1
|
Kuan EC, Wang EW, Adappa ND, Beswick DM, London NR, Su SY, Wang MB, Abuzeid WM, Alexiev B, Alt JA, Antognoni P, Alonso-Basanta M, Batra PS, Bhayani M, Bell D, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Betz CS, Blay JY, Bleier BS, Bonilla-Velez J, Callejas C, Carrau RL, Casiano RR, Castelnuovo P, Chandra RK, Chatzinakis V, Chen SB, Chiu AG, Choby G, Chowdhury NI, Citardi MJ, Cohen MA, Dagan R, Dalfino G, Dallan I, Dassi CS, de Almeida J, Dei Tos AP, DelGaudio JM, Ebert CS, El-Sayed IH, Eloy JA, Evans JJ, Fang CH, Farrell NF, Ferrari M, Fischbein N, Folbe A, Fokkens WJ, Fox MG, Lund VJ, Gallia GL, Gardner PA, Geltzeiler M, Georgalas C, Getz AE, Govindaraj S, Gray ST, Grayson JW, Gross BA, Grube JG, Guo R, Ha PK, Halderman AA, Hanna EY, Harvey RJ, Hernandez SC, Holtzman AL, Hopkins C, Huang Z, Huang Z, Humphreys IM, Hwang PH, Iloreta AM, Ishii M, Ivan ME, Jafari A, Kennedy DW, Khan M, Kimple AJ, Kingdom TT, Knisely A, Kuo YJ, Lal D, Lamarre ED, Lan MY, Le H, Lechner M, Lee NY, Lee JK, Lee VH, Levine CG, Lin JC, Lin DT, Lobo BC, Locke T, Luong AU, Magliocca KR, Markovic SN, Matnjani G, McKean EL, Meço C, Mendenhall WM, Michel L, Na'ara S, Nicolai P, Nuss DW, Nyquist GG, Oakley GM, Omura K, Orlandi RR, Otori N, Papagiannopoulos P, Patel ZM, Pfister DG, Phan J, Psaltis AJ, Rabinowitz MR, Ramanathan M, Rimmer R, Rosen MR, Sanusi O, Sargi ZB, Schafhausen P, Schlosser RJ, Sedaghat AR, Senior BA, Shrivastava R, Sindwani R, Smith TL, Smith KA, Snyderman CH, Solares CA, Sreenath SB, Stamm A, Stölzel K, Sumer B, Surda P, Tajudeen BA, Thompson LDR, Thorp BD, Tong CCL, Tsang RK, Turner JH, Turri-Zanoni M, Udager AM, van Zele T, VanKoevering K, Welch KC, Wise SK, Witterick IJ, Won TB, Wong SN, Woodworth BA, Wormald PJ, Yao WC, Yeh CF, Zhou B, Palmer JN. International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2024; 14:149-608. [PMID: 37658764 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sinonasal neoplasms, whether benign and malignant, pose a significant challenge to clinicians and represent a model area for multidisciplinary collaboration in order to optimize patient care. The International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors (ICSNT) aims to summarize the best available evidence and presents 48 thematic and histopathology-based topics spanning the field. METHODS In accordance with prior International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology documents, ICSNT assigned each topic as an Evidence-Based Review with Recommendations, Evidence-Based Review, and Literature Review based on the level of evidence. An international group of multidisciplinary author teams were assembled for the topic reviews using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses format, and completed sections underwent a thorough and iterative consensus-building process. The final document underwent rigorous synthesis and review prior to publication. RESULTS The ICSNT document consists of four major sections: general principles, benign neoplasms and lesions, malignant neoplasms, and quality of life and surveillance. It covers 48 conceptual and/or histopathology-based topics relevant to sinonasal neoplasms and masses. Topics with a high level of evidence provided specific recommendations, while other areas summarized the current state of evidence. A final section highlights research opportunities and future directions, contributing to advancing knowledge and community intervention. CONCLUSION As an embodiment of the multidisciplinary and collaborative model of care in sinonasal neoplasms and masses, ICSNT was designed as a comprehensive, international, and multidisciplinary collaborative endeavor. Its primary objective is to summarize the existing evidence in the field of sinonasal neoplasms and masses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward C Kuan
- Departments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Eric W Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nithin D Adappa
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Daniel M Beswick
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Nyall R London
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Sinonasal and Skull Base Tumor Program, Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Shirley Y Su
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Marilene B Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Waleed M Abuzeid
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Borislav Alexiev
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jeremiah A Alt
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Paolo Antognoni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Michelle Alonso-Basanta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Pete S Batra
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mihir Bhayani
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Diana Bell
- Department of Pathology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Manuel Bernal-Sprekelsen
- Otorhinolaryngology Department, Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Christian S Betz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, UNICANCER, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Benjamin S Bleier
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Juliana Bonilla-Velez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Claudio Callejas
- Department of Otolaryngology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Ricardo L Carrau
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Roy R Casiano
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Paolo Castelnuovo
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Rakesh K Chandra
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Simon B Chen
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Alexander G Chiu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Garret Choby
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Naweed I Chowdhury
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Martin J Citardi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Marc A Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Roi Dagan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Gianluca Dalfino
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Iacopo Dallan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - John de Almeida
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angelo P Dei Tos
- Section of Pathology, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - John M DelGaudio
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Charles S Ebert
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ivan H El-Sayed
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jean Anderson Eloy
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - James J Evans
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christina H Fang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, The University Hospital for Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Nyssa F Farrell
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Marco Ferrari
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Nancy Fischbein
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Adam Folbe
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
| | - Wytske J Fokkens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Meha G Fox
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Gary L Gallia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Paul A Gardner
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mathew Geltzeiler
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Christos Georgalas
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Anne E Getz
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Satish Govindaraj
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Stacey T Gray
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jessica W Grayson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Bradley A Gross
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jordon G Grube
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Ruifeng Guo
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Patrick K Ha
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Ashleigh A Halderman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Ehab Y Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Richard J Harvey
- Rhinology and Skull Base Research Group, Applied Medical Research Centre, University of South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephen C Hernandez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Adam L Holtzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Claire Hopkins
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Guys and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Zhigang Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenxiao Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Ian M Humphreys
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Peter H Hwang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Alfred M Iloreta
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Masaru Ishii
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Michael E Ivan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Aria Jafari
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - David W Kennedy
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mohemmed Khan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Adam J Kimple
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Todd T Kingdom
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Anna Knisely
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ying-Ju Kuo
- Department of Pathology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Devyani Lal
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Eric D Lamarre
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Ming-Ying Lan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hien Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Matt Lechner
- UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jivianne K Lee
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Victor H Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Corinna G Levine
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Jin-Ching Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Derrick T Lin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brian C Lobo
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Tran Locke
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amber U Luong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kelly R Magliocca
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Svetomir N Markovic
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Gesa Matnjani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Erin L McKean
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Cem Meço
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Salzburg Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - William M Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Loren Michel
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shorook Na'ara
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Piero Nicolai
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Daniel W Nuss
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Gurston G Nyquist
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gretchen M Oakley
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Kazuhiro Omura
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Richard R Orlandi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Nobuyoshi Otori
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Peter Papagiannopoulos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Zara M Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - David G Pfister
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alkis J Psaltis
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Mindy R Rabinowitz
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Murugappan Ramanathan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ryan Rimmer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Marc R Rosen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Olabisi Sanusi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Zoukaa B Sargi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Philippe Schafhausen
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Ahmad R Sedaghat
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Brent A Senior
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Raj Shrivastava
- Department of Neurosurgery and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Raj Sindwani
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Timothy L Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Kristine A Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Carl H Snyderman
- Departments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - C Arturo Solares
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Satyan B Sreenath
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Aldo Stamm
- São Paulo ENT Center (COF), Edmundo Vasconcelos Complex, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Katharina Stölzel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Baran Sumer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Pavol Surda
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Guys and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Bobby A Tajudeen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Brian D Thorp
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Charles C L Tong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Raymond K Tsang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Justin H Turner
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Mario Turri-Zanoni
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Aaron M Udager
- Department of Pathology, Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Thibaut van Zele
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Kyle VanKoevering
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Kevin C Welch
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sarah K Wise
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ian J Witterick
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tae-Bin Won
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Stephanie N Wong
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Bradford A Woodworth
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Peter-John Wormald
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - William C Yao
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Chien-Fu Yeh
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Bing Zhou
