Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections

Medial-to-lateral laparoscopic colon resection: a view beyond the learning curve

BACKGROUND

Since the authors' report on the lateral approach to laparoscopic colon resection (LCR), medial-to-lateral (M-L) segmental resection has continued to evolve. This report analyzes their learning curve experience with a standardized three-trocar M-L technique, which demonstrates the influence of operative volume on proficiency and outcome.

METHODS

From January 1999 to December 2004, 100 consecutive patients underwent a standardized three-trocar M-L segmental LCR. Patient demographics, indications for surgery, operative proficiency (time), and outcome (i.e., blood loss, conversion to open surgery, length of hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality) were recorded. A learning curve analysis was performed using a t-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA).

RESULTS

The 100 M-L LCRs included sigmoid (55%), right (34%), left (6%), and transverse (5%) approaches. Overall learning curve proficiency was influenced by increasing operative experience (p = 0.02). However, significant and consistent improvement in the learning curve occurred only after 38 LCRs (p < 0.008). Notably, all conversions to open surgery (3%) occurred during the early learning curve. Similarly, early LCR patients experienced greater morbidity (mean, 21% vs 12%) and mortality (mean, 5% vs 2%) than their later counterparts.

CONCLUSION

To obtain optimum proficiency in performing LCR, a minimum of 38 M-L procedures is required. Operative and patient outcomes improve beyond the early learning curve.

Laparoscopic colon surgery in community practice

BACKGROUND

The benefits of laparoscopic colon surgery have been shown in the literature. More recently, the oncologic outcomes have been shown to be similar in the laparoscopic group when compared with open colon surgery for colon cancer. However, most of the published literature is from university/academic institutions. There is limited literature on laparoscopic colon surgery from a community hospital.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted of 62 laparoscopic colon surgeries from a single surgeon's practice in a community hospital from October 27, 2003, to August 31, 2006. The laparoscopic approach was performed on patients with benign and curative colon cancer. The primary outcome measures were length of operating room times, pathologic results, length of hospital stay, and complication rates.

RESULTS

Of the 62 laparoscopic patients, there were 9 converted patients (14% conversion rate). There were no perioperative deaths, and no anastomotic leaks. The average length of operating room time was 190 minutes (range, 96-295 min). The median length of hospital stay was 4 days (range, 3-17 d). There were 40 laparoscopic patients for colon cancer. The resection margins all were negative, and the mean number of lymph nodes in the resected specimen was 17 (range, 5-37). The overall complication rate was 18%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that laparoscopic colon surgery is technically feasible in a community hospital. The results from this study are similar to the published literature from university/academic institutions.

Factors influencing operation time of laparoscopy-assisted distal subtotal gastrectomy: Analysis of consecutive 100 initial cases

AIMS

There is little information on patient selection criteria for laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) that would facilitate a successful initial experience for a surgeon new to the procedure. This study aimed to establish patient selection criteria that will allow increased proficiency and shorter operation times for the LADG procedure.

METHOD

One hundred LADG with lymphadenectomy and no other combined procedures were consecutively performed by one surgeon. These 100 consecutive LADG procedures were analyzed retrospectively from a prospectively designed computer database. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors influencing operation time.

RESULTS

According to univariate analysis, operation time was influenced by sex, BMI, surgical experience, and tumor location, whereas multivariate analysis indicated that operation time was significantly influenced only by BMI and surgical experience. The same analyses of only the first 50 cases showed that sex, BMI, surgical experience, and tumor location were independently associated with operation time. As BMI increased, so did operation time, whereas operation time decreased with increasing surgical experience.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that surgeons who have limited experience with this advanced procedure may shorten operation time by considering patient and tumor characteristics in their early attempts at LADG. With a shortened operation time, surgeon with limited experience may become proficient to LADG rapidly.

Implantación de la cirugía laparoscópica de colon en un servicio de cirugía general

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the viability, safety and short-term results of laparoscopic colon surgery during the first few years after its introduction in our department.

METHOD

Between January 2002 and December 2005, laparoscopic surgery was performed in patients with surgical indication for benign colon disease. After 2003, patients with malignant disease were also included. A database was created and demographic data, surgical indication, technique, conversion rate, morbidity and postoperative length of stay were recorded. All patients were operated on by the same team of three surgeons.

RESULTS

Ninety consecutive patients, with a mean age of 59.2 years (20-88) underwent laparoscopic surgery. Of these, 53 were men (59%). In total, 32 patients had previously undergone one or more open laparotomies (35.5%). Surgery was indicated for benign disease in 60 patients (66%). Distribution was left colon in 79 patients and right colon in 11 patients. The most frequent technique was sigmoidectomy (67.7%). The conversion rate was 12.2%. Operating time was 199 min. (120-340) and length of postoperative stay was 7.5 days (4-57). Morbidity was 18.8% and mortality was 1.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic surgery of the colon is safe and reproducible. Our short-term results are similar to those of previous studies. We believe that prior experience of laparoscopic surgery is important and that a stable surgical team minimizes the effect of the learning curve.

Early introduction of laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy during residency

Background

Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for benign diseases is becoming the standard of care. However, few residency programmes incorporate the procedure. This study evaluated the safety and feasibility of the early introduction of laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy during residency.

Methods

From a database of consecutive laparoscopic sigmoid colectomies collected prospectively over 6 years, those for cancer and primary open sigmoid colectomies were excluded. Surgeons were categorized into five levels of experience in colonic surgery. Patient demographics, operative data, complications and conversion rates were assessed.

Results

A total of 262 sigmoid colectomies were performed by 13 surgeons. American Society of Anesthesiologists grade and diverticular disease classification were similar across the five experience levels. There were no significant differences in morbidity, mortality or readmission rates between experience levels. However, operative time (230 versus 145 min, P &lt; 0·001) intraoperative blood loss (200 versus 100 ml, P &lt; 0·001) and conversion rate (13·6 versus 2·1 per cent, P = 0·002) all decreased with increasing surgical experience (trainee versus trainer).

Conclusion

It is safe and feasible to introduce laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy to a structured residency.

Development of a perfused ex vivo tumor-mimic model for the training of laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a safe and effective method for tumor destruction in patients with unresectable liver tumors. However, accurate probe placement using laparoscopic ultrasound guidance is required to achieve complete tumor ablation. This study aimed to develop a perfusable ex vivo tumor-mimic model for laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation training.

METHODS

After rinsing the prepared liver vessels with anticoagulants, porcine livers were perfused. Tumor-mimics were created by injecting a mixture consisting of 3% agarose, 3% cellulose, 7% glycerol, and 0.05% methylene blue, creating hyperechoic lesions in ultrasound. Heparinized porcine blood was used as perfusion medium. Continuous perfusion of the porcine liver was provided by connection of a pump system to the portal vein and the vena cava inferior. Laparoscopic RFA techniques were taught using a laparoscopic pelvi-trainer.

