Perampanel: A novel, orally active, noncompetitive AMPA-receptor antagonist that reduces seizure activity in rodent models of epilepsy

Virtually instantaneous, room-temperature [(11)C]-cyanation using biaryl phosphine Pd(0) complexes

A new radiosynthetic protocol for the preparation of [(11)C]aryl nitriles has been developed. This process is based on the direct reaction of in situ prepared L·Pd(Ar)X complexes (L = biaryl phosphine) with [(11)C]HCN. The strategy is operationally simple, exhibits a remarkably wide substrate scope with short reaction times, and demonstrates superior reactivity compared to previously reported systems. With this procedure, a variety of [(11)C]nitrile-containing pharmaceuticals were prepared with high radiochemical efficiency.

Perampanel in the management of partial-onset seizures: a review of safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability

Perampanel (PER) is a novel antiepileptic drug recently introduced for the adjunctive treatment in epilepsy patients aged 12 years or older with partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization in the US and Europe. Its antiepileptic action is based on noncompetitive inhibition of postsynaptic AMPA receptors, decreasing excitatory synaptic transmission. Evaluation of efficacy in three placebo-controlled randomized Phase III studies showed that add-on therapy of PER decreased seizure frequencies significantly compared to placebo at daily doses between 4 mg/day and 12 mg/day. PER's long half-life of 105 hours allows for once-daily dosing that is favorable for patient compliance with intake. Long-term extension studies showed a 62.5%-69.6% adherence of patients after 1 year of treatment, comparing favorably with other second-generation antiepileptic drugs. Whereas these trials demonstrated an overall favorable tolerability profile of PER, nonspecific central nervous system adverse effects like somnolence, dizziness, headache, and fatigue may occur. In addition, neuropsychiatric disturbances ranging from irritability to suicidality were reported in several case reports; both placebo-controlled and prospective long-term extension trials showed a low incidence of such behavioral and psychiatric complaints. For early recognition of neuropsychiatric symptoms like depression, anxiety, and aggression, slow titration and close monitoring during drug introduction are mandatory. This allows on the one hand to recognize patients particularly susceptible to adverse effects of the drug, and on the other hand to render the drug's full potential of seizure control available for the vast majority of patient groups tolerating the drug well.

Efficacy and safety of perampanel in the subgroup of elderly patients included in the phase III epilepsy clinical trials

Clinical data regarding use of antiepileptic drugs in the elderly are generally scarce. Therefore, a subanalysis of subjects aged ≥ 65 years who participated in the 3 phase III perampanel studies was undertaken to determine efficacy and safety in these patients. Efficacy (change in seizure frequency/28 days and 50% responder rate) in the elderly subgroup was found to be consistent with the adult population. Adverse event rates were also largely similar, with some exceptions. Because risks of falls, dizziness, and fatigue were greater in the elderly, careful titration of perampanel in patients aged ≥ 65 years is suggested, especially at higher doses, where balancing tolerability and clinical response is necessary.

Perampanel, an antagonist of α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors, for the treatment of epilepsy: studies in human epileptic brain and nonepileptic brain and in rodent models

Perampanel [Fycompa, 2-(2-oxo-1-phenyl-5-pyridin-2-yl-1,2-dihydropyridin-3-yl)benzonitrile hydrate 4:3; Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ] is an AMPA (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid) receptor antagonist used as an adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures. We asked whether perampanel has AMPA receptor antagonist activity in both the cerebral cortex and hippocampus associated with antiepileptic efficacy and also in the cerebellum associated with motor side effects in rodent and human brains. We also asked whether epileptic or nonepileptic human cortex is similarly responsive to AMPA receptor antagonism by perampanel. In rodent models, perampanel decreased epileptic-like activity in multiple seizure models. However, doses of perampanel that had anticonvulsant effects were within the same range as those engendering motor side effects. Perampanel inhibited native rat and human AMPA receptors from the hippocampus as well as the cerebellum that were reconstituted into Xenopus oocytes. In addition, with the same technique, we found that perampanel inhibited AMPA receptors from hippocampal tissue that had been removed from a patient who underwent surgical resection for refractory epilepsy. Perampanel inhibited AMPA receptor-mediated ion currents from all the tissues investigated with similar potency (IC50 values ranging from 2.6 to 7.0 μM). Cortical slices from the left temporal lobe derived from the same patient were studied in a 60-microelectrode array. Large field potentials were evoked on at least 45 channels of the array, and 10 μM perampanel decreased their amplitude and firing rate. Perampanel also produced a 33% reduction in the branching parameter, demonstrating the effects of perampanel at the network level. These data suggest that perampanel blocks AMPA receptors globally across the brain to account for both its antiepileptic and side-effect profile in rodents and epileptic patients.

