PHARMACOKINETICS OF TRAMADOL AND O-DESMETHYLTRAMADOL IN GIANT TORTOISES (CHELONOIDIS VANDENBURGHI, CHELONOIDIS VICINA)

The objective of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetics of two orally administered doses of tramadol (1 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg) and its metabolite, O-desmethyltramadol (M1) in giant tortoises (Chelonoidis vandenburghi, Chelonoidis vicina). Eleven giant tortoises (C. vandenburghi, C. vicina) received two randomly assigned, oral doses of tramadol (either 1 mg/kg or 5 mg/kg), with a washout period of 3 wk between each dose. The half-life (t½) of orally administered tramadol at 1 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg was 11.9 ± 4.6 h and 13.2 ± 6.1 h, respectively. After oral administration of tramadol at 1 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg, the maximum concentration (Cmax) was 125 ± 69 ng/ml and 518 ± 411 ng/ml, respectively. There were not enough data points to determine pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for the M1 metabolite from either dose. Tramadol administered orally to giant tortoises at both doses provided measurable plasma concentrations of tramadol for approximately 48 h with occasional transient sedation. Oral tramadol at 5 mg/kg, on average, achieves concentrations of >100 ng/ml, the reported human therapeutic threshold, for 24 h. Based on the low levels of M1 seen in this study, M1 may not be a major metabolite in this taxon.

In vitro release of new designs of modified-release tramadol hydrochloride included in a polymer matrix

Tramadol reaches therapeutic plasma concentrations in a time interval of 0.5 to 1.7 hours, so it is necessary to dose 4 times/day, which reduces compliance with the dose and the effectiveness of the treatment. Design formulations of tramadol that allow the release time to be prolonged, surpassing those obtained with the commercial product and tramadol without excipients. Several formulations of 5% tramadol hydrochloride were designed in a matrix system based on poloxamer 407 at different concentrations (10%, 14%, 17%, and 20%). In vitro release studies were performed, using a spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 273.15 nm; were compared the results with tramadol without polymeric supplements and with the commercial formulation samples were taken in a period of time from 0.25 to 72 hours, and also compared the use or absence of dialysis membrane with a porosity of 50 kilodaltons was. With the use of the membrane, the designed formulations had a release of 98%, 50%, 23%, 16% at 72 hours, respectively, different from the commercial product and the tramadol formulation without excipients released the 24 hours. Without using dialysis membranes, a 90-100% release was achieved in the 10% and 14% formulation at 36 hours. The 17% and 20% formulation at 48 hours and the commercial formulation and tramadol without excipient were released within 2 hours. Modified release formulations were obtained, which retain and prolong the release of tramadol compared to the commercial product. Therefore, we propose to conduct further in vivo model experiments to confirm our conclusion.

Evaluation of tramadol human pharmacokinetics and safety after co-administration of magnesium ions in randomized, single- and multiple-dose studies

BACKGROUND

Magnesium ions (Mg2+) increase and prolong opioid analgesia in chronic and acute pain. The nature of this synergistic analgesic interaction has not yet been explained. Our aim was to investigate whether Mg2+ alter tramadol pharmacokinetics. Our secondary goal was to assess the safety of the combination.

METHODS

Tramadol was administered to healthy Caucasian subjects with and without Mg2+ as (1) single 100-mg and (2) multiple 50-mg oral doses. Mg2+ was administered orally at doses of 150 mg and 75 mg per tramadol dosing in a single- and multiple-dose study, respectively. Both studies were randomized, open label, laboratory-blinded, two-period, two-treatment, crossover trials. The plasma concentrations of tramadol and its active metabolite, O-desmethyltramadol, were measured.

RESULTS

A total of 25 and 26 subjects completed the single- and multiple-dose study, respectively. Both primary and secondary pharmacokinetic parameters were similar. The 90% confidence intervals for Cmax and AUC0-t geometric mean ratios for tramadol were 91.95-102.40% and 93.22-102.76%. The 90% confidence intervals for Cmax,ss and AUC0-τ geometric mean ratios for tramadol were 93.85-103.31% and 99.04-105.27%. The 90% confidence intervals for primary pharmacokinetic parameters were within the acceptance range. ANOVA did not show any statistically significant contribution of the formulation factor (p > 0.05) in either study. Adverse events and clinical safety were similar in the presence and absence of Mg2+.

CONCLUSIONS

The absence of Mg2+ interaction with tramadol pharmacokinetics and safety suggests that this combination may be used in the clinical practice for the pharmacotherapy of pain.

Pharmacokinetic profile of injectable tramadol in the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) and prediction of its analgesic efficacy

Tramadol is used as an analgesic in humans and some animal species. When tramadol is administered to most species it undergoes metabolism to its main metabolites M1 or O-desmethyltramadol, and M2 or N-desmethyltramadol, and many other metabolites. This study describes the pharmacokinetic profile of tramadol when a single subcutaneous bolus of 2 mg/kg was initially administered to two koalas. Based on the results of these two koalas, subsequently 4 mg/kg as a single subcutaneous injection, was administered to an additional four koalas. M1 is recognised as an active metabolite and has greater analgesic activity than tramadol, while M2 is considered inactive. A liquid chromatography assay to quantify tramadol, M1 and M2 in koala plasma was developed and validated. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry confirmed that M1 had been identified. Additionally, the metabolite didesmethyltramadol was identified in chromatograms of two of the male koalas. When 4 mg/kg tramadol was administered, the median half-life of tramadol and M1 were 2.89 h and 24.69 h, respectively. The M1 plasma concentration remained well above the minimally effective M1 plasma concentration in humans (approximately 36 ng/mL) over 12 hours. The M1 plasma concentration, when tramadol was administered at 2 mg/kg, did not exceed 36 ng/mL at any time-point. When tramadol was administered at 2 mg/kg and 4 mg/kg the area under the curve M1: tramadol ratios were 0.33 and 0.50, respectively. Tramadol and M1 binding to plasma protein were determined using thawed, frozen koala plasma and the mean binding was 20% and 75%, respectively. It is concluded that when tramadol is administered at 4 mg/kg as a subcutaneous injection to the koala, it is predicted to have some analgesic activity.

Projected Cost-Effectiveness for 2 Gene-Drug Pairs Using a Multigene Panel for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND

For patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, gene-drug associations exist relevant to first-line treatment options-antiplatelet agent, clopidogrel, and pain medication, tramadol. Knowledge of genotype information may allow for avoidance of adverse drug events during critical clinical windows.

OBJECTIVE

This evaluation estimated cost-effectiveness associated with a multi-gene panel pre-emptively testing two genes providing CYP2C19 genotype-guided strategy for antiplatelet therapy, with CYP2D6 genotype-guided pain management, compared to single gene test for CYP2C19 with random assignment for pain treatment, and to no testing (empiric clopidogrel with random assignment for pain treatment).

METHODS

Decision analysis modeling was used to project costs from a payer perspective and patient quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) from the three strategies. The model captured composite risks of major adverse cardiovascular events and pain therapy-related adverse drug events and associated utility estimates. We conducted sensitivity analyses to assess influential input parameters.

RESULTS

Over 15 months, multi-gene testing was least costly and yielded more QALYs compared to both single gene and no testing; total incremental costs were $1646 lower with incremental gains of 0.04 QALYs for multi-gene compared with single gene and $11 368 lower with 0.17 QALY gains compared to no test. Base case analyses revealed multi gene was dominant compared to both single gene and no test, as it demonstrated cost savings with increased QALYs.

CONCLUSIONS

For these patients, a multi-gene-guided strategy yields a favorable incremental cost-effectiveness ratio compared to the other two treatment strategies. Pre-emptively ascertaining additional gene-drug pair information can inform clinical and economic decision-making at the point of care.

The Effect of Food on Tramadol and Celecoxib Bioavailability Following Oral Administration of Co-Crystal of Tramadol-Celecoxib (CTC): A Randomised, Open-Label, Single-Dose, Crossover Study in Healthy Volunteers

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Co-Crystal of Tramadol-Celecoxib (CTC), in development for the treatment of moderate to severe acute pain, is a first-in-class co-crystal containing a 1:1 molecular ratio of two active pharmaceutical ingredients; rac-tramadol·HCl and celecoxib. This randomised, open-label, crossover study compared the bioavailability of both components after CTC administration under fed and fasting conditions.

