1
|
Jaiyesimi IA, Leighl NB, Ismaila N, Alluri K, Florez N, Gadgeel S, Masters G, Schenk EL, Schneider BJ, Sequist L, Singh N, Bazhenova L, Blanchard E, Freeman-Daily J, Furuya N, Halmos B, Azar IH, Kuruvilla S, Mullane M, Naidoo J, Reuss JE, Spigel DR, Owen DH, Patel JD. Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline, Version 2023.3. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:e1-e22. [PMID: 38417091 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.02744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/01/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide evidence-based recommendations for patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer with driver alterations. METHODS This ASCO living guideline offers continually updated recommendations based on an ongoing systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), with the latest time frame spanning February to October 2023. An Expert Panel of medical oncology, pulmonary, community oncology, research methodology, and advocacy experts were convened. The literature search included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials. Outcomes of interest include efficacy and safety. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS This guideline consolidates all previous updates and reflects the body of evidence informing this guideline topic. Eight new RCTs were identified in the latest search of the literature to date. RECOMMENDATIONS Evidence-based recommendations were updated to address first, second, and subsequent treatment options for patients based on targetable driver alterations.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/living-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ishmael A Jaiyesimi
- Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak and Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI
| | - Natasha B Leighl
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nofisat Ismaila
- American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Alexandria, VA
| | | | - Narjust Florez
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Shirish Gadgeel
- Henry Ford Cancer Institute/Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI
| | - Gregory Masters
- Helen F. Graham Cancer Center and Research Institute, Newark, DE
| | - Erin L Schenk
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO
| | | | | | - Navneet Singh
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | | | | | | | - Naoki Furuya
- St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Balazs Halmos
- Montefiore Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jaiyesimi IA, Leighl NB, Ismaila N, Alluri K, Florez N, Gadgeel S, Masters G, Schenk EL, Schneider BJ, Sequist L, Singh N, Bazhenova L, Blanchard E, Freeman-Daily J, Furuya N, Halmos B, Azar IH, Kuruvilla S, Mullane M, Naidoo J, Reuss JE, Spigel DR, Owen DH, Patel JD. Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Without Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline, Version 2023.3. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:e23-e43. [PMID: 38417098 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.02746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide evidence-based recommendations for patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without driver alterations. METHODS This ASCO living guideline offers continually updated recommendations based on an ongoing systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), with the latest time frame spanning February to October 2023. An Expert Panel of medical oncology, pulmonary, community oncology, research methodology, and advocacy experts were convened. The literature search included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials. Outcomes of interest include efficacy and safety. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS This guideline consolidates all previous updates and reflects the body of evidence informing this guideline topic. Ten new RCTs were identified in the latest search of the literature to date. RECOMMENDATIONS Evidence-based recommendations were updated to address first, second, and subsequent treatment options for patients without driver alterations.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/living-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ishmael A Jaiyesimi
- Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak and Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI
| | - Natasha B Leighl
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Narjust Florez
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Shirish Gadgeel
- Henry Ford Cancer Institute/Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI
| | - Gregory Masters
- Helen F. Graham Cancer Center and Research Institute, Newark, DE
| | - Erin L Schenk
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO
| | | | | | - Navneet Singh
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | | | | | | | - Naoki Furuya
- St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Balazs Halmos
- Montefiore Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Owen DH, Jaiyesimi IA, Leighl NB, Ismaila N, Florez N, Puri S, Schenk EL, Schneider BJ, Patel JD. Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With and Without Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline Clinical Insights. JCO Oncol Pract 2024:OP2400177. [PMID: 38588478 DOI: 10.1200/op.24.00177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ishmael A Jaiyesimi
- Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak and Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI
| | - Natasha B Leighl
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nofisat Ismaila
- American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Alexandria, VA
| | - Narjust Florez
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Sonum Puri
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Erin L Schenk
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Khurshid H, Ismaila N, Bian J, Dabney R, Das M, Ellis P, Feldman J, Hann C, Kulkarni S, Laskin J, Manochakian R, Mishra DR, Preeshagul I, Reddy P, Saxena A, Weinberg F, Kalemkerian GP. Systemic Therapy for Small-Cell Lung Cancer: ASCO-Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:5448-5472. [PMID: 37820295 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing clinicians on the management of patients with small-cell lung cancer. METHODS An Expert Panel of medical oncology, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology, pulmonary, community oncology, research methodology, and advocacy experts were convened to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials published from 1990 through 2022. Outcomes of interest included response rates, overall survival, disease-free survival or recurrence-free survival, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS The literature search identified 95 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. RECOMMENDATIONS Evidence-based recommendations were developed to address systemic therapy options, timing of therapy, treatment in patients who are older or with poor performance status, role of biomarkers, and use of myeloid-supporting agents in patients with small-cell lung cancer.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/thoracic-cancer-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nofisat Ismaila
- American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Alexandria, VA
| | | | | | | | - Peter Ellis
- Juravinski Cancer Center, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jill Feldman
- EGFR Resisters Patient Advocacy Group, Deerfield, IL
| | | | - Swati Kulkarni
- Western University, Windsor Regional Cancer Program, Windsor, Ontario, Canada
| | - Janessa Laskin
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Carlson LE, Ismaila N, Addington EL, Asher GN, Bradt J, Mehta A, Rowland JH. Integrative Oncology Care of Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression in Adults With Cancer: SIO-ASCO Guideline Summary and Q&A. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:847-851. [PMID: 37582242 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023] Open
Abstract
This SIO-ASCO guideline Q&A provides guidance on integrative oncology care of symptoms of anxiety and depression in adult patients with cancer
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda E Carlson
- Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Nofisat Ismaila
- American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Alexandria, VA
| | | | - Gary N Asher
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Joke Bradt
- Department of Creative Arts Therapies, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Carlson LE, Ismaila N, Addington EL, Asher GN, Atreya C, Balneaves LG, Bradt J, Fuller-Shavel N, Goodman J, Hoffman CJ, Huston A, Mehta A, Paller CJ, Richardson K, Seely D, Siwik CJ, Temel JS, Rowland JH. Integrative Oncology Care of Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression in Adults With Cancer: Society for Integrative Oncology-ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:4562-4591. [PMID: 37582238 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide evidence-based recommendations to health care providers on integrative approaches to managing anxiety and depression symptoms in adults living with cancer. METHODS The Society for Integrative Oncology and ASCO convened an expert panel of integrative oncology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, palliative oncology, social sciences, mind-body medicine, nursing, methodology, and patient advocacy representatives. The literature search included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials published from 1990 through 2023. Outcomes of interest included anxiety or depression symptoms as measured by validated psychometric tools, and adverse events. Expert panel members used this evidence and informal consensus with the Guidelines into Decision Support methodology to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS The literature search identified 110 relevant studies (30 systematic reviews and 80 randomized controlled trials) to inform the evidence base for this guideline. RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendations were made for mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs), yoga, relaxation, music therapy, reflexology, and aromatherapy (using inhalation) for treating symptoms of anxiety during active treatment; and MBIs, yoga, acupuncture, tai chi and/or qigong, and reflexology for treating anxiety symptoms after cancer treatment. For depression symptoms, MBIs, yoga, music therapy, relaxation, and reflexology were recommended during treatment, and MBIs, yoga, and tai chi and/or qigong were recommended post-treatment. DISCUSSION Issues of patient-health care provider communication, health disparities, comorbid medical conditions, cost implications, guideline implementation, provider training and credentialing, and quality assurance of natural health products are discussed. While several approaches such as MBIs and yoga appear effective, limitations of the evidence base including assessment of risk of bias, nonstandardization of therapies, lack of diversity in study samples, and lack of active control conditions as well as future research directions are discussed.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/survivorship-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda E Carlson
- Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | | | - Gary N Asher
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Chloe Atreya
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Joke Bradt
- Department of Creative Arts Therapies, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | - Alissa Huston
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | | | - Channing J Paller
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Dugald Seely
- University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Chelsea J Siwik
- Osher Center for Integrative Health, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Jennifer S Temel
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Singh N, Daly ME, Ismaila N. Management of Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: ASCO Guideline Rapid Recommendation Update. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:4430-4432. [PMID: 37471673 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
ASCO Rapid Recommendations Updates highlight revisions to select ASCO guideline recommendations as a response to the emergence of new and practice-changing data. The rapid updates are supported by an evidence review and follow the guideline development processes outlined in the ASCO Guideline Methodology Manual. The goal of these articles is to disseminate updated recommendations, in a timely manner, to better inform health practitioners and the public on the best available cancer care options. See the Appendix for disclaimers and other important information (Appendix 1 and Appendix 2, online only).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Navneet Singh
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Megan E Daly
- University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Owen DH, Singh N, Ismaila N, Masters G, Riely GJ, Robinson AG, Schneider BJ, Jaiyesimi IA. Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline, Version 2023.2. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:e63-e72. [PMID: 37433095 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Living guidelines are developed for selected topic areas with rapidly evolving evidence that drives frequent change in clinical practice. Living guidelines are updated on a regular schedule by a standing expert panel that systematically reviews the health literature on a continuous basis; as described in the ASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual. ASCO Living Guidelines follow the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy Implementation for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Living Guidelines and updates are not intended to substitute for independent professional judgment of the treating provider and do not account for individual variation among patients. See appendix for disclaimers and other important information (Appendix 1 and Appendix 2). Updates are published regularly and can be found at https://ascopubs.org/nsclc-da-living-guideline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Navneet Singh
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | | | - Gregory Masters
- Helen F. Graham Cancer Center and Research Institute, Newark, DE
| | | | | | | | - Ishmael A Jaiyesimi
- Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital Royal Oak and Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Singh N, Jaiyesimi IA, Ismaila N, Leighl NB, Mamdani H, Phillips T, Owen DH. Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Without Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline, Version 2023.1. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:e51-e62. [PMID: 37023387 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Living guidelines are developed for selected topic areas with rapidly evolving evidence that drives frequent change in recommended clinical practice. Living guidelines are updated on a regular schedule by a standing expert panel that systematically reviews the health literature on a continuous basis; as described in the ASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual. ASCO Living Guidelines follow the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy Implementation for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Living Guidelines and updates are not intended to substitute for independent professional judgment of the treating provider and do not account for individual variation among patients. See appendix for disclaimers and other important information (Appendix 1 and Appendix 2). Updates are published regularly and can be found at https://ascopubs.org/nsclc-non-da-living-guideline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Navneet Singh
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Ishmael A Jaiyesimi
- Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital Royal Oak and Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI
| | | | - Natasha B Leighl
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hirva Mamdani
- Department of Oncology, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Singh N, Jaiyesimi IA, Ismaila N, Leighl NB, Mamdani H, Phillips T, Owen DH. Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline, Version 2023.1. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:e42-e50. [PMID: 37023367 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Living guidelines are developed for selected topic areas with rapidly evolving evidence that drives frequent change in recommended clinical practice. Living guidelines are updated on a regular schedule by a standing expert panel that systematically reviews the health literature on a continuous basis; as described in the ASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual. ASCO Living Guidelines follow the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy Implementation for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Living Guidelines and updates are not intended to substitute for independent professional judgment of the treating provider and do not account for individual variation among patients. See appendix for disclaimers and other important information (Appendix 1 and Appendix 2, online only). Updates are published regularly and can be found at https://ascopubs.org/nsclc-da-living-guideline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Navneet Singh
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Ishmael A Jaiyesimi
- Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital Royal Oak and Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI
| | | | - Natasha B Leighl
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hirva Mamdani
- Department of Oncology, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jaiyesimi IA, Owen DH, Ismaila N, Blanchard E, Celano P, Florez N, Jain D, Singh N. Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Without Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline, Version 2022.3. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:e21-e30. [PMID: 36809066 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Living guidelines are developed for selected topic areas with rapidly evolving evidence that drives frequent change in recommended clinical practice. Living guidelines are updated on a regular schedule by a standing expert panel that systematically reviews the health literature on a continuous basis, as described in the ASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual. ASCO Living Guidelines follow the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy Implementation for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Living Guidelines and updates are not intended to substitute for independent professional judgment of the treating provider and do not account for individual variation among patients. See appendix for disclaimers and other important information (Appendix 1 and Appendix 2, online only). Updates are published regularly and can be found at https://ascopubs.org/nsclc-non-da-living-guideline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ishmael A Jaiyesimi
- Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital Royal Oak, MI.,Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI
| | | | | | | | | | - Narjust Florez
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Navneet Singh
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jaiyesimi IA, Owen DH, Ismaila N, Blanchard E, Celano P, Florez N, Jain D, Singh N. Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline, Version 2022.3. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:e31-e41. [PMID: 36802359 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Living guidelines are developed for selected topic areas with rapidly evolving evidence that drives frequent change in clinical practice. Living guidelines are updated on a regular schedule by a standing expert panel that systematically reviews the health literature on a continuous basis; as described in the ASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual. ASCO Living Guidelines follow the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy Implementation for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Living Guidelines and updates are not intended to substitute for independent professional judgment of the treating provider and do not account for individual variation among patients. See appendix for disclaimers and other important information (Appendix 1 and Appendix 2). Updates are published regularly and can be found at https://ascopubs.org/nsclc-da-living-guideline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ishmael A Jaiyesimi
- Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI.,Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI
| | | | | | | | | | - Narjust Florez
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Navneet Singh
