Serum hepatitis B surface antigen quantitation can reflect hepatitis B virus in the liver and predict treatment response

Quantitative measurement of serum hepatitis B surface antigen using an immunoradiometric assay in chronic hepatitis B

PURPOSE

Measurement of serum hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) levels is important for the management of chronic hepatitis B patients in terms of monitoring response to antiviral therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a new diagnostic kit, which quantitatively measures serum HBsAg level using an immunoradiometric assay (IRMA)-based method. Measurements were compared with those obtained using a chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA)-based method.

METHODS

The blood samples of 96 patients with chronic hepatitis B were used in this study. Copy numbers of serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA were determined in 23 of these samples. The correlation between and the concordance of IRMA and CMIA results were determined using Pearson's correlation coefficients. P values of 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant throughout.

RESULTS

Laboratory diagnoses based on IRMA were wholly in agreement with those based on CMIA. Furthermore, serum HBsAg levels by IRMA were found to be highly correlated with those determined by CMIA (correlation coefficient R (2) = 0.838, p < 0.001). Serum HBsAg level and serum HBV DNA copies were found to be linearly related by both methods (R (2) = 0.067, p = 0.316 by IRMA, and R (2) = 0.101, p = 0.215 by CMIA).

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic performance of the investigated IRMA method of determining HBsAg levels was found to be comparable with that of a CMIA-based method in chronic hepatitis B patients.

Relationship between serum HBsAg level, HBV DNA level, and peripheral immune cells in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection

BACKGROUND

The chronicity of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is attributed to inappropriate functioning of cell-mediated immunity. Besides the importance of measuring serum HBV DNA and HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) as markers of viral replication and exposure, respectively, studies regarding their influence on immune cell status in chronic HBV infection are still scarce. Because such studies of chronic HBV patients have not been reported for India, we attempted to evaluate the relationship between serum concentrations of HBsAg, HBV DNA, and percentage of immune cells in peripheral blood of Indian subjects with chronic HBV infection.

METHODS

Thirty-one HbsAg-positive subjects were evaluated for serum HBe antigen (HBeAg), anti-HBe, and alanine transferase status by standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and biochemical procedures. Serum HBV DNA level was determined by real-time TaqMan® polymerase chain reaction assay. Serum HBsAg level was measured by a third-generation sandwich ELISA kit. Peripheral immune cell profiling was done by multifluorometric flow cytometry analysis, for which 21 healthy subjects were included as controls.

RESULTS

The majority (93.5%) of the study subjects were HBeAg-negative and anti-HBeAg-positive. Mean viral load, HBsAg, and alanine transferase levels were 4.20 ± 1.96 log copies/mL, 5.98 ± 4.62 log IU/mL, and 74.5 ± 110 IU/mL, respectively. In comparison with controls, total T cell and cytotoxic T cell populations were significantly (P < 0.05) reduced in HBV-infected subjects, while the status of B cells, natural killer cells, T helper cells, and ratio of T helper to cytotoxic cells remained unaltered.

CONCLUSION

Suppression of the peripheral cytotoxic T cell population in chronic HBeAg-negative chronic HBV infection is influenced by increased viral load. Serum HBsAg concentration appeared independent of serum HBV DNA level and immune cell status. Nonelevation of natural killer cell and T helper cell numbers in subjects harboring lower to moderate HBV loads is further indicative of noninduction of innate as well as a coordinated adaptive immune response favoring chronicity of the disease.

HBcrAg is a predictor of post-treatment recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma during antiviral therapy

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The recurrence rate of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is high even in patients receiving curative therapy. In this study, we analysed the risk factors for tumour recurrence after curative therapy for HBV-related HCC while under treatment with nucleot(s)ide analogues (NAs) by measuring serum HBcrAg and intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) levels to elucidate the viral status associated with HCC recurrence.

METHODS

We enrolled 55 patients who developed HCC during NA therapy and underwent either curative resection or percutaneous ablation for HCC.

RESULTS

Hepatocellular carcinoma recurred in 21 (38%) of the patients over a period of 2.2 (range, 0.2-7.4) years. In multivariate analysis, serum HBcrAg levels ≥4.8 log U/ml at the time of HCC diagnosis (hazard ratio, 8.96; 95% confidential interval, 1.94-41.4) and portal vein invasion (3.94, 1.25-12.4) were independent factors for HCC recurrence. The recurrence-free survival rates of the high cccDNA group were significantly lower than those of the low cccDNA group only in patients who underwent resection (P=0.0438). A positive correlation (P=0.028; r=0.479) was observed between the intrahepatic cccDNA and the serum HBcrAg levels at the incidence of HCC.

CONCLUSION

HBcrAg is a predictor of the post-treatment recurrence of HCC during antiviral therapy. Serum HBcrAg and intrahepatic cccDNA suppression by NAs may be important to prevent HCC recurrence.

