Risk of herpes zoster in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with anti-TNF-alpha agents

Comparison of anti-TNF treatment initiation in rheumatoid arthritis databases demonstrates wide country variability in patient parameters at initiation of anti-TNF therapy

OBJECTIVE

Characteristics of Canadian RA patients started on anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) treatment were compared with 12 other countries.

METHODS

Data from the Optimization of HUMIRA trial (OH) were compared with Canadian real world studies [Ontario Biologics Research Initiative (OBRI) and the Real-Life Evaluation of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Canadians Receiving HUMIRA (REACH)], and to data from American, Australian, British, Czech, Danish, Dutch, Finnish, German, Italian, Norwegian, Spanish, and Swedish RA databases. Patient characteristics and temporal trends at initiation of anti-TNF therapy were compared between countries.

RESULTS

Baseline Disease Activity Scores (DAS28) varied from 5.3 to 6.6. Lower disease severity was noted in databases from countries with less restrictive anti-TNF coverage: Dutch [based on previous disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) use, DAS28, swollen joint count (SJC), tender joint count (TJC), Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Danish (previous DMARD use, DAS28), Norwegian (DAS28, SJC, TJC, visual analog scale (VAS) of global health), and Swedish (DAS28, SJC, TJC, HAQ-DI)]. RA databases showed lower disease scores than did OH (P < 0.05). The US databases also showed lower disease severity (CORRONA: previous DMARD use, SJC, TJC; National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases: HAQ, P < 0.001). The UK and Czech Republic had restrictive coverage and higher mean baseline DAS28 than OH (P < 0.001). Baseline DAS28 in the registries with published data lowered over time (British, Norwegian, Danish, and Swedish) but less for the British (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm that regional variation exists between the 13 countries analyzed in the initiation of treatment with anti-TNF agents among RA patients and suggest that in some cases this variation may be increasing. In some countries the mean baseline disease severity declined over time and regional reimbursement policies and differences in physician preferences may be influencing initiation of anti-TNF therapy in RA.

Mapping the safety profile of biologicals: a disproportionality analysis using the WHO adverse drug reaction database, VigiBase

BACKGROUND

Biologicals have specific characteristics, as compared with the small molecule drugs, and carry specific risks. Safety problems, for example infliximab and the risk for tuberculosis, have been identified via spontaneous reports of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs). However, in general there is limited data on the nature of spontaneously reported suspected ADRs for biologicals.

OBJECTIVE

To map the safety profile of biologicals as compared with all other drugs. In addition, mechanistic classes of biologicals will be compared.

METHODS

Data was obtained from the ADR database (VigiBase) maintained by the WHO Collaborating Centre for International Drug Monitoring. A disproportionality analysis was performed in which case reports for biologicals and all other drugs (the reference group), reported between January 1995 and December 2008, were selected. Vaccines were not included in the analysis. Suspected ADRs were classified according to Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) version 12.0 at the System Organ Class (SOC) level. Biologicals were classified into mechanistic classes: antibodies, cytokines, enzymes, growth factors, hormones (reference group), interferons, receptors and others/various. The safety profile of the biologicals versus all other drugs in the database and of the various mechanistic classes of biologicals was compared using the proportional reporting ratio (PRR).

RESULTS

191,004 case reports containing 546,474 suspected ADRs were reported for 62 different biologicals, and 2,556,209 case reports containing 8,761,522 suspected ADRs were reported for all other drugs (the reference group). It was found that two-thirds of all suspected ADRs reported for biologicals were reported for five active substances: etanercept (20.3%), interferon-beta-1a (15.6%), infliximab (11.6%), teriparatide (10.7%) and adalimumab (9.0%). Comparison of the safety profile of biologicals and the reference group showed that suspected ADRs for biologicals were more frequently reported in the SOCs 'Infections and infestations' (PRR 4.5), 'Surgical and medical procedures' (PRR 2.4) and 'Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified' (PRR 2.1), and less frequently reported in the SOCs 'Psychiatric disorders' (PRR 0.4), 'Vascular disorders' (PRR 0.4) and 'Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions' (PRR 0.4). Regarding the differences in safety profile between various mechanistic classes of biologicals, compared with hormones (reference group), 'Infections and infestations' were more frequently reported for receptors and antibodies. 'Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified' were more frequently reported for antibodies, cytokines, interferons and receptors, and less frequently for enzymes as compared with the reference group.

