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

In a previous phase 3 trial, treatment with trifluridine-tipiracil (FTD-TPI) prolonged overall survival among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Preliminary data from single-group and randomized phase 2 trials suggest that treatment with FTD-TPI in addition to bevacizumab has the potential to extend survival.

METHODS

We randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, adult patients who had received no more than two previous chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer to receive FTD-TPI plus bevacizumab (combination group) or FTD-TPI alone (FTD-TPI group). The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points were progression-free survival and safety, including the time to worsening of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance-status score from 0 or 1 to 2 or more (on a scale from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater disability).

RESULTS

A total of 246 patients were assigned to each group. The median overall survival was 10.8 months in the combination group and 7.5 months in the FTD-TPI group (hazard ratio for death, 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 0.77; P<0.001). The median progression-free survival was 5.6 months in the combination group and 2.4 months in the FTD-TPI group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.54; P<0.001). The most common adverse events in both groups were neutropenia, nausea, and anemia. No treatment-related deaths were reported. The median time to worsening of the ECOG performance-status score from 0 or 1 to 2 or more was 9.3 months in the combination group and 6.3 months in the FTD-TPI group (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.67).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, treatment with FTD-TPI plus bevacizumab resulted in longer overall survival than FTD-TPI alone. (Funded by Servier and Taiho Oncology; SUNLIGHT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04737187; EudraCT number, 2020-001976-14.).

Liver transplantation in metastatic colorectal cancer: are we ready for it?

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a prevalent disease worldwide, with more than 50% of patients developing metastases to the liver. Five-year overall survival remains modest among patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) treated with conventional therapies however, liver transplantation in a highly selected population can improve clinical outcomes with an impressive 5-year overall survival of 83%. Despite liver transplantation appearing to be a promising therapeutical option for well-selected patients with mCRC with the liver-limited disease, these data come from small monocentric trials which included a heterogeneous population. Currently, several clinical trials are evaluating liver transplantation in this scenario, aiming for a more accurate patient selection by integrating liquid biopsy, tissue profiling, and nuclear medicine to the already known clinical biomarkers that eventually may lead to a survival improvement. In this paper, the clinical outcomes and inclusion criteria from the most relevant clinical trials and clinical series involving liver transplantation in patients with liver-limited disease colorectal cancer are reviewed as well as the trials currently recruiting.

Tucatinib plus trastuzumab for chemotherapy-refractory, HER2-positive, RAS wild-type unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer (MOUNTAINEER): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

HER2 is an actionable target in metastatic colorectal cancer. We assessed the activity of tucatinib plus trastuzumab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory, HER2-positive, RAS wild-type unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer.

METHODS

MOUNTAINEER is a global, open-label, phase 2 study that enrolled patients aged 18 years and older with chemotherapy-refractory, HER2-positive, RAS wild-type unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer at 34 sites (clinics and hospitals) in five countries (Belgium, France, Italy, Spain, and the USA). Initially, the study was designed as a single-cohort study, which was expanded following an interim analysis to include more patients. Initially, patients were given tucatinib (300 mg orally twice daily) plus intravenous trastuzumab (8 mg/kg as an initial loading dose, then 6 mg/kg every 21 days; cohort A) for the duration of treatment (until progression), and after expansion, patients were randomly assigned (4:3), using an interactive web response system and stratified by primary tumour location, to either tucatinib plus trastuzumab (cohort B) or tucatinib monotherapy (cohort C). The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate per blinded independent central review (BICR) for cohorts A and B combined and was assessed in patients in the full analysis set (ie, patients with HER2-positive disease who received at least one dose of study treatment). Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03043313, and is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 8, 2017, and Sept 22, 2021, 117 patients were enrolled (45 in cohort A, 41 in cohort B, and 31 in cohort C), of whom 114 patients had locally assessed HER2-positive disease and received treatment (45 in cohort A, 39 in cohort B, and 30 in cohort C; full analysis set), and 116 patients received at least one dose of study treatment (45 in cohort A, 41 in cohort B, and 30 in cohort C; safety population). In the full analysis set, median age was 56·0 years (IQR 47-64), 66 (58%) were male, 48 (42%) were female, 88 (77%) were White, and six (5%) were Black or African American. As of data cutoff (March 28, 2022), in 84 patients from cohorts A and B in the full analysis set, the confirmed objective response rate per BICR was 38·1% (95% CI 27·7-49·3; three patients had a complete response and 29 had a partial response). In cohorts A and B, the most common adverse event was diarrhoea (55 [64%] of 86), the most common grade 3 or worse adverse event was hypertension (six [7%] of 86), and three (3%) patients had tucatinib-related serious adverse events (acute kidney injury, colitis, and fatigue). In cohort C, the most common adverse event was diarrhoea (ten [33%] of 30), the most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were increased alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase (both two [7%]), and one (3%) patient had a tucatinib-related serious adverse event (overdose). No deaths were attributed to adverse events. All deaths in treated patients were due to disease progression.

INTERPRETATION

Tucatinib plus trastuzumab had clinically meaningful anti-tumour activity and favourable tolerability. This treatment is the first US Food and Drug Administration-approved anti-HER2 regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer and is an important new treatment option for chemotherapy-refractory HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer.

FUNDING

Seagen and Merck & Co.

Establishment of patient-derived tumor organoids to functionally inform treatment decisions in metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients tend to have modest benefits from molecularly driven therapeutics. Patient-derived tumor organoids (PDTOs) represent an unmatched model to elucidate tumor resistance to therapy, due to their high capacity to resemble tumor characteristics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used viable tumor tissue from two cohorts of patients with mCRC, naïve or refractory to treatment, respectively, for generating PDTOs. The derived models were subjected to a 6-day drug screening assay (DSA) with a comprehensive pipeline of chemotherapy and targeted drugs against almost all the actionable mCRC molecular drivers. For the second cohort DSA data were matched with those from PDTO genotyping.

RESULTS

A total of 40 PDTOs included in the two cohorts were derived from mCRC primary tumors or metastases. The first cohort included 31 PDTOs derived from patients treated in front line. For this cohort, DSA results were matched with patient responses. Moreover, RAS/BRAF mutational status was matched with DSA cetuximab response. Ten out of 12 (83.3%) RAS wild-type PDTOs responded to cetuximab, while all the mutant PDTOs, 8 out of 8 (100%), were resistant. For the second cohort (chemorefractory patients), we used part of tumor tissue for genotyping. Four out of nine DSA/genotyping data resulted applicable in the clinic. Two RAS-mutant mCRC patients have been treated with FOLFOX-bevacizumab and mitomycin-capecitabine in third line, respectively, based on DSA results, obtaining disease control. One patient was treated with nivolumab-second mitochondrial-derived activator of caspases mimetic (phase I trial) due to high tumor mutational burden at genotyping, experiencing stable disease. In one case, the presence of BRCA2 mutation correlated with DSA sensitivity to olaparib; however, the patient could not receive the therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Using CRC as a model, we have designed and validated a clinically applicable methodology to potentially inform clinical decisions with functional data. Undoubtedly, further larger analyses are needed to improve methodology success rates and propose suitable treatment strategies for mCRC patients.

A Phase I-II multicenter trial with Avelumab plus autologous dendritic cell vaccine in pre-treated mismatch repair-proficient (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer patients; GEMCAD 1602 study

BACKGROUND

Immune check-point blockade (ICB) has shown clinical benefit in mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability high metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) but not in mismatch repair-proficient/microsatellite stable patients. Cancer vaccines with autologous dendritic cells (ADC) could be a complementary therapeutic approach to ICB as this combination has the potential to achieve synergistic effects.

METHODS

This was a Phase I/II multicentric study with translational sub-studies, to evaluate the safety, pharmacodynamics and anti-tumor effects of Avelumab plus ADC vaccine in heavily pre-treated MSS mCRC patients. Primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the efficacy of the combination. The primary end-point was 40% progression-free survival at 6 months with a 2 Simon Stage.

RESULTS

A total of 28 patients were screened and 19 pts were included. Combined therapy was safe and well tolerated. An interim analysis (Simon design first-stage) recommended early termination because only 2/19 (11%) patients were disease free at 6 months. Median PFS was 3.1 months [2.1-5.3 months] and overall survival was 12.2 months [3.2-23.2 months]. Stimulation of immune system was observed in vitro but not clinically. The evaluation of basal RNA-seq noted significant changes between pre and post-therapy liver biopsies related to lipid metabolism and transport, inflammation and oxidative stress pathways.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of Avelumab plus ADC vaccine is safe and well tolerated but exhibited modest clinical activity. Our study describes, for the first-time, a de novo post-therapy metabolic rewiring, that could represent novel immunotherapy-induced tumor vulnerabilities.

