Hyperthermia after cardiac arrest is associated with an unfavorable neurologic outcome

The medical treatment of cardiogenic shock

Cardiogenic shock is characterized by tissue hypoperfusion due to the inadequate cardiac output to maintain the tissue oxygen demand. Despite some advances in cardiogenic shock management, extremely high mortality is still associated with this clinical syndrome. Its management is based on the immediate stabilization of hemodynamic parameters through medical care and the use of mechanical circulatory supports in specialized centers. This review aims to understand the cardiogenic shock current medical treatment, consisting mainly of inotropic drugs, vasopressors and coronary revascularization. In addition, we highlight the relevance of applying measures to other organ levels based on the optimization of mechanical ventilation and the appropriate initiation of renal replacement therapy.

Emergent Management of Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury

OBJECTIVE

This article outlines interventions used to improve outcomes for patients with hypoxic-ischemic brain injury after cardiac arrest.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Emergent management of patients after cardiac arrest requires prevention and treatment of primary and secondary brain injury. Primary brain injury is minimized by excellent initial resuscitative efforts. Secondary brain injury prevention requires the detection and correction of many pathophysiologic processes that may develop in the hours to days after the initial arrest. Key physiologic parameters important to secondary brain injury prevention include optimization of mean arterial pressure, cerebral perfusion, oxygenation and ventilation, intracranial pressure, temperature, and cortical hyperexcitability. This article outlines recent data regarding the treatment and prevention of secondary brain injury. Different patients likely benefit from different treatment strategies, so an individualized approach to treatment and prevention of secondary brain injury is advisable. Clinicians must use multimodal sources of data to prognosticate outcomes after cardiac arrest while recognizing that all prognostic tools have shortcomings.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Neurologists should be involved in the postarrest care of patients with hypoxic-ischemic brain injury to improve their outcomes. Postarrest care requires nuanced and patient-centered approaches to the prevention and treatment of primary and secondary brain injury and neuroprognostication.

Factors associated with fever after cardiac arrest: A post-hoc analysis of the FINNRESUSCI study

BACKGROUND

Fever after cardiac arrest may impact outcome. We aimed to assess the incidence of fever in post-cardiac arrest patients, factors predicting fever and its association with functional outcome in patients treated without targeted temperature management (TTM).

METHODS

The FINNRESUSCI observational cohort study in 2010-2011 included intensive care unit (ICU)-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients from all five Finnish university hospitals and 14 of 15 central hospitals. This post hoc analysis included those FINNRESUSCI study patients who were not treated with TH. We defined fever as at least one temperature measurement of ≥37.8°C within 72 h of ICU admission. The primary outcome was favourable functional outcome at 12 months, defined as cerebral performance category (CPC) of 1 or 2. Binary logistic regression models including witnessed arrest, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), initial rhythm and delay of return of spontaneous circulation were used to compare the functional outcomes of the groups.

RESULTS

There were 67,428 temperature measurements from 192 patients, of whom 89 (46%) experienced fever. Twelve-month CPC was missing in 7 patients, and 51 (28%) patients had favourable functional outcome at 12 months. The patients with shockable initial rhythms had a lower incidence of fever within 72 h of ICU admission (28% vs. 72%, p < .01), and the patients who experienced fever had a longer median return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) delay (20 [IQR 10-30] vs. 14 [IQR 9-22] min, p < .01). Only initial non-shockable rhythm (OR 2.99, 95% CI 1.51-5.94) was associated with increased risk of fever within the first 72 h of ICU admission. Neither time in minutes nor area (minutes  ×  degree celsius over threshold) over 37°C, 37.5°C, 38°C, 38.5°C, 39°C, 39.5°C or 40°C were significantly different in those with favourable functional outcome compared to those with unfavourable functional outcome within the first 24, 48 or 72 h from ICU admission. Fever was not associated with favourable functional outcome at 12 months (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.44-1.84).

CONCLUSIONS

Half of OHCA patients not treated with TTM developed fever. We found no association between fever and outcome.

Fluid dynamics of life: exploring the physiology and importance of water in the critical illness

Water acknowledged as a vital component for life and the universal solvent, is crucial for diverse physiological processes in the human body. While essential for survival, the human body lacks the capacity to produce water, emphasizing the need for regular ingestion to maintain a homeostatic environment. The human body, predominantly composed of water, exhibits remarkable biochemical properties, playing a pivotal role in processes such as protein transport, thermoregulation, the cell cycle, and acid–base balance. This review delves into comprehending the molecular characteristics of water and its interactions within the human body. The article offers valuable insights into the intricate relationship between water and critical illness. Through a comprehensive exploration, it seeks to enhance our understanding of water’s pivotal role in sustaining overall human health.

Association of temperature management strategy with fever in critically ill children after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Objective

To determine whether ICU temperature management strategy is associated with fever in children with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

Methods

We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study at a quaternary Children's hospital between 1/1/2016-31/12/2020. Mechanically ventilated children (<18 y/o) admitted to Pediatric or Cardiac ICU (PICU/CICU) with ROSC after OHCA who survived at least 72 h were included. Primary exposure was initial PICU/CICU temperature management strategy of: (1) passive management; or (2) warming with an air-warming blanket; or (3) targeted temperature management with a heating/cooling (homeothermic) blanket. Primary outcome was fever (≥38°C) within 72 h of admission.

Results

Over the study period, 111 children with ROSC after OHCA were admitted to PICU/CICU, received mechanical ventilation and survived at least 72 h. Median age was 31 (IQR 6-135) months, 64% (71/111) were male, and 49% (54/111) were previously healthy. Fever within 72 h of admission occurred in 51% (57/111) of patients. The choice of initial temperature management strategy was associated with occurrence of fever (χ2 = 9.36, df = 2, p = 0.009). Fever occurred in 60% (43/72) of patients managed passively, 45% (13/29) of patients managed with the air-warming blanket and 10% (1/10) of patients managed with the homeothermic blanket. Compared to passive management, use of homeothermic, but not of air-warming, blanket reduced fever risk [homeothermic: Risk Ratio (RR) = 0.17, 95%CI 0.03-0.69; air-warming: RR = 0.75, 95%CI 0.46-1.12]. To prevent fever in one child using a homeothermic blanket, number needed to treat (NNT) = 2.

Conclusion

In critically ill children with ROSC after OHCA, ICU temperature management strategy is associated with fever. Use of a heating/cooling blanket with homeothermic feedback reduces fever incidence during post-arrest care.

Comparative before-after study of fever prevention versus targeted temperature management following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Background

International guidelines for neuroprotection following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) recommend fever prevention ahead of routine temperature management. This study aimed to identify any effect of changing from targeted temperature management to fever prevention on neurological outcome following OHCA.

Methods

A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted of consecutive admissions to an ICU at a tertiary OHCA centre. Comparison was made between a period of protocolised targeted temperature management (TTM) to 36 °C and a period of fever prevention.

Results

Data were available for 183 patients. Active temperature management was administered in 86/118 (72%) of the TTM cohort and 20/65 (31%) of the fever prevention group. The median highest temperature prior to the start of temperature management was significantly lower in the TTM group at 35.6 (IQR 34.9-36.2) compared to 37.9 °C (IQR 37.7-38.2) in the fever prevention group (adjusted p < 0.001).There was no difference in the proportion of patients discharged with Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2 between the groups (42% vs. 40%, p = 0.88). Patients in the fever prevention group required a reduced duration of noradrenaline (36 vs. 46 h, p = 0.03) and a trend towards a reduced duration of propofol (37 vs. 56 h, p = 0.06).In unadjusted analysis, use of active temperature management (irrespective of group) appeared to be associated with decreased risk of poor outcome (OR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.23-0.78) but after adjustment for patient age, presenting rhythm, witnessed arrest and duration of CPR, this was no longer significant (OR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.37-2.31, p = 0.88).

