Clinical decision rules to rule out subarachnoid hemorrhage for acute headache

High risk and low incidence diseases: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

INTRODUCTION

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a serious condition that carries a high rate of morbidity.

OBJECTIVE

This review highlights the pearls and pitfalls of aSAH, including presentation, diagnosis, and management in the emergency department based on current evidence.

DISCUSSION

aSAH is a type of hemorrhagic stroke, most commonly from rupture of a saccular aneurysm, which results in leakage of blood into the subarachnoid space. It presents acutely and has many mimics, making the diagnosis difficult. Patients who present with either sentinel or acute presentation of a headache that is described as sudden or severe, has associated neck stiffness, cranial nerve deficits, syncope, seizure, and/or coma should raise suspicion for the diagnosis. Non-contrast head computed tomography is the imaging modality of choice for evaluation and diagnosis of the disease in patients who present acutely. Further diagnostic testing with lumbar puncture or advanced neuroimaging may be required in patients who present >6 h after symptom onset. Patients with aSAH require critical, multidisciplinary care, with particular attention to management of airway, breathing, and circulation; expeditious referral for neurosurgical intervention; coagulopathy reversal; and prophylaxis against downstream complications.

CONCLUSION

An understanding of aSAH can assist emergency clinicians in diagnosing and managing this disease.

Evaluation of revised UK-NEQAS CSF-xanthochromia method for subarachnoid hemorrhage: outcome data provide evidence for clinical value

OBJECTIVES

Subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) has a high morbidity and mortality and requires prompt diagnosis. In patients with negative findings on computed-tomogram of the brain (CT-Brain) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-xanthochromia is considered the test of choice if performed 12 h or more after symptom onset. We audited the accuracy, usefulness and timing of CSF-xanthochromia testing and the interpretation of equivocal CSF-xanthochromia findings. We also investigated mortality outcomes for defined subsets of patients.

METHODS

A retrospective audit of CSF-xanthochromia tests over 8 years was performed. The service uses the revised UK-NEQAS (United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Service) method.

RESULTS

We analysed 543 cases (F=299, median age 44yrs) with 19 cases (3.5 %) having SAH. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of CSF-xanthochromia testing were 100 , 98.1, 65.9, 100 % respectively (equivocal results were counted as positives). 280 cases (F=153, median age 43yrs) had LP performed more than 24 h after the onset of headache (median time to LP=72 h). The sensitivity and specificity of the CSF-xanthochromia were 100 and 97.4 % in this group with NPV 100 % and PPV 66.6 %. 183 (65.4 %) CSF-xanthochromia negative cases in this subgroup had follow up data and survived without SAH occurring in the 12 months follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, supported by followup outcome data, we show that CSF-xanthochromia testing using the revised UK-NEQAS method is fit-for-purpose for the use as a second line test to exclude SAH in patients with negative CT-brain including delayed presentation more than 24 h after headache onset.

Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome for the Internist-A Narrative Review

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome is a common, increasingly recognized cause of thunderclap headache. Most patients have some type of trigger that precedes the onset (e.g., orgasm, physical exertion, Valsalva maneuvers, exposure to vasoconstrictive medications) followed by multiple short-duration thunderclap headaches that occur over days to weeks. Physical examination is often without focal neurological deficits. Brain computed tomography may be normal, or show a convexal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Angiography shows multifocal areas of cerebral arterial vasoconstriction, although can be normal early in the course. The vasoconstriction is reversible and repeat angiography in three months will show normalization. The clinical outcomes are usually good despite some patients having hemorrhagic or ischemic strokes. Treatment is primarily analgesics and avoidance of triggers. Triptans, steroids and immunosuppressive agents, which are sometimes used if migraine or central nervous system angiitis is suspected, should be avoided. Improved recognition of RCVS will likely lead to earlier diagnosis and minimize potentially harmful empiric treatment strategies.

Misdiagnosis of Acute Headache: Mitigating Medico-legal Risks

Headache is a common complaint of patients in the emergency department. The large majority of them have self-limited causes but some have life, limb, brain, or vision-threatening secondary causes. The job of the emergency physicians is to distinguish the 2 groups. This article focuses on clinical tips to avoid or at least mitigate medico-legal risk in patients with headache. Each process of care-history, physical examination, laboratory testing, brain imaging, spinal fluid analysis, specialist consultation, and documentation-will be considered.

Relationship Between Novel Inflammatory Indices and the Incidence of Postoperative Pneumonia After Endovascular Embolization for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Background

Accurate identification of the risk of postoperative pneumonia (POP) in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is essential for the implementation of stratified treatment. This study evaluated the relevance and utility of the Systemic Immuno-inflammatory Index (SII) and the Systemic Inflammatory Response Index (SIRI) in predicting pneumonia after aSAH.

Methods

Two hundred and forty patients undergoing aSAH intervention were included. Differences in SII and SIRI between patient groups were analyzed by propensity score matching (PSM). Receiver Operating Characteristic curves (ROC) were used to evaluate the predictive validity of SII and SIRI and to determine their predictive thresholds. The association of these indices with POP risk was assessed by multivariate logistic regression and restricted cubic spline (RCS), and subgroup analyses were performed.

Results

The overall POP prevalence was 60%, with 37.5% males and 62.5% females. PSM analyses showed statistically significant differences between the two groups for SII (P=0.032) and SIRI (P=0.02). They had a high predictive accuracy for predicting POP, with AUC values of 0.643 and 0.644, respectively. SII and SIRI were positively associated with the POP risk, independent of other confounders. Moreover, further sensitivity analysis and RCS supported the stability of this finding. Subgroup analyses showed that the relationship was stable across subgroups.

Conclusion

This study reveals the potential role of SII and SIRI in predicting the risk of postoperative pneumonia in patients with aSAH, and provides a strong basis for early identification and stratification of patients who are at high risk of postoperative pneumonia in aSAH.

Low Incidence of Delayed Intracranial Hemorrhage in Geriatric Emergency Department Patients on Preinjury Anticoagulation Presenting with Blunt Head Trauma

BACKGROUND

Delayed intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after head injury in older patients taking anticoagulants has been reported to be as high as 7.2%. Other studies suggest much lower rates. Its incidence and clinical management are controversial, with some recommending observation and repeat head imaging at 24 h.

OBJECTIVE

Our study aims to assess the incidence of delayed ICH in geriatric Emergency Department (ED) head trauma patients prescribed preinjury anticoagulants.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study conducted at two hospital EDs from August 2019 to July 2020. All patients aged 65 years or older with acute head injury were eligible for enrollment. We conducted telephone follow-up at 14 and 60 days, and a chart review at 90 days. The primary study outcome was incidence of delayed ICH, which was defined as an initial negative head computed tomography scan followed by subsequent ICH believed to be caused by the initial traumatic event. We compared the rates of delayed ICH between patient cohorts based on anticoagulant use.

