Electrically evoked auditory brain-stem response in pediatric patients with cochlear implants

Evaluation of auditory pathway excitability using a pre-operative trans-tympanic electrically evoked auditory brainstem response under local anesthesia in cochlear implant candidates

OBJECTIVE

Subjective promontory stimulation is used to evaluate cochlear implant (CI) candidacy, but the test reliability is low. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) can verify the function of the auditory system objectively. This study's procedure uses a trans-tympanic rounded bent-tip electrode to perform pre-operative EABR under local anaesthesia (LA-TT-EABR) using MED-EL Software and Hardware. This study aimed to determine usability and effectiveness for CI candidates.

DESIGN

We hypothesised that LA-TT-EABR waveforms of good quality would be related to successful hearing outcomes. We assumed that the duration of hearing loss/deafness was a confounding factor to study outcomes.

STUDY SAMPLE

19 borderline CI candidates.

RESULTS

Positive LA-TT-EABR results were confirmed in 14 patients. LA-TT-EABR's mean latency was 2.05 ± 0.31 ms (eII/eIII) and 4.24 ± 0.39 ms (eIV/eV). Latencies weren't statistically different from intra-operative EABR elicited by basal CI contacts. All positive LA-TT-EABR patients benefitted from CI and speech performance improved one year after implantation. One patient with negative LA-TT-EABR was cochlear-implanted and had no hearing sensation.

CONCLUSIONS

LA-TT-EABR is a tool in the frame of pre-operative objective testing the auditory pathway. It seems useful for clinical testing CI candidacy. Based on this study's outcomes, LA-TT-EABR should be recommended for uncertain CI candidates.

[Electrically evoked ABR through cochlear implant in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder]

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the applicability of electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (eABR) registration for the estimation of neural integrity after cochlear implantation (CI) in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) and to compare the eABR data with patient's hearing performance.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

4 children, Nucleus (Cochlear) CI users, with ANSD were enrolled in the study. Hearing performance in these children ranged from successful to unsatisfied. eABR were recorded via Eclipse EP25 (Interacoustics). Electrical bipolar stimulation was achieved with Custom Sound EP software (Cochlear).

RESULTS

EABR were registered with the use of different stimulation parameters (pulse width, stimulated electrodes) in 3 patients with satisfactory results of rehabilitation. eABR thresholds corresponded to maximum comfortable levels of patients stimulation MAP. eABR were absent in the patient with poor hearing performance.

CONCLUSIONS

EABR measurements in children with ANSD demonstrated restoration of neuronal conduction in the auditory pathway up to the brainstem after cochlear implantation in 3 patients. eABR results were well correlated with hearing performance. Thereby, the study of eABR applicability for clinical practice will be expanded.

A study on relationship between Neural Response Telemetry and behavioural Threshold/Comfort levels in children with cochlear implant

Background

Our study was a prospective, non-randomised, single tertiary care centre study involving 50 children below 10 years, all implanted with Nucleus 24™ cochlear implants to find the relationship between intra-operative NRT (Neural Response Telemetry) values and post-operatively behaviourally obtained Threshold (T) and Comfort (C) levels.

Methods

NRT threshold values were obtained intra-operatively by using Custom Sound EP Software V 4.4™ (Cochlear Corporation). At switch-on after three weeks, behavioural T and C levels were measured based on behavioural responses given by patients using Custom Sound Version 4.4 software™ (Cochlear Corporation). NRT values were also measured at switch-on, 2 months, 3 months and 6 months.

Results

Intra-operative NRT levels (187.96 ± 12.48) were higher than both T (160.63 ± 22.69) and C (181.21 ± 22.41) levels obtained after 3 weeks. In addition, there was a weak correlation of NRT values with T (P value: 0.05, r = 0.391) and C (P value: 0.05, r = 0.390) levels.

Conclusion

NRT is a quick and non-invasive tool to confirm cochlear implant integrity. There is a weak correlation of NRT values with both T and C levels and therefore, intra-operative NRT is a weak predictor for setting both T and C levels at switch-on.

Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response over Round Window by Bipolar Stimulation

OBJECTIVES

Auditory brainstem potentials can be elicited by electrical stimulation of the round window (RW). In this technique, extracochlear stimulation is objectively used in the selection of cochlear implant (CI) candidates to avoid cochlear damage. However, until now, its use is limited due to the large artifacts generated by electrical stimulation. Our objective was to obtain reliable and reproducible electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (eEABRs) using a new method of stimulation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective study including subjects who underwent electrical stimulation on RW during CI surgery between 2013 and 2016. A "Stimulator Box," which produces electric stimuli identical to those provided by a CI, and an evoked potential recording equipment were used. The results obtained with monopolar and bipolar electrodes were compared.