Conclusion

Switching from TTM to fever prevention following OHCA was associated with similar rates of neurological outcomes, with a possible decrease in sedation and vasopressor requirements.

Post Cardiac Arrest Care in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiac arrests constitute a leading cause of mortality in the adult population and cardiologists are often tasked with the management of patients following cardiac arrest either as a consultant or primary provider in the cardiac intensive care unit. Familiarity with evidence-based practice for post-cardiac arrest care is a requisite for optimizing outcomes in this highly morbid group. This review will highlight important concepts necessary to managing these patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Emerging evidence has further elucidated optimal care of post-arrest patients including timing for routine coronary angiography, utility of therapeutic hypothermia, permissive hypercapnia, and empiric aspiration pneumonia treatment. The complicated state of multi-organ failure following cardiac arrest needs to be carefully optimized by the clinician to prevent further neurologic injury and promote systemic recovery. Future studies should be aimed at understanding if these findings extend to specific patient populations, especially those at the highest risk for poor outcomes.

Combined effects of targeted blood pressure, oxygenation, and duration of device-based fever prevention after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest on 1-year survival: post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The "Blood Pressure and Oxygenation Targets in Post Resuscitation Care" (BOX) trial investigated whether a low versus high blood pressure target, a restrictive versus liberal oxygenation target, and a shorter versus longer duration of device-based fever prevention in comatose patients could improve outcomes. No differences in rates of discharge from hospital with severe disability or 90-day mortality were found. However, long-term effects and potential interaction of the interventions are unknown. Accordingly, the objective of this study is to investigate both individual and combined effects of the interventions on 1-year mortality rates.

METHODS

The BOX trial was a randomized controlled two-center trial that assigned comatose resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients to the following three interventions at admission: A blood pressure target of either 63 mmHg or 77 mmHg; An arterial oxygenation target of 9-10 kPa or 13-14 kPa; Device-based fever prevention administered as an initial 24 h at 36 °C and then either 12 or 48 h at 37 °C; totaling 36 or 72 h of temperature control. Randomization occurred in parallel and simultaneously to all interventions. Patients were followed for the occurrence of death from all causes for 1 year. Analyzes were performed by Cox proportional models, and assessment of interactions was performed with the interventions stated as an interaction term.

RESULTS

Analysis for all three interventions included 789 patients. For the intervention of low compared to high blood pressure targets, 1-year mortality rates were 35% (138 of 396) and 36% (143 of 393), respectively, hazard ratio (HR) 0.92 (0.73-1.16) p = 0.47. For the restrictive compared to liberal oxygenation targets, 1-year mortality rates were 34% (135 of 394) and 37% (146 of 395), respectively, HR 0.92 (0.73-1.16) p = 0.46. For device-based fever prevention for a total of 36 compared to 72 h, 1-year mortality rates were 35% (139 of 393) and 36% (142 of 396), respectively, HR 0.98 (0.78-1.24) p = 0.89. There was no sign of interaction between the interventions, and accordingly, no combination of randomizations indicated differentiated treatment effects.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in 1-year mortality rates for a low compared to high blood pressure target, a liberal compared to restrictive oxygenation target, or a longer compared to shorter duration of device-based fever prevention after cardiac arrest. No combination of the interventions affected these findings. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03141099, Registered 30 April 2017.

Dysnatremia at ICU admission and functional outcome of cardiac arrest: insights from four randomised controlled trials

PURPOSE

To evaluate the potential association between early dysnatremia and 6-month functional outcome after cardiac arrest.

METHODS

We pooled data from four randomised clinical trials in post-cardiac-arrest patients admitted to the ICU with coma after stable return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Admission natremia was categorised as normal (135-145 mmol/L), low, or high. We analysed associations between natremia category and Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1 or 2 at 6 months, with and without adjustment on the modified Cardiac Arrest Hospital Prognosis Score (mCAHP).

RESULTS

We included 1163 patients (581 from HYPERION, 352 from TTH48, 120 from COMACARE, and 110 from Xe-HYPOTHECA) with a mean age of 63 ± 13 years and a predominance of males (72.5%). A cardiac cause was identified in 63.6% of cases. Median time from collapse to ROSC was 20 [15-29] minutes. Overall, mean natremia on ICU admission was 137.5 ± 4.7 mmol/L; 211 (18.6%) and 31 (2.7%) patients had hyponatremia and hypernatremia, respectively. By univariate analysis, CPC 1 or 2 at 6 months was significantly less common in the group with hyponatremia (50/211 [24%] vs. 363/893 [41%]; P = 0.001); the mCAHP-adjusted odds ratio was 0.45 (95%CI 0.26-0.79, p = 0.005). The number of patients with hypernatremia was too small for a meaningful multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Early hyponatremia was common in patients with ROSC after cardiac arrest and was associated with a poorer 6-month functional outcome. The mechanisms underlying this association remain to be elucidated in order to determine whether interventions targeting hyponatremia are worth investigating. Registration ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT01994772, November 2013, 21.

Factors Associated with Favorable Outcomes in Cardiac Arrest and Target Temperature Management

Current guidelines strongly recommend providing targeted temperature management (TTM) after cardiac arrest, but hypothalamic dysregulation may confound TTM's impact on a patient's ultimate outcome. Although time to reach target temperature has largely been viewed as a process measure for TTM protocols, the difference between initial presenting temperature and target temperature (Δ-temperature) may be a potential surrogate marker of hypothalamic dysregulation. We performed a retrospective observational study to explore whether Δ-temperature was associated with neurologic outcomes and mortality. We included 86 patients (53 with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest [OHCA] and 33 with in-hospital cardiac arrest [IHCA]) in our analysis; more than half of the patients were cooled to 33°C (56.9% in OHCA and 57.6% in IHCA). In univariate logistic regression analysis, Δ-temperature alone did not appear to be statistically associated with mortality or neurologic outcomes regardless of target temperature. In exploratory analysis, longer time from TTM initiation-to-target was associated with worse neurological outcomes in the 33°C target (odds ratio = 0.996, 95% confidence interval = 0.992-1.000). Further research investigating the impact of hypothalamic dysregulation and Δ-temperature as well as the rate of cooling may be warranted to elucidate additional factors contributing to outcomes after cardiac arrest. In addition, our study population was noted to have a higher proportion of Asians and Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders, with a potential disparity in outcomes. Future studies may be warranted to ensure generalizability of TTM protocols and findings across populations.

Comparison of four clinical risk scores in comatose patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Several different scoring systems for early risk stratification after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest have been developed, but few have been validated in large datasets. The aim of the present study was to compare the well-validated Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) and Cardiac Arrest Hospital Prognosis (CAHP)-scores to the less complex MIRACLE2- and Target Temperature Management (TTM)-scores.

METHODS

This was a post-hoc analysis of the Targeted Hypothermia versus Targeted Normothermia after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (TTM2) trial. Missing data were handled by multiple imputation. The primary outcome was discriminatory performance assessed as the area under the receiver operating characteristics-curve (AUROC), with the outcome of interest being poor functional outcome or death (modified Rankin Scale 4-6) at 6 months after OHCA.

