1
|
Earland N, Zhang W, Usmani A, Nene A, Bacchiocchi A, Chen DY, Sznol M, Halaban R, Chaudhuri AA, Newman AM. CD4 T cells and toxicity from immune checkpoint blockade. Immunol Rev 2023; 318:96-109. [PMID: 37491734 PMCID: PMC10838135 DOI: 10.1111/imr.13248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
Immune-related toxicities, otherwise known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs), occur in a substantial fraction of cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Ranging from asymptomatic to life-threatening, ICI-induced irAEs can result in hospital admission, high-dose corticosteroid treatment, ICI discontinuation, and in some cases, death. A deeper understanding of the factors underpinning severe irAE development will be essential for improved irAE prediction and prevention, toward maximizing the benefits and safety profiles of ICIs. In recent work, we applied mass cytometry, single-cell RNA sequencing, single-cell V(D)J sequencing, bulk RNA sequencing, and bulk T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing to identify pretreatment determinants of severe irAE development in patients with advanced melanoma. Across 71 patients separated into three cohorts, we found that two baseline features in circulation-elevated activated CD4 effector memory T-cell abundance and TCR diversity-are associated with severe irAE development, independent of the affected organ system within 3 months of ICI treatment initiation. Here, we provide an extended perspective on this work, synthesize and discuss related literature, and summarize practical considerations for clinical translation. Collectively, these findings lay a foundation for data-driven and mechanistic insights into irAE development, with the potential to reduce ICI morbidity and mortality in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah Earland
- Division of Cancer Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Division of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Wubing Zhang
- Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Abul Usmani
- Division of Cancer Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Antonella Bacchiocchi
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - David Y. Chen
- Division of Dermatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Mario Sznol
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Ruth Halaban
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Aadel A. Chaudhuri
- Division of Cancer Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Division of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Aaron M. Newman
- Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cui S, Zhang B, Li L. The relationship between bullous pemphigoid and renal disease and related treatments: a review of the current literature. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2023; 19:1407-1417. [PMID: 37707350 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2023.2249238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune subepidermal blistering disorder in older adults. There is increasing evidence that BP has connections with renal diseases, such as glomerulopathy and neoplasm; it is also linked to the receipt of renal replacement therapy. AREAS COVERED In this review, we summarize the current evidence that BP is a comorbidity of common renal diseases. Furthermore, our exploration of the characteristics and possible mechanisms underlying these connections provides insights that may facilitate the prevention, diagnosis, and management of BP. EXPERT OPINION There is mounting proof that BP is not just a skin immunological disorder but rather a systemic immune-mediated illness. Quantities of case reports focused on BP as a renal disease comorbidity and the coexistence of them is not accidental. However, the underlying mechanisms are still needed to be investigated. Clinicians should be alert to the comorbidities in order to facilitate effective treatment and improve patient prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shengnan Cui
- Department of Dermatology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Bingjie Zhang
- Department of Dermatology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Li Li
- Department of Dermatology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang J, Hu X, Jiang W, Zhou W, Tang M, Wu C, Liu W, Zuo X. Analysis of the clinical characteristics of pembrolizumab-induced bullous pemphigoid. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1095694. [PMID: 36937423 PMCID: PMC10022695 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1095694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Pembrolizumab, a programmed cell death protein 1 checkpoint inhibitor, is a novel drug used to treat a variety of advanced malignancies. However, it can also result in many immune-related adverse events, with cutaneous toxicities being the most frequent. Regarding pembrolizumab-induced skin adverse reactions, bullous pemphigoid (BP) has the worst effects on quality of life. Recently, there have been more and more reports of BP incidents resulting from pembrolizumab therapy in patients with cancer. This study aimed to define the clinical characteristics, diagnosis and management of pembrolizumab-induced BP and identify potential differences between classical BP and pembrolizumab-induced BP. Methods Case reports, case series, and case analyses of pembrolizumab-induced BP up to 10 December 2022 were collected for retrospective analysis. Results Our study included 47 patients (33 males and 14 females) from 40 studies. The median age was 72 years (range 42-86 years). The median time to cutaneous toxicity was 4 months (range 0.7-28 months), and the median time to bullae formation was 7.35 months (range 0.7-32 months). The most common clinical features were tense bullae and blisters (85.11%), pruritus (72.34%), and erythema (63.83%) on the limbs and trunk. In 20 of the 22 cases tested, the serum anti-BP180 autoantibodies were positive. However, in 10 cases (91.90%, 10/11) the circulating autoantibodies of anti-BP230 were negative. 