2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

Prevention of cardiovascular disease in rheumatoid arthritis

The increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been recognized for many years. However, although the characteristics of CVD and its burden resemble those in diabetes, the focus on cardiovascular (CV) prevention in RA has lagged behind, both in the clinical and research settings. Similar to diabetes, the clinical picture of CVD in RA may be atypical, even asymptomatic. Therefore, a proactive screening for subclinical CVD in RA is warranted. Because of the lack of clinical trials, the ideal CVD prevention (CVP) in RA has not yet been defined. In this article, we focus on challenges and controversies in the CVP in RA (such as thresholds for statin therapy), and propose recommendations based on the current evidence. Due to the significant contribution of non-traditional, RA-related CV risk factors, the CV risk calculators developed for the general population underestimate the true risk in RA. Thus, there is an enormous need to develop adequate CV risk stratification tools and to identify the optimal CVP strategies in RA. While awaiting results from randomized controlled trials in RA, clinicians are largely dependent on the use of common sense, and extrapolation of data from studies on other patient populations. The CVP in RA should be based on an individualized evaluation of a broad spectrum of risk factors, and include: 1) reduction of inflammation, preferably with drugs decreasing CV risk, 2) management of factors associated with increased CV risk (e.g., smoking, hypertension, hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, kidney disease, depression, periodontitis, hypothyroidism, vitamin D deficiency and sleep apnea), and promotion of healthy life style (smoking cessation, healthy diet, adjusted physical activity, stress management, weight control), 3) aspirin and influenza and pneumococcus vaccines according to current guidelines, and 4) limiting use of drugs that increase CV risk. Rheumatologists should take responsibility for the education of health care providers and RA patients regarding CVP in RA. It is immensely important to incorporate CV outcomes in testing of anti-rheumatic drugs.

Multicenter evaluation of dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve

BACKGROUND

First-pass myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging yields high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, standard 2D multislice CMR perfusion techniques provide only limited cardiac coverage, and hence considerable assumptions are required to assess myocardial ischemic burden. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the diagnostic performance of 3D myocardial perfusion CMR to detect functionally relevant CAD with fractional flow reserve (FFR) as a reference standard in a multicenter setting.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 155 patients with suspected CAD listed for coronary angiography with FFR were prospectively enrolled from 5 European centers. 3D perfusion CMR was acquired on 3T MR systems from a single vendor under adenosine stress and at rest. All CMR perfusion analyses were performed in a central laboratory and blinded to all clinical data. One hundred fifty patients were successfully examined (mean age 62.9±10 years, 45 female). The prevalence of CAD defined by FFR (<0.8) was 56.7% (85 of 150 patients). The sensitivity and specificity of 3D perfusion CMR were 84.7% and 90.8% relative to the FFR reference. Comparison to quantitative coronary angiography (≥50%) yielded a prevalence of 65.3%, sensitivity and specificity of 76.5% and 94.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this multicenter study, 3D myocardial perfusion CMR proved highly diagnostic for the detection of significant CAD as defined by FFR.

Transfemoral approach with systematic use of FemoSeal™ closure device compared to transradial approach in primary angioplasty

OBJECTIVES

To compare the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) bleedings in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) performed through transradial approach (TRA) or transfemoral approach (TFA) with systematic closure by FemoSeal™.

BACKGROUND

Although the risk of bleeding can be reduced using vascular closure devices (VCD), there are few data comparing TRA and TFA with VCD, particularly in the setting of pPCI.

METHODS

we included in this retrospective registry 777 patients who underwent pPCI at two centers from years 2010 to 2013. Exclusion criteria were implantation of intra-aortic balloon pump and achievement of femoral hemostasis by other means than FemoSeal™. We performed propensity-score matching and multivariate analysis to adjust for clinical and procedural confounders.

