Partial hepatectomy with wide versus narrow resection margin for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized trial

Endothelium-coated tumor clusters are associated with poor prognosis and micrometastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection

BACKGROUND

Distinct morphologic features of microvascular endothelium exist in tumor tissues. The objective of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of endothelium-coated tumor clusters (ECTCs) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

ECTCs were evaluated by immunohistochemical staining for cluster of differentiation 34 (CD34) (a cell surface glycoprotein which is expressed specifically on tumor microvascular endothelium in HCC) in 239 specimens from patients with primary HCC. Overall survival (OS) and time to recurrence (TTR) were determined using Kaplan-Meier analysis and a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Levels of terminal deoxynucleotide transferase-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick-end labeling (TUNEL) staining, and Ki-67 expression, and E-cadherin expression were assessed to determine tumor apoptosis, proliferation, and invasiveness, respectively.

RESULTS

The presence of ECTCs was associated with a poor prognosis in all patients and in patient subgroups stratified by tumor size, TNM classification, and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage and tumor invasiveness. In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, the presence of ECTCs emerged as an independent prognostic indicator of both poor OS (P = .001; hazard ratio, 1.949) and shorter TTR (P < .001; hazard ratio, 2.085). Furthermore, the presence of ECTCs was associated with micrometastatic endothelium-coated emboli (P < .001; chi-square test) and early relapse after resection (P < .001; chi-square test). In addition, patients who had endothelium-coated emboli, in which tumor cells displayed high proliferation and low apoptosis, had poor OS and shorter TTR.

CONCLUSIONS

The current results suggested that the presence of ECTCs was an efficient, simple, and convenient predictor of a poor prognosis in patients with HCC that potentially may serve as a novel target for the prevention and treatment of HCC metastasis.

Appropriate liver resection type for patients with the American joint committee on cancer classification T1 and T2 hepatocellular carcinoma

SYNOPSIS

Major liver resection prevents intrahepatic tumor recurrence in T2 hepatocellular carcinoma patients with microvascular invasion or daughter nodules.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There is no consensus on whether major or minor hepatectomy is better for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. We investigated the outcomes of liver resection type in resectable HCC patients.

METHODS

Two hundred sixty-three HCC patients with Child-Pugh class A liver function who underwent curative hepatectomy were enrolled. Among them, 186 patients had pathologic stage T1 HCC and 77 had stage T2 HCC. Patients were also classed according to the type of resection (major or minor). Clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Patients with T1 HCC who underwent major resection had a higher rate of blood transfusion than those who underwent minor resection (P < 0.001). The disease-free survival rate of T2 patients who underwent major resection was better than that of patients who underwent minor resection (P = 0.004). The overall survival rates of T1 and T2 HCC patients did not differ significantly between those with major or minor resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Major liver resection is recommended for T2 HCC patients with adequate remnant liver function because it results in a better disease-free survival rate than does minor resection in these patients. Minor liver resection is suggested for T1 HCC patients, except for those with a tumor sitting close to vessels, because it is associated with a low incidence of blood transfusion and a good survival rate.

Epidemiology and management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major world health problem because of the high incidence and case fatality rate. In most patients, the diagnosis of HCC is made at an advanced stage, which limits the application of curative treatments. Most HCCs develop in patients with underlying chronic liver disease. Chronic viral hepatitis B and C are the major causes of liver cirrhosis and HCC. Recent improvements in treatment of viral hepatitis and in methods for surveillance and therapy for HCC have contributed to better survival of patients with HCC. This article reviews the epidemiology, cause, prevention, clinical manifestations, surveillance, diagnosis, and treatment approach for HCC.

Hepatic resection versus transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization as the initial treatment for large, multiple, and resectable hepatocellular carcinomas: a prospective nonrandomized analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the survival outcomes between hepatic resection and transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization (TACE) used as the initial treatment in patients with large (≥5 cm), multiple, and resectable hepatocellular carcinomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study had local ethical committee approval; all patients gave written informed consent. Between January 2004 and December 2006, 168 consecutive patients were prospectively studied. As an initial treatment, 85 patients underwent hepatic resection and 83 underwent TACE. Of the 29 of 83 patients in whom there was a good response to TACE, 13 underwent subsequent hepatic resection. The remaining 16 patients, who refused hepatic resection, underwent TACE and local ablation. Repeated TACE was performed in patients with stable disease or progressive disease after initial TACE. The differences in survival between groups and subgroups were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to clarify the prognostic factors for survival.

RESULTS

The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates for the initial hepatic resection group and the initial TACE group were 70.6%, 35.3%, 23.9% and 67.2%, 26.0%, 18.9%, respectively (P = .26). Complication rates were significantly higher in the initial hepatic resection group than in the initial TACE group (P < .01). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates in patients who underwent initial TACE and subsequent hepatic resection were 92.3%, 67.3%, and 50.5%, respectively, which were significantly higher than rates in patients treated with initial hepatic resection (P = .04) but were not significantly higher than in patients who responded well to TACE but refused hepatic resection (P = .07). Tumor size was the independent risk factor for survival.

CONCLUSION

TACE might be a better initial treatment in patients with large, multiple, and resectable hepatocellular carcinomas; hepatic resection should be recommended to patients who respond well to TACE.

Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in Childs A cirrhotics-a retrospective study of 1,061 cases

INTRODUCTION

The long-term outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) vs. surgical resection in cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain controversial. One thousand sixty-one cirrhotic HCC patients were included into a retrospective study. Four hundred thirteen received RFA and 648 received surgical resection.

RESULTS

Overall (OS), recurrence-free (RFS), and tumor-free survival (TFS) were compared between the two groups and in subgroup analyses. The 5-year OS and corresponding RFS as well as DFS were significantly higher in the surgical resection group compared with the RFA group (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001). In subgroup analyses of solitary HCC ≤3 cm, there was no significant difference in RFS between the two groups (p = 0.719). Nonetheless, surgical resection was superior to RFA for OS and TFS in this subgroup as well as for OS, RFS, and TFS in subgroup analyses for solitary lesions 3 cm < HCC < 5 cm and multifocal HCC. Serum AFP was the only significant predicting factor for all survival analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

When treating Childs A cirrhotic patients with solitary HCC larger than 3 cm but less than 5 cm, or with two or three lesions each less than 5 cm, surgical resection provides a better survival than RFA. When treating Childs A cirrhotics with solitary HCC ≤ 3 cm, RFA has a comparable RFS to surgical resection, but RFA is less invasive.

Treatment options in hepatocellular carcinoma today

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer related death worldwide. As over 90% of HCCs arise in cirrhotic livers preventive methods and surveillance policies have been adopted in most countries with high prevalence of hepatitis B or C infected people. Poor prognosis of HCC has shown some improvement during the last years. Targeted therapy with radiofrequency ablation (RFA), hepatic resection (HR), liver transplantation (LT), and transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation (TACE) seems to have an influence on this development. The heterogeneity of cirrhotic patients with HCC is still a big challenge. A patient with a small tumour in a cirrhotic liver may have a worse prognosis than a patient with a large tumor in a relatively preserved liver after "curative" HR. The choice of the treatment modality depends on the size and the number of tumours, the stage and the cause of cirrhosis and finally on the availability of various modalities in each centre.

Summary of the 2010 AHPBA/SSO/SSAT Consensus Conference on HCC

Under the auspices of the American Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, an expert consensus conference was convened in January 2010 on the multidisciplinary management of hepatocellular carcinoma. The goals of the conference were to address knowledge gaps in the optimal preparation of patients with HCC for operative therapy, best methods to control HCC while awaiting liver transplantation, and developing a multidisciplinary approach to these patients with implementation of novel systemic therapies.

A randomized trial comparing radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection for HCC conforming to the Milan criteria

OBJECTIVE

To compare the long-term outcomes of surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a promising, emerging therapy for small HCC. Whether it is as effective as surgical resection (RES) for long-term outcomes is still indefinite.

METHODS

Two hundred thirty HCC patients who met the Milan criteria and were suitable to be treated by either RES or RFA entered into a randomized controlled trial. The patients were regularly followed up after treatment for 5 years (except for those who died). The primary end point was overall survival; the secondary end points were recurrence-free survival, overall recurrence, and early-stage recurrence.

RESULTS

The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4- and 5-year overall survival rates for the RFA group and the RES group were 86.96%, 76.52%, 69.57%, 66.09%, 54.78% and 98.26%, 96.52%, 92.17%, 82.60%, 75.65%, respectively. The corresponding recurrence-free survival rates for the 2 groups were 81.74%, 59.13%, 46.08%, 33.91%, 28.69% and 85.22%, 73.92%, 60.87%, 54.78%, 51.30%, respectively. Overall survival and recurrence-free survival were significantly lower in the RFA group than in the RES group (P = 0.001 and P = 0.017). The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year overall recurrence rates were 16.52%, 38.26%, 49.57%, 59.13%, and 63.48% for the RFA group and 12.17%, 22.60%, 33.91%, 39.13%, and 41.74% for the RES group. The overall recurrence was higher in the RFA group than in the RES group (P = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection may provide better survival and lower recurrence rates than RFA for patients with HCC to the Milan criteria.

Resection margin in laparoscopic hepatectomy: a comparative study between wedge resection and anatomic left lateral sectionectomy

BACKGROUND

Experience from open hepatectomy shows that anatomic liver resection achieves a better resection margin than wedge resection. In recent years, laparoscopic hepatectomy has increasingly been performed in patients with liver pathology including malignant lesions. Wedge resection (WR) and left lateral sectionectomy (LLS), which also represent non-anatomic and anatomic resection respectively, are the two most common types of laparoscopic hepatectomy performed. The aim of the present study was to compare the two types of laparoscopic hepatectomy with emphasis on resection margin.

METHODS

Between November 2003 and July 2009, 44 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy were identified and retrospectively reviewed. The WR and LLS group of patients were compared in terms of operative outcomes, pathological findings, recurrence patterns and survival.

RESULTS

Out of the 44 patients, 21 underwent LLS and 23 a WR. The two groups of patients were comparable in demographics. The two groups did not differ in conversion rate, blood loss, blood transfusion, mortality, morbidity and post-operative length of stay. The LLS group patients had significantly larger liver lesions, wider resection margin and less sub-centimetre margins. In patients with malignant liver lesions, there was no difference between the two groups in incidence of intra-hepatic recurrence and 3-year overall and disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Operative outcomes are similar between laparoscopic WR and LLS. However, WR is less reliable than LLS in achieving a resection margin of more than 1 cm. Larger studies involving more patients with longer follow-up are warranted to determine the impact of the resection margin on intra-hepatic recurrence and survival.

