One vs three years of adjuvant imatinib for operable gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a randomized trial

English version of Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines 2022 for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) issued by the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology

The Japan Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines 2022 for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) have been published in accordance with the Minds Manual for Guideline Development 2014 and 2017. A specialized team independent of the working group for the revision performed a systematic review. Since GIST is a rare type of tumor, clinical evidence is not sufficient to answer several clinical and background questions. Thus, in these guidelines, we considered that consensus among the experts who manage GIST, the balance between benefits and harms, patients' wishes, medical economic perspective, etc. are important considerations in addition to the evidence. Although guidelines for the treatment of GIST have also been published by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), there are some differences between the treatments proposed in those guidelines and the treatments in the present guidelines because of the differences in health insurance systems among countries.

Clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection for the treatment of intermediate- or high-risk gastric small gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Many studies of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (g-GISTs) following endoscopic resection (ER) have typically focused on tumor size, with most tumors at low risk of aggressiveness after risk stratification. There have been few systematic studies on the oncologic outcomes of intermediate- or high-risk g-GISTs after ER.

METHODS

From January 2014 to January 2020, we retrospectively collected patients considered at intermediate- or high-risk of g-GISTs according to the modified NIH consensus classification system. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Six hundred and seventy nine (679) consecutive patients were diagnosed with g-GISTs and treated by ER between January 2014 and January 2020 in three hospitals in Shanghai, China. 43 patients (20 males and 23 females) were confirmed at intermediate-or high-risk. The mean size of tumors was 2.23 ± 1.01 cm. The median follow-up period was 62.02 ± 15.34 months, with a range of 28 to 105 months. There were no recurrences or metastases, even among patients having R1 resections. The 5-year OS rate was 97.4% (42/43).

CONCLUSION

ER for intermediate- or high-risk gastric small GISTs is a feasible and safe method, which allows for a wait-and-see approach before determining the necessity for imatinib adjuvant or surgical treatment. This approach to g-GISTs does require that patients undergo close follow-up.

A case-matched study of imatinib mesylate between different formulations on plasma trough concentration, adverse events, quality of life and outcomes in gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients

Genike, the imatinib (IM)-alpha form is widely used in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients in China. We wanted to investigate whether there are differences in IM plasma concentrations, adverse events, health-related quality of life (QOL) and outcomes between patients treated with Genike and Glivec. Thirty included GIST patients receiving IM treatment were matched to either Genike or Glivec according to gastrectomy, body weight, body surface area and sex. There was no statistically significant difference in IM trough plasma levels between the two groups. There were no significant differences in very common adverse events of IM between the Genike and Glivec groups. IM was well tolerated, although it was associated with a significant change in cognitive function (P < 0.001), fatigue (P = 0.015), pain (P = 0.015), nausea/vomiting (P = 0.029), insomnia (P = 0.019), diarrhea (P = 0.003) and financial difficulties (P < 0.001). Physical functioning, financial burden and insomnia were significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.026). Until Aug. 2022, there was no significant difference in time to imatinib treatment failure (TTF) between the two groups. In conclusion, there was no difference in IM plasma concentration and adverse events between Genike and Glivec. Both Genike and Glivec could partially decrease the QOL of GIST patients. Physical functioning was worse in Genike group than in Glivec group, while the economic burden and symptoms of insomnia in Glivec patients were worse. There was no significant difference in TTF between the two groups.

Discontinuation of imatinib in patients with oligometastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour who are in complete radiological remission: a prospective multicentre phase II study

INTRODUCTION

Metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is considered incurable, and life-long treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors is recommended. We investigated whether selected patients with metastatic GIST may remain in durable remission despite imatinib discontinuation.

PATIENTS

In this 1-group, prospective, multicentre phase II trial selected patients with oligometastatic (≤3 metastases) GIST discontinued imatinib treatment. Eligible patients had been treated with imatinib >5 years without progression and had no radiologically detectable metastases after metastasectomy, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or complete response to imatinib. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) 3-years after stopping imatinib. Overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL) were secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

The trial closed prematurely due to slow accrual. Between January 5, 2017, and June 5, 2019, 13 patients were enrolled, of whom 12 discontinued imatinib. The median follow-up time was 55 months (range, 36 to 69) after study entry. Five (42%) of the 12 eligible patients remained progression free, and seven (58%) progressed with a median time to progression 10 months. Median PFS was 23 months and the estimated 3-year PFS 41%. Six of the seven patients who progressed restarted imatinib, and all six responded. Three-year OS was 100%, and all patients were alive at the time of the study analysis. QoL measured 5 and 11 months after discontinuation of imatinib demonstrated improvement compared to the baseline.

INTERPRETATION

A substantial proportion of selected patients with oligometastatic GIST treated with imatinib and metastasis surgery/RFA may remain disease-free for ≥3 years with improved QoL after stopping of imatinib.

The correlation of sarcopenia and adverse events of imatinib therapy postoperatively in gastrointestinal stromal tumor through computed tomography quantitative body composition

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the correlation between sarcopenia and adverse events (AEs) of postoperative imatinib therapy through computed tomography (CT) quantitative body composition for intermediate- and high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).

METHODS

The study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 208 patients with intermediate- and high-risk GIST treated surgically and treated with imatinib afterward at the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University between October 2011 and October 2021. Images of preoperative CT scans within 1 month were used to determine the body composition of the patients. On the basis of the L3 skeletal muscle index, patients were classified into sarcopenia and nonsarcopenia groups. In 2 groups, AEs related to imatinib were analyzed.

RESULTS

The proportion of AEs related to imatinib in the sarcopenia group was higher, and this disparity had a significant statistical significance (P = .013). Sarcopenia was significantly associated with hemoglobin reduction compared with nonsarcopenia (P = .015). There was a significant difference between the sarcopenia group and the nonsarcopenia group in the ratio of severe AEs (grades 3-4). Hemoglobin content (odds ratio [OR], 0.981; 95% CI, 0.963-1.000; P = .045), sex (OR, 0.416; 95% CI, 0.192-0.904; P = .027), and sarcopenia (OR, 5.631; 95% CI, 2.262-14.014; P < .001) were the influential factors of imatinib severe AEs in patients with intermediate- and high-risk GIST within 1 year after imatinib treatment.

CONCLUSION

Patients with preoperative sarcopenia have a higher incidence and severity of AEs during adjuvant imatinib therapy.

Precision Oncology in Soft Tissue Sarcomas and Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs), including gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), are mesenchymal neoplasms with heterogeneous clinical behavior and represent broad categories comprising multiple distinct biologic entities. Multidisciplinary management of these rare tumors is critical. To date, multiple studies have outlined the importance of biological characterization of mesenchymal tumors and have identified key molecular alterations which drive tumor biology. GIST has represented a flagship for targeted therapy in solid tumors with the advent of imatinib which has revolutionized the way we treat this malignancy. Herein, the authors discuss the importance of biological and molecular diagnostics in managing STS and GIST patients.

Treatment Access for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor in Predominantly Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Importance

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a rare cancer treated with the tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib mesylate or sunitinib malate. In general, in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), access to these treatments is limited.

Objective

To describe the demographic characteristics, treatment duration, and survival of patients with GIST in LMICs treated with imatinib and sunitinib through The Max Foundation programs.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective database cohort analysis included patients in 2 access programs administered by The Max Foundation: the Glivec International Patient Assistance Program (GIPAP), from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2016, and the Max Access Solutions (MAS) program, January 1, 2017, to October 12, 2020. Sixty-six countries in which The Max Foundation facilitates access to imatinib and sunitinib were included. Participants consisted of patients with approved indications for imatinib, including adjuvant therapy in high-risk GIST by pathologic evaluation of resected tumor or biopsy-proven unresectable or metastatic GIST. All patients were reported to have tumors positive for CD117(c-kit) by treating physicians. A total of 9866 patients received treatment for metastatic and/or unresectable disease; 2100 received adjuvant imatinib; 49 received imatinib from another source and were only included in the sunitinib analysis; and 53 received both imatinib and sunitinib through The Max Foundation programs. Data were analyzed from October 13, 2020, to January 30, 2024.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Demographic and clinical information was reported by treating physicians. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS). An imputation-based informed censoring model estimated events for patients lost to follow-up after treatment with adjuvant imatinib. Patients who were lost to follow-up with metastatic or unresectable disease were presumed deceased.