RESULTS

A total of 30 laparoscopic ablations were performed in four porcine livers. The simulated "tumors" were clearly visible on laparoscopic ultrasound and not felt during placement of the RFA probe. In addition, color duplex ultrasound showed clear signals indicating for a sufficient liver perfusion.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic RFA requires advanced laparoscopic ultrasound skills for an accurate placement of the RFA probe. The perfused tumor-mimic model presented is a safe, easy, effective, and economic method to improve and train laparoscopic RFA skills on porcine liver tissue.

A multicenter study on oncologic outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy for early cancer in Japan

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer is technically feasible, but it is not widely accepted because it has not been evaluated from the standpoint of oncologic outcome. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study of a large series of patients in Japan to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy for early gastric cancer (EGC).

METHODS

The study group comprised 1294 patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy during the period April 1994 through December 2003 in 16 participating surgical units (Japanese Laparoscopic Surgery Study Group). The short- and long-term outcomes of these patients were examined.

RESULTS

Distal gastrectomy was performed in 1185 patients (91.5%), proximal gastrectomy in 54 (4.2%), and total gastrectomy in 55 (4.3%); all were performed laparoscopically. The morbidity and mortality rates associated with these operations were 14.8% and 0%, respectively. Histologically, 1212 patients (93.7%) had stage IA disease, 75 (5.8%) had stage IB disease, and 7 (0.5%) had stage II disease (the UICC staging). Cancer recurred in only 6 (0.6%) of 1294 patients treated curatively (median follow-up, 36 months; range, 13-113 months). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 99.8% for stage IA disease, 98.7% for stage IB disease, and 85.7% for stage II disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Although our findings may be considered preliminary, our data indicate that laparoscopic surgery for EGC yields good short- and long-term oncologic outcomes.

Impact of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer on operative outcomes and survival

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent laparoscopic and open resections for colorectal cancer. Comparison of colectomy in 2 consecutive periods (period 1: January 1996-May 2000; period 2: June 2000-December 2004), with laparoscopic surgery being a surgical option in period 2, was also performed.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Prospective data of 1134 patients (448 in period 1; 656 in period 2) who underwent elective resection for colon and upper rectal cancer (above 12 cm from anal verge) were analyzed.

METHODS

The operative outcome and survival were compared between patients who underwent laparoscopic and open resection in period 2. The outcomes of colorectal resections in the 2 periods were also compared.

RESULTS

During period 2, the operative mortality rates of patients with laparoscopic (n = 401) and open resection (n = 255) were 0.8% and 3.7%, respectively (P = 0.022), and the morbidity rates were 21.7% and 15.7%, respectively (P = 0.068). The patients who underwent laparoscopic resection had significantly earlier return of bowel function, earlier resumption of diet, and shorter hospital stay. The 3-year overall survivals in those with nondisseminated disease were 74.4% and 78.8% for open and laparoscopic resection, respectively (P = 0.046). The operative morality rates were 4.4% and 2.6% in period 1 and period 2, respectively (P = 0.132). The 3-year overall survivals for patients with nondisseminated disease were 69.7% and 76.1% for period 1 and period 2, respectively (P = 0.019). The overall survivals in patients who underwent open resection in the 2 periods were similar (P = 0.284).

CONCLUSIONS

The short-term favorable outcome of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer was confirmed and improvement of survival was observed with the practice of laparoscopic resection.

The learning curve for hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: a single surgeon’s experience

BACKGROUND

Surgical experience and outcomes for hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy were evaluated to define a learning curve.

METHODS

This study included 60 patients who underwent hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomies performed by a single surgeon. They were analyzed as three consecutive equal groups: A, B, and C. Pearson's chi-square test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to compare differences in demographics and perioperative parameters. Operative times were analyzed to document the learning curve for the procedure.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the three groups in terms of age, sex, operative procedure, or comorbidity. Groups B and C showed significantly shorter operative times, significantly earlier recoveries of gastrointestinal function, less blood loss, and shorter hospital stays than group A. The incidence of operative complications was not significantly different among the three groups (35% vs 5% vs 15%; p = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 21 to 25 cases were needed to achieve proficiency in this series.

Advanced laparoscopic skills acquisition: the case of laparoscopic colorectal surgery

Acquisition of advanced technical skills requires commitment, time, patience, and discipline (eg, the 10-year rule). Dabbling is not a recipe for success. Despite the value of all other teaching methods, guided practice with feedback is essential to develop the high level of visuospatial perceptual ability (observation and performance with feedback) that is necessary for advanced MIS. The necessary ingredients to skill acquisition for advanced MIS procedures (laparoscopic colorectal surgery) for a practicing surgeon include introduction through short courses, access to skill stations, and access to preceptorship or mini-sabbatical. For residents in training, there is no better alternative than an MIS fellowship. In an ideal world where there are enough trainers, the residency environment should provide this training. Comprehensive strategies of knowledge transfer for practicing surgeons should be designed with the input of experts in knowledge transfer.

Laparoscopic colon surgery: past, present and future

Since its first described case in 1991, laparoscopic colon surgery has lagged behind minimally invasive surgical methods for solid intra-abdominal organs in terms of acceptability, dissemination, and ease of learning. In colon cancer, initial concerns over port site metastases and adequacy of oncologic resection have considerably dampened early enthusiasm for this procedure. Only recently, with the publication of several large, randomized controlled trials, has the incidence of port site metastases been shown to be equivalent to that of open resection. Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer has also been demonstrated to be at least equivalent to traditional laparotomy in terms of adequacy of oncologic resection, disease recurrence, and long-term survival. In addition, numerous reports have validated short-term benefits following laparoscopic resection for cancer, including shorter hospital stay, shorter time to recovery of bowel function, and decreased analgesic requirements, as well as other postoperative variables. In benign colonic disease, much less high-quality literature exists supporting the use of laparoscopic methods. Two recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated some short-term benefits to laparoscopic ileocolic resection for CD, in addition to evident cosmetic advantages. On the other hand, the current evidence on laparoscopic surgery for UC does not support its routine use among nonexpert surgeons outside of specialized centers. Laparoscopic colonic resection for diverticular disease appears to provide several short-term benefits, although these advantages may not translate to cases of complicated diverticulitis. Despite the increasing acceptability of minimally invasive methods for the management of benign and malignant colonic pathologies, laparoscopic colon resection remains a prohibitively difficult technique to master. Numerous technological innovations have been introduced onto the market in an effort to decrease the steep learning curve associated with laparoscopic colon surgery. Good evidence exists supporting the use of second-generation, sleeveless, hand-assist devices in this context. Similarly, new hemostatic devices such as the ultrasonic scalpel and the electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer may be particularly helpful for extensive colonic mobilizations, in which several vascular pedicles must be taken. The precise role of these hemostatic technologies has yet to be established, particularly in comparison with stapling devices and significantly cheaper laparoscopic clips. Finally, recent advances in camera systems are promising to improve the ease with which difficult colonic dissections can be performed.