RESULTS

Data on functional outcome at 6 months were available for 1829 cases, which constituted the study population. The pooled AUROC for the MIRACLE2-score was 0.810 (95% CI 0.790-0.828), 0.835 (95% CI 0.816-0.852) for the TTM-score, 0.820 (95% CI 0.800-0.839) for the CAHP-score and 0.770 (95% CI 0.748-0.791) for the OHCA-score. At the cut-offs needed to achieve specificities >95%, sensitivities were <40% for all four scoring systems.

CONCLUSIONS

The TTM-, MIRACLE2- and CAHP-scores are all capable of providing objective risk estimates accurate enough to be used as part of a holistic patient assessment after OHCA of a suspected cardiac origin. Due to its simplicity, the MIRACLE2-score could be a practical solution for both clinical application and risk stratification within trials.

[Procedure after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation-Cooling or no more cooling?]

Approximately 84 out of 100,000 inhabitants in Europe suffer from an out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) each year. The mortality after cardiac arrest (CA) is high and is particularly determined by the predominant cardiogenic shock condition and hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy. For almost two decades hypothermic temperature control was the only neuroprotective intervention recommended in guidelines for postresuscitation care; however, recently published studies failed to demonstrate any improvement in the neurological outcome with hypothermia in comparison to strict normothermia in postresuscitation treatment. According to the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) guidelines published in 2022, unconscious adults after CA should be treated with temperature management and avoidance of fever; however, many questions remain open regarding the optimal target temperature, the cooling methods and the optimal duration. Despite these currently unanswered questions, a structured and high-quality postresuscitation care that includes a targeted temperature management should continue to be provided for all patients in the postresuscitation phase, independent of the selected target temperature. Furthermore, fever avoidance remains an important component of postresuscitation care.

Temperature Outcomes without heater cooler units in adult patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Heater-cooler units (HCUs) are frequently incorporated into extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) circuits to help maintain patient normothermia. However, these devices may be associated with increased cost and infection risk. This study describes our institution's experience managing adult ECMO patients without the routine use of in-circuit HCUs.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of adult patients treated with veno-venous (VV) or veno-arterial (VA) ECMO at our institution. The primary outcomes were rates of HCU use and the relative duration of the ECMO treatment course in which patients maintained normothermia (36-37.5°C), with and without HCUs. Secondary outcomes of mortality and ECMO-related complications were planned across HCU and non-HCU groups; exploratory analyses were performed across a 75% "ECMO time in normothermia" threshold.

RESULTS

Among a cohort of 71 patients, zero (0%) were managed with in-circuit HCUs. A majority of ECMO patient-hours were spent in the normothermic range. Median and mean percentages of ECMO normothermia time were 75% (IQR 49%-81%) and 62% (SD ± 27%). Twenty-nine patients (40%) met the threshold of 75% ECMO normothermia time, as used to evaluate secondary outcomes. At this threshold, mortality risk was significantly higher among the non-normothermic cohort; other ECMO-related complications did not vary significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of HCU use, the majority of ECMO patient-hours were spent in normothermia. However, only a minority of patients achieved normothermia for at least 75% of their ECMO course. In-circuit HCUs may be required to maintain high percentages of normothermic time in adult EMCO patients.

Temperature control after cardiac arrest

Managing temperature is an important part of post-cardiac arrest care. Fever or hyperthermia during the first few days after cardiac arrest is associated with worse outcomes in many studies. Clinical data have not determined any target temperature or duration of temperature management that clearly improves patient outcomes. Current guidelines and recent reviews recommend controlling temperature to prevent hyperthermia. Higher temperatures can lead to secondary brain injury by increasing seizures, brain edema and metabolic demand. Some data suggest that targeting temperature below normal could benefit select patients where this pathology is common. Clinical temperature management should address the physiology of heat balance. Core temperature reflects the heat content of the head and torso, and changes in core temperature result from changes in the balance of heat production and heat loss. Clinical management of patients after cardiac arrest should include measurement of core temperature at accurate sites and monitoring signs of heat production including shivering. Multiple methods can increase or decrease heat loss, including external and internal devices. Heat loss can trigger compensatory reflexes that increase stress and metabolic demand. Therefore, any active temperature management should include specific pharmacotherapy or other interventions to control thermogenesis, especially shivering. More research is required to determine whether individualized temperature management can improve outcomes.

Meta-Analysis Comparing Hypothermia Versus Normothermia in Patients After a Cardiac Arrest

The current American Heart Association 2022 guidelines recommend actively preventing fever by targeting a temperature ≤37.5°C for comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Contemporary randomized controlled trials (RCTs) show conflicting results regarding the benefit of targeted hypothermia (TH). We performed this updated meta-analysis of RCTs to evaluate the role of hypothermia in patients after a cardiac arrest. We searched Cochrane, MEDLINE, and EMBASE from inception to December 2022. Trials with patients randomly allocated for targeted temperature monitoring and reported neurologic and mortality outcomes were included. Statistical analysis was performed using Cochrane Review Manager using the random-effects model and calculated the pooled risk ratios of outcomes using the Mantel-Haenszel method. A total of 12 RCTs and 4,262 patients were included in the review. Compared with normothermia, the TH group had significantly improved neurologic outcomes (risk ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.83 to 0.98). However, no significant difference in mortality was observed (risk ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.90 to 1.06) between the groups. This meta-analysis supports the role of TH in patients after a cardiac arrest, especially secondary to improvement in neurologic outcomes.

Changes in Practice of Controlled Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest in the Past 20 Years: A Critical Care Perspective

For 20 years, induced hypothermia and targeted temperature management have been recommended to mitigate brain injury and increase survival after cardiac arrest. On the basis of animal research and small clinical trials, the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation strongly advocated hypothermia at 32-34 °C for 12-24 hours for comatose patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with initial rhythm of ventricular fibrillation or nonperfusing ventricular tachycardia. The intervention was implemented worldwide. In the past decade, hypothermia and targeted temperature management have been investigated in larger clinical randomized trials focusing on target temperature depth, target temperature duration, prehospital versus in-hospital initiation, nonshockable rhythms, and in-hospital cardiac arrest. Systematic reviews suggest little or no effect of delivering the intervention on the basis of the summary of evidence, and the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation today recommends only to treat fever and keep body temperature below 37.5 °C (weak recommendation, low-certainty evidence). Here we describe the evolution of temperature management for patients with cardiac arrest during the past 20 years and how the accrued evidence has influenced not only the recommendations but also the guideline process. We also discuss possible paths forward in this field, bringing up both whether fever management is at all beneficial for patients with cardiac arrest and which knowledge gaps future clinical trials in temperature management should address.

Target temperature in post-arrest comatous patients. Is something changed in the postpandemic era?

INTRODUCTION

The recommended target temperature in the treatment of comatous patients after cardiac arrest has recently changed. We analyzed the impact on the neurological outcome of a change in the target temperature from July 2021.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis comparing the discharge status of 78 patients with a target temperature of 33 °C (group 1) with that of 24 patients with a target temperature of 36.5 °C (group 2). Pearson chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests were used.

RESULTS

The initial rhythm was defibrillable in 65% of group 1 and 71% of group 2, and cardiac arrest was witnessed in 93% of group 1 and 96% of group 2. There was an adverse outcome (death or vegetative state) in 37 patients in group 1 (47%) compared to 18 in group 2 (74%) (Pearson chi-square 5.612, p = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

In our series of patients, the temperature control target temperature change from 33 °C to 36.5 °C was associated with worse neurological outcome. Further studies are needed to evaluate the outcome of a generalized modification of temperature control targets in comatose patients after cardiac arrest in our postpandemic era.

