351
|
Abstract
Stimulation has been performed experimentally and in small case series to treat epilepsy since the 1970s. Since the introduction of vagus nerve stimulation in 1997 and intracranial stimulation methods in 2011 into patient care, invasive stimulation has become a rapidly developing but infrequently used therapeutic option in Europe. Whereas vagus nerve stimulation is frequently used, particularly in the USA, intracranial stimulation differs in its regional availability. In order to improve the efficacy of stimulation, develop criteria for its use and assure low complication rates, a concentration on experienced centers and multicenter data acquisition and sharing are needed.Invasive electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring with subdural electrodes and especially with stereotactically implanted depth electrodes have been used increasingly more often for presurgical evaluation in recent years. They are applied when non-invasive diagnostics show insufficient results to exactly identify the location and extent of the epileptogenic zone or cannot be adequately distinguished from eloquent cortex areas. Complications include intracranial hemorrhage, infections and increased intracranial pressure but lasting deficits or even death are rare (≤2 %). The outcome of invasive monitoring is inferior to non-invasive monitoring because of the higher degree of complexity of the cases; however, it is far superior to the seizure-free rates achieved by anticonvulsant drug treatment alone.
Collapse
|
352
|
Tunkel AR, Hasbun R, Bhimraj A, Byers K, Kaplan SL, Scheld WM, van de Beek D, Bleck TP, Garton HJL, Zunt JR. 2017 Infectious Diseases Society of America's Clinical Practice Guidelines for Healthcare-Associated Ventriculitis and Meningitis. Clin Infect Dis 2017; 64:e34-e65. [PMID: 28203777 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciw861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 555] [Impact Index Per Article: 69.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2016] [Accepted: 12/16/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Standards and Practice Guidelines Committee collaborated with partner organizations to convene a panel of 10 experts on healthcare-associated ventriculitis and meningitis. The panel represented pediatric and adult specialists in the field of infectious diseases and represented other organizations whose members care for patients with healthcare-associated ventriculitis and meningitis (American Academy of Neurology, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, and Neurocritical Care Society). The panel reviewed articles based on literature reviews, review articles and book chapters, evaluated the evidence and drafted recommendations. Questions were reviewed and approved by panel members. Subcategories were included for some questions based on specific populations of patients who may develop healthcare-associated ventriculitis and meningitis after the following procedures or situations: cerebrospinal fluid shunts, cerebrospinal fluid drains, implantation of intrathecal infusion pumps, implantation of deep brain stimulation hardware, and general neurosurgery and head trauma. Recommendations were followed by the strength of the recommendation and the quality of the evidence supporting the recommendation. Many recommendations, however, were based on expert opinion because rigorous clinical data are not available. These guidelines represent a practical and useful approach to assist practicing clinicians in the management of these challenging infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allan R Tunkel
- Department of Internal Medicine-Infectious Diseases, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Rodrigo Hasbun
- Department of Infectious Diseases, the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Texas
| | - Adarsh Bhimraj
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio
| | - Karin Byers
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pennsylvania
| | - Sheldon L Kaplan
- Department of Pediatrics-Section of Infectious Diseases, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - W Michael Scheld
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
| | - Diederik van de Beek
- Department of Neurology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas P Bleck
- Departments of Neurological Sciences, Neurosurgery, Anesthesiology, and Medicine, Rush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Hugh J L Garton
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; and
| | - Joseph R Zunt
- Departments of Neurology, Global Health, Medicine-Infectious Diseases, and Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle
| |
Collapse
|
353
|
Crepeau AZ, Sirven JI. Management of Adult Onset Seizures. Mayo Clin Proc 2017; 92:306-318. [PMID: 28160877 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2016] [Revised: 11/11/2016] [Accepted: 11/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Epilepsy is a common yet heterogeneous disease. As a result, management often requires complex decision making. The ultimate goal of seizure management is for the patient to have no seizures and no considerable adverse effects from the treatment. Antiepileptic drugs are the mainstay of therapy, with more than 20 medications currently approved in the United States. Antiepileptic drug selection requires an understanding of the patient's epilepsy, along with consideration of comorbidities and potential for adverse events. After a patient has failed at least 2 appropriate antiepileptic drugs, they are determined to be medically refractory. At this time, additional therapy, including dietary, device, or surgical treatments, need to be considered, typically at a certified epilepsy center. All these treatments require consideration of the potential for seizure freedom, balanced against potential adverse effects, and can have a positive effect on seizure control and quality of life. This review article discussed the treatment options available for adults with epilepsy, including medical, surgical, dietary, and device therapies.
Collapse
|
354
|
Lee DJ, Izadi A, Melnik M, Seidl S, Echeverri A, Shahlaie K, Gurkoff GG. Stimulation of the medial septum improves performance in spatial learning following pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus. Epilepsy Res 2017; 130:53-63. [PMID: 28152425 DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2017.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2016] [Revised: 12/22/2016] [Accepted: 01/09/2017] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Temporal lobe epilepsy often leads to hippocampal sclerosis and persistent cognitive deficits, including difficulty with learning and memory. Hippocampal theta oscillations are critical in optimizing hippocampal function and facilitating plasticity. We hypothesized that pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus would disrupt oscillations and behavioral performance and that electrical neuromodulation to entrain theta would improve cognition specifically in injured rats. Rats received a pilocarpine (n=30) or saline injection (n=27) and unilateral bi-polar electrodes were implanted into the medial septum and hippocampus the following day. Hippocampal and septal theta were recorded in a Plexiglas box over the first week following implantation. Control and pilocarpine-treated rats were split into stimulation (continuous 7.7Hz, 80μA, 1ms pulse width) and non-stimulation groups for behavioral analysis. Continuous stimulation was initiated one-minute prior to and throughout an object exploration task (post-injury day seven) and again for each of six trials on the Barnes maze (post-injury days 12-14). There was a significant reduction in hippocampal theta power (p<0.05) and percentage of time oscillating in theta (p<0.05). In addition there was a significant decrease in object exploration in rats post-pilocarpine (p<0.05) and an impairment in spatial learning. Specifically, pilocarpine-treated rats were more likely to use random search strategies (p<0.001) and had an increase in latency to find the hidden platform (p<0.05) on the Barnes maze. Stimulation of the medial septum at 7.7Hz in pilocarpine-treated rats resulted in performance similar to shams in both the object recognition and Barnes maze tasks. Stimulation of sham rats resulted in impaired object exploration (p<0.05) with no difference in Barnes maze latency or strategy. In conclusion, pilocarpine-induced seizures diminished hippocampal oscillations and impaired performance in both an object exploration and a spatial memory task in pilocarpine-treated rats. Theta stimulation at 7.7Hz improved behavioral outcome on the Barnes maze task; this improvement in function was not related to a general cognitive enhancement, as shams did not benefit from stimulation. Therefore, stimulation of the medial septum represents an exciting target to improve behavioral outcome in patients with epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darrin J Lee
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UC Davis School of Medicine, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3740, Sacramento, CA 95817, United States
| | - Ali Izadi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UC Davis School of Medicine, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3740, Sacramento, CA 95817, United States; Center for Neuroscience, University of California, 1544 Newton Court, Davis, CA 95618, United States.
| | - Mikhail Melnik
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UC Davis School of Medicine, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3740, Sacramento, CA 95817, United States.
| | - Stacey Seidl
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UC Davis School of Medicine, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3740, Sacramento, CA 95817, United States; Center for Neuroscience, University of California, 1544 Newton Court, Davis, CA 95618, United States.
| | - Angela Echeverri
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UC Davis School of Medicine, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3740, Sacramento, CA 95817, United States.
| | - Kiarash Shahlaie
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UC Davis School of Medicine, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3740, Sacramento, CA 95817, United States; Center for Neuroscience, University of California, 1544 Newton Court, Davis, CA 95618, United States.