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Owen DH, Singh N, Ismaila N, Blanchard E, Celano P, Florez N, Jain D, Leighl NB, Mamdani H, Masters G, Moffitt PR, Naidoo J, Phillips T, Riely GJ, Robinson AG, Schenk E, Schneider BJ, Sequist L, Spigel DR, Jaiyesimi IA. Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Without Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline, Version 2022.2. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:e1-e9. [PMID: 36534935 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Living guidelines are developed for selected topic areas with rapidly evolving evidence that drives frequent change in recommended clinical practice. Living guidelines are updated on a regular schedule by a standing expert panel that systematically reviews the health literature on a continuous basis, as described in the ASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual. ASCO Living Guidelines follow the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy Implementation for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Living Guidelines and updates are not intended to substitute for independent professional judgment of the treating provider and do not account for individual variation among patients. See Appendix 1 (online only) for disclaimers and other important information. Updates are published regularly and can be found at https://ascopubs.org/nsclc-non-da-living-guideline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Navneet Singh
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Natasha B Leighl
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hirva Mamdani
- Karmanos Cancer Institute/Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
| | - Gregory Masters
- Helen F. Graham Cancer Center and Research Institute, Newark, DE
| | | | | | | | | | - Andrew G Robinson
- Kingston General Hospital, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Erin Schenk
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO
| | | | | | | | - Ishmael A Jaiyesimi
- Beaumont Health Royal Oak and Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Owen DH, Singh N, Ismaila N, Blanchard E, Celano P, Florez N, Jain D, Leighl NB, Mamdani H, Masters G, Moffitt PR, Naidoo J, Phillips T, Riely GJ, Robinson AG, Schenk E, Schneider BJ, Sequist L, Spigel DR, Jaiyesimi IA. Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline, Version 2022.2. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:e10-e20. [PMID: 36534938 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Living guidelines are developed for selected topic areas with rapidly evolving evidence that drives frequent change in recommended clinical practice. Living guidelines are updated on a regular schedule by a standing expert panel that systematically reviews the health literature on a continuous basis, as described in the ASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual. ASCO Living Guidelines follow the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy Implementation for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Living Guidelines and updates are not intended to substitute for independent professional judgment of the treating provider and do not account for individual variation among patients. See Appendix 1 (online only) for disclaimers and other important information. Updates are published regularly and can be found at https://ascopubs.org/nsclc-da-living-guideline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Navneet Singh
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Natasha B Leighl
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hirva Mamdani
- Karmanos Cancer Institute/Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
| | - Gregory Masters
- Helen F. Graham Cancer Center and Research Institute, Newark, DE
| | | | | | | | | | - Andrew G Robinson
- Kingston General Hospital, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Erin Schenk
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO
| | | | | | | | - Ishmael A Jaiyesimi
- Beaumont Health Royal Oak and Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Yilmaz E, Ismaila N, Bauman JE, Dabney R, Gan G, Jordan R, Kaufman M, Kirtane K, McBride SM, Old MO, Rooper L, Saba NF, Sheth S, Subramaniam RM, Wise-Draper TM, Wong D, Mell LK. Immunotherapy and Biomarker Testing in Recurrent and Metastatic Head and Neck Cancers: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:1132-1146. [PMID: 36521102 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide evidence-based recommendations for practicing physicians and other health care providers on immunotherapy and biomarker testing for head and neck cancers. METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, surgical oncology, radiation oncology, radiology, pathology, and patient advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 2000 through 2022. Outcomes of interest included survival, overall response, and locoregional control. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS The literature search identified 28 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. RECOMMENDATIONS When possible, evidence-based recommendations were developed to address biomarker testing, first-line treatment regimens based on programmed death ligand-1 scores, immunotherapy in platinum-refractory recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, immunotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and radiation therapy in combination with immunotherapy for treatment of local recurrence.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Gregory Gan
- Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
| | - Richard Jordan
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Rathan M Subramaniam
- Otago Medical School, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
- Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | - Deborah Wong
- University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Loren K Mell
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yilmaz E, Ismaila N, Dabney R, Saba NF, Mell LK. Immunotherapy and Biomarker Testing in Recurrent and Metastatic Head and Neck Cancers: ASCO Guideline Q and A. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:194-196. [PMID: 36701647 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nofisat Ismaila
- American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Alexandria, VA
| | | | | | - Loren K Mell
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mao JJ, Greenlee H, Bao T, Ismaila N, Bruera E. Integrative Medicine for Pain Management in Oncology: Society for Integrative Oncology-ASCO Guideline Summary and Q&A. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:45-48. [PMID: 36260826 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jun J Mao
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Ting Bao
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mao JJ, Ismaila N, Bao T, Barton D, Ben-Arye E, Garland EL, Greenlee H, Leblanc T, Lee RT, Lopez AM, Loprinzi C, Lyman GH, MacLeod J, Master VA, Ramchandran K, Wagner LI, Walker EM, Bruner DW, Witt CM, Bruera E. Integrative Medicine for Pain Management in Oncology: Society for Integrative Oncology-ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:3998-4024. [PMID: 36122322 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this joint guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and other health care providers on integrative approaches to managing pain in patients with cancer. METHODS The Society for Integrative Oncology and ASCO convened an expert panel of integrative oncology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, palliative oncology, social sciences, mind-body medicine, nursing, and patient advocacy representatives. The literature search included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials published from 1990 through 2021. Outcomes of interest included pain intensity, symptom relief, and adverse events. Expert panel members used this evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS The literature search identified 227 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. RECOMMENDATIONS Among adult patients, acupuncture should be recommended for aromatase inhibitor-related joint pain. Acupuncture or reflexology or acupressure may be recommended for general cancer pain or musculoskeletal pain. Hypnosis may be recommended to patients who experience procedural pain. Massage may be recommended to patients experiencing pain during palliative or hospice care. These recommendations are based on an intermediate level of evidence, benefit outweighing risk, and with moderate strength of recommendation. The quality of evidence for other mind-body interventions or natural products for pain is either low or inconclusive. There is insufficient or inconclusive evidence to make recommendations for pediatric patients. More research is needed to better characterize the role of integrative medicine interventions in the care of patients with cancer.Additional information is available at https://integrativeonc.org/practice-guidelines/guidelines and www.asco.org/survivorship-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun J Mao
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Ting Bao
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Debra Barton
- University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Eran Ben-Arye
- Lin & Carmel Medical Centers, Clalit Health Services; Technion Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, Israel
| | - Eric L Garland
- College of Social Work, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | | | - Richard T Lee
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Ana Maria Lopez
- Thomas Jefferson. Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Gary H Lyman
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Jodi MacLeod
- Patient Representative, Memorial Sloan Kettering Integrative Medicine Service, New York, NY
| | - Viraj A Master
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Raab R, Ismaila N, Andre F, Stearns V, Kalinsky K. Biomarkers for Adjuvant Endocrine and Chemotherapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update Q and A. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:646-648. [DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Raab
- Messino Cancer Centers - A Division of American Oncology Partners, Asheville, NC
| | | | | | | | - Kevin Kalinsky
- Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Andre F, Ismaila N, Allison KH, Barlow WE, Collyar DE, Damodaran S, Henry NL, Jhaveri K, Kalinsky K, Kuderer NM, Litvak A, Mayer EL, Pusztai L, Raab R, Wolff AC, Stearns V. Biomarkers for Adjuvant Endocrine and Chemotherapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:1816-1837. [PMID: 35439025 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 58.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To update recommendations on appropriate use of breast cancer biomarker assay results to guide adjuvant endocrine and chemotherapy decisions in early-stage breast cancer. METHODS An updated literature search identified randomized clinical trials and prospective-retrospective studies published from January 2016 to October 2021. Outcomes of interest included overall survival and disease-free or recurrence-free survival. Expert Panel members used informal consensus to develop evidence-based recommendations. RESULTS The search identified 24 studies informing the evidence base. RECOMMENDATIONS Clinicians may use Oncotype DX, MammaPrint, Breast Cancer Index (BCI), and EndoPredict to guide adjuvant endocrine and chemotherapy in patients who are postmenopausal or age > 50 years with early-stage estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (ER+ and HER2-) breast cancer that is node-negative or with 1-3 positive nodes. Prosigna and BCI may be used in postmenopausal patients with node-negative ER+ and HER2- breast cancer. In premenopausal patients, clinicians may use Oncotype in patients with node-negative ER+ and HER2- breast cancer. Current data suggest that premenopausal patients with 1-3 positive nodes benefit from chemotherapy regardless of genomic assay result. There are no data on use of genomic tests to guide adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with ≥ 4 positive nodes. Ki67 combined with other parameters or immunohistochemistry 4 score may be used in postmenopausal patients without access to genomic tests to guide adjuvant therapy decisions. BCI may be offered to patients with 0-3 positive nodes who received 5 years of endocrine therapy without evidence of recurrence to guide decisions about extended endocrine therapy. None of the assays are recommended for treatment guidance in individuals with HER2-positive or triple-negative breast cancer. Treatment decisions should also consider disease stage, comorbidities, and patient preferences.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - N Lynn Henry
- University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Komal Jhaveri
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Kevin Kalinsky
- Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | | | - Anya Litvak
- Cancer Center at Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ
| | | | | | - Rachel Raab
- Messino Cancer Centers-A Division of American Oncology Partners, Asheville, NC
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pisters K, Kris MG, Gaspar LE, Ismaila N. Adjuvant Systemic Therapy and Adjuvant Radiation Therapy for Stage I-IIIA Completely Resected Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: ASCO Guideline Rapid Recommendation Update. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:1127-1129. [PMID: 35167335 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
ASCO Rapid Recommendations Updates highlight revisions to select ASCO guideline recommendations as a response to the emergence of new and practice-changing data. The rapid updates are supported by an evidence review and follow the guideline development processes outlined in the ASCO Guideline Methodology Manual. The goal of these articles is to disseminate updated recommendations, in a timely manner, to better inform health practitioners and the public on the best available cancer care options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mark G Kris
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Laurie E Gaspar
- Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Loveland, CO.,University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Daly ME, Singh N, Ismaila N, Antonoff MB, Arenberg DA, Bradley J, David E, Detterbeck F, Früh M, Gubens MA, Moore AC, Padda SK, Patel JD, Phillips T, Qin A, Robinson C, Simone CB. Management of Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2021; 40:1356-1384. [PMID: 34936470 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing clinicians on management of patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS An Expert Panel of medical oncology, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology, pulmonary oncology, community oncology, research methodology, and advocacy experts was convened to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials published from 1990 through 2021. Outcomes of interest included survival, disease-free or recurrence-free survival, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS The literature search identified 127 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. RECOMMENDATIONS Evidence-based recommendations were developed to address evaluation and staging workup of patients with suspected stage III NSCLC, surgical management, neoadjuvant and adjuvant approaches, and management of patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/thoracic-cancer-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Navneet Singh
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Nofisat Ismaila
- American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Alexandria, VA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Martin Früh
- Department of Medical Oncology Cantonal Hospital of St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland.,University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Sukhmani K Padda
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Jyoti D Patel
- Northwestern University-Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Angel Qin
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Charles B Simone
- New York Proton Center and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Eguzo KN, Akpanudo U, Oluoha C, Ismaila N, Jacob A, Nnah K, Tumba N, Udoekong M, Adisa C. Enhancing Nigerian Healthcare Providers Competence in Breast Cancer Clinical Pathway Development using Blended Learning Approach. Asian Pac J Cancer Care 2021. [DOI: 10.31557/apjcc.2021.6.3.271-276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Clinical pathways are a means of translating universal clinical guidelines into local protocols to inform clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of using a blended learning approach for providing instruction and building competency on the development of breast cancer clinical pathways, using the guidelines from the National Cancer Control Network (NCCN). Methods: A one-group pretest-post test design was used for this study. Participants included healthcare providers and students in Nigeria, who were recruited through social media and professional organizations. The intervention was an online course delivered through Google Classroom, followed by two-day workshops at three locations. Data collection involved pre and post-tests scores from the online course, self-reported evaluation, as well as objective grading of in-person group projects. Results: Over 400 individuals joined the online course while 90 participated in the in-person workshops. Most participants (259/408, 63%) had no prior experience with online education, with an average age of 27.46 (±9.25) years. Data analysis revealed significant increases in mean knowledge scores across all groups from pretest (M=12.76, SE = 0.60) to post test (M =17.25, SE =0.38) p<0.001. Self-reported evaluation showed higher scores regarding chemotherapy administration for blended learning participants. Objective competence scores in developing clinical pathways ranged from 63% to 87%, across three sites. Conclusion: Findings reveal that both an online course alongside in-person workshops can be effective strategies for improving the knowledge and competence respectively of healthcare professionals on clinical pathways development. Participants in the blended learning component demonstrated significantly greater improvement in self-reported confidence scores. We recommend further studies to compare the relative strengths and limitations of these strategies.
Collapse
|
24
|
Geiger JL, Ismaila N, Beadle B, Caudell JJ, Chau N, Deschler D, Glastonbury C, Kaufman M, Lamarre E, Lau HY, Licitra L, Moore MG, Rodriguez C, Roshal A, Seethala R, Swiecicki P, Ha P. Management of Salivary Gland Malignancy: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:1909-1941. [PMID: 33900808 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.00449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 134] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide evidence-based recommendations for practicing physicians and other healthcare providers on the management of salivary gland malignancy. METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, surgical oncology, radiation oncology, neuroradiology, pathology, and patient advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 2000 through 2020. Outcomes of interest included survival, diagnostic accuracy, disease recurrence, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS The literature search identified 293 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Six main clinical questions were addressed, which included subquestions on preoperative evaluations, surgical diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, appropriate radiotherapy techniques, the role of systemic therapy, and follow-up evaluations. RECOMMENDATIONS When possible, evidence-based recommendations were developed to address the diagnosis and appropriate preoperative evaluations for patients with a salivary gland malignancy, therapeutic procedures, and appropriate treatment options in various salivary gland histologies.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Marnie Kaufman
- Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma Research Foundation, Needham, MA
| | | | | | - Lisa Licitra
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.,University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Patrick Ha
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Daly ME, Ismaila N, Decker RH, Higgins K, Owen D, Saxena A, Franklin GE, Donaldson D, Schneider BJ. Radiation Therapy for Small-Cell Lung Cancer: ASCO Guideline Endorsement of an ASTRO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:931-939. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.03364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) produced an evidence-based guideline on radiation therapy (RT) for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Because of the relevance of this topic to ASCO membership, ASCO reviewed the guideline, applying a set of procedures and policies used to critically examine guidelines developed by other organizations. METHODS The ASTRO guideline on RT for SCLC was reviewed for developmental rigor by methodologists. Then, an ASCO Expert Panel reviewed the content and the recommendations. RESULTS The ASCO Expert Panel determined that the recommendations from ASTRO guideline on RT for SCLC, published in June 2020, are clear, thorough, and based upon the most relevant scientific evidence. ASCO endorsed ASTRO guideline on RT for SCLC with a few discussion points. RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendations addressed thoracic radiotherapy for limited-stage SCLC, role of stereotactic body radiotherapy in stage I or II node-negative SCLC, prophylactic cranial radiotherapy, and thoracic consolidation for extensive-stage SCLC. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/thoracic-cancer-guidelines .
