Ethical and practical implications of the human genome initiative for family medicine

Ethical aspects of genetic testing

This article explores ethical concerns and emerging dilemmas associated with the proliferation of information resulting from the extraordinary advances in molecular genetics. It provides an overview of the ethical and legal challenges associated with predictive testing for inherited disease currently being addressed in the literature. Finally, it offers a framework of ethical principles that can be used to guide nurses and other practitioners in the appropriate application of research findings to the clinical practice setting. The ethical guidelines of self-determination, benefit-burden ratio, and justice promulgated in The Belmont Report are interpreted in the new context of predictive genetic testing. The author concludes by discussing how to balance the technical imperative to advance genetic knowledge for the sake of human health with the ethical imperative to preserve the fundamental rights and liberties of both individuals and communities who are its recipients.

Family history-taking in community family practice: implications for genetic screening

PURPOSE

To identify characteristics of physicians, patients, and visits associated with obtaining family history information in community family practice.

METHODS

Research nurses directly observed 4,454 patient visits to 138 family physicians and reviewed office medical records.

RESULTS

Family history was discussed during 51% of visits by new patients and 22% of visits by established patients. Physicians' rates of family history-taking varied from 0% to 81% of visits. Family history was more often discussed at well care rather than illness visits. The average duration of family history discussions was <2.5 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

These data can form the basis for realistic interventions to increase the use of family history in primary care.

Family physicians' perspectives on genetics and the human genome project

The objective of the study was to determine family physicians' attitudes and beliefs about human genetics research and the human genome project (HGP). The design of the study involved qualitative, semi-structured interviews. Primary variables of interest included family physicians' training; their attitudes about the HGP; requests for genetics counseling; and their approaches to counseling requests. The setting was a medium-sized, Midwest, US city. The participants were 16 university-affiliated, community-based family physicians. For contents analysis, we used a coding scheme to identify illustrative themes and subthemes. While most of the family physicians reported familiarity with genetics and the HGP, and experiences with counseling requests, nearly all (15) reported little training in genetics counseling. Four major themes were identified: 1) impact on clinical care; 2) educational issues relevant to genetics and the HGP; 3) ethical concerns; and 4) family medicine responsibilities. These family physicians do not perceive genetics as having a substantial impact on their practice, but do expect major clinical changes in the future. Many feel there have been inadequate educational opportunities to learn about genetics, and some indicate reluctance to invest in self-education until genetic problems become more clinically relevant. These practitioners envision a role for family medicine the specialty to shape priorities in genetics research.