| | - Gene G Gurkoff
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UC Davis School of Medicine, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3740, Sacramento, CA 95817, United States; Center for Neuroscience, University of California, 1544 Newton Court, Davis, CA 95618, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
355
|
Cendejas Zaragoza L, Byrne RW, Rossi MA. Pre-implant modeling of depth lead placement in white matter for maximizing the extent of cortical activation during direct neurostimulation therapy. Neurol Res 2017; 39:198-211. [DOI: 10.1080/01616412.2016.1266429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Richard W. Byrne
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Marvin A. Rossi
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
356
|
Schulze-Bonhage A. Brain stimulation as a neuromodulatory epilepsy therapy. Seizure 2017; 44:169-175. [DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2016.10.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2016] [Revised: 10/27/2016] [Accepted: 10/27/2016] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
|
357
|
Carrette S, Boon P, Vonck K. A prestimulation evaluation protocol for patients with drug resistant epilepsy. Seizure 2017; 44:137-142. [DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2016.10.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2016] [Accepted: 10/16/2016] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
|
358
|
Valentín A, Selway RP, Amarouche M, Mundil N, Ughratdar I, Ayoubian L, Martín-López D, Kazi F, Dar T, Jiménez-Jiménez D, Hughes E, Alarcón G. Intracranial stimulation for children with epilepsy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2017; 21:223-231. [PMID: 27840024 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2016.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2016] [Revised: 10/19/2016] [Accepted: 10/24/2016] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the efficacy of intracranial stimulation to treat refractory epilepsy in children. METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of a pilot study on all 8 children who had intracranial electrical stimulation for the investigation and treatment of refractory epilepsy at King's College Hospital between 2014 and 2015. Five children (one with temporal lobe epilepsy and four with frontal lobe epilepsy) had subacute cortical stimulation (SCS) for a period of 20-161 h during intracranial video-telemetry. Efficacy of stimulation was evaluated by counting interictal discharges and seizures. Two children had thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the centromedian nucleus (one with idiopathic generalized epilepsy, one with presumed symptomatic generalized epilepsy), and one child on the anterior nucleus (right fronto-temporal epilepsy). The incidence of interictal discharges was evaluated visually and quantified automatically. RESULTS Among the three children with DBS, two had >60% improvement in seizure frequency and severity and one had no improvement. Among the five children with SCS, four showed improvement in seizure frequency (>50%) and one chid did not show improvement. Procedures were well tolerated by children. CONCLUSION Cortical and thalamic stimulation appear to be effective and well tolerated in children with refractory epilepsy. SCS can be used to identify the focus and predict the effects of resective surgery or chronic cortical stimulation. Further larger studies are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Valentín
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
| | - Richard P Selway
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Meriem Amarouche
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Nilesh Mundil
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Ismail Ughratdar
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Leila Ayoubian
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| | - David Martín-López
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Kingston Hospital NHS FT, London, UK; Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Farhana Kazi
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Talib Dar
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| | - Diego Jiménez-Jiménez
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK; School of Medicine, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Elaine Hughes
- Department of Paediatric Neurosciences, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK; Department of Paediatric Neurology, Evelina Children's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Gonzalo Alarcón
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK; Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Neuroscience Institute, Academic Health Systems Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| |
Collapse
|
359
|
Luan G, Wang X. Nondrug Treatment for Refractory Status Epilepticus. REFRACTORY STATUS EPILEPTICUS 2017:247-273. [DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-5125-8_7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2025]
|
360
|
Lane MA, Kahlenberg CA, Li Z, Kulandaival K, Secore KL, Thadani VM, Bujarski KA, Kobylarz EJ, Roberts DW, Tosteson TD, Jobst BC. The implantation effect: delay in seizure occurrence with implantation of intracranial electrodes. Acta Neurol Scand 2017; 135:115-121. [PMID: 27531652 DOI: 10.1111/ane.12662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A transient decrease in seizure frequency has been identified during therapeutic brain stimulation trials with stimulator in patients in the inactive sham group. This study was performed to examine whether the implantation of intracranial electrodes decreases seizure occurrence and explores factors that may be associated. METHODS A retrospective review of 193 patients was performed, all evaluated with both scalp video EEG monitoring and intracranial EEG (iEEG) monitoring. Data about the number of seizures per day during the monitoring period, the number of days until the first seizure, anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs), pain medications, types of implanted electrodes, and anesthetic agents were reviewed. We conducted a repeated measure analysis for counted data using generalized estimating equations with a log-link function and adjustment for number of days and anti-epileptic medication load on the previous day to compare seizure frequencies between scalp and iEEG monitoring. RESULTS The time to the first seizure was significantly prolonged during iEEG monitoring as compared to scalp monitoring after correction for AED withdrawal (hazard ratio: 0.81, CI 0.69-0.96). During scalp video EEG monitoring, patients experienced an average of 1.09 seizures/day vs 1.27 seizures/day during iEEG monitoring (P=.066). There was no significant difference in seizure frequency in patients that received craniotomy vs burr holes only for intracranial implantation. An increasing number of electrodes implanted increased the delay to seizures (P=.01). Of all anesthetic agents used, desflurane seemed to have an anticonvulsive effect compared to other anesthetics (P=.006). Pain medication did not influence delay to seizures. SIGNIFICANCE Seizures are delayed during iEEG as opposed to scalp monitoring illustrating the "implantation effect" previously observed. Surgical planning should account for longer monitoring periods, particularly when using larger intracranial arrays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. A. Lane
- Department of Neurology; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center; Lebanon NH USA
| | - C. A. Kahlenberg
- Department of Neurology; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center; Lebanon NH USA
| | - Z. Li
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center; Biostatistics Shared Resource; Lebanon NH USA
| | - K. Kulandaival
- Department of Neurology; Hanemann Hospital; Philadelphia PA USA
| | - K. L. Secore
- Department of Neurology; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center; Lebanon NH USA
| | - V. M. Thadani
- Department of Neurology; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center; Lebanon NH USA
| | - K. A. Bujarski
- Department of Neurology; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center; Lebanon NH USA
| | - E. J. Kobylarz
- Department of Neurology; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center; Lebanon NH USA
| | - D. W. Roberts
- Department of Neurosurgery; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center; Lebanon NH USA
| | - T. D. Tosteson
- Division of Biostatistics; Department of Biomedical Data Science; Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth; Hanover NH USA
| | - B. C. Jobst
- Department of Neurology; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center; Lebanon NH USA
| |
Collapse
|
361
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Localization of focal epileptic brain is critical for successful epilepsy surgery and focal brain stimulation. Despite significant progress, roughly half of all patients undergoing focal surgical resection, and most patients receiving focal electrical stimulation, are not seizure free. There is intense interest in high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) recorded with intracranial electroencephalography as potential biomarkers to improve epileptogenic brain localization, resective surgery, and focal electrical stimulation. The present review examines the evidence that HFOs are clinically useful biomarkers. RECENT FINDINGS Performing the PubMed search 'High-Frequency Oscillations and Epilepsy' for 2013-2015 identifies 308 articles exploring HFO characteristics, physiological significance, and potential clinical applications. SUMMARY There is strong evidence that HFOs are spatially associated with epileptic brain. There remain, however, significant challenges for clinical translation of HFOs as epileptogenic brain biomarkers: Differentiating true HFO from the high-frequency power changes associated with increased neuronal firing and bandpass filtering sharp transients. Distinguishing pathological HFO from normal physiological HFO. Classifying tissue under individual electrodes as normal or pathological. Sharing data and algorithms so research results can be reproduced across laboratories. Multicenter prospective trials to provide definitive evidence of clinical utility.
