Prophylactic cranial irradiation for patients with small-cell lung cancer in complete remission

Subsets more likely to benefit from surgery or prophylactic cranial irradiation after chemoradiation for localized non-small-cell lung cancer

After chemoradiation for localized non-small-cell lung cancer, surgery and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) have been used as additional therapies. Less than a third of patients develop brain recurrences, or have local recurrence as their sole initial site of recurrence; these are groups that would benefit from PCI or surgery, respectively. Pretreatment identification of patients more likely to benefit from surgery or PCI would be useful. A retrospective analysis of 80 patients was performed to determine prognostic factors for such patterns of failure. Twenty-nine patients were subsequently selected for surgery in a nonrandomized manner. Seventeen patients had isolated local initial recurrence and 15 had brain recurrences. In multivariable analysis, female gender and elevated LDH were found to be risk factors for brain recurrence. In the subset with stage III disease (n = 76), squamous cell histology was a risk factor for isolated initial local recurrence in both univariable and multivariable analysis. It is possible to identify subsets that may show increased benefit from PCI or surgery.

Gamma knife radiosurgery for metastatic brain tumors from lung cancer: a comparison between small cell and non—small cell carcinoma

Object. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness of gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS) for the treatment of metastatic brain tumors from lung cancer, with particular reference to small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) compared with non-SCLC (NSCLC).

Methods. Two hundred forty-five consecutive patients meeting the following five criteria were evaluated in this study: 1) no prior brain tumor treatment; 2) 25 or fewer lesions; 3) a maximum of three tumors with a diameter of 20 mm or larger; 4) no surgically inaccessible tumor 30 mm or greater in diameter; and 5) more than 3 months of life expectancy. According to the same treatment protocol, large tumors (≥ 30 mm) were surgically removed and the other small lesions (< 30 mm) were treated with GKS. New lesions were treated with repeated GKS. Chemotherapy was administered, according to the primary physician's protocol, as aggressively as possible. Progression-free, overall, neurological, qualitative, and new lesion—free survival were calculated with the Kaplan—Meier method and were compared in the SCLC and NSCLC groups by using the log-rank test. The poor prognostic factors for each type of survival were also analyzed with the Cox proportional hazard model.

Conclusions. Tumor control rate at 1 year was 94.5% in the SCLC group and 98% in the NSCLC group. The median survival time was 9.1 months in the SCLC group and 8.6 months in the NSCLC group. The 1-year survival rates in the SCLC group were 86.5% for neurological survival and 68.9% for qualitative survival; those in the NSCLC group were 87.9% for neurological and 78.9% for qualitative survival. The estimated median interval to emergence of a new lesion was 6.9 months in the SCLC group and 9.8 months in the NSCLC group. There was no significant difference between the two groups for any type of survival; this finding was verified by multivariate analysis. The results of this study suggest that GKS appears to be as effective in treating brain metastases from SCLC as for those from NSCLC.

Small-Cell Lung Cancer: State of the Art

Thirty years ago, there was a pervasive atmosphere of pessimism concerning the management of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Surgery or radiation therapy alone resulted in few cures since these techniques utilize a local therapy for a disseminated disease. Chemotherapy remains the backbone of treatment for all patients with SCLC, regardless of stage. For patients with limited-stage disease (LD), the addition of thoracic radiation to chemotherapy is standard. The optimal timing, dose, and schedule of radiation remains undefined. The majority of studies demonstrate equivalent or superior survival for early radiation when compared to delayed radiation. Approximately 50% of patients with LD will achieve a complete remission with chemoradiation and will be candidates for prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI). While phase III trials have failed to demonstrate a statistically significant survival for PCI, brain relapse is clearly reduced, and a metaanalysis reports a small long-term survival advantage favoring patients receiving PCI. Unfortunately, unlike LD SCLC, advances in extensive-stage disease have been elusive, despite the testing of numerous strategies. Four courses of cisplatin (or carboplatin) plus etoposide remain standard first-line therapy. Promising results have been seen with irinotecan/cisplatin, but confirmatory trials are still needed. A plateau has been reached with chemotherapy regimens, and novel strategies are greatly needed to improve survival for patients with SCLC.

Identical chemotherapy schedules given on and off trial protocol in small cell lung cancer: response and survival results

Patients who are treated within clinical trials may have a survival benefit dependent on being a trial participant. A number of factors may produce such beneficial outcome including more rigorous adherence to a peer reviewed trial protocol, management by an experienced treatment team, being treated in a specialist centre etc. The current investigation compared patients treated on and off trial with the same standard arm treatment regimen. The results could then be interpreted without the confounding factors of differing treatment regimens, treatment teams or treatment hospitals. The results demonstrated given these circumstances that survival was no different for patients participating in a randomised trial compared with a group of patients similarly treated who were not eligible for trial entry or who declined randomisation. These results were obtained by the rigorous adherence to a defined protocol with the invaluable assistance of designated lung cancer staff.

Small cell lung cancer: current therapy and promising new regimens

In this review, we cover current therapy and promising new regimens and highlight areas where improvement is needed in the management of small cell lung cancer.

Blue light inhibits the growth of B16 melanoma cells

Although a number of studies have been carried out to examine the biological effects of radiation and ultraviolet radiation (UV), little is known concerning the effects of visible light. In the present study, exposure of B16 melanoma cells to blue light (wavelength 470 nm, irradiance 5.7 mW / cm(2)) from a light-emitting diode (LED) inhibited cell growth in proportion to the period of exposure, with no increase observed in the number of dead cells. The number of B16 melanoma colonies that formed after exposure to blue light for 20 min was only slightly less than that in non-exposed controls, but the colony size as assessed by the area covered by colonies and cell counts per colony were markedly decreased. The percentages of G0 / G1 and G2 / M phase cells were markedly increased, with a reduction in S phase cells as determined by flow cytometry after exposure to blue light. Furthermore, analysis of the incorporation of 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) into DNA also showed a reduction in the percentage of S phase cells after exposure. These results indicate that blue light exerts cytostatic effects, but not a cytocidal action, on B16 melanoma cells.

Patterns of failure after prophylactic cranial irradiation in small-cell lung cancer: analysis of 505 randomized patients

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has a beneficial effect on overall survival in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) in complete remission as shown in a worldwide meta-analysis. The current analysis aimed to evaluate PCI effects on patterns of failure in this patient category.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Institut Gustave-Roussy coordinated two parallel randomized studies including a total of 511 patients with SCLC. Patients were randomly assigned to either PCI (24 Gy in eight fractions and 12 days) or no PCI. Patterns of failure were analyzed according to (i) total event rates and (ii) isolated first site of relapse using a competing risk approach.

