1
|
Rajendran V, Joy D, Sudheer Mohammed, Chandran B, Jacob M. Management of Preoperative Recipient Portal Vein Thrombosis in Living-donor Liver Transplantation. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2025; 15:102445. [PMID: 39802411 PMCID: PMC11714416 DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2024.102445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2024] [Accepted: 10/17/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2025] Open
Abstract
Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) occurs as a part of the natural history of cirrhosis in up to 15% of patients with cirrhosis. In the initial days, PVT was considered a contraindication to liver transplantation, but now with advanced techniques and perioperative management, patients with complex PVT also undergo living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) with a similar outcome. This review provides a comprehensive overview of methods to proceed with liver transplantation when the recipient has PVT. Preoperatively, anticoagulation remains the mainstay of treatment, with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) playing an adjunct role in preparing patients for liver transplantation. In all patients, thrombectomy with re-establishment of physiological portal flow is the initial step. In patients where flow cannot be established, other physiological or nonphysiological means are employed, especially in complex PVT. Patients with grade III/IV PVT have worse outcomes (graft failure, mortality, recurrence) than those with lower-grade PVT. Physiological reconstruction is the method of choice, whereas non-physiological means are used as a bailout procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek Rajendran
- Aster Integrated Liver Care, Aster Medcity, Cheranallur, Kochi 682027, India
| | - Danny Joy
- Aster Integrated Liver Care, Aster Medcity, Cheranallur, Kochi 682027, India
| | - Sudheer Mohammed
- Aster Integrated Liver Care, Aster Medcity, Cheranallur, Kochi 682027, India
| | - Biju Chandran
- Aster Integrated Liver Care, Aster Medcity, Cheranallur, Kochi 682027, India
| | - Mathew Jacob
- Aster Integrated Liver Care, Aster Medcity, Cheranallur, Kochi 682027, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Patwardhan S, Hong J, Weiner J. Update on Maintenance Immunosuppression in Intestinal Transplantation. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2024; 53:493-507. [PMID: 39068010 PMCID: PMC11284276 DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2023.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
Outcomes in intestinal transplantation remain hampered by higher rates of rejection than any other solid organs. However, maintenance immunosuppression regimens have largely remained unchanged despite advances in therapies for induction and treatment of rejection and graft-versus-host disease. Recently, there have been a small number of new maintenance therapies attempted, and older agents have been used in new ways to achieve better outcomes. The authors herein review the traditional maintenance therapies and their mechanisms and then consider updates in new therapies and new ways of using old therapies for maintenance immunosuppression after intestinal transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satyajit Patwardhan
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, 650 West 168th Street, BB1705, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Julie Hong
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, 650 West 168th Street, BB1705, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Joshua Weiner
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, 650 West 168th Street, BB1705, New York, NY 10032, USA; Division of Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, PH14-105, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Di Cocco P, Martinino A, Lian A, Johnson J, Spaggiari M, Tzvetanov I, Benedetti E. Indications for Multivisceral Transplantation: A Systematic Review. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2024; 53:245-264. [PMID: 38719376 DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2024.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
Consensus remains elusive in the definition and indications of multivisceral transplantation (MVT) within the transplant community. MVT encompasses transplantation of all organs reliant on the celiac artery axis and the superior mesenteric artery in different combinations. Some institutions classify MVT as involving the grafting of the stomach or ascending colon in addition to the jejunoileal complex. MVT indications span a wide spectrum of conditions, including tumors, intestinal dysmotility disorders, and trauma. This systematic review aims to consolidate existing literature on MVT cases and their indications, providing an organizational framework to comprehend the current criteria for MVT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierpaolo Di Cocco
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alessandro Martinino
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Amy Lian
- University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jess Johnson
- University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mario Spaggiari
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ivo Tzvetanov
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Enrico Benedetti
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Raghu VK, Rumbo C, Horslen SP. From intestinal failure to transplantation: Review on the current need for transplant indications under multidisciplinary transplant programs worldwide. Pediatr Transplant 2024; 28:e14756. [PMID: 38623905 PMCID: PMC11115375 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2023] [Revised: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Intestinal failure, defined as the loss of gastrointestinal function to the point where nutrition cannot be maintained by enteral intake alone, presents numerous challenges in children, not least the timing of consideration of intestine transplantation. OBJECTIVES To describe the evolution of care of infants and children with intestinal failure including parenteral nutrition, intestine transplantation, and contemporary intestinal failure care. METHODS The review is based on the authors' experience supported by an in-depth review of the published literature. RESULTS The history of parenteral nutrition, including out-patient (home) administration, and intestine transplantation are reviewed along with the complications of intestinal failure that may become indications for consideration of intestine transplantation. Current management strategies for children with intestinal failure are discussed along with changes in need for intestine transplantation, recognizing the difficulty in generalizing recommendations due to the high level of heterogeneity of intestinal pathology and residual bowel anatomy and function. DISCUSSION Advances in the medical and surgical care of children with intestinal failure have resulted in improved transplant-free survival and a significant fall in demand for transplantation. Despite these improvements a number of children continue to fail rehabilitative care and require intestine transplantation as life-saving therapy or when the burden on ongoing parenteral nutrition becomes too great to bear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikram K. Raghu
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15224
| | - Carolina Rumbo
- Unidad de Soporte Nutricional, Rehabilitación y Trasplante Intestinal Hospital Universitario Fundación Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Simon P. Horslen
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15224
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gondolesi GE. History of clinical intestinal transplantation. Hum Immunol 2024; 85:110788. [PMID: 38519405 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2024.110788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
The intestines have been considered the "forbidden organ" for years, and intestinal failure became the last organ failure recognized as such in the medical field. The impossibility of providing adequate nutritional support, turned these patients into recipients of just palliative comfort. In the 1960's, parenteral nutrition appeared as the most reasonable replacement therapy, but the initial success obtained with clinical kidney, heart, liver, lung and pancreas transplantation served as background to explore intestinal transplantation. The first clinical report of an isolated intestinal transplant was done by Richard Lillihei in 1967; in 1983, Thomas Starzl, performed the first multi visceral transplant, and in 1990, David Grant performed the first combined liver-intestinal transplant in an adult recipient in Canada. Since then, advances in immunosuppressive therapies and surgical innovations have allowed not only a continuous increase in indications, but also a worldwide application of all procedures, bringing clinical intestinal transplantation to reality. In this historical account, the most important contributions have been summarized, thus describing the steady progress, expansion and novelties developed over the last 56 years, since the first attempt. Clinical intestinal transplantation remains a complex and evolving field; ongoing research and technological advancements will continue shaping its future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel E Gondolesi
