Use of medical aid in dying by individuals with cancer at a comprehensive cancer center

e24073

Background: Understanding the experience of individuals with cancer (pts) who utilize Medical Aid in Dying (MAID) is important given growing access and limited research in the U.S. Methods: Chart review from January 1, 2014-October 1, 2020, of all pts who inquired (but did not initiate completion of all legal requirements), initiated (but did not complete all legal requirements to obtain access to the medications), or completed all legal requirements and could have had access to medications (whether or not they were obtained or used) at Seattle Cancer Care Alliance/University of Washington. Chi-square tests were used to compare differences in pt characteristics between the inquired/initiated versus completed group. Results: Of 498 total pts, 116 (23.3%) inquired, 127 (25.5%) initiated, and 255 (51.2%) completed the MAID process, of which, 45.9% (117/255) were known to have used the medications. At time of first inquiry (FI), mean age was 66 years (standard deviation [SD] = 11.9)/median 67.3/range 22-94; 206 (41.4%) were female; and 40 (8.0%) were non-white, while 11 (2.2%) were Hispanic/Latino and 14 (2.8%) were non-English speaking. At FI, 292 (58.6%) pts were married or had a significant other; 152 (30.5%) had a religious affiliation; 23 (4.6%) were uninsured; and 282 (56.6%) had Medicare. Mean months from the original cancer diagnosis and FI was 36.5 (SD = 50.3, range 0.1-366.1). 461 (92.6%) pts had solid/central nervous system (CNS) tumors, of which 231 (46.4%) had presented with metastatic disease. At FI, 84 (16.9%) were currently hospitalized; in total, 236 (47.4%) pts had been hospitalized within the 3 months prior to FI. A total of 71.9% (358/498) had not yet initiated hospice at FI; 51.8% (258/498) had evidence of advance care planning (ACP), including 41.5% (107/258) with a Physician Order for Life Sustaining Treatment on file. Overall, 152 (30.5%) and 166 (33.3%) of pts had seen social work or palliative care in the 30 days prior to FI, while 62 (12.4%) had met with a spiritual health clinician. Statistically significant differences were found between those who inquired/initiated versus completed with the following pt characteristics: non-white (ꭓ2= 6.596, p = .010); Medicaid versus all other insured (ꭓ2= 9.489, p = .002); those hospitalized at FI (ꭓ2= 6.101, p = .014); and those without evidence of ACP (ꭓ2= 17.090, p < .001). Pts with a hematologic malignancy (HM, n = 37/498, 7.4%) were less likely to complete the MAID process compared to pts with solid/CNS tumors (ꭓ2= 7.378, p = .007); 43.2% (16/37) of HM pts did not complete due to rapid decline. Conclusions: Less than half of pts who initially inquired about MAID completed the process. Recent hospitalizations and evidence of ACP were relatively common compared to current utilization of hospice or prior use of supportive care services. Future research should investigate why non-white pts, those with Medicaid and those with HM may be less likely to complete the MAID process.

Death with dignity utilization among patients with thoracic, head, and neck cancer

12032

Background: Death with Dignity (DWD) legislation, which took effect in 2009 in Washington state, allows terminally ill patients (pts) to self-administer physician-prescribed, life-ending medication. Thoracic, head and neck cancer (THN) pts are among the top cancer types requesting DWD; however, data describing this group are limited. Methods: This retrospective chart review, conducted at Seattle Cancer Care Alliance/University of Washington and Fred Hutch, collected demographics, disease, treatment, support services and steps of the DWD process. We tested the association between disease characteristics of interest and DWD completion using Fisher’s Exact test. Results: Between Jan 2014 and October 2020, 498 pts inquired about DWD, and 108 (22%) were THN pts. Among THN pts, 51 (47%) only initiated the DWD request process, 35 (33%) only completed the DWD request process, and 22 (20%) completed the DWD request and self-administered the medication. Pts were white (n=90, 83%), male (n=64, 59%), primarily English speaking (n=103, 95%), nonreligious (n=69, 64%), single/divorced/non-partnered (n=55, 51%), and insured (n=103, 95%). Median age at request was 68 years (range 35-88). The table details THN DWD utilization. At time of DWD request, the median time from diagnosis was 14 months (range=0.2-242.7), and 62 (57%) had received ≥2 lines of therapy. Among 78 (72%) pts who received systemic therapy, 51 (65%) were ≥30 days from last therapy to time of death. Within 30 days prior to DWD request, 30 (28%), 25 (23%), and 7 (7%) pts saw social work, palliative care, and spiritual health respectively, and 35 (32%) were hospice-enrolled. Stage IV at diagnosis had higher rates of DWD medication use (p=0.05). There was no significant correlation between DWD medication use and primary site, ECOG score at request, insurance type, mental health diagnosis, use of depression/anxiety or pain medications, or hospice enrollment during DWD process. Conclusions: THN pts requesting DWD were predominantly white, nonreligious, insured males. Pts with advanced stage at diagnosis were more likely to use DWD medication. There was a higher proportion of DWD medication use with poorer performance status, and no association between use of depression/anxiety, pain medications, or utilization of supportive care services and DWD medication usage. Future research should investigate DWD utilization among THN pts in multiple centers and states to evaluate these patterns. [Table: see text]

Demographics, outcomes, and risk factors for patients (Pts) with sarcoma and COVID-19: A multi-institutional cohort analysis

11523

Background: Sarcoma pts often receive aggressive, highly immunosuppressive therapy and may be at high risk for severe COVID-19. Demographics, outcomes and risk factors for pts with sarcoma and COVID-19 are unknown. We aimed to describe the course of COVID-19 in sarcoma pts and to identify factors associated with adverse outcomes. Methods: The COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (NCT04354701) is an international registry of pts with cancer and COVID-19. Adult pts (≥18 years old) with a diagnosis of sarcoma and laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 were included from 50 participating institutions. Data including demographics, sarcoma diagnosis and treatment, and course of COVID-19 infection were analyzed. Primary outcome was the composite rate of hospitalization or death at 30 days from COVID-19 diagnosis. Secondary outcomes were 30 day all-cause mortality, rate of hospitalization, O2 need, and ICU admission. Descriptive statistics and univariate Fisher tests are reported. Results: From March 17, 2020 to February 6, 2021, N=204 pts were included. Median follow up was 42 days. Median age was 58 years (IQR 43-67). 97 (48%) were male. 30 (15%) had ECOG performance status ≥2. 104 (51%) received cancer treatment, including surgery or radiation, within 3 months of COVID-19 diagnosis. 153 (75%) had active cancer, of whom 34 (22%) had lung metastases. 100 (49%) pts met the composite primary endpoint; 96 (47%) were hospitalized and 18 (9%) died within 30 days from COVID-19 diagnosis. 64 (31%) required oxygen, and 16 (8%) required ICU admission. Primary endpoint rates were similar for pts who received cytotoxic chemotherapy (38/58, 66%) or targeted therapy (16/28, 57%). Pts with higher rates of the primary endpoint included patients ≥60 years old (59% vs 40%, OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.12-3.74, p=0.016), pts with ECOG PS ≥2 vs 0-1 (90% vs 41%, OR 12.2, 95% CI 3.44-66.8, p<0.001), pts receiving any systemic therapy within 3 months of COVID-19 diagnosis (62% vs 39%, OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.43-4.97, p=0.001), and pts with lung metastases (68% vs 42%, OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.19-6.79, p=0.013). Primary endpoint rates were similar across sarcoma subtypes (Table). Conclusions: This is the largest cohort study of pts with sarcoma and COVID-19 to date. Sarcoma pts have high rates of complications from COVID-19. Older patients, those with poor performance status, those recently receiving systemic cancer therapy, and those with lung metastases appear to have worse outcomes.[Table: see text]

