Thymidylate synthase gene polymorphism determines response and toxicity of 5-FU chemotherapy

Primer on medical genomics. Part XII: Pharmacogenomics--general principles with cancer as a model

The Human Genome Project has resulted in a new era in the field of pharmacogenetics in which researchers are rapidly discovering new genetic variation, which may help to explain interindividual variability in drug efficacy and toxicity. Pharmacogenetics is the study of the role of genetic inheritance in individual variation in drug response and toxicity. With the convergence of advances in pharmacogenetics and human genomics, the field of pharmacogenomics has emerged during the past decade. Pharmacogenomics is used to refer to the study of the relationship between specific DNA-sequence variation and drug effect. In few other disciplines of medicine are the clinical examples of pharmacogenetics more striking than in oncology. In this field, treatment of patients with cancer is accomplished primarily through the use of chemotherapeutic drugs that have narrow therapeutic indexes, ie, the difference between the toxic and therapeutic dose is relatively small. In this review, we discuss several selected, clinically relevant examples of ways in which sequence variation in genes that encode drug enzymes, transporters, and drug targets can alter the efficacy and/or adverse-effect profile of "standard" doses of chemotherapeutic drugs. Additionally, we discuss some of the ways in which physicians are currently applying this knowledge in the treatment of patients with cancer.

Thymidylate synthase and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms: relationships with 5-fluorouracil sensitivity

The relationship of thymidylate synthase (TS) and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene polymorphisms on 5-fluorouracil (FU) sensitivity was tested on 19 human cancer cell lines (head and neck, breast, digestive tract) in the absence and presence of folinic acid (FA) supplementation. Thymidylate synthase polymorphisms in the 5' promoter region (double or triple tandem repeats) and 3' untranslated region (6-bp deletion) were analysed by PCR. The C677T and A1298C MTHFR polymorphisms were determined by melting curve analyses (LightCycler). Thymidylate synthase activity and intracellular concentration of the reduced folate 5-10 methylenetetrahydrofolate (CH(2)FH(4)) were measured (biochemical assays). Thymidylate synthase activity was significantly different according to 5' TS genotype, heterozygous cell lines (2R/3R) exhibiting higher TS activities than homozygous ones (P=0.05). However, whether in the absence or presence of FA, FU sensitivity was not statistically associated with either 5' or 3' TS polymorphism. Basal CH(2)FH(4) cellular concentrations were lowest in C677T homozygous wild-type (wt) (C/C) cell lines. FU sensitivity was not linked to C677T polymorphism. In contrast, there was a marked trend for a greater FU efficacy in mutated A1298C variants (C/C+A/C) as compared to wt homozygous cell lines (A/A) (P=0.055 and 0.085 without and with FA supplementation, respectively). These results suggest for the first time a potential role of A1298C MTHFR polymorphism on fluoropyrimidine sensitivity.

Colon cancer and genetic variation in folate metabolism: the clinical bottom line

So far, evidence for the relation between folate intake and colorectal cancer has been insufficient to lead to specific public health interventions. In principle, data on the relation between genetic variation in folate metabolism and colorectal neoplasia could be used to corroborate the data on the relation between folate intake or status and the disease, strengthening the evidence base for primary prevention. Issues in considering the relation between a health outcome and genetic variation in metabolism of nutrients or other food components include knowledge of gene function, linkage disequilibrium, population stratification, study size and quality, and gene-environment interaction. Overall homozygosity for MTHFR variant genotypes is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer, the opposite of what might have been expected a priori. This has led investigators to place greater emphasis on the functions of folate and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase in DNA synthesis. Folate and related nutrients may be important after adenoma formation. A challenge for the future is to characterize the effects of multiple genes influencing folate metabolism. Limited data for colorectal cancer suggest that the effect of a low folate diet overrides the effect of genotype, but two studies of adenomas suggested the opposite. Another potential role of information on genetic variation in folate metabolism is in the management of colorectal cancer but most studies have been small, have included selected patient groups, and have made limited adjustment for potentially important factors.

