Treatment with interferon beta-1b delays conversion to clinically definite and McDonald MS in patients with clinically isolated syndromes

FDA-approved preventative therapies for MS: first-line agents

Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis is highly variable in its presentation and disease course. The approach to initiating first-line preventative therapies must focus on individualizing treatment strategies. Careful discussion of available treatment options and appropriate expectations regarding outcomes is important to ensure a successful start. Early treatment is recommended, as is on-going monitoring of patients who may choose to forego therapy.

A Comparison of Optic Neuritis in Asian and in Western Countries

Acute demyelinating optic neuritis is a common optic neuropathy in young adults. There is usually satisfactory visual recovery. However, some patients convert to multiple sclerosis (MS) with potential sequelae of neurological disability. The Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial in the United States was conducted prospectively for 15 years and provided valuable data about clinical course, efficacy of steroid treatment, and risk of conversion to MS. Compared to the many studies in Western countries, research concerning optic neuritis in Asia has so far not been extensive. However, cumulative evidence shows that various features of this disorder differ between patients of Caucasian and Oriental descent. In this article we review up-to-date studies on optic neuritis in Asia and compare the results with prior literature. Prospective and multi-centre studies are currently underway in these regions to increase our understanding of optic neuritis in Asia.

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in response to interferon-beta therapy in multiple sclerosis

Interferon-beta (IFN-β) is one of the main first-line disease-modifying drugs indicated for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). The drug exhibits only limited effectiveness, and does not produce clinical benefits in around 20%-50% of patients. The availability of biomarkers would be beneficial for identification of patients at high risk of treatment failure, before initiation of therapy. Over the last 5 years, the search for such biomarkers has intensified and various promising candidates have been uncovered. Here, we review the main attempts undertaken to identify polymorphic variants associated with response to IFN-β therapy in MS by means of candidate gene approaches and whole-genome association scans. Despite substantial progress made in the field, there is still a long way to go before biomarker discoveries can be incorporated into clinical practice to predict IFN-β-responder status in MS patients.

[Clinically isolated syndrome: prognostic markers for conversion to multiple sclerosis and initiation of disease-modifying therapy]

Eighty-five percent of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) initially present with a single demyelinating event, referred to as a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) of the optic nerves, brainstem, or spinal cord. Following the onset of CIS, 38 to 68% of patients develop clinically definite MS (CDMS). Clinically silent brain lesions are seen on MRI in 50 to 80% of patients with CIS at first clinical presentation and 56 to 88% of CIS patients with abnormal MRI are at high risk of conversion to CDMS. Axonal damage, that is considered to underlie the development of persistent disability in MS, occurs in the CIS stage. Treatment with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), that might prevent axonal damage and result in slowing the progression of disability, should be initiated early during the disease course. Clinical trials demonstrated that early treatment of CIS patients with the standard dose of interferon beta (IFNbeta) significantly reduced the risk of progression to CDMS by 44 to 50%. After 5 years of followup, the results of the IFNbeta treatment extension studies confirmed that the risk of conversion to CDMS was significantly reduced by 35 to 37% in patients receiving early treatment compared to that in those receiving delayed treatment. However, not every patient with CIS will progress to CDMS; the IFNbeta treatment is appropriately indicated for CIS patients who are diagnosed with MS by McDonald diagnostic criteria based on MRI findings of dissemination in space and time and are at high risk for conversion to CDMS. Development of more reliable prognostic markers will enable DMTs to be targeted for those who are most likely to benefit.

Exacerbation history is associated with medication and appointment adherence in MS

Disease-modifying treatments are designed to prevent exacerbations in multiple sclerosis (MS). To date, few studies have examined the relationship between disease activity and treatment adherence in MS. The primary aim of this study was to examine the association between disease activity (e.g., annualized relapse rates), medication adherence, and appointment adherence in relapsing-remitting MS. Retrospective exacerbation and appointment data were collected and used to predict prospective medication adherence. Results indicated that patients with higher annualized relapse rates missed fewer doses of medication and were less likely to miss appointments. Conversely, patients with relatively stable disease were more likely to demonstrate poor medication adherence and poor appointment adherence. Patients who missed more appointments also missed more doses of their disease modifying medication. Future studies may wish to examine clinical methods designed to improve immunotherapy adherence among patients who are in relatively symptom-free stages of relapsing-remitting MS.

