Early tangential excision of the eschars of major burns

Why is priority setting important for global burn care research?

The use of robust evidence is a key component of providing high quality care to patients. Synthesised evidence to support clinical decision-making is lacking for many aspects of clinical burn care. Identifying the most important areas of care that lack high quality evidence and requires research is necessary, as funding for primary research is limited. Priority setting research studies are a joint endeavour between patients, carers and clinicians to identify and rank topics for research in a healthcare area in order to reduce research waste. Such an exercise has yet to be undertaken in burns. The aim of this paper is to outline the importance of research prioritisation in burn care, to discuss how it facilitates the maximum benefit from limited research funding and to explain the methodologies used.

The use of banked skin in the Burns Centre of Verona

BACKGROUND

The use of glycerol and subsequent research enabling the conservation of tissues over time have led to the establishment and development of tissue banks, first in the USA and then in Europe. The Verona Tissue Bank was instituted in 2003 as the Regional Centre for the storage of skin and bone, adding to the already existing Italian banks at Turin, Milan, Cesena and Siena. This retrospective study analyses the use of banked skin (autologous and allogeneic grafts) from April 2003 (date of starting activity) to December 2007, in 171 patients with burns and four with necrotising fasciitis at the Burns Centre of Verona.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Homologous skin was used for superficial and deep skin burns to protect the residual structures, thus facilitating healing by spontaneous re-epithelialisation, and for deep burns after eschar removal to clean and prepare the base of the lesion for the definitive autologous graft. The placement of a homologous graft alone led to spontaneous healing of lesions in 65 patients (36 aged >15 years and 29 aged <15 years) with superficial skin burns, while the remaining 106 patients (84 aged >15 years and 22 aged <15 years) with deeper burns underwent surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The results obtained confirm the essential role of banked skin in covering superficial burns in order to protect important underlying structures and in deep burns by guaranteeing a good preparation of the base of the lesion for the subsequent definitive autologous graft.

An historical perspective on advances in burn care over the past 100 years

The accelerated pace of clinical and laboratory research over the past century and application of the research findings to patient care have resulted in unprecedented survival of burned patients in all age groups. Resuscitation based on an understanding of the nature and magnitude of the multisystem response to injury now prevents burn shock; effective topical antimicrobial chemotherapy and early excision prevent wound toxemia and sepsis; biologic and bioengineered dressings compensate for the missing skin; and broad spectrum metabolic support regimens prevent exhaustion and accelerate convalescence. Rehabilitation programs have also been developed to restore physical function and permit the burn patient to reenter society as a productive individual.

Surgical excision of the burn wound

Early excision of the burn eschar has been one of the most significant advances in modern burn care. Historical advances in understanding of the pathophysiology of burn injury and the systemic inflammatory response fueled by the burn wound, and refinements in the techniques of tangential and fascial excision, have led to earlier excision and grafting of the burn wound with improvements in morbidity and mortality. Efforts to control blood loss, and good operative planning and attention to special areas, can lead to the safe excision and grafting of large burns.

[Early surgical management of severe burns]

The success of modern burn therapy is based on an understanding of the pathophysiology and application of burn intensive care implying fluid resuscitation and management of pulmonary or other organ failure. With the development of early eschar excision and wound closure by immediate grafting, survival and cosmetic outcome were further improved. Especially in post-acute therapy, early physical rehabilitation, early reintegration, and early plastic surgical correction of the sequelae are indispensable for the outcome.

Burn wound infections

Burns are one of the most common and devastating forms of trauma. Patients with serious thermal injury require immediate specialized care in order to minimize morbidity and mortality. Significant thermal injuries induce a state of immunosuppression that predisposes burn patients to infectious complications. A current summary of the classifications of burn wound infections, including their diagnosis, treatment, and prevention, is given. Early excision of the eschar has substantially decreased the incidence of invasive burn wound infection and secondary sepsis, but most deaths in severely burn-injured patients are still due to burn wound sepsis or complications due to inhalation injury. Burn patients are also at risk for developing sepsis secondary to pneumonia, catheter-related infections, and suppurative thrombophlebitis. The introduction of silver-impregnated devices (e.g., central lines and Foley urinary catheters) may reduce the incidence of nosocomial infections due to prolonged placement of these devices. Improved outcomes for severely burned patients have been attributed to medical advances in fluid resuscitation, nutritional support, pulmonary and burn wound care, and infection control practices.