Code status and outcomes in patients with cancer and COVID-19: A COVID-19 and cancer consortium (CCC19) registry analysis

12035

Background: In-hospital mortality among patients with cancer (pts) and COVID-19 infection is high. The frequency of, and factors associated with, do-not-resuscitate (DNR) or do-not-intubate (DNI) orders at hospital admission (HA), and their correlation with care, has not been well studied. In November 2020, we began collecting this information for pts who were hospitalized at initial presentation in the CCC19 registry (NCT04354701). Methods: We investigated: 1. the frequency of, and factors associated with, DNR/DNI orders at HA; 2. change in code status during HA; and 3. the correlation between DNR/DNI orders and palliative care consultation (PC), mortality or length of stay (LOS). We included hospitalized, adult pts with cancer and COVID-19 from 57 participating sites. Reported characteristics include age, ECOG performance status (PS), and cancer status. Comparative statistics include 2-sided Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher’s exact tests. Results: 744 pts had known baseline and/or changed code status (CS); most (79%) maintained their baseline CS (Table). Those with DNR±DNI orders at HA were older (median age 79 vs 69 yrs, p<0.001) and more likely to have: ECOG PS 2+ vs 0-1 (45% vs 22%, OR 3.95, p<0.001), metastatic disease (45% vs 35%, OR 1.72, p=0.005) and progressing cancer (32% vs 16%, OR 2.69, p<0.001), but equally likely to have received systemic anticancer therapy in the prior 3 months (38% vs 45%, p=0.15). N=192 pts with a change in CS from full to DNR±DNI were younger (median age 73), had better PS (37% ECOG PS 2+), and were less likely to have progressing cancer (23%) than those with DNR±DNI orders at baseline. However, their LOS was significantly longer, median 9 vs 6 days, p<0.001. Compared to those with DNR±DNI orders at HA, pts whose CS changed to DNR±DNI were more likely to die, OR 2.94, 95% CI 1.76-4.97, p<0.001. PC was obtained in 106 (14%) pts and associated with transition to DNR±DNI in 47 (44%), affirmation of admission CS in 58 (55%), and reversal in 1 (1%). Median LOS for pts receiving PC was 11 vs 6 days, p<0.001. Conclusions: In our sample, the majority of patients with cancer and COVID-19 were full code at hospital admission. DNR±DNI status, whether at baseline or assigned during the hospital course, was associated with worse prognosis. Longer length of stay for patients changing code status and/or receiving palliative care consultation was observed likely suggesting earlier palliative care consultation is an important, but likely underutilized component in the care of patients with cancer and COVID-19.[Table: see text]

End-of-life health care utilization (EOLHCU) in patients with thoracic, head and neck cancers with or without phase I study participation at a single institution

e19153

Background: Several retrospective studies suggest patients enrolled in clinical trials have more end-of-life health care utilization (EOLHCU). This is particularly concerning for phase I clinical trial participants who are known to have therapeutic misconceptions about the purpose and benefits of phase I clinical trial participation. Methods: We identified all phase I participants at the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance (SCCA) with thoracic, head and neck cancers (THNC) who died between July 1, 2014 and June 30, 2018(P1C). We compared them to 139 randomly selected THNC patients who died within the same time period without phase I study participation (NP1C). Patient records were abstracted from the electronic health record (and Epic Care Everywhere if patients received EOL care outside of SCCA). A chi-square test was used to compare categorial variables and t-tests were used for numerical variables. Results: 67 P1C patients were identified; 3 patients had no outside records at the end of life and were removed from the database. No statistically significant differences in gender, ethnicity, marital status, or form of insurance were found between the two groups. P1C patients were younger (median age of 62 (interquartile range (IQR) 55-69) vs. 66 (IQR 59-72), p=0.008) and had more lines of therapy from diagnosis until death (median 4 (IQR 1-3) vs. 2 (IQR 1-3), p=<0.0001). No difference in end-of-life care or quality of death metrics were found between the two groups, however a trend toward more referrals to palliative care were noted in phase I participants. (Table). Conclusions: At our center no differences in EOLHCU or quality of death parameters were seen in THNC patients who did or did not participate in phase I studies. [Table: see text]

Enhancing Connections-Palliative Care: A Quasi-Experimental Pilot Feasibility Study of a Cancer Parenting Program

Background: In 2018, >75,000 children were newly affected by the diagnosis of advanced cancer in a parent. Unfortunately, few programs exist to help parents and their children manage the impact of advanced disease together as a family. The Enhancing Connections-Palliative Care (EC-PC) parenting program was developed in response to this gap. Objective: (1) Assess the feasibility of the EC-PC parenting program (recruitment, enrollment, and retention); (2) test the short-term impact of the program on changes in parent and child outcomes; and (3) explore the relationship between parents' physical and psychological symptoms with program outcomes. Design: Quasi-experimental two-group design employing both within- and between-subjects analyses to examine change over time and change relative to historical controls. Parents participated in five telephone-delivered and fully manualized behavioral intervention sessions at two-week intervals, delivered by trained nurses. Behavioral assessments were obtained at baseline and at three months on parents' depressed mood, anxiety, parenting skills, parenting self-efficacy, and symptom distress as well as children's behavioral-emotional adjustment (internalizing, externalizing, and anxiety/depression). Subjects: Parents diagnosed with advanced or metastatic cancer and receiving noncurative treatment were eligible for the trial provided they had one or more children aged 5-17 living at home, were able to read, write, and speak English, and were not enrolled in a hospice program. Results: Of those enrolled, 62% completed all intervention sessions and post-intervention assessments. Within-group analyses showed significant improvements in parents' self-efficacy in helping their children manage pressures from the parent's cancer; parents' skills to elicit children's cancer-related concerns; and parents' skills to help their children cope with the cancer. Between-group analyses revealed comparable improvements with historical controls on parents' anxiety, depressed mood, self-efficacy, parenting skills, and children's behavioral-emotional adjustment. Conclusion: The EC-PC parenting program shows promise in significantly improving parents' skills and confidence in supporting their child about the cancer. Further testing of the program is warranted.

