Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer

The evolution of fluoropyrimidine therapy: from intravenous to oral

Chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer is based on i.v. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Numerous attempts have been made to increase the therapeutic benefit of 5-FU through schedule modification and biomodulation, but only modest improvements have been achieved. Capecitabine is an oral fluoropyrimidine that was developed in response to the clinical need for new therapeutic options offering improved efficacy, tolerability, and convenience for patients. Capecitabine was rationally designed to mimic continuous infusion 5-FU. It is rapidly and almost completely absorbed through the gastrointestinal wall and is converted to 5-FU via a three-step enzymatic cascade. 5-FU is generated preferentially in tumor by exploiting the higher activity of thymidine phosphorylase in tumor tissue compared with normal tissue. Results of a randomized, phase II trial led to the selection of a regimen of capecitabine for further clinical development (1,250 mg/m(2) twice daily for 14 days followed by a 7-day rest period). Subsequently, two large, randomized, phase III trials were conducted to compare capecitabine with i.v. bolus 5-FU/leucovorin ([LV]; Mayo Clinic regimen) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. A prospective, integrated analysis of data from the studies showed that capecitabine offers superior activity and an improved safety profile compared with 5-FU/LV. This article summarizes these developments in the treatment of colorectal cancer and assesses the feasibility of replacing i.v. 5-FU-based therapy with oral capecitabine. In addition, retrospective analyses assessing the impact of the dose modification scheme on the efficacy and tolerability of capecitabine are presented, and dose recommendations in special populations are reviewed.

Integrating oxaliplatin into the management of colorectal cancer

Oxaliplatin, a third-generation platinum analogue, is a novel compound with proven anti-tumor activity in colorectal cancer that has demonstrated synergy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in human tumor xenograft models. A series of phase II trials demonstrated that, as second-line therapy, oxaliplatin in combination with 5-FU/leucovorin (LV) is active and can overcome clinical resistance to 5-FU. Subsequently, two large, randomized, phase III trials demonstrated that the addition of oxaliplatin to 5-FU/LV significantly improved response rates and time to disease progression in the first-line setting, but had no statistically significant impact on survival. Oxaliplatin in combination with 5-FU/LV represents an important treatment option for patients in whom 5-FU-based therapy has failed and as first-line therapy. Oxaliplatin has also been investigated in combination with the oral fluoropyrimidine, capecitabine. As an oral agent that exploits the high intratumoral activity of thymidine phosphorylase to generate 5-FU preferentially within tumor tissue, capecitabine may improve the efficacy and tolerability of fluoropyrimidine/oxaliplatin combination therapy. A phase I dose-escalation study has been performed in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors to establish the most appropriate regimen. The study indicated that the combination is feasible and has substantial antitumor activity in patients with colorectal cancer. This article provides an overview of the clinical trial data for oxaliplatin and discusses how oxaliplatin may best be used in the future.

Chemotherapy in colorectal cancer: new options and new challenges

Colorectal cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality in Europe and North America. Studies conducted in the last two decades have established the role of adjuvant therapy in stage III colon cancer. However, there is currently no international consensus with the role of adjuvant treatment in stage II disease. The introduction of irinotecan, oxaliplatin, oral fluoropyrimidines and raltitrexed has broadened the treatment options available for patients with advanced colorectal cancer. The integration of these drugs with the new molecular targeted therapies such as epidermal growth factor receptor, cyclooxygenase, angiogenesis and matrix metalloproteinase inhibition will form the basis of clinical research in the next few years and may, in the future, impact on the survival of patients with colorectal cancer. This review will focus on the place of chemotherapy in colorectal cancer, but not its role in combination with radiotherapy in rectal cancer.

Trimetrexate as biochemical modulator of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer: final results of a randomised European study

BACKGROUND

Trimetrexate (TMTX) is a biochemical modulator of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV). Phase II trials have shown promising activity of 5-FU/LV/TMTX in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACC). This trial evaluated the effect of TMTX in combination with 5-FU/LV as first-line treatment in ACC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with ACC were randomised to receive either intravenous LV 200 mg/m2/5-FU 600 mg/m2 or TMTX 110 mg/m2 followed 24 h later by LV 200 mg/m2/5-FU 500 mg/m2 plus oral LV rescue. Both schedules were given weekly for 6 weeks every 8 weeks. Patients were evaluated for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), tumour response, quality of life (QoL) and toxicity.

RESULTS

A total of 365 patients were randomised. A statistically significant prolongation of median PFS was seen in patients treated with TMTX/5-FU/LV compared with 5-FU/LV (5.4 months versus 4.1 months, respectively; P = 0.03), and a trend towards a significant benefit for OS (13.4 months versus 10.5 months, respectively; P = 0.08). Tumour response, QoL and toxicity were comparable between the two arms. Diarrhoea was the most frequently occurring grade 3 or 4 toxicity (22% and 30%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of TMTX to a weekly regimen of 5-FU/LV results in a small but significant improvement in PFS without adding toxicity or worsening QoL in patients with ACC.

Quality of life and chronotherapy

The importance of evaluating patient's quality of life (QoL) in clinical practice and research is recognized clearly in oncology. In the advanced phase of disease such an evaluation represents an endpoint as important as survival. Quality of life is both a subjective and multidimensional concept evaluated mainly by validated questionnaires. In colorectal trials involving advanced stage disease the effects of different chemotherapy treatments on QoL were evaluated. Almost all the studies found no deterioration in QoL during chemotherapy. The European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Chronotherapy Study Group utilized three different approaches to assess QoL. The first centered on the stability of QoL during a 6mon treatment period in patients undergoing chronotherapy. The second centered on research of the biological and clinical determinants of QoL involving features of the circadian activity rhythm and patient survival and the relationship between QoL and patient performance status, response to therapy, and psychosocial variables as well as drug-induced toxicity. The third centered on the clinical effectiveness of psychological intervention on patients undergoing chronotherapy to improve psychosocial status during treatment. This papers reviews the results of EORTC Chronotherapy Group studies on QoL.

Treatment of colon and rectal cancer

During the past two decades, remarkable progress has been made in the treatment of cancers of the colon and rectum. Both oncologic and functional outcomes for this disease have improved dramatically. The reasons for the improved patient outcome in this disease include advances in knowledge of the biology of the disease, advances in surgical instrumentation and techniques, and ongoing advances in multimodality therapy, with the use of radiation and chemotherapy as an adjuvant to surgical resection. This review details many of these advances in a comprehensive manner and illustrates the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach for optimizing outcome for patients with these cancers.