Perampanel inhibition of AMPA receptor currents in cultured hippocampal neurons

Perampanel is an aryl substituted 2-pyridone AMPA receptor antagonist that was recently approved as a treatment for epilepsy. The drug potently inhibits AMPA receptor responses but the mode of block has not been characterized. Here the action of perampanel on AMPA receptors was investigated by whole-cell voltage-clamp recording in cultured rat hippocampal neurons. Perampanel caused a slow (τ∼1 s at 3 µM), concentration-dependent inhibition of AMPA receptor currents evoked by AMPA and kainate. The rates of block and unblock of AMPA receptor currents were 1.5×105 M-1 s-1 and 0.58 s-1, respectively. Perampanel did not affect NMDA receptor currents. The extent of block of non-desensitizing kainate-evoked currents (IC50, 0.56 µM) was similar at all kainate concentrations (3-100 µM), demonstrating a noncompetitive blocking action. Parampanel did not alter the trajectory of AMPA evoked currents indicating that it does not influence AMPA receptor desensitization. Perampanel is a selective negative allosteric AMPA receptor antagonist of high-affinity and slow blocking kinetics.

A Molecular Approach to Epilepsy Management: from Current Therapeutic Methods to Preconditioning Efforts

Epilepsy is the most common and chronic neurological disorder characterized by recurrent unprovoked seizures. The key aim in treating patients with epilepsy is the suppression of seizures. An understanding of focal changes that are involved in epileptogenesis may therefore provide novel approaches for optimal treatment of the seizure. Although the actual pathogenesis of epilepsy is still uncertain, recently growing lines of evidence declare that microglia and astrocyte activation, oxidative stress and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, mitochondria dysfunction, and damage of blood-brain barrier (BBB) are involved in its pathogenesis. Impaired GABAergic function in the brain is probably the most accepted hypothesis regarding the pathogenesis of epilepsy. Clinical neuroimaging of patients and experimental modeling have demonstrated that seizures may induce neuronal apoptosis. Apoptosis signaling pathways are involved in the pathogenesis of several types of epilepsy such as temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). The quality of life of patients is seriously affected by treatment-related problems and also by unpredictability of epileptic seizures. Moreover, the available antiepileptic drugs (AED) are not significantly effective to prevent epileptogenesis. Thus, novel therapies that are proficient to control seizure in people who are suffering from epilepsy are needed. The preconditioning method promises to serve as an alternative therapeutic approach because this strategy has demonstrated the capability to curtail epileptogenesis. For this reason, understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying brain tolerance induced by preconditioning is crucial to delineate new neuroprotective ways against seizure damage and epileptogenesis. In this review, we summarize the work to date on the pathogenesis of epilepsy and discuss recent therapeutic strategies in the treatment of epilepsy. We will highlight that novel therapy targeting such as preconditioning process holds great promise. In addition, we will also highlight the role of gene reprogramming and mitochondrial biogenesis in the preconditioning-mediated neuroprotective events.

Effect of perampanel, a novel AMPA antagonist, on benzodiazepine-resistant status epilepticus in a lithium-pilocarpine rat model

This study assessed the efficacy of diazepam, and the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid (AMPA) receptor antagonists perampanel and GYKI52466 in a lithium-pilocarpine status epilepticus (SE) model. SE was induced in rats using lithium chloride, scopolamine methyl bromide, and pilocarpine. Diazepam 10, 20, or 40 mg kg⁻¹, or perampanel 1, 2.5, 5, or 8 mg kg⁻¹ were administered intravenously at 10 or 30 min after seizure onset, and GYKI52466 50 mg kg⁻¹, or combinations of diazepam 2.5–5 mg kg⁻¹ and perampanel 0.5–1 mg kg⁻¹, were administered intravenously at 30 min after seizure onset. Diazepam 20 mg kg⁻¹ terminated seizures (based on electroencephalography and assessment of behavioral seizures) in 2/6 rats at 10 min and 0/6 rats at 30 min (ED₅₀: 10 min, 30 mg kg⁻¹; 30 min, not determined). Perampanel 8 mg kg⁻¹ terminated seizures in 6/6 rats at both 10 and 30 min (ED₅₀: 10 min 1.7 mg kg⁻¹; 30 min, 5.1 mg kg⁻¹). GYKI52466 50 mg kg⁻¹ terminated seizures in 2/4 rats at 30 min. Co-administration of diazepam 5 mg kg⁻¹ and perampanel 1 mg kg⁻¹ terminated seizures in 9/9 rats at 30 min. In conclusion, perampanel and GYKI52466 provided efficacy in a lithium-pilocarpine SE model at 30 min after seizure onset, when SE was refractory to diazepam, supporting the therapeutic potential of AMPA receptor antagonists for refractory SE. The perampanel dose required to terminate seizures was reduced by combination with diazepam, suggesting synergy.

