Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a report of the Standards Sub-committee of the Victorian State Committee of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons

A survey of Victorian surgeons performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy was carried out. This report discusses the bile duct injuries identified in the survey. Twelve injuries were recorded, a rate of 0.2%. Three of the 12 required formal repair, the other 9 being treated by T-tube alone. Possible mechanisms of these injuries, the experience of the surgeon, the role of operative cholangiography and delays in recognition of the injury are discussed.

Cholecystectomy. Which procedure is best for the high-risk patient?

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), which results in less postoperative pain, disability, and scarring, has become an attractive alternative method of surgical management of the ambulatory patient with gallbladder disease. The best procedure for severely ill patients who are poor operative risks but require cholecystectomy, however, is unknown since the operative morbidity and mortality of LC in this group of patients had not been studied. All patients (177) undergoing cholecystectomy at one institution were evaluated. Based on their preoperative state of health as defined by a modified acute physiologic score (APS), patients were divided into two groups; one group was defined by an APS of less than 10, indicating they were in good health, and the other had an APS greater than or equal to 10, indicating that the group had multiple risk factors, predicting an increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. Selection for either procedure, LC or open cholecystectomy (OC), was made independently of the patient's preoperative status. Patients' past medical histories; demographic, physiologic, and laboratory data; and postoperative complications were evaluated. When all cholecystectomy patients were arranged into the respective risk groups, the age and severity of illness scores (APS) between LC and OC were not statistically different. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were not significantly different when patients undergoing LC were compared to patients undergoing OC. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was associated with decreased hospitalization when compared to patients undergoing OC. The overall mortality of the patients undergoing OC was significantly greater than those undergoing LC. LC is an acceptable surgical alternative for high-risk patients requiring cholecystectomy.

Injuries to the bile duct resulting from laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has now become the treatment of choice for symptomatic gall stones. There does, however, appear to be an increased incidence of bile duct injuries. In this article, experience with eight patients who sustained a bile duct injury and were referred to the Hepatobiliary Service at Westmead Hospital, between 1990 and 1992, is reported.

Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

This study describes the value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Twelve consecutive patients were studied over a one year period. In all patients the biliary tree was visualised during ERCP. Four patients had complete bile duct obstruction, seven patients had a stricture (two with concomitant leakage), and one patient had leakage from a hepatic branch. Three patients with complete obstruction, presented with a relatively prolonged symptom free, 'silent' period before diagnosis. In all four patients with complete transection, a proximal hepaticojejunostomy was performed. In one patient with a tough fibrous stricture, secondary to incorrect clip placement, passage of the guidewire was impossible, leaving surgical reconstruction as the only therapeutic option. All remaining seven patients with leakage or strictures, or both were successfully treated by endoscopic sphincterotomy only (n = 1) or sphincterotomy and subsequent stent placement (n = 6). When patients do not recover uneventfully after laparoscopic cholecystectomy even without cholestasis or jaundice, early ERCP is recommended as a safe and valuable method to detect bile duct injury and to suggest treatment. Subsequently, more than half of such patients can be treated endoscopically. Extended follow up is needed to evaluate the longterm results.

Strategies for the prevention of laparoscopic common bile duct injuries

There have been many recent reports regarding the safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Common bile duct injury is considered the most significant complication. Regional tertiary centers are reporting a dramatic increase in the number of referrals for management of injuries to the common bile duct following laparoscopic cholecystectomy [22]. The high incidence of injuries has been attributed to problems inherent to the laparoscopic technique or to such secondary factors as inexperience, inadequate instruction, insufficient caution, or patient selection. In response to these numerous reports, the New York State Department of Health has recently implemented credentialing and privileging guidelines for laparoscopic surgery [11]. The purpose of this review is to assimilate the current literature on when and why common bile duct injuries occur in order to present possible strategies for their prevention.