CONCLUSIONS

In VigiBase, five biologicals comprise two-thirds of the suspected ADRs reported for biologicals, which might distort the relation found between a specific biological and a specific adverse event in case of quantitative signal detection. Therefore the choice of reference group to be used in case of quantitative signal detection should be considered very carefully. This study confirmed that biologicals have a different safety profile compared with all other drugs in the database and, within the group of biologicals, differences exist between mechanistic classes. Infections are, for example, frequently reported for receptors and antibodies, which often have an immune compromising effect. Such predictable safety issues should be specifically studied by preregistration clinical trials and/or targeted pharmacovigilance. In addition, since not all adverse reactions can be predicted or detected during development, spontaneous reporting remains an important tool for the early detection of signals.

[Infectious complications of biologic therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis]

The introduction of biological disease-modifying drugs (DMARDs) has substantially improved the treatment options for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. However, infectious complications represent the most common side effects of these drugs, including severe infections as well as rare opportunistic infections. Treating patients on biological DMARDs is therefore one of the biggest challenges in rheumatology care. The present review describes the current state of knowledge regarding frequency and type of infectious complications associated with biological DMARDs. The article focuses mainly on risk management, in particular on diagnosis and recurrence prevention of tuberculosis and reactivation of hepatitis B virus infection. Furthermore, we discuss the importance of vaccinations in primary disease prevention in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

State-of-the-art: rheumatoid arthritis

The understanding of the pathogenesis and optimal therapeutics for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has advanced remarkably over the last decade. This review highlights these key advances, particularly the outcomes of genome-wide scans which have provided an increasingly robust appraisal of the complex genetics that underpin RA. Such observations are placed in pathogenetic context, particularly concerning the breach of tolerance that presages synovitis and the mechanisms that subserve chronicity. The key therapeutic strategies and treatment agents, both conventional and biological, now available to effectively manage the disease are described. Throughout the review, emphasis is placed on unanswered questions and challenges in this exciting field.

Serious infections in patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving anti-tumor-necrosis-factor-alpha therapy: an Australian and New Zealand experience

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Anti-tumor-necrosis-factor-alpha (anti-TNF-α) medications are effective in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but have an increased risk of tuberculosis (TB) and serious infections. The aim of this study was to examine the Australian/New Zealand experience of serious infections and TB in IBD patients receiving anti-TNF-α therapy from 1999-2009.

METHODS

Serious infections, defined as 'requiring hospital admission' and TB cases in patients receiving, or within 3 months following, anti-TNF-α therapy were analyzed across Australia and New Zealand. Patient demographics, IBD medications, duration of anti-TNF-α therapy, and infection details were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 5562 IBD patients were managed across the centers. Of these, 489 (16.8%) Crohn's disease and 137 (5.2%) ulcerative colitis patients received anti-TNF-α therapy. There were three cases of latent TB that received prophylaxis prior to anti-TNF-α therapy. No cases of active TB were reported. Fourteen (2.2%) serious infections occurred. Seven occurred in patients receiving anti-TNF-α therapy for less than 6 months, including two cases of primary Varicella zoster (VZV), two cases of Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia, two cases of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, and one severe flu-like illness. Six patients were taking additional immunosuppressive medications. The other seven infections occurred after 6 months (mean 32.6 ± 24.3 months) and included one case of primary VZV, one flu-like illness, and five bacterial infections. All infections resolved with treatment.

CONCLUSION

TB is a very rare complication of anti-TNF-α therapy in Australia and New Zealand. Serious infections are uncommon but early opportunistic infections with Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia suggest a need for vigilance in patients on multiple immunosuppressive medications. VZV vaccination prior to immunosuppressive therapy should be considered in VZV-naïve patients.