Randomized multicenter phase II trial of oxaliplatin plus irinotecan versus raltitrexed as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Irinotecan and oxaliplatin are two new agents with promising activity in advanced colorectal cancer. Based on preclinical and clinical evidence that both drugs act synergistically, a randomized phase II study was initiated to investigate the therapeutic potential and tolerance of this combination in the front-line setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ninety-two patients with previously untreated, measurable disease were randomized to receive biweekly oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) plus irinotecan 175 mg/m(2) or raltitrexed 3 mg/m(2) given on day 1 every 3 weeks. Upon development of progressive disease, second-line treatment with the opposite arm was effected.

RESULTS

Patients allocated to oxaliplatin/irinotecan had a significantly better radiologically confirmed response rate (43.5% v 19.6%; P =.0025) and longer progression-free survival (median, 7.1 v 5.0 months; P =.0033). Improvement in overall survival, however, did not reach the level of significance (median, 16.0 v 16.5 months; P =.3943). The response rate after cross-over was 33.3% (eight of 24) for assessable patients treated with oxaliplatin/irinotecan compared with 14.2% (three of 21) for those treated with second-line raltitrexed. Oxaliplatin/irinotecan caused more hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities, necessitating dose reductions in 10 of the first 20 patients. After adjustment of the irinotecan starting dose from 175 to 150 mg/m(2), tolerance of treatment was acceptable; the most commonly encountered events (all grades) were neutropenia (81%), alopecia (65%), nausea/emesis (62%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (62%), and diarrhea (46%).

CONCLUSION

Oxaliplatin/irinotecan seems beneficial as first-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer, with an acceptable toxicity profile at the reduced irinotecan dose level. Its promising therapeutic potential is supported by the high response activity noted in the raltitrexed control arm after cross-over, which may also explain the lack of a difference in overall survival.

Effects of different schedules of oxaliplatin treatment on the peripheral nervous system of the rat

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of oxaliplatin scheduling on the onset of peripheral neurotoxicity and ototoxicity in a rat model. Animals were treated with four different schedules of oxaliplatin using two cumulative doses (36 and 48 mg/kg intraperitoneally (i.p.)). The neuropathological examination evidenced dorsal root ganglia (DRG) nucleolar, nuclear and somatic size reduction with nucleolar segregation in the treated rats. Sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV) was reduced after oxaliplatin treatment, while the auditory pathway was unaffected. After treatment, platinum was detected in the kidney, DRG and sciatic nerve. After a 5-week follow-up period, recovery of the pathological changes in the DRG and sciatic nerves occurred, although platinum was still detectable in these tissues. The following conclusions may be drawn: the main targets of oxaliplatin neurotoxicity were the DRG; the shorter the interval between the injections, the higher the severity of peripheral neuropathy and this was also related to the cumulative oxaliplatin dose; the peripheral neurotoxicity tended to be reversible; ototoxicity was absent even with high cumulative doses of oxaliplatin.

Regional chemotherapy of nonresectable colorectal liver metastases with mitoxantrone, 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, and mitomycin C may prolong survival

BACKGROUND

Regional chemotherapy of isolated, nonresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) by hepatic artery infusion (HAI) has the advantages of high response rates and the possibility of downstaging and resection of CRLMs. 5-Fluorodeoxyuridine (5-FUDR) has been the drug studied in most Phase II and III trials. The meta-analysis of the Phase III trials comparing HAI with systemic or supportive therapy confirmed an advantage for response and even survival for HAI. Hepatic artery infusion with 5-FUDR, however, is hepatotoxic, inducing sclerosing cholangitis (SC). The authors have introduced 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with folinic acid for HAI and found equal effectivity but no SC when compared with HAI with 5-FUDR. Now, they report a new combination chemotherapy protocol based on HAI with 5-FU with FA and on in vitro Phase II studies suggesting mitoxantrone and mitomycin C as active drugs for HAI in CRLM. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between February 1993 and August 2000, 63 patients with CRLM were treated with HAI using mitoxantrone, 5-FU with FA, and mitomycin C (MFFM) via port catheters with a protocol planing up to 11 cycles of treatment. Toxicity and response were analyzed according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, and survival was analyzed according to Kaplan-Meier. All patients were treated with more than two HAI cycles.

RESULTS

The objective response rate (complete remission and partial remission) was 54% and primary intrahepatic progression (progressive disease) occurred in 4.8%, whereas in 41.3% of the patients the intrahepatic disease was evaluated as no change. Median survival times from the first diagnosis of CRLM or start of HAI were 25.7 months and 23.7 months, respectively, and 7 patients lived longer than 40 months. Grade 3 toxicity according to WHO occurred in 34.9%, and Grade 4 occurred in 3.2%. No toxic death or SC occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Our new HAI protocol with MFFM seems to be superior to HAI with 5-FUDR, 5-FU with FA, and systemic chemotherapy with 5-FU and FA at acceptable toxicity. Currently, HAI with MFFM is compared with systemic chemotherapy using 5-FU and FA intravenously in a randomized Phase III trial.

An oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory intermediate and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of substituting cisplatin with oxaliplatin in the DHAP (dexamethasone, cytarabine and cisplatin) regimen for patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Twenty-four evaluable patients with intermediate or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were treated at 3-weekly intervals with oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2, d 1), cytarabine (2 g/m2 for two doses, d 2) and dexamethasone (40 mg, d 1-4). The median age of the patients was 58 (range 18-70). Histological subtypes were diffuse large B cell, 20; mantle cell, two; anaplastic large cell, one; and peripheral T cell, one. The overall objective response rate (RR) was 50% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 29-71%] including four complete responses and eight partial responses. RR for those patients treated at first relapse was higher than those treated at second and subsequent relapse (77% versus 29%). Grade 3 and 4 toxicity was mainly haematological: anaemia 17%, neutropenia 75% and thrombocytopenia 75%. No grade 4 non-haematological toxicity was reported. No significant renal and neurotoxicity was demonstrated. Median survival was 10.6 months. Probabilities of 1-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 47% (95% CI = 26-66%) and 50% (95% CI = 23-72%) respectively. In conclusion, dexamethasone, cytarabine and oxaliplatin (DHAX) is a novel combination in salvage therapy for relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. It has clinically significant activity with an acceptable toxicity profile. Lack of renal toxicity makes DHAX an attractive cytoreductive regimen before high-dose chemotherapy.

