Treatment with interferon beta-1b delays conversion to clinically definite and McDonald MS in patients with clinically isolated syndromes

Fingolimod in the treatment algorithm of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: a statement of the Central and East European (CEE) MS Expert Group

Fingolimod is the first oral treatment of multiple sclerosis. It is the first-in-class sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator that binds to sphingosine 1-phophate receptors on lymphocytes and via downregulation of the receptor prevents lymphocyte egress from lymphoid tissues into the circulation. This mechanism reduces the infiltration of potentially auto-aggressive lymphocytes into the central nervous system. Two large phase III studies with fingolimod have shown superior efficacy of the drug in two dosages compared to placebo and to weekly intramuscular injections of Interferon beta-1a. Among possible side effects of the drug is a transient bradycardia after the first dose of fingolimod including possible AV blockade and therefore monitoring of pulse rate and blood pressure for 6 h following the first application is needed. During treatment, attention has to be given to specific infections, elevated liver enzymes, and ophthalmologic changes. Recommendations on the use of fingolimod including safety aspects are given in this article.

Country, sex, EDSS change and therapy choice independently predict treatment discontinuation in multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndrome

Objectives

We conducted a prospective study, MSBASIS, to assess factors leading to first treatment discontinuation in patients with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) and early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

Methods

The MSBASIS Study, conducted by MSBase Study Group members, enrols patients seen from CIS onset, reporting baseline demographics, cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores. Follow-up visits report relapses, EDSS scores, and the start and end dates of MS-specific therapies. We performed a multivariable survival analysis to determine factors within this dataset that predict first treatment discontinuation.

Results

A total of 2314 CIS patients from 44 centres were followed for a median of 2.7 years, during which time 1247 commenced immunomodulatory drug (IMD) treatment. Ninety percent initiated IMD after a diagnosis of MS was confirmed, and 10% while still in CIS status. Over 40% of these patients stopped their first IMD during the observation period. Females were more likely to cease medication than males (HR 1.36, p = 0.003). Patients treated in Australia were twice as likely to cease their first IMD than patients treated in Spain (HR 1.98, p = 0.001). Increasing EDSS was associated with higher rate of IMD cessation (HR 1.21 per EDSS unit, p<0.001), and intramuscular interferon-β-1a (HR 1.38, p = 0.028) and subcutaneous interferon-β-1a (HR 1.45, p = 0.012) had higher rates of discontinuation than glatiramer acetate, although this varied widely in different countries. Onset cerebral MRI features, age, time to treatment initiation or relapse on treatment were not associated with IMD cessation.

Conclusion

In this multivariable survival analysis, female sex, country of residence, EDSS change and IMD choice independently predicted time to first IMD cessation.

Immunomodulatory therapies delay disease progression in multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Few studies have analysed long-term effects of immunomodulatory disease modifying drugs (DMDs).

OBJECTIVE

Assessment of the efficacy of DMDs on long-term evolution of multiple sclerosis, using a Bayesian approach to overcome methodological problems related to open-label studies.

METHODS

MS patients from three different Italian multiple sclerosis centres were divided into subgroups according to the presence of treatment in their disease history before the endpoint, which was represented by secondary progression. Patients were stratified on the basis of the risk score BREMS (Bayesian risk estimate for multiple sclerosis), which is able to predict the unfavourable long-term evolution of MS at an early stage.

RESULTS

We analysed data from 1178 patients with a relapsing form of multiple sclerosis at onset and at least 10 years of disease duration, treated (59%) or untreated with DMDs. The risk of secondary progression was significantly lower in patients treated with DMDs, regardless of the initial prognosis predicted by BREMS.

CONCLUSIONS

DMDs significantly reduce the risk of multiple sclerosis progression both in patients with initial high-risk and patients with initial low-risk. These findings reinforce the role of DMDs in modifying the natural course of the disease, suggesting that they have a positive effect not only on the inflammatory but also on the neurodegenerative process. The study also confirms the capability of the BREMS score to predict MS evolution.

Immunotherapies in neurologic disorders

Therapy for autoimmune demyelinating disorders has evolved rapidly over the past 10 years to include traditional immunosuppressants as well as novel biologicals. Antibody-mediated neuromuscular disorders are treated with therapies that acutely modulate pathogenic antibodies or chronically inhibit the humoral immune response. In other inflammatory autoimmune disorders of the peripheral and central nervous system, corticosteroids, often combined with conventional immunosuppression, and immunomodulatory treatments are used. Because autoimmune neurologic disorders are so diverse, evidence from randomized controlled trials is limited for most of the immunotherapies used in neurology. This review provides an overview of the immunotherapies currently used for neurologic disorders.

Early diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of optic neuritis

BACKGROUND

About half of multiple sclerosis patients present with optic neuritis (ON) as a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS). In the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial study, 28% of patients with ON and an abnormal brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) did not have a relapse at the end of 15 years. It is still difficult to predict which CIS patients will go on to develop clinically definite multiple sclerosis and which will have a benign course.

REVIEW SUMMARY

This review focuses on more advanced methods of detecting and quantifying ON in multiple sclerosis that have been developed in the past 15 years, especially on recent developments in optical coherence tomography measurement of the retinal nerve fiber layer and its role in monitoring axonal loss in the course of the disease. New clinical trial methods of measuring visual acuity include high-contrast visual acuity testing with the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts, low-contrast letter acuity, and contrast sensitivity testing. More advanced neuroimaging techniques include magnetization transfer imaging and diffusion tensor imaging to quantify visual pathway lesions. Other tests of visual function, such as multifocal visual-evoked potentials and functional MRI, have been shown to be more sensitive than conventional visual-evoked potentials or MRI in detecting early, subtle visual impairment in ON and early recovery of visual function related to cortical plasticity. Newer agents are currently being investigated for CIS in ongoing clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Better methods are being developed for the earlier diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of ON. In the future, CIS patients may be stratified according to their risk of development of clinically definite multiple sclerosis and therefore, receive the appropriate treatment.