Importance of Perioperative Processes of Care for Length of Hospital Stay after Laparoscopic Surgery

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The technologic imperative has prompted the adoption of complex laparoscopic techniques by physicians with various degrees of skill. We sought to measure the impact of both case mix and physician practice (perioperative process/risk factors) on length of stay (LOS)-a common benchmark- after laparoscopic surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified 911 patients undergoing laparoscopic retroperitoneal surgery between 1996 and 2004, who comprise our study population. Patients remaining in the hospital >5 days-the 90th percentile for the sample-were classified as having a prolonged LOS. Adjusted models were developed to determine the independent association of case mix and process measures with a prolonged LOS. The likelihood ratio test was used to discern the improvement of fit of the process model compared with the case-mix model.

RESULTS

Among factors related to case mix and structure of care, increasing age (odds ratio [OR] 1.1; 95% CI 1.0, 1.2), less surgeon experience (OR 6.1; 95% CI 2.1, 17.2), male gender (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.2, 4.0), and American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 3 or 4 (OR 7.2; 95% CI 2.2, 23.3) were independently associated with a prolonged LOS. The need for a transfusion (OR 9.4; 95% CI 33.9, 23.2), the development of a postoperative complication (OR 4.6; 95% CI 2.2, 9.5), and longer operative time (OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.3, 1.8) explained additional variation in prolonged LOS outcomes when considering perioperative process/risk factors in the model. Perioperative factors significantly improved the fit of the model (chi (2) statistic 101.8; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant variation in outcomes is explained by factors describing aspects of surgical expertise. Variability in the surgical skill set is likely greatest during the laparoscopic learning curve, which raises a quality-of-care concern during the initial implementation of the technique. Policies attempting to smooth the laparoscopic learning curve, such as mentoring and skill measurement prior to credentialing, could improve the quality of care.

Laparoscopic surgical resection for early gastric cancer

This paper provides an overview of the current status of laparoscopic resection for early gastric cancer. According to many case-control studies, laparoscopic gastrectomy is feasible and safe, and in comparison with conventional open gastrectomy is associated with less pain, a quicker recovery of gastrointestinal function, and a better postoperative quality of life, with no negative influence on survival. Large randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy are needed to establish the future role of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of patients with gastric cancer.

Laparoscopic colon resection early in the learning curve: what is the appropriate setting?

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic colon resection (LCR) is a safe and effective treatment of benign and malignant colonic lesions. There is little question that a steep learning curve exists for surgeons to become skilled and proficient at LCR. Because of this steep learning curve, debate exists regarding the appropriate hospital setting for LCR. We hypothesize that outcomes of LCR performed early in the learning curve at a regional medical center (New Hanover Regional Medical Center; NHRMC) and a university medical center (Baylor College of Medicine; BCM) would not be significantly different.

METHODS

The first 50 consecutive LCRs performed at each institution between August 2001 and December 2003 were reviewed. Age, mean body mass index (BMI), gender, history of previous abdominal surgery (PAS), operative approach [laparoscopic (LAP) versus hand/laparoscopic assisted (HAL)], conversions (Conv), operative time (OR time), pathology (benign vs. malignant), lymph nodes (LN) harvested in malignant cases, length of stay (LOS), morbidity and mortality were obtained. Continuous data were expressed as mean +/- SD. Data were analyzed by chi, Fisher exact test, or t test.

RESULTS

NHRMC patients were on average older females with a higher incidence of PAS. A LAP approach was more frequently performed at BCM (86%), whereas HAL was used more frequently at NHRMC (24%). Conversions to open were similar at both institutions (12%). Benign disease accounted for the majority of operations at both institutions. In cases of malignancy, more LN were harvested at BCM. OR time and LOS were shorter at NHRMC. Complication rates were similar between institutions. There were no anastomotic leaks or deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

LCR can be performed safely and with acceptable outcomes early in the learning curve at regional medical centers and university medical centers. Outcomes depend more on surgeons possessing advanced laparoscopic skills and adhering to accepted oncologic surgical principles in cases of malignancy, than on the size or location of the healthcare institution.

Impact of previous abdominal surgery on colorectal laparoscopy results: a comparative clinical study

To assess the results of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in patients who have previously undergone abdominal surgery. Between November 2002 and June 2004, 86 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease at our hospital. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on whether they had previously undergone abdominal surgery (previous surgery group, n = 27) or not (nonprevious surgery group, n = 59). Data were prospectively collected for statistical analyses of demographic, clinical, and histologic variables. Groups were comparable in age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, diagnosis, technique performed, and tumor size and distance to anal verge. There was no difference in perioperative complication rates. A higher conversion rate was found in the previous surgery group (26.1% vs. 5.1%, P = 0.02). In patients with tumor diseases, resection evaluations were no different regarding specimen length, distal and radial resection margins, or number of lymph nodes harvested. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery has proved to be a reliable technique for patients who have previously undergone abdominal surgery, its results comparable to those obtained with patients who have not.

What We Learned From the Experience of Laparoscopic Splenectomy in Patients With Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)???Single Surgeon Experiences

From October 1994 to December 2004, 50 cases of laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) have been carried out by a single surgeon for treating patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). This study was performed to analyze a single surgeon's experiences of LS in ITP and discuss lesions that we have learned and the technical changes based on perioperative outcomes of LS. It seems that strict right lateral decubitus is definitively the position of choice because it ensures good exposure of splenic vascular structure in hilum. We also found that a flexible scope or 45-degree angled telescope, not to mention a 30-degree one, allowed for optimal vision, and made laparoscopic procedures easy and secure. We could control the vascular structure safely by just applying 5-mm laparoscopic clips without using harmonic scalpel or endo-GIA. When delivering spleen, it maybe easy and safe way to remove the plastic pouch with spleen fragmented through the umbilical port after changing the patient's position to supine again.

Influence of operator experience in radiofrequency ablation of malignant liver tumours on treatment outcome

AIMS

Radiofrequency ablation is gaining popularity as the interventional therapy of choice for unresectable hepatic malignancies. However, little attention has been paid to the importance of operator experience in this therapy. This study aims to evaluate the results of RFA treatment dependent on operator experience and learning curve.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2/2000 and 11/2004 we have undertaken 116 RFA procedures to ablate 404 unresectable primary or metastatic liver tumours in 84 patients. The clinical data of all patients were recorded prospectively and treatment results of the first 42 patients (group I) and the second 42 patients (group II) were compared. All patients were treated by the same surgeon or interventional radiologist.

RESULTS

RFA was performed percutaneously in 44 procedures (group I n = 35, group II n = 9), via laparotomy in 64 procedures (group I n = 27, group II n = 37) and via laparoscopy in eight procedures (group I n = 1, group II n = 7). The complication rate was comparable in both groups with 7.9% in group I and 7.5% in group II. Group II had a higher complete ablation rate (96.2 vs 93.7%) than group I. One- and two-year survival rates of 92 and 89% in group II were significantly higher than in group I with 69 and 46% (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

By the experience conditional optimization of indication and performance by a specialized RFA team the results could be improved significantly. The data on hand speak for a considerable learning curve in the RFA and demonstrate the importance of the experience of the therapist for the outcome of the patients.