Collapse
|
362
|
Ung H, Davis KA, Wulsin D, Wagenaar J, Fox E, McDonnell JJ, Patterson N, Vite CH, Worrell G, Litt B. Temporal behavior of seizures and interictal bursts in prolonged intracranial recordings from epileptic canines. Epilepsia 2016; 57:1949-1957. [PMID: 27807850 DOI: 10.1111/epi.13591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Epilepsy is a chronic disorder, but seizure recordings are usually obtained in the acute setting. The chronic behavior of seizures and the interictal bursts that sometimes initiate them is unknown. We investigate the variability of these electrographic patterns over an extended period of time using chronic intracranial recordings in canine epilepsy. METHODS Continuous, yearlong intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) recordings from four dogs with naturally occurring epilepsy were analyzed for seizures and interictal bursts. Following automated detection and clinician verification of interictal bursts and seizures, temporal trends of seizures, burst count, and burst-burst similarities were determined. One dog developed status epilepticus, the recordings of which were also investigated. RESULTS Multiple seizure types, determined by onset channels, were observed in each dog, with significant temporal variation between types. The first 14 days of invasive recording, analogous to the average duration of clinical invasive recordings in humans, did not capture the entirety of seizure types. Seizures typically occurred in clusters, and isolated seizures were rare. The count and dynamics of interictal bursts form distinct groups and do not stabilize until several weeks after implantation. SIGNIFICANCE There is significant temporal variability in seizures and interictal bursts after electrode implantation that requires several weeks to reach steady state. These findings, comparable to those reported in humans implanted with the NeuroPace Responsive Neurostimulator System (RNS) device, suggest that transient network changes following electrode implantation may need to be taken into account when interpreting or analyzing iEEG during evaluation for epilepsy surgery. Chronic, ambulatory iEEG may be better suited to accurately map epileptic networks in appropriate individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hoameng Ung
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Kathryn A Davis
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.,Penn Epilepsy Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Drausin Wulsin
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Joost Wagenaar
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Emily Fox
- Department of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A
| | - John J McDonnell
- School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Ned Patterson
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, U.S.A
| | - Charles H Vite
- School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Gregory Worrell
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A
| | - Brian Litt
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.,Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.,Penn Epilepsy Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
363
|
Gooneratne IK, Green AL, Dugan P, Sen A, Franzini A, Aziz T, Cheeran B. Comparing neurostimulation technologies in refractory focal-onset epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2016; 87:1174-1182. [PMID: 27516384 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2016-313297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2016] [Accepted: 07/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
For patients with pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy in whom surgical resection of the epileptogenic focus fails or was not feasible in the first place, there were few therapeutic options. Increasingly, neurostimulation provides an alternative treatment strategy for these patients. Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) is well established. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) and cortical responsive stimulation (CRS) are newer neurostimulation therapies with recently published long-term efficacy and safety data. In this literature review, we introduce these therapies to a non-specialist audience. Furthermore, we compare and contrast long-term (5-year) outcomes of newer neurostimulation techniques with the more established VNS. A search to identify all studies reporting long-term efficacy (>5 years) of VNS, CRS and DBS in patients with refractory focal/partial epilepsy was conducted using PubMed and Cochrane databases. The outcomes compared were responder rate, percentage seizure frequency reduction, seizure freedom, adverse events, neuropsychological outcome and quality of life. We identified 1 study for DBS, 1 study for CRS and 4 studies for VNS. All neurostimulation technologies showed long-term efficacy, with progressively better seizure control over time. Sustained improvement in quality of life measures was demonstrated in all modalities. Intracranial neurostimulation had a greater side effect profile compared with extracranial stimulation, though all forms of stimulation are safe. Methodological differences between the studies mean that direct comparisons are not straightforward. We have synthesised the findings of this review into a pragmatic decision tree, to guide the further management of the individual patient with pharmacoresistant focal-onset epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inuka Kishara Gooneratne
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Oxford Epilepsy Research Group, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Alexander L Green
- Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Department of Neurosurgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Patricia Dugan
- NYU Langone Medical Center, Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Arjune Sen
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Oxford Epilepsy Research Group, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Tipu Aziz
- Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Department of Neurosurgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Binith Cheeran
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Oxford Epilepsy Research Group, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
364
|
Klein E. Informed Consent in Implantable BCI Research: Identifying Risks and Exploring Meaning. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 2016; 22:1299-1317. [PMID: 26497727 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-015-9712-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2015] [Accepted: 10/19/2015] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Implantable brain-computer interface (BCI) technology is an expanding area of engineering research now moving into clinical application. Ensuring meaningful informed consent in implantable BCI research is an ethical imperative. The emerging and rapidly evolving nature of implantable BCI research makes identification of risks, a critical component of informed consent, a challenge. In this paper, 6 core risk domains relevant to implantable BCI research are identified-short and long term safety, cognitive and communicative impairment, inappropriate expectations, involuntariness, affective impairment, and privacy and security. Work in deep brain stimulation provides a useful starting point for understanding this core set of risks in implantable BCI. Three further risk domains-risks pertaining to identity, agency, and stigma-are identified. These risks are not typically part of formalized consent processes. It is important as informed consent practices are further developed for implantable BCI research that attention be paid not just to disclosing core research risks but exploring the meaning of BCI research with potential participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eran Klein
- Department of Philosophy and Center for Sensorimotor Neural Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
- Department of Neurology, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
365
|
Abstract
Nosocomial meningitis can occur in association with central nervous system (CNS) devices such as cerebrospinal shunts or drains, intrathecal pumps, and deep brain stimulators and carry substantial morbidity and mortality. Diagnosing and treating these infections may be challenging to physicians as cerebrospinal fluid cultures may be negative due to previous antibiotic therapy and cerebrospinal abnormalities may be secondary to the primary neurosurgical issue that prompted the placement of the CNS device (e.g., "chemical meningitis" due to intracranial hemorrhage). Besides antibiotic therapy given intravenously and sometimes intrathecally, removal of the device with repeat cultures prior to re-implantation is key in achieving successful outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo Hasbun
- Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St. MSB 2.112, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
366
|
Abstract
Closed-loop, responsive focal brain stimulation provides a new treatment option for patients with refractory partial onset seizures who are not good candidates for potentially curative epilepsy surgery. The first responsive brain neurostimulator (RNS® System, NeuroPace), provides stimulation directly to the seizure focus when abnormal electrocorticographic is detected. Seizure reductions of 44% at one year increase to 60 to 66% at years 3 to 6 of treatment. There is no negative impact on cognition and mood. Risks are similar to other implanted medical devices and therapeutic stimulation is not perceived.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha J Morrell
- NeuroPace, Inc, 455 North Bernardo Avenue, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Casey Halpern
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive A301, MC 5325, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
367
|
Pais-Vieira M, Yadav AP, Moreira D, Guggenmos D, Santos A, Lebedev M, Nicolelis MAL. A Closed Loop Brain-machine Interface for Epilepsy Control Using Dorsal Column Electrical Stimulation. Sci Rep 2016; 6:32814. [PMID: 27605389 PMCID: PMC5015048 DOI: 10.1038/srep32814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2016] [Accepted: 08/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Although electrical neurostimulation has been proposed as an alternative treatment for drug-resistant cases of epilepsy, current procedures such as deep brain stimulation, vagus, and trigeminal nerve stimulation are effective only in a fraction of the patients. Here we demonstrate a closed loop brain-machine interface that delivers electrical stimulation to the dorsal column (DCS) of the spinal cord to suppress epileptic seizures. Rats were implanted with cortical recording microelectrodes and spinal cord stimulating electrodes, and then injected with pentylenetetrazole to induce seizures. Seizures were detected in real time from cortical local field potentials, after which DCS was applied. This method decreased seizure episode frequency by 44% and seizure duration by 38%. We argue that the therapeutic effect of DCS is related to modulation of cortical theta waves, and propose that this closed-loop interface has the potential to become an effective and semi-invasive treatment for refractory epilepsy and other neurological disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel Pais-Vieira
- Department of Neurobiology Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Saúde, Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal
- Instituto de Ciências da Vida e da Saúde, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal
| | - Amol P. Yadav
- Department of Neurobiology Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Derek Moreira
- Department of Neurobiology Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - David Guggenmos
- Department of Neurobiology Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Amílcar Santos
- Department of Neurobiology Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Mikhail Lebedev