RESULTS

Five hundred and five patients were analyzed. The 5-year cumulative rate of brain metastasis as an isolated first site of relapse was 37% in the control group and 20% in the PCI group (P < 0.001). The overall 5-year rates of brain metastasis were 59% and 43%, respectively [relative risk (RR) 0.50; P < 0.001]. The 5-year overall survival rates were 15% in the control group and 18% in the PCI group (RR 0.84; P = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

PCI decreased significantly the risk of brain metastasis. Other events were not influenced. The relative death risk reduction was of borderline significance. Results reported as isolated first cause of failure and subsequent competing events may explain why a major treatment effect on brain metastases rate has a rather moderate effect on survival.

Management of small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung carcinoma typically presents as a central endobronchial lesion in chronic cigarette smokers with hilar enlargement and disseminated disease. The diagnostic pathology should be reviewed by a pathologist accomplished in reading pulmonary pathology, and, if any doubt exists in the diagnosis, additional special stains or diagnostic material should be obtained. Patients with extensive stage disease should be managed by combination chemotherapy, whereas patients with limited stage disease should be treated with etoposide/cisplatin plus concurrent chest irradiation. The chemotherapy should be administered for 4 to 6 months and then should be discontinued. Prophylactic cranial irradiation should be given to patients who achieve a complete remission. Patients should be retreated with chemotherapy if they develop a relapse of their small cell lung cancer. The patients who are followed in complete remission should be observed carefully for second cancers, and appropriate therapy should be administered if the cancer reappears.

Prophylactic cranial irradiation revisited: cost-effectiveness and quality of life in small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the therapeutic usefulness and cost-effectiveness of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) who had achieved a complete remission.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was undertaken of all patients diagnosed in Saskatchewan with SCLC between 1987 and 1998 inclusive. Patients who achieved a complete remission were divided into two groups, depending on whether they underwent PCI (PCI+ and PCI-, respectively). The quality-of-life-adjusted survival was estimated by the Q-TWiST method (quality time without symptoms and toxicity). The mean incremental costs per month of incremental OS were calculated in a cost-effectiveness analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 98 complete remission patients, the median OS for PCI+ and PCI- patients was 20.0 and 19.0 months, respectively (p > 0.05, nonsignificant). The median disease-free survival was 14.7 and 10.0 months, respectively (p < 0.05). The difference in the mean Q-TWiST survival was significant (p < 0.01). The mean marginal cost was $18,834/PCI+ patient and $17,885/PCI- patient (p > 0.05, nonsignificant). The cost-effectiveness ratio was $70/mo of incremental OS if u(tox) and u(rel) (the utility coefficients to reflect the value of time in health states of toxicity and relapse) were assumed to be 1.0.

CONCLUSION

PCI is a cost-effective treatment that improves the quality-of-life-adjusted survival for patients with a complete remission of SCLC.

The treatment of limited small cell lung cancer: a report of the progress made and future prospects

The improvements in the treatment of small cell lung cancer over the last 30 years have been realised by understanding that it is a systemic disease, but that areas of bulk and sanctuary require a complementary therapy. Despite successful strategies using combinations and thoracic radiotherapy, there remains uncertainty about what the best regimens are, their timing and their intensity. However, earlier concurrent therapy and rather brief intense chemotherapy and radiotherapy seem to produce the best results in moderately fit patients of all ages. How to select the fit patients and what to do about the less fit ones remains controversial and have economic consequences for governments and payers. Despite a meta-analysis demonstrating the success of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI), doubts linger about its safety, despite nothing more than anecdotal evidence from a previous era. The role of surgery continues to be explored, more in Europe than North America or Asia. Strategies for treatment of minimum residual disease seem a focus. New drugs, molecular targeted therapy, immunotherapy and other molecular therapies offer promise and theory, but there is little evidence about their place in the treatment protocols of today.

Risk factors affecting survival after brain metastases from non-small cell lung carcinoma: a follow-up study of 70 patients

OBJECT

The authors present their experience with the treatment of brain metastases from non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted in which records from 74 patients treated at the authors' institution between 1994 and 1999 were assessed. Survival and functional outcome were reviewed relative to individual patient variables. The median survival time was 12.9 months, with 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival milestones reached by 52.2%, 30.7%. and 18.1% of patients, respectively. Patients were stratified into groups composed of those with synchronous brain metastases (tumors diagnosed within 3 months of NSCLC) and metachronous brain metastases (tumors diagnosed 3 months after NSCLC). The median survival time and 5-year survival rate were 18 months and 28.9% for metachronous, compared with 9.9 months and 0% for synchronous brain metastases. In univariate analyses, the stage of brain metastases, an initial Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score of 90 or less, and conservative therapy for NSCLC were associated with worse outcomes (p < 0.05). In analyses in which tumors were stratified by synchronous compared with metachronous brain metastases, a preoperative KPS score of 90 or less and radiation therapy (RT) alone for brain metastases were associated with worse outcomes in patients with metachronous brain metastases but not with synchronous tumors (p < 0.05). When stratified by preoperative KPS score, the synchronous brain metastases stage or treatment of brain metastases with RT alone were associated with worse outcome in patients with KPS scores of 100, but had no discernible effect on patients with KPS scores of 90 or less (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The tumor stage and preoperative KPS score were significantly associated with survival. Craniotomy plus RT significantly improved the prognosis in patients with metachronous brain metastases or those with a preoperative KPS score of 100.

The role of prophylactic cranial irradiation in the treatment of lung cancer

Patients with lung cancer face concurrent risks of their disease by local, regional as well as distant failure. The brain is one of the major sites of distant relapse and the prevention of cerebral metastasis has therefore gained rising interest. A recent meta-analysis has confirmed the benefit of prophylactic cranial irradiation in patients with limited disease small-cell lung cancer in complete remission following induction therapy. In non-small-cell lung cancer, aggressive multimodality therapy regimens including surgery have achieved locoregional control rates of 50% and higher. In these patient groups the relatively high incidence of brain relapses as a site of first failure causes substantial morbidity and worsens the prognosis. Given the proven efficacy of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) to prevent metastases to the brain, the introduction of PCI into the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer in the curative setting seems promising.