RESULTS

RW eEABR recordings of 49 subjects (mean age, 34 years) were characterized by their stability and by having wave V between 3 and 5.5 ms. A higher percentage of responses were obtained on increasing the phase duration instead of the pulse amplitude. A significantly greater percentage of positive responses were obtained using bipolar stimulation than using monopolar stimulation (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Using extracochlear electrical stimulation technique, described herein, and bipolar electrical stimulation probe allows for reliable and reproducible eEABR recordings in CI candidates.

The Relationship Between EABR and Auditory Performance and Speech Intelligibility Outcomes in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients

PURPOSE

The primary purpose of the present study was to investigate the relationship between postimplant electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) measures (wave V threshold, wave V latency, input-output functions) and auditory performance and speech intelligibility outcomes measured using parental rating scales, such as Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP; Archbold, Lutman, & Marshall, 1995) and the Speech Intelligibility Rating scale (SIR; Allen, Nikolopoulos, Dyar, & O'Donoghue, 2001), respectively. The secondary purpose was to evaluate the relationship between age at implantation and ratings on the CAP and SIR.

METHOD

Forty children with congenital sensorineural hearing loss participated. Preimplant parental ratings on the CAP and SIR were obtained, and all the children underwent cochlear implantation. Intracochlear EABRs were recorded postimplantation. Postimplant parental ratings on the CAP and SIR were obtained. The relationships between EABR parameters and auditory performance and speech intelligibility outcomes were studied. The effect of age at implantation on auditory performance and speech intelligibility outcomes was also investigated.

RESULTS

A significant negative correlation was found between EABR wave V thresholds and SIR growth (r = -.415, p = .016). Children with better CAP growths tended to have lower wave V thresholds than those with poorer CAP growths. Age at implantation had an effect on the auditory performance as measured using the CAP.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study provides evidence for the relationship between wave V thresholds of the intracochlear EABR and auditory performance and speech intelligibility outcomes measured using parental rating scales in pediatric cochlear implant recipients. Data also indicate that early intervention has a positive impact on auditory performance outcomes.

Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception

OBJECTIVE

To establish the objective, noninvasive recording of the electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response (EAMFR) for the assessment of auditory nerve function in cochlear implant candidates.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective clinical study from 2007 to 2010.

SETTING

Cochlear Implant Programme at the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Germany).

PATIENTS

Thirty-eight patients with severe-to-total bilateral sensorineural hearing impairment.

INTERVENTION

Diagnostic.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The EAMFR thresholds were correlated with the mean thresholds of the intraoperative electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) derived by auditory nerve response telemetry and with the subjective electrical stimulation test. The intraindividual left-right similarity of the EAMFR and ECAP thresholds was investigated in 9 bilaterally implanted patients. Additionally, the correlation between auditory performance and EAMFR thresholds was investigated.

RESULTS

The EAMFR auditory nerve function test produced clear responses in all patients. The EAMFR thresholds correlated significantly with the mean ECAP thresholds (r = 0.58, p < 0.01) and the subjective electrical stimulation test (r = 0.32, p < 0.05). In the bilaterally implanted patients, there was either no side difference, or the ear with the lower preoperative EAMFR threshold also was the one with the lower intraoperative mean ECAP threshold. No correlation was found between EAMFR thresholds and postoperative speech recognition scores.

CONCLUSION

These novel results support the notion that the EAMFR auditory nerve function test is a useful objective and noninvasive tool to provide information about the responsiveness of the auditory nerve to electrical stimulation in cochlear implant candidates.

Cochlear implantation in children with cochlear nerve deficiency: a report of nine cases

OBJECTIVE

Cochlear implantation for children with cochlear nerve deficiency remains controversial, as the presence of the cochlear nerve has been central to the success of cochlear implantation. This study sought to investigate whether there is any benefit from cochlear implantation for children with cochlear nerve deficiency.

METHODS

Nine children with cochlear nerve deficiency and bilateral prelingual profound sensorineural hearing loss were included in this study. Inner ear and internal auditory canal structures were evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging and temporal bone computed tomography scans. Meaningful auditory integration scales, categories of auditory performance scores, speech intelligibility ratings and pure tone average threshold with cochlear implantation were measured for evaluation of hearing and speech performance.