40 patients had skin biopsies and the skin biopsy revealed subepidermal bullae or blister eosinophil infiltration in 75.00% of patients with pembrolizumab-induced BP, 10.00% of patients with lymphocyte infiltration and 20.00% of patients with neutrophil infiltration. There were 20 patients (50%) with eosinophilic infiltration around the superficial dermis vessels, 8 patients (20.00%) with lymphocyte infiltration around the superficial dermis vessels, and 4 patients (10.00%) with neutrophil infiltration around the superficial dermis vessels. Direct immunofluorescence detected linear immunoglobulin G (IgG) IgG and/or complement C3 along the dermo-epidermal junction in 36 patients (94.74%) with BP. IgG positivity was detected by indirect immunofluorescence in 81.82% of patients with BP. All patients were in complete remission (95.65%,44/46) or partial remission (4.35%, 2/46) of BP, whereas 9/46 patients had a relapse or refractory. The majority of patients achieved BP remission after discontinuation of pembrolizumab with a combination of topically and systemically administered steroid treatments, or other medications. The median duration of BP remission was 2 months (range 0.3-15 months). Conclusion A thorough diagnosis of pembrolizumab-induced BP should be made using clinical signs, biochemical markers, histopathological and immunopathological tests. Pembrolizumab-induced BP had similar clinical characteristics to classic BP. Temporary or permanent discontinuation of pembrolizumab therapy may be required in patients with perbolizumab-induced BP depending on the severity of BP and the response to medication. Pembrolizumab-induced BP may be effectively treated using topical and systemic steroid treatments in combination with other medications (e.g., doxycycline, niacinamide, dapsone, rituximab, intravenous immunoglobulins, dupilumab, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, and infliximab). Clinicians should provide better management to patients with BP receiving pembrolizumab to prevent progression and ensure continuous cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianglin Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xin Hu
- Department of Pharmacy, Taojiang County People’s Hospital, Yiyang, China
| | - Wei Jiang
- Department of Pharmacy, Nanxian Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yiyang, China
| | - Wenjie Zhou
- Department of Pharmacy, Yongzhou Third People’s Hospital, Yongzhou, China
| | - Mengjie Tang
- Department of Pathology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Cuifang Wu
- Department of Pharmacy, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Pharmacy, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- *Correspondence: Wei Liu,
| | - Xiaocong Zuo
- Department of Pharmacy, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Asdourian MS, Shah N, Jacoby TV, Reynolds KL, Chen ST. Association of Bullous Pemphigoid With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review. JAMA Dermatol 2022; 158:933-941. [PMID: 35612829 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.1624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Importance There is limited information on immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced bullous pemphigoid (ICI-BP) in patients with cancer, with most existing studies being case reports or small case series from a single institution. Prior review attempts have not approached the literature in a systematic manner and have focused only on ICI-BP secondary to anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapy. The current knowledge base of all aspects of ICI-BP is limited. Objective To characterize the risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnostic findings, treatments, and outcomes of ICI-BP in patients with cancer as reported in the current literature. Evidence Review A systematic review was performed using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. Articles reporting data on individual patients who met preestablished inclusion criteria were selected, and a predefined set of data was abstracted. When possible, study results were quantitatively combined. Findings In total, 70 studies reporting data on 127 individual patients undergoing ICI therapy for cancer (median [IQR] age, 71 [64-77] years; 27 women [21.3%]) were included. In pooled analyses, patients ranged in age from 35 to 90 years. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced bullous pemphigoid often occurred during the course of anti-PD-1, PD-L1, or cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 therapy but was also found to develop up to several months after treatment cessation. Prodromal symptoms, such as pruritus or nonspecific skin eruptions, were found in approximately half of the patient population. Histopathologic or serologic testing, when undertaken, was a helpful adjunct in establishing diagnosis. Treatment with immunotherapy was discontinued after ICI-BP development in most patients. The most common treatments were systemic and topical corticosteroids. Steroid-sparing therapies, such as antibiotics and other systemic immunomodulators, were also used as adjuvant treatment modalities. Biologic and targeted agents, used predominantly in cases refractory to treatment with corticosteroids, were associated with marked symptomatic improvement in most patients. Conclusions and Relevance The results of this systematic review suggest that ICI-BP often poses a therapeutic challenge for patients with cancer who are receiving immunotherapy. Further research on the early recognition, diagnosis, and use of targeted treatment modalities will be essential in developing more personalized treatment options for affected patients while minimizing morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria S Asdourian
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Nishi Shah
- Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.,Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond
| | - Ted V Jacoby
- Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.,University of Hawaii at Manoa John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu
| | - Kerry L Reynolds
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston
| | - Steven T Chen