METHODS

Healthy adults received single doses of 200 mg CTC under both fed and fasting conditions (separated by a 7-day washout). Each dose of CTC was administered orally as two 100 mg tablets, each containing 44 mg tramadol·HCl and 56 mg celecoxib. In the fed condition, a high-fat, high-calorie meal [in line with recommendations by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)] was served 30 min before CTC administration. Tramadol, O-desmethyltramadol and celecoxib plasma concentrations were measured pre- and post-dose up to 48 h. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental analysis. Safety was also assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-six subjects (18 female/18 male) received one or both doses of CTC; 33 provided evaluable pharmacokinetic data under fed and fasting conditions. For tramadol and O-desmethyltramadol, fed-to-fasting ratios of geometric least-squares means and corresponding 90% confidence interval (CI) values for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and extrapolated area under the plasma concentration-time curve to infinity (AUC∞) were within the pre-defined range for comparative bioavailability (80-125%). For celecoxib, Cmax and AUC∞ fed-to-fasting ratios (90% CIs) were outside this range, at 130.91% (116.98-146.49) and 129.34% (121.78-137.38), respectively. The safety profile of CTC was similar in fed and fasting conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

As reported for standard-formulation celecoxib, food increased the bioavailability of celecoxib from single-dose CTC. Food had no effect on tramadol or O-desmethyltramadol bioavailability.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

152052 (registered with the Therapeutic Products Directorate of Health Canada).

Enantioselective pharmacokinetics of tramadol and its three main metabolites; impact of CYP2D6, CYP2B6, and CYP3A4 genotype

Tramadol is a complex drug, being metabolized by polymorphic enzymes and administered as a racemate with the (+)- and (-)-enantiomers of the parent compound and metabolites showing different pharmacological effects. The study aimed to simultaneously determine the enantiomer concentrations of tramadol, O-desmethyltramadol, N-desmethyltramadol, and N,O-didesmethyltramadol following a single dose, and elucidate if enantioselective pharmacokinetics is associated with the time following drug intake and if interindividual differences may be genetically explained. Nineteen healthy volunteers were orally administered either 50 or 100 mg tramadol, whereupon blood samples were drawn at 17 occasions. Enantiomer concentrations in whole blood were measured by LC-MS/MS and the CYP2D6,CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 genotype were determined, using the xTAG CYP2D6 Kit, pyrosequencing and real-time PCR, respectively. A positive correlation between the (+)/(-)-enantiomer ratio and time following drug administration was shown for all four enantiomer pairs. The largest increase in enantiomer ratio was observed for N-desmethyltramadol in CYP2D6 extensive and intermediate metabolizers, rising from about two to almost seven during 24 hours following drug intake. CYP2D6 poor metabolizers showed metabolic profiles markedly different from the ones of intermediate and extensive metabolizers, with large area under the concentration curves (AUCs) of the N-desmethyltramadol enantiomers and low corresponding values of the O-desmethyltramadol and N,O-didesmethyltramadol enantiomers, especially of the (+)-enantiomers. Homozygosity of CYP2B6 *5 and *6 indicated a reduced enzyme function, although further studies are required to confirm it. In conclusion, the increase in enantiomer ratios over time might possibly be used to distinguish a recent tramadol intake from a past one. It also implies that, even though (+)-O-desmethyltramadol is regarded the enantiomer most potent in causing adverse effects, one should not investigate the (+)/(-)-enantiomer ratio of O-desmethyltramadol in relation to side effects without consideration for the time that has passed since drug intake.

Correlation between plasma concentrations of tramadol and its metabolites and the incidence of seizure in tramadol-intoxicated patients

BACKGROUND

Seizure is one of the important symptoms of tramadol poisoning, but its causes are still unknown. The aim of this study is to find a relationship between tramadol and the concentrations of its metabolites versus the incidence of seizures following the consumption of high doses of tramadol.

METHODS

For this purpose, the blood samples of 120 tramadol-intoxicated patients were collected. The patients were divided in two groups (seizure and non-seizure). The concentrations of tramadol and its metabolites (M1, M2 and M5) were measured by using a high-performance liquid chromatography method. The relationship between tramadol and the levels of its metabolites and seizure incidences was also investigated.

RESULTS

In 72% of the patients, seizures occurred in the first 3 h after the ingestion of tramadol. The seizure incidences were significantly correlated with the patients' gender, concentrations of tramadol, M1 and M2 and the history of previous seizures (p<0.001). The average concentration of M2 was significantly higher in males (p=0.003). A previous history of the use of sedative-hypnotics and the co-ingestion of benzodiazepines and other opioids were shown to significantly decrease the rate of seizure. The rate of seizure was directly related to the concentrations of tramadol and its metabolites. Higher M2 concentration in males can be considered a reason for increased incidences of seizures in males. The plasma concentration of M1 affected the onset of seizure.

CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, it can be concluded that differences in the levels of the metabolites can affect the threshold of seizure in tramadol-intoxicated patients.

Evaluation of the Ecstasy influence on tramadol and its main metabolite plasma concentration in rats

BACKGROUND

Tramadol is prone to be abused alone, or in combination with 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, Ecstasy). It was reported that 95% of people with a history of substance abuse in the United States used tramadol in 2004. According to the WHO report in 2016, there was a growing number of tramadol abusers alone or in combination with psychoactive substances such as MDMA in particular in some Middle East countries. Higher concentrations of tramadol in plasma may lead to adverse drug reactions or lethal intoxication. In this study, the effect of MDMA on the pharmacokinetics of tramadol was examined in male rats.

METHODS

The effect of MDMA on Tmax, Cmax, area under the curve, elimination rate, and half-life of tramadol and its metabolites was examined. Two control and two treatment groups were designed. The treatment groups received MDMA 18 h before the administration of tramadol. Jugular vein blood samples were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescent detector to determine the concentrations of tramadol and its metabolites. Independent-sample t-test was used to define the differences between pharmacokinetic parameters of control and treatment groups.

RESULTS

When tramadol administered intraperitoneally, the absorption rate of this drug was reduced, and a lower Cmax (40%) with longer Tmax (eight-fold) was achieved. MDMA exerted greater inhibitory effects on cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) than on cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6). The M2 metabolite ratio was reduced by half, and because of the inhibition of M2 production, the M1 plasma concentration slightly increased.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the obtained data, MDMA treatment affected the absorption, distribution and metabolism phases of tramadol. This treatment increased the concentration of tramadol if administered intravenously and can latent the absorption of tramadol in oral route. However, MDMA was introduced as CYP2D6 inhibitor; in this study, MDMA inhibited CYP3A4 isoenzymes as well. This finding is important for the compounds that are metabolized through CYP3A4. It can be proposed that in abusers of MDMA who only receive tramadol for medical or nonmedical purposes in short intervals, the dangers of the intravenous administration of tramadol should be considered, and if tramadol is administered orally, the desired effect may not be achieved at the routine dose.

Preliminary pharmacokinetics of tramadol hydrochloride after administration via different routes in male and female B6 mice

OBJECTIVE

1) To determine the pharmacokinetics of tramadol hydrochloride and its active metabolite, O-desmethyltramadol (M1), after administration through different routes in female and male C57Bl/6 mice; 2) to evaluate the stability of tramadol solutions; and 3) to identify a suitable dose regimen for prospective clinical analgesia in B6 mice.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, blinded, parallel design.

ANIMALS

A total of 18 male and 18 female C57Bl/6 mice (20-30 g).

METHODS

Mice were administered 25 mg kg^-1 tramadol as a bolus [intravenously (IV), intraperitoneally (IP), subcutaneously (SQ), orally per gavage (OS_gavage)] over 25 hours [orally in drinking water (OS_water) or Syrspend SF (OS_Syrsp)]. Venous blood was sampled at six predetermined time points over 4 to 31 hours, depending on administration route, to determine tramadol and M1 plasma concentrations (liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry detection). Pharmacokinetic parameters were described using a noncompartmental model. The stability of tramadol in water (acidified and untreated) and Syrspend SF (0.20 mg mL^-1) at ambient conditions for 1 week was evaluated.

RESULTS

After all administration routes, C_max was >100 ng mL^-1 for tramadol and >40 ng mL^-1 for M1 (reported analgesic ranges in man) followed by short half-lives (2-6 hours). The mean tramadol plasma concentration after self-administration remained >100 ng mL^-1 throughout consumption time. M1 was found in the OS_Syrs group only at 7 hours, whereas it was detectable in OS_water throughout administration. Tramadol had low oral bioavailability (26%). Short-lasting side effects were observed only after IV administration. Water and Syrspend SF solutions were stable for 1 week.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

1) At the dose administered, high plasma concentrations of tramadol and M1 were obtained, with half-life depending on the administration route. 2) Plasma levels were stable over self-consumption time. 3) Solutions were stable for 1 week at ambient conditions.