A multicenter survey of clinical experiences with perampanel in real life in Germany and Austria

Perampanel (PER) has been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for adjunctive treatment of patients with partial-onset seizures from age 12 years on. It has been introduced to the market in Germany and Austria in 2012. This cross-sectional observational study summarizes the clinical experience of nine centers with adjunctive PER. Patients were consecutively followed from the initiation of PER on. Only patients with a minimum observational period of six months (in case of ongoing treatment) were recruited. Efficacy data reflect the preceding three months at last observation, tolerability data were assessed at the last observation carried forward. 281 patients were included. After six months 169 were still on PER so that a retention rate of 60% resulted. 43 patients were seizure-free for the preceding 3 months (15%). Overall incidence of adverse events was 52.0%. The leading adverse events were somnolence (24.6%) and dizziness (19.6%) followed by ataxia (3.9%), aggression (2.8%), nausea (2.5%) and irritability (2.1%). We conclude that adjunctive PER may lead to at least temporary freedom of seizures in some of these highly difficult-to-treat patients. Adverse events are not uncommon.

Efficacy of perampanel: a review of pooled data

Perampanel (PER) has been tested in three randomized placebo-controlled prospective phase III trials as an adjunctive antiepileptic drug (AED) in adult and adolescent patients age 12 years and older who had ongoing focal epileptic seizures despite receiving one to three AEDs. Patients were randomized to once-daily placebo or maintenance dosages of 2, 4, or 8 mg of PER daily in one trial or to dosages of 8 and 12 mg of PER in the other two studies. Baseline and double-blind titration periods comprised 6 weeks each before a 12-week maintenance phase. Primary endpoints were median change in partial seizure frequency (baseline vs. double-blind phase), and the percentage of patients achieving >50% reduction in seizure frequency (so-called responders, baseline vs. maintenance). All patients had the opportunity to enter an open follow-up study that allowed a titration of PER of up to 12 mg. Pooled data of all three studies included 1,478 patients. There was a statistically significant median change in seizure frequency and responder rates with PER dosages of 4, 8, and 12 mg (p < 0.01, each dose vs. placebo). Both the results of each trial and the pooled data are reported in this review. For the open follow-up study, 1,218 patients were recruited. Ninety-one percent finally reached maintenance dosages of 10 or 12 mg. After 1 year, both median seizure reduction and responder rates reached almost 50%.

Curcumol from Rhizoma Curcumae suppresses epileptic seizure by facilitation of GABA(A) receptors

Rhizoma Curcumae is a common Chinese dietary spice used in South Asia and China for thousands of years. As the main extract, Rhizoma Curcumae oil has attracted a great interest due to its newly raised therapeutic activities including its pharmacological effects upon central nervous system such as neuroprotection, cognitive enhancement, and anti-seizure efficacy; however the molecular mechanisms and the target identification remain to be established. Here we characterize an inhibitory effect of curcumol, a major bioactive component of Rhizoma Curcumae oil, on the excitability of hippocampal neurons in culture, the basal locomotor activity of freely moving animals, and the chemically induced seizure activity in vivo. Electrophysiological recording showed that acute application of curcumol significantly facilitated the γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-activated current in cultured mouse hippocampal neurons and in human embryonic kidney cells expressing α1- or α5-containing A type GABA (GABAA) receptors in a concentration-dependent manner. Measurement of tonic and miniature inhibitory postsynaptic GABAergic currents in hippocampal slices indicated that curcumol enhanced both forms of inhibition. In both pentylenetetrazole and kainate seizure models, curcumol suppressed epileptic activity in mice by prolonging the latency to clonic and tonic seizures and reducing the mortality as well as the susceptibility to seizure, presumably by facilitating the activation of GABAA receptors. Taken together, our results identified curcumol as a novel anti-seizure agent which inhibited neuronal excitability through enhancing GABAergic inhibition.