Impact of surgery on survival in palliative patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after first line treatment with weekly 24-hour infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid

BACKGROUND

In palliative first-line treatment of colorectal cancer, the secondary resection of distant metastases after downstaging has constantly gained in importance. The objective of this prospective study was to examine the tumor response rate, the toxicity, the median survival time and the prognostic impact of metastatic resection after downstaging of consecutively enrolled patients with primary nonresectable colorectal cancer treated with once weekly 24-hour (24-h) infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 1995 and July 1997, 53 consecutive patients with primary nonresectable metastases were recruited for a prospective phase II study. The patients received in out-patient care 500 mg/m2 folinic acid in the form of a 1-2-hour infusion followed by 2600 mg/m2 5-FU administered as a 24-h infusion once weekly. One treatment cycle comprised six weekly infusions followed by a two week rest. Three cycles were administered, and in the event of complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) and good tolerability, a fourth cycle was undertaken. Thereafter, the possibility of performing a curative metastatic resection was investigated.

RESULTS

Of the 53 patients treated, 7 showed a CR (13%), 15 patients a PR (28%), 26 patients stable disease (SD) (49%), and 5 patients progressive disease (PD) (10%). As the main symptom of toxicity, diarrhea (CTC grade 3 + 4) was observed in 11 patients (21%), followed by leucocytopenia (CTC grade 3 + 4) in 2 patients (4%), and the hand-foot syndrome in 1 patient (2%). The median survival time was 17 months with a median follow-up of 41 months (range: 28-59 months). In 9 patients (17%), a secondary metastatic resection was considered; in 6 patients (11%) curative resection was performed, and 4 patients (8%) showed no evidence of disease for at least three years.

CONCLUSION

In this phase II study, we have been able to show prospectively that, after downstaging by palliative treatment using a weekly 24-h infusion of high-dose 5-FU and folinic acid, secondary curative metastatic resection was technically feasible in 11% of the patients. For some of these patients, long-term survival is therefore possible. Secondary metastatic resection should be carried out in close interdisciplinary cooperation, and should be further investigated in prospective phase III studies.

Metastatic colorectal cancer

Despite advances in screening procedures and the use of adjuvant therapy, approximately 50% of patients with colorectal cancer eventually will develop metastatic disease. Long-term disease-free survival can be achieved in 25% to 40% of selected patients who undergo resection of liver or lung metastases. For all other patients, treatment is palliative. For decades, 5-fluorouracil was the only available drug for colorectal cancer; hence, numerous trials were performed that used various administration schedules and modulating agents to improve therapeutic efficacy. The addition of leucovorin to 5-FU improves response but not survival. Infusion schedules alter the toxicity profile but have a negligible impact on survival. Irinotecan was the first new drug to demonstrate activity in colorectal cancer. It was used initially in the second-line setting, where it was shown to improve quality of life and survival over best supportive care or infusional 5-FU. Recently, irinotecan has been incorporated into the front-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in combination with 5-FU and leucovorin; this combination improves survival by approximately 3 months. Careful patient selection and adherence to strict dose adjustments are essential to prevent significant toxicity when patients are treated on this regimen. The oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine recently has been approved for the front-line treatment of patients with colorectal cancer who are not appropriate candidates for combination therapy. Oxaliplatin, a novel DACH (diaminocyclohexane) platinum with definite activity in colorectal cancer, is approved for this disease in Europe and is undergoing phase III clinical trials in the United States. Other drugs with potential activity in colorectal cancer include raltitrexed, pemetrexed disodium, and the epothilone analog BMS-247550 (Bristol-Myers Squibb, New York, NY). Novel cytostatics with promising activity in colorectal cancer are being evaluated in clinical trials, including epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, such as IMC-C225 (Imclone Systems, New York, NY) and ZD1839 (AstraZeneca, London, UK), angiogenesis inhibitors such as bevacizumab and SU5416 (Sugen, San Francisco, CA), and vaccines such as CEAVac (Titan Pharmaceuticals, San Francisco, CA). For those patients whose disease is localized to the liver, there also is an emerging role for local therapies, including cryosurgery, radiofrequency ablation, and hepatic artery infusional chemotherapy, and resection. The emergence of these new drugs and new interventional modalities has allowed physicians who treat colorectal cancer to move beyond 5-FU.

Capecitabine and oxaliplatin in advanced colorectal cancer: a dose-finding study

PURPOSE

Capecitabine and oxaliplatin are both active anticancer agents in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC). The aim of this dose-finding trial was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the activity of the combination in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-five chemotherapy-pretreated patients received the combination of capecitabine and oxaliplatin. Capecitabine was administered orally twice a day continuously for 14 days in doses ranging from 1,650 to 2,500 mg/m2/d, and oxaliplatin was administered as a two-hour infusion on day 1 using dose, ranges from 100 to 130 mg/m2 repeated every three weeks.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were assessable for toxicity, and DLTs were diarrhea (grade > or = 3: 27%) and stomatitis (grade > or = 3: 9%) at dose level VI. Dose level V (capecitabine 2500 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 120 mg/m2) was found to be the MTD. Hematological toxicity was minimal, overall neurotoxicity (grade 1-4) was 27% with 1% grade 3-4. A global response rate was 17% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 2%-32%) and the median overall survival was 12 months.

CONCLUSION

The recommended dose for further phase II studies is capecitabine 2,500 mg/m2/d with intermittent schedule and oxaliplatin 120 mg/m2 every three weeks. The toxicities were mainly gastrointestinal: diarrhea, stomatitis and vomiting. This combination should be studied in phase II trials in advanced colorectal.

Randomized multicenter phase II study comparing a combination of fluorouracil and folinic acid and alternating irinotecan and oxaliplatin with oxaliplatin and irinotecan in fluorouracil-pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients

PURPOSE

To assess antitumor activity and safety of two regimens in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with proven fluorouracil (5-FU) resistance in a randomized phase II study: 5-FU/folinic acid (FA) combined with alternating irinotecan (also called CPT-11) and oxaliplatin (FC/FO tritherapy), and an oxaliplatin/irinotecan (OC) combination.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-two patients were treated: arm FC/FO (32 patients) received, every 4 weeks, FA 200 mg/m(2) followed by a 400-mg/m(2) 5-FU bolus injection, then a 600-mg/m(2) continuous infusion of 5-FU on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks administered alternately with irinotecan (180 mg/m(2) on day 1) and oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2) on day 15). Arm OC (30 patients) received oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 200 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

In an intent-to-treat analysis, two partial responses lasting 10.7 and 16 months were observed with the tritherapy regimen, and seven (median duration, 11 months; range, 10.6 to 11.4 months) were observed with the bitherapy regimen. Median progression-free and overall survival times were 8.2 and 9.8 months, respectively, in the FC/FO arm and 8.5 and 12.3 months, respectively, in the OC arm. Main grade 3/4 toxicities were, respectively, neutropenia, 53% and 47%; febrile neutropenia, 13% and 3%; diarrhea, 19% and 10%; vomiting, 6% and 13%; and neurosensory toxicity, 3% and 3%. No treatment-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSION

The every-3-weeks OC combination is safe and active in advanced 5-FU-resistant CRC patients. The lower activity data seen with the tritherapy regimen may be related to the lower dose intensities of irinotecan and oxaliplatin in this schedule.