- Chief of General Surgery, Chief of Liver, Intestine and Pancreas Transplant, Hospital Universitario, Fundación Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abreu P, Manzi J, Vianna R. Innovative surgical techniques in the intestine and multivisceral transplant. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2024; 29:88-96. [PMID: 37902277 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This timely review delves into the evolution of multivisceral transplantation (MVT) over the past six decades underscoring how advancements in surgical techniques and immunosuppression have driven transformation, to provide insight into the historical development of MVT, shedding light on its journey from experimentation to a valuable clinical approach. RECENT FINDINGS The review presents contemporary enhancements in surgical methods within the context of intestinal transplantation. The versatility of MVT is emphasized, accommodating diverse organ combinations and techniques. Both isolated intestinal transplantation (IIT) and MVT have seen expanded indications, driven by improved parenteral nutrition, transplantation outcomes, and surgical innovations. Surgical techniques are tailored based on graft type, with various approaches for isolated transplantation. Preservation strategies and ostomy techniques are also covered, along with graft assessment advancements involving donor-specific antibodies. SUMMARY This review's findings underscore the remarkable evolution of MVT from experimental origins to a comprehensive clinical practice. The progress in surgical techniques and immunosuppression has broadened the spectrum of patients who can benefit from intestinal transplant, including both IIT and MVT. The expansion of indications offers hope to patients with complex gastrointestinal disorders. The detection of donor-specific antibodies in graft assessment advances diagnostic accuracy, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phillipe Abreu
- Department of Surgery, University of Miami, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami Transplant Institute, Florida, USA
| | - Joao Manzi
- Department of Surgery, University of Miami, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami Transplant Institute, Florida, USA
- University of Sao Paulo Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Rodrigo Vianna
- Department of Surgery, University of Miami, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami Transplant Institute, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Moris D, Cox MW, Williams Z. Endovascular Treatment of a Multi-visceral Aortic Conduit Blowout With Parallel Stent Grafts and Coils. Cureus 2024; 16:e53707. [PMID: 38455807 PMCID: PMC10919244 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Multi-visceral transplantation (MVT) is a complex surgical procedure involving the transplantation of multiple abdominal organs as a single unit, typically used as bailout treatment of patients with devastating abdominal pathologies. Due to the complexity of the procedure, major and even life-threatening complications can happen. Vascular complications, including anastomotic breakdowns or pseudoaneurysms due to infections, can be universally lethal. Open surgical repair is often not an option due to the hostile operative field. We report a case of endovascular salvage of multi-visceral aortic conduit blowout utilizing parallel stent grafts and coils without sacrifice of the transplanted viscera. This combination can successfully control bleeding and maintain graft perfusion in this rare but devastating complication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Moris
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, USA
| | - Mitchell W Cox
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, USA
| | - Zachary Williams
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dasyam AK, Borhani AA, Tirukkovalur NV, Cruz RJ. Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantation: Complications. Radiol Clin North Am 2023; 61:871-887. [PMID: 37495294 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2023.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
Advancements in immunosuppression protocols, surgical techniques, and postoperative care in the last few decades have improved outcomes of intestinal transplant patients. Normal immediate postoperative imaging appearance can simulate pathology. Intestinal transplant recipients are prone for several postoperative complications due to the complex surgical technique, which involves multiple anastomoses, and immunogenic nature of the allograft intestine. Imaging plays a crucial role in detection of several major complications including infectious, immunologic, vascular, gastrointestinal, pancreaticobiliary, genitourinary, and neoplastic complications. The awareness of the posttransplant anatomy and normal imaging appearances helps radiologists anticipate and accurately detect posttransplant complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anil K Dasyam
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15216, USA.
| | - Amir A Borhani
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 North Street Claire Street, Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Nikhil V Tirukkovalur
- Kamineni Academy of Medical Science and Research Centre, LB Nagar, Hyderabad, TG 500068, India
| | - Ruy J Cruz
- Intestinal Rehabilitation and Multivisceral Transplant Program, Starzl Transplant Institute
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Maklad M, Mazariegos G, Ganoza A. Pediatric intestine and multivisceral transplant. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2023; 28:316-325. [PMID: 37418582 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Intestinal and multivisceral transplantation (ITx, MVTx) is the cornerstone in treatment of irreversible intestinal failure (IF) and complications related to parenteral nutrition. This review aims to highlight the unique aspects of the subject in pediatrics. RECENT FINDINGS Etiology of intestinal failure (IF) in children shares some similarity with adults but several unique considerations when being evaluated for transplantation will be discussed. Owing to significant advancement in IF management and home parenteral nutrition (PN), indication criteria for pediatric transplantation continues to be updated. Outcomes have continued to improve with current long-term patient and graft survival in multicenter registry reports reported at 66.1% and 48.8% at 5 years, respectively. Pediatric specific surgical challenges such abdominal closure, post transplantation outcomes, and quality of life are discussed in this review. SUMMARY ITx and MVTx remain lifesaving treatment for many children with IF. However long-term graft function is still a major challenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Maklad
- Hillman Center for Pediatric Transplantation, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ferreira MA, Ouverney LFF, Figueiredo MC, David AI. Immunosuppression Protocols in Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantation-A Literature Review. Transplant Proc 2023; 55:1431-1436. [PMID: 37088617 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intestinal transplantation (IT) and multivisceral transplantation (MVT) are curative therapies for patients with intestinal failure and severe complications associated with total parenteral nutrition. High levels of immunosuppression are required to prevent acute cellular rejection (ACR) from the bowel. Studies regarding pre-treatment, induction, and post-transplant therapy have improved graft acceptance, reducing immunosuppression doses and infectious complications. However, the low rate of IT and MVT and the small number of specialized centers have resulted in a limited number of evidence-based immunosuppression protocols. We reviewed immunosuppression in IT and MVT to draw useful conclusions regarding the best protocol strategies for the induction, maintenance, and management of ACR. METHODS A review was performed using the PubMed database. Articles on immunosuppression protocols in IT and MVT that addressed graft rejection, infection, or survival, published between 2006 and 2022, were selected. RESULTS A total of 690 articles were selected. Two researchers applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria and selected 14 articles independently. For induction, thymoglobulin, alemtuzumab, and basiliximab are the most frequently used immunosuppressants for induction. Classic maintenance therapy consists of a combination of corticosteroids and tacrolimus. Methylprednisolone with an increased tacrolimus dose is used most frequently to manage ACR. Depending on the receptor response, such as thymoglobulin, infliximab, adalimumab, or bortezomib, other immunosuppressants should be considered. CONCLUSIONS There have been great advances in IT and TMV immunosuppression. We conclude that the gold standard immunosuppressive protocol is triple therapy, comprising induction with thymoglobulin, maintenance with steroids for a few months, and tacrolimus and mycophenolate therapy. Innovative approaches for treating intestinal rejection episodes with more appropriate drugs, such as infliximab, adalimumab, or bortezomib, are necessary.