RESULTS

Only four (44.4%) children had a significant improvement in pure tone average threshold with the cochlear implant device (77.5 dBHL, 45 dBHL, 51.3 dBHL and 68.8 dBHL). No child achieved sufficient speech intelligibility or perception ability during a follow-up of at least one year after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The decision to perform cochlear implantation in children with cochlear nerve deficiency must be undertaken with caution as it has limited effectiveness and uncertain cost-benefit.

Pediatric cochlear implantation: candidacy evaluation, medical and surgical considerations, and expanding criteria

Since the first cochlear implant approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in the early 1980s, great advances have occurred in cochlear implant technology. With these advances, patient selection, preoperative evaluation, and rehabilitation consideration continue to evolve. This article describes the current practice in pediatric candidacy evaluation, reviews the medical and surgical considerations in pediatric cochlear implantation, and explores the expanding criteria for cochlear implantation within the pediatric population.

Cortical potentials as predictors of outcomes with adult cochlear implant recipients - preliminary findings

A proportion of adult cochlear implant recipients report an inability to use the signal from their cochlear implant effectively at varying post-operative intervals following cochlear implantation. Some of these recipients report deterioration in their ability to use the implant signal and do not benefit from map optimization. Others never attain the level of outcome that they had expected. Speech perception, functional listening in certain circumstances and EABR may demonstrate high performance with the cochlear implant. However recipients report extreme difficulty in noise and distortion of the signal with the cochlear implant. Commonly, environmental sounds overshadow speech. Cortical evoked potentials were measured in a group of recipients who had been reporting such difficulties. They revealed potential processing abnormalities at the level of the cortex in some of these cases. This paper will review the five result profiles that were obtained based on pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative outcomes. It will begin to explore the value of predictive factors that may indicate the difficulties these recipients would experience post-operatively. Further, management strategies to evaluate and assist in optimizing performance will be addressed.

Functional outcome of auditory implants in hearing loss

The auditory implant provides a new mechanism for hearing when a hearing aid is not enough. It is the only medical technology able to functionally restore a human sense i.e. hearing. The auditory implant is very different from a hearing aid. Hearing aids amplify sound. Auditory implants compensate for damaged or non-working parts of the inner ear because they can directly stimulate the acoustic nerve. There are two principal types of auditory implant: the cochlear implant and the auditory brainstem implant. They have common basic characteristics, but different applications. A cochlear implant attempts to replace a function lost by the cochlea, usually due to an absence of functioning hair cells; the auditory brainstem implant (ABI) is a modification of the cochlear implant, in which the electrode array is placed directly into the brain when the acoustic nerve is not anymore able to carry the auditory signal. Different types of deaf or severely hearing-impaired patients choose auditory implants. Both children and adults can be candidates for implants. The best age for implantation is still being debated, but most children who receive implants are between 2 and 6 years old. Earlier implantation seems to perform better thanks to neural plasticity. The decision to receive an implant should involve a discussion with many medical specialists and an experienced surgeon.

Perceptual Consequences of Disrupted Auditory Nerve Activity

Perceptual consequences of disrupted auditory nerve activity were systematically studied in 21 subjects who had been clinically diagnosed with auditory neuropathy (AN), a recently defined disorder characterized by normal outer hair cell function but disrupted auditory nerve function. Neurological and electrophysical evidence suggests that disrupted auditory nerve activity is due to desynchronized or reduced neural activity or both. Psychophysical measures showed that the disrupted neural activity has minimal effects on intensity-related perception, such as loudness discrimination, pitch discrimination at high frequencies, and sound localization using interaural level differences. In contrast, the disrupted neural activity significantly impairs timing related perception, such as pitch discrimination at low frequencies, temporal integration, gap detection, temporal modulation detection, backward and forward masking, signal detection in noise, binaural beats, and sound localization using interaural time differences. These perceptual consequences are the opposite of what is typically observed in cochlear-impaired subjects who have impaired intensity perception but relatively normal temporal processing after taking their impaired intensity perception into account. These differences in perceptual consequences between auditory neuropathy and cochlear damage suggest the use of different neural codes in auditory perception: a suboptimal spike count code for intensity processing, a synchronized spike code for temporal processing, and a duplex code for frequency processing. We also proposed two underlying physiological models based on desynchronized and reduced discharge in the auditory nerve to successfully account for the observed neurological and behavioral data. These methods and measures cannot differentiate between these two AN models, but future studies using electric stimulation of the auditory nerve via a cochlear implant might. These results not only show the unique contribution of neural synchrony to sensory perception but also provide guidance for translational research in terms of better diagnosis and management of human communication disorders.

