Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Outcomes of surgical Impella placement in acute cardiogenic shock

Introduction

Although a role for percutaneous Impella devices has been established, there is a paucity of data regarding the utility and outcomes of larger surgically implanted Impella devices.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of all surgical Impella implants at our institution. All Impella 5.0 and Impella 5.5 devices were included. The primary outcome was survival. Secondary outcomes included hemodynamic and end-organ perfusion as well as commonly encountered surgical complications.

Results

From 2012 to 2022, 90 surgical Impella devices were implanted. The median age was 63 [53-70] years, the mean creatinine was 2.07 ± 1.22 mg/dL, and the average lactate level was 3.32 ± 2.90 mmol/L. Prior to implantation, 47 patients (52%) were supported with vasoactive agents, while 43 (48%) were also supported with another device. The most common etiology of shock was acute on chronic heart failure (50, 56%), followed by acute myocardial infarction (22, 24%), and postcardiotomy (17, 19%). Overall, 69 patients (77%) survived to device removal, and 57 (65%) survived to hospital discharge. One-year survival was 54%. Neither etiology of heart failure nor device strategy was associated with 30-day or 1-year survival. On multivariable modeling, the number of vasoactive medications prior to device implantation was strongly associated with 30-day mortality (hazard ratio 1.94 [1.27-2.96], P < 0.01). Surgical Impella placement was associated with a significant decreased need for vasoactive infusions (P < 0.01) and decreased acidosis (P = 0.01).

Conclusions

Surgical Impella support for patients in acute cardiogenic shock is associated with lower vasoactive medication use, improved hemodynamics, increased end-organ perfusion, and acceptable morbidity and mortality.

Treatment Intensity for the Management of Cardiogenic Shock: Comparison Between STEMI and Non-STEMI

Background

Cardiogenic shock is a leading cause of mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Objectives

The authors sought to compare clinical characteristics, hospital trajectory, and drug and device use between patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock (STEMI-CS) and those without (non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock [NSTEMI-CS]).

Methods

We analyzed data from 1,110 adult admissions with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) across 17 centers within Cardiogenic Shock Working Group. The primary end point was in-hospital mortality.

Results

Our study included 1,110 patients with AMI-CS, of which 731 (65.8%) had STEMI-CS and 379 (34.2%) had NSTEMI-CS. Most patients were male (STEMI-CS: 71.6%, NSTEMI-CS: 66.5%) and White (STEMI-CS: 53.8%, NSTEMI-CS: 64.1%). In-hospital mortality was 41% and was similar among patients with STEMI-CS and NSTEMI-CS (43% vs 39%, P = 0.23). Patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest had higher in-hospital mortality in patients with NSTEMI-CS (63% vs 36%, P = 0.006) as compared to patients with STEMI-CS (52% vs 41%, P = 0.16). Similar results were observed for in-hospital cardiac arrest in patients with STEMI-CS (63% vs 33%, P < 0.001) and NSTEMI-CS (60% vs 32%, P < 0.001). Only 27% of patients with STEMI-CS and 12% of NSTEMI-CS received both a drug and temporary mechanical circulatory support device during the first 24 hours, which increased to 78% and 61%, respectively, throughout the course of the hospitalization (P < 0.001 for both).

Conclusions

Despite increasing use of inotropic and vasoactive support and mechanical circulatory support throughout the hospitalization, both patients with STEMI-CS and NSTEMI-CS remain at increased risk for in-hospital mortality. Randomized controls trials are needed to elucidate whether timing and sequence of escalation of support improves outcomes in patients with AMI-CS.

Aortic Dissection From an Intra-aortic Balloon Pump: A Dangerous Complication to Keep in Mind

Despite the benefits of the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) being a subject of debate, it remains a widely available and easy-to-use mechanical circulatory support device. Nonetheless, its use is not exempt from complications. Aortic dissection from IABP is an infrequent but deathly complication. We describe a case in which early recognition of the condition led to control through an endovascular approach. A 57-year-old male was admitted for acute decompensated heart failure requiring intravenous inotropic agents. While undergoing assessment for a heart transplant, he developed cardiogenic shock requiring initiation of mechanical circulatory support with an IABP. A few hours after device implantation, the patient developed acute tearing chest pain and was found to have an acute dissection in the descending thoracic aorta. Prompt liaison with the endovascular team led to a thoracic endovascular aortic repair to control the extent of the lesion.

Validation of the prognostic scoring system for inhospital mortality prediction in cardiogenic shock patients requiring venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

BACKGROUND

A few prognostic scoring systems have been developed for predicting mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock requiring veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), albeit with variations in performance. This study aimed to assess and compare various mortality prediction models in a cohort of patients receiving VA-ECMO following cardiogenic shock or arrest.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 77 patients with cardiogenic shock who were placed on VA-ECMO support between March 2014 and August 2021. The APACHE II, SAPS II, SAVE, Modified SAVE, ENCOURAGE, and ECMO-ACCEPTS scores were calculated for each patient to predict the in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Fifty-six (72.7%) patients died. All prediction model scores, except the ECMO-ACCEPTS, differed significantly between non-survivors and survivors as follows: ENCOURAGE, 23 versus 16 (p < 0.001); SAVE, -6 versus -3 (p = 0.008); Modified SAVE, -5 versus 0 (p = 0.005); APACHE II, 32 versus 22 (p = 0.009); and SAPS II, 67 versus 49 (p = 0.002). The ENCOURAGE score demonstrated the best discriminatory ability with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.81 (95% confidence interval: 0.7-0.81). All prognostic scoring systems possessed limited calibration ability. However, the SAPS II, SAVE, and ENCOURAGE scores had lower Akaike and Bayesian information criteria values, which were consistent with the results of the Hosmer-Lemeshow C statistic test, indicating better performance than the other scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The ENCOURAGE score can help predict in-hospital mortality in all subsets of VA-ECMO patients, even though it was originally designed to predict intensive care unit mortality in the post-acute myocardial infarction setting.