Outcomes of non-anatomic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in the patients with liver cirrhosis and analysis of prognostic factors

PURPOSE

In the east countries, patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are usually associated with varied degrees of liver cirrhosis, and anatomic resection is therefore limited to use, especially in those with severe liver cirrhosis. This study aims to evaluate the clinical value of non-anatomic resection in HCC patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

Seventy-seven consecutive HCC patients with cirrhosis underwent non-anatomic liver resection in Tongji Hospital from January 2003 to December 2006. The clinical data, severity of liver cirrhosis, and survival rates of these patients were retrospectively evaluated, and the prognostic factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

One-, 2-, and 3-year overall and disease-free survival rates of this cohort of patients were 78%, 68%, 56%, and 66%, 58%, 55%, respectively. The hospital mortality and morbidity were 0% and 24.7%, respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates were 85.7%, 77.1%, and 74.3% in the patients with mild cirrhosis, 81.5%, 63%, and 48.1% in the patients with moderate cirrhosis, and 60.0%, 53.3%, and 26.7% in the patients with severe cirrhosis, respectively. There was a significant difference among the patients with different grades of cirrhosis (P = 0.001). Multivariate and univariate analyses revealed that severity of cirrhosis, tumor diameter larger than 5 cm, and vascular invasion were independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-anatomic liver resection for HCC could yield comparable outcomes with anatomic resection in the patients with mild cirrhosis or tumors diameter smaller than 5 cm. Severity of cirrhosis is an independent factor worsening long-time survival. Non-anatomic resection is a safe and effective surgical modality in the treatment of HCC patients with cirrhosis.

Transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: a prospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

For patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT), the survival benefit of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) compared with conservative treatment largely remains controversial. The objective of this study was to determine whether TACE confers a survival benefit to patients with HCC and PVTT, and to uncover prognostic factors.

METHODS

Between July 2007 and July 2009, a prospective two-arm nonrandomized study was performed on consecutive patients with unresectable HCC with PVTT. In one arm, patients were treated by TACE using an emulsion of lipiodol and anticancer agents ± gelatin sponge embolization. In another arm, patients received conservative treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 164 patients were recruited for the study (TACE group, n = 84; conservative treatment group, n = 80). Patients in the TACE group received a mean of 1.9 (range, 1-5) TACE sessions. The overall median survival for all patients was 5.2 months, and the 12- and 24-month overall survival rates were 18.3% and 5.6%, respectively. The 12- and 24-month overall survival rates for the TACE and conservative groups were 30.9%, 9.2%, and 3.8%, 0%, respectively. The TACE group had significantly better survivals than the conservative group (P < 0.001). On subgroup analysis of segmental and major PVTT, the TACE group also had significantly better survivals (P = 0.002, P = 0.002). The treatment type, PVTT extent, tumor size, and serum bilirubin were independent prognostic factors of survival on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

TACE was safe and feasible in selected HCC patients with PVTT and it had survival benefit over conservative treatment.

Surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: expert consensus statement

As the number of effective treatment options has increased, the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma has become complex. The most appropriate therapy depends largely on the functional status of the underlying liver. In patients with advanced cirrhosis and tumor extent within the Milan criteria, liver transplantation is clearly the best option, as this therapy treats the cancer along with the underlying hepatic parenchymal disease. As the results of transplantation has become established in patients with limited disease, investigation has increasingly focused on downstaging patients with disease outside of Milan criteria and defining the upper limits of transplantable tumors. In patients with well preserved hepatic function, liver resection is the most appropriate and effective treatment. Hepatic resection is not as constrained by tumor extent and location to the same degree as transplantation and ablative therapies. Some patients who recur after resection may still be eligible for transplantation. Ablative therapies, particularly percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and transarterial chemoembolization have been used primarily to treat patients with low volume irresectable tumors. Whether ablation of small tumors provides long term disease control that is comparable to resection remains unclear.

Laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a European experience

BACKGROUND

Some series have suggested that laparoscopy is beneficial for resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. This has to be confirmed in larger series. The aim of this study was to analyze the results of 3 European surgical centers on laparoscopic liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective databases of 3 European centers involved in the development of laparoscopic liver surgery were combined. Between 1998 and 2008, 163 liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma were performed. Liver parenchyma was cirrhotic in 120 (73.6%) patients. Liver resection was anatomic in 107 (65.6%) patients and was a major resection (>or=3 segments) in 16 (9.8%). A totally laparoscopic approach was used in 155 (95.1%) patients.

RESULTS

Median surgical duration was 180 minutes. Median operative blood loss was 250 mL, and 16 (9.8%) patients received blood transfusion. Conversion to open surgery was required in 15 (9.2%) patients. Median tumor size was 3.6 cm and median surgical margin was 12 mm. Liver-specific and general complications occurred in 19 (11.6%) and 17 (10.4%) patients, respectively. Hospital length of stay was 7 days. A further analysis of early (n = 75) and recent (n = 88) experiences showed improved results in the latter group. Overall and recurrence-free survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 92.6%, 68.7%, 64.9%, and 77.5%, 47.1%, 32.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that laparoscopic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma is feasible in selected patients, with good operative and oncologic results. Laparoscopy should be routinely considered in centers experienced in liver surgery and advanced laparoscopy.