Tramadol does not enhance sedation induced by acepromazine in dogs

The sedative effect of acepromazine combined with 2 doses of tramadol [3 and 5 mg/kg body weight (BW)] was compared with the sedative effect of acepromazine alone in dogs and the effects of each sedative protocol on cardiorespiratory variables were examined. This was a prospective, randomized, blinded, crossover study. Each of 6 dogs received 3 treatments at 1-week intervals. During all anesthetic episodes, dogs received 0.05 mg/kg BW acepromazine. Approximately 25 min later, dogs were given physiological saline (control) or tramadol [3 mg/kg BW (TR3) or 5 mg/kg BW (TR5)]. All drugs were administered intravenously. Variables evaluated included heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), systolic, mean, and diastolic blood pressures (SAP, MAP, and DAP), and sedation [by use of a simple descriptive scale (SDS, range: 0 to 3) and a numeric rating scale (NRS, range: 0 to 10)]. Variables were recorded 25 min after acepromazine and for 80 min after saline or tramadol. Acepromazine administration resulted in mild sedation in most dogs and decreased RR, SAP, MAP, and DAP in all treatments. Tramadol administration did not significantly increase SDS or NRS scores compared to acepromazine alone. The only exception to this rule was observed at 20 min after TR3, when NRS was higher in this group than in the control treatment. Administration of tramadol (TR3 and TR5) decreased HR. Under the conditions of this study, sedation induced by acepromazine with tramadol was similar to that of acepromazine alone. The main adverse effects of the combination were a decrease in blood pressure and HR, without clinical significance.

Fatal visit to the general practitioner

A 31-year-old female asthmatic patient received an infusion of metamizole and tramadol for chronic pain at a GP surgery. After a few minutes, the patient developed breaing difficulties and died in spite of resuscitation measures. The general practitioner was suspected of medical malpractice. Medico-legal investigations confirmed the assumption that death was caused by anaphylacitic shock. In spite of temporary intubation into the oesophagus no evidence of medical malpractice was found, however.

LEVEL A IN VITRO-IN-IVO CORRELATION DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDA- TION FOR TRAMADOL HYDROCHLORIDE FORMULATIONS

The objective of this article is to develop and validate the level A in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) for three different formulations of tramadol hydrochloride. The formulations included were Tramazac® (Ml, conventional tablet) and TRD CONTIN® (M2, sustained release tablet), and a new controlled release tablet prepared on the basis of osmotic technology (formulation IVB). To develop level A IVIVC, in vivo data were deconvoluted into absorption data by using Wagner-Nelson equation. The absorption data (percent drug absorbed) was plotted against percent drug dissolved keeping the former along x-axis and the later along y-axis. The highest determination coefficient (R² = 0.9278) of the level A IVIVC was observed for formulation MI, and then for M2 (R² = 0.9046) and IVB (R² = 0.8796). Additionally, plasma drug levels were approximated from in vitio dissolution data using convolution approach to calculate the prediction error (%), which was found to be < 10%.

PREDICTIVE PHARMACOKINETICS OF TRAMADOL HYDROCHLORIDE FLOATING TABLETS

The purpose of this study was to propose the effectiveness of convolution approach to predict pharmacokinetics of tramadol hydrochloride floating tablets, prepared by using various ratios of carbopol, HPMC K100M, and Hibiscus rosa Sinensis as excipient. The in vitro dissolution test was conducted using paddle method in 900 mL of HCl buffer with pH 1.2 to simulate the gastric condition. The stirring speed of paddles was set at 70 rpm. Temperature of dissolution medium was adjusted at 37 ± 5 °C. At predetermined time points, 5 mL of dissolution samples were taken with a replacement of same volume using fresh medium. The obtained samples were analyzed at 271 nm using UV visible spectrophotometer. The values of predicted pharmacokinetic parameters like Cmax (maximum blood drug level), Tmax (time required to attain maximum blood drug level), and AUC (area under blood drug concentration curve) ranged between 80.8 ± 3.2-119.6 ± 4.7 ng/mL, 11.4 ± 0.2-12.2 ± 0.2 h, and 1430.5 ± 209.5-1970.6 ± 287.4 ng.h/mL, respectively. This certainly is a desired feature required at the formulation development step, where the formulator requires the development of a formulation using desired in vivo features on the basis of only accessible in vitro data. It can be concluded from the results that convolution method is a practical method for the prediction of drug concentration in blood and for quality control.

Differential Consequences of Tramadol in Overdosing: Dilemma of a Polymorphic Cytochrome P450 2D6-Mediated Substrate

Tramadol is a centrally acting opioid analgesic that is prone to polymorphic metabolism via cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6. The generation of the active metabolite, O-desmethyltramadol, which occurs through the CYP 2D6 pathway, significantly contributes to the drug's activity. However, dosage adjustments of tramadol are typically not practiced in the clinic when treating patients who are homozygous extensive metabolizers, heterozygous extensive metabolizers, or poor metabolizers. In the event of a tramadol overdose, the consequences may be influenced importantly by the genotype or phenotype status of the subject. Depending on the individual subject's CYP 2D6 status, one may see excessive miotic-related toxicity driven by the excessive availability of O-desmethyltramadol or one may manifest mydriatic-related toxicity driven by the excessive availability of tramadol. This report provides pharmacokinetic perspectives in situations of tramadol overdosing.

Formulation of bi-layer matrix tablets of tramadol hydrochloride: Comparison of rate retarding ability of the incorporated hydrophilic polymers

Bi-layer tablets of tramadol hydrochloride were prepared by direct compression technique. Each tablet contains an instant release layer with a sustained release layer. The instant release layer was found to release the initial dose immediately within minutes. The instant release layer was combined with sustained release matrix made of varying quantity of Methocel K4M, Methocel K15MCR and Carbomer 974P. Bi-layer tablets were evaluated for various physical tests including weight variation, thickness and diameter, hardness and percent friability. Drug release from bi-layer tablet was studied in acidic medium and buffer medium for two and six hours respectively. Sustained release of tramadol hydrochloride was observed with a controlled fashion that was characteristic to the type and extent of polymer used. % Drug release from eight-hour dissolution study was fitted with several kinetic models. Mean dissolution time (MDT) and fractional dissolution values (T25%, T50% and T80%) were also calculated as well, to compare the retarding ability of the polymers. Methocel K15MCR was found to be the most effective in rate retardation of freely water-soluble tramadol hydrochloride compared to Methocel K4M and Capbomer 974P, when incorporated at equal ratio in the formulation.

Simultaneous Determination of Tramadol and its Metabolite in Human Plasma by GC/MS

A simple and sensitive GC/MS method for the determination of tramadol and its metabolite (O-desmethyltramadol) in human plasma was developed and validated. Medazepam was used as an internal standard. The calibration curves were linear (r=0.999) over tramadol and O-desmethyltramadol concentrations ranging from 10 to 200 ng/mL and 7.5 to 300 ng/mL, respectively. The method had an accuracy of >95% and intra- and interday precision (RSD%) of ≤4.83% and ≤4.68% for tramadol and O-desmethyltramadol, respectively. The extraction recoveries were 97.6±1.21% and 96.3±1.66% for tramadol and O-desmethyltramadol, respectively. The LOQ using 0.5 mL human plasma was 10 ng/mL for tramadol and 7.5 ng/mL for O-desmethyltramadol. Stability studies showed that tramadol and O-desmethyltramadol were stable in human plasma after 8 h incubation at room temperature or after 1 week storage at -20°C with three freeze-thaw cycles. Also, this method was successfully applied to six patients who had been given an intravenous formulation of 100 mg tramadol with Cmax results of 2018.1±687.8 and 96.1±22.7 ng/mL for tramadol and O-desmethyltramadol, respectively.

Microparticulate drug delivery system containing tramadol hydrochloride for pain treatment

The current trend of replacing conventional pharmaceutical forms is justified because most substances administered in this form give fluctuations of therapeutic concentrations and often outside the therapeutic range. In addition, these formulations offer a reduction in the dose or the number of administrations, thus increasing patient compliance.

AIM

In the experiment, we developed an appropriate technology for the preparation of gelatin microspheres containing tramadol hydrochloride by emulsification/cross-linking method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The formulated microspheres were characterized by product yield, size distribution, encapsulation efficiency and in vitro release of tramadol hydrochloride. Data obtained from in vitro release studies were fitted to various mathematical models to elucidate the transport mechanisms. The kinetic models used were zero-order, first-order, Higuchi Korsmeyer-Peppas and Hopfenberg.

