BCR-ABL kinase domain mutation analysis in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of European LeukemiaNet

The growing arsenal of ATP-competitive and allosteric inhibitors of BCR-ABL

The BCR-ABL fusion kinase is the driving mutation of chronic myelogenous leukemias and is also expressed in a subset of acute lymphoblastic leukemias. Recent advances in elucidating the structure, regulation, and signaling of BCR-ABL have led to the identification of allosteric sites that are distant from the ATP-binding pocket and are critical for BCR-ABL-dependent oncogenic transformation. Here, we review the available data regarding the molecular mechanism of action and the specificity of ATP-competitive tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting BCR-ABL. In addition, we discuss how targeting of allosteric sites could provide new opportunities to inhibit resistant BCR-ABL mutants, either alone or in combination with conventional ATP-competitive inhibitors.

Molecular monitoring of chronic myeloid leukemia: a personalized approach to optimizing treatment response

Personalized medicine is rapidly developing a purposeful niche in the field of oncology. Monitoring the activity of the oncogenic fusion gene BCR-ABL1 in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a good example of individualizing CML treatment for patients using patient-specific genetic information. However, the frequency at which molecular monitoring for BCR-ABL1 transcripts occurs during treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for CML in clinical practice is much lower than that recommended by either the National Cancer Center Network or the European LeukemiaNet guidelines. Adherence, one of the most critical factors affecting response to TKIs, is often less than desirable and rarely communicated to physicians by patients or managed by care providers. Less than optimal molecular monitoring and low adherence to TKI treatment can lead to rising transcripts levels, that when not detected, have been shown to contribute to poor outcomes. This review reports the basis for and describes the design of a state-of-the-art program intended to improve communication with physicians through real-time messaging about sequential test results for BCR-ABL1 and patients' adherence to TKI therapy.

Developmental Therapeutics Consortium report on study design effects on trial outcomes in chronic myeloid leukaemia

BACKGROUND

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have dramatically changed the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). Results from ongoing phase 3 trials with nilotinib [Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials-Newly Diagnosed Patients (ENESTnd)] and dasatinib [Dasatinib Versus Imatinib Study in Treatment-Naive CML-CP Patients (DASISION)] in newly diagnosed patients with CML in chronic phase have demonstrated that these TKIs resulted in significant improvements in responses vs. imatinib.

DESIGN

The Developmental Therapeutics Consortium (DTC) systematically reviewed the published literature to provide a comparative analysis of the ENESTnd and DASISION trial designs and data reported on each study.

RESULTS

The recent approval of nilotinib and dasatinib based on these two pivotal studies offers physicians the option to optimise frontline treatment based on a patient's comorbidities, risk factors and tolerability profiles. Although nilotinib and dasatinib provide effective therapeutic options for the frontline treatment of CML, the lack of an evidenced-based, side-by-side comparison makes it difficult to directly compare these agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite potential bias from differences in patient populations and study design, indirect cross-trial comparisons to determine the relative effectiveness of these agents will be performed by physicians. This DTC report provides a comprehensive summary of the study designs, protocols and results of the ENESTnd and DASISION trials, which will assist physicians in making informed decisions on the best treatment approach for their patients.

Second-generation TKIs: which and when?

Impressive response rates and good tolerability have led imatinib 400 mg once a day to become the standard frontline therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. However, approximately one-third of the treated patients do not respond in an optimal manner to this drug, and the appropriate type and rhythm of CML monitoring, as well as the correct action to be undertaken in case of failure or suboptimal responses to imatinib therapy have been published in specific recommendations by European Leukemia Net and National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Failure and also cytogenetic suboptimal responses strongly demand for a change in treatment and for a switch from imatinib to one of the two second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) so far registered, dasatinib and nilotinib, for which efficacy as second-line therapy in imatinib-resistant or intolerant cases has been clearly demonstrated in phase II studies, and for which 4-year updates are now available. Other TKIs, at the moment, still under clinical investigation for imatinib-resistant patients include bosutinib and the next-generation TKI ponatinib. Different efficacy and safety criteria characterize each of the mentioned compounds and may help to decide on the one to be preferably used in individual patients.