RESULTS

We enrolled 511 patients in TRA group and 266 in TFA group. Both in the general population and in the propensity-matched population, the incidence of MACCE was comparable in TRA vs. TFA patients (3.5 vs. 3.4% and 4.4 vs. 2.6%, respectively; P = ns). On the contrary, we observed a higher incidence of TIMI bleedings in TFA vs. TRA patients (5.6 vs. 2.2% in the general population and 6.6 vs. 1.3% in the propensity-matched population; P < 0.05); this difference was mainly driven by TIMI major bleedings. TFA was an independent predictor of bleeding at multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In pPCI the rate of TIMI major bleedings was higher in TFA with closure by FemoSeal™ as compared to TRA, whereas the rates of minor bleedings and of MACCE were similar.

[Management of stable chronic coronary artery disease]

Stable coronary artery disease is one of the most frequent conditions encountered in cardiology. The diagnostic algorithm encompasses several steps, the first of which is a clinical assessment with an electrocardiogram (ECG) and echocardiography to determine the probability of disease. No further work-up is recommended if the probability of coronary artery disease remains below 15 %. For patients with an intermediate probability between 15 % and 85 %, noninvasive diagnostic testing for ischemia and coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography are recommended. In the case of a positive result, medicinal therapy should be started in order to lower the event risk and alleviate symptoms. Patients with large areas of inducible ischemia and patients who remain symptomatic in spite of medicinal therapy should undergo invasive angiography. Revascularization options include bypass surgery and, more liberally than previously, percutaneous coronary intervention with stent placement and must be decided on the basis of patient characteristics. Consultation in the form of a "heart team" is recommended. After revascularization, medicinal therapy must be continued on a lifelong basis. The widely practiced routine of annual ischemia testing in patients with known coronary artery disease is not enforced by current guidelines.

Timing of staged percutaneous coronary intervention before transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Significant coronary artery disease is highly prevalent in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Timing of staged percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in TAVI candidates remains debated. The present study assessed the impact of timing of the staged PCI on TAVI outcomes. Ninety-six patients (age 81 ± 5 years, 57% men) who had undergone staged PCI within 1 year before TAVI were included. The population was dichotomized according to the median time elapsed between PCI and TAVI (<30 and ≥30 days). In-hospital events and 30-day outcomes after TAVI were defined according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 definitions. Forty-eight patients underwent PCI <30 days and 48 patients underwent PCI ≥30 days before TAVI. Patients treated with PCI <30 days had lower hemoglobin levels at baseline (7.2 ± 0.9 mmol/L vs 7.9 ± 0.9 mmol/L, p = 0.002), more frequently atrial fibrillation (27% vs 13%, p = 0.018), and a shorter time interval between computed tomography acquisition and TAVI (7 days [2 to 10] vs 22 days [6 to 39], p <0.001) than their counterparts. Minor bleedings (13% vs 0%, p = 0.011) and overall vascular injury (27% vs 8%, p = 0.016 [minor injury: 17% vs 2%, p = 0.014; major injury: 10% vs 6%, p = 0.460]) were more frequently recorded in patients with staged PCI <30 days before TAVI. There were no differences in the incidence of other events and in 2-year survival. In conclusion, shortly (<30 days) or remote (≥30 days) staged PCI before TAVI resulted in comparable outcomes with the exception of minor vascular injury and minor bleeding events which were more frequently observed in patients treated with shortly staged PCI.

New-onset atrial fibrillation after recent coronary stenting: Warfarin or non-vitamin K-antagonist oral anticoagulants to be added to aspirin and clopidogrel? A viewpoint

The antithrombotic management of patients on oral anticoagulation (OAC), with either warfarin or non-vitamin K-antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stent (PCI-S) has been recently addressed in a joint European consensus document. In accordance, triple therapy (TT) of OAC, aspirin and clopidogrel should generally be given as the initial therapy. More uncertainty exists over whether warfarin or a NOAC should be added in patients already on dual antiplatelet therapy of aspirin and clopidogrel (DAPT) after recent PCI-S. Upon review of available data, it appears that the risk of major bleeding of TT as compared to DAPT is similar with either warfarin or a NOAC. In particular, TT consistently appears associated to an approximately 2.5 fold increase in the risk of major bleeding. Because of the higher convenience, NOACs might be considered the preferred OAC to be added to DAPT. Given the reported different safety profiles of the various NOACs on the incidence of major, and gastrointestinal, bleeding, the NOACs, and the dose, showing the greatest safety in this regard should be selected. In accordance, dabigatran 110 mg and apixaban 2.5mg twice daily appear as the most valuable options in patients who are not and who are respectively, at increased risk of bleeding. As an alternative, apixaban 5mg twice daily might be considered in patients at risk of bleeding not increased, whereas rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily may be considered in the presence of increased risk of bleeding (essentially when related to moderate renal impairment).