A Phase Ib/II Study of WNT974 + Encorafenib + Cetuximab in Patients With BRAF V600E-Mutant KRAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

WNT974 is a small molecule inhibitor of Wnt signaling that specifically inhibits porcupine O-acyltransferase. This phase Ib dose--escalation study evaluated the maximum tolerated dose of WNT974 in combination with encorafenib and cetuximab in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer with RNF43 mutations or RSPO fusions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received once-daily encorafenib and weekly cetuximab, in addition to once-daily WNT974, in sequential dosing cohorts. In the first cohort, patients received 10-mg WNT974 (COMBO10), which was reduced in subsequent cohorts to 7.5-mg (COMBO7.5) or 5-mg (COMBO5) after dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed. Primary endpoints were incidence of DLTs and exposure to WNT974 and encorafenib. Secondary endpoints were anti-tumor activity and safety.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were enrolled (COMBO10, n = 4; COMBO7.5, n = 6; COMBO5, n = 10). DLTs were observed in 4 patients, including grade 3 hypercalcemia (COMBO10, n = 1; COMBO7.5, n = 1), grade 2 dysgeusia (COMBO10, n = 1), and lipase increased (COMBO10, n = 1). A high incidence of bone toxicities (n = 9) was reported, including rib fracture, spinal compression fracture, pathological fracture, foot fracture, hip fracture, and lumbar vertebral fracture. Serious adverse events were reported in 15 patients, most frequently bone fracture, hypercalcemia, and pleural effusion. The overall response rate was 10% and disease control rate 85%; most patients achieved stable disease as their best response.

CONCLUSION

Concerns surrounding the safety and lack of preliminary evidence of improved anti-tumor activity of WNT974 + encorafenib + cetuximab, compared with previous encorafenib + cetuximab data, ultimately led to study discontinuation. Phase II was not initiated.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02278133.

Pembrolizumab in Asian patients with microsatellite-instability-high/mismatch-repair-deficient colorectal cancer

The phase 3 KEYNOTE-177 study evaluated pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab or cetuximab in patients with newly diagnosed, microsatellite-instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch-repair-deficient (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 by BICR and safety. Here, we report results from the post hoc analysis of patients who were enrolled in Asia from the final analysis (FA) of KEYNOTE-177. A total of 48 patients from Japan, Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan (pembrolizumab, n = 22; chemotherapy, n = 26) were included. At FA, median time from randomization to data cutoff (February 19, 2021) was 45.3 (range 38.1-57.8) months with pembrolizumab and 43.9 (range 36.6-55.1) months with chemotherapy. Median PFS was not reached (NR; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9 months-NR) with pembrolizumab versus 10.4 (95% CI 6.3-22.0) months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.56, 95% CI 0.26-1.20). Median OS was NR (range 13.8 months-NR) versus 30.0 (14.7-NR) months (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.27-1.55) and ORR was 50% (95% CI 28-72) versus 46% (95% CI 27-67). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported by two patients (9%) in the pembrolizumab arm and 20 (80%) in the chemotherapy arm. Immune-mediated adverse events or infusion reactions were reported by six patients (27%) and 10 patients (40%), respectively. No deaths due to TRAEs occurred. These data support first-line pembrolizumab as a standard of care for patients from Asia with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02563002.

Advances in immune checkpoint inhibitor combination strategies for microsatellite stable colorectal cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have reshaped the prognostic of several tumor types, including metastatic colorectal tumors with microsatellite instability (MSI). However, 90-95% of metastatic colorectal tumors are microsatellite stable (MSS) in which immunotherapy has failed to demonstrate meaningful clinical results. MSS colorectal tumors are considered immune-cold tumors. Several factors have been proposed to account for this lack of response to immune checkpoint blockade including low levels of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, low tumor mutational burden, a high rate of WNT/β-catenin pathway mutations, and liver metastases which have been associated with immunosuppression. However, studies with novel combinations based on immune checkpoint inhibitors are showing promising activity in MSS colorectal cancer. Here, we review the underlying biological facts that preclude immunotherapy activity, and detail the different immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations evaluated, along with novel immune-based therapies, to overcome innate mechanisms of resistance in MSS colorectal cancer.

Effectiveness and safety of encorafenib-cetuximab in BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer: Confidence study

126

Background: BRAFV600E mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has a poor prognosis. The BEACON trial demonstrated an improvement in tumor response, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) when administering encorafenib-cetuximab (EC) to patients (pts) who progressed after 1 or 2 therapy lines. This study provides a retrospective analysis of the effectiveness and safety of EC in the real-world setting in Spain. Methods: This retrospective analysis included BRAFV600E mCRC pts treated with EC in 2nd line treatment, recruited from March to July 2022. The Co-primary study endpoints included effectiveness based on PFS and OS. Secondary endpoints included sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients before EC initiation, overall response rate (ORR), and safety. Results: From March to July 2022, 81 evaluable pts were included. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics are displayed.A median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 6.0 (4.0-13.0) cycles of encorafenib and 6.0 (4.0-14.5) cycles of cetuximab were administered. Median treatment duration was 4.4 (2.6-7.8) months (m) and 4.4 m (2.8-7.6) respectively. The ORR and disease control rate was 33.8 % (CI 95% 23.4-45.5) and 68.8 (CI 95% 57.3 – 78.9) respectively. One (1.2%) pt achieved complete response At data cut-offwith a 9.7 median follow-up, 50 (61.7%) pts had died, all of them due to disease progression. Median (95% Confidence Interval, CI) OS was 12.6 m (8.0-17.3) and median PFS was 5.0 m (3.8-6.2). The 12-m OS and 12-m PFS rates were 54.6% (95% CI, 43.3-65.9) and 19.9% (10.5-29.3) respectively. Pts with neutrophils/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥3 had worse OS (HR, 1.8 95% CI 1.0-3.2; p < 0.049) and worse PFS (HR, 2.3, 1.4-3.8; p < 0.002). Disease progression (86.7%) was the most frequent cause of treatment discontinuation, followed by unacceptable AEs (3.7%). Eleven pts (13.5%) experienced treatment-related graded 3 or 4 AEs, mainly acne (3.7%). Treatment-related deaths were not reported. Conclusions: This study provides real-world data of BRAFV600E mCRC pts treated with EC combination in routine clinical practice in Spain. EC effectiveness and safety were consistent with the results obtained in clinical trials. [Table: see text]

HER2 testing in colorectal cancer: Concordance analysis between breast and gastric scoring algorithms from the MOUNTAINEER trial

198

Background: HER2 overexpression/amplification (HER2+) occurs in 3%-5% of patients (pts) w/ metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Rates of HER2+ can increase to ~10% in pts w/ RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC tumors. The MOUNTAINEER trial (NCT03043313) evaluated the efficacy and safety of the investigational combination of tucatinib with trastuzumab in pts with HER2+ and RAS wild-type mCRC. Established regional guidelines for mCRC recommend HER2 testing and HER2-directed treatment options; however, there is currently no established best practice for HER2 testing and interpretation in mCRC. Here, we present data from a concordance analysis comparing breast and gastric HER2 testing algorithms in the mCRC setting. Methods: The MOUNTAINEER trial enrolled pts w/ HER2+ mCRC identified using ≥1 method: tissue-based local immunohistochemistry (IHC), in situ hybridization (ISH), and/or next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing. Archival or fresh tumor tissue was submitted to a sponsor-designated central laboratory for confirmatory HER2 testing w/ IHC/FISH per the package insert of the FDA approved assay and scored by both the breast and gastric algorithms for HER2 IHC. A positive result per the breast scoring criteria for IHC requires circumferential membrane staining for HER2, while the gastric criteria allows for circumferential, basolateral, or lateral staining patterns. Results: A total of 114 pts were enrolled with HER2+ tumors per ≥1 local testing methods; 69 pts were HER2+ by NGS, 46 by IHC 3+, and 36 by ISH. Of 105 pts who had tissue available for central HER2 testing w/IHC/FISH, 98 had valid HER2 results; 82/98 (83.7%) of pts had tumors centrally confirmed as HER2+ using both the breast and gastric algorithms. Tissue samples from pts in the MOUNTAINEER trial had 100% concordance between breast and gastric algorithms in HER2 status and 99% concordance in HER2 IHC score. Conclusions: Central pathology testing using both the breast and gastric criteria showed high concordance between these two commonly used algorithms. A high central confirmation rate of local HER2+ results was also observed. These data support the use of either the breast or gastric algorithms to identify HER2+ mCRC tumors until an FDA-approved HER2 assay is available for mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT03043313 . [Table: see text]