Consequences of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic procedures converted to open approaches have been associated with higher complication rates than laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy and appendectomy. Laparoscopic colorectal resections have relatively high conversion rates compared with other laparoscopic procedures. This study was designed to evaluate outcomes of conversions compared with laparoscopic and open colorectal resections.

METHODS

We reviewed 498 consecutive colorectal resections performed between 1995 and 2002. Procedures were divided into laparoscopic colorectal resections, open colorectal resections, or conversions. Demographics, underlying disease, type of procedure performed, and operative outcomes were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Of the 238 laparoscopic procedures performed, 182 were completed laparoscopically and 56 (23 percent) required conversion; 260 were performed open. Conversions were associated with greater blood loss (200 (range, 50-750) vs. 100 (range, 30-900) ml), longer time to first bowel movement (82 (range, 40-504) vs. 72 (range, 12-420) hr), and longer length of stay (6 (range, 2-67) vs.. 5 (range, 2-62) days) than the laparoscopic colorectal resections group. There was no difference in operative time, transfusion requirements, intraoperative and postoperative complications, or mortality between conversions and laparoscopic colorectal resections. Conversions resulted in fewer patients requiring transfusions (4 vs. 14 percent), shorter time to first bowel movement (82 (range, 40-504) vs. 93 (range, 24-240) hr), and shorter length of stay (6 (range, 2-67) vs. 7 (range, 2-180) days) than in the open colorectal resections group. There were no differences in complications or mortality between the conversion group and the open colorectal resections group.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic colorectal resections has a relatively high conversion rate; however, the converted cases have outcomes similar to open colorectal resections. In fact, the converted group required fewer blood transfusions than the open group. Experience and good judgment are fundamental for timely conversion of a laparoscopic procedure to open to decrease complication rates. Despite a high conversion rate, surgeons should consider laparoscopic colorectal resections, because even when necessary, conversion does not result in poorer outcomes than laparoscopic colorectal resections or open colorectal resections.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: rational evolution for diverticulitis

Laparoscopic technique has proved to be a revolutionary advance in the surgical treatment of disease. However, limits exist regarding its application to colorectal resection as evidenced by the higher conversion rate and longer learning curve seen with colectomy. Conversion remains a complex issue related to multiple factors. One of the factors, inflammatory disease such as diverticulitis, exposes limitations of laparoscopic technique, specifically the absence of tactile sensation and use of one's hand as a surgical instrument. Nonetheless, the clinical benefits of smaller incisions, decreased pain, decreased ileus, and reduced hospitalization and disability make laparoscopic colectomy a compelling surgical option for the treatment of diverticulitis. Hand-assisted technique offers surgeons a practical and rational innovation for conventional laparoscopic colectomy and offers promise for improved feasibility and efficacy for the treatment of diverticulitis.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticular disease: 100 consecutive cases

BACKGROUND

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) has been proposed as a useful alternative to conventional laparoscopic and open surgery. As compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery, it offers the advantages of tactile feedback, better exposure, and a shorter learning curve. There is increasing evidence that HALS retains the advantages of minimal-access surgery. The aim of this study was to analyze the feasibility as well as the short- and medium-term outcomes of HALS sigmoid resection for diverticular disease.

METHODS

The study included 100 consecutive patients between July 1999 and August 2004. Data were prospectively recorded. Follow-up evaluation was performed by standardized telephone interview after a mean postoperative period of 19 months (range, 2-55 months).

RESULTS

Two major intraoperative complications occurred: splenic laceration requiring splenectomy and ureteral injury requiring suture. There were only three conversions: one case of pararectal incision and two cases of extended lower Pfannestiel incision. There was no single case of conversion to midline laparotomy. One patient died postoperatively of myocardial infarction. The postoperative complications included intraabdominal hematoma (2%), anastomotic leakage (3%), wound infection (11%) and bladder dysfunction (1%). The reoperation rate was 5%. The median hospital stay was 8 days. In terms of satisfaction with the results, 97% of patients would choose HALS again.

CONCLUSIONS

When used for diverticular disease, HALS sigmoid resection has a low intra- and postoperative complication rate. The satisfaction rate among patients is high. Even in technically difficult cases, conversion to midline laparotomy can be avoided.

[Colorectal laparoscopy in the Canary Islands. A multicenter study of 144 patients]

INTRODUCTION

To analyze the short-term results of laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCRS) in the Canary Islands.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A questionnaire was sent to hospitals performing laparoscopy and retrospective data on demographic, perioperative and pathological variables in 144 patients who underwent LCRS between May 1993 and May 2003 were obtained.

RESULTS

Sixty-five men and 79 women underwent colon (n=126) and rectal (n=18) surgery in the last 16 months of the study period. The most frequently performed procedure was sigmoidectomy in 85 patients (59%). The most frequent diagnosis was colon adenocarcinoma in 73 patients (50%), followed by diverticular disease in 36 patients (25%). The mean values of the variables studied were: body mass index, 27.3 (range, 22-35); operating time, 175 min (range, 60-255); blood loss, 183.6 ml (range, 50-500). Peristalsis reinitiated at 45 h; oral diet was introduced at 67 h and the overall mean length of hospital stay was 7.8 days (range, 3-30). The length of hospital stay was significantly longer in patients with complications (14.5 vs 6.4; p <.01). There were 7 conversions (4.86%). There were no perioperative deaths. The overall morbidity rate was 28%. The most frequent early complication was surgical wound infection in 9 patients (6.2%). Anastomotic leak was detected in 5 patients (3.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

LCRS has been shown to be a safe and effective technique that has recently increased in the centers surveyed. The factor with the greatest influence on length of hospital stay was the development of postoperative complications.

Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer

Multiple reports have outlined the potential benefits of the laparoscopic approach to colon surgery. Recently, randomized control trials have demonstrated the safety of applying these techniques to colorectal cancer. This study examined the long-term follow-up assessment of patients after laparoscopic colorectal cancer resections and compared them with a large prospective database of open resections. A total of 231 resections were performed for adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum between 1992 and 2004. Of these 231 resections, 93 were rectal (40.3%) and 138 were colonic (59.7%). A total of 8 (3.2%) of the resections were performed as emergencies, and 27 (11.7%) were converted to open surgery. The mean follow-up period was 35.84 months (range, 0-132 months). The disease recurred in 51 of the patients (22.1%) before death, involving 14 (6.1%) local and 37 (16%) distant recurrences. Only two patients had wound recurrences (0.8%), and both patients had widespread peritoneal recurrence at the time of diagnosis. The overall survival rate was 65.3% at 60 months and 60.3% at 120 months. The disease-free survival rate was 58% at 60 months and 56% at 120 months. Laparoscopic techniques can be applied to a wide range of colorectal malignancies without sacrificing oncologic results during a long-term follow-up period.

Laparoscopic colon surgery performed safely by general surgeons in a community hospital: a review of 154 consecutive cases

BACKGROUND

The primary end point of this study was documentation of the feasibility, safety, and benefits of laparoscopic colon resection (LCR) performed by general surgeons in a community hospital.