Anti-TNF-α agents in the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: mechanisms of action and pitfalls

TNF-α is a potent inducer of the inflammatory response, a key regulator of innate immunity and plays an important role in the regulation of Th1 immune responses against intracellular bacteria and certain viral infections. However, dysregulated TNF can also contribute to numerous pathological situations. These include immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) including rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, ulcerative colitis and severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Animal and human studies concerning the role of TNF-α in IMIDs have led to the development of a therapy based on TNF blockage. This article focuses first on the potential mechanisms by which the three currently licensed agents, adalimumab, etarnecept and infliximab, decrease the inflammatory activity of patients with different IMIDs. Second, it focuses on the risks, precautions and complications of the use of TNF-α inhibitors in these patients.

Incidence and risk of hospitalisation due to shingles and chickenpox in patients with rheumatic diseases treated with TNF antagonists

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the incidence of hospitalisation due to varicella zoster virus (VZV) infection in patients treated with tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists for inflammatory rheumatic conditions and to compare it with the expected rate in the general population.

METHODS

Secondary data analysis was performed of two large databases: (1) the national registry of rheumatic diseases patients treated with biological agents (BIOBADASER); and (2) the national hospital discharge database Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos al Alta Hospitalaria. Hospitalisations due to shingles or chickenpox were analysed. For each condition the incidence rate (IR) and the age and gender standardised IR per 100,000 person-years plus the standardised incidence ratio (SIR) and the standardised incidence difference (SID) were estimated.

RESULTS

In patients exposed to TNF antagonists, the estimated IR of hospitalisation due to shingles was 32 cases per 100,000 patient-years (95% CI 14 to 78), the expected rate in the general population was 3.4 (95% CI 3.2 to 3.5), the SIR was 9 (95% CI 3 to 20) and the SID was 26 (95% CI 14 to 37). The estimated IR of hospitalisation due to chickenpox was 26 cases per 100,000 (95% CI 10 to 69), the expected rate was 1.9 (95% CI 1.8 to 2.0), the SIR was 19 (95% CI 5 to 47) and the SID 33 (95% CI 21 to 45).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients suffering rheumatic diseases exposed to TNF antagonists are hospitalised due to VZV infections significantly more frequently than expected in the general population. Since the absolute IR of hospitalisations due to chickenpox and shingles is low in these patients, the implementation of risky preventive measures may not be justified at present.

Rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis is characterised by persistent synovitis, systemic inflammation, and autoantibodies (particularly to rheumatoid factor and citrullinated peptide). 50% of the risk for development of rheumatoid arthritis is attributable to genetic factors. Smoking is the main environmental risk. In industrialised countries, rheumatoid arthritis affects 0·5-1·0% of adults, with 5-50 per 100 000 new cases annually. The disorder is most typical in women and elderly people. Uncontrolled active rheumatoid arthritis causes joint damage, disability, decreased quality of life, and cardiovascular and other comorbidities. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), the key therapeutic agents, reduce synovitis and systemic inflammation and improve function. The leading DMARD is methotrexate, which can be combined with other drugs of this type. Biological agents are used when arthritis is uncontrolled or toxic effects arise with DMARDs. Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors were the first biological agents, followed by abatacept, rituximab, and tocilizumab. Infections and high costs restrict prescription of biological agents. Long-term remission induced by intensive, short-term treatment selected by biomarker profiles is the ultimate goal.

How well do patient reports reflect adverse drug reactions reported by rheumatologists? Agreement of physician- and patient-reported adverse events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis observed in the German biologics register

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the validity of patient reports on adverse drug reactions (ADRs) compared with the reports given by the treating physician.

METHODS

Patients with RA enrolled in the German biologics register rheumatoid arthritis observation of biologic therapy (RABBIT) between May 2001 and September 2006 were included in the study. We investigated concordance of reporting and level of agreement between physician- and patient-reported ADRs, taking the physician as gold standard.