Normative findings of electrically evoked compound action potential measurements using the neural response telemetry of the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant system

One hundred and forty-seven adult recipients of the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system, from 13 different European countries, were tested using neural response telemetry to measure the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP), according to a standardised postoperative measurement procedure. Recordings were obtained in 96% of these subjects with this standardised procedure. The group results are presented in terms of peak amplitude and latency, slope of the amplitude growth function and ECAP threshold. The effects of aetiological factors and the duration of deafness on the ECAP were also studied. While large intersubject variability and intrasubject variability (across electrodes) were found, results fell within a consistent pattern and a normative range of peak amplitudes and latencies was established. The aetiological factors had little effect on the ECAP characteristics. However, age affected ECAP amplitude and slope of the amplitude growth function significantly; i.e., the amplitude is higher in the lowest age category (15-30 years). Principal component analysis of the ECAP thresholds shows that the thresholds across 5 electrodes can be described by two factors accounting for 92% of the total variance. The two factors represent the overall level of the threshold profiles ('shift') and their slopes across the electrode array ('tilt'). Correlation between these two factors and the same factors describing the T- and C-levels appeared to be moderate, in the range of 0.5-0.6.

Event-Related Potentials in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Patients

OBJECTIVE

The main objective of this study was to assess the correlation of auditory event related potential (ERP) measures with behavioral assessment data to identify if ERPs including mismatch negativity (MMN) can be used to categorize cochlear implant patients into good and poor performers.

DESIGN

We investigated auditory event-related potentials to standard and deviant speech stimuli presented in a pseudorandom sequence in 35 cochlear implant patients between the ages of 7 and 17 yr. We compared the occurrence, latencies, and amplitudes of P1, N2, and MMN with overall behavioral outcome in these children. Behavioral measures included category of auditory performance scores and speech intelligibility rating scores.

RESULTS

Auditory ERPs in response to standard stimuli were identifiable in 30 of 35 patients, demonstrating a major positive component (P1) followed by a negativity (N2) with absence of N1 in all patients. The P1 component in prelingually deaf patients showed a statistically significant reduction in its latency with increasing duration of implant use. MMN was recorded in 80-85% of star performers but in only 15-20% of poor performers. Patients with higher SIR scores demonstrated statistically significant longer duration of MMN compared with those with a lower SIR score.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that MMN can be used to assess the functional status of the auditory cortex in terms of auditory memory and discrimination in young children with cochlear implants and may provide an objective mechanism for differentiating good from poor performers.

Clinical uses of electrically evoked auditory nerve and brainstem responses

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to summarize current thinking relative to clinical applications for the electrically evoked compound action potential and the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response with the focus on works published between 1998 and 2003.

RECENT FINDINGS

During the period of this review, a considerable body of research has been published describing how the electrically evoked compound action potential can be measured and how the electrically evoked compound action potential may be used in the clinical treatment of cochlear implant patients. During this same period, there has been a decline in the number of studies reporting potential clinical applications for the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response. Perhaps the strongest clinical application for the electrically evoked compound action potential today is as a tool to facilitate the process of fitting the speech processor of the cochlear implant. This is particularly important for pediatric patients who may not be able to be programmed using traditional behavioral techniques. The accuracy of these predictions is discussed in addition to the limitations of the studies reviewed.

SUMMARY

The introduction of cochlear implants with the capability of measuring the response of the auditory nerve to electrical stimulation from an intracochlear electrode has tremendous potential to impact clinical practice. Research into how best to use this information is ongoing.

Electrically evoked auditory potentials: comparison between transtympanic promontory and round-window stimulations

OBJECTIVE

Electrically evoked auditory potential (eEAP) techniques have been developed in order to assess electrical excitability of auditory nervous pathways in deaf patients before cochlear implantation. The aim of this study was to compare eEAPs recorded after a transtympanic promontory stimulation with those obtained after a round-window stimulation during a surgical approach.

DESIGN

eEAPs were recorded after promontory and round-window stimulation in 10 deaf subjects (i.e. 14 ears) who were candidates for cochlear implantation.