Laparoscopic-assisted bowel surgery

The use of laparoscopic surgical techniques is now being applied to a variety of operations traditionally performed in an open fashion. Twenty patients underwent laparoscopic-guided large and small bowel surgery at our institution from March 1991 to April 1992. The indications for surgery included polyps, obstruction, bleeding, and perforation, and pathologic diagnoses included benign polyps, lipomas, inflammatory bowel disease, perforation of a jejunal diverticulum, colonic arteriovenous malformations, and adenocarcinoma. Mobilization of the colon, ligation of the mesentery, and closure of the mesenteric defect were performed using the laparoscopic equipment. One trocar site was enlarged to 3 cm to deliver the bowel through the abdominal wall. All anastomoses were hand-sewn. Postoperative hospitalization ranged from 2 to 31 days (median, five days). No mortality was noted, and morbidity was 20 percent. We conclude that laparoscopic-guided bowel surgery is technically feasible and should translate into shorter hospitalization and less patient discomfort.

Laparoscopic anatomy of the biliary tree

A thorough knowledge of the anatomy of the extrahepatic biliary tree and its frequent anatomic variations is essential for performance of a safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The surgeon should have an appreciation for the distortions in the anatomy as a result of retraction on the gallbladder and how the direction of retraction alters the spatial relationships between the cystic duct and common bile duct. The steps in the operative procedure have been outlined to provide good exposure and optimize the identification of structures. Good exposure will enable the surgeon to identify anatomic variants; however, a thorough knowledge of these variants is necessary for safe performance of the operation.

Open cholecystectomy. A contemporary analysis of 42,474 patients

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated, in a large, heterogeneous population, the outcome of open cholecystectomy as it is currently practiced. SUMMARY BACKGROUND AND DATA: Although cholecystectomy has been the gold standard of treatment for cholelithiasis for more than 100 years, it has recently been challenged by the introduction of several new modalities including laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Efforts to define the role of these alternative treatments have been hampered by the lack of contemporary data regarding open cholecystectomy.

METHODS

A population-based study was performed examining all open cholecystectomies performed by surgeons in an eastern and western state during a recent 12-month period. Data compiled consisted of a computerized analysis of Uniformed Billing (UB-82) discharge analysis information from all non-Veterans Administration (VA), acute care hospitals in California (Office of Statewide Planning and Development [OSHPD]) and in Maryland (Health Services Cost Review Commission [HSCRC]) between January 1, 1989, and December 31, 1989. This data base was supplemented with a 5% random sample of Medicare UB-82 data from patients who were discharged between October 1, 1988, and September 30, 1989. Patients undergoing cholecystectomy were identified based on diagnosis-related groups (DRG-197 and DRG-198), and then classified by Principal Diagnosis and divided into three clinically homogeneous subgroups: acute cholecystitis, chronic cholecystitis, and complicated cholecystitis.

RESULTS

A total of 42,474 patients were analyzed, which represents approximately 8% of all patients undergoing cholecystectomy in the United States in any recent 12-month period. The overall mortality rate was 0.17% and the incidence rate of bile duct injuries was approximately 0.2%. The mortality rate was 0.03% in patients younger than 65 years of age and 0.5% in those older than 65 years of age. Mortality rate, length of hospital stay, and charges were all significantly correlated (p < 0.001) with age, admission status (elective, urgent, or emergent), and disease status.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that open cholecystectomy currently is a very safe, effective treatment for cholelithiasis and is being performed with near zero mortality. The ultimate role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy needs to be defined in the context of current and contemporary data regarding open cholecystectomy.

The importance of extrahepatic biliary anatomy in preventing complications at laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Major biliary complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be prevented by an understanding of extrahepatic biliary ductal and arterial anatomic relationships. The common patterns of anatomic variations important to the surgeon performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy are reviewed with respect to recently reported biliary injury during this procedure. Recommendations for delineating biliary anatomy and avoiding laparoscopic complications are reviewed.

