Treatment of Women After Bilateral Salpingo-oophorectomy Performed Prior to Natural Menopause

Menopausal hormone therapy and the female brain: Leveraging neuroimaging and prescription registry data from the UK Biobank cohort

Background

Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is generally thought to be neuroprotective, yet results have been inconsistent. Here, we present a comprehensive study of MHT use and brain characteristics in females from the UK Biobank.

Methods

19,846 females with magnetic resonance imaging data were included. Detailed MHT prescription data from primary care records was available for 538. We tested for associations between the brain measures (i.e. gray/white matter brain age, hippocampal volumes, white matter hyperintensity volumes) and MHT user status, age at first and last use, duration of use, formulation, route of administration, dosage, type, and active ingredient. We further tested for the effects of a history of hysterectomy ± bilateral oophorectomy among MHT users and examined associations by APOE ε4 status.

Results

Current MHT users, not past users, showed older gray and white matter brain age, with a difference of up to 9 mo, and smaller hippocampal volumes compared to never-users. Longer duration of use and older age at last use post-menopause was associated with older gray and white matter brain age, larger white matter hyperintensity volume, and smaller hippocampal volumes. MHT users with a history of hysterectomy ± bilateral oophorectomy showed younger gray matter brain age relative to MHT users without such history. We found no associations by APOE ε4 status and with other MHT variables.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that population-level associations between MHT use and female brain health might vary depending on duration of use and past surgical history.

Funding

The authors received funding from the Research Council of Norway (LTW: 223273, 249795, 273345, 298646, 300768), the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority (CB: 2023037, 2022103; LTW: 2018076, 2019101), the European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (LTW: 802998), the Swiss National Science Foundation (AMGdL: PZ00P3_193658), the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (LAMG: PJT-173554), the Treliving Family Chair in Women's Mental Health at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (LAMG), womenmind at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (LAMG, BHL), the Ann S. Bowers Women's Brain Health Initiative (EGJ), and the National Institutes of Health (EGJ: AG063843).

Effects of menopause on temperature regulation

Changes in thermoregulation, notably the emergence of hot flashes, occur during the menopause transition in association with reproductive hormonal changes. Hot flashes constitute the most characteristic symptom of menopause (prevalence of 50-80%), and have a substantial negative effect on quality of life. Here, we review the endocrine changes associated with menopause and the thermoregulatory system and its sensitivity to female sex hormones. We then review current knowledge on the underlying neural mechanisms of hot flashes and how the reproductive and thermoregulatory systems interact in females. We consider the kisspeptin-neurokinin B-dynorphin (KNDy) neuron complex, which becomes hyperactive when estradiol levels decrease. KNDy neurons project from the arcuate nucleus to thermoregulatory areas within the hypothalamic preoptic area, where heat loss mechanisms are triggered, including cutaneous vasodilation and sweating - characteristics of the hot flash. We describe the physiology and measurement of hot flashes and discuss the mixed research findings about thresholds for sweating in symptomatic individuals. We consider the unique situation of hot flashes that arise during sleep, and discuss the relationships between the environment, exercise, and body mass index with hot flashes. We also discuss the unique situation of surgical menopause (with oophorectomy) and cancer therapy, conditions that are associated with frequent, severe, hot flashes. We then provide an overview of treatments of hot flashes, including hormone therapy and targeted neurokinin B-antagonists, recently developed to target the neural mechanism of hot flashes. Finally, we highlight gaps in knowledge about menopausal thermoregulation and hot flashes and suggest future directions for research.

The knowledge and skills required for the onco-rheumatologist: Study of four-year consultation records of a high-volume cancer centre

OBJECTIVES

Onco-rheumatology, the intersection of oncology and rheumatology, is an emerging field requiring further definition. This study aimed to identify the knowledge and skills essential for rheumatologists in clinical oncology.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed consultations with the onco-rheumatology department of a high-volume tertiary cancer centre in Japan from January 2020 to December 2023.