RESULTS

There were 3425 patients enrolled: 2300 (67.2%) were not on an anticoagulant, 249 (7%) were on preinjury warfarin, 780 (22.7%) were on a direct-acting oral anticoagulant, and 96 (2.8%) were on enoxaparin or heparin. The median age was 82 years (interquartile range 65-107), the majority were female (55.2%), and almost all were Caucasian (84.3%). An acute ICH was identified in 229 of 3425 (6.7%, 95% confidence interval 6-8%) and delayed ICH in 13 (0.4%, 95% confidence interval 0.2-0.6%). There were no differences in rates of delayed ICH between those who had been prescribed anticoagulants vs. those who had not (p = 0.45).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of delayed ICH is very low in older ED head trauma patients on prescribed pre-injury anticoagulants. Our data have important clinical implications for the management of blunt head trauma among older ED patients on anticoagulants.

Subarachnoid haemorrhage in the emergency department (SHED): a prospective, observational, multicentre cohort study

BACKGROUND

People presenting to the ED with acute severe headache often undergo investigation to exclude subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). International guidelines propose that brain imaging within 6 hours of headache onset can exclude SAH, in isolation. The safety of this approach is debated. We sought to externally validate this strategy and evaluate the test characteristics of CT-brain beyond 6 hours.

METHODS

A prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study of consecutive adult patients with non-traumatic acute headache presenting to the ED within a UK National Health Service setting. Investigation, diagnosis and management of SAH were all performed within routine practice. All participants were followed up for 28 days using medical records and direct contact as necessary. Uncertain diagnoses were independently adjudicated.

RESULTS

Between March 2020 and February 2023, 3663 eligible patients were enrolled from 88 EDs (mean age 45.8 (SD 16.6), 64.1% female). 3268 patients (89.2%) underwent CT-brain imaging. There were 237 cases of confirmed SAH, a prevalence of 6.5%. CT within 6 hours of headache onset (n=772) had a sensitivity of 97% (95% CI 92.5% to 99.2%) for the diagnosis of SAH and a negative predictive value of 99.6% (95% CI 98.9% to 99.9%). The post-test probability after a negative CT within 6 hours was 0.5% (95% CI 0.2% to 1.3%). The negative likelihood ratio was 0.03 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.08). CT within 24 hours of headache onset (n=2008) had a sensitivity of 94.6% (95% CI 91.0% to 97.0%). Post-test probability for SAH was consistently less than 1%. For aneurysmal SAH, post-test probability was 0.1% (95% CI 0.0% to 0.4%) if the CT was performed within 24 hours of headache onset.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest a very low likelihood of SAH after a negative CT-brain scan performed early after headache onset. These results can inform shared decision-making on the risks and benefits of further investigation to exclude SAH in ED patients with acute headache.

Advances of curcumin in nervous system diseases: the effect of regulating oxidative stress and clinical studies

In recent years, researchers have highly observed that neurological disorders (NSDs) with the aging of the population are a global health burden whose prevalence is increasing every year. Previous evidence suggested that the occurrence of neurological disorders is correlated with predisposing factors such as inflammation, aging, and injury. Particularly, the neuronal cells are susceptible to oxidative stress, leading to lesions caused by high oxygen-consuming properties. Oxidative stress (OS) is a state of peroxidation, which occurs as a result of the disruption of the balance between oxidizing and antioxidizing substances. The oxidative intermediates such as free radicals, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and superoxide anion (O2-) produced by OS promote disease progression. Curcumin, a natural diketone derived from turmeric, is a natural antioxidant with a wide range of neuroprotective, anti-inflammatory, anti-tumor, anti-aging, and antioxidant effects. Fortunately, curcumin is recognized for its potent antioxidant properties and is considered a promising candidate for the prevention and treatment of neurological diseases. Consequently, this review elucidates the mechanisms by which curcumin mitigates oxidative stress and emphasizes the potential in treating nervous system disorders, including depression, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, epilepsy, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and glioblastoma. We aim to provide a new therapeutic option for the management of neurological diseases.

Etiology and characteristics of non-aneurysmal thunderclap headache presenting to an acute setting

OBJECTIVES

To describe the characteristics and causes of non-aneurysmal thunderclap headache (TCH) and compare serious from benign underlying causes.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients with TCH presenting to a tertiary care academic medical center between 2010 and 2020. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage cases were excluded. Cases were categorized into serious or benign; serious TCH was defined as any condition in which delayed diagnosis and treatment could result in neurological disability or death. Risk factors for serious TCH were analyzed. We adhere to standardized guidelines for reporting observational studies.

RESULTS

A total of 932 patients presented with TCH. After exclusion of 393 patients with aneurysmal-type subarachnoid hemorrhage, 539 were included in the analysis. One-half (n = 275, 51.0 %) had a serious cause. Median age was 51 years, 69.0 % were female. Most frequent diagnoses were intracranial hemorrhage (n = 102, 18.9 %), reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (n = 97, 18.0 %), and idiopathic TCH (n = 102, 38.6 %). A multivariable logistic regression model for prediction of serious TCH included age, hypertension, migraines, recurrent TCH, level of consciousness and other clinical exam findings, and achieved an AUROC of 0.732. This score had a sensitivity of 79.9 % (95 % CI 73.5-83.5 %) for the identification of serious TCH. A 0.5-point increase in the risk score was associated with a 73 % increase in the odds of serious TCH (odds ratio 1.73, 95 % CI 1.53-1.95, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study describes the relative frequency of presentation and etiologies among patients with TCH This score can aide clinicians in recognising patients with potentially serious cause of TCH, for whom additional imaging and neurological consultation is necessary.

Gabapentinoids for the treatment of stroke

ABSTRACT

Gabapentinoid drugs (pregabalin and gabapentin) have been successfully used in the treatment of neuropathic pain and in focal seizure prevention. Recent research has demonstrated their potent activities in modulating neurotransmitter release in neuronal tissue, oxidative stress, and inflammation, which matches the mechanism of action via voltage-gated calcium channels. In this review, we briefly elaborate on the medicinal history and ligand-binding sites of gabapentinoids. We systematically summarize the preclinical and clinical research on gabapentinoids in stroke, including ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, seizures after stroke, cortical spreading depolarization after stroke, pain after stroke, and nerve regeneration after stroke. This review also discusses the potential targets of gabapentinoids in stroke; however, the existing results are still uncertain regarding the effect of gabapentinoids on stroke and related diseases. Further preclinical and clinical trials are needed to test the therapeutic potential of gabapentinoids in stroke. Therefore, gabapentinoids have both opportunities and challenges in the treatment of stroke.

Persistent headache without neurologic deficit from a spontaneous vertebral artery dissection

INTRODUCTION

Non-traumatic headache is a common complaint seen in the emergency department (ED), accounting for 2.3% of ED visits per year in the United States (Munoz-Ceron et al., 2019). When approaching the workup and management of headache, an emergency medicine physician is tasked with generating a deadly differential by means of a thorough history and physical exam to determine the next best steps.

CASE

A 21-year-old male presented to the emergency department with a debilitating new-onset headache, preceded by an isolated vertiginous event 3 days prior. He was found to have a normal neurologic examination. A non-contrast CT scan of the head revealed a large hypodensity within the left cerebellum with a subsequent MRA of the brain and neck notable for a left vertebral artery dissection, complicated by an ischemic cerebellar stroke.