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - James N Palmer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hou X, Liang F, Lou Y. Clinical features and prognostic factors for malignant parotid tumors in children and adolescents: A population-based study. JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY, ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY 2023; 125:101741. [PMID: 38104649 DOI: 10.1016/j.jormas.2023.101741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We performed a population-based cohort study to investigate the clinical characteristics and survival rates of primary malignant parotid tumors (MPT) in children and adolescents. METHODS The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify all pediatric and adolescent patients with MPT who were diagnosed between 2000 and 2018. Based on a number of parameters, survival curves were produced using Kaplane-Meier estimates. The log-rank test was used to compare survival curves. The influence of each component on overall survival (OS) was examined using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS There were 352 identified pediatric and adolescent patients with MPT. At diagnosis, the age ranged from 1.0 to 19 years, with a median of 15 years. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MC) (46.5 %) was the most common histological subtype, followed by acinar cell carcinoma (ACC) (36.4 %) and others (17.1 %) such as adenoid cystic carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. All patients had overall survival rates of 98.8 %, 95.6 %, and 94.6 % at 1-year, 3-year and 5-year, respectively. The results of the Cox proportional hazard regression showed that tumor grade, SEER stage, radiotherapy, and treatment regimens were significant independent predictors of overall survival. CONCLUSIONS In pediatric and adolescent MPT, tumor grade, SEER stage, adjuvant radiation, and treatment regimens were found to be important independent predictors of survival. More research is required to validate the role of adjuvant radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiapei Hou
- Department of Stomatology, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Fuhua Liang
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Nanning Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Yi Lou
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hangzhou Children's Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Moffitt GB, Sandison GA, Argento DC, Emery R, Wootton LS, Parvathaneni U, Liao JJ, Laramore GE, Stewart RD. Effects of tissue heterogeneity and comparisons of collapsed cone and Monte Carlo fast neutron patient dosimetry using the University of Washington clinical neutron therapy system (CNTS). Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:245011. [PMID: 37983905 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad0e38] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
Fast neutron therapy is a high linear energy transfer (LET) radiation treatment modality offering advantages over low LET radiations. Multileaf collimator technology reduces normal-tissue dose (toxicity) and makes neutron therapy more comparable to MV x-ray treatments. Published clinical-trial and other experiences with fast neutron therapy are reported. Early comparative studies failed to consider differences in target-dose spatial conformality between x-ray and neutron treatments, which is especially important for organs-at-risk close to tumor targets. Treatments planning systems (TPS) for high-energy neutrons lag behind TPS tools for MV x-rays, creating challenges for comparative studies of clinical outcomes. A previously published Monte Carlo model of the University of Washington (UW) Clinical Neutron Therapy System (CNTS) is refined and integrated with the RayStation TPS as an external dose planning/verification tool. The collapsed cone (CC) dose calculations in the TPS are based on measured dose profiles and output factors in water, with the absolute dose determined using a tissue-equivalent ionization chamber. For comparison, independent (external) Monte Carlo simulation computes dose on a voxel-by-voxel basis using an atlas that maps Hounsfield Unit (HU) numbers to elemental composition and density. Although the CC algorithm in the TPS accurately computes neutron dose to water compared to Monte Carlo calculations, calculated dose to water differs from bone or tissue depending largely on hydrogen content. Therefore, the elemental composition of tissue and bone, rather than the material or electron density, affects fast neutron dose. While the CC algorithm suffices for reproducible patient dosimetry in fast neutron therapy, adopting methods that consider tissue heterogeneity would enhance patient-specific neutron dose accuracy relative to national standards for other types of ionizing radiation. Corrections for tissue composition have a significant impact on absolute dose and the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of neutron treatments compared to other radiation types (MV x-rays, protons, and carbon ions).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory B Moffitt
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356043, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America
| | - George A Sandison
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356043, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America
| | - David C Argento
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356043, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America
| | - Robert Emery
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356043, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America
| | - Landon S Wootton
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356043, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America
- Baylor Scott and White, Department of Radiation Oncology, 4516 Monterosa Lane, Round Rock, TX 78665, United States of America
| | - Upendra Parvathaneni
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356043, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America
| | - Jay J Liao
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356043, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America
| | - George E Laramore
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356043, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America
| | - Robert D Stewart
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356043, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hariharan A, Tran SD. Localized Drug Delivery Systems: An Update on Treatment Options for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas. Pharmaceutics 2023; 15:1844. [PMID: 37514031 PMCID: PMC10385385 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15071844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is one of the most common cancers in the world, with surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy being the primary treatment modalities. The treatment for HNSCC has evolved over time, due to which the prognosis has improved drastically. Despite the varied treatment options, major challenges persist. HNSCC chemotherapeutic and immunotherapeutic drugs are usually administered systemically, which could affect the patient's quality of life due to the associated side effects. Moreover, the systemic administration of salivary stimulating agents for the treatment of radiation-induced xerostomia is associated with toxicities. Localized drug delivery systems (LDDS) are gaining importance, as they have the potential to provide non-invasive, patient-friendly alternatives to cancer therapy with reduced dose-limiting toxicities. LDDSs involve directly delivering a drug to the tissue or organ affected by the disease. Some of the common localized routes of administration include the transdermal and transmucosal drug delivery system (DDSs). This review will attempt to explore the different treatment options using LDDSs for the treatment of HNSCC and radiotherapy-induced damage and their potential to provide a better experience for patients, as well as the obstacles that need to be addressed to render them successful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arvind Hariharan
- McGill Craniofacial Tissue Engineering and Stem Cells Laboratory, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, 3640 University Street, Montreal, QC H3A 0C7, Canada
| | - Simon D Tran
- McGill Craniofacial Tissue Engineering and Stem Cells Laboratory, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, 3640 University Street, Montreal, QC H3A 0C7, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gordon K, Gulidov I, Fatkhudinov T, Koryakin S, Kaprin A. Fast and Furious: Fast Neutron Therapy in Cancer Treatment. Int J Part Ther 2022; 9:59-69. [PMID: 36060415 PMCID: PMC9415749 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-22-00017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Fast neutron therapy has been used for decades. In conjunction with recent advances in photonic techniques, fast neutrons are no longer of much oncologic interest, which is not unequivocally positive, given their undoubted therapeutic value. This mini-review recalls the history of medical research on fast neutrons, considers their physical and radiobiological properties alongside their benefits for cancer treatment, and discusses their place in modern radiation oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantin Gordon
- 1 Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “People's Friendship University of Russia,” Medical Institution, Moscow, Russia
- 2 A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center—branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Obninsk, Russia
| | - Igor Gulidov
- 2 A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center—branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Obninsk, Russia
| | - Timur Fatkhudinov
- 1 Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “People's Friendship University of Russia,” Medical Institution, Moscow, Russia
| | - Sergey Koryakin
- 2 A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center—branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Obninsk, Russia
| | - Andrey Kaprin
- 1 Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “People's Friendship University of Russia,” Medical Institution, Moscow, Russia
- 2 A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center—branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Obninsk, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Viscariello N, Greer MD, Parvathaneni U, Liao JJ, Laramore GE, Stewart RD. Comparisons of 3-Dimensional Conformal and Intensity-Modulated Neutron Therapy for Head and Neck Cancers. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:51-61. [PMID: 34722811 PMCID: PMC8489487 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00059.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Neutron therapy is a high linear energy transfer modality that is useful for the treatment of radioresistant head and neck (H&N) cancers. It has been limited to 3-dimensioanal conformal-based fast-neutron therapy (3DCNT), but recent technical advances have enabled the clinical implementation of intensity-modulated neutron therapy (IMNT). This study evaluated the comparative dosimetry of IMNT and 3DCNT plans for the treatment of H&N cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS Seven H&N IMNT plans were retrospectively created for patients previously treated with 3DCNT at the University of Washington (Seattle). A custom RayStation model with neutron-specific scattering kernels was used for inverse planning. Organ-at-risk (OAR) objectives from the original 3DCNT plan were initially used and were then systematically reduced to investigate the feasibility of improving a therapeutic ratio, defined as the ratio of the mean tumor to OAR dose. The IMNT and 3DCNT plan quality was evaluated using the therapeutic ratio, isodose contours, and dose volume histograms. RESULTS When compared with the 3DCNT plans, IMNT reduces the OAR dose for the equivalent tumor coverage. Moreover, IMNT is most advantageous for OARs in close spatial proximity to the target. For the 7 patients with H&N cancers examined, the therapeutic ratio for IMNT increased by an average of 56% when compared with the 3DCNT. The maximum OAR dose was reduced by an average of 20.5% and 20.7% for the spinal cord and temporal lobe, respectively. The mean dose to the larynx decreased by an average of 80%. CONCLUSION The IMNT significantly decreases the OAR doses compared with 3DCNT and provides comparable tumor coverage. Improvements in the therapeutic ratio with IMNT are especially significant for dose-limiting OARs near tumor targets. Moreover, IMNT provides superior sparing of healthy tissues and creates significant new opportunities to improve the care of patients with H&N cancers treated with neutron therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Viscariello
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Matthew D. Greer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Jay J. Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - George E. Laramore
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Robert D. Stewart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cantù G. Adenoid cystic carcinoma. An indolent but aggressive tumour. Part B: treatment and prognosis. ACTA OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGICA ITALICA : ORGANO UFFICIALE DELLA SOCIETA ITALIANA DI OTORINOLARINGOLOGIA E CHIRURGIA CERVICO-FACCIALE 2021; 41:296-307. [PMID: 34533533 PMCID: PMC8448184 DOI: 10.14639/0392-100x-n1729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Giulio Cantù
- Former Director of Otorhinolaryngology and Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Unit, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Aljabab S, Lui A, Wong T, Liao J, Laramore G, Parvathaneni U. A Combined Neutron and Proton Regimen for Advanced Salivary Tumors: Early Clinical Experience. Cureus 2021; 13:e14844. [PMID: 34104589 PMCID: PMC8175057 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.14844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and objective Fast neutron radiotherapy (NRT) is a high linear energy transfer (LET) particle therapy that offers a local control (LC) advantage over low-LET X-rays in the treatment of advanced and unresectable salivary gland malignancies. However, in tumors approximating the base of skull (BOS), target volumes may be underdosed to minimize toxicity to the central nervous system (CNS). In this setting, a proton beam boost to the underdosed part of the tumor may improve LC. We report our early experience with a hybrid neutron-proton approach in patients with BOS involvement. Materials and methods We retrospectively reviewed 29 patients with locally advanced and unresectable salivary gland tumors involving the BOS between 2014-2018. The median age of the patients was 56 years, with the majority of them having adenoid cystic carcinomas (ACC) (79%) with advanced T4a/b disease (86%), pathologic perineural invasion (PNI) (55.2%), and orbital invasion (34.5%). Five patients (17.2%) were cases of re-irradiation. Surgical resection was attempted in 15 patients (51.7%), of which none achieved negative margins. The median neutron dose was 18.4 neutron Gray (nGy) with a sequential proton boost (PB) with a median dose of 25 Gy [relative biological effectiveness (RBE)] (range: 16-45 Gy). Toxicity was graded per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03. Descriptive statistics and the Kaplan-Meier method were used. Results At a median follow-up of 18.9 months [interquartile range (IQR): 6.1-32.5], the entire cohort's overall survival (OS) was 93.1%, progression-free survival (PFS) was 79.3%, and LC was 89.7%. Among patients who were not re-irradiated (n=24), the most commonly recorded acute grade 3 toxicities were mucositis (50%) and dermatitis (37.5%). There was no documented acute grade 4/5 events. Late grade 3/4 events included trismus (n=1), hearing loss (n=2), visual loss (n=6), and bone necrosis (n=1). There were no reported late grade 5 events in de novo patients. Conclusion In this challenging cohort with a poor prognosis, early outcomes for a hybrid neutron-proton approach were found to be promising. Further studies involving longer follow-ups with a larger cohort of patients are required to validate our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saif Aljabab
- Department of Radiation Oncology, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU
| | - Andrew Lui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, USA