Effect of disease-modifying drugs on cortical lesions and atrophy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

To measure the effects of disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) on the development of cortical lesions (CL) and cortical atrophy in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

METHODS

RRMS patients (n = 165) were randomized to subcutaneous (sc) interferon (IFN) beta-1a (44 mcg three times weekly), intramuscular (im) IFN beta-1a (30 mcg weekly) or glatiramer acetate (GA; 20 mg daily). The reference population comprised 50 untreated patients. Clinical and MRI examinations were performed at baseline, 12 months and 24 months.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-one treated patients completed the study. After 12 months, 37/50 (74%) of untreated patients developed ≥ 1 new CL (mean 1.6), compared with 30/47 (64%) of im IFN beta-1a-treated patients (mean 1.2, p = 0.021), 24/48 (50%) of GA-treated patients (mean 0.8, p = 0.001) and 12/46 (26%) of sc IFN beta-1a-treated patients (mean 0.4, p < 0.001). After 24 months, ≥ 1 new CL was observed in 41/50 (82%) of untreated (mean 3.0), 34/47 (72%) of im IFN beta-1a-treated (mean 1.6, p < 0.001), 30/48 (62%) of GA-treated (mean 1.3, p < 0.001) and 24/46 (52%) of sc IFN beta-1a-treated patients (mean 0.8, p < 0.001). Mean grey matter fraction decrease in DMD-treated patients at 24 months ranged from 0.7 to 0.8 versus 1.0 in untreated patients (p = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

Disease-modifying drugs significantly decreased new CL development and cortical atrophy progression compared with untreated patients, with faster and more pronounced effects seen with sc IFN beta-1a than with im IFN beta-1a or GA.

Interferon-β-1b: a review of its use in multiple sclerosis

Interferon-β-1b has been used as a disease-modifying therapy in multiple sclerosis (MS) for many years. Although its mechanism of action in MS has not been fully elucidated, it appears to involve immunomodulatory effects mediated by interactions with specific receptors. Large, randomized, multicentre, clinical trials of 2-3.5 years' duration have demonstrated the efficacy of interferon-β-1b 250 μg subcutaneously every other day in patients with a first clinical event suggestive of MS (i.e. those with clinically isolated syndrome [CIS]) and in those with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). In terms of its efficacy on primary (or co-primary) endpoints, interferon-β-1b significantly reduced the risk of developing clinically definite MS compared with placebo in patients with CIS in the BENEFIT study. In patients with RRMS, interferon-β-1b was associated with a significantly lower annualized relapse rate and a significantly higher proportion of relapse-free patients compared with placebo in a registration trial conducted by the Interferon-β MS Study Group. The INCOMIN trial in patients with RRMS showed a significant advantage of interferon-β-1b over intramuscular interferon-β-1a in terms of the percentage of relapse- and progression-free patients and the proportion of patients without new MRI-documented lesions. Other active-comparator trials in RRMS used a variety of primary (or co-primary) endpoints and showed no significant differences between interferon-β-1b and either subcutaneous glatiramer acetate (BECOME and BEYOND trials) or subcutaneous interferon-β-1a (Danish MS Group trial) for these outcomes. In patients with secondary progressive MS (SPMS), the European Study Group showed that interferon-β-1b significantly increased the time to confirmed disease progression compared with placebo, although there was no significant between-group difference for this primary endpoint in a similar trial conducted by the North American Study Group. The studies allowed inclusion of patients with superimposed relapse, and both trials showed a significant reduction in annualized relapse rate with interferon-β-1b. The most frequently reported adverse events with interferon-β-1b are flu-like symptoms and injection-site reactions, which can usually be managed. The incidence of these adverse events generally declines markedly after the first year of treatment. Lymphopenia is the most frequently reported laboratory abnormality and occurs in the majority of patients. Depression, suicidal ideation and injection-site necrosis were the most serious adverse events reported with interferon-β-1b in clinical trials. Long-term safety data over a 16-year follow-up period showed no unexpected adverse events among patients treated with interferon-β-1b. Thus, interferon-β-1b is a well established, first-line, disease-modifying therapy that has demonstrated efficacy in newly emerging MS, RRMS and SPMS with superimposed relapse in well designed clinical trials, and has a generally manageable tolerability profile, with no unexpected adverse events after many years of follow-up.

Eye disorders in patients with multiple sclerosis: natural history and management

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a demyelinating disease of the central nervous system and leading cause of disability in young adults. Vision impairment is a common component of disability for this population of patients. Injury to the optic nerve, brainstem, and cerebellum leads to characteristic syndromes affecting both the afferent and efferent visual pathways. The objective of this review is to summarize the spectrum of eye disorders in patients with MS, their natural history, and current strategies for diagnosis and management. We emphasize the most common disorders including optic neuritis and internuclear ophthalmoparesis and include new techniques, such as optical coherence tomography, which promise to better our understanding of MS and its effects on the visual system.

New approaches in the management of multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a central nervous system chronic inflammatory disease that is characterized by an extensive and complex immune response. Scientific advances have occurred in immunology, pathophysiology, and diagnostic and clinical assessment tools, and recent discovery of unique therapeutic targets has spurred numerous Phase II and Phase III clinical trials. Reductions in MS relapse rates and improvements in T₂ or gadolinium-enhancing lesion burdens have been reported from Phase III trials that include fingolimod, alemtuzumab, cladribine, and rituximab. Promising Phase II trial data exist for teriflunomide, daclizumab, laquinimod, and fumarate. The optimism created by these favorable findings must be tempered with evaluation of the adverse effect profile produced by these new agents. Given the discovery of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy with the use of natalizumab, ongoing vigilance for rare and life-threatening reactions due to new agents should be paramount. Patients with MS often experience difficulty with ambulation, spasticity, and cognition. Recent clinical trial data from two Phase III dalfampridine-SR trials indicate certain patients receive benefits in ambulation. This article provides an overview of data from clinical trials of newer agents of potential benefit in MS.