Multicenter phase II trial of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and etoposide with concurrent radiation for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of adding paclitaxel to cisplatin/etoposide chemotherapy and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in treatment of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received five courses of chemotherapy (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 1-hour intravenous [IV] infusion day 1; cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) IV day 1; etoposide 100 mg/m2 IV day 1; oral etoposide 100 mg bid days 2 to 5) at 3-week intervals. TRT (42 Gy administered in 15 fractions) was administered concurrent with chemotherapy cycle 3. All patients were evaluated before starting TRT and 4 weeks after termination of chemotherapy. Patients achieving complete remission (CR) were administered prophylactic cranial irradiation.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients were included, and the median age was 63 years. The median follow-up was 36 months (range, 19 to 57 months). The overall response rate was 92% (CR, 81%; partial response, 11%), and the median survival was 21 months. The 1- and 2-year disease-specific survival rates were 69% and 37%, respectively. Of 29 CR patients, 83% have relapsed. Brain metastasis was as frequent as local recurrences (42%). Hematologic toxicity included grade 3 to 4 leukopenia in 74% of patients and grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 10%. One treatment-related death occurred as a result of severe neutropenia and septicemia. Hematotoxicity caused dose reductions in 31% of courses. One patient had an anaphylactic reaction during the first paclitaxel infusion. Paclitaxel-related neuropathy and myalgia were reversible. Grade 3 esophagitis was seen in five patients during and shortly after TRT.

CONCLUSION

This novel multimodal regimen is effective and well tolerated in patients with LD-SCLC. It compares favorably with previously published phase II studies.

Prophylactic cranial irradiation in small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis

PURPOSE

A systematic review of the literature was carried out to determine the role of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

METHODS

To be eligible, full published trials needed to deal with SCLC and to have randomly assigned patients to receive PCI or not. Trials quality was assessed by two scores (Chalmers and ELCWP).

RESULTS

Twelve randomised trials (1547 patients) were found to be eligible. Five evaluated the role of PCI in SCLC patients who had complete response (CR) after chemotherapy. Brain CT scan was done in the work-up in five studies and brain scintigraphy in six. Chalmers and ELCWP scores are well correlated (p < 0.001), with respective median scores of 32.6 and 38.8 %. This meta-analysis based on the available published data reveals a decrease of brain metastases incidence (hazard ratio (HR): 0.48; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.39 - 0.60) for all the studies and an improvement of survival (HR: 0.82; 95 % CI: 0.71 - 0.96) in patients in CR in favour of the PCI arm. Unfortunately, long-term neurotoxicity was not adequately described.

CONCLUSIONS

PCI decreases brain metastases incidence and improves survival in CR SCLC patients but these effects were obtained in patients who had no systematic neuropsychological and brain imagery assessments. The long-term toxicity has not been prospectively evaluated. If PCI can be recommended in patients with SCLC and CR documented by a work-up including brain CT scan, data are lacking to generalise its use to any CR situations.

Practice guideline on prophylactic cranial irradiation in small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline that would address the following questions: (a) What is the role of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in patients with limited or extensive stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) who have achieved complete remission in response to induction therapy (chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy)? (b) What dose and fractionation schedules of PCI are optimal? (c) Does the use of PCI in patients with SCLC in complete remission affect quality of life? Survival, disease-free survival, quality of life, and adverse effects were the outcomes of interest.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A systematic review of the published literature was undertaken to provide the data for an evidence-based practice guideline.

RESULTS

Six randomized controlled trials and one fully published individual patient data meta-analysis were included in the systematic review of the evidence. For patients who have achieved complete response after induction therapy, there is evidence of a disease-free survival benefit (4 of 6 trials) and an overall survival benefit (meta-analysis). There is insufficient evidence to make a definitive recommendation with respect to dose. There is some indication that 30-36 Gy in 2-3 Gy per fraction, or a biologically equivalent dose, may produce a better outcome than a lower dose or less aggressive fractionation regimen. The schedule commonly used in Canada is 25 Gy in 10 fractions over 2 weeks. Data from further research, including a trial currently ongoing that compares 25 Gy in 10 fractions with 36 Gy in 18 fractions, will be required to determine optimal dose of PCI. There is insufficient evidence to make recommendations concerning the optimal timing of PCI in relation to the administration of chemotherapy. Lung DSG members generally felt that it should be given as soon as possible after completion of chemotherapy. There is evidence from trials with data for up to 2 years of follow-up that prophylactic cranial irradiation does not produce significant late neurotoxicity. There is evidence from one trial that prophylactic cranial irradiation does not have a detrimental effect on quality of life in the first 12 months following the completion of therapy. There is insufficient evidence to comment on the long-term effects of prophylactic cranial irradiation on quality of life.

CONCLUSION

For adult patients with limited or extensive SCLC who achieve a complete remission with induction therapy, PCI is recommended.

Factors affecting the risk of brain metastases after definitive chemoradiation for locally advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma

PURPOSE

As therapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) improves, brain metastases (BM) may become a greater problem. We analyzed our chemoradiation experience for patients at highest risk for the brain as the first failure site.

METHODS

Records for 150 consecutive patients with stage II/III NSCLC treated definitively with chemoradiation from June 1992 to June 1998 at the University of Pennsylvania were reviewed. Most patients (89%) received cisplatin, paclitaxel, or both. All had negative brain imaging before treatment. Posttreatment brain imaging was performed for suspicious symptoms. Incidence of BM was examined as a function of age, sex, histology, stage, performance status, weight loss, tumor location, surgery, radiation dose, initial radiation field, chemotherapy regimen, and chemotherapy timing.

RESULTS

Crude and 2-year actuarial rates of BM were 19% and 30%, respectively. Among pretreatment parameters, stage IIIB was associated with a higher risk of BM (P <.04) versus stage II/IIIA. Histology alone was not significant (P <.12), although patients with IIIB nonsquamous tumors had an exceptionally high 2-year BM rate of 42% (P <.01 v all others). Examining treatment-related parameters, crude and 2-year actuarial risk of BM were 27% and 39%, respectively, in patients receiving chemotherapy before radiotherapy and 15% and 20%, respectively, when radiotherapy was not delayed (P <.05). On multivariate analysis, timing of chemotherapy (P <.01) and stage IIIA versus IIIB (P <.01) remained significant.

CONCLUSION

Patients with later stage, nonsquamous NSCLC, particularly those receiving induction chemotherapy, have sufficiently common BM rates to justify future trials including prophylactic cranial irradiation.