A phase I/II study of pembrolizumab (Pem) and doxorubicin (Dox) in treating patients with metastatic/unresectable sarcoma

11009

Background: Patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS) treated with single agent Dox have a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.6 months (mo) and response rate (RR) of 14%. Dox sensitizes tumors to Pem through calreticulin release and killing of immunosuppressive cells. Thus we hypothesize that combining Dox + Pem will improve patient outcomes. Methods: A phase I/II trial (NCT02888665) evaluating Dox+Pem was designed for Dox naïve STS and select bone sarcomas with a 1° endpoints of safety (CTCAE v4.03) and response rate (RR) by RECIST 1.1. Patients received one “priming” dose of Pem (200mg IV) prior to starting Dox+Pem Q3wks. Dox+Pem was continued for up to 6 cycles, followed by Pem monotherapy for up to 2 years or progression. The phase I portion used a 3+3 design with 2 Dox doses (45 & 75 mg/m2), followed by a Simon 2-stage expansion. A retrospective study of patients treated at our center on non-ifosfamide containing Dox trials (DoxT) was performed in order to compare our observed PFS with a comparable historic population. Results: Treatment was well tolerated; detailed safety data will be presented. No additional cardiac risk was observed. No DLTs were observed during phase I and 75mg/m2 was selected as the phase 2 Dox dose. The study met criteria for expansion to the 2nd stage. Though the planned enrollment was 41, the study closed after 37 as it was clear that the RR (22% , including phase I patients) would not meet the phase 2 RR target of 29%. However, 59% of patients had stable disease (disease control rate = 81%) with tumor regression in a majority of patients. The median PFS on Dox + Pem was 8.1 mo (95% CI: 6.3, 10.8). Patients treated with Dox + Pem had a significantly longer median PFS compared to the DoxT cohort (4.1 mo, 95%CI 3.0 – 6.6, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Dox+Pem is well-tolerated. While this study failed to meet its 1° RR endpoint, a highly significant improvement in PFS was observed compared with historical controls. This is consistent with findings in other cancers, such as head & neck, where improved clinical outcomes were observed without significant increase in RR by RECIST. A randomized trial of Dox +/- Pem should be carefully considered in light of recent negative trials in STS. Clinical trial information: NCT02888665.

Creating an end-of-life dashboard with administrative data

304

Background: The care given at the End of Life (EoL) is a topic of great interest for cancer patients, oncologists and insurers. This focus has been guided by a desire to achieve the highest quality of life (QoL) near the end of life while simultaneously decreasing costs of what is deemed by many as futile life-sustaining efforts. While EoL measures are reported by hospitals and clinics to external quality programs, the ability for a single center to sustainably measure these data proves burdensome, thus limiting the ability to assess and monitor for the purposes of improvement. Seattle Cancer Care Alliance (SCCA), a single comprehensive cancer center, set out to create regular, accessible and actionable EoL reporting. Methods: This project was broken into 5 phases: (1) Determining rationale for reporting and defining the audience(s). (2) Defining the patient population and measures of interest. (3) Identifying data sources and ensuring data quality. (4) Developing the report and building a data visualization. (5) Sharing report with stakeholders to seek input on definitions visual display. Results: An EoL Metrics Dashboard was created and made available to all SCCA clinicians and staff. The dashboard provides rates for 10 EoL metrics: chemotherapy at 7/14/30 days before death, radiation treatment at 7/14/30 days before death, emergency department (ED) visit within 30 days of death (DoD), ED plus inpatient admission within 30 DoD, intensive care unit (ICU) stay within 30 (DoD), and death in the ICU. The denominator is defined as decedents with ≤3 visits at SCCA within 12 months of death. Data is displayed monthly, rolling 16-month with trendlines for EoL events. Data is viewable by EoL event, cancer type, sex, race, age at death and payor. There is also a permission-based view containing patient-level data. Conclusions: With clear data definitions and dedicated analytic resources it is feasible to create an automated EoL report using administrative data. The largest limitation is that the data available to a hospital or clinic is only inclusive of care within their facility. Also, while this report is useful to detect trends, additional analysis is required at the patient level to determine whether an event was avoidable or did not align with the patient’s wishes.

Effect of intratumoral (IT) injection of the toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) agonist G100 on a clinical response and CD4 T-cell response locally and systemically

71

Background: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are heterogeneous tumors which are morbid and lethal. G100 is under investigation in multiple clinical trials and contains a potent TLR4 agonist (oil-in-water emulsion of glucopyranosyl lipid A) that has been tested as vaccine adjuvant. We hypothesized IT G100 would induce robust local and potentially systemic anti-tumor immune response, leading to improved outcomes. Methods: 15 metastatic STS patients with superficial lesions were treated with weekly IT G100 for 8-12 wks; 12 patients received radiation (RT) for 2 wks to start, while 3 received IT G100 for 6 wks prior to RT. Biopsies and PBMC were collected pre and post treatment, and flow cytometry was performed on biopsies. TIL and PBMC were analyzed with TCR deep sequencing. PBMC were analyzed by single cell multiplex cytokine profiling. Results: No grade ≥ 3 toxicity was observed, and local tumor control was achieved in all evaluable tumors (14/14). Treated tumors tracked post-trial (mean 156 days) had persistent local control with 1 CR (7%), 1 PR (7%), and 11 SD (79%). In 3 patients with long term follow up, treated lesions remained controlled vs index lesions (-53% vs +31% at mean 235 days, p = 0.002). In all tumors after G100 alone, T cell infiltration increased. In P14, CD3 live cells in tumor rose from < 1% to 62%. PBMC clonality increased in 8/14 tested including P06, who had 4× increase in clonality and CR in the injected lesion; PBMC and TIL TCR overlap increased from 13.4% to 21.5%. P13 had a 2.3× rise in TIL clonality; the top clone (a CD4 T cell) expanded from 0.1% to 38% and expressed more TNFα than the rest (p < 0.0001). Single cell cytokine analysis of PBMC showed 7/13 (54%) increased in polyfunctionality (producing > 2 cytokines) in CD4 T cells; no consistent increase was seen in CD8 T cells. TNFα levels in pre-treatment monocytes correlated with PFS (R2= 0.5, p = 0.02). Conclusions: IT G100 is a viable agent for local control of metastatic STS lesions. With or without RT, G100 appears to cause CD4 T cell mediated local and systemic response. Combination of G100 with other immunomodulators could induce clinically significant systemic responses, as seen in follicular NHL treated with G100. Clinical trial information: NCT02180698.

