The value of "multimodal" or "balanced analgesia" in postoperative pain treatment

Effect of parecoxib on postoperative pain after lumbar spine surgery: a bicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial

STUDY DESIGN

A bicenter randomized, patients, healthcare providers, and data collectors blind placebo-controlled trial in multimodal analgesia for postoperative lumbar spine surgery was conducted.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of parecoxib on postoperative pain management after posterior lumbar spine surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Systematic reviews suggest that cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors are an effective treatment for acute postoperative pain. However, previous trials on lumbar spine surgery showed equivocal efficacy of cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors for postoperative pain relief.

METHODS

In this study, 120 patients undergoing posterior lumbar discectomy, spinal decompression, or spinal fusion were stratified based on the surgical procedure to 3 groups (n = 40) and randomly allocated to receive multidoses of parecoxib 40 mg/dose or placebo. Efficacy was assessed by total morphine used from patient-controlled analgesic pump, pain intensity, pain relief, and the patient's subjective rating of the medication.

RESULTS

Parecoxib 40 mg reduced the total amount of morphine required over 48 hours by 39% relative morphine reduction compared with placebo (P = 0.0001). Pain at rest was reduced by 30% (P = 0.0001). Ninety percent of patients given parecoxib experienced at least 50% maximum total pain relief compared with 58% treated with placebo. The number-needed-to-treat for 1 patient to have at least half pain relief was 3.1 (2.0-4.6). Patients' subjective rating of the medication was described as "excellent, good, and fair" by 48%, 43%, and 8% in the parecoxib group, respectively, compared with 21%, 50%, and 28% of placebo patients (P = 0.004). Overall adverse effects of patients receiving parecoxib and morphine were comparable to those receiving morphine alone.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates that the perioperative administration of parecoxib with patient-controlled analgesic morphine after lumber spine surgery resulted in significantly improved postoperative analgesic management as defined by reduction in opioid requirement, lower pain scores, and higher patients' subjective rating of the medication.

Comparison of analgesic efficacy of preoperative or postoperative carprofen with or without preincisional mepivacaine epidural anesthesia in canine pelvic or femoral fracture repair

OBJECTIVE

To compare analgesic efficacy of preoperative versus postoperative administration of carprofen and to determine, if preincisional mepivacaine epidural anesthesia improves postoperative analgesia in dogs treated with carprofen.

STUDY DESIGN

Blind, randomized clinical study.

ANIMALS

Dogs with femoral (n=18) or pelvic (27) fractures.

METHODS

Dogs were grouped by restricted randomization into 4 groups: group 1 = carprofen (4 mg/kg subcutaneously) immediately before induction of anesthesia, no epidural anesthesia; group 2 = carprofen immediately after extubation, no epidural anesthesia; group 3 = carprofen immediately before induction, mepivacaine epidural block 15 minutes before surgical incision; and group 4 = mepivacaine epidural block 15 minutes before surgical incision, carprofen after extubation. All dogs were administered carprofen (4 mg/kg, subcutaneously, once daily) for 4 days after surgery. Physiologic variables, nociceptive threshold, lameness score, pain, and sedation (numerical rating scale [NRS], visual analog scale [VAS]), plasma glucose and cortisol concentration, renal function, and hemostatic variables were measured preoperatively and at various times after surgery. Dogs with VAS pain scores >30 were administered rescue analgesia.

RESULTS

Group 3 and 4 dogs had significantly lower pain scores and amount of rescue analgesia compared with groups 1 and 2. VAS and NRS pain scores were not significantly different among groups 1 and 2 or among groups 3 and 4. There was no treatment effect on renal function and hemostatic variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative carprofen combined with mepivacaine epidural anesthesia had superior postoperative analgesia compared with preoperative carprofen alone. When preoperative epidural anesthesia was performed, preoperative administration of carprofen did not improve postoperative analgesia compared with postoperative administration of carprofen.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Preoperative administration of systemic opioid agonists in combination with regional anesthesia and postoperative administration of carprofen provides safe and effective pain relieve in canine fracture repair.

A survey of postoperative epidural and intravenous analgesia in Greece

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Epidural and intravenous analgesia are widely used for postoperative pain management. Efficacy and safety is enhanced with the establishment of acute pain services. We studied the terms of application of these techniques in Greek hospitals and compared practices between anaesthetic departments with or without acute pain services.

METHODS

We performed a postal survey regarding departmental policy on the application of epidural and intravenous analgesia, patient monitoring, audit and educational activities, acute pain service teams and proposals for improvement. Pain services were classified according to predetermined quality criteria. Hospitals with or without acute pain services were compared.

RESULTS

Response rate was 46.3% (51 of 110 departments). Epidural analgesia was used in 49 departments, equally applied as intermittent boluses or continuous infusion. Twenty-two of the 39 departments that were using continuous infusion, used exclusively a lumbar approach. Intravenous analgesia was used by 42 (82%) departments; 13 used exclusively continuous infusion. All eight departments that had an established acute pain service fulfilled the predefined quality criteria compared with only ten of the remaining 43 (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study discloses important issues regarding the use of intravenous and epidural analgesia and postoperative patient monitoring in Greek hospitals. Implementation of acute pain services that are satisfying the quality criteria may help to improve patient care.

The effects of electromyographic activity on the accuracy of the Narcotrend monitor compared with the Bispectral Index during combined anaesthesia

The Narcotrend is a monitor system for the assessment of depth of anaesthesia. The objective of this trial was to investigate the susceptibility of the Narcotrend to electromyographic (EMG) activity when compared with the Bispectral Index (BIS). We enrolled 33 patients undergoing major urological procedures under combined anaesthesia (thoracic epidural analgesia and general anaesthesia). Anaesthetic depth was assessed simultaneously by the BIS XP and Narcotrend. The intended anaesthetic depth ranged between 40 and 55 in the BIS and between D2 and D0 in the Narcotrend. BIS, but not Narcotrend, values correlated significantly (p < 0.0001) with EMG. BIS values between 70 and 80 occurred intermittently above an EMG activity of 35 dB, whereas the Narcotrend and the clinical signs remained unchanged during the period of elevated BIS values. None of the patients reported intra-operative awareness. Increased electromyographic activity does not affect Narcotrend values. Under combined anaesthesia, the Narcotrend monitor is more reliable when compared with the BIS regarding susceptibility to increased EMG activity.