METHODS

The charts of 154 patients who underwent LCR between March 1998 and August 2003 by a group of three surgeons working in a community hospital were reviewed. Data extracted from the charts included patients' demographics, surgical indications and procedures, conversion rate, history, operative time, postoperative recovery time, and complication rates.

RESULTS

Of the 154 patients, 70 were men. The mean age of the patients was 60 years. Overall, 62% of the patients had a history of prior abdominal surgery. In the majority of cases (77%), LCR was performed for benign disease. Segmental resection involving the left colon was performed for 122 patients, and right hemicolectomy was performed for 32 patients. The rates of conversion were 9.6% for open surgery and 12% for diverticulitis (n = 83). For LCR, the median operative time was 120 min, and the median hospital stay was 5 days. The complication rate was 21.6% for LCR, and the mortality rate was 2.1%.

CONCLUSION

The outcomes for LCR performed by a team of general surgeons working together in a community hospital are similar to the historical results from academic health science centers.

Minimally invasive abdominal surgery: lux et veritas past, present, and future

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgery has developed out of multiple technology innovations and the desire to see beyond the confines of the human body. As the instrumentation became more advanced, the application of this technique followed. By revisiting the historical developments that now define laparoscopic surgery, we can possibly foresee its future.

DATA SOURCES

A Medline search was performed of all the English-language literature. Further references were obtained through cross-referencing the bibliography cited in each work and using books from the authors' collection.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive surgery is becoming important in almost every facet of abdominal surgery. Optical improvements, miniaturization, and robotic technology continue to define the frontier of minimally invasive surgery. Endoluminal resection surgery, image-guided surgical navigation, and remotely controlled robotics are not far from becoming reality. These and advances yet to be described will change laparoscopic surgery just as the electric light bulb did over 100 years ago.

Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections

OBJECTIVE

To provide a multidimensional analysis of the learning curve in major laparoscopic colonic and rectal surgery and compare outcomes between right-sided versus left-sided resections.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The laparoscopic learning curve is known to vary between surgeons, may be influenced by the patient selection and operative complexity, and requires appropriate case-mix adjustment.

METHODS

This is a descriptive single-center study using routinely collected clinical data from 900 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery between November 1991 and April 2003. Outcome measures included operation time, conversion rate (CR), and readmission and postoperative complication rates. Multifactorial logistic regression analysis was used to identify patient-, surgeon-, and procedure-related factors associated with conversion of laparoscopic to open surgery. A risk-adjusted Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) model was used for evaluating the learning curve for right and left-sided resections.

RESULTS

The conversion rate for right-sided colonic resections was 8.1% (n = 457) compared with 15.3% for left-sided colorectal resections (n = 443). Independent predictors of conversion of laparoscopic to open surgery were the body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.07 per unit increase), ASA grade (OR = 1.63 per unit increase), type of resection (left colorectal versus right colonic procedures, OR = 1.5), presence of intra-abdominal abscess (OR = 5.0) or enteric fistula (OR = 4.6), and surgeon's experience (OR 0.9 per 10 additional cases performed). Having adjusted for case-mix, the CUSUM analysis demonstrated a learning curve of 55 cases for right-sided colonic resections versus 62 cases for left-sided resections. Median operative time declined with operative experience (P<0.001). Readmission rates and postoperative complications remained unchanged throughout the series and were not dependent on operative experience.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion rates for laparoscopic colectomy are dependent on a multitude of factors that require appropriate adjustment including the learning curve (operative experience) for individual surgeons. The laparoscopic model described can be used as the basis for performance monitoring between or within institutions.

Anterior resection of rectal cancer through a one hand-size incision with or without laparoscopy: proposal of one hand-size incision surgery (OHaSIS)

BACKGROUND

One hand-size incision surgery (OHaSIS) is a surgery that is carried out through one hand-size incision with or without laparoscopy. Safety, feasibility and recovery advantage of the anterior resection of rectal cancer by the OHaSIS were studied.

STUDY DESIGN

Nineteen consecutive patients with rectal cancer, consisting of seven rectosigmoid, six upper rectal, and six lower rectal cancers, were treated with anterior resection, including seven high, six low, three super-low, and three partial intersphincteric resections, through a suprapubic longitudinal one hand-size incision. The initial 11 patients were treated in combination with laparoscopy and the following eight patients were treated without laparoscopy.

RESULTS

All anterior resections with mesorectal excision were completed in a safe manner with acceptable operative time (average 245 min), blood loss (average 280 g), and postoperative complications without any elongation of the initial incision. When compared with 12 previous high and low anterior resections by conventional open surgery (OS), the 13 high and low anterior resections by the OHaSIS showed equivalent operative time, blood loss, anastomotic procedures of single stapling, lymph node numbers dissected, surgical margin of the anal side of the tumor, and complications. Moreover, analysis of perioperative parameters for surgical invasiveness, including a body temperature >37 degrees C, days of bed rest, and days of use of parenteral narcotics, revealed a recovery advantage in the OHaSIS group compared with that in the OS group.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that anterior resection for patients with rectal cancer by the OHaSIS is safe, feasible, and less invasive than conventional OS, and has sufficient operative performance. Although the survival benefit and recurrence rate by this approach must be ensured in a future trial, we would like to propose the new concept of OHaSIS for treating rectal cancer.

Impact of hospital case volume on short-term outcome after laparoscopic operation for colonic cancer

BACKGROUND

High hospital case volume has been associated with improved outcome after open operation for colorectal malignancies.

METHODS

To assess the impact of hospital case volume on short-term outcome after laparoscopic operation for colon cancer, we conducted an analysis of patients who underwent laparoscopic colon resection within the COlon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection (COLOR) trial.

RESULTS

A total of 536 patients with adenocarcinoma of the colon were included in the analysis. Median operating time was 240, 210 and 188 min in centers with low, medium, and high case volumes, respectively (p < 0.001). A significant difference in conversion rate was observed among low, medium, and high case volume hospitals (24% vs 24% vs 9%; p < 0.001). A higher number of lymph nodes were harvested at high case volume hospitals (p < 0.001). After operation, fewer complications (p = 0.006) and a shorter hospital stay (p < 0.001) were observed in patients treated at hospitals with high caseloads.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic operation for colon cancer at hospitals with high caseloads appears to be associated with improved short-term results.

Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease

Laparoscopic management of sigmoid diverticular disease has emerged as an important adjunct to the armamentarium of surgical options for this disease process. Although there are no prospective randomized studies directly comparing laparoscopic and open colectomy for diverticulitis, the comparative studies provide compelling data. The magnitude of benefits achieved with laparoscopic colectomy in the hands of experienced laparoscopic colon surgeons may soon be sufficient to make laparoscopic colectomy the standard of care.

Defining the learning curve for laparoscopic splenectomy for immune thrombocytopenia purpura

BACKGROUND

The current study was undertaken to define the learning curve for laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP).