Predicting brain temperature in humans using bioheat models: Progress and outlook

Brain temperature, regulated by the balance between blood circulation and metabolic heat generation, is an important parameter related to neural activity, cerebral hemodynamics, and neuroinflammation. A key challenge for integrating brain temperature into clinical practice is the lack of reliable and non-invasive brain thermometry. The recognized importance of brain temperature and thermoregulation in both health and disease, combined with limited availability of experimental methods, has motivated the development of computational thermal models using bioheat equations to predict brain temperature. In this mini-review, we describe progress and the current state-of-the-art in brain thermal modeling in humans and discuss potential avenues for clinical applications.

Temperature Control After Cardiac Arrest: A Narrative Review

Cardiac arrest (CA) is a critical public health issue affecting more than half a million Americans annually. The main determinant of outcome post-CA is hypoxic-ischemic brain injury (HIBI), and temperature control is currently the only evidence-based, guideline-recommended intervention targeting secondary brain injury. Temperature control is a key component of a post-CA care bundle; however, conflicting evidence challenges its wide implementation across the vastly heterogeneous population of CA survivors. Here, we critically appraise the available literature on temperature control in HIBI, detail how the evidence has been integrated into clinical practice, and highlight the complications associated with its use and the timing of neuroprognostication after CA. Future clinical trials evaluating different temperature targets, rates of rewarming, duration of cooling, and identifying which patient phenotype benefits from different temperature control methods are needed to address these prevailing knowledge gaps.

Therapeutic Hypothermia Following Cardiopulmonary Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis

Introduction

The risk-benefit profile of therapeutic hypothermia is controversial with several randomized controlled trials providing conflicting results.

Aim of Study

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine if therapeutic hypothermia provides beneficial neurologic outcomes relative to adverse effects.

Material and Methods

MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for randomized controlled trials of post-cardiac arrest patients comparing therapeutic hypothermia (~33 degrees Celsius) to normothermia or the standard of care (36 - 38 degrees Celsius). Data were collected using the Covidence systematic review software. Statistical analysis was performed by Review Manager software. Risk of bias, sensitivity, and heterogeneity were analyzed using the Cochran's Collaboration tool, trial sequential analysis (TSA) software, and I2 statistic respectively.

Results

A total of 1825 studies were screened and 5 studies (n=3614) were included. No significant differences existed between the hypothermia group and normothermia for favorable neurologic outcome (risk ratio [RR] 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97 to 1.41) or all-cause mortality (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.05). When compared to normothermia, the hypothermia group had greater risk of adverse effects (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.28), which was driven by the onset of arrhythmias. Subgroup analyses revealed that therapeutic hypothermia provided greater neurologic benefit in trials with a higher percentage of subjects with shockable rhythms (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.6 to 0.88). Trial sequential analysis revealed statistical futility for therapeutic hypothermia and favorable neurologic outcome, mortality, and adverse effects.

Conclusions

Therapeutic hypothermia does not provide consistent benefit in neurologic outcome or mortality in the general cardiac arrest population. Patients with shockable rhythms may show favorable neurologic outcome with therapeutic hypothermia and further investigation in this population is warranted. Any potential benefit associated with therapeutic hypothermia must be weighed against the increased risk of adverse effects, particularly the onset of arrhythmias.

One-Year Review in Cardiac Arrest: The 2022 Randomized Controlled Trials

Cardiac arrest, one of the leading causes of death, accounts for numerous clinical studies published each year. This review summarizes the findings of all the randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT) on cardiac arrest published in the year 2022. The RCTs are presented according to the following categories: out-of- and in-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA, IHCA) and post-cardiac arrest care. Interestingly, more than 80% of the RCTs encompassed advanced life support and post-cardiac arrest care, while no studies focused on the treatment of IHCA, except for one that, however, explored the temperature control after resuscitation in this population. Surprisingly, 9 out of 11 RCTs led to neutral results demonstrating equivalency between the newly tested interventions compared to current practice. One trial was negative, showing that oxygen titration in the immediate pre-hospital post-resuscitation period decreased survival compared to a more liberal approach. One RCT was positive and introduced new defibrillation strategies for refractory cardiac arrest. Overall, data from the 2022 RCTs discussed here provide a solid basis to generate new hypotheses to be tested in future clinical studies.

Duration of Device-Based Fever Prevention after Cardiac Arrest

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend active fever prevention for 72 hours after cardiac arrest. Data from randomized clinical trials of this intervention have been lacking.

METHODS

We randomly assigned comatose patients who had been resuscitated after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac cause to device-based temperature control targeting 36°C for 24 hours followed by targeting of 37°C for either 12 or 48 hours (for total intervention times of 36 and 72 hours, respectively) or until the patient regained consciousness. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause or hospital discharge with a Cerebral Performance Category of 3 or 4 (range, 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating more severe disability; a category of 3 or 4 indicates severe cerebral disability or coma) within 90 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes included death from any cause and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment score (range, 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive ability) at 3 months.

RESULTS

A total of 393 patients were randomly assigned to temperature control for 36 hours, and 396 patients were assigned to temperature control for 72 hours. At 90 days after randomization, a primary end-point event had occurred in 127 of 393 patients (32.3%) in the 36-hour group and in 133 of 396 patients (33.6%) in the 72-hour group (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.77 to 1.26; P = 0.70) and mortality was 29.5% in the 36-hour group and 30.3% in the 72-hour group. At 3 months, the median Montreal Cognitive Assessment score was 26 (interquartile range, 24 to 29) and 27 (interquartile range, 24 to 28), respectively. There was no significant between-group difference in the incidence of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Active device-based fever prevention for 36 or 72 hours after cardiac arrest did not result in significantly different percentages of patients dying or having severe disability or coma. (Funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation; BOX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03141099.).

Therapeutic Hypothermia Following Cardiac Arrest After the TTM2 trial - More Questions Raised Than Answered

For almost 20 years, therapeutic hypothermia has been a cornerstone of modern post-cardiac arrest care lowering mortality, and improvin neurologic outcome compared to conventional therapy. This was challenged by the first TTM-trial in 2013, which did not show a benefit for hypothermia at 33°C compared to controlled normothermia at 36°C. Now, the TTM2 trial showed no benefit of hypothermia compared to fever prevention alone. While TTM1 and TTM2 suggest that hypothermia might not be helpful, a deep dive into the trials reveals that this conclusion does not hold true. Here, we focus on patient selection, suboptimal application of hypothermia, interaction of standard sedation with hypothermia, high incidence of post-arrest fever, and withdrawal of life support based on per-protocol neurologic prognostication in the TTM2-trial. Of particular interest, contemporary trials and registries using intravascular cooling in TTM-like patients repeatedly reported much lower mortality rates than those described in both TTM1 and TTM2.