Hemodynamic monitoring in cardiogenic shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a life-threatening condition characterized by acute end-organ hypoperfusion due to inadequate cardiac output that can result in multiorgan failure, which may lead to death. The diminished cardiac output in CS leads to systemic hypoperfusion and maladaptive cycles of ischemia, inflammation, vasoconstriction, and volume overload. Obviously, the optimal management of CS needs to be readjusted in view of the predominant dysfunction, which may be guided by hemodynamic monitoring. Hemodynamic monitoring enables (1) characterization of the type of cardiac dysfunction and the degree of its severity, (2) very early detection of associated vasoplegia, (3) detection and monitoring of organ dysfunction and tissue oxygenation, and (4) guidance of the introduction and optimization of inotropes and vasopressors as well as the timing of mechanical support. It is now well documented that early recognition, classification, and precise phenotyping via early hemodynamic monitoring (e.g., echocardiography, invasive arterial pressure, and the evaluation of organ dysfunction and parameters derived from central venous catheterization) improve patient outcomes. In more severe disease, advanced hemodynamic monitoring with pulmonary artery catheterization and the use of transpulmonary thermodilution devices is useful to facilitate the right timing of the indication, weaning from mechanical cardiac support, and guidance on inotropic treatments, thus helping to reduce mortality. In this review, we detail the different parameters relevant to each monitoring approach and the way they can be used to support optimal management of these patients.

The role of temporary mechanical circulatory support in de novo heart failure syndromes with cardiogenic shock: A contemporary review

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex clinical syndrome with a high mortality rate. It can occur to due to multiple etiologies of cardiovascular disease and is phenotypically heterogeneous. Acute myocardial infarction-related CS (AMI-CS) has historically been the most prevalent cause, and thus, research and guidance have focused primarily on this. Recent data suggest that the burden of non-ischemic CS is increasing in the population of patents requiring intensive care admission. There is, however, a paucity of data and guidelines to inform the management of these patients who fall into two broad groups: those with existing heart failure and CS and those with no known history of heart failure who present with "de novo" CS. The use of temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has expanded across all etiologies, despite its high cost, resource intensity, complication rates, and lack of high-quality outcome data. Herein, we discuss the currently available evidence on the role of MCS in the management of patients with de novo CS to include fulminant myocarditis, right ventricular (RV) failure, Takotsubo syndrome, post-partum cardiomyopathy, and CS due to valve lesions and other cardiomyopathies.

Acute kidney injury in patients with acute decompensated heart failure-cardiogenic shock: Prevalence, risk factors and outcome

BACKGROUND

Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) represents a major complication of acute heart failure and cardiogenic shock (CS). There is a paucity of data on AKI complicating acutely decompensated heart failure patients presenting with CS (ADHF-CS). We aimed to investigate AKI prevalence, risk factors and outcomes in this subgroup of patients.

METHODS

Retrospective observational study on patients admitted for ADHF-CS to our 12-bed Intensive Care Unit (ICU), between January 2010 and December 2019. Demographic, clinical, and biochemical variables were collected at baseline and during hospital stay.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight patients were consecutively recruited. The predominant etiologies were idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (47%), followed by post-ischemic (24%). AKI was diagnosed in 70 (79.5%) of patients. Forty-three out of 70 patients met the criteria for AKI at ICU admission. On multivariate analysis, a central venous pressure (CVP) higher than 10 mmHg (OR 3.9; 95%CI 1.2-12.6; p = 0.025) and serum lactate higher than 3 mmol/L (OR 4.1; 95%CI 1.01-16.3; p = 0.048) were identified to be independently associated with AKI. Age and AKI stage were independent predictors of 90-day mortality.

CONCLUSION

AKI is a common and early complication of ADHF-CS. Venous congestion and severe hypoperfusion are risk factors for AKI development. Early detection and prevention of AKI could lead to better outcome in this clinical subgroup.

Concomitant intra-aortic balloon pump and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock

We aimed to compare the outcomes of ECMO with and without IABP for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock. The study included 103 patients who needed ECMO for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock. Patients were grouped according to the use of IABP into ECMO without IABP (n = 43) and ECMO with IABP (n = 60). The study endpoints were hospital complications, successful weaning, and survival. Patients with IABP had lower preoperative ejection fraction (p = 0.002). There was no difference in stroke (p = 0.97), limb ischemic (p = 0.32), and duration of ICU stay (p = 0.11) between groups. Successful weaning was non-significantly higher with IABP (36 (60%) vs 19 (44.19%); p = 0.11). Predictors of successful weaning were inversely related to the high pre-ECMO lactate levels (OR: 0.89; p = 0.01), active endocarditis (OR: 0.06; p = 0.02), older age (OR: 0.95; p = 0.02), and aortic valve replacement (OR: 0.26; p = 0.04). There was no difference in survival between groups (p = 0.80). Our study did not support the routine use of IABP during ECMO support.

Inotrope versus Placebo Therapy in Cardiogenic Shock: Rationale and Study Design of the CAPITAL DOREMI2 Trial

BACKGROUND

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a state of end-organ hypoperfusion related to cardiac dysfunction. Current guidelines recommend consideration of inotrope therapy in patients with CS, however no robust data support their use. The purpose of the CAPITAL DOREMI2 trial is to examine the efficacy and safety of inotrope therapy against placebo in the initial resuscitation of patients with CS.

METHODS AND DESIGN

This is a multi-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial comparing single-agent inotrope therapy to placebo in patients with CS. A total of 346 participants with Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions class C or D CS will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to inotrope or placebo therapy, which will be administered over a 12-hour period. After this period, participants will continue open-label therapies at the discretion of the treating team. The primary outcome is a composite of all-cause in-hospital death, and, as measured during the 12-hour intervention period, any of: sustained hypotension or high dose vasopressor requirements, lactate greater than 3.5 mmol/L at 6 hours or thereafter, need for mechanical circulatory support, arrhythmia leading to emergent electrical cardioversion, and resuscitated cardiac arrest. All participants will be followed for the duration of their hospitalization, and secondary outcomes will be assessed at the time of discharge.