Serum HBeAg sero-conversion correlated with decrease of HBsAg and HBV DNA in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with a therapeutic vaccine

Currently, there are various approaches for developing therapeutic vaccines for chronic hepatitis B patients. Previously, an antigen-antibody-based therapeutic vaccine (YIC) has been conducted in a double-blind placebo controlled phase IIb clinical trial in 242 chronic hepatitis B patients. At the end of follow-up for 24 weeks, HBeAg sero-conversion rate was 21.6% in the 60 μg immunized group, compared to 9% in the alum immunized control group (p=0.03). To analyze the correlation between HBeAg-seroconversion, and decrease of serum HBsAg and HBV DNA, serum samples were back quantified for serum HBsAg and HBV DNA collected at baseline, end of treatment, and end of follow-up from patients who were treated either with 60 μg of YIC, or with placebo. Patients were dichotomized to HBeAg sero-converted and non-converted groups in comparison with patients in the placebo group. The correlations between HBeAg seroconversion and the decrease of HBsAg, HBV DNA and ALT levels during study period were analyzed using a logistic regression model. Results showed marked and sustained reduction of HBsAg, HBV DNA and ALT level in HBeAg sero-converted patients compared to those in patients of HBeAg non-converted and placebo groups. Reduction of HBV DNA and elevation of ALT was markedly associated with HBeAg seroconversion with an adjusted OR of 0.09 (95%CI: 0.01-0.62) and 0.08 (95%CI: 0.02-0.37) respectively after adjusted by age and sex, while reduction of HBsAg level was close to of significance (p=0.054). Analysis indicated that HBeAg sero-conversion was a reasonable endpoint for therapeutic vaccination.

Prediction of sustained response to peginterferon alfa-2b for hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B using on-treatment hepatitis B surface antigen decline

Serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels may reflect the immunomodulatory efficacy of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN). We investigated within a large randomized trial whether quantitative HBsAg levels predict response to PEG-IFN in patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B. Serum HBsAg was measured in samples taken at baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 52, and 78 of 221 patients treated with PEG-IFN alfa-2b with or without lamivudine for 52 weeks. HBsAg decline was compared between treatment arms and between responders and nonresponders. Response was defined as HBeAg loss with HBV DNA < 10,000 copies/mL at 26 weeks after treatment (week 78); 43 of 221 (19%) patients achieved a response. One year of PEG-IFN with or without lamivudine resulted in a significant decline in serum HBsAg, which was sustained after treatment (decline 0.9 log IU/mL at week 78, P < 0.001). Patients treated with combination therapy experienced a more pronounced on-treatment decline, but relapsed subsequently. Responders experienced a significantly more pronounced decline in serum HBsAg compared to nonresponders (decline at week 52: 3.3 versus 0.7 log IU/mL, P < 0.001). Patients who achieved no decline at week 12 had a 97% probability of nonresponse through posttreatment follow-up and no chance of HBsAg loss. In a representative subset of 149 patients similar results were found for prediction through long-term (mean 3.0 years) follow-up.

CONCLUSION

PEG-IFN induces a significant decline in serum HBsAg in HBeAg-positive patients. Patients who experience no decline from baseline at week 12 have little chance of achieving a sustained response and no chance of HBsAg loss and should be advised to discontinue therapy with PEG-IFN.

Change in serum hepatitis B surface antigen level and its clinical significance in treatment-naïve, hepatitis B e antigen-positive patients receiving entecavir

BACKGROUND/AIM

We investigated changes in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) level and its correlation with clinical outcomes in treatment-naive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients undergoing entecavir therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Among 51 hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive treatment-naive CHB patients receiving entecavir for more than 1 year, 28 were enrolled. HBsAg levels were measured at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months after treatment using the Architect HBsAg QT assay (Abbott, dynamic; range: 0.05 to 125,000 IU/mL). Serum alanine aminotransferase, HBeAg, anti-HBe, and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA (Cobas Taqman: low detection limit 1.84 log10 copies/mL) were measured at baseline and every 3 months. The HBsAg response was defined as an HBsAg level that decreased more than 1 log10 IU/mL from baseline level at 12 months after entecavir treatment.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were treated for a median period of 21 months (range: 18 to 24 mo). Serum HBsAg level showed a mean of 4.0, 3.7, and 3.6 log10 IU/mL at pretreatment, 6, and 12 months, respectively, and declined significantly (P<0.001). Serum HBV DNA level showed a mean of 8.1, 3.1, and 2.4 log10 copies/mL at pretreatment, 6, and 12 months, respectively, and declined significantly (P<0.001). The decline in HBsAg level was significantly correlated with that of the HBV DNA level at 12 months from baseline (γ=0.391, P=0.044). Five patients showed an HBsAg response, and cumulative incidence of HBeAg loss at 1 year after entecavir treatment was 80% versus 30% in patients with an HBsAg response and those without, respectively (P=0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Monitoring changes in quantitative HBsAg level could be a useful parameter for assessing the response to entecavir therapy in HBeAg-positive treatment-naive CHB patients.

A longitudinal study on the natural history of serum hepatitis B surface antigen changes in chronic hepatitis B

Serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) quantification has been suggested to reflect the concentration of covalently closed circular DNA in the liver. We aimed to investigate the HBsAg levels at different stages of chronic hepatitis B and the changes in HBsAg level during the natural progression of disease. One hundred seventeen untreated patients with chronic hepatitis B were studied with longitudinal follow-up for 99 ± 16 months. HBsAg quantification was performed at the first visit, the last visit, and three visits at each quartile during the follow-up. At the first visit, HBsAg level was higher among patients who were hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive (N = 49) than those who were HBeAg-negative (N = 68) (4.01 ± 0.91 log IU/mL versus 2.73 ± 1.25 log IU/mL, P < 0.001). HBsAg level was persistently high at approximately 5 log IU/mL among patients in the immune tolerance phase (N = 7). The HBsAg levels among patients with HBeAg-positive active disease (N = 25) or sustained HBeAg seroconversion (N = 17) were comparable at approximately 3-4 log IU/mL. The HBsAg levels among patients who were HBeAg-negative tended to be higher among patients with active (N = 46) than those with inactive disease (N = 22). The median HBsAg levels decreased in HBeAg-negative patients with active and inactive disease by 0.041 log IU/mL/year and 0.043 log IU/mL/year, respectively. Twenty-two (17%) patients had HBsAg reduction >1 log IU/mL at the last visit; most of them showed reduced hepatitis B virus DNA, and eight had HBsAg loss.