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) associated with fruquintinib in the global phase 3, placebo-controlled, double-blind FRESCO-2 study

67

Background: The global phase 3 FRESCO-2 study, (NCT04322539) demonstrated that fruquintinib (F) vs placebo (P) significantly improved OS (HR=0.66 [95% CI: 0.55-0.80]; p<0.001) and PFS (HR=0.32 [95% CI: 0.27-0.39]; p<0.001) in heavily pre-treated patients (pts) with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). F safety profile was consistent with the established monotherapy profile. Here we report the HRQoL and tolerability results. Methods: Pts were randomized 2:1 to F + BSC or P + BSC. EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-5L were assessed at baseline and on Day (D) 1 of each Cycle (C) until treatment discontinuation, and ECOG PS was assessed at baseline, D1 of each C, and D21 of C1 to C3. Least-squares mean (LSM) change from baseline to post-baseline visits and the difference between F and P in QLQ-C30 scale scores (e.g. global health status [GHS]/QoL) and EQ-5D-5L scale scores (e.g. visual analog scale [VAS]) were calculated using mixed model repeated measures approach. For each scale, the appropriate minimally important difference (MID) thresholds were determined to evaluate the improvement or deterioration. Time to deterioration (TTD), defined as worsening from baseline in scale-specific MID or death, was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method, adjusted log-rank test, and stratified Cox PH model. QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-5L analyses were conducted on the ITT population, and ECOG PS was on the safety population. Results: 691 pts were randomized (F: 461 vs P: 230) and 686 pts received study drug (F: 456 vs P: 230). Median treatment Cycles received (range) were 3 (1, 20) for F vs 2 (1, 13) for P. More than 79% of pts on both arms had a baseline and ≥1 post-baseline assessment for QLQ-C30, EQ-5D-5L, and ECOG PS. GHS/QoL was similar between F and P at baseline; the LSM differences between F and P were 1.7 (95% CI: -1.7, 5.0) for C2 and 1.6 (95% CI: -3.2, 6.4) for C3. At C4, <30 P patients were available. The % of patients who remained stable (MID -6.38 to <8.43) or improved (≥8.43) was numerically higher for F vs P (C2: 61.5% vs 57.1%; C3: 56.4% vs 50.9%). Median TTD was 2.1 months in F and 1.8 months in P (HR=0.9; 95% CI: 0.7-1.0; P=0.098). EQ-5D VAS was similar between F and P at baseline; the LSM differences between F and P were 0.6 (95% CI: -2.3, 3.5) for C2 and 1.4 (95% CI: -2.8, 5.6) for C3. The % of patients who remained stable (MID -7 to <7) or improved (≥7) was similar for F and P (C2: 64.6% vs 58.3%; C3: 64.2% vs 64.8%). Median TTD was 2.6 months in F and 1.9 months in P (HR=0.8; 95% CI: 0.6-0.9; P=0.001). The % of patients with ≥1-point increase from baseline in ECOG PS was 52.1% in F vs 54.0% in P. Conclusions: HRQoL is not negatively impacted by treatment with F. TTD in health utility instrument EQ-5D is improved for patients receiving F. These results, along with improved OS and PFS and favorable toxicity profile, further support F as a potential new treatment option for patients with refractory mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT04322539 .

A phase Ia/b first-in-human, open-label, multicenter study of BI 905711, a bispecific TRAILR2 agonist, in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancers

115

Background: BI 905711 is a tetravalent bispecific antibody that cross-links TRAILR2 with CDH17. This cross-linking drives CDH17-dependent TRAILR2 oligomerization, leading to caspase activation and eventual apoptosis, inhibiting tumor growth in preclinical models of GI cancer. Methods: This Phase Ia/b study of BI 905711 in patients (pts) with advanced GI cancers (NCT04137289) aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) based on the proportion of pts with dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and explore preliminary antitumor activity. In Phase Ia, pts received BI 905711 every 14 days. One pt with colorectal cancer (CRC) was enrolled at each of the 2 lowest dose levels (0.02/0.06 mg/kg) and 4 pts with CRC were enrolled at each subsequent level (0.2/0.6/1.2/2.4/3.6/4.8 mg/kg). Up to 4 pts with non-CRC GI cancers were included at the dose level below the CRC cohort. Dose escalation was guided by a Bayesian logistic regression model. Results: As of 01 August 2022, 48 pts (CRC: n = 26; non-CRC: n = 22, including 13 with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [PDAC]) had received BI 905711 (dose range 0.02–4.8 mg/kg); pts had a median age of 61 years (range 27–78) and had received a median of 3 (range 1–11) prior lines of treatment. No DLTs were observed and the MTD was not reached. 41 pts had AEs (grade [G] 3–5: 14 pts; serious: 13 pts). 17 pts had treatment-related AEs (TRAEs); 4 TRAEs were G3: AST increased (2 pts), fatigue and ALT increased (1 pt each). 1 pt had serious TRAEs: G2 decreased appetite and G3 fatigue. 2 pts had G1/2 infusion-related reactions that resolved and did not prevent resumption of treatment. PD biomarker modulation on the level of plasma caspase-3/7 activity was most common at 0.6 mg/kg (4/7 pts) or 1.2 mg/kg (2/6 pts). 13 pts achieved stable disease (SD) and 8 pts were progression-free for ≥4 months (PFS4). In pts with CRC, 6 pts achieved SD and 3 had PFS4. Among non-CRC pts, 7 pts achieved SD (PDAC: n = 6) and 5 had PFS4 (PDAC: n = 4). Median duration of treatment was 30.5 days (range 15–246) overall and 71 days (range 15–211) in the 0.6 mg/kg group (n = 8, predicted therapeutic dose; of whom 3 pts had PFS4: CRC: n = 1/4 [all CDH17+]; non-CRC: n = 2/4). Conclusions: In heavily pretreated pts, BI 905711 was associated with a tolerable safety profile and early signs of disease control. BI 905711 will be further assessed in Phase Ib in 4 dose groups: 0.6/1.2/2.4 mg/kg every 14 days, and 0.6 mg/kg weekly. Clinical trial information: NCT04137289 .

Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for third-line treatment of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: The phase 3 randomized SUNLIGHT study

4

Background: Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab (Bev) demonstrated promising efficacy in a randomized phase 2 trial of heavily pretreated patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). SUNLIGHT was conducted to confirm these findings. Methods: The global phase 3 SUNLIGHT study enrolled pts aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed mCRC, ECOG PS 0/1, and treated with 1-2 prior chemotherapy regimens in an advanced setting, including fluoropyrimidines, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody (if medically considered) and/or anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody for RAS wild-type tumors. Pts were randomised (1:1) to receive FTD/TPI (35 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–5 and 8–12 of each 28-day cycle) alone or combined with Bev (5 mg/kg on days 1 and 15). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results: Between Nov 2020 and Feb 2022, 492 pts were randomised to receive FTD/TPI + Bev (n = 246) or FTD/TPI (n = 246). Baseline characteristics were balanced between arms. FTD/TPI + Bev significantly extended OS over FTD/TPI, median OS was 10.8 months vs 7.5 months, respectively (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.49, 0.77; P< 0.001). OS rates at 12 months were 43% in the FTD/TPI + Bev arm and 30% in the FTD/TPI arm. Median progression-free survival was 5.6 months in the FTD/TPI + Bev arm and 2.4 months in the FTD/TPI arm (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.36,0.54; P< 0.001). Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were not significantly increased in the FTD/TPI + Bev arm vs the FDT/TPI arm (72.4% vs 69.5%). No new safety signals were noted. Conclusions: FTD/TPI + Bev provided a statistically significant and a clinically meaningful 3.3-month improvement in OS, extending mOS up to 10.8 months, with a 39% reduction in the HR of death in pts with refractory mCRC and with a predictable and acceptable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT04737187 .