Management of chemotherapy-induced adverse effects in the treatment of colorectal cancer

The anticancer agents fluorouracil, raltitrexed, irinotecan and oxaliplatin show limited efficacy in the treatment of colorectal cancer and may be associated with substantial toxicity. Therefore, the prevention and reduction of chemotherapy-induced adverse effects is of major significance, in accordance with the increasing concern for the quality of life of patients with cancer. Therapeutic drug monitoring of fluorouracil and chronomodulation of fluorouracil and oxaliplatin, have been effective in reducing the incidence and gravity of adverse effects in several clinical trials. However, these concepts have not been implemented in clinical practice yet. At the present time, dose adaptation and supportive measures are the main tools for toxicity control in the treatment of colorectal cancer. In this review, supportive measures for alleviation of the adverse effects of fluorouracil, raltitrexed, irinotecan and oxaliplatin, respectively, are described, based on study results. The main adverse effects of these agents are myelosuppression, oral mucositis, diarrhoea, acute cholinergic syndrome, nausea and emesis, neurotoxicity, hand-foot syndrome and other cutaneous adverse effects, ocular toxicity, cardiotoxicity, small bowel toxicity, asthenia, elevated liver transaminase levels and alopecia. The incidence and gravity of these adverse effects are more or less related to the agent and administration schedule involved. The supportive measures and recommendations include the use of specific drugs, alterations of administration schedule and several nonpharmacological methods. In addition, guidelines for dosage adjustments when toxicity occurs are presented. For optimal management of adverse effects, patients should be considered individually, while patients, nurses and physicians should cooperate to identify and treat adverse effects in an early stage of their development.

Irinotecan plus oxaliplatin: a promising combination for advanced colorectal cancer

The standard treatment for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) has been 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy. However, addition of irinotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, to the combination of 5-FU and leucovorin (LV) has proven to be superior to treatment with 5-FU/LV alone in both chemonaive as well as previously treated patients. Oxaliplatin, a 1,2 diaminocyclohexane platinum compound, in combination with 5-FU and LV, has demonstrated superiority as first-line therapy over 5-FU and LV in terms of response rate and time to progression. The irinotecan/oxaliplatin combination showed synergistic activity in vitro, and the optimal dose safety profile has been explored in several phase I studies. Neutropenia and diarrhea were the dose-limiting toxicities. The recommended dose of irinotecan/oxaliplatin in every-2-week and every-3-week schedules ranged from 150-200 mg/m2 and 85 mg/m2, respectively. In the weekly schedule, the recommended doses of irinotecan/oxaliplatin were 65 mg/m2 and 60 mg/m2. Promising clinical efficacy in CRC was observed in all studies. A recent randomized phase II study revealed that the irinotecan/oxaliplatin combination has equivalent clinical activity to other 5-FU-based combinations and a manageable toxicity profile. The evaluation of irinotecan/oxaliplatin in phase III trials as well as in combination with 5-FU is ongoing.

Oxaliplatin and protracted venous infusion of 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced or relapsed 5-fluorouracil pretreated colorectal cancer

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the activity and safety of oxaliplatin and protracted venous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (PVI 5-FU) in patients with advanced or relapsed 5-FU pretreated colorectal cancer. 38 patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal carcinoma with documented progression on or within 6 months following 5-FU or thymidylate synthase inhibitor containing chemotherapy were recruited between June 1997 and September 2000. Oxaliplatin (100 mg x m(-2)) was given every 2 weeks and PVI 5-FU (300 mg x m(-2) x day(-1)) was administered. Median age of patients was 61 years. 17 patients had >2 sites of disease involvement. 10 had received 5-FU based adjuvant chemotherapy. 16 received oxaliplatin and PVI 5-FU as second-line chemotherapy for advanced disease and 22 as third or subsequent lines. Median follow up was 6.1 months. The best achieved objective tumour response rate was 29% (11 partial responses 95% confidence interval [CI] = 15-46%). 20 patients (52.6%) had stable disease. The median duration of response was 3.9 months. Even for patients who had previously received both 5-FU and irinotecan (n = 22), 27.3% had partial response with oxaliplatin and PVI 5-FU. 37 patients had symptoms on entry into the study. 25 patients had pain, 10 had anorexia and 28 had lethargy. 64%, 70% and 17.9% had symptomatic improvement after treatment respectively. Grade 3-4 toxicities were anaemia 10.6%, neutropenia 2.6%, thrombocytopenia 5.2%, diarrhoea 18.9%, nausea and vomiting 2.7%, infection 5.4% and lethargy 37.8%. The median survival was 9.1 months. Probability of overall survival at 6 months was 58.4% (95% CI = 38.7-73.7%). The median failure-free survival was 4 months. Oxaliplatin and PVI 5FU is an active and well tolerated regimen in patients with heavily pre-treated advanced colorectal cancer.

Capecitabine in the management of colorectal cancer

Significant progress has been made in the chemotherapy of colorectal cancer. The author discusses new available options and the development of a new oral fluoropyrimidine, capecitabine (Xeloda). The rational development of this targeted drug with its selective activation in tumor tissue is highlighted. The clinical development of capecitabine and its present and future role in the management of colorectal cancer are reviewed.

Mortality associated with irinotecan plus bolus fluorouracil/leucovorin: summary findings of an independent panel

PURPOSE

To review and assign attribution for the causes of early deaths on two National Cancer Institute-sponsored cooperative group studies involving irinotecan and bolus fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (IFL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The inpatient, outpatient, and research records of patients treated on Cancer and Leukemia Group B protocol C89803 and on North Center Cancer Treatment Group protocol N9741 were reviewed by a panel of five medical oncologists not directly involved with either study. Each death was categorized as treatment-induced, treatment-exacerbated, or treatment-unrelated.

RESULTS

The records of 44 patients who experienced early deaths on C89803 (21 patients) or N9741 (23 patients) were reviewed. Patients treated with irinotecan plus bolus 5-FU/leucovorin had a three-fold higher rate of treatment-induced or treatment-exacerbated death than patients treated on the other arm(s) of the respective studies. For C89803, these rates were 2.5% (16 of 635) for IFL versus 0.8% (five of 628) for bolus weekly 5-FU and leucovorin. For N9741, these rates were 3.5% (10 of 289) for IFL, 1.1% (three of 277) for oxaliplatin plus bolus and infusional 5-FU and leucovorin, and 1.1% (three of 275) for oxaliplatin plus irinotecan. Multiple gastrointestinal toxicities that often occurred together were characterized into a gastrointestinal syndrome. Sudden, unexpected thromboembolic events were characterized as a vascular syndrome. The majority of deaths in both studies were attributable to one or both of these syndromes.

