An interferon-free antiviral regimen for HCV after liver transplantation

Treatment of hepatitis C in difficult-to-treat patients

Interferon-free regimes are now the treatment of choice for patients with chronic hepatitis C; previously patients who were 'difficult-to-treat' using interferon-containing treatments can now safely be treated with such therapies. More than 90% of patients infected with HCV genotype 1 or 4, compensated cirrhosis, or who have had liver transplantation, can be cured with the use of sofosbuvir combined with simeprevir, daclatasvir or ledipasvir, or by the combination of paritaprevir with ritonavir, ombitasvir and with or without dasabuvir. Addition of ribavirin seems to shorten treatment duration. However, the safety of these drugs is not fully explored in patients with decompensated cirrhosis (that is, those with Child-Pugh class C disease), and protease inhibitors should not be used in this group. The optimal use of interferon-free regimes in patients with renal failure or after kidney transplantation is currently being studied. However, new and improved drugs are needed to treat patients infected with HCV genotype 3. Unfortunately, the broad application of new HCV treatments is limited by their high costs. In this Review, I discuss the treatment of patients with hepatitis C with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis, before and after orthotopic liver transplantation and in patients with impaired kidney function.

Ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor based therapy: a new strategy in chronic hepatitis C therapy

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a worldwide health issue. All oral therapies are quickly replacing peg-interferon-based treatment regimens. Developing effective, well tolerated, treatments accessible for difficult to treat populations remains an unmet need. Ritonavir, an HIV-1 protease inhibitor, has pharmacokinetic properties that enhance the activity of concomitantly administered direct acting antivirals against HCV. Ritonavir inhibits Cytochrome P450 isozyme 3A4, diminishing first pass effect and hepatic metabolism, changing the pharmacokinetic parameters of Cytochrome P450 isozyme 3A4 substrates. When combined with the HCV protease inhibitor paritaprevir, ritonavir increases mean area under the curve, allowing once daily dosing. While Phase II and III clinical trials with ritonavir-boosted paritaprevir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir demonstrated high efficacy in those with HCV infection, drug-drug interactions warrant cautious use of ritonavir in specific patient populations. Consideration of the patients' full medication list is imperative due to the ubiquitous nature of the Cytochrome P450 isozyme 3A4 system.

From non-A, non-B hepatitis to hepatitis C virus cure

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) was discovered in the late 1980s. Interferon (IFN)-α was proposed as an antiviral treatment for chronic hepatitis C at about the same time. Successive improvements in IFN-α-based therapy (dose finding, pegylation, addition of ribavirin) increased the rates of sustained virologic response, i.e. the rates of curing HCV infection. These rates were further improved by adding the first available direct-acting antiviral (DAA) drugs to the combination of pegylated IFN-α and ribavirin. An IFN-free era finally started in 2014, yielding rates of sustained virologic response over 90% in patients treated for 8 to 24 weeks with all-oral regimens. Major challenges however remain in implementation of these new treatment strategies, not only in low- to middle-income countries, but also in high-income countries where the price of these therapies is still prohibitive. Elimination of HCV infection through treatment in certain areas is possible but raises major public health issues.

Sofosbuvir and ribavirin before liver re-transplantation for graft failure due to recurrent hepatitis C: a case report

Background

Recurrent hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation is associated with reduced graft and patient survival. Re-transplantation for graft failure due to recurrent hepatitis C is controversial and not performed in all centers.

Case presentation

We describe a 54-year-old patient with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b infection and a null response to pegylated interferon-α and ribavirin who developed decompensated graft cirrhosis 6 years after a first liver transplantation. Treatment with sofosbuvir and ribavirin allowed for rapid negativation of serum HCV RNA and was well tolerated despite advanced liver and moderate renal dysfunction. Therapeutic drug monitoring did not reveal any clinically significant drug-drug interactions. Despite virological response, the patient remained severely decompensated and re-transplantation was performed after 46 days of undetectable serum HCV RNA. The patient is doing well 12 months after his second liver transplantation and remains free of hepatitis C virus.

Conclusions

The use of directly acting antivirals may allow for successful liver re-transplantation for recipients who remain decompensated despite virological response and is likely to improve the outcome of liver re-transplantation for end-stage recurrent hepatitis C.