Perampanel

Each month, subscribers to The Formulary Monograph Service receive 5 to 6 well-documented monographs on drugs that are newly released or are in late phase 3 trials. The monographs are targeted to Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committees. Subscribers also receive monthly 1-page summary monographs on agents that are useful for agendas and pharmacy/nursing in-services. A comprehensive target drug utilization evaluation/medication use evaluation (DUE/MUE) is also provided each month. With a subscription, the monographs are sent in print and are also available on-line. Monographs can be customized to meet the needs of a facility. A drug class review is now published monthly with The Formulary Monograph Service. Through the cooperation of The Formulary, Hospital Pharmacy publishes selected reviews in this column. For more information about The Formulary Monograph Service.Through the cooperation of The Formulary, Hospital Pharmacy publishes selected reviews in this column. For more information about The Formulary Monograph Service, call The Formulary at 800-322-4349. The April 2013 monograph topics are alogliptin, crofelemer, lomitapide, ponatinib, and sumatriptan iontophoretic transdermal. The DUE/MUE is on alogliptin.

AMPA receptor inhibitors for the treatment of epilepsy: the role of perampanel

α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors in the postsynaptic membrane are involved in fast excitatory signaling in the brain and their activation may lead to the firing of action potentials. Talampanel and perampanel were the first noncompetitive AMPA receptor antagonists to be tested as add-on drugs in patients with refractory partial seizures, and were found to be effective in improving seizure control. Due to an unfavorable kinetic and tolerability profile, talampanel clinical development in the field of epilepsy was discontinued early while perampanel has been recently approved in Europe and the USA as adjunctive therapy for adults with partial seizures with or without secondary generalization. The recommended perampanel starting dose is 2 mg/day once daily, which can be increased up to the recommended maintenance dose of 4-8 mg/day. Increments should be of 2 mg/day and based on clinical response and tolerability. Titration should be performed at 1-week intervals or at lower speed and a 12-mg daily dose should be considered after careful evaluation. To date, no serious and/or idiosyncratic adverse effects have been associated with this agent. Most frequently reported adverse effects are dizziness, ataxia, aggression, irritability, vertigo, somnolence, fatigue, headache and gait disturbance. Weight increase is the only non-neurological adverse effects associated with perampanel.

Targeting α-amino-3-hydroxyl-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionate receptors in epilepsy

INTRODUCTION

Despite epilepsies being between the oldest and most studied neurological diseases, new treatment remains an unmet need of scientific research due to the high percentage of refractory patients. Several studies have identified new suitable anti-seizure targets. Glutamate activation of α-amino-3-hydroxyl-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionate receptors (AMPARs) have long ago been identified as suitable targets for the development of anti seizure drugs.

AREAS COVERED

Here, we describe: i) AMPARs' structure and their involvement and role during seizures and in epilepsy and ii) the efficacy of AMPAR antagonists in preclinical models of seizures and epilepsy.

EXPERT OPINION

The physiological and pathological role of AMPAR in the CNS and the development of AMPAR antagonists have recently gained attention considering their recent involvement in status epilepticus and the marketing of perampanel. The need for new anti-seizure drugs represents a major challenge in both preclinical and clinical epilepsy. The introduction into the market of perampanel for the treatment of epilepsy will shed new light on the real potential of AMPAR antagonism in clinical settings outside the limited world of clinical trials. While research will go on in this area, fundamental will be the post-marketing evaluation of perampanel efficacy and tolerability and a better definition of the role of this receptor in the epileptic brain.

Perampanel: a selective AMPA antagonist for treating seizures

Perampanel is a selective, noncompetitive AMPA receptor antagonist that has recently been approved for treating localization-related epilepsy. This article reviews the pharmacology, clinical development, efficacy, and safety/tolerability of perampanel.

Epilepsy in glioblastoma patients: basic mechanisms and current problems in treatment

Glioblastoma-related epilepsy requires paying careful attention to a combination of factors with an integrated approach. Major interrelated issues must be considered in the seizure care of glioblastoma patients. Seizure control frequently requires the administration of antiepileptic drugs simultaneously with other treatments, including surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, with complete seizure relief often being difficult to achieve. The pharmacological interactions between antiepileptic drugs and antineoplastic agents can modify the activity of both treatments, compromising their efficacy and increasing the probability of developing adverse events related to both therapies. This review summarizes the new pathophysiological pathways involved in the epileptogenesis of glioblastoma-related seizures and the interactions between antiepileptic drugs and oncological treatment, paying special attention to its impact on survival and the current evidence of the antiepileptic treatment efficacy, including the potential usefulness of new third-generation compounds.

Perampanel: What is its Place in the Management of Partial Onset Epilepsy?

Introduction

Current pathways for treatment of partial onset epilepsy are diverse and include 14 new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) licensed for use as either monotherapy or adjunctive therapy. However, the impact of these new AEDs on the treatment of partial epilepsy has so far been disappointing and there persists a need for additional drugs. Recently, perampanel, a first-in-class AED was licensed as an adjunct for the management of refractory partial onset seizures with or without secondary generalization in patients 12 years and older. This review highlights the current management of partial epilepsy and analyses the published clinical and preclinical data of perampanel to consider its potential role in the treatment of partial epilepsy.