Molecular monitoring 101: helping your patients with chronic myeloid leukemia to understand the meaning of molecular response

For patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), measurement of molecular response (i.e. the level of BCR-ABL1 transcripts) is firmly established as a key element of disease monitoring. Assessment of BCR-ABL1 levels may help to identify early signs of resistance to treatment and enable a timely switch to alternative therapies. Hence, regular and accurate monitoring of BCR-ABL1 transcripts helps to maximize the chance of successful outcomes in CML. Because the incidence of CML is relatively low, many community oncologists encounter only a limited number of cases; measuring and interpreting BCR-ABL1 measurements in a clinically relevant fashion may be challenging. The team at our institution often encounters questions regarding real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction assessments of BCR-ABL1 levels, International Scale standardization, the implications of achieving or losing molecular responses and mutation monitoring. The aim of this article is to provide practical advice for effective long-term monitoring of patients with CML by addressing frequently asked questions and common case scenarios using guideline- and evidence-based approaches.

Initial treatment for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia

The first-line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia is based on the three currently available tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), namely imatinib, nilotinib and dasatinib. Nilotinib and dasatinib are more potent, and it is predicted that, in comparison with imatinib, they can reduce the risk of progression and increase the number of the patients who can discontinue the treatment without relapsing. Other TKIs are still being developed and may help to improve treatment options further on. Hydroxyurea has no longer a role. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is the treatment of choice for the advanced phases, and in case of resistance to at least two TKIs.

Advances in treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: the evolving role of Bcr–Abl mutations and mutational analysis

Over the last decade, the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia has progressed tremendously. The first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib is now flanked by two second-generation molecules, dasatinib and nilotinib – and others are in advanced clinical development. One of the reasons for such intensive research on novel compounds is the problem of resistance, that is thought to be caused, in a proportion of cases, by point mutations in Bcr–Abl. In this article, the authors review how the biological and clinical relevance of Bcr–Abl mutations has evolved in parallel with the availability of more and more therapeutic options. The authors also discuss the practical relevance of Bcr–Abl mutation analysis and how this tool should best be integrated in the optimal clinical management of chronic myeloid leukemia patients.

Pushing the limits of targeted therapy in chronic myeloid leukaemia

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy targeting the BCR-ABL1 kinase is effective against chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), but is not curative for most patients. Minimal residual disease (MRD) is thought to reside in TKI-insensitive leukaemia stem cells (LSCs) that are not fully addicted to BCR-ABL1. Recent conceptual advances in both CML biology and therapeutic intervention have increased the potential for the elimination of CML cells, including LSCs, through simultaneous inhibition of BCR-ABL1 and other newly identified, crucial targets.

Managing inadequate responses to frontline treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia: a case-based review

The tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib are the standard of care for treating patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Compared with interferon-based treatment, the previous standard of care, imatinib is associated with significantly higher cytogenetic response rates and prolonged overall survival. Nilotinib and dasatinib, both newer and more potent TKIs, significantly improve cytogenetic and molecular response rates compared with imatinib. Despite significant advances in CML treatment enabled by the TKIs, a fraction of patients who receive frontline treatment with a TKI demonstrate inadequate response. The reasons for this vary, but in many cases, inadequate response can be attributed to non-adherence to the treatment regimen, intolerance to the drug, intrinsic or acquired resistance to the drug, or a combination of reasons. More often than not, strategies to improve response necessitate a change in treatment plan, either a dose adjustment or a switch to an alternate drug, particularly in the case of drug intolerance or drug resistance. Improved physician-patient communication and patient education are effective strategies to address issues relating to adherence and intolerance. Because inadequate response to TKI treatment correlates with poor long-term outcomes, it is imperative that patients who experience intolerance or who fail to achieve appropriate responses are carefully evaluated so that appropriate treatment modifications can be made to maximize the likelihood of positive long-term outcome.