CONCLUSION

HBsAg remained stable in HBeAg-positive patients and tended to reduce slowly in HBeAg-negative patients. Reduction of HBsAg for >1 log IU/mL could reflect improved immune control.

[Comparison of nine different qualitative HBsAg assay kits]

BACKGROUND

Qualitative hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) assay kits are still commonly used in Korea where hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is endemic. The accurate determination of HBsAg plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and prevention of HBV infection, especially in endemic areas. The aim of this study was to compare the detection sensitivities of 9 qualitative HBsAg assay kits.

METHODS

Seven pooled sera with HBsAg concentration ranging from 0.14 IU/mL to 29.96 IU/mL were prepared. The HBsAg concentration of each pooled serum was determined by a quantitative HBsAg assay, Architect HBsAg (Abbott Laboratories, Ireland). The fully automated immunoassay kits included Elecsys HBsAg (Roche Diagnostics, Germany) and Immulite 2000 HBsAg (DPC, USA) and the rapid tests included 5 immunochromatographic assay (ICA) kits and 2 reverse passive hemagglutination assay (RPHA) kits.

RESULTS

Elecsys HBsAg (Roche Diagnostics) showed positive result in pooled serum with HBsAg concentration of 0.14 IU/mL, but Immulite 2000 HBsAg (DPC) showed negative result in the same concentration. Although ICA kits showed variable results among different assay kits, all of them showed negative results in pooled sera with HBsAg concentration of < or = 1.89 IU/mL. Two RPHA kits showed negative results in pooled sera with HBsAg concentration of < or = 7.98 IU/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Although ICAs were more sensitive than RPHAs, they had variable sensitivities for HBsAg and were less sensitive than the automated immunoassay kits. Therefore, ICAs and RPHAs should be used with caution in the screening tests for HBsAg and their sensitivities need to be improved.

Detection of hepatitis B virus covalently closed circular DNA in paraffin-embedded and cryo-preserved liver biopsies of chronic hepatitis B patients

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) may become an important predictor for treatment outcome or long-term follow-up.

AIM

To detect cccDNA in formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded (FFPE) and to compare with cryo-preserved liver tissue.

METHODS

Biopsies of 56 chronic hepatitis B patients were collected. Cryo-preserved and FFPE liver biopsies were available from 37 out of 56 patients. Paraffin was extracted with 1 ml xylene, followed by 100% alcohol and acetone. For the detection of cccDNA, selective primers were used. For quantification of hepatocytes a commercial Taqman beta-actin control kit was used.

RESULTS

The cccDNA was detected in 80% of FFPE and in 100% of cryo-preserved liver specimens. Recovery of hepatocytes and cccDNA was approximately a 100-fold lower in FFPE liver tissue, but intrahepatic cccDNA levels were comparable. In FFPE and cryo-preserved liver tissue, intrahepatic cccDNA levels correlated strongly with HBV DNA, hepatitis B e antigen (HbeAg), and plasma cccDNA levels. HbeAg positive chronic hepatitis B patients had significantly higher intrahepatic cccDNA levels compared with HBeAg negative patients (P<0.05). In HBeAg positive patients, no difference in intrahepatic cccDNA levels were seen between patients with active (histological activity index score>3; HBV DNA>20 000 IU/ml) and inactive hepatitis (histological activity index score</=3). In HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B patients, intrahepatic cccDNA levels were significantly higher in patients with active hepatitis (P=0.004 and 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Recovery of hepatocytes and cccDNA in FFPE tissue was lower, but intrahepatic cccDNA in FFPE biopsies were comparable with cryo-preserved liver tissue. Therefore, FFPE liver tissue is an attractive alternative for cccDNA analysis when cryo-preserved tissue is not available.

Hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance during chronic HBV infection

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance in chronic HBV infection occurs at an annual incidence of 1-2%. The long-term outcome after HBsAg seroclearance is excellent if there is no pre-existing cirrhosis or viral superinfection. For this reason, HBsAg seroclearance has attracted recent interest in both long-term studies of the natural history of HBV infection and in patients receiving antiviral therapy. Here, we review a diverse range of studies investigating spontaneous HBsAg seroclearance in varied groups of patients and consider the many predictive factors - of both viral and host origin - for seroclearance. Studies to assess the effects of antiviral therapy, and in particular interferon treatment, are also discussed together with virological, biochemical and histological profiles following HBsAg seroclearance and the long-term outcomes.