IMPLICATION

This trial will be the first to establish the safety and efficacy of inotrope therapy against placebo in a population of patients with CS and has the potential to alter the standard care provided to this group of patients.

Fulminant Myocarditis: When One Size Does Not Fit All - A Critical Review of the Literature

Fulminant myocarditis, rather than being a distinct form of myocarditis, is instead a peculiar clinical presentation of the disease. The definition of fulminant myocarditis has varied greatly in the last 20 years, leading to conflicting reports on prognosis and treatment strategies, mainly because of varied inclusion criteria in different studies. The main conclusion of this review is that fulminant myocarditis may be due to different histotypes and aetiologies that can be diagnosed only by endomyocardial biopsy and managed by aetiology-directed treatment. This life-threatening presentation requires rapid, targeted management both in the short term (mechanical circulatory support, inotropic and antiarrhythmic treatment and endomyocardial biopsy) and in the long term (including prolonged follow-up). Fulminant presentation has also recently been identified as a risk factor for worsened prognosis, even long after the resolution of the acute phase of myocarditis.

Unloading the Left Ventricle in Venoarterial ECMO: In Whom, When, and How?

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation provides cardiorespiratory support to patients in cardiogenic shock. This comes at the cost of increased left ventricle (LV) afterload that can be partly ascribed to retrograde aortic flow, causing LV distension, and leads to complications including cardiac thrombi, arrhythmias, and pulmonary edema. LV unloading can be achieved by using an additional circulatory support device to mitigate the adverse effects of mechanical overload that may increase the likelihood of myocardial recovery. Observational data suggest that these strategies may improve outcomes, but in whom, when, and how LV unloading should be employed is unclear; all techniques require balancing presumed benefits against known risks of device-related complications. This review summarizes the current evidence related to LV unloading with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Cardiogenic Shock Classification and Associated Mortality Risk

The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) Shock Classification was developed to create standardized language describing the severity of cardiogenic shock (CS). The purposes of this review were to evaluate short-term and long-term mortality rates at each SCAI shock stage for patients with or at risk for CS, which has not been studied previously, and to propose using the SCAI Shock Classification to develop algorithms for clinical status monitoring. A detailed literature search was conducted for articles published from 2019 through 2022 in which the SCAI shock stages were used to assess the mortality risk. In total, 30 articles were reviewed. The SCAI Shock Classification at hospital admission revealed a consistent and reproducible graded association between shock severity and mortality risk. Furthermore, shock severity correlated incrementally with mortality risk even after patients were stratified for diagnosis, treatment modalities, risk modifiers, shock phenotype, and underlying cause. The SCAI Shock Classification system can be used to evaluate mortality across populations of patients with or at risk for CS including those with different causes, shock phenotypes, and comorbid conditions. We propose an algorithm that uses clinical parameters incorporating the SCAI Shock Classification into the electronic health record to continually reassess and reclassify the presence and severity of CS across time throughout hospitalization. The algorithm has the potential to alert the care team and a CS team, leading to earlier recognition and stabilization of the patient, and may facilitate the use of treatment algorithms and prevent CS deterioration, leading to improved outcomes.

Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Shock Classification to Stratify Outcomes of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

We applied the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) schema to cardiogenic shock (CS) patients treated with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) to assess performance in this high acuity group of patients. Records of adult patients receiving VA-ECMO for CS at our institution from 01/2015 to 12/2019 were reviewed. Post-cardiotomy and noncardiogenic shock patients were excluded. A total of 245 patients were included, with a median age of 59 years [IQR: 48-67]; 159 (65%) were male. There were 34 (14%) patients in Stage C, 82 (33%) in D, and 129 (53%) in E. Of E patients, 88 (68%) were undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Median ECMO duration decreased with stage (C:7, D:6, E:4 days, P < 0.001). In-hospital mortality increased (C:35%, D:56%, E:71%, P < 0.001) and myocardial recovery decreased with stage (C:65%, D:35%, E:30%, P < 0.001). Acute kidney injury (C:35%, D:45%, E:54%, P = 0.045), acute liver failure (C:32%, D:66%, E:76%, P < 0.001), and infection (C:35%, D:28%, E:16%, P = 0.004) varied among groups. Multivariable analysis revealed age (HR=1.02), male sex (HR=0.62), and E classification (HR=2.69) as independently associated with 1-year mortality. Competing-risks regression identified D (SHR=0.53) and E classification (SHR=0.45) as inversely associated with myocardial recovery. In patients treated with VA-ECMO for CS, the SCAI classification provided robust risk stratification.

Temporary mechanical circulatory support devices: practical considerations for all stakeholders

Originally intended for life-saving salvage therapy, the use of temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices has become increasingly widespread in a variety of clinical settings in the contemporary era. Their use as a short-term, prophylactic support vehicle has expanded to include procedures in the catheterization laboratory, electrophysiology suite, operating room and intensive care unit. Accordingly, MCS device design and technology continue to develop at a rapid pace. In this Review, we describe the functionality, indications, management and complications associated with temporary MCS, together with scenario-specific utilization, goal-directed development and bioengineering of future devices. We address various considerations for the use of temporary MCS devices in both prophylactic and rescue scenarios, with input from stakeholders from various cardiovascular specialties, including interventional and heart failure cardiology, electrophysiology, cardiothoracic anaesthesiology, critical care and cardiac surgery.

Mechanical Circulatory Support in COVID-19

Despite aggressive care, patients with cardiopulmonary failure and COVID-19 experience unacceptably high mortality rates. The use of mechanical circulatory support devices in this population offers potential benefits but confers significant morbidity and novel challenges for the clinician. Thoughtful application of this complex technology is of the utmost importance and should be done in a multidisciplinary fashion by teams familiar with mechanical support devices and aware of the particular challenges provided by this complex patient population.

