Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analyses

Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery

BACKGROUND

Health care systems provide care to increasingly complex and elderly patients. Colorectal surgery is a prime example, with high volumes of major procedures, significant morbidity, prolonged hospital stays, and unplanned readmissions. This situation is exacerbated by an exponential rise in costs that threatens the stability of health care systems. Enhanced recovery pathways (ERP) have been proposed as a means to reduce morbidity and improve effectiveness of care. We have reviewed the evidence supporting the implementation of ERP in clinical practice.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched for randomized, controlled trials comparing ERP with traditional care in colorectal surgery. Systematic reviews and papers on ERP based on data published in major surgical and anesthesiology journals were critically reviewed by international contributors, experienced in the development and implementation of ERP.

RESULTS

A random-effect Bayesian meta-analysis was performed, including 6 randomized, controlled trials totalizing 452 patients. For patients adhering to ERP, length of stay decreased by 2.5 days (95% credible interval [CrI] -3.92 to -1.11), whereas 30-day morbidity was halved (relative risk, 0.52; 95% CrI, 0.36-0.73) and readmission was not increased (relative risk, 0.59; 95% CrI, 0.14-1.43) when compared with patients undergoing traditional care.

CONCLUSION

Adherence to ERP achieves a reproducible improvement in the quality of care by enabling standardization of health care processes. Thus, while accelerating recovery and safely reducing hospital stay, ERPs optimize utilization of health care resources. ERPs can and should be routinely used in care after colorectal and other major gastrointestinal procedures.

Clinical benefits after the implementation of a multimodal perioperative protocol in elderly patients

CONTEXT

Multimodal protocol of perioperative care may enhance recovery after surgery. Based on evidence these new routines of perioperative care changed conventional prescriptions in surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the results of a multimodal protocol (ACERTO protocol) in elderly patients.

METHODS

Non-randomized historical cohort study was performed at the surgical ward of a tertiary university hospital. One hundred seventeen patients aged 60 and older were submitted to elective abdominal operations under either conventional (n = 42; conventional group, January 2004-June 2005) or a fast-track perioperative protocol named ACERTO (n = 75; ACERTO group, July 2005-December 2007). Main endpoints were preoperative fasting time, postoperative day of re-feeding, volume of intravenous fluids, length of hospital stay and morbidity.

RESULTS

The implantation of the ACERTO protocol was followed by a decrease in both preoperative fasting (15 [8-20] vs 4 [2-20] hours, P<0.001) and postoperative day of refeeding (1st [1st-10th] vs 0 [0-5th] PO day; P<0.01), and intravenous fluids (10.7 [2.5-57.5] vs 2.5 [0.5-82] L, P<0.001). The changing of protocols reduced the mean length of hospital stay by 4 days (6[1-43] vs 2[1-97] days; P = 0.002) and surgical site infection rate by 85.7% (19%; 8/42 vs 2.7%; 2/75, P<0.001; relative risk = 1.20; 95% confidence interval = 1.03-1.39). Per-protocol analysis showed that hospital stay in major operations diminished only in patients who completed the protocol (P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

The implementation of multidisciplinary routines of the ACERTO protocol diminished both hospitalization and surgical site infection in elderly patients submitted to abdominal operations.

A brief review of laparoscopic appendectomy: the issues and the evidence

Laparoscopic appendectomy was first performed more than 25 years ago. We performed a systematic literature search on laparoscopic appendectomy and selected related topics. The technique should be considered the gold standard for surgical removal of the appendix in women of childbearing age (level of evidence Ia). There is minor but consistent evidence that it should also be advocated for men (level of evidence III), obese (level of evidence III), and elderly (level of evidence IIb) patients, while there is some evidence of unfavorable results on pregnant women (level of evidence IIb). Studies reporting higher incidence of intra-abdominal abscesses after laparoscopic appendectomy are difficult to interpret due to a lack of standardization of the operative technique and lack of uniformity related to the different grades of disease (ranging from uninflamed appendix to diffuse peritonitis, gangrene, or perforation of the organ). As far as surgical technique, the three-port procedure is superior to needleoscopy and single port access (level of evidence Ia). Costly high-tech instruments for dissection are mostly unnecessary (level Ib). Mechanical closure of the stump might prove safer (level Ib). The quantity of peritoneal lavage fluid is generally scanty (level III), and abdominal drains are not useful (level Ia). Fast-track protocols should be implemented (level Ic). Training and technical standardization are the key to devising future trials on this topic.

Does the type of pancreaticojejunostomy after Whipple alter the leak rate?

Despite the overwhelming limitations that plague the literature surrounding the optimal method of reestablishing pancreatico-enteric continuity following a Whipple operation, it is clear that all successful techniques conform to sound surgical principles. These principles include a water-tight and tension-free anastomosis, preservation of adequate blood supply for both organs involved in the anastomosis, and minimal trauma to the pancreas gland. Although surgeon experience, gland texture, and pancreatic duct size are clearly the dominate risk factors from a long list of variables associated with pancreatic leaks following pancreatoduodenectomy, these are nonmodifiable covariates. Although the plethora of current literature cannot provide a single definitive technical solution for restoring pancreatico-enteric continuity, a small number of well-designed RCTs support the use of transanastomotic external stenting for high-risk pancreatic glands and an end-to-side invaginated pancreaticojejunostomy. The truth remains that an individual surgeon's mastery of a specific anastomotic technique, in conjunction with a large personal experience, is likely to be the best predictor of a low pancreas leak rate following pancreatoduodenectomy.