Animal models of multiple sclerosis--potentials and limitations

Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is still the most widely accepted animal model of multiple sclerosis (MS). Different types of EAE have been developed in order to investigate pathogenetic, clinical and therapeutic aspects of the heterogenic human disease. Generally, investigations in EAE are more suitable for the analysis of immunogenetic elements (major histocompatibility complex restriction and candidate risk genes) and for the study of histopathological features (inflammation, demyelination and degeneration) of the disease than for screening of new treatments. Recent studies in new EAE models, especially in transgenic ones, have in connection with new analytical techniques such as microarray assays provided a deeper insight into the pathogenic cellular and molecular mechanisms of EAE and potentially of MS. For example, it was possible to better delineate the role of soluble pro-inflammatory (tumor necrosis factor-α, interferon-γ and interleukins 1, 12 and 23), anti-inflammatory (transforming growth factor-β and interleukins 4, 10, 27 and 35) and neurotrophic factors (ciliary neurotrophic factor and brain-derived neurotrophic factor). Also, the regulatory and effector functions of distinct immune cell subpopulations such as CD4+ Th1, Th2, Th3 and Th17 cells, CD4+FoxP3+ Treg cells, CD8+ Tc1 and Tc2, B cells and γδ+ T cells have been disclosed in more detail. The new insights may help to identify novel targets for the treatment of MS. However, translation of the experimental results into the clinical practice requires prudence and great caution.

Optic neuritis

Optic neuritis usually presents with painful monocular vision loss in younger patients. Spontaneous improvement in vision occurs over weeks, and treatment with high-dose intravenous steroids increases the rate but not extent of visual recovery. Risk of progression to multiple sclerosis (MS) is largely dictated by baseline brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Those with a normal MRI finding at the time of optic neuritis diagnosis have a lower rate of progression to multiple sclerosis than those with T2 hyperintense white matter lesions on MRI. High-dose intravenous steroids should be considered acutely in optic neuritis, and disease-modifying therapy should be considered in patients at high risk of MS as defined by MRI.

Prognostic value of cerebrospinal fluid analysis at the time of a first demyelinating event

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the value of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings for predicting conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis (CDMS).

METHODS

From a database of 447 patients with a first demyelinating event, the records of 208 patients less than 51 years old who had baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and CSF examinations and a follow-up of at least 1 year were included. A multivariable Cox model was used to assess the short-term risk of CDMS according to baseline CSF findings after adjustment for prognostic factors (including brain MRI) and to provide a simple classification for predicting CDMS.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 3.5 years, 141 (67.8%) patients converted to CDMS. In multivariate analysis, younger age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.44 [95% CI 1.02-2.01]), spatial dissemination on brain MRI (HR: 2.07 [95% CI 1.47-2.91]) and more than 4 WBC/mm³ in CSF (HR: 1.44 [95% CI 1.03-2.02]) were independently associated with CDMS. The Cox score obtained from these three predictors enabled patients to be divided into three groups with significant increased risks of CDMS at 1, 2 and 3 years; groups were classified as high-risk (64.7%, 77.4%, 96.1%), intermediate-risk (33.3%, 51.5%, 61.5%), and low-risk (11.1%, 18.3%, 40.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Age at onset, spatial dissemination on brain MRI and CSF white blood cell count are independently associated with short-term conversion to CDMS. The three proposed risk group classifications could be a useful tool to select patients for early therapeutic intervention.

Gender effects on intramuscular interferon beta-1a in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis: analysis of 1406 patients

Background: We aimed to evaluate effects of gender on efficacy and safety of intramuscular (IM) interferon beta (IFNβ)-1a in patients with relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) or clinically isolated syndromes (CIS) characteristic of early MS.

Methods: Pooled data from 1406 (1027 women; 379 men) patients enrolled in five clinical studies of IM IFNβ-1a were analyzed. One analysis examined data for all patients treated with IM IFNβ-1a from all studies. Separate analyses were conducted of pooled IM IFNβ-1a-treated groups from all studies and pooled IFNβ-1a-treated and placebo-treated patients from the placebo-controlled studies. Outcome measures included time to first relapse, annualized relapse rate, time to disability progression, number of gadolinium-enhanced lesions, adverse events, laboratory evaluations, and neutralizing antibodies.

Results: All efficacy assessments indicated similar treatment effects of IM IFNβ-1a in men and women with no significant treatment-by-gender interactions. Women reported more headaches, urinary tract infections, and depression in the analysis; however, these were also common in women who received placebo. Men reported more frequent flu-like symptoms in the placebo-controlled studies only. There were no other differences in the safety profile of IM IFNβ-1a between men and women.