Impact of Lynch syndrome, BRAFV600E, and RAS mutations on outcomes in MSI/dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI): Analysis of combined international cohorts

171

Background: ICI have demonstrated efficacy in patients (pts) with MSI/dMMR mCRC . Lynch (LS) vs sporadic (Sp) status, BRAFV600E and RAS mutations (mt) are known factors of clinical and molecular heterogeneity in this population. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of these parameters in ICI-treated MSI mCRC pts. Methods: Pts are drawn from international cohorts (France, Italy, Spain, and USA). Pts were considered to have cancer linked to LS only in case of determined germline mutation and Sp in case of loss of MLH1/PMS2 protein expression associated with BRAF V600E mutation and/or hypermethylation of MLH1 promoter, or in case of biallelic somatic mutations of MMR genes. Survival analyses: progression-free survival (PFS) per iRECIST criteria and overall survival (OS) were adjusted on prognostic modifiers, selected on unadjusted analysis (p < 0.2) in case of limited number of events. Results: On the 466 pts included, 112 (24%) received ICI in first line, 305 (65%) received anti-PD1 alone, 161 (35%) anti-PD1 plus anti-CTLA4, 129 (29%) had BRAFV600Emt and 153 (34%) RASmt. Median follow-up was 24.0 months. In adjusted analysis of the whole population (n=466; 186 PFS events and 143 OS events), no association with PFS and OS was observed for BRAFV600E mt (PFS HR 1.20 [0.80 to 1.79], p=0.372; OS HR 1.06 [0.66 to 1.70], p= 0.811) and RASmt (PFS HR 0.93 [0.64 to 1.36], p= 0.712; OS HR 0.75 [0.48 to 1.17] p= 0.202). Adjusting factors were age, ECOG status, number of prior chemotherapies, treatment type (bi vs monotherapy), sidness (right vs left + rectum), primary tumor surgery. Concerning the population with determined Lynch status (n= 242; 83 PFS events and 54 OS events), PFS results are displayed. The analysis of impact of LS was not adjusted on BRAFV600E mutational status due to collinearity. In adjusted analysis, LS improved PFS compared with Sp (HR = 0.49, 95%CI (0.25 to 0.96), p = 0.036). Adjusted HR for OS was 0.56 without reaching significance 95%CI (0.25 to 1.22), p = 0.143. Conclusions: In this analysis of ICI-treated MSI/dMMR mCRC pts, RAS/BRAFV600E mutations are not associated with survival while Lynch syndrome pts demonstrated improved PFS. [Table: see text]

Identification and external validation of clinical-molecular features to predict benefit from oxaliplatin reintroduction/rechallenge in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

153

Background: Oxaliplatin is a backbone cytotoxic treatment for mCRC patients, particularly in the front-line setting. In the refractory disease, current treatment options are scarce and with limited efficacy. Several retrospective studies have explored the efficacy of oxaliplatin reintroduction/rechallenge (OxRe) in this scenario. However, more evidence is still needed to determine which patients do benefit from this treatment strategy. Methods: The discovery cohort includes all patients treated with oxaliplatin in a third- or fourth-line setting at VHIO between 2015 and 2021 (N = 102). Results were externally validated in a real-world cohort of patients treated at community oncology practices from Oncoclínicas Group in Brazil (N = 157). We analyzed the impact of clinical-molecular features in uni- and multivariable prognostic models in terms of median progression free survival (mPFS) (discovery cohort) and median time to treatment discontinuation (mTTD) (validation cohort). For both cohorts separately, data was extracted from EHRs in structured formats (demographics, tumor characteristics, pharmacy records) and combined with elements from unstructured sources (physician notes on progression and survival status) using technology-based abstraction techniques. Results: In the discovery cohort, 102 out of 735 mCRC patients (13,9%) were eligible. Median oxaliplatin-free interval (from Oxl stop to OxRe) was 17 months (CI95% 13.0-23.2). In OxRe setting, mPFS was 4.0 months (CI95% 3.29-5.03). In PFS multivariate analysis, determinants of favorable outcome were left tumor location (p = 0.01), oxaliplatin-free interval (p = 0.03), administration of Bev in refractory setting (p = 0.001), and not receiving Bev in first-line treatment (p = 0.008). Overall, 27% of all patients had a mPFS > 6 months with OxRe. In the validation cohort, out of 4,317 patients with mCRC, 157 (4%) were treated with OxRe. Median oxaliplatin-free interval was 15 months. Median time to treatment discontinuation (mTTD) of the OxRe was 3.4 months (CI95% 2.8-4.2). In multivariable model, the only independent prognostic factor was addition of Bev to OxRe (p = 0.036). Interestingly, 31% of all patients had mTTD > 6 months, largely enriched (65%) in patients with first Bev exposure at the time of OxRe. Conclusions: This study suggests that in refractory mCRC patients re-exposed to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, the addition of Bev is associated with improved outcomes. One-third of the patients are long-term responders (PFS/TTD > 6 months), reinforcing the value of this strategy in selected populations and the relevance of anti-angiogenic agents in refractory mCRC.

BREAKWATER safety lead-in (SLI): Encorafenib (E) + cetuximab (C) + chemotherapy for BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

119

Background: Based on the phase 3 BEACON study (NCT02928224), BRAF inhibitor (i) encorafenib (E) + EGFRi cetuximab (C) was approved for the treatment (tx) of previously treated patients (pts) with BRAFV600E mCRC, with mPFS of 4.3 months (mo) and ORR of 19.5%. In the phase 2 ANCHOR study (NCT03693170), mPFS was 5.8 mo and ORR was 48% for 1L EC + binimetinib in BRAFV600E mCRC. To further assess 1L approaches, the ongoing phase 3 BREAKWATER study (NCT04607421) is evaluating EC ± chemotherapy vs standard-of-care chemotherapy in BRAFV600E mCRC. Here, we present updated safety and antitumor activity data as well as biomarker data from the BREAKWATER SLI. Methods: Inclusion criteria for the SLI were BRAFV600E mCRC (blood or tumor tissue), ≤1 prior systemic tx for mCRC, and ECOG PS 0/1. Pts previously treated with BRAFi/EGFRi or both oxaliplatin and irinotecan were excluded. Pts received E 300 mg daily + C 500 mg/m2 every 2 weeks (Q2W) + either mFOLFOX6 Q2W (n=27) or FOLFIRI Q2W (n=30) in 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was frequency of dose-limiting toxicities. Secondary endpoints included safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity. Exploratory endpoints included evaluation of plasma (circulating tumor DNA [ctDNA] genomic profiling) and tumor tissue (molecular profiling) biomarkers. Updated results from the BREAKWATER SLI will be presented, including overall safety and tolerability and antitumor activity. Biomarker data, including changes from baseline in BRAFV600E ctDNA following treatment (Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 15 and Cycle 7 Day 1) and MSI status of pts, will also be presented. Expected conclusions will be included in the final abstract. Clinical trial information: NCT04607421 .

A phase 1b/2, open-label study of amivantamab monotherapy or in combination with standard-of-care chemotherapy in participants with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer

TPS279

Background: Amivantamab, a fully human EGFR and MET bispecific antibody, has shown clinical activity against tumors with primary activating EGFR mutations, EGFR resistance mutations, or MET pathway activation. Amivantamab has demonstrated activity in both EGFR- and MET-driven non-small cell lung cancer, with preclinical evidence demonstrating its ability to recruit immune effector cells. While two anti-EGFR antibodies are incorporated as part of the standard of care (SoC) for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients, MET is highly expressed or amplified in subsets of mCRC and additionally plays a role in mediating resistance to anti-EGFR therapies; therefore, amivantamab may provide benefit in this setting. Methods: This open-label, multicenter, global Ph1b/2 study will assess the safety and anti-tumor activity of amivantamab as a monotherapy and characterize the safety and tolerability of amivantamab in addition to SoC chemotherapy in KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and EGFR ectodomain wild type participants with advanced or metastatic CRC. The Ph2 amivantamab monotherapy Cohorts A and B will assess the anti-tumor activity in participants with left-sided CRC who have progressed on or after SoC fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based chemotherapy and an anti-VEGF treatment, without (Cohort A) or with (Cohort B) prior exposure to anti-EGFR treatment. The Ph2 amivantamab monotherapy Cohort C will assess the antitumor activity in participants with right-sided CRC who have progressed on or after SoC fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based chemotherapy and an anti-VEGF treatment, with or without an anti-EGFR treatment. The Ph1b dose confirmation cohorts (Ph1b-D and Ph1b-E) will assess the safety and confirm the recommended Ph2 combination dose (RP2CD) of amivantamab in addition to SoC chemotherapy regimens (mFOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI). Upon confirmation of the RP2CD, the Ph2 Cohorts D and E, which are distinct cohorts from Ph1b-D or Ph1b-E, will further characterize the safety, tolerability, and preliminary anti-tumor activity of amivantamab in addition to SoC mFOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI in mCRC patients who have progressed after front-line therapy. The primary objectives are to assess the anti-tumor activity of amivantamab as a monotherapy and characterize the safety of amivantamab when added to SoC chemotherapy in participants with mCRC (Ph2 cohorts), as well as to assess the RP2CD of amivantamab when added to SoC chemotherapy (Ph1b). The key secondary objectives are to characterize the safety of amivantamab as a monotherapy and to assess the anti-tumor activity of amivantamab when added to SoC chemotherapy in participants with mCRC. This study is currently enrolling (NCT05379595) as of August 2022 in 12 countries, with goal enrollment of 225 participants. Clinical trial information: NCT05379595 .