Collapse
|
26
|
Chen YP, Ismaila N, Chua MLK, Colevas AD, Haddad R, Huang SH, Wee JTS, Whitley AC, Yi JL, Yom SS, Chan ATC, Hu CS, Lang JY, Le QT, Lee AWM, Lee N, Lin JC, Ma B, Morgan TJ, Shah J, Sun Y, Ma J. Chemotherapy in Combination With Radiotherapy for Definitive-Intent Treatment of Stage II-IVA Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: CSCO and ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:840-859. [PMID: 33405943 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.03237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 48.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this joint guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and other healthcare providers on definitive-intent chemoradiotherapy for patients with stage II-IVA nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) and ASCO convened an expert panel of radiation oncology, medical oncology, surgery, and advocacy representatives. The literature search included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials published from 1990 through 2020. Outcomes of interest included survival, distant and locoregional disease control, and quality of life. Expert panel members used this evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS The literature search identified 108 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Five overarching clinical questions were addressed, which included subquestions on radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy sequence, and concurrent, induction, and adjuvant chemotherapy options. RECOMMENDATIONS Evidence-based recommendations were developed to address aspects of care related to chemotherapy in combination with RT for the definitive-intent treatment of stage II to IVA NPC.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Pei Chen
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | | | - Melvin L K Chua
- National Cancer Centre Singapore/Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | | | | | - Shao Hui Huang
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joseph T S Wee
- National Cancer Centre Singapore/Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | | | - Jun-Lin Yi
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Sue S Yom
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Anthony T C Chan
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Chao-Su Hu
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Jin-Yi Lang
- Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Chengdu, and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Quynh-Thu Le
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Anne W M Lee
- The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, People's Republic of China, and The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Nancy Lee
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Brigette Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | | | - Jatin Shah
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ying Sun
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun Ma
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Maghami E, Ismaila N, Alvarez A, Chernock R, Duvvuri U, Geiger J, Gross N, Haughey B, Paul D, Rodriguez C, Sher D, Stambuk HE, Waldron J, Witek M, Caudell J. Diagnosis and Management of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Unknown Primary in the Head and Neck: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:2570-2596. [PMID: 32324430 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.00275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and other health care providers on the diagnosis and management of squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary in the head and neck (SCCUP). METHODS The American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, surgery, radiation oncology, radiology, pathology, and advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 2008 through 2019. Outcomes of interest included survival, local and regional disease control, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS The literature search identified 100 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Four main clinical questions were addressed, which included subquestions on preoperative evaluations, surgical diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, appropriate pathology techniques, and adjuvant therapy. RECOMMENDATIONS Evidence-based recommendations were developed to address preoperative evaluation for patients with a neck mass, surgical diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, appropriate treatment options in unilateral versus bilateral SCCUP.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Bruce Haughey
- Advent Health Medical Group, Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Celebration, FL, and University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | - Doru Paul
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | | | - David Sher
- University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX
| | | | - John Waldron
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matt Witek
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Schneider BJ, Ismaila N, Altorki N. Lung Cancer Surveillance After Definitive Curative-Intent Therapy: ASCO Guideline Summary. JCO Oncol Pract 2020; 16:83-86. [PMID: 32045555 DOI: 10.1200/jop.19.00722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
29
|
Henry NL, Andre F, Ismaila N, Somerfield MR, Stearns V. Reply to A. Katz. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:102-103. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.02431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- N. Lynn Henry
- N. Lynn Henry, MD, PhD, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Fabrice Andre, MD, PhD, Institute Gustave Roussy, Paris Sud University, Paris, France; Nofisat Ismaila, MD; Mark R. Somerfield, PhD, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; and Vered Stearns, MD, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Fabrice Andre
- N. Lynn Henry, MD, PhD, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Fabrice Andre, MD, PhD, Institute Gustave Roussy, Paris Sud University, Paris, France; Nofisat Ismaila, MD; Mark R. Somerfield, PhD, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; and Vered Stearns, MD, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Nofisat Ismaila
- N. Lynn Henry, MD, PhD, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Fabrice Andre, MD, PhD, Institute Gustave Roussy, Paris Sud University, Paris, France; Nofisat Ismaila, MD; Mark R. Somerfield, PhD, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; and Vered Stearns, MD, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Mark R. Somerfield
- N. Lynn Henry, MD, PhD, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Fabrice Andre, MD, PhD, Institute Gustave Roussy, Paris Sud University, Paris, France; Nofisat Ismaila, MD; Mark R. Somerfield, PhD, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; and Vered Stearns, MD, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Vered Stearns
- N. Lynn Henry, MD, PhD, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Fabrice Andre, MD, PhD, Institute Gustave Roussy, Paris Sud University, Paris, France; Nofisat Ismaila, MD; Mark R. Somerfield, PhD, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; and Vered Stearns, MD, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Schneider BJ, Ismaila N, Aerts J, Chiles C, Daly ME, Detterbeck FC, Hearn JWD, Katz SI, Leighl NB, Levy B, Meyers B, Murgu S, Nekhlyudov L, Santos ES, Singh N, Tashbar J, Yankelevitz D, Altorki N. Lung Cancer Surveillance After Definitive Curative-Intent Therapy: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2019; 38:753-766. [PMID: 31829901 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.02748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing clinicians on radiographic imaging and biomarker surveillance strategies after definitive curative-intent therapy in patients with stage I-III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and SCLC. METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology, pulmonary, radiology, primary care, and advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 2000 through 2019. Outcomes of interest included survival, disease-free or recurrence-free survival, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS The literature search identified 14 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. RECOMMENDATIONS Patients should undergo surveillance imaging for recurrence every 6 months for 2 years and then annually for detection of new primary lung cancers. Chest computed tomography imaging is the optimal imaging modality for surveillance. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging should not be used as a surveillance tool. Surveillance imaging may not be offered to patients who are clinically unsuitable for or unwilling to accept further treatment. Age should not preclude surveillance imaging. Circulating biomarkers should not be used as a surveillance strategy for detection of recurrence. Brain magnetic resonance imaging should not be used for routine surveillance in stage I-III NSCLC but may be used every 3 months for the first year and every 6 months for the second year in patients with stage I-III small-cell lung cancer who have undergone curative-intent treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Joachim Aerts
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Megan E Daly
- University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA
| | | | | | - Sharyn I Katz
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Natasha B Leighl
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Benjamin Levy
- Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Sibley Memorial Hospital, Washington, DC
| | | | | | | | | | - Navneet Singh
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
PURPOSE There is a paucity of data about current usage of oncology guidelines in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), specifically in terms of the availability and quality of those guidelines. Our objective was to determine usage of oncology guidelines and the barriers and facilitators to their usage among radiation oncologists in LMICs. METHODS An online cross-sectional survey was conducted among practicing radiation oncologists in Nigeria via e-mail and the social media database of the Association of Radiation and Clinical Oncologists of Nigeria. In addition, paper questionnaires were administered at regional clinical meetings. RESULTS The survey response rate was 53.4% in a sample of 101 radiation oncologists from the database. Sixty-nine percent of respondents were consultants and 30% were residents. Approximately 43% had < 5 years' experience. All of the respondents were involved in administering chemotherapy during the treatment of patients with cancer, whereas approximately half were involved in diagnosing cancer. Ninety-three percent reported using guidelines in treating patients, the top two guidelines being those from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (90%) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (50%). The two major barriers to guideline usage were that facilities were inadequate for proper guideline implementation and that the information in guidelines were too complex to understand. Potential facilitators included providing adequate facilities, developing local guidelines, and increasing awareness of guideline usage. CONCLUSION Our study shows that clinicians involved in the treatment of patients with cancer in LMICs are aware of cancer treatment guidelines. However, implementation of these guidelines hinders their usage because the facilities are inadequate, guidelines are not applicable to the local setting, and the information in the guidelines is too complex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nofisat Ismaila
- Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria VA; Omolola Salako, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos; Jimoh Mutiu, University College Hospital; and Oladeji Adebayo, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Omolola Salako
- Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria VA; Omolola Salako, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos; Jimoh Mutiu, University College Hospital; and Oladeji Adebayo, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Jimoh Mutiu
- Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria VA; Omolola Salako, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos; Jimoh Mutiu, University College Hospital; and Oladeji Adebayo, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Oladeji Adebayo
- Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria VA; Omolola Salako, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos; Jimoh Mutiu, University College Hospital; and Oladeji Adebayo, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Koyfman SA, Ismaila N, Holsinger FC. Reply to C. Schilling et al. J Oncol Pract 2019; 15:561. [PMID: 31513479 DOI: 10.1200/jop.19.00434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Shlomo A Koyfman
- Shlomo A. Koyfman, MD, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Nofisat Ismaila, MD, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; and F. Christopher Holsinger, MD, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Nofisat Ismaila
- Shlomo A. Koyfman, MD, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Nofisat Ismaila, MD, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; and F. Christopher Holsinger, MD, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
| | - F Christopher Holsinger
- Shlomo A. Koyfman, MD, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Nofisat Ismaila, MD, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; and F. Christopher Holsinger, MD, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Andre F, Ismaila N, Stearns V. Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update Summary. J Oncol Pract 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jop.19.00264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrice Andre
- Institute Gustave Roussy, Paris-Sud University, Paris, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Henry NL, Somerfield MR, Abramson VG, Ismaila N, Allison KH, Anders CK, Chingos DT, Eisen A, Ferrari BL, Openshaw TH, Spears PA, Vikas P, Stearns V. Role of Patient and Disease Factors in Adjuvant Systemic Therapy Decision Making for Early-Stage, Operable Breast Cancer: Update of the ASCO Endorsement of the Cancer Care Ontario Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:1965-1977. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.00948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To update the American Society of Clinical Oncology endorsement of the Cancer Care Ontario recommendations on the Role of Patient and Disease Factors in Adjuvant Systemic Therapy Decision Making for Early-Stage, Operable Breast Cancer. METHODS Two phase III trials—the Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (TAILORx) in women with hormone receptor–positive, node-negative tumors and the Microarray in Node-Negative and 1 to 3 Positive Lymph Node Disease May Avoid Chemotherapy (MINDACT) trial—provided the evidence for this update. UPDATED RECOMMENDATIONS Shared decision making between clinicians and patients is appropriate for adjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer. For patients older than age 50 years and whose tumors have Onco type DX recurrence scores less than 26, and for patients age 50 years or younger whose tumors have Onco type DX recurrence scores less than 16, there is little to no benefit from chemotherapy. Clinicians may offer endocrine therapy alone for these patients. For patients age 50 years or younger with recurrence scores of 16 to 25, clinicians may offer chemoendocrine therapy. Patients with recurrence scores greater than 30 should be considered candidates for chemoendocrine therapy. Based on informal consensus, the Panel recommends that oncologists may offer chemoendocrine therapy to patients with Onco type DX scores of 26 to 30. The MammaPrint assay could be used to guide decisions on withholding adjuvant systemic chemotherapy in patients with hormone receptor–positive lymph node–negative breast cancer and in select patients with lymph node–positive cancers. In both patients with node-positive and node-negative disease, evidence of clinical utility of the MammaPrint assay was only apparent in those determined to be at high clinical risk; the Panel thus did not recommend use of MammaPrint assay in patients determined to be at low clinical risk. Remaining recommendations from the 2016 ASCO guideline endorsement are unchanged. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N. Lynn Henry
- University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | | | | | | | - Carey K. Anders
- University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - Andrea Eisen
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | - Patricia A. Spears
- University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Praveen Vikas
- University of Iowa Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, Iowa City, IA
| | - Vered Stearns
- Kimmel Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Andre F, Ismaila N, Henry NL, Somerfield MR, Bast RC, Barlow W, Collyar DE, Hammond ME, Kuderer NM, Liu MC, Van Poznak C, Wolff AC, Stearns V. Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update—Integration of Results From TAILORx. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:1956-1964. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.00945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 136] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This focused update addresses the use of Onco type DX in guiding decisions on the use of adjuvant systemic therapy. METHODS ASCO uses a signals approach to facilitate guideline updating. For this focused update, the publication of the Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (TAILORx) evaluating noninferiority of endocrine therapy alone versus chemoendocrine therapy for invasive disease–free survival in women with Onco type DX scores provided a signal. An expert panel reviewed the results of TAILORx along with other published literature on the Onco type DX assay to assess for evidence of clinical utility. UPDATED RECOMMENDATIONS For patients with hormone receptor–positive, axillary node–negative breast cancer whose tumors have Onco type DX recurrence scores of less than 26, there is little to no benefit from chemotherapy, especially for patients older than age 50 years. Clinicians may recommend endocrine therapy alone for women older than age 50 years. For patients 50 years of age or younger with recurrence scores of 16 to 25, clinicians may offer chemoendocrine therapy. Patients with recurrence scores greater than 30 should be considered candidates for chemoendocrine therapy. Based on informal consensus, the panel recommends that oncologists may offer chemoendocrine therapy to these patients with recurrence scores of 26 to 30. Additional information can be found at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrice Andre
- Institute Gustave Roussy, Paris Sud University, Paris, France
| | | | - N. Lynn Henry
- University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | - Robert C. Bast
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - Nicole M. Kuderer
- Advanced Cancer Research Group and University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | - Antonio C. Wolff
- Johns Hopkins University Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - Vered Stearns
- Johns Hopkins University Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Adelstein DJ, Ismaila N, Ku JA, Burtness B, Swiecicki PL, Mell L, Beitler JJ, Gross N, Jones CU, Kaufman M, Le QT, Semrad TJ, Siu LL, Ridge JA. Role of Treatment Deintensification in the Management of p16+ Oropharyngeal Cancer: ASCO Provisional Clinical Opinion. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:1578-1589. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.00441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE An ASCO provisional clinical opinion offers timely clinical direction to ASCO’s membership after publication or presentation of potentially practice-changing data from major studies. This provisional clinical opinion addresses the role of treatment deintensification in the management of p16+ oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). CLINICAL CONTEXT For patients with p16+ OPC, current treatment approaches are well established. In the good-prognosis subset of nonsmoking p16+ patients with early-stage disease, these treatments have been highly successful, albeit with significant associated acute and late toxicity. Deintensification of surgical, radiation, and medical treatment in an effort to reduce toxicity while preserving high survival rates is an appropriate therapeutic objective currently being explored in patients who are experiencing the best treatment results. However, careful delineation of this good-risk subset is essential. While the current eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system is prognostically robust, it should not be interpreted as reason to alter therapeutic decisions or justify treatment deintensification. The development of transoral surgical techniques and the adoption of intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning have been transformative in disease management and suggest potentially beneficial approaches. Recent advances in systemic treatments have been notable. The optimal integration and modification of these modalities to ameliorate toxicity has not been defined and remains an important focus of current investigation. PROVISIONAL CLINICAL OPINION The hypothesis that de-escalation of treatment intensity for patients with p16+ OPC can reduce long-term toxicity without compromising survival is compelling and necessitates careful study and the analysis of well-designed clinical trials before changing current treatment standards. Treatment deintensification for these patients should only be undertaken in a clinical trial. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Loren Mell
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | | | - Neil Gross
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Marnie Kaufman
- Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma Research Foundation, Needham, MA
| | | | | | - Lillian L. Siu
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Adelstein DJ, Ismaila N, Ridge JA. Role of Treatment Deintensification in the Management of p16+ Oropharyngeal Cancer: ASCO Provisional Clinical Opinion Summary. J Oncol Pract 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jop.19.00115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
38
|
Eguzo KN, Ismaila N, Akpanudo U, Chukwuemeka O, Jacob A, Udoekong M, Adisa CA. Using blended learning to improve education on clinical pathways for breast cancer management in Nigeria: Preliminary results. J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.10539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
10539 Background: Most Nigerian clinicians lack adequate skills and resources in screening, diagnosis, and managing women with breast cancer. The absence of locally-sensitive clinical pathways in hospitals in Abia State impact patient outcomes and clinicians job satisfaction. Blended learning (BL), a combination of online and face-to-face teaching methods, has been used in other settings to improve the competencies of clinicians. Research seeks to develop and evaluate a BL course that will train clinicians in Abia State on using NCCN breast cancer management guidelines, and to develop and implement locally-sensitive clinical pathways. Methods: The course is divided into four online modules delivered via Google Classroom and a workshop module to be delivered in 3 cities. Course evaluation involves an objective-focused method, following a mixed-methods design. Data collection includes pre-and-post-tests, course evaluation and focus group discussions. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics and t-test. Comments deductively analyzed to identify common themes. A sample size of 107 individuals is required to identify a moderate effect size for the BL course. Results: Forty-three participants (physicians=15, Nurses=28) have been recruited for cohort 1, with average age of 44 (±9.9) years. Most participants have never taken an online class (65%) but use mobile phones (60%) to access the course. With a maximum of 20 points in each test, there is a pattern of improvement in the post-tests performance compared with the pre-tests. Table shows mean scores. Most participants have expressed satisfaction with the course. Conclusions: Results show improvement in learning. More participants are being recruited. The workshops will hold at after the online modules.[Table: see text]