Conclusions: We conclude that no significant gender-related differences were found in the efficacy and safety of IM IFNβ-1a in patients with RRMS or CIS.

Compliance with McDonald criteria and red flag recognition in a general neurology practice in Ireland

BACKGROUND

The revised McDonald criteria aim to simplify and speed the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS). An important principle of the criteria holds there should be no better explanation for the clinical presentation. In Miller et al.'s consensus statement on the differential diagnosis of MS, red flags are identified that may suggest a non-MS diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

All new patients with a practice diagnosis of MS were assessed for compliance with McDonald criteria. The group of patients not fulfilling criteria was followed up to assess compliance over time. At the end of the follow-up period, red flags were sought in the group of patients who remained McDonald criteria negative.

METHODS

Clinical notes and paraclinical tests were examined retrospectively for compliance with McDonald criteria and for the presence of red flags.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients were identified, with two lost to follow-up. Twenty-six (42%) patients fulfilled criteria at diagnosis. After 53 months follow-up, 47 (78%) patients fulfilled criteria. In the 13 (22%) patients who remain McDonald criteria negative, a total of 20 red flags were identified, ranging from one to six per patient. Alternative diagnoses were considered and further investigations performed in 10 patients with no significantly abnormal results.

CONCLUSION

Twenty-two percent of patients still do not fulfill McDonald criteria after 53 months. Dissemination in time was not proven in the majority of patients and the lack of follow-up neuroimaging was an important factor in this. Red flags may be useful in identifying alternative diagnoses, but the yield was low in our cohort.

Chemotherapeutics in the treatment of multiple sclerosis

The likely pathogenic mechanisms of multiple sclerosis (MS) provide a sound rationale for investigating the efficacy of drugs possessing immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory properties. With proven efficacy, safety and tolerability, interferon beta formulations and glatiramer acetate have become the mainstay of initial treatment for patients with relapsing forms of MS. More recently, natalizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody (mAb) against the cellular adhesion molecule α4-integrin, has been employed for patients with an inadequate response or lack of tolerability to an alternate MS therapy, or as initial therapy for patients with severe disease. Various agents initially developed for oncological indications, either as chemotherapeutics or mAbs, may also have current or future uses in MS treatment. Mitoxantrone is currently the only chemotherapeutic agent approved for treatment of MS in the United States, while in parts of Europe azathioprine is approved and widely used for MS treatment. Other chemotherapeutics that have been tested in MS to date include cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, cladribine, and the mAbs alemtuzumab and rituximab. While there has been varying evidence of efficacy for these compounds, each appears to be associated with serious risks that require careful consideration and management. Given the risks that have been demonstrated for available chemotherapeutic agents and while long-term postmarketing safety data are still not available for those agents in development, it seems prudent to carefully assess the possible use of chemotherapeutics in the treatment of MS. A thorough risk-benefit analysis is becoming increasingly important in the assessment of therapeutic options for this disabling disease.

Meeting Review: The management of multiple sclerosis in children: a European view

About 3—5% of all patients with multiple sclerosis experience the onset of their disease under the age of 16. A significant proportion of paediatric multiple sclerosis patients develop significant cognitive disturbances and persistent physical disability. The high relapse rate and the morbidity in the paediatric multiple sclerosis population has triggered the use of disease-modifying therapies that have been shown to reduce relapse rate, disease progression and cognitive decline in adult patients with multiple sclerosis. Hard evidence for the right treatment and its appropriate timing is scarce in paediatric multiple sclerosis. Nevertheless, expertise in this field has grown thanks to recent open-label trials and experience generated in specialized centres. In spring 2009, a first meeting was held in Rotterdam with clinicians from 11 European countries (one from Canada) that are all active in the management of paediatric multiple sclerosis. One of the aims was to generate a common view on the management of paediatric multiple sclerosis patients. The result of this meeting is presented here to help standardize treatment and to support clinicians with less experience in this field.

Modifications to the McDonald MRI dissemination in space criteria for use in Asians with classic multiple sclerosis: the Taiwanese experience

Background: The McDonald MRI dissemination in space criteria have been found to be less sensitive when applied to Asians with classic multiple sclerosis. The Asian neurological community thus proposed modifications to the criteria with reduction of minimal number of T2 lesions from nine to four, and removal of restriction on spinal cord lesion length and morphology for use in Asians.

Objective: The study is to examine the accuracy of modified MRI dissemination in space criteria for prediction of conversion from clinically isolated syndrome to definite multiple sclerosis according to patients’ baseline MRI.

Methods: From 2001 to 2007, we recruited 67 patients with clinically isolated syndrome. They had been followed-up until development of definite multiple sclerosis or remaining as clinically isolated syndrome for more than 2 years. The non-converters were taken as negative cases. The 67 patients’ baseline MRIs were evaluated by two radiologists and determined as either fulfilling or not fulfilling McDonald and modified MRI criteria for dissemination in space.

