1
|
Hohenschurz-Schmidt DJ, Cherkin D, Rice AS, Dworkin RH, Turk DC, McDermott MP, Bair MJ, DeBar LL, Edwards RR, Farrar JT, Kerns RD, Markman JD, Rowbotham MC, Sherman KJ, Wasan AD, Cowan P, Desjardins P, Ferguson M, Freeman R, Gewandter JS, Gilron I, Grol-Prokopczyk H, Hertz SH, Iyengar S, Kamp C, Karp BI, Kleykamp BA, Loeser JD, Mackey S, Malamut R, McNicol E, Patel KV, Sandbrink F, Schmader K, Simon L, Steiner DJ, Veasley C, Vollert J. Research objectives and general considerations for pragmatic clinical trials of pain treatments: IMMPACT statement. Pain 2023; 164:1457-1472. [PMID: 36943273 PMCID: PMC10281023 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Many questions regarding the clinical management of people experiencing pain and related health policy decision-making may best be answered by pragmatic controlled trials. To generate clinically relevant and widely applicable findings, such trials aim to reproduce elements of routine clinical care or are embedded within clinical workflows. In contrast with traditional efficacy trials, pragmatic trials are intended to address a broader set of external validity questions critical for stakeholders (clinicians, healthcare leaders, policymakers, insurers, and patients) in considering the adoption and use of evidence-based treatments in daily clinical care. This article summarizes methodological considerations for pragmatic trials, mainly concerning methods of fundamental importance to the internal validity of trials. The relationship between these methods and common pragmatic trials methods and goals is considered, recognizing that the resulting trial designs are highly dependent on the specific research question under investigation. The basis of this statement was an Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) systematic review of methods and a consensus meeting. The meeting was organized by the Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks (ACTTION) public-private partnership. The consensus process was informed by expert presentations, panel and consensus discussions, and a preparatory systematic review. In the context of pragmatic trials of pain treatments, we present fundamental considerations for the planning phase of pragmatic trials, including the specification of trial objectives, the selection of adequate designs, and methods to enhance internal validity while maintaining the ability to answer pragmatic research questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J. Hohenschurz-Schmidt
- Pain Research, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Dan Cherkin
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington and Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Andrew S.C. Rice
- Pain Research, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robert H. Dworkin
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Dennis C. Turk
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Michael P. McDermott
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Matthew J. Bair
- VA Center for Health Information and Communication, Regenstrief Institute, and Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Lynn L. DeBar
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States
| | | | - John T. Farrar
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Robert D. Kerns
- Departments of Psychiatry, Neurology and Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - John D. Markman
- Neuromedicine Pain Management and Translational Pain Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Michael C. Rowbotham
- Department of Anesthesia, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Karen J. Sherman
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute and Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle WA, United States
| | - Ajay D. Wasan
- Departments of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, and Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Penney Cowan
- American Chronic Pain Association, Rocklin, CA, United States
| | - Paul Desjardins
- Department of Diagnostic Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, United States
| | - McKenzie Ferguson
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, IL, United States
| | - Roy Freeman
- Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jennifer S. Gewandter
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Ian Gilron
- Departments of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Biomedical & Molecular Sciences, Centre for Neuroscience Studies, and School of Policy Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Hanna Grol-Prokopczyk
- Department of Sociology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo NY, United States
| | - Sharon H. Hertz
- Hertz and Fields Consulting, Inc, Silver Spring, MD, United States
| | | | - Cornelia Kamp
- Center for Health and Technology (CHeT), Clinical Materials Services Unit (CMSU), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States
| | | | - Bethea A. Kleykamp
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - John D. Loeser
- Departments of Neurological Surgery and Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Sean Mackey
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Neurosciences and Neurology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | | | - Ewan McNicol
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Kushang V. Patel
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Friedhelm Sandbrink
- Department of Neurology, Washington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
- Department of Neurology, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Kenneth Schmader
- Department of Medicine-Geriatrics, Center for the Study of Aging, Duke University Medical Center, and Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Lee Simon
- SDG, LLC, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | | | - Christin Veasley
- Chronic Pain Research Alliance, North Kingstown, RI, United States
| | - Jan Vollert
- Pain Research, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
