Evoked otoacoustic emissions and sensorineural hearing loss

Denoising click-evoked otoacoustic emission signals by optimal shrinkage

Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) are clinically used as an objective way to infer whether cochlear functions are normal. However, because the sound pressure level of CEOAEs is typically much lower than the background noise, it usually takes hundreds, if not thousands, of repetitions to estimate the signal with sufficient accuracy. In this paper, we propose to improve the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of CEOAE signals within limited measurement time by optimal shrinkage (OS) in two different settings: covariance-based optimal shrinkage (cOS) and singular value decomposition-based optimal shrinkage (sOS). By simulation, the cOS consistently enhanced the SNR by 1-2 dB from a baseline method that is based on calculating the median. In real data, however, the cOS cannot enhance the SNR over 1 dB. The sOS achieved a SNR enhancement of 2-3 dB in simulation and demonstrated capability to enhance the SNR in real recordings. In addition, the level of enhancement increases as the baseline SNR decreases. An appealing property of OS is that it produces an estimate of all single trials. This property makes it possible to investigate CEOAE dynamics across a longer period of time when the cochlear conditions are not strictly stationary.

Comparative multivariate analyses of transient otoacoustic emissions and distorsion products in normal and impaired hearing

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The clinical utility of otoacoustic emissions as a noninvasive objective test of cochlear function has been long studied. Both transient otoacoustic emissions and distorsion products can be used to identify hearing loss, but to what extent they can be used as predictors for hearing loss is still debated. Most studies agree that multivariate analyses have better test performances than univariate analyses. The aim of the study was to determine transient otoacoustic emissions and distorsion products performance in identifying normal and impaired hearing loss, using the pure tone audiogram as a gold standard procedure and different multivariate statistical approaches.

METHODS

The study included 105 adult subjects with normal hearing and hearing loss who underwent the same test battery: pure-tone audiometry, tympanometry, otoacoustic emission tests. We chose to use the logistic regression as a multivariate statistical technique. Three logistic regression models were developed to characterize the relations between different risk factors (age, sex, tinnitus, demographic features, cochlear status defined by otoacoustic emissions) and hearing status defined by pure-tone audiometry. The multivariate analyses allow the calculation of the logistic score, which is a combination of the inputs, weighted by coefficients, calculated within the analyses. The accuracy of each model was assessed using receiver operating characteristics curve analysis. We used the logistic score to generate receivers operating curves and to estimate the areas under the curves in order to compare different multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

We compared the performance of each otoacoustic emission (transient, distorsion product) using three different multivariate analyses for each ear, when multi-frequency gold standards were used. We demonstrated that all multivariate analyses provided high values of the area under the curve proving the performance of the otoacoustic emissions. Each otoacoustic emission test presented high values of area under the curve, suggesting that implementing a multivariate approach to evaluate the performances of each otoacoustic emission test would serve to increase the accuracy in identifying the normal and impaired ears. We encountered the highest area under the curve value for the combined multivariate analysis suggesting that both otoacoustic emission tests should be used in assessing hearing status. Our multivariate analyses revealed that age is a constant predictor factor of the auditory status for both ears, but the presence of tinnitus was the most important predictor for the hearing level, only for the left ear. Age presented similar coefficients, but tinnitus coefficients, by their high value, produced the highest variations of the logistic scores, only for the left ear group, thus increasing the risk of hearing loss. We did not find gender differences between ears for any otoacoustic emission tests, but studies still debate this question as the results are contradictory. Neither gender, nor environment origin had any predictive value for the hearing status, according to the results of our study.

CONCLUSION

Like any other audiological test, using otoacoustic emissions to identify hearing loss is not without error. Even when applying multivariate analysis, perfect test performance is never achieved. Although most studies demonstrated the benefit of using the multivariate analysis, it has not been incorporated into clinical decisions maybe because of the idiosyncratic nature of multivariate solutions or because of the lack of the validation studies.

Maturation and aging of the human cochlea: a view through the DPOAE looking glass

Cochlear function changes throughout the human lifespan. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were recorded in 156 ears to examine these changes and speculate as to their mechanistic underpinnings. DPOAEs were analyzed within the context of current OAE generation theory, which recognizes distinct emission mechanisms. Seven age groups including premature newborns through senescent adults were tested with a swept-tone DPOAE protocol to examine magnitude and phase features of both the mixed DPOAE and individual distortion and reflection components. Results indicate (1) 6-8-month-old infants have the most robust DPOAE and component levels for frequencies >1.5 kHz; (2) older adults show a substantial reduction in DPOAE and distortion-component levels combined with a smaller drop in reflection-component levels; (3) all age groups manifest a violation of distortion phase invariance at frequencies below 1.5 kHz consistent with a secular break in cochlear scaling; the apical phase delay is markedly longer in newborns; and (4) phase slope of reflection emissions is most shallow in the older adults. Combined findings suggest that basilar membrane motion in the apical half of the cochlea is immature at birth and that the cochlea of senescent adults shows reduced nonlinearity and relatively shallow reflection-component phase slope, which can be interpreted to suggest degraded tuning.