Management of bile duct injuries and strictures following cholecystectomy

During 7057 conventional cholecystectomies (1972-1991), 16 bile duct injuries occurred, amounting to a risk of 0.22%. A total of 1022 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed without such a complication since April 1990. In a retrospective study, 64 patients (16 of our patients and 48 referrals) with an injury or stricture due to conventional cholecystectomy were investigated. In 14 of our 16 patients the injury was recognized and immediately repaired with a good long-term result of 93%, including one successful repair of a subsequent stricture. Two cases of unrecognized injury were managed by nonoperative means. The group of 48 referred patients comprised 10 early postoperative complications (21%) and 38 strictures after an "uneventful" cholecystectomy. Of the 64 total patients, 10 (16%) underwent nonoperative treatment, and 54 required surgery. The mean follow-up period after surgery was 7.4 +/- 4.9 years. Most cases (93%) were repaired by bilioenteric anastomosis (i.e., foremost hepaticojejunostomy) with an 18% restricture rate. Including second and third repairs for restricture, a total of 60 operations (14 primary and 46 secondary reconstructions) were performed without hospital mortality. A good long-term result after stricture repair was achieved in 75% of the patients, whereas 17% had a poor outcome owing to restricture or death (10% had related mortality within 10 years). The other 8% had a moderate result due to recurrent cholangitis. Thus immediate repair of a bile duct injury offers the better chance of a favorable prognosis compared to secondary stricture repair.

Safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a community setting, N = 762

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) can be introduced into a community with morbidity and mortality rates equal to that of open cholecystectomy. The entire general surgical community of Greensboro, NC, learned the technique of LC on animal models prior to offering this innovation to the community. Over the ensuing 12 months, they served as surgeons or assistant surgeons to each other on 762 LCs with morbidity and mortality rates comparable to open cholecystectomy. This retrospective study examined the first 1 year of experience beginning 8/13/90. This work represents all of the LCs performed in Greensboro, and all of the surgeons participated in this review. All of the surgeries were done with an electrocautery and utilized a 0 degree forward-viewing scope. Cases were performed at two hospitals with a surgeon as both operator and assistant, and no effort was made to exclude high-risk or elderly patients from this procedure. Patients averaged 50 years of age and ranged from 14 to 96 years. Static cholangiograms were performed in 27% of patients. Conversion to open cholecystectomy was seen in 4.8%. There were two cardiac deaths (0.26%) and significant complications were seen in 3.4%. Seven patients required reoperations. There were no major common bile duct injuries. This retrospective review indicates that this new procedure can be introduced into a community setting by novice laparoscopic surgeons acting both as operators and assistant with a morbidity and mortality rate comparable to that reported for open cholecystectomy.

Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: mechanism of injury, prevention, and management

Although several studies have shown a low incidence of bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, concerns remain because of the sustained increase in the number of referrals for biliary reconstruction after the procedure. Twenty-one patients have been referred to our institution because of major bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The injury was recognized during the laparoscopic procedure in only 6 of the 21 (29%). Nineteen patients underwent hepaticojejunostomy at least once, one patient required hepaticojejunostomy and repair of a choledochoduodenal fistula, and one patient needed repair of a biliary colonic fistula. Hepaticojejunostomy above the bifurcation was required in 10 patients (50%), at the bifurcation in 3, and below the bifurcation in 7. Nine of the eleven patients in whom the initial repair was performed at the local hospital presented with early stricture (median 7 months). The common denominator of the development of bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the failure to identify the structures of the triangle of Calot. Specific steps during laparoscopic cholecystectomy to avoid bile duct injuries are described. Expertise in hepatobiliary surgery appears to optimize results of biliary reconstruction.

Laparoscopic versus traditional appendectomy for suspected appendicitis

We compared the results of concurrently performed laparoscopic versus open appendectomy as treatments for suspected acute appendicitis. The 68 laparoscopic procedures resulted in 62 appendectomies, 47 by the laparoscopic (LA) technique and 15 by the open (LO) technique. Another 54 patients underwent open appendectomy (OA). Significantly more females underwent laparoscopy (LA and LO: 52% versus OA: 33%, p = 0.047). Operative duration was shortest for OA (81 +/- 3 minutes), which was shorter than for LO (108 +/- 7 minutes), but not different than LA (86 +/- 6 minutes). The postoperative length of stay was not different for LA (3.5 +/- 0.5 days) compared with OA (5.9 +/- 1.6 days) or LO (4.8 +/- 1.3 days). One death occurred in the OA group. Wound complication rates were not significantly different for LA (4.3%) compared with OA (9.4%) and LO (13.3%). Overall complication rates were lower for LA (10.6%) and OA (18.9%) compared with LO (46.7%, p < 0.01). Median hospital cost for LO ($10,425) was higher (p < 0.02) than for either LA ($5,899) or OA ($5,220). When appendicitis was not present, definitive confirmation of pathology was achieved in 9 of 18 patients undergoing LA versus 4 of 14 patients having OA (p = not significant). We conclude that when laparoscopy and laparoscopic appendectomy can be performed, the procedure is safe and produces results comparable with those of open appendectomy without significant overall cost differences.

