Effect of intravenous omeprazole on recurrent bleeding after endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers

Current management of acute gastrointestinal bleeding

Endoscopic therapy is now the first-line treatment for the management of acute ulcer bleeding. Of the many endoscopic methods available, combination treatment using adrenaline injection to arrest the active bleeding, followed by thermal or electrical coagulation to seal the vessel, is currently the most popular. Endoscopic ulcer haemostasis is technically demanding, and indiscriminate extrapolation of results of published trials without reference to the expertise available locally may be dangerous. The cost-effectiveness of a routine second-look endoscopy has not been established, but repeat treatment in those who have rebled has shown good results in experienced hands. Current evidence supports the use of a proton-pump inhibitor to prevent acid-pepsin digestion of the blood clot plugging the eroded blood vessel. Interplay between acid, Helicobacter, NSAID and 'stress' results in peptic ulceration. Eradication of Helicobacter is an important measure in the secondary prevention of ulcer bleeding. The inability to measure blood flow in the eroded artery before and after treatment, to reliably seal a large blood vessel and to detect rebleeding before significant blood loss are limiting factors in the current management of ulcer bleeding.

The role of acid suppression in the management and prevention of gastrointestinal hemorrhage associated with gastroduodenal ulcers

Peptic ulcer bleeding remains a substantial source of morbidity and mortality in the ICU setting. Endoscopic injection with adrenaline and thermocoagulation is the mainstay of treatment for peptic ulcer bleeds. To enhance healing and overcome limitations of endoscopic therapies, acid suppression therapy is recommended. Although results from a few studies do not support their use fully following an episode of acute UGI bleeding, PPIs have been used successfully to lower transfusion requirements and additional surgical procedures, reduce hospital stays, and lower medical costs. H2RAs and PPIs have a rapid onset of action when given intravenously; however, patients quickly become tolerant to the effects of H2RAs, generally requiring increased doses of medication after the first day of administration. PPIs provide persistent acid suppression, maintaining neutral gastric pH, especially during the critical first 72 hours following a bleed. Recent clinical studies further support their use in preventing bleeding in the clinical setting. Controversy exists over the utility of pharmacologically induced acid suppression in critically ill patients at risk for stress ulcers. Comparative pH studies, however, suggest that i.v. PPIs such as pantoprazole are more effective in raising intragastric pH than are H2RAs. Although the clinical benefits of PPIs for stress ulcer prophylaxis have not been established, there is a theoretical framework suggesting that they should be beneficial. Ongoing clinical studies should show whether the theoretical advantage translates into clinically meaningful benefits.

An Overview of Proton Pump Inhibitors

SUMMARY

Proton pump inhibitors are the standard of treatment for acid-related disorders. These disorders include gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications (i.e., erosive esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus), peptic ulcer disease, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, and idiopathic hypersecretion. Proton pump inhibitors are also successfully used for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. There are currently five proton pump inhibitors approved by the Food and Drug Administration and available in the United States. These are omeprazole (Prilosec), lansoprazole (Prevacid), rabeprazole (Aciphex), pantoprazole (Protonix), and esomeprazole (Nexium). This review discusses the history of proton pump inhibitors and compares and evaluates the pharmacology including mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, administration, dosage, and drug interactions. Information regarding therapeutic indications, clinical efficacy, short- and long-term side effects, and cost is also presented. A case presentation offers an analysis of the use of proton pump inhibitors in individualized patient care.

Acute upper GI bleeding: did anything change? Time trend analysis of incidence and outcome of acute upper GI bleeding between 1993/1994 and 2000

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine recent time trends in incidence and outcome of upper GI bleeding.

METHODS

Prospective data collection on all patients presenting with acute upper GI bleeding from a defined geographical area in the period 1993/1994 and 2000.

RESULTS

Incidence decreased from 61.7/100,000 in 1993/94 to 47.7/100,000 persons annually in 2000, corresponding to a 23% decrease in incidence after age adjustment (95% CI = 15-30%). The incidence was higher among patients of more advanced age. Rebleeding (16% vs 15%) and mortality (14% vs 13%) did not differ between the two time periods. Ulcer bleeding was the most frequent cause of bleeding, at 40% (1993/94) and 46% (2000). Incidence remained stable for both duodenal and gastric ulcer bleeding. Almost one half of all patients with peptic ulcer bleeding were using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or aspirin. Also, among patients with ulcer bleeding, rebleeding (22% vs 20%) and mortality (15% vs 14%) did not differ between the two time periods. Increasing age, presence of severe and life-threatening comorbidity, and rebleeding were associated with higher mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Between 1993/1994 and 2000, among patients with acute upper GI bleeding, the incidence rate of upper GI bleeding significantly decreased, but no improvement was seen in the risk of rebleeding or mortality in these patients. The incidence rate of ulcer bleeding remained stable. Prevention of ulcer bleeding is important.

Cost implications of administering intravenous proton pump inhibitors to all patients presenting to the emergency department with peptic ulcer bleeding

OBJECTIVES

Administering proton pump inhibitors (PPI) intravenously (iv) after endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers reduces the incidence of rebleeding, the need for operative procedures, and hospitalizations. We assessed the cost implications of iv PPI initiated in all patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with signs of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding.

