Laparoscopic splenectomy does the training of minimally invasive surgical fellows affect outcomes?

Resident involvement in minimally-invasive vs. open procedures

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of resident involvement on surgical outcomes in laparoscopic compared to open procedures.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2007-2012 was queried for open and laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (VHR), inguinal hernia repair (IHR), splenectomy, colectomy, or cholecystectomy (CCY). Multivariable regression analyses were performed to assess the impact of resident involvement on surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 88,337 VHR, 20,586 IHR, 59,254 colectomies, 3301 splenectomies, and 95,900 CCY were identified. Resident involvement was predictive for major complication during open VHR (AOR, 1.29; p < 0.001), but not during any other procedure. Resident participation significantly prolonged operative time for open, as well as laparoscopic VHR, IHR, colectomy, splenectomy, and CCY (all p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that resident participation has a similar impact on surgical outcomes during laparoscopic and open surgery, and is generally safe.

The Presence of an Advanced Gastrointestinal (GI)/Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) Fellowship Program Does Not Impact Short-Term Patient Outcomes Following Fundoplication or Esophagomyotomy

INTRODUCTION

The current surgical landscape reflects a continual trend towards sub-specialization, evidenced by an increasing number of US surgeons who pursue fellowship training after residency. Despite this growing trend, however, the effect of advanced gastrointestinal (GI)/minimally invasive surgery (MIS) fellowship programs on patient outcomes following foregut/esophageal operations remains unclear. This study looks at two representative foregut surgeries (laparoscopic fundoplication and esophagomyotomy) performed in New York State (NYS), comparing hospitals which do and do not possess a GI/MIS fellowship program, to examine the effect of such a program on perioperative outcomes. We also aimed to identify any patient or hospital factors which might influence perioperative outcomes.

METHODS

The SPARCS database was examined for all patients who underwent a foregut procedure (specifically, either an esophagomyotomy or a laparoscopic fundoplication) between 2012 and 2014. We compared the following outcomes between institutions with and without a GI/MIS fellowship program: 30-day readmission, hospital length of stay (LOS), and development of any major complication.

RESULTS

There were 3175 foregut procedures recorded from 2012 to 2014. Just below one third (n = 1041; 32.8%) were performed in hospitals possessing a GI/MIS fellowship program. Among our entire included study population, 154 patients (4.85%) had a single 30-day readmission, with no observed difference in readmission between hospitals with and without a GI/MIS fellowship program, even after controlling for potential confounding factors (p = 0.6406 and p = 0.2511, respectively). Additionally, when controlling for potential confounders, the presence/absence of a GI/MIS fellowship program was found to have no association with risk of having a major complication (p = 0.1163) or LOS (p = 0.7562). Our study revealed that postoperative outcomes were significantly influenced by patient race and payment method. Asians and Medicare patients had the highest risk of suffering a severe complication (10.00 and 7.44%; p = 0.0311 and p = 0.0036, respectively)-with race retaining significance even after adjusting for potential confounders (p = 0.0276). Asians and uninsured patients demonstrated the highest readmission rates (15.00 and 12.50%; p = 0.0129 and p = 0.0012, respectively)-with both race and payment method retaining significance after adjustment (p = 0.0362 and p = 0.0257, respectively). Lastly, payment method was significantly associated with postoperative LOS (p < 0.0001), with Medicaid patients experiencing the longest LOS (mean 3.99 days) and those with commercial insurance experiencing the shortest (mean 1.66 days), a relationship which retained significance even after adjusting for potential confounders (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The presence of a GI/MIS fellowship program does not impact short-term patient outcomes following laparoscopic fundoplication or esophagomyotomy (two representative foregut procedures). Presence of such a fellowship should not play a role in choosing a surgeon. Additionally, in these foregut procedures, patient race (particularly Asian race) and payment method were found to be independently associated with postoperative outcomes, including postoperative LOS.

Broad-Based Fellowships: A Cornerstone of Minimally Invasive Surgery Education and Dissemination

Aware of the trends in surgery and of public demand, many residents completing a 5-year training program seek fellowships in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) because of inadequate exposure to advanced MIS during their residency. A survey was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a broad-based fellowship in advanced laparoscopic surgery offered in an academic health science center. The questionnaire was mailed to all graduates. Data on demographics, comfort level with specific laparoscopic procedures, and opinions regarding the best methods of acquiring these skills were collected. Most of the surgeons entered the fellowship directly after residency. The majority of these surgeons are academic surgeons. Fellows performed a median of 187 cases by the end of their training and felt comfortable operating on foregut, hindgut, and end organ. A full year of training was found to be the best format for appropriate skill transfer. A broad-based MIS fellowship meets the needs of both academic and community surgeons desiring to perform advanced laparoscopic procedures.