Religious/Spiritual Struggle in Young Adult Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Survivors

PURPOSE

This study describes the prevalence of religious and/or spiritual (R/S) struggle in long-term young adult (YA) survivors following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) as well as existential concerns (EC), social support, and demographic, medical, and emotional correlates of R/S struggle.

METHODS

Data were collected as part of an annual survey of survivors of HCT aged 18-39 years at survey completion; age at HCT was 1-39 years. Study measures included measures of R/S struggle (defined as any non-zero response on the negative religious coping subscale from Brief RCOPE), quality of life (QOL), and depression. Factors associated with R/S struggle were identified using multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Fifty-two of the 172 respondents (30%), who ranged from less than a year to 33 years after HCT, had some R/S struggle. In bivariate analysis, depression was associated with R/S struggle. In a multivariable logistic regression model, individuals with greater EC were nearly five times more likely to report R/S struggle. R/S struggle was not associated with age at transplant, time since transplant, gender, race, R/S self-identification, or medical variables.

CONCLUSION

R/S struggle is common among YA HCT survivors, even many years after HCT. There is a strong correlation between EC and R/S struggle. Given the prevalence of R/S struggle and its associations with EC, survivors should be screened and referred to professionals with expertise in EC and R/S struggle as appropriate. Further study is needed to determine longitudinal trajectory, impact of struggle intensity, causal relationships, and effects of R/S struggle on health, mood, and QOL for YA HCT survivors.

Comprehensive distress screening and referral at a tertiary cancer center

134

Background: Addressing distress in cancer patients is now broadly recognized as critical to well-being and associated with increased survival. Cancer centers are developing innovative distress screening methods; we describe our novel process and results. Methods: New patients from 9/2015 to 3/2017 received an email requesting completion of a 44-item web-based survey assessing depression (2-item Patient Health Questionnaire), anxiety (2-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder), quality of life (QOL, 28-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-General), malnutrition (3-item Malnutrition Screening Tool), and 9 items addressing existential crisis, physical function, symptoms, tangible needs and concerns for dependent children. Results were computer scored, with positive screens resulting in direct, automated referrals to supportive care services (SCR). Analysis includes descriptive statistics and logistic regression using SAS 9.4. Results: 71% (n = 2629 of 3724) of those approached provided an email and completed the survey; 73% reporting no survey burden. Non-responders were more likely to be minority, non-English speaking, with non-commercial insurance (all p < 0.001). 59% (n = 1543) of responders screened positive for one or more SCR, including 6% to palliative care for poor QOL or symptoms. Receipt of SCR was more likely with Medicaid insurance (1.36 odds ratio [OR], 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.76, p = .0061); plan to receive care (1.27 OR, CI 1.07-1.50, p = .0061); and any report of survey burden (2.26 OR, CI 1.83-2.80, p < .0001). Conclusions: Web-based distress screening is feasible, efficient and not burdensome for the majority of cancer patients. Those who find this screening burdensome are two-fold more likely to have distress. Future efforts should address screening of vulnerable populations.

A phase II trial of regorafenib (REGO) in patients (pts) with advanced Ewing sarcoma and related tumors (EWS) of soft tissue and bone: SARC024 trial results

11005

Background: Pazopanib is approved for soft tissue sarcoma pts after failure of other therapy, but there are few subtype-specific data regarding kinase inhibitor activity. We report on a single arm, phase II trial of REGO in advanced EWS. Methods: EWS pts (age > 18, ECOG 0-2, good organ function) who had at least 1 line of therapy and had PD within 6 mo were eligible. Prior oral kinase inhibitors were not allowed. Initial REGO dose was 160 mg PO QD x21 q28d. Dose reductions were employed for toxicity and AEs. The primary endpoint was PFS at 8 weeks (PFS8w) employing RECIST 1.1. Sample size of 30 allowed determination of the difference between PFS8w of 50% vs 25% with alpha = 0.05 and power of 91%. Results: 30 pts (median age 32, range 19-65; M/F = 20/10; ECOG 0/1/2 = 16/13/1; bone, 12; soft tissue, 18; median prior treatments 5, range 1-10) enrolled at 14 US sites (09/2014-03/2016). Most common grade (G3) toxicities were hypophosphatemia (6), hypertension (2), high ALT (2) and 1 each: fatigue, abd pain, diarrhea, hypokalemia, oral mucositis, neutropenia and rash; no G4 toxicities were noted. 13 pts required ≥1 dose reduction, most commonly hypophosphatemia (n = 7); 2 stopped REGO for toxicity. There was 1 death in the 30 day post study period, not REGO related. Median dose at study end: 140 mg (3.5 tabs, range 80-160 mg) 3 wks on/1wk off. 18/30 pts were without PD at 8 wks. Median PFS: 3.6 mo (95%CI 2.8-3.8 mo). PFS8w by KM was 73% (95%CI 57-89%). Best responses: PR/SD/PD/not evaluable of 3/18/7/2, for RECIST RR 10%. Two pts with PR had EWSR1 translocation by FISH; a third had CIC-DUX4. Median duration of response: 5.5 mo (95%CI 2.9-8.0). Median OS is not reached. Conclusions: The substudy met its primary endpoint. REGO toxicity was similar to that seen previously. Enrollment continues in LPS and OGS cohorts, and is being expanded to further study variant EWS without EWSR1-FLI1 fusion. Study of the existing tissue may elucidate which EWS patients may benefit from REGO. Clinical trial information: NCT02048371.