METHODS

From a third-party payer perspective with a time horizon of 60 days, we built a decision analytic model comparing standard endoscopic therapy to a strategy in which all patients presenting to the ED with UGI bleeding would start iv PPI before endoscopy. After endoscopy, only those with peptic ulcers would be kept on iv PPI added to standard therapy. Probabilities of health events were extracted from published literature. Resource utilization profiles and costs (iv PPI, hospital stay for medical and operative procedures, and professional fees) were based on Medicare reimbursement data from a large hospital in Alabama. All costs were expressed in 2000 US dollars. Uncertainty was investigated through one-way sensitivity analyses and probabilistic analyses using Monte Carlo simulations.

RESULTS

In a hypothetical group of 1000 individuals, routine use of iv PPI prevented 40 rebleeds, 9 surgical procedures, and 223 hospital days, and led to incremental savings of dollars 920 per subject. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicated that the strategy of using iv PPI was likely to be dominant even when accounting for uncertainty.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on available evidence, routine administration of iv PPI to all persons presenting with UGI bleeding represents good value for money and merits consideration as standard hospital policy.

Treatment of acid-related diseases in the elderly with emphasis on the use of proton pump inhibitors

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have revolutionised the treatment of acid-related disorders, and they have also made it possible to define the spectrum of acid inhibition required for optimal treatment in each disorder. Five PPIs are now available: the older drugs, omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole, and the two newest, rabeprazole and esomeprazole. These agents have predominantly been developed in the younger adult population, and data for the elderly population are limited. Subtle differences have emerged between the old and the new PPIs in their pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and efficacy profiles. The degree of clinical relevance of these differences in the adult population is in question. However, according to this review, based on the available data for the elderly and by inference from the adult population, the differences are highly relevant in the elderly population. Studies of the pharmacokinetics of older PPIs demonstrated considerable variation in drug clearance that was reflected in a wide range of efficacy related to acid suppression with standard dosages. The newer PPIs offer several advantages over older agents, particularly in terms of rapid, profound and consistent acid inhibition. Consistent acid inhibition is particularly important in the elderly since clinical response is often difficult to judge in this patient group. An individual's cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 genotype predicts the degree of acid suppression and consequently the clinical efficacy of the PPIs. The older PPIs are predominantly metabolised by CYP2C19, with this being of more importance for omeprazole and lansoprazole than pantoprazole. The hepatic metabolism of rabeprazole is predominantly by nonenzymatic reactions and minimally by CYP-mediated reactions, which therefore confers an advantage over older PPIs in that genetic polymorphisms for CYP2C19 do not significantly influence rabeprazole clearance, clinical efficacy or potential for drug interactions. The metabolism of esomeprazole involves CYP2C19 but to a lesser extent than its predecessor omeprazole. Furthermore, esomeprazole has a more rapid onset of action and less variation in clearance rates than omeprazole. Drug clearance decreases with age independently of CYP2C19 status, exaggerating some of the differences between the PPIs and increasing the risk of drug interactions.

[Acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Diagnosis and management]

Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage calls for a team approach. Early endotracheal intubation of unconscious patients helps to prevent aspiration. Erythromycin i.v. 20 min. before emergency endoscopy improves the diagnostic yield. Patients without increased risk of rebleeding may be treated on an outpatient basis. Band ligation is the gold standard for acute variceal bleeding. Terlipressin, somatostatin and octreotide are equally effective but require additional measures for prevention of late recurrence. Somatostatin and analogues used as adjunct to ligation slightly reduce the risk of rebleeding but not of death. Three to seven days of prophylactic antibiotics decrease the risk of uncontrolled or recurrent bleeding. Therapeutic failures are rescued by transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting (TIPS). Patients with nonvaricose bleeding should only be treated when active hemorrhage or a "visible vessel" is found. First line treatment is endoscopic injection of diluted adrenalin or isotonic saline. Thermal coagulation is an alternative. Tissue-destructing sclerosants should be avoided. Clipping and injection of fibrin glue are second and third line measures. Proton pump inhibitors improve endoscopic hemostasis, however, it is unclear whether high i.v. doses are required. H. pylori must be eradicated to prevent late recurrence. Rebleeding is treated endoscopically with angiographic intervention or surgery as rescue measures.

Pharmacologic Treatment of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

The first goal of therapy is to assess hemodynamic stability in a patient presenting with evidence of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and, second, to maintain hemodynamic stability using crystalloids or packed red blood cells. The diagnosis of the cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding should be performed using endoscopic techniques, which should be performed early. Therapy directed at treating the cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding should be initiated at the time of endoscopy. Pharmacologic management should be based on the prevention of ulcer rebleeding and should be initiated at the time of endoscopic diagnosis. Surgery should be considered only in cases when endoscopic and pharmacologic treatments are deemed a failure.

A negative rapid urease test is unreliable for exclusion of Helicobacter pylori infection during acute phase of ulcer bleeding. A prospective case control study

BACKGROUND

The reliability of the rapid urease test has not been proven in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding. Some studies show bad diagnostic results with the rapid urease test for gastrointestinal bleeding.