Effects of temperature control on hyperthermia-related cardiac dysfunction in a porcine model of cardiac arrest

The outcome of cardiac arrest is worse when there is fever after spontaneous circulation is restored (ROSC). The purpose of this study was to investigate the mechanism of post-ROSC cardiac dysfunction after hyperthermia treatment and the effects of temperature control. Twenty-four male Bama minipigs were randomized into 3 groups (8 per group): CPR + controlled normothermia (CN), CPR + hyperthermia (HT), and CPR + therapeutic mild hypothermia (TMH). Defibrillation was given to pigs with ventricular fibrillation after 8 min of untreated fibrillation. Subsequently, these animals received the post-ROSC treatments of hyperthermia (38 °C), controlled normothermia (37 °C) or hypothermia (33 °C) according to the groups. Hemodynamic parameters, left ventricular ejection fraction, blood samples and myocardial tissues were assessed. At 24 h after the post-ROSC treatments, the pigs treated with hyperthermia showed increments in heart rate and plasma cardiac troponin I, and decreases in mean arterial pressure, cardiac index, and left ventricular ejection fraction, compared to those with the controlled normothermia pigs. However, the deterioration of the above parameters can be attenuated by TMH. The pigs in the TMH group also had a reduced percentage of apoptotic cardiomyocytes, an increased anti-apoptotic Bcl-2/Bax ratio and a decreased caspase-3 activity in myocardium, as compared with both controlled normothermia and hyperthermia pigs. In conclusion, hyperthermia is associated with a worse myocardial dysfunction. TMH improves hyperthermia-induced myocardial dysfunction by attenuating apoptosis in a porcine model of cardiac arrest.

Targeted Temperature Management in Cardiac Arrest: An Updated Narrative Review

The established benefits of cooling along with development of sophisticated methods to safely and precisely induce, maintain, monitor, and reverse hypothermia have led to the development of targeted temperature management (TTM). Early trials in human subjects showed that hypothermia conferred better neurological outcomes when compared to normothermia among survivors of cardiac arrest, leading to guidelines recommending targeted hypothermia in this patient population. Multiple studies have sought to explore and compare the benefit of hypothermia in various subgroups of patients, such as survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest versus in-hospital cardiac arrest, and survivors of an initial shockable versus non-shockable rhythm. Larger and more recent trials have shown no statistically significant difference in neurological outcomes between patients with targeted hypothermia and targeted normothermia; further, aggressive cooling is associated with a higher incidence of multiple systemic complications. Based on this data, temporal trends have leaned towards using a lenient temperature target in more recent times. Current guidelines recommend selecting and maintaining a constant target temperature between 32 and 36 °C for those patients in whom TTM is used (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence), as soon as possible after return of spontaneous circulation is achieved and airway, breathing (including mechanical ventilation), and circulation are stabilized. The comparative benefit of lower (32-34 °C) versus higher (36 °C) temperatures remains unknown, and further research may help elucidate this. Any survivor of cardiac arrest who is comatose (defined as unarousable unresponsiveness to external stimuli) should be considered as a candidate for TTM regardless of the initial presenting rhythm, and the decision to opt for targeted hypothermia versus targeted normothermia should be made on a case-by-case basis.

The Association Between Induction Rate and Neurologic Outcome in Patients Undergoing Targeted Temperature Management at 33°C

To determine the association between the induction rate and 6-month neurologic outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors who underwent targeted temperature management (TTM). This retrospective observational study analyzed data prospectively collected from adult comatose OHCA survivors treated with TTM at the Chonnam National University Hospital in Gwangju, Korea, between October 2015 and December 2020. We measured the core body temperature (BT) through an esophageal probe and recorded it every 5 minutes throughout TTM. Induction time was defined as the elapsed time between the initiation of TTM and the achievement of target BT of 33°C. We calculated the induction rate as the change of BT divided by induction time. The primary outcome was a poor 6-month neurologic outcome, defined as cerebral performance category 3-5. Of the OHCA survivors, 218 patients were included, and 137 (62.8%) patients had a poor neurologic outcome. Patients with a poor neurologic outcome had lower BT at the initiation of TTM, shorter induction time, and higher induction rate than those with good neurologic outcomes. After adjusting for confounders, induction time (odds ratio [OR] 0.995; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.992-0.999) and induction rate (OR 2.362; 95% CI, 1.178-4.734) were independently associated with poor neurologic outcome. BT at TTM initiation was not associated with a poor neurologic outcome. Induction rate was independently associated with a poor neurologic outcome in OHCA survivors who underwent TTM at 33°C.

Outcomes after decrease in hypothermia usage for out of Hospital Cardiac arrest after targeted temperature management study

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate trends in targeted temperature management with regards to temperature selection, its effect on neurologic outcomes at discharge, and compare this with recent large randomized controlled trial outcomes.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study between January 2010 and December 2019.

SETTING

Single large tertiary academic community hospital.

PATIENTS

634 adult non-traumatic patients presenting with out of hospital cardiac arrest with persistent comatose state treated with active targeted temperature management.

INTERVENTIONS, MEASUREMENTS, AND MAIN RESULTS

473 patients received hypothermia of 33 °C and were compared to 161 patients who received targeted normothermia of 36.5 °C. The primary outcome was Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) at hospital discharge, with levels 1 or 2 considered good outcomes. Mortality, ICU days, ventilator days, and overall hospital stay length were secondary outcomes. Patients receiving T33 had more favorable CPC outcomes when compared to patients receiving T36.5 (OR = 2.4 [1.3, 4.6], p = 0.006). Subgroup analysis of initial non-shockable rhythms demonstrated improved CPC scores (OR = 2.5, p = 0.04), however this was not maintained in the shockable rhythm group. T33 patients had a shorter length of stay. Mortality, ICU days, and ventilator days did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Out of hospital cardiac arrest patients with persistent comatose state treated with hypothermia of 33 °C had improved odds of discharge with good neurologic outcomes when compared to those treated with targeted normothermia. This improvement of outcomes appears to have been driven by the improved outcomes in the patients who had presented with non-shockable rhythm.

Temperature control in adults after cardiac arrest: a survey of current clinical practice in Germany

BACKGROUND

Temperature control is recommended after out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) by international guidelines. This survey aimed to investigate current clinical practice and areas of uncertainty.

METHODS

Online survey targeting members of three medical emergency and critical care societies in Germany (April 21-June 6, 2022) assessing post-cardiac arrest temperature control management.

RESULTS

Of 341 completed questionnaires 28% (n = 97) used temperature control with normothermic target and 72% (n = 244) temperature control with hypothermic target. The definition of fever regarding patients with cardiac arrest ranged from ≥ 37.7 to 39.0 °C. Temperature control was mainly started in the ICU (80%, n = 273) and most commonly core cooling (74%, n = 254) and surface cooling (39%, n = 134) with feedback were used. Temperature control was maintained for 24 h in 18% (n = 61), 48 h in 28% (n = 94), 72 h in 42% (n = 143) and longer than 72 h in 13% (n = 43). 7% (n = 24) were using different protocols for OHCA with initial shockable and non-shockable rhythm. Additional 14% (n = 48) were using different temperature control protocols after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) compared with OHCA. Overall, 37% (n = 127) changed practice after the publication of the ERC-2021 guidelines and 33% (n = 114) after the recent publication of the revised ERC-ESICM guideline on temperature control.

CONCLUSIONS

One-third of the respondents changed clinical practice since recent guideline update. However, a majority of physicians further trusts in temperature control with a hypothermic target. Of interest, 14% used different temperature control strategies after IHCA compared with OHCA and 7% for shockable and non-shockable initial rhythm. A more individualized approach in post resuscitation care may be warranted.