Durability of peginterferon alfa-2b treatment at 5 years in patients with hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B

Approximately 30%-40% of patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B treated with peginterferon and/or lamivudine achieve HBeAg seroconversion 6 months after the end of treatment. The durability and long-term effect of treatment are unknown. In this study, 85 HBeAg-positive patients who received peginterferon alfa-2b 1.5 microg/kg/week for 32 weeks and lamivudine 100 mg/day for 52 or 104 weeks were prospectively followed for 6.1 +/- 1.7 years posttreatment. Twenty-five (29%) patients had virologic response (HBeAg seroconversion and HBV DNA <10,000 copies/mL) at 5 years. The rate of HBeAg seroconversion rose progressively from 37% at the end of treatment to 60% at 5 years. Twenty-seven (32%) and 11 (13%) patients had undetectable HBV DNA (<100 copies/mL) at the end of peginterferon treatment and at 5 years, respectively. Two (2.4%) patients achieved hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance at 2.6 and 84 months posttreatment. Among virologic responders at the end of treatment, 82% and 57% and sustained HBeAg seroconversion and virologic response at 5 years. End-of-treatment serum quantitative HBsAg was significantly lower in patients with sustained virologic response at 5 years (median 1,431 IU/mL versus 2,689 IU/mL [P = 0.041]). At the last follow-up, the liver stiffness measurement by transient elastography was 5.8 +/- 2.7 kPa. Only two patients had liver stiffness suggestive of advanced fibrosis. Week 16 HBV DNA, end-of-treatment HBeAg seroconversion, and undetectable HBV DNA were independent factors associated with virologic response at 5 years. The duration of concomitant lamivudine treatment had no impact on any long-term response.

CONCLUSION

Peginterferon has high durability in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients with end-of-treatment virologic response.

Comparison between quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis B e-antigen and hepatitis B virus DNA levels for predicting virological response to pegylated interferon-alpha-2b therapy in hepatitis B e-antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical applicability of quantitative serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA for predicting virological response (VR) to pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) therapy.

METHODS

Thirty HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients who received PEG-IFN-alpha-2b for 48 weeks were enrolled. Quantitative HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV DNA were measured before, during and after the therapy. Paired liver biopsies were performed before and after treatment for covalently closed circular (ccc)DNA and intrahepatic HBV DNA analysis.

RESULTS

VR at 48 weeks post-treatment, defined as HBeAg seroconversion and HBV DNA less than 10 000 copies/mL was achieved in 10 (33.3%) patients. Responders had significantly lower baseline HBsAg, HBeAg, cccDNA and intrahepatic HBV DNA levels than non-responders. Baseline and reduced levels of log(10) HBsAg and log(10) HBeAg correlated well with those of log(10) cccDNA and log(10) total intrahepatic HBV DNA. Responders showed consistent decrease in serum HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV DNA levels during therapy. HBeAg level of 2.0 log(10) sample to cut-off ratio at week 24 on therapy provided the best prediction of sustained virological response, with sensitivity and negative predictive values of 85% and 92%, respectively. One patient (3.3%) who cleared HBsAg at follow up exhibited a more rapid decline in serum HBsAg during therapy than those who developed VR without HBsAg clearance.

CONCLUSION

Quantitative measurement of serum HBeAg during therapy may be superior to serum HBsAg and HBV DNA as a prediction of HBeAg seroconversion. Kinetics of HBsAg levels on therapy may help predict HBsAg clearance after treatment.

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels in the natural history of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infection: a European perspective

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The quantifiable level of HBsAg has been suggested as a predictor of treatment response in chronic hepatitis B. However, there is limited information on HBsAg levels considering the dynamic natural course of HBV-infection. This study aimed to determine HBsAg levels in the different phases of HBV-infection in European HBsAg-positive patients.

METHODS

226 HBV-monoinfected patients, not undergoing antiviral therapy, were analyzed in a cross-sectional study. Patients were categorized according to the phase of HBV-infection: HBeAg(+) immune tolerance phase (IT, n=30), immune clearance phase (IC, n=48), HBeAg(-) low-replicative phase (LR, n=68), HBeAg(-) hepatitis (ENH, n=68), and acute hepatitis B (n=12). HBsAg was quantified and correlated with HBV-DNA, HBV-genotypes and clinical parameters. In addition, 30 LR-patients were followed longitudinally.

RESULTS

HBsAg levels were higher in IT-patients and IC-patients compared to LR-patients and ENH-patients (4.96/4.37/3.09/3.87-log(10)IU/ml, p<0.001). HBsAg showed a strong correlation with HBV-DNA during acute hepatitis B (R=0.79, p<0.01). Correlation of HBsAg and HBV-DNA was weak or missing when analyzing different phases of persistent HBV-infection separately. However, associations between HBsAg and HBV-DNA were observed in patients infected with HBV-genotype D but not with HBV-genotype A. LR-patients with HBV-reactivation during follow-up (increase of HBV-DNA >2000IU/ml) showed >3-fold higher baseline HBsAg levels with a NPV of 95% for an HBsAg cut-off of 3500IU/ml.

CONCLUSIONS

HBsAg levels show significant differences during the natural course of HBV-infection and between HBV-genotypes. These findings may have important implications for understanding the natural history of HBV-infection and for using quantitative HBsAg as a diagnostic tool, i.e. as a marker for predicting HBV-reactivation.

On-treatment serum HBsAg level is predictive of sustained off-treatment virologic response to telbivudine in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients

BACKGROUND

Effective management of chronic hepatitis B infection is still very challenging, despite decades of clinical research. Telbivudine is one of the most frequently used antiviral drug at the current stage, but its long-term effectiveness, particularly at off-treatment, is still unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To assess on-treatment HBsAg kinetics in patients treated with telbivudine for 2 years, and predicting sustained virologic response (SR) at 2 years off-treatment.

STUDY DESIGN

Serum HBV DNA/HBsAg levels were assessed from 17 HBeAg+ patients treated with telbivudine 600 mg/day for 104 weeks, at baseline, weeks 24, 52 and 104, as well as during off-treatment follow-up.