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy of the rapid urease test in patients with bleeding gastric or duodenal ulcers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 96 patients with acute peptic ulcer bleeding without proton pump inhibitor or antibiotic therapy within the last 14 days before bleeding were included into the study. During index endoscopy, specimens for histological and rapid urease test were obtained from the antrum and corpus mucosa of the stomach. Patients were also investigated by the 13C-urea breath test. Diagnostic quality parameters were calculated with the histology and the 13C-urea breath test as reference and compared with a matched control group with uncomplicated ulcers.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of the rapid urease test was 80% and the specificity 100% compared to histology and 13C-urea breath test. The negative predictive value was 75%. These values were statistically significantly different from those of the control group (sensitivity 96%, specificity 100%, negative predictive value 88%).

CONCLUSION

The exclusive use of the rapid urease test cannot be recommended in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of high-dose omeprazole infusion as adjuvant therapy to endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcer

BACKGROUND

Intravenous administration of proton pump inhibitors after endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers has been shown to decrease the rate of recurrent bleeding and the need for subsequent surgery. Yet there is a relative lack of formal assessment of this practice. The aim of this study was to examine the cost-effectiveness of this therapy by using standard pharmacoeconomic methods.

METHODS

The present study was performed in conjunction with a randomized controlled clinical trial that included 232 patients who received either omeprazole (80 mg intravenous bolus followed by infusion at 8 mg/hour for 72 hours) or placebo after hemostasis was achieved endoscopically. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to evaluate the different outcomes of the trial. All related direct medical costs were identified from patient records. Cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated.

RESULTS

Analysis by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test showed that the direct medical cost in the omeprazole group was lower than that for the placebo group. Cost-effectiveness ratios for omeprazole and placebo groups were, respectively, HK$ 28,764 (US$ 3688) and HK$ 36,992 (US$ 4743) in averting one episode of recurrent bleeding in one patient after initial hemostasis was achieved endoscopically.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous administration of high-dose omeprazole appears to be a cost-effective therapy in reducing the recurrence of bleeding and need for surgery in patients with active bleeding ulcer after initial hemostasis is obtained endoscopically.

Effect of oral omeprazole in reducing re-bleeding in bleeding peptic ulcers: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic therapies and continuous intravenous omeprazole can decrease the morbidity and duration of hospital stay of patients with high-risk peptic ulcer.

AIM

To evaluate the role of oral omeprazole in high-risk bleeders.

METHODS

After injection therapy of 160 patients with high-risk peptic ulcer, 80 received oral omeprazole and 80 received placebo, and all were followed up.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-nine patients (71 omeprazole and 78 placebo) completed the study. Eleven patients were excluded from the study. Thirty-seven (25%) patients had gastric ulcer and 112 (75%) had duodenal ulcer. Fifty-seven (38%) ulcers showed visible vessels, 80 (54%) showed oozing of blood and 12 (8%) showed a spurting artery. Only one patient died (placebo group). The mean hospital stays were 62.8 +/- 28.6 h and 75 +/- 39 h in the omeprazole and placebo groups, respectively (P = 0.032). The mean amounts of blood transfused were 1.13 +/- 1.36 and 1.68 +/- 1.68 bags in the omeprazole and placebo groups, respectively (P = 0.029). The re-bleeding rate was lower in the omeprazole group than in the placebo group (12 vs. 26, respectively; P = 0.022).

CONCLUSION

Oral omeprazole is effective in decreasing the hospital stay, re-bleeding rate and the need for blood transfusion in high-risk ulcer bleeders treated with endoscopic injection therapy.

Cost-effectiveness in Canada of intravenous proton pump inhibitors for all patients presenting with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding

BACKGROUND

The administration of proton pump inhibitors intravenously after endoscopic treatment of peptic ulcers significantly reduces the recurrence of bleeding.

AIM

To evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness in Canada of intravenous proton pump inhibitor before endoscopic therapy to patients presenting with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, compared with endoscopic treatment alone.

METHODS

From a third-party payer perspective, we modelled the costs and effectiveness over 60 days of the two approaches using decision analysis. The probabilities of various outcomes, such as re-bleeding and the need for surgery, were taken from the published literature. We included the costs of intravenous proton pump inhibitor, therapeutic endoscopy, surgical procedures and hospitalizations, all expressed in 2001 Canadian dollars.

RESULTS

In a hypothetical cohort of 1000 patients, the intravenous proton pump inhibitor approach resulted in mean savings of 20,700 Canadian dollars with 37 re-bleeding episodes averted. The investigation of uncertainty resulted in a likelihood of intravenous proton pump inhibitor being cost-effective of at least 0.73.

CONCLUSION

It is common in Canada to administer intravenous proton pump inhibitors to patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding even before endoscopic confirmation of bleeding peptic ulcers. Our results suggest that this approach has a high likelihood of being cost-effective.

Outcome of endoscopic treatment for peptic ulcer bleeding: Is a second look necessary? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic therapy for GI bleeding is highly effective. Nevertheless, bleeding recurs in 10% to 25% of cases, irrespective of the method of treatment used. Whether a second-look endoscopy with retreatment after initial hemostasis is of clinical value is controversial. A meta-analysis was performed to assess whether systematic second-look endoscopy with retreatment reduces the risks of recurrent bleeding, salvage surgery, and death in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed of randomized controlled studies of the value of second-look endoscopy in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding published between 1990 and 2000. Four studies were selected according to predefined criteria. Two investigators extracted the data independently. Pooled risk estimates and number need to treat were calculated for each procedure. Heterogeneity of effects was tested.