RESULTS

We analysed 417 consultations. The most common consultation (229, 55%) was related to immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Of the 238 irAEs in 185 patients, 15% were rheumatic and 85% were nonrheumatic (e.g. hepatobiliary toxicities, colitis). Approximately 25% of nonendocrine irAEs were refractory/relapsing, requiring second-line therapy (e.g. mycophenolate mofetil, biologics, immunoglobulin). In addition to irAE consultations, 137 (33%) consultations were about possible rheumatic diseases. The final diagnosis often related to cancer treatment, such as granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-related aortitis (15 patients, 11%), olaparib-related erythema nodosum (10 patients, 7.3%), and surgical menopause-related arthralgia (10 patients, 7.3%). Five patients (3.6%) were diagnosed with autoinflammatory bone disease mimicking bone tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

Onco-rheumatologists are expected to play a central role in the management of a wide range of irAEs, not limited to rheumatic irAEs. They must also manage rheumatologic manifestations during cancer treatment and rheumatic diseases that mimic tumours.

Hormone replacement therapy in surgical menopause after gynecological malignancies

This review examines hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in cases of surgical menopause following gynecological malignancies. It aims to capture current knowledge, summarize recent findings, and provide recommendations for clinical settings. Unlike natural menopause, surgical menopause occurs abruptly, without an adjustment period, and is associated with a notably higher risk of fractures, arthritis, cognitive decline, dementia, Parkinson's disease, and various metabolic disorders affecting glucose and lipid levels-all of which contribute to an increased risk of major cardiovascular events. In 2017, The North American Menopause Society recommended that, barring contraindications, HRT should be initiated in women who enter surgical menopause before age 45. If these women do not experience vasomotor symptoms or other issues, HRT should be maintained consistently at least until age 52. This guideline reflects contemporary knowledge and is the result of a multidisciplinary consensus, based on a review of existing literature and several randomized clinical trials focusing on women who have survived gynecological cancers and whose quality of life is significantly impacted by surgical or early menopause. Estrogen supplementation is particularly beneficial, as it is linked to marked improvements in quality of life, including delayed onset of chronic cardiovascular issues, reduced fracture risk, enhanced cognitive function, reduced inflammation, and improved self-esteem, as well as better social and work performance. Clinical implementation of HRT, however, requires a highly individualized approach. This approach must consider the type and stage of malignancy, histopathological characteristics, risk factors for recurrence (such as diet, concurrent medications, medical history, and genetic predispositions), and a thorough assessment of the potential benefits and risks of HRT, as well as the patient's personal wishes and expectations.

Laser for genitourinary syndrome of menopause: what we know and what we need to know

Energy-based treatments, including the fractional CO2 laser, have been widely used for treatment of genitourinary symptoms associated with menopause. With the availability of data from seven double-blind sham-controlled randomized trials, the evidence does not support the fractional CO2 laser as an efficacious treatment for genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM). A 2024 meta-analysis of these trials demonstrated that the symptom with greatest absolute improvement was dyspareunia at 16.3%, although not statistically significant. This improvement is far less than previously anticipated based on prospective data that suggested promising improvements of more than 90% satisfaction following laser treatment. Other data, including those from unblinded studies which are subject to a placebo effect, and outcomes that are not participant-reported including the appearance of the vagina on examination and histology, are not reliable in determining efficacy of laser treatment for GSM. While there may be a clinical effect of laser over sham treatments for GSM, the effect is unlikely to be clinically meaningful. Until we define and demonstrate a minimal clinically important difference in a robust and appropriately powered study, the laser should not be used in a clinical context for GSM.

Menopausal Hormone Therapy Use Among Postmenopausal Women

Importance

Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is the treatment of choice for symptoms of menopause. However, its adoption is hindered by the risk-benefit trade-off in relation to acute and chronic diseases.

Objective

To evaluate trends in and correlates of MHT use among postmenopausal women in the US from 1999 to March 2020.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This serial cross-sectional analysis of MHT use used data from the nationally representative National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Participants included noninstitutionalized US postmenopausal women from 10 NHANES study cycles (1999-2000 to 2017-March 2020 [pre-COVID-19 pandemic]). Data were analyzed from December 2023 to April 2024.

Exposures

NHANES study cycle.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Prevalence of MHT use was extracted from the prescription medication data collected during NHANES household interviews. MHT formulations were determined by hormone type.