RESULTS

eEAPs were successfully recorded in 13 out of 14 (93%) and 11 out of 14 (79%) ears after promontory stimulation and round-window stimulation, respectively. Similar waveforms, latencies, thresholds and eV amplitudes were observed in both cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Both tests provide objective and useful information for the patient selection process before cochlear implantation. Transtympanic stimulation should be preferred in clinical practice as it is less invasive than round-window stimulation and does not require surgical exposure.

A method for the direct electrical stimulation of the auditory system in deaf subjects: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study

PURPOSE

To develop a safe functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) procedure for auditory assessment of deaf subjects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A gold-plated tungsten electrode has been developed which has zero magnetic susceptibility. Used with carbon leads and a carbon reference pad, it enables safe, distortion-free fMRI studies of deaf subjects following direct electrical stimulation of the acoustic nerve. Minor pickup of the radio frequency (RF) pulses by the electrode assembly is difficult to eliminate, and a SPARSE acquisition sequence is used to avoid any effects of unintentional auditory nerve stimulation.

RESULTS

The procedure is demonstrated in a deaf volunteer. Activation is observed in the contralateral but not the ipsilateral primary auditory cortex. This is in sharp contrast to studies of auditory processing in hearing subjects, but consistent with the small number of previous positron emission tomography (PET) and MR studies on adult deaf subjects.

CONCLUSION

The fMRI procedure is able to demonstrate whether the auditory pathway is fully intact, and may provide a useful method for preoperative assessment of candidates for cochlear implantation.

Implantation of the malformed cochlea

OBJECTIVE

This study assesses the results of cochlear implantation in children with cochlear malformations.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, matched-pairs analysis of prospectively collected data.

SETTING

University-based regional cochlear implant center.

PATIENTS

Seventeen children with osseous cochlear malformations who had undergone implantation were matched and compared with a group of children with normal cochleae who had undergone implantation.

INTERVENTIONS

All subjects received a multichannel cochlear implant and habilitation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

All subjects were tested with the Early Speech Perception test, and the Glendonald Auditory Speech Perception tests for words and sentences. Patients were classified in a standardized speech perception category based on performance on the Early Speech Perception test.

RESULTS

All subjects demonstrated improving performance on all measures of speech perception over time. Overall, the two groups showed no statistically significant differences in performance at 6 and 24 months. However, subjects with malformed cochleae evidenced slower rates of improvement than did their matched control subjects. Subjects with more severe malformations demonstrated poorer performance, but this may have been attributable to preoperative factors rather than to implant performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with radiographic cochlear malformations benefit from cochlear implantation with multichannel devices. They ultimately perform as well as their matched counterparts with normal cochleae, although they may improve more slowly over time.

The influence of age at implantation on performance with a cochlear implant in children

OBJECTIVE

This study involved the assessment of speech recognition abilities as a function of age at implantation and length of cochlear implant use in children who received the Nucleus CI22M cochlear implant.

STUDY DESIGN

Two separate analyses were performed. The first analysis involved the assessment of speech recognition performance as a function of length of time with a cochlear implant in 48 patients evaluated at 7 years of age. The second analysis involved the assessment of speech recognition performance as a function of age at implantation in 53 patients evaluated 36 months after implantation. Patients were divided into four groups based on length of implant use or age at implantation, and the results were analyzed by a repeated-measures analysis of variance.

SETTING

This study was carried out at a tertiary academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Patients consisted of children implanted with a Nucleus Multi Channel cochlear implant programmed with the SPEAK encoding strategy. Their ages at the time of evaluation ranged from 5.5 to 7.8 years. Their ages at implantation ranged from 2.4 to 14.5 years.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients received a Nucleus Multi Channel cochlear implant programmed with the SPEAK encoding strategy. Word and sentence recognition tests were administered at various ages and at several postimplantation intervals.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Performance as a function of length of cochlear implant use and as a function of age at implantation.

RESULTS

Patients performed significantly better as length of cochlear implant use increased and age at implantation decreased. When patients were tested at a fixed postimplantation time interval (36 months), there was an overall trend for patients who received the implant at a younger age to perform better in spite of being younger at the time of evaluation. However, these effects were not statistically significant for all speech recognition tests that were administered.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm previous findings indicating continued improvement of speech recognition with time in implanted children. Furthermore, the results support the concept of the advantage of a younger age at implantation.