Otoacoustic emissions and tympanometry in a general adult population in Sweden: Emisiones otoacústicas y timpanometría en la población general adulta de Suecia

The present study concerns a general adult population in Sweden, not exposed to hazardous occupational noise. Tympanometry and spontaneous (SOAE), transient evoked (TEOAE) and distortion-product (DPOAE) otoacoustic emissions were investigated in 493 randomly selected men and women aged from 20 to 79 years. Effects of gender, age, ear side and middle ear state were determined, with and without adjusting for hearing threshold level. No statistically significant effects on middle ear pressure or compliance were present. For TEOAEs and DPOAEs, the effect of gender and age was statistically significant (p < 0.01), with larger signal levels for female subjects and young subjects, even after adjusting for hearing threshold level. No effect of middle ear pressure on otoacoustic emissions was present, but high middle ear compliance was associated with low emission levels (p < 0.01). Reference data for middle ear compliance and pressure and prevalence data on SOAEs, TEOAEs and DPOAEs for male and female subjects in different age groups were determined. Mean signal levels of TEOAEs and DPOAEs are presented.

Otoacoustic emissions in the general adult population of Nord-Trøndelag, Norway: III. Relationships with pure-tone hearing thresholds

This study aims to describe the association between otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) and pure-tone hearing thresholds (PTTs) in an unscreened adult population (N =6415), to determine the efficiency by which TEOAEs and DPOAEs can identify ears with elevated PTTs, and to investigate whether a combination of DPOAE and TEOAE responses improves this performance. Associations were examined by linear regression analysis and ANOVA. Test performance was assessed by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. The relation between OAEs and PTTs appeared curvilinear with a moderate degree of non-linearity. Combining DPOAEs and TEOAEs improved performance. Test performance depended on the cut-off thresholds defining elevated PTTs with optimal values between 25 and 45 dB HL, depending on frequency and type of OAE measure. The unique constitution of the present large sample, which reflects the general adult population, makes these results applicable to population-based studies and screening programs.

On a possible prognostic value of otoacoustic emissions: a study on patients with sudden hearing loss

Otoacoustic emissions (OAE) and pure tone audiogram (PTA) were examined in 26 ears of 25 patients suffering from sudden hearing loss from the 1st day to up to 505 days following the drop of hearing to test the hypothesis whether the OAEs are capable of delivering predictive information about the recovery process. The patients were selected from 50 candidates according to the following criteria: one or both ears exhibited a systematic and significant recovery of pure tone threshold in at least one frequency, OAEs were detectable and PTA available, a conductive hearing loss was excluded, and the auditory brainstem responses (ABR) yielded no signs of retrocochlear disorders. Transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) were measured under constant stimulus and recording conditions in three to nine sessions. The relation between OAE level and actual pure tone threshold was subject to a regression analysis. The correlation between both parameters is small but significant. Even smaller correlations are observed if the OAE level is related to former hearing loss, whereas the correlation improves if the OAE level is compared to the pure tone threshold measured in a later session. The slopes of individual trajectories that connect the successive results of one ear in a plane defined by hearing loss and OAE level show a remarkable accumulation around zero, i.e., in many cases the OAEs remain unchanged even if the hearing loss decreases. The comparison of the OAE levels measured at an early stage with later audiograms shows that there are only a small number of cases with small initial emissions and good final threshold or large initial emissions and bad final threshold. This means that small initial OAEs end up with a remaining final hearing deficit, whereas a high OAE level immediately after drop of threshold correlates with good outcome. The reliability of an individual prediction based on the OAE level combined with the threshold after sudden hearing loss and the consequences for the physiologic mechanisms underlying the sudden hearing loss remain to be proved in further investigations.

Screening methods: current status

Two technologies are currently used to screen newborn infants for hearing, auditory brainstem response (ABR), and otoacoustic emissions (OAEs). Each technology is based on detecting the infant's physiologic response to auditory stimulation. ABR is a short-latency auditory evoked response originating from eighth nerve and brainstem auditory pathway structures and detected by scalp surface electrodes. OAEs are auditory signals generated by cochlear outer hair cells in response to acoustic stimulation and detected by a miniature microphone coupled to the infant's ear. Although each technique requires specific sound generation and response recording technologies, advances in computerized stimulus delivery and response detection algorithms allow these tests to be performed by trained technicians or volunteers under the supervision of an audiologist. Results of test performance, and the advantages and disadvantages of each technique are described.

Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: transient evoked otoacoustic emissions during the perinatal period

OBJECTIVES

1) To describe transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) levels, noise levels and signal to noise ratios (SNRs) for a range of frequency bands in three groups of neonates who were tested as a part of the Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment multi-center consortium project. 2) To describe the relations between these TEOAE measurements and age, test environment, baby state, and test time.

DESIGN

TEOAEs were measured in 4478 graduates of neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), 353 well babies with at least one risk indicator, and 2348 well babies without risk factors. TEOAE and noise levels were measured for frequency bands centered at 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 kHz for a click stimulus level of 80 dB SPL. For those ears not meeting "passing" stopping criteria at 80 dB pSPL, a level of 86 dB pSPL was included. Measurement-based stopping rules were used such that a test did not terminate unless the response revealed a criterion SNR in four out of five frequency bands or no response occurred after a preset number of averages. Baby state, test environment, and other test factors were captured at the time of test.

RESULTS

TEOAE levels, noise levels and SNRs were similar for NICU graduates, well babies with risk factors and well babies without risk factors. There were no consistent differences in response quality as a function of test environment, i.e., private room, unit, open crib, nonworking isolette, or working isolette. Noise level varied little across risk group, test environment, or infant state other than crying, suggesting that the primary source of noise in TEOAE measurements is infant noise. The most significant effect on response quality was center frequency. Responses were difficult to measure in the half-octave band centered at 1.0 kHz, compared with higher frequencies. Reliable responses were measured routinely at frequencies of 1.5 kHz and higher.