Collapse
|
11
|
Gentilini MV, Perez-Illidge L, Pedraza N, Nemirovsky SI, Fernandez MF, Ramisch D, Solar H, Rumbo M, Rumbo C, Gondolesi GE. Induction Versus Maintenance Immunosuppression After Intestinal Transplant: Determining Which Treatment Most Impacts Long-Term Patient And Graft Survival. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2022; 20:1105-1113. [PMID: 36718010 DOI: 10.6002/ect.2022.0359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Immunosuppressive strategies for intestinal transplant have changed over time. However, specific intestinal transplant-oriented protocols and reports on long-term maintenance regimens are scarce. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of 2 different initial immunosuppressive protocols based on thymoglobulin (group A) and basiliximab (anti-interleukin 2 antibody) (group B) and of changes to maintenance immunosuppression over long-term follow-up in intestinal transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively established protocol for intestinal transplant immunosuppression, conducted between May 2006 and December 2020. We analyzed 51 intestinal transplant recipients, with 6 patients excluded because of early death or graft loss. Acute cellular rejection frequency and grade, number of acute cellular rejection episodes, time to the first acute cellular rejection episode, response to treatment, number of patients who progressed to chronic allograft rejection, kidney function, infections, incidence of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder and graft-versus-host disease, and patient and graft survival were analyzed. RESULTS In the study groups, there were 87 acute cellular rejection episodes in 45 patients (33 in group A and 54 in group B). We found degree of acute cellular rejection to be mild in 45 patients, moderate in 18, and severe in 24 (not significant between groups). Our comparison of induction therapy (thymoglobulin [group A] vs interleukin 2 antibody [group B]) did not show any statistical difference during clinical followup. Long-term review showed that all patients were on tacrolimus. Five-year patient and graft survival rates were 62% and 45% for group A and 54% and 46% for group B, respectively (not significant). CONCLUSIONS Long-term patient and graft outcomes reflected the use of an individualized follow-up with adjustments and changes in immunosuppressive medications according to the patient's clinical course and complications rather than based on the induction immunosuppressive protocol used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Virginia Gentilini
- From the Unidad de Soporte Nutricional, Rehabilitaciín y Trasplante Intestinal, Hospital Universitario Fundaciín Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,From the Laboratorio de Investigaciín Traslacional e Inmunología Asociada al Trasplante, Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Inmunología, Trasplante y Bioingenería (IMeTTyB-CONICET), Universidad Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Immunosuppression in liver and intestinal transplantation. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2021; 54-55:101767. [PMID: 34874848 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2021.101767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Immunosuppression handling plays a key role in the early and long-term results of transplantation. The development of multiple immunosuppressive drugs led to numerous clincial trials searching to reach the ideal regimen. Due to heterogeneity of the studied patient cohorts and flaws in many, even randomized controlled, study designs, the answer still stands out. Nowadays triple-drug immunosuppression containing a calcineurin inhibitor (preferentially tacrolimus), an antimetabolite (using mycophenolate moffettil or Azathioprine) and short-term steroids with or without induction therapy (using anti-IL2 receptor blocker or anti-lymphocytic serum) is the preferred option in both liver and intestinal transplantation. This chapter aims, based on a critical review of the definitions of rejection, corticoresistant rejection and standard immunosuppression to give some reflections on how to reach an optimal immunosuppressive status and to conduct trials allowing to draw solid conclusions. Endpoints of future trials should not anymore focus on biopsy proven, acute and chronic, rejection but also on graft and patient survival. Correlation between early- and long-term biologic, immunologic and histopathologic findings will be fundamental to reach in much more patients the status of operational tolerance.
Collapse
|
13
|
Hollins AW, Napier K, Wildman-Tobriner B, Erdmann R, Sudan DL, Ravindra KV, Erdmann D, Atia A. Using Radiographic Domain for Evaluating Indications in Abdominal Wall Transplantation. Ann Plast Surg 2021; 87:348-354. [PMID: 33559994 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000002708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is currently no description of abdominal domain changes in small bowel transplantation population or consensus of criteria regarding which patients are at high risk for immediate postoperative abdominal wall complications or would benefit from abdominal wall vascularized composite allotransplantation. METHODS A retrospective chart review was performed on 14 adult patients receiving intestinal or multivisceral transplantation. Preoperative and postoperative computed tomography scans were reviewed, and multiple variables were collected regarding abdominal domain and volume and analyzed comparing postoperative changes and abdominal wall complications. RESULTS Patients after intestinal or multivisceral transplantation had a mean reduction in overall intraperitoneal volume in the immediate postoperative period from 9031 cm3 to 7846 cm3 (P = 0.314). This intraperitoneal volume was further reduced to an average of 6261 cm3 upon radiographic evaluation greater than 1 year postoperatively (P = 0.024). Patients with preexisting abdominal wound (P = 0.002), radiation, or presence of ostomy (P = 0.047) were significantly associated with postoperative abdominal wall complications. No preoperative radiographic findings had a significant association with postoperative abdominal wall complications. CONCLUSIONS Computed tomography imaging demonstrates that intestinal and multivisceral transplant patients have significant reduction in intraperitoneal volume and domain after transplantation in the acute and delayed postoperative setting. Preoperative radiographic abdominal domain was not able to predict patients with postoperative abdominal wall complications. Patients with abdominal wounds, ostomies, and preoperative radiation therapy were associated with acute postoperative abdominal complications and may be considered for need of reconstructive techniques including abdominal wall transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew W Hollins
- From the Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Department of Surgery
| | | | | | - Ralph Erdmann
- From the Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Department of Surgery
| | - Debra L Sudan
- Division of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC
| | - Kadiyala V Ravindra
- Division of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC
| | - Detlev Erdmann
- From the Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Department of Surgery
| | - Andrew Atia
- From the Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Department of Surgery
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Canovai E, Ceulemans LJ, Gilbo N, Duchateau NM, De Hertogh G, Hiele M, Jochmans I, Vanuytsel T, Maleux G, Verhaegen M, Monbaliu D, Pirenne J. Multivisceral Transplantation for Diffuse Portomesenteric Thrombosis: Lessons Learned for Surgical Optimization. Front Surg 2021; 8:645302. [PMID: 33681286 PMCID: PMC7933591 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.645302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Multivisceral transplantation entails the en-bloc transplantation of stomach, duodenum, pancreas, liver and bowel following resection of the native organs. Diffuse portomesenteric thrombosis, defined as the complete occlusion of the portal system, can lead to life-threatening gastrointestinal bleeding, malnutrition and can be associated with liver and intestinal failure. Multivisceral transplantation is the only procedure that offers a definitive solution by completely replacing the portal system. However, this procedure is technically challenging in this setting. The aim of this study is to describe our experience, highlight the challenges and propose technical solutions. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of our cohort undergoing multivisceral transplantation for diffuse portomesenteric thrombosis at our institution from 2000 to 2020. Donor and recipient demographics and surgical strategies were reviewed in detail and posttransplant complications and survival were analyzed. Results: Five patients underwent MVTx. Median age was 47 years (23–62). All had diffuse portomesenteric thrombosis with life-threatening variceal bleeding. Major blood loss during exenteration was avoided by combining two techniques: embolization of the native organs followed by a novel, staged extraction. This prevented major perioperative blood loss [median intra-operative transfusion of 3 packed red blood cell units (0–5)]. Median CIT was 330 min (316–416). There was no perioperative death. One patient died due to invasive aspergillosis. Four others are alive and well with a median follow-up of 4.1 years (0.3–5.9). Conclusions: Multivisceral transplantation should be considered in patients with diffuse portomesenteric thrombosis that cannot be treated by any other means. We propose a standardized surgical approach to limit the operative risk and improve the outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilio Canovai
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Leuven Intestinal Failure and Transplantation Center, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Abdominal Transplant Surgery and Transplant Coordination, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Laurens J Ceulemans
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (BREATHE), Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nicholas Gilbo
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Leuven Intestinal Failure and Transplantation Center, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Abdominal Transplant Surgery and Transplant Coordination, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nicolas M Duchateau
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Leuven Intestinal Failure and Transplantation Center, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Abdominal Transplant Surgery and Transplant Coordination, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gert De Hertogh
- Leuven Intestinal Failure and Transplantation Center, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Martin Hiele
- Leuven Intestinal Failure and Transplantation Center, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ina Jochmans
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Leuven Intestinal Failure and Transplantation Center, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Abdominal Transplant Surgery and Transplant Coordination, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tim Vanuytsel
- Leuven Intestinal Failure and Transplantation Center, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Geert Maleux
- Leuven Intestinal Failure and Transplantation Center, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marleen Verhaegen
- Leuven Intestinal Failure and Transplantation Center, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Diethard Monbaliu
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Leuven Intestinal Failure and Transplantation Center, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Abdominal Transplant Surgery and Transplant Coordination, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jacques Pirenne
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Leuven Intestinal Failure and Transplantation Center, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Abdominal Transplant Surgery and Transplant Coordination, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In this article, data from the intestinal transplant registry, recent publications and reviews in the field will be used to describe mortality, morbidity, complications, nutritional and psychosocial outcomes in intestinal transplant recipients with a focus on those furthest out from transplant. RECENT FINDINGS Registry data show static long-term survival data (41% 10-year survival in the most recent analysis), but experienced centres report improvements with survival between 60 and 70% at 10 years. Chronic rejection remains a problem for long-term graft survival, but understanding of humoral immunity is increasing. Nutritional outcomes are good with most recipients achieving enteral autonomy with an unrestricted diet. Health-related quality of life data generally shows improvement in the years after transplant, educational attainment is good, but some patients have ongoing psychosocial problems. SUMMARY Most patients do well in the long-term after transplant. Survival outcomes have improved in experienced centres, and nutrition and quality of life outcomes are good. Recognition of psychosocial outcomes is increasing. Nevertheless, challenges remain in areas such as infectious complications, renal function, chronic rejection, social support and mental health.