| | - Tony Wong
- Department of Medical Physics, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Proton Therapy Center, Seattle, USA
| | - Jay Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, USA
| | - George Laramore
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Geiger JL, Ismaila N, Beadle B, Caudell JJ, Chau N, Deschler D, Glastonbury C, Kaufman M, Lamarre E, Lau HY, Licitra L, Moore MG, Rodriguez C, Roshal A, Seethala R, Swiecicki P, Ha P. Management of Salivary Gland Malignancy: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:1909-1941. [PMID: 33900808 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.00449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 147] [Impact Index Per Article: 49.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide evidence-based recommendations for practicing physicians and other healthcare providers on the management of salivary gland malignancy. METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, surgical oncology, radiation oncology, neuroradiology, pathology, and patient advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 2000 through 2020. Outcomes of interest included survival, diagnostic accuracy, disease recurrence, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS The literature search identified 293 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Six main clinical questions were addressed, which included subquestions on preoperative evaluations, surgical diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, appropriate radiotherapy techniques, the role of systemic therapy, and follow-up evaluations. RECOMMENDATIONS When possible, evidence-based recommendations were developed to address the diagnosis and appropriate preoperative evaluations for patients with a salivary gland malignancy, therapeutic procedures, and appropriate treatment options in various salivary gland histologies.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Marnie Kaufman
- Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma Research Foundation, Needham, MA
| | | | | | - Lisa Licitra
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.,University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Patrick Ha
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sommer F. Rare Diseases of the Nose, the Paranasal Sinuses, and the Anterior Skull Base. Laryngorhinootologie 2021; 100:S1-S44. [PMID: 34352902 PMCID: PMC8354577 DOI: 10.1055/a-1331-2469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Due to their low incidence and thus resulting limited diagnostic criteria as well as therapeutic options, rare diseases of the nose, the paranasal sinuses, and the anterior skull base are a significant challenge. The value as of which a disease has to be considered as rare amounts to a maximum of 5 patients per 10 000 people. Within these diseases, however, there are extreme differences. Some rare or orphan diseases like for example the inverted papilloma belong to regularly diagnosed and treated diseases of larger departments of oto-rhino-laryngology whereas other rare diseases and malformations have only been described in less than 100 case reports worldwide. This fact emphasizes the necessity of bundling the available experience of diagnostics and therapy. The present article gives an overview about rare diseases of the nose, the paranasal sinuses, and the anterior skull base from the field of diseases/syndromes of the olfactory system, malformations of the nose and paranasal sinuses, ventilation and functional disorders as well as benign and malignant tumors. The classification and data on diagnostic and therapeutic options were established based on the current literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Sommer
- Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie, Universitätsklinik Ulm
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
[ 125Ⅰ seed brachytherapy for recurrent salivary gland carcinoma after external radiotherapy]. BEIJING DA XUE XUE BAO. YI XUE BAN = JOURNAL OF PEKING UNIVERSITY. HEALTH SCIENCES 2020. [PMID: 33047730 PMCID: PMC7653434 DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167x.2020.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the clinical application and efficacy of 125Ⅰ radioactive seeds implantation in the treatment of recurrent salivary gland carcinoma after external radiotherapy. METHODS From July 2004 to July 2016, 43 cases of recurrent salivary gland carcinoma of the neck after external radiotherapy or surgery combined with external radiotherapy were treated. According to the conventional segmentation radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (once a day, 1.8-2.0 Gy each time, 5 days per week), the cumulative radiation dose of the patients in this group was calculated. In the study, 26 patients received 50-60 Gy, 7 patients received less than 50 Gy, 4 patients received 60-70 Gy, and 6 patients received more than 80 Gy (range: 80-120 Gy). The interval between the last external irradiation and local recurrence was 4-204 months, and the median interval was 48 months. Among them, 25 cases were treated with 125Ⅰ radioactive seeds implantation only and 18 cases were treated with 125Ⅰ radioactive seeds implantation after operation. The prescription dose was 100-140 Gy. The control rate, survival rate and disease-free survival rate were recorded to evaluate the side effects. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 27 months (ranging from 2.5 to 149.0 months). Among them, the median follow-up time of adenoid cystic carcinoma patients was 31 months (range: 2.5-112.0 months), and the median follow-up time of mucoepidermoid carcinoma patients was 18 months (range: 5-149 months). The local control rates for 1, 3 and 5 years were 66.5%, 48.8% and 42.7%, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5- year survival rates were 88.0%, 56.7% and 45.8%, respectively. The disease-free survival rates of 1, 3 and 5 years were 58.3%, 45.4% and 38.1%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in local control rate, survival rate, and disease-free survival between the radioactive seeds implantation group and the radioactive seeds implantation group after surgical resection. There were 2 cases of acute radiation reaction Ⅰ/Ⅱ and 3 cases of reaction Ⅲ or above. In the late stage of radiotherapy, there were 8 cases with Ⅰ/Ⅱ grade reaction and 3 cases with Ⅲ grade or above reaction. The incidence of radiation reactions of Grade Ⅲ and above was 7%. CONCLUSION 125Ⅰ radioactive seeds implantation provides an alternative method for the treatment of recurrent salivary gland carcinoma after external radiotherapy. The local control rate and survival rate are improved on the premise of low incidence of side effects.
Collapse
|
12
|
Streitmatter SW, Stewart RD, Moffitt G, Jevremovic T. Mechanistic Modeling of the Relative Biological Effectiveness of Boron Neutron Capture Therapy. Cells 2020; 9:cells9102302. [PMID: 33076401 PMCID: PMC7602619 DOI: 10.3390/cells9102302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Revised: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Accurate dosimetry and determination of the biological effectiveness of boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is challenging because of the mix of different types and energies of radiation at the cellular and subcellular levels. In this paper, we present a computational, multiscale system of models to better assess the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and compound biological effectiveness (CBE) of several neutron sources as applied to BNCT using boronophenylalanine (BPA) and a potential monoclonal antibody (mAb) that targets HER-2-positive cells with Trastuzumab. The multiscale model is tested against published in vitro and in vivo measurements of cell survival with and without boron. The combined dosimetric and radiobiological model includes an analytical formulation that accounts for the type of neutron source, the tissue- or cancer-specific dose–response characteristics, and the microdistribution of boron. Tests of the model against results from published experiments with and without boron show good agreement between modeled and experimentally determined cell survival for neutrons alone and in combination with boron. The system of models developed in this work is potentially useful as an aid for the optimization and individualization of BNCT for HER-2-positive cancers, as well as other cancers, that can be targeted with mAb or a conventional BPA compound.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seth W. Streitmatter
- Medical Imaging Physics and Radiation Safety, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-801-581-2271
| | - Robert D. Stewart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98115, USA; (R.D.S.); (G.M.)
| | - Gregory Moffitt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98115, USA; (R.D.S.); (G.M.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Moffitt GB, Wootton LS, Hårdemark B, Sandison GA, Laramore GE, Parvathaneni U, Stewart RD. Scattering kernels for fast neutron therapy treatment planning. Phys Med Biol 2020; 65:165009. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab9a85] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
14
|
Schaub L, Harrabi SB, Debus J. Particle therapy in the future of precision therapy. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20200183. [PMID: 32795176 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20200183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The first hospital-based treatment facilities for particle therapy started operation about thirty years ago. Since then, the clinical experience with protons and carbon ions has grown continuously and more than 200,000 patients have been treated to date. The promising clinical results led to a rapidly increasing number of treatment facilities and many new facilities are planned or under construction all over the world. An inverted depth-dose profile combined with potential radiobiological advantages make charged particles a precious tool for the treatment of tumours that are particularly radioresistant or located nearby sensitive structures. A rising number of trials have already confirmed the benefits of particle therapy in selected clinical situations and further improvements in beam delivery, image guidance and treatment planning are expected. This review summarises some physical and biological characteristics of accelerated charged particles and gives some examples of their clinical application. Furthermore, challenges and future perspectives of particle therapy will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Schaub
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi Ben Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cash H, Harbison RA, Futran N, Parvathaneni U, Laramore GE, Liao J, Cannon R, Rodriguez C, Houlton JJ. Neutron Therapy for High-Grade Salivary Carcinomas in the Adjuvant and Primary Treatment Setting. Laryngoscope 2020; 131:541-547. [PMID: 32603506 DOI: 10.1002/lary.28830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Revised: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS Our primary objective was to compare differences in survival of patients with high-grade salivary gland carcinomas (SGCs) receiving adjuvant neutron versus photon radiotherapy using a hospital-based national cohort and restricted mean survival time (RMST) analysis. Our secondary objective was to compare survival of similar patients treated with primary neutron versus photon radiation. STUDY DESIGN Multicenter, retrospective population-based study of patients within the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2014. METHODS One thousand eight hundred forty-four patients were selected on diagnosis of high-grade parotid and submandibular malignancies. One thousand seven hundred seventy-seven patients receiving photon and 67 patients receiving neutron therapy were identified who met inclusion criteria. Patients were then categorized as having primary surgery with adjuvant radiation or primary radiation without prior surgery. Bivariate analysis was performed to assess for differences between groups, and RMST analysis was performed at 1-, 2-, and 5-year timepoints with controlling for available covariate data. RESULTS There was no significant difference in RMST for patients receiving neutrons over photons at 1, 2, and 5 years in the adjuvant setting. Among patients undergoing primary radiotherapy, there was a difference in RMST of 2.29 months at 1 year and 5.05 months at 2 years for neutrons over photons, though this benefit was not observed at 5 years post-therapy. CONCLUSIONS For patients with high grade SGCs undergoing adjuvant photon versus neutron radiotherapy, there was no difference in RMST. There was observed to be a significant difference in RMST at 1 and 2 years among patients undergoing primary neutron therapy of up to 5 months. Given the benefit observed with primary neutron therapy, it should be considered in both the primary and adjuvant treatment setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4 Laryngoscope, 131:541-547, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harrison Cash
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A
| | - R Alex Harbison
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A
| | - Neal Futran
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A
| | - Upendra Parvathaneni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A
| | - George E Laramore
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A
| | - Jay Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A
| | - Richard Cannon
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S.A
| | - Cristina Rodriguez
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A
| | - Jeffrey J Houlton
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Reirradiation of salivary gland tumors with carbon ion radiotherapy at CNAO. Radiother Oncol 2020; 145:172-177. [PMID: 32044529 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Revised: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To report oncologic and functional outcomes in terms of tumor control and toxicity of carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) in reirradiation setting for recurrent salivary gland tumors at CNAO. METHODS From November 2013 to September 2016, 51 consecutive patients with inoperable recurrent salivary gland tumors were retreated with CIRT in the frame of the phase II protocol CNAO S14/2012C for recurrent head and neck tumors. RESULTS Majority of pts (74.5%) had adenoid cystic carcinoma, mainly rcT4a (51%) and rcT4b (37%). Median dose of prior photon based radiotherapy was 60 Gy. Median dose of CIRT was 60 Gy [RBE] at a mean of 3 Gy [RBE] per fraction. During reirradiation, 19 patients (37.3%) experienced grade G1 toxicity, 19 pts (37.3%) had G2 and 2 pts (3.9%) had G3. Median follow up time was 19 months. Twenty one (41.2%) patients had stable disease and 30 (58.8%) tumor progression at the time of last follow up. Furthermore, 9 (18%) patients had G1 late toxicity, 19 (37%) had G2 and 9 (17. 5%) had G3. Using the Kaplan Meier method, progression free survival (actuarial) at one and two years were 71.7% and 52.2% respectively. Estimated overall survival (actuarial) at one and two years were 90.2% and 64%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS CIRT is a good option for retreatment of inoperable recurrent salivary gland tumors with acceptable rates of acute and late toxicity. Longer follow up time is needed to assess the effectiveness of CIRT in reirradiation setting of salivary gland tumors.