Heterozygote deficiency in thymidylate synthase enhancer region polymorphism genotype distribution in Hungarian colorectal cancer patients

Thymidylate synthase (TS) gene polymorphisms are important as prognostic factors in cancer chemotherapy, but recent results describe that the TS enhancer region (TSER) polymorphic genotypes may also modulate risk for malignancies. Two functionally important and ethnically diverse polymorphisms are present on the TS transcript, TSER, a repeat polymorphism (2 or 3 repeats; 2R, 3R) affecting TS expression, and a 6 bp ins/del polymorphism on the 3' UTR (position TS1494, del6 or ins6), which may influence mRNA stability. Hungarian population has one of the highest colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality rates in Europe, and several elevated dietary risk factors affect a large part of the population. In our study (99 primary CRC cases), population analysis of the patient group genotype frequencies revealed a departure from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and significant heterozygote deficiency (p < 0.05) at the TSER locus. Despite the strong linkage between the 2 polymorphic loci, case TS1494del genotype frequencies were normally distributed, as well as the genotype frequencies of the healthy control population (n = 102), at both loci. Case-control comparison demonstrated a lower relative risk of TSER heterozygotes (OR = 0.47; CI = 0.27-0.83; p = 0.008) and a possible higher prevalence of the 3R3R&ins6/del6 in the CRC group. The observation that heterozygotes are those less susceptible for CRC in the Hungarian population may support the possibility of 2 different pathways in which TS may play a role in colorectal carcinogenesis, probably nutrient (or folate)-dependently. The lack of similar genotype effect seen with TS1494del polymorphism and the increased presence of one genotype combination (3R3R&ins6/del6) in the patient group suggest a possible TS haplotype effect influencing CRC risk.

Pharmacogenomics: road to anticancer therapeutics nirvana?

Interindividual differences in the toxicity and response to anticancer therapies are currently observed for essentially all available treatment regimens. Such 'unpredictable' drug responses are particularly dangerous in the context of anticancer agents that have narrow therapeutic indices. Pharmacogenomics attempts to elucidate the inherited basis of interindividual differences in drug response, with the eventual goal of minimizing such variability through the use of 'individualized' treatments. There are several emerging examples of genetic polymorphisms of drug-metabolizing enzymes, DNA repair genes and drug targets that have been shown to influence the toxicity and efficacy of anticancer treatment. This review discusses the role of genetic variants of UGT1A1, TS and EGFR to exemplify the potential impact of phramacogenomics on the field of anticancer therapeutics.

Pharmacogenetic aspects in treatment of colorectal cancer – an update

Pharmacogenomic analyses will become crucial to predict patients’ toxicity to treatment and will also help to predict the tumor response. Processes of drug metabolism, drug efflux, DNA-repair and characteristics of drug targets are critical checkpoints of drug efficacy. These crucial pathways for drug action have been part of pharmacogenomic studies evaluating the impact of genomic variants on transcription, translation, protein structure and substrate binding of the genes involved. Promising candidates have been identified with predictive value for response and toxicity to chemotherapy in colorectal cancers. These candidates need to be incorporated into large, prospective clinical trials to confirm their impact for response and survival to chemotherapy that has been reported in retrospective analyses. Confirmed predictive markers, together with additional yet to be identified pharmacogenomic key players, will provide the basis for tailoring chemotherapy in the future.

Molecular predictors of treatment and outcome in colorectal cancer

Understanding of the metabolism and mechanisms of resistance of tumors to chemotherapeutic agents is essential so that we can administer therapy to maximize response and minimize toxicity. In this review we describe molecular markers associated with fluoropyrimidine and platinum-based chemotherapy that may predict the outcome of therapy when patients are treated with these agents. We discuss the ways in which determination of gene expression levels can enhance the treatment of colorectal cancer through prediction of patient response and tailoring of chemotherapy to the characteristics of an individual tumor.

Review article: colorectal cancer chemotherapy

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer death world-wide. There have been important advances in the chemotherapeutic management of colorectal cancer as a result of a deliberate collaborative process of well-designed clinical trials. From the earlier standard of 5-fluorouracil-based therapy alone, the recent availability of newer agents, including capecitabine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin, has significantly expanded the options available for the management of patients with advanced colorectal cancer, with consequent improvements in survival. For patients with resected, high-risk, localized disease, adjuvant systemic chemotherapy improves survival. The identification of new chemotherapy regimens, the use of predictive testing and the integration of novel targeted therapies with cytotoxic chemotherapies are areas of active clinical investigation. A review of the chemotherapeutic management of colorectal cancer is presented.

