Are immunizations an incentive for well-child visits?

Impact of immunization at sick visits on well-child care

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the impact of immunization at sick visits on subsequent and overall well-child care.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data from 4 urban practices affiliated with an academic medical center. Participants included all children born between September 1, 2003, and July 31, 2004, with a visit at a study practice before 6 weeks of age and > or = 1 sick visit (n = 1675). The main outcome measures were (1) attendance at a well-child visit within 60 days after an index sick visit by children due for vaccines and preventive care and (2) the overall number of well-child visits kept by children between 6 weeks and 13 months of age.

RESULTS

Among all demographic and health-related factors considered, immunization receipt at a sick visit was associated most strongly with decreased subsequent well-child care. Among children already delayed (late) for vaccines, 31% returned for well-child care if immunizations were given at eligible sick visits, compared with 47% of those who received no vaccines (risk difference, with adjustment for covariates: -16%). Among those without immunization delay, 42% of children who received vaccines returned for well-child care, compared with 73% of those who received no vaccines (risk difference: -31%). Although 5 well-child visits are recommended, children with no immunizations at sick visits had an adjusted predicted number of 3.8 well-child visits, those with 1 sick visit with immunizations had 3.3 visits, and those with > or = 2 sick visits with immunizations had 2.8 visits between 6 weeks and 13 months of age.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunization at sick visits was associated with decreased rates of well-child care, especially among those without previous vaccine delay. This strong association between immunization at sick visits and well-child care should be considered in any plan to restructure pediatric preventive care.

Impact of clinical alerts within an electronic health record on routine childhood immunization in an urban pediatric population

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that clinical alerts for routine pediatric vaccinations within an electronic health record would reduce missed opportunities for vaccination and improve immunization rates for young children in an inner-city population.

METHODS

A 1-year intervention study (September 1, 2004, to August 31, 2005) with historical controls was conducted in 4 urban primary care centers affiliated with an academic medical center. All children who were younger than 24 months were enrolled. Electronic health record-based clinical reminders for routine childhood vaccinations were programmed to appear prominently at every patient encounter with vaccines due. The main outcome measures were rates of captured immunization opportunities and overall immunization rates at 24 months of age.

RESULTS

Immunization alerts appeared at 15,928 visits during the intervention. Alert implementation was associated with increases in captured immunization opportunities from 78.2% to 90.3% at well visits and from 11.3% to 32.0% at sick visits. Adjusted up-to-date immunization rates at 24 months of age increased from 81.7% to 90.1% from the control to intervention period. Children in the intervention group also became up-to-date earlier than control patients. Patient characteristics were stable throughout the study.

CONCLUSIONS

An electronic health record-based clinical alert intervention was associated with increases in captured opportunities for vaccination at both sick and well visits and significant improvements in immunization rates at 2 years of age. As electronic health records become more common in medical practice, such systems may transform immunization delivery to children.

Improving the health of infants on Medicaid by collocating special supplemental nutrition clinics with managed care provider sites

OBJECTIVES

This study tested whether collocation of Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) clinics at managed care provider sites improved health care for infants enrolled in Medicaid and WIC.

METHODS

Weights and immunization rates were studied for the 1997 birth cohort of African American infants enrolled in WIC and Medicaid in Detroit, Mich. Infants using traditional WIC clinics and health services were compared with those enrolled under Medicaid in 2 managed care organizations (MCOs), of whom about half obtained WIC services at MCO provider sites.

RESULTS

Compared with other infants, those who used collocated WIC sites either were closer to their age-appropriate weight or had higher immunization rates when recertified by WIC after their first birthday. Specific benefits (weight gain or immunizations) varied according to the priorities at the collocated sites operated by the 2 MCOs.

CONCLUSIONS

Collocation of WIC clinics at MCO sites can improve health care of low-income infants. However specific procedures for cooperation between WIC staff and other MCO staff are required to achieve this benefit.

Vaccination visits in early childhood: just one more visit to be fully vaccinated

BACKGROUND

This study characterizes the healthcare visits at which children receive vaccinations, including the number of these visits and the number of vaccinations that are administered.