Mechanisms and novel approaches in overriding tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia

Chronic myeloid leukemia is a stem cell-initiated but progenitor-driven disease induced by the BCR-ABL oncogene. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were introduced in the late 1990s and have revolutionized the management of chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. The majority of patients can now expect to live a normal life as long as they continue to comply with TKI treatment. However, in a significant proportion of cases TKI resistance develops over time, requiring a switch of therapy. The most frequent mechanism for drug resistance is the development of kinase domain mutations that reduce or completely ablate drug efficacy. Fortunately, the last 10 years have seen an impressive array of new drugs, some modeled on the mechanism of action of imatinib, others employing more novel approaches, for these patients.

Mutations of FLT3/ITD confer resistance to multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors

FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) normally functions in the survival/proliferation of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells, but its constitutive activation by internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutations correlates with a poor prognosis in AML. The development of FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) is a promising strategy, but resistance that arises during the course of treatment caused by secondary mutations within the mutated gene itself poses a significant challenge. In an effort to predict FLT3 resistance mutations that might develop in patients, we used saturation mutagenesis of FLT3/ITD followed by selection of transfected cells in FLT3 TKI. We identified F621L, A627P, F691L and Y842C mutations in FLT3/ITD that confer varying levels of resistance to FLT3 TKI. Western blotting confirmed that some FLT3 TKI were ineffective at inhibiting FLT3 autophosphorylation and signaling through MAP kinase, STAT5 and AKT in some mutants. Balb/c mice transplanted with the FLT3/ITD Y842C mutation confirmed resistance to sorafenib in vivo but not to lestaurtinib. These results indicate a growing number of FLT3 mutations that are likely to be encountered in patients. Such knowledge, combined with known remaining sensitivity to other FLT3 TKI, will be important to establish as secondary drug treatments that can be substituted when these mutants are encountered.

Molecular characterization of de novo Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute myeloid leukemia

Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a controversial diagnosis, as others propose that it represents chronic myelogenous leukemia in blast phase (CML-BP). NPM1 mutations occur in 25-35% of patients with AML but are absent in patients with CML. Conversely, ABL1 mutations occur in 25% of imatinib-naive patients with CML-BP but are not described in patients with AML. We analyzed for NPM1 and ABL1 mutations in nine Ph+ patients with AML and five patients with CML-BP initially presenting in BP. In six cases of Ph+ AML, we screened for a panel of gene mutations using Sequenome(®)-based methods including AKT1, AKT2, AKT3, BRAF, EGFR, GNAQ, GNAS, IDH1, IDH2, KRAS, MET, NRAS, PIK3CA and RET. Two of nine (22%) patients with Ph+ AML had NPM1 mutations and were alive 36 and 71 months after diagnosis. All cases of Ph+ AML were negative for ABL1 and other gene mutations. One (20%) patient with CML-BP had ABL1 mutation; no patients had NPM1 mutations. These data suggest that Ph+ AML is distinct from CML-BP.

AHI-1: a novel signaling protein and potential therapeutic target in human leukemia and brain disorders

Progress in the understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms of human cancer, including human leukemia and lymphomas, has been spurred by cloning of fusion genes created by chromosomal translocations or by retroviral insertional mutagenesis; a number of oncogenes and tumor suppressors involved in development of a number of malignancies have been identified in this manner. The BCR-ABL fusion gene, originating in a multipotent hematopoietic stem cell, is the molecular signature of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Discovery of this fusion gene has led to the development of one of the first successful targeted molecular therapies for cancer (Imatinib). It illustrates the advances that can result from an understanding of the molecular basis of disease. However, there still remain many as yet unidentified mutations that may influence the initiation or progression of human diseases. Thus, identification and characterization of the mechanism of action of genes that contribute to human diseases is an important and opportune area of current research. One promising candidate as a potential therapeutic target is Abelson helper integration site-1(Ahi-1/AHI-1) that was identified by retroviral insertional mutagenesis in murine models of leukemia/lymphomas and is highly elevated in certain human lymphoma and leukemia stem/progenitor cells. It encodes a unique protein with a SH3 domain, multiple SH3 binding sites and a WD40-repeat domain, suggesting that the normal protein has novel signaling activities. A new AHI-1-BCR-ABL-JAK2 interaction complex has recently been identified and this complex regulates transforming activities and drug resistance in CML stem/progenitor cells. Importantly, AHI-1 has recently been identified as a susceptibility gene involved in a number of brain disorders, including Joubert syndrome. Therefore, understanding molecular functions of the AHI-1 gene could lead to important and novel insights into disease processes involved in specific types of diseases. Ultimately, this knowledge will set the stage for translation into new and more effective diagnostic and treatment strategies.