Collapse
|
16
|
A detailed analysis of the current status of intestinal transplantation in the middle east. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2020; 25:169-175. [PMID: 32073492 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Intestinal transplantations are among the most complex transplantations, which are performed in few centers in the world. When patients develop intestinal failure, different treatment modalities including parenteral nutrition, autologous gastrointestinal tract reconstructive surgery, and intestinal transplantations are considered. The Middle East is a region where reports on intestinal failures and intestinal transplantations are mainly lacking. In the present review, we highlighted the status of intestinal transplantations in the Middle East and focused on existing reports from this region. RECENT FINDINGS Very few countries in the Middle East have the facilities for home parenteral nutrition and only two countries including Iran and Turkey perform intestinal transplantations in the region. With advances in intestinal rehabilitation units and development of autologous gastrointestinal tract reconstructive surgery, some centers have been able to reduce the number of patients in need of intestinal transplantations. SUMMARY An overview of the condition of intestinal transplantations in the Middle East shows that the issue of intestinal failure and the treatment facilities still remain an unsolved problem. Although there exists a high need for intestinal transplantation, advances in reconstructive surgeries and the development of parenteral nutrition in this region can significantly reduce the need for intestinal transplantations among patients with intestinal failure.
Collapse
|
17
|
Tekin A, Beduschi T, Vianna R, Mangus RS. Multivisceral transplant as an option to transplant cirrhotic patients with severe portal vein thrombosis. Int J Surg 2020; 82S:115-121. [PMID: 32739540 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Revised: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Non-tumoral portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a critical complication in the patient with advanced cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation (LT). With the evolution of liver transplant (LT) technique, PVT has morphed from an absolute contraindication to a relative contraindication, depending on the grade of the thrombus. The Yerdel classification is one system of grading PVT severity. Patients with Yerdel class 1-3 PVT can undergo LT at centers with experience in complex portal vein (PV) dissection, thrombectomy, and reconstruction. Class 4 PVT, however, is even more complex and may require heroic techniques such as cavoportal hemitransposition, PV arterialization or multivisceral transplant (MVT). Some centers use a MVT back-up approach for patients with Yerdel class 4 PVT. In these patients, all organs with PV outflow are procured simultaneously as a cluster graft from a deceased donor (liver, pancreas, intestine±stomach). If physiologic PV inflow is established intraoperatively, the recipient undergoes LT. Otherwise the MVT graft is transplanted. MVT establishes physiologic PV flow, but transplantation of the intestine confers significant lifelong risks including rejection, graft-versus host disease and post-transplant lymphoma. Yerdel class 1-4 PVT patients undergoing successful LT have 5-year survival similar to non-PVT patients, while patients requiring full MVT experience somewhat higher mortality because of the complexity of the surgery and medical management.
Collapse
|
18
|
Amin A, Farmer DG. Current outcomes after pediatric and adult intestinal transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2020; 24:193-198. [PMID: 30676400 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In this article, we will review the outcomes of patients with intestinal transplant (ITx) with a focus on factors affecting long-term graft and patient survival. RECENT FINDINGS The most recent International Intestinal Transplant Registry reports a 1-, 5-, and 10-year graft survival of 71%, 50%, and 41% respectively, for ITx grafts transplanted since 2000. Over the past decades, significant improvements have been achieved in short-term graft and patient outcomes for ITx recipients. The improvement in short-term outcomes may be related to the focused treatment of antihuman leukocyte antigen antibodies, the use of induction immunotherapy protocols, refinements in surgical techniques, establishment of dedicated ITx units, and improved postoperative management.However, long-term graft and patient outcomes for ITx recipients remain stagnant. Issues impairing long-term outcomes of ITx include the challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of chronic rejection and antibody-mediated rejection, progressive decline in renal function, and long-term infectious and malignancy risks especially related to cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder after ITx. SUMMARY Addressing and preventing early and late complications is the key to improving short-term and long-term outcomes after ITx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arpit Amin
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Felgendreff P, Tautenhahn HM, Dondorf F, Rauchfuß F, Settmacher U. Multiviszeraltransplantationen – Indikationen, Technik und Outcome. DER GASTROENTEROLOGE 2019; 14:282-288. [DOI: 10.1007/s11377-019-0350-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/19/2025]
|
20
|
Graft Loss Due to Thrombosis of an Aortic Conduit in a Pediatric Multivisceral Transplant Recipient. Transplant Direct 2018; 4:e407. [PMID: 30584588 PMCID: PMC6283089 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000000838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2018] [Accepted: 08/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
|
21
|
Costa G, Parekh N, Osman M, Armanyous S, Fujiki M, Abu-Elmagd K. Composite and Multivisceral Transplantation: Nomenclature, Surgical Techniques, Current Practice, and Long-term Outcome. Surg Clin North Am 2018; 99:129-151. [PMID: 30471738 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2018.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
The successful development of multivisceral and composite visceral transplantation is among the milestones in the recent history of human organ transplantation. All types of gastrointestinal transplantation have evolved to be the standard of care for patients with gut failure and complex abdominal pathologic conditions. The outcome has markedly improved over the last 3 decades owing to technical innovation, novel immunosuppression, and better postoperative care. Recent data documented significant improvement in the long-term therapeutic indices of all types of visceral transplantation close to that achieved with thoracic and solid abdominal organs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guilherme Costa
- Center for Gut Rehabilitation and Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk A100, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Neha Parekh
- Center for Gut Rehabilitation and Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk A100, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Mohammed Osman
- Center for Gut Rehabilitation and Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk A100, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Sherif Armanyous
- Department of Nephrology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk A100, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Masato Fujiki
- Center for Gut Rehabilitation and Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk A100, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Kareem Abu-Elmagd
- Center for Gut Rehabilitation and Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk A100, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk A100, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Costa G, Parekh N, Osman M, Armanyous S, Fujiki M, Abu-Elmagd K. Composite and Multivisceral Transplantation: Nomenclature, Surgical Techniques, Current Practice, and Long-term Outcome. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2018; 47:393-415. [PMID: 29735032 DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2018.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
The successful development of multivisceral and composite visceral transplantation is among the milestones in the recent history of human organ transplantation. All types of gastrointestinal transplantation have evolved to be the standard of care for patients with gut failure and complex abdominal pathologic conditions. The outcome has markedly improved over the last 3 decades owing to technical innovation, novel immunosuppression, and better postoperative care. Recent data documented significant improvement in the long-term therapeutic indices of all types of visceral transplantation close to that achieved with thoracic and solid abdominal organs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guilherme Costa
- Center for Gut Rehabilitation and Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk A100, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Neha Parekh
- Center for Gut Rehabilitation and Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk A100, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Mohammed Osman
- Center for Gut Rehabilitation and Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk A100, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Sherif Armanyous
- Department of Nephrology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk A100, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Masato Fujiki
- Center for Gut Rehabilitation and Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk A100, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Kareem Abu-Elmagd