Beyond Stage C: Considerations in the Management of Patients with Heart Failure Progression and Gaps in Evidence

Despite treatment with contemporary medical therapies for chronic heart failure (HF), there has been an increase in the prevalence of patients progressing to more advanced disease. Patients progressing to and living at the interface of severe Stage C and Stage D HF are underrepresented in clinical trials, and there is a lack of high-quality evidence to guide clinical decision making. For patients with a severe HF phenotype, the medical therapies used for patients with a less advanced stage of illness are often no longer tolerated nor provide adequate clinical stability. The limited data on these patients highlights the need to increase formal research characterizing this high-risk population. This review summarizes existing clinical trial data on and incorporates our considerations for approaches to the medical management of patients advanced "beyond Stage C" HF.

RGD and Scutellarin Conjugate (WK001) Targeting Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Protects from Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury: Synthesis, Characterization, and Bioactivity Evaluation

Myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (MI/R) injury is an unresolved clinical challenge. The blockade of binding fibrinogen by glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb-IIIa) inhibitors has become a new therapeutic approach against MI/R injury. In this study, we modified the RGD structure to combine with scutellarin and synthesized a novel peptide, scutellarin-HomoArg-Gly-Asp-Trp-NH₂ (WK001). Herein, reported experimental and docking evidence indicates that WK001 provides immediate and potent platelet inhibition, with stronger inhibition of platelet aggregation than eptifibatide and scutellarin. In particular, it is administered intravenously to prevent thrombus formation and attenuate myocardial fibrosis progression in vivo. Therefore, WK001 could be developed as an antiplatelet drug to treat thrombosis-associated diseases, such as stroke and myocardial infarction.

Not all Shock States Are Created Equal: A Review of the Diagnosis and Management of Septic, Hypovolemic, Cardiogenic, Obstructive, and Distributive Shock

Shock in the critically ill patient is common and associated with poor outcomes. Categories include distributive, hypovolemic, obstructive, and cardiogenic, of which distributive (and usually septic distributive) shock is by far the most common. Clinical history, physical examination, and hemodynamic assessments & monitoring help differentiate these states. Specific management necessitates interventions to correct the triggering etiology as well as ongoing resuscitation to maintain physiologic milieu. One shock state may convert to another and may have an undifferentiated presentation; therefore, continual re-assessment is essential. This review provides guidance for intensivists for management of all shock states based on available scientific evidence.

Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction-Cardiogenic Shock: Current Studies and Future Directions

Cardiogenic shock (CS) caused by acute myocardial infarction (AMI) accounts for most deaths in the population with AMI and continues to be associated with high short-term mortality. Several temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices have been developed to treat CS and studied in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of patients with AMI-CS. Unfortunately, none of these RCTs has demonstrated an improvement in survival with temporary MCS in AMI-CS. Potential reasons for these negative results in RCTs are numerous and reflect the challenges of enrolling critically ill patients with CS. Researchers have used observational study designs to provide insights about outcomes associated with the use of temporary MCS in AMI-CS. These observational studies have yielded conflicting results, in some cases contrary to the results of RCTs. Several limitations pertinent to both RCTs and observational analyses, mostly relating to selection bias and failure to consider unmeasured confounding variables and population heterogeneity, preclude drawing strong inferences regarding the effects of temporary MCS on survival in populations with AMI-CS. Understanding these limitations is essential to correctly interpreting the literature regarding temporary MCS to treat AMI-CS and is necessary to inform the design of future studies that will potentially provide stronger evidence. Optimally matching temporary MCS devices to the needs of individual patients with AMI-CS will presumably be more successful than indiscriminate application in unselected patients. In this review, we discuss the existing literature on temporary MCS to treat AMI-CS and describe the specific challenges that must be overcome to develop an improved evidence base for guiding clinical practice.

[Intensive Care in Heart Surgery - is All Now Different?]

With approximately 100000 operations performed in Germany per year, cardiac surgery is among the surgical specialties that require intensive care tratment most frequently. Although all therapeutic aspects of ICU treatment are of high importance among cardiac surgery patients, there is a focus on hemodynamics with the overarching goal of sufficient oxygen delivery. Patients undergoing cardiac surgery are particularily prone to hemodynamic instability and low cardiac output syndrome, potentially culminating into cardiogenic shock. This article presents an overview of essential elements of intensive care medicine in cardiac surgery, paying special attention to hemodynamic monitoring, low cardiac output syndrome, inotropy, cardiac arrhyhmia, perioperative myocardial infarction, and patient blood management.

Traumatic Brain Injury: Intraoperative Management and Intensive Care Unit Multimodality Monitoring

Traumatic brain injury is a devastating event associated with substantial morbidity. Pathophysiology involves the initial trauma, subsequent inflammatory response, and secondary insults, which worsen brain injury severity. Management entails cardiopulmonary stabilization and diagnostic imaging with targeted interventions, such as decompressive hemicraniectomy, intracranial monitors or drains, and pharmacological agents to reduce intracranial pressure. Anesthesia and intensive care requires control of multiple physiologic variables and evidence-based practices to reduce secondary brain injury. Advances in biomedical engineering have enhanced assessments of cerebral oxygenation, pressure, metabolism, blood flow, and autoregulation. Many centers employ multimodality neuromonitoring for targeted therapies with the hope to improve recovery.

The impact of preservation and recovery of renal function on survival after veno-arterial extracorporeal life support: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (V-A ECLS) has become a cornerstone in the management of critical cardiogenic shock, but it can also precipitate organ injury, e.g., acute kidney injury (AKI). Available studies highlight the effect of non-cardiac organ injury on patient outcomes. Only very little is known about the impact of non-cardiac organ recovery on patient survival. AKI occurs frequently during cardiogenic shock and carries a poor prognosis. We have developed descriptive models to hypothesize on the role of AKI severity versus that of recovery of renal function for patient survival.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational study including 175 patients who were successfully decannulated from V-A ECLS. We assessed AKI severity using the "Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes" (KDIGO) criteria. We defined recovered or preserved renal function (RPRF) prior to decannulation from V-A ECLS as 0 (AKI with no improvement) or 1 (no AKI or AKI with improvement). We classified patient outcomes as alive or dead at hospital discharge.