DISCUSSION

With an estimated incidence of 1-5 per 100,000, vertebral artery dissection is a rare cause of stroke within the general population and carries with it a high degree of morbidity and mortality (Rodallec et al., 2008). Vertebral artery dissection is a result of blood penetrating the intimal wall of the artery to form an intramural hematoma. Diagnosis can be difficult in cases presenting subacutely but a thorough history evaluating for red flags and using simple but highly sensitive exams such as the bedside HINTS exam can increase pretest probability of stroke. Clinical syndromes, red flags, and time from onset of symptoms should guide imaging modalities such as CT, CTA, MRI, and MRA in detection of small ischemic changes, intimal flaps, and luminal thromboses.

CONCLUSION

Vertebral artery dissection should remain high on the differential for an emergency medicine physician when history is suggestive of a new onset headache, preceded by vertiginous symptoms. An absence of recent trauma and a normal neurologic examination does not eliminate the diagnosis.

Subarachnoid hemorrhage mimicking an acute migraine attack: A case report

Subarachnoid hemorrhage is a neurological emergency in which arterial blood accumulates in the subarachnoid space with cerebral aneurysmal rupture being the most common cause. Subarachnoid hemorrhage is often misdiagnosed in the emergency department and mortality rates range from 8% to 67%. It may be the manifestation of the chronicity of the migraine. The difference in severity or quality compared to previous headaches, and other symptoms, particularly neck stiffness, but also seizure, syncope, focal neurological deficit, and vomiting are the key factors differentiating subarachnoid hemorrhage from the migraine. We report a case of a 37-year-old female with a previous history of migraines who presented with acute onset of excruciating headaches in the occiput associated with nausea, vomiting, and photophobia in whom a non-contrast computed tomography scan of the head showed hyper-densities involving the bilateral cerebral cortical sulcus and Sylvian fissure and the cerebral angiography showed a complex aneurysm in anterior communicating artery.

Diagnosis and management of subarachnoid haemorrhage

Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) presents a challenge to clinicians because of its multisystem effects. Advancements in computed tomography (CT), endovascular treatments, and neurocritical care have contributed to declining mortality rates. The critical care of aSAH prioritises cerebral perfusion, early aneurysm securement, and the prevention of secondary brain injury and systemic complications. Early interventions to mitigate cardiopulmonary complications, dyselectrolytemia and treatment of culprit aneurysm require a multidisciplinary approach. Standardised neurological assessments, transcranial doppler (TCD), and advanced imaging, along with hypertensive and invasive therapies, are vital in reducing delayed cerebral ischemia and poor outcomes. Health care disparities, particularly in the resource allocation for SAH treatment, affect outcomes significantly, with telemedicine and novel technologies proposed to address this health inequalities. This article underscores the necessity for comprehensive multidisciplinary care and the urgent need for large-scale studies to validate standardised treatment protocols for improved SAH outcomes.

Headache Disorders: Differentiating Primary and Secondary Etiologies

In the initial assessment of a headache patient, several dangerous secondary etiologies must be considered. A thorough history and physical examination, along with a comprehensive differential diagnosis may alert a physician to the diagnosis of a secondary headache particularly when it is accompanied by certain clinical features. Evaluation and workup include a complete neurological examination, consideration of neuroimaging, and serum/spinal fluid analysis if indicated. Careful attention to the patients' history and physical examination will guide the diagnostic work-up and management. In this review, we summarize the diagnostic workup of various primary and secondary headache etiologies. Although most headaches are primary in nature, it is essential to screen for headache "red flags", as they can suggest life threatening secondary etiologies. When secondary causes are suspected, appropriate neuroimaging can further differentiate the underlying cause. The appropriate imaging is dependent on the most likely secondary etiology, which is deduced from history and physical examination. When no red flags are present, primary headaches are more likely. These can be differentiated by frequency, location, duration, triggers, and presence of aura. The different clinical presentations for secondary headaches, as well as the distinguishing features for primary headaches are outlined in this review.

Physician Management and CT Ordering in the Emergency Department for Primary Headaches

OBJECTIVE

Management of primary headache (PHA) varies across emergency departments (ED), yet there is widespread agreement that computed tomography (CT) scans are overused. This study assessed emergency physicians' (EPs) PHA management and their attitudes towards head CT ordering.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was undertaken with EPs from one Canadian center. Drivers of physicians' perceptions regarding the appropriateness of CT ordering for patients with PHA were explored.

RESULTS

A total of 73 EPs (70% males; 48% with <10 years of practice) participated in the study. Most EPs (88%) did not order investigations for moderate-severe primary headaches; however, CT was the common investigation (47%) for headaches that did not improve. Computed tomography ordering was frequently motivated by the need for specialist consultation (64%) or admission (64%). A small proportion (27%) believed patients usually/frequently expected a scan. Nearly half of EPs (48%) identified patient imaging expectations/requests as a barrier to reducing CT ordering. Emergency physicians with CCFP (EM) certification were less likely to perceive CT ordering for patients with PHA as appropriate. Conversely, those who identified the possibility of missing a condition as a major barrier to limiting their CT use were more likely to perceive CT ordering for patients with PHA as appropriate.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency physicians reported consistency and evidence-based medical management. They highlighted the complexities of limiting CT ordering and both their level of training and their perceived barriers for limiting CT ordering seem to be influencing their attitudes. Further studies could elucidate these and other factors influencing their practice.

Defining and measuring objective and subjective spinal stiffness: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Examine and identify the breadth of definitions and measures of objective and subjective spinal stiffness in the literature, with a focus on clinical implications.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted to determine what is known about definitions and measures of the specific term of spinal stiffness. Following the framework by Arksey and O'Malley, eligible peer-reviewed studies identified using PubMed, Ebsco health, and Scopus were included if they reported definitions or measures of spinal stiffness. Using a data abstraction form, the studies were classified into four themes: biomechanical, surgical, pathophysiological, and segmental spinal assessment. To identify similarities and differences between studies, sixteen categories were generated.

RESULTS

In total, 2426 records were identified, and 410 met the eligibility criteria. There were 350 measures (132 subjective; 218 objective measures) and 93 indicators of spinal stiffness. The majority of studies (n = 69%) did not define stiffness.

CONCLUSION

This review highlights the breadth of objective and subjective measures that are both clinically and methodologically diverse. There is no consensus regarding a standardised definition of stiffness in the reviewed literature.

Frailty as a Predictor of Outcomes in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Frailty is an emerging concept in clinical practice used to predict outcomes and dictate treatment algorithms. Frail patients, especially older adults, are at higher risk for adverse outcomes. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a neurosurgical emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality rates that have previously been shown to correlate with frailty. However, the relationship between treatment selection and post-treatment outcomes in frail aSAH patients is not established. We conducted a meta-analysis of the relevant literature in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar using "Subarachnoid hemorrhage AND frailty" and "subarachnoid hemorrhage AND frail" as search terms. Data on cohort age, frailty measurements, clinical grading systems, and post-treatment outcomes were extracted. Of 74 studies identified, four studies were included, with a total of 64,668 patients. Percent frailty was 30.4% under a random-effects model in all aSAH patients (p < 0.001). Overall mortality rate of aSAH patients was 11.7% when using a random-effects model (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in mortality rate between frail and non-frail aSAH patients, but this analysis only included two studies and should be interpreted cautiously. Age and clinical grading, rather than frailty, independently predicted outcomes and mortality in aSAH patients.