How I treat CML blast crisis

Blast crisis (BC) remains the major challenge in the management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). It is now generally accepted that BC is the consequence of continued BCR-ABL activity leading to genetic instability, DNA damage, and impaired DNA repair. Most patients with BC carry multiple mutations, and up to 80% show additional chromosomal aberrations in a nonrandom pattern. Treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors has improved survival in BC modestly, but most long-term survivors are those who have been transplanted. Patients in BC should be treated with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor according to mutation profile, with or without chemotherapy, with the goal of achieving a second chronic phase and proceeding to allogeneic stem cell transplantation as quickly as possible. Although long-term remissions are rare, allogeneic stem cell transplantation provides the best chance of a cure in BC. Investigational agents are not likely to provide an alternative in the near future. In view of these limited options, prevention of BC by a rigorous and early elimination of BCR-ABL is recommended. Early response indicators should be used to select patients for alternative therapies and early transplantation. Every attempt should be made to reduce or eliminate BCR-ABL consistent with good patient care as far as possible.

Structure, regulation, signaling, and targeting of abl kinases in cancer

Abl kinases are prototypic cytoplasmic tyrosine kinases and are involved in a variety of chromosomal aberrations in different cancers. This causes the expression of Abl fusion proteins, such as Bcr-Abl, that are constitutively activated and drivers of tumorigenesis. Over the past decades, biochemical and functional studies on the molecular mechanisms of Abl regulation have gone hand in hand with progression of our structural understanding of autoinhibited and active Abl conformations. In parallel, Abl oncoproteins have become prime molecular targets for cancer therapy, using adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-competitive kinase inhibitors, such as imatinib. Abl-targeting drugs serve as a paradigm for our understanding of kinase inhibitor action, specificity, and resistance development. In this review article, I will review the molecular mechanisms that are responsible for the regulation of Abl kinase activity and how oncogenic Abl fusions signal. Furthermore, past and ongoing efforts to target Abl oncoproteins using ATP-competitive and allosteric inhibitors, as well as future possibilities using combination therapy, will be discussed.

Chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells in the era of targeted therapies: resistance, persistence and long-term dormancy

Targeted therapies of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) using tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have profoundly changed the natural history of the disease with a major impact on survival. Molecular monitoring with BCR-ABL quantification shows that a status of undetectable molecular residual disease (UMRD) is obtained in a significant minority of patients. However, it remains unclear whether these patients are definitively cured of their leukemia. Imatinib mesylate withdrawal trials have demonstrated the rapid appearance of the malignant clone in the majority of the patients whereas some patients remain in a state of UMRD. It has clearly been demonstrated that the most primitive stem cells are refractory to all TKIs used in clinical practice. In addition, long-term dormancy is one of the most fundamental characteristics of hematopoietic stem cells. In this context, we have recently undertaken a systematic analysis of the bone marrow stem cell compartment in several patients in durable UMRD. We have demonstrated the long-term persistence of a considerable amount of BCR-ABL-expressing stem cells, even in the absence of relapse. The phenomenon of long-term leukemic stem cell dormancy is of major importance in CML and one of the key questions in cancer biology in general. We discuss, here, the potential mechanisms, including intrinsic and microenvironmental factors, that control the response of leukemic stem cells (LSCs) to targeted therapies and potential novel strategies currently in progress with a curative intent. Moreover, we propose a molecular evaluation of the residual LSC compartment in selected patients in order to develop rational TKI-cessation strategies in CML.