RESULTS

Data from 4246 patients were analysed. Patients reported on average 1.2 ADRs per patient-year (PY) compared with 0.8 ADRs reported by the physicians (P<0.001). Gastrointestinal disorders were the most frequently reported ADRs by patients (277.8/1000 PYs) and physicians (137.8/1000 PYs), infections were reported with considerably higher frequency by physicians (124/1000 PYs) than by patients (72/1000 PYs). Agreement between patients and physicians (same or similar event reported at the same time) differed according to the nature of the reported ADR. High agreement was found for easily observable, known ADRs (such as alopecia, agreement 76.7%) In contrast, even for some serious ADRs, many patients did not see a connection between the event and the drug taken (e.g. pneumonia, agreement 37.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient reports on ADRs are a useful source of information on the safety of new therapies. However, drug surveillance cannot rely on patient reports only, since even life-threatening events were not reported as ADRs by the patients who failed to associate them with the therapy. When coding patient reports on ADRs to a standard coding system, the differences in language and terminology between patients and physicians should be taken into account.

Maintenance of cytomegalovirus-specific CD4pos T-cell response in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving anti-tumor necrosis factor treatments

INTRODUCTION

Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α biotherapies have considerably changed the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, serious infections are a major concern in patients with rheumatic diseases treated with anti-TNF-α. Little is known about viral, especially latent, infections in anti-TNF-α treatments. Infections by cytomegalovirus (CMV), a β-herpes virus, are frequent and induce a strong CD4pos T-cell immunity, which participates in the control of infection. We thus have chosen to analyze the CD4pos T-cell response to CMV antigens as a model of antiviral response in RA patients treated with anti-TNF-α. CD28 expression was evaluated.

METHODS

We have measured the CD4pos response to CMV antigens in RA patients, before and after initiation of treatment with an anti-TNF-α agent. The intracellular production of interferon (IFN)-γ in total and CD28neg CD4pos T cells in response to CMV antigens (Ags) was evaluated with flow cytometry. The proliferation of total CD4pos T cells in the presence of CMV antigens was measured with 3H-thymidine incorporation.

RESULTS

Anti-TNF-α treatments impaired neither the anti-CD4pos anti-CMV IFN-γ response nor the proliferative response in patients. The percentage of CD28neg CD4pos cells remained constant.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the CD4pos T-cell response against CMV is not altered by anti-TNF-α treatments and that infection remains controlled in treated RA patients latently infected with CMV. Our observation brings new insight into the current knowledge of the risks of infection in patients treated with anti-TNF-α biotherapies.

Incidence of herpes zoster in patients with giant cell arteritis: a population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To determine the incidence of herpes zoster (HZ) in GCA.

METHODS

Utilizing the resources of the Rochester Epidemiology Project, all incident cases of GCA diagnosed between 1 January 1950 and 31 December 2004 were identified. For each GCA patient, two subjects without GCA of the same gender and similar age and length of medical history were randomly selected from the population. Patients were followed until death, last contact or 31 December 2006.

RESULTS

The study population included 204 GCA patients and 407 non-GCA subjects. The GCA cohort had 163 (79%) women and 41 (21%) men, with a mean age of 76.0 (8.2) years. The non-GCA cohort had 325 (80%) women and 82 (20%) men, with a mean age of 75.6 (8.4) years. During follow-up, 21 GCA patients and 38 non-GCA subjects developed HZ. There was no difference in the development of HZ in GCA patients compared with non-GCA patients [hazard ratio (HR): 1.22; 95% CI 0.71, 2.08; adjusted for age, sex and calendar year]. No GCA patient and one non-GCA subject developed HZ within 6 months of index date. The frequency of post-herpetic neuralgia was similar between both groups (P = 0.64).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with GCA do not appear to be at increased risk of HZ compared with the general population, even during the first 6 months of therapy when glucocorticoid doses are usually highest.

Viruses and arthritis: new challenges in diagnosis, therapy, and immunization

BACKGROUND

Although many viruses produce musculoskeletal symptoms during an acute infection, a long-term inflammatory arthritis remains an unusual consequence. When evaluating arthritis in a patient with a chronic or latent viral infection, serologic testing and therapeutic options are significantly altered.