Laparoscopic gastric surgery in an enhanced recovery programme

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopy is associated with less pain and organ dysfunction than open surgery. Improved perioperative care (enhanced recovery programmes, fast-track methodology) has also led to reduced morbidity and a shorter hospital stay. The effects of a combination of laparoscopic resection and accelerated recovery have not been examined previously in the context of gastric surgery.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of 32 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric resection combined with an enhanced recovery protocol (early oral intake, no drains or nasogastric tubes, no epidural analgesia, use of a urinary catheter for less than 24 h and planned discharge 72 h after surgery). Outcomes included length of hospital stay, intraoperative and postoperative complications, readmission rate and 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Operative procedures were elective distal or subtotal gastrectomy (22 patients) and total gastrectomy (10). Median length of hospital stay was 4 (range 2-30) days. There were two major complications: postoperative bleeding requiring reoperation and pulmonary embolism. Two patients required readmission, one for a wound abscess and one for treatment of a urinary tract infection. There were no deaths within 30 days.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive gastrectomy with enhanced postoperative recovery results in a short hospital stay and low morbidity rate.

Prevention of infectious complications after laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated acute appendicitis--the role of routine abdominal drainage

PURPOSE

Complicated acute appendicitis is still associated with an increased morbidity. If laparoscopy has been accepted as a valid approach, some questions remain concerning intra-abdominal abscess formation. Routine prophylactic drainage of the abdomen has been proposed. However, this practice remains a matter of debate, poorly validated in the literature. With the present study, we investigated the impact of drainage in laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.

METHOD

This is a case match study of consecutive patients operated on by laparoscopy in a single institution. One hundred and thirty patients operated for complicated appendicitis (local peritonitis without perforation, with perforation, or with periappendicular abscess) with prophylactic intraperitoneal drainage were matched one by one to 130 patients operated without drainage. Uncomplicated appendicitis and generalized peritonitis were excluded. Primary endpoint was surgical complications and secondary endpoints were transit recovery time and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Patients without drain had significantly less overall complications (7.7% vs. 18.5%, p = 0.01). Moreover, the absence of drainage was of significant benefit for transit recovery time (2.5 vs. 3.5 days, p = 0.0068) and length of hospital stay (4.2 vs. 7.3 days, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

No benefits were observed for prophylactic drainage of the abdominal cavity during emergency laparoscopic treatment of complicated appendicitis. For this reason, this practice may be abandoned.

Fast-track surgery improves postoperative recovery in patients with gastric cancer: a randomized comparison with conventional postoperative care

BACKGROUND

Fast-track surgery is a new, promising comprehensive program for surgical patients and is beneficial to recovery. Prospective randomized, controlled clinical trials involving fast-track surgery for gastric cancer are lacking.

PATIENT AND METHODS

Ninety-two patients with gastric cancer were randomly divided into a fast-track surgery group (n = 45) and conventional surgery group (n = 47). We compared outcomes (duration of postoperative stay in hospital, fever, and flatus, complications, and medical costs); postoperative serum levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein; and resting energy expenditure between two groups.

RESULTS

Compared with the conventional surgery group, the fast-track surgery group had no more complications (P > 0.05) with a significantly shorter duration of fever, flatus, and hospital stay, and less medical costs as well as a higher quality of life score on hospital discharge (all P < 0.05). With a significantly lower resting energy expenditure (days 1 and 3) postoperatively (P < 0.05), the fast-track surgery group showed a lower serum level of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (days 1 and 3), interleukin-6 (days 1 and 3), and C-reactive protein (days 1, 3, and 7) than the conventional surgery group (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Fast-track surgery can lessen postoperative stress reactions and accelerate rehabilitation for patients with gastric cancer.

Complications in colorectal surgery: risk factors and preventive strategies

BACKGROUND

Open or laparoscopic colorectal surgery comprises of many different types of procedures for various diseases. Depending upon the operation and modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors the intra- and postoperative morbidity and mortality rate vary. In general, surgical complications can be divided into intraoperative and postoperative complications and usually occur while the patient is still in the hospital.

METHODS

A literature search (1980-2009) was carried out, using MEDLINE, PubMed and the Cochrane library.

RESULTS

This review provides an overview how to identify and minimize intra- and postoperative complications. The improvement of different treatment strategies and technical inventions in the recent decade has been enormous. This is mainly attributable to the increase in the laparoscopic approach, which is now well accepted for many procedures. Training of the surgeon, hospital volume and learning curves are becoming increasingly more important to maximize patient safety, surgeon expertise and cost effectiveness. In addition, standardization of perioperative care is essential to minimize postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

This review summarizes the main perioperative complications of colorectal surgery and influencable and non-influencable risk factors which are important to the general surgeon and the relevant specialist as well. In order to minimize or even avoid complications it is crucial to know these risk factors and strategies to prevent, treat or reduce intra- and postoperative complications.

A clinicopathological review of 324 appendices removed for acute appendicitis in Durban, South Africa: a retrospective analysis

INTRODUCTION

Acute appendicitis remains a common surgical condition and the importance of specific elements in the clinical diagnosis remain controversial. A variety of neoplastic and inflammatory conditions mimic acute appendicitis. The purpose of this study was to determine the presenting pattern of acute appendicitis and to review the pathological diagnosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of 324 patients who had appendicectomy for acute appendicitis at Prince Mshiyeni Memorial Hospital (Natal, South Africa) during the period January 2002 to December 2004. Patient demographics, clinical features, white cell count, operative findings, outcome and histology results were recorded on a special patient proforma.