CONCLUSION

Close clinical monitoring, early recognition of toxicities and toxicity syndromes, aggressive therapeutic intervention, and withholding therapy in the presence of unresolved drug-related toxicities is recommended for patients receiving IFL or other intensive chemotherapy regimens.

Irinotecan and oxaliplatin: an overview of the novel chemotherapeutic options for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequent malignancies in humans and an important cause of cancer death. Metastatic colorectal cancer remains incurable with available systemic therapeutic options. The most active cytotoxic drug against this malignancy, the antimetabolite 5-fluorouracil, was developed more than forty years ago, and as a single agent produces responses in only 10 to 15% of patients which in general last less than one year. Efforts to ameliorate these poor results resulted in the 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin combination, which enhances response rates about two-fold, without, however, significantly improving survival rates. The recent emergence of a handful of new 5-fluorouracil analogues and folate antagonists, as well as the topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan, and the third-generation platinum compound oxaliplatin, is likely to alter this gloomy scenario. These agents are at least as effective as 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma, both untreated and previously treated with 5-fluorouracil-based regimens. This has led to the approval of irinotecan as second-line treatment for 5-fluorouracil-refractory disease, while the use of oxaliplatin has been suggested for patients having a defective 5-fluorouracil catabolism. Recently, FDA approved the combination of irinotecan with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for first-line treatment of advanced colon cancer. Based on the synergistic preclinical antitumor effects of some of these agents, their meaningful single-agent activity, distinct mechanisms of cytotoxicity and resistance, and only partially overlapping toxicity profiles, effective combination regimens are now being developed, which are likely to lead to a new, more hopeful era for patients suffering from advanced colorectal carcinoma.

[Levofolinate and fluorouracil combination therapy]

Levofolinate and fluorouracil regimen (l-leucovorin and 5 fluorouracil regimen) is a biochemical modulation of 5 fluorouracil (5FU) by leucovorin (LV). In the USA and Europe d,l-LV and 5FU regimen is frequently administered for colorectal cancer treatment and recognized as the standard regimen. In Japan, multi-institutional clinical trials of l-leucovorin (l-LV), a bioactive diastereomer of leucovorin, and 5FU combination were conducted for the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal cancer with comparable results to the US/Europe data. This l-LV and 5FU regimen was approved in August 1999 for the indications of advanced gastric cancer and colorectal cancer. The dosage and administration is referred to the weekly method developed at RPMI. Recently, the irinotecan (CPT-11) or oxariplatin plus LV and 5FU combination showed higher antitumor activities than the LV and 5FU combination with increased progression-free survival. These regimens, however, are not yet properly established because clinical trial results with Japanese patients are not completed for agreement of the dosage and administration schedule. For the l-LV and 5FU regimen diarrhea and leukocytopenia, including grade 3 and higher, were reported as the major adverse events. Administration for eligible patients with periodical monitoring of diagnostic data is necessary.

Factors predicting efficacy of oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) +/- folinic acid in a compassionate-use cohort of 481 5-FU-resistant advanced colorectal cancer patients

A statistical analysis was performed on the patient data collected from two compassionate-use programmes using oxaliplatin (Eloxatin(R)) + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) +/- folinic acid (FA), to identify predictive factors for oxaliplatin-based salvage treatment in patients with 5-FU-resistant advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC). 481 5-FU-resistant ACRC patients, most with performance status < or = 2, > or = 3 involved sites, and > or = 2 prior lines of chemotherapy, received oxaliplatin + 5-FU +/- FA. Prognostic factors associated with overall response rate (ORR), time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic and/or Cox proportional hazards analyses. The ORR was 16% (95% CI: 13-20), the median TTP was 4.2 months (95% CI: 3.4-4.6), and the median OS was 9.6 months (95% CI: 8.6-10.6). The multivariate analysis indicated poor (> or = 2 WHO) performance status (PS), a large number of prior chemotherapy regimens (> or = 3), a low baseline haemoglobin level (< 10 g/dl), and a triweekly (vs biweekly) treatment administration schedule as significantly associated (P< 0.05) with a lower ORR. Sex (male), number of organs involved (> or =3) and alkaline phosphatase (AP) level (> or = 2 x the upper limit of normal) were associated (P< 0.05) with shorter TTP. Poor PS, a large number of organs involved, and elevated AP were independently and significantly correlated with shorter OS. Our analysis identified a relationship between efficacy results of oxaliplatin + 5-FU +/- FA treatment in 5-FU-resistant ACRC patients and baseline prognostic factors related to PS, extent of disease and number of prior regimens.

Review of the role of CPT-11 in the treatment of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in Western countries, and although the treatment of advanced CRC has progressed substantially, the improvements in response rates have not always been translated into a significant survival benefit. Until recently, the standard therapy for advanced CRC was a variety of biomodulated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) regimens. 5-FU was used as first- or second-line therapy, and a different 5-FU regimen was used second line if first-line 5-FU therapy failed. Typically, the survival times for these patients were short and their quality of life poor. In recent years, a variety of new agents have emerged that have demonstrated activity in the treatment of advanced CRC. Of these, irinotecan (CPT-11) and oxaliplatin in combination with 5-FU and folinic acid (FA) have yielded the most promising results. However, only CPT-11 combined with either bolus or high-dose infusional 5-FU/FA, in randomized phase III studies, has demonstrated an increased response rate and median time to progression, producing a significant and clinically relevant survival advantage. In 2 randomized phase III studies, oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA demonstrated a clear increase in response rate over 5-FU/FA alone but failed to demonstrate a survival advantage. CPT-11 was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in April 2000 for the first-line treatment of advanced CRC in combination with 5-FU/FA.

New chemotherapy approaches in colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer deaths in the Western world, with approximately 50% of all patients dying from metastatic disease. Until recently, therapeutic options for advanced colorectal cancer were mainly confined to chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil in various schedules, with or without biochemical modulation with leucovorin. The development of new cytotoxic drugs with substantial activity in this tumor during the past 2 years has dramatically changed treatment strategies and therapeutic goals in metastatic colorectal cancer and has introduced neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by secondary surgery with the intent of long-term survival. Among these new drugs, oral fluoropyrimidines (tegafur/uracil and capecitabine), irinotecan, and oxaliplatin have already established themselves as part of various treatment approaches. Other novel therapeutics including agents designed to act on molecular targets already show promising activity and will become part of combination protocols with current standard chemotherapy.