METHODS

The data of 50 patients who underwent LS for ITP between March 1996 and February 2003 were reviewed. Patients were divided into sequential groups of 10. Operative time, estimated blood loss, conversion to open procedure, length of stay (LOS), time to oral intake, complications, and mortality rates were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean OR time in the 3rd, 4th, and 5th groups of 10 were significantly shorter than the 1st and 2nd groups of 10. There were no significant differences in estimated blood loss, LOS, or time to oral intake between the groups. Three conversions to open splenectomy occurred; one each in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th groups of 10. Complications were evenly distributed between groups. There were no deaths.

CONCLUSION

The learning curve for LS in patients with ITP is a minimum of 20 cases.

Conversion rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a predictive model with, 1253 patients

BACKGROUND

This study aimed all develop a mathematical model for predicting the conversion rate for patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

METHOD

This descriptive single-center study used routinely collected clinical data from 1,253 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery between November 1991 and April 2003. A two-level hierarchical regression model was used to identify patient, surgeon, and procedure-related factors associated with conversion of laparoscopic to open surgery. The model was internally validated and tested using measures of discrimination and calibration. Exclusion criteria for laparoscopic colectomy included a body mass greater than 50, lesion diameter exceeding 15 cm, and multiple prior major laparotomies (exclusive of appendectomy, hysterectomy, and cholecystectomy).

RESULTS

The average conversion rate for the study population was 10.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.3-11.7%). The independent predictors of conversion of laparoscopic to open surgery were the body mass index (odds ratio [OR], 2.1 per 10 Americans Society of Anesthesiology units increase), (ASA) grade 3 or 4, 1 or 2 (OR, 3.2, 5.8), type of resection (low rectal, left colorectal, right colonic vs small/other bowel procedures; OR, 8.82, 4.76, 2.98), presence of intraoperative abscess (OR, 3.60) or fistula (OR, 4.73), and surgeon seniority (junior vs senior staff OR, 1.56). The model offered adequate discrimination (area under receiver operator characteristic curve, 0.74) and excellent agreement (p = 0.384) between observed and model-predicted conversion rates (range of calibration, 3-32% conversion rate).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic conversion rates are dependent on a multitude of factors that require appropriate adjustment for case mix before comparisons are made between or within centers. The Cleveland Clinic Foundation (CCF) laparoscopic conversion rate model is a simple additive score that can be used in everyday practice to evaluate outcomes for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: the state of the art

Laparoscopic techniques have expanded since their introduction 15 years ago. The laparoscopic approach for colorectal surgery has been slower to develop than other fields of surgery. However, this approach does provide significant benefits for colorectal resection, although concerns regarding the ability to satisfy oncological criteria have restricted its use in the past. This review studies the published data on the use of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer including the short- and long-term outcomes. New long-term outcome data is now available which is likely to encourage the use of this technique for colon cancer resection. Laparoscopic rectal cancer resection is also discussed including the more limited outcome data that is available.

Laparoscopic resection of colon Cancer: Consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES)

BACKGROUND

The European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) initiated a consensus development conference on the laparoscopic resection of colon cancer during the annual congress in Lisbon, Portugal, in June 2002.

METHODS

A systematic review of the current literature was combined with the opinions, of experts in the field of colon cancer surgery to formulate evidence-based statements and recommendations on the laparoscopic resection of colon cancer.

RESULTS

Advanced age, obesity, and previous abdominal operations are not considered absolute contraindications for laparoscopic colon cancer surgery. The most common cause for conversion is the presence of bulky or invasive tumors. Laparoscopic operation takes longer to perform than the open counterpart, but the outcome is similar in terms of specimen size and pathological examination. Immediate postoperative morbidity and mortality are comparable for laparoscopic and open colonic cancer surgery. The laparoscopically operated patients had less postoperative pain, better-preserved pulmonary function, earlier restoration of gastrointestinal function, and an earlier discharge from the hospital. The postoperative stress response is lower after laparoscopic colectomy. The incidence of port site metastases is <1%. Survival after laparoscopic resection of colon cancer appears to be at least equal to survival after open resection. The costs of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer are higher than those for open surgery.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer is a safe and feasible procedure that improves short-term outcome. Results regarding the long-term survival of patients enrolled in large multicenter trials will determine its role in general surgery.

A Laryngeal Dissection Station: Educational Paradigms in Phonosurgery

OBJECTIVES

To introduce a new tool for phonosurgical training and education. A multitude of innovations in complex laryngeal surgery has catalyzed new educational initiatives. Establishing dexterity in phonomicrosurgery is often difficult to achieve while working on patients because of the narrow margin for success. Furthermore, laryngoplastic phonosurgery and open partial laryngectomy require sophisticated knowledge of precise anatomic relationships, which can be difficult to express in images. Finally, many teaching programs do not have a high volume of these procedures, and there is a significant need to transmit this information in continuing education courses.

STUDY DESIGN

Prototype design.

METHODS

A laryngeal dissection station (LDS) was designed to facilitate the acquisition of high-level procedural skill sets for both transoral and transcervical techniques.

RESULTS

This LDS can be used in existing temporal-bone laboratories by using cadaveric larynges. A rectangular frame supports two adjustable holders, one for the larynx and one for the examining speculum of a laryngoscope. Procedures are performed with the larynx fixed in space by a novel fixator. Variation in position and orientation of the components affords simulation of both microlaryngoscopy and open surgery. The dissection station can accommodate virtually any laryngoscope, regardless of size or shape.

CONCLUSIONS

This training apparatus should facilitate laryngeal surgical instruction in residency training and continuing medical education. This device and others like it can help establish clinical competency in laryngology, should this become necessary in future educational models of residency training and recertification.

Learning curve for radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors: prospective analysis of initial 100 patients in a tertiary institution

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the effect of operator experience on the treatment outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for malignant liver tumors.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

RFA is gaining popularity as the ablative therapy of choice for liver tumors. It is generally considered a simple and safe technique, and little attention has been paid to the importance of operator experience in this treatment. A learning curve in this treatment modality has not been documented before.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The clinical data and treatment outcomes of the initial 100 patients undergoing RFA for liver tumors (hepatocellular carcinoma, n = 84; metastasis, n = 15; cholangiocarcinoma n = 1) were collected prospectively. All patients were managed by a single team of surgeons and interventional radiologists. The data of the first 50 patients (group I) and the second 50 patients (group II) were compared.

RESULTS

RFA was performed by percutaneous (group I, n = 22; group II, n = 19), open (group I, n = 26; group II, n = 30) or laparoscopic (group I, n = 2; group II, n = 1) approach. In group I, 30 patients (60%) had a solitary tumor and 20 (40%) had multiple tumors; in group II, 35 patients (70%) had a solitary tumor and 15 (30%) had multiple tumors (P = 0.295). The size of the largest tumor was comparable between groups I and II (median, 2.8 cm in both groups; P = 0.508). Group II had significantly shorter hospital stay (median, 4.0 versus 5.5 days; P = 0.048), lower morbidity rate (4% versus 16%; P = 0.046) and higher complete ablation rate (100% versus 85.7%; P = 0.006) than group I. There was 1 hospital death (2%) in group I and 0 in group II. By multivariate analysis, treatment period (group I versus group II) was an independent significant factor affecting the morbidity rate and complete ablation rate.