Results

Data on 13 048 US postmenopausal women (47.1% ≥65 years old) were analyzed. From 1999 to 2020, the prevalence of MHT use decreased among women of all age groups, from 26.9% (95% CI, 22.6%-31.7%) in 1999 to 4.7% (95% CI, 3.4%-6.5%) in 2020. Until 2002, MHT use was highest among women aged 52 to 65 years, but since 2005, MHT use has been highest among women younger than 52 years. MHT use decreased by 23.5% (95% CI, 11.4%-35.6%), 31.4% (95% CI, 23.4%-39.5%), and 10.6% (95% CI, 6.3%-14.8%) for women younger than 52 years, 52 years to younger than 65 years, and 65 years and older, respectively. Prevalence of MHT use decreased from 13.8% (95% CI, 8.5%-21.7%) to 2.6% (95% CI, 1.5%-4.6%) for Hispanic women, 11.9% (95% CI, 8.5%-16.3%) to 0.5% (95% CI, 0.2%-1.1%) for non-Hispanic Black women, and 31.4% (95% CI, 27.1%-36.1%) to 5.8% (95% CI, 4.1%-8.2%) for non-Hispanic White women. Non-Hispanic White women consistently had the highest prevalence of MHT use. Estrogen-only formulation accounted for more than 50% of the MHT for most study periods. The prevalence of MHT use varied by family income-to-poverty ratio, health insurance coverage in all racial and ethnic groups, weight, and smoking status among non-Hispanic White women, as well as by education attainment among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic women.

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this cross-sectional study show that over the past 2 decades, MHT use declined among US postmenopausal women of all age and racial and ethnic groups. Women of racial and ethnic minority groups had lower prevalence of MHT use compared to non-Hispanic White women.

Risks and benefits of hormone therapy after menopause for cognitive decline and dementia: A conceptual review

OBJECTIVE

The effects on the brain of hormone therapy after the onset of menopause remain uncertain. The effects may be beneficial, neutral, or harmful. We provide a conceptual review of the evidence.

METHODS

We 1) provide a brief history of the evidence, 2) discuss some of the interpretations of the evidence, 3) discuss the importance of age at menopause, type of menopause, and presence of vasomotor symptoms, and 4) provide some clinical recommendations.

RESULTS

The evidence and the beliefs about hormone therapy and dementia have changed over the last 30 years or more. Five recent observation studies suggested that hormone therapy is associated with an increased risk of dementia, and the association appears not to change with the timing of initiation of therapy. These harmful associations may be explained by a causal effect of hormone therapy on the brain or by several confounding mechanisms. We suggest that the use of hormone therapy should be customized for different subgroups of women. It may be important to subgroup women based on age at onset of menopause, type of menopause, and presence or absence of vasomotor symptoms. In addition, the effects may vary by type, dose, route, and duration of administration of estrogens and by the concurrent use of progestogens.

DISCUSSION

The relation of hormone therapy with the risk of dementia is complex. Hormone therapy may have beneficial, neutral, or harmful effects on the brain. Hormone therapy should be guided by the clinical characteristics of the women being treated.

Excess morbidity and mortality associated with underuse of estrogen replacement therapy in premenopausal women who undergo surgical menopause

BACKGROUND

Contrary to clinical guidelines, there has been a decrease over time in estrogen therapy use in premenopausal women undergoing bilateral oophorectomy for benign indications.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to estimate the excess morbidity and mortality associated with current patterns of estrogen therapy use in women who undergo bilateral oophorectomy with hysterectomy for benign indications.

STUDY DESIGN

We developed 2 Bayesian sampling Markov state-transition models to estimate the excess disease incidence (incidence model) and mortality (mortality model). The starting cohort for both models were women who had undergone bilateral oophorectomy with hysterectomy for benign indications at the age of 45 to 49 years. The models tracked outcomes in 5-year intervals for 25 years. The incidence model estimated excess incidence of breast cancer, lung cancer, colorectal cancer, coronary heart disease, and stroke, whereas the mortality model estimated excess mortality due to breast cancer, lung cancer, coronary heart disease, and all-other-cause mortality. The models compared current rates of estrogen therapy use with optimal (100%) use and calculated the mean difference in each simulated outcome to determine excess disease incidence and death.

RESULTS

By 25 years after bilateral oophorectomy with hysterectomy, there were an estimated 94 (95% confidence interval, -158 to -23) fewer colorectal cancer cases, 658 (95% confidence interval, 339-1025) more coronary heart disease cases, and 881 (95% confidence interval, 402-1483) more stroke cases. By 25 years after bilateral oophorectomy with hysterectomy, there were an estimated 189 (95% confidence interval, 59-387) more breast cancer deaths, 380 (95% confidence interval, 114-792) more coronary heart disease deaths, and 759 (95% confidence interval, 307-1527) more all-other-cause deaths. In sensitivity analyses where we defined estrogen therapy use as a duration of >2 years of use, these differences increased >2-fold.