Hepatic-arterial chemotherapy

The liver is a common site of metastases from cancers from most sites, but particularly from the gastrointestinal tract, since the portal vein drains into the liver. About half of all patients with colorectal cancer develop liver metastases. The response of liver metastases to systemic combination chemotherapy has improved, but the 2-year survival is only 25-30%. Hepatic-arterial infusion of chemotherapy produces higher response rates, with a 2-year survival of 50-60%. In patients who can undergo liver resection followed by hepatic-arterial infusion, the 2-year survival is 85%. This review summarises the anatomical basis, pharmacokinetic background, and cost-effectiveness of this procedure. We discuss the phase II and phase III studies of hepatic-arterial infusion therapy, with a focus on liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

An overview of chemotherapy-induced peripheral sensory neuropathy, focusing on oxaliplatin

When treating patients for metastatic cancer, there is always a balance between the benefits of treatment and resulting side-effects. Peripheral sensory neuropathy (PSN) is a side-effect of many anticancer agents used in routine practice. Oxaliplatin is a relatively new agent currently licensed in over 50 countries including France, Germany and the UK for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Although it is a new agent, it is from the same family of drugs as cisplatin, an agent that has been used for many years. PSN is the most commonly discussed side-effect associated with oxaliplatin. Oxaliplatin-induced PSN is characterized by two distinct syndromes: a transient acute dysaesthesia and a cumulative distal neurotoxicity. Importantly, both are generally reversible after stopping treatment. Oxaliplatin-induced acute PSN is triggered and exacerbated by cold and can be greatly reduced in affected patients simply by avoiding cold conditions. Oxaliplatin-induced cumulative PSN may also be managed by temporary cessation of treatment.

Phase I Study of Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Floxuridine and Dexamethasone With Systemic Irinotecan for Unresectable Hepatic Metastases From Colorectal Cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities of concurrent systemic irinotecan and hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of floxuridine (FUDR) and dexamethasone in patients with unresectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer, to determine the safety of this combination in patients who have undergone cryosurgery, and to evaluate the pharmacokinetic effects of HAI FUDR on the metabolism of irinotecan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-six previously treated patients with unresectable liver metastases and no known extrahepatic disease were treated concurrently with intravenous irinotecan weekly for 3 weeks and with HAI of FUDR and dexamethasone for 14 days (both were recycled in 28 days). Parallel cohorts of patients treated with or without cryosurgery were entered at escalating dose levels.

RESULTS: The MTD for patients who did not undergo cryosurgery was 100 mg/m2 of irinotecan weekly for 3 weeks every 4 weeks with concurrent HAI FUDR (0.16 mg/kg/d × pump volume/flow rate) plus dexamethasone for 14 days of a 28-day cycle. The dose-limiting toxicities were diarrhea and neutropenia. The response rate (complete and partial) among all patients who did not undergo cryosurgery was 74%. All patients in the cryosurgery group responded, and seven of the eight cryosurgery patients developed normal positron emission tomography scans after chemotherapy. HAI FUDR had no effect on the metabolism of irinotecan.

CONCLUSION: Combination therapy with HAI FUDR and dexamethasone plus systemic irinotecan may be safely administered to patients with unresectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. The MTD has been reached for patients with unresectable disease, and we continue to investigate the MTD for patients who have undergone cryosurgery. Although the main objective of this study was to evaluate the toxicity of the combined regimen, a high response rate (74%) was observed.

Second-line treatment with oxaliplatin + raltitrexed in patients with advanced colorectal cancer failing fluoropyrimidine/leucovorin-based chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of combined raltitrexed and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer pretreated with fluoropyrimidine leucovorin-based chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-six patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, who progressed while receiving or within six months after withholding palliative chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidines leucovorin +/- irinotecan, participated in this study. Treatment consisted of oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 and raltitrexed 3.0 mg/m2 both given on day 1 every three weeks for a total of eight courses unless prior evidence of progressive disease.

RESULTS

The overall objective response rate was 33.3% for all 36 evaluable patients (95% confidence interval (CI): 18.6%-51%). Seventeen additional patients (47.2%) had stable disease, and only seven (19.5%) progressed. The median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (range 1.2-14.0). After a median follow-up time of 12 months, 23 patients (63.8%) are still alive. The tolerance of treatment was acceptable with only 8 of 36 patients (22%) experiencing grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. Grade 3 non-haematological adverse reactions included peripheral sensory neuropathy in three, asthenia in one, diarrhea in two, and clinically insignificant increase in serum transaminases in two patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the combination of oxaliplatin and raltitrexed has substantial antitumour activity in patients with progressive fluoropyrimidine leucovorin + irinotecan pretreated colorectal cancer. Because of its favorable toxicity profile and convenient three-weekly outpatient administration schedule, further evaluation of this regimen seems warranted.

A randomised phase II study of oxaliplatin alone versus oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (Mayo Clinic regimen) in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients

The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of both oxaliplatin as a single agent and oxaliplatin in combination with dailyx5 bolus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (5-FU/FA, Mayo clinic regimen) in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. 73 advanced CRC patients were randomised to receive either oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks (35 patients), or the same treatment combined with 5-FU 425 mg/m(2)/day and FA 20 mg/m(2)/dayx5 days every 4 weeks (38 patients). Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. All patients had documented inoperable disease and no previous chemotherapy for advanced disease. Based on the investigators' assessment of best response, objective response rate was 9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2-24%) in the oxaliplatin arm, and 45% (95% CI 27-64%) in the oxaliplatin+5-FU/FA arm. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2 months (95% CI 1.7-2.4 months) in the oxaliplatin arm and 3.9 months (95% CI 2.9-5 months) in the oxaliplatin+5-FU/FA arm. Severe neutropenia was seen in 23% of patients in the oxaliplatin+5-FU/FA arm, and none in the oxaliplatin arm. There were two treatment-related deaths, both in the oxaliplatin+5-FU/FA arm. In the oxaliplatin+5-FU/FA arm, severe diarrhoea, vomiting and stomatitis were seen in 34, 14 and 14% of the patients, respectively. In conclusion, oxaliplatin at a dose of 85 mg/m(2) given every 2 weeks was well tolerated and has limited activity in metastatic CRC, while the combination of this treatment with the full-dose Mayo clinic regimen (5-FU bolus 425 mg/m(2)/day+FA 20 mg/m(2)/dayx5 days every 4 weeks), although active, was unfeasible due to a high level of myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicity. Alternative lower dosing or other regimens are to be explored to ascertain the value of bolus 5-FU/FA combined with oxaliplatin.