Collapse
|
17
|
Adeberg S, Windisch P, Ehret F, Baur M, Akbaba S, Held T, Bernhardt D, Haefner MF, Krauss J, Kargus S, Freudlsperger C, Plinkert P, Flechtenmacher C, Herfarth K, Debus J, Rieken S. Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) With Carbon Ion Boost in the Multimodal Treatment of Salivary Duct Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2019; 9:1420. [PMID: 31921675 PMCID: PMC6932999 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 11/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: To assess outcomes and treatment related toxicity following intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and a Carbon Ion Radiotherapy (CIRT) boost for salivary duct carcinoma (SDC). Methods: Twenty-eight consecutive patients with SDC who underwent a postoperative (82%) or definitive (18%) radiation therapy between 2010 and 2017 were assessed in this retrospective single-center analysis. CIRT boost was delivered with median 18 Gy(RBE) in 6 daily fractions, followed by an TomoTherapy®-based IMRT (median 54 Gy in 27 daily fractions). Treatment-related acute toxicity was assessed according to CTCAE Version 4. Results: Tumors were most commonly located in the major salivary glands (n = 25; 89%); 23 patients (82%) received previous surgery (R0: 30%; R1: 57%; R2: 4%; RX: 19%). Median follow-up was 30 months. Four patients (14%) experienced a local relapse and 3 (11%) developed locoregional recurrence. The two-year local control (LC) and locoregional control (LRC) was 96 and 93%, respectively. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 27 months, metastasis-free survival (MFS) was 69 months, and overall survival (OS) was 93 months. Acute grade 3 toxicity occurred in 11 patients (mucositis, dermatitis, xerostomia; n = 2 each (7%) were the most common) and 2 osteonecroses of the mandibular (grade 3) occurred. No patients experienced grade ≥4 toxicities. Conclusions: Multimodal therapy approaches with surgery followed by IMRT and CIRT boost for SDC leads to good local and locoregional disease control. However, the frequent occurrence of distant metastases limits the prognosis and requires optimization of adjuvant systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Paul Windisch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Ehret
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Melissa Baur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias F Haefner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Steffen Kargus
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Freudlsperger
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Plinkert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Seidensaal K, Harrabi SB, Uhl M, Debus J. Re-irradiation with protons or heavy ions with focus on head and neck, skull base and brain malignancies. Br J Radiol 2019; 93:20190516. [PMID: 31647306 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Re-irradiation can offer a potentially curative solution in case of progression after initial therapy; however, a second course of radiotherapy can be associated with an increased risk of severe side-effects. Particle therapy with protons and especially carbon ions spares surrounding tissue better than most photon techniques, thus it is of high potential for re-irradiation. Irradiation of tumors of the brain, head and neck and skull base involves several delicate risk organs, e.g. optic system, brainstem, salivary gland or swallowing muscles. Adequate local control rates with tolerable side-effects have been described for several tumors of these locations as meningioma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, chordoma or chondrosarcoma and head and neck tumors. High life time doses nonetheless lead to a different scope of side-effects, e.g. an enhanced rate of carotid blow outs has been reported. This review summarizes the current data on particle irradiation of the aforementioned locations and malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Seidensaal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi Ben Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Uhl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Treatment Outcome of 227 Patients with Sinonasal Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma (ACC) after Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy and Active Raster-Scanning Carbon Ion Boost: A 10-Year Single-Center Experience. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11111705. [PMID: 31683896 PMCID: PMC6895865 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11111705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2019] [Revised: 10/28/2019] [Accepted: 10/29/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate the treatment outcome of primary and postoperative bimodal radiotherapy (RT) including intensity modulated photon radiotherapy (IMRT) and carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for sinonasal adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) patients. Medical records of 227 consecutive patients who received either a primary (n = 90, 40%) or postoperative (n = 137, 60%; R2, n = 86, 63%) IMRT with doses between 48 and 56 Gy in 1.8 or 2 Gy fractions and active raster-scanning carbon ion boost with 18 to 24 Gy (RBE, relative biological effectiveness) in 3 Gy (RBE) fractions between 2009 and 2019 up to a median total dose of 80 Gy (EQD2, equivalent dose in 2 Gy single dose fractions, range 71–80 Gy) were reviewed. Results: Median follow-up was 50 months. In univariate and multivariate analysis, no significant difference in local control (LC) could be shown between the two treatment groups (p = 0.33). Corresponding 3-year LC rates were 79% for primary bimodal RT and 82% for postoperative bimodal RT, respectively. T4 stage (p = 0.002) and solid histology (p = 0.005) were identified as independent prognostic factors for decreased LC. Significant worse long-term treatment tolerance was observed for postoperatively irradiated patients with 17% vs. 6% late grade 3 toxicity (p < 0.001). Primary radiotherapy including IMRT and carbon ion boost for dose-escalation results in adequate LC with less long-term grade 3 toxicity compared to postoperative bimodal radiotherapy in sinonasal ACC patients. The high rate of macroscopic tumor disease in the postoperative group makes the interpretation of the beneficial results in LC for primary RT difficult.