CONCLUSION

Underuse of estrogen therapy in premenopausal women who undergo oophorectomy is associated with substantial excess morbidity and mortality.

Ovarian Insufficiency: Clinical Spectrum and Management Challenges

The term "ovarian insufficiency" describes the decline of ovarian function resulting in fertility loss and the marked decrease of ovarian steroid hormone production. From a clinical standpoint, ovarian insufficiency presents in three different settings. The first is natural menopause at midlife occurring at the average age of 51 years. The second arises after surgical oophorectomy owing to disease or elective cancer prophylaxis. Finally, primary or premature ovarian insufficiency is characterized by menopause occurring before age 40, often of undetermined etiology, but at times linked with genetic mutations, autoimmune syndromes, metabolic conditions, iatrogenic etiologies, and toxic exposures. Each clinical situation presents unique concerns and management challenges. The majority of women with intact ovaries who live to age 51 experience natural menopause, with early menopause <45 years. In the United States, surgical menopause with bilateral oophorectomy occurs in ∼600,000 women per year. The timing and specific clinical indication for oophorectomy alters management. Primary ovarian insufficiency occurs in 1% of women, although recent estimates suggest the prevalence may be increasing. Symptoms of ovarian insufficiency include hot flashes or vasomotor symptoms, mood disorders, sleep disruption, and vaginal/urinary symptoms. Health concerns include bone, cardiovascular, and cognitive health. Management of symptoms and preventive strategies varies depending upon the age, clinical situation, and specific health concerns of each individual. Treatment options for symptom relief include cognitive behavior therapy and hypnosis, nonhormonal prescription therapies, and hormone therapy. Tailoring the therapeutic approach over time in response to age, emerging medical issues, and patient desires constitutes individualized care.

Primary ovarian insufficiency: a toolkit for the busy clinician

Primary ovarian insufficiency (sometimes known as premature ovarian insufficiency) is a result of loss of ovarian follicular activity before the age of 40 years. It is an endocrine deficiency state in women, characterized by premature estrogen deprivation. In the absence of estrogen replacement, women experience bothersome menopause symptoms and a predisposition to accelerated aging and multimorbidity accumulation. Unless a true contraindication exists, estrogen therapy is recommended at least until the age of natural menopause. This Practice Pearl summarizes the clinical manifestations, diagnostic evaluation, and management of primary ovarian insufficiency.

Sociodemographic characteristics associated with indications for surgical menopause in women: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical menopause indications and sociodemographic characteristics of women.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we analyzed the sociodemographic characteristics of women with indications for surgical menopause in 2010-2020. The R Version 4.1.1 (2021-08-10) software and logistic regression analysis were used to evaluate the data.

RESULTS

A total of 704 women's data were obtained in this study. Surgical menopause indications were found to stem from bleeding (46.0%), cancer (28.3%), cancer risk (18.9%), and other causes (6.8%). Surgical menopause indications originating from cancer were increased by 0.08 times (95%CI 0.01-0.68) due to smoking, 0.45 times (95%CI 0.23-0.88) due to regular drug use, and 0.36 times (95%CI 0.19-0.69) due to the presence of chronic disease (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

More than half of the women with surgical menopause indications were between 41 and 46 years of age. Additionally, 54.9% of the women had a chronic disease. Therefore, it is recommended to plan preventive health services for morbidity and mortality risks that may develop due to surgical menopause.

Perioperative Vaginal Estrogen as Adjunct to Native Tissue Vaginal Apical Prolapse Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Surgical repairs of apical/uterovaginal prolapse are commonly performed using native tissue pelvic ligaments as the point of attachment for the vaginal cuff after a hysterectomy. Clinicians may recommend vaginal estrogen in an effort to reduce prolapse recurrence, but the effects of intravaginal estrogen on surgical prolapse management are uncertain.

Objective

To compare the efficacy of perioperative vaginal estrogen vs placebo cream on prolapse recurrence following native tissue surgical prolapse repair.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This randomized superiority clinical trial was conducted at 3 tertiary US clinical sites (Texas, Alabama, Rhode Island). Postmenopausal women (N = 206) with bothersome anterior and apical vaginal prolapse interested in surgical repair were enrolled in urogynecology clinics between December 2016 and February 2020.