Temperature control after cardiac arrest

Most of the patients who die after cardiac arrest do so because of hypoxic-ischemic brain injury (HIBI). Experimental evidence shows that temperature control targeted at hypothermia mitigates HIBI. In 2002, one randomized trial and one quasi-randomized trial showed that temperature control targeted at 32-34 °C improved neurological outcome and mortality in patients who are comatose after cardiac arrest. However, following the publication of these trials, other studies have questioned the neuroprotective effects of hypothermia. In 2021, the largest study conducted so far on temperature control (the TTM-2 trial) including 1900 adults comatose after resuscitation showed no effect of temperature control targeted at 33 °C compared with normothermia or fever control. A systematic review of 32 trials published between 2001 and 2021 concluded that temperature control with a target of 32-34 °C compared with fever prevention did not result in an improvement in survival (RR 1.08; 95% CI 0.89-1.30) or favorable functional outcome (RR 1.21; 95% CI 0.91-1.61) at 90-180 days after resuscitation. There was substantial heterogeneity across the trials, and the certainty of the evidence was low. Based on these results, the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation currently recommends monitoring core temperature and actively preventing fever (37.7 °C) for at least 72 h in patients who are comatose after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Future studies are needed to identify potential patient subgroups who may benefit from temperature control aimed at hypothermia. There are no trials comparing normothermia or fever control with no temperature control after cardiac arrest.

Temperature Control After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to determine the effect of hypothermic temperature control after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) on mortality and functional outcome as compared with normothermia.

METHODS

An investigator initiated, open-label, blinded-outcome-assessor, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing hypothermic temperature control (32-34°C) for 24 h with normothermia after IHCA in 11 hospitals in Germany. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality after 180 days. Secondary end points included in-hospital mortality and favorable functional outcome using the Cerebral Performance Category scale after 180 days. A Cerebral Performance Category score of 1 or 2 was defined as a favorable functional outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 1055 patients were screened for eligibility and 249 patients were randomized: 126 were assigned to hypothermic temperature control and 123 to normothermia. The mean age of the cohort was 72.6±10.4 years, 64% (152 of 236) were male, 73% (166 of 227) of cardiac arrests were witnessed, 25% (57 of 231) had an initial shockable rhythm, and time to return of spontaneous circulation was 16.4±10.5 minutes. Target temperature was reached within 4.2±2.8 hours after randomization in the hypothermic group and temperature was controlled for 48 hours at 37.0°±0.9°C in the normothermia group. Mortality by day 180 was 72.5% (87 of 120) in hypothermic temperature control arm, compared with 71.2% (84 of 118) in the normothermia group (relative risk, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.79-1.40]; P=0.822). In-hospital mortality was 62.5% (75 of 120) in the hypothermic temperature control as compared with 57.6% (68 of 118) in the normothermia group (relative risk, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.86-1.46, P=0.443). Favorable functional outcome (Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2) by day 180 was 22.5% (27 of 120) in the hypothermic temperature control, compared with 23.7% (28 of 118) in the normothermia group (relative risk, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.78-1.44]; P=0.822). The study was prematurely terminated because of futility.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypothermic temperature control as compared with normothermia did not improve survival nor functional outcome at day 180 in patients presenting with coma after IHCA. The HACA in-hospital trial (Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest in-hospital) was underpowered and may have failed to detect clinically important differences between hypothermic temperature control and normothermia.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique Identifier: NCT00457431.

Targeted Temperature Management in Postresuscitation Care After Incorporating Results of the TTM2 Trial

Cardiac arrest still accounts for a substantial proportion of cardiovascular related deaths and is associated with a tremendous risk of neurological injury and, among the few survivors, poor quality of life. Critical determinants of survival and long‐term functional status after cardiac arrest are timely initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and use of an external defibrillator for patients with a shockable rhythm. Outcomes are still far from satisfactory, despite ongoing efforts to improve cardiac arrest response systems, as well as elaborate postresuscitation algorithms. Targeted temperature management at the wide range between 32 °C and 36 °C has been one of the main therapeutic strategies to improve neurological outcome in postresuscitation care. This recommendation has been mainly based on 2 small randomized trials that were published 20 years ago. Most recent data derived from the TTM2 (Targeted Hypothermia Versus Targeted Normothermia After Out‐of‐Hospital Cardiac Arrest) trial, which included 1861 patients, challenge this strategy. It showed no benefit of targeted hypothermia at 33 °C over normothermia at 36 °C to 37.5 °C with fever prevention. Because temperature management at lower temperatures also correlated with an increased risk of side effects without any benefit in the TTM2 trial, a modification of the guidelines with harmonizing temperature management to normothermia might be necessary.

Therapeutic hypothermia for stroke: Unique challenges at the bedside

Therapeutic hypothermia has shown promise as a means to improving neurological outcomes at several neurological conditions. At the clinical level, it has been shown to improve outcomes in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest and in neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, but has yet to be convincingly demonstrated in stroke. While numerous preclinical studies have shown benefit in stroke models, translating this to the clinical level has proven challenging. Major obstacles include cooling patients with typical stroke who are awake and breathing spontaneously but often have significant comorbidities. Solutions around these problems include selective brain cooling and cooling to lesser depths or avoiding hyperthermia. This review will cover the mechanisms of protection by therapeutic hypothermia, as well as recent progress made in selective brain cooling and the neuroprotective effects of only slightly lowering brain temperature. Therapeutic hypothermia for stroke has been shown to be feasible, but has yet to be definitively proven effective. There is clearly much work to be undertaken in this area.

Through the Looking Glass: The Paradoxical Evolution of Targeted Temperature Management for Comatose Survivors of Cardiac Arrest

For the past two decades, targeted temperature management (TTM) has been a staple in the care of comatose survivors following cardiac arrest. However, recent clinical trials have failed to replicate the benefit seen in earlier studies, bringing into question the very existence of such clinical practice. In this review, we explore clinical scenarios within critical care that appeared to share a similar fate, but in actuality changed the landscape of practice in a modern world. Accordingly, clinicians may apply these lessons to the utilization of TTM among comatose survivors following cardiac arrest, potentially paving way for a re-framing of clinical care amidst an environment where current data appears upside down in comparison to past successes.

Targeted Temperature Management After Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review

Targeted temperature management (TTM) has been the cornerstone of post-cardiac arrest care, but even after therapy, neurological outcomes remain poor. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the influence of TTM in post-cardiac arrest treatment, its effect on the neurological outcome, survival, and the adverse events associated with it. We also aimed to examine any difference between the effect of therapy at various intensities and durations on the prognosis of the patient.

A search of two databases was done to find relevant studies, followed by a thorough screening in which the inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, and a quality appraisal of clinical trials was done. In this systematic review, six randomized clinical trials with a total of 3870 participants were examined. Of these, 2,767 participants were treated with targeted hypothermia to varying degrees (between 31 and 36 degrees Celsius), 931 participants were treated with targeted normothermia (36.5 to 37.5 degrees Celsius), and 172 participants were treated with only normothermia (without any active cooling or interventions).

It was concluded that TTM at a lower temperature did not have any benefit regarding the neurological outcome and mortality over targeted normothermia but was superior to no temperature management. TTM was also found to have significantly more negative effects when the intensity or duration was increased. 