Intravenous paracetamol as adjunctive treatment for postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: a double blind randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids are routinely used after cardiac surgery in order to mitigate postoperative pain; however, these drugs are burdened by side effects. Tramadol and paracetamol are believed to be lacking in such side effects. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of intravenous paracetamol as an adjunctive analgesic to a tramadol-based background analgesia after cardiac surgery.

METHODS

A total of 113 patients participated in this single center, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial. Fifty-six patients were randomized to receive paracetamol and 57 to placebo. Intravenous study drug (1 g) was administered 15 min before the end of surgery and every 6h for 72 h. Standard analgesia (tramadol) and anti-emetic prophylactic regimen (ondansetron) were available to both patient groups. Postoperative pain was evaluated by visual analog scale, and it was measured at rest and during a deep breath. A rescue dose of 2-5 mg of intravenous morphine was administered whenever the VAS score was greater than 3.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were equivalent between the two groups. At 12, 18, 24 h after the end of operation, patients who received paracetamol had significantly less pain at rest (p=0.0041, 0.0039, 0.0044, respectively); after this time the two groups did not differ. During a deep breath the difference was significant only at 12 h (p=0.0040). Paracetamol group required less cumulative morphine than placebo group (48 mg vs 97 mg) even if the difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.274).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing cardiac surgery, intravenous paracetamol in combination with tramadol provides effective pain control.

Treatment with Lavender Aromatherapy in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit reduces Opioid Requirements of Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding

BACKGROUND

Parenteral administration of opioids and NSAIDs has been the mainstay for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). Both classes of drugs, however, are associated with serious adverse effects. An addition of complimentary analgesic techniques may decrease requirement for traditional analgesics, thus reducing the incidence of side-effects. We designed the study to evaluate the effectiveness of Lavender aromatherapy in reducing opioid requirements after LAGB.

METHODS

A prospective randomized placebo controlled study was carried out on 54 patients undergoing LAGB. Upon arrival to the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), patients in the study group were treated with lavender oil, which was applied to the oxygen face mask; the control group patients received nonscented baby oil. Postoperative pain was treated with morphine. Numerical rating scores (0-10) were used to measure the level of pain at 5, 30, and 60 min. Sedation was evaluated using the Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale (0-5). Data analyzed included the amount of opioids, NRS, OAA/S, PACU discharge time, as well as the incidence of side-effects.

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable with regard to patient characteristics, intraoperative drug use, and surgical time. Significantly more patients in the Placebo group (PL) required analgesics for postoperative pain (22/27, 82%) than patients in the Lavender group (LAV) (12/26, 46%) (P = .007). Moreover, the LAV patients required significantly less morphine postoperatively than PL patients: 2.38 mg vs 4.26 mg, respectively (P = .04). There were no differences in the requirements for post-operative antiemetics, antihypertensives, or PACU discharge time.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that lavender aromatherapy can be used to reduce the demand for opioids in the immediate postoperative period. Further studies are required to assess the effect of this therapy on clinically meaningful outcomes, such as the incidence of respiratory complications, delayed gastric emptying, length of hospital stay, or whether this therapy is applicable to other operations.

Pre-emptive analgesic effect of tramadol after mandibular third molar extraction: a pilot study

PURPOSE

We compared the efficacy of tramadol given before or immediately after surgical extraction of an impacted mandibular third molar under local anesthesia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind pilot study, 3 groups of 20 patients each were included: tramadol preoperative, 100 mg intramuscularly (IM) 1 hour before surgery (group A); tramadol postoperative, 100 mg IM immediately after surgery (group B); and saline (group C). We evaluated intensity of pain and analgesic consumption as was requested.

RESULTS

The analgesic efficacy measured as complete relief of pain at 24 hours was 86% in the preemptive tramadol compared with 70% and 36% for postoperative tramadol administration and control group. A significant reduction in the consumption of analgesics was seen in preoperative group as compared with the postoperative and control groups. Adverse events were minimal and similar in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests the preemptive use of tramadol as an alternative for the acute pain treatment after the removal of an impacted mandibular third molar carried out under local anesthesia.

Evaluating the Analgesic Efficacy of Administering Celecoxib as a Component of Multimodal Analgesia for Outpatient Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery: Retracted

BACKGROUND

Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors may play an important role in multimodal management of pain after orthopedic surgery. We examined the analgesic efficacy of administering celecoxib as a component of a multimodal analgesic regimen for outpatient anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery.

METHODS

Two-hundred consecutive patients were randomized to receive acetaminophen 1000 mg and either celecoxib 400 mg or placebo 1-2 h before ACL surgery. All patients received intraarticular analgesics (bupivacaine, clonidine, and morphine) and had an external cooling system applied to the operative knee. After discharge, patients were instructed to take acetaminophen 1000 mg every 6 h and either celecoxib 200 mg every 12 h or matching placebo for the first 14 days postoperatively. Oxycodone 5-10 mg was available for rescue analgesia.

RESULTS

Patients in the celecoxib group were more likely to experience less pain in the recovery room (P < 0.01) and require less opioids (P < 0.001) for postoperative analgesia. These patients reported a lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (P < 0.05) and were discharged home earlier (P < 0.05). While at home, patients in the celecoxib group reported lower pain scores both at rest (P < 0.05) and with movement (P < 0.01), and used less oxycodone at all postoperative time intervals.

CONCLUSIONS

The perioperative administration of celecoxib decreases postoperative pain, opioid use, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and recovery room length of stay. These results support the use of celecoxib as a component of a preventive multimodal analgesic technique for ACL surgery.

Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Comparison of Local Anesthetic and Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs for Postoperative Pain Management after Laparoscopic Surgery

Compared with the open approach, laparoscopy has been shown to significantly reduce postoperative pain. Improving postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic surgery is an area of continued interest. The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy of local anesthetic infiltration with or without preoperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were enrolled in an Institutional Review Board-approved, prospective, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled comparison study. Patients were randomized into four groups: Group I, preoperative oral administration of a placebo medication and prein cision local infiltration of 40 mL of 0.5 per cent bupivicaine at trocar sites; Group II, preoperative oral administration of 50 mg of rofecoxib; Group III, preoperative oral administration of 50 mg of rofecoxib and preincision local infiltration of 40 mL of 0.5 per cent bupivicaine into skin, muscle, and peritoneum; and Group IV, preoperative oral administration of a placebo medication. Postoperative pain scores were assessed at 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours using a visual analog scale. Postoperative analgesic use, complications, and length of stay were recorded. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. Fifty-five patients (46 women and 9 men) were enrolled in this study and underwent a standardized, elective, laparoscopic cholecystectomy for mild, symptomatic cholelithiasis (96.4%) and gallbladder polyps (3.6%). No patient had pain immediately before surgery. Postoperative analgesic requests, visual analog scale results, incidence of postoperative vomiting at 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours, in addition to length of stay, were not statistically different between the four groups. No complications occurred. The use of preoperative rofecoxib, 0.5 per cent bupivicaine infiltration, or both for postoperative analgesia did not decrease postoperative pain or decrease length of stay after laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with placebo. Preoperative administration of an oral anti-inflammatory pain medication, infiltration of a local anesthetic, or both had no greater effect than placebo in controlling discomfort after a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The challenge of preempting postoperative pain continues and will require further investigation.

The Role of the Anesthesiologist in Fast-Track Surgery: From Multimodal Analgesia to Perioperative Medical Care

BACKGROUND

Improving perioperative efficiency and throughput has become increasingly important in the modern practice of anesthesiology. Fast-track surgery represents a multidisciplinary approach to improving perioperative efficiency by facilitating recovery after both minor (i.e., outpatient) and major (inpatient) surgery procedures. In this article we focus on the expanding role of the anesthesiologist in fast-track surgery.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary group of clinical investigators met at McGill University in the Fall of 2005 to discuss current anesthetic and surgical practices directed at improving the postoperative recovery process. A subgroup of the attendees at this conference was assigned the task of reviewing the peer-reviewed literature on this topic as it related to the role of the anesthesiologist as a perioperative physician.

RESULTS

Anesthesiologists as perioperative physicians play a key role in fast-track surgery through their choice of preoperative medication, anesthetics and techniques, use of prophylactic drugs to minimize side effects (e.g., pain, nausea and vomiting, dizziness), as well as the administration of adjunctive drugs to maintain major organ system function during and after surgery.

CONCLUSION

The decisions of the anesthesiologist as a key perioperative physician are of critical importance to the surgical care team in developing a successful fast-track surgery program.

Perioperative pain management

The under-treatment of postoperative pain has been recognised to delay patient recovery and discharge from hospital. Despite recognition of the importance of effective pain control, up to 70% of patients still complain of moderate to severe pain postoperatively. The mechanistic approach to pain management, based on current understanding of the peripheral and central mechanisms involved in nociceptive transmission, provides newer options for clinicians to manage pain effectively. In this article we review the rationale for a multimodal approach with combinations of analgesics from different classes and different sites of analgesic administration. The pharmacological options of commonly used analgesics, such as opioids, NSAIDs, paracetamol, tramadol and other non-opioid analgesics, and their combinations is discussed. These analgesics have been shown to provide effective pain relief and their combinations demonstrate a reduction in opioid consumption. The basis for using non-opioid analgesic adjuvants is to reduce opioid consumption and consequently alleviate opioid-related adverse effects. We review the evidence on the opioid-sparing effect of ketamine, clonidine, gabapentin and other novel analgesics in perioperative pain management. Most available data support the addition of these adjuvants to routine analgesic techniques to reduce the need for opioids and improve quality of analgesia by their synergistic effect. Local anaesthetic infiltration, epidural and other regional techniques are also used successfully to enhance perioperative analgesia after a variety of surgical procedures. The use of continuous perineural techniques that offer prolonged analgesia with local anaesthetic infusion has been extended to the care of patients beyond hospital discharge. The use of nonpharmacological options such as acupuncture, relaxation, music therapy, hypnosis and transcutaneous nerve stimulation as adjuvants to conventional analgesia should be considered and incorporated to achieve an effective and successful perioperative pain management regimen.

A survey of acute pain services in teaching hospitals in the Republic of Ireland

BACKGROUND

Acute Pain Services (APS) evolved in response to the desire for improved management of postoperative pain.

AIMS

To assess the status of APS in teaching hospitals in Ireland. This information has not previously been available.

METHODS

Postal questionnaires were sent to all teaching hospitals in the Republic of Ireland (n = 40). The questionnaire dealt with current and future APS.

RESULTS

Thirty-one out of the 40 teaching hospitals returned a completed questionnaire (78% response). Seventy-one per cent of respondents had formalised APS of which 85% were established after 1990. Ninety percent of respondents selected postoperative pain as their primary target. Pain was included in quality assurance in 73% of hospitals and 87% of clinicians believed the trend in pain consultations is increasing.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a growing trend in pain management and publication of guidelines, only 71% (22/31) of teaching hospitals in the Republic of Ireland have such services. Further resources are needed to address this deficiency.

Postoperative pain management: new, convenient analgesic therapies

Despite the potential benefits to patient health that can result from effective pain management, survey results continue to indicate that acute postoperative pain remains inadequately managed worldwide. The development of novel analgesics and advanced analgesic delivery techniques has the potential to improve current strategies for postoperative pain management. This article outlines the pharmacological principles and clinical utility of recently developed agents and a novel drug delivery device indicated for the management of moderate-to-severe acute postoperative pain.

Pre-emptive analgesia for removal of nasal packing: A double-blind placebo controlled study

OBJECTIVE

The most frequent complaint of patients after septoplasty is severe pain felt during removal of nasal packing placed on the operation. Various methods have been described to decrease pain and to increase patient comfort during removal of nasal packing. However, these methods are not practical. There has been an increase in the number of studies on pre-emptive analgesia use for postoperative pain relief. The aim of this study was to determine whether pre-emptive analgesia decreased pain during removal of Merocel packs placed in septoplasties.