Mortality in patients treated with extended duration dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation: a pairwise and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised trials

BACKGROUND

Despite recent studies, the optimum duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after coronary drug-eluting stent placement remains uncertain. We performed a meta-analysis with several analytical approaches to investigate mortality and other clinical outcomes with different DAPT strategies.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane databases, and proceedings of international meetings on Nov 20, 2014, for randomised controlled trials comparing different DAPT durations after drug-eluting stent implantation. We extracted study design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, sample characteristics, and clinical outcomes. DAPT duration was categorised in each study as shorter versus longer, and as 6 months or shorter versus 1 year versus longer than 1 year. Analyses were done by both frequentist and Bayesian approaches.

FINDINGS

We identified ten trials published between Dec 16, 2011, and Nov 16, 2014, including 31,666 randomly assigned patients. By frequentist pairwise meta-analysis, shorter DAPT was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality compared with longer DAPT (HR 0·82, 95% CI 0·69-0·98; p=0·02; number needed to treat [NNT]=325), with no significant heterogeneity apparent across trials. The reduced mortality with shorter compared with longer DAPT was attributable to lower non-cardiac mortality (0·67, 0·51-0·89; p=0·006; NNT=347), with similar cardiac mortality (0·93, 0·73-1·17; p=0.52). Shorter DAPT was also associated with a lower risk of major bleeding, but a higher risk of myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis. We noted similar results in a Bayesian framework with non-informative priors. By network meta-analysis, patients treated with 6-month or shorter DAPT and 1-year DAPT had higher risk of myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis but lower risk of mortality compared with patients treated with DAPT for longer than 1 year. Patients treated with DAPT for 6 months or shorter had similar rates of mortality, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis, but lower rates of major bleeding than did patients treated with 1-year DAPT.

INTERPRETATION

Although treatment with DAPT beyond 1 year after drug-eluting stent implantation reduces myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis, it is associated with increased mortality because of an increased risk of non-cardiovascular mortality not offset by a reduction in cardiac mortality.

FUNDING

None.

Mean platelet volume and high-residual platelet reactivity in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel or ticagrelor

OBJECTIVE

High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) is associated with a two- to ninefold increased risk of recurrent ischemic events among patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for coronary artery disease. However, its determinants are still poorly understood. The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of mean platelet volume (MPV) on platelet reactivity in patients receiving DAPT after an acute coronary syndrome or PCI.

METHODS

Patients treated with DAPT (acetylsalicylic acid [ASA] and clopidogrel or ticagrelor) were scheduled for platelet function assessment at 30 - 90 days post-discharge. By whole blood impedance aggregometry, HRPR was considered for ASPI test > 862 aggregation units (AU)*min (for ASA) and ADP test values ≥ 417 AU*min (for ADP-antagonists).

RESULTS

Our population is represented by a total of 487 patients on DAPT, divided according to MPV tertiles (< 10.4 fl; 10.4 - 11.29 fl; ≥ 11.3 fl). Larger-sized platelets were associated with use of statins (p < 0.001) and beta-blockers (p = 0.03), higher hemoglobin levels (p = 0.002) and lower platelets count (p < 0.001). Higher platelet reactivity was observed at ASPI test in patients with higher MPV (r = 0.12, p = 0.008), but not for ADP-mediated aggregation (r = -0.007, p = 0.88). However, a low prevalence of HRPR was observed with ASA, with no impact of MPV tertiles (1.2 vs 1.1 vs 1.6%, p = 0.70, adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.05 [0.51 - 1.77], p = 0.87). MPV did not influence the prevalence of HRPR for ADP-antagonists (25.9 vs 1 vs 26.5%, p = 0.89; adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.1 [0.84 - 1.45], p = 0.50) with similar results among the 259 patients receiving clopidogrel (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.15 [0.82 - 1.62], p = 0.43) and the 228 patients on ticagrelor (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.46 [0.84 - 2.55], p = 0.18).