- Neurophysiology, Mannheim Center of Translational Neuroscience (MCTN), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dantas FT, Felix-Silva PH, Angotti-Carrara HH, Dos-Reis FJC, Junior MT, DE-Souza SLS, Palioto DB. A New Method for Obtaining Tumor Interstitial Fluid Applied to Cytokine Analysis of Breast Carcinoma Samples. Anticancer Res 2022; 42:1327-1332. [PMID: 35220223 DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2021] [Revised: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Tumor interstitial fluid (TIF), a component of the tumor microenvironment, is a valuable source of molecules and substances that help in diagnosis and prognosis of solid tumors. There is still no consensus on the optimal method for collecting TIF. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a new method of collecting TIF in invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) samples for cytokine interleukin 1β (IL1β) quantification. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty women allowed the collection of TIF using absorbent paper strips during the performance of the core biopsy. The samples were stored at a temperature of -80°C and then analyzed using an enzyme-linked immunoassay. RESULTS The mean values for IL1β and total protein were 11.39 mg/ml and 2.15 mg/ml, respectively. CONCLUSION it was possible to quantify the cytokine IL1β and the total protein concentration present in the tumor tissue through TIF collection with the use of absorbent paper filters, demonstrating the effectiveness of this new method in oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe Torres Dantas
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Periodontology, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Pedro Henrique Felix-Silva
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Periodontology, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Mario Taba Junior
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Periodontology, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Sérgio Luís Scombatti DE-Souza
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Periodontology, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Daniela Bazan Palioto
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Periodontology, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Katz N, Dworkin RH, North R, Thomson S, Eldabe S, Hayek SM, Kopell BH, Markman J, Rezai A, Taylor RS, Turk DC, Buchser E, Fields H, Fiore G, Ferguson M, Gewandter J, Hilker C, Jain R, Leitner A, Loeser J, McNicol E, Nurmikko T, Shipley J, Singh R, Trescot A, van Dongen R, Venkatesan L. Research design considerations for randomized controlled trials of spinal cord stimulation for pain: Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials/Institute of Neuromodulation/International Neuromodulation Society recommendations. Pain 2021; 162:1935-1956. [PMID: 33470748 PMCID: PMC8208090 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an interventional nonpharmacologic treatment used for chronic pain and other indications. Methods for evaluating the safety and efficacy of SCS have evolved from uncontrolled and retrospective studies to prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Although randomization overcomes certain types of bias, additional challenges to the validity of RCTs of SCS include blinding, choice of control groups, nonspecific effects of treatment variables (eg, paresthesia, device programming and recharging, psychological support, and rehabilitative techniques), and safety considerations. To address these challenges, 3 professional societies (Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials, Institute of Neuromodulation, and International Neuromodulation Society) convened a meeting to develop consensus recommendations on the design, conduct, analysis, and interpretation of RCTs of SCS for chronic pain. This article summarizes the results of this meeting. Highlights of our recommendations include disclosing all funding source and potential conflicts; incorporating mechanistic objectives when possible; avoiding noninferiority designs without internal demonstration of assay sensitivity; achieving and documenting double-blinding whenever possible; documenting investigator and site experience; keeping all information provided to patients balanced with respect to expectation of benefit; disclosing all information provided to patients, including verbal scripts; using placebo/sham controls when possible; capturing a complete set of outcome assessments; accounting for ancillary pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments in a clear manner; providing a complete description of intended and actual programming interactions; making a prospective ascertainment of SCS-specific safety outcomes; training patients and researchers on appropriate expectations, outcome assessments, and other key aspects of study performance; and providing transparent and complete reporting of results according to applicable reporting guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathaniel Katz
- Corresponding author. Address: WCG Analgesic Solutions, Wayland, MA, USA. Tel.: 1-617-948-5161. E-mail address: (N. Katz)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yao X, Florez ID, Zhang P, Zhang C, Zhang Y, Wang C, Liu X, Nie X, Wei B, Ghert MA. Clinical research methods for treatment, diagnosis, prognosis, etiology, screening, and prevention: A narrative review. J Evid Based Med 2020; 13:130-136. [PMID: 32445266 DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2019] [Accepted: 03/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
This narrative review is an introduction for health professionals on how to conduct and report clinical research on six categories: treatment, diagnosis/differential diagnosis, prognosis, etiology, screening, and prevention. The importance of beginning with an appropriate clinical question and the exploration of how appropriate it is through a literature search are explained. There are three methodological directives that can assist clinicians in conducting their studies from a methodological perspective: (1) how to conduct an original study or a systematic review, (2) how to report an original study or a systematic review, and (3) how to assess the quality or risk of bias for a previous relevant original study or systematic review. This methodological overview article would provide readers with the key points and resources regarding how to perform high-quality research on the six main clinical categories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaomei Yao