RESULTS

A total of 371 patients underwent appendicectomy during this period and 324 (M:F, 3.6:1) were available for analysis. The majority of our patients were in the second decade (43.1%) with only 29.3% presenting within 24 h of onset of symptoms. The most common symptoms were abdominal pain (100%), vomiting (57.4%) and anorexia (49.0%). Generalised and localised abdominal tenderness were present in 62.0% and 19.4% of patients, respectively. Pyrexia was noted in 41.0%. Localised and generalised peritonitis were present in 26.4% and 14.0%, respectively. The most common incisions were lower midline laparotomy (47.2%) and gridiron (37.3%). The negative appendicectomy rate was 17.0%. Acute appendiceal inflammation and gangrenous appendicitis was present in 36.1% and 9.6%, respectively. The perforation rate was 34.0% and there was a direct correlation with delayed presentation. There were no patients with carcinoid tumour or adenocarcinoma. Parasites and other associated conditions were seen in 8.6% of cases. Postoperative complications included: wound sepsis (25.3%), prolonged ileus (6.2%), peritonitis (4.6%) and chest infection (3.4%). Four patients died (1.2%) all from the perforated group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our patients present late with advanced disease and complications. All surgeons should bear in mind the possibility of parasitic infestations mimicking acute appendicitis and the presence of significant unusual histological findings in our setting justifies routine histopathological examination of appendices.

Perioperative management in distal pancreatectomy: results of a survey in 23 European participating centres of the DISPACT trial and a review of literature

BACKGROUND

Concomitant treatment in addition to intervention may influence the primary outcome, especially in complex interventions such as surgical trials. Evidence-based standards for perioperative care after distal pancreatectomy, however, have been rarely defined. This study's objective was therefore to identify and analyse the current basis of evidence for perioperative management in distal pancreatectomy.

METHODS

A standardised questionnaire was sent to 23 European centres recruiting patients for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) on open distal pancreatectomy that would compare suture versus stapler closure of the pancreatic remnant (DISPACT trial, ISRCTN 18452029). Perioperative strategies (e.g., bowel preparation, pain management, administration of antibiotics, abdominal incision, drainages, nasogastric tubes, somatostatin, mobilisation and feeding regimens) were assessed. Moreover, a systematic literature search in the Medline database was performed and retrieved meta-analyses and RCTs were reviewed.

RESULTS

All 23 centres returned the questionnaire. Consensus for thoracic epidural catheters (TECs), pain treatment and transverse incisions was found, as well as strong consensus for the placement of intra-abdominal drainages and perioperative single-shot antibiotics. Also, there was consensus that bowel preparation, somatostatin application, postoperative nasogastric tubes and intravenous feeding might not be beneficial. The literature search identified 16 meta-analyses and 19 RCTs demonstrating that bowel preparation, somatostatin therapy and nasogastric tubes can be omitted. Early mobilisation, feeding and TECs seem to be beneficial for patients. The value of drainages remains unclear.

CONCLUSION

Most perioperative standards within the centres participating in the DISPACT trial are in accordance with current available evidence. The need for drainages requires further investigation.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN 18452029.

Study of the patency of different peritoneal drains used prophylactically in bariatric surgery

AIM

To compare the performance of different types of abdominal drains used in bariatric surgery.

METHODS

A vertical banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was performed in 33 morbidly obese patients. Drainage of the peritoneal cavity was performed in each case using three different types of drain selected in a randomized manner: a latex tubular drain, a Watterman tubulolaminar drain, and a silicone channeled drain. Drain permeability, contamination of the drained fluid, ease of handling, and patient discomfort were evaluated postoperatively over a period of 7 d.

RESULTS

The patients with the silicone channeled drain had larger volumes of drainage compared to patients with tubular and tubulolaminar drains between the third and seventh postoperative days. In addition, a lower incidence of discomfort and of contamination with bacteria of a more pathogenic profile was observed in the patients with the silicone channeled drain.

CONCLUSION

The silicone channeled drain was more comfortable and had less chance of occlusion, which is important in the detection of delayed dehiscence.

Abdominal drains in liver transplantation: useful tool or useless dogma? A matched case-control study

On the basis of the growing evidence from randomized trials that routine prophylactic drainage is unnecessary in liver surgery or even harmful in chronic liver disease, we challenged the concept of prophylactic drainage in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Since September 2006, we omitted drains in every patient who underwent OLT, regardless of the procedure. Thirty-five cadaveric OLTs were performed during a 12-month period. These patients were matched 1:2 with 70 patients who had prophylactic drainage after OLT according to donor/recipient age, recipient gender, recipient body mass index, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. Endpoints were postoperative morbidity, in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit (ICU), and hospital stay. Complications were graded according to a therapy-oriented classification (grades I-V). Both groups (no drainage, n = 35; drainage, n = 70) were comparable in terms of median donor age (47.5 versus 51.0 years), recipient age (50.6 versus 52.0 years), MELD score (18 versus 14), and body mass index (25.3 versus 26 kg/m(2)). Because of the increasing shortage of organs, more marginal grafts were used in the recent period (ie, no-drainage group): 49% (17/35) versus 27% (19/70; P = 0.04). Major complications were not different between groups: grade 3a (endoscopic/radiological intervention) in 20% (7/35) versus 16% (11/70; not significant), grade 3b (surgical intervention) in 23% (8/35) versus 17% (12/70; not significant), grade 4a (ICU therapy, intermittent hemodialysis) in 34% (12/35) versus 21% (15/70; not significant), grade 4b (multiorgan failure) in 14% (5/35) versus 10% (7/70; not significant), and grade 5 (death) in 6% (2/35) versus 7% (5/70; not significant). This matched case study challenges the dogma of prophylactic drainage after OLT. A no-drain strategy provided no disadvantages despite increased use of extended criteria donors in the no-drainage group. Prophylactic drainage appears unnecessary on a routine basis.

Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery

BACKGROUND

Optimization of postoperative outcome requires the application of evidence-based principles of care carefully integrated into a multimodal rehabilitation program.

OBJECTIVE

To assess, synthesize, and discuss implementation of "fast-track" recovery programs.

DATA SOURCES

Medline MBASE (January 1966-May 2007) and the Cochrane library (January 1966-May 2007) were searched using the following keywords: fast-track, enhanced recovery, accelerated rehabilitation, and multimodal and perioperative care. In addition, the synthesis on the many specific interventions and organizational and implementation issues were based on data published within the past 5 years from major anesthesiological and surgical journals, using systematic reviews where appropriate instead of multiple references of original work.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Based on an increasing amount of multinational, multicenter cohort studies, randomized studies, and meta-analyses, the concept of the "fast-track methodology" has uniformly provided a major enhancement in recovery leading to decreased hospital stay and with an apparent reduction in medical morbidity but unaltered "surgery-specific" morbidity in a variety of procedures. However, despite being based on a combination of evidence-based unimodal principles of care, recent surveys have demonstrated slow adaptation and implementation of the fast-track methodology.

CONCLUSION

Multimodal evidence-based care within the fast-track methodology significantly enhances postoperative recovery and reduces morbidity, and should therefore be more widely adopted. Further improvement is expected by future integration of minimal invasive surgery, pharmacological stress-reduction, and effective multimodal, nonopioid analgesia.

Initial experience with a multimodal enhanced recovery programme in patients undergoing liver resection

Background

Accelerated recovery from surgery has been achieved when patients are managed within a multimodal Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol. This study evaluated the benefit of an ERAS programme for patients undergoing liver resection.

Methods

The ERAS protocol of epidural analgesia, early oral intake and early mobilization was studied prospectively in a consecutive series of 61 patients. Outcomes were compared with those in a consecutive series of 100 patients who underwent liver resection before the start of the study. Endpoints were postoperative length of hospital stay, postoperative resumption of oral intake, readmissions, morbidity and mortality.

Results

Fifty-six patients (92 per cent) in the ERAS group tolerated fluids within 4 h of surgery and a normal diet on day 1 after surgery. Median hospital stay, including readmissions, was 6·0 days compared with 8·0 days in the control group (P &lt; 0·001). There were no significant differences in rates of readmission (13 and 10·0 per cent respectively), morbidity (41 and 31·0 per cent) and mortality (0 and 2·0 per cent) between ERAS and control groups.

Conclusion

The ERAS fast-track protocol is safe and effective for patients undergoing liver resection. It allows early oral intake, promotes faster postoperative recovery and reduces hospital stay.

The rules of evidence-based medicine: can they be generalized to improve GI surgical practice?

Evidence-based surgical practice (EBSP) must be integrated into the educational curriculum for all surgeons. Independent of the compelling need for best practice, there are at least three compelling drivers: the exploding cost of health care demands evidence-based practice, patient safety is best supported by best evidence, and the medico-legal environment uses EBSP to pursue its goals.

Pancreatoduodenectomy: role of drain fluid analysis in the management of pancreatic fistula

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic fistula remains an important cause of death following pancreatoduodenectomy. There is still uncertainty regarding the use of drains following pancreatoduodenectomy with recent reports suggesting that it might be harmful with increased complications. We evaluated the use of drain fluid analysis in the management of patients following pancreatoduodenectomy.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted on all patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy at two hospitals between April 2004 and August 2006. Drain fluid analysis was carried out from day 3 to day 5. These data were collected with the clinical pictures of the patients and with subsequent radiological assessment.

RESULTS

Fifty consecutive patients underwent modified extended pancreatoduodenectomy for a periampullary tumour. In patients with no clinical evidence of a fistula, the mean postoperative drain fluid amylase levels were as follows: on postoperative day 3 it was 262 U/mL (standard error of mean 69), on postoperative day 4 it was 112 U/mL (standard error of mean 47) and on postoperative day 5 it was 125 U/mL (standard error of mean 64). Only three (6/6, 50%) of these patients had clinical features suggestive of a leak and were found to have a pancreatic fistula on subsequent imaging. There was no correlation between the total or mean volumes of drainage and development of a pancreatic fistula.

CONCLUSION

The drain fluid analysis did not provide additional information that was not already evident from the clinical picture of the patient. Drain fluid analysis had no effect on patients with a biochemical leak only. Patients who had a significant disruption of their pancreatic anastamosis did not need biochemical analysis as the character, that is, turbidity of the drain fluid was an equally reliable indicator of the underlying pathology.

Efficacy of closed suction drainage in lower limb arterial surgery: a meta-analysis of published clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Suction drains are widely used in vascular surgery, despite the absence of specific evidence that they confer benefit to patients. There has been no systematic review of the available evidence, though drainage has been shown to confer no benefit, or indeed harm, across a variety of surgical disciplines. Accordingly, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current evidence base for closed suction drainage following surgical lower limb revascularization was undertaken.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, trial registries, conference proceedings, and article reference lists were searched to identify randomized controlled trials of the use of surgical drains. The primary outcomes were wound infection, seroma/lymphocele formation, and hematoma formation. Pooled odds ratios were calculated for categorical outcomes.