- Department of Biomedical Engineering Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Duke Center for Neuroengineering Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Miguel A. L. Nicolelis
- Department of Neurobiology Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Duke Center for Neuroengineering Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Edmond and Lily Safra International Institute of Neuroscience of Natal, Natal, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
368
|
Ledesma J, Mnatsakanyan L, Lin JJ, Sen-Gupta I, Sazgar M, Hsu FP, Vadera S. Responsive Neurostimulation System (RNS) in setting of cranioplasty and history of multiple craniotomies. INTERDISCIPLINARY NEUROSURGERY 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.inat.2016.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
|
369
|
Abstract
Purpose of review Technological advance has revolutionized epilepsy management recently. Herein, we review some recent developments. Recent findings Responsive neurostimulation (Food and Drug Administration [FDA]-approved 2013) works by continuous analysis of brain rhythms and direct brain stimulation on detecting patterns thought to be epileptogenic, thereby aborting seizures. Cardio-responsive vagus nerve stimulation (FDA-approved 2015) is an improvement over traditional vagus nerve stimulation systems, taking advantage of the fact that 80% of seizures are associated with tachycardia. Automated tachycardia detection leads to vagus nerve stimulation to abort seizures. In MRI-guided stereotactic laser ablation (developed 2012), a directed laser emitting fiberoptic catheter is used to ablate epileptogenic lesions. The procedure can be completed in 3 to 4 hours, potentially under local anesthesia and with next-day discharge. Perampanel (FDA-approved 2012) is a promising new class of AMPA (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid)-antagonist antiseizure therapy. Meanwhile, a millennia-old remedy for epilepsy, cannabis, is staging a comeback with recent legal and social permissiveness accelerating research into this use. Summary The coming years will demonstrate how these recent advances in device and drug management will improve the care of epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chutima Saipetch
- Baylor College of Medicine (CS), Houston, TX; Emory University (ES), Atlanta, GA; and Baylor College of Medicine and the VA Medical Center (ZH), Houston, TX
| | - Ezekiel Sachs
- Baylor College of Medicine (CS), Houston, TX; Emory University (ES), Atlanta, GA; and Baylor College of Medicine and the VA Medical Center (ZH), Houston, TX
| | - Zulfi Haneef
- Baylor College of Medicine (CS), Houston, TX; Emory University (ES), Atlanta, GA; and Baylor College of Medicine and the VA Medical Center (ZH), Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
370
|
Jetté N, Sander JW, Keezer MR. Surgical treatment for epilepsy: the potential gap between evidence and practice. Lancet Neurol 2016; 15:982-994. [DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(16)30127-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2016] [Revised: 06/07/2016] [Accepted: 06/08/2016] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
|
371
|
Johnson EL, Krauss GL. Evaluating and Treating Epilepsy Based on Clinical Subgroups. Neurol Clin 2016; 34:595-610. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ncl.2016.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
372
|
Jehi L, Jetté N. Not all that glitters is gold: A guide to surgical trials in epilepsy. Epilepsia Open 2016; 1:22-36. [PMID: 29588926 PMCID: PMC5867837 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/16/2016] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Epilepsy surgery is often the only effective treatment in appropriately selected patients with drug‐resistant epilepsy, a disease affecting about 30% of those with epilepsy. We review the evidence supporting the use of epilepsy surgery, with a focus on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Second, we identify gaps in knowledge about the benefits of epilepsy surgery for certain populations, the challenges of individualizing the choice of surgery, and our lack of understanding of the mechanisms of surgical outcomes. We conducted a search (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, Clinicaltrials.gov) on March 2, 2016, to identify epilepsy surgery RCTs, systematic reviews, or health technology assessments (HTAs). Abstracts were screened to identify resective, palliative (e.g., corpus callosotomy, multiple subpial transection [MST]), ablative (e.g., Laser interstitial thermal therapy [LITT], gamma knife radiosurgery [RS]), and neuromodulation (e.g., cerebellar stimulation [CS], hippocampal stimulation [HS], repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation [rTMS], responsive neurostimulation [RNS], thalamic stimulation [TS], trigeminal nerve stimulation [TNS], and vagal nerve stimulation [VNS]) RCTs. Study characteristics and outcomes were extracted. Knowledge gaps were identified. Of 1,205 abstracts, 20 RCTs were identified (resective surgery including corpus callosotomy [n = 7], MST [n = 0], RS [n = 1, 3 papers], LITT [n = 0], CS [n = 1], HS [n = 2], RNS [n = 1], rTMS [n = 1], TNS [n = 1], TS [n = 1], and VNS [n = 5]). Most studies targeted patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and none examined the effectiveness of resective surgical therapies in patients with extra‐TLE (ETLE) or with specific lesions aside from mesial temporal lobe sclerosis. No pediatric surgical RCTs were identified except for VNS. Few RCTs address the effectiveness of surgery in epilepsy and most are of limited generalizability. Future studies are needed to compare the effectiveness of different surgical strategies, better understand the mechanisms of surgical outcomes, and define the ideal surgical approaches, particularly for patients with high or very low cognitive function, normal imaging, or ETLE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Jehi
- Epilepsy Center Cleveland Clinic Neurological Institute Cleveland Ohio U.S.A
| | - Nathalie Jetté
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Hotchkiss Brain Institute Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.,Department of Community Health Sciences and O'Brien Institute for Public Health Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada
| |
Collapse
|
373
|
Choy M, Duffy BA, Lee JH. Optogenetic study of networks in epilepsy. J Neurosci Res 2016; 95:2325-2335. [PMID: 27413006 PMCID: PMC5548626 DOI: 10.1002/jnr.23767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2016] [Revised: 04/27/2016] [Accepted: 04/28/2016] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Currently, approximately 30% of patients with epilepsy do not have adequate seizure control. A greater understanding of the underlying mechanisms by which seizures start or propagate could lead to new therapeutic strategies. The recent development of optogenetics, because of its unprecedented precision for controlling activity within distinct neuronal populations, has revolutionized neuroscience, including epilepsy research. This Review discusses recent breakthroughs made with optogenetics in epilepsy research. These breakthroughs include new insights into the key roles that different cell types play in mediating seizures as well as in the development of epilepsy. Subsequently, we discuss how targeting different brain regions and cell populations has opened up the possibility of highly specific therapies that can stop seizures on demand. Finally, we illustrate how combining newly available neuroscience tools with whole-brain imaging techniques will allow researchers to understand better the spread of seizures on a network level. © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Neuroscience Research Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- ManKin Choy
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Ben A Duffy
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Jin Hyung Lee
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California.,Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California.,Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California.,Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
374
|
Spencer DC, Sun FT, Brown SN, Jobst BC, Fountain NB, Wong VSS, Mirro EA, Quigg M. Circadian and ultradian patterns of epileptiform discharges differ by seizure-onset location during long-term ambulatory intracranial monitoring. Epilepsia 2016; 57:1495-502. [DOI: 10.1111/epi.13455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sarah N. Brown
- Oregon Health & Science University; Portland Oregon U.S.A
| | - Barbara C. Jobst
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth; Lebanon New Hampshire U.S.A
| | | | | | | | - Mark Quigg
- University of Virginia; Charlottesville Virginia U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
375
|
Holmes GL, Noebels JL. The Epilepsy Spectrum: Targeting Future Research Challenges. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2016; 6:6/7/a028043. [PMID: 27371672 DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a028043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
There have been tremendous recent advances in our understanding of the biological underpinnings of epilepsy and associated comorbidities that justify its representation as a spectrum disorder. Advances in genetics, electrophysiology, and neuroimaging have greatly improved our ability to differentiate, diagnose, and treat individuals with epilepsy. However, we have made little overall progress in preventing epilepsy, and the number of patients who are cured remains small. Likewise, the comorbidities of epilepsy are often underdiagnosed or not adequately treated. In this article, we suggest a few areas in which additional research will likely pay big dividends for patients and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory L Holmes
- Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont 05405
| | - Jeffrey L Noebels
- Developmental Neurogenetics Laboratory, Departments of Neurology, Neuroscience, and Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030
| |
Collapse
|
376
|
Carrette S, Boon P, Dekeyser C, Klooster DCW, Carrette E, Meurs A, Raedt R, Baeken C, Vanhove C, Aldenkamp AP, Vonck K. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of refractory epilepsy. Expert Rev Neurother 2016; 16:1093-110. [DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2016.1197119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
377
|
Çavuş I, Romanyshyn JC, Kennard JT, Farooque P, Williamson A, Eid T, Spencer SS, Duckrow R, Dziura J, Spencer DD. Elevated basal glutamate and unchanged glutamine and GABA in refractory epilepsy: Microdialysis study of 79 patients at the yale epilepsy surgery program. Ann Neurol 2016; 80:35-45. [PMID: 27129611 DOI: 10.1002/ana.24673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2015] [Revised: 03/19/2016] [Accepted: 04/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Aberrant glutamate and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) neurotransmission contribute to seizure generation and the epileptic state. However, whether levels of these neurochemicals are abnormal in epileptic patients is unknown. Here, we report on interictal levels of glutamate, glutamine, and GABA in epilepsy patients at seizure onset and nonepileptic sites, cortical lesions, and from patients with poorly localized neocortical epilepsies. METHODS Subjects (n = 79) were medically refractory epilepsy patients undergoing intracranial electroencephalogram evaluation. Microdialysis probes (n = 125) coupled to depth electrodes were implanted within suspected seizure onset sites and microdialysis samples were obtained during interictal periods. Glutamate, glutamine, and GABA were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography. Probe locations were subsequently classified by consensus of expert epileptologists. RESULTS Glutamate levels were elevated in epileptogenic (p = 0.03; n = 7), nonlocalized (p < 0.001), and lesional cortical sites (p < 0.001) when compared to nonepileptogenic cortex. Glutamate was also elevated in epileptogenic (p < 0.001) compared to nonepileptogenic hippocampus. There were no statistical differences in GABA or glutamine, although GABA levels showed high variability across patients and groups. INTERPRETATION Our findings indicate that chronically elevated extracellular glutamate is a common pathological feature among epilepsies with different etiology. Contrary to our predictions, GABA and glutamine levels were not decreased in any of the measured areas. Whereas variability in GABA levels may in part be attributed to the use of GABAergic antiepileptic drugs, the stability in glutamine across patient groups indicate that extracellular glutamine levels are under tighter metabolic regulation than previously thought. Ann Neurol 2016;80:35-45.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Idil Çavuş