Computational modeling of targeted temperature management in post-cardiac arrest patients

Our core body temperature is held around [Formula: see text]C by an effective internal thermoregulatory system. However, various clinical scenarios have a more favorable outcome under external temperature regulation. Therapeutic hypothermia, for example, was found beneficial for the outcome of resuscitated cardiac arrest patients due to its protection against cerebral ischemia. Nonetheless, practice shows that outcomes of targeted temperature management vary considerably in dependence on individual tissue damage levels and differences in therapeutic strategies and protocols. Here, we address these differences in detail by means of computational modeling. We develop a multi-segment and multi-node thermoregulatory model that takes into account details related to specific post-cardiac arrest-related conditions, such as thermal imbalances due to sedation and anesthesia, increased metabolic rates induced by inflammatory processes, and various external cooling techniques. In our simulations, we track the evolution of the body temperature in patients subjected to post-resuscitation care, with particular emphasis on temperature regulation via an esophageal heat transfer device, on the examination of the alternative gastric cooling with ice slurry, and on how anesthesia and the level of inflammatory response influence thermal behavior. Our research provides a better understanding of the heat transfer processes and therapies used in post-cardiac arrest patients.

Targeted temperature management after out of hospital cardiac arrest: quo vadis?

Targeted temperature management (TTM) has become a cornerstone in the treatment of comatose post-cardiac arrest patients over the last two decades. Belief in the efficacy of this intervention for improving neurologically intact survival was based on two trials from 2002, one truly randomized-controlled and one small quasi-randomized trial, without clear confirmation of that finding. Subsequent large randomized trials reported no difference in outcomes between TTM at 33 vs. 36°C and no benefit of TTM at 33°C as compared with fever control alone. Given that these results may help shape post-cardiac arrest patient care, we sought to review the history and rationale as well as trial evidence for TTM, critically review the TTM2 trial, and highlight gaps in knowledge and research needs for the future. Finally, we provide contemporary guidance for the use of TTM in daily clinical practice.

Modeling current practices in critical care comparative effectiveness research

Objective: To determine whether contemporaneous practices are adequately represented in recent critical care comparative effectiveness research studies. Design: All critical care comparative effectiveness research trials published in the New England Journal of Medicine from April 2019 to March 2020 were identified. To examine studies published in other high impact medical journals during the same period, such trials were subsequently also identified in the Journal of the American Medical Association and The Lancet. All cited sources were reviewed, and the medical literature was searched to find studies describing contemporary practices. Then, the designated control group or the comparable therapies studied were examined to determine if they represented contemporaneous critical care practices as described in the medical literature. Results: Twenty-five of 332 randomised clinical trials published in these three journals during this 1-year period described critical care comparative effectiveness research that met our inclusion criteria. Seventeen characterised current practices before enrolment (using surveys, observational studies and guidelines) and then incorporated current practices into one or more study arm. In the other eight, usual care arms appeared insufficient. Four of these trials randomly assigned patients to one of two fixed approaches at either end of a range of usually titrated care. However, due to randomisation, different subgroups within each arm received care that was inappropriate for their specific clinical conditions. In the other four of these trials, common practices influencing treatment choice were not reflected in the trial design, despite a prior effort to characterise usual care. Conclusion: One-third of critical care comparative effectiveness research trials published in widely read medical journals during a recent year did not include a designated control arm or comparable therapies representative of contemporary practices. Failure to incorporate contemporary practices into critical care comparative effectiveness trials appears to be a widespread design weakness.

Temperature control after cardiac arrest: friend or foe

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Most patients who are successfully resuscitated after cardiac arrest are initially comatose and require mechanical ventilation and other organ support in an ICU. Best practice has been to cool these patients and control their temperature at a constant value in the range of 32-36 oC for at least 24 h. But the certainty of the evidence for this practice is increasingly being challenged. This review will summarize the evidence on key aspects of temperature control in comatose postcardiac arrest patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

The Targeted Temperature Management 2 (TTM-2) trial documented no difference in 6-month mortality among comatose postcardiac arrest patients managed at 33 oC vs. targeted normothermia. A systematic review and meta-analysis completed by the Advanced Life Support (ALS) Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) concluded that temperature control with a target of 32-34 °C did not improve survival or favourable functional outcome after cardiac arrest. Two observational studies have documented an association between predicted moderate hypoxic-ischaemic brain injury and better outcome with temperature control at 33-34 oC compared with 35-36 oC.

SUMMARY

We suggest actively preventing fever by targeting a temperature 37.5 oC or less for those patients who remain comatose following return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after cardiac arrest.

Association between initial body temperature on hospital arrival and neurological outcome among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a multicenter cohort study (the CRITICAL study in Osaka, Japan)

Background

The association between spontaneous initial body temperature on hospital arrival and neurological outcomes has not been sufficiently studied in patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

Methods

From the prospective database of the Comprehensive Registry of Intensive Care for OHCA Survival (CRITICAL) study in Osaka, Japan, we enrolled all patients with OHCA of medical origin aged > 18 years for whom resuscitation was attempted and who were transported to participating hospitals between 2012 and 2019. We excluded patients who were not witnessed by bystanders and treated by a doctor car or helicopter, which is a car/helicopter with a physician. The patients were categorized into three groups according to their temperature on hospital arrival: ≤35.9 °C, 36.0–36.9 °C (normothermia), and ≥ 37.0 °C. The primary outcome was 1-month survival, with a cerebral performance category of 1 or 2. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between temperature and outcomes (normothermia was used as the reference). We also assessed this association using cubic spline regression analysis.

Results

Of the 18,379 patients in our database, 5014 witnessed adult OHCA patients of medical origin from 16 hospitals were included. When analyzing 3318 patients, OHCA patients with an initial body temperature of ≥37.0 °C upon hospital arrival were associated with decreased favorable neurological outcomes (6.6% [19/286] odds ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.27–0.95) compared to patients with normothermia (16.4% [180/1100]), whereas those with an initial body temperature of ≤35.9 °C were not associated with decreased favorable neurological outcomes (11.1% [214/1932]; odds ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.56–1.07). The cubic regression splines demonstrated that a higher body temperature on arrival was associated with decreased favorable neurological outcomes, and a lower body temperature was not associated with decreased favorable neurological outcomes.

Conclusions

In adult patients with OHCA of medical origin, a higher body temperature on arrival was associated with decreased favorable neurologic outcomes.

Contemporary targeted temperature management: Clinical evidence and controversies

Advancements in cardiac arrest and post-cardiac arrest care have led to improved survival to hospital discharge. While survival to hospital discharge is an important clinical outcome, neurologic recovery is also a priority. With the advancement of targeted temperature management (TTM), the American Heart Association guidelines for post-cardiac arrest care recommend TTM in patients who remain comatose after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Recently, the TTM2 randomized controlled trial found no significant difference in neurologic function and mortality at 6-months between traditional hypothermia to 33°C versus 37.5°C. While TTM has been evaluated for decades, current literature suggests that the use of TTM to 33° when compared to a protocol of targeted normothermia does not result in improved outcomes. Instead, perhaps active avoidance of fever may be most beneficial. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation and membrane oxygenation can provide a means of both hemodynamic support and TTM after ROSC. This review aims to describe the pathophysiology, physiologic aspects, clinical trial evidence, changes in post-cardiac arrest care, potential risks, as well as controversies of TTM.

Targeted Hypothermia vs Targeted Normothermia in Survivors of Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

BACKGROUND

The role of targeted hypothermia in patients with coma after cardiac arrest has been challenged in a recent randomized clinical trial.