Factors contributing to limited open-set speech perception in children who use a cochlear implant

Cochlear implants have enabled many children with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss to develop speech perception skills. However, some children experience few gains while others develop high levels of speech perception. We identified potential factors contributing to poor performance with an implant by studying implanted children who do not develop functional speech perception. Five children were identified as developing no open-set word recognition skills after at least 2 years of implant use. This study group was compared to a randomly selected control group (n=10) and an age-matched control group (n=5). Pre-implant factors were examined using a Graded Profile Analysis and post-implant factors were assessed in a retrospective chart review. A greater number of pre-implant concerns were raised in the study group than in randomized controls (P<0.01). Chronological age and duration of deafness were pre-implant concerns in all study group subjects. A greater number of post-implant concerns were found in the study group than in randomly selected controls (P<0.005). We conclude that while appropriate selection of candidates for cochlear implantation is important in predicting speech perception outcomes, post-implant follow-up is also essential and must include regular monitoring of equipment, monitoring of stimulation levels with use of objective measures of stimulation levels if necessary, and consistent habilitation.

The prognostic value of promontory electric auditory brain stem response in pediatric cochlear implantation

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that children with clear promontory electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses (prom-EABRs) would outperform, after cochlear implantation, children who had no prom-EABR preoperatively.

DESIGN

A prospective study was undertaken on 47 implanted children assigning them to two groups (group A: 35 children with a clear wave e-V in the preoperative prom-EABR and group B: 12 children with no prom-EABR). Speech perception and speech intelligibility were assessed annually up to 3 yr after implantation with the IOWA sentence test (level A and level B), Connected Discourse Tracking, Categories of Auditory Performance, and Speech Intelligibility Rating. t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the above outcome measures in the two groups.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups on any of the outcome measures at any interval. Moreover, the small differences observed showed no consistent trend toward either group of children. Further analysis revealed that the outcomes have not been affected by possible confounding factors (age at implantation, duration of deafness, preoperative unaided pure-tone thresholds, and number of inserted electrodes).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that children with no prom-EABR performed at levels comparable with children who had clear promontory responses preoperatively. The prognostic value of prom-EABR is limited and absence of a prom-EABR is not, by itself, a contraindication for cochlear implantation. However, in selected cases (congenital malformations, cochlear nerve dysplasia or suspected aplasia, narrow internal auditory canal, etc.) the presence of a prom-EABR is a positive finding in the assessment of candidates for cochlear implantation as it confirms the existence of intact auditory neurones.

Comparison of EAP thresholds with MAP levels in the nucleus 24 cochlear implant: data from children

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between the electrically evoked compound action potential (EAP) thresholds and the MAP thresholds (T-levels) and maximum comfort levels (C-levels) in children implanted with the Nucleus 24 device.

DESIGN

EAP thresholds were measured using the Neural Response Telemetry system of the Nucleus 24 device. Twenty children implanted with the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant participated in this study. EAP thresholds were compared with the behavioral measures of T- and C-level used to construct the MAP these children used on a daily basis. For these subjects, both EAP and MAP T- and C-levels were obtained the same visit, which occurred at 3 to 5 mo postconnection.

RESULTS

EAP thresholds were shown to fall between MAP T- and C-level for 18 of 20 subjects tested; however, considerable variability across subjects was noted. On average, EAP thresholds fell at 53% of the MAP dynamic range. Correlations between EAP threshold and MAP T- and C-level improved substantially when combined with behavioral measures obtained from one electrode in the array.

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate correlations were found between EAP thresholds and MAP T- and C-levels for the children participating in this study. However, a technique is described for improving the accuracy of predictions of MAP T- and C-levels based on EAP data combined with a small amount of behavioral information.

Congenital sensorineural hearing loss and enlarged endolymphatic sac and duct: role of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography

During the past 20 years, there have been significant advances in cochlear implants as the treatment of choice for profoundly hearing-impaired children. The increasing application of cochlear implant has brought with it an increase in the investigational use of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. In this article, the author reviews (a) the anatomy and embryology of the inner ear, (b) the pathological changes associated with congenital sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), and (c) the spectrum of imaging findings in patients with SNHL.