CONCLUSION

In patients receiving DAPT, MPV does not affect the response to major antiplatelet therapies. In fact, MPV elevation does not influence the risk of HRPR with clopidogrel, ticagrelor or ASA.

Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After DES Implantation: A Meta-Analysis of 11 Randomized Trials

Despite new-generations of drug-eluting stents (DESs), the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) remains controversial. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials (RTs) evaluating the effectiveness and safety of shorter versus longer DAPT duration strategies in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions with DES. Literature and main scientific session abstracts were searched. The primary end point was mortality. Secondary end points were (1) cardiovascular mortality, (2) nonfatal myocardial infarction, (3) definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST), and (4) major bleedings. We included 11 RTs (n = 32 372 patients). Shorter DAPT duration reduced mortality (odds ratio, OR [95% confidence interval, CI] = 0.85 [0.71-1], P = .05; p heterogeneity = 0.91). Similar results were observed when comparing 3 to 6 versus 12 months DAPT, while a significant increase in recurrent ischemic events was found for 6 to 12 months DAPT versus extended treatment (myocardial infarction: OR [95%CI] = 1.66 [1.37-2], P < .00001; phet = 0.13 and ST: OR [95%CI] = 2.47 [1.72-3.45], P < .00001; phet = 0.12), however, counterbalanced by a significant reduction in major bleeding (OR [95%CI] = 0.60 [0.47-0.76], P < .0001; phet = 0.38) and a trend in lower mortality. Thus, among selected patients undergoing DES implantation, a shorter DAPT strategy is associated with reduction in mortality and major bleeding but a higher risk of myocardial infarction and ST. A short duration (3-6 months) of DAPT appears as the safest strategy, while a prolonged duration (24-36 months) reduces thrombotic complications but with an excess in major bleeding complications.

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for 6 Months vs 12 Months After New-generation Drug-eluting Stent Implantation: Matched Analysis of ESTROFA-DAPT and ESTROFA-2

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The recommendation for dual antiplatelet therapy following drug-eluting stent implantation ranges from 6 months to 12 months or beyond. Recent trials have suggested the safety of a 6-month dual antiplatelet therapy regimen, yet certain caveats to these studies limit the applicability of this shorter duration dual antiplatelet therapy strategy in real world settings.

METHODS

A registry was constructed with consecutive recruitment of patients undergoing new-generation drug-eluting stent implantation and prescribed 6 months of dual antiplatelet therapy. Propensity score matching was undertaken with a historical cohort of patients treated with second-generation drug-eluting stents who received 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy from the ESTROFA-2 registry. The sample size was calculated using a noninferiority basis and the primary endpoint was the combination of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, revascularization, or major bleeding at 12 months.

RESULTS

The analysis included 1286 patients in each group, with no significant differences in baseline characteristics. The primary endpoint occurred in 5.0% and 6.6% in the 6-month and 12-month groups, respectively (P = .001 for noninferiority). The incidence of definite or probable stent thrombosis was 0.5% and 0.7% in the 6-month and 12-month groups, respectively (P = .4). Major bleeding events were lower in the 6-month group than in the 12-month group (0.8% vs 1.4%; P = .2) CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients in this large multicenter study, the safety and efficacy of a 6-month dual antiplatelet therapy regimen after implantation of new-generation drug-eluting stents appeared to be noninferior to those of a 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy regimen.

Fractional Flow Reserve in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Guide for Non-Culprit Lesions?

In patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multi-vessel disease (MVD), the optimal therapy for non-culprit lesions is still a matter of debate. While guidelines discourage a concomitant treatment of infarct- and non-infarct-related arteries, recent studies document advantages of a complete (preventive) revascularization during primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Such an approach, however, may result in overtreatment, because angiography does not provide robust information about the functional severity of MVD. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements can be a valuable guide for non-culprit lesions in acute myocardial infarction, but so far, only the reliability and safety of FFR measurements have been established in this setting. The clinical implications of an FFR-guided treatment strategy in STEMI patients with MVD are currently being tested in a large randomized trial.