Burn wound infections

Burns are one of the most common and devastating forms of trauma. Patients with serious thermal injury require immediate specialized care in order to minimize morbidity and mortality. Significant thermal injuries induce a state of immunosuppression that predisposes burn patients to infectious complications. A current summary of the classifications of burn wound infections, including their diagnosis, treatment, and prevention, is given. Early excision of the eschar has substantially decreased the incidence of invasive burn wound infection and secondary sepsis, but most deaths in severely burn-injured patients are still due to burn wound sepsis or complications due to inhalation injury. Burn patients are also at risk for developing sepsis secondary to pneumonia, catheter-related infections, and suppurative thrombophlebitis. The introduction of silver-impregnated devices (e.g., central lines and Foley urinary catheters) may reduce the incidence of nosocomial infections due to prolonged placement of these devices. Improved outcomes for severely burned patients have been attributed to medical advances in fluid resuscitation, nutritional support, pulmonary and burn wound care, and infection control practices.

The management of complicated charcoal contact burns involving deep tissues

This report describes the management of a charcoal burn involving deep tissues at different anatomic sites. The closure of burn wounds should be considered as a functional and cosmetic outcome whenever possible. Our aim should be to get the soft tissue of the early burned wound closed. A satisfactory result can be achieved if both the functional anatomy and the aesthetic outcome can be kept in mind while planning the management.

Skin resurfacing for the burned patient

It has been estimated that 2 million people per year have burns requiring medical attention in the United States. The available and expert clinicians in dedicated burn centers around the country have cared successfully for these patients and given them a second chance at a functional life. It still behooves current-day plastic surgeons to be knowledgeable and adept in their care, not only because they may be called upon at times to manage some of the smaller acute burns, but also because many of the general principles of burn reconstruction and wound management are relevant to other areas of general plastic surgery. Acute burns should be dealt with like any other major trauma with the ABCs of aggressive resuscitation and airway management. Like any other wound, debridement and nutrition are important (i.e., early escharectomy of the burn wound and enteral nutrition during the hypermetabolic state). Early coverage of the open wound is essential to limit bacterial colonization and prevent infection and to reduce fluid and electrolyte and heat loss. If autografts are not available immediately, temporary coverage with one of the above-mentioned barrier materials should be used. Still, autografts, when available, should be the burn surgeon's first choice. Donor sites may be reharvested to provide more autograft than was anticipated with large-percentage TBSA burns. Physicians should keep in mind the advantages (and disadvantages) of using the scalp and back. As far as research and technological advances in the area of plastic surgery, burn surgery may be the most progressive, with the evolution of biologic tissue-engineered skin substitutes and the research of growth factors in healing. Further improvements in tissue engineering and technology should result in even more effective skin substitutes and hence better functional and aesthetic outcomes with economic efficiency in large burns.

Prolonged intermittent hydrotherapy and early tangential excision in the treatment of an extensive strong alkali burn

It is well known that the first step in the treatment of cutaneous strong alkali burn is very early and persistent washing of the site of injury with large volumes of water. However, ideal duration and the technique of hydrotherapy has not yet been established. Besides hydrotherapy, tangential excision of the injured skin might prevent further tissue damage if it is performed early enough. We report the treatment of a 36-year-old male who sustained 53% body surface area (BSA) cutaneous burn due to caustic soda (NaOH). Prolonged intermittent hydrotherapy, early tangential excision and autografting of the injured skin are the keys for the proper management of extensive strong alkali burn.