RESULTS

HBsAg levels <2 log(10)IU/ml at treatment week 104 were highly predictive of SR (i.e., HBV DNA <300 copies/ml, HBeAg seroconversion, ALT normalization) at 2 years off-treatment (positive predictive value [PPV], 93%; negative predictive value [NPV], 100%). HBsAg levels consistently declined from baseline only in patients achieving SR during 2 years off-treatment. At weeks 24 and 52, HBsAg decline rate was a better predictor of off-treatment response than HBV DNA decline rate. HBsAg decline rates of >0.8 and >1 log(10)IU/ml at treatment weeks 24 and 52 were predictive of SR (PPV, 75%; NPV, 86% at week 24; PPV, 75%; NPV, 86% at week 52).

CONCLUSIONS

Serum HBsAg levels <2 log(10)IU/ml at treatment week 104 are highly predictive of SR to telbivudine at 2 years off-treatment. HBsAg decline rate at on-treatment weeks 24 and 52 from baseline were also more predictive of SR than HBV DNA decline rate.

Chronic hepatitis B: whom to treat and for how long? Propositions, challenges, and future directions

Recent guidelines of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, the European Association for the Study of the Liver, and the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver 2008 update of the "Asian-Pacific consensus statement on the management of chronic hepatitis B" offer comprehensive recommendations for the general management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). These recommendations highlight preferred approaches to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of CHB. Nonetheless, the results of recent studies have led to an improved understanding of the disease and a belief that current recommendations on specific therapeutic considerations, including CHB treatment initiation and cessation criteria, particularly in patient populations with special circumstances, can be improved. Twelve experts from the Asia-Pacific region formed the Asia-Pacific Panel Recommendations for the Optimal Management of Chronic Hepatitis B (APPROACH) Working Group to review, challenge, and assess relevant new data and inform future updates of CHB treatment guidelines. The significance of and controversy about reported findings were discussed and debated in an expert meeting of the Working Group in Beijing, China, in November 2008. This review paper attempts to identify areas requiring improved CHB management and provide suggestions for future guideline updates, with special emphasis on treatment initiation and duration.

Serum hepatitis B surface antigen concentration correlates with HBV DNA level in patients with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Serum HBV DNA level is crucial in the management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB); however, the assay is expensive and cannot be used widely. Therefore, we explored the possibility of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) quantification as a surrogate marker for HBV DNA level in CHB patients.

METHODS

A total of 289 CHB patients were enrolled, 251 were evaluated at baseline and 75 of them were also evaluated during anti-HBV treatment. Another 38 on-treatment patients were used for validation. Serum HBsAg titre was quantified by an immunoassay and HBV DNA level by a PCR-based method. Baseline and on-treatment data were analysed.

RESULTS

In parallel to log(10) HBV DNA, the log(10) HBsAg was high in both immune tolerance and immune clearance phases, and significantly decreased in the inactive carrier state and was again increased in the reactivation phase of the CHB infection. There was a positive correlation between log(10) HBsAg and log(10) HBV DNA, which was greater in patients with chronic hepatitis, hepatitis B e antigen-positivity, greater alanine aminotransferase or HBsAg levels at baseline and during pegylated interferon treatment. Log(10) HBsAg could predict log(10) HBV DNA independently. An HBsAg titre of >900 IU/ml at baseline or >1,500 IU/ml within the first year of treatment could predict an HBV DNA level of >20,000 IU/ml, especially in subgroups of chronic hepatitis with alanine aminotransferase levels >40 IU/l. The dynamics of HBsAg might also predict serial HBV DNA changes. In the validation group, 64% of patients with on-treatment HBV DNA levels >20,000 IU/ml could be correctly predicted.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum HBsAg concentration might serve as a surrogate marker of HBV DNA level in CHB patients.

Predictors of treatment response in chronic hepatitis B

The ultimate goal of treatment for chronic hepatitis B is to reduce liver-related complications and mortality. Sustained hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) clearance 6-12 months after stopping treatment are the short-term surrogate outcomes for interferon or peginterferon therapy. As most patients require long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment, which also has the risk of drug resistance in the case of incomplete viral suppression, maintained hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA suppression to an undetectable level is the appropriate surrogate outcome. Because no antiviral treatment is perfect, it is desirable for treatment response to be predicted and the treatment regimen modified accordingly. At baseline, high ALT and low HBV DNA levels can predict response to both (peg)interferon and nucleos(t)ide analogues. Genotype A HBV responds best to peginterferon but HBV genotype has no predictive value for nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment. HBV DNA is a good on-treatment predictor of response for nucleos(t)ide analogues but not for (peg)interferon. The data supporting the use of quantitative HBsAg and HBeAg to predict response to peginterferon is stronger than that for nucleos(t)ide analogues. In conclusion, predictors of response are useful to provide the most appropriate antiviral therapy to the most suitable patients, in order to achieve the best response and improve the clinical outcome of chronic hepatitis B patients.