Prediction of sensitivity to fluoropyrimidines by metabolic and target enzyme activities in gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to investigate the role of thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), and thymidine phosphorylase (TP) in tumor progression and sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU).

METHODS

A total of 275 tumor samples from 275 patients with gastric cancer were utilized in this study. TS activity was determined in 130 samples by 5-fluorodeoxyuridine monophosphate binding assay. DPD activity was measured in 140 samples by radioenzymatic assay, and TP protein level was determined in 157 samples by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) system. These parameters were compared with several clinicopathologic factors and sensitivity to 5-FU determined by in-vitro ATP assay. The antitumor activities of 5-FU, uracil plus tegafur (UFT), and 1M tegafur--0.4 M 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine--1 M potassium oxonate (S-1 [TS-1]) were also compared, using three human gastric cancer xenografts in nude mice.

RESULTS

There was no correlation between either TS or TP and sensitivity to 5-FU. However, a weak inverse correlation was found between DPD activity and sensitivity to 5-FU. High DPD activity in tumor resulted in poor prognosis, especially in patients who received 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Although TP was significantly correlated with depth of tumor invasion and with lymphatic and venous invasions, TP alone had no impact on survival. On the other hand, TS, as well as peritoneal, hepatic, and lymph node metastases, was selected as an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer. In the animal model, there was no significant difference in antitumor activities among the drugs in a tumor with low DPD activity. However, S-1 showed superior antitumor activity to 5-FU or UFT in tumors with high DPD activity.

CONCLUSION

DPD is considered to be a most important predictive factor of 5-FU sensitivity. The use of DPD inhibitory fluoropyrimidines is strongly recommended for tumors with high DPD activity.

Implications of genetic testing in the management of colorectal cancer

The prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer is impacted by various factors at the time of diagnosis, including location of the tumor, gender, age and overall performance status of the patient. Optimal postoperative management of patients who have undergone successful tumor resection involves the utilization of reliable determninants of prognosis to help select patients who would benefit from adjuvant treatment, while sparing others from drug-related adverse effects. Tailoring chemotherapy for patients with disseminated cancer, or for patients who receive adjuvant chemotherapy, is also critical. Interpatient differences in tumor response and drug toxicity are common during chemotherapy. Genomic variability of key metabolic enzyme complexes, drug targets, and drug transport molecules is an important contributing factor. The identification of genetic markers of response and prognosis will aid in the development of more individualized chemotherapuetic strategies for cancer patients. Potential prognostic indicators in colorectal cancer include oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, genes involved in angiogenic and apoptotic pathways and cell proliferation, and those encoding targets of chemotherapy. Specifically, molecular markers such as deletion of 18q (DCC), p27 and microsatellite instability are promising as indicators of good or poor prognosis. Molecular determinants of efficacy and host toxicity of the most commonly used drugs in colorectal cancer, fluoracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin, are being investigated. Alterations in gene expression, protein expression and polymorphic variants in genes encoding thymidylate synthase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, dUTP nucleotidehydrolase and thymidine phosphorylase (for fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy), uridine diphosphate glucosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1 and carboxylesterase (for irinotecan therapy), and excision repair cross-complementing genes (ERCC1 and ERCC2) and glutathione-S-transferase P1 (for oxalilplatin-based regimens) may be useful as markers for clinical drug response, survival and host toxicity.