Results

A total of 12 015 unique patients were included in the analysis (6890 male [57.6%]; median age, 54 [range, 0-100] years). Of these, 2100 patients were treated with imatinib in the adjuvant setting (median age, 54 [range 8-88] years) and 9866 were treated with imatinib for metastatic or unresectable disease (median age, 55 [range, 0-100] years). Male patients comprised 5867 of 9866 patients (59.5%) with metastatic or unresectable disease and 1023 of 2100 patients (48.7%) receiving adjuvant therapy. The median OS with imatinib for unresectable or metastatic disease was 5.8 (95% CI, 5.6-6.1) years, and the median TTD was 4.2 (95% CI, 4.1-4.4) years. The median OS with sunitinib for patients with metastatic or unresectable GIST was 2.0 (95% CI, 1.5-2.5) years; the median TTD was 1.5 (95% CI, 1.0-2.1) years. The 10-year OS rate in the adjuvant setting was 73.8% (95% CI, 67.2%-81.1%).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of patients with GIST who were predominantly from LMICs and received orally administered therapy through the GIPAP or MAS programs, outcomes were similar to those observed in high-resource countries. These findings underscore the feasibility and relevance of administering oral anticancer therapy to a molecularly defined population in LMICs, addressing a critical gap in cancer care.

An integrative proteomics approach identifies tyrosine kinase KIT as a therapeutic target for SPINK1-positive prostate cancer

Elevated serine peptidase inhibitor, Kazal type 1 (SPINK1) levels in ∼10%-25% of prostate cancer (PCa) patients associate with aggressive phenotype, for which there are limited treatment choices and dismal clinical outcomes. Using an integrative proteomics approach involving label-free phosphoproteome and proteome profiling, we delineated the downstream signaling pathways involved in SPINK1-mediated tumorigenesis and identified tyrosine kinase KIT as highly enriched. Furthermore, high to moderate levels of KIT expression were detected in ∼85% of SPINK1-positive PCa specimens. We show KIT signaling orchestrates SPINK1-mediated oncogenesis, and treatment with KIT inhibitor reduces tumor growth and metastases in preclinical mice models. Mechanistically, KIT signaling modulates WNT/β-catenin pathway and confers stemness-related features in PCa. Notably, inhibiting KIT signaling led to restoration of AR/REST levels, forming a feedback loop enabling SPINK1 repression. Overall, we uncover the role of KIT signaling downstream of SPINK1 in maintaining lineage plasticity and provide distinct treatment modalities for advanced-stage SPINK1-positive patients.

Premalignant Lesions in the Kidney Transplant Candidate

End-stage kidney disease patients who are referred for transplant undergo an extensive evaluation process to ensure their health prior to transplant due in part to the shortage of available organs. Although management and surveillance guidelines exist for malignancies identified in the transplant and waitlist populations, less is written about the management of premalignant lesions in this population. This review covers the less common premalignant lesions (intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, thymoma, and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor) that can be found in the transplant candidate population. High-level evidence for the management of these rarer premalignant lesions in the transplant population is lacking, and this review extrapolates evidence from the general population and should not be a substitute for a multidisciplinary discussion with medical and surgical oncologists.

The Role of Neoadjuvant Therapy in a Giant Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumour: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is a rare disease with an annual incidence of 10 cases per million. Herein, we present the case of a 45-year-old man who visited our clinic with complaints of weight loss and anorexia, without changes in bowel habits or vomiting, for four months. On physical examination, all vital signs were normal. The abdomen was distended without tenderness and had a giant upper abdominal mass. Tumour marker investigation revealed high levels of cancer antigen 125 with normal levels of alpha-1-fetoprotein, carcinoembryonic antigen, and carbohydrate antigen. A computed tomography (CT) scan showed a mass measuring 35 × 25 × 20 cm, likely originating from the fundus of the stomach. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy indicated external compression of the stomach and a fundal submucosal mass. Ultrasound-guided biopsy demonstrated the presence of a GIST. There was a severe danger of both the tumour rupturing during surgery and the combined excision of adjacent organs if the surgery was performed with the massive tumour. Therefore, daily neoadjuvant therapy with imatinib 400 mg was administered for three months. Post-therapeutic CT indicated a significant reduction in the size of the mass, which now measured 17 × 14 × 21 cm. The patient underwent surgical resection a month after the completion of neoadjuvant therapy, and the post-operative period was uneventful. He was followed up regularly at the general surgery department for 24 months without recurrence. This case asserts the benefit of neoadjuvant therapy in reducing the tumour size pre-operatively, which enhances the complete resection rate, prevents the need for multi-organ resection, and lowers the risk of surgery.

FBXW7 regulates the sensitivity of imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumors by targeting MCL1

BACKGROUND

Imatinib contributes to improving prognosis of high-risk or unresectable gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). As therapeutic efficacy is limited by imatinib resistance and toxicity, the exploration of predictive markers of imatinib therapeutic efficacy that enables patients to utilize more effective therapeutic strategies remains urgent.

METHODS

The correlation between FBXW7 and imatinib resistance via FBXW7-MCL1 axis was evaluated in vitro and in vivo experiments. The significance of FBXW7 as a predictor of imatinib treatment efficacy was examined in 140 high-risk patients with GISTs.

RESULTS

The ability of FBXW7 to predict therapeutic efficacy of adjuvant imatinib in high-risk GIST patients was determined through 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates analysis and multivariate analysis. FBXW7 affects imatinib sensitivity by regulating apoptosis in GIST-T1 cells. FBXW7 targets MCL1 to regulate apoptosis. MCL1 involves in the regulation of imatinib sensitivity through inhibiting apoptosis in GIST-T1 cells. FBXW7 regulates imatinib sensitivity by down-regulating MCL1 to enhance imatinib-induced apoptosis in vitro. FBXW7 regulates imatinib sensitivity of GIST cells by targeting MCL1 to predict efficacy of imatinib treatment in vivo.

CONCLUSIONS

FBXW7 regulates imatinib sensitivity by inhibiting MCL1 to enhance imatinib-induced apoptosis in GIST, and predicts efficacy of imatinib treatment in high-risk GIST patients treated with imatinib.

The impact of contour maps on estimating the risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumor recurrence: indications for adjuvant therapy: an analysis of the Kinki GIST registry

INTRODUCTION

Contour maps enable risk classification of GIST recurrence in individual patients within 10 postoperative years. Although contour maps have been referred to in Japanese guidelines, their usefulness and role in determining indications for adjuvant therapy is still unclear in Japanese patients. The aims of this study are to investigate the validity of contour maps in Japanese patients with GIST and explore the new strategy for adjuvant therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 1426 Japanese GIST patients who were registered to the registry by the Kinki GIST Study Group between 2003 and 2012 were analyzed. Patients who had R0 surgery without perioperative therapy were included in this study. The accuracy of contour maps was validated.

RESULTS

Overall, 994 patients have concluded this study. Using contour maps, we validated the patients. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates of patients within the GIST classification groups of 0-10%, 10-20%, 20-40%, 40-60%, 60-80%, 80-90%, and 90-100% were 98.1%, 96.6%, 92.3%, 48.0%, 37.3%, 41.0% and 42.4%, respectively. We confirmed that this classification by contour maps was well reflected recurrence prediction. Further, in the high-risk group stratified by the modified National Institutes of Health consensus criteria (m-NIHC), the 10-year RFS rate was remarkably changed at a cutoff of 40% (0-40% group vs. 40-100% group: 88.7% vs. 50.3%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Contour maps are effective in predicting individual recurrence rates. And it may be useful for the decision of individual strategy for high-risk patients combined with m-NIHC.

Individualized Dosing Patterns in the Treatment of Older Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Results of a Registry-Based Observational National Cohort Study Including 871 Patients

BACKGROUND

While the effectiveness of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) seems similar in older patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) compared with younger patients, toxicities in older patients treated with TKIs more often lead to discontinuation of treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To better understand the age-related pharmacology and pharmacodynamic differences in patients with GIST treated with TKIs, the primary aim of this study was to evaluate TKI dosing patterns in older patients with GIST, while the secondary aims were to evaluate differences in imatinib trough plasma concentrations between age groups and to compare the overall survival (OS) in patients with and without dose reductions in all treatment lines in a palliative setting.

METHODS

Patients (18 years of age or older) with histologically proven GIST diagnosed between January 2009 and June 2021 and treated with one or more lines of TKIs were selected from the Dutch GIST Registry (DGR) database. Age groups were divided into younger patients (age <70 years) and older patients (age ≥70 years). All imatinib trough plasma concentrations of blood withdrawals taken from initiation of imatinib until a maximum of 1 year of treatment with imatinib were collected. Reasons for first adjustment of treatment were classified as adverse event, dose modification, progressive disease and other reasons. The next treatment steps after first adjustment of treatment were defined as dose escalation, dose reduction, dose interruption, or end of treatment. The association of dose reduction and OS was analyzed using the landmark approach.