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bhardwaj M, Chiu MN, Pilkhwal Sah S. Adverse cutaneous toxicities by PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors: Pathogenesis, Treatment, and Surveillance. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 2022; 41:73-90. [PMID: 35107396 DOI: 10.1080/15569527.2022.2034842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Introduction-The therapeutic use of humanized monoclonal programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) (pembrolizumab, and nivolumab) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) (atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi) as potent anticancer therapies is rapidly increasing. The mechanism of signaling of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 involves triggering cytotoxic CD4+/CD8 + T cell activation and subsequent abolition of cancer cells which induces specific immunologic adverse events that are specific to these therapies. These drugs can cause numerous cutaneous reactions and are characterized as the most frequent immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Majority of cutaneous irAEs range from nonspecific eruptions to detectible skin manifestations, which may be self-limiting and present acceptable skin toxicity profiles, while some may produce life-threatening complications.Objective-.This review aims to illuminate the associated cutaneous irAEs related to drugs used in oncology along with the relevant mechanism(s) and management.Areas covered-Literature was searched using various databases including Pub-Med, Google Scholar, and Medline. The search mainly involved research articles, retrospective studies, case reports, and clinicopathological findings. With this review article, an overview of the cutaneous irAEs with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, as well as suggestions, have been provided, so that their recognition at early stages could help in better management and would prevent treatment discontinuation.Article highlightsCutaneous adverse effects are the most prevalent immune-related adverse events induced by anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune-checkpoint antibodies.Cutaneous toxicities mainly manifest in the form of maculopapular rash and pruritus.More specific cutaneous complications can also occur, including vitiligo, worsened psoriasis, lichenoid dermatitis, mucosal involvement (e.g., oral lichenoid reaction), dermatomyositis, lupus erythematosus.Cutaneous manifestations can be life-threatening including Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN).Dermatologic toxicities are usually mild, readily manageable, and rarely result in significant morbidity.Adequate management of the cutaneous adverse event and recognition in early stages could lead to the prevention of worsening of the lesions and limit treatment disruption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maitry Bhardwaj
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Panjab University, Chandigarh, 160014, India
| | - Mei Nee Chiu
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Panjab University, Chandigarh, 160014, India
| | - Sangeeta Pilkhwal Sah
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Panjab University, Chandigarh, 160014, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lozano AX, Chaudhuri AA, Nene A, Bacchiocchi A, Earland N, Vesely MD, Usmani A, Turner BE, Steen CB, Luca BA, Badri T, Gulati GS, Vahid MR, Khameneh F, Harris PK, Chen DY, Dhodapkar K, Sznol M, Halaban R, Newman AM. T cell characteristics associated with toxicity to immune checkpoint blockade in patients with melanoma. Nat Med 2022; 28:353-362. [PMID: 35027754 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-021-01623-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 145] [Impact Index Per Article: 72.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occur in up to 60% of patients with melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, it is unknown whether a common baseline immunological state precedes irAE development. Here we applied mass cytometry by time of flight, single-cell RNA sequencing, single-cell V(D)J sequencing, bulk RNA sequencing and bulk T cell receptor (TCR) sequencing to study peripheral blood samples from patients with melanoma treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy or anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 combination ICIs. By analyzing 93 pre- and early on-ICI blood samples and 3 patient cohorts (n = 27, 26 and 18), we found that 2 pretreatment factors in circulation-activated CD4 memory T cell abundance and TCR diversity-are associated with severe irAE development regardless of organ system involvement. We also explored on-treatment changes in TCR clonality among patients receiving combination therapy and linked our findings to the severity and timing of irAE onset. These results demonstrate circulating T cell characteristics associated with ICI-induced toxicity, with implications for improved diagnostics and clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander X Lozano
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aadel A Chaudhuri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. .,Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. .,Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA. .,Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| | - Aishwarya Nene
- Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Noah Earland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Matthew D Vesely
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Abul Usmani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Brandon E Turner
- Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Chloé B Steen
- Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Bogdan A Luca
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ti Badri
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Gunsagar S Gulati
- Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Milad R Vahid
- Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Farnaz Khameneh
- Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Peter K Harris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - David Y Chen
- Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Division of Dermatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Kavita Dhodapkar
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mario Sznol
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.,Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Ruth Halaban
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.,Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Aaron M Newman
- Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. .,Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|