Methods

A literature review of Embase, Medline and PubMed was conducted in April 2013 using the search terms ‘perampanel’ and ‘AMPA receptor antagonist/blocker’. Publications were included if they discussed perampanel in the context of preclinical or clinical epilepsy.

Results

Perampanel acts on the glutamate pathway. It is a novel highly selective non-competitive alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor antagonist. This is a previously untargeted post-synaptic glutamate receptor. It is responsible for mediating rapid trans-synaptic signal transduction and hence believed to play a major role in seizure propagation. The three pivotal placebo-controlled trials of adjunctive perampanel demonstrated that the effective dosing range is 4–12 mg/day. The drug can be prescribed once daily, and its adverse effect profile is minimal with dizziness, fatigue, headache, and somnolence being the most commonly reported.

Conclusions

Perampanel is a welcome addition as it represents an alternative approach in the management of epilepsy with potential to have a significant impact on the prognosis of intractable epilepsy. However, it has only recently been licensed for clinical use in Europe, the USA, and Canada, and there are no data directly comparing it with other AEDs; hence, it remains far too early to ascertain its place in the treatment of patients with partial epilepsy.

The efficacy and tolerability of perampanel and other recently approved anti-epileptic drugs for the treatment of refractory partial onset seizure: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This paper compares the efficacy and tolerability of perampanel (PER) relative to other recently approved anti-epileptic drug (AEDs) - lacosamide (LCS), retigabine (RTG), and eslicarbazepine (ESL) for the adjunctive treatment of partial onset seizures with or without secondary generalization and specifically in the secondary generalization subgroup.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature review of all RCTs of PER and selected AEDs in EMBASE, Medline, and the Cochrane Central from 1998 to January 2011 with an update in PubMed in March 2013 was performed. A network meta-analysis was conducted for 50% responder rate for overall seizures; withdrawal due to adverse events; seizure freedom; and 50% responder rate for secondary generalized seizures.

RESULTS

Twelve RCTs (three PER, three LCS, three RTG and three ESL) were included. PER performed significantly better than placebo for 'responder rate' (OR 2.151, 95% CrI 1.348-3.472) and 'seizure freedom' (OR 2.507, 95% CrI 1.067-7.429). When compared to other agents, PER was found to be equally effective. For 'withdrawal due to adverse events', PER had the lowest odds ratio vs. placebo compared with other AEDs. In the analysis for the subgroup of patients with secondary generalization, only four RCTs (three PER and one LCS) met the inclusion criteria for one outcome (responder rate) for LCS. In this subgroup, PER was statistically significantly better than placebo (OR 2.448, 95% CrI 1.088-5.828).

CONCLUSION

PER was statistically significantly superior to placebo in responder rate, seizure freedom, and responder rate in the secondary generalization population. Though PER had statistically significant greater withdrawal compared to placebo, it had the lowest ORs vs. placebo, suggesting a superior safety profile among the comparators included in this analysis. In patients with partial onset seizure with secondary generalization, PER had a statistically significant effect on responder rate compared to placebo.

New drug classes for the treatment of partial onset epilepsy: focus on perampanel

Perampanel (2-[2-oxo-1-phenyl-5-pyridin-2-yl-1,2-dihydropyridin-3-yl] benzonitrile hydrate) is the latest in the line of new antiepileptic drugs with a novel mechanism of action. Perampanel inhibits α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid (AMPA)-induced increases in intracellular Ca²⁺ and selectively blocks AMPA receptor-mediated synaptic transmission, thus reducing neuronal excitation. Three Phase III multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials demonstrated the efficacy and good tolerability of perampanel as adjunctive treatment in patients with refractory partial-onset seizures. The drug is approved for use in the European Union and United States, with expected release onto the American market in June–September 2013, pending US Drug Enforcement Agency classification. The pharmacology of perampanel offers potential as more than just another new antiepileptic drug. This first-in-class drug will provide another option for practitioners of rational polytherapy. As an AMPA-receptor antagonist, perampanel may possess antiepileptogenic properties in addition to its demonstrated antiseizure properties.

Epilepsy: new drug targets and neurostimulation

Despite advances in the medical and surgical therapy for epilepsy, about 30% of patients do not achieve full seizure control. In the past 5 years new antiepileptic drugs have been approved for clinical use. Some of these drugs have unique, novel mechanisms of action. Overall efficacy of these agents, however, seems similar to other antiepileptic drugs. Vagus nerve stimulation is a well-established palliative therapy for medically resistant epilepsy. Neurostimulation, with newer devices and targets becoming available, is a rapidly expanding field in epileptology. Considerable development and research are still necessary before these newer techniques become the standard of care for the treatment of epilepsy.