Membrane transport of folates

The chapter reviews the current understanding of the transport mechanisms for folates in mammalian cells--their molecular identities and organization, tissue expression, regulation, structures, and their kinetic and thermodynamic properties. This encompasses a variety of diverse processes. Best characterized is the reduced folate carrier, a member of the SLC19 family of facilitative carriers. But other facilitative organic anion carriers (SLC21), largely expressed in epithelial tissues, transport folates as well. In addition to these bi-directional carrier systems are the membrane-localized folate receptors alpha and beta, that mediate folate uptake unidirectionally into cells via an endocytotic process. There are also several transporters, typified by the family of multidrug resistance-associated proteins, that unidirectionally export folates from cells. There are transport activities for folates, that function optimally at low pH, related in part to the reduced folate carrier, with at least one activity that is independent of this carrier. The reduced folate carrier-associated low-pH route mediates intestinal folate transport. This review considers how these different transport processes contribute to the generation of transmembrane folate gradients and to vectorial flows of folates across epithelia. The role of folate transporters in mouse development, as assessed by homologous deletion of folate receptors and the reduced folate carrier, is described. Much of the focus is on antifolate cancer chemotherapeutic agents that are often model surrogates for natural folates in transport studies. In particular, antifolate transport mediated by the reduced folate carrier is a major determinant of the activity of, and resistance to, these agents. Finally, many of the key in vitro findings on the properties of antifolate transporters are now beginning to be extended to patient specimens, thus setting the stage for understanding response to these drugs in the clinical setting at the molecular level.

Pharmacogenetics in cancer treatment

Interindividual variability in the efficacy and toxicity of drug therapy is associated with polymorphisms in genes encoding drug-metabolizing enzymes, transporters, or drug targets. Pharmacogenetics aims to identify individuals predisposed to high risk of toxicity from conventional doses of cancer chemotherapeutic agents. We review the role of genetic polymorphisms in UGT1A1 and TPMT, as well as mutations in DPD, in influencing drug disposition and toxicity. Recent studies show that pharmacogenetic determinants may also influence treatment outcomes. We discuss the clinical significance of polymorphisms in TS, MTHFR, and FCGR3A, as well as the polymorphic DNA repair genes XPD and XRCC1, in influencing response to chemotherapy and survival outcomes. Finally, the potential implications of transporter pharmacogenetics in influencing drug bioavailability are addressed.

5-fluorouracil: mechanisms of action and clinical strategies

5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is widely used in the treatment of cancer. Over the past 20 years, increased understanding of the mechanism of action of 5-FU has led to the development of strategies that increase its anticancer activity. Despite these advances, drug resistance remains a significant limitation to the clinical use of 5-FU. Emerging technologies, such as DNA microarray profiling, have the potential to identify novel genes that are involved in mediating resistance to 5-FU. Such target genes might prove to be therapeutically valuable as new targets for chemotherapy, or as predictive biomarkers of response to 5-FU-based chemotherapy.

Targeted therapy and pharmacogenomic programs

The goal in administering chemotherapeutics is to develop the ability to predict the outcome of therapy in terms of response and toxicity. Technology has been developed to allow tumor profiling with measurement of protein expression, gene expression levels of markers, and even genetic polymorphisms, which may predict response to particular chemotherapeutics. The chemotherapeutics for which particular markers have been shown to predict outcome include the fluoropyrimidines and platinums. The next step is to develop clinical trials that will assess prospectively the benefits of profiling a patient's particular tumor, which should translate into an improvement in response and toxicity.

The power and the promise of DNA methylation markers

The past few years have seen an explosion of interest in the epigenetics of cancer. This has been a consequence of both the exciting coalescence of the chromatin and DNA methylation fields, and the realization that DNA methylation changes are involved in human malignancies. The ubiquity of DNA methylation changes has opened the way to a host of innovative diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Recent advances attest to the great promise of DNA methylation markers as powerful future tools in the clinic.

Cancer pharmacogenomics: current and future applications

Heterogeneity in patient response to chemotherapy is consistently observed across patient populations. Pharmacogenomics is the study of inherited differences in interindividual drug disposition and effects, with the goal of selecting the optimal drug therapy and dosage for each patient. Pharmacogenomics is especially important for oncology, as severe systemic toxicity and unpredictable efficacy are hallmarks of cancer therapies. In addition, genetic polymorphisms in drug metabolizing enzymes and other molecules are responsible for much of the interindividual differences in the efficacy and toxicity of many chemotherapy agents. This review will discuss clinically relevant examples of gene polymorphisms that influence the outcome of cancer therapy, and whole-genome expression studies using microarray technology that have shown tremendous potential for benefiting cancer pharmacogenomics. The power and utility of the mouse as an experimental system for pharmacogenomic discovery will also be discussed in the context of cancer therapy.