Interventions

The intervention was 1 g of conjugated estrogen cream (0.625 mg/g) or placebo, inserted vaginally nightly for 2 weeks and then twice weekly to complete at least 5 weeks of application preoperatively; this continued twice weekly for 12 months postoperatively. Participants underwent a vaginal hysterectomy (if uterus present) and standardized apical fixation (either uterosacral or sacrospinous ligament fixation).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was time to failure of prolapse repair by 12 months after surgery defined by at least 1 of the following 3 outcomes: anatomical/objective prolapse of the anterior or posterior walls beyond the hymen or the apex descending more than one-third of the vaginal length, subjective vaginal bulge symptoms, or repeated prolapse treatment. Secondary outcomes included measures of urinary and sexual function, symptoms and signs of urogenital atrophy, and adverse events.

Results

Of 206 postmenopausal women, 199 were randomized and 186 underwent surgery. The mean (SD) age of participants was 65 (6.7) years. The primary outcome was not significantly different for women receiving vaginal estrogen vs placebo through 12 months: 12-month failure incidence of 19% (n = 20) for vaginal estrogen vs 9% (n = 10) for placebo (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.97 [95% CI, 0.92-4.22]), with the anatomic recurrence component being most common, rather than vaginal bulge symptoms or prolapse repeated treatment. Masked surgeon assessment of vaginal tissue quality and estrogenization was significantly better in the vaginal estrogen group at the time of the operation. In the subset of participants with at least moderately bothersome vaginal atrophy symptoms at baseline (n = 109), the vaginal atrophy score for most bothersome symptom was significantly better at 12 months with vaginal estrogen.

Conclusions and Relevance

Adjunctive perioperative vaginal estrogen application did not improve surgical success rates after native tissue transvaginal prolapse repair.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02431897.

Take it or leave it: oophorectomy at the time of benign hysterectomy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Previous modeling data suggest ovarian conservation up to age 65 for women without adnexal disease and at average risk of ovarian cancer because of an increase in mortality associated with ovarian removal. Recent modeling data challenges this practice. This review of recent literature will update providers regarding consideration for oophorectomy at time of benign hysterectomy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Oophorectomy at time of hysterectomy for women less than 50 years with estrogen supplementation and greater than 50 years without estrogen supplementation is not associated with increased mortality.

SUMMARY

Although not associated with increased mortality, the decision to remove the ovaries at time of hysterectomy in women older than 50 years is nuanced and requires careful shared decision-making, considering unique patient factors.

Steroid hormones: risk and resilience in women's Alzheimer disease

More women have Alzheimer disease (AD) than men, but the reasons for this phenomenon are still unknown. Including women in clinical research and studying their biology is key to understand not just their increased risk but also their resilience against the disease. In this sense, women are more affected by AD than men, but their reserve or resilience mechanisms might delay symptom onset. The aim of this review was to explore what is known about mechanisms underlying women's risk and resilience in AD and identify emerging themes in this area that merit further research. We conducted a review of studies analyzing molecular mechanisms that may induce neuroplasticity in women, as well as cognitive and brain reserve. We also analyzed how the loss of steroid hormones in aging may be linked to AD. We included empirical studies with human and animal models, literature reviews as well as meta-analyses. Our search identified the importance of 17-b-estradiol (E2) as a mechanism driving cognitive and brain reserve in women. More broadly, our analysis revealed the following emerging perspectives: (1) the importance of steroid hormones and their effects on both neurons and glia for the study of risk and resilience in AD, (2) E2's crucial role in women's brain reserve, (3) women's verbal memory advantage as a cognitive reserve factor, and (4) E2's potential role in linguistic experiences such as multilingualism and hearing loss. Future directions for research include analyzing the reserve mechanisms of steroid hormones on neuronal and glial plasticity, as well as identifying the links between steroid hormone loss in aging and risk for AD.

Prophylactic salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy as a two-staged alternative for primary prevention of ovarian cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: women's point of view

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine BRCA -mutation carrier women's interest and acceptability of participating in a study examining prophylactic salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy (PSDO) as an alternative to the current recommendation for bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for risk reduction.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study. All women visiting the high-risk clinics for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in a single tertiary medical center were asked to complete a questionnaire concerning the two-stage approach from October 2018 to December 2019. Before completing the questionnaire, detailed explanation was given by a senior physician regarding the procedure, related background, possible risks, and benefits.