Development of perampanel in epilepsy

Alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA)-type glutamate receptors play a key role in mediating glutamatergic transmission in the cortex. Perampanel (2-[2-oxo-1-phenyl-5-pyridin-2-yl-1,2-dihydropyridin-3-yl] benzonitrile) is a potent, orally active, highly selective, non-competitive AMPA-type glutamate receptor antagonist, identified via a focused discovery program at Eisai Research Laboratories. Development of perampanel as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of partial-onset seizures was planned in keeping with regulatory guidance and guidelines on antiepileptic drug (AED) development. This is the first AED with a specific action on glutamate-mediated excitatory neurotransmission to show evidence of efficacy and tolerability in reducing treatment-refractory partial-onset seizures in Phase III clinical trials. Perampanel (Fycompa(®)) has been approved in the EU and the United States for adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures.

Regulators of synaptic transmission: roles in the pathogenesis and treatment of epilepsy

Synaptic transmission is the communication between a presynaptic and a postsynaptic neuron, and the subsequent processing of the signal. These processes are complex and highly regulated, reflecting their importance in normal brain functioning and homeostasis. Sustaining synaptic transmission depends on the continuing cycle of synaptic vesicle formation, release, and endocytosis, which requires proteins such as dynamin, syndapin, synapsin, and synaptic vesicle protein 2A. Synaptic transmission is regulated by diverse mechanisms, including presynaptic modulators of synaptic vesicle formation and release, postsynaptic receptors and signaling, and modulators of neurotransmission. Neurotransmitters released presynaptically can bind to their postsynaptic receptors, the inhibitory γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic receptors or the excitatory glutamate receptors. Once released, glutamate activates a variety of postsynaptic receptors including α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA), N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), kainate, and metabotropic receptors. The activation of the receptors triggers downstream signaling cascades generating a vast array of effects, which can be modulated by a numerous auxiliary regulatory subunits. Moreover, different neuropeptides such as neuropeptide Y, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), somatostatin, ghrelin, and galanin, act as regulators of diverse synaptic functions and along with the classic neurotransmitters. Abnormalities in the regulation of synaptic transmission play a critical role in the pathogenesis of numerous brain diseases, including epilepsy. This review focuses on the different mechanisms involved in the regulation of synaptic transmission, which may play a role in the pathogenesis of epilepsy: the presynaptic modulators of synaptic vesicle formation and release, postsynaptic receptors, and modulators of neurotransmission, including the mechanism by which drugs can modulate the frequency and severity of epileptic seizures.

Preclinical pharmacology of perampanel, a selective non-competitive AMPA receptor antagonist

Perampanel [2-(2-oxo-1-phenyl-5-pyridin-2-yl-1,2-dihydropyridin-3-yl)benzonitrile; E2007] is a potent, selective, orally active non-competitive AMPA receptor antagonist developed for the treatment of epilepsy. Perampanel has a 2,3'-bipyridin-6'-one core structure, distinguishing it chemically from other AMPA receptor antagonist classes. Studies in various physiological systems indicate that perampanel selectively inhibits AMPA receptor-mediated synaptic excitation without affecting NMDA receptor responses. Blocking of AMPA receptors occurs at an allosteric site that is distinct from the glutamate recognition site. Radioligand-binding studies suggest that the blocking site coincides with that of the non-competitive antagonist GYKI 52466, believed to be on linker peptide segments of AMPA receptor subunits that transduce agonist binding into channel opening. As is typical for AMPA receptor antagonists, perampanel exhibits broad-spectrum antiseizure activity in diverse animal seizure models. Perampanel has high oral bioavailability, dose-proportional kinetics, and undergoes oxidative metabolism, primarily via CYP3A4, followed by glucuronidation. The terminal half-life (t½ ) in humans is 105 h; however, in the presence of a strong CYP3A4 inducer (such as carbamazepine), the t½ can be reduced. In sum, perampanel is a selective, centrally acting, negative allosteric modulator of AMPA receptors with good oral bioavailability and favorable pharmacokinetic properties.