Background information on multiple sclerosis patients stopping ongoing immunomodulatory therapy: a multicenter study in a community-based environment

Adherence to an immunomodulatory therapy still needs to be improved in MS patients. We analyzed the data of 396 MS patients of 40 German MS outpatient centers who had stopped an ongoing immunomodulatory treatment. Items analyzed were among others adherence data, reasons for the interruption and willingness to start a new therapy. It became obvious that 74.6 % of the patients made the decision to withdraw from therapy on their own. The most commonly mentioned reasons for the withdrawal were proven or putative lack of efficacy (51.4 %), side effects (58.1 %), and complaints of fatigue and depression. There was no difference concerning sex, duration of the treatment and medication taken. The expectations correlated with the empathy of the treating physician and the setting with MS nurses taking care of the patient. A total of 199 patients (51.8 % of the females, 48.9 % of the males) wanted to restart another IMT. Reasons for not wanting to restart were lack of conviction that a therapy may influence the disease (29.4 %), fear of injection (18.7 %), fear of bringing the disease to mind regularly (17.9 %) and doubt about the diagnosis (11.2 %). The results suggest that adherence is most effectively promoted by cultivating an appropriate and individual therapeutic setting for each MS patient on a medical, organizational and last but not least psychological level.

Effects of interferon beta-1b on cognitive performance in patients with a first event suggestive of multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Cognitive dysfunction occurs at the earliest stages of multiple sclerosis (MS), including the stage of clinically isolated syndrome (CIS).

METHODS

We evaluated the impact of interferon beta-1b (IFNβ-1b) 250 µg on cognitive performance during the CIS stage in the BENEFITstudy. Cognition was assessed by Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test-3" (PASAT-3") scores.

RESULTS

Improvement in PASAT-3" score from baseline to year two was greater for IFNβ-1b treatment than placebo in patients not reaching clinically definite MS (CDMS) by year two. The treatment effect was maintained at year five and was statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

To conclude, early IFNβ-1b treatment had a sustained positive effect on PASAT-3" score over the 5-year BENEFIT study.

Adherence to first-line disease-modifying therapy for multiple sclerosis in kuwait

The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the rate of nonadherence to disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) among multiple sclerosis (MS) patients in Kuwait and to identify reasons for patient discontinuation of long-term therapy. Using a newly established MS registry at our institution, we collected data on MS patients' demographics, clinical characteristics, disability measures, and continuation or discontinuation of first-line DMTs. Reasons for nonadherence were divided into four categories: adverse events, inconvenience, perceived lack of efficacy, and physician-documented disease progression. Of 212 eligible patients, 40.1% were found to be nonadherent to first-line DMTs. In the nonadherent group, the female-to-male ratio was 1.75:1 and the mean age at disease onset was 26.8 years. Of this group, 69.4% of patients had a relapsing-remitting course, 18.8% had a secondary progressive course, and 11.8% had clinically isolated syndrome. Compared with the adherent group, the nonadherent group had a shorter mean disease duration (P = .014) and a greater likelihood of having Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores of 3 or lower (67.1% vs. 48.0%; P = .007). Inconvenience was the most common reason for nonadherence (32.9%), followed by perceived lack of efficacy (25.9%), adverse events (23.5%), and physician-documented disease progression (17.7%). In summary, the rate of nonadherence to first-line DMTs in MS patients at our institution is considered high. Most nonadherent patients had a short disease duration and low EDSS scores. Inconvenience and perceived lack of efficacy were the most common reasons for nonadherence. The results demonstrate a need to improve treatment adherence among MS patients in Kuwait through providing better patient education, improving communication between patients and health-care providers, defining therapy expectations, and instituting new therapeutic techniques.

Cutaneous adverse events associated with disease-modifying treatment in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review

Glatiramer acetate and interferon-beta are approved first-line disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS). DMTs can be associated with cutaneous adverse events, which may influence treatment adherence and patient quality of life. In this systematic review, we aimed to provide an overview of the clinical spectrum and the incidence of skin reactions associated with DMTs. A systematic literature search was performed up to May 2011 in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases without applying restrictions in study design, language, or publishing date. Eligible for inclusion were articles describing any skin reaction related to DMTs in MS patients. Selection of articles and data extraction were performed by two authors independently. One hundred and six articles were included, of which 41 (39%) were randomized controlled trials or cohort studies reporting incidences of mainly local injection-site reactions. A large number of patients had experienced some form of localized injection-site reaction: up to 90% for those using subcutaneous formulations and up to 33% for those using an intramuscular formulation. Sixty-five case-reports involving 106 MS patients described a wide spectrum of cutaneous adverse events, the most frequently reported being lipoatrophy, cutaneous necrosis and ulcers, and various immune-mediated inflammatory skin diseases. DMTs for MS are frequently associated with local injection-site reactions and a wide spectrum of generalized cutaneous adverse events, in particular, the subcutaneous formulations. Although some of the skin reactions may be severe and persistent, most of them are mild and do not require cessation of DMT.