Liquid Biopsy Detects Early Molecular Response and Predicts Benefit to First-Line Chemotherapy plus Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: PLATFORM-B Study

PURPOSE

Chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR is standard first-line therapy in RAS wild-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but biomarkers of early response are clinically needed. We aimed to define the utility of ctDNA to assess early response in patients with mCRC receiving first-line anti-EGFR therapy.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Prospective multicentric study of tissue patients with RAS wt mCRC treated with first-line chemotherapy plus cetuximab undergoing sequential liquid biopsies. Baseline and early (C3) ctDNA were analyzed by NGS. Trunk mutations were assessed as surrogate marker of total tumor burden. RAS/BRAF/MEK/EGFR-ECD were considered mutations of resistance. ctDNA results were correlated with clinical outcome.

RESULTS

One hundred patients were included. ctDNA was detected in 72% of patients at baseline and 34% at C3. Decrease in ctDNA trunk mutations correlated with progression-free survival (PFS; HR, 0.23; P = 0.001). RAS/BRAF were the only resistant mutations detected at C3. An increase in the relative fraction of RAS/BRAF at C3 was followed by an expansion of the RAS clone until PD, and was associated with shorter PFS (HR, 10.5; P < 0.001). The best predictor of response was the combined analysis of trunk and resistant mutations at C3. Accordingly, patients with "early molecular response" (decrease in trunk and decrease in resistant mutations) had better response (77.5% vs. 25%, P = 0.008) and longer PFS (HR, 0.18; P < 0.001) compared with patients with "early molecular progression" (increase in trunk and/or increase in resistant mutations).

CONCLUSIONS

ctDNA detects early molecular response and predicts benefit to chemotherapy plus cetuximab. A comprehensive NGS-based approach is recommended to integrate information on total disease burden and resistant mutations. See related commentary by Eluri et al., p. 302.

Current professional standing of young medical oncologists in Spain: a nationwide survey by the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology + MIR section

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of knowledge about the career paths and employment situation of young medical oncologists. The aim of our study was to evaluate the current professional standing of these professionals in Spain.

METHODS

The Spanish Society of Medical Oncology + MIR section conducted a national online survey in May 2021 of young medical oncology consultants (< 6 years of expertise) and final year medical oncology residents.

RESULTS

A total of 162 responses were eligible for analysis and included participants from 16 autonomous communities; 64% were women, 80% were consultants, and 20% were residents. More than half of the participants performed routine healthcare activity and only 7% research activity. Almost three quarters (73%) were subspecialized in a main area of interest and almost half of these chose this area because it was the only option available after residency. Half of the respondents (51%) considered working abroad and 81% believed the professional standing in Spain was worse than in other countries. After finishing their residency, only 22 were offered a job at their training hospital. Just 16% of participants had a permanent employment contract and 87% were concerned (score of ≥ 5 on a scale of 1-10) about their job stability. In addition, one quarter of the participants in our study showed an interest in increasing their research activity.

CONCLUSIONS

The choice of subspecialty in medical oncology may depend on job opportunities after residency rather than personal interest. The abundance of temporary contracts may have influenced the job stability concerns observed. Future mentoring strategies should engage in building a long-term career path for young medical oncologists.

A path to translation: How 3D patient tumor avatars enable next generation precision oncology

3D patient tumor avatars (3D-PTAs) hold promise for next-generation precision medicine. Here, we describe the benefits and challenges of 3D-PTA technologies and necessary future steps to realize their potential for clinical decision making. 3D-PTAs require standardization criteria and prospective trials to establish clinical benefits. Innovative trial designs that combine omics and 3D-PTA readouts may lead to more accurate clinical predictors, and an integrated platform that combines diagnostic and therapeutic development will accelerate new treatments for patients with refractory disease.

RNF43 mutations predict response to anti-BRAF/EGFR combinatory therapies in BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer

Anti-BRAF/EGFR therapy was recently approved for the treatment of metastatic BRAF^V600E colorectal cancer (mCRC^BRAF-V600E). However, a large fraction of patients do not respond, underscoring the need to identify molecular determinants of treatment response. Using whole-exome sequencing in a discovery cohort of patients with mCRC^BRAF-V600E treated with anti-BRAF/EGFR therapy, we found that inactivating mutations in RNF43, a negative regulator of WNT, predict improved response rates and survival outcomes in patients with microsatellite-stable (MSS) tumors. Analysis of an independent validation cohort confirmed the relevance of RNF43 mutations to predicting clinical benefit (72.7% versus 30.8%; P = 0.03), as well as longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio (HR), 0.30; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.12–0.75; P = 0.01) and overall survival (HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.10–0.71; P = 0.008), in patients with MSS-RNF43^mutated versus MSS-RNF43^wild-type tumors. Microsatellite-instable tumors invariably carried a wild-type-like RNF43 genotype encoding p.G659fs and presented an intermediate response profile. We found no association of RNF43 mutations with patient outcomes in a control cohort of patients with MSS-mCRC^BRAF-V600E tumors not exposed to anti-BRAF targeted therapies. Overall, our findings suggest a cross-talk between the MAPK and WNT pathways that may modulate the antitumor activity of anti-BRAF/EGFR therapy and uncover predictive biomarkers to optimize the clinical management of these patients.

The presence of inactivating mutations in RNF43, a negative regulator of WNT, in tumor cells predicts improved response rates and survival outcomes in patients with metastatic BRAF^V600E colorectal cancer treated with anti-BRAF/EGFR therapy.

Two phase I studies of BI 836880, a vascular endothelial growth factor/angiopoietin-2 inhibitor, administered once every 3 weeks or once weekly in patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

BI 836880 is a humanized bispecific nanobody® that inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor and angiopoietin-2. Here, we report results from two phase I, nonrandomized, dose-escalation studies (NCT02674152 and NCT02689505; funded by Boehringer Ingelheim) evaluating BI 836880 in patients with confirmed locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors, refractory to standard therapy, or for which standard therapy was ineffective.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients aged ≥18 years, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 and adequate organ function received escalating intravenous doses of BI 836880 once every 3 weeks (Q3W; Study 1336.1) or once weekly (QW; Study 1336.6). Primary objectives were maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose of BI 836880, based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during the first cycle.

RESULTS

Patients received one of five dosages of 40-1000 mg Q3W (29 patients) or 40-240 mg QW (24 patients). One DLT occurred with Q3W treatment [Grade (G) 3 pulmonary embolism (1000 mg)]. Five DLTs occurred in four patients treated QW [G2 proteinuria (120 mg); G3 hypertension (180 mg); G3 proteinuria and G3 hypertension (240 mg); and G4 respiratory distress (240 mg)]. All patients experienced adverse events, most commonly hypertension with Q3W treatment (89.7%; G3 41.4%), and asthenia with QW treatment (62.5%). Two patients treated Q3W (both 1000 mg) and three patients treated QW (120 mg, 2 patients; 180 mg, 1 patient) experienced partial response.

CONCLUSIONS

The MTD of BI 836880 was 720 mg Q3W and 180 mg QW. BI 836880 was generally manageable and demonstrated preliminary efficacy.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.govNCT02674152; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02674152 and NCT02689505; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02689505.

Encorafenib plus cetuximab for the treatment of BRAF-V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer

B-type RAF (BRAF)-V600E mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have been described in up to 12% of the patients. This mutation confers a bad prognostic and poor response with standard chemotherapy. Unlike the scenario for BRAF mutant melanoma, successful BRAF blockade in mCRC has emerged as a complex path, primarily due to the complex underlying biology of mCRC. The BEACON trial has reshaped the therapeutic landscape of BRAF mCRC demonstrating the benefit of the BRAF inhibitor encorafenib in combination with the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor cetuximab. This paper aims to review the main features of BRAF mCRC as well as to review the development of targeted therapy and biomarkers in this specific population. Finally, a deep insight into the underlying biology and molecular classification of BRAF-V600E mCRC has also been performed. The words 'BRAF-V600E mutation', 'colorectal cancer', 'BRAF inhibitors', 'consensus molecular subtypes', 'encorafenib', and 'cetuximab' were used to identify the clinical trials from phase I to phase III related to the development of BRAF inhibitors in this population. A deep search among international meetings (American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society of Medical Oncology) has been performed to incorporate the last trials presented. BRAF-V600E mCRC is a challenging disease, mostly because of its molecular biology. The BEACON trial has been the most important therapeutic change in the last decade. Nevertheless, new information regarding biomarkers or novel combinations including BRAF inhibitors plus immune checkpoint inhibitors are also promising.