METHODS

This is a double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled study. The study included 121 patients who underwent elective septoplasty in our otorhinolaryngology clinic. The patients were randomly assigned into two groups: study and placebo groups. The study and placebo groups received two tablets of diflunisal 500 mg and placebo, respectively, two and a half hours before removal of nasal packing. Visual analog scale (VAS) values immediately after and 5 min after removal of nasal packing, effects of the procedure on patient comfort and its side-effects were evaluated separately.

RESULTS

VAS values immediately after the removal of nasal packs significantly decreased in the study group (p<0.001), but there was no significant difference in VAS values obtained after the procedure between the study and placebo groups. Patient discomforts were significantly lower in the diflunisal group (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

It can be concluded that pre-emptive analgesia decreases pain during removal of nasal packing placed in septoplasties and increases patient comfort.

The impact of opioid-induced hyperalgesia for postoperative pain

Clinical evidence suggests that--besides their well known analgesic activity - opioids can increase rather than decrease sensitivity to noxious stimuli. Based on the observation that opioids can activate pain inhibitory and pain facilitatory systems, this pain hypersensitivity has been attributed to a relative predominance of pronociceptive mechanisms. Acute receptor desensitization via uncoupling of the receptor from G-proteins, upregulation of the cAMP pathway, activation of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor system, as well as descending facilitation, have been proposed as potential mechanisms underlying opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Numerous reports exist demonstrating that opioid-induced hyperalgesia is observed both in animal and human experimental models. Brief exposures to micro-receptor agonists induce long-lasting hyperalgesic effects for days in rodents, and also in humans large-doses of intraoperative micro-receptor agonists were found to increase postoperative pain and morphine consumption. Furthermore, the prolonged use of opioids in patients is often associated with a requirement for increasing doses and the development of abnormal pain. Successful strategies that may decrease or prevent opioid-induced hyperalgesia include the concomitant administration of drugs like NMDA-antagonists, alpha2-agonists, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioid rotation or combinations of opioids with different receptor/selectivity.

Preadministration of flurbiprofen suppresses prostaglandin production and postoperative pain in orthopedic patients undergoing tourniquet inflation

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of preadministration of flurbiprofen on the plasma concentrations of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and postoperative pain.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled and double-blind study.

SETTING

Inpatient surgery at Nagasaki Rosai Hospital.

PATIENTS

32 ASA physical status I to II patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty or open anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Five minutes before tourniquet inflation (350 mmHg), group A (n = 16) received placebo (intralipid, one mL . kg(-1)), and group B (n = 16) received flurbiprofen one mg . kg(-1) IV. Catheters were placed in the ipsilateral femoral vein for collection of local blood and in a cubital vein for sampling of systemic blood.

MEASUREMENTS

Prostaglandin E2 (femoral vein and cubital vein) was measured before tourniquet inflation (T1), before tourniquet deflation (T2), and immediately after tourniquet deflation (T3). Postoperative analgesia was provided with intravenous buprenorphine, 0.1 mg, on patient demand. Pain (Visual Analog Scale) was assessed at 0.5, one, two, 4, 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery.

MAIN RESULTS

Visual Analog Scale and buprenorphine consumptions in group B were significantly lower than those in group A during the first 4 postoperative hours. In group A, PGE2 in femoral vein increased significantly at T2 (359 +/- 105 pg mL(-1), P < 0.0001), compared with T1 (211 +/- 61 pg mL(-1)) and returned to control values at T3 (252 +/- 77 pg mL(-1)), whereas PGE2 in the cubital vein showed no change. In group B, PGE2 in either the femoral vein or cubital vein showed no change throughout the time course.

CONCLUSIONS

Preadministration of flurbiprofen suppresses the local production of PGE2 during tourniquet ischemia, resulting in reduced early postoperative pain in patients undergoing knee surgery.

Isobolographic analysis of the antinociceptive interactions between ketoprofen and paracetamol

The present study was undertaken to evaluate the antinociceptive interaction between paracetamol and ketoprofen. The antinociceptive effect of oral administration of the drugs alone or in combination was evaluated using the mouse abdominal constriction test. The data were interpreted by isobolographic analysis to establish the nature of the interaction. The effective dose that produced 50% antinociception (ED(50,mix)) was calculated from the log dose-response curve of fixed-ratio combinations of paracetamol with ketoprofen. This ED(50,mix) was compared to the theoretical additive ED(50,add) by isobolographic analysis. The experimental ED(50,mix) was found to be significantly smaller than the theoretically calculated ED(50,add), indicating a synergistic antinociceptive interaction between ketoprofen and paracetamol. Pharmacokinetic studies were carried out with mice treated with combined ketoprofen (12 mg/kg) and paracetamol (36 mg/kg). Plasma levels of ketoprofen were not changed by concurrent paracetamol treatment, and similarly no statistically significant difference was observed between paracetamol alone and the combination with ketoprofen. The pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that the combination of ketoprofen with paracetamol exerted a synergistic (supra-additive) interaction that was not associated with a pharmacokinetic interaction. The results of this study demonstrate significant synergism between ketoprofen and paracetamol.

Use of gabapentin for perioperative pain control -- a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Gabapentin, an anticonvulsant, has recently been suggested as an effective postoperative 'analgesic' agent. The objective of the present study was to examine the analgesic effectiveness, opioid-sparing effects and side effects associated with the use of gabapentin in a perioperative setting.

METHODS

Following the Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses recommendations, nine electronic databases until February 2006 were searched, without language restriction, for randomized controlled trials comparing gabapentin with control for postoperative pain control. Outcome measures, namely, 24 h cumulative opioid consumption, visual analogue scale pain scores and adverse effects, were expressed as odds ratios, ratio of means or weighted mean differences (as appropriate), which were aggregated under the fixed or random effects models.

RESULTS

Gabapentin caused a 35% reduction in total opioid consumption over the first 24 h following surgery (ratio of means 0.65, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.72), a significant reduction in postoperative pain at rest (in the first 24 h) and with movement (at 2 h, 4 h and 12 h), regardless of whether treatment effects were expressed as ratios of means or weighted mean differences, and a reduction of vomiting (relative risk [RR] 0.73, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.95) and pruritus (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.70). It was associated with a significant increase in dizziness (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.84) and an increase in sedation of borderline significance (RR 1.65, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.74).