RESULTS

78% (n = 138) of all patients survived hospital discharge of which 38% (n = 67) never developed AKI. After adjusting for shock severity and non-renal organ injury, RPRF emerged as an independent predictor of survival in both the overall cohort [OR (95% CI) - 4.11 (1.72-9.79)] and the AKI-only sub-cohort [OR (95% CI) - 5.18 (1.8-14.92)]. Neither maximum KDIGO stage nor KDIGO stage at the end of V-A ECLS was independently associated with survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Our model identifies RPRF, but not AKI severity, as an independent predictor of hospital survival in patients undergoing V-A ECLS for cardiogenic shock. We hypothesize that recovered or preserved non-cardiac organ function during V-A ECLS is crucial for patient survival.

Review of Pathophysiology of Cardiogenic Shock and Escalation of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex clinical entity that continues to carry a high risk of mortality. The landscape of CS management has changed with the advent of several temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices designed to provide hemodynamic support. It remains challenging to understand the role of different temporary MCS devices in patients with CS, as many of these patients are critically ill, requiring complex care with multiple MCS device options. Each temporary MCS device can provide different types and levels of hemodynamic support. It is important to understand the risk/benefit profile of each one of them for appropriate device selection in patients with CS.

RECENT FINDINGS

MCS may be beneficial in CS patients through augmentation of cardiac output with subsequent improvement of systemic perfusion. Selecting the optimal MCS device depends on several variables including the underlying etiology of CS, clinical strategy of MCS use (bridge to recovery, bridge to transplant or durable MCS, or abridge to decision), amount of hemodynamic support needed, associated respiratory failure, and institutional preference. Furthermore, it is even more challenging to determine the appropriate time to escalate from one MCS device to another or combine different MCS devices. In this review, we discuss the current available data published in the literature on the management of CS and propose a standardized approach for escalation of MCS devices in patients with CS. Shock teams can play an important role to help in hemodynamic-guided management and algorithm-based step-by-step approach in early initiation and escalation of temporary MCS devices at different stages of CS. It is important to define the etiology of CS, and stage of shock and recognize univentricular vs biventricular shock for appropriate device selection and escalation of therapy.

Time from Admission to Right Heart Catheterization in Cardiogenic Shock Patients

Cardiogenic shock (CS) presents with a complex spectrum of low output states, which can be provoked by Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) or Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (ADHF). Its management includes hemodynamic assessment via right heart catheterization (RHC). Herein, we describe the timing of RHC based on the etiology and severity of CS as defined by the Society of Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions (SCAI) Shock Classification. We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of patients admitted with CS secondary to ACS or ADHF from January 7, 2018 to June 30, 2020 at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics. Among the 647 patients admitted, 249 patients had RHC during their admission. Of those, 51 had underlying ACS and 198 had ADHF. The overall time from admission to invasive hemodynamic assessment was 2.73 days. The mean time for SCAI-A was 3.6 ± 2.8 days, SCAI-B 3.7 ± 3.7 days, SCAI-C 2.6 ± 3.0 days, SCAI-D 2.5 ± 4.1 days, and SCAI-E 1.3 ± 2.1 days. The linear regression model showed that RHC was performed earlier in patients with worse hemodynamics evaluated by Cardiac Power Output (CPO) (Coefficient 0.14, R- squared 0.01, P = 0.03). Hemodynamic parameters showed that high PAPi, RVSWi, and Cardiac Power Output during admission predicted low in-hospital mortality (P < 0.01). RHC was performed earlier in more critically ill patients. Patients with CS in the setting of ACS underwent RHC significantly earlier than those with ADHF.

Clinical Presentation and In-Hospital Trajectory of Heart Failure and Cardiogenic Shock

BACKGROUND

Heart failure-related cardiogenic shock (HF-CS) remains an understudied distinct clinical entity.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to profile a large cohort of patients with HF-CS focused on practical application of the SCAI (Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions) staging system to define baseline and maximal shock severity, in-hospital management with acute mechanical circulatory support (AMCS), and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

The Cardiogenic Shock Working Group registry includes patients with CS, regardless of etiology, from 17 clinical sites enrolled between 2016 and 2020. Patients with HF-CS (non-acute myocardial infarction) were analyzed and classified based on clinical presentation, outcomes at discharge, and shock severity defined by SCAI stages.

RESULTS

A total of 1,767 patients with HF-CS were included, of whom 349 (19.8%) had de novo HF-CS (DNHF-CS). Patients were more likely to present in SCAI stage C or D and achieve maximum SCAI stage D. Patients with DNHF-CS were more likely to experience in-hospital death and in- and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and they escalated more rapidly to a maximum achieved SCAI stage, compared to patients with acute-on-chronic HF-CS. In-hospital cardiac arrest was associated with greater in-hospital death regardless of clinical presentation (de novo: 63% vs 21%; acute-on-chronic HF-CS: 65% vs 17%; both P < 0.001). Forty-five percent of HF-CS patients were exposed to at least 1 AMCS device throughout hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large contemporary HF-CS cohort, we identified a greater incidence of in-hospital death and cardiac arrest as well as a more rapid escalation to maximum SCAI stage severity among DNHF-CS. AMCS use in HF-CS was common, with significant heterogeneity among device types. (Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Registry [CSWG]; NCT04682483).

Prognosis in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Who Received Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support

Background

Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is often used in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), and the type of MCS may vary by cause of CS.

Objectives

This study sought to describe the causes of CS in patients receiving temporary MCS, the types of MCS used, and associated mortality.

Methods

This study used a nationwide Japanese database to identify patients receiving temporary MCS for CS between April 1, 2012, and March 31, 2020.