Prophylactic cranial irradiation in limited disease small-cell lung cancer in complete remission: a retrospective analysis

Recently a meta-analysis showed an improved survival probability of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in limited disease small-cell lung cancer (LD SCLC) in complete remission after chemotherapy. We evaluated treatment results of PCI+ and PCI- in these patients. Whether PCI (n = 65) or no PCI (n = 37) was administered did not depend either on patients or on tumour characteristics. After 2 years the incidence of brain metastases was 11% in PCI+ patients and 51% in PCI- patients. Both disease-free survival and overall survival were significantly longer after PCI. PCI reduces the incidence of brain metastases, prolongs brain metastases-free period, and overall survival in LD SCLC patients in complete remission after chemotherapy.

Prophylactic cranial irradiation in small-cell lung cancer

Prophylactic cranial irradiation is now known to improve survival to a significant degree in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients; this is in addition to its established role in preventing the disabling symptoms of brain metastases. New information indicates that it confers a survival benefit for limited or extensive stage SCLC patients gaining a complete response in the chest. A review of causes of cerebral dysfunction as a complication indicates that such problems can be due to suboptimal radiation fractionation, chemotherapy, or an inappropriate combination of prophylactic brain irradiation with chemotherapy. Optimum treatment with prophylactic brain irradiation has been shown not to cause adverse effects with detailed psychometric testing. Several additional sources of information can be drawn together to suggest a dose-response pattern for prophylactic brain irradiation, leading to the recommendation that a dose of 25-36 Gy is optimal, delivered in 2-3 Gy daily fractions after the completion of chest irradiation and chemotherapy. This will be better defined in future clinical trials.

The role of systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of brain metastases from small-cell lung cancer

Brain is the most common site of metastatic spread in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Approximately 10% of SCLC patients have brain metastases (BM) already at diagnosis and an additional 40% will develop central nervous system (CNS) involvement during their disease course. Although whole brain radiotherapy and corticosteroids is considered the treatment of choice, accumulating evidence suggests that systemic chemotherapy may also play an important role. The concept of the brain as a pharmacologic sanctuary site for established metastases is in contrast with recent clinical observations of frequent BM responses with systemic chemotherapy. During the last decade, several reports about the effect of systemic chemotherapy on BM from SCLC have been published. Pooled data from five studies report 66% response rate (RR) in 64 patients with initial BM. In addition, an average RR of 36% is derived from five studies including 135 patients with delayed BM treated with systemic single agent chemotherapy. Among new drugs with activity in patients with SCLC brain metastases, camptothecin analog topotecan is one of the most promising with a 52% RR. Although whole brain radiation remains the standard treatment of established BM in SCLC there is an emerging role for systemic chemotherapy, particularly with the use of new active drugs as part of combined modality treatments.

Psychophysiological evaluation of short-term neurotoxicity after prophylactic brain irradiation in patients with small cell lung cancer: a study of event related potentials

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to show, whether a certain prophylacting applicable radiation affects the cognition, particularly, the specific cognitive components P50, N100, P300 and N400 of auditory event related potentials (ERPs) during a short memory test.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eleven patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), who had presented complete response of disease after chemotherapy and radical radiotherapy in the lung, were prescribed to receive a prophylacting cranial irradiation (PCI) with a 6 MeV linear accelerator. The dose schedule was consisting of a total dose up to 30 Gy in 10 fractions, within 12 days (5 days a week). The psychophysiological approach before and after PCI was assessed by measurements of the auditory ERPs during a short memory performance using the digit-span Wechsler test. Components of ERP were recorded from 15 scalp electrodes. Additionally, symptomatology of depression and anxiety were assessed using Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale and Spielberger Anxiety Inventory, respectively, for pre- and post-PCI.

RESULTS

No significant difference was noticed pre- and post-radiotherapy of all particular level of psychophysiological analysis concerning both the latencies and the amplitudes of ERPs auditory components P50, N100, P300 and N400 (P > 0.05, Wilcoxon signed test). Additionally, no changes were found with regard to behavioral performance (memory recall), depression symptomatology and state anxiety, according to pre- and post-radiation measurements. However, the self-reported depression symptomatology showed that the patients presented moderate depression.

CONCLUSION

No short-term psychophysiological neurotoxicity was detected with this PCI schedule using these instruments, lending additional support to evidence suggesting the benefit of this certain PCI schedule for patients with SCLC.

Treatment of brain metastases of small-cell lung cancer: comparing teniposide and teniposide with whole-brain radiotherapy--a phase III study of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Cooperative Group

PURPOSE

Approximately 60% of patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) develop brain metastases. Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) gives symptomatic improvement in more than 50% of these patients. Because brain metastases are a sign of systemic progression, and chemotherapy was found to be effective as well, it becomes questionable whether WBRT is the only appropriate therapy in this situation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a phase III study, SCLC patients with brain metastases were randomized to receive teniposide with or without WBRT. Teniposide 120 mg/m(2) was given intravenously three times a week, every 3 weeks. WBRT (10 fractions of 3 Gy) had to start within 3 weeks from the start of chemotherapy. Response was measured clinically and by computed tomography of the brain.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty eligible patients were randomized. A 57% response rate was seen in the combined-modality arm (95% confidence interval [CI], 43% to 69%), and a 22% response rate was seen in the teniposide-alone arm (95% CI, 12% to 34%) (P<.001). Time to progression in the brain was longer in the combined-modality group (P=.005). Clinical response and response outside the brain were not different. The median survival time was 3.5 months in the combined-modality arm and 3.2 months in the teniposide-alone arm. Overall survival in both groups was not different (P=.087).

CONCLUSION

Adding WBRT to teniposide results in a much higher response rate of brain metastases and in a longer time to progression of brain metastases than teniposide alone. Survival was poor in both groups and not significantly different.

Small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: analysis of 10 cases and review of the published data

Small cell carcinoma of the esophagus is a rare and aggressive tumor with early widespread dissemination. In this retrospective study, we report epidemiologic, histologic, and clinical characteristics of small cell carcinoma of the esophagus from the analysis of 10 patients, with a literature review. Between 1993 and 1998, 10 patients with small cell carcinoma of the esophagus were treated in our institution, representing 2.8% of all esophageal malignancies diagnosed during this period. Four patients sought treatment for limited disease, whereas six patients had distant metastasis at the time of diagnosis. All patients received polychemotherapy, and a complete response was observed in eight patients. Seven of these patients received subsequent locoregional radiotherapy, with endoesophageal brachytherapy in two patients. The overall median survival was 15.5 months (range, 2-36 months) for all of the patients. In limited stages, the overall median survival was 18.5 months (range, 2-36 months), whereas it was 11 months (range, 6-19 months) for the extensive stage at initial diagnosis. In this article, we report our experience with this uncommon neoplasia and attempt to make comparisons with the cases published in the literature regarding location, symptoms, histopathologic diagnosis, and treatment. We conclude that the optimum treatment seems to be the same as for small cell carcinomas of the lung, that is, a multidrug combination chemotherapy regimen used alone or with sequential radiation.