New developments in antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis B affects approximately 400 million people in the world with a substantial disease burden like liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Treatment for chronic hepatitis B has improved dramatically in the last decade, resulting in more patients achieving a state of inactive disease. Currently two treatment strategies are available; treatment with peginterferon (peg-IFN) or nucleos(t)ide analogues with the aim to suppress hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA to subsequently avoid the development of cirrhosis and HCC. Unfortunately, treatment with peg-IFN can be suboptimal with important adverse effects and nucleos(t)ide analogues provoke resistance. At present, no new promising compounds attacking the HBV life cycle are in development. However, for prediction of sustained response or treatment failure, data from the long-term large peg-IFN trials provide important response markers. For the future the focus is to achieve HBsAg loss and anti-HBs conversion which is the closest the treatment can get to a cure. This review summarizes the current treatment options with their response rates and discusses future strategies for chronic hepatitis B treatment.

Low pretreatment serum HBsAg level and viral mutations as predictors of response to PEG-interferon alpha-2b therapy in chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Viral genomic mutations have become increasingly recognized as being associated with the outcome of chronic HBV infection. However, the role of viral mutations as a predictor of response to pegylated-interferon (PEG-IFN) therapy has so far remained unclear.

STUDY DESIGN

Viral mutations in the enhancer II/basal core promoter (BCP)/precore and the pre-S regions were characterized by direct sequencing in pretreatment serum samples of 50 patients with chronic hepatitis B (33 HBeAg-positive and 17 HBeAg-negative), who were treated for 48 weeks with PEG-IFN alpha-2b.

RESULTS

Sustained virological response at 48 weeks post treatment, defined as HBeAg seroconversion and HBV DNA<2000IU/mL for HBeAg-positive patients, and HBV DNA<200IU/mL for HBeAg-negative patients, was achieved in 12 (36.4%) and 6 (35.3%) of HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients, respectively. Response to PEG-IFN therapy correlated to low pretreatment HBsAg level but did not correlate with HBV genotype, pretreatment alanine transaminase and HBV DNA levels. In HBeAg-positive hepatitis, PEG-IFN response correlated with the appearance of double BCP mutations (A1762T/G1764A) at baseline (P=0.041). In the HBeAg-negative group, response to PEG-IFN therapy was associated with the presence of pre-S mutation/deletions (P=0.028). Multivariate analysis identified low pretreatment HBsAg level as an independent factor associated with SVR in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment quantitative HBsAg determination is useful for predicting response to PEG-IFN therapy. The presence of double BCP and pre-S mutation/deletions at entry may be associated with a high rate of antiviral response in HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative hepatitis, respectively.

The role of quantitative hepatitis B serology in the natural history and management of chronic hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remains a serious clinical problem worldwide. Advances in molecular technology have enabled the development of sensitive assays for the detection and quantification of hepatitis B virus (HBV) nucleic acid and demonstrated a positive correlation between serum HBV DNA levels and disease progression. Assessment of specific serologic and virologic factors also plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis and effective management of individuals with CHB. Recent development of quantitative assays for intrahepatic HBV replicative intermediates, as well as hepatitis B e antigen and hepatitis B surface antigen, has spurred investigation into the relationship between these factors and response to antiviral therapy and disease progression. Recent findings from preclinical and clinical investigations indicate that these factors may have promise in identifying patients likely to respond to treatment. Additional work is needed to standardize and validate these assays before they can be considered to be of true diagnostic value. Further evaluation is needed to decide which will have the greatest clinical applicability.

Antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B: are we doing any good to patients?

At the recent National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference, the value of antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B in improving clinical outcome was hotly debated. In patients with chronic hepatitis B, antiviral therapy has proved effective in viral load reduction, alanine aminotransferase normalization and histological improvements. However, its efficacy in reducing decompensated liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma and liver-related death remains unclear. To date, animal studies and observational studies, but very few randomized controlled trials, have shown improved clinical outcomes after antiviral therapy. The difficulties of conducting clinical trials using clinical endpoints are highlighted. Before more clinical outcome data are available, it is important to validate the clinical implications of surrogate markers including biochemical, virological and histological responses.

Benefits and risks of interferon therapy for hepatitis B

Alpha interferon is the only licensed drug for hepatitis B with immunomodulatory as well as viral inhibitory properties. Potential advantages of interferon compared to nucleoside analogs include a lack of drug resistance, a finite and defined treatment course, and a higher likelihood for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) clearance. Approximately 30% of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and 40% of HBeAg-negative cases have a sustained virological response (when defined as HBeAg seroconversion and/or hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels below 20,000 copies/mL, respectively) 6 months after completion of a 48-week course of peginterferon alfa-2a These responses remain durable in 80% and 50% of cases, respectively, when evaluated several years later. Recent studies have shown that changes in HBsAg and HBeAg concentration during treatment predict sustained virological response and serial monitoring of HBsAg is helpful in predicting HBsAg clearance. HBeAg-positive patients with genotype A have higher rates of HBeAg and HBsAg clearance, whereas HBeAg-negative patients with genotype D have the lowest rate of response to interferon therapy. Long-term follow-up of virological responders to either standard alpha interferon or peginterferon has demonstrated a progressive increase in the rate of HBsAg clearance, particularly in patients who were initially HBeAg-positive. Future studies need to address if specific virological benchmarks during therapy can be used to tailor treatment duration.

CONCLUSION

Peginterferon alfa has a place as first-line therapy of hepatitis B in patients who are carefully selected on the basis of pretreatment serum HBV DNA and aminotransferase levels, safety considerations, and viral genotype.