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.,Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | | | - Jeremy T Kennard
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Pue Farooque
- Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Anne Williamson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Tore Eid
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.,Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Susan S Spencer
- Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Robert Duckrow
- Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - James Dziura
- Yale Center for Clinical Investigation Biostatistics Unit
| | - Dennis D Spencer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| |
Collapse
|
378
|
Klein E, Ojemann J. Informed consent in implantable BCI research: identification of research risks and recommendations for development of best practices. J Neural Eng 2016; 13:043001. [PMID: 27247140 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/4/043001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Implantable brain-computer interface (BCI) research promises improvements in human health and enhancements in quality of life. Informed consent of subjects is a central tenet of this research. Rapid advances in neuroscience, and the intimate connection between functioning of the brain and conceptions of the self, make informed consent particularly challenging in BCI research. Identification of safety and research-related risks associated with BCI devices is an important step in ensuring meaningful informed consent. APPROACH This paper highlights a number of BCI research risks, including safety concerns, cognitive and communicative impairments, inappropriate subject expectations, group vulnerabilities, privacy and security, and disruptions of identity. MAIN RESULTS Based on identified BCI research risks, best practices are needed for understanding and incorporating BCI-related risks into informed consent protocols. SIGNIFICANCE Development of best practices should be guided by processes that are: multidisciplinary, systematic and transparent, iterative, relational and exploratory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eran Klein
- Department of Neurology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. Department of Philosophy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Center for Sensorimotor Neural Engineering, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
379
|
Increased caffeine intake leads to worsening of electrocorticographic epileptiform discharges as recorded with a responsive neurostimulation device. Clin Neurophysiol 2016; 127:2341-2. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2016] [Accepted: 03/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
380
|
Seizure outcomes in nonresective epilepsy surgery: an update. Neurosurg Rev 2016; 40:181-194. [PMID: 27206422 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-016-0725-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2015] [Revised: 01/31/2016] [Accepted: 03/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
In approximately 30 % of patients with epilepsy, seizures are refractory to medical therapy, leading to significant morbidity and increased mortality. Substantial evidence has demonstrated the benefit of surgical resection in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, and in the present journal, we recently reviewed seizure outcomes in resective epilepsy surgery. However, not all patients are candidates for or amenable to open surgical resection for epilepsy. Fortunately, several nonresective surgical options are now available at various epilepsy centers, including novel therapies which have been pioneered in recent years. Ablative procedures such as stereotactic laser ablation and stereotactic radiosurgery offer minimally invasive alternatives to open surgery with relatively favorable seizure outcomes, particularly in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. For certain individuals who are not candidates for ablation or resection, palliative neuromodulation procedures such as vagus nerve stimulation, deep brain stimulation, or responsive neurostimulation may result in a significant decrease in seizure frequency and improved quality of life. Finally, disconnection procedures such as multiple subpial transections and corpus callosotomy continue to play a role in select patients with an eloquent epileptogenic zone or intractable atonic seizures, respectively. Overall, open surgical resection remains the gold standard treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy, although it is significantly underutilized. While nonresective epilepsy procedures have not replaced the need for resection, there is hope that these additional surgical options will increase the number of patients who receive treatment for this devastating disorder-particularly individuals who are not candidates for or who have failed resection.
Collapse
|
381
|
Rugg-Gunn F, Duncan J, Hjalgrim H, Seyal M, Bateman L. From unwitnessed fatality to witnessed rescue: Nonpharmacologic interventions in sudden unexpected death in epilepsy. Epilepsia 2016; 57 Suppl 1:26-34. [PMID: 26749014 DOI: 10.1111/epi.13231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/05/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) risk reduction remains a critical aim in epilepsy care. To date, only aggressive medical and surgical efforts to control seizures have been demonstrated to be of benefit. Incomplete understanding of SUDEP mechanisms limits the development of more specific interventions. Periictal cardiorespiratory dysfunction is implicated in SUDEP; postictal electroencephalography (EEG) suppression, coma, and immobility may also play a role. Nocturnal supervision is protective against SUDEP, presumably by permitting intervention in the case of a life-threatening event. Resuscitative efforts were implemented promptly in near-SUDEP cases but delayed in SUDEP deaths in the Mortality in Epilepsy Monitoring Unit Study (MORTEMUS) study. Nursing interventions--including repositioning, oral suctioning, and oxygen administration--reduce seizure duration, respiratory dysfunction, and EEG suppression in the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU), but have not been studied in outpatients. Cardiac pacemakers or cardioverter-defibrillator devices may be of benefit in a few select individuals. A role for implantable neurostimulators has not yet been established. Seizure detection devices, including those that monitor generalized tonic-clonic seizure-associated movements or cardiorespiratory parameters, may provide a means to permit timely periictal intervention. However, these and other devices, such as antisuffocation pillows, have not been adequately investigated with respect to SUDEP prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fergus Rugg-Gunn
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Institute of Neurology, NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom.,Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy, Chalfont St. Peter, United Kingdom
| | - John Duncan
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Institute of Neurology, NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Masud Seyal
- Department of Neurology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, U.S.A
| | - Lisa Bateman
- Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, New York, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
382
|
Goldman AM, LaFrance WC, Benke T, Asato M, Drane D, Pack A, Syed T, Doss R, Lhatoo S, Fureman B, Dingledine R. 2014 Epilepsy Benchmarks Area IV: Limit or Prevent Adverse Consequence of Seizures and Their Treatment Across The Lifespan. Epilepsy Curr 2016; 16:198-205. [PMID: 27330453 PMCID: PMC4913859 DOI: 10.5698/1535-7511-16.3.198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Alica M. Goldman
- Associate Professor, Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, NB222, Houston, TX, USA
| | - W. Curt LaFrance
- Associate Professor, Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence RI 02903-4923 USA
| | - Tim Benke
- Associate Professor, Departments of Pediatrics, Neurology, Pharmacology and Otolaryngology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Miya Asato
- Associate Professor, Pediatrics and Psychiatry, Divisionof Child Neurology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Dan Drane
- Assistant Professor, Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine and Department of Neurology, University of Washington School of Medicine
| | - Alison Pack
- Associate Professor of Neurology, Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Tanvir Syed
- Assistant Professor of Neurology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
| | - Robert Doss
- Clinical Neuropsychologist, Minnesota Epilepsy Group, P.A., St. Paul, MN and Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, MN
| | - Samden Lhatoo
- Professor and Chair, Department of Neurology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | - Brandy Fureman
- Program Director, Channels Synapses and Circuits Cluster, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Ray Dingledine
- Professor and Chair, Department of Pharmacology, Emory University, Atlanta GA
| | - for the American Epilepsy Society (AES)/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Epilepsy Benchmark Stewards.
- Associate Professor, Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, NB222, Houston, TX, USA
- Associate Professor, Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence RI 02903-4923 USA
- Associate Professor, Departments of Pediatrics, Neurology, Pharmacology and Otolaryngology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
- Associate Professor, Pediatrics and Psychiatry, Divisionof Child Neurology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Assistant Professor, Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine and Department of Neurology, University of Washington School of Medicine
- Associate Professor of Neurology, Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
- Assistant Professor of Neurology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
- Clinical Neuropsychologist, Minnesota Epilepsy Group, P.A., St. Paul, MN and Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, MN
- Professor and Chair, Department of Neurology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
- Program Director, Channels Synapses and Circuits Cluster, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
- Professor and Chair, Department of Pharmacology, Emory University, Atlanta GA
| |
Collapse
|
383
|
Abstract
The use of epilepsy surgery in various medically resistant epilepsies is well established. For patients with intractable pediatric epilepsy, the role of intracranial electrodes, resective surgery, hemispherectomy, corpus callosotomy, neurostimulation, and multiple subpial transections continues to be very effective in select cases. Newer treatment and diagnostic methods include laser thermal ablation, minimally invasive surgeries, stereo electroencephalography, electrocorticography, and other emerging techniques. This article will review the established and emerging surgical therapies for severe pediatric epilepsies, their respective indications and overall efficacy.