Treatment of Brain Metastases in Patients with Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Lessons from Treatment of Other Tumors

Brain metastases are common in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and are usually fatal. About half of all patients who develop brain metastases will remain symptomatic at their time of death, even if the immediate cause of death is not neurologic. While it has been argued that the obtundation that sometimes comes with brain metastases may be a relatively easy way to die, studies which have examined the quality of life of individuals developing brain metastases dispute this. For most patients and their families, the impairment of physical, cognitive, and affective function which accompanies most brain metastases is highly distressing and can be seen as a "loss" of the patient even before his/her death. Thus, improved treatment of overt brain metastases will be of palliative value, and eradication of microscopic disease in the brain may cure patients whose disease in other sites has been eradicated. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) for patients who have achieved a complete response to induction therapy markedly reduces the risk of central nervous system relapse and modestly but significantly improves survival. Despite the use of PCI, many patients with SCLC will develop brain metastases, and there is increasing interest in surgical treatment of patients with solitary lesions and the use of systemic chemotherapy in treating patients, with both SCLC and non small-cell lung cancer, who have multifocal brain metastases which are minimally symptomatic, particularly when these patients also have extracranial metastatic disease.

Management of small cell cancer of the lung

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 20% to 25% of bronchogenic carcinoma cases. Combination chemotherapy offers the best chance for improved survival. Cisplatin plus etoposide appears to be the most reasonable choice for first line therapy. Increasing dose intensity, although sometimes associated with higher response rates, does not appear to significantly improve survival. Concurrent thoracic radiotherapy administered early in the course of chemotherapy confers a survival advantage over chemotherapy alone in limited-stage SCLC. Prophylactic cranial irradiation reduces central nervous system recurrences with minimal long-term sequelae and appears to improve survival. Several new cytotoxic agents are active in SCLC. These include gemcitabine, paclitaxel, docetaxel, topotecan, irinotecan, and JM216. Novel approaches being investigated include antibodies to factors expressed by SCLC cells and agents targeting angiogenesis, cell cycle regulation, and cell-signaling pathways.

Asymptomatic brain metastases (BM) in small cell lung cancer (SCLC): MR-imaging is useful at initial diagnosis

PURPOSE

In this study we evaluated the usefulness of MR-imaging in the detection of asymptomatic brain metastases (BM) at the initial diagnosis in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and studied the follow-up of these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One-hundred and twenty-five patients with SCLC were investigated with MR-imaging.

RESULTS

In 112 patients with normal neurological findings, MR-imaging of the brain demonstrated BM in 17 patients (15%). Six of these 17 patients were therefore upgraded to extensive disease (ED). Two of these 17 patients died during chemotherapy because of progressive disease and 3 patients became neurologic symptomatic with progressive disease on MR-imaging of the brain. After completion of chemotherapy a repeated MR-imaging of the brain in the remaining 12 patients showed 1 complete remission, 4 partial remission and 7 progressive disease of the BM.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that at presentation an unexpectedly high percentage of SCLC patients had asymptomatic BM on MR-imaging. We propose that MR-imaging of the brain should be included in the staging of SCLC patients as well for staging, prognosis and therapy.

A phase II study of combined chemoradiotherapy for limited disease-small-cell lung cancer

A study to evaluate the efficacy of cisplatin, doxorubicin, and etoposide chemotherapy with combined radiotherapy was undertaken in 26 patients with limited disease-small-cell lung cancer. Patients were treated with cisplatin (80 mg/m2) intravenously (i.v.) on day 1, doxorubicin (30 mg/m2) i.v. on day 1, and etoposide (80 mg/m2) i.v. on days 1, 3, and 5, every 4 weeks for four cycles. Thoracic irradiation of 40 Gy in 20 fractions was delivered during 4 weeks to the primary site starting on day 8 of the second cycle of chemotherapy. The objective response rate was 100%. A complete response was observed in 10 patients (38%). The median survival time was 23 months, and the 3-year survival rate was 42%. Seven patients (27%) continued to survive at least 8 years and remain free from disease. Grade III/IV leukopenia was observed in 25 patients (96%). Grade III/IV thrombocytopenia developed in 19 patients (73%). Grade III/IV esophagitis was not seen. Interstitial pneumonitis occurred in two patients. This regimen is effective and has acceptable toxicity for use in the treatment of limited disease-small-cell lung cancer.

Phase II trial of up-front accelerated thoracic radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy and optional up-front prophylactic cranial irradiation in limited small-cell lung cancer. Groupe d'Oncologie Thoracique des Régions Alpines

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility and outcome of bifractionated, up-front thoracic radiotherapy (TR) (45 Gy in 30 fractions of 1.5 Gy twice daily over 3 weeks) combined with chemotherapy (CT) (six cycles of cisplatin and etoposide) and optional low-dose, up-front prophylactic cranial irradiation (18 Gy in 10 fractions of 1.8 Gy twice daily over 5 days) in limited small-cell lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

CT (etoposide 100 mg/m(2) for 3 days and cisplatin 25 mg/m(2) for 3 days) was started on day 8 or 15 after the first TR treatment. In the five subsequent cycles, cisplatin was given as a single 100-mg/m(2) dose on day 1 every 4 weeks. A total of 52 patients were entered (41 men and 11 women); the median age was 55 years (range, 33 to 67 years). World Health Organization performance status was 0 in 34 patients, 1 in 16 patients, and 2 in two patients. Thirty-six patients (69%) received the full planned six cycles of CT.

RESULTS

All treated patients were assessable for response. Thirty-one patients (60%) achieved a complete response, and 16 (30%) had a partial response. One-, 3-, and 4-year survival rates were 74% (95% confidence interval [CI], 60% to 84%), 34% (95% CI, 21% to 49%), and 32% (95 CI, 16% to 46%), respectively. The median survival time was 18 months. Event-free survival at 1 year was 45% (95% CI, 32% to 58%) and at 3 years, 30% (95% CI, 18% to 44%). The main radiation-related acute toxicity was esophageal: 38% of the patients experienced grade 3 or 4 acute toxicity. CT was well tolerated. Although grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 86% of the patients, only 4% presented with associated fever. Grade 3/4 nausea and vomiting was seen in 35% of patients.