Systematic review with meta-analysis of the impact of surgical fellowship training on patient outcomes

Background

The number of surgeons entering fellowship training before independent practice is increasing. This may have a negative impact on surgeons in training. The impact of fellowship training on patient outcomes is not yet known. This review aimed to investigate the impact of fellowship training in surgery on patient outcomes.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify studies exploring the structural and surgeon-specific characteristics of fellowship training on patient outcomes. Data from these studies were extracted, synthesized and reported qualitatively, or quantitatively through meta-analysis.

Results

Twenty-three studies were included. The mortality rate for patients in centres with an affiliated fellowship programme was lower than that for centres without (odds ratio 0·86, 95 per cent c.i. 0·84 to 0·88), as was the rate of complications (odds ratio 0·90, 0·78 to 1·02). Surgeons without fellowship training converted more laparoscopic operations to open surgery than those with fellowship training (risk ratio (RR) 1·04, 95 per cent c.i. 1·03 to 1·05). Comparison of outcomes for senior surgeons versus current fellows showed no differences in rates of mortality (RR 1·00, 1·00 to 1·01), complications (RR 1·03, 0·98 to 1·08) or conversion to open surgery (RR 1·01, 1·00 to 1·01).

Conclusion

Fellowship training appears to have a positive impact on patient outcomes.

Liver transplant fellowship and resident training is not a part of the "July effect"

BACKGROUND

The influx of new resident physicians has been shown to cause increased complications in academic institutions, named the "July effect." This study investigated if this effect is associated with liver transplants and if it affects patient or allograft outcomes after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The United Network of Organ Sharing or Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database was queried. Cases were separated and coded by the month of transplant. The survival analysis was calculated by log-rank and Kaplan-Meier tests in SPSS version 15.0 (IBM Corporation, Chicago, IL).

RESULTS

A total of 108,666 OLTs were analyzed through March 31, 2011. The mean short-term patient survivals at 30 d and 1 y were 94.3% and 85.2%, respectively. The mean long-term survivals at 3, 5, and 10 y were 77.6%, 72.1%, and 58.8%, respectively. The mean short-term allograft survivals at 30 d and 1 y were 90.6% and 79.4%, respectively. The mean long-term allograft survivals at 3, 5, and 10 y were 71.0%, 65.0%, and 51.5%, respectively. OLTs in the month of April had significantly improved patient and allograft survivals compared with those in the months of January, October, and December; OLTs in the month of December had significantly decreased patient and allograft survivals compared with those in the months of July and August.

CONCLUSIONS

OLTs in the month of April had significantly improved outcomes, and OLTs in the month of December had significantly decreased outcomes. These months do not correlate with the beginning of new trainees; therefore, there is no July effect observed in liver transplant fellowship and resident training.

Laparoscopic appendectomy conversion rates two decades later: an analysis of surgeon and patient-specific factors resulting in open conversion

BACKGROUND

The role of laparoscopy in appendicitis has gained increased popularity but remains controversial. Despite more than 20 y of experience in laparoscopy, the nationwide laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) conversion rate is reportedly 8.6%. We sought to analyze the impact of patient-specific and surgeon-specific factors that may contribute to open conversion during LA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 745 LAs (49.9% females and 50.1% males; average age of 37.8 y performed at a large tertiary community teaching hospital over a 5-y period (May 2004-October 2008) was performed.

RESULTS

The overall conversion rate for the study period was 4.16% (n = 31). The most common reason for open conversion was severe acute inflammation (38.7%). Among converted cases, 77.42% had no prior abdominal surgery and only 25.81% of cases were converted due to adhesions. Females and patients ≥ 65-y-old had a higher likelihood of open conversion (4.30% versus 4.02%, P < 0.99 and 9.26% versus 3.76%, P < 0.1107). The overall conversion rate of cases performed by high-volume surgeons (≥ 50 total cases) in comparison to low-volume surgeons (10-49 total cases) was higher (4.86% versus 3.30%, P < 0.39). Conversion rates were lower among surgeons who completed residency training after 1990 (3.72% versus 4.35%, P < 0.82) and those with fellowship training (1.42% versus 5.18%, P < 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic conversion continues to gain popularity and remains the gold standard procedure for appendectomy. Older patients have a higher likelihood of conversion with severe acute inflammation being the most common reason for conversion. Additional minimally invasive fellowship training was the only surgeon-specific factor that significantly impacted conversion rate.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy conversion rates two decades later

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Now nearly 2 decades into the laparoscopic era, nationwide laparoscopic cholecystectomy conversion rates remain around 5% to 10%. We analyzed patient- and surgeon-specific factors that may impact the decision to convert to open.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 2205 LCs performed at a large tertiary community hospital over a 52 month period (May 2004 through October 2008).