Novel treatment options for epilepsy: focus on perampanel

Perampanel is a new chemical entity recently approved in the United States (US) and European Union (EU) as adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures with and without secondary generalization in patients with epilepsy aged 12 years and older. Pharmacological studies suggest that perampanel acts with a new mechanism of action via non-competitive antagonism of the ionotropic α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazoleproprionic acid (AMPA) receptor of glutamate, the main mediator of excitatory neurotransmission in the central nervous system. Perampanel is completely absorbed after oral administration. The drug is 95% bound to plasma proteins and is extensively metabolized by oxidation followed by glucuronidation. Perampanel has an elimination half-life of approximately 52-129h, allowing once daily dosing, with peak plasma levels observed 0.25-2h post-dose. Randomized placebo-controlled trials of adjunctive treatment have demonstrated that once-daily perampanel doses of 4-12mg/day significantly reduced partial-onset seizure frequency in patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy along with a favorable tolerability profile. In perampanel pivotal trials, the most frequently reported treatment emergent adverse events (>10%) included dizziness, somnolence, fatigue and headache. Perampanel therapeutic response was maintained in patients included in the long term open-label extension studies for up to 4 years. Based on these data, perampanel offers a valuable option in the add-on treatment of partial-onset and secondarily generalized seizures.

Profile of perampanel and its potential in the treatment of partial onset seizures

Perampanel (PER) is a novel antiepileptic compound that decreases neuronal excitability by modulating glutamatergic transmission through selective noncompetitive blockade of AMPA receptors. PER has been evaluated in three pivotal placebo-controlled randomized trials as adjunctive therapy in adult drug-resistant partial epilepsy. In comparison to placebo, adjunctive PER effectively reduces seizure frequency. The relative risk of the responder rate (95% confidence interval [CI]) was thus 1.60 (1.08-2.36), 1.79 (1.42-2.25) and 1.66 (1.24-2.23) for once-daily PER 4 mg/day, 8 mg/day and 12 mg/day, respectively. The most common adverse events associated with PER were nonspecific central nervous system side effects. Some concerns have been raised about risk of clinically significant weight gain and of psychiatric adverse events. Long-term open-label extensions of the three pivotal trials are underway. PER has recently been approved both in Europe and in the USA for the adjunctive treatment of partial onset seizures in patients aged 12 years and above. However, in the absence of a direct comparison between PER and other licensed antiepileptic drugs' efficacy and tolerability, the clinical advantages of PER over the other drugs in intractable partial epilepsy remains to be determined.

Perampanel: as adjunctive therapy in patients with partial-onset seizures

Perampanel is a novel antiepileptic drug (AED) used as adjunctive therapy in adolescents and adults with partial-onset seizures (with or without secondarily generalized seizures). It is a selective, noncompetitive antagonist of α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA)-type glutamate receptors on post-synaptic neurons, and is the first in this new class of AED known as AMPA receptor antagonists. In three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trials in adolescent and adult patients with refractory partial-onset seizures, once-daily administration of perampanel 4, 8 and 12 mg/day (6-week titration phase followed by 13-week maintenance phase), as adjunctive therapy with one to three AEDs, was statistically superior to adjunctive placebo in achieving the key efficacy endpoints of the median percentage change from baseline in seizure frequency and/or the proportion of patients with a ≥50 % reduction in seizure frequency relative to baseline. Adverse events were usually mild or moderate in severity and the most frequent treatment-emergent events reported among perampanel recipients were CNS-related, such as dizziness, somnolence, headache and fatigue. Interim data from a large extension study (16-week blinded conversion period followed by open-label maintenance phase), which enrolled patients who completed the phase III trials, showed a similar group response for the reduction in seizure frequency over at least 1 year of adjunctive treatment with perampanel. Perampanel was generally well tolerated over the longer-term in extension studies, with no unexpected adverse events reported. On the basis of its overall clinical profile and unique mechanism of action, perampanel is a useful adjunctive treatment option in patients with refractory partial-onset seizures.

Emerging drugs for focal epilepsy

INTRODUCTION

Epilepsy is one of the most common serious neurological disorders in adults, affecting approximately 50 million people worldwide at a total annual cost, in Europe, of approximately 15.5 billion Euros.

AREAS COVERED

The present paper reviews current compounds in preclinical and clinical development for the treatment of focal epilepsies, namely, ganaxolone, perampanel, BGG-492, NS-1209, belnacasan, YKP-3089, brivaracetam. New formulations in clinical development, such as intranasal midazolam, diazepam auto-injection, a new formulation of valproic acid using drug targeting technology and controlled release formulations for topiramate and pregabalin, are also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

During the last 30 years, antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) development have been based on specific assumptions regarding the neurobiology of epilepsy but all marketed drugs have not changed the proportion of drug refractory patients. AEDs in development with new mechanisms of actions, especially anti-inflammatory agents, are of interest. AMPA blockers, especially water-soluble ones, being suitable for parenteral formulation, can be of relevance in treating refractory status epilepticus, a major life-threatening complication. Finally, new formulations, especially those adopting drug targeting technologies are promising in order to maximize the efficacy with very limited adverse effects.