The CombiRx trial of combined therapy with interferon and glatiramer cetate in relapsing remitting MS: Design and baseline characteristics

BACKGROUND: Interferon-β1a (IFNB) and glatiramer acetate (GA) are distinct therapies which are both partially effective for relapsing MS. It is not known if combining the two treatments would be more effective. OBJECTIVE: To review the rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of the CombiRx study of combined treatment with IFNB and GA. METHODS: The key inclusion criteria included a diagnosis of relapsing MS, at least 2 episodes of MS activity in the previous 3 years, expanded disability status scale of 0 to 5.5, and no prior treatment with either IFNB or GA. Subjects were randomized to IFNB+GA, IFNB monotherapy, or GA monotherapy in a 2:1:1 ratio. RESULTS: From 2005 to 2009, we enrolled 1008 subjects. The participants were 72.4% female and 87.6% Caucasian with a mean age of 37.7 years. The median duration of symptoms was 2 years at entry into the study, and the mean EDSS was 2.1. On the baseline MRI, the mean total lesion load was 12.2 ml, and 40% of the participants had enhancing lesions. CONCLUSION: We have recruited a population of patients with clinical and MRI characteristics typical for early MS. The study results will aid in deciding on the optimum early treatment. This trial should serve as a model for future studies of combination therapy.

Reliability and equivalence of alternate forms for the Symbol Digit Modalities Test: implications for multiple sclerosis clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Cognitive impairment is common in multiple sclerosis (MS), but is seldom assessed in clinical trials investigating the effects of disease-modifying therapies. The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is a particularly promising tool due to its sensitivity and robust correlation with brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and vocational disability. Unfortunately, there are no validated alternate SDMT forms, which are needed to mitigate practice effects.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to assess the reliability and equivalence of SDMT alternate forms.

METHODS

Twenty-five healthy participants completed each of five alternate versions of the SDMT - the standard form, two versions from the Rao Brief Repeatable Battery, and two forms specifically designed for this study. Order effects were controlled using a Latin-square research design.

RESULTS

All five versions of the SDMT produced mean values within 3 raw score points of one another. Three forms were very consistent, and not different by conservative statistical tests. The SDMT test-retest reliability using these forms was good to excellent, with all r values exceeding 0.80.

CONCLUSIONS

For the first time, we find good evidence that at least three alternate versions of the SDMT are of equivalent difficulty in healthy adults. The forms are reliable, and can be implemented in clinical trials emphasizing cognitive outcomes.

Current and emerging therapies for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: focus on cladribine

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory, immune-mediated, demyelinating disorder of the central nervous system with a heterogeneous clinical presentation and pathology in which activated lymphocytes play an important role in mediating tissue damage. Until recently, all first line therapies for MS were injectable. Several oral medications have been studied for preventative treatment of MS. Cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine) is a purine nucleoside analog that has been used for the treatment of several hematologic neoplasms, with a unique lymphcytotoxic mechanism of action. Cladribine has been investigated as treatment of MS for more than 15 years. A recent placebo-controlled, double-blind study of cladribine, CLARITY, showed decreased relapse rates, risk of disability progression and MRI measures of disease activity at 96 weeks. Cladribine's strengths included high efficacy and convenient, biannual oral dosing. However, concerns about safety prevented the FDA from approving cladribine in 2011. Thus, use of cladribine for treatment of relapsing and remitting multiple sclerosis will remain off-label.

Can a physician predict the clinical response to first-line immunomodulatory treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis?

BACKGROUND

Decreased relapse rate and slower disease progression have been reported with long-term use of immunomodulatory treatments (IMTs, interferon beta or glatiramer acetate) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. There are, however, patients who do not respond to such treatments, and they can be potential candidates for alternative therapeutic approaches.

OBJECTIVE

To identify clinical factors as possible predictors of poor long-term response.

METHODS

A 9-year prospective, continuous follow-up at a single center in Hungary to assess clinical efficacy of IMT.

RESULTS

In a patient group of 81 subjects with mean IMT duration of 54 ± 33 months, treatment efficacy expressed as annual relapse rate and change in clinical severity from baseline did not depend on the specific IMT (any of the interferon betas or glatiramer acetate), and on mono- or multifocal features of the initial appearance of the disease. Responders had shorter disease duration and milder clinical signs at the initiation of treatment. Relapse-rate reduction in the initial 2 years of treatment predicted clinical efficacy in subsequent years.

CONCLUSION

Based on these observations, we suggest that a 2-year trial period is sufficient to decide on the efficacy of a specific IMT. For those with insufficient relapse reduction in the first 2 years of treatment, a different IMT or other therapeutic approaches should be recommended.

Placebo-controlled trials in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis: are they still needed?

Placebo-controlled clinical trials are an important tool to verify the efficacy of therapeutic approaches. During recent years, many trials have been conducted into relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis, resulting in a variety of treatment options considered effective based on prospective, randomized controlled trials with masked outcome assessment in a representative population of patients (class I evidence). Accordingly, treatment is recommended because the benefit of treatment outweighs the potential risks (level A recommendation), whereas no treatment or delay of treatment may potentially harm patients. Placebo-controlled trials seem to be outdated in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis because they: cannot predict where a new treatment is placed in relation to the already established therapies, lead to the recruitment of inactive and nonrepresentative patient populations, delay the registration process due to slow recruitment, change the genetic background of study populations due to a shift of clinical trials to Asian countries and are unethical.