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Center for Clinical Practice Guideline Conduction and Evaluation, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, P.R. China
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ivan D Florez
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Antioquia, Colombia
| | - Ping Zhang
- Editorial Office, Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Chongfan Zhang
- Center for Clinical Practice Guideline Conduction and Evaluation, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Yi Zhang
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Chunxue Wang
- Division of Neuropsychiatry and Behavioral Neurology and Clinical Psychology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Xiaofang Liu
- Division of Respirology, Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Xiuhong Nie
- Division of Respirology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Bing Wei
- Division of Respirology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Michelle A Ghert
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pomponio G, Tedesco S, Peghetti A, Bianchi T, Rowan S, Greco A, Cutting K, Price P, Moore Z, Gabrielli A, Wolcott R. Improving the quality of clinical research on chronic wound infection treatment: expert-based recommendations. J Wound Care 2019; 28:S26-S31. [PMID: 30724117 DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.sup1.s26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To produce recommendations for the design of reliable and informative clinical investigations in chronic wound infection. METHOD: A multidisciplinary panel of international experts from four countries (Italy, UK, Ireland and the US) were involved in a detailed, semi-structured discussion on how to better select and describe a target population, interventions and outcomes, and which infection-related criteria to apply in order to achieve a high-quality trial. Consent among the experts was measured using the Delphi method and GRADE Working Group suggestions. The project was fully supported by AISLeC 2016 (Italian Nursing Society for Wound Care Study). RESULTS: In total, 37 recommendations achieved substantial agreement among the experts; 10 concerned the most appropriate description and selection of a target population, four related to interventions and 15 to outcomes. A further eight statements about critical methodological points were approved. CONCLUSION: Developing recommendations in a systematic manner through a representative group of experts could generate tools for improving the design of clinical trials in this challenging area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Silvia Tedesco
- SOSD Fibrosi Cistica, AOU Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Italy
| | - Angela Peghetti
- Ospedale S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, former AISLeC President, Executive Board of World Union of Wound Healing Societies, Italy
| | - Tommaso Bianchi
- UO Dermatologia AUSL Bologna - Istituto delle scienze neurologiche Bellaria, Bologna, Italy
| | - Sara Rowan
- C3S - Clinical Scientific Support Services, Italy
| | - Alessandro Greco
- Outpatient Wound Care Centre, Local Health Care System Frosinone, Italy
| | - Keith Cutting
- Clinical Research Consultant, Hertfordshire, Tissue Viability Specialist, First Community Health and Care, Surrey, UK
| | - Patricia Price
- Emeritus Professor; c/o Pro Vice-Chancellors' Office, Cardiff University, UK
| | - Zena Moore
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; and Visiting Professor, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, UGent, Ghent University, Belgium
| | - Armando Gabrielli
- Professor; Clinica Medica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Corregano L, Bastert K, Correa da Rosa J, Kost RG. Accrual Index: A Real-Time Measure of the Timeliness of Clinical Study Enrollment. Clin Transl Sci 2015; 8:655-61. [PMID: 26573223 DOI: 10.1111/cts.12352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Achieving timely accrual into clinical research studies remains a challenge for clinical translational research. We developed an evaluation measure, the Accrual Index (AI), normalized for sample size and study duration, using data from the protocol and study management databases. We applied the AI retrospectively and prospectively to assess its utility. METHODS Accrual Target, Projected Time to Accrual Completion (PTAC), Evaluable Subjects, Dates of Recruitment Initiation, Analysis, and Completion were defined. AI is (% Accrual Target accrued/% PTAC elapsed). Changes to recruitment practices were described, and data extracted from study management databases. RESULTS December 2014 (or final) AI was analyzed for 101 studies initiating recruitment from 2007 to 2014. Median AI was ≥1 for protocols initiating recruitment in 2011, 2013, and 2014. The AI varied widely for studies pre-2013. Studies with AI > 4 utilized convenience samples for recruitment. Data-justified PTAC was refined in 2013-2014 after which the AI range narrowed. Protocol characteristics were not associated with study AI. CONCLUSION Protocol AI reflects the relative agreement between accrual feasibility assessment (PTAC), and accrual performance, and is affected by recruitment practices. The AI may be useful in managing accountability, modeling accrual, allocating recruitment resources, and testing innovations in recruitment practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Corregano
- Clinical Research Support Office, The Rockefeller University Center for Clinical and Translational Science, New York, New York, USA
| | - Katelyn Bastert