Collapse
|
20
|
Akbaba S, Heusel A, Mock A, Held T, Lang K, Hoerner-Rieber J, Forster T, Katayama S, Kargus S, Rieken S, Plinkert P, Herfarth K, Debus J, Adeberg S. The impact of age on the outcome of patients treated with radiotherapy for mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) of the salivary glands in the head and neck: A 15-year single-center experience. Oral Oncol 2019; 97:115-123. [PMID: 31494395 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Revised: 08/02/2019] [Accepted: 08/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Data regarding treatment and survival outcome of patients with mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the head and neck are limited to case reports and case series. As a consequence of lacking evidence, treatment guidelines do not exist. We aimed to analyze the effect of modern radiotherapy in form of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) either with simultaneously integrated boost or carbon ion boost on local control and survival for a relatively large patient collective. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patient records of 62 consecutive patients treated with postoperative (n = 53, 85%) or definitive (n = 9, 15%) radiotherapy between 2004 and 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Kaplan-Meier estimates for overall survival (OS), distant progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC) and locoregional control (LRC) were statistically calculated and prognostic factors were identified using the log-rank test. Toxicity was assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). RESULTS The median follow-up was 47 months (range, 4-188 months). The 3-year OS, DPFS, LC and LRC, estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves, were 82%, 87%, 89% and 92%, the estimated 5-year OS, DPFS, LC and LRC were 78%, 87%, 84% and 88%, respectively. In univariate analysis, age >56 years (vs. age ≤56 years) was identified as the only independent negative prognostic factor for decreased OS (HR = 1.078; 95%-CI = 1.029-1.130; p = 0.001), DPFS (HR = 1.055; 95%-CI = 1.000-1.114; p = 0.051) and LC (HR = 1.087; 95%-CI = 1.022-1.157; p = 0.008). Treatment was well tolerated without any grade ≥4 toxicity. Acute and late grade 3 toxicities were rare with 16% acute (n = 10) and 13% late toxicities (n = 8). CONCLUSION Radiotherapy with intensity modulated radiotherapy including either simultaneously integrated photon boost or active raster-scanning carbon ion boost for mucoepidermoid carcinomas of the head and neck resulted in excellent survival outcome and locoregional control with moderate toxicity. However, patients older than 56 years seem to have a disadvantage in all calculated endpoints (OS, DPFS, LRC) due to frequent local and distant relapses. CONDENSED ABSTRACT Modern radiotherapy with intensity modulated radiotherapy including either a simultaneously integrated photon boost or carbon ion boost for mucoepidermoid carcinoma results in excellent survival outcome and locoregional control with moderate toxicity. The 5-year OS, DPFS, LC and LRC, estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves, were 89%, 75%, 84% and 80%, respectively. Patients older than 56 years seem to have a disadvantage in all calculated endpoints (OS, DPFS, LRC).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Astrid Heusel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Andreas Mock
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Thomas Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Juliane Hoerner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Tobias Forster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Sonja Katayama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Steffen Kargus
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Peter Plinkert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Akbaba S, Mock A, Hoerner-Rieber J, Held T, Katayama S, Forster T, Freudlsperger C, Rieken S, Herfarth K, Plinkert P, Debus J, Adeberg S. Treatment Outcome of a Combined Dose-Escalated Treatment Regime With Helical TomoTherapy® and Active Raster-Scanning Carbon Ion Boost for Adenocarcinomas of the Head and Neck. Front Oncol 2019; 9:755. [PMID: 31475108 PMCID: PMC6705231 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Data regarding treatment and survival outcome of patients with adenocarcinoma of the head and neck are limited to case reports and case series. As a consequence of lacking evidence, treatment guidelines do not exist. We aimed to analyze the effect of a bimodal irradiation regime with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and carbon ion boost on local control (LC) and survival in adenocarcinoma patients for a large patient collective. Materials and Methods: Patient records of eighty consecutive patients treated between 2009 and 2018 were analyzed retrospectively and Kaplan-Meier estimates for LC, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared among patients with salivary gland adenocarcinoma (SGAC), salivary duct adenocarcinoma (SDAC), and intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (ITAC) according to the World Health Organization (WHO). Prognostic factors were identified using the log-rank test and cox-regression modeling. Toxicity was assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Results: Median follow-up was 41 months. The 3-year and estimated 5-year Kaplan-Meier rates for all patients were 83 and 75% for LC, 74 and 50% for OS and 60 and 53% for PFS, respectively. While bimodal RT for ITAC resulted in a significantly decreased 3-year LC rate of 50 vs. 93% for each SGAC and SDAC (p < 0.01), no statistical significant survival differences could be identified across the three groups regarding OS (p = 0.08) and PFS (p = 0.063). 3-year OS was 88% for SGAC, 78% for SDAC and 67% for ITAC and 3-year PFS was 72% for SGAC, 53% for SDAC and 44% for ITAC, respectively. Nevertheless, in subgroup analysis, OS for ITAC was significantly worse compared to SGAC (p = 0.024). In multivariate analysis, bilateral tumor side (vs. unilateral) solely could be identified as independent negative prognostic factor for LC (p < 0.01). Treatment was well-tolerated with 21% acute (n = 17) and 25% (n = 20) late grade ≥3 toxicities. Conclusion: Radiotherapy including active raster-scanning carbon ion boost for relatively radio resistant adenocarcinomas of the head and neck resulted in favorable survival outcome for salivary gland and salivary duct adenocarcinomas with moderate toxicity. However, local control and prognosis for bilateral intestinal-type adenocarcinomas (ITAC) seem to remain low even after dose-escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas Mock
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hoerner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sonja Katayama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Forster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Freudlsperger
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Plinkert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mantravadi AV, Moore MG, Rassekh CH. AHNS series: Do you know your guidelines? Diagnosis and management of salivary gland tumors. Head Neck 2018; 41:269-280. [PMID: 30548929 DOI: 10.1002/hed.25499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2018] [Accepted: 08/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
This article is the next installment of the series "Do you know your guidelines" presented by the Education Committee of the American Head and Neck Society. Guidelines for the workup and management of tumors of the major and minor salivary glands are reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avinash V Mantravadi
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Timoshchuk MA, Dekker P, Hippe DS, Parvathaneni U, Liao JJ, Laramore GE, Dillon JK. The efficacy of neutron radiation therapy in treating salivary gland malignancies. Oral Oncol 2018; 88:51-57. [PMID: 30616797 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2018] [Revised: 10/29/2018] [Accepted: 11/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Radiation therapy is commonly used to treat head and neck malignancies. While there is abundant research regarding photon radiation therapy, literature on neutron radiotherapy (NRT) and oral complications is limited. This study aims to determine: (1) the 6-year and 10-year locoregional control and survival rates, (2) factors associated with locoregional control and survival and (3) the frequency of oral complications in patients undergoing NRT for salivary gland malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study. The sample was composed of patients with salivary gland malignancies treated with NRT between 1997 and 2010. Data were extracted from patient charts, telephone surveys, and social security records. Multivariate competing risk and Cox regression models were used to assess predictors of locoregional control and survival. RESULTS The sample was composed of 545 subjects with a mean age of 54.2 years (±16). The predominant tumor and location were adenoid cystic carcinoma (47%) and the parotid (56%). Multivariate analysis indicated that positive surgical margins, biopsied/inoperable malignancies, neck involvement, and lymphovascular invasion were prognostic risk factors associated with decreased survival. The 6- and 10-year locoregional control rates were 84% and 79%. The 6- and 10-year survival rates were 72% and 62%. Osteoradionecrosis developed in 3.4% of subjects. CONCLUSIONS The 6- and 10-year locoregional control and survival rates compare favorably to rates reported for conventional photon radiation. Osteoradionecrosis rates were comparable to that of photon radiation treatment (2-7%). Given the potential benefits of NRT, healthcare professionals should be educated regarding its indications and oral complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Preston Dekker
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Dentistry, USA.
| | | | | | - Jay J Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, USA.
| | | | - Jasjit K Dillon
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Practical clinical guidelines for contouring the trigeminal nerve (V) and its branches in head and neck cancers. Radiother Oncol 2018; 131:192-201. [PMID: 30206021 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.08.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2018] [Revised: 08/24/2018] [Accepted: 08/27/2018] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The trigeminal nerve (V) is a major route of tumor spread in several head and neck cancers. However, only limited data are currently available for its precise contouring, although this is absolutely necessary in the era of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The purpose of this article is to present practical clinical guidelines for contouring the trigeminal nerve (V) in head and neck cancers at risk of spread along this nerve. METHOD The main types of head and neck cancers associated with risks of spread along the trigeminal nerve (V) and its branches were comprehensively reviewed based on clinical experience, literature-based patterns of failure, anatomy and radio-anatomy. A consensus for contouring was proposed based on a multidisciplinary approach among head and neck oncology experts including radiation oncologists (JBi, ML, MO, VG and JB), a radiologist (VD) and a surgeon (CS). These practical clinical guidelines have been endorsed by the GORTEC (Head and Neck Radiation Oncology Group). RESULTS We provided contouring and treatment guidelines, supported by detailed figures and tables to help, for the trigeminal nerve and its branches: the ophthalmic nerve (V1), the maxillary nerve (V2) and the manidibular nerve (V3). A CT- and MRI-based atlas was proposed to illustrate the whole trigeminal nerve pathway with its main branches. CONCLUSION Trigeminal nerve (V) invasion is an important component of the natural history of various head and neck cancers. Recognizing the radio-anatomy and potential routes of invasion is essential for optimal contouring, as presented in these guidelines.
Collapse
|
25
|
Iodine-125 brachytherapy alone for advanced primary parotid gland carcinoma. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 47:561-567. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.03.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2016] [Revised: 01/12/2017] [Accepted: 03/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
26
|
Hayashi K, Koto M, Demizu Y, Saitoh J, Suefuji H, Okimoto T, Ohno T, Shioyama Y, Takagi R, Ikawa H, Nemoto K, Nakano T, Kamada T. A retrospective multicenter study of carbon-ion radiotherapy for major salivary gland carcinomas: Subanalysis of J-CROS 1402 HN. Cancer Sci 2018; 109:1576-1582. [PMID: 29493851 PMCID: PMC5980152 DOI: 10.1111/cas.13558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2018] [Revised: 02/21/2018] [Accepted: 02/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
A retrospective multicenter study was carried out to assess the clinical outcomes of carbon-ion radiotherapy for head and neck malignancies (Japan Carbon-Ion Radiation Oncology Study Group [J-CROS] study: 1402 HN). We evaluated the safety and efficacy of carbon-ion radiotherapy in patients with major salivary gland carcinoma. Sixty-nine patients treated with carbon-ion radiotherapy at four Japanese institutions were analyzed. Thirty-three patients (48%) had adenoid cystic carcinomas, 10 (14%) had mucoepidermoid carcinomas, and 26 (38%) had other disease types. Three patients (4%) had T1 disease, 8 (12%) had T2, 25 (36%) had T3, and 33 (48%) had T4. The median radiation dose was 64 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 16 fractions. The median gross tumor volume was 27 mL. The median follow-up period was 32.7 months. The 3-year local control rate and overall survival rate were 81% and 94%, respectively. Regarding acute toxicities, seven patients had grade 3 mucositis and seven had grade 3 dermatitis. Regarding late toxicities, one patient had grade 3 dysphagia and one had a grade 3 brain abscess. No grade 4 or worse late reactions were observed. In conclusion, definitive carbon-ion radiotherapy was effective with acceptable toxicity for major salivary gland carcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuhiko Hayashi