Hepatitis C

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major health problem worldwide. The effects of chronic infection include cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease, and hepatocellular carcinoma. As a result of shared routes of transmission, co-infection with HIV is a substantial problem, and individuals infected with both viruses have poorer outcomes than do peers infected with one virus. No effective vaccine exists, although persistent HCV infection is potentially curable. The standard of care has been subcutaneous interferon alfa and oral ribavirin for 24-72 weeks. This treatment results in a sustained virological response in around 50% of individuals, and is complicated by clinically significant adverse events. In the past 10 years, advances in HCV cell culture have enabled an improved understanding of HCV virology, which has led to development of many new direct-acting antiviral drugs that target key components of virus replication. These direct-acting drugs allow for simplified and shortened treatments for HCV that can be given as oral regimens with increased tolerability and efficacy than interferon and ribavirin. Remaining obstacles include access to appropriate care and treatment, and development of a vaccine.

Drug Interactions With Direct-Acting Antivirals for Hepatitis C: Implications for HIV and Transplant Patients

OBJECTIVE

Review pharmacokinetics of new direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for hepatitis C (HCV) infection and interactions with concomitant immunosuppressant and antiretroviral therapies (ART).

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (1948-January 2015), EMBASE (1964-January 2015), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-January 2015), Google, and Google Scholar were searched combining the terms simeprevir, sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, daclatasvir, paritaprevir, ABT-450, ombitasvir, dasabuvir, pharmacokinetics, drug interaction, drug metabolism, HIV, antiretroviral, immunosuppressant, transplant. Articles, conference proceedings, abstracts, and product monographs were reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Literature on pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interactions with DAAs and immunosuppressants or ART was considered for inclusion. Pertinent information was extracted and summarized in the review. In the absence of data, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles were used to predict the likelihood of interactions.

DATA SYNTHESIS

DAA pharmacokinetics are reviewed and drug interaction data are presented with provision of management strategies. Fixed-dose combination paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir plus dasabuvir is most susceptible to drug interactions with immunosuppressants and ART mainly due to the influence of ritonavir on multiple enzymes. Simeprevir is also prone to drug interactions because of cytochrome P450(CYP) 3A4, CYP1A2, P-glycoprotein, and OATP1 involvement and is not recommended for use in combination with several HIV antiretrovirals (ARVs). Close therapeutic drug monitoring of calcineurin inhibitors is required with concomitant simeprevir. Few clinically significant interactions are expected with sofosbuvir or ledipasvir. Limited data suggest that daclatasvir may be coadministered with immunosuppressants but requires dose adjustments with certain ARVs.

CONCLUSIONS

None of the DAAs are completely free of drug interactions. Awareness and management of drug interactions is critical to optimize outcomes and minimize adverse effects in these patient populations.

Enhancing our understanding of current therapies for hepatitis C virus (HCV)

Great progress has been made in understanding the HCV genome and its molecular virology. This understanding has culminated in the development of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents targeting HCV viral proteins. Telaprevir (TVR) and boceprevir (BOC) were the first DAAs introduced for treatment of genotype 1 HCV in 2011; when used in combination with pegylated interferon (pegIFN) and ribavirin (RBV), these protease inhibitors improved efficacy in patients with chronic HCV infection compared to the traditional dual therapy. However, this combination was associated with adverse events that often led to early termination of therapy. In late 2013, the FDA approved a second wave of DAAs, sofosbuvir (SOF) and simeprevir (SMV). The use of SOF with SMV opened the door for IFN-free combination regimens. This combination was highly efficacious and well tolerated in patients with HCV genotype 1. Sofosbuvir and ledipasvir (LDV) fixed-dose oral combination (FDC) therapy, and paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir and dasabuvir ± RBV were recently approved, elevating sustained virologic response (SVR) rates to over 95 %. We are anticipating the approval of additional IFN-free regimens with comparable efficacy and tolerability but with the addition of pangenotypic coverage, fewer drug-drug interactions, and a high barrier to resistance. This review will summarize current management for chronic HCV infection.

Dasabuvir : a new direct antiviral agent for the treatment of hepatitis C

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has revolutionized the care of infected patients. Among these novel compounds are non-nucleoside analogs, which bind viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase resulting in a conformational change inhibiting RNA synthesis.

AREAS COVERED

Efficacy and tolerability of treatment regimens containing the non-nucleoside analog polymerase inhibitor dasabuvir (ABT-333).

EXPERT OPINION

Dasabuvir-containing regimens achieve high rates of sustained virologic response in HCV genotype 1a and 1b-infected patients when combined with other DAAs, namely paritaprevir (ABT-450), ritonavir and ombitasvir (ABT-267). In the populations studied, dasabuvir seems to be well tolerated and safe. The major limitations of this novel drug are its genotype-restricted activity, the necessity to include ribavirin for HCV genotype 1a and the emergence of resistance if not combined with other DDAs.