Effect of flurbiprofen on the reduction of intraocular pressure after administration of 1% apraclonidine in patients with glaucoma

Medical control of intraocular pressure after cataract surgery

PURPOSE

To compare the effectiveness of 2 medications commonly used to prevent intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation in the early period after cataract surgery.

SETTING

Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, USA.

METHODS

This prospective study comprised 202 eyes of patients scheduled for cataract extraction who agreed to participate. Patients were randomized to receive oral acetazolamide, 500 mg 1 hour preoperatively; oral acetazolamide, 500 mg immediately postoperatively; apraclonidine hydrochloride 1%, 2 drops 1 hour preoperatively; or artificial tears (control group). Intraocular pressure was measured preoperatively and 4 to 6 and 24 hours postoperatively.

RESULTS

Preoperative IOP was not significantly different among the 4 groups. At 4 to 6 hours postoperatively, only preoperative acetazolamide was significantly more effective than the control medication (P = .038); at 24 hours there were no significant differences among the 4 groups. Postoperative IOP elevation in excess of 35 mm Hg at 6 or 24 hours decreased significantly in the preoperative acetazolamide group (3/46 eyes) compared with the control group (14/54 eyes). There was no statistically significant difference in IOP elevation between eyes having extracapsular cataract extraction and those having phacoemulsification, independent of treatment group.

CONCLUSION

The results favor preoperative acetazolamide to control postcataract IOP elevation. The method of cataract removal did not affect postoperative IOP elevation.

Intraocular availability and pupillary effect of flurbiprofen and indomethacin during cataract surgery

PURPOSE

To compare the bioavailability and pupillary effect of flurbiprofen and indomethacin during phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation.

SETTING

Gimbel Eye Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, double-masked study, 236 patients had cataract extraction by phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. They received topical flurbiprofen 0.03% solution or indomethacin 1% suspension applied every 15 minutes for 60 to 75 minutes before surgery. An aqueous humor sample (100 microL) was taken immediately before the corneal incision was made. Pupil diameters (horizontal and vertical) were measured before aqueous humor sampling, after phacoemulsification, after irrigation and aspiration (I/A), and after acetylcholine instillation.

RESULTS

Mean concentration of flurbiprofen and indomethacin in the aqueous humor was 59.8 ng/mL and 90.2 ng/mL, respectively (P < .001). The percentage of dose detected in the aqueous humor was 4.38% in the flurbiprofen group and 0.21% in the indomethacin group (P < .001). Pupil diameters were 7.2 and 7.3 mm presurgery and 7.0 and 7.0 mm after I/A in the flurbiprofen and indomethacin groups, respectively (P > .05). No adverse events were reported in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the absolute concentration of indomethacin was higher, the percentage of dose detected in the aqueous humor was 20 times greater in the flurbiprofen than in the indomethacin group. Flurbiprofen is absorbed 20 times more readily than indomethacin. Both drugs were equally effective in preventing miosis during cataract surgery.

Effectiveness of apraclonidine and acetazolamide in preventing postoperative intraocular pressure spikes after extracapsular cataract extraction

We studied the effectiveness of two prophylactic agents in controlling early postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) increases after cataract surgery. Fifty-four nonglaucomatous patients received either topical 1% apraclonidine, one drop before and after surgery, or sustained-release acetazolamide, 500 mg, or no medication at the completion of planned extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE). Mean baseline IOPs were similar among patients randomized to the apraclonidine, acetazolamide, and control groups: 15.29 mm Hg, 15.33 mm Hg, and 14.26 mm Hg, respectively. At 3 hours postoperatively, IOPs were significantly lower in the apraclonidine group (11.13 mm Hg, P = .035), nonsignificantly lower in the acetazolamide group (13.3 mm Hg, P = .17), and significantly increased in the control group (21.32 mm Hg, P = .003). One eye in the apraclonidine group and six in the control group had IOPs greater than 30 mm Hg. At 24 hours, the only statistically significant difference was in the control group, whose mean IOPs remained elevated (21.83 mm Hg, P = .0008). One eye in the apraclonidine group, two in the acetazolamide group, and five in the control group had IOPs greater than 30 mm Hg. We found a significant early IOP reduction with apraclonidine given topically preoperatively and at the completion of planned ECCE.