RESULTS

Overall, 871 patients were included in this study, including 577 younger patients and 294 older patients. Older patients more often had an adverse event as the reason for first adjustment of treatment with both imatinib (45.6%; p < 0.001) and sunitinib (58.6%; p = 0.224) compared with younger patients (19.5% and 42.7%, respectively). Adjustment of imatinib and sunitinib after starting on a standard dose because of an adverse event most often resulted in dose reduction in both age groups. Median trough plasma concentrations of all samples taken within the first year after initiation of imatinib were higher in older patients (1228 ng/mL, interquartile range [IQR] 959-1687) compared with younger patients (1035 ng/mL [IQR 773-1377]; p < 0.001). No significant differences were seen between OS in patients with or without dose reduction in all treatment lines (imatinib: p = 0.270; sunitinib: p = 0.547; and regorafenib: p = 0.784).

CONCLUSION

Older patients showed higher imatinib trough plasma concentrations compared with younger patients and also had earlier and more often adverse events as the reason for first adjustment of treatment with imatinib followed by dose reduction. However, in a landmark analysis, patients with imatinib dose reductions had no poorer outcomes compared with patients not requiring a dose reduction.

Recent advances for treatment of upper gastrointestinal malignancy

Recent prospective trials for esophageal cancer, gastric cancer, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) are encouraging. This manuscript reviews selected recently published studies. Not surprisingly, immunotherapy dominates the current clinical trial landscape. However, targeted biologic therapies and standard chemotherapy remain critical to the treatment of gastric and esophageal cancer while imatinib remains the backbone for advanced or metastatic GISTs. For all three cancers, surgical resection remains important when intent of treatment is potential cure.

TARGET: A Phase II, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study of 5-Year Adjuvant Osimertinib in Completely Resected EGFR-Mutated Stage II to IIIB NSCLC Post Complete Surgical Resection

INTRODUCTION

Osimertinib is a central nervous system (CNS)-active, third generation, irreversible, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that potently and selectively inhibits EGFR-TKI sensitizing and EGFR T790M resistance mutations, with demonstrated efficacy in EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We present the rationale and design for TARGET (NCT05526755), which will evaluate the efficacy and safety of 5 years of adjuvant osimertinib in patients with completely resected EGFRm stage II to IIIB NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

TARGET is a phase II, multinational, open-label, single-arm study. Adults aged ≥18 years (Taiwan ≥20 years), with resected stage II to IIIB NSCLC are eligible; prior adjuvant chemotherapy is allowed. Eligible patients must have locally confirmed common (exon 19 deletion or L858R) or uncommon (G719X, L861Q, and/or S768I) EGFR-TKI sensitizing mutations, alone or in combination. Patients will receive osimertinib 80 mg once daily for 5 years or until disease recurrence, discontinuation or death. The primary endpoint is investigator-assessed disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years (common EGFR mutations cohort). Secondary endpoints include: investigator-assessed DFS at 3 and 4 years; overall survival at 3, 4, and 5 years (common EGFR mutations cohort); DFS at 3, 4, and 5 years (uncommon EGFR mutations cohort); safety and tolerability, type of recurrence and CNS metastases (both cohorts). Exploratory endpoints include: tissue/plasma concordance; analysis of circulating molecules in plasma samples using different profiling approaches to detect minimal residual disease; incidence and change over time of incidental pulmonary nodules.

RESULTS

TARGET is currently recruiting, and completion is expected in 2029.

Assessing prognostic factors of long-term survival after surgery for colorectal gastrointestinal stromal tumours

AIM

Due to their rarity, the management of colorectal gastrointestinal stromal tumours (CR GISTs) is still under debate. The aim of this study was to assess prognostic factors.

METHOD

We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent surgery with curative intent for CR GIST at our centre from 2002 to 2019. Factors associated with overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analysed.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients were included [median age 63 years, 29 (52%) female, 30 (54%) Miettinen high-risk, 40 (71%) with rectal GIST]. Nineteen (34%) patients received perioperative (neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant) imatinib. All cases of colonic GIST had an R0 resection, compared with 28 (70%) of rectal GISTs. After a median follow-up of 97 months (interquartile range 48-155 months), 14 (25%) deaths and 14 (25%) recurrences occurred. In the high-risk cohort, factors associated with improved RFS were R0 resection (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.1-0.5, p = 0.002) and perioperative imatinib (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.42-0.97, p = 0.04). Patients who had received perioperative imatinib had longer RFS (60% vs. 11% at 5 years, p = 0.006) but not OS. In rectal GISTs, 5-year OS was 85% for R0 and 70% for R1 resections (p = 0.164) and 5-year RFS was 85% for R0 and 12% for R1 resection (p < 0.001). When stratifying patients by perioperative imatinib, there were no differences in OS or RFS in the R0 or R1 groups.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative imatinib and R0 resection were associated with improved RFS in high-risk patients with CR GIST. In patients with rectal GIST, R1 resection was associated with worse RFS irrespective of perioperative imatinib treatment.

A Rare Case of Terminal Ileum Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor in a Young Caucasian Adult

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare in young individuals and typically affect older adults. We present the case of a previously healthy male who presented with severe hematochezia, fatigue, and dizziness. Colonoscopy did not demonstrate any colonic mass. CT of the pelvis with contrast revealed a pelvic mass measuring 7.4 cm. Biopsy confirmed a low-grade mixed-type GIST of the terminal ileum. Surgical resection was successfully performed. Histopathological analysis further characterized the tumor, and the patient was discharged with consideration of adjuvant imatinib therapy. This case underscores the importance of thorough diagnostic evaluation and multidisciplinary management for atypical presentations of gastrointestinal bleeding in young patients.

Neoadjuvant Imatinib in Locally Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) is Effective and Safe: Results from a Prospective Single-Center Study with 108 Patients

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant imatinib is considered for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) when decreased tumor size provides less extensive surgery and higher R0 resection rates. This study evaluates the effectivity and safety of neoadjuvant imatinib for large or locally advanced GIST.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From the prospective database of the Dutch GIST Consortium, all patients who underwent surgery after neoadjuvant imatinib at our center between 2009 and 2022 were selected. Independent and blinded assessment of surgical strategy was performed by two surgeons, based on anonymized computed tomography (CT) scans before and after neoadjuvant imatinib.

RESULTS

Of 113 patients that received neoadjuvant imatinib, 108 (95%) [mean age 61.6, standard deviation (SD) 11.5, 54% male] underwent a GIST resection. Of all GISTs, 67% was localized in the stomach and 25% in the duodenum or small intestine. In 74% of the patients with GIST, a KIT exon 11 mutation was found. Decreased tumor size was seen in 95 (88%) patients. Having a KIT exon 11 mutation [odds ratio (OR) 5.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.67-19.1, p < 0.01] or not having a mutation (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04-0.89, p = 0.04) were positive and negative predictive values for partial response, respectively. In 55 (51%) patients, there was deescalation of surgical strategy after neoadjuvant imatinib. Surgical complications were documented in 16 (15%) patients (n = 8, grade II; n = 5, grade IIIa; n = 3, grade IIIb) and R0 resection was accomplished in 95 (89%) patients. The 5-year disease-free and overall survival were 80% and 91%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that neoadjuvant imatinib is effective and safe for patients with large or locally advanced GIST.

Re-appraisal of the universal definition of tumor rupture among patients with high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Aim

Tumor rupture has been indicated as a risk factor for recurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). The universal definition of tumor rupture was proposed. This study evaluated whether the universal definition was more accurate in identification of GISTs with high recurrent risk than subjective judgment.

Methods

The study included 507 patients with high-risk GISTs who underwent complete resection between December 2012 and December 2015. We conducted a questionnaire survey in participating institutes to re-diagnose tumor rupture based on the universal definition according to their surgical and pathological findings. We compared the clinical outcomes of tumor rupture based on the definition to those based on the surgeon's judgment and clarified the clinical importance of the rupture.

Results

Sixty-four patients were initially registered to have tumor rupture by surgeon's judgment, and it became 90 patients who had tumor rupture after reevaluation. Although there were significant differences in recurrence-free survival (RFS) between no rupture and rupture for both initial registration and reevaluation (p = 0.002, <0.001, respectively), a significant difference in overall survival was only observed after reevaluation (p = 0.011). Tumor rupture was significantly associated with large tumor size, mixed cell type in histology, R1 resection, frequent adjuvant therapy and recurrence, but not with location, mitosis, and genotype. Adjuvant therapy more than 3 years improved RFS of patients with tumor rupture.