RESULTS

Spherical microspheres were obtained, with free-flowing properties. The entrapment efficiency of tramadol hydrochloride in microparticles was 79.91% and product yield -94.92%. As the microsphere size was increased, the entrapment efficiency increased. This was 67.56, 70.03, 79.91% for formulations MT80-250, MT8-500 and, MT250-500. High entrapment efficiency was observed for MT250-500 formulation. The gelatin microspheres had particle sizes ranging from 80 to 500 microm. The drug was released for a period of 12 hours with a maximum release of 96.02%. Of the three proposed formulations, MT250-500 presented desirable properties and optimal characteristics for the therapy of pain. Release of tramadol hydrochloridi was best fitted to Korsmeyer-Peppas equation because the Akaike Information Criterion had the lowest values for this kinetic model.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest the opportunity to influence the therapeutic characteristics of gelatin microspheres to obtain a suitable drug delivery system for the oral administration of tramadol hydrochloride.

The effect of processing variables on the mechanical and release properties of tramadol matrix tablets incorporating Cissus populnea gum as controlled release excipient

BACKGROUND

Natural gums are polymers widely used as excipients in drug formulation. Polymer extraction and formulation processing methods could significantly affect formulation characteristics.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate different methods of gum extraction and the effect of different compression methods on the mechanical and release properties of tramadol hydrochloride matrix tablets incorporating cissus gum as controlled release polymer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Water (CW) and acetone (CA) extracts of cissus gum were obtained from Cissus populea stem and two methods - wet granulation and direct compression - were used to compress the tablet and compare it with xanthan gum (X) formulations. Crushing strength and friability were used to assess mechanical properties while dissolution rate were used to assess release properties. Data were analysed using t-test and ANOVA at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

The crushing strength of tramadol tablets has increased together with the increase in polymer concentration in all formulations, while friability has decreased for both methods. Tablets made by wet granulation had higher crushing strength than those made by direct compression method. The release mechanism for both direct compression and wet granulation methods was Fickian and non-Fickian respectively. The rank order for t25, t50 and t75 for all formulations was X > CA > CW. Generally, wet granulation method decreased the rate of tramadol release more than direct compression method, indicating a higher drug retarding ability.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporation of cissus gum controlled the release of tramadol hydrochloride from the matrix tablets. Extraction method and formulation variables influenced mechanical and release properties of the tablets. Cissus gum acetone extract had comparable release properties with xanthan gum and could serve as a cheaper alternative in controlled release tablet formulations.

Biopharmaceutical evaluation of new slow release tablets obtained by hot tableting of coated pellets with tramadol hydrochloride

This study was aimed at a biopharmaceutical evaluation of a new oral dosage form of tramadol hydrochloride (TH)--slow release tablets obtained by hot tableting of coated pellets, 100 mg (TP), compared to the conventional slow release tablets, Tramal Retard, 100 mg (TR). Both TP and TR formulations showed a similar release profile of TH (f2 was 71) in in vitro release studies. The in vivo study was a two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence, single-oral dose 100 mg, crossover design using rabbit model with the phases separated by a washout period of 14 days. It was shown that the amount of TH absorbed into the systemic circulation is similar for TP and TR (the 90% confidence intervals for the AUC(0-1), AUC(0-infinity) and ratios were 85-122 and 92-107%, respectively). However, after administration of slow release tablets obtained by hot tableting of coated pellets, a prolonged absorption and elimination processes and a smoother and more extended plasma profile of TH were observed. It can be assumed that the use of a new oral dosage form of TH in patients affects the extension of analgesia after single administration of the drug, with its gradual absorption into the systemic circulation.

Physiology-based IVIVE predictions of tramadol from in vitro metabolism data

PURPOSE

To predict the tramadol in vivo pharmacokinetics in adults by using in vitro metabolism data and an in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE)-linked physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling and simulation approach (Simcyp®).

METHODS

Tramadol metabolism data was gathered using metabolite formation in human liver microsomes (HLM) and recombinant enzyme systems (rCYP). Hepatic intrinsic clearance (CLintH) was (i) estimated from HLM corrected for specific CYP450 contributions from a chemical inhibition assay (model 1); (ii) obtained in rCYP and corrected for specific CYP450 contributions by study-specific intersystem extrapolation factor (ISEF) values (model 2); and (iii) scaled back from in vivo observed clearance values (model 3). The model-predicted clearances of these three models were evaluated against observed clearance values in terms of relative difference of their geometric means, the fold difference of their coefficients of variation, and relative CYP2D6 contribution.

RESULTS

Model 1 underpredicted, while model 2 overpredicted the total tramadol clearance by -27 and +22%, respectively. The CYP2D6 contribution was underestimated in both models 1 and 2. Also, the variability on the clearance of those models was slightly underpredicted. Additionally, blood-to-plasma ratio and hepatic uptake factor were identified as most influential factors in the prediction of the hepatic clearance using a sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSION

IVIVE-PBPK proved to be a useful tool in combining tramadol's low turnover in vitro metabolism data with system-specific physiological information to come up with reliable PK predictions in adults.

In vitro - in vivo evaluation of a new oral dosage form of tramadol hydrochloride--controlled-release capsules filled with coated pellets

The aim of this study was an in vitro - in vivo evaluation of a new oral dosage form of tramadol hydrochloride (TH), controlled-release capsules filled with coated pellets, 100 mg (TC), compared to the sustained release tablets, Tramal Retard, 100 mg (TR). In vitro release study of both formulations showed a similar release profile of TH over 8 h (f2 was 52). In vivo study (single oral, 100 mg dose administration in 8 rabbits) showed that the amount of TH absorbed into the systemic circulation after TC and TR administration was also similar (90% CI for AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-infinity) were 90-124% and 97-109%, respectively). However, a comparison of AUC(0-t) of pharmacokinetics of TC and TR indicates significantly prolonged absorption and elimination processes of TH when the drug is given in controlled-release capsules filled with coated pellets. It was manifested by longer: mean absorption time (p = 0.0016), mean residence time (p = 0.0268), absorption half-life (p = 0.0016), elimination half-life (p = 0.0493) and lower: absorption rate constant (p = 0.0016), elimination rate constant (p = 0.0148) and total body clearance Cl/F (p = 0.0076). It may be concluded that the new TH formulation could be expected to have a more prolonged analgesic activity than commercial sustained release tablets.

Effect of the cytochrome P450 2D6*10 genotype on the pharmacokinetics of tramadol in post-operative patients

The cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) is the most highly polymorphic isoenzyme of the cytochrome P-450-system, which affects the metabolism of one-fourth of all prescription drugs. Tramadol, a narcotic-like pain reliever used to treat moderate to severe pain, is primarily metabolized by CYP2D6. The CYP2D6*10 allele is the most common allele in the Chinese population. Therefore, we investigated the effects of CYP2D6*10 on tramadol pharmacokinetics in 45 post-operative patients who had undergone gastrointestinal tract surgery. Tramadol was administered to the patients after the operation, and the plasma concentrations of tramadol and O-desmethyltramadol were subsequently evaluated at 12 time points. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed using non-compartmental methods. The area under the curve (AUC), plasma clearance (CL), elimination half-life (T1/2), mean residence time (MRT), peak concentration, and peak time of tramadol and O-desmethyltramadol were calculated. CYP2D6*10 was genotyped by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. The frequency of CYP2D6*10 alleles was 51% in the 45 patients. The patients were divided into three groups according to their CYP2D6*10 genotype: wild-type, heterozygous, and homozygous mutant. Pharmacokinetic parameters were compared among the three groups. The analyses showed that T1/2, MRT, and AUC of tramadol were larger, and CL was lower in homozygous mutant patients compared to the wild-type group (P< 0.05). These results show that the CYP2D6*10 genetic polymorphism has a significant impact on the pharmacokinetics of tramadol in Chinese post-operative patients.

[Pharmacokinetics of tramadol hydrochloride in the extracellular fluid of mouse frontal cortex studied by in vivo microdialysis]

The paper aims to explore the studying method for the pharmacokinetics of drugs in target organs, the pharmacokinetic process of tramadol hydrochloride in the extracellular fluid of frontal cortex (FrCx) of mice was investigated. Six male mice (Kunming strain) were anaesthetized (urethane, 1.8 g x kg(-1), ip) and secured on a stereotaxic frame. A microdialysis probe was implanted into the FrCx and perfused with artificial cerebrospinal fluid at a flow rate of 2 microL x min(-1). One hour later, mice were administrated (ip) with tramadol hydrochloride (50 mg x kg(-1)) and dialysates were collected continuously at 12-min intervals (24 microL each) for 6 h. The tramadol concentration in dialysates was determined by HPLC-Ultraviolet detection method, and the concentration-time curve and pharmacokinetic parameters of tramadol were calculated with DAS software. The results showed that the pharmacokinetic process of tramadol in the FrCx extracellular fluid of mice was fitted to a two-compartment open model, and the main pharmacokinetic parameters t1/2alpha, t1/2beta, t(max), C(max) and AUC(0-infinity) were (0.27 +/- 0.05) h, (2.72 +/- 0.24) h, (0.50 +/- 0.10) h, (2 110.37 +/- 291.22) microg x L(-1) and (4 474.51 +/- 441.79) microg x L(-1) x h, respectively. In conclusion, a studying method for pharmacokinetics of drugs in the target organ is established, which is simple and feasible. Tramadol hydrochloride shows a two-compartment model in the extracellular fluid of the mouse FrCx, and the distribution- and elimination half-life are 0.5 h and 2.7 h, respectively.