RESULTS

Four trials containing 429 groin wounds were eligible for inclusion. There was no significant effect on wound infection, seroma/lymphocele formation, or hematoma formation.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis suggests that no benefit is conferred by wound drainage following lower limb revascularization. The practice incurs avoidable expense and should not be routinely used.

An unusual cause of postoperative gastric volvulus

BACKGROUND

Gastric volvulus presents with nonspecific abdominal symptoms and therefore may be missed. Its diagnosis has increased with improving imaging techniques such as computed tomography scan with contrast. Volvulus around a surgical drain has not been previously reported.

OUR CASE

We report the case of a 44-year-old lady who suffered with symptoms of persistent postprandial nausea and vomiting after distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy. A computed tomography scan of the abdomen demonstrated a surgical drain slinging up the pylorus and a partial gastric volvulus. The symptoms resolved after the drain was removed.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric volvulus is a differential diagnosis of persistent postprandial vomiting after surgical disruption of the gastrosplenic ligament. However, if this occurs in the early postoperative period the drains should be removed to ensure resolution.

Anastomotic leakage, the search for a reliable biomarker. A review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Colorectal anastomotic leakage (AL) is a severe complication leading to severe infection, sepsis and sometimes death. At present the diagnosis is made clinically, usually at 6-8 days after surgery. An objective biomarker reflecting the intra-abdominal milieu surrounding the anastomosis would be a useful additional diagnostic tool to make the diagnosis of AL before its clinical presentation. This review aims to assess the current status of the search for such a biomarker in peritoneal fluid.

METHOD

A literature search was carried out, using MEDLINE, PubMed and the Cochrane library, for all publications concerning human peritoneal fluid in relation to postoperative complications in general, and, more specific, anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery.

RESULTS

Analysis of several immune parameters, tissue repair parameters, parameters for ischaemia and microbiological composition of peritoneal fluid show that these can be determined reliably in the fluid, albeit with a large variance. Furthermore the data show that changes in concentration of these parameters precede AL and other postoperative complications by several days.

CONCLUSION

The results of the review demonstrate that it is possible to distinguish between patients with and without AL by measuring biomarkers in fluid from the peritoneal drain. Prospective studies with larger numbers of patients should, however, be performed and additional biomarkers should be studied to explore the full diagnostic potential of this approach.

Intraluminal migration of surgical drains after transhiatal esophagogastrectomy: radiographic findings and clinical relevance

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of our study were to review our experience with a group of patients in whom contrast examinations after transhiatal esophagogastrectomy and gastric pull-through revealed intraluminal migration of a surgical drain and to describe the radiographic appearance and clinical relevance of this phenomenon.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that intraluminal migration of a surgical drain after transhiatal esophagogastrectomy is an infrequent but serious phenomenon that hinders or prevents healing of an anastomotic leak. Radiologists should be aware of this phenomenon and should be able to recognize the findings of an intraluminal drain on contrast examinations. When such drains are identified, we believe that they should be promptly withdrawn or removed to facilitate healing of anastomotic leaks.

["Fast track" colorectal surgery]

Many factors have effect on the enhanced recovery after colon surgery. Not only the technical skill but the perioperative events needed to be optimized by the pre- and postoperative issues. Articles were obtained with search for keywords in Medline electronic database and evidences have been ranked according to the recommendation of the Oxford Evidence-Based Medicine Centre. Multicentric, randomised studies have proved that preoperative bowel emptying could not decrease the number of anastomotic insufficiency and wound infection rate; the use of abdominal drains is not necessary in every case; the proper, early oral intake is safe and well tolerated in colo-rectal surgery, and with laparoscopic surgery the same results can be achieved as with open ones. The evidences found even are not used completely. The advantage of laparoscopic surgery can be improved with fast track methods. To use correctly the affecting factors it is essential to know the current literature.

Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this randomized multicenter trial was to assess the rate of symptomatic anastomotic leakage in patients operated on with low anterior resection for rectal cancer and who were intraoperatively randomized to a defunctioning stoma or not.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The introduction of total mesorectal excision surgery as the surgical technique of choice for carcinoma in the lower and mid rectum has led to decreased local recurrence and improved oncological results. Despite these advances, perioperative morbidity remains a major issue, and the most feared complication is symptomatic anastomotic leakage. The role of the defunctioning stoma in regard to anastomotic leakage is controversial and has not been assessed in any randomized trial of sufficient size.

METHODS

From December 1999 to June 2005, a total of 234 patients were randomized to a defunctioning loop stoma or no loop stoma. Loop ileostomy or loop transverse colostomy was at the choice of the surgeon. Inclusion criteria for randomization were expected survival >6 months, informed consent, anastomosis < or =7 cm above the anal verge, negative air leakage test, intact anastomotic rings, and absence of major intraoperative adverse events.