Collapse
|
384
|
Dlugos D, Worrell G, Davis K, Stacey W, Szaflarski J, Kanner A, Sunderam S, Rogawski M, Jackson-Ayotunde P, Loddenkemper T, Diehl B, Fureman B, Dingledine R. 2014 Epilepsy Benchmarks Area III: Improve Treatment Options for Controlling Seizures and Epilepsy-Related Conditions Without Side Effects. Epilepsy Curr 2016; 16:192-7. [PMID: 27330452 PMCID: PMC4913858 DOI: 10.5698/1535-7511-16.3.192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Dlugos
- Professor of Neurology and Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Greg Worrell
- Associate Professor of Neurology, Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Departments of Neurology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Kathryn Davis
- Assistant Professor, Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - William Stacey
- Assistant Professor of Neurology, Department of Neurology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan
| | - Jerzy Szaflarski
- Professor, Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Department of Neurology and UAB Epilepsy Center, Birmingham, AL
| | - Andres Kanner
- Profressor of Clinical Neurology, Department of Neurology, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Sridhar Sunderam
- Assistant Professor, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
| | - Mike Rogawski
- Professor, Center for Neurotherapeutics Discovery and Development and Department of Neurology, UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA
| | - Patrice Jackson-Ayotunde
- Associate Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, MD
| | - Tobias Loddenkemper
- Associate Professor, Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Beate Diehl
- Clinical Neurophysiologist and Neurologist, Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Brandy Fureman
- Program Director, Channels Synapses and Circuits Cluster, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Ray Dingledine
- Professor and Chair, Department of Pharmacology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - for the Epilepsy Benchmark Stewards
- Professor of Neurology and Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Associate Professor of Neurology, Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Departments of Neurology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
- Assistant Professor, Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Assistant Professor of Neurology, Department of Neurology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan
- Professor, Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Department of Neurology and UAB Epilepsy Center, Birmingham, AL
- Profressor of Clinical Neurology, Department of Neurology, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
- Assistant Professor, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
- Professor, Center for Neurotherapeutics Discovery and Development and Department of Neurology, UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA
- Associate Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, MD
- Associate Professor, Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Clinical Neurophysiologist and Neurologist, Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
- Program Director, Channels Synapses and Circuits Cluster, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
- Professor and Chair, Department of Pharmacology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
385
|
Lewis PM, Thomson RH, Rosenfeld JV, Fitzgerald PB. Brain Neuromodulation Techniques. Neuroscientist 2016; 22:406-21. [DOI: 10.1177/1073858416646707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
The modulation of brain function via the application of weak direct current was first observed directly in the early 19th century. In the past 3 decades, transcranial magnetic stimulation and deep brain stimulation have undergone clinical translation, offering alternatives to pharmacological treatment of neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders. Further development of novel neuromodulation techniques employing ultrasound, micro-scale magnetic fields and optogenetics is being propelled by a rapidly improving understanding of the clinical and experimental applications of artificially stimulating or depressing brain activity in human health and disease. With the current rapid growth in neuromodulation technologies and applications, it is timely to review the genesis of the field and the current state of the art in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip M. Lewis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Monash Institute of Medical Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Richard H. Thomson
- Monash Institute of Medical Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jeffrey V. Rosenfeld
- Department of Neurosurgery, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Monash Institute of Medical Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Paul B. Fitzgerald
- Monash Institute of Medical Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
386
|
|
387
|
Lim SN, Lee CY, Lee ST, Tu PH, Chang BL, Lee CH, Cheng MY, Chang CW, Tseng WEJ, Hsieh HY, Chiang HI, Wu T. Low and High Frequency Hippocampal Stimulation for Drug-Resistant Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. Neuromodulation 2016; 19:365-72. [PMID: 27072376 PMCID: PMC5074270 DOI: 10.1111/ner.12435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2015] [Revised: 12/23/2015] [Accepted: 02/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Objective Electrical stimulation of the hippocampus offers the possibility to treat patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) who are not surgical candidates. We report long‐term follow‐up results in five patients receiving low or high frequency hippocampal stimulation for drug‐resistant MTLE. Materials and Methods The patients underwent stereotactic implantation of quadripolar stimulating electrodes in the hippocampus. Two of the patients received unilateral electrode implantation, while the other three received bilateral implantation. Stimulation of the hippocampal electrodes was turned ON immediately after the implantation of an implantable pulse generator, with initial stimulation parameters: 1 V, 90–150 μs, 5 or 145 Hz. The frequency of seizures was monitored and compared with preimplantation baseline data. Results Two men and three women, aged 27–61 years were studied, with a mean follow‐up period of 38.4 months (range, 30–42 months). The baseline seizure frequency was 2.0–15.3/month. The five patients had an average 45% (range 22–72%) reduction in the frequency of seizures after hippocampal stimulation over the study period. Low frequency hippocampal stimulation decreased the frequency of seizures in two patients (by 54% and 72%, respectively). No implantation‐ or stimulation‐related side effects were reported. Conclusions Electrical stimulation of the hippocampus is a minimally invasive and reversible method that can improve seizure outcomes in patients with drug‐resistant MTLE. The optimal frequency of stimulation varied from patient to patient and therefore required individual setting. These experimental results warrant further controlled studies with a large patient population to evaluate the long‐term effect of hippocampal stimulation with different stimulation parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siew-Na Lim
- Department of Neurology, Section of Epilepsy, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou Medical Center and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Yi Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou Medical Center and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Tseng Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou Medical Center and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Po-Hsun Tu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou Medical Center and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Bao-Luen Chang
- Department of Neurology, Section of Epilepsy, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou Medical Center and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Hong Lee
- Department of Neurology, Section of Epilepsy, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou Medical Center and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Mei-Yun Cheng
- Department of Neurology, Section of Epilepsy, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou Medical Center and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Wei Chang
- Department of Neurology, Section of Epilepsy, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou Medical Center and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Wei-En Johnny Tseng
- Department of Neurology, Section of Epilepsy, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou Medical Center and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Hsiang-Yao Hsieh
- Department of Neurology, Section of Epilepsy, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou Medical Center and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Hsing-I Chiang
- Department of Neurology, Section of Epilepsy, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou Medical Center and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Tony Wu
- Department of Neurology, Section of Epilepsy, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou Medical Center and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
388
|
Pevzner A, Izadi A, Lee DJ, Shahlaie K, Gurkoff GG. Making Waves in the Brain: What Are Oscillations, and Why Modulating Them Makes Sense for Brain Injury. Front Syst Neurosci 2016; 10:30. [PMID: 27092062 PMCID: PMC4823270 DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2016.00030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2016] [Accepted: 03/22/2016] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can result in persistent cognitive, behavioral and emotional deficits. However, the vast majority of patients are not chronically hospitalized; rather they have to manage their disabilities once they are discharged to home. Promoting recovery to pre-injury level is important from a patient care as well as a societal perspective. Electrical neuromodulation is one approach that has shown promise in alleviating symptoms associated with neurological disorders such as in Parkinson’s disease (PD) and epilepsy. Consistent with this perspective, both animal and clinical studies have revealed that TBI alters physiological oscillatory rhythms. More recently several studies demonstrated that low frequency stimulation improves cognitive outcome in models of TBI. Specifically, stimulation of the septohippocampal circuit in the theta frequency entrained oscillations and improved spatial learning following TBI. In order to evaluate the potential of electrical deep brain stimulation for clinical translation we review the basic neurophysiology of oscillations, their role in cognition and how they are changed post-TBI. Furthermore, we highlight several factors for future pre-clinical and clinical studies to consider, with the hope that it will promote a hypothesis driven approach to subsequent experimental designs and ultimately successful translation to improve outcome in patients with TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandr Pevzner
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California-DavisSacramento, CA, USA; Center for Neuroscience, University of California-DavisSacramento, CA, USA
| | - Ali Izadi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California-DavisSacramento, CA, USA; Center for Neuroscience, University of California-DavisSacramento, CA, USA
| | - Darrin J Lee
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California-DavisSacramento, CA, USA; Center for Neuroscience, University of California-DavisSacramento, CA, USA
| | - Kiarash Shahlaie
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California-DavisSacramento, CA, USA; Center for Neuroscience, University of California-DavisSacramento, CA, USA
| | - Gene G Gurkoff
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California-DavisSacramento, CA, USA; Center for Neuroscience, University of California-DavisSacramento, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
389
|