RESULTS

The absolute risk reduction in clinical recurrent bleeding was 6.2% (p < 0.01). Absolute risk reduction for surgery and mortality were, respectively, 1.7% and 1.0% (not significant). The second look with retreatment significantly reduced the risk of recurrent bleeding compared with control patients (OR 0.64; 95% CI [0.44, 0.95]; p < 0.01), with a number needed to treat of 16. There was no heterogeneity among studies. The risk of surgery as well as the risk of death were not significantly influenced by the second-look endoscopy with retreatment (number needed to treat, respectively, 58 and 97).

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic second-look endoscopy with retreatment significantly reduces the risk of recurrent bleeding in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding compared with control patients, but it does not substantially reduce the risk of salvage surgery or mortality.

Minimizing recurrent peptic ulcer hemorrhage after endoscopic hemostasis: the cost-effectiveness of competing strategies

OBJECTIVES

Controversy exists regarding the optimal strategy to minimize recurrent ulcer hemorrhage after successful endoscopic hemostasis. Our objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of competing strategies for the posthemostasis management of patients with high risk ulcer stigmata.

METHODS

Through decision analysis, we calculated the cost-effectiveness of four strategies: 1) follow patients clinically after hemostasis and repeat endoscopy only in patients with evidence of rebleeding (usual care); 2) administer intravenous proton pump inhibitors (i.v. PPIs) after hemostasis and repeat endoscopy only in patients with clinical signs of rebleeding; 3) perform second look endoscopy at 24 h in all patients with successful endoscopic hemostasis; and 4) perform selective second look endoscopy at 24 h only in patients at high risk for rebleeding as identified by the prospectively validated Baylor Bleeding Score. Probability estimates were derived from a systematic review of the medical literature. Cost estimates were based on Medicare reimbursement. Effectiveness was defined as the proportion of patients with rebleeding, surgery, or death prevented.

RESULTS

The selective second look endoscopy strategy was the most effective and least expensive of the four competing strategies, and therefore dominated the analysis. The i.v. PPI strategy required 50% fewer endoscopies than the competing strategies, and became the dominant strategy when the rebleed rate with i.v. PPIs fell below 9% and when the cost of i.v. PPIs fell below 10 dollars/day.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the usual practice of "watchful waiting," performing selective second look endoscopy in high risk patients may prevent more cases of rebleeding, surgery, or death at a lower overall cost. However, i.v. PPIs are likely to reduce the need for second look endoscopy and may be preferred overall if the rebleed rate and cost of i.v. PPIs remains low.

Endoscopic hemostasis of a bleeding marginal ulcer: hemoclipping or dual therapy with epinephrine injection and heater probe thermocoagulation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic hemoclipping and dual therapy with epinephrine injection and heater probe thermocoagulation have been proven effective in the hemostasis of bleeding peptic ulcers. However, the hemostatic efficacy has not been investigated in bleeding marginal ulcers. The aim of this study is to investigate the hemostatic efficacy of endoscopic hemoclipping and dual therapy with epinephrine injection and heater probe thermocoagulation in bleeding marginal ulcers.

METHODS

From November 1997 to July 2000, 50 patients with active marginal ulcer bleeding underwent either hemoclipping (20 patients) or dual therapy (30 patients) for hemostasis. The demographic data, clinicopathological characteristics, endoscopic findings, initial hemostatic rates, rebleeding rates, amount of blood transfusion, the need of surgery, and mortality rates were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Marginal ulcers were located at the anastomotic site (64%), saddle portion (22%), efferent loop (10%), or at the afferent loop (4%). The bleeding stigmata were classified into spurting artery (32%), oozing vessel (38%), visible vessel (20%), and blood clot adhesion (10%). The overall therapeutic results in 50 patients were initial hemostasis (100%), rebleeding rate (22%), need for surgery (4%), and hospital mortality rate (4%). There was no significant difference in demographic data and clinicopathological characteristics between the two modes of treatments, whereas recurrent bleeding developed in 5% in the hemoclipping group and 33% in the dual therapy group. No complication related to the procedure occurred in either mode of therapy. The hospital mortality rates were 0 and 6.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopy is effective in achieving initial hemostasis from bleeding marginal ulcers. However, the rebleeding rate remains high and repeated endoscopy may be needed to arrest the hemorrhage.

Interventional endoscopy

Technologic milestones have been achieved in the field of interventional endoscopy. These have resulted in improved hemostasis, more accurate cancer staging, safer and less invasive methods of removing gastric neoplasms, and endoscopic palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction via stenting. However, just as these milestones are achieved, new challenges emerge: (1) How much sedation can one use safely? (2) What is the risk of transmitting infection and how can that be prevented? (3) Can scopes be made smaller and more comfortable? (4) Can optics be improved? (5) Can endoscopic repair of gastric perforations be safely performed? In this section, we review some of these issues. First, we will provide an update on the most recent concepts in the field of light sedation and infection control. Then, a review of the most commonly used interventional endoscopy procedures, including hemostasis, endosonography, endoscopic mucosal resection, stenting, and percutaneous gastrostomy tube placements. Finally, an overview of the ongoing research and development in the field of interventional endoscopy and how it can improve patient comfort, diagnostic accuracy, therapeutic efficacy, and training in the future.