Toxicity and efficacy of bolus (BOL) versus continuous intravenous (CIV) dosing of doxorubicin (DOX) in soft tissue sarcoma (STS): Post hoc analysis of a prospective randomized trial

11023

Background: DOX remains critical in STS treatment. Controversy exists regarding its optimal administration route (BOL vs CIV). BOL vs CIV could affect toxicity and/or efficacy. A randomized trial to assess this is unlikely. We conducted a post hoc analysis to explore differences in these routes of DOX administration. Methods: Data from a prospective randomized phase III study of doxorubicin with or without evofosfamide (TH-302) were used. At the discretion of treating physician, BOL or CIV DOX could be used. Grade 3-5 hematologic, non-hematologic and cardiac toxicities and treatment response were explored using multivariable logistic regression. OS and PFS were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards. Results: 640 subjects were enrolled (556 BOL, 84 CIV). Baseline differences in age, extent of disease and prior radiotherapy were controlled for in regression models. Hematologic toxicity was associated with age, performance status (PS) and cumulative (CUM) DOX dose. Non-hematologic toxicity was associated with age, PS, receipt of prior radiotherapy and CUM TH-302 dose. Cardiac toxicity was only associated with CUM DOX dose. Odds of response were strongly associated with CUM DOX dose (mg/m2, OR = 1.011, p < 0.0001), and, to a lesser extent, with CUM TH-302 dose (g/m2, OR = 1.081, p = 0.0008), STS subtype and prior radiotherapy. Comparing CIV to BOL DOX, neither OS (median 21.7m vs 18.3m, HR = 0.85, p = 0.29) nor PFS (median 6.1m vs. 6.1m, HR = 0.89, p = 0.43) was affected by manner of DOX administration (CIV vs BOL). Cox analyses indicated that factors reflecting tumoral biology and host status, rather than treatment received, were associated with OS (PS, histologic STS subtype, histologic grade, receipt of prior radiotherapy) and PFS (PS, treatment-related toxicity). Conclusions: Our analyses provide no evidence for superiority of either BOL or CIV administration of DOX as regards toxicity or efficacy in STS treatment. Thus, the logistically simpler BOL administration of DOX should be favored over CIV administration.

Correlation of T-cell infiltration and clonality with PD-L1 expression in soft tissue sarcomas

23

Background: The success of immunotherapy has raised new issues regarding the selection of patients, design of combination strategies, and sequencing of various regimens. Sarcomas have poor outcomes in the metastatic setting but may be amenable to immune therapies. However, we currently have limited knowledge of the immunologic profiles of different soft tissue sarcoma (STS) subtypes. Methods: We identified patients with the relatively common STS subtypes: leiomyosarcoma (LMS), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), synovial sarcoma (SS) and liposarcoma. Formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumor samples from 81 patients underwent gene expression analysis, immunohistochemistry for PD-1 and PD-L1, and sequencing of the T cell receptor Vβ region. Differences in liposarcoma subsets were also evaluated. Results: UPS and LMS had high expression levels of genes related to antigen presentation and T cell infiltration. UPS had higher levels of PD-L1 (p ≤ 0.001) and PD-1 (p ≤ 0.05) on IHC. UPS also had the highest T cell infiltration based on TCR sequencing, significantly more than SS, which had the lowest (p ≤ 0.05). UPS and LMS both had higher clonality compared with SS and liposarcoma (p ≤ 0.05). A model adjusted for STS histologic subtype found that for all sarcoma T cell infiltration and clonality were highly correlated with PD-1 and PD-L1 staining levels (p ≤ 0.01). Conclusions: In a model adjusted for sarcoma histologic subtypes, T cell infiltration and clonality were highly correlated with PD-1 and PD-L1 expression, consistent with the emerging view of tumor immunity that highly inflamed tumors acquire inhibitory ligands to evade tumor-specific T cells. UPS, which is a more highly mutated STS subtype, provokes a strong immune response evidenced by multiple inflammatory features suggesting that it may be well-suited to checkpoint inhibitor based approaches. SS and liposarcoma subsets are less highly mutated but do express immunogenic self-antigens therefore strategies to improve antigen presentation and T cell infiltration may be valuable for allowing immunotherapeutic success in these tumor types.

Advanced Imaging and Receipt of Guideline Concordant Care in Women with Early Stage Breast Cancer

Objective. It is unknown whether advanced imaging (AI) is associated with higher quality breast cancer (BC) care. Materials and Methods. Claims and Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results data were linked for women diagnosed with incident stage I-III BC between 2002 and 2008 in western Washington State. We examined receipt of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or AI (defined as computed tomography [CT]/positron emission tomography [PET]/PET/CT) versus mammogram and/or ultrasound (M-US) alone and receipt of guideline concordant care (GCC) using multivariable logistic regression. Results. Of 5247 women, 67% received M-US, 23% MRI, 8% CT, and 3% PET/PET-CT. In 2002, 5% received MRI and 5% AI compared to 45% and 12%, respectively, in 2008. 79% received GCC, but GCC declined over time and was associated with younger age, urban residence, less comorbidity, shorter time from diagnosis to surgery, and earlier year of diagnosis. Breast MRI was associated with GCC for lumpectomy plus radiation therapy (RT) (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.08-2.26, and p = 0.02) and AI was associated with GCC for adjuvant chemotherapy for estrogen-receptor positive (ER+) BC (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.17-2.59, and p = 0.01). Conclusion. GCC was associated with prior receipt of breast MRI and AI for lumpectomy plus RT and adjuvant chemotherapy for ER+ BC, respectively.

Cancer-Related Fatigue, Version 2.2015

Cancer-related fatigue is defined as a distressing, persistent, subjective sense of physical, emotional, and/or cognitive tiredness or exhaustion related to cancer or cancer treatment that is not proportional to recent activity and interferes with usual functioning. It is one of the most common side effects in patients with cancer. Fatigue has been shown to be a consequence of active treatment, but it may also persist into posttreatment periods. Furthermore, difficulties in end-of-life care can be compounded by fatigue. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Cancer-Related Fatigue provide guidance on screening for fatigue and recommendations for interventions based on the stage of treatment. Interventions may include education and counseling, general strategies for the management of fatigue, and specific nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions. Fatigue is a frequently underreported complication in patients with cancer and, when reported, is responsible for reduced quality of life. Therefore, routine screening to identify fatigue is an important component in improving the quality of life for patients living with cancer.

Predictors of preoperative MRI for breast cancer: differences by data source

AIM

Investigate how the results of predictive models of preoperative MRI for breast cancer change based on available data.

MATERIALS & METHODS

A total of 1919 insured women aged ≥18 with stage 0-III breast cancer diagnosed 2002-2009. Four models were compared using nested multivariable logistic, backwards stepwise regression; model fit was assessed via area under the curve (AUC), R2.

RESULTS

MRI recipients (n = 245) were more recently diagnosed, younger, less comorbid, with higher stage disease. Significant variables included: Model 1/Claims (AUC = 0.76, R2 = 0.10): year, age, location, income; Model 2/Cancer Registry (AUC = 0.78, R2 = 0.12): stage, breast density, imaging indication; Model 3/Medical Record (AUC = 0.80, R2 = 0.13): radiologic recommendations; Model 4/Risk Factor Survey (AUC = 0.81, R2 = 0.14): procedure count.

CONCLUSION

Clinical variables accounted for little of the observed variability compared with claims data.