- Hospital of the National Institute of Radiological SciencesNational Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and TechnologyChibaJapan
| | - Masashi Koto
- Hospital of the National Institute of Radiological SciencesNational Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and TechnologyChibaJapan
| | - Yusuke Demizu
- Department of RadiologyHyogo Ion Beam Medical CenterTatsunoJapan
| | - Jun‐ichi Saitoh
- Medicine and Biology DivisionGunma University Heavy Ion Medical CenterMaebashiJapan
| | | | - Tomoaki Okimoto
- Department of RadiologyHyogo Ion Beam Medical CenterTatsunoJapan
| | - Tatsuya Ohno
- Medicine and Biology DivisionGunma University Heavy Ion Medical CenterMaebashiJapan
| | | | - Ryo Takagi
- Department of Oral SrgeryTokyo Dental College Sudobashi HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Hiroaki Ikawa
- Hospital of the National Institute of Radiological SciencesNational Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and TechnologyChibaJapan
| | - Kenji Nemoto
- Department of Radiation OncologyFaculty of MedicineYamagata UniversityYamagataJapan
| | - Takashi Nakano
- Medicine and Biology DivisionGunma University Heavy Ion Medical CenterMaebashiJapan
| | - Tadashi Kamada
- Hospital of the National Institute of Radiological SciencesNational Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and TechnologyChibaJapan
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Multicenter Study of Carbon-Ion Radiation Therapy for Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Subanalysis of the Japan Carbon-Ion Radiation Oncology Study Group (J-CROS) Study (1402 HN). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 100:639-646. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2017] [Revised: 11/01/2017] [Accepted: 11/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
28
|
Radomski S, Dermody S, Harley EH. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of major salivary gland malignancies in children. Laryngoscope 2017; 128:1126-1132. [PMID: 28990673 DOI: 10.1002/lary.26946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2017] [Revised: 08/28/2017] [Accepted: 09/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS Determine demographics, clinical characteristics, and survival rates for children with primary salivary gland malignancies. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective, population-based cohort study. METHODS All cases of primary salivary gland malignancies diagnosed between the years of 2002 and 2013 in patients ages 0 to 19 years were extracted from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Additional variables collected included age, gender, ethnicity, tumor histological subtype, tumor size, treatment modality, vitality status, and follow-up time. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated. RESULTS Two hundred forty-five primary salivary gland malignancies were identified (220 parotid, 25 submandibular). Median age at diagnosis was 15 years. Most patients were female (59%), white (74%), and non-Spanish/Hispanic/Latino (81%). Among parotid tumors, mean tumor size was 2.3 cm, and there were 109 (50%) mucoepidermoid carcinomas and 86 (39%) acinic cell carcinomas. Most patients underwent surgery (n = 212, 96%) and 64 (29%) received adjuvant radiation. At a mean follow-up of 62.4 months, 10 patients (5%) were deceased. Kaplan-Meier survival curves illustrated that black children exhibited higher mortality rates than white children (15.8% vs. 4.6%, log-rank = 0.0260) as did those who underwent adjuvant radiation (15.73% vs. 3.2%, log-rank = 0.0209). Among submandibular tumors, mean tumor size was 3.1 cm, and there were 11 (44%) mucoepidermoid carcinomas. All patients underwent surgery and most received adjuvant radiation (n = 15, 60%). At a mean follow-up of 51.25 months, one patient was deceased. CONCLUSIONS Salivary gland malignancies in children and adolescents are rare. Overall survival for both parotid and submandibular tumors in children is good. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4. Laryngoscope, 128:1126-1132, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sarah Dermody
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, U.S.A
| | - Earl H Harley
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, U.S.A.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gold nanoparticles as a potent radiosensitizer in neutron therapy. Oncotarget 2017; 8:112390-112400. [PMID: 29348833 PMCID: PMC5762518 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2017] [Accepted: 07/25/2017] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential of gold nanoparticles as radiosensitizer for use in neutron therapy against hepatocellular carcinoma. The hepatocellular carcinoma cells lines Huh7 and HepG2 were irradiated with γ and neutron radiation in the presence or absence of gold nanoparticles. Effects were evaluated by transmission electron microscopy, cell survival, cell cycle, DNA damage, migration, and invasiveness. Gold nanoparticles significantly enhanced the radiosensitivity of Huh7 and HepG2 cells to γ-rays by 1.41- and 1.16-fold, respectively, and by 1.80- and 1.35-fold to neutron radiation, which has high linear energy transfer. Accordingly, exposure to neutron radiation in the presence of gold nanoparticles induced cell cycle arrest, DNA damage, and cell death to a significantly higher extent, and suppressed cell migration and invasiveness more robustly. These effects are presumably due to the ability of gold nanoparticles to amplify the effective dose from neutron radiation more efficiently. The data suggest that gold nanoparticles may be clinically useful in combination therapy against hepatocellular carcinoma by enhancing the toxicity of radiation with high linear energy transfer.
Collapse
|
30
|
Margin Analysis: Malignant Salivary Gland Neoplasms of the Head and Neck. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2017; 29:315-324. [PMID: 28551337 DOI: 10.1016/j.coms.2017.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
There are no established protocols for the optimum surgical margin required for salivary gland malignancies. Factors including histologic diagnosis and TNM stage have been shown to be important in prognosis and survival outcome and mandate special consideration of margin size. Salivary cancers are treated differently at different anatomic sites, and different histologic types show a propensity for major or minor glands. Low-grade malignancies are treated with soft tissue margins of 1 cm or less. The facial nerve is preserved unless infiltrated and encased. Adenoid cystic carcinoma and carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma require more complex planning to obtain negative margins.
Collapse
|
31
|
Keller G, Steinmann D, Quaas A, Grünwald V, Janssen S, Hussein K. New concepts of personalized therapy in salivary gland carcinomas. Oral Oncol 2017; 68:103-113. [PMID: 28325631 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2016] [Revised: 01/18/2017] [Accepted: 02/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Salivary gland carcinomas are rare tumours and therapy strategies are less standardized than in lung, gastric or breast cancer. Therapy is based on surgery, but not all carcinomas are completely resectable, e.g. because carcinomas often show infiltration of nerves. For further therapy decision pathology is recommended, but evaluation of potential targets for personalized therapy is not part of the routine panel. Many salivary gland carcinomas can be resistant to radio- and/or chemotherapy, which limits therapeutic options. This review summarizes new concepts for personalized therapy in salivary gland carcinoma patients. Targeting growth receptors HER2, EGFR, AR and ER is possible but, in some studies, potential target molecules were not adequately tested before therapy. In addition, approximately 20-25% of carcinomas have RAS mutation (mainly H-RAS), which could explain resistance to therapy. Possible therapy options in the future could be immunomodulation (inhibition of PDL1/PD1 signalling), nanoparticles (gold nanoparticles conjugated to cetuximab can increase radiosensitivity) and drug delivery systems (trastuzumab emtansine/T-DM1).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gunter Keller
- Institute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Hannover, Germany; Department of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Henriettenstift, Hannover, Germany
| | - Diana Steinmann
- Institute for Radiation Therapy and Special Oncology, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Hannover, Germany
| | - Alexander Quaas
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Viktor Grünwald
- Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Kais Hussein
- Institute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Hannover, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Mifsud MJ, Burton JN, Trotti AM, Padhya TA. Multidisciplinary Management of Salivary Gland Cancers. Cancer Control 2017; 23:242-8. [PMID: 27556664 DOI: 10.1177/107327481602300307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Salivary carcinomas are a rare group of biologically diverse neoplasms affecting the head and neck. The wide array of different histological entities and clinical presentations has historically limited attempts to establish well-defined treatment algorithms. In general, low-risk lesions can be managed with a single treatment modality, whereas advanced lesions require a more complex, multidisciplinary approach. METHODS The relevant literature was reviewed, focusing on diagnostic and treatment algorithms for salivary malignancies. RESULTS Salivary carcinomas with high-risk features require an aggressive treatment approach with complete surgical resection, neck dissection to appropriate cervical lymph-node basins, and postoperative radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS The heterogeneity of salivary neoplasms represents a unique clinical challenge. Despite the multidisciplinary management paradigm detailed in this review, outcomes for advanced disease are unsatisfactory. Future progress will likely require the addition of novel systemic therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Mifsud
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON M5G1X5, Canada.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Gentile MS, Yip D, Liebsch NJ, Adams JA, Busse PM, Chan AW. Definitive proton beam therapy for adenoid cystic carcinoma of the nasopharynx involving the base of skull. Oral Oncol 2016; 65:38-44. [PMID: 28109466 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2016.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2016] [Revised: 11/19/2016] [Accepted: 11/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Management of unresectable adenocystic carcinoma (ACC) of the nasopharynx is challenging given the high dose required for tumor control while respecting dose constraints. We evaluated long-term outcomes and toxicity in patients with unresectable ACC of the nasopharynx treated with definitive proton beam therapy. METHODS Between 2000 and 2013, 14 patients with ACC of the nasopharynx were treated. Ninety-three percent had T4 disease. All had involvement of the skull base. Seventy-nine percent and 21% of patients underwent biopsy and endoscopic debulking surgery, respectively. Median dose was 73.8Gy (RBE). Fifty percent of patients received concurrent chemotherapy. Locoregional control and overall survival probabilities were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Treatment toxicity was scored by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. RESULTS Median follow-up of surviving patients was 69months. There were 3 local, 1 regional, and 4 distant failures. Median time of local failures was 69months (range: 63-161). All local recurrences were within previous high-dose regions. Four patients developed metastatic disease at a median of 30months (range: 4-64). Five-year overall survival was 59%. The most common cause of death was due to metastatic disease. There was one acute grade 3 toxicity. No patient required gastrostomy tube or hospitalization. Three patients developed grade 3 or higher late toxicity. Two of these patients received combined modality treatment. With 176months follow-up, no second cancer was observed. CONCLUSION Proton beam therapy results in promising local control with acceptable toxicity in patients with unresectable ACC of the nasopharynx. As late recurrence is common, longer follow-up is necessary to confirm our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle S Gentile
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Darwin Yip