Management of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Children

Gastrointestinal bleeding in infants and children is a potentially life-threatening problem that is encountered by virtually all practicing pediatric gastroenterologists. Youngsters with a normal hematocrit, hemodynamic stability, and a history consistent with an acute, self-limited illness most frequently need only close observation; others require more in-depth assessment and intervention. Meticulous attention to the patient's cardiopulmonary status and knowledge of appropriate pediatric resuscitation schemes form the cornerstones on which more specific therapeutic interventions are based. Many treatment techniques and approaches have been extrapolated for pediatric use from adult studies; the regimen implemented for a child should be individualized and based on factors such as patient size, underlying condition, and operator expertise. Although the physician treating pediatric gastrointestinal hemorrhage requires more than a modicum of patience and determination, this must be tempered with a ready willingness to seek consultation from surgical colleagues to ensure optimal outcomes. Knowledge of acid-suppressive and vasoactive medications is essential, as is familiarity with at least one injection technique and one thermocoagulation technique for hemostasis. Endoscopic sclerotherapy and variceal band ligation are equally efficacious in achieving control of acute variceal bleeding, but band ligation is emerging as the technique best suited for prophylaxis. Beta blockade appears to have a smaller and less well-defined role in pediatric variceal prophylaxis compared with that in adults, but random controlled trials are necessary to confirm this impression.

Endovascular intervention for the treatment of acute arterial gastrointestinal hemorrhage

The treatment of arterial gastrointestinal hemorrhage continues to evolve. Currently, most interventional radiologists approach bleeding both in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract with intention to treat. Embolization has replaced local vasoconstrictive therapy as the catheter-based treatment of choice in many hospitals. Coaxial microcatheters have simplified embolotherapy and enabled lower gastrointestinal bleeding to be treated safely and effectively.

A prospective, randomized trial of endoscopic hemoclip versus heater probe thermocoagulation for peptic ulcer bleeding

OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic heater probe thermocoagulation and hemoclip are considered to be safe and very effective in the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcer. So far, there are only few reports concerning hemostasis with endoscopic hemoclip. The aims of this study were to compare the hemostatic effects of both therapeutic modalities in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding.

METHODS

A total of 80 patients with active bleeding or nonbleeding visible vessels were randomized to receive endoscopic hemoclip (n = 40) or heater probe thermocoagulation (n = 40).

RESULTS

Initial hemostasis was achieved in 34 patients (85%) in the hemoclip group and 40 patients (100%) in the heater probe group (p = 0.01277). Rebleeding occurred in three patients (8.8%) in the hemoclip group and two patients (5%) in the heater probe group (p > 0.1). Among patients with difficult-to-approach bleeding, we obtained a better hemostatic rate in the heater probe group (nine of 11 patients vs three of 10, p = 0.02417). The volume of blood transfused after entry into the study, duration of hospital stay, number of patients requiring urgent surgery, and the mortality rate were not statistically significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with peptic ulcer bleeding, heater probe thermocoagulation offers an advantage in achieving hemostasis than hemoclip. In difficult-to-approach bleeders, heater probe is a more suitable therapeutic modality.

Erythromycin intravenous bolus infusion in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Emergency endoscopy may be difficult in upper gastrointestinal bleeding when blood obscures the visibility. Erythromycin, a motilin agonist, induces gastric emptying. We investigated whether an intravenous bolus infusion of erythromycin would improve the yield of endoscopy in these patients.

METHODS

Patients admitted within 12 hours after hematemesis were randomly assigned to erythromycin (250 mg) or placebo, 20 minutes before endoscopy. The primary end point was endoscopic yield, as assessed by objective and subjective scoring systems and endoscopic duration. Secondary end points were the need for a second look, endoscopy-related complications, blood units transfused, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients received erythromycin and 54 received placebo. A clear stomach was found more often in the erythromycin group (82% vs. 33%; P < 0.001). This difference remained significant in patients with cirrhosis. Erythromycin shortened the endoscopic duration (13.7 vs. 16.4 minutes in the placebo group; P = 0.036) and reduced the need for second-look endoscopy (6 vs. 17 cases; P = 0.018). Length of hospital stay and blood units transfused did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. No complications were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Erythromycin infusion before endoscopy in patients with recent hematemesis makes endoscopy shorter and easier, thereby reducing the need for a repeat procedure.

Meta-analysis: the efficacy of intravenous H2-receptor antagonists in bleeding peptic ulcer

BACKGROUND

Although a previous meta-analysis found that intravenous H2-receptor antagonists were only weakly beneficial in bleeding gastric ulcer and of no benefit in bleeding duodenal ulcer, patients with ulcer bleeding continue to receive such treatment.

AIM

To re-evaluate the efficacy of intravenous H2-receptor antagonists in ulcer re-bleeding, surgery and mortality by updating the previous meta-analysis.

METHODS

After two independent literature searches, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of intravenous H2-receptor antagonists in bleeding ulcer published between 1984 and 2000 were added to those from the initial meta-analysis. Pooled rates of re-bleeding, surgery and death were re-calculated, together with the relative risk reduction, absolute risk reduction, number needed to treat and Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio.

RESULTS

Intravenous H2-receptor antagonists did not significantly reduce re-bleeding, surgery or death in bleeding duodenal ulcer. There were small but significant reductions in re-bleeding, surgery and death in bleeding gastric ulcer; the absolute risk reductions were 7.2%, 6.7% and 3.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous H2-receptor antagonists are of no value in bleeding duodenal ulcer, although they may be mildly beneficial in bleeding gastric ulcer. Because proton pump inhibitors have a greater inhibitory effect on gastric acid secretion than H2-receptor antagonists, they may be more effective in ulcer bleeding and should be further evaluated for that indication.

Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients: causes and treatment modalities

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding from peptic ulcers or other nonvariceal causes generally stops spontaneously; if it fails to do so, aggressive management is required. Such measures also are necessary for patients at high risk for rebleeding. Endoscopic therapy achieves hemostasis in >90% of bleeding patients and reduces mortality. After successful hemostasis of the initial bleeding episode, the primary concern becomes the prevention of rebleeding, which occurs in up to 20% of patients. Acid suppression with histamine-2-receptor antagonists has been widely used for many years to prevent recurrent bleeding. However, in acutely bleeding patients, these agents have not been shown to reduce the number of episodes of further bleeding or rebleeding or to reduce the need for transfusions or surgery. Omeprazole, an intravenous proton pump inhibitor, significantly reduced the rate of rebleeding in a recent placebo-controlled trial in which only patients with endoscopic confirmation of successful hemostasis were enrolled. Although this drug does not seem to reduce the need for surgical intervention or to decrease mortality, the trial does indicate the promise of intravenous proton pump inhibitors in reducing upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Evidence from additional well-controlled trials is needed to confirm this finding. The use of proton pump inhibitors in this setting also may have a positive economic impact, and a decrease in the percentage of patients who experience rebleeding will eliminate the cost of further management strategies in those cases.

Variable use of endoscopic haemostasis in the management of bleeding peptic ulcers

BACKGROUND

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that endoscopic haemostasis is beneficial for patients with a bleeding peptic ulcer. The relevance of such data to management outside of RCTs is unclear. Therefore we examined management of patients with a bleeding peptic ulcer in a UK teaching hospital.

METHODS

All patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy for bleeding peptic ulcer between 1997 and 1999 were identified from an endoscopy database and the clinical records reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

A total of 872 patients underwent UGI endoscopy for presumed acute UGI haemorrhage; 179 (21%) had an endoscopic diagnosis of bleeding peptic ulcer. Seventy nine patients had a peptic ulcer with stigmata of recent haemorrhage (SRH) but only 61 (77%) of these patients received endoscopic haemostasis (77% adrenaline, 23% combination therapy). Re-bleeding occurred in 24 patients with SRH in whom transfusion requirement was the sole predictor of re-bleeding. The re-bleeding rate among patients who received adrenaline was 25% (n=12), compared with 57% (n=8) in the combination group and 31% (n=4) in those who did not receive endoscopic haemostasis. Patients who received combination endoscopic haemostasis had an increased incidence of active bleeding (p=0.007) and an increased transfusion requirement (p=0.002). Eleven of 20 patients who re-bled had repeat endoscopic haemostasis, with 45% eventually requiring surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of endoscopic management of bleeding peptic ulcers in the unit studied differ markedly from those published by specialised centres. The data reported here suggest that increased standardisation of endoscopic haemostasis is required, especially in units with provision for emergency "out-of-hours" endoscopy, performed by several individuals of different grades.

Evidence-based medicine as it applies to acid suppression in the hospitalized patient

An evidence-based-medicine approach may be applied to studies in the medical literature to help physicians make sound judgments about efficacy and safety data and to improve clinical decision making. To assess the role of gastric acid suppression in the prevention of stress ulcer bleeding and in the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding after successful hemostasis of bleeding peptic ulcer disease, the following questions should be addressed: Is it possible to identify risk factors for clinically important bleeding in critically ill patients? Can intravenous acid suppression prevent stress ulcer-related bleeding or prevent rebleeding in peptic ulcers after successful hemostasis? What is the most effective method of acid suppression for these disorders? An evidence-based-medicine review of published trials yields sufficient evidence to support the use of prophylactic acid suppression in critically ill patients with coagulopathy or in those who are receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation. Not enough data have accumulated to prove the superiority of intravenous proton pump inhibitors to intravenous histamine-2-receptor antagonists for prophylaxis of clinically important stress ulcer bleeding. With respect to acute gastrointestinal bleeding, however, two well-conducted trials indicate that an intravenous proton pump inhibitor is significantly more effective than an intravenous histamine-2-receptor antagonist or placebo in reducing the rate of rebleeding after hemostasis in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer. Analysis of the data from both trials shows that only five to six patients would need to receive an intravenous proton pump inhibitor to avoid one episode of rebleeding.

Intravenous proton pump inhibitors in the critical care setting

Two well-controlled trials were carried out to investigate the effectiveness of intravenous proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) to reduce peptic ulcer rebleeding after successful hemostasis. The results demonstrated that the PPI reduced the rate of rebleeding significantly. The recent availability of the first intravenous PPI formulation in the United States, intravenous pantoprazole, represents an alternative to intravenous histamine-2 receptor antagonists. The results of 16 randomized, controlled trials involving a total of >3,800 patients (1,892 receiving PPIs and 1,911 controls) suggest that bolus administration plus continuous infusion of PPIs is a more effective pharmacotherapy than bolus infusion alone in decreasing both rebleeding and the need for surgery. Optimal effect is achieved with an intravenous 80-mg bolus, followed by continuous infusion of 8 mg/hr for 3 days, after which therapy may be continued with an oral PPI. Intermittent bolus administration yielded a minimal benefit. A difference in mortality rates has not yet been demonstrated.