CONCLUSION

Gabapentin improves the analgesic efficacy of opioids both at rest and with movement, reduces analgesic consumption and opioid-related adverse effects, but is associated with an increased incidence of sedation and dizziness.

Intravenous magnesium sulphate decreases postoperative tramadol requirement after radical prostatectomy*

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess whether the addition of intravenous magnesium sulphate (Mg) at the induction of anaesthesia to a balanced anaesthetic protocol including wound infiltration, paracetamol and tramadol resulted in improved analgesic efficiency after radical prostatectomy.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Thirty ASA I or II males scheduled to undergo radical retropubic prostatectomy with general anaesthesia were prospectively assigned to one of the two groups (n = 15 each). The Mg group (Gr Mg) received 50 mg kg-1 of MgSO4 in 100 mL of isotonic saline over 20 min immediately after induction of anaesthesia and before skin incision. The patients in the control group (Gr C) received the same volume of saline over the same period. At the time of abdominal closure, wound infiltration with 190 mg (40 mL) of ropivacaine was performed in both groups. Pain was assessed by a 10-point visual analogue scale in the recovery room starting from the time of tracheal extubation. Standardized postoperative analgesia included paracetamol and tramadol administered via a patient-controlled analgesia device.

RESULTS

In the postoperative period, both groups experienced an identical pain course evolution. Cumulative mean tramadol dose after 24 h was 226 mg in the magnesium group and 446 mg in the control group (P < 0.001). Postoperative nausea occurred in two patients in each group. Two vs. eight patients required analgesic rescue in magnesium and control groups, respectively (P = 0.053).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that intravenous magnesium sulphate reduces tramadol consumption when used as a postoperative analgesic protocol in radical prostatectomy.

The efficacy of intra-articular bupivacaine for relief of pain following arthroscopy of the ankle

The intra-articular injection of local anaesthetic is frequently used for pain relief after arthroscopy. There is, however, no published evidence of the analgesic effect of bupivacaine in the ankle. In a randomised, double-blind study, 35 patients undergoing arthroscopy of the ankle were allocated to receive intra-articular saline or bupivacaine. Pain was assessed using pain scores and additional analgesic requirements. Intra-articular bupivacaine had a significant analgesic effect in the immediate post-operative period, reducing pain scores and the need for additional analgesics.

We recommend the use of intra-articular bupivacaine for post-operative analgesia in ankle surgery.

The role of COX-2 inhibitors in the treatment of postoperative pain

Postoperative pain requires treatment not only to provide comfort to patients but also to improve postoperative outcome. Anti-inflammatory compounds are an important component of multimodal analgesia in the postoperative period. The newer cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors are as effective as classical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in this setting. However, COX-2 inhibitors offer a number of advantages over NSAIDs when used to treat postoperative pain. These include a reduced incidence of gastrointestinal ulceration and no inhibitory effect on platelet function and thereby a reduced risk of blood loss. Other benefits are less impairment of bone healing and no induction of bronchospasm in patients with aspirin-sensitive asthma. Increased cardiovascular thromboembolic events by COX-2 inhibitors have been reported after coronary artery bypass graft surgery only, but in general, surgery studies the incidence of such complications was comparable to placebo. Overall, COX-2 inhibitors offer a number of advantages over classical NSAIDs in the postoperative pain setting, but require the same caution with regard to renal effects.

The Analgesic Efficacy of Celecoxib, Pregabalin, and Their Combination for Spinal Fusion Surgery: Retracted

BACKGROUND

As optimal pain relief after surgery is difficult to achieve with the use of just one drug, many pain experts advocate the use of two or more classes of medications so as to reduce the side effects from any one drug. In this trial, we assessed the analgesic efficacy of administering perioperative celecoxib, pregabalin, or both after spinal fusion surgery.

METHODS

Eighty patients scheduled to undergo elective decompressive lumbar laminectomy with posterior spinal fusion were randomized to receive oral medications: placebo 1 h before and 12 h after surgery, celecoxib 400 mg 1 h before and celecoxib 200 mg 12 h after surgery, pregabalin 150 mg 1 h before and 12 h after surgery, or a pregabalin/celecoxib combination of 400 mg/150 mg 1 h before and 200 mg/150 mg 12 h after surgery.

RESULTS

The pregabalin/celecoxib group consumed the least patient-controlled morphine. Celecoxib alone or pregabalin alone also reduced opioid use compared with placebo, but not as much as when combined. The pregabalin/celecoxib combination was the most effective treatment for reducing pain both at rest and with movement over the 24-h postoperative time period. Hemodynamics and respiratory rate did not differ among the four treatment groups. Fewer patients experienced nausea in the pregabalin/celecoxib group compared with that in the placebo group.

CONCLUSION

The perioperative administration of the combination of celecoxib and pregabalin improved analgesia and caused fewer side effects, than either analgesic drug alone after spinal fusion surgery.

Reduction of paracetamol metabolism after hepatic resection

INTRODUCTION

Paracetamol is often used as an analgesic following hepatic resection. During liver resection, vascular clamping is carried out to reduce blood loss. Previous studies have described transient postoperative rises in serum aminotransferase levels and decreases in prothrombin time and factor V levels. We have examined paracetamol metabolism after liver resection.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was performed. All patients undergoing liver resection were included. Propacetamol was given every 6 h. Blood samples for plasma paracetamol concentrations were collected before, 1 h after the end of the first injection (T1), just before the second injection (6 h: T6), and just before the fifth injection (24 h: T24).

RESULTS

37 patients were recruited. 13 had hepatic vascular exclusion (HVE group), 13 had portal triad clamping (PTC group) and 11 had abdominal surgery with no liver resection (NLR group: control group). At T6, the plasma paracetamol concentration in the HVE group was significantly higher than in the NLR groups; at T24, this concentration was significantly higher in the HVE group than in the NLR and PTC groups, and was higher in the PTC group than in the NLR group. Prothrombin time and factor V was significantly lower in the HVE group than in the PTC group on the first postoperative day.