RESULTS

The overall rate of symptomatic leakage was 19.2% (45 of 234). Patients randomized to a defunctioning stoma (n = 116) had leakage in 10.3% (12 of 116) and those without stoma (n = 118) in 28.0% (33 of 118) (odds ratio = 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-6.9; P < 0.001). The need for urgent abdominal reoperation was 8.6% (10 of 116) in those randomized to stoma and 25.4% (30 of 118) in those without (P < 0.001). After a follow-up of median 42 months (range, 6-72 months), 13.8% (16 of 116) of the initially defunctioned patients still had a stoma of any kind, compared with 16.9% (20 of 118) those not defunctioned (not significant). The 30-day mortality after anterior resection was 0.4% (1 of 234) and after elective reversal a defunctioning stoma 0.9% (1 of 111). Median age was 68 years (range, 32-86 years), 45.3% (106 of 234) were females, 79.1% (185 of 234) had preoperative radiotherapy, the level of anastomosis was median 5 cm, and intraoperative blood loss 550 mL, without differences between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Defunctioning loop stoma decreased the rate of symptomatic anastomotic leakage and is therefore recommended in low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

The Role of the Anesthesiologist in Fast-Track Surgery: From Multimodal Analgesia to Perioperative Medical Care

BACKGROUND

Improving perioperative efficiency and throughput has become increasingly important in the modern practice of anesthesiology. Fast-track surgery represents a multidisciplinary approach to improving perioperative efficiency by facilitating recovery after both minor (i.e., outpatient) and major (inpatient) surgery procedures. In this article we focus on the expanding role of the anesthesiologist in fast-track surgery.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary group of clinical investigators met at McGill University in the Fall of 2005 to discuss current anesthetic and surgical practices directed at improving the postoperative recovery process. A subgroup of the attendees at this conference was assigned the task of reviewing the peer-reviewed literature on this topic as it related to the role of the anesthesiologist as a perioperative physician.

RESULTS

Anesthesiologists as perioperative physicians play a key role in fast-track surgery through their choice of preoperative medication, anesthetics and techniques, use of prophylactic drugs to minimize side effects (e.g., pain, nausea and vomiting, dizziness), as well as the administration of adjunctive drugs to maintain major organ system function during and after surgery.

CONCLUSION

The decisions of the anesthesiologist as a key perioperative physician are of critical importance to the surgical care team in developing a successful fast-track surgery program.

Application of fibrin glue sealant after hepatectomy does not seem justified: results of a randomized study in 300 patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy, amount of hemorrhage, biliary leakage, complications, and postoperative evolution after fibrin glue sealant application in patients undergoing liver resection.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Fibrin sealants have become popular as a means of improving perioperative hemostasis and reducing biliary leakage after liver surgery. However, trials regarding its use in liver surgery remain limited and of poor methodologic quality.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 300 patients undergoing hepatic resection were randomly assigned to fibrin glue application or control groups. Characteristics and debit of drainage and postoperative complications were evaluated. The amount of blood loss, measurements of hematologic parameters liver test, and postoperative evolution (particularly involving biliary fistula and morbidity) was also recorded.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, no differences were observed in the amount of transfusion (0.15 +/- 0.66 vs. 0.17 +/- 0.63 PRCU; P = 0.7234) or in the patients that required transfusion (18% vs. 12%; P = 0.2), respectively, for the fibrin glue or control group. There were no differences in overall drainage volumes (1180 +/- 2528 vs. 960 +/- 1253 mL) or in days of postoperative drainage (7.9 +/- 5 vs. 7.1 +/- 4.7). Incidence of biliary fistula was similar in the fibrin glue and control groups, (10% vs. 11%). There were no differences regarding postoperative morbidity between groups (23% vs. 23%; P = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

Application of fibrin sealant in the raw surface of the liver does not seem justified. Blood loss, transfusion, incidence of biliary fistula, and outcome are comparable to patients without fibrin glue. Therefore, discontinuation of routine use of fibrin sealant would result in significant cost saving.

Laparoscopic sigmoidectomy in Germany—a standardised procedure?

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic resection of the sigmoid colon is generally considered as feasible option to open surgery, but standardised guidelines on surgical details have not been adopted yet. The aim of this survey was to investigate which techniques were applied by laparoscopic surgeons who are members of the Surgical Working Group for Minimal Invasive Surgery (CAMIC) of the German Surgical Society.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 2005, we conducted a written survey among all members of the CAMIC asking them for their routine surgical strategy of laparoscopic sigmoid resection in a standardised multiple-choice questionnaire. This questionnaire consisted of 20 questions covering main technical issues of laparoscopic sigmoid resection including trocar and team positioning, mobilisation and resection of the left colon, specimen retrieval as well as anastomosing technique. The results were classified into four levels of consensus depending on the level of agreement between participating surgeons.

RESULTS

There were 292 surgeons who took part in the survey. Strong consensus (>95% agreement) was only found in 1 of 20 technical details: the operating surgeon standing at the patient right's side. Consensus (75-95% agreement) was found for: position of the first assistant standing to the patient's left side, size of the camera port is 10 mm, lateral mobilisation of the left hemicolon before ligating the inferior mesenteric artery, extracorporeal resection of the sigmoid via minilaparotomy, transrectal stapling of the colorectal anastomosis, intraoperative testing of the anastomosis for leakage, no regular suturing over the anastomosis and irrigating of the abdominal cavity after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Variability of technical details of laparoscopic sigmoidectomy was surprisingly high among German laparoscopic surgeons. This fact should be considered when discussing clinical studies about laparoscopic sigmoidectomy because trocar position, type of minilaparotomy and dissection techniques may very well influence patient outcome after laparoscopic surgery. Therefore, publications of clinical results concerning laparoscopic sigmoid resection should include a precise description of the technical details of the operation.