Frontiers in Gastroenterology

There have been a number of exciting advancements and changes in the gastroenterology field over the last few years. A new mesalamine formulation, balsalazide disodium, is now available for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Balsalazide may be utilized as first line therapy for patients with UC, or patients who are intolerant to other mesalamine preparations. In the area of irritable bowel syndrome, alosetron was removed from the market after reports that it was associated with severe constipation and death, although a causal relationship could not be established. Published data examines the risk of certain medications and the development of reflux disease and esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Also, new proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are available, esomeprazole, as well as alternate methods of administration for others. The first intravenous PPI, pantoprazole, is available in the United States, although currently there is a paucity of data regarding its efficacy. Peptic ulcer disease is also discussed, including Helicobacter pylori resistance, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and the treatment of bleeding ulcers. With pegylated interferon, progress in the treatment of hepatitis C offers promise for many patients. This review will highlight many recent changes in gastroenterology an offer a perspective on how disease management has changed.

General principles to enhance practice patterns in gastrointestinal endoscopy

AIM

To develop general rules on how to pursue a therapeutic goal of interventional endoscopy without getting lost in abundant details.

METHODS

The influences of various medical interventions on the survival of a patient with gastrointestinal haemorrhage are modelled by an influence diagram. Survival is the focal point of multiple influences affecting its overall strength. Any downstream influence can represent the focal point of other preceding upstream influences. The mathematics underlying the influence diagram are similar to those of a decision tree with some notable exceptions. Its formalism allows one to consider inhibitory and additive influences and to include in the same analysis non-commensurable qualities, such as correct diagnosis, haemostasis or survival.

RESULTS

The analysis reveals five general rules. First, the large number of factors involved in successful endoscopy render the influence of each individual factor less important. Second, a single factor that exerts its influence on many subsequent factors tends to be associated with an overall greater relevance. Third, remote influences are of lesser relevance than those directly linked to the final outcome. Fourth, factors multiplied by several consecutive probabilities lose their influence. Fifth, endoscopists need to assess the relevance of individual factors with respect to the immediate goals of endoscopy, as well as the general goals of patient well-being.

CONCLUSIONS

The influence model of endoscopic haemostasis reveals several general principles that can be utilized as tools in endoscopy training.

A prospective, randomized trial of large- versus small-volume endoscopic injection of epinephrine for peptic ulcer bleeding

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic injection of epinephrine in the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcer is considered highly effective, safe, inexpensive, and easy to use. However, bleeding recurs in 6% to 36% of patients. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal dose of epinephrine for endoscopic injection in the treatment of patients with bleeding peptic ulcer.

METHODS

One hundred fifty-six patients with active bleeding or nonbleeding visible vessels were randomized to receive small- (5-10 mL) or large-volume (13-20 mL) injections of a 1:10,000 solution of epinephrine.

RESULTS

The mean volume of epinephrine injected was 16.5 mL (95% CI [15.7, 17.3 mL]) in the large-volume group and 8.0 mL (95% CI [7.5, 8.4 mL]) in the small-volume group. Initial hemostasis was achieved in all patients studied. The number of episodes of recurrent bleeding was smaller in the large-volume group (12/78, 15.4%) compared with the small-volume group (24/78, 30.8%, p = 0.037). The volume of blood transfused after entry into the study, duration of hospital stay, numbers of patients requiring urgent surgery, and mortality rates were not statistically different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Injection of a large volume (>13 mL) of epinephrine can reduce the rate of recurrent bleeding in patients with high-risk peptic ulcer and is superior to injection of lesser volumes of epinephrine when used to achieve sustained hemostasis.

Acute Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage

Upper endoscopy to assess the risk of rebleeding in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding may be used for triage, allowing outpatient care of selected patients and leading to significant cost savings. Over the last 10 years, hospitalization days required for upper gastrointestinal bleeding have decreased significantly and the majority of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding undergo endoscopy within 24 hours of admission. Twenty percent to 35% of these endoscopies include endoscopic hemostatic therapy. Endoscopic treatment is recommended for actively bleeding (ie, spurting or oozing) visible vessels and nonbleeding visible vessels that are raised and cannot be washed off. Endoscopic methods can be divided into thermal (multipolar coagulation, heater probe, argon plasma coagulator, Nd:YAG laser) and nonthermal (eg, injection therapy); both types are effective. A combination of injection and thermal therapy with initial injection to slow the bleeding or "clear the field" followed by coagulation of the identified vessel is popular. Bleeding recurs in 15% of patients. A recent randomized controlled trial of repeat endoscopic treatment versus surgery for patients with recurrent ulcer bleeding concluded that endoscopic retreatment is superior to surgery. Most peptic ulcer rebleeding occurs within the first 3 days of presentation. A comparison of omeprazole and placebo therapy in high-risk ulcer patients with bleeding stigmata at endoscopy who were not treated endoscopically found that high-dosage omeprazole (40 mg twice a day) significantly lowered the rates of further bleeding and surgical intervention. Although unlikely to replace endoscopic therapy, this study demonstrated the efficacy of potent acid suppression, perhaps due to stabilization of clotting activity. A recent placebo-controlled trial of high-dosage parenteral omeprazole after endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers demonstrated a substantial reduction in the risk of rebleeding.