Results

Of 65,837 patients, the cause of CS was acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in 77.4%, heart failure (HF) in 10.9%, valvular disease in 2.7%, fulminant myocarditis (FM) in 2.5%, arrhythmia in 4.5%, and pulmonary embolism (PE) in 2.0% of cases. The most commonly used MCS was an intra-aortic balloon pump alone in AMI (79.2%) and in HF (79.0%) and in valvular disease (66.0%), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with intra-aortic balloon pump in FM (56.2%) and arrhythmia (43.3%), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation alone in PE (71.5%). Overall in-hospital mortality was 32.4%; 30.0% in AMI, 32.6% in HF, 33.1% in valvular disease, 34.2% in FM, 60.9% in arrhythmia, and 59.2% in PE. Overall in-hospital mortality increased from 30.4% in 2012 to 34.1% in 2019. After adjustment, valvular disease, FM, and PE had lower in-hospital mortality than AMI: valvular disease, OR: 0.56 (95% CI: 0.50-0.64); FM: OR: 0.58 (95% CI: 0.52-0.66); PE: OR: 0.49 (95% CI: 0.43-0.56); whereas HF had similar in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.92-1.05) and arrhythmia had higher in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.04-1.26).

Conclusions

In a Japanese national registry of patients with CS, different causes of CS were associated with different types of MCS and differences in survival.

The High Cost of Death After Acute Myocardial Infarctions: Results from a National US Hospital Database

Introduction

This study described the differences in costs and length of stay (LOS) among patients with AMI who died versus survived using a large, nationally representative cohort of AMI patients.

Methods

The 2019 HCUP NIS was used to analyze costs, and LOS among all patients with a principal diagnosis of AMI. A propensity-score matched analysis and multivariable regression were used to adjust for patient and hospital characteristics.

Results

There were 4559 visits in each of the cohorts (total 9118). The adjusted mean hospital cost was $18,970 (95% CI $16,453 - $21,871) for those that survived and $23,173 (95% CI $20,167 - $26,626; p <0.001) for those that died. The LOS was 3.95 (95% CI 3.41-4.57) in survivors and 4.24 (95% CI 3.67-4.89; p <0.001) in those who died.

Conclusion

Survivors of AMI incurred lower costs and length of stay than those who died. Higher costs were attributed to greater LOS and higher-level care. The results suggest that economic evaluations of cardiovascular interventions that do not include the cost of dying may underestimate the benefits of the intervention.

Management of Cardiogenic Shock Unrelated to Acute Myocardial Infarction

Cardiogenic shock is an extreme manifestation of acute decompensated heart failure. Cardiogenic shock is often caused by-and has traditionally been studied in the setting of-acute myocardial infarction (AMI CS); however, there is increasing incidence and recognition of cardiogenic shock not associated with acute myocardial infarction (non-AMI CS) as a distinct entity. Despite decades of study and technologic advancements, cardiogenic shock mortality remains as high as 50%, regardless of etiology. New approaches to shock phenotyping and classification have emerged, with a focus on appropriately matching patient physiology to a growing list of available interventions. Further study is needed to determine whether these efforts will lead to more nuanced use of mechanical circulatory support and improved patient outcomes, especially in non-AMI CS. In the meantime, models of care incorporating multidisciplinary decision making, such as shock teams, may improve patient selection and outcomes.

Impact of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation on all-cause mortality among patients with Takotsubo syndrome complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the German-Italian-Spanish (GEIST) registry

Aims

Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is an acute and reversible left ventricular dysfunction and can be complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS). However, few data are available on optimal care in TTS complicated by CS. Aim of this study was to evaluate short- and long-term impact of intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP) on mortality in this setting.

Methods and results

In a multi-centre, international registry on TTS, 2248 consecutive patients were enrolled from 38 centres from Germany, Italy, and Spain. Of the 2248 patients, 212 (9.4%) experienced CS. Patients with CS had a higher prevalence of diabetes (27% vs. 19%), male sex (25% vs. 10%), and right ventricular involvement (10% vs. 5%) (P < 0.01 in all cases). Forty-three patients with CS (20% of 212) received IABP within 8 h (interquartile range 4-18) after admission. No differences in terms of age, gender, cardiovascular risk factors, and admission left ventricular ejection fraction were found among patients with and without IABP. There were no significant differences in terms of 30-day mortality (16% vs. 17%, P = 0.98), length of hospitalization (18.9 vs. 16.7 days, P = 0.51), and need of invasive ventilation (35% vs. 41%, P = 0.60) among two groups: 30-day survival was not significantly different even after propensity score adjustment (log-rank P = 0.73). At 42-month follow-up, overall mortality in patients with CS and TTS was 35%, not significantly different between patients receiving IABP and not (37% vs. 35%, P = 0.72).

Conclusions

In a large multi-centre observational registry, the use of IABP was not associated with lower mortality rates at short- and long-term follow-up in patients with TTS and CS.

In-hospital mortality from acute coronary syndrome in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

There is an increasing recognition of the burden of cardiovascular disease in Africa. However, little is known about the pooled prevalence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS)-associated in-hospital mortality and contributing factors.

Methods

PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science (Core Collection), and supplementary sources including Google Scholar, World Cat, Research Gate, and Cochrane Library were searched. Chi-square test and I ²-statistic were used to assess heterogeneity. Egger's and Begg's tests and funnel plots were used to assess publication bias. Data were analyzed using Stata software (version 15.0).

Result

Twenty nine studies with a total sample of 11,788 were included. The pooled estimate of all-cause in-hospital mortality was 22% (pooled proportion (PP) = 0.22; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.17-0.27. The In-hospital mortality rate was lower at the cardiac centers (PP = 0.14; CI: 0.05-0.23) compared to referral hospitals (PP = 0.24; CI: 0.17-0.31]) The mortality rate was comparable in Eastern (PP = 0.23; CI: 0.19-0.27) and Northern Africa (PP = 0.22; CI: 0.16-0.28). The incidence of in-hospital heart failure, cardiogenic shock, arrhythmia, bleeding, acute stroke, and reinfarction were 42, 17.0, 20.0, 16.0, 4.0, and 5.0%, respectively.