- Center for Gut Rehabilitation and Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk A100, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk A100, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Low G, Shapiro AMJ. Invited Commentary on "Imaging of Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantation". Radiographics 2018. [PMID: 29528834 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2018180002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Gavin Low
- 1 Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging and
| | - A M James Shapiro
- 2 Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University of Alberta Hospital Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Guzman L, Qiu F, Kalil AC, Mercer DF, Langnas A, Florescu DF. Risk factors for Clostridium difficile infection in intestinal transplant recipients during the first year post-transplant. Transpl Infect Dis 2018; 20:e12858. [PMID: 29427406 DOI: 10.1111/tid.12858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2017] [Revised: 08/14/2017] [Accepted: 10/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clostridium difficile is the most common cause of healthcare-associated infectious diarrhea. Risk factors for C. difficile infections (CDI) in intestinal transplant recipients (ITR) are not well-defined. The aim of our study was to assess specific risk factors for CDI in ITR. METHODS This is a 1:3 case-control study that included 29 ITR who developed CDI (cases) and 87 ITR without CDI (controls) observed during the first year post-transplantation. Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare variables. Univariate and multivariable conditional logistic regressions analysis were performed to identify risk factors for CDI. RESULTS The multivariable conditional logistic regression analysis showed that proton pump inhibitors (PPI) administration (odds ratio [OR] = 0.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.007-0.52; P = .01) was the only factor associated with lower rates of CDI. Outcomes for cases vs controls: rejection episodes 24.14% vs 20.69% (P = .7), graft loss 0% vs 2.3% (P = .99), and survival rate 1 year post-transplantation 79.3% (59.6-90.1%) vs 87.2% (78.1-92.7%) (P = .38). CONCLUSIONS Proton pump inhibitor administration might be protective for CDI in ITR. Risks factors for CDI might be different in ITR compared to other populations; anatomical differences and medications administered in the post-transplantation period may affect intestinal microbiota.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Guzman
- Infectious Diseases Division, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - F Qiu
- College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - A C Kalil
- Infectious Diseases Division, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - D F Mercer
- Transplant Surgery Division, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - A Langnas
- Transplant Surgery Division, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - D F Florescu
- Infectious Diseases Division, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.,Transplant Surgery Division, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rees MA, Amesur NB, Cruz RJ, Borhani AA, Abu-Elmagd KM, Costa G, Dasyam AK. Imaging of Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantation. Radiographics 2018. [DOI: 10.1148/rg.2018170086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell A. Rees
- From the Departments of Radiology (M.A.R., N.B.A., A.A.B., A.K.D.) and Surgery (R.J.C.), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, Radiology Suite 200, East Wing E2051B, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; and Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (K.M.A., G.C.)
| | - Nikhil B. Amesur
- From the Departments of Radiology (M.A.R., N.B.A., A.A.B., A.K.D.) and Surgery (R.J.C.), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, Radiology Suite 200, East Wing E2051B, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; and Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (K.M.A., G.C.)
| | - Ruy J. Cruz
- From the Departments of Radiology (M.A.R., N.B.A., A.A.B., A.K.D.) and Surgery (R.J.C.), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, Radiology Suite 200, East Wing E2051B, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; and Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (K.M.A., G.C.)
| | - Amir A. Borhani
- From the Departments of Radiology (M.A.R., N.B.A., A.A.B., A.K.D.) and Surgery (R.J.C.), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, Radiology Suite 200, East Wing E2051B, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; and Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (K.M.A., G.C.)
| | - Kareem M. Abu-Elmagd
- From the Departments of Radiology (M.A.R., N.B.A., A.A.B., A.K.D.) and Surgery (R.J.C.), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, Radiology Suite 200, East Wing E2051B, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; and Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (K.M.A., G.C.)
| | - Guilherme Costa
- From the Departments of Radiology (M.A.R., N.B.A., A.A.B., A.K.D.) and Surgery (R.J.C.), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, Radiology Suite 200, East Wing E2051B, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; and Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (K.M.A., G.C.)
| | - Anil K. Dasyam
- From the Departments of Radiology (M.A.R., N.B.A., A.A.B., A.K.D.) and Surgery (R.J.C.), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, Radiology Suite 200, East Wing E2051B, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; and Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (K.M.A., G.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Chi Z, Mangus RS, Kubal CA, Chen S, Lin J. Multivisceral transplant is a viable treatment option for patients with non-resectable intra-abdominal fibromatosis. Clin Transplant 2017; 32:e13186. [PMID: 29288580 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intra-abdominal fibromatosis often involves the mesentery root which is non-resectable by conventional surgery. Multivisceral transplant (MVT), as a potential cure to non-resectable fibromatosis, has rarely been reported and the prognosis is unknown. METHODS Six patients who underwent MVT for intra-abdominal fibromatosis were reviewed. Clinicopathological features, immunohistochemistry for β-catenin, p53, and Ki67, and outcomes were evaluated. Appropriate data for comparative analysis were obtained from a cohort of 24 patients who underwent conventional resection for intra-abdominal fibromatosis. RESULTS Among six MVT patients, four had familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Two patients had an initial intestinal transplantation, three had multiple prior surgeries, and two had adjuvant therapy. One patient died of hemorrhagic stroke shortly after MVT, and five patients (83%) survived with a median follow-up of 64 months. The 1-year and 5-year survival rates were 67% for all five patients. Two patients had recurrences after MVT and one of them had FAP. In comparison, six of 24 patients who underwent conventional surgery had FAP; six (25%) had recurrences and three had FAP. For FAP patients; the mean recurrence time was 13 months for MVT versus 6 months for conventional surgery. Ki67 proliferative index, β-catenin, and p53 expression did not significantly correlate to recurrence. CONCLUSIONS Multivisceral transplant (MVT) is a viable option for patients who have non-resectable intra-abdominal fibromatosis with promising surviving rates, although recurrence still occurs. Surgical margin, Ki67 proliferative index, β-catenin, and p53 expression are not predicative for recurrence of fibromatosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhikai Chi
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Richard S Mangus
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - Shaoxiong Chen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Jingmei Lin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Li J, Guo QJ, Cai JZ, Pan C, Shen ZY, Jiang WT. Simultaneous liver, pancreas-duodenum and kidney transplantation in a patient with hepatitis B cirrhosis, uremia and insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23:8104-8108. [PMID: 29259387 PMCID: PMC5725306 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i45.8104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2017] [Revised: 08/27/2017] [Accepted: 09/13/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simultaneous liver, pancreas-duodenum, and kidney transplantation has been rarely reported in the literature. Here we present a new and more efficient en bloc technique that combines classic orthotopic liver and pancreas-duodenum transplantation and heterotopic kidney transplantation for a male patient aged 44 years who had hepatitis B related cirrhosis, renal failure, and insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). A quadruple immunosuppressive regimen including induction with basiliximab and maintenance therapy with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids was used in the early stage post-transplant. Postoperative recovery was uneventful and the patient was discharged on the 15th postoperative day with normal liver and kidney function. The insulin treatment was completely withdrawn 3 wk after operation, and the blood glucose level remained normal. The case findings support that abdominal organ cluster and kidney transplantation is an effective method for the treatment of end-stage liver disease combined with uremia and IDDM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiang Li
- Department of Liver Transplant, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin 300192, China
| | - Qing-Jun Guo
- Department of Liver Transplant, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin 300192, China