CONCLUSION

This trial demonstrates that up-front accelerated TR associated with CT is feasible, has acceptable toxicity, and shows considerable long-term survival potential.

Therapeutic advances in small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is characterised by neuroendocrine differentiation, early metastatic potential and initial responsiveness to cytotoxic therapy. Unfortunately, despite recent therapeutic advances, most patients relapse and the overall five-year survival rate is only 5%. Standard treatment of SCLC consists of platinum-based combination chemotherapy, with thoracic irradiation added for patients with limited-stage disease. Several newer chemotherapeutic drugs have recently been shown to have significant activity in patients with untreated or relapsed SCLC. These agents include: the topoisomerase I inhibitors, topotecan and irinotecan; the taxanes, paclitaxel and docetaxel; the pyrimidine analogue, gemcitabine; and the vinca alkaloid, vinorelbine. Recent advances in our understanding of the molecular events involved in the pathogenesis and progression of SCLC have led to the identification of a variety of potential targets for novel therapeutic interventions. Strategies aimed at inhibiting the myriad of growth factor pathways that control the proliferation of SCLC cells, include: broad spectrum neuropeptide antagonists (e.g., substance P analogues); growth factor/receptor-specific inhibitors (e.g., anti-GRP monoclonal antibodies, bradykinin antagonist dimers); and a variety of selective protein kinase inhibitors. The importance of cell death pathways in carcinogenesis and treatment-resistance has led to several novel strategies targeting apoptotic mediators, such as bcl-2, that are frequently dysregulated in SCLC (e.g., bcl-2 antisense). Our current challenges are to further refine these promising therapeutic strategies, efficiently evaluate their activity in the clinical setting and integrate them into more effective treatment regimens to improve the overall prognosis of patients with SCLC.

Lung cancer

Lung cancer remains a major worldwide health problem, accounting for more than a sixth of cancer deaths. The proportion of cancers that are adenocarcinomas is increasing in North America and to some degree in Europe, leading to a changing clinical picture characterised by early development of metastases. Newer diagnostic techniques have allowed for more accurate tumour staging and treatment planning. In patients with non-small-cell cancer, surgical resection offers substantial cure rates in early-stage cases. Combined chemotherapy plus radiation therapy has clearly improved the treatment results for patients with locally advanced cancers, and patients with metastatic disease are now candidates for newer chemotherapy regimens with more favourable results than in the past. Small-cell lung cancer is highly responsive to chemotherapy, and recent advances in radiation therapy have improved the prospects for long survival. New techniques for screening, and innovative approaches to both local and systemic treatment offer hope for substantial progress against this disease in the near future.

Small-Cell Lung Cancer at the Millennium: Radiotherapy Innovations Improve Survival While New Chemotherapy Treatments Remain Unproven

Because of the systemic nature of small-cell lung cancer, one could predict that treatment advances would mainly come from innovations of chemotherapy. Although combination chemotherapy is better than monotherapy, a clearly superior multidrug regimen has not emerged. Investigations of more intensive chemotherapy with increased drug diversity and delivery have not prospered, and advantages of regimens including new agents have not yet been demonstrated in controlled trials. As we enter the new millennium, twenty-five years have passed since the publication of studies describing the combined used of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine for small-cell lung cancer. It has been almost 20 years since the publication of the combination of etoposide and cisplatin became the widely accepted standard for the treatment of small-cell lung cancer. Today, both treatment regimens continue to be widely used as standard therapy. Ironically, proven advances in this systemic disease have been associated with innovations of local therapy. Data from limited-stage small-cell lung cancer clinical trials published during the 1990s demonstrated that a number of radiotherapy interventions had significant survival benefits. These radiotherapy interventions include addition of thoracic irradiation to chemotherapy, early delivery of thoracic irradiation concurrently with chemotherapy, more intense thoracic irradiation, and prophylactic cranial irradiation. As we await improved systemic therapy in the next millennium, the prognosis for extensive-stage disease remains guarded, and adherence to optimal radiotherapy detail remains crucial for routine management of limited-stage patients.

Cranial irradiation for preventing brain metastases of small cell lung cancer in patients in complete remission

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic cranial irradiation halves the rate of brain metastases in patients with small cell lung cancer. Individual randomized trials conducted on patients in complete remission were unable to clarify whether this treatment improves survival.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to test whether prophylactic cranial irradiation prolongs survival of patients with small cell lung cancer in complete remission.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Published and unpublished trials were eligible. Electronic databases, reference lists of trial publications, review articles and relevant books were used to identify potentially eligible trials. The search was also guided by discussions with investigators and experts, and the examination of meeting proceedings and of the Physician Data Query clinical trial registry.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized trials comparing prophylactic cranial irradiation with no prophylactic cranial irradiation in patients with small cell lung cancer in complete remission.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Meta-analysis based on updated individual data. The main endpoint was survival.

MAIN RESULTS

The relative risk of death in the treatment group compared to the control group was 0.84 (95% confidence interval=0.73 to 0.97, P=0.01), corresponding to a 5.4 percent increase in the 3-year survival rate (from 15.3 percent in the control group to 20.7 percent in the treatment group). Prophylactic cranial irradiation also increased disease-free survival (relative risk=0.75, 95% confidence interval=0.65 to 0.86, P<0.001) and decreased the risk of brain metastases (relative risk=0.46, 95% confidence interval=0.38 to 0.57, P<0.001). Increasing doses of irradiation decreased the risk of brain metastases when four groups (8 Gy, 24-25 Gy, 30 Gy, 36-40 Gy) were analyzed [trend test, P=0.02], but the effect on survival did not differ significantly according to the dose. We found a trend (P=0.01) for a decrease in the brain metastasis risk in favour of earlier administration of cranial irradiation after the initiation of induction treatment.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic cranial irradiation significantly improves survival and disease-free survival for patients with small cell lung cancer in complete remission. Further clinical trials are needed to confirm the potential greater benefit on brain metastasis rate suggested when cranial irradiation is given earlier or at higher doses.