[Clinical, pathological and molecular prognostic factors in colorectal carcinomas]

Various aspects of the progression and prognosis of colorectal carcinoma have been investigated in numerous publications during recent years. An exact macroscopic and microscopic examination is still of basic importance but different factors of the molecular pathogenesis of colorectal carcinoma could be described by immunohistochemistry and molecular biology. Furthermore, they have been evaluated regarding their importance for the course of disease and prognosis and in particular, the different pathways of carcinogenesis and microsatellite instability were included. The detection of micrometastasis was investigated applying mostly molecular genetic methods. Numerous oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes and regulators of the cell cycle, markers of proliferation and apoptosis, cell adhesion antigens and angiogenetic factors were characterized with regard to their prognostic potential. In the future, so-called response predictors will presumably gain a certain relevance in the context of neoadjuvant (radiotherapy) chemotherapy. The present review summarizes these results and discusses the future clinical relevance.

The human reduced folate carrier gene is regulated by the AP2 and sp1 transcription factor families and a functional 61-base pair polymorphism

Recently, our laboratory reported an intricate regulation of the human reduced folate carrier (hRFC) gene, involving multiple promoters and noncoding exons. We localized promoter activity to a 452-bp GC-rich region upstream of noncoding exon A, including a 47-bp basal promoter with a CRE/AP-1-like consensus element that bound the bZip family of DNA-binding proteins (e.g. CREB-1 and c-Jun). We now report that three nearly identical tandem repeats (49-61 bp) in the hRFC-A upstream region are involved in regulating promoter activity. By in vitro binding assays, multiple transcription factors (e.g. AP2 and Sp1/Sp3) bound this region. When AP2 was cotransfected with the hRFC-A reporter construct into HT1080 cells, promoter activity increased 3-fold. In Drosophila SL2 cells, Sp1 transactivated promoter A and showed synergism with CREB-1. However, c-Jun was antagonistic to the effects of Sp1. A sequence variant in the hRFC-A repeated region was identified, involving an exact duplication of a 61-bp sequence. This variant had an allelic frequency of 78% in 72 genomic DNAs and resulted in a 63% increase in promoter activity. These results identify important regions in the hRFC-A promoter and critical roles for AP2 and Sp1, in combination with the bZip transcription factors. Moreover, they document a functionally novel polymorphism that increases promoter activity and may contribute to interpatient variations in hRFC expression and effects on tissue folate homeostasis and antitumor response to antifolates.

Pharmacogenomic strategies for developing customized chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

In this review, we deal with six groups of cytotoxic drugs commonly used in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although there are many reviews of thymidylate synthase (TS) and antifolate inhibitors, in this article, we have tried to highlight aspects that are more important for medical oncologists to consider when treating NSCLC patients. There is compelling evidence that TS gene transcripts and TS polymorphisms could be used to decide which patients can best benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy approaches, especially in colorectal cancer, and not less importantly, to tailor chemotherapy in metastatic NSCLC when using drugs akin to fluorouracil, such as pemetrexed. Secondly, cisplatin is central to chemotherapy combinations and evidence indicates that DNA repair capacity influences response to cisplatin-based regimens. ERCC1 gene transcript stands out as a predictive marker of cisplatin sensitivity. Thirdly, preliminary studies indicate that upregulation of beta-tubulin III correlates with response to paclitaxel and vinorelbine. Fourthly, overexpression of ribonucleotide reductase can influence response to gemcitabine. Fifthly, we describe mechanisms of resistance to topoisomerase I inhibitors, although this subject has not yet been completely elucidated. Finally, to understand the mechanisms of resistance to EGF-R inhibitors, which have been shown to be useful in many different types of cancer, the Src-STAT signaling pathways are described here in detail. Hopefully, the assessment of Src and of STAT-3 can be implemented as predictive markers.