Subcutaneous recombinant interferon-β-1a (Rebif®): a review of its use in the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis

Subcutaneous recombinant interferon-β-1a (SC IFNβ-1a) [Rebif®] is indicated as monotherapy for the prevention of relapses and progression of physical disability in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). This article reviews the efficacy and tolerability of SC IFNβ-1a in this indication, with further discussion of its pharmacological properties and pertinent pharmacoeconomic studies. SC IFNβ-1a efficacy and tolerability were evaluated in randomized, double-blind, multinational trials in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). Its efficacy was demonstrated in the 2-year PRISMS trial, as SC IFNβ-1a 22 or 44 μg three times weekly (tiw) significantly reduced relapse rates, with an ≈30% relative risk reduction compared with placebo. SC IFNβ-1a was also associated with significantly delayed progression of disability, and lower disease activity according to MRI, relative to placebo. In the 24-week EVIDENCE trial, a significantly higher proportion of SC IFNβ-1a 44 μg tiw than intramuscular IFNβ-1a (Avonex®) 30 μg once weekly recipients remained relapse free. A serum-free formulation of SC IFNβ-1a 44 μg tiw was more efficacious than placebo in preventing the development of brain lesions in the 16-week IMPROVE trial. In the 96-week REGARD trial, the efficacy of SC IFNβ-1a 44 μg tiw was not significantly different to that of glatiramer acetate for clinical endpoints, although it was associated with reduced development of brain lesions compared with glatiramer acetate, according to some MRI endpoints. In the 36-month CAMMS223 trial, alemtuzumab led to significantly lower relapse rates and risk of developing sustained disability than SC IFNβ-1a 44 μg tiw, and was generally more efficacious according to other clinical and MRI endpoints. Across trials, influenza-like symptoms, injection-site reactions, haematological disturbances and hepatic enzyme abnormalities were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events occurring with SC IFNβ-1a. In the PRISMS trial, SC IFNβ-1a 22 and 44 μg tiw recipients had more injection-site reactions than placebo recipients and, at the higher dosage, haematological disturbances and increases in ALT levels were also significantly more frequent than with placebo. Pooled data from clinical trials and postmarketing surveillance indicate that haematological and hepatic adverse events are generally asymptomatic and rarely result in treatment discontinuation. Nevertheless, some cases of serious hepatic complications have been reported. In cost-utility studies, first-line therapies for RRMS, including SC IFNβ-1a, all exceeded commonly accepted US thresholds for incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-years gained relative to symptomatic treatment. However, because of patient need and the difficulty in adequately assessing cost utility in a gradually progressive disease, these agents have been made available to many patients worldwide through special access programmes. Overall, SC IFNβ-1a has a favourable risk-benefit ratio and is a valuable first-line treatment option for patients with relapsing MS.

Predictive nature of IgM anti-α-glucose serum biomarker for relapse activity and EDSS progression in CIS patients: a BENEFIT study analysis

Background:

Higher serum levels of at least one of a panel of four α-glucose IgM antibodies (gMS-Classifier1) in clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) patients are associated with imminent early relapse within 2 years.

Objective:

The objective of this study was to determine the prognostic value of gMS-Classifier1 in a large study cohort of CIS patients.

Methods:

The BEtaseron^® in Newly Emerging multiple sclerosis For Initial Treatment (BENEFIT) 5-year study was designed to evaluate the impact of early versus delayed interferon-β-1b (IFNβ-1b; Betaseron^®) treatment in patients with a first event suggestive of multiple sclerosis (MS). Patients (n = 258, 61% of total) with a minimum of 2 ml baseline serum were eligible for the biomarker study. gMS-Classifier1 antibodies’ panel (anti-GAGA2, anti-GAGA3, anti-GAGA4 and anti-GAGA6) levels were measured blinded to clinical data. Subjects were classified as either ‘positive’ or ‘negative’ according to a classification rule.

Results:

gMS-Classifier1 was not predictive for the time to clinically definite MS or time to MS according to the revised McDonald’s criteria, but did significantly predict an increased risk for confirmed disability progression (log-rank test: p = 0.012).

Conclusions:

We could not confirm previous results that gMS-Classifier1 can predict early conversion to MS in CIS. However, raised titres of these antibodies may predict early disability progression in this patient population.

Comparison of two dosing frequencies of subcutaneous interferon beta-1a in patients with a first clinical demyelinating event suggestive of multiple sclerosis (REFLEX): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

In patients presenting with a first clinical demyelinating event that is suggestive of multiple sclerosis (MS), treatment with interferon beta can delay the occurrence of further attacks and the onset of MS. We investigated the effects of two dosing frequencies of subcutaneous interferon beta-1a in patients with a first clinical demyelinating event.

METHODS

We undertook a multicentre phase 3 study (REbif FLEXible dosing in early MS [REFLEX]) that included patients (aged 18-50 years) with a single clinical event suggestive of MS, and at least two clinically silent T2 lesions on brain MRI. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio by use of a centralised interactive voice response system to receive the serum-free formulation of subcutaneous interferon beta-1a 44 μg three times a week or once a week (plus placebo twice a week for masking), or placebo three times a week for up to 24 months. Patients and physicians were masked to group allocation. The primary endpoint was time to a diagnosis of MS as defined by the 2005 McDonald criteria and the main secondary endpoint was time to clinically definite MS (CDMS) as defined by the Poser criteria. Analysis was by intention to treat. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00404352.

FINDINGS

517 patients were randomly assigned (171 to subcutaneous interferon beta-1a three times a week, 175 to subcutaneous interferon beta-1a once a week, and 171 to placebo) and 515 were treated. The 2-year cumulative probability of McDonald MS was significantly lower in patients treated with subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (three times a week 62·5%, p<0·0001, hazard ratio [HR] 0·49 [95% CI 0·38-0·64]; once a week 75·5%, p=0·008, HR 0·69 [0·54-0·87]) versus placebo (85·8%). 2-year rates of conversion to CDMS were lower for both interferon beta-1a dosing regimens (three times a week 20·6%, p=0·0004, HR 0·48 [0·31-0·73]; once a week 21·6%, p=0·0023, HR 0·53 [0·35-0·79]) than for placebo (37·5%). Adverse events were within the established profile for subcutaneous interferon beta-1a.