2023 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

AIM

The "2023 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage" replaces the 2012 "Guidelines for the Management of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage." The 2023 guideline is intended to provide patient-centric recommendations for clinicians to prevent, diagnose, and manage patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

METHODS

A comprehensive search for literature published since the 2012 guideline, derived from research principally involving human subjects, published in English, and indexed in MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline, was conducted between March 2022 and June 2022. In addition, the guideline writing group reviewed documents on related subject matter previously published by the American Heart Association. Newer studies published between July 2022 and November 2022 that affected recommendation content, Class of Recommendation, or Level of Evidence were included if appropriate. Structure: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is a significant global public health threat and a severely morbid and often deadly condition. The 2023 aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage guideline provides recommendations based on current evidence for the treatment of these patients. The recommendations present an evidence-based approach to preventing, diagnosing, and managing patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, with the intent to improve quality of care and align with patients' and their families' and caregivers' interests. Many recommendations from the previous aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data.

Update on primary headache associated with sexual activity and primary thunderclap headache

BACKGROUND

This narrative review aims to provide an update on primary headache associated with sexual activity and primary thunderclap headache.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search on PubMed with the keywords "headache associated with sexual activity", "sexual headache", "orgasmic cephalalgia", and "coital cephalalgia" in addition to "thunderclap headache" to assess the appropriateness of all published articles in this review.

RESULTS

Primary headache associated with sexual activity is a "primary" headache precipitated by sexual activity, which occurs as sexual excitement increases (progressive at onset), or manifests as an abrupt and intense headache upon orgasm (thunderclap at onset) or combines these above two features. Primary headache associated with sexual activity is diagnosed after a thorough investigation, including appropriate neuroimaging studies, to exclude life-threatening secondary causes such as subarachnoid hemorrhage. According to the criteria of the third edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders, primary thunderclap headache is also a diagnosis by exclusion. The pathophysiology of primary headache associated with sexual activity and primary thunderclap headache remains incompletely understood. Treatment may not be necessary for all patients since some patients with primary headache associated with sexual activity and primary thunderclap headache have a self-limiting course.

CONCLUSION

A comprehensive neuroimaging study is needed for distinguishing primary headache associated with sexual activity or primary thunderclap headache from secondary causes. Primary headache associated with sexual activity and primary thunderclap headache are self-limited diseases and the prognoses are good, but some patients with primary headache associated with sexual activity may have a prolonged course.

The Role of VASOGRADE as a Simple Grading Scale to Predict Delayed Cerebral Ischemia and Functional Outcome After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

The VASOGRADE is a simple aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) grading scale that combines the modified Fisher scale (mFisher) and the World Federation of Neurological Societies (WFNS) grading system, allowing the stratification of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) risk. However, the VASOGRADE accuracy in predicting functional outcomes is still to be determined.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated a multiethnic cohort of consecutive patients with aSAH admitted to a high-volume center in Brazil from January 2016 to January 2019. Patients were classified according to the severity of the clinical presentation (WFNS), the amount of blood in the initial head computerized tomography (mFisher) scan, and the VASOGRADE (green, yellow, red). The primary outcome was to detect DCI-related cerebral infarction, and the secondary outcome was the functional outcome at hospital discharge according to the modified Rankin scale (mRs). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were employed.

RESULTS

A total of 212 patients (71.7% female, mean age 52.7 ± 12.8) were included. Sixty-nine patients were classified as VASOGRADE-Green (32.5%), 98 patients as VASOGRADE-Yellow (46.9%), and 45 patients as VASOGRADE-Red (20.6%). DCI-related infarction was present in 39 patients (18.9%). The proportions of patients in the VASOGRADE-Green, VASOGRADE-Yellow, and VASOGRADE-Red categories with DCI-related infarction were 7.7, 61.5, and 30.8%, respectively. After a multivariable analysis including age, sex, aneurysm location, and the VASOGRADE classification as variables, both VASOGRADE-Yellow and VASOGRADE-Red were independently associated with DCI-related infarction (odds ratio [OR] 7.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.13-27.8, and OR 8.07, 95% CI 2.03-32.11, respectively) and unfavorable outcome (OR 4.16, 95% CI 1.33-13.03, and OR 25.57, 95% CI 4.45-147.1, respectively). The VASOGRADE discrimination performance for DCI-related infarction (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) was 0.67 ± 0.04 (95% CI 0.58-0.75; p = 0.001). VASOGRADE-Red had 97.5% specificity for predicting an unfavorable mRs score at discharge (95% CI 92.8-99.5%). Conversely, VASOGRADE-Green had an excellent specificity for predicting favorable outcome at discharge (mRs score 0-2, 95% CI 82.6-95.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, in a multiethnic cohort of patients with aSAH, VASOGRADE-Green predicted the absence of DCI and good clinical outcome at discharge with very high specificity, and patients in this category might be selected for early intensive care unit (ICU) discharge, minimizing costs and medical complications associated with prolonged hospital stay. On the other hand, patients categorized as VASOGRADE-Yellow and VASOGRADE-Red were at the highest risk for DCI. They should, therefore, be selected as a priority for care in high-volume aSAH centers, being aggressively monitored for DCI at the ICU. Such stratification methods are crucial, especially in countries with low financial resources and high health care services demand.

A case report: Ruptured aneurysm with a wide neck treated by flow diverter stent and coil embolization

Diagnosis and endovascular treatment for ruptured wide neck aneurysms are challenges in clinics, particularly in developing countries. In the present study, we described a clinical case with a ruptured wide neck aneurysm in Vietnam treated by flow diverter stent and coil embolization. A 77-year-old- female patient had a right droopy eyelid for 2 months. The patient was admitted to hospital on the second day after being presented with a sudden-severe headache. Cerebral computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were taken on the second day and fifth day after the onset of the headache. The results showed an aneurysm in the right internal carotid artery but no potential subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) was displayed. An uncoagulated blood was found in cerebrospinal fluid indicated by a lumbar puncture test. Digital subtraction angiography provided images with one wide-neck right internal carotid aneurysm. The patient was treated by flow diverter stent and coil embolization and the dual antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor and aspirin at home. After 45 days, the patient did not face with any complication, no neurological symptoms, and the aneurysm was partially thrombosed indicated by MRI images. These results suggested that a lumbar puncture should be analyzed on the patient with brain aneurysm appeared a sudden severe headache and even no potential SAH on brain MRI or CT was found. The combination of flow diverter stent and coil embolization to treat cases with ruptured wide necked aneurysms should be considered in the future.

Spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage

Subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) is the third most common subtype of stroke. Incidence has decreased over past decades, possibly in part related to lifestyle changes such as smoking cessation and management of hypertension. Approximately a quarter of patients with SAH die before hospital admission; overall outcomes are improved in those admitted to hospital, but with elevated risk of long-term neuropsychiatric sequelae such as depression. The disease continues to have a major public health impact as the mean age of onset is in the mid-fifties, leading to many years of reduced quality of life. The clinical presentation varies, but severe, sudden onset of headache is the most common symptom, variably associated with meningismus, transient or prolonged unconsciousness, and focal neurological deficits including cranial nerve palsies and paresis. Diagnosis is made by CT scan of the head possibly followed by lumbar puncture. Aneurysms are commonly the underlying vascular cause of spontaneous SAH and are diagnosed by angiography. Emergent therapeutic interventions are focused on decreasing the risk of rebleeding (ie, preventing hypertension and correcting coagulopathies) and, most crucially, early aneurysm treatment using coil embolisation or clipping. Management of the disease is best delivered in specialised intensive care units and high-volume centres by a multidisciplinary team. Increasingly, early brain injury presenting as global cerebral oedema is recognised as a potential treatment target but, currently, disease management is largely focused on addressing secondary complications such as hydrocephalus, delayed cerebral ischaemia related to microvascular dysfunction and large vessel vasospasm, and medical complications such as stunned myocardium and hospital acquired infections.