Antithrombotic therapy in the anticoagulated patient undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with coronary stenting

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite being the subject of extensive research, the optimal antithrombotic therapy for patients on chronic oral anticoagulation (OAC) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation is still unknown. This review presents the latest data regarding this much-debated topic.

RECENT FINDINGS

Dual therapy, with clopidogrel (a P2Y12 inhibitor) and OAC, may be an alternative to triple therapy, which usually consists of aspirin and clopidogrel in addition to OAC, in terms of improving clinical outcomes in patients on chronic OAC following PCI with stent implantation. With the arrival of new, safer nonvitamin K antagonists oral anticoagulants (NOACs), the combination of NOAC and clopidogrel may also be an option for replacing triple therapy. In contrast to clopidogrel, combining the more potent P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel and ticagrelor) with OAC may only be considered in certain specific circumstances.

SUMMARY

Patients on chronic OAC undergoing PCI with stent implantation require triple therapy. However, triple therapy is controversial, because it increases the risk of bleeding. With the introduction of prasugrel, ticagrelor and NOACs, the question arises which P2Y12 inhibitor to choose as part of the triple therapy regime and how NOACs combine with antiplatelet agents when treating patients undergoing PCI.

Clinical Outcomes According to Diabetic Status in Patients Treated With Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents

Background—

Ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (BP-SES) proved noninferior to durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES) for a composite clinical end point in a population with minimal exclusion criteria. We performed a prespecified subgroup analysis of the Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularisation (BIOSCIENCE) trial to compare the performance of BP-SES and DP-EES in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Methods and Results—

BIOSCIENCE trial was an investigator-initiated, single-blind, multicentre, randomized, noninferiority trial comparing BP-SES versus DP-EES. The primary end point, target lesion failure, was a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization within 12 months. Among a total of 2119 patients enrolled between February 2012 and May 2013, 486 (22.9%) had diabetes mellitus. Overall diabetic patients experienced a significantly higher risk of target lesion failure compared with patients without diabetes mellitus (10.1% versus 5.7%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27–2.56; P =0.001). At 1 year, there were no differences between BP-SES versus DP-EES in terms of the primary end point in both diabetic (10.9% versus 9.3%; HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.67–2.10; P =0.56) and nondiabetic patients (5.3% versus 6.0%; HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.58–1.33; P =0.55). Similarly, no significant differences in the risk of definite or probable stent thrombosis were recorded according to treatment arm in both study groups (4.0% versus 3.1%; HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.49–3.41; P =0.60 for diabetic patients and 2.4% versus 3.4%; HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.39–1.25; P =0.23, in nondiabetics).

Conclusions—

In the prespecified subgroup analysis of the BIOSCIENCE trial, clinical outcomes among diabetic patients treated with BP-SES or DP-EES were comparable at 1 year.

Clinical Trial Registration—

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01443104.

Fundamentals in clinical coronary physiology: why coronary flow is more important than coronary pressure

Wide attention for the appropriateness of coronary stenting in stable ischaemic heart disease (IHD) has increased interest in coronary physiology to guide decision making. For many, coronary physiology equals the measurement of coronary pressure to calculate the fractional flow reserve (FFR). While accumulating evidence supports the contention that FFR-guided revascularization is superior to revascularization based on coronary angiography, it is frequently overlooked that FFR is a coronary pressure-derived estimate of coronary flow impairment. It is not the same as the direct measures of coronary flow from which it was derived, and which are critical determinants of myocardial ischaemia. This review describes why coronary flow is physiologically and clinically more important than coronary pressure, details the resulting limitations and clinical consequences of FFR-guided clinical decision making, describes the scientific consequences of using FFR as a gold standard reference test, and discusses the potential of coronary flow to improve risk stratification and decision making in IHD.

Triple therapy for percutaneous coronary intervention in atrial fibrillation: standard of care, or a nightmare soon to end?

The need to combine anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy ('triple therapy') in patients with atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease increases the risk of bleeding. As percutaneous intervention is now the dominant therapy for coronary disease, clinicians question how to manage the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation and a coronary stent that require dual antiplatelet therapy. In this review, the risk of stroke and coronary thrombosis in this difficult group of patients will be summarized using current recommendations and guidelines. The scarce randomized data on triple therapy are reviewed, and there will be a focus on currently running trials on this topic.

Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) therapy is a widely used intervention for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. Guidelines, which previously strongly recommended it, have recently undergone substantial change.

OBJECTIVE

To assess IABP efficacy in acute myocardial infarction.

DATA SOURCES

Human studies found in Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane libraries through December 2014 and in reference lists of selected articles. Search strings were "myocardial infarction" or "acute coronary syndrome" and "intra-aortic balloon pump" or "counterpulsation."

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing use of IABP with no IABP in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two reviewers independently extracted the data, and risk of bias in RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. We conducted separate meta-analyses of the RCTs and observational studies. Data were quantitatively synthesized using random-effects meta-analysis.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Thirty-day mortality.

RESULTS

There were 12 eligible RCTs randomizing 2123 patients. In the RCTs, IABP use had no statistically significant effect on mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.96 [95% CI, 0.74-1.24]), with no significant heterogeneity among trials (I2 = 0%; P = .52). This result was consistent when studies were stratified by the presence (OR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.69-1.28]; P = .69, I2 = 0%) or absence (OR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.57-1.69]; P = .95, I2 = 17%) of cardiogenic shock. There were 15 eligible observational studies totaling 15 530 patients. Their results were mutually conflicting (heterogeneity I2 = 97%; P < .001), causing wide uncertainty in the summary estimate for the association with mortality (OR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.54-1.70]). A simple index of baseline risk marker imbalance in the observational studies appeared to explain much of the heterogeneity in the observational data (R2meta = 46.2%; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Use of IABP was not found to improve mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction in the RCTs, regardless of whether patients had cardiogenic shock. The observational studies showed a variety of mutually contradictory associations between IABP therapy and mortality, much of which was explained by the differences between studies in the balance of risk factors between IABP and non-IABP groups.

Perspectives on the 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization : Fifty Years of Revascularization: Where Are We and Where Are We Heading?

The joint European Society of Cardiology and European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (ESC/EACTS) guidelines on myocardial revascularization collect and summarize the evidence regarding decision-making, diagnostics, and therapeutics in various clinical scenarios of coronary artery disease, including elective, urgent, and emergency settings. The 2014 document updates and extends the effort started in 2010, year of the first edition of these guidelines. Importantly, this latest edition provides a systematic review of all randomized clinical trials performed since 1980, comparing different strategies of myocardial revascularization, including coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), balloon angioplasty, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with bare-metal stents (BMS) and first- and second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES). This review aims to highlight the most relevant novelties introduced by the 2014 edition of the ESC/EACTS myocardial revascularization guidelines as compared with the previous edition and to describe similarities and differences with the American societies' guidelines.

A Review of the Key Clinical Trials of 2014

INTRODUCTION

Over the last year, multiple, potentially practice-changing, cardiology trials or studies have been published or presented at international meetings including the American College of Cardiology, European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions, European Society of Cardiology, Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics, Heart Failure Congress, Heart Rhythm Society, Heart Failure Society of America, American Society of Hypertension and the American Heart Association.

METHODS

Clinical trial results presented at major cardiology conferences during 2014 were reviewed by the authors. Search terms included heart failure (HF), acute coronary syndrome, stable coronary disease, interventional cardiology, atrial fibrillation, electrophysiology and coronary prevention. Selection criteria were trials of broad relevance to the cardiology community, those with potential to change current practice and those with potential to guide further phase III research.

RESULTS

In this paper, the authors describe and place in clinical context, new HF, data including neprilysin inhibitors, intravenous ferric carboxymaltose, potassium-absorbing compounds, quadripolar leads for cardiac resynchronization therapy and intraventricular device intervention. New trial data are also described for acute coronary syndromes (clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor), stable coronary artery disease (ivabradine), percutaneous coronary intervention (the role of thrombectomy or treatment of non-culprit lesions during primary intervention, pressure wire studies and outcomes of new stent designs), transcatheter aortic valve intervention data, atrial fibrillation (anticoagulation and direct current cardioversion), electrophysiology (leadless pacemaker devices, use of quinidine in Brugada syndrome) and coronary prevention (landmark Ezetimibe outcome data, PCSK9 clinical trials, childhood prevalence of hypertension, renal denervation for resistant hypertension and the role of cardiac computerized tomography in cardiovascular screening).