INTERPRETATION

Both regimens of subcutaneous interferon beta-1a delayed clinical relapses and subclinical disease activity. The potential differences between the regimens warrant longer-term study.

FUNDING

Merck Serono SA, Geneva, Switzerland.

Establishing long-term efficacy in chronic disease: use of recursive partitioning and propensity score adjustment to estimate outcome in MS

Context

Establishing the long-term benefit of therapy in chronic diseases has been challenging. Long-term studies require non-randomized designs and, thus, are often confounded by biases. For example, although disease-modifying therapy in MS has a convincing benefit on several short-term outcome-measures in randomized trials, its impact on long-term function remains uncertain.

Objective

Data from the 16-year Long-Term Follow-up study of interferon-beta-1b is used to assess the relationship between drug-exposure and long-term disability in MS patients.

Design/Setting

To mitigate the bias of outcome-dependent exposure variation in non-randomized long-term studies, drug-exposure was measured as the medication-possession-ratio, adjusted up or down according to multiple different weighting-schemes based on MS severity and MS duration at treatment initiation. A recursive-partitioning algorithm assessed whether exposure (using any weighing scheme) affected long-term outcome. The optimal cut-point that was used to define “high” or “low” exposure-groups was chosen by the algorithm. Subsequent to verification of an exposure-impact that included all predictor variables, the two groups were compared using a weighted propensity-stratified analysis in order to mitigate any treatment-selection bias that may have been present. Finally, multiple sensitivity-analyses were undertaken using different definitions of long-term outcome and different assumptions about the data.

Main Outcome Measure

Long-Term Disability.

Results

In these analyses, the same weighting-scheme was consistently selected by the recursive-partitioning algorithm. This scheme reduced (down-weighted) the effectiveness of drug exposure as either disease duration or disability at treatment-onset increased. Applying this scheme and using propensity-stratification to further mitigate bias, high-exposure had a consistently better clinical outcome compared to low-exposure (Cox proportional hazard ratio = 0.30–0.42; p<0.0001).

Conclusions

Early initiation and sustained use of interferon-beta-1b has a beneficial impact on long-term outcome in MS. Our analysis strategy provides a methodological framework for bias-mitigation in the analysis of non-randomized clinical data.

Trial Registration

Clinicaltrials.govNCT00206635

Exploring the Association between Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness and Initial Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Patients with Acute Optic Neuritis

Background. Recent studies have shown that OCT-measured retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) values may represent a marker for axonal damage in the anterior visual pathway of optic neuritis (ON) and multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. The goal of this study was to determine the link between RNFL values and initial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence of central nervous system (CNS) inflammation in patients with acute ON. Methods. Fifty patients who experienced ON as a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) were followed for a mean period of 34 months with OCT testing. RNFL values in affected (ON) eyes and clinically unaffected (non-ON) eyes were compared between patients with MRI evidence of white matter lesions and those with normal baseline MRI findings, over a two year period. Findings. Twenty-one patients (42%) developed clinically definite MS (CDMS) during the study. After two years, temporal RNFL values were thinner (P = .07) in ON patients with MRI lesions at baseline, but the results were not significant. Conclusions. There is no association between RNFL values and baseline MRI status in ON patients at risk for future CDMS over a two year period.

Potential health care cost savings associated with early treatment of multiple sclerosis using disease-modifying therapy

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials have shown that treatment with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), such as interferon, at the time of clinically isolated syndrome can delay the onset of multiple sclerosis (MS).

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to assess health care utilization and expenditures associated with treating patients early with DMTs rather than delaying until patients meet the full diagnostic criteria of MS.

METHODS

A retrospective study used insurance claims data (2000-2008) of enrolled patients before documented MS (1 inpatient or 2 outpatient claims with International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification 340 coding). Treatment cohorts were early DMT (DMT claim before the first documented MS; N = 227) and delayed DMT (DMT started after documented MS; N = 3724). Comparisons during 1 year of follow-up were adjusted for confounding using multivariate methods.

RESULTS

Adjusted annual per-patient expenditures (including patient out of pocket) for early versus delayed were as follows: total ($28,280 vs $29,102; P = 0.44), excluding DMT cost ($15,214 vs $17,630; P < 0.01), and MS-related ($9365 vs $13,661; P < 0.01). Hospitalizations were 10.1% versus 16.5% (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.32-0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis indicated that early DMT treatment was associated with fewer hospitalizations than delayed treatment, and there was no statistically significant difference in annual health care expenditures. This suggests that the drug costs of early therapy were offset by savings in other medical expenditures.

Principles of a new treatment algorithm in multiple sclerosis

We are entering a new era in the management of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The first oral treatment (fingolimod) has now gained US FDA approval, addressing an unmet need for patients with MS who wish to avoid parenteral administration. A second agent (cladribine) is currently being considered for approval. With the arrival of these oral agents, a key question is where they may fit into the existing MS treatment algorithm. This article aims to help answer this question by analyzing the trial data for the new oral therapies, as well as for existing MS treatments, by applying practical clinical experience, and through consideration of our increased understanding of how to define treatment success in MS. This article also provides a speculative look at what the treatment algorithm may look like in 5 years, with the availability of new data, greater experience and, potentially, other novel agents.