Omics Screening for Pharmaceutical Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Practice

As molecular techniques have improved, investigators have attempted to improve pharmaceutical efficacy and safety by making trait associations with genomic, epigenomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic polymorphisms. The 'omics era has seen screening assays for pharmaceutical efficacy and safety translated into clinical practice. This manuscript will discuss each 'omic field and the screening assays available to the clinician. While success has been demonstrated in each 'omic field, many challenges remain. Assays need wider availability, predictive values remain low, and costs remain high. In order for clinicians to realize improved efficacy and safety due 'omic screens, development of improved techniques, combining of 'omic assays, and increased clinical utilization is necessary. This is an exciting time for investigators and clinicians that desire improved pharmaceutical therapy.

Genetic resistance to JAK2 enzymatic inhibitors is overcome by HSP90 inhibition

Enzymatic inhibitors of Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) are in clinical development for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) with rearrangements of the cytokine receptor subunit cytokine receptor-like factor 2 (CRLF2), and other tumors with constitutive JAK2 signaling. In this study, we identify G935R, Y931C, and E864K mutations within the JAK2 kinase domain that confer resistance across a panel of JAK inhibitors, whether present in cis with JAK2 V617F (observed in MPNs) or JAK2 R683G (observed in B-ALL). G935R, Y931C, and E864K do not reduce the sensitivity of JAK2-dependent cells to inhibitors of heat shock protein 90 (HSP90), which promote the degradation of both wild-type and mutant JAK2. HSP90 inhibitors were 100-1,000-fold more potent against CRLF2-rearranged B-ALL cells, which correlated with JAK2 degradation and more extensive blockade of JAK2/STAT5, MAP kinase, and AKT signaling. In addition, the HSP90 inhibitor AUY922 prolonged survival of mice xenografted with primary human CRLF2-rearranged B-ALL further than an enzymatic JAK2 inhibitor. Thus, HSP90 is a promising therapeutic target in JAK2-driven cancers, including those with genetic resistance to JAK enzymatic inhibitors.

Imatinib and beyond--targeting activated tyrosine kinases in myeloproliferative disorders

Tyrosine kinases (TKs) play a major role in cellular signal transduction. Deregulated TK activity has been observed in solid cancers and hematologic malignancies. Advances in the understanding of the oncogenic activation of TKs led to the identification of new kinase inhibitors with improved potency, specificity, and efficacy. With the advent of imatinib mesylate, a new era in the management of patients with BCR-ABL+ chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and myeloproliferative neoplasms including chronic myelomonocytic leukemia with PDGFRB gene rearrangements and hypereosinophilic syndrome has begun. CML represents a model for the rational design of TK inhibitors based on the insights into signal transduction pathways. In CML, treatment with imatinib led to an outstanding clinical efficacy with limited toxicity. In BCR-ABL-negative myeloproliferation, the finding of activating point mutations in JAK2 prompted the development of JAK inhibitors to target this activated pathway. Aberrations of epigenetically active genes are the latest finding in the pathogenesis of myeloproliferative disorders and will serve as another target for innovative therapies.

Genetic mutations in chronic myelogenous leukemia: when to check and what to do?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The review will appraise the literature concerning ABL kinase domain mutations that has appeared over the last year and identify new questions, answers to old questions, and discuss new trends in clinical and laboratory based research.

RECENT FINDINGS

A concise summary of European LeukemiaNet guidelines for kinase domain mutation studies was published this year. A new controversial topic emerged: the relevance of IC50 data to guide second-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Although flaws in the methodology have been acknowledged, one group summarily rejected IC50 data and recommended that clinicians use individual patient comorbidities and drug safety profiles. The influence of kinase domain mutations on response to second-line and third-line TKI therapy was also published this year; unexpectedly, kinase domain mutations were found to have no effect on response or survival. However, the presence of a kinase domain mutation did influence survival following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Lastly, new findings from laboratories identified transcription factors BCL6 and STAT5 as potential new treatment targets.