Collapse
|
39
|
Koyfman SA, Ismaila N, Holsinger FC. Management of the Neck in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Summary. J Oncol Pract 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jop.18.00727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
|
40
|
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Mikhael
- City of Hope Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ and International Myeloma Foundation, North Hollywood, CA
| | | | - Tom Martin
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Mikhael J, Ismaila N, Cheung MC, Costello C, Dhodapkar MV, Kumar S, Lacy M, Lipe B, Little RF, Nikonova A, Omel J, Peswani N, Prica A, Raje N, Seth R, Vesole DH, Walker I, Whitley A, Wildes TM, Wong SW, Martin T. Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: ASCO and CCO Joint Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:1228-1263. [PMID: 30932732 DOI: 10.1200/jco.18.02096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 162] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide evidence-based recommendations on the treatment of multiple myeloma to practicing physicians and others. METHODS ASCO and Cancer Care Ontario convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, surgery, radiation oncology, and advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and some phase II studies published from 2005 through 2018. Outcomes of interest included survival, progression-free survival, response rate, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS The literature search identified 124 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. RECOMMENDATIONS Evidence-based recommendations were developed for patients with multiple myeloma who are transplantation eligible and those who are ineligible and for patients with relapsed or refractory disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Mikhael
- 1 City of Hope Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ.,2 International Myeloma Foundation, North Hollywood, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Brea Lipe
- 8 University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | | | - Anna Nikonova
- 10 Juravinski Cancer Center, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - James Omel
- 11 Education and Advocacy, Grand Island, NE
| | | | - Anca Prica
- 13 Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Noopur Raje
- 14 Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Rahul Seth
- 15 Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
| | - David H Vesole
- 16 Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ.,17 Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Irwin Walker
- 18 McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Sandy W Wong
- 21 University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Tom Martin
- 21 University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Koyfman SA, Ismaila N, Crook D, D'Cruz A, Rodriguez CP, Sher DJ, Silbermins D, Sturgis EM, Tsue TT, Weiss J, Yom SS, Holsinger FC. Management of the Neck in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:1753-1774. [PMID: 30811281 DOI: 10.1200/jco.18.01921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 166] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of the current work is to provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and others on the management of the neck in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx. METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, surgery, radiation oncology, and advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 1990 through 2018. Outcomes of interest included survival, regional disease control, neck recurrence, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS The literature search identified 124 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Six clinical scenarios were devised; three for oral cavity cancer and three for oropharynx cancer, and recommendations were generated for each one. RECOMMENDATIONS For oral cavity cancers, clinical scenarios focused on the indications for and the hallmarks of a high-quality neck dissection, indications for postoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, and whether radiotherapy alone is sufficient elective treatment of an undissected neck compared with high-quality neck dissection. For oropharynx cancers, clinical scenarios focused on hallmarks of a high-quality neck dissection, factors that would favor operative versus nonoperative primary management, and clarifying criteria for an incomplete response to definitive chemoradiation for which salvage neck dissection would be recommended. Consensus was reached and recommendations were made for all six clinical scenarios. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Doug Crook
- 3 Patient representative, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jared Weiss
- 10 University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Sue S Yom
- 11 University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
de Haas V, Ismaila N, Zhang L. Initial Diagnostic Workup of Acute Leukemia: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement Summary of the CAP and ASH Guideline. J Oncol Pract 2019; 15:101-105. [DOI: 10.1200/jop.18.00613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Valérie de Haas
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
de Haas V, Ismaila N, Advani A, Arber DA, Dabney RS, Patel-Donelly D, Kitlas E, Pieters R, Pui CH, Sweet K, Zhang L. Initial Diagnostic Work-Up of Acute Leukemia: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement of the College of American Pathologists and American Society of Hematology Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:239-253. [PMID: 30523709 PMCID: PMC6338392 DOI: 10.1200/jco.18.01468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The College of American Pathologists (CAP) and the American Society of Hematology (ASH) developed an evidence-based guideline on the initial diagnostic work-up of acute leukemia (AL). Because of the relevance of this topic to the ASCO membership, ASCO reviewed the guideline and applied a set of procedures and policies for endorsing clinical practice guidelines that have been developed by other professional organizations. METHODS The CAP-ASH guideline on initial diagnostic work-up of AL was reviewed for developmental rigor by methodologists. Then, an ASCO Endorsement Expert Panel updated the literature search and reviewed the content and recommendations. RESULTS The ASCO Expert Panel determined that the recommendations from the guideline, published in 2016, are clear, thorough, and based on the most relevant scientific evidence. ASCO fully endorsed the CAP-ASH guideline on initial diagnostic work-up of AL and included some discussion points according to clinical practice and updated literature. CONCLUSION Twenty-seven guideline statements were reviewed. Some discussion points were included to better assess CNS involvement in leukemia and to provide novel insights into molecular diagnosis and potential markers for risk stratification and target therapy. These discussions are categorized into four sections: (1) initial diagnosis focusing on basic diagnostics and determination of risk parameters, (2) molecular markers and minimal residual disease detection, (3) context of referral to another institution with expertise in the management of AL, and (4) reporting and record keeping for better outlining and follow-up discussion. Additional information is available at: www.asco.org/hematologic-malignancies-guidelines .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valérie de Haas
- 1 Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Rob Pieters
- 1 Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kindler HL, Rusch V, Bueno R, Ismaila N, Pass H, Sterman D, Hassan R. Reply to D. de Fonseka et al. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:2746-2747. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.78.7333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Hedy L. Kindler
- Hedy L. Kindler, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York NY; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria VA; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Raffit Hassan, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Valerie Rusch
- Hedy L. Kindler, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York NY; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria VA; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Raffit Hassan, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Raphael Bueno
- Hedy L. Kindler, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York NY; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria VA; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Raffit Hassan, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Nofisat Ismaila
- Hedy L. Kindler, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York NY; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria VA; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Raffit Hassan, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Harvey Pass
- Hedy L. Kindler, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York NY; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria VA; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Raffit Hassan, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Daniel Sterman
- Hedy L. Kindler, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York NY; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria VA; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Raffit Hassan, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Raffit Hassan
- Hedy L. Kindler, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York NY; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria VA; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Raffit Hassan, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Anderson K, Ismaila N, Flynn PJ, Halabi S, Jagannath S, Ogaily MS, Omel J, Raje N, Roodman GD, Yee GC, Kyle RA. Role of Bone-Modifying Agents in Multiple Myeloma: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:812-818. [PMID: 29341831 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.76.6402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To update guideline recommendations on the role of bone-modifying agents in multiple myeloma. Methods An update panel conducted a targeted systematic literature review by searching PubMed and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, clinical practice guidelines, and observational studies. Results Thirty-five relevant studies were identified, and updated evidence supports the current recommendations. Recommendations For patients with active symptomatic multiple myeloma that requires systemic therapy with or without evidence of lytic destruction of bone or compression fracture of the spine from osteopenia on plain radiograph(s) or other imaging studies, intravenous administration of pamidronate 90 mg over at least 2 hours or zoledronic acid 4 mg over at least 15 minutes every 3 to 4 weeks is recommended. Denosumab has shown to be noninferior to zoledronic acid for the prevention of skeletal-related events and provides an alternative. Fewer adverse events related to renal toxicity have been noted with denosumab compared with zoledronic acid and may be preferred in this setting. The update panel recommends that clinicians consider reducing the initial pamidronate dose in patients with preexisting renal impairment. Zoledronic acid has not been studied in patients with severe renal impairment and is not recommended in this setting. The update panel suggests that bone-modifying treatment continue for up to 2 years. Less frequent dosing has been evaluated and should be considered in patients with responsive or stable disease. Continuous use is at the discretion of the treating physician and the risk of ongoing skeletal morbidity. Retreatment should be initiated at the time of disease relapse. The update panel discusses measures regarding osteonecrosis of the jaw. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/hematologic-malignancies-guidelines and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth Anderson