Monitoring during and after antiviral therapy for hepatitis B

Recent studies suggest that long-term suppression of viral replication is critical to reducing the complications of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Monitoring for continued virological response during and after treatment is essential because current treatment options have limited success in achieving durable endpoints, and antiviral resistance may emerge during long-term therapy. Methods of monitoring treatment response include tests for serum aminotransferase levels, HBV DNA level, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and antibody (anti-HBe), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or antibody (anti-HBs), and liver histology. Virological suppression and loss of HBeAg or HBsAg with or without seroconversion play a prominent role in decision-making regarding the success and duration of antiviral therapy. Guidelines recommend that testing for serum markers be repeated every 12-24 weeks during antiviral therapy and every 6-12 months afterward. Recent data also suggest that serum HBV DNA levels should be assessed at weeks 12 and 24 of therapy, because early viral response may predict the likelihood of sustained response and antiviral resistance. The use of serum HBV DNA levels for this purpose requires an assay with a wide range of quantification, such as real-time polymerase chain reaction assays, which have a 7-8 log(10) dynamic range. Newer, investigational methods for monitoring treatment response include quantitative measurement of HBsAg, HBeAg, and intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA.

CONCLUSIONS

Better methods for defining durable treatment endpoints are needed. Other areas requiring further research include the optimal treatment duration and the establishment of the optimal use of early viral kinetics for decision-making during antiviral therapy.

Endpoints of therapy in chronic hepatitis B

Because clearance of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is rarely, if ever, achievable, the goals of therapy necessarily focus on prevention of bad clinical outcomes. Ideally, therapies would be shown to prevent tangible clinical endpoints like development of cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. However, these endpoints typically take years or decades to occur and are therefore impractical targets for clinical trials which last only 1-2 years. As a result, surrogate biomarkers that are believed to correlate with long-term outcome are used to evaluate therapy. Of the clinical, biochemical, serological, virological, and histological endpoints that have been evaluated, none has been shown to be ideal on its own. Symptoms are uncommon and aminotransferase levels fluctuate spontaneously. Loss of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) has been the traditional therapeutic endpoint; however, the indefinite durability off treatment and the emergence of HBeAg-negative disease have made it inadequate as the sole goal of therapy. Loss of hepatitis B surface antigen is associated with improved clinical outcomes, but it is rarely achieved with current therapies. Suppression of viral replication, as measured by serum HBV DNA levels, has become the major goal of therapy, particularly if maintained off therapy. Although useful, the significance of viral levels depends on the stage of disease, degree of liver damage, and the type of therapy. Finally, liver biopsy, often considered the gold standard, is invasive, prone to sampling error, and may take years to change significantly.At present, there is no ideal biomarker for evaluation of therapies for hepatitis B. Future research should be directed at development and validation of surrogate markers that accurately predict or reflect clinically relevant outcomes of chronic hepatitis B.

Diagnosis and management of chronic viral hepatitis: antigens, antibodies and viral genomes

Virological tools, including serological and molecular tools, are needed to diagnose chronic hepatitis B and C infections. They may also be useful to establish their prognosis, but they have found their principal application in guiding treatment decisions and assessing the virological responses to therapy. The goal of chronic hepatitis B therapy is to prevent progression of liver disease. This is achieved if HBV replication is durably abolished or significantly reduced. In HBeAg-positive patients, HBeAg clearance followed by the HBe seroconversion phase can be achieved. In HBeAg-negative patients, long-term antiviral suppression of viral replication is needed. The loss of HBsAg, eventually associated with an HBs seroconversion, is the most desirable endpoint of therapy but is rarely achieved. The efficacy endpoint of chronic hepatitis C treatment is the sustained virological response, defined by an undetectable HCV RNA in serum with a sensitive assay 24 weeks after the end of treatment. The HCV genotype and on-treatment viral kinetics can be used to tailor treatment dosages and duration.

Correlation of quantitative assay of HBsAg and HBV DNA levels during chronic HBV treatment

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Viral load is used for the diagnosis and monitoring the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). These methods are molecular-based and are expensive. Previous studies suggest that quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) studied by automated chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay can be a surrogate marker. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether quantitative HBsAg correlates hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels during CHB treatment.

METHODS

The study included 18 patients (13 male, 5 female, mean age: 33 +/- 9 years) with CHB. They were given pegylated interferon +/- lamivudine for 52 months and serum samples were obtained in weeks 0, 4, 8, 24, 48, 52, and 76. HBV DNA was measured by TaqMan polymerase chain reaction (PCR; Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands). Quantitative HBsAg was studied by automated chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (Architect HBsAg, Abbott, IL). Results HBV DNA levels were measured as follows: 9.66, 7.69, 7.06, 5.93, 5.89, 5.88, and 7.27 logarithmic genome equivalent/ml, respectively. The corresponding HBsAg quantitation results were 42,888, 31,176, 37,882, 27,277, 28,279, 29,471, and 31,535 IU/ml, respectively. They showed a significant correlation (canonical correlation = 0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

HBsAg studied by automated chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay correlates with HBV DNA and can be a surrogate marker during the monitoring of the efficacy of HBV treatment.

Early hepatitis B virus DNA suppression can predict virologic response to peginterferon and lamivudine treatment

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We aimed to investigate the early on-treatment HBV DNA response to predict sustained virologic response for peginterferon and lamivudine combination therapy.