Management of small hepatocellular carcinoma: a review of transplantation, resection, and ablation

PURPOSE AND DESIGN

The management of patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma has become increasingly complex. The most appropriate therapy largely depends on the functional status of the underlying liver. Here we review the modalities of transplantation, resection, and ablation in this patient population.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

In patients with cirrhosis and/or portal hypertension, and disease extent within the Milan criteria, liver transplantation is clearly the best option. This modality not only provides therapy for the cancer but also treats the underlying hepatic parenchymal disease. In patients with well-preserved hepatic function, on the other hand, liver resection remains the most appropriate and effective treatment. Hepatic resection is not constrained by the same variables of tumor extent and location that limit the applicability of transplantation and ablative therapies. In addition, patients whose disease recurs after resection are often still eligible for transplantation. Ablative therapies, particularly percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and transarterial embolization/chemoembolization, have been used primarily to treat patients with low-volume unresectable tumors. The question has increasingly been raised regarding whether ablation of small tumors (<3 cm) provides long-term disease control that is comparable to resection. Ablative therapies has also been used as a means of controlling disease in patients who are on transplantation waiting lists, although improved posttransplantation outcome using these techniques has yet to be proven prospectively. The major problem with assessing the efficacy of various treatment modalities in these patients is the heterogeneity of disease presentation, which often precludes the use of certain therapies and therefore makes the conduct of randomized control trial difficult.

Management of small hepatocellular carcinoma: a review of transplantation, resection, and ablation

PURPOSE AND DESIGN

The management of patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma has become increasingly complex. The most appropriate therapy largely depends on the functional status of the underlying liver. Here we review the modalities of transplantation, resection, and ablation in this patient population.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

In patients with cirrhosis and/or portal hypertension, and disease extent within the Milan criteria, liver transplantation is clearly the best option. This modality not only provides therapy for the cancer but also treats the underlying hepatic parenchymal disease. In patients with well-preserved hepatic function, on the other hand, liver resection remains the most appropriate and effective treatment. Hepatic resection is not constrained by the same variables of tumor extent and location that limit the applicability of transplantation and ablative therapies. In addition, patients whose disease recurs after resection are often still eligible for transplantation. Ablative therapies, particularly percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and transarterial embolization/chemoembolization, have been used primarily to treat patients with low-volume unresectable tumors. The question has increasingly been raised regarding whether ablation of small tumors (<3 cm) provides long-term disease control that is comparable to resection. Ablative therapies has also been used as a means of controlling disease in patients who are on transplantation waiting lists, although improved posttransplantation outcome using these techniques has yet to be proven prospectively. The major problem with assessing the efficacy of various treatment modalities in these patients is the heterogeneity of disease presentation, which often precludes the use of certain therapies and therefore makes the conduct of randomized control trial difficult.

Hepatocellular carcinoma--what's new?

The increasing incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has led several countries to standardize and update its management. This review aims at summarizing these evolutions through six questions focusing on diagnosis and treatment. The radiological diagnosis of this tumor has been refined. Besides being hypervascular at the arterial phase, the "washout" in particular at the late phase of injection has become a prominent feature. Although routine ultrasound remains the corner stone of screening, contrast ultrasound has become a very reliable characterization tool as it allows continuous monitoring of the vascular kinetics. Biopsy of the tumor allows identification of conventional or molecular prognosis features, some of which could be used in current practice. The metabolic syndrome is an increasing etiology of HCC and carcinogenesis in this context may not always require the development of formal underlying cirrhosis. Associated (in particular cardiovascular) conditions account for an increased morbidity-mortality following surgery. Liver transplantation is the most effective treatment of early-stage tumors. The limited availability of grafts has led some countries including France to implement new allocation rules that are still evaluated and might need to be refined. Sorafenib is the first medical treatment shown to be effective in the treatment of HCC. This efficacy is however still limited and its indication is therefore restricted to Child-Pugh A, OMS 0-2 patients in whom a potentially curative treatment is contraindicated.

Comparison of the outcomes between anatomical resection and limited resection for single hepatocellular carcinomas no larger than 5 cm in diameter: a single-center study

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Liver resection is a widely preferred treatment modality for hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). This study aimed to compare the survival impact of anatomical resection with that of limited resection, in patients with single HCCs no larger than 5 cm in diameter.

METHODS

A cohort study was carried out on 209 consecutive patients who underwent hepatic resection for a single HCC no larger than 5 cm in diameter between January 1994 and March 2007 at Osaka City General Hospital.

RESULTS

The cumulative 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates in the anatomical resection group (n = 111) were 71 and 40%, respectively, both of which were significantly better than the 48 and 25% seen in the limited resection group (n = 98) (P = 0.0043 and P = 0.0232, respectively). Better effects of the anatomical resection on both overall and disease-free survival were seen in patients having HCC larger than 2 cm in diameter and in patients with moderately or poorly differentiated HCC. But no significant difference in either overall or disease-free survival was seen between the groups in patients with a HCC 2 cm or less in diameter or in the patients with well-differentiated HCC. Using Cox's regression model, anatomical resection was confirmed to be an independent favorable factor for both overall and disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomical resection is therefore recommended for histologically advanced single HCCs ranging from 2 to 5 cm in diameter.