Results: Thirty-two patients converted to definite multiple sclerosis and 35 did not. The modified criteria are slightly more sensitive (53.1% vs. 50.0%) and accurate (77.6% vs. 76.1%) as compared with McDonald criteria. However, further reduction of the cutoff of abnormal MRI criteria from three of four to two of four criteria yields best sensitivity (71.9%) and accuracy (83.6%).

Conclusions: Modifications to the McDonald MRI dissemination in space criteria (by using fewer T2 lesions, removal of the restriction on the spinal cord lesion and reduction of the cutoff of MRI criteria) are more appropriate for use in the Taiwanese population for the diagnosis of classic multiple sclerosis.

Therapeutic strategies in childhood multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) in children and adolescents accounts for 3-10% of the whole MS population, and is characterized by a relapsing course in almost all cases. The frequency of relapses is higher than in adult onset MS, at least in the first years of evolution. The objective of treatment is to speed the recovery after a relapse, to prevent the occurrence of relapses, and to prevent disease progression and neurodegeneration. The use of drugs for MS in children and adolescents has not been studied in clinical trials, so their use is mainly based on results from trials in adults and from observational studies. There is a consensus to treat acute relapses with intravenous high-dose corticosteroids. The possibility of preventing relapses and disease progression is based on the use of immunomodulatory agents. Interferon-beta (IFNB) and glatiramer acetate (GA) have been demonstrated to be safe and well tolerated in pediatric MS patients, and also to reduce relapse rate and disease progression. Cyclophosphamide and natalizumab could be offered as second-line treatment in patients with a poor response to IFNB or GA. New oral and injectable drugs will be available in the near future: if safe and well tolerated in the long-term follow up of adults with MS, they could be tested in the pediatric MS population.

The role of glatiramer acetate in the early treatment of multiple sclerosis

The treatment of the underlying disease process causing multiple sclerosis has continued to evolve since the initial approval of interferon-beta-1b in 1993. Current emphasis is on early treatment, including treatment after a single clinical attack (clinically isolated syndrome). The assessment of which disease modifying medication to use as initial therapy has continued to remain a combination of science and the art of medicine. Equally important are the assessment of treatment failure and the subsequent choice of medication change. This article will present scientific information, as well as information about clinical decision making, about these choices, with emphasis on the changing role of glatiramer acetate in this process.

New developments in the treatment of optic neuritis

Acute optic neuritis (ON) has various etiologies. The most common presentation is inflammatory, demyelinating, idiopathic, or "typical" ON, which may be associated with multiple sclerosis. This must be differentiated from "atypical" causes of ON, which differ in their clinical presentation, natural history, management, and prognosis. Clinical "red flags" for an atypical cause of ON include absent or persistent pain, exudates and hemorrhages on fundoscopy, very severe, bilateral, or progressive visual loss, and failure to recover. In typical ON, steroids shorten the duration of the attack, but do not influence visual outcome. This is in contrast to atypical ON associated with conditions such as sarcoidosis and neuromyelitis optica, which require aggressive immunosuppression and sometimes plasma exchange. The visual prognosis of typical ON is generally good. The prognosis in atypical ON is more variable. New developments aimed at designing better treatments for patients who fail to recover are discussed, focusing on recent research elucidating mechanisms of damage and recovery in ON. Future therapeutic directions may include enhancing repair processes, such as remyelination or adaptive neuroplasticity, or alternative methods of immunomodulation. Pilot studies investigating the safety and proof-of-principle of stem cell treatment are currently underway.

Response to interferon in multiple sclerosis is related to lipid-specific oligoclonal IgM bands

The objective of this study was to investigate whether the presence of lipid-specific oligoclonal IgM bands (LS-OCMB) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) influences the response to treatment with beta-interferon in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients. We performed a collaborative prospective study including RRMS patients with brain MRI and LS-OCMB studies performed before starting interferon treatment. The primary endpoint was the risk of having a relapse after treatment initiation. Secondary endpoints included relapse rate, relapse-rate reduction, proportion of relapse-free patients and proportion of patients with sustained disability increase during follow-up. One-hundred and two patients were included. After a mean follow-up of 37.4 months, the risk of suffering a relapse was two-fold higher in patients with LS-OCMB (hazard ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.1-3.8). LS-OCMB+ patients showed lower reduction in relapse rate (51.8% versus 80.8%; p < 0.0001), higher relapse rate in the first year (0.8 versus 0.2; p = 0.001), lower proportion of relapse-free patients (25% versus 61.3%; p = 0.003), and higher proportion of patients with sustained 1.0 increase in the Expanded Disability Status Score (45% versus 12.9%; p = 0.0003). In conclusion, LS-OCMB can have an influence on the response to interferon treatment in RRMS patients. They could be used as a biological marker to predict high inflammatory activity after treatment.