Fatores de risco para as complicações após apendicectomias em adultos

OBJETIVO: Definir os fatores de risco para as complicações após as apendicectomias em adultos. INTRODUÇÃO: os fatores de risco que levam as complicações após as apendicectomias são ainda pouco conhecidos. Sua definição pré-operatória é importante na diminuição da morbi-mortalidade pós-operatória. MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo de 500 pacientes submetidos à apendicectomia no Hospital Regional da Asa Norte entre os anos de 2003 e 2004. Estes foram avaliados quanto à idade, sexo, duração dos sintomas até a procura por assistência médica, presença de febre, características da dor abdominal, hemograma, tempo de admissão até a operação, co-morbidades, incisões utilizadas nas operações, achados operatórios, utilização de drenos, complicações pós-operatórias e dias de internação hospitalar. Foram utilizadas análises de regressões logísticas para predizer e quantificar os fatores de risco para as complicações após as operações. RESULTADOS: As chances de complicações foram maiores no gênero feminino (OR=1,97, 95%, IC-1,19-3,13), na apendicite perfurada (OR=4,67, 95%, IC-2,43-8,94), na apendicite sem perfuração (OR=3,32, 95%, IC-1,72-6,38), naqueles pacientes submetidos à drenagem abdominal (OR=17,54, 95%,IC-4,83-63,77) ou com ASA II (OR=1,53, 95%, IC 2,52-15,89). As infecções do sítio cirúrgico e os abscessos intra-abdominais foram os principais fatores de morbidade. A mortalidade foi nula. CONCLUSÕES: A análise de regressão logística multivariável demonstrou que o gênero, a necrose apendicular, a drenagem da cavidade abdominal e a classificação de ASA contribuíram para o aumento das complicações pós-operatórias dos pacientes submetidos às apendicectomias.

A randomised controlled trial of routine suction drainage after elective thyroid and parathyroid surgery with ultrasound evaluation of fluid collection

OBJECTIVE

To determine the need for suction drainage after elective thyroid and parathyroid surgery.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

University teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients requiring elective thyroid or parathyroid surgery were recruited and informed consent was obtained (n = 100). Before wound closure, patients were randomised into either group A (to remain without suction drainage) or group B (to receive suction drainage). Excluded patients were those requiring associated neck dissection and those with bleeding diatheses, all of whom would necessarily require drainage in our unit.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary - ultrasound evaluation of any collection in the thyroid bed, performed 1-day postoperatively. Secondary - postoperative complications; length of in-patient stay.

RESULTS

One hundred patients completed the study, and groups A and B comprised 50 patients each. Patients in each group exhibited a mean age of 49 years, and a male to female ratio of 1 : 9. Both groups were also well-matched regarding type of operation, size of tumour and histopathological diagnosis. Modal and median postoperative neck collection volume on ultrasound examination was 0 and 0 cm(3) respectively (range 0-16 cm(3)) in group A and was 0 and 0 cm(3) (range 0-70 cm(3)) in group B. This difference was not statistically significant, but three patients with a haematoma were all in the suction drainage group. Difference in complication rates between groups was also not statistically significant. Modal and median length of in-patient stay was 2 and 2 days respectively (range 2-3 days) in group A and 3 and 3 days (range 2-4 days) in group B, and this difference was statistically significant (P = 0.0006).

CONCLUSION

Routine suction drainage after uncomplicated elective thyroid and parathyroid surgery appears unnecessary, and prolongs in-patient stay.

Impact of intraoperative ultrasonography in laparoscopic liver surgery

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgery has gained growing acceptance, but this does not hold for laparoscopic surgery of the liver. This mainly includes diagnostic procedures, interstitial therapies, and treatment of liver cysts. However, the authors believe there is room for a laparoscopic approach to the liver in selected cases.

METHODS

A prospective study of laparoscopic liver resections was undertaken with patients who had preoperative diagnoses of benign lesion and hepatocellular carcinoma with compensated cirrhosis. The inclusion criteria required that hepatic involvement be limited and located in the left or peripheral right segments (segments 2-6), and that the tumor be 5 cm or smaller. The location of the tumor and its transection margin were defined by laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS).

RESULTS

From December 1996, 17 (5%) of 313 liver resections were included in the study. There were 5 benign lesions and 12 hepatocellular carcinomas in cirrhotic patients. The mean age of the study patients was 59 years (range, 29-79 years). The LUS evaluation identified the presence of new hepatocellular carcinoma nodules in two patients (17%). The resections included 1 bisegmentectomy, 8 segmentectomies, 3 subsegmentectomies, and 3 nonanatomic resections. The mean operative time, including laparoscopic ultrasonography, was 156 +/- 50 min (median, 150 min; range, 60-250 min), and the perioperative blood loss was 190 +/- 97 ml. There was no mortality. Conversion to laparotomy was necessary for two patients. Postoperative complications were experienced by 3 of 15 patients, all of them cirrhotics. One of the patients had a wall hematoma, and the remaining two patients had bleeding from a trocar access requiring a laparoscopic reexploration. The mean hospital stay for the whole series was 6.9 +/- 4.9 days (median, 6 days; range, 2-25 days) and 5.6 +/-1.4 days (median, 6 days; range, 2-8 days) for the 15 laparoscopic patients.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic treatment should be considered for selected patients with benign and malignant lesions in the left lobe or frontal segments of the liver. Evaluation by LUS is indispensable to guarantee precise determination of the segmental tumor location and the relationship of the tumor to adjacent vascular or biliary structures, excluding adjacent or adjunctive new lesions. The evolution of laparoscopic hepatectomies probably will depend on the development of new techniques and instrumentations.