- Kenneth Anderson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Noopur Raje, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Patrick J. Flynn, Minnesota Oncology, Woodbury; Robert A. Kyle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Susan Halabi, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Sundar Jagannath, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Mohammed S. Ogaily, Beuamont Center for Hematology and Oncology-Downriver, Brownstown, MI; Jim Omel, Education and Advocacy, Grand Island; Gary C. Yee, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; and G. David Roodman, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Nofisat Ismaila
- Kenneth Anderson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Noopur Raje, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Patrick J. Flynn, Minnesota Oncology, Woodbury; Robert A. Kyle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Susan Halabi, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Sundar Jagannath, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Mohammed S. Ogaily, Beuamont Center for Hematology and Oncology-Downriver, Brownstown, MI; Jim Omel, Education and Advocacy, Grand Island; Gary C. Yee, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; and G. David Roodman, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Patrick J Flynn
- Kenneth Anderson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Noopur Raje, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Patrick J. Flynn, Minnesota Oncology, Woodbury; Robert A. Kyle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Susan Halabi, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Sundar Jagannath, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Mohammed S. Ogaily, Beuamont Center for Hematology and Oncology-Downriver, Brownstown, MI; Jim Omel, Education and Advocacy, Grand Island; Gary C. Yee, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; and G. David Roodman, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Susan Halabi
- Kenneth Anderson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Noopur Raje, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Patrick J. Flynn, Minnesota Oncology, Woodbury; Robert A. Kyle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Susan Halabi, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Sundar Jagannath, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Mohammed S. Ogaily, Beuamont Center for Hematology and Oncology-Downriver, Brownstown, MI; Jim Omel, Education and Advocacy, Grand Island; Gary C. Yee, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; and G. David Roodman, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Sundar Jagannath
- Kenneth Anderson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Noopur Raje, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Patrick J. Flynn, Minnesota Oncology, Woodbury; Robert A. Kyle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Susan Halabi, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Sundar Jagannath, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Mohammed S. Ogaily, Beuamont Center for Hematology and Oncology-Downriver, Brownstown, MI; Jim Omel, Education and Advocacy, Grand Island; Gary C. Yee, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; and G. David Roodman, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Mohammed S Ogaily
- Kenneth Anderson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Noopur Raje, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Patrick J. Flynn, Minnesota Oncology, Woodbury; Robert A. Kyle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Susan Halabi, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Sundar Jagannath, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Mohammed S. Ogaily, Beuamont Center for Hematology and Oncology-Downriver, Brownstown, MI; Jim Omel, Education and Advocacy, Grand Island; Gary C. Yee, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; and G. David Roodman, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Jim Omel
- Kenneth Anderson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Noopur Raje, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Patrick J. Flynn, Minnesota Oncology, Woodbury; Robert A. Kyle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Susan Halabi, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Sundar Jagannath, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Mohammed S. Ogaily, Beuamont Center for Hematology and Oncology-Downriver, Brownstown, MI; Jim Omel, Education and Advocacy, Grand Island; Gary C. Yee, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; and G. David Roodman, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Noopur Raje
- Kenneth Anderson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Noopur Raje, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Patrick J. Flynn, Minnesota Oncology, Woodbury; Robert A. Kyle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Susan Halabi, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Sundar Jagannath, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Mohammed S. Ogaily, Beuamont Center for Hematology and Oncology-Downriver, Brownstown, MI; Jim Omel, Education and Advocacy, Grand Island; Gary C. Yee, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; and G. David Roodman, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - G David Roodman
- Kenneth Anderson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Noopur Raje, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Patrick J. Flynn, Minnesota Oncology, Woodbury; Robert A. Kyle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Susan Halabi, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Sundar Jagannath, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Mohammed S. Ogaily, Beuamont Center for Hematology and Oncology-Downriver, Brownstown, MI; Jim Omel, Education and Advocacy, Grand Island; Gary C. Yee, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; and G. David Roodman, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Gary C Yee
- Kenneth Anderson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Noopur Raje, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Patrick J. Flynn, Minnesota Oncology, Woodbury; Robert A. Kyle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Susan Halabi, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Sundar Jagannath, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Mohammed S. Ogaily, Beuamont Center for Hematology and Oncology-Downriver, Brownstown, MI; Jim Omel, Education and Advocacy, Grand Island; Gary C. Yee, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; and G. David Roodman, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Robert A Kyle
- Kenneth Anderson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Noopur Raje, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Patrick J. Flynn, Minnesota Oncology, Woodbury; Robert A. Kyle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Susan Halabi, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Sundar Jagannath, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Mohammed S. Ogaily, Beuamont Center for Hematology and Oncology-Downriver, Brownstown, MI; Jim Omel, Education and Advocacy, Grand Island; Gary C. Yee, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; and G. David Roodman, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kindler HL, Ismaila N, Hassan R. Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Summary. J Oncol Pract 2018. [PMID: 29517955 DOI: 10.1200/jop.17.00012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Hedy L Kindler
- The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria VA; and National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Nofisat Ismaila
- The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria VA; and National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Raffit Hassan
- The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria VA; and National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Anderson K, Ismaila N, Kyle RA. Role of Bone-Modifying Agents in Multiple Myeloma: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update Summary. J Oncol Pract 2018. [PMID: 29517956 DOI: 10.1200/jop.17.00013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth Anderson
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Nofisat Ismaila
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Robert A Kyle
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Krop
- Ian Krop, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; William Barlow, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; and Vered Stearns, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Nofisat Ismaila
- Ian Krop, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; William Barlow, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; and Vered Stearns, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - William Barlow
- Ian Krop, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; William Barlow, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; and Vered Stearns, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Vered Stearns
- Ian Krop, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; William Barlow, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; and Vered Stearns, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Kindler HL, Ismaila N, Armato SG, Bueno R, Hesdorffer M, Jahan T, Jones CM, Miettinen M, Pass H, Rimner A, Rusch V, Sterman D, Thomas A, Hassan R. Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:1343-1373. [PMID: 29346042 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.76.6394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 252] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and others on the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Methods ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology, pulmonary, pathology, imaging, and advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 1990 through 2017. Outcomes of interest included survival, disease-free or recurrence-free survival, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. Results The literature search identified 222 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Recommendations Evidence-based recommendations were developed for diagnosis, staging, chemotherapy, surgical cytoreduction, radiation therapy, and multimodality therapy in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/thoracic-cancer-guidelines and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hedy L Kindler
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nofisat Ismaila
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Samuel G Armato
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Raphael Bueno
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Mary Hesdorffer
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Thierry Jahan
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Clyde Michael Jones
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Markku Miettinen
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Harvey Pass
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Valerie Rusch
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Daniel Sterman
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Anish Thomas
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Raffit Hassan
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|