Hammer DX, Lozzi A, Boretsky A, Welle CG. Acute insertion effects of penetrating cortical microelectrodes imaged with quantitative optical coherence angiography. NEUROPHOTONICS 2016; 3:025002. [PMID: 32064297 PMCID: PMC7011942 DOI: 10.1117/1.nph.3.2.025002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2016] [Accepted: 03/16/2016] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
The vascular response during cortical microelectrode insertion was measured with amplitude decorrelation-based quantitative optical coherence angiography (OCA). Four different shank-style microelectrode configurations were inserted in murine motor cortex beneath a surgically implanted window in discrete steps while OCA images were collected and processed for angiography and flowmetry. Quantitative measurements included tissue displacement (measured by optical flow), perfused capillary density, and capillary flow velocity. The primary effect of insertion was mechanical perturbation, the effects of which included tissue displacement, arteriolar rupture, and compression of a branch of the anterior cerebral artery causing a global decrease in flow. Other effects observed included local flow drop-out in the region immediately surrounding the microelectrode. The mean basal capillary network velocity for all animals was 0.23 ( ± 0.05 SD ) and 0.18 ( ± 0.07 SD ) mm / s for capillaries from 100 to 300 μ m and 300 to 500 μ m , respectively. Upon insertion, the 2-shank electrode arrays caused a decrease in capillary flow density and velocity, while the results from other configurations were not different from controls. The proximity to large vessels appears to play a larger role than the array configuration. These results can guide neurosurgeons and electrode designers to minimize trauma and ischemia during microelectrode insertion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel X. Hammer
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Division of Biomedical Physics, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, 20903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993, United States
- Address all correspondence to: Daniel X. Hammer, E-mail:
| | - Andrea Lozzi
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Division of Biomedical Physics, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, 20903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993, United States
| | - Adam Boretsky
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Division of Biomedical Physics, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, 20903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993, United States
| | - Cristin G. Welle
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Division of Biomedical Physics, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, 20903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993, United States
- University of Colorado Denver, Departments of Neurosurgery and Bioengineering, 12700 East 19th Avenue, Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
| |
Collapse
|
390
|
Abstract
In the approximately 1% of children affected by epilepsy, pharmacoresistance and early age of seizure onset are strongly correlated with poor cognitive outcomes, depression, anxiety, developmental delay, and impaired activities of daily living. These children often require multiple surgical procedures, including invasive diagnostic procedures with intracranial electrodes to identify the seizure-onset zone. The recent development of minimally invasive surgical techniques, including stereotactic electroencephalography (SEEG) and MRI-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT), and new applications of neurostimulation, such as responsive neurostimulation (RNS), are quickly changing the landscape of the surgical management of pediatric epilepsy. In this review, the authors discuss these various technologies, their current applications, and limitations in the treatment of pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy, as well as areas for future research. The development of minimally invasive diagnostic and ablative surgical techniques together with new paradigms in neurostimulation hold vast potential to improve the efficacy and reduce the morbidity of the surgical management of children with drug-resistant epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Karsy
- 1 Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA ; 2 Division of Neurosurgery, University of Vermont, Burlington, USA ; 3 Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Jian Guan
- 1 Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA ; 2 Division of Neurosurgery, University of Vermont, Burlington, USA ; 3 Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Katrina Ducis
- 1 Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA ; 2 Division of Neurosurgery, University of Vermont, Burlington, USA ; 3 Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Robert J Bollo
- 1 Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA ; 2 Division of Neurosurgery, University of Vermont, Burlington, USA ; 3 Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, USA
| |
Collapse
|
391
|
Klooster DCW, de Louw AJA, Aldenkamp AP, Besseling RMH, Mestrom RMC, Carrette S, Zinger S, Bergmans JWM, Mess WH, Vonck K, Carrette E, Breuer LEM, Bernas A, Tijhuis AG, Boon P. Technical aspects of neurostimulation: Focus on equipment, electric field modeling, and stimulation protocols. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2016; 65:113-41. [PMID: 27021215 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2015] [Revised: 02/05/2016] [Accepted: 02/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Neuromodulation is a field of science, medicine, and bioengineering that encompasses implantable and non-implantable technologies for the purpose of improving quality of life and functioning of humans. Brain neuromodulation involves different neurostimulation techniques: transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), and deep brain stimulation (DBS), which are being used both to study their effects on cognitive brain functions and to treat neuropsychiatric disorders. The mechanisms of action of neurostimulation remain incompletely understood. Insight into the technical basis of neurostimulation might be a first step towards a more profound understanding of these mechanisms, which might lead to improved clinical outcome and therapeutic potential. This review provides an overview of the technical basis of neurostimulation focusing on the equipment, the present understanding of induced electric fields, and the stimulation protocols. The review is written from a technical perspective aimed at supporting the use of neurostimulation in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D C W Klooster
- Kempenhaeghe Academic Center for Epileptology, P.O. Box 61, 5590 AB Heeze, The Netherlands; Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Technology Eindhoven, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - A J A de Louw
- Kempenhaeghe Academic Center for Epileptology, P.O. Box 61, 5590 AB Heeze, The Netherlands; Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Technology Eindhoven, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - A P Aldenkamp
- Kempenhaeghe Academic Center for Epileptology, P.O. Box 61, 5590 AB Heeze, The Netherlands; Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Technology Eindhoven, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands; School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | - R M H Besseling
- Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Technology Eindhoven, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - R M C Mestrom
- Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Technology Eindhoven, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - S Carrette
- Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | - S Zinger
- Kempenhaeghe Academic Center for Epileptology, P.O. Box 61, 5590 AB Heeze, The Netherlands; Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Technology Eindhoven, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - J W M Bergmans
- Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Technology Eindhoven, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - W H Mess
- Departments of Clinical Neurophysiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - K Vonck
- Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | - E Carrette
- Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | - L E M Breuer
- Kempenhaeghe Academic Center for Epileptology, P.O. Box 61, 5590 AB Heeze, The Netherlands.
| | - A Bernas
- Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Technology Eindhoven, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - A G Tijhuis
- Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Technology Eindhoven, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - P Boon
- Kempenhaeghe Academic Center for Epileptology, P.O. Box 61, 5590 AB Heeze, The Netherlands; Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Technology Eindhoven, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
392
|
Ng KA, Greenwald E, Xu YP, Thakor NV. Implantable neurotechnologies: a review of integrated circuit neural amplifiers. Med Biol Eng Comput 2016; 54:45-62. [PMID: 26798055 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-015-1431-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2015] [Accepted: 12/11/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Neural signal recording is critical in modern day neuroscience research and emerging neural prosthesis programs. Neural recording requires the use of precise, low-noise amplifier systems to acquire and condition the weak neural signals that are transduced through electrode interfaces. Neural amplifiers and amplifier-based systems are available commercially or can be designed in-house and fabricated using integrated circuit (IC) technologies, resulting in very large-scale integration or application-specific integrated circuit solutions. IC-based neural amplifiers are now used to acquire untethered/portable neural recordings, as they meet the requirements of a miniaturized form factor, light weight and low power consumption. Furthermore, such miniaturized and low-power IC neural amplifiers are now being used in emerging implantable neural prosthesis technologies. This review focuses on neural amplifier-based devices and is presented in two interrelated parts. First, neural signal recording is reviewed, and practical challenges are highlighted. Current amplifier designs with increased functionality and performance and without penalties in chip size and power are featured. Second, applications of IC-based neural amplifiers in basic science experiments (e.g., cortical studies using animal models), neural prostheses (e.g., brain/nerve machine interfaces) and treatment of neuronal diseases (e.g., DBS for treatment of epilepsy) are highlighted. The review concludes with future outlooks of this technology and important challenges with regard to neural signal amplification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kian Ann Ng
- Singapore Institute for Neurotechnology (SINAPSE), National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117456, Singapore. .,Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117576, Singapore.
| | - Elliot Greenwald
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Yong Ping Xu
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117576, Singapore
| | - Nitish V Thakor
- Singapore Institute for Neurotechnology (SINAPSE), National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117456, Singapore.,Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117576, Singapore.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
393
|
Krishna V, King NKK, Sammartino F, Strauss I, Andrade DM, Wennberg RA, Lozano AM. Anterior Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation for Refractory Epilepsy. Neurosurgery 2016; 78:802-11. [DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000001197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Anterior nucleus (AN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a palliative treatment for medically refractory epilepsy. The long-term efficacy and the optimal target localization for AN DBS are not well understood.
OBJECTIVE:
To analyze the long-term efficacy of AN DBS and its predictors.