CONCLUSIONS

TEOAEs are easily measured in both NICU graduates and well babies with and without risk factors for hearing loss in a wide variety of test environments. Given the difficulties encountered in making reliable measurements for a frequency band centered at 1.0 kHz, its inclusion in a screening program may not be justified.

Otoacoustic Emissions in Patients with Retrocochlear Dysfunction: A Report of Five Cases

This article describes the results of otoacoustic emissions testing in five patients with sensorineural hearing loss. We conducted an audiologic evaluation and performed image and cerebral function studies on each patient. Our investigation revealed that all five had spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and/or distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Pharmacologic treatment with anxiolytics, antidepressants, and anticonvulsant drugs was successful in alleviating symptoms in three patients. An organic and a central functional cause of symptoms was found in the remaining two patients. Before pharmacologic therapy, the spontaneous otoacoustic emissions were of high intensity, and the distortion product emissions were minimal. Following drug therapy, the former disappeared and the latter appeared.

Predicting audiometric status from distortion product otoacoustic emissions using multivariate analyses

OBJECTIVES

1) To determine whether multivariate statistical approaches improve the classification of normal and impaired ears based on distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) measurements, in comparison with the results obtained with more traditional single-variable applications of clinical decision theory. 2) To determine how well the multivariate predictors, derived from analysis on a training group, generalized to a validation group. 3) To provide a way to apply the multivariate approaches clinically.

DESIGN

Areas under the relative operating characteristic (ROC) curve and cumulative distributions derived from DPOAE, DPOAE/Noise, discriminant function (DF) scores and logit function (LF) scores were used to compare univariate and multivariate predictors of audiometric status. DPOAE and Noise amplitudes for 8 f2 frequencies were input to a discriminant analysis and to a logistic regression. These analyses generated a DF and LF, respectively, composed of a linear combination of selected variables. The DF and LF scores were the input variables to the decision theory analyses. For comparison purposes, DPOAE test performance was also evaluated using only one variable (DPOAE or DPOAE/Noise when f2 = audiometric frequency). Analyses were based on data from over 1200 ears of 806 subjects, ranging in age from 1.3 to 96 yr, with thresholds ranging from -5 to >120 dB HL. For statistical purposes, normal hearing was defined as thresholds of 20 dB HL or better. For the multivariate analyses, the database was randomly divided into two groups of equal size. One group served as the "training" set, which was used to generate the DFs and LFs. The other group served as a "validation" set to determine the robustness of the DF and LF solutions.

RESULTS

For all test frequencies, multivariate analyses yielded greater areas under the ROC curve than univariate analyses, and greater specificities at fixed sensitivities. Within the multivariate techniques, discriminant analysis and logistic regression yielded similar results and both yielded robust solutions that generalized well to the validation groups. The improvement in test performance with multivariate analyses was greatest for conditions in which the single predictor variable resulted in the poorest performance.

CONCLUSIONS

A more accurate determination of auditory status at a specific frequency can be obtained by combining multiple predictor variables. Although the DF and LF multivariate approaches resulted in the greatest separation between normal and impaired distributions, overlap still exists, which suggests that there would be value in continued efforts to improve DPOAE test performance.

Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with normal hearing and in patients with hearing loss

OBJECTIVES

1) To evaluate transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) test performance when measurements are made under routine clinical conditions. 2) To evaluate TEOAE test performance as a function of frequency and as a function of the magnitude of hearing loss. 3) To compare test performance using univariate and multivariate approaches to data analyses. 4) To provide a means of interpreting clinical TEOAE measurements.

DESIGN

TEOAEs were measured in 452 ears of 246 patients. All measurements were made after acoustic immittance assessments, which were used to demonstrate that middle-ear function was normal at the time of the TEOAE test. TEOAE amplitudes and signal to noise ratios (SNRs), analyzed into octave bands centered at 1, 2, and 4 kHz, were compared with the pure-tone threshold at the same frequencies. Data were analyzed with clinical decision theory, cumulative distributions, discriminant analyses, and logistic regressions.

RESULTS

Using univariate analysis techniques, TEOAEs accurately identified auditory status at 2 and 4 kHz but were less accurate at 1 kHz. Test performance was best when audiometric thresholds between 20 and 30 dB HL were used as the criteria for normal hearing. TEOAE SNR resulted in better test performance than did TEOAE amplitude alone; this effect decreased as frequency increased. Multivariate analysis methods resulted in better separation between normal and impaired ears than did univariate approaches, which relied on only TEOAE amplitude or SNR when test frequency band and audiometric frequency were the same. This improvement in test performance was greatest at 1 kHz, decreased as frequency increased, and was negligible at 4 kHz.

CONCLUSIONS

TEOAEs can be used to identify hearing loss in children under routine clinical conditions. Univariate tests accurately identified auditory status at mid and high frequencies but performed more poorly at lower frequencies. The decrease in performance as frequency decreases may be a result of increased noise at lower frequencies but also may be due to properties of the measurement paradigm ("QuickScreen," high-pass filter at 0.8 kHz), which would not be ideal for recording energy around 1 kHz. The improvement in test performance when SNR was used and the interaction of this effect with frequency, however, would be consistent with the view that test performance in lower frequencies is at least partially influenced by the level of background noise. Multivariate analysis techniques improved test performance compared with the more traditional univariate approaches to data analysis. An approach is provided that allows one to assign measured TEOAE amplitudes, SNRs, or outputs from multivariate analyses to one of three categories: response properties consistent with normal hearing; results consistent with hearing loss; hearing status undetermined.