A new systematic small for size resection for liver tumors invading the middle hepatic vein at its caval confluence: mini-mesohepatectomy

OBJECTIVE

We describe a new ultrasound guided conservative procedure for patients with liver tumors invading the middle hepatic vein (MHV) at its caval confluence.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Morbidity and mortality for major hepatectomies are not negligible. However, when tumors invade the MHV at the caval confluence, major surgery is usually recommended.

METHODS

Patients included in this study were those with tumors invading the MHV at its hepato-caval confluence (within 4 cm). Minimum follow-up was established at 6-months from surgery. Among 284 consecutive hepatectomies, 17 (6%) met the inclusion criteria. Partial sparing of segments 4, 5, and 8 was established intraoperatively, based on color-Doppler IOUS findings (NCT00600522 on ClinicalTrials.gov).

RESULTS

In all the 17 patients at least one of the color-Doppler IOUS criteria was disclosed, and limited resections of just segments 4sup and 8 were always feasible. The MHV tract involved was always resected. Seven patients had single tumor removed and 10 multiple: total number of resected tumors was 58 (median: 2; range: 1-18). There were no postoperative mortality and major morbidity. Overall morbidity occurred in 3 (18%) patients. Median blood loss was 250 (range: 50-1000). One patient (6%) received blood transfusion. No local recurrences were observed (median follow-up: 26 months).

CONCLUSIONS

IOUS assistance systematically allows conservative resection of liver tumor invading the MHV at caval confluence. This drastically limits the need for larger resections, and further broadens the role of IOUS in optimizing the surgical strategy.

Liver resection for transplantable hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term survival and role of secondary liver transplantation

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Liver transplantation (LT) is the best theoretical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) fulfilling the Milan criteria (TNM stages 1-2). However, LT is limited by organ availability and tumor progression on the waiting list. Liver resection (LR) may represent an alternative in these patients. The aim of this study is to report the results of LR in transplantable patients.

PATIENTS

From 1990 to 2007, 274 patients underwent liver resection for HCC. Sixty-seven (24%) met the Milan criteria on pathologic study of the specimen. Ten were TNM stage 1 and 57 stage 2 and all had chronic liver disease. There were 56 men and 11 women with a mean age of 63. LR included 12 major hepatectomies, 14 bisegmentectomies, 14 segmentectomies, and 27 nonanatomic resections. Thirty-seven resections were performed through a laparoscopic approach and there were only 8 open resections since 1998.

RESULTS

Three patients died postoperatively (4.5%), none after laparoscopic resection. Morbidity rate was 34%. After a mean follow-up of 4.8 years, 36 patients (54%) developed intrahepatic tumor recurrence. Twenty-eight (77%) were again transplantable of which 16 (44%) were transplanted. Two additional patients underwent pre-emptive LT (ie before recurrence). When considering 44 patients <65 years at the time of resection (ie upper age limit for LT), the rates of recurrence, transplantable recurrence, and intention to treat salvage transplantation (patients with transplantable recurrence actually transplanted) were 59%, 80%, and 61%, respectively. Overall and disease free 5-year survival rates were 72% and 44%, respectively. Survival was not influenced by TNM stage 1 or 2, AFP level, tumor differentiation, or the presence microscopic vascular invasion. Survival after salvage LT was 70% and 87% when calculated from the date of LT and LR, respectively.

CONCLUSION

LR for small solitary HCC in compensated cirrhosis yields an overall survival rate comparable to upfront LT. Despite a significant recurrence rate, close imaging monitoring after resection allows salvage LT in 61% of patients with recurrence on intention to treat analysis.

Laparoscopic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a matched-pair comparative study

BACKGROUND

Only a few series have demonstrated the safety of laparoscopic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the benefits of this approach. Moreover, these studies reported mostly minor and nonanatomic hepatic resections. This report describes the results of a pair-matched comparative study between open and laparoscopic liver resections for HCC in a series of essentially anatomic resections.

METHODS

Patients were retrospectively matched in pairs for the following criteria: sex, age, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, severity of liver disease, tumor size, and type of resection. A total of 42 patients undergoing laparoscopy were compared with patients undergoing laparotomy during the same period. Surgeons from the authors' department not trained in laparoscopy performed open resections. Operative, postoperative, and oncologic outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

The mean duration of surgery was similar in the two groups. Significantly less bleeding was observed in the laparoscopic group (364.3 vs. 723.7 ml; p < 0.0001). Transfusion was required for four patients (9.5%) in the laparoscopic group and seven patients (16.7%) in the open surgery group (p = 0.51). Postoperative ascites was less frequent after laparoscopic resections (7.1 vs. 26.1%; p = 0.03). General morbidity was similar in the two groups (9.5 vs. 11.9%; p = 1.00). The mean hospital stay was significantly shorter for the patients undergoing laparoscopy (6.7 vs. 9.6 days; p < 0.0001). The surgical margin and local recurrence adjacent to the liver stump were not affected by laparoscopy. The overall postoperative survival rates in the laparoscopic group were 93.1% at 1 year, 74.4% at 3 years, and 59.5% at 5 years and, respectively, 81.8, 73, and 47.4% in the open surgery group (p = 0.25). The postoperative disease-free survival rates in the laparoscopic group were at 81.6% at 1 year, 60.9% at 3 years, and 45.6% at 5 years, respectively, 70.2, 54.3, and 37.2% in the open surgery group (p = 0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic resection of HCC for selected patients gave a better postoperative outcome without oncologic consequences. Prospective trials are required to confirm these results.