Conclusion

This study suggested that tumor rupture based on the universal definition more accurately identified GISTs with poor prognostic outcomes than the subjective judgment.

Guideline-Based Follow-Up Outcomes in Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor With Low Risk of Recurrence: A Report From the Italian Sarcoma Group

Importance

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) follow-up is recommended by international guidelines, but data on the role of follow-up in patients with low relapse risk are missing. For these patients, the potential benefit of anticipating recurrence detection should be weighed against psychological burden and radiologic examination loads in terms of costs and radiation exposure.

Objective

To evaluate the outcomes of guideline-based follow-up in low-risk GIST.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This multi-institutional retrospective cohort study involving Italian Sarcoma Group reference institutions evaluated patients with GIST who underwent surgery between January 2001 and June 2019. Median follow-up time was 69.2 months. Data analysis was performed from December 15, 2022, to March 20, 2023. Patients with GIST at low risk according to Armed Forces Institute of Pathology criteria were included provided adequate clinical information was available: primary site, size, mitotic index, surgical margins, and 2 or more years of follow-up.

Exposures

All patients underwent follow-up according to European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the number of tests needed to identify a relapse according to ESMO guidelines follow-up plan. Secondary outcomes included relapse rate, relapse timing, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), GIST-specific survival (GIST-SS), postrelapse OS, secondary tumor rates, and theoretical ionizing radiation exposure. An exploratory end point, new follow-up schedule proposal for patients with low-risk GIST according to the observed results, was also assessed.

Results

A total of 737 patients (377 men [51.2%]; median age at diagnosis, 63 [range, 18-86] years) with low-risk GIST were included. Estimated 5-year survival rates were 95.5% for DFS, 99.8% for GIST-SS, and 96.1% for OS. Estimated 10-year survival rates were 93.4% for DFS, 98.1% for GIST-SS, and 91.0% for OS. Forty-two patients (5.7%) experienced disease relapse during follow-up (9 local, 31 distant, 2 both), of which 9 were detected after 10 or more years. This translated into approximately 1 relapse detected for every 170 computed tomography scans performed, with a median radiation exposure of 80 (IQR, 32-112) mSv per patient. Nongastric primary tumor (hazard ratio [HR], 2.09; 95% CI, 1.14-3.83; P = .02), and KIT mutation (HR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.05-7.27; P = .04) were associated with a higher risk of relapse. Second tumors affected 187 of 737 patients (25%), of which 56 were detected during follow-up and represented the primary cause of death in these patients.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study on patients affected by low-risk GISTs, the risk of relapse was low despite a follow-up across 10 or more years. These data suggest the need to revise follow-up schedules to reduce the anxiety, costs, and radiation exposure of currently recommended follow-up strategy.

Personalized radiomics signature to screen for KIT-11 mutation genotypes among patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a retrospective multicenter study

OBJECTIVES

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) carrying different KIT exon 11 (KIT-11) mutations exhibit varying prognoses and responses to Imatinib. Herein, we aimed to determine whether computed tomography (CT) radiomics can accurately stratify KIT-11 mutation genotypes to benefit Imatinib therapy and GISTs monitoring.

METHODS

Overall, 1143 GISTs from 3 independent centers were separated into a training cohort (TC) or validation cohort (VC). In addition, the KIT-11 mutation genotype was classified into 4 categories: no KIT-11 mutation (K11-NM), point mutations or duplications (K11-PM/D), KIT-11 557/558 deletions (K11-557/558D), and KIT-11 deletion without codons 557/558 involvement (K11-D). Subsequently, radiomic signatures (RS) were generated based on the arterial phase of contrast CT, which were then developed as KIT-11 mutation predictors using 1408 quantitative image features and LASSO regression analysis, with further evaluation of its predictive capability.

RESULTS

The TC AUCs for K11-NM, K11-PM/D, K11-557/558D, and K11-D ranged from 0.848 (95% CI 0.812-0.884), 0.759 (95% CI 0.722-0.797), 0.956 (95% CI 0.938-0.974), and 0.876 (95% CI 0.844-0.908), whereas the VC AUCs ranged from 0.723 (95% CI 0.660-0.786), 0.688 (95% CI 0.643-0.732), 0.870 (95% CI 0.824-0.918), and 0.830 (95% CI 0.780-0.878). Macro-weighted AUCs for the KIT-11 mutant genotype ranged from 0.838 (95% CI 0.820-0.855) in the TC to 0.758 (95% CI 0.758-0.784) in VC. TC had an overall accuracy of 0.694 (95%CI 0.660-0.729) for RS-based predictions of the KIT-11 mutant genotype, whereas VC had an accuracy of 0.637 (95%CI 0.595-0.679).

CONCLUSIONS

CT radiomics signature exhibited good predictive performance in estimating the KIT-11 mutation genotype, especially in prediction of K11-557/558D genotype. RS-based classification of K11-NM, K11-557/558D, and K11-D patients may be an indication for choice of Imatinib therapy.

Novel Genomic Risk Stratification Model for Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) in the Adjuvant Therapy Era

PURPOSE

Traditional risk stratification schemes in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) were defined in the pre-imatinib era and rely solely on clinicopathologic metrics. We hypothesize that genomic-based risk stratification is prognostically relevant in the current era of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapeutics.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Comprehensive mutational and copy-number profiling using MSK-IMPACT was performed. We integrated clinicopathologic and genomic parameters and utilized an elastic-net penalized Cox proportional hazards machine learning model for outcome risk stratification.

RESULTS

A 3-tier genomic risk stratification model for recurrence-free survival (RFS) in 152 primary localized gastric and 80 small bowel GISTs was proposed. Gastric GISTs were classified as high risk if chr1p deletion or SDHB loss was present, and intermediate risk if chr14q deletion was present or KIT exon 11 mutation was absent. Small bowel GISTs were classified as high risk if MAX/MGA/MYC, CDKN2A, or RB1 alterations were present, and intermediate risk if chr1p deletion or chr5q amplification was present. Compared with conventional risk stratification, genomic risk stratification both upgrades and downgrades, suggesting that conventional risk stratification may underestimate or overtreat some high-risk and low-risk patients, respectively. Longitudinal sequencing detected most KIT-independent genomic alterations at baseline. Subanalysis in 26 SDH-deficient GISTs revealed that presence of TP53 mutations or chr1q amplifications portends worse RFS and disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a novel, next-generation genomic risk stratification model for primary gastric and small bowel GISTs, complementing traditional clinicopathologic models. Future independent validation of our model in external cohorts is essential.

Adjuvant Targeted Therapy in Solid Cancers: Pioneers and New Glories

Targeted therapy (TT) has revolutionized cancer treatment, successfully applied in various settings. Adjuvant TT in resected early-stage gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and breast cancer has led to practice-changing achievements. In particular, standard treatments include BRAF inhibitors for melanoma, osimertinib for NSCLC, hormone therapy or HER2 TT for breast cancer, and imatinib for GIST. Despite the undeniable benefit derived from adjuvant TT, the optimal duration of TT and the appropriate managing of the relapse remain open questions. Furthermore, neoadjuvant TT is emerging as valuable, particularly in breast cancer, and ongoing studies evaluate TT in the perioperative setting for early-stage NSCLC. In this review, we aim to collect and describe the large amount of data available in the literature about adjuvant TT across different histologies, focusing on epidemiology, major advances, and future directions.

KIT and PDGFRA Mutations and Survival of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Patients Treated with Adjuvant Imatinib in a Randomized Trial

PURPOSE

Limited data are available about the influence of KIT and PDGFRA mutations on overall survival (OS) of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) treated with adjuvant imatinib.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Scandinavian Sarcoma Group XVIII/AIO multicenter trial accrued 400 patients with a high risk for GIST recurrence after macroscopically complete surgery between February 4, 2004, and September 29, 2008. The patients received adjuvant imatinib 400 mg/day for either 1 year or 3 years based on random allocation. We analyzed using conventional sequencing KIT and PDGFRA mutations centrally from 341 (85%) patients who had localized, centrally confirmed GIST, and correlated the results with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and OS in exploratory analyses.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up time of 10 years, 164 RFS events and 76 deaths occurred. Most patients were re-treated with imatinib when GIST recurred. Patients with KIT exon 11 deletion or indel mutation treated with 3 years of adjuvant imatinib survived longer than patients treated for 1 year [10-year OS 86% versus 64%, respectively; HR, 0.34; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.15-0.72; P = 0.007], and also had longer RFS (10-year RFS 47% versus 29%; HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.31-0.74; P < 0.001). Patients with KIT exon 9 mutation had unfavorable OS regardless of the duration of adjuvant imatinib.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with 1 year of imatinib, 3 years of adjuvant imatinib led to 66% reduction in the estimated risk of death and a high 10-year OS rate in the subset of patients with a KIT exon 11 deletion/indel mutation.