Clinical interpretations of transient otoacoustic emissions

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to characterize the relation of different ordinal patterns of transient otoacoustic emissions (TEOAES) with respect to underlying otologic disorders and auditory status.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The results of TEOAEs in 225 patients with various auditory disorders were investigated and compared with normative data established from 90 subjects of various ages. TEOAEs were categorized according to four patterns: (1) normal (general response level within 90% of normative data, (2) reduced amplitude (general response level was > or =2 dB peak sound pressure level (pSPL), but less than the mean -1.64 SD of the normative data), (3) abnormal morphology of frequency spectrum (general response level was within normal limits, but reduced at > or =2 individual octave frequencies between 1,000 and 5,000 Hz), and (4) total absence (response level <2 dB pSPL).

RESULTS

This study showed that the normal pattern of TEOAEs, in terms of response amplitude, varied with age. Our results further indicated that a reduced amplitude pattern of TEOAEs was noted in patients with a mild sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), negative tympanometric pressure, a pressure-equalization tube, and Meniere's disease. TEOAEs provided good frequency-specific information for patients with a noise-induced hearing loss. All patients with ossicular chain abnormalities, more than moderate SNHL, and a middle ear mass or effusion had total absence of TEOAEs. Patients with acoustic neuroma and brainstem lesions presented a complex profile of TEOAEs. In the follow-up of auditory function in patients undergoing otologic surgery, different patterns of TEOAEs between the preoperative and postoperative recordings were evident, which correlated with the hearing thresholds and middle ear status. The abnormal findings of TEOAEs due to specific auditory diseases were discussed.

CONCLUSION

The interpretation of TEOAEs can be facilitated through an analysis of specific patterns and in combination with other audiologic tests.

Bilateral otoacoustic emissions pass in a baby with Mondini deformity and subsequently confirmed profound bilateral hearing loss

Evoked otoacoustic emissions are well established as a hearing screening technique and are used extensively in paediatric audiology. They are believed to originate from the outer hair cells and can be detected in almost 100% of normally hearing ears; even a mild hearing loss has been shown to abolish otoacoustic emissions. Results are presented of a baby boy born at 29 weeks' gestation requiring 77 days of neonatal care, but experiencing no complications following discharge from the neonatal unit. This child had clear bilateral evoked otoacoustic emissions at almost four months of age, but was subsequently found to have a profound bilateral hearing impairment and absent otoacoustic emissions. Radiological investigations revealed bilateral Mondini dysplasia, and this child has now been implanted with a multi-channel MXM Digisonic cochlear implant. He is progressing well and shows awareness of sound. Approximately 10 previous cases of otoacoustic emissions occurring in profoundly deaf ears have been reported in the literature. Although it is likely that this child's hearing loss was progressive in nature, the authors believe that this is the first reported case of otoacoustic emissions being recorded in the presence of Mondini dysplasia. This raises concerns about the use of neonatal screening in isolation without adequate mechanisms for later identification of hearing impairment, although it is acknowledged that it represents a rare situation.

Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in children after cisplatin chemotherapy

Little is known about cisplatin ototoxicity in pediatric patients. Measurement of otoacoustic emissions is a rapid, reproducible, objective method of evaluating hearing. We examined whether transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in pediatric patients exposed to cisplatin in the past correlated with audiographic findings. Twelve patients were entered into the study (mean age at treatment 7.8 years, mean cumulative dose 442.5 mg/mm2, mean 7.1 doses). Hearing at 3000 Hz was preserved in 82.6% of patients. In the higher frequencies significant sensorineural hearing loss was noted: 43.5% at 4 kHz; 81.0% at 6 kHz; and 90.5% at 8 kHz. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions were measurable in 11 of 12 patients. Middle ear disease accounted for abnormal otoacoustic emission seen in three patients (1 with effusion, 2 with significant negative middle ear pressure). When the middle ear was normal, a statistically significant correlation was seen between the transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions reproducibility and pure-tone threshold (correlation coefficient = -0.69, p = 0.008). Increased hearing loss was also associated with young age at first dose of cisplatin (p = 0.044), high number of chemotherapy cycles (p = 0.042), and high cumulative dose (p = 0.042).

Cochlear origin of hearing loss in MELAS syndrome

There have been few studies investigating the mechanism and nature of the hearing loss that occurs in the mitochondrial disorders. We studied 18 patients with the MELAS A3243G point mutation from four different kindreds. Pure tone audiometry, speech discrimination testing, acoustic reflexes, tympanometry, and brain stem auditory evoked responses were performed to localize the site of pathology in the auditory pathways. In 12 patients, we performed electrocochleography and otoacoustic emissions to assess cochlear involvement. Neuroimaging and promontory nerve stimulation were performed to exclude retrocochlear pathology. Audiological testing confirmed sensorineural hearing loss in 14 of the 18 patients studied; hearing loss was usually gradual in onset, was symmetrical, and initially affected the higher frequencies. In some patients, there were features that distinguished the hearing loss from presbyacusis, including a young age at onset, asymmetrical involvement, stepwise progression, and partial recovery. We treated one patient who had profound bilateral hearing loss with cochlear implantation; this restored good functional hearing. Hearing loss in MELAS syndrome appears to be due to dysfunction of the cochlea, probably resulting from metabolic failure of the stria vascularis and outer hair cells. Cochlear implantation is a therapeutic option worth considering in those patients who become deaf.