SUMMARY

The last 12 months has brought much attention to clinical management of patients with kinase domain mutations and identified a new controversy concerning IC50 data use in the clinic. Kinase domain mutations do not appear to influence response to second-line and third-line response to TKI therapy. New targets that do not directly involve BCR-ABL added potential new therapeutic approaches.

Four-channel asymmetric Real-Time PCR hybridization probe assay: a rapid pre-screening method for critical BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations

OBJECTIVES

Within the laboratory protocols, used for the study of BCR-ABL resistance mutations in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with Imatinib, direct sequencing remains the reference method. Since the incidence of patients with a mutation-related loss of response is not very high, it is very useful in the routine laboratory to perform a fast pre-screening method.

DESIGN AND METHODS

With this in mind, we have designed a new technique, based on a single Real-Time FRET-based PCR, followed by a study of melting peaks. This new tool, developed in a LightCycler 2.0, combines four different fluorescence channels for the simultaneous detection, in a single close tube, of critical mutations within the ABL kinase domain.

RESULTS

Assay evaluation performed on 33 samples, previously genotyped by sequentiation, resulted in full concordance of results.

CONCLUSIONS

This new methodology detects in a few steps the presence of critical mutations associated to Imatinib resistance.

Mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapies in acute myeloid leukemia and chronic myeloid leukemia

Small molecule kinase inhibitors of BCR-ABL in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and of FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have been successful at achieving remissions in these diseases as monotherapy, but these leukemias do not initially respond in a subset of patients (primary resistance) and they progress in an additional group of patients after an initial response (secondary resistance). Resistance to these agents can be divided into mechanisms that allow reactivation kinase activity and those that bypass reliance on oncogenic signaling mediated by the target kinase. Elucidation of clinical resistance mechanisms to targeted therapies for patients can provide important insights into disease pathogenesis and signaling.

Poor response to second-line kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia patients with multiple low-level mutations, irrespective of their resistance profile

Specific imatinib-resistant BCR-ABL1 mutations (Y253H, E255K/V, T315I, F317L, and F359V/C) predict failure of second-line nilotinib or dasatinib therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia; however, such therapy also fails in approximately 40% of patients in the chronic phase of this disease who do not have these resistant mutations. We investigated whether sensitive mutation analysis could identify other poor-risk subgroups. Analysis was performed by direct sequencing and sensitive mass spectrometry on 220 imatinib-resistant patients before they began nilotinib or dasatinib therapy. Patients with resistant mutations by either method (n = 45) were excluded because inferior response was known. Of the remaining 175 patients, 19% had multiple mutations by mass spectrometry versus 9% by sequencing. Compared with 0 or 1 mutation, the presence of multiple mutations was associated with lower rates of complete cytogenetic response (50% vs 21%, P = .003) and major molecular response (31% vs 6%, P = .005) and a higher rate of new resistant mutations (25% vs 56%, P = .0009). Sensitive mutation analysis identified a poor-risk subgroup (15.5% of all patients) with multiple mutations not identified by standard screening.

Evolution of therapies for chronic myelogenous leukemia

The clinical outcome for patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) has changed dramatically in the past 15 years. This has been due to the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), compounds that inhibit the activity of the oncogenic BCR-ABL1 protein. Imatinib was the first TKI developed for CML, and it led to high rates of complete cytogenetic responses and improved survival for patients with this disease. However, approximately 35% of patients in chronic phase treated with imatinib will develop resistance or intolerance to this drug. The recognition of the problem of imatinib failure led to the design of second-generation TKI (dasatinib, nilotinib, and bosutinib). These drugs are highly active in the scenario of imatinib resistance or intolerance. More recently, both nilotinib and dasatinib were approved for frontline use in patients with chronic phase CML. Ponatinib represents the last generation of TKI, and this drug has been developed with the aim of targeting a specific BCR-ABL1 mutation (T315I), which arises in the setting of prolonged TKI therapy and leads to resistance to all commercially available TKI. Parallel to the development of specific drugs for treating CML, major advances were made in the field of disease monitoring and standardization of response criteria. In this review, we summarize how therapy with TKI for CML has evolved during the last decade.