Long-term outcomes of a phase II study of neoadjuvant imatinib in large gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant treatment is recommended for large GISTs due to their friability and risk of extensive operations; however, studies on the indications and long-term results of this approach are lacking.

METHODS

Patients with large (≥ 10 cm) gastric GISTs were enrolled from multiple centers in Korea and Japan after a pathologic confirmation of c-KIT ( +) GISTs. Imatinib (400 mg/d) was given for 6-9 months preoperatively, and R0 resection was intended. Postoperative imatinib was given for at least 12 months and recommended for 3 years.

RESULTS

A total of 56 patients were enrolled in this study, with 53 patients receiving imatinib treatment at least once and 48 patients undergoing R0 resection. The 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 94.3% and 61.6%, respectively. Even patients with stable disease by RECIST criteria responded well to preoperative imatinib treatment and could undergo R0 resection, with most being evaluated as partial response by CHOI criteria. The optimal reduction in tumor size was achieved with preoperative imatinib treatment for 24 weeks or more. No resumption of imatinib treatment was identified as an independent prognostic factor for recurrence after R0 resection. No additional size criteria for a higher risk of recurrence were identified in this cohort with a size of 10 cm or more.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant imatinib treatment is an effective treatment option for gastric GISTs 10 cm or larger. Postoperative imatinib treatment is recommended even after R0 resection to minimize recurrence.

A Rare Case of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor of the Abdominal Cavity: A Case Report

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare gastrointestinal neoplasms. We are presenting a 57-year-old female patient with a GIST of considerable dimensions that was deemed unresectable during the initial intervention. The patient had a previous surgical record of a peritoneal sarcomatosis tumor that covered approximately 50% of the abdominal cavity. The patient underwent surgical procedures, including exploratory laparotomy, lumpectomy, splenectomy, proximal gastrectomy, esophagogastric anastomosis, pyloroplasty, jejunostomy, and left diaphragm plasty. One of the observed results was the presence of a 50×40 cm exophytic multilobed cerebroid-like tumor in the abdomen region, specifically dependent on the gastric fundus. The primary treatment for patients without metastases is surgical removal of the tumor, with wedge resection being recommended for the preservation of organ function and quality of life postoperatively.

Cost Evaluation Analysis of Genetic Testing and Tailored Adjuvant Imatinib in Patients With Resected High-Risk GI Stromal Tumors: The Brazilian Perspective

PURPOSE

Mutations of the KIT gene are the molecular hallmark of most GI stromal tumors (GISTs). Imatinib has revolutionized GIST treatment. Adjuvant imatinib for 3 years is the standard of care for high-risk resected GIST. However, the GIST molecular biologic profile has found different responses to this approach. Despite this, genetic testing at diagnosis is not a routine and empirical adjuvant imatinib remains the rule. Barriers to genetic profiling include concerns about the cost and utility of testing. This analysis aims to determine whether targeted genetic testing reduces costs as an ancillary tool for a limited-resource scenario instead of adjuvant empirical imatinib in patients with resected high-risk GIST.

METHODS

The cost evaluation analysis of molecular testing for GIST was based on the Cost of Preventing an Event (COPE), considering the Number Needed to Treat and the costs of each test compared with the cost of 3-year empirical adjuvant imatinib and real treatment costs (median number of cycles) from the public and private Brazilian Healthcare System's perspective. The analysis compared the costs of the molecular tests (broad next-generation sequencing [NGS], GS Infinity DNA/RNA assay, and targeted NGS: GS Focus GIST and the Fleury GIST Tumor DNA sequencing panel), costs of drug acquisition, considering discounts (imatinib mesylate and Glivec), and the costs of supportive care.

RESULTS

In both scenarios, public and private, regardless of the use of imatinib or Glivec, tailoring adjuvant treatment reduced costs, irrespective of the number of cycles. The only exception was the combination of the broad NGS test and imatinib in the Public Healthcare System.

CONCLUSION

The molecularly tailored adjuvant imatinib reduced costs considering the COPE of available NGS tests for both the public and private Brazilian health care systems.

Utilization of Neoadjuvant Therapy in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors of the Stomach: Analysis of the 2006-2018 National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy has reduced tumor burden and improved survival in both primary and recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, no clear guidelines exist on optimal patient selection for neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). Our aim was to analyze factors and outcomes associated with the therapeutic sequence of TKI therapy before and/or after surgery for gastric GISTs.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of patients surgically treated for a gastric GIST utilizing the 2006-2018 National Cancer Database. We examined demographic, clinical, and pathological characteristics associated with NAT versus adjuvant therapy (AT) using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of the 3732 patients, 20.4% received NAT and 79.6% had AT. Among patients receiving therapy, NAT significantly increased over our study period (12% to 30.7%). A majority of the AT group received a partial gastrectomy (77.9%) compared with the NAT group who received more near-total/total gastrectomy or gastrectomy with en bloc resection (p < 0.001). In a multivariable model, patients were more likely to receive NAT when insured (private, aOR: 2.37, 95% CI: 1.31-4.29), treated at an academic/research program (aOR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.49-2.56), had tumors located in the proximal stomach (aOR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.06-1.86), tumor size > 10 cm (aOR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.41-2.51), and received near-total/total gastrectomy (aOR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.42-2.29). There were no differences in outcomes.

CONCLUSION

NAT for gastric GIST has increased in utilization. NAT was used in patients with larger tumors and who underwent more extensive resection. Despite these factors, outcomes were similar to patients receiving only AT. More studies are required to determine the therapeutic sequence for gastric GISTs.

SEOM-GEIS clinical guideline for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (2022)

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common malignant neoplasm of mesenchymal origin, and a paradigmatic model for a successful rational development of targeted therapies in cancer. The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors with activity against KIT/PDGFRA in both localized and advanced stages has remarkably improved the survival in a disease formerly deemed resistant to all systemic therapies. These guidelines are elaborated by the conjoint effort of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) and the Spanish Sarcoma Research Group (GEIS) and provide a multidisciplinary and updated consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of GIST patients. We strongly encourage that the managing of these patients should be performed within multidisciplinary teams in reference centers.

2023 GEIS Guidelines for gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common malignant neoplasm of mesenchymal origin. GIST spans a wide clinical spectrum that ranges from tumors with essentially no metastatic potential to malignant and life-threatening spread diseases. Gain-of-function mutations in KIT or PDGFRA receptor tyrosine kinases are the crucial drivers of most GISTs, responsible for tumor initiation and evolution throughout the entire course of the disease. The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting these receptors has substantially improved the outcomes in this formerly chemoresistant cancer. As of today, five agents hold regulatory approval for the treatment of GIST: imatinib, sunitinib, regorafenib, ripretinib, and avapritinib. This, in turn, represents a success for a rare neoplasm. During the past two decades, GIST has become a paradigmatic model in cancer for multidisciplinary work, given the disease-specific particularities regarding tumor biology and tumor evolution. Herein, we review currently available evidence for the management of GIST. This clinical practice guideline has been developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel (oncologist, pathologist, surgeon, molecular biologist, radiologist, and representative of patients' advocacy groups) from the Spanish Group for Sarcoma Research, and it is conceived to provide, from a critical perspective, the standard approach for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up.