RESULTS

The overall conversion rate was 4.9%. The most common reason for conversion was adhesions, and the majority of these patients had prior abdominal surgery. Males and patients >50 years old had a significantly higher likelihood of open conversion. The conversion rate of high-volume surgeons (≥100 total cases) in comparison to low-volume surgeons (40 to 99 total cases) was significantly lower. Conversion rates were lower among surgeons with fellowship training and those who completed residency training after 1990. Interestingly, the percentage of conversions due to technical difficulty was lower among those with fellowship training but higher among those who completed training after 1990.

CONCLUSION

Conversion occurred in ∼5% of all laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Males, patients >50 years old, and cases performed by low-volume surgeons had a higher likelihood of conversion. Other surgeon-specific factors did not have a significant impact on conversion rate.

Reaching proficiency in laparoscopic splenectomy

AIM: To investigate the proficiency level reached in laparoscopic splenectomy using the learning curve method.

METHODS: All patients in need of splenectomy for benign causes in whom laparoscopic splenectomy was attempted by a single surgeon during a time period of 6 years were included in the study (n = 33). Besides demographics, operation-related variables and the response to surgery were recorded. The patients were allocated to groups of five, ranked according to the date of the operation. Operation duration, complications, postoperative length of stay, conversion to laparotomy and splenic weight were then compared between these groups.

RESULTS: There was a significant difference regarding operation times between the groups (P = 0.001). An improvement was observed after the first 5 cases. The learning curve was flat up to the 25th case. Following the 25th case the operation times decreased still further. There was no difference between the groups regarding the other parameters.

CONCLUSION: Unlike the widely accepted “L” shape, the learning curve for laparoscopic splenectomy is a horizontal lazy “S” with two distinct slopes. Privileges may be granted after the first 5 cases. However proficiency seems to require 25 cases.

Laparoscopic splenectomy: the clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES)

BACKGROUND

Although laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) has become the standard approach for most splenectomy cases, some areas still remain controversial. To date, the indications that preclude laparoscopic splenectomy are not clearly defined. In view of this, the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) has developed clinical practice guidelines for LS.

METHODS

An international expert panel was invited to appraise the current literature and to develop evidence-based recommendations. A consensus development conference using a nominal group process convened in May 2007. Its recommendations were presented at the annual EAES congress in Athens, Greece, on 5 July 2007 for discussion and further input. After a further Delphi process between the experts, the final recommendations were agreed upon.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic splenectomy is indicated for most benign and malignant hematologic diseases independently of the patient's age and body weight. Preoperative investigation is recommended for obtaining information on spleen size and volume as well as the presence of accessory splenic tissue. Preoperative vaccination against meningococcal, pneumococcal, and Haemophilus influenzae type B infections is recommended in elective cases. Perioperative anticoagulant prophylaxis with subcutaneous heparin should be administered to all patients and prolonged anticoagulant prophylaxis to high-risk patients. The choice of approach (supine [anterior], semilateral or lateral) is left to the surgeon's preference and concomitant conditions. In cases of massive splenomegaly, the hand-assisted technique should be considered to avoid conversion to open surgery and to reduce complication rates. The expert panel still considered portal hypertension and major medical comorbidities as contraindications to LS.

CONCLUSION

Despite a lack of level 1 evidence, LS is a safe and advantageous procedure in experienced hands that has displaced open surgery for almost all indications. To support the clinical evidence, further randomized controlled trials on different issues are mandatory.

Is training in endoscopic sinus surgery detrimental to patient outcome?

OBJECTIVE

To identify whether training in endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is detrimental to patient outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospective evaluation of SinoNasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) scores for all patients undergoing ESS. Comparison between the outcome scores of patients operated on by the established endoscopic sinus surgeon with outcome scores of patient operated on by the supervised trainee.

RESULTS

Patients operated on by the supervised trainee did not have poorer outcome scores than patients operated on by the established endoscopic surgeon.

CONCLUSIONS

Training in endoscopic sinus surgery is not detrimental to patient outcome when assessing symptom resolution, assuming that the training is closely supervised and that the trainee complies with a structured training program.