Prognostic impact of performance status on the outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibition strategies in patients with dMMR/MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors yielded unprecedented outcomes in patients with mismatch repair deficient/ microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but clinical decision-making in this rapidly evolving treatment landscape is challenging. Since performance status (PS) represents a well-established prognostic factor in clinical practice, we investigated whether worse PS, overall or related to either patients' frailty or high tumour burden, could affect the outcomes in this whole patients' population and according to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment type.

METHODS

We conducted a global study at Tertiary Cancer Centres and collected data of patients with dMMR/MSI-H mCRC treated with anti- programmed-death (ligand)-1 (PD(L)-1) monotherapy or anti-PD-1/anti- cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 combination.

RESULTS

The cohort included 502 patients. At a median follow-up of 31.2 months, worse PFS and OS were reported in patients with patient-related PS ≥ 1 (adjusted-HRs: 1.73, 95%CI: 1.06-2.83, p = 0.004 and 2.06, 95%CI: 1.13-3.74, p = 0.001, respectively) and cancer-related PS ≥ 1 (adjusted-HRs: 1.61, 95%CI: 1.19-2.17, p = 0.004 and 1.87, 95%CI: 1.32-2.66, p = 0.001, respectively). Anti-PD-1/anti- cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 combination did not provide significantly better survival compared to anti-PD(L)-1 monotherapy in PS 0 subgroup (PFS HR = 0.62, 95%CI: 0.37-1.02, p = 0.059; OS HR = 0.59, 95%CI: 0.32-1.11, p = 0.100) and in patient-related PS ≥ 1 (PFS HR 0.93, 95%CI: 0.31-2.83, p = 0.899; OS HR 1.22, 95%CI: 0.34-4.37, p = 0.760), but the difference was significant and clinically meaningful in the subgroup with cancer-related PS ≥ 1 (PFS HR = 0.32, 95%CI: 0.19-0.53, p < 0.001; OS HR = 0.26, 95%CI: 0.14-0.48, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with dMMR/MSI-H mCRC, an extensive evaluation of clinical variables including PS may be implemented in the therapy decision-making.

The need to develop the career pathway in oncology as an opportunity to improve the satisfaction of young oncologists in Spain: A national survey by the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) + mir section

11038

Background: A long-term planning of the oncologists’ career path is essential to approach the continuous changes in the oncology field given the need of further subspecialization after the training period. Our aim is to evaluate the current professional development of young medical oncologists in Spain and seek improvement strategies to enhance their careers in order to guarantee commitment with research and improve in patient care and outcomes. Methods: The SEOM +MIR Section launched a national online survey in May 2021 aimed at young medical oncology consultants (<6 years of experience) and last year medical oncology residents. Spanish professionals were invited to participate via email through the SEOM database. A descriptive analysis was performed using R software v4.1.2. Results: A total of 162 responses were eligible. 103 (64%) were women. 129 (80%) were consultants and 33 (20%) were residents. 92 (68%) performed standard clinical care and 11 (7%) research activity. 118 (73%) were subspecialized in a main area of interest and almost half of them, 70 (59%), chose it because it was the only option available after finishing residency. 87 (54%) had considered different employment opportunities other than standard clinical care and 38 (23%) showed an interest in enhancing their research activity. 141 (87%) showed relevant concern about their employment stability (table attached). 82 (51%) had considered working abroad: 33 (44%) outside European Union. The main reasons were: 132 (81%) believed the professional standing in Spain was worse than other countries, 41 (25%) thought it might increase their professional development and 33 (20%) argued for better salary conditions abroad. Among them, 21 (13%) had signed at least 4 contracts and 66 (41%) had ≥5 employment contracts in the last 5 years. 27% of respondents indicated that the figure of the boss had been the most contributing professional in their professional career. The mentor (20%) and the tutor (18%) also stand out as relevant figures in terms of professional development. Up to 27% of the sample refers not to have obtained any help from the figures mentioned. Conclusions: An absence of engagement in the long-term career paths of young medical oncologists in Spain was observed. Research is not defined in the current early professional life. Furthermore, there is a lack of contractual quality and planning for the entry into the labour market of newly trained oncologists. The lack of such a career pathway has consequences that encourage the search for employment opportunities different from clinical care and in other countries. [Table: see text]

Molecular characterization and subsequent treatments after encorafenib-cetuximab +/- binimetinib in BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer

3562

Background: The BRAF-V600E mutation confers poor prognosis in patients with mCRC. E-C+/-B improve clinical outcomes compared with standard of care. Data about subsequent treatment lines and the impact of NGS in the treatment choice after the BRAF targeted treatment are still limited. We have analyzed the global overall survival (OS) and the impact of NGS to guide subsequent treatments (approved targeted therapies (TT) or clinical trials (CT)) after E-C+/-B. Methods: Patients who had received E-C+/-B were included. Clinical data was collected prospectively. Tissue NGS was performed prospectively and retrospectively using an in-house NGS panel (VHIO-300). Subsequent treatments’ clinical outcomes were described. Percentage of patients who received TT or CT based on NGS results is reported. Clinical outcomes were calculated using survival Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: From 2017 to 2021, 59 patients with refractory mCRC received E-C+/-B at our institution. 50 patients have already progressed to the BRAF inhibitor combination and 9 patients remain on BRAF inhibitor treatment. Tumor tissue for NGS testing before BRAF inhibitor treatment was available in 70% of patients (41/59). BRAF-V600E mutation was confirmed in tissue using ddPCR in all patients. The most frequent alterations were: BRAF-V600E 93%, TP53 64%, RNF43 30%, APC 20%, PIK3CA 14%, NOTCH1/2 9%, RANBP2 8%, PTEN 8%, MET amplification 5%. MSI incidence was 10%, 2 out of 6 (33%) received subsequent immunotherapy. After the BRAF inhibitor combination, 23 patients (38%) did not receive subsequent treatment (clinical deterioration or death). The 27 remaining patients (62%) received 41 subsequent treatments (37% of them were TT or CT). Median subsequent lines after the BRAF inhibitor combination were 1 (0-3). NGS led to targeted therapy in 20% of the patients: BRAF inhibitors combos (20%), microtubule inhibitors (13%), antiPD1 (13%), NOTCH inhibitors (6%), and MET inhibitor (6%). ORR among patients who received matched TT or CT was 6% and DCR (CR+PR+SD) was 47%. The median OS after the BRAF inhibitor was 3.8 months; 10.1 months vs 3.0 months (HR 0.43 (95%CI 0.2-0.95), p = 0.04) for those patients who received TT or CT vs patients who did not receive TT or CT. When MSI patients were excluded mOS was 5.2 vs 3.0 months (HR 0.61 (95%CI 0.27-1.37), p = 0.23) respectively. There were no differences in terms of OS regarding the number of previous lines (0-1 vs 2-3, HR 0.75 (95%CI 0.4-1.42), p = 0.37) or with the BRAF inhibitor regimen used (E-C vs E-C-B) (HR 0.84, (95%CI 0.44-1.6), p = 0.61) Conclusions: This study suggests that patients with BRAF-V600E mutant mCRC could have benefit when treated with TT and/or in CT after a BRAF inhibitor-based therapy, including immunotherapy. Genomic analysis might help to guide subsequent treatments. Because of molecular heterogeneity, these patients should be discussed in Molecular Tumor Boards.