Disease modifying agents for multiple sclerosis

Objective:

To summarize major clinical trials which evaluate the efficacy and safety data of approved disease modifying agents for the treatment of various types of multiple sclerosis.

Data Sources:

A MEDLINE (1966 to August 2008) search of clinical trials using the terms multiple sclerosis, interferon, glatiramer, mitoxantrone and natalizumab was performed. A manual bibliographic search was also conducted. English-language articles identified from the searches were evaluated. New agents under investigation in phase 3 clinical trials were identified using www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Study Selection & Data Extraction:

Relevant information was identified and selected based on clinical relevance and evidence-based strength. Prescribing information leaflets were used to provide usual dosage, contraindications, precautions, monitoring parameters and other relevant drug-specific information.

Data Synthesis:

Interferon beta products are more efficacious for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Interferon beta 1-b also delayed the time to diagnosis of definite multiple sclerosis and reduced brain lesion burden in patients with clinical isolated syndrome. Glatiramer and natalizumab have both established efficacy in relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis; whereas mitoxantrone is more commonly used in patients with advanced disease. There are limited data the comparative efficacy among different disease modifying agents. New agents currently under investigation have showed promising results and may offer more treatment options in the future.

Conclusions:

MS is a complex and devastating disease with challenging treatment considerations and approaches. Interferon beta products continue to be the mainstay of therapy in many patients, however, other treatments are proving to be at least as effective in the management of various types of MS. Newer compounds are being developed and studied with much anticipation and promise for the clinical management of the disease.

Progression on the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite in multiple sclerosis: what is the optimal cut-off for the three components?

For the Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW) and 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT), components of the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC), cut-off points of 20% change have previously been defined as meaningful endpoints of functional decline. Recently, however, a 15% change of MSFC components was introduced. The objective of this study was to determine optimal cut-offs for all MSFC components to indicate clinical disease progression in a primary progressive (PP) multiple sclerosis (MS) population. T25FW, 9HPT and the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) were performed in 161 patients with PPMS with a 2-year interval. Absolute and relative differences in test scores were calculated. For each cut-off point of relative change, proportions of patients who progressed (deterioration beyond cut-off value) and improved (improvement beyond cut-off value) were calculated. Further, we calculated the ratio of ‘improved’ versus ‘progressed’ patients. Line graphs were created indicating: percentage progressed patients, percentage improved patients, and ratio of improved versus progressed patients. The optimal cut-off was determined by searching the cut-off point with the lowest ratio of improved versus progressed patients, while at the same time capturing a substantial amount of progression. For both T25FW and 9HPT, the ratio between patients that improved and worsened clearly decreased between the cut-offs of 15% and 20%. For the PASAT, the ratio between patients improved and worsened was persistently poor. In conclusion, a cut-off of 20% for both T25FW and 9HPT has a better signal-to-noise ratio than lower values (e.g. 15%) and is therefore preferable for the assessment of disease progression. No satisfactory cut-off point for the PASAT could be determined.

[Radiologically isolated syndrome: multiple sclerosis based solely on MRI findings?]

Incidental brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings are the result of an increasing usage of MRI in the diagnostic work-up of patients. An adequate assessment of patients in which brain lesions typical for multiple sclerosis (MS) are determined but who have been asymptomatic so far is problematic, especially when Barkhof-Tintoré criteria for spatial dissemination are fulfilled and no other differential diagnosis can be confirmed. This entity, the so-called radiologically isolated syndrome, constitutes a major diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Two recent studies revealed that a subgroup of patients with radiologically isolated syndrome are at high risk for near-term development of MR-based progression and occurrence of the first clinical event. Hence, the radiologically isolated syndrome has to be classified as a possible preliminary phase of the clinical manifestation of MS in a subgroup of patients and entails in-depth therapeutic considerations. This article covers the current literature for this syndrome and, in the absence of official guidelines, provides a pragmatic diagnostic and therapeutic approach for patient management.

Update on the treatment options for multiple sclerosis

Recent progress in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) is remarkable, and the introduction of new therapies is yielding improvements in the management of MS. Furthermore, clinical trials with many different types of agents, especially selected monoclonal antibodies, have been undertaken or are ongoing, and some of the agents involved will probably be available as treatments for MS in the near future. Although these new and promising agents include targeted immunotherapies, some of them have limitations such as associated severe adverse events and the development of neutralizing antibodies. With regard to risk-benefit ratios, pharmacogenetics could shed light on inherited differences in drug metabolism and response, which would make individualized therapy possible in MS. Here, we review the recent progress in current therapeutic strategies for MS, and the potential options for future MS treatment.