Sensitivity of the SNNOOP10 list in the high-risk secondary headache detection

AIM

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the SNNOOP10 list in the detection of high-risk headaches.

METHODS

Patients that visited the Hospital Clínico San Carlos (Madrid) emergency department due to headache that were allocated to a Manchester Triage System level between critical and urgent were prospectively included but retrospectively analysed. A researcher blind to the patients' diagnosis administered a standardised questionnaire and afterwards a neurologist blind to the questionnaire results diagnosed the patient according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders. The primary endpoint was to assess the sensitivity of the SNNOOP10 list in the detection of high-risk headaches. Secondary endpoints included the evaluation of the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and area under the curve of each SNNOOP10 item.

RESULTS

Between April 2015 and October 2021, 100 patients were included. Patients were 44 years old (inter-quartile range: 33.6-64.7) and 57% were female. We identified 37 different diagnoses. Final diagnosis was a primary headache in 33%, secondary headache in 65% and cranial neuralgia in 2%. There were 46 patients that were considered as having high-risk headache. Patients from the primary headache group were younger and more frequently female. Sensitivity of SNNOOP10 list was 100% (95% confidence interval: 90.2%-100%). The items with higher sensitivity were neurologic deficit or disfunction (75.5%), pattern change or recent onset of the headache (64.4%), onset after 50 years (64.4%). The most specific items were posttraumatic onset of headache (94.5%), neoplasm in history (89.1%) and systemic symptoms (89%). The area under the curve of the SNNOOP10 list was 0.66 (95% CI: 0.55-0.76).

CONCLUSION

The red flags from the SNNOOP10 list showed a 100% sensitivity in the detection of high-risk headache disorders.

User initiated symptom assessment with an electronic symptom checker. Study protocol for mixed-methods validation. (Preprint)

BACKGROUND

The national Omaolo digital social welfare and health care service of Finland provides a symptom checker, Omaolo, which is a medical device (based on Duodecim Clinical Decision Support EBMEDS software) with a CE marking (risk class IIa), manufactured by the government-owned DigiFinland Oy. Users of this service can perform their triage by using the questions in the symptom checker. By completing the symptom checker, the user receives a recommendation for action and a service assessment with appropriate guidance regarding their health problems on the basis of a selected specific symptom in the symptom checker. This allows users to be provided with appropriate health care services, regardless of time and place.

OBJECTIVE

This study describes the protocol for the mixed methods validation process of the symptom checker available in Omaolo digital services.

METHODS

This is a mixed methods study using quantitative and qualitative methods, which will be part of the clinical validation process that takes place in primary health care centers in Finland. Each organization provides a space where the study and the nurse triage can be done in order to include an unscreened target population of users. The primary health care units provide walk-in model services, where no prior phone call or contact is required. For the validation of the Omaolo symptom checker, case vignettes will be incorporated to supplement the triage accuracy of rare and acute cases that cannot be tested extensively in real-life settings. Vignettes are produced from a variety of clinical sources, and they test the symptom checker in different triage levels by using 1 standardized patient case example.

RESULTS

This study plan underwent an ethics review by the regional permission, which was requested from each organization participating in the research, and an ethics committee statement was requested and granted from Pirkanmaa hospital district's ethics committee, which is in accordance with the University of Tampere's regulations. Of 964 clinical user-filled symptom checker assessments, 877 cases were fully completed with a triage result, and therefore, they met the requirements for clinical validation studies. The goal for sufficient data has been reached for most of the chief symptoms. Data collection was completed in September 2019, and the first feasibility and patient experience results were published by the end of 2020. Case vignettes have been identified and are to be completed before further testing the symptom checker. The analysis and reporting are estimated to be finalized in 2024.

CONCLUSIONS

The primary goals of this multimethod electronic symptom checker study are to assess safety and to provide crucial information regarding the accuracy and usability of the Omaolo electronic symptom checker. To our knowledge, this will be the first study to include real-life clinical cases along with case vignettes.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/41423.

The relationship between abnormal intracranial findings in brain computed tomography and antiplatelet or anticoagulant use in patients with nontraumatic headache: a prospective cohort study

Objective This study aimed to investigate the relationship between abnormal intracranial findings on brain computed tomography and antiplatelet or anticoagulant use in patients with nontraumatic headache in the emergency department (ED).Methods This was a single-center prospective observational study of patients admitted to the tertiary ED with complaints of nontraumatic headache between May 1, 2016 and September 1, 2016. Anticoagulant or antiplatelet drug use by the patient was recorded. Brain computed tomography (CT) results were categorized into two groups, abnormal results (CT positive) and no pathologic results (CT negative), and compared. The CT positive group included any pathological signs in the brain and the negative group was considered a normal read. A logistic regression analysis was used for evaluating the association of antiplatelets and anticoagulants with abnormal CT findings.Results Of the 837 patients with nontraumatic headaches, 157 (18.8%) patients who underwent brain CT scanning were included. The mean age of the patients was 44.4±16.7 years. Eighty-eight (56.1%) of the patients were women. Of the 29 (18.4%) patients using antiplatelets or anticoagulants, 16 (55.2%) were in the CT positive group. There was a statistically significant difference between both groups in terms of drug use compared to the CT negative group (P<0.001). Factors affecting CT results were examined in logistic regression analysis and a statistically significant difference was found in the detection of positive results in antiplatelet or anticoagulant drug users (adjusted odds ratio, 2.478; 95% confidence interval, 1.006–6.102; P=0.048).Conclusion The use of antiplatelets or anticoagulants in patients admitted to the ED with nontraumatic headache is associated with an increased risk of abnormal intracranial results in brain CT.

Updates on aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: is there anything really new?

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a severe disease, with systemic involvement and complex diagnosis and treatment. Since the current guidelines were published by the AHA/ASA, Neurocritical Care Society and the European Stroke Organization in 2012-2013,there has been an evolution in the comprehension of SAH-associated brain injury and its multiple underlying mechanisms. As a result, several clinical and translational trials were developed or are underway. Objective: The aim of this article is to review some updates in the diagnosis and treatment of neurological complications of SAH. Methods: A review of PubMed (May, 2010 to February, 2022) was performed. Data was summarized. Results: Content of five meta-analyses, nine review articles and 23 new clinical trials, including pilots, were summarized. Conclusions:Advances in the comprehension of pathophysiology and improvements in critical care have been reflected in the reduction of mortality in SAH. However, despite the number of publications, the only treatments shown to be effective in adequate, well-controlled clinical trials are nimodipine and repair of the ruptured aneurysm. Thus, doubts about the optimal management of SAH still persist.