Medial olivocochlear system stabilizes active cochlear micromechanical properties in humans

To investigate the involvement of the medial olivocochlear system (MOCS) in outer hair cell (OHC) motility stabilization, evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAEs) were recorded in 20 normal-hearing subjects and in eight vestibular-neurotomized subjects, successively in the presence and absence of low-intensity contralateral acoustic stimulation. Intrasubject EOAE amplitude variability was assessed as the standard deviation computed over several successive recordings. In normal-hearing subjects, a significantly lower EOAE amplitude variability with contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS) was observed in subjects in whom the CAS induced the greatest EOAE amplitude reduction. This result could not be attributed to the EOAE amplitude reduction itself, since variability was otherwise found to increase when EOAE amplitude decreased. Moreover, statistically significant correlations between EOAE amplitude attenuation and EOAE amplitude variability under CAS were observed. In the eight subjects operated for vestibular neurotomy, no such effect was found. Being sectioned in vestibular-neurotomized subjects, the MOCS can no longer exert its effects. These results strongly support the notion that MOCS activity, as induced by CAS, elicits a reduction in EOAE amplitude variability in normal-hearing subjects. This finding and some of its possible implications for understanding the role of the MOCS in hearing in humans are discussed.

COAE thresholds: 1. Effects of equal-amplitude versus subtraction methods

Although research has demonstrated that click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (COAEs) elicited by high-level stimuli are useful for identifying hearing loss, the ability of COAEs to predict behavioral thresholds has not been adequately tested. Results of studies comparing COAE thresholds and behavioral thresholds have been equivocal, perhaps due to the need for a more rigorous approach to COAE threshold estimation. The present study was designed to address several methodological concerns in COAE threshold testing, particularly the effects of two methods of stimulus presentation on COAE testing and threshold calculation. In an attempt to make COAE threshold estimation consistent across participants, COAE threshold calculations were based on mean noise floor levels across participants. COAE and noise floor levels were measured in 15 participants using both equal-amplitude clicks and a subtraction method. Broadband COAEs were analyzed into 1/3 octave bands, so that input/output functions could be examined and COAE thresholds could be calculated for each 1/3 octave band. Comparison of the two stimulus methods indicated several differences. Mean noise floor levels for the equal-amplitude method were approximately 6 dB lower than those measured for the subtraction method across frequency. In many cases COAEs evoked using the equal-amplitude method were higher in amplitude than those evoked using the subtraction method. COAE thresholds measured using the equal-amplitude click stimuli were significantly lower than those measured using the subtraction method. The significantly higher thresholds obtained using the subtraction method may be attributed in part to the reduction of COAE amplitude by the subtraction procedure, and not merely to the higher noise level. Slopes of the input/output functions were not significantly different between the two stimulus methods. These results suggest that the equal-amplitude method is preferable for COAE threshold testing because lower noise floor and larger amplitude COAEs may be obtained in the same test time.

The role of transient-evoked otoacoustic emission testing in the evaluation of elderly persons

OBJECTIVE

The purposes of this study were: To determine the quantitative and qualitative changes that occur in transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) in older individuals without addressing the effect of aging alone and without correction for hearing loss of the subject selection. To investigate the clinical value of measuring TEOAEs in the routine audiological evaluation of older people reasoning that a finding of hearing loss in the presence of TEOAEs could indicate a form of presbycusis with a primary central component.

DESIGN

Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) were measured in 201 subjects without middle ear problems aged 60 yr and older (range 60 to 97 yr) who volunteered for the study because of complaints concerning their hearing. Audiological procedures included a pure-tone audiogram, modified Speech Perception in Noise test (German version: Basler Satztest), and the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (German version). Results from ears with a pure-tone average (PTA) at 0.5, 1, and 2 kHz of < or = 30 dB HL were further analyzed with respect to the presence or absence of CEOAEs. In addition, tone burst evoked otoacoustic emissions (TbOAEs) were tested in ears with responses to click stimuli. The test consisted of a paradigm used previously in our laboratory to assess superposition and suppression of frequency within the cochlea (see Xu, Probst, Harris, & Roede, 1994).

RESULTS

CEOAEs were not detectable in ears with a PTA > 30 dB HL. The prevalence of CEOAEs in ears with a PTA < or = 30 dB HL was 60%. Response levels decreased as hearing thresholds became poorer, but there was no apparent influence on TEOAE level due to age alone. The audiological measures from ears with and without CEOAEs and with PTAs < or = 30 dB HL were similar with the exception of small between group differences at lower frequencies. The TbOAE results showed no differences in linear superposition and suppression when results were compared with those of younger subjects tested previously.

CONCLUSIONS

The lower overall amplitudes of TEOAEs and the lower prevalence of 60% in comparison to results from younger subjects with normal hearing imply that cochlear changes do occur with aging. However, the preservation or loss of TEOAEs does not separate subjects with presbycusis into distinct audiological categories or handicaps. Tone burst results suggest that frequency processing within the cochlea is not affected by age alone. We conclude that TEOAEs add no relevant information in the routine clinical evaluation of elderly persons with hearing problems.