Integrating the oral fluoropyrimidines into the management of advanced colorectal cancer

In colorectal cancer, leucovorin-modulated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been the mainstay of both adjuvant treatment and treatment of metastatic disease for many years. In advanced disease, response rates of 10-43% are reported; efforts to improve efficacy through schedule modification, including prolonged infusions, have led to limited success. New agents with improved efficacy, tolerability and ease of administration are required. Among the newer drugs, irinotecan and oxaliplatin are becoming established as first- and second-line treatment for advanced disease. Their novel mechanisms of action have proven to be of value in 5-FU-resistant patients. In tandem with these developments, thymidylate synthase inhibition has remained an important objective and oral fluoropyrimidines such as capecitabine and UFT (uracil plus tegafur)/leucovorin have been developed with this goal in mind. Two large, phase III studies of capecitabine in metastatic disease demonstrated objective response rates of 26.6 and 24.8%. UFT/leucovorin has also been evaluated in phase III trials, with an 11.7% response rate reported. Both agents are being evaluated in combination with oxaliplatin and irinotecan, and ultimately oral fluoropyrimidines as monotherapy or combination therapy may replace intravenous (i.v.) 5-FU as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Phase I study of a weekly schedule of oxaliplatin, high-dose leucovorin, and infusional fluorouracil in pretreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

To identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicities (DLT) of oxaliplatin (L-OHP) given on a weekly schedule including fixed doses of leucovorin (LV) and infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), to define the toxicity profile of this regimen and to find preliminary evidence of its activity in pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients with progressive disease, treated with fluoropyrimidines and with histologically measurable MCRC entered into this phase I study. Fixed doses of LV (500 mg/m2) followed by a 48-hour 5-FU 2600 mg/m2 infusion (5-FU48h) were administered with escalating doses of L-OHP, starting from 60 mg/m2 and with stepwise increments of 5 mg/m2. No intra-patient dose escalation was allowed. Treatment was given once a week for four consecutive weeks, followed by a one-week rest period.

RESULTS

Three dose levels were tested. The MTD was L-OHP 70 mg/m2 since two of the three patients showed dose-limiting diarrhea and the third developed neutropenia during the first cycle of chemotherapy. Most patients complained of mild peripheral sensitive neurotoxicity, which was related to the cumulative dose of L-OHP. Treatment delays were necessary for a total of 42 cases, but only in II of 42 after the pre-arranged 10% dose reduction of 5-FU (2300 mg/m2). Sixteen patients were evaluable for response: seven (33%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 14.6%-57.0%) were considered to show a major response (one complete), six showed a stable disease, and in addition progressive disease was observed in three patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that L-OHP, LV and 5-FU can be administered safely and repetitively using a weekly schedule. Diarrhea and neutropenia are the DLT of this regimen. Its activity and its manageable toxicity profile deserve further evaluation in chemotherapy-naïve MCRC patients. The doses recommended for phase II trials are: L-OHP 65 mg/m2, LV 500 mg/m2 and 5-FU48h 2300 mg/m2 infusion given on a weekly-times-four schedule followed by a one-week rest period.

New therapies, new directions: advances in the systemic treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death and it is clear that patients with metastatic disease have better quality of life and survival when given treatment. Despite four decades of experience of treating patients with fluorouracil, there remains considerable controversy about the optimum dose and scheduling, as well as biomodulation with leucovorin and methotrexate. However, irrespective of the dose and schedule, overall survival times are poor--about 1 year. Disappointingly, oral agents with similar mechanisms to fluorouracil do not improve survival rates in comparison with fluorouracil and leucovorin treatment. Irinotecan and oxaliplatin are newer agents that have improved the response rates for patients with metastatic disease when they are added to flurouracil and leucovorin. The combination of irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin has also improved overall survival. These are small advances in the fight against colorectal cancer, and further drug development is necessary.

Advances in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer represents the third leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States. During the past four decades, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has served as the cornerstone of therapy for individuals with advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC). Despite numerous attempts at maximizing efficacy of 5-FU through biochemical modulation, a significant benefit in terms of survival has never been realized. The recent emergence of novel chemotherapeutic drugs employing different mechanisms of action than 5-FU has led to the incorporation of irinotecan (CPT-11) with 5-FU/leucovorin as the new standard first-line regimen for future trials. This review outlines emerging data utilizing oral fluoropyrimidines and other new agents including oxaliplatin, raltitrexed, and eniluracil. Randomized clinical trials are currently underway in an effort to define optimal combination chemotherapy regimens, scheduling of agents, duration of therapy, and choice of therapy using a variety of prognostic molecular markers.

High-dose intensity oxaliplatin added to the simplified bimonthly leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil regimen as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (FOLFOX 7)

This phase II study examined a regimen (FOLFOX7) of leucovorin (LV), high-dose intensity oxaliplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. 48 patients were enrolled - 36 refractory and 12 resistant to prior therapy with LV-5-FU. Oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2) was infused with LV (400 mg/m2) over 2 h on day 1, followed by bolus 400 mg/m2 and a 46-h infusion (2400 g/m2) of 5-FU, every 2 weeks. Patients who responded or were stable received eight cycles. Patients were evaluated every 2 months. 20 patients (42%) had partial responses (95% confidence interval (CI): 28-56%), 19 (40%) had stable disease and 9 (19%) progressed. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6 months and median survival 16.1 months. Toxic effects of National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) grade 3/4 were: peripheral neuropathy 15%, nausea 8%, diarrhoea 11%, neutropenia 9%, thrombocytopenia 11%. Overall, 38% of patients experienced grade 3/4 toxicities, and 64% received 90% or more of the scheduled oxaliplatin dose intensity during the first four cycles. FOLFOX7 was highly active, with good tolerability, in pretreated patients resistant to LV-5-FU [corrected].

Addition of oxaliplatin to continuous fluorouracil, l-folinic acid, and concomitant radiotherapy in rectal cancer: the Lyon R 97-03 phase I trial

PURPOSE

Oxaliplatin could increase the efficacy of fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer. We tested three dose levels to identify a feasible oxaliplatin dose for combination therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between February 1998 and April 2000, we included 17 rectal adenocarcinoma patients in a single-center phase I study. Patients had T4 rectal carcinoma, T1-T3 disease with colostomy refusal, or potentially operable T2/T3 M1 requiring local treatment. Pelvic radiotherapy was 45 Gy over 5 weeks, 1.8 Gy/fraction, with concomitant chemotherapy weeks 1 and 5. Chemotherapy was oxaliplatin 80, 100, or 130 mg/m2 2-hour infusion on day 1 followed by L-folinic acid 100 mg/m2/d intravenous bolus, and 5-FU 350 mg/m2/d continuous infusion on days 1 to 5 (FolfoR1). Six patients refusing surgery received additional contact radiotherapy +/- brachytherapy. Dose escalation proceeded if less than two of six patients had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at a given dose-level.