Tramadol hydrochloride

A profile of the analgesic tramadol hydrochloride ((1RS,2RS)-2-[(dimethylamino)methyl]-1-(3-methoxyphenyl)cyclohexanol hydrochloride) is provided in this chapter and includes a summary of the physical characteristics known for this drug substance (e.g., UV/vis, IR, NMR, and mass spectra). Details regarding the stability of tramadol hydrochloride in the solid state and solution-phase are presented and methods of analysis (compendial and literature) are summarized. Furthermore, an account of biological properties and a description of the chemical synthesis of tramadol hydrochloride are given.

Near-fatal tramadol cardiotoxicity in a CYP2D6 ultrarapid metabolizer

BACKGROUND

Tramadol is a synthetic, centrally acting analgesic for the treatment of moderate to severe pain. The marketed tramadol is a racemic mixture containing 50% (+)tramadol and 50% (-)tramadol and is mainly metabolized to O-desmethyltramadol (M1) by the cytochrome P450 CYP2D6. Tramadol is generally considered to be devoid of any serious adverse effects of traditional opioid receptor agonists, such as respiratory depression and drug dependence.

CASE REPORT

A 22-year-old Caucasian female patient was admitted to our ICU in refractory cardiac arrest requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. This aggressive support allowed resolution of multi-organ dysfunction syndrome. Repeated blood analyses using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry confirmed high concentrations of both tramadol and its main metabolite O-desmethyltramadol. Genotyping of CYP2D6 revealed the patient to be heterozygous for a duplicated wild-type allele, predictive of a CYP2D6 ultrarapid metabolizer (UM) phenotype, confirmed by calculation of the tramadol/M1 (MR1) metabolic ratio at all time points.

DISCUSSION

We here report a case of near-fatal isolated tramadol cardiotoxicity. Because of the inhibition of norepinephrine reuptake, excessive blood epinephrine levels in this CYP2D6R UM patient following excessive tramadol ingestion could explain the observed strong myocardial stunning. This patient admitted intermittent tramadol consumption to gain a "high" sensation. In patients with excessive morphinomimetic effects, levels of tramadol and its main metabolite M1could be measured, ideally combined with CYP2D6 genotyping, to identify individuals at risk of tramadol-related cardiotoxicity. Tramadol treatment could be optimized in these at-risk individuals, consequently improving patient outcome and safety.

Evaluation of ionotropic cross-linked chitosan/gelatin B microspheres of tramadol hydrochloride

Microspheres of tramadol hydrochloride (TM) for oral delivery were prepared by complex coacervation method without the use of chemical cross-linking agents such as glutaraldehyde to avoid the toxic reactions and other undesirable effects of the chemical cross-linking agents. Alternatively, ionotropic gelation was employed by using sodium-tripolyphosphate as cross-linking agent. Chitosan and gelatin B were used as polymer and copolymer, respectively. All the prepared microspheres were subjected to various physicochemical studies, such as drug-polymer compatibility by thin layer chromatography (TLC) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, surface morphology by scanning electron microscopy, frequency distribution, drug entrapment efficiency, in vitro drug release characteristics and release kinetics. The physical state of drug in the microspheres was determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and X-ray diffractometry (XRD). TLC and FTIR studies indicated no drug-polymer incompatibility. All the microspheres showed initial burst release followed by a fickian diffusion mechanism. DSC and XRD analysis indicated that the TM trapped in the microspheres existed in an amorphous or disordered-crystalline status in the polymer matrix. From the preliminary trials, it was observed that it may be possible to formulate TM microspheres by using biodegradable natural polymers such as chitosan and gelatin B to overcome the drawbacks of TM and to increase the patient compliance.

[Distribution of tramadol in acute poisoned rats]

OBJECTIVE

To develop a rapid and accurate gas chromatography method and investigate the distribution of tramadol in acute poisoned rats for information of samples selection and results evaluation in forensic identification.

METHODS

After an oral administration of tramadol at 1140 mg/kg (5 x LD50), concentrations of tramadol in rats' biological fluids and tissues were determined by gas chromatography.

RESULTS

The limit of detection of tramadol in blood and urine was 0.1 microg/mL and the limit of detection in liver was 0.1 microg/g. The intra-day precision and inter-day precision were within 3.1% and 5.5% respectively, and the recovery of tramadol in blood was more than 98%. The average levels of tramadol displayed in descending order of heart blood, liver, peripheral blood, urine, vitreous humor, kidney, lung, spleen, heart, brain respectively.

CONCLUSION

The established method could meet the requirements for toxicological analysis, and the results of the study suggest that blood, urine, liver, lung and kidney are suitable samples for forensic toxicological analysis in tramadol poisoning cases.

Adverse event profile of tramadol in recent clinical studies of chronic osteoarthritis pain

OBJECTIVE

To review the safety profile of tramadol hydrochloride (tramadol) in the treatment of chronic osteoarthritis pain, with specific reference to the incidence of adverse events (AEs) reported in large clinical trials.

METHODS

An extensive review of published clinical trials with tramadol was conducted, using literature searches in MEDLINE and EMBASE (since 1997) and the key search terms: tramadol, immediate-release (IR), extended-release (ER), sustained-release (SR), chronic pain, and osteoarthritis. Studies were included based on appropriate study design, appropriately reported safety data, and chronic osteoarthritis as a pain condition. Secondary analyses of previously published pain studies were excluded.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The most common AEs reported across all tramadol formulations were nausea, dizziness, constipation, vomiting, somnolence, and headache. Most AEs were mild to moderate in severity and occurred more commonly during initial treatment than during maintenance treatment. Differences in the rates of selected gastrointestinal and central nervous system AEs were seen between long-acting and immediate-release tramadol formulations, both within individual studies and across all studies. AEs appeared to be dose-dependent in fixed-dose studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides a robust base for descriptive assessment of AEs associated with long-acting tramadol formulations. Although the actions of different tramadol formulations are biologically similar, differences in pharmacokinetics, drug-release patterns, and availability may influence the incidence of AEs associated with tramadol. Because of the limitations of a qualitative safety analysis across studies with different populations and study designs, any observed differences should be interpreted with caution, but these differences may help educate healthcare providers about tramadol treatment in patients with chronic osteoarthritis pain and help them select the optimal dose for specific patients.

The pharmacokinetics, metabolism and urinary detection time of tramadol in camels

The pharmacokinetics of tramadol in camels (Camelus dromedarius) were studied following a single intravenous (IV) and a single intramuscular (IM) dose of 2.33 mg kg(-1) bodyweight. The drug's metabolism and urinary detection time were also investigated. Following both IV and IM administration, tramadol was extracted from plasma using an automated solid phase extraction method and the concentration measured by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS). The plasma drug concentrations after IV administration were best fitted by an open two-compartment model. However a three-compartment open model best fitted the IM data. The results (means+/-SEM) were as follows: after IV drug administration, the distribution half-life (t(1/2)(alpha)) was 0.22+/-0.05 h, the elimination half-life (t(1/2)(beta)) 1.33+/-0.18 h, the total body clearance (Cl(T)) 1.94+/-0.18 L h kg(-1), the volume of distribution at steady state (Vd(ss)) 2.58+/-0.44 L kg(-1), and the area under the concentration vs. time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) 1.25+/-0.13 mg h L(-1). Following IM administration, the maximal plasma tramadol concentration (C(max)) reached was 0.44+/-0.07 microg mL(-1) at time (T(max)) 0.57+/-0.11h; the absorption half-life (t(1/2 ka)) was 0.17+/-0.03 h, the (t(1/2)(beta)) was 3.24+/-0.55 h, the (AUC(0-infinity)) was 1.27+/-0.12 mg h L(-1), the (Vd(area)) was 8.94+/-1.41 L kg(-1), and the mean systemic bioavailability (F) was 101.62%. Three main tramadol metabolites were detected in urine. These were O-desmethyltramadol, N,O-desmethyltramadol and/or N-bis-desmethyltramadol, and hydroxy-tramadol. O-Desmethyltramadol was found to be the main metabolite. The urinary detection times for tramadol and O-desmethyltramadol were 24 and 48 h, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of tramadol in camels was characterised by a fast clearance, large volume of distribution and brief half-life, which resulted in a short detection time. O-Desmethyltramadol detection in positive cases would increase the reliability of reporting tramadol abuse.