Single HCC smaller than 2 cm: surgery or ablation: interventional oncologist's perspective

In the EASL and AASLD guidelines, hepatic resection (HR) is considered the first option for patients in stage 0 (very early HCC). This statement was not based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) versus other therapies, but on the oncological assumption that HR is the better procedure for obtaining complete tumor ablation including a safety margin. Subsequently, three RCTs compared percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus HR in patients with early HCC. All failed to demonstrate better survival in favor of HR, even though the larger size of the early stage needs a larger area of necrosis. A recent study focused on stage 0 demonstrated a sustained local complete response after RFA comparable with that of HR. All these trials established that RFA is less invasive and associated with lower complication rates and lower costs. These data suggest that RFA can be considered the first option for operable patients with very early HCC. Other options (HR, PEI, selective TAE/TACE) can be used as salvage therapy for the few cases in which RFA is unsuccessful or unfeasible.

Anatomic resection of segment VIII of liver for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients based on an intrahepatic Glissonian approach

BACKGROUND

Isolated segmentectomy VIII is a technically demanding operative procedure and is reported only rarely. To our knowledge, no reports on anatomic segmentectomy based on an intrahepatic approach have been described. For cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) limited to segment VIII, this is a parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy that can be tolerated.

METHODS

Eighteen patients with HCC underwent anatomic segment VIII segmentectomy from January 2005 to January 2008 in our institution. The operative techniques, postoperative, and oncologic outcomes were reviewed.

RESULTS

Anatomic segmentectomy VIII was feasible with the technology described herein in all patients. The perioperative and oncologic outcomes were comparable with those of other similar hepatic resections. The median follow-up time was 28 months. The 3-year survival rate was 65%.

CONCLUSION

Although complex and technically demanding, an intrahepatic Glissonian approach for anatomic segmentectomy of segment VIII is an oncologically radical but parenchyma-sparing hepatic resection. In terms of preserving greater functioning liver parenchyma, it may be a safe and effective alternative to extensive hepatectomy.

Efficacy of a hepatectomy and a tumor thrombectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma with tumor thrombus extending to the main portal vein

INTRODUCTION

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with major portal tumor thrombus has been considered to be a fatal disease. A thrombectomy remains the only therapeutic option that offer a chance of complete tumor removal avoiding acute portal vein obstruction. However, the efficacy of tumor thrombectomy in addition to hepatectomy has not been well evaluated.

METHODS

Of 979 patients who consecutively underwent initial HCC resection, 45 (4.6%) HCC patients with tumor invasion of the first branch of the portal vein (vp3) and tumor in the main portal trunk or the opposite-side portal branch (vp4) were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the efficacy of hepatectomy and tumor thrombectomy.

RESULTS

Alpha-fetoprotein, serosal invasion, and intrahepatic metastases were independently significant prognostic factors in all the 45 patients with vp3 or vp4 HCC. The 3- and 5-year survival rates in vp3 and vp4 group were 35.3% and 41.8%, and 21.2% and 20.9%, respectively. There were longer operative times and more intraoperative bleeding in patients with vp4, but no significant difference in mortality, morbidity, and survival between patients with vp3 and vp4.

CONCLUSION

Hepatectomy and thrombectomy for vp4 could not only avoid acute portal occlusion due to tumor thrombus but provide a comparable survival benefit with hepatectomy for vp3.

Increased intratumoral IL-17-producing cells correlate with poor survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To characterize IL-17-producing cells, a newly defined T helper cell subset with potent pro-inflammatory properties, in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to determine their prognostic values.

METHODS

One hundred and seventy-eight HCC patients were enrolled randomly. Distribution and phenotypic features of IL-17-producing cells were determined by flow cytometry and/or immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Compared with corresponding non-tumor regions, the levels of Th17 cells were significantly increased in tumors of HCC patients (P<0.001). Most intratumoral Th17 cells exhibited an effector memory phenotype with increased expression of CCR4 and CCR6. Intratumoral IL-17-producing cell density was associated with overall survival (OS, P=0.001) and disease-free survival (DFS, P=0.001) in HCC patients. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that intratumoral IL-17-producing cell density was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR=2.351, P=0.009) and DFS (HR=2.256, P=0.002). Moreover, the levels of intratumoral Th17 cells were positively correlated with microvessel density in tumors (r=0.616, P=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Accumulation of intratumoral IL-17-producing cells may promote tumor progression through fostering angiogenesis, and intratumoral IL-17-producing cell could serve as a potential prognostic marker and a novel therapeutic target for HCC.

A randomized controlled trial of hepatectomy with adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization versus hepatectomy alone for Stage III A hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

Hepatectomy is considered as the potentially curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and used in some selected Stage IIIA HCC, which include multiple tumors more than 5 cm or tumor involving a major branch of the portal or hepatic vein(s) (UICC TNM staging system, sixth edition). Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) was used in retrospective studies to improve the survival outcome of resected HCC. However, its beneficial effect on the survival outcomes of the Stage IIIA patients has not been evaluated. The present study is to evaluate if hepatectomy combining with adjuvant TACE for Stage IIIA HCC result in better long-term survival outcome when compared with hepatectomy alone.