Accuracy of presenting symptoms, physical examination, and imaging for diagnosis of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: Systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) is a life-threatening condition, and rapid diagnosis is necessary to facilitate early surgical intervention. We sought to evaluate the accuracy of presenting symptoms, physical examination signs, computed tomography with angiography (CTA), and point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) for diagnosis of rAAA.

METHODS

We searched six databases from inception through April 2021. We included studies investigating the accuracy of any of the above tests for diagnosis of rAAA. The primary reference standard used in all studies was intraoperative diagnosis or death from rAAA. Because PoCUS cannot detect rupture, we secondarily assessed its accuracy for the diagnosis of AAA, using the reference standard of intraoperative or CTA diagnosis. We used GRADE to assess certainty in estimates.

RESULTS

We included 20 studies (2,077 patients), with 11 of these evaluating signs and symptoms, seven evaluating CTA, and five evaluating PoCUS. Pooled sensitivities of abdominal pain, back pain, and syncope for rAAA were 61.7%, 53.6%, and 27.8%, respectively (low certainty). Pooled sensitivity of hypotension and pulsatile abdominal mass were 30.9% and 47.1%, respectively (low certainty). CTA had a sensitivity of 91.4% and specificity of 93.6% for diagnosis of rAAA (moderate certainty). In our secondary analysis, PoCUS had a sensitivity of 97.8% and specificity of 97.0% for diagnosing AAA in patients suspected of having rAAA (moderate certainty).

CONCLUSIONS

Classic clinical symptoms associated with rAAA have poor sensitivity, and their absence does not rule out the condition. CTA has reasonable accuracy, but misses some cases of rAAA. PoCUS is a valuable tool that can help guide the need for urgent transfer to a vascular center in patients suspected of having rAAA.

Management of patients presenting to the emergency department with sudden onset severe headache: systematic review of diagnostic accuracy studies

Objective

Advances in imaging technologies have precipitated uncertainty and inconsistency in the management of neurologically intact patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with non-traumatic sudden onset severe headache with a clinical suspicion of subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate diagnostic strategies in these patients.

Methods

Studies assessing any decision rule or diagnostic test for evaluating neurologically intact adults with a severe headache, reaching maximum intensity within 1 hour, were eligible. Eighteen databases (including MEDLINE and Embase) were searched. Quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. Where appropriate, hierarchical bivariate meta-analysis was used to synthesise diagnostic accuracy results.

Results

Thirty-seven studies were included. Eight studies assessing the Ottawa SAH clinical decision rule were pooled; sensitivity 99.5% (95% CI 90.8 to 100), specificity 24% (95% CI 15.5 to 34.4). Four studies assessing CT within 6 hours of headache onset were pooled; sensitivity 98.7% (95% CI 96.5 to 100), specificity 100% (95% CI 99.7 to 100). The sensitivity of CT beyond 6 hours was considerably lower (≤90%; 2 studies). Three studies assessing lumbar puncture (LP; spectrophotometric analysis) following negative CT were pooled; sensitivity 100% (95% CI 100 to 100), specificity 95% (95% CI 86.0 to 98.5).

Conclusion

The Ottawa SAH Rule rules out further investigation in only a small proportion of patients. CT undertaken within 6 hours (with expertise of a neuroradiologist or radiologist who routinely interprets brain images) is highly accurate and likely to be sufficient to rule out SAH; CT beyond 6 hours is much less sensitive. The CT–LP pathway is highly sensitive for detecting SAH and some alternative diagnoses, although LP results in some false positive results.

Spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage due to arteriovenous malformation mimicking migraine: A case report

Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) due to Arteriovenous Malformation (AVM) is a rare emergency case, which is often misdiagnosed as migraine. Here we present a case of SAH due to AVM that mimics migraine. A 41-year-old man came with headaches that radiated to the neck, worsened in the last week, accompanied by nausea, vomiting, photophobia, and a history of intermittent headaches for the previous 2 years. Physical examination was within normal limits, initial laboratory tests showed leukocytosis, and CT scan was not typical. The patient was diagnosed with migraine. Apparently, the lumbar puncture showed very high red blood cells, suspected as SAH. CT angiography revealed an extra-axial AVM. The patient was later diagnosed as SAH due to AVM. We recommend applying 4 key points, namely headache progressivity, neck pain, neck stiffness, and leukocytosis, to differentiate SAH due to AVM from migraine, especially in areas with limited facilities.

Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) remains an important cause of mortality and long-term morbidity. This article uses a case-based approach to guide readers through the fundamental epidemiology and pathogenesis of SAH, the approach to diagnosis and management, the results of clinical trials and evidence to date, prognostic considerations, controversies, recent developments, and future directions in SAH.

RECENT FINDINGS

Historically, management of SAH focused on prevention and treatment of subsequent cerebral vasospasm, which was thought to be the primary cause of delayed cerebral ischemia. Clinical and translational studies over the past decade, including several therapeutic phase 3 randomized clinical trials, suggest that the pathophysiology of SAH-associated brain injury is multiphasic and multifactorial beyond large vessel cerebral vasospasm. The quest to reduce SAH-associated brain injury and improve outcomes is shifting away from large vessel cerebral vasospasm to a new paradigm targeting multiple brain injury mechanisms, including early brain injury, delayed cerebral ischemia, microcirculatory dysfunction, spreading cortical depolarization, inflammation, and the brain-body interaction in vascular brain injury with critical illness.Despite multiple negative randomized clinical trials in search of potential therapeutic agents ameliorating the downstream effects after SAH, the overall outcome of SAH has improved over recent decades, likely related to improvements in interventional options for ruptured cerebral aneurysms and in critical care management. Emerging clinical evidence also suggests potential harmful impact of historic empiric treatments for SAH-associated vasospasm, such as prophylactic induction of hypertension, hypervolemia, and hemodilution (triple H therapy).With decreasing mortality, long-term SAH survivorship and efforts to reduce chronic morbidity and to improve quality of life and patient-centered outcome are growing areas of unmet need. Despite existing guidelines, significant variabilities in local and regional practices and in scientific terminologies have historically limited advancement in SAH care and therapeutic development. Large global collaborative efforts developed harmonized SAH common data elements in 2019, and studies are under way to examine how existing variabilities in SAH care impact long-term SAH outcomes.

SUMMARY

Although the overall incidence and mortality of SAH is decreasing with advances in preventive and acute care, SAH remains a major cause of long-term morbidity in survivors. Significant variabilities in care settings and empiric treatment protocols and inconsistent scientific terminologies have limited advancement in patient care and therapeutic clinical studies. Large consensus efforts are under way to introduce clinical guidelines and common data elements to advance therapeutic approaches and improve patient outcome.

Assessment of diagnostic strategies based on risk stratification for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a retrospective chart review

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE

Current guidelines recommend noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) followed by lumbar puncture for the diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Alternative strategies, including clinical risk stratification and CT angiography (CTA), are emerging.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate alternative strategies to current guidelines through clinical risk stratification.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Single-site, retrospective observational study of patients with SAH suspicion, from 2011 to 2016. We combined results of each investigation (NCCT, CTA and lumbar puncture) with a clinical risk assessment, including Ottawa score.