DISCUSSION

This study showed a reduction of paracetamol metabolism in the liver resection group with significantly increased paracetamol levels. However, the maximum mean plasma concentration reached was not clinically or toxicologically significant. For these reasons, we cannot suggest that paracetamol should or should not be avoided in patients undergoing liver resection.

Plasma concentrations following repeated rectal or intravenous administration of paracetamol after heart surgery

BACKGROUND

Paracetamol is commonly used for post-operative pain management in combination with more potent analgesics. The best route of paracetamol administration after major surgery, when oral intake may not be optimal, is not known. Our primary purpose was to study plasma concentrations after the 1st and 4th dose of 1 g of paracetamol given either rectally or intravenously (i.v.) after major surgery.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized study, 48 patients undergoing heart surgery were randomized upon arrival to the intensive care unit (ICU) to receive paracetamol every 6th hour either as suppositories or intravenous injections. In half the patients (n = 24), blood samples for paracetamol concentration were obtained before and 20, 40 and 80 min after the first dose. In the other patients (n = 24), additional samples were taken prior to, and at 20, 40, 80 min and 4 and 6 h after, the 4th dose.

RESULTS

Plasma paracetamol concentration peaked (95 +/- 36 micromol/l) within 40 min after initial i.v. administration but did not increase within 80 min after the 1st suppository. Plasma concentration before the 4th dose was 74 +/- 51 and 50 +/- 27 in the rectal and i.v. groups, respectively. Paracetamol concentration peaked 20 min after the 4th dose for the i.v. patients (210 +/- 84 micromol/l) and declined to 99 +/- 27 micromol/l at 80 min as compared with the rectal patients 69 +/- 44 to 77 +/- 48 micromol/l.

CONCLUSION

Both time course and peak plasma concentrations of paracetamol given rectally differ from the one seen after intravenous administration. The clinical impact of these differences needs further investigation.

Combination analgesia in 2005 - a rational approach: focus on paracetamol-tramadol

A multimodal (or balanced) approach to anaesthesia is a familiar concept that offers important benefits in the management of both acute and chronic pain. Rational combinations of analgesic agents with different mechanisms of action can achieve improved efficacy and/or tolerability and safety compared with equianalgesic doses of the individual drugs. Combining different agents also enhances efficacy in complex pain states that involve multiple causes. Combinations of paracetamol plus a weak opioid agent are widely used. One such combination, paracetamol plus tramadol, exploits the well-established complementary pharmacokinetics and mechanisms of action of these two drugs. This combination has demonstrated genuine synergy in animal studies and also combines paracetamol's rapid onset of efficacy with tramadol's prolonged analgesic effect. Numerous studies have confirmed the efficacy and tolerability of paracetamol plus tramadol in both acute and chronic pain. As a single-dose treatment for acute post-operative pain, this combination delivers rapid and sustained pain relief that is greater than either agent alone. There is also extensive evidence for efficacy in the long-term management of chronic pain conditions, including osteoarthritis, low back pain and fibromyalgia. In the setting of chronic pain, paracetamol plus tramadol has shown sustained efficacy, safety and tolerability for up to 2 years without the development of tolerance. The efficacy of this combination has been demonstrated as well in respect to reduction of pain intensity and, more importantly, with regard to improvement of function and quality of life and the reduction of disability. Comparative trials have shown that paracetamol plus tramadol has comparable efficacy to paracetamol plus codeine, but with reduced somnolence and constipation compared with the codeine combination. The paracetamol plus tramadol combination is also free of organ toxicity associated with selective and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Hence, paracetamol plus tramadol offers an effective and well-tolerated alternative to anti-inflammatory drugs or other paracetamol plus weak opioid combinations.

Current management of pediatric postoperative pain

Pain is a common complaint in children after surgery. Four out of five children require analgesia even after minor surgery, and after more extensive surgery, significant postoperative pain may last for weeks. Severe pain during, and after surgery may aggravate long-lasting negative effects to the body and mind. In order to prevent harmful effects, all children should be provided with effective analgesia. Pain management should be safe and easy to administer. Postoperative pain management in children has improved substantially during the last 5 years. Recent trials indicate that children may undergo major surgery with minimal untoward effects when effective proactive pain management is provided. This review will focus on new clinical strategies on pain management in children. Since most pediatric surgery is performed as a day-case or short-stay basic recommendations for parental guidance and pain management after discharge are also presented.

Preoperative administration of rofecoxib versus ketoprofen for pain relief after tonsillectomy

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the analgesic efficacy and the opioid-sparing effect of oral rofecoxib compared with intramuscular (IM) ketoprofen in tonsillectomy.

METHODS

Seventy-seven adult patients were randomized into 2 groups: group R (n = 39), which received a single oral preoperative dose of rofecoxib 50 mg, and group K (n = 38), which received 2 IM doses of ketoprofen 100 mg (before surgery and after 12 hours). In both groups, additional IM meperidine hydrochloride 1 mg/kg was given. All patients received general anesthesia. A pain score (visual analog scale, 0 to 100) was assessed both at rest and during swallowing at 30 minutes and at 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after operation. If the pain score exceeded 40, patients were given meperidine as rescue analgesia.

RESULTS

The pain scores during rest and swallowing in group R were significantly lower (p < .05) than those of group K at 4, 8, and 12 hours after operation. Meperidine was given as rescue medication in significantly more patients of group K (76%) than of group R (38%; p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral premedication with rofecoxib seems to be more effective than use of ketoprofen in decreasing postoperative pain and the need for opioid rescue medication after elective tonsillectomy. Both drugs seem to be relatively safe as far as postoperative bleeding is concerned.