Intrahepatic cholangiojejunostomy following hepatobiliary resection

Background

Although intrahepatic cholangiojejunostomy is technically difficult, with recent improvements in surgery it should be possible to perform the anastomosis safely. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of anastomotic leak after intrahepatic cholangiojejunostomy and to identify risk factors for such leakage.

Methods

Intrahepatic cholangiojejunostomy was performed in 423 patients undergoing hepatobiliary resection between January 1991 and December 2005. Anastomotic leak was proven radiographically by leakage from the anastomosis of contrast medium introduced via a biliary drainage tube placed during surgery.

Results

Anastomotic leak occurred in 27 patients (6·4 per cent), and was not related to the number of bile ducts reconstructed. The leak rate decreased significantly from 9·5 per cent (19 of 199) in the first 10 years to 3·6 per cent (eight of 224) in the last 5 years. Anastomotic leak was often followed by infections such as wound infection, intra-abdominal abscess and bacteraemia. Multivariable analysis identified age and intraoperative blood loss as independent risk factors for anastomotic leak. All leaks were treated by maintaining a prophylactically placed drain near the cholangiojejunostomy; neither repeat laparotomy nor percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage was required.

Conclusion

Although demanding, intrahepatic cholangiojejunostomy can be performed successfully with a relatively low failure rate. Routine use of prophylactic drains and anastomotic stenting allows safe management of anastomotic leak with conservative therapy.

Predictors for Complications after Loop Stoma Closure in Patients with Rectal Cancer

PURPOSE

This unmatched case control study was undertaken to evaluate factors contributing to surgery-related complications of loop stoma closure in patients with rectal cancer.

METHODS

Cases were consecutive patients with complications identified from a local registry. Complications were defined as surgery-related and included 30 days overall mortality. Controls were all other patients with stoma closure from the same population of the registry without the endpoint.

RESULTS

Of the 243 patients, 47 (19%) patients experienced a surgery-related complication, including 5 patients who died within 30 days after surgery. Significant risk factors in the univariate analysis were supervised operation (odds ratio 0.50; 95% confidence interval 0.27-0.95; P=0.04), stapled anastomosis (odds ratio 0.40; 95% confidence interval 0.17-0.91; P=0.04) and using a soft silicone drain (odds ratio 2.03; 95% confidence interval 1.07-3.85; P=0.04). Using a soft silicone drain (odds ratio 2.17; 95% confidence interval 1.10-4.26; P=0.03) and stapled anastomosis (odds ratio 0.38; 95% confidence interval 0.15-0.98; P=0.04) were the only significant predictors in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study in a homogeneous group of patients with rectal cancer as elective indication for temporary loop stoma construction confirms the high complications rate and mortality rate associated with stoma closure. Intraperitoneal drains should be omitted after loop stoma closure.

Analyse factuelle du drainage abdominal prophylactique

Abdominal prophylactic drainage in digestive surgery was considered until recently as a dogma. But randomised controlled trials have questioned the routine use of abdominal drain in elective surgery. The aim of this review was to assess the usefulness of abdominal prophylactic drainage according to the concept of evidence-based medicine by analysing published randomised trials and meta-analyses. Levels of evidence vary greatly according to the type of surgery. One can conclude: with a good level of evidence that abdominal drainage has no place following elective cholecystectomy, appendicectomy and colectomy with intraperitoneal anastomosis; that it is perhaps unwarranted (lower level of evidence) following gastroduodenal surgery, pancreatectomy, splenectomy, and rectal surgery; and finally that could be indicated following oesophagectomy and common bile duct surgery (very low level of evidence). Nevertheless, when interpreting these data and evidence-based guidelines we should be consider the limitations of published studies (series coming from very expert teams, selected patients, short series, and elective surgery).

Randomized clinical trial of the effects of abdominal drainage after elective hepatectomy using the crushing clamp method

BACKGROUND

Abdominal drainage is a standard procedure after hepatectomy, but this practice has been challenged recently.

METHODS

Between September 2004 and March 2005, 120 consecutive patients who had undergone hepatic resection by the same surgical team were randomly allocated into drainage and no drainage groups (60 in each group). Patient characteristics, preoperative liver function, presence of cirrhosis, resection-related factors and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The groups were comparable in terms of demographics, indications for surgery, preoperative liver function test results, presence of cirrhosis, extent of hepatectomy, intraoperative blood loss and requirement for blood transfusion. Symptomatic subphrenic collection and pleural effusion occurred in four patients (7 per cent) who had abdominal drainage and three (5 per cent) who did not. Local wound complications occurred in 17 (28 per cent) and two (3 per cent) patients respectively (P < 0.001). The postoperative hospital stay was similar in the two groups. Multivariate analysis indicated that the presence of cirrhosis and abdominal drainage were independently related to the development of postoperative wound complications.

CONCLUSION

Routine abdominal drainage is unnecessary after elective hepatectomy using the crushing clamp method.

Evidence-Based Surgery

Understanding the issues associated with surgical epidemiology,knowledge management, and evidence-based surgical practice has implications for clinicians in the community, surgeons in large metropolitan hospitals, surgeon scholars, and the academic surgeon. All need to have some understanding of not only the evaluation of the evidence and how to find it but, in addition, application of those concepts to continuous quality improvement and to closing a circle of surgical audit. If the surgical profession has an obligation to redefine clinical modus operandi and educational processes, the argument for formal training in aspects of clinical epidemiology during the surgical residency program is obvious,because all surgeons will benefit from those educational exercises.