Current and future disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis

The development of disease-modifying therapies (DMT) in multiple sclerosis (MS) has rapidly evolved over the last few years and continues to do so. Prior to the United States Food and Drug Administration approval of the immunomodulatory agent, interferon-beta1b in 1993, no other drug had been shown to alter the course of the disease in a controlled study of MS. At present, there are five licenced disease-modifying agents in MS - interferon-beta1b, interferon-beta1a, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab and mitoxantrone. All have shown significant therapeutic efficacy in large controlled trials. However, current therapies are only partially effective and are not free from adverse effects. Moreover, available DMTs are overwhelmingly biased in favour of those with relapsing-remitting disease. Effective treatment for progressive MS is severely limited, with only interferon-beta1b and mitoxantrone having licenced use in secondary progressive, but not primary progressive disease. Monoclonal antibodies, such as natalizumab selectively target immune pathways involved in the pathogenic process of MS. Alemtuzumab, daclizumab and rituximab are other notable monoclonal antibodies currently undergoing phase II and III trials in MS. Alemtuzumab has so far shown promising therapeutic benefit in relapsing disease, although immunological adverse effects have been a problem. Oral therapies have the benefit of improved tolerability and patient compliance compared with current parenteral treatments. Cladribine and fingolimod (FTY720) have shown encouraging results in their phase III clinical trials. It is also worth noting the evidence for starting DMT in patients with clinically isolated syndrome, whereby early treatment has shown to delay the onset of clinically definite MS in separate phase III studies.

Injectable interferon beta-1b for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is chronic inflammatory and demyelinating disease with either a progressive (10%–15%) or relapsing-remitting (85%–90%) course. The pathological hallmarks of MS are lesions of both white and grey matter in the central nervous system. The onset of the disease is usually around 30 years of age. The patients experience an acute focal neurologic dysfunction which is not characteristic, followed by partial or complete recovery. Acute episodes of neurologic dysfunction with diverse signs and symptoms will then recur throughout the life of a patient, with periods of partial or complete remission and clinical stability in between. Currently, there are several therapeutic options for MS with disease-modifying properties. Immunomodulatory therapy with interferon beta-1b (IFN-β1b) or -1a, glatiramer and natalizumab shows similar efficacy; in a resistant or intolerant patient, the most recently approved therapeutic option is mitoxantrone. IFN-β1b in patients with MS binds to specific receptors on surface of immune cells, changing the expression of several genes and leading to a decrease in quantity of cell-associated adhesion molecules, inhibition of major histocompatibility complex class II expression and reduction in inflammatory cells migration into the central nervous system. After 2 years of treatment, IFN-β1b reduces the risk of development of clinically defined MS from 45% (with placebo) to 28% (with IFN-β1b). It also reduces relapses for 34% (1.31 exacerbations annually with placebo and 0.9 with higher dose of IFN-β1b) and makes 31% more patients relapse-free. In secondary-progressive disease annual rate of progression is 3% lower with IFN-β1b. In recommended doses IFN-β1b causes the following frequent adverse effects: injection site reactions (redness, discoloration, inflammation, pain, necrosis and non-specific reactions), insomnia, influenza-like syndrome, asthenia, headache, myalgia, hypoesthesia, nausea, paresthesia, myasthenia, chills and depression. Efficacy of IFN-β1b in relapsing-remitting MS is higher than that of IFN-β1a, and similar to the efficacy of glatiramer acetate. These facts promote IFN-β1b as one of the most important drugs in the spectrum of immunological therapies for this debilitating disease.

Early treatment of multiple sclerosis: a Latin American experts meeting

Patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) by definition do not have multiple sclerosis (MS) but are at risk of developing it. While studies show earlier immunomodulating drug use is effective, treatment must consider likely patient prognosis. In this paper we review current diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment literature for patients with CIS within Latin American clinical settings. Latin American MS experts, convened by ACINDES (The Civil Association for Research and Development in Health), reviewed current CIS (and early MS) literature and drew consensus conclusions. Three subgroups addressed separate questionnaires on CIS issues: prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment. MRI can contribute to predicting MS risk in patients with CIS; in Latin America, investigation of haplotype presence associated with CIS would be appropriate. McDonald's criteria and subsequent revisions enable earlier, more accurate MS diagnosis. Type A evidence exists supporting all leading immunomodulating MS drugs for effective treatment of CIS with a high risk of conversion to MS. In conclusion, patients with CIS are usually young, with often-limited symptomatic manifestations, and must be adequately prepared to receive preventive treatment. This consensus review should contribute to the dialogue between physicians and patients.

Comparison of multifocal visual evoked potential, standard automated perimetry and optical coherence tomography in assessing visual pathway in multiple sclerosis patients

BACKGROUND

Multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEP) measure local response amplitude and latency in the field of vision.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the sensitivity of mfVEP, Humphrey visual field (HVF) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) in detecting visual abnormality in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.

METHODS

mfVEP, HVF, and OCT (retinal nerve fiber layer [RNFL]) were performed in 47 MS-ON eyes (last optic neuritis [ON] attack >or=6 months prior) and 65 MS-no-ON eyes without ON history. Criteria to define an eye as abnormal were: (1) mfVEP amplitude/latency - either amplitude or latency probability plots meeting cluster criteria with 95% specificity; (2) mfVEP amplitude or latency alone (specificity: 97% and 98%, respectively); and (3) HVF and OCT, mean deviation and RNFL thickness meeting p < 0.05, respectively.