Integration of molecular diagnostics with therapeutics: implications for drug discovery and patient care

The Introduction of targeted therapeutics into clinical practice has created major opportunities for further development of the molecular diagnostics industry. Emerging genomic and proteomic technologies and information are now resulting in the molecular subclassification of disease as the basis for diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutic selection. The ultimate goals of personalized medicine are to take advantage of a molecular understanding of disease, both to optimize drug development and direct preventive resources and therapeutic agents at the right population of people while they are still well. Single nucleotide polymorphisms identification and genotyping have uncovered predisposition markers from cancer and heart disease as well in the prediction of both drug efficacy and toxicity. Pharmacogenomic and pharmacodynamic assays are being developed to enhance the speed and decrease the cost of drug development, as well as reduce side effects and increase response rates in a variety of diseases. The traditional trial and error practice of medicine is progressively eroding in favor of more precise marker-assisted diagnosis and safer and more effective molecularly guided treatment of disease. For the diagnostics industry this represents an unprecedented opportunity for integration, increased value and commercial opportunities for molecularly-derived tests.

Functional polymorphism of the thymidylate synthase gene in colorectal cancer accompanied by frequent loss of heterozygosity

The thymidylate synthase (TS) gene has a polymorphic repeated sequence in its 5'-untranslated region. The repeat length is associated with TS protein expression, which suggests that we may be able to predict the efficacy of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy from a patient's TS genotype determined through analysis of normal tissue obtained non-invasively. However, it is not yet elucidated whether the TS genotype is identical in tumor and normal tissue. In this study, we investigated the TS genotype in 151 matched tumor and normal DNA samples isolated from colorectal cancer and adjacent normal tissues by PCR analysis. The results showed that TS genotypes are identical in normal and tumor tissues of homozygous individuals, suggesting that the repeat sequence is stable through carcinogenesis. However, in heterozygous samples, an imbalance between the 2R and 3R alleles in the tumor DNA was frequently observed, suggesting loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at the TS locus. Detailed LOH analysis revealed that 62% (31 of 50) of 2R/3R-heterozygous samples had LOH. Frequent LOH at the TS locus was confirmed by RT-PCR of TS mRNA and microsatellite analysis using the marker D18S59, located on 18p11.3. There was no difference in the expressions of TS mRNA and TS protein between LOH and non-LOH samples. However, when the heterozygous genotype bearing LOH was subdivided according to the number of repeats, the cancer tissue with 2R/loss genotype expressed a significantly lower level of TS protein than did that with 3R/loss genotype. The results suggest that the difference in TS genotype between tumor and normal tissue due to LOH should be considered when the genotype is analyzed with normal tissue, such as peripheral blood cells, because it is important for TS protein expression.

The impact of pharmacogenomics on gastrointestinal cancer therapy

Recently, we have seen major advances in the chemotherapy of gastrointestinal tumors, in particular colorectal cancer, leading to a substantial increase in overall survival of the patients. However, clinical efficacy and also toxicity of a given chemotherapy are still largely unpredictable for the individual patient. Amongst other variables, genetic polymorphisms determine the interindividual heterogeneity in both toxicity and therapeutic efficacy. In this review we present current evidence on host genetic polymorphisms that affect the toxicity or efficacy of three drugs commonly used for the treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin.

Fluoropyrimidine resistance in colon cancer

A significant obstacle for the management of patients with colorectal cancer is intrinsic drug resistance or in patients that respond to chemotherapy, acquired drug resistance. Drug resistance can occur through a variety of mechanisms. These include alterations in drug influx, drug efflux, intracellular metabolic activation, intracellular catabolism, through alterations in the drug's target or through numerous changes downstream of the target including alterations in genes involved in the regulation of the cell cycle, apoptosis or in DNA damage repair. In this article, the mechanisms of action and the mechanisms of resistance to the fluoropyrimidines are reviewed focusing on newer studies using tumor samples obtained from patients. Clinical trials that can potentially overcome the relevant mechanisms of resistance are described.