- Clinical Research Support Office, The Rockefeller University Center for Clinical and Translational Science, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joel Correa da Rosa
- Department of Research Design and Biostatistics, The Rockefeller University Center for Clinical and Translational Science, New York, New York, USA
| | - Rhonda G Kost
- Clinical Research Support Office, The Rockefeller University Center for Clinical and Translational Science, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bergamaschi R, Quaglini S, Tavazzi E, Amato MP, Paolicelli D, Zipoli V, Romani A, Tortorella C, Portaccio E, D'Onghia M, Garberi F, Bargiggia V, Trojano M. Immunomodulatory therapies delay disease progression in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2012; 22:1732-1740. [PMID: 22653657 DOI: 10.1177/1352458512445941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2011] [Accepted: 03/28/2012] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have analysed long-term effects of immunomodulatory disease modifying drugs (DMDs). OBJECTIVE Assessment of the efficacy of DMDs on long-term evolution of multiple sclerosis, using a Bayesian approach to overcome methodological problems related to open-label studies. METHODS MS patients from three different Italian multiple sclerosis centres were divided into subgroups according to the presence of treatment in their disease history before the endpoint, which was represented by secondary progression. Patients were stratified on the basis of the risk score BREMS (Bayesian risk estimate for multiple sclerosis), which is able to predict the unfavourable long-term evolution of MS at an early stage. RESULTS We analysed data from 1178 patients with a relapsing form of multiple sclerosis at onset and at least 10 years of disease duration, treated (59%) or untreated with DMDs. The risk of secondary progression was significantly lower in patients treated with DMDs, regardless of the initial prognosis predicted by BREMS. CONCLUSIONS DMDs significantly reduce the risk of multiple sclerosis progression both in patients with initial high-risk and patients with initial low-risk. These findings reinforce the role of DMDs in modifying the natural course of the disease, suggesting that they have a positive effect not only on the inflammatory but also on the neurodegenerative process. The study also confirms the capability of the BREMS score to predict MS evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Bergamaschi
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Clinical Neurology, Neurological Institute C. Mondino, Via Mondino 2, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Silvana Quaglini
- Department of Computer Engineering and Systems Science, University of Pavia, Italy
| | - Eleonora Tavazzi
- Centre of Research in Multiple Sclerosis (CRISM), Neurological Institute C. Mondino, Italy
| | - Maria Pia Amato
- Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Sciences, University of Florence, Italy
| | - Damiano Paolicelli
- Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Sciences, University of Bari, Italy
| | - Valentina Zipoli
- Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Sciences, University of Florence, Italy
| | - Alfredo Romani
- Centre of Research in Multiple Sclerosis (CRISM), Neurological Institute C. Mondino, Italy
| | - Carla Tortorella
- Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Sciences, University of Bari, Italy
| | - Emilio Portaccio
- Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Sciences, University of Florence, Italy
| | - Mariangela D'Onghia
- Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Sciences, University of Bari, Italy
| | - Francesca Garberi
- Department of Computer Engineering and Systems Science, University of Pavia, Italy
| | - Valeria Bargiggia
- Centre of Research in Multiple Sclerosis (CRISM), Neurological Institute C. Mondino, Italy
| | - Maria Trojano
- Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Sciences, University of Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Helfand M, Tunis S, Whitlock EP, Pauker SG, Basu A, Chilingerian J, Harrell FE, Meltzer DO, Montori VM, Shepard DS, Kent DM. A CTSA agenda to advance methods for comparative effectiveness research. Clin Transl Sci 2011; 4:188-98. [PMID: 21707950 PMCID: PMC4567896 DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00282.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Clinical research needs to be more useful to patients, clinicians, and other decision makers. To meet this need, more research should focus on patient-centered outcomes, compare viable alternatives, and be responsive to individual patients' preferences, needs, pathobiology, settings, and values. These features, which make comparative effectiveness research (CER) fundamentally patient-centered, challenge researchers to adopt or develop methods that improve the timeliness, relevance, and practical application of clinical studies. In this paper, we describe 10 priority areas that address 3 critical needs for research on patient-centered outcomes (PCOR): (1) developing and testing trustworthy methods to identify and prioritize important questions for research; (2) improving the design, conduct, and analysis of clinical research studies; and (3) linking the process and outcomes of actual practice to priorities for research on patient-centered outcomes. We argue that the National Institutes of Health, through its clinical and translational research program, should accelerate the development and refinement of methods for CER by linking a program of methods research to the broader portfolio of large, prospective clinical and health system studies it supports. Insights generated by this work should be of enormous value to PCORI and to the broad range of organizations that will be funding and implementing CER.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Helfand
- Oregon Clinical & Translational Research Center, Oregon Health & Sciences University, and Department of Hospital and Specialty Medicine, The Portland VA Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|