RESULTS

The study population included 293 women, of whom 183 (62.4%) were BRCA1 mutation carriers, 97 (33.1%) were BRCA2 mutation carriers, and 13 (4.4%) had unknown familial mutation. Risk-reducing surgery was completed in 160 (55.17%) of the women. First-degree and second-degree family history was reported in 166 (57.24%) and 52 (17.9%) of the women, respectively. Among women surveyed, more than half of the women (n = 66 [51%]) who had yet to undergo risk-reducing surgery reported interest in having PSDO. Similarly, among those who had already received prophylactic surgery, 64 (40%) also considered PSDO to be an acceptable alternative. Multivariate logistic regression analysis found family history of related malignancies to be the only independent factor associated with reduced interest in a study of PSDO (odds ratio, 0.15 [95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.77]; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, BRCA -mutation carrier women indicated interest in PSDO risk-reducing surgery, taking into consideration the potential additional risk. These findings suggest that a clinical study exploring the equivalence of PSDO as alternative treatment is feasible.

Frequency and type of premature or early menopause in a geographically defined American population

OBJECTIVE

There is limited information on the prevalence of premature and early menopause. Therefore, we studied the frequency and type of premature (age < 40 years) or early (age 40-44 years) menopause in a geographically-defined American population.

METHODS

We studied a random sample of women aged 18 to 50 years who resided in Olmsted County, MN between 1988 and 2007. Women were followed through December 2021, and age at cessation of menses was assessed via review of the medical records included in a medical records-linkage system. Menopause was defined as cessation of menses due to spontaneous or induced ovarian insufficiency.

RESULTS

1015 women (71.3 %) underwent spontaneous menopause, 138 (9.7 %) underwent bilateral oophorectomy, 17 (1.2 %) had antecedent chemotherapy or radiation therapy, and 254 (17.8 %) underwent hysterectomy or endometrial ablation. The median age at cessation of menses was 51.0 years (IQR, 49.0-52.0) for spontaneous menopause, 46.0 years (IQR, 41.0-49.0) for menopause induced by oophorectomy, chemotherapy, or radiation therapy, and 38.0 years (IQR, 33.0-44.0) for hysterectomy. Considering both spontaneous and induced menopause, the frequency was 3.1 % (95 % CI, 2.2-4.2) for premature and 6.2 % (95 % CI, 5.0-7.8) for early menopause. Considering only spontaneous menopause, the frequency reduced to 0.4 % (95 % CI, 0.2-1.0) for premature and 5.2 % (95 % CI, 4.0-6.8) for early menopause. However, considering all types of cessations of menses, the frequency was 12.2 % (95 % CI, 10.6-14.0) for premature and 9.7 % (95 % CI, 8.3-11.3) for early cessation of menses.

DISCUSSION

Approximately 3 % of women in the general population experienced either spontaneous or induced premature menopause. The most common cause of premature menopause was bilateral oophorectomy.

Rethinking Menopausal Hormone Therapy: For Whom, What, When, and How Long?

Menopausal hormone therapy (HT) was widely used in the past, but with the publication of seminal primary and secondary prevention trials that reported an excess cardiovascular risk with combined estrogen-progestin, HT use declined significantly. However, over the past 20 years, much has been learned about the relationship between the timing of HT use with respect to age and time since menopause, HT route of administration, and cardiovascular disease risk. Four leading medical societies recommend HT for the treatment of menopausal women with bothersome menopausal symptoms. In this context, this review, led by the American College of Cardiology Cardiolovascular Disease in Women Committee, along with leading gynecologists, women's health internists, and endocrinologists, aims to provide guidance on HT use, including the selection of patients and HT formulation with a focus on caring for symptomatic women with cardiovascular disease risk.

Premature Ovarian Insufficiency

Natural menopause typically occurs between the ages of 46 to 55 years. Premature ovarian insufficiency or premature menopause refers to compromised ovarian follicular activity, occurring spontaneously or because of medical interventions, prior to the age of 40 years. The premature loss of estrogen leads to bothersome menopause symptoms and predisposes the women to multiple long-term health risks including a higher mortality risk. Hormone replacement therapy used until the natural age of menopause can help manage the symptoms effectively and can mitigate the long-term risk of estrogen deprivation to some extent. However, hormone replacement therapy is underutilized in this population due to the inappropriate extrapolation of potential risks that have been demonstrated with hormone therapy use in women after natural menopause. There is a large unmet need for educating patients and providers regarding the impact of premature ovarian insufficiency and the compelling need for its appropriate management.