Reduced blood loss during burn surgery

The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of subcutaneous injection of burn wounds and skin graft donor sites with an adrenaline-saline solution to reduce blood loss during burn surgery. This retrospective study reviewed the requirements of blood products in 30 randomly selected adult patients with more than 10% body area burned, who had at least one burn operation at a university regional burn center, between January 1991 and June 1997. Patients were matched by age and percent body area burned and stratified according to the surgical technique in two groups. In Group 1, 15 patients received the modified tumescent surgical technique: subcutaneous injection of adrenaline (1 part/million in warm saline solution) into the subcutaneous tissue of the donor sites for autologous skin graft and areas of burn eschar to be excised, combined with pneumatic tourniquets in extremities and saline-adrenaline soaked nonadherent pads. In Group 2, 15 patients received the traditional surgical technique: soaked gauze compresses with an adrenaline-thrombin solution (1 ml of 1:1,000 adrenaline, thrombin 10,000 units, and 1 L of normal saline). Outcome measures, transfusion of blood products, operating time and complications between the two patient groups were analyzed using the Wilcoxon 2-sample test. The two patient groups were not different by age (40.4 +/- 19.4 vs 38.9 +/- 17.9), percent total body area burned (27.6 +/- 15.4 vs 32.8 +/- 13.4), or percent full thickness burn (7.0 +/- 8.5 vs 11.5 +/- 8.5). The modified tumescent surgical technique significantly reduced mean total blood units transfused per patient (7.9 +/- 11.5 vs 15.7 +/- 12.9 units; P = .031), and the mean blood units transfused intraoperatively per patient (4.7 +/- 7.8 vs 8.9 +/- 8.0 units; P = .026). The modified tumescent surgical technique significantly reduced the intraoperative and total blood transfusion requirements in our thermally injured patients.

Benefits and limitations of burn wound excision

This review is intended to provide a balanced view of the role of surgical burn wound excision and closure within the larger context of the total care and rehabilitation of patients with burn injury. The historical background leading to present practice is outlined. The salient technical and logistical problems associated with the performance of wound excision are discussed, with emphasis on the necessity for expeditiously completing these procedures which are associated with major blood loss. A realistic analysis of the results of excisional therapy in patients with burns of varying severity is presented. Benefits attributable to the surgical phase of therapy become progressively more difficult to identify as the size of deep burns increases beyond 20% of total body surface area.

Early burn wound excision significantly reduces blood loss

The hypothesis that near-total early excision of large burns in children can be performed safely with a reduction in blood loss was tested. Of 1662 acutely burned patients admitted to this institution between 1982 and 1989, 594 underwent near-total excision of cutaneous flame or scald burn injuries in a single procedure. Operations took less than 3 hours and there were no operative deaths. Blood losses in burns of more than 30% total body surface area (TBSA) were significantly less at 0.40 +/- 0.06 mL/cm2 and 0.49 +/- 0.49 mL/cm2 excised when surgery was performed within the first 24 hours or after the 16th day after burn, respectively, when compared to 0.75 +/- 0.02 mL/cm2 for those excised between 2 and 16 days after burn (p less than 0.05). Blood loss for burns of less than 30% TBSA was of 1.19 +/- 0.13 mL/cm2. Early excision did not increase mortality rate when compared to later excision times. We suggest that near-total excision of large burns within the first 24 hours reduces blood requirements and morbidity without adversely altering hemodynamic stability or increasing mortality risks.

The burn patient: II. Later care and complications of thermal injury

The care necessary for the extensively burned patient is of an intensity, variety and duration most effectively and economically provided by the multidisciplinary staff of a specialized treatment facility. The organization of burn care in the United States has been well regionalized in recognition of this fact. The burn care given and the research carried out at burn units and burn centers has led to the identification of the pathophysiologic changes, the development of new treatments and the improvement in functional result and survival described in this review.

Pulmonary complications of burns: the major threat to the burn patient

Images