Diagnosis and management of biliary complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the operation of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis. However, this operation may result in serious biliary complications. Our aims were to review our experience with biliary complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and to document the mechanisms of the injuries and the techniques of managing these complications. We treated 20 patients with biliary complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Symptomatic collections of bile (bilomas) were present in five patients. One of these patients underwent operative ligation of an accessory bile duct in the gallbladder bed, whereas the others had percutaneous or endoscopic therapy. In the remaining 15 patients (of whom 13 were referred from other hospitals), injuries to the major bile ducts were managed by combined radiologic, endoscopic, and operative therapies. In 10 of these patients (67%), the mechanism of injury was the misidentification of the common bile duct as the cystic duct. In 3 of 15 patients, a noncircumferential injury to the lateral aspect of the common bile duct occurred. The Bismuth levels of the remaining bile duct injuries were type I in 3, type II in 4, type III in 3, and type IV in 2. Early outcome of therapy for these bile duct injuries has been favorable. One patient was lost to follow-up, and 2 died of nonbiliary causes, whereas 12 patients are alive and well with normal serum liver enzyme levels at 4 to 19 months postoperatively (mean: 14 months). The most common cause of major bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is mistaking the common bile duct for the cystic duct. Most bilomas can be managed successfully with noninvasive methods. Coordinated efforts by radiologists, endoscopists, and surgeons are necessary to optimize the management of patients with major bile duct injury, suggesting that patients with biliary complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be referred to specialty centers for optimal care.

Spectrum and management of major complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the most prevalent method of treating uncomplicated, symptomatic cholelithiasis in the United States and elsewhere. As experience with this procedure grows, certain pitfalls are becoming apparent. Since October 1990, we have treated 22 patients for major injuries incurred during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, including 15 women and 7 men (range: 23 to 85 years). One patient had previous upper abdominal surgery; no other patient had any relative contraindication to laparoscopic surgery. The most frequent site of injury (19 patients) was the extrahepatic biliary tract. There was one fatal duodenal perforation. All but two patients whose injuries went unrecognized at laparoscopy were symptomatic during the immediate postoperative period. The biliary injuries included complete transection of the common hepatic or common bile duct in 10 patients, complete ductal occlusion in 3, a cystic duct stump leak in 2, and a partially retained gallbladder with a contained intraperitoneal bile leak in 2. The site and extent of biliary injuries were delineated with transhepatic or endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Reconstruction or repair of the biliary tract was accomplished with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy or cholangiojejunostomy in 11 and 1 patients, respectively, completion cholecystectomy in 2, and temporary transhepatic stenting, primary choledochocholedochostomy, and primary choledochorrhaphy over a T-tube in 1 patient each. One patient with a cystic duct stump leak was managed successfully with endoscopic sphincterotomy, whereas another required operative ligation. Laparoscopic injuries during cholecystectomy can lead to serious morbidity and mortality, thus emphasizing the need for adequate training and credentialing for surgeons and for a heightened clinical awareness of the potential complications, their long-term sequelae, and how to avoid them.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

After laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the patient can expect a hospital stay of < 2 days and a return to work within 2 weeks. The associated operative mortality rate is low at < 0.2 per cent. The increased incidence of bile duct injury with the laparoscopic technique compared with open cholecystectomy is a cause for concern but such injuries should decrease with proper training in laparoscopic surgery. The use of operative cholangiography (whether routine, selective or never) is controversial but there is no evidence that routine cholangiography will prevent major bile duct injury.

Management of major biliary complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

OBJECTIVE

A total of 50 major bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy were managed by the Duke University Hepatobiliary Service from 1990-1992. The management of these complex cases is reviewed.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the preferred method for removing the gallbladder. Bile duct injury is the most feared complication of the new procedure.