Acute pain management for opioid dependent patients

Patients requiring acute pain management may be opioid dependent as a result of either recreational or therapeutic opioid use, including those in opioid addiction programmes. Pain in these patients is often under-estimated and under-treated. In addiction, drug-seeking behaviour differentiates it from simple dependence. With few randomised controlled trials, current evidence predominantly consists of guidelines based on case reports, retrospective studies and expert opinion. Consensus recommendations include maintaining regular provision of the patient's pre-existing opioid requirement, with additional analgesia, ideally multimodal, in appropriate combinations of short-acting opioid (as required), local anaesthesia, and adjuvant anti-inflammatory analgesics and paracetamol. Patient controlled analgesia with higher bolus doses and shorter lock-out intervals is a recommended strategy. Transdermal opioid patches and implantable pumps will continue to deliver opioid, to which non-opioid and short-acting opioids may be added. Re-exposure to opioid is ideally avoided in previously addicted patients, but if not feasible, opioid therapy should be prescribed.

Perioperative Schmerztherapie in der Kniegelenkendoprothetik

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with significant postoperative pain. Adequate analgesics and techniques are required for early mobilization, continuous passive motion and intensified physical therapy as well as for high-quality postoperative analgesia.However, in the immediate postoperative setting the excessive nociceptive input can be blocked by using doses which are most frequently associated with adverse effects like dizziness, nausea and vomiting, sedation and risk of respiratory depression. The use of peripheral nerve blocks is recommended after orthopaedic surgery. After TKA, the continuous "3 in 1 nerve block" has been proven to be more effective than conventional patient controlled intravenous opioid therapy as well as than epidural analgesia accompanied by side effects. Postoperative analgesic techniques influence surgical outcome, duration of hospitalization and re-convalescence. The use of regional analgesia after TKA may initially lead to higher costs but it is counterbalanced by a reduction in morbidity and mortality, decrease in hospitalization, improved re-convalescence and a better functional outcome.

Intravenous acetaminophen reduced the use of opioids compared with oral administration after coronary artery bypass grafting

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate if intravenous acetaminophen compared to oral administration reduced the consumption of opioids and their side effects without an increase in pain during the stay in the intensive care unit (ICU).

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized study.

SETTING

An ICU in a university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighty patients with written informed consent undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesthesia was based on propofol and fentanyl combined with sevoflurane.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to 2 groups: acetaminophen, 1 g every sixth hour during the postoperative period, either as tablets or intravenously after extubation.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The amount of opioids administered during the study period was measured starting with acetaminophen administration during the stay in the ICU until 9 o'clock the following morning. Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was noted. Pain was evaluated with a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 to 10. Three patients, 2 in the oral and 1 in the intravenous group, were excluded because of incomplete data. The intravenous group received less opioids than the orally treated group, 17.4 +/- 7.9 mg compared with 22.1 +/- 8.6 mg (p = 0.016). PONV incidence and VAS scores did not differ. During the first hours after extubation, 50 of 77 patients reported VAS scores >3 with no difference between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous acetaminophen had a limited opioid-sparing effect when compared with oral administration after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The opioid-sparing effect was not accompanied by any reduction in the incidence of PONV. The clinical significance of the opioid-sparing effect could therefore be questioned.

The changing role of non-opioid analgesic techniques in the management of postoperative pain

Given the expanding role of ambulatory surgery and the need to facilitate an earlier hospital discharge, improving postoperative pain control has become an increasingly important issue for all anesthesiologists. As a result of the shift from inpatient to outpatient surgery, the use of IV patient-controlled analgesia and continuous epidural infusions has steadily declined. To manage the pain associated with increasingly complex surgical procedures on an ambulatory or short-stay basis, anesthesiologists and surgeons should prescribe multimodal analgesic regimens that use non-opioid analgesics (e.g., local anesthetics, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, cyclooxygenase inhibitors, acetaminophen, ketamine, alpha 2-agonists) to supplement opioid analgesics. The opioid-sparing effects of these compounds may lead to reduced nausea, vomiting, constipation, urinary retention, respiratory depression and sedation. Therefore, use of non-opioid analgesic techniques can lead to an improved quality of recovery for surgical patients.

The role of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition in foot and ankle arthrodesis

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors are an important adjunct in controlling postoperative pain. Concerns exist regarding the use of NSAIDs for postoperative pain management because of the possible deleterious impact on bone healing in patients undergoing hindfoot arthrodesis. Orthopedic surgeons are concerned with: (1) a multimodal approach for postoperative pain control, and (2) bone healing following arthrodesis, fracture repair with rigid internal fixation, and cementless implants. The use of COX-2 inhibitors has been shown to be an important component of a pain control strategy but questions about their effects on bone healing have inhibited their use. This article discusses the laboratory and clinical data available on the use of COX-2 inhibitors on bone healing and their effects on foot and ankle arthrodesis procedures.

Opioid-sparing effects of diclofenac and paracetamol lead to improved outcomes after cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the analgesic efficacy, side effects, time to extubation, and oxygenation of 3 analgesic regimens after coronary artery bypass surgery using diclofenac, paracetamol, and placebo suppositories.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

SETTING

Referral center for cardiothoracic surgery at a university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty consenting adults scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were divided into 3 groups postoperatively: diclofenac/paracetamol: diclofenac, 100 mg rectally, and paracetamol, 1 g rectally. Diclofenac was repeated after 18 hours and paracetamol every 6 hours for 24 hours; diclofenac: diclofenac as in diclofenac/paracetamol, with placebos replacing paracetamol; and placebo: 2 placebo suppositories at same times as diclofenac/paracetamol. All patients received morphine patient-controlled analgesia.

RESULTS

Twenty-four hour morphine consumption with diclofenac/paracetamol was 12 +/- 6 mg, diclofenac 22 +/- 13 mg, and placebo 37 +/- 15 mg (diclofenac/paracetamol and diclofenac, p = 0.0003 and p = 0.0159 compared with placebo). Patients in the placebo group had significantly greater pain scores at 12 and 24 hours compared with diclofenac/paracetamol and diclofenac. Extubation time was significantly prolonged in the placebo group compared with the diclofenac/paracetamol and diclofenac groups (mean [SD] minutes diclofenac/paracetamol, diclofenac, and placebo 478 [150], 487 [257], and 710 [326], respectively). Oxygenation following extubation was significantly lower in the placebo group compared with the diclofenac/paracetamol and diclofenac groups (mean [SD] mmHg: diclofenac/paracetamol, diclofenac, and placebo 175 [44], 157 [43], and 117 [22], respectively). Episodes of nausea and vomiting were significantly less in the diclofenac/paracetamol and diclofenac groups than in the placebo group (46% and 51% reduction, respectively). all groups had similar blood loss and change in serum creatinine.