Prioritizing comparative effectiveness research for cancer diagnostics using a regional stakeholder approach

AIMS

This paper describes our process to engage regional stakeholders for prioritizing comparative effectiveness research (CER) in cancer diagnostics. We also describe a novel methodology for incorporating stakeholder data and input to inform the objectives of selected CER studies.

MATERIALS & METHODS

As an integrated component to establishing the infrastructure for community-based CER on diagnostic technologies, we have assembled a regional stakeholder group composed of local payers, clinicians and state healthcare representatives to not only identify and prioritize CER topics most important to the western Washington State region, but also to inform the study design of selected research areas. A landscape analysis process combining literature searches, expert consultations and stakeholder discussions was used to identify possible CER topics in cancer diagnostics. Stakeholders prioritized the top topics using a modified Delphi/group-nominal method and a standardized evaluation criteria framework to determine a final selected CER study area. Implementation of the selected study was immediate due to a unique American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funding structure involving the same researchers and stakeholders in both the prioritization and execution phases of the project. Stakeholder engagement was enhanced after study selection via a rapid analysis of a subset of payers' internal claims, coordinated by the research team, to obtain summary data of imaging patterns of use. Results of this preliminary analysis, which we termed an 'internal analysis,' were used to determine with the stakeholders the most important and feasible study objectives.

RESULTS

Stakeholders identified PET and MRI in cancers including breast, lung, lymphoma and colorectal as top priorities. In an internal analysis of breast cancer imaging, summary data from three payers demonstrated utilization rates of advanced imaging increased between 2002 and 2009 in the study population, with a great deal of variability in use between different health plans. Assessing whether breast MRI affects treatment decisions was the top breast cancer study objective selected by the stakeholders. There were other high-priority research areas including whether MRI use improved survival that were not deemed feasible with the length of follow-up time following MRI adoption.

CONCLUSION

Continuous stakeholder engagement greatly enhanced their enthusiasm for the project. We believe CER implementation will be more successful when undertaken by regional stakeholders.

Diffusion of Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Women with Advanced Ovarian Cancer in Community Settings 2003-2008: The Effect of the NCI Clinical Recommendation

Purpose: A 2006 National Cancer Institute clinical announcement recommended the use of combined intravenous (IV) and intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy over IV chemotherapy alone for women with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage 3 optimally debulked ovarian cancer due to significant survival benefit demonstrated in multiple randomized clinical trials. We examined uptake of IP chemotherapy in community practice before and after this recommendation.

Methods: We identified 288 women with FIGO stage 2 or greater incident ovarian cancer diagnosed from 2003 to 2008 at three integrated delivery systems in the US. Administrative health plan data were used to determine patient characteristics and receipt of IV and IP chemotherapy within 12 months of diagnosis. We compared characteristics of women receiving IV chemotherapy alone vs. IP chemotherapy (with or without IV chemotherapy) and assessed temporal trends in IP chemotherapy use.

Results: Overall 12.5% (n = 36) of women received IP chemotherapy during the study period. IP chemotherapy use was non-existent between 2003 and 2005. Use of IP chemotherapy occurred among 26.9% of women diagnosed in 2006 and plateaued at 20.4% of women diagnosed in 2008. IP recipients were younger (mean age 55.9 vs. 63.5 years, p = < 0.001) and more likely to have stage 3 ovarian cancer (77.8 vs. 50.4% p = 0.039) compared to their IV-only chemotherapy counterparts.

Conclusion: Use of IP chemotherapy for newly diagnosed advanced stage ovarian cancer patients was uncommon in this community setting. Future research should identify potential patient, physician, and system barriers and facilitators to using IP chemotherapy in this setting.

The End-of-Life Experience of Patients With Rare Cancers and Their Caregivers

Little is known about the end-of-life (EOL) experience of patients with rare cancers (PRC) or their caregivers. From September 2002 to August 2008, 618 stage IV cancer patients [195 PRC and 423 patients with common cancers (PCC)] and their caregivers participated in an interview-based cohort study. Patients were interviewed about EOL preferences, planning, medical care, and followed until death. Interviews with caregivers at baseline assessed caregiver mental and physical health; and postmortem, assessed EOL patient care. PRC were four times more likely than PCC to be receiving both radiation and chemotherapy at study entry (10.3% vs 3.3%, respectively, adjusted odds ratio 4.31, P=0.003). PRC's caregivers were more likely to report declining health (22.1% vs 15.7%, P=0.05) and marginally more likely to report using mental health services to cope than PCC's caregivers. PRC were as likely to acknowledge their illness was terminal, have EOL discussions, and participate in advance care planning as PCC. Future research should investigate terminal care for PRC and how providing care affects caregivers' physical and mental health.

Patient and oncologist discussions about cancer care costs

PURPOSE

Patient out-of-pocket costs are higher for cancer care than for any other health-care sector. Oncologist-patient discussions of costs are not well understood. We conducted an exploratory interview study to examine the frequency, patterns, attitudes, and preferences of both patients and providers on discussion of treatment costs.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with oncology clinicians and people receiving chemotherapy at a large nonprofit health system. Multiple investigators conducted thematic analysis using modified content analysis, grounded theory, and interaction analysis methods.

RESULTS

Patient themes included the relevance of cost to their experience, preference for the doctor to be the starting point of cost discussions, but relative infrequency of discussions with doctors or other care team member. Provider themes were an emphasis on clinical benefit above costs, conviction that cost-related decisions should rest with patients, and lack of access to treatment costs. Interest in discussing costs and barriers accessing cost information were common themes from both patients and providers.

CONCLUSIONS

Doctors and patients want to discuss treatment costs but lack access to them. These data support growing evidence for a provider role in discussions of cost during cancer treatment planning.

Patient and oncologist discussions about cancer care costs

PURPOSE

Patient out-of-pocket costs are higher for cancer care than for any other health-care sector. Oncologist-patient discussions of costs are not well understood. We conducted an exploratory interview study to examine the frequency, patterns, attitudes, and preferences of both patients and providers on discussion of treatment costs.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with oncology clinicians and people receiving chemotherapy at a large nonprofit health system. Multiple investigators conducted thematic analysis using modified content analysis, grounded theory, and interaction analysis methods.

RESULTS

Patient themes included the relevance of cost to their experience, preference for the doctor to be the starting point of cost discussions, but relative infrequency of discussions with doctors or other care team member. Provider themes were an emphasis on clinical benefit above costs, conviction that cost-related decisions should rest with patients, and lack of access to treatment costs. Interest in discussing costs and barriers accessing cost information were common themes from both patients and providers.

CONCLUSIONS

Doctors and patients want to discuss treatment costs but lack access to them. These data support growing evidence for a provider role in discussions of cost during cancer treatment planning.