CONCLUSION

This paper summarizes key clinical trials during 2014 and should be of practical interest to clinicians and cardiology researchers.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ticagrelor when treating non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes

INTRODUCTION

ADP-induced platelet activation via P2Y12 receptor plays a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of arterial thrombosis and acute coronary syndrome. The value of dual antiplatelet therapy with the addition of the thienopyridine clopidogrel to aspirin has been widely established. Prasugrel, another thienopyridine, has demonstrated more potent platelet inhibition and efficacy than clopidogrel, although this drug requires metabolic activation and is associated with increased risk of bleedings.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, we discuss the role of ticagrelor in the management of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes treatment. We describe the unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of this drug and the extensive data obtained by preclinical and Phase II and III clinical studies.

EXPERT OPINION

Current guidelines recommend ticagrelor, in addition to aspirin, for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes at moderate to high-risk regardless of initial therapeutic strategy. Benefit of ticagrelor, as regard mortality, may be related to off-target effects of the drug, especially those involving the metabolism of adenosine. Ticagrelor represents a cost-effective alternative in the spectrum of P2Y12 inhibitors; however, further studies are required to enable the physician to choose the most appropriate antiplatelet agent for each patient.

Alternative stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: improving the efficacy of primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Despite the efficacy of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in achieving epicardial reperfusion in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, it is often limited by impaired microvascular perfusion attributable to distal embolization of plaque and thrombus, and stent malappostion due to vessel constriction and thrombus apposition, attenuating the full benefits of myocardial reperfusion and resulting in unfavorable clinical outcomes. In the long run implantation of permanent metallic implants have negative effect the biological behavior of the target vessel with a continuous low device failure over the years. Recently, however, efforts have been realized to tackle these shortcomings and optimize mechanical reperfusion by improvements to stent design, as substantiated by the self-expanding stent, the mesh-covered stent and the bioresorbable vascular scaffold. In this article, we provide an overview of the role of these novel, innovatively designed, alternative devices in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Intravascular Ultrasound for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Limitations of angiography for assessment of coronary artery disease are well-known, but are more evident and relevant in the left main coronary artery (LMCA) segment given the amount of myocardium this vessel subtends and the risks associated with the presence of atherosclerosis and subsequent intervention. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) characterizes the severity of luminal narrowing, plaque morphology, and plaque extension into the distal bifurcation. Once the indication for percutaneous intervention (PCI) is established, information provided by IVUS is crucial to plan treatment and optimize results. IVUS-guided PCI with drug-eluting stents improves clinical outcomes, particularly in patients with distal left main disease.

Value of Hybrid Imaging with PET/CT to Guide Percutaneous Revascularization of Chronic Total Coronary Occlusion

Chronic total coronary occlusions (CTO) are documented in approximately one fifth of diagnostic invasive coronary angiographies (ICA). Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) of CTO are challenging and are accompanied by higher complication and lower success rates in comparison with non-CTO PCI. Scrutinous evaluation of ischemia and viability to justify percutaneous revascularization is therefore of importance to select eligible patients for such a procedure. Furthermore, knowledge of the anatomical features of the occlusion may predict the chances of success of PCI CTO and could even guide the procedural strategy to augment the likelihood of recanalization. Positron emission tomography (PET) is unequivocally accepted as the reference standard for ischemia and viability testing, whereas coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) currently allows for non-invasive detailed three-dimensional imaging of the coronary anatomy that adds morphological information over two-dimensional ICA. Hybrid PET/CT could therefore be useful for optimal patient selection as well as procedural planning. This review discusses the potential value of PET/CT to guide PCI in CTOs.