METHODS

Review of videotapes, pathology, and management of the original operations were reviewed retrospectively, and the injuries categorized. Major biliary injury was defined as a recognized disruption of any part of the major extrahepatic biliary system. Biliary leakage was defined as a clinically significant biliary fistula in the absence of major biliary injury, i.e., with an intact extrahepatic biliary system.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight injuries were major biliary ductal injuries and 12 patients had simple biliary leakage. Twenty-four patients had the classic type injury or some variant of the classic injury. A standard treatment approach was developed which consisted of ERCP for diagnosis, preoperative PTC with the placement of stents, CT drainage immediately after the PTC for drainage of biliary ascites, and usually Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy with placement of O-rings for future biliary access if necessary. Major ductal injuries were high in the biliary system involving multiple ducts in 31 of the 38 patients. Re-operation was required in 5 of the 38 patients with particularly complex problems.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful management of bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy requires careful understanding of the mechanisms, considerable preoperative assessment by experts, and a multidisciplinary approach.

Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with open cholecystectomy in a single center

In this retrospective study, we compared the results of 1,283 open cholecystectomies (OCs) performed at our medical center during the pre-laparoscopic era with 1,107 laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LCs) performed from 1990 to 1992. There was no difference in the percentage of cases of acute and chronic cholecystitis in each time period (16.8% in each), nor were there differences in the patient characteristics for each group. The percentage of patients undergoing intraoperative cholangiography was similar for patients with chronic cholecystitis for each period, although the incidence of abnormal cholangiograms was lower in the laparoscopic era (5.8% versus 15.2%, p < 0.001). There was one bile duct injury in the OC group and three in the LC group (although one of these occurred after conversion ot an open procedure), but this difference was not statistically significant. However, there was a higher mortality rate in the patients with acute cholecystitis treated with OC (2.3% versus 0%, p = 0.03) and an increase in the overall complications in the patients with chronic cholecystitis in the OC group (7.5% versus 3.1%, p < 0.001) compared with the LC group. The increase in overall complications appeared to be primarily related to the increased rate of wound-related complications (3.6% versus 0%, p < 0.001) in the patients with chronic cholecystitis in the OC group. LC appears to be a safe procedure with a low incidence of complications including bile duct injury when performed by adequately trained surgeons.

Double gallbladder treated successfully by laparoscopy

A rare case of true duplication of the gallbladder is herein reported on a young male patient with other congenital abnormalities. Both gallbladders had unequivocal signs of chronic inflammatory disease and lithiasis. The patient was diagnosed preoperatively as having acute cholecystitis but the diagnosis of an accessory gallbladder was made only at the time of surgery. Emphasis is placed on the use of a complete cholangiographic evaluation before proceeding with the operation in order to prevent inadvertent damage to the biliary ductal system. The accessory gallbladder must then be removed to avoid an unnecessary reoperation. All of this can be accomplished readily by laparoscopic surgery.

Complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

After becoming alarmed about seven unusual and severe complications reported by New York State hospitals after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the Department of Health of New York State tabulated all reported adverse incidents. After observing unusual injuries to the great vessels of the abdomen and an increase in major bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the Department of Health prepared a memorandum to New York State hospitals advising closer attention to education, credentialing, proctoring, and outcome after these operations. The frequency of cholecystectomy has increased sharply, by 21%, since the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The serious injury rate may be approximately 15 times that observed after an open cholecystectomy. Recognizing the theoretic advantages of the procedure, the Department of Health reminded hospital Boards of Trustees of their obligation to establish mechanisms for credentialing and privileging surgeons and surgical teams so that the risks do not exceed those expected of the open procedure and to detect and correct deviations from this standard.

Complications of laparoscopic surgery

The potential complications of a laparoscopic procedure include those related to laparoscopy and those related to the specific operative procedure. The majority of these complications occur during the early learning phase for laparoscopy. They also may occur, however, during procedures performed by surgeons who have considerable laparoscopic experience. As new applications for laparoscopy continue to emerge, it is important for the surgeon to be familiar with the possible complications associated with the various laparoscopic procedures. Only through an appreciation of the potential complications of a procedure can their overall incidence be reduced to a minimum.

Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe and effective treatment of cholelithiasis in experienced hands. Mortality is rare. The Southern Surgeons Club data and several other recent large series indicate that major complications occur in less than 3% of patients. The most significant common complication is injury to the bile duct, for which the greatest risk factor is inexperience. Major biliary injury usually requires reoperations. Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomies, often multiple, are usually necessary for repair. The popularity of this technique continues, and further efforts should be focused on elimination of the learning curve for major biliary injury. If injuries do occur, they should be recognized early, and patients should be referred to centers experienced in their treatment.

Exposure, dissection, and laser versus electrosurgery in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

The technical complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy occur while creating the pneumoperitoneum, placing trocars, obtaining exposure, and performing the initial dissection of the cystic duct and artery. The errors most feared are intestinal injury, vascular injury, and common bile duct injury. Bile duct injury usually results from the misinterpretation of the extrahepatic biliary anatomy. Confusion is most likely if the gallbladder infundibulum is pushed superiorly and medially, pulling the common bile duct out from behind the duodenum and into line with the cystic duct and gallbladder. Other dissection errors resulting in bile duct injury include the failure to begin dissection on the gallbladder, routine dissection of the cystic duct all the way to the common bile duct, failure to identify anomalies of the cystic and hepatic ducts, failure to open all folds of the gallbladder infundibulum, and entrapment of a narrow common bile duct by a cystic duct clip "slid" too far proximally. Proper dissection strategy includes posterolateral traction on the gallbladder infundibulum and initiation of dissection at the most medial point where the gallbladder is clearly seen. Pedunculation of the gallbladder will reveal most ductal anomalies but should be supplemented with routine digital fluoroscopic cholangiography. The controversy over optimal sources for thermal dissection of the gallbladder has largely been resolved. Electrosurgical dissection is a more rapid, hemostatic, and economical dissection.

Routine versus selective intraoperative cholangiography

Since its introduction 60 years ago, intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) has reduced the incidence of unnecessary common bile duct (CBD) explorations from 66% to less than 5%. However, the use of routine IOC during cholecystectomy remains controversial. Routine IOC during laparoscopic cholecystectomy reduces the incidence, level, and severity of bile duct injuries. Performing routine IOC with CBD exploration eliminates the need for postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or endoscopic sphincterotomy in the 1.4% to 3.5% of postoperative patients with abdominal pain or retained stones, thereby also eliminating the need for reoperation after failed endoscopic sphincterotomy. The financial cost of routine IOC is equal to or less than the cost of treating the severe bile duct injuries that are prevented as well as the cost of the work-up and treatment of patients with retained stones who have not had IOC. A policy of routine IOC sets operative priorities and improves the surgical skills that are necessary for laparoscopic transcystic duct CBD exploration.

Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy

To assess the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy from the payer's perspective, we estimated the probabilities of potential outcomes of each procedure, associated quality-of-life effects, and related direct medical charges and incorporated these estimates into a computerized simulation model. The model projects that laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be more effective than open surgery in terms of total mortality and quality-adjusted survival, for both sexes and all ages. Projected 5-year cumulative charges are lower for laparoscopic cholecystectomy than for open cholecystectomy ($5,354 versus $5,525 for 45-year-old women; $6,036 versus $6,830 for 45-year-old men), and the differences increase substantially with increasing age. We concluded that laparoscopic cholecystectomy is likely to be less costly and more effective than open cholecystectomy for most patients, as long as it does not routinely require preoperative cholangiography and is not associated with increased professional fees or increased risks of retained stones or bile duct injury.

Bile duct complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

A retrospective review and analysis of patients referred to the Division of Gastroenterology and the Section of Gastrointestinal Surgery with common bile duct complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy was undertaken in order to identify injury patterns, management, and outcome. Sixteen patients were identified over a 20-month period. Twelve patients had major common bile duct injuries and four had minor injuries (cystic duct leaks). Seventy-one percent of injuries occurred with surgeons who had done more than 13 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Eighty-three percent of patients who had major ductal injury did not have a cholangiogram prior to the injury. Sixteen percent of patients with major common bile duct injuries had findings of acute cholecystitis and 58% of these major injuries were "easy" gallbladders. One-third of major injuries were recognized at operation. Two-thirds of immediate repairs failed. All cystic duct leaks were managed nonoperatively. It appears that bile duct complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy are more common in the community than is reported. Bile duct complications occur with surgeons who are experienced and inexperienced with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Common bile duct injuries, unrecognized at laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the majority of cases, usually occur with "easy" gallbladders. Operative cholangiography is not utilized in the majority of common bile duct injuries. When immediate repair of common bile duct injuries is undertaken, the majority are unsuccessful. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is invaluable in the diagnosis and management of bile duct complications. Cystic duct leaks may be managed successfully with endoscopic stents.