Frequency-specific identification of hearing loss using transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions to clicks and tones

Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) to clicks and to 500- and 2000-Hz brief tones were measured in 72 normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects (86 ears). The TEOAE's reproducibility parameter was used for the analyses. The purpose of the investigation was to determine which stimuli best predicted the presence of sensorineural hearing loss in a frequency-specific manner at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. Analyses of the TEOAEs filtered into frequency-specific bands showed that separation of normal and impaired ears at 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz was best achieved by TEOAEs evoked by clicks. Identification of hearing loss at 500 Hz was best obtained using 500-Hz tone-evoked TEOAEs filtered using a band centered at 500 Hz. Octave- and half-octave-wide bands identified hearing loss equally well. An analysis sweep time of 20 ms provided slightly better results compared to 30 ms, except for 500 Hz, where the 30-ms sweep time slightly improved the identification of hearing loss. Increases in the audiometric criterion did not yield better test performance once hearing loss exceeded 20 dB HL. The findings from this study suggest that the combination of bandpass-filtered TEOAEs to clicks and TEOAEs to 500-Hz tones identifies with reasonable accuracy ears with sensorineural hearing loss at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz.

Bilateral evoked otoacoustic emissions in a child with bilateral profound hearing loss

Recording of bilateral evoked otoacoustic emissions in a 3-year-old girl with bilateral profound hearing loss is presented. No component of auditory-evoked brain stem potentials was recorded. Findings on computed tomography of the inner ear were within normal limits. At retest 3 months later, these results were unchanged. Explanations for this particular condition are presented together with a review of the literature.

Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in occupational medicine as an auditory screening test for employment

TEOAEs are considered a valuable test for specific evaluation of the inner ear function and can be used as a screening method for an objective diagnosis of cochlear damage. The aim of this study was the evaluation of TEOAEs as a diagnostic tool for adult male subjects undergoing medical selection for recruitment in the Italian Air Force (IAF). The analysis was performed with ILO88 System on 30 normal and 83 hearing-impaired subjects. Only cochlear hearing losses were considered and categorized in three classes: unilateral (UHL), bilateral (BHL), high frequencies (HFHL: cochlear damage only at 6 and/or 8 kHz). TEOAE intensity, reproducibility and spectrum were the main parameters investigated. A qualitative comparison between the responses obtained in the two ears of the same subject was also performed. Moreover, TEOAE spectra and Pure Tone Audiometry (PTA) data were compared. Significant differences between the normal and the affected ear in UHLs were found, while no variations between the two ears were observed in BHLs and HFHLs. A high correlation between TEOAE spectrum and PTA was reported in normals and UHLs. The global test sensitivity was high in UHLs (94%) and BHLs (83%), while specificity was 85.0% in the normal sample. Although significant limitations reduce their efficiency, TEOAEs can be regarded as a useful complementary test to standard PTA for audiological selective purposes.

An unusual case of deafness with speech impairment: lesson in diagnosis and management

Hearing impairment can be the cause of significant disability and handicap. This medico-legal case demonstrates the need for accurate assessment of both the severity and type of hearing loss if the best clinical management is to be provided. In particular, the case identifies the critical role of additional, objective auditory testing when pure tone audiometry, which depends on the subjective response of the individual, is inconsistent or indicates severe hearing impairment.

Moving time window analysis of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions

We have developed a technique for off-line analysis of transient otoacoustic emissions. The correlation of two curves was calculated in a moving time-window of 1 ms time sections. By this method it is possible to recognize high-correlation parts, time sections with low correlation, and thus the duration of the emission can be determined. The mean absolute duration of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in 36 normal ears was 15.1 +/- 0.69 ms (mean +/- SE). The duration was significantly shorter (9.34 +/- 0.43) in 75 ears with different grades of sensorineural hearing loss. The breakdown of this group into sub-groups according to the width of the high frequency band with elevated threshold showed a correlation between the severity of the hearing loss and the absolute duration.

Effect of lidocaine injection of EOAE in patients with tinnitus

In the present study, evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAEs) were measured in 30 patients with tinnitus before and after intravenous lidocaine injection (1 mg/kg). For EOAE recordings, 1 kHz tone burst stimuli were used. Intravenous lidocaine injection resulted in suppression of tinnitus in 22 (73%) ears, and changes of EOAE amplitude (increase or decrease) in 18 (60%) ears. Of the 18 ears with EOAE amplitude changes, tinnitus disappeared or decreased in 17 (94%) ears. In 12 ears without changes of EOAE amplitude, tinnitus was suppressed in only 5 (42%). Changes in latency were not detected in any of the ears. These results indicate that there is a relationship between the effect of lidocaine in tinnitus suppression and changes in cochlear micromechanics caused by lidocaine.

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and sensorineural hearing loss

As other types of otoacoustic emissions, distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) allow the exploration of the active cochlear mechanisms known to take place in the outer hair cell system. Most authors consider that 2f1-f2 DPOAEs are generated in a cochlear region corresponding to the geometric mean (GM) of the primary frequencies. To verify the relevance of this hypothesis in clinical practice, DPOAEs were recorded at seven different frequencies, ranging from 0.5 to 4 kHz, in 81 hearing-impaired patients and in 24 normally hearing subjects. To test the hypothesis that DPOAEs reflect the hearing threshold at the frequency of the GM rather than at the 2f1-f2 frequency, this study compares the 2f1-f2 frequency and the GM of the primaries to the frequency of hearing loss. DPOAEs can be used to explore a large range of frequencies, especially at high frequencies, but responses at low frequencies are less reliable due to noise contamination. Secondly, DPOAEs can be recorded in ears that have a hearing threshold as high as 65 dB HL at the frequency corresponding to the GM of the primaries. Finally, DPOAE recordings show frequency specificity: i.e., hearing loss at a specific frequency correlates best with DPOAEs whose GM of primary frequencies corresponds to the frequency of the hearing loss. However, this frequency specificity is still unsatisfactory and decreases as the levels of primaries increase above 60 dB SPL. Moreover, DPOAE amplitude is too variable to predict hearing loss at a particular frequency, whereas DPOAE threshold allows a correct prediction of abnormal auditory threshold in more than 80% of the cases at frequencies above 1 kHz.

Contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: intra-individual variability in tinnitus and normal subjects

Contralateral acoustic stimulation reduces the amplitude of the transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) in humans. The mechanism is thought to be mediated, at least in part, through the medial olivocochlear efferent system innervating the outer hair cells. To assess its usefulness as a possible clinical test, TEOAE suppression was measured in each ear of 12 subjects over a 6-week period, and these data are shown in detail for four subjects representing extremes of variability in a tinnitus and a non-tinnitus group. Intra-subject test results (n = 18) exhibited a varying extent of suppression values and the variance of each session, consisting of three tests, was not statistically different from one session to another. There was no dependence on variables such as ear (right or left), session, day of testing or their interaction. There was a significant difference in the variability between the tinnitus and the normal group.

Reproducibility and short-term variability of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions

The reproducibility and short-term, less than 3 days, variability of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) were studied in 23 young, otologically healthy subjects engaged either in strenuous physical exercise or relatively sedentary occupations. Tympanometry was also performed. TEOAEs were highly reproducible. No differences were found between the two subject groups, nor any significant diurnal variations in TEOAE amplitudes. The latter were, however, significantly (p = 0.005) correlated to middle ear pressures. Tympanometry should therefore be performed in studies of possible intrinsic or extrinsic influences on TEOAE amplitudes.

Characteristics of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in ears with normal hearing and with noise-induced hearing loss

The clinical application of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAE) in the assessment of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) was examined in a group of 72 ears with NIHL and 61 ears with normal hearing (NH). The characteristics of the EOAE in ears with NIHL significantly differed from the NH, according to all EOAE parameters tested in the present study. The mean overall EOAE level was lower and the mean EOAE nonlinearity threshold was worse in the NIHL group. In 95% of the NH ears the EOAE spectrum range was wide, while in 91.5% of the NIHL ears the range was narrow. Moreover, in 94% of the ears with NIHL, the frequency at which the hearing loss began (BHL) was at or above the frequency of the last peak in the EOAE spectrum (FLP). Furthermore, combination of EOAE spectral measures correctly discriminate on average 93.5% of ears with NH from NIHL (sensitivity) and 92% of ears with NIHL from NH (specificity). In contrast, the nonlinearity threshold and the overall level of EOAE yielded lower specificity of less than 33%. It was therefore concluded that EOAE spectrum may serve as a useful and objective tool in screening adults with suspected noise-induced high frequency hearing loss.

Click-evoked oto-acoustic emissions in 1036 ears of healthy newborns

Click-evoked oto-acoustic emissions (EOAEs) were recorded in 1036 ears of healthy newborns and in 71 normal-hearing adult ears. Newborns aged between 3 and 238 h were examined in a separate but not silent room of the obstetric ward. The adults were tested in a quiet but not sound-treated room. The recordings were more difficult in the newborn than in the adult, which was mirrored in recording parameters such as the time required for measurement (up to 7 min in newborns vs. 1-2 min in adult ears). Recording was always successful in adults, while retests were necessary in 4% of newborns. Also the artefact-rejection level and the stimulus stability were more favourable in adults. Still, EOAE recording for screening purposes in newborns seems feasible. Response levels in newborns (range 1.6-38.6; mean 20.2 dB SPL) appear to be higher than in adults (range 2.7-20.6; mean 12.8 dB SPL). The overall prevalence of EOAEs in newborns amounted to 93.4% and appeared to be age related. It rises from 78% in ears from newborns younger than 36 h to 99% in ears of newborns older than 108 h. This rise may be related to the middle ear clearance of amniotic fluid in the first days post partum. The prevalence in newborns older than 3-4 days is comparable with the prevalence of 97.2% in adults. Therefore, newborns should not be screened before the age of 4 days. In search of an objective EOAE detection variable, the prevalence of EOAEs for different age groups was calculated for various criterion values of reproducibility. These prevalences were compared to subjectively scored EOAE prevalences in the same age groups. A reproducibility criterion of about 50% appears to be useful for mass screening in newborns.

Interrelations between transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions, spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and acoustic distortion products in normally hearing subjects

Active cochlear mechanisms and especially outer hair cells seem to be involved in oto-acoustic emissions (OAEs) genesis. This study sought to investigate basic characteristics of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs), click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TOAEs) and interrelations between SOAEs, TOAEs and 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 distortion product OAEs (DPOAEs) in 135 normally hearing subjects. A gender effect was shown on TOAEs and DPOAEs amplitude, and is attributed to the higher incidence of SOAEs in women (58%) than in men (22%). Moreover, SOAEs presence seems to mask the age effect found, especially at high frequency components, on TOAEs amplitude. A general influence of SOAEs on TOAEs and DPOAEs is shown, especially at frequencies ranging from 1 kHz to 3 kHz, collecting more than 66% of the SOAEs peaks recorded. Lastly, correlations between TOAEs frequency band amplitude and 2f1-f2 DPOAEs amplitude, shows frequency specificity, at least at low frequencies (i.e., from 0.5 to 2 kHz) in agreement with previous works suggesting that the 2f1-f2 DPOAEs generation site is at the geometric mean of the primaries. The same correlations calculated with 2f2-f1 DPOAEs amplitude show frequency specificity at low frequencies i.e., at 800 Hz and 1600 Hz. 2f2-f1 DPOAEs in humans are shown to be generated near the 2f2-f1 frequency region on the cochlear partition.