Management of small cell lung cancer: current state of the art

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a common malignancy that is rapidly fatal if left untreated, with most patients surviving < 6 months. Currently, patients with SCLC are treated with chemotherapy with or without thoracic radiotherapy. Randomized trials have demonstrated the superiority of multiagent regimens over single-agent therapies, with the combination of cisplatin and etoposide being the initial regimen of choice for most patients, regardless of stage at presentation. Dose escalation, weekly chemotherapy, alternating noncross-resistant chemotherapy, and maintenance chemotherapy have been evaluated in SCLC, with no convincing data to date demonstrating an advantage for these strategies over conventional treatment strategies. Second-line therapy may be effective in selected patients, depending on the interval between primary treatment and recurrence, response to primary therapy, and the agents used for initial treatment. Radiotherapy is generally accepted as an essential component of optimal management of limited-stage disease, although sequencing, timing, fractionation, dose, and field size remain less than adequately defined. Finally, the routine use of prophylactic cranial irradiation remains controversial, and currently should be reserved for patients in complete remission.

Prognostically orientated multimodality treatment including surgery for selected patients of small-cell lung cancer patients stages IB to IIIB: long-term results of a phase II trial

Following mediastinoscopy, a prognostically orientated multimodality approach was chosen in selected small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients with hyperfractionated accelerated chemoradiotherapy (Hf-RTx) and definitive surgery (S). Stage IB/IIA patients had four cycles of cisplatin/etoposide (PE) and surgery. Stage IIB/IIIA patients had three cycles PE followed by one cycle concurrent chemoradiation including Hf-RTx and surgery. Most stage IIIB patients were not planned for surgery and had CTx followed by sequential RTx or one cycle concurrent CTx/RTx. Of 46 consecutive patients (stage IB six, IIA two, IIB/IIIA 22, IIIB 16) 43 (94%) showed an objective response. Twenty-three of patients (72%) planned for inclusion of S were completely resected (R0) (IB 6/6, IIA 2/2, IIB/IIIA 13/22, IIIB 2/2). Overall toxicity was acceptable--one patient died of septicaemia, no perioperative deaths occurred. Median follow-up of patients alive (n = 21) is 52 months (30+ - 75+). Median survival and 5-year survival rate of all patients are 36 months and 46%, in R0 patients 68 months and 63% (R0-IIB/IIIA/IIIB: not yet reached and 67%). This multimodality treatment including surgery proved highly effective with 100% local control and remarkable long-term survival after complete resection, even in locally advanced SCLC stages IIB/IIIA patients.

Prophylactic cranial irradiation in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer after multimodality treatment: long-term follow-up and investigations of late neuropsychologic effects

PURPOSE

Relapse pattern and late toxicities in long-term survivors were analyzed after the introduction of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) into a phase II trial on trimodality treatment of locally advanced (LAD) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-five patients with stage IIIA(N2)/IIIB NSCLC were treated with induction chemotherapy, preoperative radiochemotherapy, and surgery. PCI was routinely offered during the second period of study accrual. Patients were given a total radiation dose of 30 Gy (2 Gy per daily fraction) over a 3-week period starting 1 day after the last chemotherapy cycle.

RESULTS

Introduction of PCI reduced the rate of brain metastases as first site of relapse from 30% to 8% at 4 years (P =.005) and that of overall brain relapse from 54% to 13% (P <.0001). The effect of PCI was also observed in the good-prognosis subgroup of 47 patients who had a partial response or complete response to induction chemotherapy, with a reduction of brain relapse as first failure from 23% to 0% at 4 years (P =.01). Neuropsychologic testing revealed impairments in attention and visual memory in long-term survivors who received PCI as well as in those who did not receive PCI. T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging revealed white matter abnormalities of higher grades in patients who received PCI than in those who did not.

CONCLUSION

PCI at a moderate dose reduced brain metastases in LAD-NSCLC to a clinically significant extent, comparable to that in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer. Late toxicity to normal brain was acceptable. This study supports the use of PCI within intense protocols for LAD-NSCLC, particularly in patients with favorable prognostic factors.

Moderate dose-escalation of combination chemotherapy with concomitant thoracic radiotherapy in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer: prolonged intrathoracic tumor control and high central nervous system relapse rate. Groupe d'Oncologie-Pneumologie Clinique de l'Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels and Liège, Belgium

BACKGROUND

The role of chemotherapy dose-intensification in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains unclear. This phase I-II study evaluates feasibility and outcome of combination chemotherapy at moderately elevated doses with concomitant thoracic radiotherapy in limited-disease SCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Moderately elevated doses of ifosfamide-epirubicin (cycles 1 and 3) and of carboplatin-etoposide (cycles 2 and 4) were given with G-CSF and peripheral blood stem-cell (PBSC) support. Thoracic radiotherapy (40 Gy) was given once daily during the first five days of each cycle.

RESULTS

Overall toxicity was acceptable; most common side-effects were myelosuppression and asthenia. All 35 eligible patients responded (23 CR, 12 PR). Median time to progression was 15 months: median overall survival was 24.6 months. Only 6 of 25 relapsing patients (24%) presented with a locoregional recurrence while 12 of 25 (48%) relapsed in the central nervous system (CNS).

CONCLUSIONS

This regimen is a feasible dose-intensification with an acceptable toxicity profile. Its efficacy was demonstrated by a 100% response rate, an excellent local tumor control rate and a median survival of 24.6 months. In the absence of PCI, CNS relapse is a major problem if adequate local control is achieved.

Prophylactic cranial irradiation for patients with small-cell lung cancer in complete remission. Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation Overview Collaborative Group

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic cranial irradiation reduces the incidence of brain metastasis in patients with small-cell lung cancer. Whether this treatment, when given to patients in complete remission, improves survival is not known. We performed a meta-analysis to determine whether prophylactic cranial irradiation prolongs survival.

METHODS

We analyzed individual data on 987 patients with small-cell lung cancer in complete remission who took part in seven trials that compared prophylactic cranial irradiation with no prophylactic cranial irradiation. The main end point was survival.

RESULTS

The relative risk of death in the treatment group as compared with the control group was 0.84 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.73 to 0.97; P= 0.01), which corresponds to a 5.4 percent increase in the rate of survival at three years (15.3 percent in the control group vs. 20.7 percent in the treatment group). Prophylactic cranial irradiation also increased the rate of disease-free survival (relative risk of recurrence or death, 0.75; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.65 to 0.86; P<0.001) and decreased the cumulative incidence of brain metastasis (relative risk, 0.46; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.38 to 0.57; P<0.001). Larger doses of radiation led to greater decreases in the risk of brain metastasis, according to an analysis of four total doses (8 Gy, 24 to 25 Gy, 30 Gy, and 36 to 40 Gy) (P for trend=0.02), but the effect on survival did not differ significantly according to the dose. We also identified a trend (P=0.01) toward a decrease in the risk of brain metastasis with earlier administration of cranial irradiation after the initiation of induction chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic cranial irradiation improves both overall survival and disease-free survival among patients with small-cell lung cancer in complete remission.