CONCLUSIONS

A low complication rate and a high complete ablation rate could be achieved with the accumulated experience from the first 50 cases of RFA for liver tumors by a specialized team. This study demonstrates that there is a significant learning curve in RFA for liver tumors.

Laparoscopic resections for colorectal cancer: does conversion survival?

BACKGROUND

This purpose of this study was to examine whether survival is affected when laparoscopic resections for colorectal cancer are converted to open surgery.

METHODS

A prospective database of 377 consecutive laparoscopic resections for colorectal cancer performed between November 1991 and June 2002 was reviewed. The TNM classification for colorectal cancer and the Kaplan-Meier method were used to determine survival curves for each group.

RESULTS

Conversion to an open procedure was required in 46 cases (12.8%). Converted and laparoscopic groups were similar in age, sex, comorbidities, and location and size of tumor. The converted group had a significantly higher weight (75 kg vs 69 kg, p = 0.013) and conversion score (2.18 vs. 1.87, p = 0.005). Patients with stage IV disease were significantly more likely to be converted than those with stage I-III disease (23.0% vs 11.2%, p = 0.04). There was no difference in the conversion rate between patients with stage I (14%), II (8%), or III (13%) colorectal cancers. Median follow-up was 30.5 months for stage I-III and 10.8 months for stage IV cancers. There were 190 patients followed at least 2 years and 73 patients followed at least 5 years. Survival curves demonstrate significantly lower 2-year survival after converted procedures as compared to laparoscopic (75.7% vs 87.2%, p = 0.02), with a trend toward lower 5-year survival (61.9% vs 69.7%, p = 0.077).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival rates at 2 and 5 years are lower for patients in the converted group compared to patients with LR. This finding could have serious impact on the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer. Further confirmation is required.

Clinical Skills Acquisition for Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy

PURPOSE

The learning curve associated with laparoscopic surgery may be associated with higher patient risk, and in the setting of kidney donation such risk may be unacceptable. We characterize the learning curve for hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in the context of a urology training program, and establish a case volume threshold after which improvements in laparoscopic skill can be demonstrated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 245 consecutive laparoscopic cases, including 111 donor nephrectomies, performed in 2 (1/2) years to characterize various measures of experience. Documentation of resident involvement in each case was made by a single surgeon and collected prospectively. Outcomes assessed included operative time, blood loss and intraoperative complications.

RESULTS

Of the 111 hand-assisted donor nephrectomies the resident was surgeon in 47%. Operative time proved a reliable and sensitive measure of surgeon experience. Increasing laparoscopic experience, as measured by several parameters, was associated with decreasing operative time (each p <0.02). Measurable improvements in laparoscopic skill were realized after participating in 13 (p = 0.007) or serving as surgeon in as few as 6 (p = 0.02) hand-assisted donor nephrectomies. Conversion (2%) and intraoperative complication rates (3%) were low.

CONCLUSIONS

Skills for hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy can be safely taught in the context of a urology training program independent of resident training level. We documented measurable improvements in laparoscopic skill as gauged by operative time. Our findings provide a basis by which expectations can be set for laparoscopic skill acquisition in the context of a residency program and for the laparoscopically naïve surgeon.

Laparoscopic vs open resection for the treatment of diverticular disease

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether laparoscopic colon resection (LCR) offers any advantages over open colon resection (OCR) in the treatment of diverticular disease.

METHODS

Between 1992 and 2002, 95 patients underwent LCR and 80 patients underwent OCR for the treatment of diverticular disease. Demographics, details of operative procedure, outcome, and pathology were compared.

RESULTS

Patients in both groups were matched for age, sex, body mass index, history of previous abdominal operations, comorbidities, location of the disease, and presence of complications. LCR resulted in significantly less estimated blood loss and postoperative complications, shorter time to first bowel movement, and shorter length of stay than the OCR. There was no difference in operative time, intraoperative complications, mortality rates between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

LCR is a safe and effective approach for the treatment of patients with diverticular disease. It results in less estimated blood loss, shorter time to first bowel movement, less postoperative complications, and shorter length of hospital stay.

Laparoscopy and its current role in the management of colorectal disease

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the current place of laparoscopy in the management of colorectal disease.

METHOD

A literature search was undertaken on Medline between the period 1991 and 2002.

RESULTS

From the literature there is good evidence that the laparoscopic approach is associated with at least some short-term advantages. Improved cosmesis and better patient's satisfaction are also evident. Because of this laparoscopy has been widely employed in various benign conditions. Among others, laparoscopic stoma formation, laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease and Crohn's disease, laparoscopic rectopexy, as well as laparoscopic assisted reversal of Hartmann's procedure were commonly reported. As port site recurrence and oncological safety are of less concern, there have been increasing reports on laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Although long-term follow up data is still limited, results of large prospective studies as well as various randomized trials show that recurrence and survival rates of the laparoscopic approach were at least comparable to open surgery. As experience and confidence accumulates, there are also increasing reports on technically demanding, laparoscopic sphincter-saving rectal excision. Articles on functional aspects following this type of resection also start to appear, which might be one of the future directions.

CONCLUSION

The applicability of laparoscopy to colorectal disease continues to expand. Laparoscopic approach should be considered for patients with benign conditions. For colorectal cancer, results from randomized trials so far have been favourable. Hence, the authors suggest the utility of laparoscopy in potentially curable cancer can also be judiciously relaxed.

Laparoscopic gastric surgery in a Japanese institution: analysis of the initial 100 procedures

BACKGROUND

Although endoscopic surgical procedures are popular in various fields, reports on its use in gastric surgical procedures are limited. This study was designed to review our initial experience with laparoscopic gastric surgical techniques to evaluate indications and surgical results.

STUDY DESIGN

We undertook a retrospective analysis of 100 patients (66 men and 34 women, mean age 63 years) who underwent laparoscopic gastric surgical procedures between 1995 and 2001. Procedures performed were distal gastrectomy (n = 76), wedge resection (n = 20), and intragastric surgical procedures (n = 4). Patients were divided into two groups according to the date of the procedure, from the earliest to the most recent.

RESULTS

There were 85 patients with gastric cancers, 14 submucosal tumors, and 1 duodenal ulcer. In 8 cases conversion was made to an open surgical procedure. Operation times required for distal gastrectomy, wedge resection, and intragastric surgical procedures were 330 +/- 69, 144 +/- 34, and 298 +/- 106 min, and blood loss was 354 +/- 251, 56 +/- 94, and 33 +/- 58 g, respectively. Complications included transient anastomotic stenosis (n = 5), leakage (n = 4), and bleeding (n = 1) after distal gastrectomy, and bleeding (n = 1) after intragastric surgical procedures. There were no complications after wedge resection. Comparing the first and second halves of the series, the percentage of distal gastrectomy significantly increased from 66% to 86% (p = 0.02) and the number of dissected lymph nodes at this procedure increased from 20 +/- 13 to 33 +/- 17 (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic gastric surgical procedures are safe and feasible for early gastric cancers and submucosal tumors. Technical advances in lymph node dissection have made distal gastrectomy a leading and increasingly popular laparoscopic procedure for early gastric cancer.