| | - Jin-Zhen Cai
- Department of Liver Transplant, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin 300192, China
| | - Cheng Pan
- Department of Liver Transplant, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin 300192, China
| | - Zhong-Yang Shen
- Department of Liver Transplant, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin 300192, China
| | - Wen-Tao Jiang
- Department of Liver Transplant, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin 300192, China
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin 300192, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
He XS, Fu SJ, Zhao Q, Zhu XF, Wang DP, Han M, Ju WQ, Ma Y, Jiao XY, Yuan XP, Hu AB, Guo ZY. A simplified multivisceral transplantation procedure for patients with combined end-stage liver disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Liver Transpl 2017; 23:1161-1170. [PMID: 28422396 DOI: 10.1002/lt.24774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2016] [Revised: 03/25/2017] [Accepted: 04/06/2017] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
In liver transplant patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), the disease worsens after transplantation because of longterm use of diabetogenic immunosuppressive drugs, making management of those patients a great challenge. The objective of our study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a simplified multivisceral transplantation (SMT) procedure for the treatment of patients with end-stage liver disease and concurrent type 2 DM. Forty-four patients who had pretransplant type 2 DM were included. A total of 23 patients received SMT, and 21 patients received orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Patient and graft survivals, complications, diabetic control, and quality of life (QOL) were retrospectively analyzed in both groups. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative patient and graft survival rates were 91.5%, 75.4%, and 75.4% in the SMT group and were 94.4%, 64.4%, and 64.4% in the OLT group, respectively (P = 0.70). Interestingly, 95.7% (22/23) of patients achieved complete remission from DM after SMT compared with 16.7% (3/18) of patients after OLT. The occurrence of biliary complication was significantly higher in the OLT group than that in the SMT group (23.8% versus 0.0%; P = 0.01). Moreover, better QOL was observed in the SMT group than that in the OLT group. In conclusion, the SMT procedure we described here is a safe and viable option for patients with end-stage live disease and concurrent type 2 DM. This SMT procedure offers excellent transplant outcomes and QOL. Liver Transplantation 23 1161-1170 2017 AASLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Shun He
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Organ Transplantation, Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Shun-Jun Fu
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Organ Transplantation, Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Qiang Zhao
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Organ Transplantation, Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Feng Zhu
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Organ Transplantation, Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Dong-Ping Wang
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Organ Transplantation, Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ming Han
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Organ Transplantation, Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei-Qiang Ju
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Organ Transplantation, Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yi Ma
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Organ Transplantation, Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Xing-Yuan Jiao
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Organ Transplantation, Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Peng Yuan
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Organ Transplantation, Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - An-Bin Hu
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Organ Transplantation, Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhi-Yong Guo
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Organ Transplantation, Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lee E, Hodgkinson N, Fawaz R, Vakili K, Kim HB. Multivisceral transplantation for abdominal tumors in children: A single center experience and review of the literature. Pediatr Transplant 2017; 21. [PMID: 28393434 DOI: 10.1111/petr.12904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Standard management of intra-abdominal pediatric solid tumors requires complete resection. However, tumors with multiple organ and vascular involvement present a unique surgical challenge. We conducted a retrospective chart review of four patients, aged 2-14 years, undergoing MVT for intra-abdominal tumors with significant involvement of the visceral arteries and/or portomesenteric venous system at our institution. Indications for MVT included hepatocellular carcinoma, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, and two cases of hepatoblastoma. Grafts included liver, stomach, small bowel, and pancreas in all patients, with two patients also receiving spleens, and one, a partial esophageal transplant. Median hospital stay was 80 days. Postoperative complications included reoperation for abdominal hematoma and bowel obstruction, steroid responsive intestinal rejection, wound dehiscence, fungemia, seizures, and chyle leak with pleural effusion. One patient developed Epstein-Barr virus-associated complications which responded well to treatment. On follow-up (range 2.8-7.8 years), all patients have satisfactory graft function and no evidence of recurrent disease. MVT is an effective means of achieving complete gross resection of intra-abdominal malignancies in patients with multiple organ and vascular involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliza Lee
- Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nicole Hodgkinson
- Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rima Fawaz
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, & Nutrition, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Khashayar Vakili
- Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Heung Bae Kim
- Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Garcia Aroz S, Tzvetanov I, Hetterman EA, Jeon H, Oberholzer J, Testa G, John E, Benedetti E. Long-term outcomes of living-related small intestinal transplantation in children: A single-center experience. Pediatr Transplant 2017; 21. [PMID: 28295952 DOI: 10.1111/petr.12910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Pediatric patients with irreversible intestinal failure present a significant challenge to meet the nutritional needs that promote growth. From 2002 to 2013, 13 living-related small intestinal transplantations were performed in 10 children, with a median age of 18 months. Grafts included isolated living-related intestinal transplantation (n=7), and living-related liver and small intestine (n=6). The immunosuppression protocol consisted of induction with thymoglobulin and maintenance therapy with tacrolimus and steroids. Seven of 10 children are currently alive with a functioning graft and good quality of life. Six of the seven children who are alive have a follow-up longer than 10 years. The average time to initiation of oral diet was 32 days (range, 13-202 days). The median day for ileostomy takedown was 77 (range, 18-224 days). Seven children are on an oral diet, and one of them is on supplements at night through a g-tube. We observed an improvement in growth during the first 3 years post-transplant and progressive weight gain throughout the first year post-transplantation. Growth catch-up and weight gain plateaued after these time periods. We concluded that living donor intestinal transplantation potentially offers a feasible, alternative strategy for long-term treatment of irreversible intestinal failure in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Garcia Aroz
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ivo Tzvetanov
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Hoonbae Jeon
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jose Oberholzer
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Giuliano Testa
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Baylor University, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eunice John
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Enrico Benedetti
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this article is to review the existing literature on the current indications, surgical techniques, immunosuppressive therapy and outcomes following intestinal transplantation (ITx). RECENT FINDINGS Over recent years, ITx has become a more common operation with approximately 2500 procedures carried out worldwide by 2014. It is reserved for patients with intestinal failure and who have developed complications of home parenteral nutrition or who have a high risk of dying from their underlying disease. Recent advances such as the improvement in survival rates, not only for isolated small bowel transplants but also following inclusion of a liver graft in combined liver-small bowel transplant, and the utility of citrulline as a noninvasive biomarker to appreciate acute rejection herald an exciting shift in the field of ITx. SUMMARY With advancements in immunosuppressive drugs, induction regimens, standardization of surgical techniques and improved postoperative care, survival is increasing. In due course, it will most likely become as good as remaining on home parenteral nutrition and as such could become a viable first-line option.