Metabolism of two analgesic agents, tramadol-n-oxide and tramadol, in specific pathogen-free and axenic mice

The in vivo metabolism of both tramadol-N-oxide (TNO) and tramadol was investigated in urine pools obtained from 0-24 h after a single 300 mg kg-1 oral dose administration of each compound to specific pathogen-free and axenic mice. Unchanged TNO (< or =42% of the initial drug sample), tramadol, and 23 metabolites from TNO-treated mice and unchanged tramadol (< or =15% of the sample) plus 20 metabolites from tramadol-treated mice were profiled, quantified and tentatively identified on the basis of atmospheric pressure ionization mass spectrometry (API-MS) and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) data. Of the tramadol metabolites, five (M1-5) have been previously identified in mice. Of the tramadol and TNO metabolites, six (M18-23) are new metabolites. The tramadol and TNO metabolites were formed via the following seven metabolic pathways: N-oxide reduction (TNO), O/N-demethylation, cyclohexyloxidation, oxidative N-dealkylation, dehydration (TNO), N-oxidation (tramadol), and glucuronidation. Pathways 1-3 appear to be predominant steps forming four major O/N-desmethyl and hydroxycyclohexyl metabolites, and in conjunction with pathway 7, formed six minor glucuronides. Both tramadol-N-oxide and tramadol are extensively metabolized in mice, and no significant qualitative or quantitative differences in metabolism were observed between specific pathogen-free and axenic mice with the exception of a greater amount of unchanged TNO in axenic mice than in specific pathogen-free mice, more M2 in specific pathogen-free mice than in axenic mice in the TNO-dosed mice, and visa versa for M2 of tramadol-dosed mice.

Onset of analgesic effect and plasma levels of controlled-release tramadol (Tramadol Contramid once-a-day) 200-mg tablets in patients with acute low back pain

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Tramadol hydrochloride, a centrally acting, synthetic analgesic, has been available in Europe since 1977 in a variety of formulations and in the United States since 1995. Its clinical efficacy was established in a variety of painful conditions (cance rpain, neuropathic pain, and osteoarthritis). Nonetheless, little published data exist regarding the relationship between analgesic onset and minimum therapeutic plasma levels. Tramadol Contramid once-a-day (OAD) demonstrates a pharmacokinetic profile with a sharp initial absorption slope similar to the pharmacokinetic profile of the immediate-release tramadol, suggesting that both the immediate-release and the once-daily (Contramid) formulation may produce a similar onset of analgesia.

METHODS

This multicentre, open-label, single-dose study examined the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of Tramadol Contramid OAD in patients with acute low back pain. Patients who signed informed consent were screened and washed-out of prior analgesics. Patients received one dose of Tramadol Contramid OAD 200 mg. The patients indicated the time of onset of pain relief (stopwatch method). Ratings of pain intensity and pain relief and pharmacokinetic samples were taken prior to dosing, at the onset of pain relief and 3 and 6 hours postdose. No rescue medication was permitted until the end of the study (6-hour postdose). Adverse events were monitored throughout the study.

RESULTS

Forty of the 47 patients enrolled completed the study. Onset of perceptible pain relief was achieved within 1 hour for the majority of patients and at plasma levels, suggesting a therapeutic threshold between 50 and 100 ng/mL. Two patients did not experience any pain relief

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this exploratory study suggest that similar to immediate-release tramadol, onset of analgesia for this controlled-release formulation of tramadol (Tramadol Contramid OAD) occurs within 1 hour at a mean therapeutic threshold concentration of 56 +/- 38 ng/mL.

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous tramadol in dogs

The purpose of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetics of tramadol and the active metabolite mono-O-desmethyltramadol (M1) in 6 healthy male mixed breed dogs following intravenous injection of tramadol at 3 different dose levels. Verification of the metabolism to the active metabolite M1, to which most of the analgesic activity of this agent is attributed to, was a primary goal. Quantification of the parent compound and the M1 metabolite was performed using gas chromatography. Pharmacodynamic evaluations were performed at the time of patient sampling and included assessment of sedation, and evaluation for depression of heart and respiratory rates. This study confirmed that while these dogs were able to produce the active M1 metabolite following intravenous administration of tramadol, the M1 concentrations were lower than previously reported in research beagles. Adverse effects were minimal, with mild dose-related sedation in all dogs and nausea in 1 dog. Analgesia was not documented with the method of assessment used in this study. Tramadol may be useful in canine patients, but additional studies in the canine population are required to more accurately determine the effective clinical use of the drug in dogs and quantification of M1 concentrations in a wider population of patients.

Supra-additive effects of tramadol and acetaminophen in a human pain model ☆

The combination of analgesic drugs with different pharmacological properties may show better efficacy with less side effects. Aim of this study was to examine the analgesic and antihyperalgesic properties of the weak opioid tramadol and the non-opioid acetaminophen, alone as well as in combination, in an experimental pain model in humans. After approval of the local Ethics Committee, 17 healthy volunteers were enrolled in this double-blind and placebo-controlled study in a cross-over design. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation at high current densities (29.6+/-16.2 mA) induced spontaneous acute pain (NRS=6 of 10) and distinct areas of hyperalgesia for painful mechanical stimuli (pinprick-hyperalgesia). Pain intensities as well as the extent of the areas of hyperalgesia were assessed before, during and 150 min after a 15 min lasting intravenous infusion of acetaminophen (650 mg), tramadol (75 mg), a combination of both (325 mg acetaminophen and 37.5mg tramadol), or saline 0.9%. Tramadol led to a maximum pain reduction of 11.7+/-4.2% with negligible antihyperalgesic properties. In contrast, acetaminophen led to a similar pain reduction (9.8+/-4.4%), but a sustained antihyperalgesic effect (34.5+/-14.0% reduction of hyperalgesic area). The combination of both analgesics at half doses led to a supra-additive pain reduction of 15.2+/-5.7% and an enhanced antihyperalgesic effect (41.1+/-14.3% reduction of hyperalgesic areas) as compared to single administration of acetaminophen. Our study provides first results on interactions of tramadol and acetaminophen on experimental pain and hyperalgesia in humans. Pharmacodynamic modeling combined with the isobolographic technique showed supra-additive effects of the combination of acetaminophen and tramadol concerning both, analgesia and antihyperalgesia. The results might act as a rationale for combining both analgesics.

Both postnatal and postmenstrual age contribute to the interindividual variability in tramadol glucuronidation in neonates

INTRODUCTION

Although of pharmacokinetic and -dynamic relevance, data on ontogeny of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) activity in neonates are scant. We therefore wanted to assess the impact of both postnatal and postmenstrual age (PNA/PMA) on the interindividual variability of glucuronidation to overall tramadol urinary elimination in neonates.

METHODS

O-demethyl tramadol (M1) and M1-glucuronide (M1G) were determined in 24 hour urine collections during continuous intravenous tramadol administration in neonates. Glucuronidation fraction (%) was calculated by the ratio of M1G to the sum of M1G and M1 free (M1total). Fractions (%) in early (<day 8) or late neonatal life (day 8-28) were compared (Mann-Whitney U) and forward multiple regression was applied to assess the impact of various covariates.

RESULTS

Urine collections were available in 59 neonates with a PNA of 6 (1-28) days and a PMA of 38 (SD 4) weeks. Mean M1G/M1total was 27 (SD 15) % and was significantly lower in early compared to late neonatal life (22 versus 32%, p=0.0001). In a forward multiple regression model, both PMA and early versus late neonatal life remained independent variables to explain the interindividual variability in M1G/M1total.

CONCLUSIONS

Besides PMA, there is an additional, independent impact of PNA since phenotypic glucuronidation activity is significantly lower in the first week of postnatal life. These findings should be taken into account in the assessment of compounds for whom glucuronidation is of pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic or toxicological relevance.

[Importance of the formulation for a chronopharmacologically optimised way of pain therapy. Results of a comparative bioavailability study of tramadol extended-release capsules after single-dose evening versus morning administration]

Objective of this study was to investigate the rate and extent of tramadol bioavailability following evening versus morning administration.

METHODS

The study was performed following an open, randomised, cross-over study-design. 18 male and female volunteers were enrolled into the study and treated with 200 mg tramadol extended-release capsules (T-long), which were to be taken either in the morning or in the evening.