Genetically Determined Platelet Reactivity and Related Clinical Implications

Many drugs are nowadays available to inhibit platelet activation and aggregation, especially in patients with acute coronary syndromes and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation. Primary targets are represented by enzymes or receptors involved in platelet activation. Genetic mutations in these targets contribute to the inter-individual variability in platelet responses therefore weakening the efficacy of antiplatelet agents. High on treatment platelet reactivity is a condition characterized by low levels of platelet inhibition despite the use of antiplatelet drugs. This could be responsible for re-infarction, stent-thrombosis and strokes, affecting short and long-term prognosis after coronary revascularization. So far, to test antiplatelet resistance either the assessment of platelet function or the identification of genetic carriers of poly morphisms have been pursued. Although several methods are now available to test platelet reactivity, it is still debated whether its routine assessment gives real benefits in clinical practice. The present review aims at examining current evidences on genetic polymorphisms affecting optimal platelet inhibition.

Comparison of Strut Coverage at 6 Months by Optical Coherence Tomography With Everolimus-Eluting Stenting of Bare-Metal Stent Restenosis Versus Stenosis of Nonstented Atherosclerotic Narrowing (from the DESERT Study)

Incomplete struts coverage is a predictor of late stent thrombosis after implantation of the drug-eluting stents (DES) in atherosclerotic lesions. The process of struts coverage in DES implanted for bare-metal stent (BMS) restenosis has never been described. Thirty-two patients with stable coronary artery disease were consecutively selected, 11 with BMS restenosis (group A) and 21 with de novo atherosclerotic lesions (group B). All patients underwent everolimus-eluting stent implantation; coronary angiography and optical coherence tomography were performed at 6 months follow-up. Percentage difference in struts coverage between the 2 groups was the primary end point. A total of 85,773 struts (17,891 in group A and 67,882 in group B) were analyzed: compared with group B, the percentage of uncovered stent struts was significantly lower in group A (2.6% vs 4.8%; p <0.0001). In group A, DES struts protruding out of BMS were more uncovered (5.0% vs 1.9%; p <0.0001) and malapposed (4.1% vs 2.1%; p <0.0001) compared with overlapping struts. In conclusion, when DES are implanted to treat BMS restenosis, struts coverage at 6 months follow-up is more complete compared with DES implanted in atherosclerotic lesions.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: defining the role of coronary angiography and intervention

Targeted temperature management and early coronary angiography have become the standard of care for postcardiac arrest patients remaining comatose and with ST-segment elevation on the ECG. Less clear is the optimal approach for similar patients without ST-segment elevation on the postresuscitation ECG. However, current data from nonrandomized cohort studies suggest that many of these patients also benefit from an aggressive approach to postresuscitation care. Recent reports of increased stent thrombosis in the postarrest population need further exploration.

Pre-hospital ticagrelor in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Ready for prime time?

In ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) peri-procedural P2Y12 antagonism - although of great importance - is often suboptimal, even with the novel oral antiplatelet agents prasugrel and ticagrelor. The concept of pre-hospital ticagrelor loading, investigated in the recently published Administration of Ticagrelor in the Cath Lab or in the Ambulance for New ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction to Open the Coronary Artery (ATLANTIC) trial, appears quite a promising strategy to optimize peri-procedural platelet inhibition and potentially clinical outcome. Implementation of such an approach when treating low risk STEMI patients in 'real life' practice might prove even more beneficial than expected from the ATLANTIC results, given the reported delays from first medical contact to primary PCI performance.

Coronary artery fistulas as a cause of angina: How to manage these patients?

Coronary artery fistulas represent the most common hemodynamically significant congenital defect of the coronary arteries and the clinical presentation is mainly dependent on the severity of the left-to-right shunt. We describe a case of a 55-year-old man with history of chest pain and without history of previous significant chest wall trauma or any invasive cardiac procedures. A coronary multislice computed tomography showed two large coronary fistulas arising from the left anterior descending coronary artery and ending in an angiomatous plexus draining into the common pulmonary trunk. Coronary angiography confirmed the CT finding and showed a third fistulous communication arising from the sinus node artery. Although coronary fistulas are infrequent, they are becoming increasingly important because their management and treatment could prevent serious complications. The latest guidelines of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association indicate as Class I recommendation the percutaneous or surgical closure for large fistulas regardless of symptoms. In this manuscript, we provide a detailed review of the literature on this topic, focusing on the clinical management of these patients.