Integrity of the auditory pathway in young children with congenital and postmeningitic deafness

This study compares the functional integrity of the auditory pathways of congenitally deaf and postmeningitically deaf children. We used the electrical auditory brain stem response evoked by promontory stimulation to assess 49 profoundly deaf children before cochlear implantation. The age at implantation ranged from 21 months to 15 years (mean 4.5 years). The onset of deafness was either congenital or up to the age of 2 years (mean 5 months). The cause of deafness was meningitis in 19 children (39%) and congenital in 30 (61%). The number of children with identifiable waveform components (eV, eIII, and eII) was significantly greater in the congenitally deaf group. We also analyzed the amplitudes, the latencies, and 4 parameters of the amplitude input-output functions. All the statistically significant differences were in favor of better responses in the congenitally deaf children. These results suggest that the functional status of the peripheral neurons of the auditory pathways may be more intact in congenitally deaf children than in postmeningitic children.

Summary of results using the nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential

OBJECTIVE

This study outlines a series of experiments using the neural response telemetry (NRT) system of the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant to measure the electrically evoked compound action potential (EAP). The goal of this investigation was to develop a protocol that allows successful recording of the EAP in a majority of CI24M cochlear implant users.

DESIGN

Twenty-six postlingually deafened adults participated in this study. A series of experiments were conducted that allowed us to examine how manipulation of stimulation and recording parameters may affect the morphology of the EAP recorded using the Nucleus NRT system.

RESULTS

Results of this study show consistent responses on at least some electrodes from all subjects. Cross-subject and cross electrode variations in both the growth of the response and the temporal refractory properties of the response were observed. The range of stimulus and recording parameters that can be used to record the EAP with the Nucleus NRT system is described.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the protocol outlined in this study, it is possible to reliably record EAP responses from most subjects and for most electrodes in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users. These responses are robust and recording these responses does not require that the subject sleep or remain still. Based on these results, a specific protocol is proposed for measurement of the EAP using the NRT system of the CI24M cochlear implant. Potential clinical implications of these results are discussed.

Can event-related potentials be evoked by extra-cochlear stimulation and used for selection purposes in cochlear implantation?

To investigate whether electrically evoked event-related responses (P300) could be elicited by extra-cochlear stimulation, measurements were performed on a group of adults fitted with the single-channel extra-cochlear implant. To optimize measurement conditions, and because of the low number of subjects still using an extra-cochlear device in our cochlear implant programme, measurements were also performed on a group of experienced users fitted with the intra-cochlear Nucleus multichannel device. For reference purposes, subjects with normal hearing (control group) were also included in the study. Reproducible late latency responses (N1 and P2 peaks) were found in the five extra-cochlear implant users, while P300s were present in four out of these five subjects. The latencies were longer than those of the control group, but were similar to those obtained in the intra-cochlear implant group. Significant correlations were found for most N1, P2 and P300 measurements evoked by the tonal stimuli and by speech stimuli. The P300 amplitudes, evoked by either tonal or speech stimuli, appeared to be related to speech perception ability. This led to the conclusion that N1, P2 and P300 measurements may have potential as a clinical tool for preoperative prediction and postoperative evaluation of sound processing on a cortical level.

Correlation between electrical auditory brainstem response and perceptual thresholds in Digisonic cochlear implant users

OBJECTIVES

To examine the relationships between psychophysical perceptions and the electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs) in multichannel cochlear implant (CI) users and to determine the effectiveness of EABRs in electrode failure.

DESIGN

A descriptive study reported the EABR characteristics while the different electrodes were activated. Characteristics of the EABR and of the perceptual measures served as compared variables in a correlational study.

SETTING

The study was carried out in the audiology clinic of an otolaryngology department at a university hospital.

PATIENTS

The subjects consisted of nine consecutively selected habitual Digisonic DX1OR multichannel CI users. Seven patients were postlinguistically deafened adult patients; two were congenitally deaf children.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Ipsilateral recordings were performed using a previously published method. Morphology, latency, and amplitude measures of the EABR recordings were described, computed, and compared with the literature data for EABRs obtained while activating other types of CI and for acoustically evoked ABRs. Correlations between EABRs and behavioral perception thresholds were analyzed using the parametric Pearson's correlation test.

RESULTS

EABRs allowed the authors to detect failure of no. 10 electrode integrity in one child. Perceptual threshold measures were found to be highly significantly related to the EABR threshold across subjects and electrode position (n = 31, r = 0.98; P < 0.001; linear regression equation: perceptual threshold = 1.06 EABR threshold + 0.76). The latencies and amplitudes were found to be similar to those described in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

EABRs may be used to estimate settings for the Digisonic DX10 CI even in a pediatric population, although they cannot entirely replace behavioral measurements, especially in children. The EABR can be employed for electrode dysfunction diagnosis. Further studies are needed to determine whether recordings of EABR quality could contribute to the evaluation of functional prognosis during the rehabilitation.