RESULTS

The example of hepatitis C reveals how chronic infection can complicate the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Determination of rheumatoid factor is of limited utility, whereas the anticyclic citrullinated peptide has become a new test with improved specificity. Therapeutic options are severely constrained because of potential hepatotoxicity of oral agents such as methotrexate and leflunomide. Antitumor necrosis factor alpha biologics have demonstrated initial safety in the setting of hepatitis C virus but may be associated with reactivation of hepatitis B virus. Biologics such as abatacept and rituximab have been inadequately studied in this population to date. Prevention of viral infections by influenza and herpes zoster vaccines in rheumatoid arthritis patients needs improved administration rates and careful planning to maximize efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic viral infections complicate the diagnosis and therapy of inflammatory arthritis. The antitumor necrosis factor alpha biologics have become important therapeutic options for patients with hepatitis C. Vaccination against influenza and herpes zoster are underused in health maintenance of arthritis patients.

Anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy and influenza: keeping it in perspective

The association of opportunistic infections in the context of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antibody therapies have attracted widespread attention. The recent H1N1 influenza pandemic brought this into sharp focus with numerous patient queries and physician anxieties. The following short review gives a scientific perspective to this issue including the role of vaccination.

Tumor necrosis factor blockade and the risk of viral infection

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockers are widely used to treat rheumatoid arthritis and other chronic inflammatory diseases. Many studies have demonstrated an increased risk of opportunistic infections such as tuberculosis and fungal infection in patients treated with TNF blockers, which is thought to be related to the primary role of TNF both in host defense and in the immune response. Little is known, however, about the association between TNF blockade and the development of viral infection. Owing to the critical role of TNF in the control of viral infection, depletion of this cytokine with TNF blockers could facilitate the development or reactivation of viral infection. A number of large observational studies have found an increased risk of herpes zoster in patients receiving TNF blockers for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. This Review draws attention to the risk of several viral infections, including HIV, varicella zoster virus, Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, and human papillomavirus, in patients receiving TNF-blocking therapy for chronic inflammatory conditions. In addition, implications for clinical practice and possible preventative approaches are discussed.

Risk of incident or recurrent malignancies among patients with rheumatoid arthritis exposed to biologic therapy in the German biologics register RABBIT

INTRODUCTION

We used the data of the German biologics register RABBIT, a nationwide prospective cohort study, to investigate the risk of new or recurrent malignancy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving biologics compared to conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs).

METHODS

The analysis was based on patients with RA enrolled in RABBIT at the start of a biologic or conventional DMARD therapy between 01 May 2001 and 31 December 2006. Incidences of first or recurrent malignancies were analysed separately. A nested case-control design was used to investigate the risk of developing a first malignancy. Matching criteria were: age, gender, follow-up time, disease activity score based on 28 joint counts (DAS28) at study entry, smoking status, and selected chronic co-morbid conditions (obstructive or other lung disease, kidney, liver or gastrointestinal disease, psoriasis).

RESULTS

A prior malignancy was reported in 122 out of 5,120 patients. Fifty-eight of these patients had received anti-TNFalpha agents, 9 anakinra, and 55 conventional DMARDs at study entry. In 14 patients (ever exposed to anti-TNFalpha: eight, to anakinra: one) 15 recurrent cancers were observed. The average time period since the onset of the first malignancy was nine years. Crude recurrence rates per 1,000 patient-years (pyrs) were 45.5 for patients exposed to anti-TNFalpha agents, 32.3 for anakinra patients and 31.4 for patients exposed to DMARDs only (Incidence rate ratio anti-TNFalpha vs. DMARD = 1.4, P = 0.6.). In patients without prior cancer, 74 patients (70% female, mean age: 61.3) developed a first malignancy during the observation. This corresponds to an incidence rate (IR) of 6.0/1,000 pyrs. Forty-four of these patients were ever exposed to anti-TNFalpha treatment (IR = 5.1/1,000 pyrs). In a nested case-control study comparing cancer patients to cancer-free controls, 44 of the cancer patients and 44 of the cancer-free controls were ever exposed to anti-TNFalpha agents (P = 1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences in the overall incidence of malignancies in patients exposed or unexposed to anti-TNFalpha or anakinra treatment were found. The same applied to the risk of recurrent malignancies. However, in particular this last finding needs further validation in larger data sets.