Prescription of hormone replacement therapy among cervical cancer patients with treatment-induced premature menopause

OBJECTIVE

To examine the utilization of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) among newly diagnosed cervical cancer patients who experienced premature menopause due to primary treatment.

METHODS

The MarketScan Databases were used to identify newly diagnosed cervical cancer patients <50 years of age with premature menopause after hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (primary surgery) or primary external beam pelvic radiation (primary radiotherapy). We examined the cumulative utilization of HRT until 24 months after the loss of ovarian function. Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models were developed to examine the factors associated with cumulative HRT use. The duration of HRT use was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

A total of 1826 patients, including 352 (19.3%) who underwent primary surgery and 1474 (80.7%) who received primary radiotherapy, were identified. Overall, 39.0% of patients received HRT within 24 months of primary treatment. HRT was used in 49.4% of those who underwent primary surgery and in 36.6% of those who received primary radiotherapy (p<0.0001). The median duration of HRT use was 60 days among the entire cohort and was significantly shorter for the primary radiotherapy group than the primary surgery group (35 vs 90 days, p<0.0001). Primary radiotherapy, older age, residency in the Northeastern USA, and Black race were associated with a lower likelihood of HRT use.

CONCLUSIONS

HRT was prescribed to less than half of patients with newly diagnosed cervical cancer under the age of 50 who experienced premature menopause due to primary treatment. Among those who used HRT the duration of use was short.

Menopause, hysterectomy, menopausal hormone therapy and cause-specific mortality: cohort study of UK Biobank participants

STUDY QUESTION

What is the association between menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) and cause-specific mortality?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Self-reported MHT use following early natural menopause, surgical menopause or premenopausal hysterectomy is associated with a lower risk of breast cancer mortality and is not consistently associated with the risk of mortality from cardiovascular disease or other causes.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Evidence from the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trials showed that the use of estrogen alone is not associated with the risk of cardiovascular mortality and is associated with a lower risk of breast cancer mortality, but evidence from the Million Women Study showed that use of estrogen alone is associated with a higher risk of breast cancer mortality.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Cohort study (the UK Biobank), 178 379 women, recruited in 2006-2010.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Postmenopausal women who had reported age at menopause (natural or surgical) or hysterectomy, and information on MHT and cause-specific mortality. Age at natural menopause, age at surgical menopause, age at hysterectomy and MHT were exposures of interest. Natural menopause was defined as spontaneous cessation of menstruation for 12 months with no previous hysterectomy or oophorectomy. Surgical menopause was defined as the removal of both ovaries prior to natural menopause. Hysterectomy was defined as removal of the uterus before natural menopause without bilateral oophorectomy. The study outcome was cause-specific mortality.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Among the 178 379 women included, 136 790 had natural menopause, 17 569 had surgical menopause and 24 020 had hysterectomy alone. Compared with women with natural menopause at the age of 50-52 years, women with natural menopause before 40 years (hazard ratio (HR): 2.38, 95% CI: 1.64, 3.45) or hysterectomy before 40 years (HR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.23, 2.07) had a higher risk of cardiovascular mortality but not cancer mortality. MHT use was associated with a lower risk of breast cancer mortality following surgical menopause before 45 years (HR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.08, 0.36), at 45-49 years (HR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.35) or at ≥50 years (HR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.13, 0.63), and the association between MHT use and the risk of breast cancer mortality did not differ by MHT use duration (<6 or 6-20 years). MHT use was also associated with a lower risk of breast cancer mortality following natural menopause before 45 years (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.36, 0.95) or hysterectomy before 45 years (HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.32, 0.74).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Self-reported data on age at natural menopause, age at surgical menopause, age at hysterectomy and MHT.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The current international guidelines recommend women with early menopause to use MHT until the average age at menopause. Our findings support this recommendation.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This project is funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) (grant numbers APP1027196 and APP1153420). G.D.M. is supported by NHMRC Principal Research Fellowship (APP1121844), and M.H. is supported by an NHMRC Investigator Grant (APP1193838). There are no competing interests.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.