Perampanel Study 207: long-term open-label evaluation in patients with epilepsy

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate interim long-term tolerability, safety and efficacy of adjunctive perampanel, a novel α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-5-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA)-receptor antagonist, in patients with refractory partial-onset seizures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study 207, an open-label extension (OLE) study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00368472), enrolled patients (18-70 years) who completed one of two randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation Phase II studies. The OLE Treatment Phase comprised a 12-week Titration Period (2 mg increments of perampanel every 2 weeks to 12 mg/day, maximum) and a Maintenance Period, during which patients continued treatment up to a planned maximum of 424 weeks (~8 years). Interim analysis data cut-off date was 1 December, 2010.

RESULTS

Of 180 patients completing the Phase II studies, 138 enrolled in study 207. At the time of interim analyses (approximately 4 years after study start), over a third (n = 53, 38.4%) remained on perampanel; 41.3% (n = 57) of patients had >3 years of exposure; and 13.0% (n = 18) had at least 4 years' exposure. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) duration of exposure was 116 ± 75 weeks and mean ± SD dose during the OLE Maintenance Period was 7.3 ± 3.3 mg. No new safety signals emerged with long-term treatment. Consistent with previous studies, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events were as follows: dizziness, headache and somnolence. Overall median (range) per cent change from baseline in seizure frequency per 28 days during open-label treatment was -31.5% (-99.2 to 512.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term - up to 4 years - adjunctive perampanel had a favourable tolerability profile in patients with refractory partial-onset seizures. Improvements in seizure control were maintained with long-term treatment.

Perampanel, a selective, noncompetitive α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor antagonist, as adjunctive therapy for refractory partial-onset seizures: interim results from phase III, extension study 307

PURPOSE

To evaluate safety, tolerability, and seizure outcome data during long-term treatment with once-daily adjunctive perampanel (up to 12 mg/day) in patients with refractory partial-onset seizures.

METHODS

Study 307 was an extension study for patients completing the double-blind phase of three pivotal phase III trials (studies 304, 305, and 306). The study consisted of two phases: an open-label treatment phase (including a 16-week blinded conversion period and a planned 256-week maintenance period) and a 4-week follow-up phase. Patients were blindly titrated during the conversion period to their individual maximum tolerated dose (maximum 12 mg/day). Adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the study and seizure frequency recorded. The interim data cutoff date for analyses was December 1, 2010.

KEY FINDINGS

In total, 1,218 patients were enrolled in the study. At the interim cutoff date, 1,186 patients were in the safety analysis set; 1,089 (91.8%) patients had >16 weeks of exposure to perampanel, 580 (48.9%) patients had >1 year of exposure, and 19 (1.6%) patients had >2 years of exposure. At the interim analysis, 840 (70.8%) patients remained on perampanel treatment. The large majority of patients (n = 1,084 [91%]) were titrated to 10 mg or 12 mg/day. Median (range) duration of exposure was 51.4 (1.1-128.1) weeks. Treatment-emergent AEs were reported in 87.4% of patients. The most frequent were dizziness (43.9%), somnolence (20.2%), headache (16.7%), and fatigue (12.1%). Serious AEs were reported in 13.2% of patients. In the intent-to-treat analysis set (n = 1,207), the frequency of all seizures decreased over the first 26 weeks of perampanel treatment in patients with at least 26 weeks of exposure to perampanel (n = 1,006 [83.3%]); this reduction was maintained in patients with at least 1 year of exposure (n = 588 [48.7%]). The overall median percent changes in seizure frequency in patients included in each 13-week interval of perampanel treatment were -39.2% for weeks 14-26 (n = 1,114), -46.5% for weeks 40-52 (n = 731), and -58.1% for weeks 92-104 (n = 59). Overall responder rates in patients included in each 13-week interval of perampanel treatment were 41.4% for weeks 14-26 (n = 1,114), 46.9% for weeks 40-52 (n = 731), and 62.7% for weeks 92-104 (n = 59). During the blinded conversion period, the reduction in seizure frequency in patients previously randomized to placebo (-42.4%, n = 369) was similar to that in patients previously randomized to perampanel (-41.5%, n = 817).

SIGNIFICANCE

Consistent with pivotal phase III trials, these interim results demonstrated that perampanel had a favorable tolerability profile in patients with refractory partial-onset seizures over the longer term. The decrease in seizure frequency was consistent and maintained in those patients over at least 1 year of perampanel exposure.