Review article: chronic viral infection in the anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy era in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy is now well established in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease and the risk of opportunistic infection is recognized. However, specific considerations regarding screening, detection, prevention and treatment of chronic viral infections in the context of anti-TNF therapy in inflammatory bowel disease are not widely adopted in practice.

AIM

To provide a detailed and comprehensive review of the relevance of chronic viral infections in the context of anti-TNF therapy in inflammatory bowel disease.

METHODS

Literature search was conducted using Medline, Pubmed and Embase using the terms viral infection, hepatitis, herpes, CMV, EBV, HPV, anti-TNF, infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol and etanercept. Hepatitis B and C and HIV had the largest literature associated and these have been summarized in Tables.

RESULTS

Particular risks are associated with the use of anti-TNF drugs in patients with hepatitis B infection, in whom reactivation is common unless anti-viral prophylaxis is used. Reactivation of herpes zoster is the most common viral problem associated with anti-TNF treatment, and may be particularly severe. Primary varicella infection may present with atypical features in patients on anti-TNF.

CONCLUSION

Appreciation of risks of chronic viral disease associated with anti-TNF therapy may permit early recognition, prophylaxis and treatment.

Bioboosters in the treatment of rheumatic diseases: a comprehensive review of currently available biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis

Immunologic research has clarified many aspects of the pathogenesis of inflammatory rheumatic disorders. Biologic drugs acting on different steps of the immune response, including cytokines, B- and T-cell lymphocytes, have been marketed over the past 10 years for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-cytokine agents in RA (including the anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) drugs infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab, certolizumab, anti-interleukin (IL)-1 anakinra, and anti-IL-6 tocilizumab) demonstrated a significant efficacy compared to traditional therapies, if combined with methotrexate (MTX), as measured by ACR 20, 50 and 70 response criteria. The new therapies have also been demonstrated to be superior to MTX in slowing or halting articular damage. RCTs have shown the efficacy of anti-TNFα in AS patients through significant improvement of symptoms and function. Trials of anti-TNFα in PsA patients showed marked improvement of articular symptoms for psoriasis and radiological disease progression. More recent studies have demonstrated the efficacy of B-cell depletion with rituximab, and T-cell inactivation with abatacept. All these drugs have a satisfactory safety profile. This paper reviews the different aspects of efficacy and tolerability of biologics in the therapy of RA, AS, and PsA.

Antibody to varicella-zoster virus immediate-early protein 62 augments allodynia in zoster via brain-derived neurotrophic factor

Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) expresses immediate-early protein 62 (IE62), and zoster is associated with neuropathic pain. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is involved in the neuronal mechanism underlying pain hypersensitivity. Zoster is associated with prodrome and the robust production of booster antibody to VZV. We hypothesized that the intrathecal production of antibody to IE62 cross-reacting with BDNF and the nerve injury by skin lesions may augment allodynia in zoster by enhancing BDNF activity. One of three monoclonal antibodies against the 268-556 peptide of IE62 recognized BDNF. Immunological cross-reactivity between IE62 and BDNF and the effects of anti-IE62 monoclonal antibody (anti-IE62 MAb) cross-reactivity with BDNF on BDNF activity in cultured neurons were examined. Anti-IE62 MAb and anti-BDNF MAbs recognized the 414-429 peptide of IE62 and the BDNF dimer. Anti-IE62 MAb significantly augmented BDNF-related transcription in neurons and the morphological development of spinal dorsal horn neurons. Sera from patients recognized IE62 and BDNF and enhanced BDNF activity in neurons. The effect of anti-IE62 antibody on mechanical allodynia was characterized by the threshold of allodynia using von Frey filaments in a spinal nerve injury (SNI) in mice. The administration of anti-IE62 MAb to or immunization with cross-reacting IE62 protein to mice significantly enhanced mechanical allodynia on the side with SNI but not on the uninjured side. Anti-IE62 antibody augmented BDNF activity in neurons and allodynia in mice with SNI. The intrathecal production of anti-IE62 antibody augmenting BDNF activity and peripheral nerve injury by zoster may participate in the pathogenesis of allodynia in zoster.