RESULTS

All except two patients completed treatment; patients at level 1 (prolonged grade 1 thrombocytopenia) and level 3 (prolonged cold-related dysesthesia) had no second chemotherapy course. Median follow-up is 14 months (range, 2 to 28 months). One elderly patient at dose level 1 had DLT asthenia, severe diarrhea and vomiting, and more than 10% weight loss. There were no other DLTs and no severe rectitis or gastrointestinal toxicity. There were objective responses at all doses and no progressions. Eight patients underwent radical surgery after chemoradiotherapy. Two had complete pathologic responses.

CONCLUSION

FolfoR1 seems feasible and effective. Dose escalation did not increase toxicity. Although the MTD was not reached in this study, we recommend oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 for phase II studies because it is the dose determined from studies in metastatic patients with no toxicity when given concurrently with radiation.

Comparison of oral capecitabine versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line treatment in 605 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase III study

PURPOSE

To compare the response rate, efficacy parameters, and toxicity profile of oral capecitabine with bolus intravenous (IV) fluorouracil plus leucovorin (5-FU/LV) as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We prospectively randomized 605 patients to treatment with oral capecitabine for 14 days every 3 weeks or 5-FU/LV by rapid IV injection daily for 5 days in 4-week cycles.

RESULTS

The overall objective tumor response rate among all randomized patients was significantly higher in the capecitabine group (24.8%) than in the 5-FU/LV group (15.5%; P =.005). In the capecitabine and 5-FU/LV groups, median times to disease progression were 4.3 and 4.7 months (log-rank P =.72), median times to treatment failure were 4.1 and 3.1 months (P =.19), and median overall survival times were 12.5 and 13.3 months (P =.974), respectively. Capecitabine, compared with bolus 5-FU/LV treatment, produced a significantly lower incidence (P <.0002) of diarrhea, stomatitis, nausea, and alopecia. Patients treated with capecitabine also displayed lower incidences of grade 3/4 stomatitis and grade 3/4 neutropenia (P <.0001) leading to significantly less neutropenic fever/sepsis. Grade 3 hand-foot syndrome (P <.00001) and grade 3/4 hyperbilirubinemia were the only toxicities more frequently associated with capecitabine than with 5-FU/LV treatment.

CONCLUSION

Oral capecitabine was more active than 5-FU/LV in the induction of objective tumor responses. Time to disease progression and survival were at least equivalent for capecitabine compared with the 5-FU/LV arm. Capecitabine also demonstrated clinically meaningful benefits over bolus 5-FU/LV in terms of tolerability.

Chemotherapy in elderly patients with colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is usually diagnosed in patients around 70 years of age. With a continuous increase in life expectancy we may expect a higher number of elderly patients in the future. Because patients above 70 or 75 years are often excluded there is uncertainty as to what extent systemic adjuvant and palliative treatment should be offered to elderly patients.

METHODS

We reviewed the available literature on adjuvant and metastatic colorectal cancer in order to identify reports on elderly patients treated within chemotherapy trials.

RESULTS

Only about 20% of patients entering clinical trials belong to the age group of over 70 years and represent the minority of the very fit patients. Compared to their younger counterparts 5-FU-based treatment appears to be equally effective and more toxic according to some reports. Data regarding raltitrexed, oral fluoropyrimidines, topoisomerase I inhibitors or DACH-platin derivates are limited but suggest no age-specific differences in activity or toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients should not be excluded from clinical trials and studies in unfit elderly patients are warranted. Elderly patients need more attention regarding their functional, social and mental status. Fit elderly patients should be offered adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy.

Oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma: results of a Phase I-II trial

BACKGROUND

Oxaliplatin and raltitrexed both are active anticancer agents in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma: They have different mechanisms of action and toxicity profiles and have shown at least additive effects in experimental and preliminary clinical studies. The aim of this disease oriented Phase I-II study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and the objective response rate of this combination in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.

METHODS

Between April 1998 and March 1999, 69 patients with measurable metastatic colorectal carcinoma who previously were unexposed to palliative chemotherapy were enrolled. In the Phase I part of the study, 27 patients were treated with 3-weekly courses of a fixed dose of raltitrexed (3 mg/m(2) given as a 15-minute intravenous infusion) followed by a 2-hour infusion of oxaliplatin, which was escalated in consecutive cohorts of three to six patients from 85 mg/m(2) to 100 mg/m(2), 120 mg/m(2), 130 mg/m(2), and 140 mg/m(2). After having defined the toxic dose, 42 additional patients were entered at one dose level below to define the therapeutic index of this combination more precisely.

RESULTS

In the Phase I part of the study, during the first three dose levels, only one patient each experienced DLT (Grade 3 increase in transaminases, diarrhea, and stomatitis); at level 4, two of the first six patients entered had Grade 3 neutropenic infection or peripheral neurotoxicity, whereas dose level 5 (oxaliplatin 140 mg/m(2)) constituted the toxic dose with three of three patients experiencing DLT (Grade 3 asthenia, transient amaurosis, and diarrhea with Grade 4 neutropenia). Externally reviewed objective responses were noted in 9 of these 27 patients (33%), and stable disease occurred in 12 patients (44.4%). Among the 42 patients who were treated subsequently at the MTD level (Phase II portion), 20 patients (47.6%) responded (95% confidence interval, 32-62.6%), and 21 patients (50%) had stable disease. Their median progression free survival was 9.0 months, and the median overall survival, with 42 patients (67%) currently alive, is > 14.5 months. Treatment tolerance at the MTD was acceptable, with only 9 of 42 patients (21%) experiencing Grade 3-4 neutropenia; Grade 3 nonhematologic adverse reactions included increase in serum transaminases in 6 patients, peripheral neuropathy in 3 patients, diarrhea in 3 patients, and both stomatitis and emesis in only 1 patient each.

CONCLUSIONS

The described objective response and toxicity data, which are in agreement with preliminary results of other Phase I-II studies, support the promising therapeutic potential of this combination in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. Due to its substantial antitumor activity, tolerance (at the recommended MTD level), and convenient 3-weekly outpatient administration schedule, further evaluation of this regimen seems warranted.