Frequency specificity of human distortion product otoacoustic emissions

The amplitudes and growth functions of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOE) at 2f1-f2, elicited by two primary tones f1 and f2 with a constant frequency ratio f2/f1 = 1.23 and varying geometric mean values 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6 and 8 kHz, were measured for 25 normal subjects and 50 patients with sensorineural hearing loss. Partial correlations between DPOE amplitudes and auditory thresholds (0.25 to 8 kHz, half-octave steps) were examined. The amplitude of DPOE evoked by low-intensity primary tones (at or below 62 dB SPL) was strongly correlated only with the auditory threshold at their mean frequency, and DPOE disappeared for local hearing losses larger than about 30 dB. Moreover, DPOE amplitudes did not depend on the basal cochlear state. Confounding effects of middle ear transmission and aging were not significant in this set of experiments. When elicited by higher intensities of primary tones (72 dB SPL), DPOE exhibited a more complex and non-local behavior, and their sensitivity to hearing loss decreased. These results suggest that when low-intensity primaries are used, DPOE patterns provide frequency-specific information on the local cochlear state.

Evoked acoustic emissions from the human ear. VI. Findings in cochlear hearing impairment

Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAE) were recorded in 28 subjects with mild to moderate flat or steeply sloping cochlear hearing loss. We used the same equipment and recording technique as previously employed in the testing of newborns. A rescaling and subtraction procedure was implemented in an attempt to eliminate the tail of the stimulus artifact. However, in some cases the method also seems to eliminate a true response. In ears with flat losses and with identified CEOAE, no one had a hearing loss exceeding 40 dB HL in the mid-frequency region (0.5, 1 and 2 kHz). Conversely, in ears with flat losses and without CEOAE, no one had a hearing loss less than 30 dB HL in this frequency region. In ears with sloping hearing losses the thresholds at 1 and 2 kHz were most important for the generation of the CEOAE and a significant correlation between the emission amplitude at 70aud (approximately dB p.e. SPL) and the threshold at 1 kHz was found.

Evoked otoacoustic emissions: relative importance of age, sex and sensorineural hearing-loss using a mathematical model of the audiogram

The influence of age, sex and of hearing loss on the EOAEs were studied in 140 subjects. The EOAEs were never found when hearing loss on the best hearing frequency was above 40 dB HL and when the threshold of intelligibility was above 45 dB HL. The presence of EOAEs therefore does not only give specific information on the midfrequencies, but also shows a hearing loss below or equal to 40 dB HL on at least one frequency. In addition, there is a relation between the audiometric curve and the spectrum analysis of EOAEs. These seem to be promising results for clinical applications.

Quantitative assessment of human cochlear function by evoked otoacoustic emissions

The amplitudes of evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOE) and their detection threshold were measured in 44 normal young adults and 118 patients with two categories of cochlear dysfunction, acoustic trauma and presbycusis. A different method was used for each category: detection of click EOE or of stimulus frequency emissions. A partial correlation and multivariate analysis was performed for both groups of results to investigate the relations between EOE threshold one pure tone audiometric thresholds (250 to 8000 Hz). Only one significant correlation was found, linearly relating EOE threshold and hearing threshold at 2 kHz (P less than 0.001), independently of the origin of cochlear dysfunction. It suggests that EOE threshold is not frequency-specific since the frequency of EOE at threshold was nearly always close to 1 kHz. A simple model is proposed, based on the assumption that EOE amplitudes and threshold are proportional to the total number of residual active sites in the organ of Corti, i.e. to the total length of active basilar membrane. It is shown that this model accounts for the results disclosed by the statistical analysis and fits the experimental data. It can be used for quantitatively predicting the residual cochlear activity of a patient. However, the EOE threshold is only sensitive to already important cochlear alterations and this parameter does not seem to allow a follow-up of early stages of cochlear dysfunction.

Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and sensori-neural hearing loss

This study sought to clarify the clinical relevance of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) and to define the hearing loss level (and frequency) at which absence of SOAE is found. Findings from 126 ears of patients with sensori-neural hearing loss showed an incidence of SOAEs in 18.25% of the cases (23 out of 126 ears). SOAEs were never found when hearing loss at 1,000 Hz exceeded 10 dB. The presence of SOAE seems to indicate a good cochlear functioning at least in the mid-frequencies. Although the incidence of SOAEs is markedly lower than that of evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAEs), SOAE recording is shown to be a good test, rapid, non-invasive for audiological screening, the presence of SOAE confirming a hearing threshold of less than 10 dB at 1,000 Hz, the absence of SOAE being inconclusive.

Age-related changes in evoked otoacoustic emissions

Outer hair cells of the organ of Corti play an important part in the genesis of evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAEs), which are related to cochlear biomechanics. The aim of this study was to investigate the age factor in relation to EOAEs in 166 ears of subjects between 6 weeks and 83 years of age. The results show that when age increases, the presence of EOAEs by age group and the frequency peak in spectral analysis decrease, and EOAE threshold increases. Thus, there is an effect of age upon EOAEs, and it seems linked with alteration of cochlear biomechanics and/or hair cell loss. Such an effect has to be taken into consideration when EOAEs are used in clinical applications, and limits the use of EOAEs in older subjects.