Accuracy of diagnostic tests in multiple sclerosis--a systematic review

New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS) have been recently proposed and further updates are upcoming. This systematic literature review summarizes diagnostic studies in suspected MS to clarify the value of diagnostic tests. We included studies of at least 40 patients followed up for 2 years. All studies are limited by the fact that no gold standard to validate diagnostic tests is available. A second relapse is used as a surrogate in relapsing-remitting MS, but long follow-up of at least 5 years is necessary to detect all cases. Many studies showed selection bias, partly because of the vague definition of a clinically isolated syndrome. Based on these limitations, sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) criteria was between 35% and 100%, and specificity was between 36% and 92%. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) oligoclonal banding showed sensitivities between 69% and 91% with specificities between 59% and 94%. Combination studies of MRI and CSF indicate enhanced sensitivity (56-100%) and specificity (53-96%). Studies on evoked potentials did not justify conclusions about their value. A combination of simplified MRI criteria with CSF might be the best approach for an early MS diagnosis. However, the value of a very early diagnosis stays questionable as patients' benefit of new diagnostic criteria has never been addressed.

Application of the 2010 McDonald criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis in a Spanish cohort of patients with clinically isolated syndromes

Background: Recently the International Panel on Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) has proposed new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) criteria for the diagnosis of MS in patients with clinically isolated syndromes (CIS). We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of these new criteria for lesions dissemination in space (DIS) and time (DIT), from a single MRI scan, to predict conversion from CIS to clinically definite MS.

Methods: We studied 67 CIS patients with baseline MRI performed within the first 3 months after onset. The follow-up was of at least 24 months. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of Barkhof–Tintoré criteria and the new proposed MRI criteria for DIS and DIT were calculated with SPSS v.15.0.

Results: The mean age for clinical onset was 30 years and 64% of patients were female. The overall conversion rate was 74%. In our cohort, Barkhof–Tintoré criteria showed a sensitivity of 71.43%, a specificity of 66.67%, with an accuracy of 73.1%. New DIS criteria showed a sensitivity of 85.71%, a specificity of 64.71% and an accuracy of 80.30%. We also evaluated the new DIT criteria with a single MRI scan in 54 patients with baseline scans that included gadolinium-enhanced images. The sensitivity of the test was 52.63% with a specificity of 75.00% and an accuracy of 59.26%.

Conclusion: New DIS criteria are simpler and more sensitive than previous criteria. The sensitivity of DIT criterion using a single MRI scan was rather low, as other previous studies showed, reflecting its stringency, but it could improve the accuracy of early MS diagnosis in that group of patients with typical CIS and gadolinium-enhancing and non-enhancing lesions on their baseline scans. These results reinforce their use in MS diagnosis.

No increase in cancer incidence detected after cyclophosphamide in a French cohort of patients with progressive multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Cyclophosphamide is still used in progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) in view of its suggested efficacy and safety in the short term. No data exist on its long-term safety in MS, particularly on the risk of malignancy.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate cancer incidence in MS after cyclophosphamide treatment.

METHODS

We performed a historical prospective study in a cohort of MS patients treated with cyclophosphamide. We collected demographic data and medical history from medical databases and patient interviews. Reported cancers were histologically confirmed. Cancer incidence was compared with the incidence in the general population by estimating standardized incidence ratios (SIRs).

RESULTS

We included 354 patients, with a median follow-up of 5 years (range 2-15) after cyclophosphamide treatment. Fifteen patients developed a solid cancer, which occurred at a median of 3 years (range 0.5-14) after cyclophosphamide introduction. The cumulative incidence of cancer after cyclophosphamide was 3.1% at 5 years and 5.9% at 8 years. We found no increase in cancer incidence after cyclophosphamide treatment in men (SIR = 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30-1.82), women (SIR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.43-1.95), or men and women combined (SIR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.50-1.54).

CONCLUSION

We found no evidence of an increased risk of cancer associated with cyclophosphamide treatment in MS patients.

Current disease-modifying treatment of multiple sclerosis

The treatment era for multiple sclerosis began in 1993 with the approval of the first disease-modifying therapy. This changed the management of multiple sclerosis from treating acute exacerbations to focusing on preventive therapeutic options that lessen the risk for exacerbations, changes on magnetic resonance imaging, and disability as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale. Currently, there are 8 therapies approved to treat multiple sclerosis: beta-interferons (Avonex, Betaseron, Extavia, and Rebif), fingolimod (Gilenya), glatiramer acetate (Copaxone), mitoxantrone (Novantrone), and natalizumab (Tysabri). These agents will be reviewed including the pivotal trial data, mechanisms of action, and side effects. The timing of beginning therapy and selection of these agents must be individualized for each patient depending upon patient preference, tolerability, clinical and magnetic resonance imaging disease activity, and disease course. All of the current treatments are approved for relapsing disease. To date only the injectable agents, including interferons and glatiramer acetate, have been shown to be of benefit when started after an initial demyelinating event referred to as clinically isolated syndrome. Mitoxantrone was approved for progressive relapsing and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, although its use is limited by potential risks such as cardiotoxicity and leukemia. Although these agents have made a significant impact on the treatment of multiple sclerosis, they are often only partially effective, so patients may continue to have disease activity. Multiple new agents are currently being tested in clinical trials and it is likely our treatment paradigms will change as more effective therapies become available.

Natural history of multiple sclerosis: have available therapies impacted long-term prognosis?

Since the mid-1990s several disease-modifying drugs (DMDs), such as β-interferons and glatiramer acetate, have become available to treat patients with relapse-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). These therapies have known short- and medium-term benefit in reducing relapses, disability progression, and accrual of new inflammatory lesions. However, the short duration of the randomized pivotal MS trials have provided little to no information about benefit from such treatment over periods of extended (>5 years) use. Whether DMDs may significantly alter the development of long-term disability remains uncertain, thus it remains challenging how to best approach the issue of long-term benefits from these treatments.

Natural history of multiple sclerosis: early prognostic factors

Multiple sclerosis is a heterogeneous disease, and predicting its course is difficult at the individual level. In this article, clinical, demographic, and additional features that are associated with the risk of relapses and of intermediate-term disability are reviewed.