METHODS

We performed a computerized search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases through July 2021 for randomized trials evaluating the outcomes of targeted hypothermia vs normothermia in patients with coma after cardiac arrest with shockable or non-shockable rhythm. The main study outcome was mortality at the longest reported follow-up.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 8 randomized studies with a total of 2927 patients, with a weighted follow-up period of 4.9 months. The average targeted temperature in the hypothermia arm in the included trials varied from 31.7°C to 34°C. There was no difference in long-term mortality between the hypothermia and normothermia groups (56.2% vs 56.9%, risk ratio [RR] 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-1.06). There was no significant difference between hypothermia and normothermia groups in rates of favorable neurological outcome (37.9% vs 34.2%, RR 1.31; 95% CI, 0.99-1.73), in-hospital mortality (RR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.77-1.01), bleeding, sepsis, or pneumonia. Ventricular arrhythmias were more common among the hypothermia vs normothermia groups (RR 1.36; 95% CI, 1.17-1.58; P = .42). Sensitivity analysis, excluding the Targeted Hypothermia vs Targeted Normothermia after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (TTM2) trial, showed favorable neurological outcome with hypothermia vs normothermia (RR 1.45; 95% CI, 1.17-1.79).

CONCLUSION

Targeted temperature management was not associated with improved survival or neurological outcomes compared with normothermia in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Further studies are warranted to further clarify the value of targeted hypothermia compared with targeted normothermia.

ERC-ESICM guidelines on temperature control after cardiac arrest in adults

The aim of these guidelines is to provide evidence‑based guidance for temperature control in adults who are comatose after resuscitation from either in-hospital or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, regardless of the underlying cardiac rhythm. These guidelines replace the recommendations on temperature management after cardiac arrest included in the 2021 post-resuscitation care guidelines co-issued by the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). The guideline panel included thirteen international clinical experts who authored the 2021 ERC-ESICM guidelines and two methodologists who participated in the evidence review completed on behalf of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) of whom ERC is a member society. We followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of evidence and grade recommendations. The panel provided suggestions on guideline implementation and identified priorities for future research. The certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to low. In patients who remain comatose after cardiac arrest, we recommend continuous monitoring of core temperature and actively preventing fever (defined as a temperature > 37.7 °C) for at least 72 hours. There was insufficient evidence to recommend for or against temperature control at 32-36 °C or early cooling after cardiac arrest. We recommend not actively rewarming comatose patients with mild hypothermia after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) to achieve normothermia. We recommend not using prehospital cooling with rapid infusion of large volumes of cold intravenous fluids immediately after ROSC.

The “Blood pressure and oxygenation targets in post resuscitation care, a randomized clinical trial”: design and statistical analysis plan

Background

Comatose patients admitted after resuscitation from cardiac arrest have a significant risk of poor outcome due to hypoxic brain injury. While numerous studies have investigated and challenged the target temperature as the efficacious part of the guideline endorsed Targeted Temperature Management (TTM) protocols, our knowledge and how the remaining parts of the TTM are optimized remain sparse. The present randomized trial investigated two aspects of the TTM protocol: target blood pressure during the ICU stay and oxygenation during mechanical ventilation. Furthermore, the efficacy of device-based post-TTM fever management is addressed.

Methods

Investigator-initiated, dual-center, randomized clinical trial in comatose OHCA patients admitted to an intensive cardiac care unit. Patients are eligible for inclusion if unconscious, older than 18 years of age, and have return of spontaneous circulation for more than 20 min.

Intervention: allocation 1:1:1:1 into a group defined by (a) blood pressure targets in double-blind intervention targeting a mean arterial blood pressure of 63 or 77 mmHg and (b) restrictive (9–10 kPa) or liberal (13–14 kPa) of arterial oxygen concentration during mechanical ventilation. As a subordinate intervention, device-based active fever management is discontinued after 36 h or 72. Patients will otherwise receive protocolized standard of care according to international guidelines, including targeted temperature management at 36 °C for 24 h, sedation with fentanyl and propofol, and multimodal neuro-prognostication. Primary endpoint: Discharge from hospital in poor neurological status (Cerebral Performance category 3 or 4) or death, whichever comes first. Secondary outcomes: Time to initiation of renal replacement therapy or death, neuron-specific enolase (NSE) level at 48 h, MOCA score at day 90, Modified Ranking Scale (mRS) and CPC at 3 months, NT-pro-BNP at 90 days, eGFR and LVEF at 90 days, daily cumulated vasopressor requirement during ICU stay, and need for a combination of vasopressors and inotropic agents or mechanical circulatory support.

Discussion

We hypothesize that low or high target blood pressure and restrictive and liberal oxygen administration will have an impact on mortality by reducing the risk and degree of hypoxic brain injury. This will be assessment neurological outcome and biochemical and neuropsychological testing after 90 days.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03141099. Registered on May 2017 (retrospectively registered)

ERC-ESICM guidelines on temperature control after cardiac arrest in adults

The aim of these guidelines is to provide evidence‑based guidance for temperature control in adults who are comatose after resuscitation from either in-hospital or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, regardless of the underlying cardiac rhythm. These guidelines replace the recommendations on temperature management after cardiac arrest included in the 2021 post-resuscitation care guidelines co-issued by the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). The guideline panel included thirteen international clinical experts who authored the 2021 ERC-ESICM guidelines and two methodologists who participated in the evidence review completed on behalf of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) of whom ERC is a member society. We followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of evidence and grade recommendations. The panel provided suggestions on guideline implementation and identified priorities for future research. The certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to low. In patients who remain comatose after cardiac arrest, we recommend continuous monitoring of core temperature and actively preventing fever (defined as a temperature > 37.7 °C) for at least 72 h. There was insufficient evidence to recommend for or against temperature control at 32-36 °C or early cooling after cardiac arrest. We recommend not actively rewarming comatose patients with mild hypothermia after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) to achieve normothermia. We recommend not using prehospital cooling with rapid infusion of large volumes of cold intravenous fluids immediately after ROSC.

Resuscitation 2020: Proceedings From the NeoHeart 2020 International Conference

Resuscitation guidelines are developed and revised by medical societies throughout the world. These guidelines are increasingly based on evidence from preclinical and clinical research. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation reviews evidence for each resuscitation practice and provides summary consensus statements that inform resuscitation guideline committees. A similar process is used for different populations including neonatal, pediatric, and adult resuscitation. The NeoHeart 2020 Conference brought together experts in resuscitation to discuss recent evidence and guidelines for resuscitation practices. This review summarizes the main focus of discussion from this symposium.

Differential Effectiveness of Hypothermic Targeted Temperature Management According to the Severity of Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome

International guidelines recommend targeted temperature management (TTM) to improve the neurological outcomes in adult patients with post-cardiac arrest syndrome (PCAS). However, it still remains unclear if the lower temperature setting (hypothermic TTM) or higher temperature setting (normothermic TTM) is superior for TTM. According to the most recent large randomized controlled trial (RCT), hypothermic TTM was not found to be associated with superior neurological outcomes than normothermic TTM in PCAS patients. Even though this represents high-quality evidence obtained from a well-designed large RCT, we believe that we still need to continue investigating the potential benefits of hypothermic TTM. In fact, several studies have indicated that the beneficial effect of hypothermic TTM differs according to the severity of PCAS, suggesting that there may be a subgroup of PCAS patients that is especially likely to benefit from hypothermic TTM. Herein, we summarize the results of major RCTs conducted to evaluate the beneficial effects of hypothermic TTM, review the recent literature suggesting the possibility that the therapeutic effect of hypothermic TTM differs according to the severity of PCAS, and discuss the potential of individualized TTM.