Evaluation of Systemic Treatment Options for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal tumours of the gastrointestinal tract. Surgical treatment is recommended for the majority of localised GIST, while systemic treatment is the cornerstone of management for metastatic or unresectable disease. While a three-year regimen of imatinib is the standard of care in the adjuvant setting, there is no precise recommendation for the duration of neoadjuvant treatment, where imatinib is usually given between 4 and 12 months. Continuous treatment with imatinib at a dose of 400 mg once per day is recommended for most patients with unresectable or metastatic GIST in the first line. An exception is represented by patients with tumours harbouring the imatinib-insensitive PDGFRA D842V mutation who would be better treated with avapritinib. Targeted therapies are also recommended in the presence of NTRK rearrangements and BRAF mutations, although limited data are available. While an increase in the dose of imatinib to 800 mg is an option for the second line, sunitinib is usually considered the standard of care. Similar outcomes were reported for ripretinib in patients with tumours harbouring KIT exon 11 mutation, with significantly fewer side effects. Regorafenib and ripretinib are the standards of care in the third and fourth lines, respectively. The recent development of various systemic treatment options allows for a more personalised approach based on the molecular profile of the GIST, patient characteristics, and the profile of medications' adverse events. A multidisciplinary approach is paramount since combining systemic treatment with locoregional treatment options and supportive care is vital for long-term survival.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Our Ten-Year Experience of a Single-Center Tertiary Hospital

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most frequent mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. They have variable clinical presentation, prognosis, and molecular characteristics. Here, we present the results of our retrospective study including patients operated on for GIST during the last decade.

METHODS

All the patients who underwent GIST resection during the decade 2008-2018 were included in the study. The diagnosis was based on the pathology report. All the data were collected and analyzed statistically using the Statistical Package for Social Science v25.0. Finally, after having applied the proper search terms, a comprehensive review of articles published in the Medline database was held.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients (sixteen women) were included in the study with a mean age of 69.6 years old (SD = 13.9). Twenty-one patients had a GIST in the stomach, eight in the small intestine, and three had an extra GIST. Of the 29 patients contacted, 21 were alive with a mean survival time of 74.3 months (SD = 49.6 months, min: 3.0 months, max: 161.0 months), whereas eight patients passed away. Finally, 13 patients were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of whom only one died, while 9 patients passed away from those treated with surgery alone (p = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results were in concordance with the existing data in the literature. GISTs require patient-based therapeutical management depending on the histology of the tumors. Gastric tumors present a better prognosis than those localized in the intestine, while the use of TKIs has led to an improvement in patient survival rate.

KIT and PDGFRA Variants and the Survival of Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Treated with Adjuvant Imatinib

Adjuvant imatinib improves the recurrence-free survival and overall survival (OS) of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) who have a high risk of recurrence after surgery and is now considered standard treatment. Yet, OS benefit has been demonstrated in only one randomized study, the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group XVIII/AIO trial, where patients with high-risk GISTs were allocated to either 1 year or 3 years of adjuvant imatinib. SSGXVIII/AIO is also the only randomized trial in which adjuvant imatinib duration exceeding 2 years was evaluated. In this trial, the 3-year treatment led to a 45% reduction in the risk of death during the first 10 years that followed random allocation even though some of the patients did not have GISTs at tumor histology review, had mutations now known to be imatinib-resistant or had non-localized disease at study entry. In the subgroup of patients who had KIT exon 11 deletion/indel mutation, the reduction in the risk of death was 66% in favor of the longer treatment. Proper patient selection is of crucial importance since many patients are cured with surgery. Little evidence for OS benefit is available from randomized trials for patients whose GIST harbors KIT exon 9 mutation, KIT insertion mutation, PDGFRA D842V mutation, or lacks KIT and PDGFRA mutations. Adjuvant imatinib improves OS substantially if high-risk GISTs can be identified, treatment duration is long enough, and GISTs harbor an imatinib-sensitive mutation.

Sarcoma Research with Cancer Registry Data: Data and Peculiarities of Germany in the Light of Other Countries

INTRODUCTION

Sarcomas are documented in population-based and in clinic-associated databases. This study evaluated the status quo regarding the potential and obstacles of cancer registry-based research on sarcomas exemplified by Germany in comparison to similar databases in the US and Europe. Completeness and quality of data are discussed based on statistical analyses of a pooled data set established for the German Cancer Congress 2020.

METHODS

We analyzed data derived from 16 German institutions (federal state cancer registries and some facility-based registries). Malignant sarcomas in adults diagnosed between 2000 and 2018 with information on histology were grouped according to the WHO classification of soft tissue and bone tumors. Descriptive analyses of the study population regarding the distribution of age, sex, histology, localization of primary tumors, and metastases were performed. Survival for the ten most frequent histological groups and UICC stages was evaluated according to Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression. Time interval between surgery and subsequent radiation was calculated.

RESULTS

The initial data set contained 35,091 sarcomas. After several steps of data cleaning, 28,311 patients with known sex and unambiguous assignment to a histological subgroup remained (13,682 women and 14,629 men). Between 40 and 54 years, women were more likely to develop sarcomas, whereas in the older age groups more men were affected. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors, fibroblastic, and myofibroblastic tumors, smooth muscle tumors (mostly non-uterine leiomyosarcomas), and adipocytic tumors represented 48% of all sarcomas. Preferential sites for fibrosarcomas were the limbs, the trunk, and the head and neck region. The liposarcoma occurred most frequently on the trunk and limbs. Distant primary metastases were mostly located in the lung (43%), followed by the liver (14%), and bones (13%). Vascular and smooth muscle tumors showed the worst survival prognosis (5-year survival: approx. 15%, median survival approx. 8-16 months), whereas in low stages, the probability of survival of many sarcoma patients was beyond 5 years. Adjuvant radiotherapy was applied within 90 days in 71% of patients (n = 2,534).

CONCLUSION

Our results correspond to the data from the literature. However, a lack of data quality and completeness hampers further meaningful analyses, especially nonspecific or missing information about morphology and stage. Compared to some other countries, a comprehensive database is presently missing in Germany. However, currently, there are important efforts and legislative initiatives to create a comprehensive database on a national level within the near future.

Molecular Advances in the Treatment of Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

Most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are driven by activating mutations in Proto-oncogene c-KIT (KIT) or PDGFRA receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK). The emergence of effective therapies targeting these mutations has revolutionized the management of advanced GIST. However, following initiation of first-line imatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), nearly all patients will develop resistance within 2 years through the emergence of secondary resistance mutations in KIT, typically in the Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP)-binding site or activation loop of the kinase domain. Moreover, some patients have de novo resistance to imatinib, such as those with mutations in PDGFRA exon 18 or those without KIT or PDGFRA mutation. To target resistance, research efforts are primarily focused on developing next-generation inhibitors of KIT and/or PDGFRA, which can inhibit alternate receptor conformations or unique mutations, and compounds that impact complimentary pathogenic processes or epigenetic events. Here, we review the literature on the medical management of high-risk localized and advanced GIST and provide an update on clinical trial approaches to this disease.

Minimally invasive technique for gastric GIST at challenging locations: single incision surgical gastroscopy

Organ sparing resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) located in the proximal stomach or esophagogastric junction can be challenging, resulting in proximal or total gastrectomy to facilitate a radical resection without tumor spill. We developed and evaluated a single incision surgical gastroscopy (SISG) procedure to provide a technically feasible alternative for the removal of gastric GISTs at these challenging locations. We developed an endoluminal resection of gastric GISTs through a small single abdominal incision and longitudinal ventral gastrotomy. Patients with a proximal tumor location, in whom a wedge resection was deemed challenging on pre-operative investigation were included in the current series. Safety, short-term oncological and surgical outcome were evaluated. We performed SISG in six consecutive patients with histopathological proven or suspected gastric GIST. In all patients, the procedure was performed successfully with no tumor rupture. The mean operative time was 61 min and there were no significant complications. Pathological examination showed a microscopically radical resection in all patients. Single incision surgical gastroscopy is a feasible technique with excellent short-term oncological and surgical outcomes. This technique serves as a good alternative for complicated resections for gastric GISTs at challenging locations.

Diagnosis and management of high risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor in first trimester pregnancy: A case report and review of the literature

Objective

There are less than 20 reported cases of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in pregnancy. Of these reported cases, there are only two that detail GIST in the first trimester. We report our experience with the third known GIST diagnosis in the first trimester of pregnancy. Notably, our case report highlights the earliest known gestational age at time of GIST diagnosis.

Methods

We conducted a literature review of GIST diagnosis in pregnancy via PUBMED, using a combination of the following terms: (pregnancy or gestation) and (GIST). We utilized Epic for chart review of our patient's case report.