Spiritual/religious struggle in hematopoietic cell transplant survivors

9573

Background: Spiritual/religious (SR) struggle (e.g., feeling abandoned or punished by God) has been associated with poorer coping and quality of life (QOL), greater depression and pain, and health declines in general cancer populations. Few studies have been conducted among survivors of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). This study examined the prevalence and predictors of SR struggle in HCT survivors. Methods: Data were collected as part of an annual questionnaire of adult (age >18 years) survivors of HCT at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, WA. The 2011 survey included a SR module that incorporated the following items: Negative Religious Coping subscale of Brief RCOPE, subscales from the McGill QOL Questionnaire and the SF-36, Patient Health Questionnaire-8, disease information and socio-demographics. SR struggle was defined as any non-zero response on the Negative Religious Coping subscale of the Brief RCOPE. A multi-variable logistic regression model was used to determine factors associated with SR struggle. Results: Of 2113 returned surveys (52% response rate), 83% returned the SR module (n=1745) and of those 1586 were included in this analysis. Subjects were 49% female; 67% Christian and 20% Agnostic/Atheist/No preference; and 91% white. Mean age was 55 years; survivors ranged from 6 months to 40 years post-transplant. Primary indications for transplant were leukemia (49%), lymphoma (20%), and multiple myeloma (15%). Twenty-eight percent indicated SR struggle. In a multi-variable model, SR struggle showed statistically significant associations with age >=65 years (odds ratio [OR] .57, p=.02); patient report of being religious only (OR 3.5, p<.001) or spiritual only (OR 1.8, p<.001) compared to being both religious and spiritual; depression (OR 1.1, p<.001); and better social support (OR 0.77, p<.001). Time since HCT, religious affiliation and race/ethnicity did not show statistically significant associations with SR struggle. Conclusions: SR struggle is common among HCT survivors, even years after HCT.Further study is needed to determine causal relations, longitudinal trajectory, impact of struggle intensity, and effects of SR struggle on health, mood and social roles for HCT survivors.

End-of-life experience of patients with rare cancers and their caregivers

9540

Background: Cancers are defined as rare if fewer than 35,000 cases are diagnosed per year. Rare cancers represented 23% of incident cancer cases and 33% of cancer deaths in 2008. However, little is known about the end-of-life (EOL) experience of patients with rare cancers or their caregivers. Methods: From September 2002 to August 2008, 618 advanced cancer patients (195 with rare and 423 with common stage IV cancers following failure of first line chemotherapy) and their caregivers participated in a U.S. multi-site, prospective, interview-based cohort study (Coping with Cancer). Patients were interviewed about EOL preferences, planning, and care at study entry. Interviews with caregivers at baseline assessed caregiver mental and physical health, while post-mortem surveys assessed EOL patient care. Descriptive statistics (t-test, chi-square) were used to characterize the study sample; logistic regression tested the association between cancer type and care received, controlling for confounders. Results: Rare cancer participants were more likely to be younger (57.7 vs 60.7 years, p=.01), Hispanic (19% vs 9%, p=.002) and have fewer co-morbidities (Charlson comorbidity index, mean 5.9 vs 6.5, p=.004), than their common-cancer counterparts. Rare cancers patients were four times more likely to be receiving both radiation and chemotherapy at study entry than common cancer patients (10.3% versus 3.3%, OR 4.31, p=0.003), but equally as likely to acknowledge their illness was terminal, have EOL discussions, and participate in advance care planning as common cancer patients. Caregivers of patients with rare cancers were more likely than common cancer caregivers to report declining health during the prior year of care-giving (22.1% versus 15.7%, p=0.05) and marginally more likely to prefer the patient choose treatment focusing on extending life rather than pain relief (22.3% vs 16.5%, p=0.08). Conclusions: Patients with advanced-stage, rare cancers may be treated more aggressively following failure of first line chemotherapy than individuals with common cancers. Future research should investigate patterns and quality of care for terminally ill patients with rare cancers and caregiver burden.

Implementing a Death with Dignity program at a comprehensive cancer center

BACKGROUND

The majority of Death with Dignity participants in Washington State and Oregon have received a diagnosis of terminal cancer. As more states consider legislation regarding physician-assisted death, the experience of a comprehensive cancer center may be informative.

METHODS

We describe the implementation of a Death with Dignity program at Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, the site of care for the Fred Hutchinson-University of Washington Cancer Consortium, a comprehensive cancer center in Seattle that serves the Pacific Northwest. Institution-level data were compared with publicly available statewide data from Oregon and Washington.

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients inquired about our Death with Dignity program between March 5, 2009, and December 31, 2011. Of these, 44 (38.6%) did not pursue the program, and 30 (26.3%) initiated the process but either elected not to continue or died before completion. Of the 40 participants who, after counseling and upon request, received a prescription for a lethal dose of secobarbital (35.1% of the 114 patients who inquired about the program), all died, 24 after medication ingestion (60% of those obtaining prescriptions). The participants at our center accounted for 15.7% of all participants in the Death with Dignity program in Washington (255 persons) and were typically white, male, and well educated. The most common reasons for participation were loss of autonomy (97.2%), inability to engage in enjoyable activities (88.9%), and loss of dignity (75.0%). Eleven participants lived for more than 6 months after prescription receipt. Qualitatively, patients and families were grateful to receive the lethal prescription, whether it was used or not.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, our Death with Dignity program has been well accepted by patients and clinicians.

Safety of early discharge for low-risk patients with febrile neutropenia: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Febrile neutropenia commonly complicates cancer chemotherapy. Outpatient treatment may reduce costs and improve patient comfort but risk progression of undetected medical problems.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

By using our validated algorithm, we identified medically stable inpatients admitted for febrile neutropenia (neutrophils < 500/μL) after chemotherapy and randomly assigned them to continued inpatient antibiotic therapy or early discharge to receive identical antibiotic treatment at home. Our primary outcome was the occurrence of any serious medical complication, defined as evidence of medical instability requiring urgent medical attention.

RESULTS

We enrolled 117 patients with 121 febrile neutropenia episodes before study termination for poor accrual. We excluded five episodes as ineligible and three because of inadequate documentation of the study outcome. Treatment groups were clinically similar, but sociodemographic imbalances occurred because of block randomization. The median presenting absolute neutrophil count was 100/μL. Hematopoietic growth factors were used in 38% of episodes. The median neutropenia duration was 4 days (range, 1 to 15 days). Five outpatients were readmitted to the hospital. Major medical complications occurred in five episodes (8%) in the hospital arm and four (9%) in the home arm (95% CI for the difference, -10% to 13%; P = .56). No study patient died. Patient-reported quality of life was similar on both arms.