Conclusion

All-cause in-hospital mortality rate associated with ACS is high in Africa. The mortality rate at cardiac centers was 10% lower when compared with referral hospitals. Establishing coronary units, strengthening existing cardiac services, and improving availability and access to cardiovascular medicines could help in reducing the burden of ACS in the continent.

The prognostic value of admission D-dimer level in patients with cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction

Background

Shock is associated with the activation of the coagulation and fibrinolytic system, and D-dimer is the degradation product of cross-linked fibrin. However, the prognostic value of D-dimer in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains unclear.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of consecutive patients with CS complicating AMI. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality and the secondary endpoint was the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) including 30-day all-cause mortality, ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation, atrioventricular block, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and non-fatal stroke. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses were performed to assess the association between admission D-dimer and outcomes. A multivariable Cox regression model was performed to identify independent risk factors. The risk predictive potency with D-dimer added to the traditional risk scores was evaluated by C-statistics and the net reclassification index.

Results

Among 218 patients with CS complicating AMI, those who died during the 30-day follow-up presented with worse baseline characteristics and laboratory test results, including a higher level of D-dimer. According to the X-tile program result, the continuous plasma D-dimer level was divided into three gradients. The 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with low, medium, and high levels of D-dimer were 22.4, 53.3, and 86.2%, respectively (p < 0.001 for all). The 30-day incidence of MACEs was 46.3, 77.0, and 89.7%, respectively (p < 0.001). In the multivariable Cox regression model, the trilogy of D-dimer level was an independent risk predictor for 30-day mortality (median D-dimer cohort: HR 1.768, 95% CI 0.982-3.183, p = 0.057; high D-dimer cohort: HR 2.602, 95% CI 1.310-5.168, p = 0.006), a similar result was observed in secondary endpoint events (median D-dimer cohort: HR 2.012, 95% CI 1.329-3.044, p = 0.001; high D-dimer cohort: HR 2.543, 95% CI 1.452-4.453, p = 0.001). The RCS analyses suggested non-linear associations of D-dimer with 30-day mortality. The enrollment of D-dimer improved risk discrimination for all-cause death when combined with the traditional CardShock score (C-index: 0.741 vs. 0.756, p _difference = 0.004) and the IABP-SHOCK II score (C-index: 0.732 vs. 0.754, p _difference = 0.006), and the GRACE score (C-index: 0.679 vs. 0.715, p _difference < 0.001). Similar results were acquired after logarithmic transformed D-dimer was included in the risk score. The improvements in reclassification which were calculated as additional net reclassification index were 7.5, 8.6, and 12.8%, respectively.

Conclusion

Admission D-dimer level was independently associated with the short-term outcome in patients with CS complicating AMI and addition of D-dimer brought incremental risk prediction value to traditional risk prediction scores.

Spinal Cord Infarction With Prolonged Femoral Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

OBJECTIVES

There have been sporadic reports of ischemic spinal cord injury (SCI) during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) support. The authors observed a troubling pattern of this catastrophic complication and evaluated the potential mechanisms of SCI related to ECMO.

DESIGN

This study was a case series.

SETTING

This study was performed at a single institution in a University setting.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients requiring prolonged VA-ECMO were included.

INTERVENTIONS

No interventions were done. This was an observational study.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Four hypotheses of etiology were considered: (1) hypercoagulable state/thromboembolism, (2) regional hypoxia/hypocarbia, (3) hyperperfusion and spinal cord edema, and (4) mechanical coverage of spinal arteries. The SCI involved the lower thoracic (T7-T12 level) spinal cord to the cauda equina in all patients. Seven out of 132 (5.3%) patients with prolonged VA-ECMO support developed SCI. The median time from ECMO cannulation to SCI was 7 (range: 6-17) days.There was no evidence of embolic SCI or extended regional hypoxia or hypocarbia. A unilateral, internal iliac artery was covered by the arterial cannula in 6/7 86%) patients, but flow into the internal iliac was demonstrated on imaging in all available patients. The median total flow (ECMO + intrinsic cardiac output) was 8.5 L/min (LPM), and indexed flow was 4.1 LPM/m². The median central venous oxygen saturation was 88%, and intracranial pressure was measured at 30 mmHg in one patient, suggestive of hyperperfusion and spinal cord edema.

CONCLUSIONS

An SCI is a serious complication of extended peripheral VA-ECMO support. Its etiology remains uncertain, but the authors' preliminary data suggested that spinal cord edema from hyperperfusion or venous congestion could contribute.

C1QC, VSIG4, and CFD as Potential Peripheral Blood Biomarkers in Atrial Fibrillation-Related Cardioembolic Stroke

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major risk factor for ischemic stroke. We aimed to identify novel potential biomarkers with diagnostic value in patients with atrial fibrillation-related cardioembolic stroke (AF-CE).Publicly available gene expression profiles related to AF, cardioembolic stroke (CE), and large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified and then functionally annotated. The support vector machine recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis were conducted to identify potential diagnostic AF-CE biomarkers. Furthermore, the results were validated by using external data sets, and discriminability was measured by the area under the ROC curve (AUC). In order to verify the predictive results, the blood samples of 13 healthy controls, 20 patients with CE, and 20 patients with LAA stroke were acquired for RT-qPCR, and the correlation between biomarkers and clinical features was further explored. Lastly, a nomogram and the companion website were developed to predict the CE-risk rate. Three feature genes (C1QC, VSIG4, and CFD) were selected and validated in the training and the external datasets. The qRT-PCR evaluation showed that the levels of blood biomarkers (C1QC, VSIG4, and CFD) in patients with AF-CE can be used to differentiate patients with AF-CE from normal controls (P < 0.05) and can effectively discriminate AF-CE from LAA stroke (P < 0.05). Immune cell infiltration analysis revealed that three feature genes were correlated with immune system such as neutrophils. Clinical impact curve, calibration curves, ROC, and DCAs of the nomogram indicate that the nomogram had good performance. Our findings showed that C1QC, VSIG4, and CFD can potentially serve as diagnostic blood biomarkers of AF-CE; novel nomogram and the companion website can help clinicians to identify high-risk individuals, thus helping to guide treatment decisions for stroke patients.