Results

A 24 year old G3P1011 presented to the Emergency Department at 4w6d by last menstrual period (LMP) with worsening abdominal cramping, bloating, and associated nausea. Physical exam revealed a large, mobile, nontender mass palpated in the right lower abdomen. Transvagianl ultrasound noted the presence of a large pelvic mass of unknown etiology. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was obtained for further characterization, revealing a 7.3× 12.4 × 12.2 cm mass with multiple fluid levels, centered in the anterior mesentery. Exploratory laparotomy was performed with en bloc resection of small bowel and pelvic mass, with pathology demonstrating a 12.8 cm spindle cell neoplasm compatible with GIST and notable for a mitotic rate of 40 mitoses/50 high power field (HPF). Next generation sequencing (NGS) was pursued in order to predict tumor responsiveness to Imatinib, which revealed a mutation at KIT exon 11, suggesting a response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. The patient's multidisciplinary treatment team, consisting of medical oncologists, surgical oncologists, and maternal fetal medicine specialists, made the recommendation for adjuvant Imatinib therapy. The patient was offered termination of pregnancy with immediate initiation of Imatinib, as well as continuation of pregnancy with either immediate or delayed treatment. Interdisciplinary counseling focused on both the maternal and fetal implications of each proposed management plan. She ultimately elected termination of pregnancy, and underwent an uncomplicated dilation and evacuation.

Conclusions

GIST diagnosis in pregnancy is exceedingly rare. Patients with high-grade disease encounter a multitude of decision-making dilemmas, often with competing maternal and fetal interests. As additional cases of GIST in pregnancy are added to the literature, clinicians will be able to implement evidence-based options counseling for their patients. Shared decision-making is contingent upon patient understanding of diagnosis, risk of recurrence, available treatment options, and the treatment-related implications on maternal and fetal outcomes. A multidisciplinary approach is crucial for optimization of patient-centered care.

Precision Oncology in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

GIST (gastrointestinal stromal tumors) represent 20% of sarcomatous tumors and 1-2% of primary gastrointestinal cancers. They have an excellent prognosis when localized and resectable, though their prognosis is poor in the metastatic setting, with limited options after the second line until recently. Four lines are now standard in KIT-mutated GIST and one in PDGFRA-mutated GIST. An exponential growth of new treatments is expected in this era of molecular diagnostic techniques and systematic sequencing. Currently, the main challenge remains the emergence of resistance linked to secondary mutations caused by selective pressure induced by TKIs. Repeating biopsies to tailor treatments might be a step in the right direction, and liquid biopsies at progression may offer a non-invasive alternative. New molecules with wider KIT inhibition are under investigation and could change the catalog and the sequence of existing treatments. Combination therapies may also be an approach to overcome current resistance mechanisms. Here, we review the current epidemiology and biology of GIST and discuss future management options, with an emphasis on genome-oriented therapies.

Molecular Mechanisms of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors and Their Impact on Systemic Therapy Decision

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are soft tissue sarcomas that mostly derive from Cajal cell precursors. They are by far the most common soft tissue sarcomas. Clinically, they present as gastrointestinal malignancies, most often with bleeding, pain, or intestinal obstruction. They are identified using characteristic immunohistochemical staining for CD117 and DOG1. Improved understanding of the molecular biology of these tumors and identification of oncogenic drivers have altered the systemic treatment of primarily disseminated disease, which is becoming increasingly complex. Gain-of-function mutations in KIT or PDGFRA genes represent the driving mutations in more than 90% of all GISTs. These patients exhibit good responses to targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Gastrointestinal stromal tumors lacking the KIT/PDGFRA mutations, however, represent distinct clinico-pathological entities with diverse molecular mechanisms of oncogenesis. In these patients, therapy with TKIs is hardly ever as effective as for KIT/PDGFRA-mutated GISTs. This review provides an outline of current diagnostics aimed at identifying clinically relevant driver alterations and a comprehensive summary of current treatments with targeted therapies for patients with GISTs in both adjuvant and metastatic settings. The role of molecular testing and the selection of the optimal targeted therapy according to the identified oncogenic driver are reviewed and some future directions are proposed.

Cardiovascular-Specific Mortality among Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Patients: A Population-Based Analysis

Background

The overall risk of cardiovascular mortality (CVM) in cancer survivors has increased with time. The trend of CVM in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) remains unclear. This study is aimed at assessing the risks and independent predictors of CVM in GIST patients.

Methods

Data of the GIST patients were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2000-2019). The standardized mortality ratio (SMR) was used to evaluate the risk of CVM, and a multivariate competing risk model was utilized to identify the predictors for CVM.

Results

A total of 12,058 patients with GIST were included in this study, of whom 477 (4.0%) patients died of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The SMR for CVM among GIST patients was significantly higher than in the general population (SMR, 3.23, 95% CI: 2.97-3.52), and all categories of CVD were associated with a significantly elevated SMR. The cumulative mortality of CVD was the lowest among all causes of death, while the CVM was the second most common cause of death in patients ≥ 80 years when stratified by age at diagnosis. Furthermore, male sex, older age at diagnosis, White race, unmarried, earlier year of diagnosis, and not receiving chemotherapy were the poor prognostic factors for CVM.

Conclusions

The CVM risk in GIST patients was significantly higher relative to the general US population. Timely screening and cardioprotective interventions should be implemented to prevent the occurrence of CVM in patients with GIST.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients receiving surgery with or without TKI therapy: a retrospective real-world study

PURPOSE

To retrospectively analyze the clinical characteristics of patients undergoing surgical treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) in Ruijin Hospital and explore the relevant prognosis clinical factors after surgical treatment.

METHODS

We screened out 1015 patients with GISTs diagnosed and treated during January 2010 to December 2019. We performed univariate analysis by the log-rank test and multivariate analysis by COX regression. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of the whole group.

RESULTS

All 1015 patients in the whole group received radical surgery, and the proportion of patients with high, intermediate, and low risk was 31.1%, 21.7%, and 47.3%, respectively. Among the 480 low-risk patients, surgery could achieve radical therapy; only the Ki-67 index was related to DFS and OS (DFS: p = 0.032, OS: p = 0.009) among the 140 intermediate-risk patients with tumors located in the stomach, whether received Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) therapy did not affect the prognosis of patients (DFS: p = 0.716, OS: p = 0.848). Among the 331 high-risk patients, those with non-gastric tumors (those outside the stomach, duodenum, and small intestine, HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.19-2.00, p < 0.001), tumor diameter > 10 cm (hazard ratio, HR 2.63, 95% confidence interval, CI 2.09-4.03, p < 0.001), as well as high-risk patients with mitotic rate > 10/50 HPF (HR 2.74, 95% CI 2.00-3.76, p < 0.001), the overall prognosis was obviously worse than that of other patients. For some high-risk patients, prolonged postoperative imatinib therapy could significantly improve the survival of patients (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.15-0.66, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

For the vast majority of GIST patients, surgery can be curative; but in intermediate-risk patients, the Ki-67 index and postoperative TKI treatment are closely related to prognosis. For intermediate-risk patients whose primary tumor is the stomach, the value of TKI-targeted therapy after surgery seem be not necessary in our study. However, for some high-risk patients, the prognosis of patients can be improved by appropriately prolonging the treatment time of TKI.

Evidence for the Current Management of Soft-tissue Sarcoma and Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors and Emerging Directions

Soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) is not a single entity but, rather, a family of diseases with differing biologic behaviors and anatomic site- and histotype-specific responses to treatment. Whereas surgery remains the mainstay of treatment of primary, localized disease, evolving evidence is establishing the role of multimodality treatment of these tumors. This article summarizes prospective evidence to date informing our treatment of STS. Key future directions will include advancing our understanding of fundamental tumor biology and mechanisms of response and recurrence, as well as defining the optimal provision of regional, systemic, and targeted therapies, including the role of immunotherapy. Ongoing global collaborations will be integral to progress in treating these rare tumors.

Imatinib use for gastrointestinal stromal tumors among older patients in Japan and Taiwan

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) improve the prognosis of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). We conducted a retrospective cohort study using cancer registries linked with health utilization data in Japan and Taiwan to assess TKI usage in older and non-older patients. Patients diagnosed with GIST (2012-2014) were categorized into the following: adjuvant and advanced/metastatic settings. The duration and patterns of imatinib therapy were compared between the older (aged ≥ 75 years) and non-older (< 75 years) groups. We included 232 Japanese and 492 Taiwanese patients in the adjuvant setting, and 235 Japanese and 401 Taiwanese patients in the advanced/metastatic setting. Older patients had higher proportions of starting with lower doses (< 400 mg/day) than the non-older patients (adjuvant: 22.5% vs. 4.3% [Japan]; 22.5% vs. 10.9% [Taiwan]; advanced/metastatic: 29.6% vs. 7.2% [Japan]; 32.6% vs. 8.1% [Taiwan]; all p < 0.01). The median time to stop imatinib was shorter in the older than in the non-older patients (adjuvant: 301 vs. 975 days [Japan], 366 vs. 1028 days [Taiwan]; advanced/metastatic: 423 vs. 542 days [Japan]; 366.5 vs. 837 days [Taiwan]). More older patients with GIST tended to have TKIs at a lower initial dose and a shorter imatinib duration than the non-older patients.