Advanced laparoscopic skills acquisition: the case of laparoscopic colorectal surgery

Acquisition of advanced technical skills requires commitment, time, patience, and discipline (eg, the 10-year rule). Dabbling is not a recipe for success. Despite the value of all other teaching methods, guided practice with feedback is essential to develop the high level of visuospatial perceptual ability (observation and performance with feedback) that is necessary for advanced MIS. The necessary ingredients to skill acquisition for advanced MIS procedures (laparoscopic colorectal surgery) for a practicing surgeon include introduction through short courses, access to skill stations, and access to preceptorship or mini-sabbatical. For residents in training, there is no better alternative than an MIS fellowship. In an ideal world where there are enough trainers, the residency environment should provide this training. Comprehensive strategies of knowledge transfer for practicing surgeons should be designed with the input of experts in knowledge transfer.

Outpatient laparoscopic splenectomy: patient safety and satisfaction

BACKGROUND

We assessed the feasibility of outpatient laparoscopic splenectomy, as performed by an experienced laparoscopic term and combined with optimal anesthesia.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria in the study was limited to patients not hospitalized before the procedure who had hematological or neoplastic indications for splenectomy and were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-III. They received general intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil and were given keterolac, propacetamol, droperidol, and ondansetron as prophylaxis against postoperative pain and nausea. Laparoscopic splenectomy was performed via three trocars. The specimen was removed via an incision in the left iliac fossa.

RESULTS

Ten of the 12 patients were discharged 3-6 h postoperatively; the other two were admitted primarily to hospital. One was readmitted due to a fever, which was finally explained by measles. The median operative times was 58 min (range, 45-135). Patient satisfaction was excellent in nine and intermediate in two cases; it was poor in one case, due to postoperative pain.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic splenectomy can be completed in a relatively short time; therefore, it is feasible, safe, and satisfactory for most patients as an outpatient procedure.

Does the Early Ligation of the Splenic Artery Reduce Hemorrhage During Laparoscopic Splenectomy?

The aim of this study was to investigate whether early ligation of the splenic artery before splenic lysis has an effect on the amount of intraoperative bleeding and conversion rate during laparoscopic splenectomy. Laparoscopic splenectomy was performed in 34 patients with hematological diseases or splenic cysts between January 1993 and January 2003. The splenic artery was ligated before manipulation of the spleen in 22 patients (group 1) and laparoscopic splenectomy was performed with no previous ligation of the splenic artery in 12 patients (group 2). Prospective data was collected and the groups compared regarding intraoperative blood loss, platelet count, operative time, hospital stay, and conversion rate. Laparoscopic splenectomy was successfully completed in 30 (88%) patients. One patient in group 1 (5%) and 3 patients in group 2 (25%) required conversion due to bleeding. Estimated average blood loss was 161 mL (range 70-450 mL) in group 1, and 292 mL (range 100-700 mL) in group 2 (P < 0.001). The average operative time was 140 minutes (range 80-240) in group 1, and 155 minutes (range 80-200) in group 2 (P > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups comparing splenic size, conversion rate, hospital length of stay and platelet count. Early ligation of the splenic artery is feasible, safe and effective and may provide easy dissection and manipulation of the spleen during laparoscopic splenectomy with decreased intraoperative blood loss and no extension of the operative time.

Laparoscopic splenectomy: the latest technical evaluation

AIM: To introduce our latest innovation on technical manipulation of laparoscopic splenectomy.

METHODS: Under general anesthesia and carbon dioxide (CO₂) pneumoperitoneum, 86 cases of laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) were performed. The patients were placed in three different operative positions: 7 cases in the lithotomic position, 31 cases in the right recumbent position and 48 cases in the right lateral position. An ultrasonic scissors was used to dissect the pancreaticosplenic ligament, the splenocolicum ligament, lienorenal ligament and the lienophrenic ligament, respectively. Lastly, the gastrosplenic ligament and short gastric vessels were dissected. The splenic artery and vein were resected at splenic hilum with Endo-GIA. The impact of different operative positions, spleen size and other events during the operation were studied.

RESULTS: The laparoscopic splenectomy was successfully performed on all 86 patients from August 1997 to August 2002. No operative complications, such as peritoneal cavity infection, massive bleeding after operation and adjacent organs injured were observed. There was no death related to the operation. The study showed that different operative positions could significantly influence the manipulation of LS. The right lateral position had more advantages than the lithotomic position and the right recumbent position in LS.

CONCLUSION: Most cases of LS could be accomplished successfully when patients are placed in the right lateral position. The right lateral position has more advantages than the conventional supine approach by providing a more direct view of the splenic hilum as well as other important anatomies. Regardless of operation positions, the major axis of spleen exceeding 15 cm by B-ultrasound in vitro will surely increase the difficulties of LS and therefore prolong the duration of operation. LS is a safe and feasible modality for splenectomy.