Collapse
|
32
|
|
33
|
Cooper DKC, Joseph Tector A. Thomas E. Starzl, MD, PhD, 1926-2017. Xenotransplantation 2017; 24. [PMID: 28421680 DOI: 10.1111/xen.12307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David K C Cooper
- Xenotransplantation Program, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - A Joseph Tector
- Xenotransplantation Program, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Cooper DKC. Early clinical xenotransplantation experiences-An interview with Thomas E. Starzl, MD, PhD. Xenotransplantation 2017; 24:10.1111/xen.12306. [PMID: 28421681 PMCID: PMC5431570 DOI: 10.1111/xen.12306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2017] [Revised: 03/20/2017] [Accepted: 03/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Dr Thomas E. Starzl, who died on March 4, 2017, was one of the great pioneers of organ transplantation. He was also a pioneer in the field of xenotransplantation. In 1964, he carried out baboon kidney transplants in six patients with terminal renal disease for whom no living or deceased donor became available; graft survival was for 19-60 days, the grafts being lost largely through continuous complement activation. Between 1966 and 1974, he carried out one ex vivo liver perfusion and three orthotopic liver transplants using chimpanzees as sources of organs; graft survival was for <14 days. In 1992 and 1993, his team carried out baboon liver transplantation in two patients with cirrhosis from hepatitis B infection; graft survival was for 70 and 26 days, respectively. This early clinical experience is briefly discussed. Toward the end of his life, Dr Starzl was somewhat disillusioned by what he considered excessive regulation of medical research in the United States and believed that new advances were now likely to take place in countries such as China, where the regulatory framework is less developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David K C Cooper
- Xenotransplantation Program, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
Intestine transplantation has evolved into a feasible alternative for children with permanent intestinal failure and life-threatening complications related to total parenteral nutrition. Although the first transplantations were done nearly 40 years ago, long-term survival has only been achieved in the last decade. Nearly 700 intestinal transplantations have been performed internationally since 1985, with an overall patient survival of greater than 50%. Improvements in patient selection, medical management, and assessment and treatment for rejection and infection have contributed to the increased survival. This article will discuss current results and medical management strategies for this innovative type of transplantation for children with end-stage short gut syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beverly Kosmach Park
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Starzl Transplantation Institute, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa., USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
|
37
|
Urgent Multivisceral Transplantation for Widespread Splanchnic Ischemia. J Am Coll Surg 2016; 222:760-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2016] [Accepted: 02/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
38
|
Hommel MJ, van Baren R, Haveman JW. Surgical management and autologous intestinal reconstruction in short bowel syndrome. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2016; 30:263-80. [PMID: 27086890 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2016.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2016] [Accepted: 03/05/2016] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Short bowel syndrome (SBS) is a serious condition with considerable morbidity and mortality. When treatment with parenteral nutrition fails and life-threatening complications occur, autologous intestinal reconstruction (AIR) should be considered before intestinal transplantation (ITx). Single or combined ITx should be reserved for patients with severe liver disease and as last resort in the treatment of SBS. Longitudinal intestinal lengthening and tailoring (LILT) has proven its value in AIR, but its availability depends on the expertise of the surgeons. Serial transverse enteroplasty (STEP) has similar success rates as LILT and fewer patients progress to ITx. STEP is also applicable at small bowel dilatation in ultra-short bowel syndrome. The scope may be widened when duodenal dilatation can be treated as well. Spiral intestinal lengthening and tailoring (SILT) is a promising alternative. More research is needed to confirm these findings. Therefore we suggest an international data registry for all intestinal lengthening procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthijs J Hommel
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Robertine van Baren
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Jan Willem Haveman
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Radiologic features of pancreatic and biliary complications following composite visceral transplantation. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 40:1961-70. [PMID: 25549783 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-014-0338-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Small bowel transplantation is a surgical technique reserved for patients with end-stage intestinal failure. Despite its inherent technical difficulties, it has emerged as the standard of care for these patients. This article reviews the background and different surgical techniques for this procedure and then fully describes the spectrum of imaging findings of pancreatic and biliary complications, which have a prevalence of up to 17%, after this procedure based on 23-year single-center experience. The pancreaticobiliary complications encountered in our experience and discussed in this article include: ampullary stenosis, biliary cast, choledocholithiasis, bile leak, recurrent cholangitis, acute pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, and pancreatic duct fistula. Familiarity with the broad spectrum of PB complications and their variable manifestations will help radiologists to accurately diagnose these complications which have relatively high morbidity and mortality in these immune-compromised patients.
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
Intestinal transplantation has become a well-accepted and successful procedure to save the lives of patients suffering from intestinal failure and who have developed life-threatening complications of parenteral nutrition. Advances in all aspects of care, from the role of multidisciplinary intestinal rehabilitation services prior to transplant to the development strategies for early recognition of infectious sequelae and even the increasing availability of preventive strategies, have led to improved outcomes and a dramatic decline in infection-associated morbidity and mortality in children undergoing intestinal transplantation. Improvements in surgical techniques and immunosuppressive regimens have been essential components in these improvements, reducing risk of infection through reduction of technical complications and more optimal immunosuppression regimens. In addition, the development of molecular tools for early recognition of viral pathogens and an understanding of the timing and risks for infection have allowed for earlier and more successful treatments. Despite these improvements, infectious sequelae remain an important problem in this population, and additional efforts are needed to further minimize the risk of infectious sequelae in those children requiring this procedure.
Collapse
|
41
|
Meira Filho SP, Guardia BD, Evangelista AS, Matielo CEL, Neves DB, Pandullo FL, Felga GEG, Alves JADS, Curvelo LA, Diaz LGG, Rusi MB, Viveiros MDM, Almeida MDD, Epstein MG, Pedroso PT, Salvalaggio P, Meirelles Júnior RF, Rocco RA, Almeida SSD, Rezende MBD. Intestinal and multivisceral transplantation. EINSTEIN-SAO PAULO 2015; 13:136-41. [PMID: 25993080 PMCID: PMC4977588 DOI: 10.1590/s1679-45082015rw3155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2014] [Accepted: 02/08/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Intestinal transplantation has shown exceptional growth over the past 10 years. At the end of the 1990’s, intestinal transplantation moved out of the experimental realm to become a routine practice in treating patients with severe complications related to total parenteral nutrition and intestinal failure. In the last years, several centers reported an increasing improvement in survival outcomes (about 80%), during the first 12 months after surgery, but long-term survival is still a challenge. Several advances led to clinical application of transplants. Immunosuppression involved in intestinal and multivisceral transplantation was the biggest gain for this procedure in the past decade due to tacrolimus, and new inducing drugs, mono- and polyclonal anti-lymphocyte antibodies. Despite the advancement of rigid immunosuppression protocols, rejection is still very frequent in the first 12 months, and can result in long-term graft loss. The future of intestinal transplantation and multivisceral transplantation appears promising. The major challenge is early recognition of acute rejection in order to prevent graft loss, opportunistic infections associated to complications, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease and graft versus host disease; and consequently, improve results in the long run.