Model for teaching laparoscopic colectomy to surgical residents

BACKGROUND

This study was undertaken to determine the impact that a resident teaching model for advanced laparoscopic skills has on performance, using outcome for laparoscopic colectomy as an indicator of efficacy.

METHODS

Six senior surgical residents took part in a model for teaching advanced laparoscopic procedures over 3 years. Animal laboratory sessions, tutorial sessions, and feedback were the principle components of this model with residents evaluating each component and their operative experiences. Conversion rates, hospital length of stay, and operating time during the 3 years (n = 100) were compared with a previous year (baseline year) where the faculty performed most of a procedure (n = 20).

RESULTS

Each resident performed an average of 17 cases, being the primary surgeon after the sixth case. There were no differences in operative time for both right and left colectomies compared with the baseline year. Postoperative length of stay was less than 5 days by year 3, with a 14% conversion rate to open surgery. Feedback and tutorials were deemed most important for strategic planning and for reducing operative time.

CONCLUSIONS

Resident participation in advanced laparoscopic surgery, concurrent with structured skills development and feedback, portends very favorable outcomes.

When can I be proficient in laparoscopic surgery? A systematic review of the evidence

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to quantify the learning curve in laparoscopic surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review of the evidence using a defined search strategy (PubMed, Medline, OVID, Embase, ERIC, Cochrane databases) was performed. Studies without statistical evaluation of the learning curve and opinion articles were excluded. The authors analysed 7 common laparoscopic procedures: cholecystectomy, fundoplication, colectomy, herniorrhaphy, splenectomy, appendicectomy, and pyloromyotomy. The "initial" and "late" stages of experience were compared with regards to the following outcome measures: operating time, conversion rate, complication rate, and length of stay in hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 3,641 articles were reviewed, of which, 37 (25,777 patients) fulfilled the entry criteria (5 in children). In all articles, the definition of proficiency was subjective, and the number of operations required to reach it was highly variable. There were improvements in all 4 outcome measures for cholecystectomy, fundoplication, colectomy, herniorrhaphy, and splenectomy between the "initial" and "late" experience. No data were available for the learning curves in appendicectomy or pyloromyotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of procedures required to reach proficiency in laparoscopic surgery has not been defined clearly. These findings are important for training, ethical and medico-legal issues.

[Laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis: is learning phase associated with increased morbidity?]

AIM

To assess retrospectively the results of laparoscopic sigmidectomy for diverticulitis, with intent to treat, in 58 consecutive patients operating by one surgeon compared with a control group operating by laparotomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1995 to 2001, 90 consecutive patients undergoing elective sigmoid resection for diverticulitis were divided into 3 groups: laparotomy (Group 1 : n = 32), first cases of laparoscopy (Group 2 : n = 29) and last cases of laparoscopy (Group 3 : n = 29). These 3 groups were similar according to age, sex, Body Mass Index (BMI), American society of anesthesia score (ASA), previous abdominal surgery, number of attacks of diverticulitis, and time between last attack and surgery. Following criteria were studied: operating time, conversation rate, intra-operative and post-operative morbidity, return of intestinal transit, and hospital stay.

RESULTS

During laparoscopy, conversion was mandatory in 24% of the cases (7/29) in group 2 and 14% in group 3 (4/29; NS). No intra-operative morbidity was noted in the 58 laparoscopies. Mean operative time was 240 min in group 1, 259 min in group 2, and 241 min in group 3 (NS). Postoperative morbidity was observed in 31% of patients in group 1, 34% in group 2, and 10% in group 3 (p = 0.02). Returm of intestinal transit and oral ingestion and mean hospital stay were significantly shorter in group 2 and group 3 versus group 1 (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm previous data demonstrating faisability of laparoscopic sigmodectomy for diverticulitis and its benefice in terms of return of intestinal transit and hospital stay. Furthermore, our study suggest that when surgeon gain experience, conversion rate, morbidity and operative time can be reduced.

Factors and consequences of conversion in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease

BACKGROUND

The disadvantages of laparoscopic elective sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease include the risk of conversion to open operation and longer operative time. The aim of this study was to analyse the causes and consequences of conversion in 168 consecutive patients who underwent a laparoscopically assisted colectomy between January 1994 and June 2001.

METHODS

Data were collected prospectively to analyse the causes and consequences of conversion to open surgery in terms of postoperative morbidity and patient recovery.

RESULTS

Postoperative mortality, morbidity, conversion and reoperation rates were zero, 21.4 per cent (n = 36), 14.3 per cent (n = 24) and 3.0 per cent (n = 5) respectively. The reasons for conversion were presence of intraperitoneal adhesions and/or inflammatory pseudotumour (n = 21), an intraoperative diagnosis of sigmoid cancer (n = 1), hypercapnia (n = 1) and abdominal bleeding (n = 1). Three preoperative factors were associated with a significant higher risk of conversion: surgical expertise, the presence of sigmoid stenosis or fistula, and the severity of diverticulitis on pathological examination. Morbidity was no different between laparoscopic sigmoidectomy (30 of 144; 20.8 per cent) and converted procedures (six of 24; 25.0 per cent). Open conversion was associated with a longer operative time and significantly delayed patient recovery and hospital discharge.

CONCLUSION

Surgical experience and severe diverticular disease are predictive factors for conversion in laparoscopic elective sigmoidectomy. Even if necessary, conversion does not increase the morbidity rate.

Laparoscopic splenectomy does the training of minimally invasive surgical fellows affect outcomes?

BACKGROUND

The training of surgeons and residents in laparoscopic surgery has become an important issue. The purpose of this study is to determine if the training of a laparoscopic fellow affects outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic splenectomy (LS).

METHODS

Data were obtained from a prospectively collected database of patients who underwent LS from August 1994 to November 1999. Outcomes of the last 25 cases, performed by fellows under supervision, were compared to 25 cases performed by staff surgeons prior to the introduction of fellows.

RESULTS

Patient demographics, preoperative platelet count, and splenic size were similar for the two groups. Outcome measures comparing the staff and the fellows group including operative time (151 vs 178 min, p = 0.055), blood loss (214 vs 162 ml, p = 0.40), intraoperative complications (3 vs 2, p = 1.0), need for transfusion (2 vs 3, p = 1.0), conversions (1 vs 0, p = 1.0), length of hospital stay (3.3 vs 2.5 days, p = 0.13), and postoperative complications (1 vs 2, p = 1.0) were similar for the two groups.

CONCLUSION

When performed by a fellow under supervision, LS has the same outcomes as when the procedure is performed by the teaching staff surgeon.