CONCLUSION

We found no evidence of adverse medical consequences from home care, despite a protocol designed to detect evidence of clinical deterioration. These results should reassure clinicians who elect to treat rigorously characterized low-risk patients with febrile neutropenia in suitable outpatient settings with appropriate surveillance for unexpected clinical deterioration.

Costs of home versus inpatient treatment for fever and neutropenia: analysis of a multicenter randomized trial

PURPOSE

For patients with cancer who have febrile neutropenia, relative costs of home versus hospital treatment, including unreimbursed costs borne by patients and families, are poorly characterized. We estimated costs from a randomized trial of patients with low-risk febrile neutropenia for whom outpatient care was feasible, comparing inpatient treatment with discharge to home care after inpatient observation.

METHODS

We collected direct medical and self-reported indirect costs for 57 inpatient and 35 outpatient treatment episodes of patients enrolled in a randomized trial from 1996 through 2000. Charges from hospital bills were converted to costs using Medicare cost-to-charge ratios. Patients kept daily logs of out-of-pocket payments and time spent by informal caregivers providing care. Dollar amounts were standardized to June 2008.

RESULTS

Mean total charges for the hospital arm were 49% higher than for the home treatment arm ($16,341 v $10,977; P < .01). Mean estimated total costs for the hospital arm were 30% higher ($10,143 v $7,830; P < .01). Inspection of sparse available data suggests that payments made were similar by treatment arm. Inpatients and their caregivers spent more out of pocket than their outpatient counterparts (mean, $201 v $74; P < .01). Informal caregivers for both treatment arms reported similar time caring and lost from work.

CONCLUSION

Home intravenous antibiotic treatment was less costly than continued inpatient care for carefully selected patients with cancer having febrile neutropenia without significantly increased indirect costs or caregiver burden.

Associations between United States acculturation and the end-of-life experience of caregivers of patients with advanced cancer

BACKGROUND

Cultural beliefs and values influence treatment preferences for and experiences with end-of-life (EOL) care among racial and ethnic groups. Within-group variations, however, may exist based on level of acculturation.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the extent to which EOL treatment factors (EOL treatment preferences and physician-caregiver communication) and select psychosocial factors (mental health, complementary therapies, and internal and external social support) differ based on the level of acculturation of caregivers of patients with advanced cancer.

METHODS

One hundred sixty-seven primary caregivers of patients with advanced cancer were interviewed as part of the multisite, prospective Coping with Cancer Study.

RESULTS

Caregivers who were less acculturated were more positively predisposed to use of a feeding tube at EOL (odds ratio [OR] 0.99 [p = 0.05]), were more likely to perceive that they received too much information from their doctors (OR 0.95 [p = 0.05]), were less likely to use mental health services (OR 1.03 [p = 0.003] and OR 1.02 [p = 0.02]), and desire additional services (OR 1.03 [p = 0.10] to 1.05 [p = 0.009]) than their more acculturated counterparts. Additionally, caregivers who were less acculturated cared for patients who were less likely to report having a living will (OR 1.03 [p = 0.0003]) or durable power of attorney for health care (OR 1.02 [p = 0.007]) than more acculturated caregivers. Caregivers who were less acculturated felt their religious and spiritual needs were supported by both the community (beta -0.28 [p = 0.0003]) and medical system (beta -0.38 [p < 0.0001]), had higher degrees of self-efficacy (beta -0.22 [p = 0.005]), and had stronger family relationships and support (beta -0.27 [p = 0.0004]).

CONCLUSIONS

The level of acculturation of caregivers of patients with advanced cancer does contribute to differences in EOL preferences and EOL medical decision-making.

Provision of spiritual care to patients with advanced cancer: associations with medical care and quality of life near death

PURPOSE

To determine whether spiritual care from the medical team impacts medical care received and quality of life (QoL) at the end of life (EoL) and to examine these relationships according to patient religious coping.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prospective, multisite study of patients with advanced cancer from September 2002 through August 2008. We interviewed 343 patients at baseline and observed them (median, 116 days) until death. Spiritual care was defined by patient-rated support of spiritual needs by the medical team and receipt of pastoral care services. The Brief Religious Coping Scale (RCOPE) assessed positive religious coping. EoL outcomes included patient QoL and receipt of hospice and any aggressive care (eg, resuscitation). Analyses were adjusted for potential confounders and repeated according to median-split religious coping.

RESULTS

Patients whose spiritual needs were largely or completely supported by the medical team received more hospice care in comparison with those not supported (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 3.53; 95% CI, 1.53 to 8.12, P = .003). High religious coping patients whose spiritual needs were largely or completely supported were more likely to receive hospice (AOR = 4.93; 95% CI, 1.64 to 14.80; P = .004) and less likely to receive aggressive care (AOR = 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.79; P = .02) in comparison with those not supported. Spiritual support from the medical team and pastoral care visits were associated with higher QOL scores near death (20.0 [95% CI, 18.9 to 21.1] v 17.3 [95% CI, 15.9 to 18.8], P = .007; and 20.4 [95% CI, 19.2 to 21.1] v 17.7 [95% CI, 16.5 to 18.9], P = .003, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Support of terminally ill patients' spiritual needs by the medical team is associated with greater hospice utilization and, among high religious copers, less aggressive care at EoL. Spiritual care is associated with better patient QoL near death.

Racial differences in predictors of intensive end-of-life care in patients with advanced cancer

PURPOSE

Black patients are more likely than white patients to receive life-prolonging care near death. This study examined predictors of intensive end-of-life (EOL) care for black and white advanced cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three hundred two self-reported black (n = 68) and white (n = 234) patients with stage IV cancer and caregivers participated in a US multisite, prospective, interview-based cohort study from September 2002 to August 2008. Participants were observed until death, a median of 116 days from baseline. Patient-reported baseline predictors included EOL care preference, physician trust, EOL discussion, completion of a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order, and religious coping. Caregiver postmortem interviews provided information regarding EOL care received. Intensive EOL care was defined as resuscitation and/or ventilation followed by death in an intensive care unit.

RESULTS

Although black patients were three times more likely than white patients to receive intensive EOL care (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.04, P = .037), white patients with a preference for this care were approximately three times more likely to receive it (aOR = 13.20, P = .008) than black patients with the same preference (aOR = 4.46, P = .058). White patients who reported an EOL discussion or DNR order did not receive intensive EOL care; similar reports were not protective for black patients (aOR = 0.53, P = .460; and aOR = 0.65, P = .618, respectively).

CONCLUSION

White patients with advanced cancer are more likely than black patients with advanced cancer to receive the EOL care they initially prefer. EOL discussions and DNR orders are not associated with care for black patients, highlighting a need to improve communication between black patients and their clinicians.