Collapse
|
42
|
Rege A. The Surgical Approach to Short Bowel Syndrome - Autologous Reconstruction versus Transplantation. VISZERALMEDIZIN 2015; 30:179-89. [PMID: 26288592 PMCID: PMC4513826 DOI: 10.1159/000363589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Short bowel syndrome (SBS) is a state of malabsorption resulting from massive small bowel resection leading to parenteral nutrition (PN) dependency. Considerable advances have been achieved in the medical and surgical management of SBS over the last few decades. METHODS This review discusses in detail the surgical approach to SBS. RESULTS Widespread use of PN enables long-term survival in patients with intestinal failure but at the cost of PN-associated life-threatening complications including catheter-associated blood stream infection, venous thrombosis, and liver disease. The goal of management of intestinal failure due to SBS is to enable enteral autonomy and wean PN by means of a multi-disciplinary approach. Availability of modified enteral feeding formulas have simplified nutrition supplementation in SBS patients. Similarly, advances in the medical field have made medications like growth hormone and glucagon-like peptide (GLP2) available to improve water and nutrient absorption as well as to enable achieving enteral autonomy. Autologous gastrointestinal reconstruction (AGIR) includes various techniques which manipulate the bowel surgically to facilitate the bowel adaptation process and restoration of enteral nutrition. Ultimately, intestinal transplantation can serve as the last option for the cure of intestinal failure when selectively applied. CONCLUSION SBS continues to be a challenging medical problem. Best patient outcomes can be achieved through an individualized plan, using various AGIR techniques to complement each other, and intestinal transplantation as a last resort for cure. Maximum benefit and improved outcomes can be achieved by caring for SBS patients at highly specialized intestinal rehabilitation centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aparna Rege
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
|
44
|
Abstract
Organ transplantation has enriched and prolonged the lives of many patients who otherwise would have died of organ failure. Many of these advances, which occurred in the later part of the 20th century, are due to improved techniques and pharmacological management. Today, almost every organ can be transplanted. However, donor and recipient criteria can vary widely according to the organ(s) in question. This article reviews the historical changes that have occurred in transplant along with current criteria for donors and recipients, and describes the newest outreach to increase the donor pool.
Collapse
|
45
|
Pécora RAA, David AI, Lee AD, Galvão FH, Cruz-Junior RJ, D'Albuquerque LAC. Small bowel transplantation. ABCD-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA 2014; 26:223-9. [PMID: 24190382 DOI: 10.1590/s0102-67202013000300013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2012] [Accepted: 02/27/2013] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Small bowel transplantation evolution, because of its complexity, was slower than other solid organs. Several advances have enabled its clinical application. AIM To review intestinal transplantation evolution and its current status. METHOD Search in MEDLINE and ScIELO literature. The terms used as descriptors were: intestinal failure, intestinal transplantation, small bowel transplantation, multivisceral transplantation. Were analyzed data on historical evolution, centers experience, indications, types of grafts, selection and organ procurement, postoperative management, complications and results. CONCLUSION Despite a slower evolution, intestinal transplantation is currently the standard therapy for patients with intestinal failure and life-threatening parenteral nutrition complications. It involves some modalities: small bowel transplantation, liver-intestinal transplantation, multivisceral transplantation and modified multivisceral transplantation. Currently, survival rate is similar to other solid organs. Most of the patients become free of parenteral nutrition.
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
Intestinal transplantation is the definitive therapy for patients with irreversible intestinal failure and can be combined with transplantation of other abdominal organs, such as stomach, spleen, and pancreas with or without liver. There is an increasing trend in the volume of intestinal and multivisceral transplantation in the past few decades and there is also increasing trend in patient and graft survival primarily due to improved patient selection, advances in immunosuppression, and improved perioperative management. This review summarizes the various key elements in patient selection, types of grafts, and updates in the perioperative management involved in multivisceral transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kalyan Ram Bhamidimarri
- Miami Transplant Institute, University of Miami, 1500 Northwest 12th Avenue, Suite 1101, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Thiago Beduschi
- Miami Transplant Institute, University of Miami, Highland Professional Building, 1801 Northwest 9th Avenue, Suite 310, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Rodrigo Vianna
- Miami Transplant Institute, University of Miami, Highland Professional Building, 1801 Northwest 9th Avenue, Suite 310, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Some intra-abdominal or retroperitoneal tumors such as low-grade slow-growing malignancies may seem unresectable due to major vessel encasement or presence of intra-abdominal dissemination, but the slow growth rate and to some extent long life expectancy of the patients urge us to find some strategies to cure the patients or at least achieve tumor remission or symptom palliation. En bloc resection, followed by multivisceral or liver-sparing "modified" multivisceral transplantation has recently been used for treatment of these patients. RESULTS Between May 2010 and October 2012, 3 multivisceral and 3 modified multivisceral transplantations were performed in 6 patients (aged 14 to 55 years; mean, 32 years) with some slow growing intra-abdominal malignancies (2 neuroendocrine tumors, 2 gastrointestinal stromal tumors, 1 desmoid tumor, and 1 low-grade sarcoma). All patients survived the procedure. One patient died of pancytopenia 2 months after transplantation and another died with pulmonary emboli at 4 months. The remaining 4 patients are alive without any evidence of disease recurrence. CONCLUSIONS Although large intra-abdominal desmoid tumors, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, and gastrointestinal stromal tumors are slow growing, they tend to invade locally, especially to the mesenteric root and/or celiac axis and other abdominal viscera. Complete resection followed by multivisceral transplantation could be a therapeutic option for these advanced tumors.
Collapse
|
48
|
Margreiter R. Response to: Jan Lerut, Laudatio for Prof. Raimund Margreiter on the occasion of the honorary membership of ESOT. Transpl Int 2014; 27:e68. [PMID: 24805259 DOI: 10.1111/tri.12346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
49
|
Soin AS, Mohanka R, Saraf N, Rastogi A, Goja S, Menon B, Vohra V, Saigal S, Sud R, Kumar D, Bhangui P, Ramachandra S, Singla P, Shetty G, Raghvendra K, Elmagd KMA. India's first successful intestinal transplant: the road traveled and the lessons learnt. Indian J Gastroenterol 2014; 33:104-13. [PMID: 24500752 DOI: 10.1007/s12664-013-0437-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2013] [Accepted: 12/14/2013] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Intestinal transplant is a therapeutic challenge not just surgically but also logistically because of the multidisciplinary expertise and resources required. A large proportion of patients who undergo massive bowel resection and develop intestinal failure have poor outcome, because of inability to sustain long-term parenteral nutrition and limited availability of intestinal and multi-visceral transplantation facilities. We report the first successful isolated intestinal transplant from India.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A S Soin
- Medanta Institute of Liver Diseases and Transplantation, Medanta-The Medicity, Sector 38, Gurgaon, Haryana, 122 001, India,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Vakili K, Kim HB. Partial esophageal transplantation is possible as part of a multivisceral graft. Am J Transplant 2014; 14:720-3. [PMID: 24447794 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2013] [Revised: 12/10/2013] [Accepted: 12/10/2013] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
We report a case of a 9-year-old female with inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT), which involved the upper retroperitoneum, visceral vessels, stomach and distal esophagus. Complete resection of the tumor required a multivisceral (MV) transplant. Due to tumor involvement, resection of the distal third of recipient esophagus was necessary. Gastrointestinal continuity was subsequently established via esophagoesophagostomy to donor esophagus en bloc with a standard MV graft. After 1.9 years of follow-up, the patient has no symptoms of dysphagia or reflux. This case illustrates the feasibility of including the distal donor esophagus as part of an MV graft.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Vakili
- Department of Surgery and Pediatric Transplant Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | |
Collapse
|