Impact of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) mutant allele fraction in response to anti-angiogenic therapy in RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Clinical data in the first-line setting and correlation in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models

3560

Background: Currently, there are no well-established biomarkers available to select mCRC patients (pts) who will benefit most from antiangiogenic therapy. RAS mutant (mt) allele fraction in plasma (plMAF) is an independent prognostic factor in mCRC. Preliminary data from our group suggests the possible predictive role of plMAF in RAS mt pts treated with 1st line chemotherapy (ct) +/- bevacizumab (bev). Methods: Data prospectively/retrospectively collected from RASmt mCRC pts who received 1st line ct+/-bev treatment in our center, selecting the subset of pts with plMAF sample evaluable with digital PCR (BEAMing) at baseline. Pts were stratified as high (≥ 5.8%) or low ( < 5.8%) plMAF, based on a previously established prognostic cutoff (Elez et al, Mol Onc 2019). We investigated the associations between clinic-pathological variables, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) stratified by plMAF RAS levels using Cox regression models. OS and PFS were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. Murine PDX were developed from mCRC pts including models from patients with KRASG12/G13 mutations to explore recapitulation of the clinical findings. Results: From October ‘17 to December ‘21, 102 basal plasma samples were analyzed by BEAMing. 47 pts (46%) were classified as high, 39 pts (38%) as low, and 16 (16%) as no-mt detected by BEAMing (non-shedding). OS was significant longer in low plMAF pts than in high plMAF pts (median OS 15.9 vs 37.1 months (mo); HR 0.43; p = 0.001). In high plMAF pts, a trend towards a better PFS was observed in those pts treated with ct+bev compared to ct alone (median 9.4 vs 6.1 mo; HR 0.6; p = 0.18). No differences were observed in low plMAF pts treated with ct +/- bev (median 14.5 vs 14.9 mo; HR 1.2; p = 0.58). Results were not modified when adjusted by the presence of liver metastases. The multivariate PFS model showed no association between RAS plMAF and clinicopathological variables, except for treatment benefit with ct+bev and better outcomes in pts with resectable liver metastases. Interestingly, human ctDNA in one murine PDX model from non-shedding pt was not detectable, whereas human ctDNA was present in another PDX model with a plMAF of 36.2%. Conclusions: This study suggests that plMAF could be a promising predictive biomarker of response to bev in 1st line RASmt mCRC, but more pts need to be analyzed to confirm this effect. Our results confirm the prognostic role of RASmt plMAF in mCRC. plMAF could partially depend on tumor cell shedding degree and characteristics on the tumor vasculature architecture, this is being investigated in ongoing imaging studies and PDX models. These models will also help to understand the biology behind tumor response to bev and its connection with ctDNA shedding.

Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer (KEYNOTE-177): final analysis of a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

Pembrolizumab has shown improved progression-free survival versus chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer. However, the treatment's effect on overall survival in this cohort of patients was unknown. Here, we present the final overall survival analysis of the KEYNOTE-177 study.

METHODS

This randomised, open-label, phase 3 study was done in 193 academic medical centres and hospitals in 23 countries. We recruited patients aged at least 18 years, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and who had previously untreated microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) in blocks of four using an interactive voice response system or integrated web response system to intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks or to the investigator's choice of intravenous mFOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1, leucovorin 400 mg/m2 on day 1, and fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 bolus on day 1 followed by a continuous infusion of 1200 mg/m2 per day for 2 days on days 1-2) or intravenous FOLFIRI (irinotecan 180 mg/m2 on day 1, leucovorin 400 mg/m2 on day 1, and fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 bolus on day 1 followed by a continuous infusion of 1200 mg/m2 per day for 2 days on days 1-2), every 2 weeks with or without intravenous bevacizumab 5 mg/kg every 2 weeks or intravenous weekly cetuximab (first dose 400 mg/m2, then 250 mg/m2 for every subsequent dose). Patients receiving chemotherapy could cross over to pembrolizumab for up to 35 treatment cycles after progression. The co-primary endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. KEYNOTE-177 is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02563002, and is no longer enrolling patients.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 11, 2016, and Feb 19, 2018, 852 patients were screened, of whom 307 (36%) were randomly assigned to pembrolizumab (n=153) or chemotherapy (n=154). 93 (60%) patients crossed over from chemotherapy to anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 therapy (56 patients to on-study pembrolizumab and 37 patients to off-study therapy). At final analysis (median follow-up of 44·5 months [IQR 39·7-49·8]), median overall survival was not reached (NR; 95% CI 49·2-NR) with pembrolizumab vs 36·7 months (27·6-NR) with chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0·74; 95% CI 0·53-1·03; p=0·036). Superiority of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for overall survival was not demonstrated because the prespecified α of 0·025 needed for statistical significance was not achieved. At this updated analysis, median progression-free survival was 16·5 months (95% CI 5·4-38·1) with pembrolizumab versus 8·2 months (6·1-10·2) with chemotherapy (HR 0·59, 95% CI 0·45-0·79). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse occurred in 33 (22%) of 153 patients in the pembrolizumab group versus 95 (66%) of 143 patients in the chemotherapy group. Common adverse events of grade 3 or worse that were attributed to pembrolizumab were increased alanine aminotransferase, colitis, diarrhoea, and fatigue in three (2%) patients each, and those attributed to chemotherapy were decreased neutrophil count (in 24 [17%] patients), neutropenia (22 [15%]), diarrhoea (14 [10%]), and fatigue (13 [9%]). Serious adverse events attributed to study treatment occurred in 25 (16%) patients in the pembrolizumab group and in 41 (29%) patients in the chemotherapy group. No deaths attributed to pembrolizumab occurred; one death due to intestinal perforation was attributed to chemotherapy.

INTERPRETATION

In this updated analysis, although pembrolizumab continued to show durable antitumour activity and fewer treatment-related adverse events compared with chemotherapy, there was no significant difference in overall survival between the two treatment groups. These findings support pembrolizumab as an efficacious first-line therapy in patients with microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer.

FUNDING

MSD.

Ongoing and evolving clinical trials enhancing future colorectal cancer treatment strategies

INTRODUCTION

Molecular profiling has led to significantly longer survival in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Clinical guidelines recommend testing for KRAS/NRAS, BRAF and MSI status and over the last few years several promising new biomarkers have also been identified. Circulating tumor DNA has reshaped the prognosis of localized CRC. These genomic findings can guide treatment management to improve clinical outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

Preclinical and clinical data over the last decade were reviewed for known and novel biomarkers with clinical implications in refractory and metastatic CRC. In the localized stage, al clinical trials involving new approaches such as liquid biopsy or neoadjuvant immunotherapy are also discussed. Molecular alterations and targeted agents are described, and data from completed and ongoing studies with targeted therapy and immunotherapies are presented.

EXPERT OPINION

The implementation of liquid biopsies in the localized CRC setting has reshaped management of this disease. The expanded use of biomarkers to guide the treatment of patients with CRC has revealed a level of complexity arising from interactions between different biomarkers. Prevalence of most established targetable biomarkers is low, however the number of identified biomarkers in CRC is increasing. Thus, metastatic CRC may ultimately be considered an umbrella diagnosis encompassing numerous rare disease subtypes.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd; DS-8201) in patients (pts) with HER2-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Final results from a phase 2, multicenter, open-label study (DESTINY-CRC01)

119

Background: T-DXd is an antibody-drug conjugate of a humanized anti-HER2 antibody bound to a topoisomerase I inhibitor by a cleavable linker. The primary analysis of DESTINY-CRC01 (DS8201-A-J203; NCT03384940), a phase 2, open-label, multicenter study of T-DXd in pts with HER2-expressing mCRC showed promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile (cohort A median follow-up [FU], 27.1 weeks; Siena S, ASCO 2020). We present updated longer-term efficacy and safety data. Methods: Pts had centrally confirmed HER2-expressing, RAS wild-type mCRC that progressed after ≥2 prior regimens. 6.4 mg/kg of T-DXd was administered every 3 weeks (Q3W) in 3 cohorts (A: HER2 IHC3+ or IHC2+/ISH+; B: IHC2+/ISH−; C: IHC1+). The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by independent central review in cohort A. Secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR; CR + PR + SD), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: At data cutoff (Dec 28, 2020), 86 pts (A, 53; B, 15; C, 18) received T-DXd. Median age was 58.5 y (range, 27-79), 53.5% were male, and 90.7% had left colon or rectum cancer. Median prior regimens for metastatic disease was 4 (range, 2-11). All pts had prior irinotecan; 30.2% in cohort A had prior anti-HER2 therapy. Median (m) treatment duration (all pts) was 3.0 mo (95% CI, 2.1-4.1; cohort A, 5.1 mo [95% CI, 3.9-7.6]). In cohort A (median FU, 62.4 weeks), confirmed ORR was 45.3% (24/53 pts; 95% CI, 31.6-59.6), DCR was 83.0% (44/53 pts; 95% CI, 70.2-91.9), mDOR was 7.0 mo (95% CI, 5.8-9.5), mPFS was 6.9 mo (95% CI, 4.1-8.7) with 37 (69.8%) PFS events, and mOS was 15.5 mo (95% CI, 8.8-20.8) with 36 (67.9%) OS events. These results are consistent with the primary analysis. Confirmed ORR was 43.8% (7/53 pts; 95% CI, 19.8-70.1) for pts with prior anti-HER2 therapy, 57.5% (23/53 pts; 95% CI, 40.9-73.0) for pts with IHC3+ status, and 7.7% (1/53 pts; 95% CI, 0.2-36.0) for pts with IHC2+/ISH+ status. In cohorts B and C, mPFS was 2.1 mo (95% CI, 1.4-4.1) and 1.4 mo (95% CI, 1.3-2.1); mOS was 7.3 mo (95% CI, 3.0-NE) and 7.7 mo (95% CI, 2.2-13.9), respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of grade (G) ≥3 occurred in 65.1% of pts (56/86); the most common TEAEs were hematologic and gastrointestinal. TEAEs leading to drug discontinuation occurred in 13 pts (15.1%). 8 pts (9.3%) had interstitial lung disease (ILD) adjudicated by an independent committee as related to T-DXd (4 G2; 1 G3; 3 G5). Conclusions: T-DXd at 6.4 mg/kg Q3W showed promising activity and durability with longer-term FU in pts with HER2-expressing mCRC. The safety profile was consistent with prior results; ILD continues to be an important identified risk that requires careful monitoring and intervention as needed. These results support continued exploration of T-DXd in this patient population. Clinical trial information: NCT03384940.