RESULTS

Plasma concentration versus time profiles obtained after morning and evening administration were almost superimposable for both, tramadol and its active metabolite. Maximum exposure of tramadol and O-desmethyltramadol (geometric means of c(max)-values) as well as extent of exposure (geometric means of AUC(0-48)-values) were comparable after morning and eveningadministration.

CONCLUSIONS

Time-point of administration does not have any relevant impact on the rate and extent of absorption in the investigated dosage form. Thus, time-point of administration may be adjusted to the patient's need in a chronopharmacologically optimised way for pain therapy.

Pharmacokinetics of oral tramadol in patients with liver cancer

BACKGROUND

There are no studies reported on pharmacokinetics of opioids in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, the fifth most common cancer in the world.

METHODS

The authors have studied the pharmacokinetic profile of oral tramadol (50 mg) capsule in 20 patients with liver carcinoma (10 with primary carcinoma on top of chronic hepatitis C and 10 with secondary metastatic liver malignancy as a result of other primary) compared with 10 healthy controls. Plasma tramadol concentrations were measured in venous samples at intervals up to 12 hours by high-pressure liquid chromatography. Allpharmacokinetic variables were evaluated using one-compartment model.

RESULTS

Tramadol bioavailability showed a substantial increase in patients with primary liver cancer and secondary metastatic than that of control (98 percent, 75 percent, and 68 percent, respectively). The area under the serum concentration-time curve increased significantly in patients with primary and metastatic cancer of liver than in control [1,933 microg/h/L (SD = 41), 1,327 microg/h/L (SD = 51), 1,138.5 microg/h/L (SD = 31), respectively]. Also, a significant difference in Cmax and Tmax was found between patients with malignant liver and control. Reduced clearance and impaired elimination was significantly observed in patients with liver carcinoma than control. Clearance was reduced to 50 percent of control, and elimination halflife increased up to three folds in patients with primary liver carcinoma than that of control. Satisfactory pain relief with minimal side effects was observed all over study period.

CONCLUSION

It is recommended to lengthen the dose interval of oral tramadol, if it is to be used in patients with liver cancer for analgesic purposes, to 50 mg every 12 hours as it is proved to be effective and safe.

Neonatal clinical pharmacology: recent observations of relevance for anaesthesiologists

Neonatal drug dosing needs to be based on the physiological characteristics of the newborn, the pharmacokinetic parameters of the drug and has to take maturational aspects of drug disposition into account. We would like to provide the reader with some recently published compound-specific observations (paracetamol, ibuprofen, tramadol, propofol) in neonates of relevance for anaesthesiologists. Age-specific dosing regimes of intravenous paracetamol have been evaluated and were well tolerated, independent of the postnatal age. Administration of ibuprofen or acetyl salicylic acid resulted in a transient reduction of 20% of the glomerular filtration rate and should be used cautiously in newborns. Both postmenstrual age and pharmacogenetics (CYP2D6) were covariates of tramadol metabolism in newborns. Tramadol seems to be a potential useful analgesic for term neonates and infants, but has limited indications in (extreme) preterm neonates. Finally, propofol clearance depends on post-menstrual and postnatal age. There is a risk for accumulation in preterms and in the first two weeks of postnatal life.

Urinary metabolites to assess in vivo ontogeny of hepatic drug metabolism in early neonatal life

In addition to size-dependent allometric metabolic activity, most isoenzymes display age-dependent isoenzyme-specific ontogeny. We therefore need probe drugs to describe isoenzyme-specific ontogeny to develop more sophisticated, physiologically based models. We illustrate the feasibility and the relevance of in vivo assessment of hepatic metabolism, based on observations on urinary elimination of paracetamol and tramadol metabolites in neonates. On the basis of the observations on tramadol disposition, we were able to document that O-demethylation phenotypic activity developed sooner when compared with N-demethylation. During repeated administration of intravenous paracetamol, it was documented that, in addition to postmenstrual and postnatal age (PNA), repeated administration also contributed to the urinary excretion of glucuronidated paracetamol. In both probe drugs evaluated, age only in part explained the interindividual variability observed. Urine metabolites to assess in vivo metabolism of drugs routinely administered in neonates likely increase both the feasibility and clinical relevance of studies on in vivo isoenzyme-specific ontogeny in neonates.

Fatal intoxication due to tramadol alone: case report and review of the literature

Poisoning may also lead to both coma and multiple organ failure, also in youngsters without a known major medical history. As not all toxic agents are routinely screened when a poisoning is suspected, it is useful to consider less frequently encountered poisons in certain cases. We describe the occurrence of asystole and multiple organ failure which occurred in a young man after a suspected tramadol overdose. The tramadol concentration on admission in the ICU was indeed 8 microg/ml (mg/l), far above the therapeutic range. Subsequently, the patient developed severe acute liver failure, finally leading to death. Post-mortem toxicology did not reveal any other poison responsible for this unfavourable course as only very high serum and tissue tramadol and desmethyltramadol concentrations were found. Only a few fatal poisonings attributable to tramadol alone, as observed in our case, have been reported. An overview of these cases is presented.

Impact of CYP2D6 genetic polymorphism on tramadol pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Tramadol is metabolized by the highly polymorphic enzyme cytochrome P450 (CYP)2D6. Patients with different CYP2D6 genotypes may respond differently to tramadol in terms of pain relief and adverse events. In this study, we compare the pharmacokinetics and effects of tramadol in Malaysian patients with different genotypes to establish the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship of tramadol.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

All patients received an intravenous dose of tramadol 100mg as their first postoperative analgesic. Blood was sampled at 0 minutes and subsequently at 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 hours for serum tramadol and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Patients were genotyped for CYP2D6*1, *3, *4, *5, *9, *10, and *17 alleles and duplication of the gene by means of an allele-specific PCR. Pain was measured using the Visual Analog Scales, and adverse effects were recorded.

RESULTS

About half of the patients had the wild-type allele (CYP2D6*1), with the 'Asian'CYP2D6*10 allele accounting for most of the rest (40%). None of the genotypes predicted poor metabolism. Twenty-seven percent of the patients were intermediate metabolizers (IM) and 2.9% were ultra-rapid (UM) metabolizers; the remaining 70% were extensive metabolizers (EM). The mean total clearance (CL) predicted by the model was lower (19 L/h) and the half-life longer (5.9 hours) than those reported in Western populations. This may due to the high frequency of the CYP2D6*10 allele amongst Malaysian patients. The UM and EM groups had 2.6- and 1.3-times faster CL, respectively, than the IM. CL was 16, 18, 23, and 42 L/h while mean half-lives were 7.1, 6.8, 5.6, and 3.8 hours among the IM, EM1, EM2, and UM groups, respectively. However, the analgesic effects of tramadol were not measured adequately among the postoperative patients to establish its full therapeutic effects. There were significant differences in the adverse-effect profiles amongst the various genotype groups, with the IM group experiencing more adverse effects than the EM, and the EM having more adverse effects than the UM.

CONCLUSION

CYP2D6 activity may play an important role in determining the pharmacokinetics of tramadol and in predicting its adverse effects. If these results can be confirmed in a larger population, genotyping may be an important tool in determining the dose of tramadol.

Improved liquid chromatographic method for the simultaneous determination of tramadol and its three main metabolites in human plasma, urine and saliva

Tramadol, an analgesic agent, and its main metabolites O-desmethyltramadol (M1), N-desmethyltramadol (M2) and O,N-didesmethyltramadol (M5) were determined simultaneously in human plasma, saliva and urine by a rapid and specific HPLC method. The sample preparation was a simple, one-step, extraction with ethyl acetate. Chromatographic separation was achieved with a Chromolith Performance RP-18e 100 mm x 4.6 mm column, using a mixture of methanol:water (19:81, v/v) adjusted to pH 2.5 by phosphoric acid, in an isocratic mode at flow rate of 2 ml/min. Fluorescence detection (lambda(ex) 200 nm/lambda(em) 301 nm) was used. The calibration curves were linear (r(2)>0.996) in the concentration ranges in plasma, saliva and urine. The lower limit of quantification was 2.5 ng/ml for all compounds. The within- and between-day precisions in the measurement of QC samples at four tested concentrations were acceptable in all analyzed body fluids The developed procedure was applied to assess the pharmacokinetics of tramadol and its main metabolites following administration of 100mg single oral dose of tramadol to healthy volunteers.

Single- and multiple-dose bioequivalence of two once-daily tramadol formulations using stereospecific analysis of tramadol and its demethylated (M1 and M5) metabolites

OBJECTIVE

To assess bioequivalence of two once-daily formulations of tramadol (T) as well as delineate pharmacokinetics of its enantiomers and those of its main metabolites after single- and multiple-dose administration.