Large esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors resected thoracoscopically after oral imatinib therapy: a report of two cases

Esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are very rare, accounting for 2–5% of all GISTs. As with other GISTs, the principle of surgical treatment is complete resection with negative margins. In addition to biological grades of GISTs itselves, local recurrence due to capsular damage is a known risk. We describe two cases of massive esophageal GISTs that were successfully resected thoracoscopically after 2 months administration of 400 mg imatinib, with some discussion of the literature. Case 1, the patient was a 51-years-old man. After treated with 400 mg of imatinib as preoperative chemotherapy for 2 months, we performed surgery that included right thoracoscopic subtotal esophagectomy, gastric tube reconstruction, and jejunostomy. The resection specimen and histopathology were esophageal GIST-LtMtAeG, 110 × 95 mm. The postoperative course was uneventful, and was discharged on postoperative day 14. The patient has been recurrence free for 11 months postoperatively. Case 2, the patient was a 70-years-old man. After treated with 400 mg of imatinib as preoperative chemotherapy for 2 months, we performed surgery that included right thoracoscopic subtotal esophagectomy, gastric tube reconstruction, and jejunostomy. The resection specimen and histopathology were esophageal GIST-LtAeG, 90 × 52 mm. The postoperative course was uneventful, and was discharged on postoperative day 14. The patient has been recurrence free for 9 months postoperatively.

Gastro-intestinal stromal tumor (GIST): Experience from a tertiary care center in a low resource country

Objectives

The aim of this retrospective study was to review the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of GISTs treated surgically at our center over the past decade.

Material and Methods

We undertook a 12-year retrospective review of our experience in treating this condition with a focus on long-term outcomes of treated patients in a resource-constrained environment. Incomplete follow-up information continues to be a major problem with studies conducted in low resource settings, and in order to overcome this, we undertook telephonic contact with patients or their relatives to get the necessary information about their clinical status.

Results

Fifty-seven patients with GIST underwent surgical resection during this period of time. The stomach was the most common organ involved in the disease, with 74% of the patients. Surgical resection was the main treatment approach, with R0 resection possible in 88%. Nine percent of the patients were given Imatinib as neoadjuvant treatment and 61% were offered the same, as adjuvant therapy. The duration of adjuvant treatment changed from one year to three years over the study period. Pathological risk assessment categorized the patients as Stage I, 33%; Stage II, 19%; Stage III, 39%; and Stage IV, 9%. Of the 40 patients who were at least three years from surgery, 35 were traceable giving an 87.5%, overall three-year survival. Thirty-one patients (77.5%) were confirmed to be disease-free at three years.

Conclusion

This is the first report of mid-long-term outcomes of the multimodality treatment of GIST from Pakistan. Upfront surgery continues to be the main modality. OS & DFS in resource-poor environments can be similar to those seen in a better-structured healthcare setting.

Self-reported cognitive impairments and quality of life in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor: Results of a multinational survey

BACKGROUND

Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) has long-term effects on survivor quality of life, but CRCI research on patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is lacking. The aims of this study were to investigate CRCI and concomitant quality of life among patients with GIST.

METHODS

An online survey was used to assess CRCI in adult patients with GIST using the validated Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive-v.3. Age, education, demographically indexed IQ, general health, and quality of life factors (e.g., fatigue, emotional distress) were also assessed. The online survey was administered through five international GIST and sarcoma support organizations.

RESULTS

Over the 3-month recruitment period, the survey was completed by 485 participants: mean age, 57.80 (SD, 11.51), median 5 years after diagnosis. A majority (63.91%) reported experiencing cognitive symptoms with a significant negative quality of life impact. Controlling for age, patients with GIST ≥5 years after diagnosis reported worse cognitive function than those <5 years after diagnosis (p < .05) but did not differ in educational level or IQ. Whereas longer term survivors were more likely to have been treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapies, there was no observed association of TKI therapy with self-reported cognitive impairments.

CONCLUSIONS

A majority of GIST patients report cognitive symptoms that have a negative impact on quality of life, with longer term survivors (≥5 years) tending to report more cognitive impairments. Given the success of TKI therapy to substantially increase overall survival of patients with GIST, addressing CRCI in clinical practice may improve long-term GIST survivor function and quality of life.

Prognostic Nomogram for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors after Surgery Based on the SEER Database

We aimed to determine prognostic factors and develop an effective and practical nomogram for predicting cancer-specific survival in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients. Postoperative data were obtained from the SEER database (2000-2018). Patients were divided into training and validation cohorts at random (7 : 3). Prognostic factors were screened, and a prognostic nomogram was established using log-rank testing and Cox regression. We used DCA, ROC curves, C-index, and calibration curves to evaluate our model's predictive performance. The clinical value of the nomogram and the modified National Institute of Health (M-NIH) classification were compared using the NRI and IDI. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to examine survival by risk group, and log-rank tests were applied to compare variations in survival curves. Independent prognostic risk factors associated with cancer-specific survival on multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were age, race, and tumor location, size, grade, and stage. Clinically relevant variables need to be considered in addition to statistically significant variables when developing prognostic models to aid clinical decision-making. We included two additional variables (mitotic rate and chemotherapy) when constructing the prognostic model. The C-index was 0.766 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.737-0.794) in the training cohort and 0.795 (95% CI: 0.754-0.836) in the internal validation group suggesting robustness. The areas under the ROC curve for three-year and five-year survival were >0.700, indicating satisfactory discrimination. The calibration curves showed good agreement between the predictions of the nomogram and the actual results. The NRI (0.346 for 3-year and 0.265 for 5-year cancer-specific survival for patients with GIST (GSS) prediction; validation cohort: 0.356 for 3-year and 0.246 for 5-year GSS prediction) and IDI values (0.047 for 3-year and 0.060 for 5-year GSS prediction; validation cohort: 0.071 for 3-year and 0.084 for 5-year GSS prediction) suggested that the established nomogram performed significantly better than the M-NIH classification. The DCA indicated that the nomogram was clinically useful and had a high discriminative ability in identifying patients who were at high risk of poor outcomes. According to nomogram findings, patients were divided into three groups (high, moderate, and low risk), with significantly different prognoses in both cohorts. Our nomogram satisfactorily predicted survival in postsurgical GIST patients, which may assist clinicians to evaluate the postoperative status and guide subsequent treatments.

Current Molecular Profile of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors and Systemic Therapeutic Implications

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are malignant mesenchymal tumors arising from the intestinal pacemaker cells of Cajal. They compose a heterogenous group of tumors due to a variety of molecular alterations. The most common gain-of-function mutations in GISTs are either in the KIT (60-70%) or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) genes (10-15%), which are mutually exclusive. However, a smaller subset, lacking KIT and PDGFRA mutations, is considered wild-type GISTs and presents distinct molecular findings with the activation of different proliferative pathways, structural chromosomal and epigenetic changes, such as inactivation of the NF1 gene, mutations in the succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), BRAF, and RAS genes, and also NTRK fusions. Currently, a molecular evaluation of GISTs is imperative in many scenarios, aiding in treatment decisions from the (neo)adjuvant to the metastatic setting. Here, we review the most recent data on the molecular profile of GISTs and highlight therapeutic implications according to distinct GIST molecular subtypes.

Small molecule inhibitors targeting the cancers

Compared with traditional therapies, targeted therapy has merits in selectivity, efficacy, and tolerability. Small molecule inhibitors are one of the primary targeted therapies for cancer. Due to their advantages in a wide range of targets, convenient medication, and the ability to penetrate into the central nervous system, many efforts have been devoted to developing more small molecule inhibitors. To date, 88 small molecule inhibitors have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration to treat cancers. Despite remarkable progress, small molecule inhibitors in cancer treatment still face many obstacles, such as low response rate, short duration of response, toxicity, biomarkers, and resistance. To better promote the development of small molecule inhibitors targeting cancers, we comprehensively reviewed small molecule inhibitors involved in all the approved agents and pivotal drug candidates in clinical trials arranged by the signaling pathways and the classification of small molecule inhibitors. We discussed lessons learned from the development of these agents, the proper strategies to overcome resistance arising from different mechanisms, and combination therapies concerned with small molecule inhibitors. Through our review, we hoped to provide insights and perspectives for the research and development of small molecule inhibitors in cancer treatment.