METHODS

Patients recruited in previous clinical trials receiving 32-week peginterferon alfa-2b and 52- to 104-week lamivudine combination treatment were studied. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of HBV DNA at different time intervals were analyzed to predict sustained virologic response, which was defined as HBeAg seroconversion and HBV DNA <10,000 copies/mL at 1 year after treatment.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients had peginterferon started 8 weeks before lamivudine, and 9 patients had the 2 drugs commenced simultaneously. Eighteen (27%) patients developed sustained virologic response. The area under ROC for log HBV DNA to predict sustained virologic response reached 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.91; P < .001) at week 8 and plateaued off at subsequent time intervals. Among the 57 patients started with peginterferon monotherapy during the first 8 weeks, the area under ROC was 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.73-0.94; P < .001). Compared with other time intervals, the likelihood ratio for sustained virologic response was highest for HBV DNA <10,000 copies/mL at week 8 (10.35), with a high sensitivity (0.89) and negative predictive value (0.92). Two of 33 (6%) patients who had HBV DNA >or=10,000 copies/mL at week 8 developed sustained virologic response.

CONCLUSIONS

HBV DNA >or=10,000 copies/mL at week 8 of peginterferon treatment had a low chance of sustained virologic response.

Diagnosis of hepatitis B virus infection through serological and virological markers

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is an important health problem and the major cause of chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) worldwide. The natural history of chronic HBV infection can be divided into four dynamic phases in HBV carriers who acquire the virus early in life. Diagnosis of HBV infection is usually through serological and virological markers. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is the hallmark of HBV infection and is the first serological marker to appear in acute hepatitis B, and persistence of HBsAg for more than 6 months suggests chronic HBV infection. Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) usually indicates active HBV replication and risk of transmission of infection. Recently, occult HBV infection is recognized as the absence of circulating HBsAg in individuals positive for serum or tissue HBV DNA, irrespective of other HBV serological markers. Meanwhile, monitoring the serum HBV DNA level is valuable for assessing liver disease activity, differentiating other etiologies of hepatitis activity in HBV carriers, predicting risk of HCC development or liver-related mortality, deciding to administer antiviral therapy, determination of the response to antiviral treatment, predicting the risk of developing drug resistance, and detecting the emergence of drug-resistant mutants. On the other hand, HBV genotype C, basal core promoter mutant and pre-S deletion mutant are reported to be associated with increased risk of HCC development. The roles of quantitative HBV serology and intrahepatic HBV covalently closed circular (ccc)DNA deserve further studies. In conclusion, it is particularly important for physicians to screen for HBV infection in HBV-endemic areas and to monitor liver disease progression in HBV carriers by using both serological and virological markers, so that effective treatment can be initiated early before the development of advanced liver disease.

Recent data on treatment of chronic hepatitis B with nucleos(t)ide analogues

Forty years ago in 1967, Professor Blumberg discovered the Australian Antigen, later known as the hepatitis B surface antigen, and was awarded the Nobel Prize. This discovery enables the diagnosis of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and defines its epidemiology. Viral hepatitis B infection affects global health situation, and chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is particularly serious in the Asia-Pacific region. HBV vaccines created the first breakthrough in HBV prevention. Through universal HBV vaccination program for the newborns, promoted since the mid-1980s, the main route that perpetuates chronic infection from mother to child is curbed. Most children and young adults now have immunity against HBV infection. The next breakthrough comes with therapy for CHB. This prevents progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Standard interferon therapy with modest efficacy has been largely replaced by therapy with nuclos(t)ide analogues or pegylated interferons alfa-2a and -2b. Lamivudine was approved by the FDA USA in 1998, followed by adefovir dipivoxil in 2002, entecavir in 2005, and telbivudine in 2006. Clevudine, tenofovir, and many promising candidates are in different stages of development and clinical trial. This paper critically reviews recent data published or presented since the APASL Consensus and Guideline Update of 2005. Clinical efficacy mostly in patients with raised serum alanine aminotransferase will be analyzed.

Treatment of Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B who have Failed Previous Antiviral Treatment with Pegylated Interferon α2a (40 kDa; PEGASYS®)

Background

Although nucleot(s)ide analogues can effectively suppress hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication, many patients experience relapse of hepatitis after cessation of treatment. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of pegylated interferon α2a (PEG-IFN-α2a) in these difficult-to-treat patients.

Methods

Chronic hepatitis B patients who have received antiviral drugs for ≥12 months and stopped for ≥6 months were treated by 48-week PEG-IFN-α2a. Virological response was defined as HBV DNA <10,000 copies/ml and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion (for HBeAg-positive patients).

Results

A total of 40 patients, 29 HBeAg-positive and 11 HBeAg-negative, with median log10 HBV DNA 7.3 copies/ml and alanine aminotransferase 110 IU/ml were studied. The last antiviral treatment was given for 92 +61 weeks and stopped for 176 +88 weeks. At the end of treatment, 22 (12 HBeAg-positive and 10 HBeAg-negative; 55%) patients had virological response and 16 (7 HBeAg-positive and 9 HBeAg-negative; 40%) patients had undetectable HBV DNA (<100 copies/ml). At 24 weeks post-treatment, 14 (8 HBeAg-positive and 6 HBeAg-negative; 35%) patients had virological response and 9 (5 HBeAg-positive and 4 HBeAg-negative; 23%) patients had undetectable HBV DNA. Two (5%) patients had lost hepatitis B surface antigen. HBV DNA levels at week 24 best predicted sustained virological response (area under curve 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.60–0.92, P=0.007). At HBV DNA cutoffs of 3 logs and 5 logs at week 24, the sensitivity/specificity for sustained virological response were 50%/85% and 86%/62%, respectively.

Conclusions

PEG-IFN-α2a was effective in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B patients who have failed previous antiviral treatment.