EXPOSURE

Comparing the current strategy (NCCT ± lumbar puncture if negative CT) to alternative strategies (NCCT + CTA ± lumbar puncture if high clinical risk or negative CT and onset of headache ≥12 h o dds ratio ≥24 h).

OUTCOME MEASURE AND ANALYSIS

Main outcome was diagnosis of SAH at hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were death from all causes and need for invasive procedures at 28 days. We used sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value (NPV) to evaluate the diagnostic performance of three strategies.

MAIN RESULTS

310 patients were included. SAH was diagnosed in 8 cases (2.6%), none died and 7 (2.2%) had a surgical procedure. Performances of different strategies were not statistically different. NPVs were 99.7% [95% Confidence interval (CI), 98.2-100%] for strategy 1 and 100% (95% CI, 98.8-100%) for strategies 2 and 3. More than 4000 lumbar punctures are needed to diagnose one SAH when CTA is performed within 24 h of symptoms' onset and absence of high-risk criteria.

CONCLUSION

Clinical risk stratification and CTA strategy are well-tolerated and effective for diagnosis of SAH, avoiding systematic use of lumbar puncture.

Clinical presentation and assessment of older patients presenting with headache to emergency departments: A multicentre observational study

OBJECTIVE

To describe the characteristics, assessment and management of older emergency department (ED) patients with non-traumatic headache.

METHODS

Planned sub-study of a prospective, multicentre, international, observational study, which included adult patients presenting to ED with non-traumatic headache. Patients aged ≥75 years were compared to those aged <75 years. Outcomes of interest were epidemiology, investigations, serious headache diagnosis and outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 298 patients (7%) in the parent study were aged ≥75 years. Older patients were less likely to report severe headache pain or subjective fever (both P < 0.001). On examination, older patients were more likely to be confused, have lower Glasgow Coma Scores and to have new neurological deficits (all P < 0.001). Serious secondary headache disorder (composite of headache due to subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH), intracranial haemorrhage, meningitis, encephalitis, cerebral abscess, neoplasm, hydrocephalus, vascular dissection, stroke, hypertensive crisis, temporal arteritis, idiopathic intracranial hypertension or ventriculoperitoneal shunt complications) was diagnosed in 18% of older patients compared to 6% of younger patients (P < 0.001). Computed tomography brain imaging was performed in 66% of patients ≥75 years compared to 35% of younger patients (P < 0.001). Older patients were less likely to be discharged (43% vs 63%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Older patients with headache had different clinical features to the younger cohort and were more likely to have a serious secondary cause of headache than younger adults. There should be a low threshold for investigation in older patients attending ED with non-traumatic headache.

BET 1: The Ottawa Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Clinical Decision Rule shows high sensitivity but limited evidence of patient benefit

A short-cut review of the literature was carried out to examine the diagnostic test characteristics and potential patient benefits through the use of the Ottawa Subarachnoid Haemorrhage Clinical Decision Rule. Nine papers were identified as suitable for inclusion using the reported search strategy. The author, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results and study weaknesses of the best papers are tabulated. It is concluded that the Ottawa Clinical Decision Rule has a high sensitivity for the diagnosis of subarachnoid haemorrhage; however, there is limited robust evidence of international generalisability and no evidence of improved patient outcomes following implementation. Further prospective research is required in populations with variable prevalence to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this intervention, compared with routine evaluation strategies.

External validation for sensitivity of the Ottawa subarachnoid hemorrhage rule in a Japanese tertiary teaching hospital

The Ottawa subarachnoid hemorrhage (OSAH) rule is a validated clinical prediction rule for ruling out subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Another SAH rule (Ottawa-like rule) was developed in Japan but was not well validated. We aimed to validate both rules by examining the sensitivity for ruling out SAH in Japanese patients diagnosed with SAH. We conducted a retrospective cohort study by reviewing the medical records of consecutive adult patients hospitalized with SAH at a tertiary-care teaching hospital in Japan who visited our emergency department between July 2009 and June 2019. Sensitivity and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated for each rule for the diagnosis of SAH. In a total of 280 patients with SAH, 56 (20.0%) patients met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed for the OSAH rule, and a sensitivity of the OSAH rule was 56/56 (100%; 95% CI 93.6–100%). While, 126 (45%) patients met the inclusion criteria of the Ottawa-like rule, and the rule showed a sensitivity of 125/126 (99.2%; 95%CI 95.7–100%). The OSAH rule showed 100% sensitivity among our Japanese patients diagnosed with SAH. The implementation of the Ottawa-like rule should be cautious because the false-negative rate is up to 4%.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms and Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) are commonly acquired vascular lesions that form an outpouching of the arterial wall due to wall thinning. The prevalence of UIAs in the general population is 3.2%. In contrast, an intracranial aneurysm may be manifested after rupture with classic presentation of a thunderclap headache suggesting aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Previous consensus suggests that although small intracranial aneurysms (<7 mm) are less susceptible to rupture, aneurysms larger than 7 mm should be treated on a case-by-case basis with consideration of additional risk factors of aneurysmal growth and rupture. However, this distinction is outdated. The PHASES score, which comprises data pooled from several prospective studies, provides precise estimates by considering not only the aneurysm size but also other variables, such as the aneurysm location. The International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms is the largest observational study on the natural history of UIAs, providing the foundation to the current guidelines for the management of UIAs. Although SAH accounts for only 3% of all stroke subtypes, it is associated with considerable burden of morbidity and mortality. The initial management is focused on stabilizing the patient in the intensive care unit with close hemodynamic and serial neurologic monitoring with endovascular or open surgical aneurysm treatment to prevent rebleeding. Since the results of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial, treatment of aneurysmal SAH has shifted from surgical clipping to endovascular coiling, which demonstrated higher odds of survival free of disability at 1 year after SAH. Nonetheless, aneurysmal SAH remains a public health hazard and is associated with high rates of disability and death.

Diagnosis and Management of Headaches in the Emergency Department (ED) in Adults and Children

Background

Headache accounts for a significant number of cases presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) and has a high societal cost, contributed by recurrent ED and clinic visits, and unnecessary diagnostic tests.

Objective

This review article covers the important clinical tools needed to evaluate headaches in both adults and children in the ED.

Methods

Medline/PubMed was searched using the keywords "Emergency department", "headache", "adult", "pediatric", "clinical assessment", "diagnosis" and "treatment", in the title or abstract. The search covers the period from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2019.

Results

The articles selected were based on their relevancy to the objective of this review article. Additional relevant publications were identified from article references lists.

Conclusion

The emergency physician plays a key role in differentiating between primary and secondary headaches. Within the limited ED resources, appropriate diagnostic testing should be used to identify the life-threatening headaches. This will ensure patients are given the appropriate evidence-based pharmacological therapy and holistic management.

Subarachnoid hemorrhage in the emergency department

BACKGROUND

Subarachnoid hemorrhage accounts for more than 30,000 cases of stroke annually in North America and encompasses a 4.4% mortality rate. Since a vast number of subarachnoid hemorrhage cases present in a younger population and can range from benign to severe, an accurate diagnosis is imperative to avoid premature morbidity and mortality. Here, we present a straightforward approach to evaluating, risk stratifying, and managing subarachnoid hemorrhages in the emergency department for the emergency medicine physician.