Integrating pharmacogenomics into drug development

The first observations of inherited differences in drug effects in the 1950s led to the recognition of a genetic basis for drug response. With the development of genetics and molecular biology, it became clear that certain drug responses could be associated with specific genetic variations or polymorphisms. There are now examples of polymorphisms that affect response to drugs ranging from common analgesics to chemotherapeutics. The goal of pharmacogenetics is to identify polymorphisms that can serve as predictive markers of drug response. This review summarizes how existing pharmacogenomic technologies can be applied advantageously throughout drug development to bring drugs successfully to market along with diagnostic tests that ensure their appropriate use.

Pharmacogenetics and folate metabolism -- a promising direction

Folate metabolism is the target of two major drug groups: folate antagonists (e.g., methotrexate) and thymidylate synthase inhibitors (for example, 5-fluorouracil). These agents are widely used in cancer chemotherapy, as treatment for rheumatoid arthritis, and for other conditions. The administration of these drugs in cancer chemotherapy can induce a state of acute folate depletion with sometimes life-threatening toxic sequelae. Recent studies suggest that polymorphisms in folate-metabolizing enzymes may modify the therapeutic effectiveness and toxicity of drugs targeting folate metabolism. This review briefly summarizes major drugs targeting the folate pathway and describes common polymorphisms in folate-metabolizing enzymes and transport proteins. Pharmacogenetic studies investigating the relevance of these polymorphisms with respect to patients' response to antifolate chemotherapeutic agents are discussed. Investigating genetic variability in folate metabolism in the framework of pharmacogenetics is a promising field. Findings to date illustrate the potential for targeting therapy based on patients' genotypes with improved outcomes and reduced toxicity.

Reply: Thymidylate synthase polymorphism and survival of colorectal cancer patients treated with 5-fluorouracil

British Journal of Cancer (2002) 86, 1366. DOI: 10.1038/sj/bjc/6600230www.bjcancer.com

© 2002 Cancer Research UK

Update on pharmacogenetics in cancer chemotherapy

This review describes how genetic differences among patients may change the therapeutic outcome in cancer chemotherapy. Severe toxicity in genetically predisposed patients is predominantly associated with mutations in drug metabolism enzyme genes, and an update on genetic intolerance to 6-mercaptopurine, 5-fluorouracil, and irinotecan is provided. Moreover, recent findings pointed out that the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T mutation might change patient susceptibility to the toxic effects of the cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) regimen and raltitrexed. Finally, it is emerging that not only toxicity, but also response to chemotherapy could be influenced by pharmacogenetic determinants, and the clinical relevance of polymorphisms in thymidylate synthase (TS) and glutathione-S-transferase (GST) genes is discussed.

Thymidylate Synthase Pharmacogenetics in Colorectal Cancer

No Abstract

Thymidylate synthase pharmacogenetics in colorectal cancer

Thymidylate synthase (TS) is an important target for chemotherapy drugs, such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (FUDR), oral 5-FU prodrugs (e.g., uracil/tegafur [UFT], S-1, and capecitabine), and other novel folate-based drugs (e.g., raltitrexed, pemetrexed, and nolatrexed). Overexpression of TS is linked to resistance to TS-targeted chemotherapy drugs. Polymorphic tandem repeats located in the TS enhancer region (TSER) have been shown to influence TS expression. Three copies (TSER*3) of the tandem repeat give a 2.6-fold greater in vitro TS expression than 2 copies (TSER*2). A stepwise increase in expression and enzyme activity has been observed with increasing copies of the TSER. Alleles containing 4 (TSER*4), 5 (TSER*5), and 9 (TSER*9) copies of the tandem repeat have also been identified, although the effect of these alleles remains unclear. Preliminary data have suggested that stage III colorectal cancer patients with the TSER*3/TSER*3 genotype do not receive the improvement in survival from adjuvant 5-FU observed in patients with the TSER*3/TSER*2 or TSER*2/TSER*2 genotype. A poor response rate to 5-FU for neoadjuvant rectal or metastatic colorectal disease is also apparent in TSER*3/TSER*3 patients. This has significant clinical implications because TSER*3/TSER*3 occurs in 30% of Caucasian patients. Ethnic variation also exists in the TSER, with Asian populations having significantly higher frequency of TSER*3 than other world populations. Prospective confirmation of the impact of TSER on outcome, after TS-targeted chemotherapy, will define the utility of pharmacogenetics to optimize the selection of 5-FU therapy for colorectal cancer.