Prospective validation of the Rockall risk scoring system for upper GI hemorrhage in subgroups of patients with varices and peptic ulcers

OBJECTIVES

The Rockall risk assessment score was devised to allow prediction of the risk of rebleeding and death in patients with upper GI hemorrhage. The score was derived by multivariate analysis in a cohort of patients with upper GI hemorrhage and subsequently validated in a second cohort. Only 4.4% of patients included in the initial study had esophageal varices, and analysis was not performed according to the etiology of the bleeding. Our aim was to assess the validity of the Rockall risk scoring system in predicting rebleeding and mortality in patients with esophageal varices or peptic ulcers.

METHODS

Admissions (n = 358) over 32 months to a single specialist GI bleeding unit were scored prospectively. The distribution of episodes of rebleeding and mortality by Rockall score were statistically analyzed using Fisher's exact test with 99% CIs calculated using a Monte Carlo method. The Child-Pugh score was determined in patients with esophageal varices.

RESULTS

The Rockall score was predictive of both rebleeding and mortality in patients with variceal hemorrhage (both ps < 0.0005), as was the Child-Pugh score (p = 0.001 and p < 0.0005, respectively). The initial Rockall score was predictive of mortality in patients with peptic ulcers (p = 0.01), although the complete score was not (p > 0.05). The complete score did, however, predict rebleeding in these patients (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to validate the Rockall score in specific subgroups of patients with esophageal varices or peptic ulcers and suggests that it is particularly applicable to variceal hemorrhage.

Epinephrine versus epinephrine plus fibrin glue injection in peptic ulcer bleeding: a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Peptic ulcer bleeding remains a disease with considerable morbidity and mortality. Epinephrine is the most widely used endoscopic injection agent, but bleeding recurs in 20% of high-risk cases. Fibrin glue might be an ideal injection agent, based on its physiologic properties, despite its demanding injection technique and high cost. The aim of this study was to determine whether the injection of fibrin glue in combination with epinephrine improves outcome for patients at high risk of recurrent bleeding.

METHODS

Patients were prospectively randomized to injection of epinephrine alone (n = 70) or epinephrine plus fibrin glue (n = 65). Endoscopy was repeated daily until the ulcer base was clean. All patients were treated with high-dose omeprazole.

RESULTS

Initial hemostasis was 100% in both groups. There was no significant overall difference in rates of recurrent bleeding (24.3% and 21.5%, respectively, for epinephrine and epinephrine plus fibrin). When patients were stratified according to Forrest criteria, no significant difference could be found, although there was a trend toward less recurrent bleeding after fibrin injection of actively bleeding ulcers. There was no significant difference in the proportions of patients who required surgery (10% and 6%, respectively, for epinephrine and epinephrine plus fibrin). Mortality was the same (3%) in each group.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding fibrin glue to epinephrine for injection treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers does not improve outcome. Fibrin glue might be of some value in selected cases.

Pharmacologic prophylaxis and treatment of stress ulcers in critically ill patients

Most clinicians agree that critically ill patients are at significant risk of developing stress-related ulcers and may have already developed mucosal lesions even if they are asymptomatic. Many options, including new pharmacologic advances, are available for the treatment and prophylaxis of stress-related ulcers; therefore, all critically ill patients should receive prophylaxis, even if they do not require treatment. Nutrition may play a significant role in the future in preventing stress-related ulcers. By improving stores of critical elements such as antioxidants, vitamins, and minerals before surgery, patients may lower the risk of developing stress ulcers. Critical care clinicians are critical in preventing and treating stress-related ulcers and should be vigilant in their patient care.

Management of gastrointestinal haemorrhage

A variety of endoscopic haemostatic techniques have enabled major advances in the management of not only bleeding peptic ulcers and bleeding varices, but also in a variety of bleeding lesions in the small intestine and in the colon. Indeed, the development and widespread implementation of endoscopic haemostasis has been one of the most important developments in clinical gastroenterology in the past two decades. An increasingly ageing cohort of patients with multiple co-morbidity are being treated and therefore improving the outcome of gastrointestinal bleeding continues to pose major challenges.

The novel use of an intravenous proton pump inhibitor in a patient with short bowel syndrome

Recent evidence suggests that parenteral proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can effectively control gastric acid hypersecretion. Intravenous PPI (omeprazole) can substantially reduce the risk of recurrent bleeding in patients with peptic ulcer disease. We describe a patient with short bowel syndrome who had recurrent life-threatening upper gastrointestinal bleeding from severe gastric and esophageal ulcerations. The patient had failed long-term, maximal-dose intravenous ranitidine therapy but was successfully treated and maintained on long-term therapy with an intravenous PPI (pantoprazole). To our knowledge, this is the first case report in the literature describing the use of an intravenous PPI to treat upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a patient with complete intestinal resection. Intravenous PPIs should be considered as the first line of treatment of erosive esophagitis and peptic ulcer disease in patients with short bowel syndrome and in patients who are nil per os and who fail intravenous H 2 -receptor antagonist treatment. Parenteral PPI may also be the drug of choice in intensive care patients who have erosive esophagitis. Furthermore, this is the first case report describing the novel use of intravenous pantoprazole to treat erosive esophagitis in a patient with short bowel syndrome, suggesting that intravenous PPI may also be useful for the treatment of ulcer prophylaxis in patients undergoing intestinal transplantation.