METHODS

The 1999 National Immunization Survey (NIS) is a nationally representative sample of children aged 19 to 35 months, verified by provider records, that is conducted to obtain estimates of vaccination coverage rates. We describe the number of healthcare visits in which one or more vaccinations were given, the number of vaccinations given at these visits, and the number of visits and vaccinations needed for an underimmunized child to complete the recommended vaccination series.

RESULTS

Of the children who did not receive all doses of the recommended vaccinations (4:3:1:3:3 vaccination series), three fourths had four or more immunization visits. Vaccination coverage increased as the number of visits increased, and children who had completed the series were more likely to receive multiple vaccinations than those who had not. Most children (70.7%) received a maximum of four vaccinations in any immunization visit. The majority of children (73.5%) who had not completed the 4:3:1:3:3 vaccination series needed only a single visit to complete the series. The majority (61.7%) of children who needed only one visit also needed only one additional vaccination.

CONCLUSIONS

While estimated national coverage for all recommended vaccinations is considerably below the Healthy People 2000 and Healthy People 2010 goal of 90%, achieving this goal is in essence just one visit away. If all children who needed one more visit were to receive that final visit, the national coverage among children 19 to 35 months for all recommended vaccinations would be 93%.

Applying workflow analysis tools to assess immunization delivery in outpatient primary care settings

BACKGROUND

As health care organizations face increasing pressure to institute quality assurance activities, the already-underfunded community clinics that treat the poor and underserved are challenged to perform these activities within tight constraints of human and financial resources. With pediatric immunizations as a marker, a workflow observation tool was used to identify causal processes affecting immunization delivery.

METHODS

Ten clinics and five private practices, located in areas designated as health professional shortage areas, participated in the study, gaining access to a tool that would have been unaffordable to them from the private sector. Trained observers followed families through the clinic, using a 127-item workflow observation form--the Observational Checklist of Patient Encounters (OCPE)--assessing discrete activities that families encountered during the checkin/pre-exam, exam, discharge, and billing processes. A convenience sampling of the targeted population--children younger than three years of age--included observations of scheduled acute, scheduled well-child, follow-up, and walk-in visits. In the feedback session, a summary of each clinic's immunization delivery patterns was presented, with an emphasis on the individual health center's operational issues.

RESULTS

The workflow observation tool was used to identify operational errors affecting both clinical and fiscal processes in each of the clinics that had not been previously apparent to either clinic management or the quality improvement (QI) teams.

DISCUSSION

Feedback addressed and encouraged process-oriented improvements in response to the workflow observations, which were incorporated into the clinics' QI procedures. Twelve of the 15 clinics have formed process action teams to address QI issues on an ongoing basis.

Immunization levels and risk factors for low immunization coverage among private practices

OBJECTIVES

Previous studies have indicated that provider characteristics are an important determinant of immunization coverage. The objectives of this study were to: 1) assess immunization coverage levels among 2-year-old children receiving care in private practices in 3 California counties; and 2) evaluate practice and patient risk factors for low immunization coverage.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional chart review of immunization histories and provider survey of immunization policies.

SETTING

Forty-five randomly selected, private medical practices in 3 counties in California.

PATIENTS

Children 12 to 35 months old, followed by the participating practices.

METHODS

Providers underwent a detailed assessment of their immunization coverage and completed a questionnaire describing their immunization policies and procedures. Immunization data were abstracted from randomly selected medical charts of children 12 to 35 months old. Only patients who met the criteria for active status (>/=2 visits and >/=1 visit during the preceding 18 months) were included in analyses. Immunization coverage levels were calculated and logistic regression was used to estimate the risk of underimmunization associated with different practice and child characteristics.