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Norbert J Liebsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Judith A Adams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Paul M Busse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Annie W Chan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Koto M, Hasegawa A, Takagi R, Ikawa H, Naganawa K, Mizoe JE, Jingu K, Tsujii H, Tsuji H, Kamada T, Okamoto Y. Definitive carbon-ion radiotherapy for locally advanced parotid gland carcinomas. Head Neck 2016; 39:724-729. [PMID: 28006083 DOI: 10.1002/hed.24671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2016] [Revised: 08/08/2016] [Accepted: 11/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to present our evaluation of the safety and efficacy of carbon-ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) for locally advanced parotid gland carcinomas. METHODS Clinicopathological features and outcomes were evaluated in 46 patients receiving C-ion RT for parotid gland carcinomas. RESULTS Sixteen patients had adenoid cystic carcinoma; 8 had adenocarcinoma, 8 had mucoepidermoid carcinoma, and 14 had other carcinomas. T2, T3, T4a, and T4b diseases were diagnosed in 3, 18, 8, and 17 patients, respectively. C-ion RT was provided to 25 patients as the primary treatment, to 20 patients for local recurrences after surgery, and to 1 patient for residual tumor after surgery. During follow-up (median duration, 62 months), 5-year local control and overall survival (OS) rates were 74.5% and 70.1%, respectively. Of the 30 patients without facial nerve palsy before C-ion RT, 25 showed no radiation-induced facial nerve palsy. CONCLUSION C-ion RT is effective and has acceptable toxicity levels for locally advanced parotid gland carcinomas. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 39: 724-729, 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Koto
- Research Center for Charged Particle Therapy Hospital, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan
| | - Azusa Hasegawa
- Research Center for Charged Particle Therapy Hospital, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan
| | - Ryo Takagi
- Research Center for Charged Particle Therapy Hospital, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Ikawa
- Research Center for Charged Particle Therapy Hospital, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kensuke Naganawa
- Research Center for Charged Particle Therapy Hospital, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan
| | | | - Keiichi Jingu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Hirohiko Tsujii
- Research Center for Charged Particle Therapy Hospital, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Tsuji
- Research Center for Charged Particle Therapy Hospital, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tadashi Kamada
- Research Center for Charged Particle Therapy Hospital, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Okamoto
- Department of Otolaryngology, Chiba University School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Jensen AD, Poulakis M, Vanoni V, Uhl M, Chaudhri N, Federspil PA, Freier K, Krauss J, Debus J. Carbon ion therapy (C12) for high-grade malignant salivary gland tumors (MSGTs) of the head and neck: do non-ACCs profit from dose escalation? Radiat Oncol 2016; 11:90. [PMID: 27386864 PMCID: PMC4936021 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-016-0657-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2016] [Accepted: 06/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the use of high-dose radiotherapy using carbon ions (C12) on non-adenoid cystic malignant salivary gland tumors (MSGT). Patients and methods Between 2009 and 2013, patients with biopsy-proven non-ACC MSGT histologies of the head and neck received a combined regimen of IMRT plus C12 boost. Treatment toxicity (CTC v3), response (RECIST 1.1), control and survival rates were retrospectively analyzed. Results 40 patients with pathologically confirmed non-ACC MSGT (T4: 45 %; N+: 40 %; gross residual: 58 %; mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC): 45 %; adenocarcinoma: 20 %) were treated with a median of 74 GyE (80 Gy BED). Chemoradiation was given in 5 patients with MEC. Grade III acute toxicity was observed in up to 15 % (mucositis, dermatitis, dysphagia), no higher-grade late toxicity occurred to date. At a follow-up of 25.5 months, LC, and PFS at 2 and 3 years are 81.5 % (LC) and 66.8 % (PFS), OS at 2 and 3 years is 83.6 % and 72.8 %. Most frequent site of disease progression was distant metastasis. Histologic subtype correlated with LC and PFS. Resection status (gross vs microscopic disease) had no significant effect on LC, PFS, or OS. Conclusion The treatment is well tolerated, no higher grade late effects were observed. Considering the negative pre-selection, LC, PFS and OS are promising. While histology and site of origin significantly influenced control and survival rates, resection status did not, potentially due to the effect of dose escalation. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13014-016-0657-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A D Jensen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, INF 400, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - M Poulakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, INF 400, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - V Vanoni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, INF 400, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Uhl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, INF 400, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - N Chaudhri
- Department of Medical Physics, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), INF 450, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - P A Federspil
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Heidelberg, INF 400, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - K Freier
- Department of Dental and Oro-maxillofacial Surgery, University of Heidelberg, INF 400, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J Krauss
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), INF 460, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, INF 400, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Orlandi E, Iacovelli NA, Bonora M, Cavallo A, Fossati P. Salivary Gland. Photon beam and particle radiotherapy: Present and future. Oral Oncol 2016; 60:146-56. [PMID: 27394087 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2016.06.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2016] [Revised: 06/20/2016] [Accepted: 06/27/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Salivary gland cancers (SGCs) are rare diseases and their treatment depends upon histology, stage and site of origin. Radical surgery is the mainstay of treatment but radiotherapy (RT) plays a key role in both the postoperative and the inoperable setting, as well as in recurrent disease. In the absence of prospective randomized trials, a wide retrospective literature suggests postoperative RT (PORT) in patients with high risk pathological features. SGCs, and adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) in particular, are known to be radio-resistant tumors and should therefore respond well to particle beam therapy. Recently, excellent outcome has been reported with radical carbon ion RT (CIRT) in particular for ACC. Both modern photon- and hadron-based treatments are effective and are characterized by a favourable toxicity profile. But it is not clear whether one modality is superior to the other for disease control, due to the differences in patients' selection, techniques, fractionation schedules and outcome measurements among clinical experiences. In this paper, we review the role of photon and particle RT for malignant SGCs, discussing the difference between modalities in terms of biological and technical characteristics. RT dose and target volumes for different histologies (ACC versus non-ACC) have also been taken into consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ester Orlandi
- Radiotherapy 2 Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
| | | | - Maria Bonora
- Clinical Department, CNAO (National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy), Pavia, Italy
| | - Anna Cavallo
- Medical Physics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Piero Fossati
- Clinical Department, CNAO (National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy), Pavia, Italy; Radiotherapy Division, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Holliday E, Bhattasali O, Kies MS, Hanna E, Garden AS, Rosenthal DI, Morrison WH, Gunn GB, Phan J, Zhu XR, Zhang X, Frank SJ. Postoperative Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Head and Neck Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma. Int J Part Ther 2016; 2:533-543. [PMID: 31772965 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-15-00032.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2015] [Accepted: 12/07/2015] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Postoperative radiation therapy can improve control for adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the head and neck; however, delivering adequate dose to the tumor bed must be balanced with limiting dose to nearby critical organs. Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) may help improve the therapeutic ratio, though concerns exist regarding tissue heterogeneity and other sources of uncertainty in several head and neck subsites. We report control and toxicity outcomes for patients with ACC of the head and neck treated at a single institution with postoperative IMPT and robust planning and analysis. Patients and Methods Sixteen patients with head and neck ACC treated with postoperative IMPT were identified. Intensity-modulated proton therapy was delivered by using multifield optimization. Robust planning and analysis were performed. The median dose was 60 (range, 60 to 70) Gy (RBE) (Gy [relative biological effectiveness]). Adjuvant IMPT was given with (N = 12) or without (N = 4) platinum-based chemotherapy. Tumor control outcomes were recorded from the medical record, and acute and chronic toxicities were graded weekly during treatment and upon follow-up per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0 (CTCAE v4). Results Median follow-up is 24.9 (range, 9.2 to 40.2) months. One patient developed local and distant recurrence and subsequently died. The remaining 15 patients are alive without evidence of disease. Four patients experienced acute grade 3 toxicities: dermatitis (N = 3) and oral mucositis (N = 1). One patient developed a chronic grade 4 optic nerve disorder. There were no grade 5 toxicities. Conclusions Intensity-modulated proton therapy is a feasible option for patients with ACC of the head and neck in the postoperative setting. Robust treatment planning and plan analysis can be performed such that uncertainties and tissue heterogeneities do not appear to limit safe and effective IMPT delivery. Safety and efficacy appear comparable to those of other types of radiation therapy, but further follow-up of clinical outcomes is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Holliday
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Onita Bhattasali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Merrill S Kies
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ehab Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adam S Garden
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - William H Morrison
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - G Brandon Gunn
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - X Ronald Zhu
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xiaodong Zhang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J Frank
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Jensen AD, Poulakis M, Nikoghosyan AV, Welzel T, Uhl M, Federspil PA, Freier K, Krauss J, Höss A, Haberer T, Jäkel O, Münter MW, Schulz-Ertner D, Huber PE, Debus J. High-LET radiotherapy for adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck: 15 years’ experience with raster-scanned carbon ion therapy. Radiother Oncol 2016; 118:272-80. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2015] [Revised: 04/30/2015] [Accepted: 05/14/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
39
|
Bhattasali O, Holliday E, Kies MS, Hanna EY, Garden AS, Rosenthal DI, Morrison WH, Gunn GB, Fuller CD, Zhu XR, Frank SJ. Definitive proton radiation therapy and concurrent cisplatin for unresectable head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma: A series of 9 cases and a critical review of the literature. Head Neck 2015; 38 Suppl 1:E1472-80. [PMID: 26561041 DOI: 10.1002/hed.24262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/25/2015] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The primary treatment for head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is surgery. Infrequently, however, ACC's propensity for perineural and base of skull invasion can preclude definitive surgical management. We present our experience with proton radiation therapy (RT) and concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS Nine patients with unresectable node-negative, nonmetastatic head and neck ACC received definitive proton RT and concurrent cisplatin. Outcomes and toxicities were recorded. A systematic review of the literature was performed. RESULTS Median follow-up was 27 months (range, 9.2-48.3 months). Four patients achieved complete response at the primary site, and an additional 4 patients achieved stabilization of local disease. Only 1 patient developed local disease progression. Four patients had 5 acute grade 3 (G3) toxicities, and 1 patient developed a chronic G4 optic nerve disorder. CONCLUSION Our preliminary results suggest proton RT and concurrent chemotherapy is a definitive treatment option for select patients with head and neck ACC. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E1472-E1480, 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Onita Bhattasali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Emma Holliday
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Merrill S Kies
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ehab Y Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Adam S Garden