METHODS

From January 2001 to March 2004, we conducted a prospective randomized trial in patients with Stage IIIA HCC (NCT00652587), recruiting 115 Stage IIIA HCC patients to undergo hepatectomy with adjuvant TACE (HT arm) or to undergo hepatectomy alone (HA arm) in our cancer center. Survival outcomes of the two arms were analyzed.

RESULTS

The demographic data were well matched between the two arms. There were no significant differences in the morbidity and in-hospital mortality between the two arms of patients. The most significant toxicities associated with adjuvant TACE were nausea/vomiting (54.4%) and transient hepatic toxicity (elevation of aminotransferase, 52.6%). Although there was no significant difference in the rate of recurrence between the two arms (50/57 vs. 56/58, P = 0.094), HT arm seemed to have more proportion of single lesion of recurrent HCC (chi (2) = 3.719, P = 0.054) and more proportion of potential curative therapy for recurrence (chi (2) = 4.456, P = 0.035). Until the time of censor, 92 patients had died. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates and median overall survival for HT arm were 80.7, 33.3, 22.8% and 23.0 months, respectively. The corresponding overall survival rates and median overall survival for HA arm were 56.5, 19.4, 17.5% and 14.0 months, respectively. The difference was significant (stratified log-rank test, P = 0.048). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival rates and median disease-free survival for HT arm were 29.7, 9.3, 9.3% and 6.0 months, respectively; correspondingly, for HA arm were 14.0, 3.5, 1.7% and 4.0 months, respectively (stratified log-rank test, P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

For Stage IIIA HCC, hepatectomy with adjuvant TACE efficaciously and safely improved survival outcomes when compared with hepatectomy alone.

Ten-year experience of totally laparoscopic liver resection in a single institution

BACKGROUND

Recent developments in liver surgery include the introduction of laparoscopic liver resection. The aim of the present study was to review a single institution's 10-year experience of totally laparoscopic liver resection (TLLR).

METHODS

Between May 1997 and April 2008, 82 patients underwent TLLR for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (37 patients), liver metastases (39) and benign liver lesions (six). Operations included 69 laparoscopic wedge resections, 11 laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomies and two thoracoscopic wedge resections. Nine patients underwent simultaneous laparoscopic resection of colorectal primary cancer and synchronous liver metastases.

RESULTS

Median operating time was 177 (range 70-430) min and blood loss 64 (range 1-917) ml. Median tumour size and surgical margin were 25 (range 15-85) and 6 (range 0-40) mm respectively. One procedure was converted to a laparoscopically assisted hepatectomy. Three patients developed complications. Median postoperative stay was 9 (range 3-37) days. The overall 5-year survival rate after surgery for HCC and colorectal metastases was 53 and 64 per cent respectively.

CONCLUSION

TLLR can be performed safely for a variety of primary and secondary liver tumours, and seems to offer at least short-term benefits in selected patients.

Hepatic parenchyma resection using stapling devices: peri-operative and long-term outcome

BACKGROUND

Stapler-assisted hepatectomy has not been well established, as a routine procedure, although few reports exist in the literature. This analysis assesses the safety and outcome of the method based on peri-operative data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From February 2005 to December 2006, endo GIA vascular staplers were used for parenchymal liver transection in 62 consecutive cases in our department. There were 18 (29%) patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 31 (50%) with metastatic lesions and 13 (21%) with benign lesions [adenoma, focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), simple cysts]. Twenty-one patients underwent major resections (33.9%) (i.e. removal of three segments or more) and 41 (66.1%) minor hepatic resections.

RESULTS

Median blood loss was 260 ml. The median total operative time was 150 min and median transection time was 35 min. No patient required more than 2 days of intensive care unit (ICU) treatment. The median hospital stay was 8 days. Surgical complications included two (3%) cases of bile leak, two (3%) cases of pneumonia, two (3%) cases with wound infection and two (3%) cases with pleural effusion. The peri-operative mortality was zero. In a 30-month median follow-up, all patients with benign lesions were alive and free of disease. The 3-year disease-free survival for patients with HCC was 61% (57% for patients with colorectal metastases) and the 3-year survival 72% (68% for patients with colorectal metastases).

CONCLUSION

Stapler-assisted liver resection is feasible with a low incidence of surgical complications. It can be used as an alternative for parenchyma transection especially in demanding hepatectomies for elimination of the operating time and control of bleeding.

[Risk factors for early recurrence after surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma]

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Early recurrence (ER) after liver resection is one of the most important factors impacting the prognosis and survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to identify the factors associated with ER after curative hepatic resection for HCC.

METHODS

From the July 2000 to July 2006, 144 patients underwent hepatic resection for HCC at a single institution. After excluding those with ruptured HCC, combined or mixed HCC, and who died during admission, 116 patients were analyzed. Patients with ER (defined as within 1 year) were compared with those who remained free of disease for more than 1 year. Various clinical characteristics including tumor and operative factors were evaluated to determine the factors predicting postoperative ER using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

ER occurred in 51 patients (44%). In the univariate analysis, tumor size (P=0.001), microvascular invasion (P=0.003), portal vein invasion (P=0.001), TNM stage (P=0.010), serum levels of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) (P=0.002) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (P=0.011), and operative time (P=0.033) were significantly associated with ER. AFP and AST were the independent predictors of ER in the multivariate analysis (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative serum AFP and AST levels were the independent risk factors for ER after surgical resection for HCC. Close postoperative surveillance is recommended for early detection of recurrence and additional treatments in patients with these factors.