Herpes simplex encephalitis during treatment with tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors

We report 3 cases of herpes simplex virus encephalitis in patients receiving tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitors for rheumatologic disorders. Although TNF-alpha inhibitors have been reported to increase the risk of other infectious diseases, to our knowledge, an association between anti-TNF-alpha drugs and herpes simplex virus encephalitis has not been previously described.

Infectious complications of tumor necrosis factor blockade

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Our understanding of the infection risks posed by tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists has continued to evolve in the 10 years since these drugs were first introduced. This review summarizes recent data regarding infection risk, examines potential structure-function relationships that may account for the differences, and discusses their implications with regard to tuberculosis prevention and management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent prospective studies have confirmed the risk of tuberculosis reactivation posed by TNF antibodies to be several fold greater than soluble TNF receptor. Certolizumab pegol, a monovalent anti-TNF Fab' fragment appears to share this risk, despite its lack of Fc and its inability to cross-link transmembrane TNF. Screening and initiation of treatment for latent tuberculosis (TB) infection can greatly reduce the TB risk of anti-TNF treatment in western countries. However, alternative strategies to prevent TB because of new transmission may be required as these therapies become available worldwide. Current recommendations for withdrawal of anti-TNF therapy when TB is diagnosed place patients at risk for paradoxical worsening because of recovery of TNF-dependent inflammation. Recent case reports suggest reinstitution of TNF blockade may be safe and effective adjunctive treatment in such cases, but prospective studies are needed to confirm these observations.

SUMMARY

TNF blockers have transformed treatment of several chronic inflammatory conditions. Further research is needed to determine how best to prevent and manage their infectious complications and to determine their potential adjunctive therapeutic role in chronic infection diseases.

Intima-media thickness evolution after treatment with infliximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Background

Atherosclerosis is a well known progressive disease that recognizes risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension, smoking, dyslipidemia, and inflammation. Mechanisms underlying atherosclerotic processes during inflammation are not completely understood, but cytokines are also involved, in particular tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). Chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are commonly associated with atherosclerotic complication. Little is known about the role of treatment of chronic inflammatory disease on the evolution of atherosclerosis in this kind of disease. Usually, evolution of atherosclerosis is monitored by intima-media thickness and the presence of plaques on several arteries such as common carotid.

Aim

The aim of the study was to monitor atherosclerosis evolution in seven RA patients on common treatment with infliximab (an anti-TNF-α drug) compared with seven RA patients during common treatment but not treated with infliximab.

Patients and methods

We selected 14 patients with RA according to the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria. Seven patients were selected before and after common treatment for RA based on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), methotrexate, and steroids (12 months), and seven patients before and after treatment based on infliximab associated with NSAIDs, methotrexate, and steroids (12 months). Ultrasound vascular imaging was performed to screen intima-media thickness and the presence of atherosclerotic plaques on common carotid artery and identify evolution of atherosclerosis.

Results

After 12 months, patients that were treated with infliximab showed significant worsening of atherosclerosis with an increase of intima-media thickness and the presence of further atherosclerotic plaques compared to patients that were treated traditionally and showed a nonsignificant increase of the same parameters.

Discussion

Treatment based on anti-TNF-α such as infliximab shows a worsening evolution of atherosclerosis based on our data. If these data are associated with a poor clinical outcome such as atherothrombosis of cerebral vessels and/or coronary vessels, this should be evaluated by further studies.