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - William H Morrison
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - G Brandon Gunn
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - C David Fuller
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - X Ronald Zhu
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Steven J Frank
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Davis C, Sikes J, Namaranian P, Laramore G, Dillon JK. Neutron Beam Radiation Therapy: An Overview of Treatment and Oral Complications When Treating Salivary Gland Malignancies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 74:830-5. [PMID: 26611376 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2015] [Revised: 10/12/2015] [Accepted: 10/14/2015] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE There is limited information in the literature regarding the oral complications of neutron radiotherapy, with an associated lack of guidelines for their management. The purpose of this study was to review the indications, dosing, prognosis, and oral complications of neutron radiotherapy for salivary gland malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a retrospective case series of patients with salivary gland malignancies treated with neutron radiotherapy by the Radiation Oncology Department at the University of Washington from 1997 to 2006. Variables included patient demographics, tumor staging and characteristics, operative treatment, final diagnosis, operative and pathologic findings (ie, perineural invasion, lymph node involvement, and skull base invasion), dosing, complications, and locoregional control and survival rates. Data were extracted from patients' charts and by telephone for follow-up and quality-of-life information. RESULTS The sample was composed of 140 patients (49% men, 51% women) with a mean age of 53 years (standard deviation, 15 yr). Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the submandibular gland was the most common tumor type and location. Post-treatment trismus occurred in 56%. Acute mucositis and xerostomia occurred in approximately 88 and 89% of patients, respectively. Osteoradionecrosis was reported in 5.7% of patients. The 6-year survival rate was 58% and the 6-year locoregional control was 72%. The current standard neutron dose for head and neck tumors is 1.15 neutron Gray (nGy) 4 times per week for 4 weeks (total, 18.4 nGy), which is an equivalent amount of radiation as the standard 60 to 70 Gy given for 6 to 7 weeks with conventional photon radiation. CONCLUSION The 6-year overall survival of 58% found in this study compares favorably to the survival rate reported in the literature for traditional photon radiation treatment of advanced salivary gland tumors. The dental profession should be educated regarding neutron radiotherapy and its indications, dosing methods, and oral complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Davis
- Dental Student, University of Washington School of Dentistry, Seattle, WA
| | - Justin Sikes
- Former Resident, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Parshan Namaranian
- Former Resident, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - George Laramore
- Professor, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Jasjit K Dillon
- Clinical Associate Professor, Program Director, and Acting Chief of Service, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
COSMIC: A Regimen of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Plus Dose-Escalated, Raster-Scanned Carbon Ion Boost for Malignant Salivary Gland Tumors: Results of the Prospective Phase 2 Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015; 93:37-46. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2015] [Revised: 04/30/2015] [Accepted: 05/11/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
42
|
Jensen AD, Nikoghosyan AV, Poulakis M, Höss A, Haberer T, Jäkel O, Münter MW, Schulz-Ertner D, Huber PE, Debus J. Combined intensity-modulated radiotherapy plus raster-scanned carbon ion boost for advanced adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck results in superior locoregional control and overall survival. Cancer 2015; 121:3001-9. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2015] [Revised: 03/15/2015] [Accepted: 03/31/2015] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra D. Jensen
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University of Heidelberg; Heidelberg Germany
| | - Anna V. Nikoghosyan
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University of Heidelberg; Heidelberg Germany
| | - Melanie Poulakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University of Heidelberg; Heidelberg Germany
| | - Angelika Höss
- Medical Informatics and Regulatory Affairs; Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center; Heidelberg Germany
| | | | - Oliver Jäkel
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center; Heidelberg Germany
| | - Marc W. Münter
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University of Heidelberg; Heidelberg Germany
| | | | - Peter E. Huber
- Molecular Radiation Oncology; German Cancer Research Center; Heidelberg Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University of Heidelberg; Heidelberg Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Zhang J, Zheng L, Liu SM, Huang MW, Shi Y, Wang W, Zhang JG. Brachytherapy for recurrent malignant tumours of the parotid gland. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 53:58-62. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2014] [Accepted: 09/21/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
44
|
|
45
|
Delayed cerebral radiation necrosis after neutron beam radiation of a parotid adenocarcinoma: a case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Neurol Med 2014; 2014:717984. [PMID: 25349750 PMCID: PMC4198779 DOI: 10.1155/2014/717984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2014] [Revised: 08/27/2014] [Accepted: 09/14/2014] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Cerebral radiation necrosis (CRN) is a well described possible complication of radiation for treatment of intracranial pathology. However, CRN as sequelae of radiation to extracranial sites is rare. Neutron beam radiation is a highly potent form of radiotherapy that may be used to treat malignant tumors of the salivary glands. This report describes a patient who underwent neutron beam radiation for a parotid adenocarcinoma and who developed biopsy-confirmed temporal lobe radiation necrosis thirty months later. This represents the longest time interval described to date, from initial neutron radiation for extracranial pathology to development of CRN. Two other detailed case studies exist in the literature and are described in this report. These reports as well as our patient's case are reviewed, and additional recommendations are made to minimize the development of CRN after extracranial neutron beam radiation. Physicians should include the possible diagnosis of CRN in any patient with new neurologic signs or symptoms and a history of head and neck radiation that included planned fields extending to the base of the skull. Counseling of patients prior to neutron beam radiation should include potential neurologic complications associated with CRN and risks of treatment for CRN including neurosurgical intervention.
Collapse
|
46
|
Mao MH, Zhang JG, Zhang J, Zheng L, Liu SM, Huang MW, Shi Y. Postoperative [125I] seed brachytherapy in the treatment of acinic cell carcinoma of the parotid gland. Strahlenther Onkol 2014; 190:1008-14. [DOI: 10.1007/s00066-014-0668-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2014] [Accepted: 03/31/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
47
|
Liao JJ, Parvathaneni U, Laramore GE, Thompson JA, Bhatia S, Futran ND, Bhrany AD, Hawes SE, Ladra M. Fast neutron radiotherapy for primary mucosal melanomas of the head and neck. Head Neck 2014; 36:1162-7. [PMID: 23852725 DOI: 10.1002/hed.23428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2012] [Revised: 04/07/2013] [Accepted: 06/27/2013] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary head and neck mucosal melanomas (HNMMs) are rare tumors managed with surgery and/or radiotherapy and associated with poor outcomes. Given their radioresistance, high linear energy transfer radiotherapy with neutrons may improve local control. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of 14 patients with HNMM treated with neutrons at the University of Washington from 1990 to 2012. Five patients had T3 disease, 9 had T4 disease, 3 had regional nodal disease, and 4 had distant metastases at diagnosis. Primary sites were sinonasal (n=10), lip (n=2), and palate (n=2). Ten patients had initial surgical resection/debulking. RESULTS Nine patients had gross residual disease, 6 had complete response, and 3 had partial response. Local control was achieved in 79% until death or last follow-up, and 50% developed distant metastases. Kaplan-Meier 5-year local control was 66% and overall survival was 21%. CONCLUSION High rates of locoregional control were achieved with neutrons, despite the presence of gross disease. Survival was limited by early distant metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jay J Liao
- University of Washington, Department of Radiation Oncology, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Stannard C, Vernimmen F, Carrara H, Jones D, Fredericks S, Hille J, de Kock E. Malignant salivary gland tumours: Can fast neutron therapy results point the way to carbon ion therapy? Radiother Oncol 2013; 109:262-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2013] [Revised: 06/12/2013] [Accepted: 08/07/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
49
|
Karam SD, Snider JW, Wang H, Wooster M, Lominska C, Deeken J, Newkirk K, Davidson B, Harter KW. Survival outcomes of patients treated with hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy for parotid gland tumors: a retrospective analysis. Front Oncol 2012; 2:55. [PMID: 22666661 PMCID: PMC3364484 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2012.00055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2012] [Accepted: 05/10/2012] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: to review a single-institution experience with the management of parotid malignancies treated by fractionated stereotactic body radiosurgery (SBRT). Findings: Between 2003 and 2011, 13 patients diagnosed with parotid malignancies were treated with adjuvant or definitive SBRT to a median dose of 33 Gy (range 25–40 Gy). There were 11 male and two female patients with a median age of 80. Ten patients declined conventional radiation treatment and three patients had received prior unrelated radiation therapy to neighboring structures with unavailable radiation records. Six patients were treated with definitive intent while seven patients were treated adjuvantly for adverse surgical or pathologic features. Five patients had clinical or pathologic evidence of lymph node disease. Conclusion: at a median follow-up of 14 months only one patient failed locally, and four failed distantly. The actuarial 2-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and local-regional control rates were 46, 84, and 47%, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed surgery as a positive predictor of overall survival while presence of gross disease was a negatively correlated factor (p < 0.05).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sana D Karam
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Jensen AD, Nikoghosyan AV, Lossner K, Herfarth KK, Debus J, Münter MW. IMRT and carbon ion boost for malignant salivary gland tumors: interim analysis of the COSMIC trial. BMC Cancer 2012; 12:163. [PMID: 22551422 PMCID: PMC3407497 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2011] [Accepted: 05/02/2012] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The COSMIC trial is designed to evaluate toxicity in dose-escalated treatment with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and carbon ion boost for malignant salivary gland tumors (MSGT) of the head and neck including patients with inoperable/ incompletely resected MSGTs (R2-group) and completely resected tumors plus involved margins or perineural spread (R1-group). Methods COSMIC is a prospective phase II trial of IMRT (25 × 2 Gy) and carbon ion boost (8 × 3 GyE). Primary endpoint is mucositis CTC°III, secondary endpoints are local control, progression-free survival, and toxicity. Evaluation of disease response is carried out according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST); toxicity is assessed using NCI CTC v 3.0. Results Twenty-nine patients were recruited from 07/2010 to 04/2011, all patients have at least completed first follow-up. Sixteen patients were treated in the R2-group, 13 in the R1-group. All treatments were completed as planned and well tolerated, mucositis CTC grade III was 25% (R2) and 15.4% (R1), no dysphagia CTC grade III was observed, no feeding tubes were necessary. Side-effects rapidly resolved, only 4 patients (13.8%) reported xerostomia grade II at first follow-up. Overall response rate (complete and partial response) according to RECIST in the R2-group is 68.8% at 6–8 weeks post treatment, all patients within this group showed radiological signs of treatment response. Conclusion No unexpected toxicity was observed, mucositis rates and other side effects do not differ between patients with visible residual tumor and macroscopically completely resected tumors. Initial treatment response is promising though longer follow-up is needed to assess local control. Trial registration Clinical trial identifier NCT 01154270
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra D Jensen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|