An easy approach to laparoscopic cholangiography

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the procedure of choice for surgical removal of the gallbladder. Intraoperative cholangiography is often needed to define ductal anatomy and to detect choledocholithiasis, a procedure which often proves more difficult than its open counterpart. Several newer cholangiocatheters have been introduced which have made laparoscopic cholangiography easier, however, the standard approach through an existing operating port will usually place the catheter at an odd angle, making catheterization of the cystic duct all but impossible in some cases. To avoid this acute angle between the catheter and the cystic duct, the authors have begun using a standard central line introducer as the port through which the catheter is inserted. When placed in the proper position through the lateral abdominal wall, this approach allows the catheter to be inserted parallel and in line with the cystic duct for much easier and faster cannulation.

Technique of intraluminal biliary ultrasonography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Intraluminal ultrasonography of the common duct was performed in nine patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, using a system comprising a 20-MHz crystal in a 95-cm, blunt-tipped 6F sheath, mechanically rotated at 1,800 rpm. The probe was introduced through an incision in the cystic duct and passed into the duodenum. When the catheter was withdrawn, excellent visualization of the common and cystic ducts and lower end of the common hepatic duct was achieved. In seven patients, the biliary tree was normal. A small calculus was discovered in the common duct in one patient. This stone was not seen on a subsequent cholangiogram and was subsequently retrieved. An additional patient had mucus or sludge noted in the duct, which cast no acoustic shadow and thus was distinguished from calculi. The technique was fast, efficient, and easy to perform in this small group of patients and holds promise for screening the common duct pathology during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Routine or selective intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

The routine versus selective use of intraoperative cholangiography has been the subject of debate for some time. Most authors currently advocate routine intraoperative cholangiography with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The authors report their experience with the selective and routine utilization of intraoperative cholangiography at two institutions. At institution A, 155 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were attempted, and 21 cholangiograms were performed (based on preoperative criteria of ultrasound, liver function tests, and history of jaundice, or intraoperative anatomical uncertainty). At institution B, 164 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were attempted and 127 cholangiograms were performed (a routine intraoperative cholangiography policy). At institution A, there were no common bile duct injuries but there was one retained stone. At institution B, there was one common bile duct injury and no retained stones. The patient with the retained stone from institution A had a preoperative indication (total bilirubin = 4.4 mg/dl) for a cholangiogram, but it was not performed due to technical difficulties. This patient later required endoscopic sphincterotomy with stone extraction. One patient at institution B had a choledochotomy which was detected by intraoperative cholangiography (IOC). This was managed with a T-tube. The selective use of cholangiograms in laparoscopic cholecystectomy will not yield a higher incidence of common bile duct injuries or retained stones compared to routine use. Further, a cholangiogram may not necessarily prevent choledochotomy but can prevent extension of common bile duct injury. Thus, it should always be performed when there is anatomic uncertainty.

Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases

Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy were evaluated by a survey of surgical department chairpersons at 4,292 US hospitals. The 77,604 cases were reported by 1,750 respondents. Laparotomy was required for treatment of a complication in 1.2% of patients. The mean rate of bile duct injury (exclusive of cystic duct) was 0.6% and was significantly lower at institutions that had performed more than 100 cases. Bile duct injuries were recognized postoperatively in half of the cases and most frequently required anastomotic repair. Intraoperative cholangiography was practiced selectively by 52% of the respondents and routinely by 31%. Bowel and vascular injuries, which occurred in 0.14% and 0.25% of cases, respectively, were the most lethal complications. Postoperative bile leak was recognized in 0.3% of patients, most commonly originating from the cystic duct. Eighteen of 33 postoperative deaths resulted from operative injury. These data demonstrate that laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with low rates of morbidity and mortality but a significant rate of bile duct injury.