Can the functional assessment of multiple sclerosis adapt to changing needs? A psychometric validation in patients with clinically isolated syndrome and early relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis

Background: The Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS) is widely used in clinical trial programmes; however, it was developed before the rise in trials targeted at early stage multiple sclerosis (MS) and clinically isolated syndrome (CIS).

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the FAMS within two clinically distinct populations, CIS and early relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS), and discern the appropriateness of the FAMS within these populations.

Methods: Secondary analysis was conducted on FAMS data from two clinical trials assessing interferon beta–1b in early RRMS and CIS. The statistical analysis assessed the scale acceptability, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the FAMS. Item response theory (IRT) was also conducted on the early RRMS sample in order to assess how well the FAMS discriminated amongst individuals with less severe MS.

Results: Results from both trials demonstrated an improvement in the FAMS psychometric properties with increased baseline disease severity. However, high ceiling effects were evident amongst less severe patients, and there was an overall lack of responsiveness to improvement and poor construct validity. IRT also demonstrated its lack of discrimination/sensitivity in early RRMS.

Conclusions: In trials involving patients with early stage RRMS and CIS, modifications to the FAMS based on a qualitative assessment of its content validity in these populations would be required in order to potentially improve the FAMS psychometric properties and sensitivity.

Disease-modifying agents in multiple sclerosis

Since 1993, six disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis (MS) have been proven to be of benefit in rigorous phase III clinical trials. Other agents are also available and are used to treat MS, but definitive data on their efficacy is lacking. Currently, disease-modifying therapy is used for relapsing forms of MS. This includes clinically isolated syndrome/first-attack high-risk patients, relapsing patients, secondary progressive patients who are still experiencing relapses, and progressive relapsing patients. The choice of agent depends upon drug factors (including affordability, availability, convenience, efficacy, and side effects), disease factors (including clinical and neuroimaging prognostic indicators), and patient factors (including comorbidities, lifestyle, and personal preference). This review will discuss the disease-modifying agents used currently in MS, as well as available alternative agents.

Evolving expectations around early management of multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis is a progressive inflammatory disease of the central nervous system. With prevention or at least delay of disease progression as a key target in the management of multiple sclerosis, current opinion on treatment encourages early intervention with well-tolerated disease-modifying treatments in order to optimize long-term clinical outcomes. Patients presenting with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) may progress to clinically definite multiple sclerosis, and clinical trials have demonstrated that early treatment with interferon beta can reduce the conversion rate. Cognitive impairment may already be present in patients with CISs. Today there is evolving evidence that cognitive impairment may be relevant for prognosis and that early treatment with interferon beta may also have a protective effect on the cognitive function. As an accumulation of neuronal loss is now considered to underlie the development of persistent disability in multiple sclerosis, it is crucial that treatment can protect against neuronal damage. In addition to its anti-inflammatory activity, interferon beta may have direct and indirect neuroprotective effects, and several studies have explored the role of interferon beta in regulating neuroprotective factors. With over 15 years of clinical experience as evidence, the long-term safety and efficacy of interferon beta treatment is unquestionable. Results from the CIS studies have demonstrated the high percentage of patients converting to clinically definite multiple sclerosis without treatment and the short- and long-term benefits of an early use of disease-modifying treatments. These findings support starting disease-modifying treatment as soon as the diagnosis of MS is reasonably formulated.

A one-year prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, quadruple-blinded, phase II safety pilot trial of combination therapy with interferon beta-1a and mycophenolate mofetil in early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (TIME MS)

BACKGROUND

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an oral DNA base synthesis inhibitor with immunomodulatory effects on B cells, T cells, and macrophages.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a safety and tolerability pilot study of interferon beta-1a (IFN-b1a) in combination with either placebo or oral MMF in multiple sclerosis (MS).

METHODS

Twenty-four treatment-naïve R-RMS patients participated in a one-year prospective, placebo-controlled, blinded, safety pilot clinical trial. Every patient injected weekly intramuscular interferon beta-1a. The cohort was then randomized (1 : 1) to either active oral MMF or identical-appearing placebo tablets. Clinical evaluations were assessed every 3 months, along with brain MRI scans performed at baseline and repeated every 60 days for one year. Comprehensive laboratory assessments were monitored for safety, along with adverse events.

RESULTS

In this small pilot investigation, no differences were identified between the two treatment groups with respect to patient-reported adverse events, MRI metrics, or laboratory abnormalities. Notwithstanding these observations, and the limited number of patients treated, trends appeared to favor the combination therapy regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination treatment regimen of interferon beta-1a and MMF appeared to be well tolerated in this pilot study. Despite the small sample size, therapeutic trends were observed in favor of combination therapy. An adequately powered controlled trial of MMF in MS appears warranted.

Management of optic neuritis

Optic neuritis is an inflammatory condition of the optic nerve characterized by a sudden onset of unilateral visual loss, usually affecting young females. Demyelination associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common cause in regions where MS is prevalent; while in other places, there are a substantial proportion of cases where infective or autoimmune causes are seen. Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial (ONTT) was the first major study that provided information on the natural history, role of steroids in treatment and risk of development of MS. Subsequently, numerous clinical trials have evaluated different modalities of management of optic neuritis and MS. The Controlled High-Risk Subjects Avonex Multiple Sclerosis Prevention Study (CHAMPS); the Prevention of Relapses and Disability by Interferon β-1a Subcutaneously in Multiple Sclerosis (PRISMS) Trial; and, most recently, the Betaferon in Newly Emerging Multiple Sclerosis for Initial Treatment (BENEFIT) Study have provided large amount of information on the natural history of optic neuritis and management options available. However, due to the low prevalence of MS reported in Asian studies, high cost of therapy and indefinite time period of treatment, it may not be cost effective to start interferon therapy in most cases.