RESULTS

Of the 72 eligible practices that were contacted, 45 participated in the study, yielding a participation rate of 62%. The median immunization coverage of participating offices was 54% (range: 0%-91%). Multivariate analysis revealed 5 independent risk factors for underimmunization. The strongest predictors were having fewer than 50% active children in the practice and children having fewer than 8 visits to the provider. Other significant predictors were the percentage of patients in the practice on Medicaid, administering diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis 4 at a separate visit from the Haemophilus influenzae type b booster, and practice location.

CONCLUSIONS

These data provide new insights into immunization practices in an important clinical setting that has been poorly characterized previously. Immunization coverage levels were found to be low and significant risk factors for underimmunization were identified. Recommendations are made for immunization policy changes and targeting of immunization improvement interventions at practices that may be at risk for low immunization coverage. immunization, vaccination, immunization programs, primary prevention, private practice, child, preschool, pediatrics, family practice.

The relation of parent and provider characteristics to vaccination status of children in private practices and managed care organizations in Maryland

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to identify provider practices and policies in private pediatric settings that relate to vaccination status, controlling for the characteristics of the children served.

METHODS

Vaccination data came from the medical records of 709 randomly selected 2-year-old children at 18 private practices and managed care organizations in Maryland, family data from 466 telephone interviews with the children's parents, and provider characteristics from 18 site questionnaires and 42 individual physician and nurse practitioner questionnaires. Logistic regression and generalized estimating equations were used to estimate the relation of provider characteristics to vaccination status. Three age-appropriate (AA) and two up-to-date (UTD) vaccination status variables characterized successful vaccination.

RESULTS

Approximately 70% of the study children were up-to-date by age 2 years for the full vaccination series, excluding hepatitis B vaccine. Family demographic characteristics were the strongest correlates of undervaccination. Neither parents' knowledge and attitudes about immunization nor the children's insurance coverage was statistically related to vaccination status. Site reminder or follow-up systems and provider perceptions about appointment scheduling and receipt of vaccine information from health departments were positively related to vaccination. Concern for liability was associated with a reduced odds of age-appropriate and up-to-date vaccination.

CONCLUSIONS

Family demographics strongly correlate with vaccination status; however, they are generally not modifiable. This study's findings encourage providers to operate a tracking system, to remain current on immunization recommendations, to use all clinical encounters to screen and vaccinate children, and to ensure the availability and convenience of vaccination services.

Parent reports on willingness to accept childhood immunizations during urgent care visits

OBJECTIVES

To 1) describe whether parents would be willing to accept childhood immunizations at urgent care visits; and 2) identify predictors of parents' willingness to accept childhood immunizations at urgent care visits.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

Cross-sectional telephone survey of parents of children aged 18 to 24 months who were underimmunized according to a computerized immunization tracking system and who had recently made an urgent care visit in a regional group-model health maintenance organization in Northern California. Chart review was conducted to confirm immunization status and to identify contraindications to vaccination.

RESULTS

Of the 424 eligible participants, 351 (83%) completed interviews. Children with contraindications to vaccination and children who were actually up-to-date at the time of the urgent care visit were excluded, leaving 263 families in the final analysis. Among these parents, 75% said they would have been willing to have their child immunized at the urgent care visit in question if the physician had suggested it. An additional 11% said they would have accepted vaccination if the physician told them that the shot would be safe and strongly encouraged them to accept it. Overall, 86% reported they theoretically would have accepted an immunization during the urgent care visit. In the multivariate analysis, the strongest predictors of stated willingness to accept shots at the urgent care visit were the parent: 1) not being aware that their child was underimmunized (odds ratio [OR] 3.5, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-7.7); 2) perceiving that the child was not very sick at the visit (OR 1.8, 95% CI, 1.1-3.0); 3) being less concerned about the risk of shots (OR 1.8, 95% CI, 1.2-2.5); and 4) being of nonwhite race (OR 3.6, 95% CI, 1.6-7.7). Income and education were not significantly associated with reported willingness to accept immunization.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that most parents of underimmunized toddlers report being willing to accept immunizations during urgent care visits if the clinician recommends it. More effective ways of alerting providers in urgent care settings when immunizations are due, such as indications on a chart or registration form, hold promise for improving immunization coverage rates.