METHODS:
We performed a retrospective review of 16 patients who underwent AN DBS. We selected only patients with reliable seizure frequency data and at least a 1-year follow-up. We studied the duration of the seizure reduction after DBS insertion and before stimulation (the insertional effect) and its association with long-term outcome. We modeled the volume of activation using the active contacts, stimulation parameters, and postoperative imaging. The overlap of this volume was plotted in Montreal Neurological Institute 152 space in 7 patients with significant clinical efficacy.
RESULTS:
Nine patients reported a decrease in seizure frequency immediately after electrode insertion (insertional or microthalamotomy effect). The duration of insertional effect varied from 2 to 4 months. However, 1 patient had a long-term insertional effect of 36 months. Altogether, 11 patients reported >50% decrease in seizure frequency with long-term stimulation. The most common pattern of seizure control was immediate and sustained stimulation benefit (n = 8). In patients with long-term stimulation benefit, the efficacious target was localized in the anteroventral AN in close proximity to the mammillothalamic tract.
CONCLUSION:
AN DBS is efficacious in the control of seizure frequency in selected patients. An insertional effect is commonly observed (56%). The most efficacious site of stimulation appears to be the anteroventral AN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ido Strauss
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Danielle M. Andrade
- Department of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Richard A. Wennberg
- Department of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
394
|
Klinger NV, Mittal S. Clinical efficacy of deep brain stimulation for the treatment of medically refractory epilepsy. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2016; 140:11-25. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2015] [Revised: 10/26/2015] [Accepted: 11/12/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
395
|
Wei Z, Gordon CR, Bergey GK, Sacks JM, Anderson WS. Implant Site Infection and Bone Flap Osteomyelitis Associated with the NeuroPace Responsive Neurostimulation System. World Neurosurg 2015; 88:687.e1-687.e6. [PMID: 26743382 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.11.106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2015] [Revised: 11/08/2015] [Accepted: 11/12/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The NeuroPace RNS System is a method recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for closed-loop direct brain stimulation in selected patients with drug-resistant partial seizures. The long-term risks of implant site infection and accompanying bone flap osteomyelitis associated with responsive neurostimulation (RNS) devices have not been fully appreciated. CASE DESCRIPTION We report 3 cases of refractory partial epilepsy that were treated with RNS therapy in conjunction with antiepileptic drugs. Patients underwent invasive epilepsy monitoring and resection of seizure foci. All patients continued to have debilitating partial seizures and underwent implantation of the RNS device, which resulted in various degrees of symptomatic relief. On average, the battery of the implantable pulse generator was replaced every 2 years. All 3 patients developed implant site infection and bone flap osteomyelitis with multiple implantable pulse generator replacements, and the RNS devices were removed. Bone flaps were removed in 2 patients because of significant osteomyelitis and were reconstructed in a delayed fashion with customized cranial implants. No patient had evidence of meningitis or cerebritis. The patients were treated via a multidisciplinary approach, and all patients recovered well with satisfactory wound healing and seizure control. CONCLUSIONS Implant site infection and bone flap osteomyelitis are significant adverse events associated with the RNS device. The incidence of infection in this series (10%) is comparable to the incidence reported in the long-term trial. The infection risk is mainly associated with reoperations and increases with multiple implantable pulse generator replacements. The RNS device may benefit from reducing technical risk factors that are associated with postoperative bone and soft tissue infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhikui Wei
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
| | - Chad R Gordon
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Gregory K Bergey
- Department of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Justin M Sacks
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - William S Anderson
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
396
|
Making sense: Determining the parameter space of electrical brain stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015; 112:15012-3. [PMID: 26607448 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1520704112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
397
|
Miller KJ, Burns TC, Grant GA, Halpern CH. Responsive stimulation of motor cortex for medically and surgically refractive epilepsy. Seizure 2015; 33:38-40. [DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2015.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2015] [Revised: 10/17/2015] [Accepted: 10/19/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
|
398
|
Kros L, Eelkman Rooda OHJ, De Zeeuw CI, Hoebeek FE. Controlling Cerebellar Output to Treat Refractory Epilepsy. Trends Neurosci 2015; 38:787-799. [PMID: 26602765 DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2015.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2015] [Revised: 09/12/2015] [Accepted: 10/18/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Generalized epilepsy is characterized by recurrent seizures caused by oscillatory neuronal firing throughout thalamocortical networks. Current therapeutic approaches often intervene at the level of the thalamus or cerebral cortex to ameliorate seizures. We review here the therapeutic potential of cerebellar stimulation. The cerebellum forms a prominent ascending input to the thalamus and, whereas stimulation of the foliated cerebellar cortex exerts inconsistent results, stimulation of the centrally located cerebellar nuclei (CN) reliably stops generalized seizures in experimental models. Stimulation of this area indicates that the period of stimulation with respect to the phase of the oscillations in thalamocortical networks can optimize its effect, opening up the possibility of developing on-demand deep brain stimulation (DBS) treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieke Kros
- Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Oscar H J Eelkman Rooda
- Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Chris I De Zeeuw
- Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Dutch Academy for Arts and Sciences, Meibergdreef 47, 1105 BA Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Freek E Hoebeek
- Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
399
|
Abstract
Various neurostimulation modalities have emerged in the field of epilepsy. Despite the fact that delivery of an electrical current to the hyperexcitable epileptic brain might, at first, seem contradictory, neurostimulation has become an established therapeutic option with a promising efficacy and adverse effects profile. In "responsive" neurostimulation the strategy is to interfere as early as possible with the accumulation of seizure activity to prematurely abort or even prevent an upcoming seizure. The design of technology required for responsive stimulation is more challenging compared with devices for open-loop neurostimulation. The achievement of therapeutic success is dependent on adequate sensing and stimulation algorithms and a fast coupling between both. The benefits of delivering current only at the time of an approaching seizure merit further investigation. Current experience with responsive neurostimulation in epilepsy is still limited, but seems promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofie Carrette
- a Laboratory for Clinical and Experimental Neurophysiology, Neurobiology and Neuropsychology (LCEN3), Ghent University, Department of Neurology , Ghent University Hospital, Institute for Neuroscience , Ghent , Belgium
| | - Paul Boon
- a Laboratory for Clinical and Experimental Neurophysiology, Neurobiology and Neuropsychology (LCEN3), Ghent University, Department of Neurology , Ghent University Hospital, Institute for Neuroscience , Ghent , Belgium
| | - Mathieu Sprengers
- a Laboratory for Clinical and Experimental Neurophysiology, Neurobiology and Neuropsychology (LCEN3), Ghent University, Department of Neurology , Ghent University Hospital, Institute for Neuroscience , Ghent , Belgium
| | - Robrecht Raedt
- a Laboratory for Clinical and Experimental Neurophysiology, Neurobiology and Neuropsychology (LCEN3), Ghent University, Department of Neurology , Ghent University Hospital, Institute for Neuroscience , Ghent , Belgium
| | - Kristl Vonck
- a Laboratory for Clinical and Experimental Neurophysiology, Neurobiology and Neuropsychology (LCEN3), Ghent University, Department of Neurology , Ghent University Hospital, Institute for Neuroscience , Ghent , Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
400
|
Löscher W, Hirsch LJ, Schmidt D. The enigma of the latent period in the development of symptomatic acquired epilepsy - Traditional view versus new concepts. Epilepsy Behav 2015; 52:78-92. [PMID: 26409135 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.08.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2015] [Accepted: 08/30/2015] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
A widely accepted hypothesis holds that there is a seizure-free, pre-epileptic state, termed the "latent period", between a brain insult, such as traumatic brain injury or stroke, and the onset of symptomatic epilepsy, during which a cascade of structural, molecular, and functional alterations gradually mediates the process of epileptogenesis. This review, based on recent data from both animal models and patients with different types of brain injury, proposes that epileptogenesis and often subclinical epilepsy can start immediately after brain injury without any appreciable latent period. Even though the latent period has traditionally been the cornerstone concept representing epileptogenesis, we suggest that the evidence for the existence of a latent period is spotty both for animal models and human epilepsy. Knowing whether a latent period exists or not is important for our understanding of epileptogenesis and for the discovery and the trial design of antiepileptogenic agents. The development of antiepileptogenic treatments to prevent epilepsy in patients at risk from a brain insult is a major unmet clinical need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Löscher
- Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Pharmacy, University of Veterinary Medicine, 30559 Hannover, Germany; Center for Systems Neuroscience, 30559 Hannover, Germany.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|