RESULTS

MfVEP (amplitude/latency) identified more abnormality in MS-ON eyes (89%) than HVF (72%), OCT (62%), mfVEP amplitude (66%) or latency (67%) alone. Eighteen percent of MS-no-ON eyes were abnormal for both mfVEP (amplitude/latency) and HVF compared with 8% with OCT. Agreement between tests ranged from 60% to 79%. mfVEP (amplitude/latency) categorized an additional 15% of MS-ON eyes as abnormal compared with HVF and OCT combined.

CONCLUSIONS

mfVEP, which detects both demyelination (increased latency) and neural degeneration (reduced amplitude), revealed more abnormality than HVF or OCT in MS patients.

Accuracy of MRI criteria for dissemination in space for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis in patients with clinically isolated syndromes

The MRI Barkhof—Tintoré criteria have proved to be highly specific for predicting conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis in patients with clinically isolated syndromes (CIS), but lacked an optimal sensitivity. In order to improve the accuracy of early multiple sclerosis diagnosis, new imaging criteria have been proposed by Swanton et al. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of both MRI criteria for dissemination in space to predict conversion from CIS to clinically definite multiple sclerosis. We studied 79 CIS patients with baseline MRI performed within the first 3 months after onset. The sensitivity and specificity of both MRI criteria to predict conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis were analysed. The time to develop clinically definite multiple sclerosis from CIS onset, according to each imaging criteria, was studied by Kaplan—Meier survival curves. The overall conversion rate was 75.7% with a median follow-up of 57 months. Barkhof— Tintoré’s criteria showed a sensitivity of 71.9% and a specificity of 77.2%. Swanton’s criteria had a sensitivity of 91.2% and a specificity of 68.1%. Both MRI criteria identified CIS patients with higher risk and faster conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis. Swanton’s criteria are simpler and more sensitive than Barkhof—Tintoré‘s criteria, with a slight decrease in specificity. These results reinforce their use in multiple sclerosis diagnosis.

Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis, an autoimmune disorder causing the destruction of the impulse carrying myelin sheath of neurons, can be a debilitating and disabling disease. Symptomatic treatment has provided patients with relief through the use of antispasmodics, anticholinergics, and antidepressants, just to name a few, as well as disease treatment by decreasing progression of the illness by treating acute episodes through the use of corticosteroids, interferons, plasmapheresis, and other immunomodulators like glatiramer, mitoxantrone, and natalizumab. With medical advancements and the development of new treatments such as laquinimod, fampridine-SR, and several others, the future looks promising for those living with this illness.

Treatment of multiple sclerosis: role of natalizumab

The results on relapse rate and disease progression of available drugs for multiple sclerosis are shown, as well as their most relevant side effects. Results from pivotal and long-term follow-up studies support the efficacy and safety of interferons and glatiramer acetate. The treatment with mitoxantrone is limited by the occurrence of infertility, cardiotoxicy and leukaemia. Efficacy and tolerability of natalizumab are undisputable, compared to other drugs. Risks related to its treatment are PML, opportunistic infections, hepatotoxicity, melanoma, and their occurrence needs to be more exactly assessed by post-marketing surveillance. The principles of induction versus escalating therapy are also discussed. The final therapeutic decision is based on the evaluation of the disease state and prognosis, based on clinical and instrumental measures, and on the safety/efficacy profile of each treatment.

Decision-making for and impact of early immunomodulatory treatment: the Austrian Clinically Isolated Syndrome Study (ACISS)

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

When to start disease-modifying treatment (DMT) in patients with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) requires individual weighing of benefits versus possible burden of side effects and costs. How this occurs in a routine setting is barely known. The aim of the study was to investigate the decision-making process regarding immediate or later DMT and the ensuing impact on CIS patients in Austria.

METHODS

Demographic and (para) clinical characteristics of 296 CIS patients were recorded in 29 multiple sclerosis (MS) centres, and the patients' overall condition was rated on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Clinical follow-up and VAS ratings were repeated at 6-month intervals over 2 years. The decision for initiation of DMT was at the physician's and patient's discretion.

RESULTS

In 29% of patients, DMT was started within 3 months and this decision was independently associated with a T2-lesion number >or=9 on MRI and a worse VAS rating by the physician. DMT initiation in the subsequent 6 months was additionally associated with the presence of oligoclonal bands and rarely occurred thereafter. Adapted to the clinical course, later treatment was associated with the highest rate of conversion to clinically definite MS and greatest disability after 2 years whilst never treated patients fared best. Patient VAS ratings significantly improved during follow-up independently of treatment decisions.

CONCLUSION

The management of Austrian CIS patients relies strongly on MRI findings and the physicians' interpretation of the patients' overall situation which, after 2 years, depends primarily on the course of the disease.