Electrical and physiological changes during short-term and chronic electrical stimulation of the normal cochlea

In the electrical stimulation (ES) of auditory pathways, the type of stimulus and the electrode/tissue interface are critical parameters for the safety and efficacy of the protocol. In this study the influence of alternate pulses, applied between round window and vertex electrodes in chronically implanted guinea pigs, and maintained during 1 and 25 daily periods of 2 h (short-term and long-term experiments, respectively), was investigated. ES consisted of monophasic current pulses of +/- 70 microA and 300 (micro)s in duration at a rate of 167/s, with alternate polarity. Compound Action Potential (CAP) audiograms, amplitudes and latencies of click-evoked CAPs, amplitudes and latencies of electrically-evoked auditory responses (EARs), and electrode impedances, were measured periodically outside or during the ES periods. Short-term ES induced no change in CAP thresholds, amplitude and latency in response to clicks at 80 dB above normal threshold, but induced a slight latency increase and amplitude decrease of the EAR, correlated with an exponential decay of the electrode impedance. On a long-term basis, CAP audiograms and latencies did not change significantly, whereas CAP amplitudes and electrode impedances increased, in correlation with each other. In control guinea pigs receiving no ES, the same CAP amplitude and impedance changes were observed over the same long-term period. The EAR and CAP changes can be explained by a variation of the electrical impedance of the electrode/tissue interface. This is possibly due to a change in electrolytes around the electrode under the influence of the ES for the short-term variation, and to an electrode encapsulation by fibrous tissue independent of the ES for the long-term change. In itself, and under the conditions of this experiment, the ES demonstrated no adverse effects on the auditory function and can be safely used for inner-ear exploration.

Cochlear implantation of children with minimal open-set speech recognition skills

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the postoperative performance of 12 children who demonstrated some open-set speech recognition skills before receiving a Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant with a view toward expanding the selection criteria for cochlear implant candidacy to include children who derive minimal benefit from amplification.

DESIGN

Pre- and postoperative performance of two groups of children were compared. Group 1 consisted of 12 children who demonstrated some open-set speech recognition skills before receiving a Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant (Borderline group). Group 2 consisted of 12 children who demonstrated no open-set speech recognition skills before implantation with a Nucleus device (Traditional group). In all children, candidacy was determined based on preimplant binaural aided performance. For most subjects, the poorer ear was selected for implantation. Mean pre- and postoperative speech recognition scores of the Borderline subjects were compared to determine the benefit provided by their cochlear implants. Secondly, matched-pair analyses were used to compare the mean speech recognition scores obtained by the Borderline and Traditional subjects.

RESULTS

The scores of the Borderline group improved significantly on five of six speech recognition measures when 6 mo postoperative scores obtained with the implant were compared with preoperative test scores obtained with hearing aids. By the 12 mo postoperative interval, the scores of the Borderline group had improved significantly (p < 0.05) on all six measures. In contrast, scores obtained by the Traditional group had improved significantly on three of six measures at both the 6 and 12 mo postoperative intervals. Comparison of postoperative test scores revealed that the Borderline group scored significantly higher than the Traditional group on three of six measures at the 6 mo test interval and on six of six measures at the 12 mo test interval (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study indicate that both groups derive significant benefit from their cochlear implants. Although the mean preoperative audiograms for the implanted ears did not differ significantly for the two groups of subjects, members of the Borderline group exhibited significantly better speech recognition skills than the Traditional group during the first year after implantation. These findings suggest that the increased auditory experience of the Borderline subjects positively influenced their performance with a cochlear implant. The authors advocate that the selection criteria used to determine pediatric cochlear implant candidacy be broadened to include consideration of children who demonstrate minimal open-set speech recognition skills.

Adult and Pediatric Cochlear Implant Programs at the University of Michigan

The Cochlear Implant Program at the University of Michigan has evolved over the past several years and is strongly dependent on a team approach to clinical care. Members of the team work closely together to assist patients and their families as they participate in the implant evaluation and rehabilitation process. We feel fortunate that we have been able to help so many profoundly deaf individuals and look forward to continued growth and future advances that will inevitably come about in the field of cochlear implants.