DISCUSSION

The diversities of symptom presentation should be considered before proceeding with diagnostic modalities for subarachnoid hemorrhage. Once a subarachnoid hemorrhage is suspected, a computed tomography of the head with the assistance of the Ottawa subarachnoid hemorrhage rule should be utilized as an initial diagnostic measure. If further investigation is needed, a CT angiography of the head or a lumbar puncture can be considered keeping risks and limitations in mind. Initiating timely treatment is essential following diagnosis to help mitigate future complications. Risk tools can be used to assess the complications for which the patient is at greatest.

CONCLUSION

Subarachnoid hemorrhages are frequently misdiagnosed; therefore, we believe it is imperative to address the diagnosis and initiation of early management in the emergency medicine department to minimize poor outcomes in the future.

Subarachnoid haemorrhage rules in the decision for acute CT of the head: external validation in a UK cohort

BACKGROUND

The Ottawa subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) rule and the Emerald SAH rule are clinical decision tools to aid in the decision for computed tomography (CT) of the head in patients attending an emergency department (ED) with acute non-traumatic headache. The objective of this study was to analyse the performance of these rules in a contemporary UK cohort.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective external validation study. Patients undergoing CT of the head for the evaluation and treatment of non-traumatic headaches over a 6-month period in the ED at two tertiary centres were assessed. Each patient's Ottawa rule and Emerald rule were calculated and compared with their final diagnosis.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 366 patients and there were 16 cases of SAH (based on CT findings or the presence of xanthochromia in cerebrospinal fluid). The Ottawa rule identified 288 patients requiring CT of the head. The sensitivity of the Ottawa rule was 100% (95% confidence interval (CI) 71-100%) and the specificity was 22% (95% CI 18-27%). The Emerald rule identified 267 patients who required CT, and achieved a sensitivity of 81% (95% CI 54-96%) and a specificity of 27% (95% CI 23-32%).

CONCLUSIONS

The Ottawa SAH rule correctly identified all patients with SAH in this contemporary cohort. The Emerald rule did not perform as well in this cohort and is unsuitable for clinical use. The Ottawa rule is a useful tool to aid in the decision for CT of the head in patients presenting with acute non-traumatic headache to the ED.

Evaluating thunderclap headache

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Thunderclap headache (TCH) is an abrupt-onset of severe headache that needs to be thoroughly investigated because the most common secondary cause is subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). There has been no consensus guideline regarding the diagnostic workup. This review aims to provide an update on the evaluation of TCH.

RECENT FINDINGS

The most important update in the 2019 American College of Emergency Physicians guideline for evaluation of acute headache in the emergency department is that negative noncontrast brain computed tomography (CT) findings within 6 h from ictus essentially excludes SAH. Additionally, the updated guideline recommends that after a negative brain CT, CT angiogram is a reasonable alternative to lumbar puncture if clinical suspicion of an intracranial source of SAH is high. An important update of reversible vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS), the second most common etiology of TCH, is the RCVS2 score development based on clinical and radiological features, providing high specificity and sensitivity for distinguishing RCVS from other intracranial arteriopathies.

SUMMARY

Although the evaluation of TCH is exhaustive, the potentially catastrophic consequence of a missed diagnosis of sentinel headache justifies the efforts. Awareness of the clinical features and application of diagnostic tools specific for different pathological conditions can facilitate the diagnostic workup.

Management of thunderclap headache in the emergency room: A retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

The evaluation of red flags is crucial for the accurate the diagnosis of headache disorders, especially for thunderclap headache. We analysed if secondary headache disorders were adequately ruled out in patients that presented to the emergency room with thunderclap headache.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we screened all patients that visited the emergency room for headache, including those that described thunderclap headache. We measured the frequency with which secondary causes were not adequately ruled out. We analysed the order of the exams, the final diagnosis, and the time elapsed between arrival, initial request for imaging, and the completion of the imaging.

RESULTS

We screened 2132 patients, and 42 (1.9%) fulfilled eligibility criteria. Mean age was 43.1 ± 17.1 years, and 57% of patients were female. For 22 (52.4%) patients, the work-up was incomplete. Vascular study was missing in 16 (38.1%) patients, cerebrospinal fluid evaluation in nine (21.4%), and magnetic resonance imaging in seven (16.7%), with multiple assessments missing in six (14.3%). There were ten different combinations in which the exams were performed, with the most frequent being the second exam's cerebral spinal fluid evaluation in 18 (52.9%) and the computed tomography angiogram in 10 (29.4%). A secondary cause of thunderclap headache was found in 16 (38.1%) patients, and four (9.5%) had a primary headache diagnosis after an adequate and complete study.

CONCLUSIONS

Thunderclap onset was described in one of every 50 patients that visited the emergency room for headache. More than half of these patients were not adequately managed. More than a third of thunderclap headache patients had a secondary cause.

Evaluating and managing severe headache in the emergency department

Introduction: Headache is the fifth most common reason to visit an emergency department (ED). In most of the cases, headache is benign and has a primary origin, with migraine as the most common diagnosis. Inappropriate use of ED for non-emergency conditions causes overcrowding, unnecessary testing, and increased medical costs.Areas covered: All stages of headache management in ED, from the reasons to go there, the diagnosis that is made and the investigations necessary to make it, to get to the therapies administered and those prescribed at discharge, if there were any. Finally, the authors evaluated the habit of recommending medical follow-up and how often the headache is still present at discharge or returns within 24 hours.Expert Opinion: Primary headaches are underdiagnosed, misdiagnosed, and the majority do not receive drug therapy either in ED or on discharge, and in cases where the therapy is prescribed is not specific. Increase the number of primary care medical services, spread the 'headaches culture' among GPs and ED doctors, the adoption of ICHD in the diagnostic protocols used in EDs and a fast referral to a headache center could decrease the inappropriate use of ED and improve the headache management in the emergency units.

Neurovascular disease, diagnosis, and therapy: Subarachnoid hemorrhage and cerebral vasospasm

The worldwide incidence of spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage is about 6.1 per 100,000 cases per year (Etminan et al., 2019). Eighty-five percent of cases are due to intracranial aneurysms. The mean age of those affected is 55 years, and two-thirds of the patients are female. The prognosis is related mainly to the neurologic condition after the subarachnoid hemorrhage and the age of the patient. Overall, 15% of patients die before reaching the hospital, another 20% die within 30 days, and overall 75% are dead or remain disabled. Case fatality has declined by 17% over the last 3 decades. Despite the improvement in outcome probably due to improved diagnosis, early aneurysm repair, administration of nimodipine, and advanced intensive care support, the outcome is not very good. Even among survivors, 75% have permanent cognitive deficits, mood disorders, fatigue, inability to return to work, and executive dysfunction and are often unable to return to their premorbid level of functioning. The key diagnostic test is computed tomography, and the treatments that are most strongly supported by scientific evidence are to undertake aneurysm repair in a timely fashion by endovascular coiling rather than neurosurgical clipping when feasible and to administer enteral nimodipine. The most common complications are aneurysm rebleeding, hydrocephalus, delayed cerebral ischemia, and medical complications (fever, anemia, and hyperglycemia). Management also probably is optimized by neurologic intensive care units and multidisciplinary teams.