CONCLUSION

Diclofenac alone or with paracetamol has a significant opioid-sparing effect after CABG, producing more rapid extubation and better oxygenation.

High dose nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs compromise spinal fusion

PURPOSE

Although nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) provide benefit to patients following spinal fusion surgery, their routine administration has remained controversial due to concerns about possible deleterious effects on bone healing. The goal of this retrospective study was to assess the incidence of non-union following the perioperative administration of ketorolac, celecoxib, or rofecoxib.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 434 patients receiving perioperative ketorolac (20-240 mg.day(-1)), celecoxib (200-600 mg.day(-1)), rofecoxib (50 mg.day(-1)), or no NSAIDs in the five days following spinal fusion surgery.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the incidence of non-union among the groups that received no NSAIDs (11/130; 8.5%), celecoxib 5/60; 8.3%), or rofecoxib (9/124; 7.3%). In contrast, 23/120 of patients (19.2%) that received ketorolac had a higher incidence (P < 0.001) of non-union compared to non-NSAID users. However, only 3/50 patients (6%) receiving low-dose ketorolac (< or = 110 mg.day(-1)) resulted in non-union which was not significantly different from non-NSAID users. Patients administered higher doses of ketorolac (120-240 mg.day(-1)) resulted in a higher incidence (P < 0.0001) of non-union (20/70; 29%) compared to non-NSAID users. For those patients developing non-union, there was a higher incidence comparing smokers vs non-smokers (P < 0.0001) and one level fusion vs two level fusions (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that the short-term perioperative administration of celecoxib, rofecoxib, or low-dose ketorolac (< or = 110 mg.day(-1)) had no significant deleterious effect on non-union. In contrast, higher doses of ketorolac (120-240 mg.day(-1)), history of smoking, and two level vertebral fusions resulted in a significant increase in the incidence of non-union following spinal fusion surgery.

Anaesthesia for correction of scoliosis in children

Surgical correction of spinal deformities in children presents a challenge to the anaesthetist because of the extensive nature of the surgery, the co-morbidities of the patients and the constraints on anaesthetic techniques of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is the most common deformity. Patients with scoliosis secondary to neuromuscular conditions are at greatest risk of perioperative problems, particularly excessive blood loss and respiratory failure. The risk of spinal cord damage can be decreased by the use of intraoperative spinal cord monitoring, particularly monitoring of the lower limb compound muscle action potential evoked by transcranial electrical stimulation. Specific anaesthetic techniques are required for this monitoring to be reliable. Because of concerns about spinal cord perfusion there is now less reliance on induced hypotension and haemodilution to reduce blood loss, with emphasis on proper patient positioning, controlled haemodynamics and antifibrinolytic therapy. Effective postoperative pain management requires a multimodal approach.

Intravenous Ketoprofen in Postoperative Pain Treatment after Major Abdominal Surgery

In recent years considerable attention has been paid to the treatment of postoperative pain, with regard to the favorable effect of adequate analgesia on patient outcome. Multimodal analgesia (e.g., opioids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs] or local anesthetics) is recommended for effective postoperative pain relief. There are few data on the use of NSAIDs in postoperative pain treatment after abdominal surgery. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the analgesic efficacy and safety of ketoprofen after major abdominal surgery. One and nine hours postoperatively patients received 100 mg of ketoprofen i.v. (n = 21) or placebo (n = 22) in addition to a pain-treatment protocol consisting of continuous infusion of tramadol 200 mg and metamizol 5 g over 24 hours with additional 25 mg i.v. tramadol in case of inadequate analgesia. Pain was assessed by numeric rating scale at rest and at deep breath 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively and the total dose of tramadol used in the first 24 hours was recorded. Patients in the ketoprofen group had significantly lower pain scores both at rest and at deep breath, at 3 (p < 0.01), 6, and 12 hours (p < 0.05) postoperatively. The 24-hour use of tramadol was significantly lower in the ketoprofen group (p < 0.01), with less nausea and vomiting. There were no bleeding complications or other adverse events related to ketoprofen therapy. The study showed the value of short-term use of ketoprofen to improve the quality of analgesia after major abdominal surgery without significant adverse effects.

Multimodal Analgesia Techniques and Postoperative Rehabilitation

The concept of multimodal analgesia involves the use of different classes of analgesics and different sites of analgesic administration to provide superior dynamic pain relief with reduced analgesic-related side effects. Although multimodal analgesia techniques have assumed increasing importance in the management of perioperative pain, it has become increasingly apparent that postoperative outcome may not be improved. Nevertheless, the integration of multimodal analgesia techniques with a multimodal and multidisciplinary rehabilitation program may enhance recovery, reduce hospital stay, and facilitate early convalescence.

The median effective dose of tramadol and morphine for postoperative patients: a study of interactions

Tramadol is a centrally-acting analgesic drug. In a search of an effective balanced analgesia technique with a morphine-sparing component, we studied the median effective analgesic doses (ED(50)) of tramadol, morphine, and their combination to determine the nature of their interaction using an isobolographic analysis. In this double-blind, randomized, two-stage prospective study, 90 postoperative patients were enrolled in one of three groups. The dose of tramadol and morphine received by a particular patient was determined using an up-down allocation technique. Initial doses and increments were, respectively, 100 mg and 10 mg in the tramadol group and 5 mg and 1 mg in the morphine group. In the second part, a 40:3 tramadol:morphine dosing ratio was used. The threshold of effective analgesia was defined as 3 or less on a numerical pain score (0-10). Isobolographic analysis was subsequently applied. The ED(50) values (95% confidence interval) of tramadol and morphine were, respectively, 86 mg (57-115 mg) and 5.7 mg (4.2-7.2 mg). The ED(50) of the combination was 72 mg (62-82 mg) for tramadol and 5.4 mg (4-6.6.2 mg) for morphine. The combination of tramadol and morphine was infra-additive and thus not recommended for postoperative analgesia.