Evaluation of baseline BRAF V600E mutation in circulating tumor DNA and efficacy response from the BEACON study

162

Background: In the randomized phase 3 BEACON study, encorafenib + binimetinib + cetuximab (triplet) and encorafenib + cetuximab (doublet) regimens improved overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) versus standard of care (control) in patients (pts) with previously treated BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer. To identify whether detection of a BRAF V600E mutation in baseline circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) correlated with response, we evaluated the status and allele frequency of BRAF V600E compared with clinical outcomes. Methods: Plasma samples were collected at Cycle 1 Day 1 and end of treatment for ctDNA analysis and analyzed using GuardantOMNI. Variant allele frequency (VAF) of BRAF V600E was grouped into high (> median) and low (≤median) categories. Low VAF samples included those where BRAF V600E mutation was not detected or no ctDNA was detected. ORR, based on blinded independent central review, and OS were compared between treatment arms according to VAF levels. ORR comparisons used Chi-square test and logistic regression. OS was summarized using the Kaplan-Meier method. HRs and 95% CIs were estimated using a Cox model. Additional correlation analyses between BRAF V600E status in baseline tumor tissue, as well as clonality, will be presented. Results: Baseline plasma samples were analyzed from 544 of 631 pts in the ctDNA analysis: 88.3% (196/222) in the triplet arm, 86.6% (187/216) in the doublet arm, and 83.4% (161/193) in the control arm. BRAF V600E mutations were detected in 90.4% (492/544) of pts (90.3% [177/196] triplet, 90.4% [169/187] doublet, and 90.7% [146/161] control). Pts with BRAF V600E mutations with high VAF had significantly ( P≤0.0001) increased ORR (95% CI) in the triplet and doublet arms (27.3% [19.5–36.8] and 15.9% [9.7–25.0], respectively) compared with control (0% [0.0–4.3]). Similar response trends were observed in pts with BRAF V600E mutations with low VAF (triplet: 28.9% [20.8–38.9]; doublet: 25.3% [17.7–34.6]; control: 5.3% [2.1–12.8]). OS decreased in BRAF V600E pts with high VAF (median OS [95% CI]: triplet 7.2 [6.0–8.0] months, n = 99; doublet 5.4 [4.4–6.1] months, n = 88; control 4.2 [3.4–4.8] months, n = 85) compared with pts with low VAF (triplet 14.8 [10.2–19.8] months, n = 97; doublet 14.8 [11.7–23.0] months, n = 99; control 9.3 [7.5–11.3] months, n = 76). Conclusions: ctDNA analyses showed the majority of pts in BEACON analyzed at baseline had a detectable BRAF V600E mutation. Increased response rates were observed in pts treated with triplet or doublet therapy compared with control, independent of VAF. Pts with a higher VAF for BRAF V600E may have a worse prognosis. Clinical trial information: NCT04607421.

A first-in-human phase Ia/b, open-label, multicenter study of the TRAILR2 agonist BI 905711 in patients (pts) with advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancers

TPS222

Background: Activation of the tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor 2 (TRAILR2) induces apoptosis via caspase activation. Targeting TRAILR2 is an attractive therapeutic strategy, but some early TRAILR2 agonists were associated with severe hepatotoxicity. Cadherin 17 (CDH17), a membrane protein highly expressed in GI cancers, is not expressed in normal hepatocytes so using CDH17 as a liver-sparing anchor may avoid hepatotoxicity. BI 905711 is a tetravalent bispecific antibody that cross-links TRAILR2 with CDH17 to induce CDH17-dependent TRAILR2 oligomerisation. In preclinical assays, BI 905711 demonstrated a potency shift of ̃1000 fold versus the 1st-generation TRAILR2 agonist lexatumumab. BI 905711 induced apoptosis in CDH17-positive tumor cells in vitro, impaired tumor growth in pt-derived colorectal cancer (CRC) xenografts, and no hepatotoxicity was observed. Methods: This phase Ia/Ib study (NCT04137289) aims to determine the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy of BI 905711 in pts with advanced, refractory GI cancers. Up to 140 adult pts with histologically confirmed, advanced unresectable/metastatic colorectal, gastric, esophageal or pancreatic adenocarcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, or gallbladder or small intestine carcinoma, who have progressed on standard-of-care therapies, will be enrolled. In phase Ia, pts will receive intravenous BI 905711 at escalating doses (range 0.02–4.8 mg/kg) every 14 days, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. Dose escalation will be guided by a Bayesian logistic regression model with overdose control based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in the first 28 days. In phase Ia, a minimum number of CRC pts will be enrolled to each cohort: ≥1 CRC pt at each of the 2 lowest dose levels (0.02/0.06 mg/kg) and 4 pts at each subsequent dose level (0.2/0.6/1.2/2.4/3.6/4.8 mg/kg). In parallel to dose escalation in CRC pts, up to 4 pts with non-CRC GI cancers will be included at the dose level below that of the CRC cohort. If an objective response (OR) per RECIST v1.1 is observed in CRC or non-CRC GI pts at a safe dose level, up to 10 additional pts with the same tumor type will be recruited at that dose level. In phase Ib, CRC pts will be randomized into up to 4 dose cohorts (as determined in phase Ia; n=20 each) to define the recommended phase II dose. The primary endpoints are determination of the MTD based on the proportion of pts with DLTs (phase Ia) and OR rate based on RECIST v1.1 (phase Ib). Secondary endpoints include PK parameters and OR in pts with measurable disease (phase Ia), and disease control, tumor shrinkage, duration of response, and progression-free survival (phase Ib). Trial enrollment is ongoing, with 33 pts enrolled to date. Clinical trial information: NCT04137289.

Nivolumab (NIVO) + 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6)/bevacizumab (BEV) versus mFOLFOX6/BEV for first-line (1L) treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Phase 2 results from CheckMate 9X8

8

Background: Standard 1L therapies for mCRC include a fluoropyrimidine with oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan, and a biologic agent. NIVO may enhance antitumor activity in combination with 1L standard therapies within a subset of patients (pts) with mCRC. CheckMate 9X8 evaluated NIVO + mFOLFOX6/BEV vs mFOLFOX6/BEV in 1L mCRC (NCT03414983). Methods: Adults with previously untreated, unresectable, mCRC were randomized 2:1 to NIVO 240 mg + mFOLFOX6/BEV Q2W (NIVO + standard-of-care [SOC]) or mFOLFOX6/BEV Q2W (SOC). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) per RECIST v1.1. Key secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), time to response (TTR), duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: 195 pts were randomized to NIVO + SOC (n = 127) or SOC (n = 68). Median (range) follow-up was 23.7 (0–33.2) months (mo; NIVO + SOC) vs 23.2 (0–32.3) mo (SOC). Median (range) duration of therapy was 9.9 (0.1–31.8+) mo (NIVO + SOC) and 7.7 (0.1–26.7+) mo (SOC). The HR (95% CI) for PFS was 0.81 (0.53–1.23; P = 0.30), which did not meet the prespecified threshold for statistical significance (median PFS, 11.9 mo in both arms; Table). PFS rates after 12 mo were higher with NIVO + SOC vs SOC (Table). ORR was 60% (NIVO + SOC) and 46% (SOC; odds ratio 1.72 [95% CI 0.96–3.10]) and median (95% CI) DOR was 12.9 (9.0–13.1) mo (NIVO + SOC) and 9.3 (7.5–11.3) mo (SOC; Table). Rates of grade 3−4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were higher with NIVO + SOC; however, no new safety signals were identified (Table). Biomarker analyses, including tumor mutational burden and baseline CD8 levels, will be presented. Conclusions: The primary endpoint of PFS was not met; however, NIVO + SOC showed higher PFS rates after 12 mo, a higher response rate, and more durable responses compared with SOC, along with acceptable safety, in 1L mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT03414983. [Table: see text]