The mechanism of action of interferon-β in relapsing multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is characterized by autoimmune inflammation and subsequent neurodegeneration. It is believed that early in the disease course, proinflammatory T cells that are activated in the periphery by antigen presentation cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) into the CNS directed by various chemotaxic agents. However, to date, there has been no formal demonstration of a specific precipitating antigen. Once inside the CNS, activated T cells including T helper-1 (T(h)1), T(h)17, γδ and CD8+ types are believed to secrete proinflammatory cytokines. Decreased levels of T(h)2 cells also correlate with relapses and disease progression in MS, since T(h)2-derived cytokines are predominantly anti-inflammatory. In healthy tissue, inflammatory effects are opposed by specific subsets of regulatory T cells (T(regs)) including CD4+, CD25+ and FoxP3+ cells that have the ability to downregulate the activity of proinflammatory T cells, allowing repair and recovery to generally follow inflammatory insult. Given their function, the pathogenesis of MS most likely involves deficits of T(reg) function, which allow autoimmune inflammation and resultant neurodegeneration to proceed relatively unchecked. Interferons (IFNs) are naturally occurring cytokines possessing a wide range of anti-inflammatory properties. Recombinant forms of IFNβ are widely used as first-line treatment in relapsing forms of MS. The mechanism of action of IFNβ is complex, involving effects at multiple levels of cellular function. IFNβ appears to directly increase expression and concentration of anti-inflammatory agents while downregulating the expression of proinflammatory cytokines. IFNβ treatment may reduce the trafficking of inflammatory cells across the BBB and increase nerve growth factor production, leading to a potential increase in neuronal survival and repair. IFNβ can also increase the number of CD56bright natural killer cells in the peripheral blood. These cells are efficient producers of anti-inflammatory mediators, and may have the ability to curb neuron inflammation. The mechanistic effects of IFNβ manifest clinically as reduced MRI lesion activity, reduced brain atrophy, increased time to reach clinically definite MS after the onset of neurological symptoms, decreased relapse rate and reduced risk of sustained disability progression. The mechanism of action of IFNβ in MS is multifactorial and incompletely understood. Ongoing and future studies will increase our understanding of the actions of IFNβ on the immune system and the CNS, which will in turn aid advances in the management of MS.

Alternative statistical methods for estimating efficacy of interferon beta-1b for multiple sclerosis clinical trials

BACKGROUND

In the randomized study of interferon beta-1b (IFN beta-1b) for multiple sclerosis (MS), it has usually been evaluated the simple annual relapse rate as the study endpoint. This study aimed to investigate the performance of various regression models using information regarding the time to each recurrent event and considering the MS specific data generation process, and to estimate the treatment effect of a MS clinical trial data.

METHODS

We conducted a simulation study with consideration of the pathological characteristics of MS, and applied alternative efficacy estimation methods to real clinical trial data, including 5 extended Cox regression models for time-to-event analysis, a Poisson regression model and a Poisson regression model with Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE). We adjusted for other important covariates that may have affected the outcome.

RESULTS

We compared the simulation results for each model. The hazard ratios of real data were estimated for each model including the effects of other covariates. The results (hazard ratios of high-dose to low-dose) of all models were approximately 0.7 (range, 0.613 - 0.769), whereas the annual relapse rate ratio was 0.714.

CONCLUSIONS

The precision of the treatment estimation was increased by application of the alternative models. This suggests that the use of alternative models that include recurrence event data may provide better analyses.

When to initiate disease-modifying drugs for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis in adults?

For patients with Relapsing Remitting Multiple Scierosis Beta Interfaerons and Glatiramer Acetate were the first to be licensed for treatment. This review deals with one major question: when to initiate therapy? Through exploring the unique characteristics of the disease and treatement we suggest an approach that should be helpful in the process of decision-making.

Head tremor secondary to MS resolved with rituximab

We describe the case of a 33-year-old woman who presented with a 2-month history of worsening head tremor. The medical evaluation led to the new diagnosis of MS and the MRI of brain demonstrated prominently active disease. Intravenous rituximab was started according to the HERMES trial, and significant improvement was noted. She has received additional rituximab dosing approximately every 6 months, and at the 2-year follow-up the tremor has not recurred. The resolution of head tremor likely resulted from the complete suppression of MS disease activity, which must have allowed restoration of normal neural circuitry. In agreement with a growing body of evidence that supports early control of MS disease activity to prevent accumulation of fixed disability, this case advocates for aggressive immunological therapy at the onset of tremor in MS patients.

Development of oral immunomodulatory agents in the management of multiple sclerosis

The emergence of oral disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis (MS) will have a significant impact on the evolving scenario of immunomodulatory treatments in MS where current therapies are all injectable. Reducing relapses in trials translates for individuals with MS into a therapeutic aim of stopping future events. Thus the possible absence of any perceived benefits to the individual together with the long disease course, variable outcome, and a younger age group affected in MS makes side effects the major issue. The use of disease-modifying therapies as a whole needs to be placed in the context of a widening therapeutic indication where the use of these therapies is being justified at an increasingly early stage and in pre-MS syndromes such as clinically isolated and radiologically isolated syndromes where no fixed disability is likely to have accumulated. The five oral therapies discussed (cladribine, fingolimod, laquinimod, BG-12, and teriflunomide) have just completed Phase III studies and some have just been licensed. New oral drugs for MS need to be placed within this evolving marketplace where ease of delivery together with efficacy and side effects needs to be balanced against the known issues but also the known long-term safety of standard injectables.