Selection criteria for liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and chronic liver disease

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide with an annual occurrence of one million new cases. An etiologic association between HBV infection and the development of HCC has been established with a relative risk 200-fold greater than in non-infected individuals. Hepatitis C virus is also proving an important predisposing factor for this malignancy with an incidence rate of 7% at 5 years and 14% at 10 years. The prognosis depends on tumor stage and degree of liver function, which affect the tolerance to invasive treatments. Although surgical resection is generally accepted as the treatment of choice for HCC, new treatment strategies, such as local ablative therapies, transarterial embolization and liver transplantation, have been developed nowadays. With increasing detection of small HCCs from screening programs for cirrhotic patients, it is foreseen that locoregional therapy will play an important role in the near future.

Systematic extended right posterior sectionectomy: a safe and effective alternative to right hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

A surgical approach based on ultrasound-guided hepatectomy might minimize the need for major resection, whose rates of morbidity and mortality are not negligible. Right hepatectomy (RH) is traditionally performed in cases of vascular invasion of the right hepatic vein with multiple tumors in the right posterior section, and/or of the right posterior portal branch (P6-7) with tumor in contact with right anterior portal branch (P5-8). We herein describe an alternative approach to RH consisting in ultrasound-guided systematic extended right posterior hepatic sectionectomy (SERPS).

METHODS

Among 207 consecutive patients who underwent hepatectomies, 21 (10%) underwent SERPS. Median age was 67 years (range, 48-79). There were 13 men and 8 women. Ten (48%) patients had hepatocellular carcinoma; 11 (52%) had colorectal liver metastases. Median tumor number was 2 (range, 1-15); median tumor size was 4.5 cm (range, 2.5-20). Ten (48%) patients had cirrhosis, 8 (38%) had steatosis, and 3 (16%) had normal liver. Surgical strategy was based on tumor-vessels relationship at intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) and on findings at color-Doppler IOUS.

RESULTS

In-hospital and 90-days mortality were nil. Major and minor morbidity occurred in 3 (14%) and 2 (9.5%) patients, respectively. No patients were reoperated because of complications. Blood transfusions were given to 2 (9.5%) patients. After a median follow-up of 21 months, no local recurrence was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

IOUS-guided SERPS is feasible, safe, and effective. It should be applied whenever possible as alternative resection to RH to maximize liver parenchymal sparing.

Diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

The diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have witnessed major changes over the past decade. Until the early 1990s, HCC was a relatively rare malignancy, typically diagnosed at an advanced stage in a symptomatic patient, and there were no known effective palliative or therapeutic options. However, the rising incidence of HCC in several regions around the world coupled with emerging evidence for efficacy of screening in high-risk patients, liver transplantation as a curative option in select patients, ability to make definitive diagnosis using high-resolution imaging of the liver, less dependency on obtaining tissue diagnosis, and proven efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization and sorafenib as palliative therapy have improved the outlook for HCC patients. In this article, we present a summary of the most recent information on screening, diagnosis, staging, and different treatment modalities of HCC, as well as our recommended management approach.

The use of saline-linked radiofrequency dissecting sealer for liver transection in patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

In patients with cirrhosis excessive hemorrhage and the need for blood transfusion are associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality as well as a poor long-term outcome. Saline-linked radiofrequency dissecting sealer (TissueLink) is a recent advance in technology that improves hemostasis during difficult liver resections. Preliminary studies have shown that this technique reduces blood loss without inflow occlusion.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A controlled study was performed on 122 consecutive patients with cirrhosis who underwent liver resection for hepatocytotic carcinoma. The outcomes of liver transection with clamp crushing and TissueLink were compared to evaluate which strategy is most beneficial to the patients.

RESULTS

Both intraoperative blood loss and blood transfusion requirements were significantly higher in the crushing clamp group than in the TissueLink group (P = 0.047 and P = 0.031, respectively). In addition, a significantly higher number of patients required a blood transfusion in the crushing clamp group (P < 0.001). However, the transection time was significantly faster in the crushing clamp group than in the TissueLink group (P < 0.001). The number of patients that required Pringle's maneuver was markedly higher in the crushing clamp group (P < 0.001). In addition, the hemostasis time was significantly longer in the crushing clamp group (P < 0.001). The serum aspartate aminotransferase levels 3 and 7 days after surgery were significantly higher in the crushing clamp group than in the TissueLink group (P = 0.035 and P = 0.003, respectively). Serum total bilirubin levels were markedly increased 3 days after surgery in the crushing clamp group than in the TissueLink group (P = 0.011). Biliary leakage occurred in a higher number of crushing clamp patients (six) than TissueLink patients (three), although this difference was not significant. The operative morbidity not including biliary leakage was higher in the crushing clamp group than the TissueLink group (nine patients versus five patients, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This study reveals that the TissueLink procedure has beneficial effects during liver transection under cirrhotic conditions in terms of blood loss and reperfusion-related liver injury. However, this procedure requires a significantly longer transection time of the parenchyma.