METHODS

Single- and multiple-dose studies were conducted separately each in 48 healthy volunteers using an open-label, randomized, crossover design. Subjects received the 200 mg test (Tramadolor) and reference (Ultram ER) formulations in a randomized manner separated by a 7-day washout period once (single-dose study) or once daily for 7 days (multiple-dose study). Blood was sampled on days 1-2 (single-dose) or days 4-7 (multiple-dose), and plasma samples were analyzed using a stereospecific assay for quantitation of individual enantiomers of T and its active O-demethylated (M1) and N,O-demethylated (M5) metabolites. Bioequivalence was assessed using log-transformation and 90% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

All analytes showed stereoselectivity after single and multiple doses of both products, with average concentrations of (+)-T, (-)-M1, and (-)-M5 exceeding those of their respective antipode. However, a decrease in steady-state oral clearance of T relative to single dose was not stereoselective. In both studies, the formulations were bioequivalent with regard to AUG and Cmax for both enantiomers of all analytes. The Tmax for the reference (10-12 h) was significantly (p < 0.05) longer than that for the test (5-6 h). Degree of fluctuation of T enantiomers after the test was greater than the reference. Both formulations were tolerated relatively well.

CONCLUSIONS

Tramadolor and Ultram ER were bioequivalent for both enantiomers of T, M1 and M5. It is unlikely there would be any significant clinical differences between the two formulations.

[Pharmacokinetics of tramadol in children]

The recent studies focusing on the pharmacokinetics of tramadol in children contributed to the increase popularity of tramadol as an analgesic alternative in clinical practice. Tramadol is a racemic mixture of 2 enantiomers that have comparable pharmacokinetic profile and this lack of difference is also observed with their main active metabolite, O-demethyl tramadol (M1). The serum concentrations of this metabolite depend largely on the activity of the cytochrome P450 and particularly of the enzyme CYP2D6 which reaches its maturity in the newborn. Nevertheless, the interindividual variability observed in the pharmacokinetics of tramadol and consequently in the pharmacodynamic profile is mainly due to the genetic polymorphism of cytochrome P450.

Comparative metabolic capabilities and inhibitory profiles of CYP2D6.1, CYP2D6.10, and CYP2D6.17

Polymorphisms in the cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) gene are a major cause of pharmacokinetic variability in human. Although the poor metabolizer phenotype is known to be caused by two null alleles leading to absence of functional CYP2D6 protein, the large variability among individuals with functional alleles remains mostly unexplained. Thus, the goal of this study was to examine the intrinsic enzymatic differences that exist among the several active CYP2D6 allelic variants. The relative catalytic activities (enzyme kinetics) of three functionally active human CYP2D6 allelic variants, CYP2D6.1, CYP2D6.10, and CYP2D6.17, were systematically investigated for their ability to metabolize a structurally diverse set of clinically important CYP2D6-metabolized drugs [atomoxetine, bufuralol, codeine, debrisoquine, dextromethorphan, (S)-fluoxetine, nortriptyline, and tramadol] and the effects of various CYP2D6-inhibitors [cocaine, (S)-fluoxetine, (S)-norfluoxetine, imipramine, quinidine, and thioridazine] on these three variants. The most significant difference observed was a consistent but substrate-dependent decease in the catalytic efficiencies of cDNA-expressed CYP2D6.10 and CYP2D6.17 compared with CYP2D6.1, yielding 1.32 to 27.9 and 7.33 to 80.4% of the efficiency of CYP2D6.1, respectively. The most important finding from this study is that there are mixed effects on the functionally reduced allelic variants in enzyme-substrate affinity or enzyme-inhibitor affinity, which is lower, higher, or comparable to that for CYP2D6.1. Considering the rather high frequencies of CYP2D6*10 and CYP2D6*17 alleles for Asians and African Americans, respectively, these data provide further insight into ethnic differences in CYP2D6-mediated drug metabolism. However, as with all in vitro to in vivo extrapolations, caution should be applied to the clinical consequences.

Concentrations of tramadol and O-desmethyltramadol enantiomers in different CYP2D6 genotypes

The influence of CYP2D6 genotype and CYP2D6 inhibitors on enantiomeric plasma levels of tramadol and O-desmethyltramadol as well as response to tramadol was investigated. One hundred and seventy-four patients received one hundred intravenous tramadol 3 mg/kg for postoperative analgesia. Blood samples drawn 30, 90, and 180 min after administration were analyzed for plasma concentrations of the enantiomers (+)-, (-)tramadol and (+)-, (-)O-desmethyltramadol by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Different CYP2D6 genotypes displaying zero (poor metabolizer (PM)), one (heterozygous individual (HZ)/intermediate metabolizer (IM)), two extensive metabolizer (EM), and three (ultra rapid metabolizer (UM)) active genes were compared. Concentrations of O-desmethyltramadol differed in the four genotype groups. Median (1/3 quartile) area under the concentration-time curves for (+)O-desmethyltramadol were 0 (0/11.4), 38.6 (15.9/75.3), 66.5 (17.1/118.4), and 149.7 (35.4/235.4) ng x h/ml for PMs, HZ/IMs, EMs, and UMs (P<0.001). Comedication with CYP2D6 inhibitors decreased (+) O-desmethyltramadol concentrations (P<0.01). In PMs, non-response rates to tramadol treatment increased fourfold compared with the other genotypes (P<0.001). In conclusion, CYP2D6 genotype determined concentrations of O-desmethyltramadol enantiomers and influenced efficacy of tramadol treatment.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of tramadol IR and SR in elderly patients: a prospective, age-group-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Tramadol is widely prescribed, even to the eldest patients. Although age-related differences in pharmacologic responsiveness are to be expected, the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of tramadol have not been systematically compared between patients of various ages.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore the effectiveness, PK properties, and safety profile of 2 galenic tramadol formulations in 3 similarly sized age groups with malignant and nonmalignant pain of moderate to severe intensity.

METHODS

This prospective, age-group-controlled study was conducted at the ambulatory pain clinic of the Landeskrankenhaus Kärnten, Klagenfurt, Austria. Male and female adults with malignant and nonmalignant pain of moderate to severe intensity were eligible. Patients were stratified into similarly sized age groups, as follows: >or=75, 65-<75, and <65 years. Patients first received the immediate-release galenic formulation of tramadol (tramadol IR) until steady state was achieved, followed by the sustained-release formulation (tramadol SR) until steady state. Serum concentrations of tramadol and its active metabolite (O-desmethyl-tramadol [M1]) were measured using gas chromatography to estimate the age-related PK handling of the analgesic drug. Three validated scales were used to measure pain intensity during the study: a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), an 11-point numeric analog scale (NAS), and a 4-point verbal rating scale (VRS). Tolerability was assessed by evaluating daily answers about the potential occurrence of adverse events (and respective details such as type and severity) from baseline until the end of the observation period.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were enrolled (58 women, 42 men; mean [SD] age, 65.2 [15.0] years; >or=75, 30 patients; 65-<75, 31 patients; and <65 years, 39 patients). Predominant causes of pain were neoplasms (27.4% of causes) and injury and other external causes (20.8%), and diseases of the musculoskeletal and connective-tissues systems (19.8%). Fifty-five patients completed the study and provided all data as planned. Mean (SEM) steady-state tramadol IR doses were 250 (20.2), 277 (39.8), and 325 (33.1) mg/d in patients aged >or=75, 65-<75, and 65 years, respectively (P = NS); tramadol SR, 278 (27.5), 306 (39.7), and 340 (35.1) mg/d (P = NS). Serum concentrations of tramadol and M1 were statistically similar across all 3 age groups. Overall, mean pain intensity scores, as measured using the VAS and NAS, were decreased from baseline (62.4 [2.0] mm and 6.22 [0.22] points, respectively) to steady state with tramadol IR (23.6 [2.9] mm and 2.65 [0.30] points) and tramadol SR (16.9 [2.5] mm and 1.91 [0.26] points) (all, P < 0.001). Pain intensity before and improvements during both treatment phases were similar across all 3 age groups.

RESULTS

for pain intensity on the VRS also did not find age-related differences. The predominant adverse effects were nausea (27.0% of patients), dizziness and giddiness (18.0%), and malaise and fatigue (15.0%); no significant differences in adverse events were found between age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The fate of tramadol and its active metabolite, and their clinical effects, have been examined here for the first time in a prospective cohort study, which compared patients aged <65 years, 65-<75 years, and >or=75 years. In contrast to expectations, it was concluded that tramadol IR and tramadol SR were both generally well tolerated and effective in the treatment of moderate to severe pain in any of the 3 age groups in these patients. Although the eldest group of patients consumed, on average, 20% less tramadol (P = NS) than the youngest group, the PK properties of both drugs were not changed when given to elderly patients.