Magnifying endoscopic observation of the gastric mucosa, particularly in patients with atrophic gastritis

The gastric mucosal surface was observed using the magnifying fibergastroscope (FGS-ML), and the fine gastric mucosal patterns, which were even smaller than one unit of gastric area, were examined at a magnification of about 30. For simplicification, we classified these patterns by magnifying endoscopy in the following ways; FP, FIP, FSP, SP and MP, modifying Yoshii's classification under the dissecting microscope. The FIP, which was found to have round and long elliptical gastric pits, is a new addition to our endoscopic classification. The relationship between the FIP and the intermediate zone was evaluated by superficial and histological studies of surgical and biopsy specimens. The width of the band of FIP seems to be related to the severity of atrophic gastritis. Also, the transformation of FP to FIP was assessed by comparing specimens taken from the resected and residual parts of the stomach, respectively. Moreover, it appears that severe gastritis occurs in the gastric mucosa which shows a FIP. Therefore, we consider that the FIP indicates the position of the atrophic border.

Magnifying endoscopic observation of the gastric mucosa, particularly in patients with atrophic gastritis

The gastric mucosal surface was observed using the magnifying fibergastroscope (FGS-ML), and the fine gastric mucosal patterns, which were even smaller than one unit of gastric area, were examined at a magnification of about 30. For simplicification, we classified these patterns by magnifying endoscopy in the following ways; FP, FIP, FSP, SP and MP, modifying Yoshii's classification under the dissecting microscope. The FIP, which was found to have round and long elliptical gastric pits, is a new addition to our endoscopic classification. The relationship between the FIP and the intermediate zone was evaluated by superficial and histological studies of surgical and biopsy specimens. The width of the band of FIP seems to be related to the severity of atrophic gastritis. Also, the transformation of FP to FIP was assessed by comparing specimens taken from the resected and residual parts of the stomach, respectively. Moreover, it appears that severe gastritis occurs in the gastric mucosa which shows a FIP. Therefore, we consider that the FIP indicates the position of the atrophic border.

Magnifying endoscopic observation of the gastric mucosa, particularly in patients with atrophic gastritis

The gastric mucosal surface was observed using the magnifying fibergastroscope (FGS-ML), and the fine gastric mucosal patterns, which were even smaller than one unit of gastric area, were examined at a magnification of about 30. For simplicification, we classified these patterns by magnifying endoscopy in the following ways; FP, FIP, FSP, SP and MP, modifying Yoshii's classification under the dissecting microscope. The FIP, which was found to have round and long elliptical gastric pits, is a new addition to our endoscopic classification. The relationship between the FIP and the intermediate zone was evaluated by superficial and histological studies of surgical and biopsy specimens. The width of the band of FIP seems to be related to the severity of atrophic gastritis. Also, the transformation of FP to FIP was assessed by comparing specimens taken from the resected and residual parts of the stomach, respectively. Moreover, it appears that severe gastritis occurs in the gastric mucosa which shows a FIP. Therefore, we consider that the FIP indicates the position of the atrophic border.

Magnifying endoscopic observation of the gastric mucosa, particularly in patients with atrophic gastritis

The gastric mucosal surface was observed using the magnifying fibergastroscope (FGS-ML), and the fine gastric mucosal patterns, which were even smaller than one unit of gastric area, were examined at a magnification of about 30. For simplicification, we classified these patterns by magnifying endoscopy in the following ways; FP, FIP, FSP, SP and MP, modifying Yoshii's classification under the dissecting microscope. The FIP, which was found to have round and long elliptical gastric pits, is a new addition to our endoscopic classification. The relationship between the FIP and the intermediate zone was evaluated by superficial and histological studies of surgical and biopsy specimens. The width of the band of FIP seems to be related to the severity of atrophic gastritis. Also, the transformation of FP to FIP was assessed by comparing specimens taken from the resected and residual parts of the stomach, respectively. Moreover, it appears that severe gastritis occurs in the gastric mucosa which shows a FIP. Therefore, we consider that the FIP indicates the position of the atrophic border.