Management of Post-Myocardial Infarction Right Ventricular Failure

Right ventricular failure (RVF) due to an acute myocardial infarction (MI) has been associated with high morbidity and mortality. Initial treatment is guided by early recognition and prompt revascularization. Current management of post-MI RVF is built upon expert consensus and is also informed by RVF from other etiologies, including massive pulmonary embolism, left ventricular assist device-associated right ventricular dysfunction, postcardiotomy shock, etc.; this speaks to the limited data available on the specific management of RVF in acute MI. The goal of this review is to discuss the current literature on the pathophysiology, general management considerations, interventional management, hemodynamic monitoring, medical management, and mechanical circulatory support of MI-induced RVF.

Single center experience and early outcomes of Impella 5.5

Background

Acute decompensated heart failure (HF) and cardiogenic shock (CS) frequently are refractory to conservative treatment and require mechanical circulatory support (MCS). We report our early clinical experience and evaluate patient outcomes with the newer generation surgical Impella 5.5.

Methods

Seventy patients that underwent Impella 5.5 implantation between October 2019 and December 2021 at a single center were enrolled in this study. Pre-operative characteristics, peri-operative clinical course information, and post-operative outcomes were retrospectively collected.

Results

Fifty-seven (81%) patients survived to discharge, and 51 (76%) patients survived at the time of the first 30 days post-discharge visit. Thirty-one patients (44%) received Impella support for a bridge to advanced surgical heart failure therapy (transplant or durable left ventricular assist device [LVAD]), 27 (39%) cases were used for a bridge to recovery/decision and 12 (17.1%) cases was used for planned perioperative support for high-risk cardiac surgery procedure.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that Impella 5.5 provides favorable survival in the management of HF and CS, particularly used for a bridge to heart transplant or LVAD. Early extubation and mobilization with high flow circulatory support allowed effective tailoring of MCS approaches from peri-operative support for high-risk cardiac surgery, bridge to recovery, and to advanced surgical heart failure therapy.

Pre-percutaneous coronary intervention sudden cardiac arrest in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Incidence, predictors, and related outcomes

Background

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a frequent cause of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) and early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with increased survival. Despite constant improvements in SCA management, survival remains poor. We aimed to assess pre-PCI SCA incidence and related outcomes in patients admitted with STEMI.

Methods

This was a prospective cohort study of patients admitted with STEMI in a tertiary university hospital over 11  years. All patients were submitted to emergency coronary angiography. Baseline characteristics, details of the procedure, reperfusion strategies, and adverse outcomes were assessed. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcome was 1-year mortality after hospital discharge. Predictors of pre-PCI SCA was also assessed.

Results

During the study period 1,493 patients were included; the mean age was 61.1 years (±12), and 65.3% were male. Pre-PCI SCA was present in 133 (8.9%) patients. In-hospital mortality was higher in the pre-PCI SCA group (36.8% vs. 8.8%, p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, anterior MI, cardiogenic shock, age, pre-PCI SCA and lower ejection fraction remained significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. When we analyzed the interaction between pre-PCI SCA and cardiogenic shock upon admission there is a further increase in mortality risk when both conditions are present. For predictors of pre-PCI SCA, only younger age and cardiogenic shock remained significantly associated after multivariate analysis. Overall 1-year mortality rates were similar between pre-PCI SCA survivors and non-pre-PCI SCA group.

Conclusion

In a cohort of consecutive patients admitted with STEMI, pre-PCI SCA was associated with higher in-hospital mortality, and its association with cardiogenic shock further increases mortality risk. However, long-term mortality among pre-PCI SCA survivors was similar to non-SCA patients. Understanding characteristics associated with pre-PCI SCA may help to prevent and improve the management of STEMI patients.

Correlation between severity of obesity and mortality in cardiogenic shock

INTRODUCTION

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with high mortality despite the development of risk stratification tools and new treatment strategies. Obesity, although a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, is not included in current risk stratification tools for CS. A relationship between mortality and obesity has only been shown in subsets populations of CS; there is not yet a clear relationship between severity of obesity and all-cause CS.

OBJECTIVES

In this study we evaluate the relationship between rising body mass index (BMI) and mortality in all-cause CS.

METHODS

All patients with BMI measurements and hospitalizations complicated by CS from 2014 to 2019 at a single quaternary care institution were identified. Patients were grouped by obesity classification. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine a relationship between higher obesity classifications with 30-day mortality in patients with CS.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients were available for analysis. Mean BMI for those who survived compared to those who did not was 29.7 ± 8 kg/m2 vs 33.7 ± 7.6 kg/m2 (p = 0.04). The odds ratio for mortality with incremental increase in obesity classification was 1.6 (95% CI 1.1 - 2.6, p = 0.03) after adjusting for etiology of CS and other common associations with CS mortality.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the higher mortality risk with incremental increases in BMI should be taken into account when risk stratifying these patients.

Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support: Left, Right, and Biventricular Devices

Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) encompasses a wide array of invasive devices, which provide short-term hemodynamic support for multiple clinical indications. Although initially developed for the management of cardiogenic shock, indications for MCS have expanded to include prophylactic insertion prior to high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention, treatment of acute circulatory failure following cardiac surgery, and bridging of end-stage heart failure patients to more definitive therapies, such as left ventricular assist devices and cardiac transplantation. A wide variety of devices are available to provide left ventricular, right ventricular, or biventricular support. The choice of a temporary MCS device requires consideration of the clinical scenario, patient characteristics, institution protocols, and provider familiarity and training. In this review, the most common forms of left, right, and biventricular temporary MCS are discussed, along with their indications, contraindications, complications, cannulations, hemodynamic effects, and available clinical data.