Current guidelines for the management of small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 20% to 25% of cases of bronchogenic carcinoma and results in pronounced morbidity and mortality in the United States. More than 90% of cases of SCLC are caused by cigarette smoking. Common pulmonary manifestations are dyspnea, persistent cough, hemoptysis, and postobstructive pneumonia. At the time of diagnosis, patients usually have extensive disease. To date, therapeutic approaches have made only modest advances in outcome. Combined modality approaches, such as radiotherapy administered concomitantly with the initiation of chemotherapy, induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy administered during the subsequent courses of chemotherapy, sequential chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and courses of radiotherapy split between cycles of chemotherapy, are important for improving survival in patients with SCLC.

Cerebral toxicity in patients treated for small cell carcinoma of the lung

OBJECTIVE

To present the clinical characteristics of patients enrolled in a trial of treatment of small cell carcinoma (SCC) of the lung and to describe the central nervous system toxicity associated with the chemotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 60 patients with SCC who received chemotherapy and thoracic radiation therapy. PCI was administered to patients who had limited disease or who had extensive disease that was subsequently down-staged to only residual chest disease after initial treatment. The total PCI dose was 3,200 cGy administered in 16 fractions of 200 cGy, given concurrently with systemic chemotherapy. Diagnostic criteria for leukoencephalopathy were based on previously published guidelines.

RESULTS

Of the 60 eligible and enrolled patients, 35 received PCI and 25 did not. Leukoencephalopathy developed in 5 of the 35 patients (14%) who received PCI. The median age of the patients in whom leukoencephalopathy developed was 64 years (range, 57 to 69), and the median follow-up time was 59 months. The most common signs and symptoms of leukoencephalopathy were intellectual changes, memory alterations, and motor abnormalities. The mean time to onset of symptoms after termination of irradiation was 357 days (range, 30 to 524). Of all 60 patients, 6 were still alive 4 years after enrollment, and 3 of them (50%) already had leukoencephalopathy.

CONCLUSION

Small dosage fractions of PCI may still result in leukoencephalopathy. The routine use of PCI in the management of SCC should be reassessed because of increasing evidence of the toxicity associated with it.

National survey on prophylactic cranial irradiation: differences in practice patterns between medical and radiation oncologists

PURPOSE

Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients remains controversial in the oncology community because of its potential for long-term toxicity and unproven survival benefit in randomized trials. A national survey of 9176 oncologists was conducted to characterize the use of PCI with regard to physician demographics, patient characteristics, and oncologists' beliefs.

METHODS

Data was collected via a questionnaire letter survey. Biographical data, treatment patterns, and clinical impressions were analyzed by the generalized linear model and generalized estimating equations method.

RESULTS

There were 1231 responders overall (13.4% of those surveyed), including 628 (51%) radiation oncologists (RO), 587 (48%) medical oncologists (MO), 8 (0.6%) surgical oncologists, and 8 (0.6%) from other oncology subspecialties. Of respondents, 74% overall recommend PCI in limited-stage patients, including 65% of MO and 82% RO (p = 0.001). Of responders who recommend PCI in limited-stage patients, 67% do so only after complete response to initial therapy. Only 30% of respondents recommend PCI for extensive-stage SCLC patients (p = 0.001), and 94% of these recommend PCI only when those patients have a complete response after initial therapy. Interestingly, 38% of responding MO feel that PCI improves survival of limited-stage patients, but only 11% believe PCI improves quality of life. Of the RO, 48% believe PCI improves survival in limited-stage SCLC, and 36% feel PCI improves quality of life (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). MO responders believe PCI causes late neurological sequelae more often than do RO responders (95% vs. 84%, p < 0.05), with impaired memory (37%), chronic fatigue (19%), and loss of motivation (13%) as most commonly seen side effects. Only 1.5% overall, however, routinely obtain neuropsychiatric testing in PCI patients, and 42% overall never obtain them.

CONCLUSION

Results confirm that oncologic subspecialists have statistically significant differences in opinion regarding the use of PCI. However, these differences may not translate into large differences in clinical practice. Most oncologists continue to recommend PCI in limited-stage SCLC patients, despite many believing PCI may not provide a survival advantage nor improve quality of life.

Decreased metastasis and improved survival with early thoracic radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation in combined-modality treatment of limited-stage small cell lung cancer

In an attempt to verify the relative efficacy of early concurrent vs. sequential timing of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and platinum/etoposide chemotherapy, 48 patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer treated with either early-concurrent (29 patients) or sequential (19 patients) TRT and platinum/etoposide chemotherapy were evaluated. Disease-specific prognostic variables and the role of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) were also analyzed. Thirty-four patients (71%) received TRT to a dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions (range, 30-55 Gy). Most patients (75%) received 4-6 cycles of chemotherapy. Twenty-one of 27 patients achieving a complete response after completion of TRT and chemotherapy received PCI. Median follow-up was 29.3 months (range, 12-98 months). Variables of potential prognostic significance were evaluated by both univariate and multivariate analysis. The absolute and relapse-free survival rates for all patients were 42% and 35% at 2 years and 32% and 31% at 5 years, respectively. Thirty-six sites of failure were observed in 27 patients. Thoracic recurrence occurred in nine patients, and the central nervous system (CNS) was the most common site of distant failure (15 patients). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that (a) early concurrent TRT and chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy followed by sequential TRT and (b) disease volume [less than or greater than one-third of the thoracic width] were significantly predictive for survival (P=0.036 and P=0.05, respectively). Rates of control of thoracic disease were 79% for patients with a disease volume less than one-third of the thoracic width vs. 36% for disease volumes greater than one-third of the thoracic width (P=0.0009). Early concurrent TRT and chemotherapy resulted in a significantly lower incidence of distant metastasis (26% for concurrent vs. 63% for sequential; P=0.008). In patients who received PCI, the CNS control rate was 86% vs. 56% in patients not treated with PCI. Our findings suggest that (a) treatment with early concurrent TRT and platinum/etoposide chemotherapy may improve survival when compared with sequential treatment and (b) PCI for patients with complete systemic responses is effective in preventing CNS recurrence. We also conclude that thoracic disease volume is a significant prognostic factor for both local control and overall survival.