Intradermal inoculation with Heptavax-B. Immune response and histologic evaluation of injection sites

Hepatitis B vaccine by intradermal route in non responder patients: An update

Vaccination is the main prophylactic measure to reduce the mortality caused by hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in healthy subjects since the immune response to hepatitis B recombinant vaccination occurs in over 90% of general population. Individuals who develop an anti-HBs titer less than 10 mIU/mL after primary vaccination cycle are defined “no responders”. Many factors could cause a non response to the HBV vaccination, such as administration of the vaccine in buttocks, impaired vaccine storage conditions, drug abuse, smoking, infections and obesity. Moreover there are some diseases, like chronic kidney disease, human immunodeficiency virus infection, chronic liver disease, celiac disease, thalassaemia, type I diabetes mellitus, down’s syndrome and other forms of mental retardation that are characterized by a poorer response to HBV vaccination than healthy subjects. To date it is still unclear how to treat this group of patients at high risk of hepatitis B infection. Recent studies seem to indicate that the administration of HBV recombinant vaccine by the intradermal route is very effective and could represent a more useful strategy than intramuscular route. This review focuses on the use of anti hepatitis B vaccine by intradermal route as alternative to conventional intramuscular vaccine in all non responder patients. A comprehensive review of the literature using PubMed database, with appropriate terms, was undertaken for articles in English published since 1983. The literature search was undertaken in September 2013.

Current evidence on intradermal influenza vaccines administered by Soluvia™ licensed micro injection system

Among the several strategies explored for (1) the enhancement of the immune response to influenza immunization, (2) the improvement of the vaccine acceptability and (3) the overcoming of the egg-dependency for vaccine production, intradermal administration of influenza vaccine emerges as a promising alternative to conventional intramuscular route, thanks to the recent availability of new delivery devices and the perception of advantages in terms of immunogenicity, safety, reduction of antigen content and acceptability.

 

Data from clinical trials performed in children, adults <60 y and elderly people and post-marketing surveillance demonstrate that actually, licensed intradermal influenza vaccines, Intanza™ 9 and 15 µg and Fluzone™ Intradermal, administered by the microinjection system Soluvia™, show an excellent acceptability, tolerability and safety profile. Formulations containing 9 and 15 μg per strain demonstrate, respectively, comparable and superior immunogenicity than conventional intramuscular vaccines. Licensed intradermal influenza vaccines can be considered a valid alternative to standard intramuscular vaccination offering significant advantages in low-responder populations and helping to increase influenza vaccination coverage rates especially in people with fear of needles or high apprehension associated with annual vaccination.

Intradermal vaccine delivery: will new delivery systems transform vaccine administration?

There has been a recent resurgence of interest in intradermal vaccine delivery. The physiological advantages of intradermal vaccine delivery have been known for some time, but the difficulties associated with performing an intradermal injection have historically limited its use. New delivery systems currently in development facilitate convenient intradermal vaccination, unlocking the potential advantages of this delivery route, and potentially transforming vaccine delivery.

High seroprotection rate induced by intradermal administration of a recombinant hepatitis B vaccine in young healthy adults: comparison with standard intramuscular vaccination

Intradermal (ID) vaccination has been proposed as a cost-saving alternative for administration of Hepatitis B (HB) vaccine to implement of mass vaccination of high-risk groups, particularly in developing countries. Therefore, the effectiveness of ID vaccination needs to be evaluated and verified in different ethnic backgrounds. The present study is a randomized trail using a recombinant vaccine (Heberbiovac) to compare immunogenecity and safety of an intradermal low-dose (4 microg) with standard dose (20 microg) of intramuscular (IM) vaccination in healthy Iranian population. Participants were 143 healthy Iranian medical and nursing students randomly allocated to ID or IM vaccination group. The vaccine was inoculated at 0, 1 and 6 months intervals. Serum samples were collected 1 month after the last vaccination and the anti-HBs response was determined using ELISA. The overall seroprotection rate (anti-HBs level > or = 10 IU/L) was 97.3% for ID vaccination group, which was not different from that of IM vaccination group (98.55%) (p = 0.99). Similarly, geometric mean titers (GMT) of anti-HBs were not significantly different between ID (1164.1 IU/L) and IM (1071.8 IU/L) vaccination groups (p = 0.4). There was no significant difference in seroprotection rate and GMT of anti-HBs between sexes. Although induration and hyperpigmentation at the site of injection were more frequently observed in ID vaccination group, no other clinically adverse effects were observed in both vaccination groups. We conclude that the ID route, which would require one-fifth of the standard dose, would be suitable for use in certain groups such as high-risk adults when the cost of vaccine is the inhibiting factor for mass vaccination.

Clinical trial of the intradermal administration of hepatitis B vaccine produced at the Department of Medical Research, Myanmar

A total of 280 apparently healthy volunteers were screened for hepatitis B (HB) markers out of which 49 subjects (17.5%) were positive for HB surface antigen (HBsAg) and 82 (29.3%) were positive for antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs). Three doses of DMR-HB vaccine, 0.15 ml per dose were administered to 95 subjects, who were serologically negative for both HB markers. The vaccination was given by the intradermal route on the flexor surface of the left forearm, at 1 month intervals according to the 0, 1 and 2 months schedule. The subjects were carefully monitored to record any adverse reaction of the vaccine. Blood specimen was collected from each subject, 1 month after the second and third vaccinations, to determine the anti-HBs antibody response to the vaccine. The study results showed that local pain was the only side effect noted and protective antibodies (anti-HBs) were detected in 69 (72.6%) of the vaccinees after the second dose of the vaccine and 89 (93.6%) after the third dose of the vaccine. Thus the intradermal route, which would require approximately one-seventh of the standard dose, would be suitable for use in certain groups such as high risk adults, when the cost of the vaccine is the inhibiting factor for routine or mass vaccination.

Arthus reaction to recombinant hepatitis B virus vaccine

A severe, local, inflammatory, late-phase reaction accompanied by skin necrosis occurred after an infant was given an intramuscular injection of recombinant hepatitis B virus vaccine. The clinical course and appearance of the rash were typical of an Arthus reaction. Although not identical to this case, prior reported cases of complement-mediated reactions occurring after hepatitis B virus infection or vaccination provide theoretical support for this diagnosis.

An investigation of the intradermal route as an effective means of immunization for microparticulate vaccine delivery systems

Among the common routes of parenteral immunization, the skin is the only site that can function as an immune organ. Skin-associated lymphoid tissue contains specialized cells that enhance the immune response. The intercellular space in the skin interstitium provides a connection to the lymphatic capillaries and vessels that terminate in peripheral immune organs like the lymph nodes and spleen. The potential of intradermal immunization with microparticulate vaccine delivery systems was investigated in this study. The microparticulates used were muramyl dipeptide (MDP) loaded ovalbumin microspheres (OVA-MSs) and fluorescent latex microspheres of fixed sizes of 2.3 and 2.1 microm diameter, respectively. Similar doses of OVA-MSs were injected subcutaneously (s.c.) and intradermally (i.d.) in mice. The induced OVA-specific IgG antibody immune response was found to be significantly higher in i.d. immunized mice as compared to those injected s.c. The sc and i.d. administration of fluorescent latex microspheres in mice demonstrated that the uptake and translocation of microspheres from the site of injection depends primarily upon the surface area of the microspheres. The enhancement in antibody production upon i.d. administration was explained on the basis of (i) an increased surface area of microspheres and a lower number of microspheres per injection site, and (ii) an increased probability of interaction with the immune cells of the skin. Efficient lymph node targeting observed from the id administered microspheres may be the result of both of these factors. The results of this study demonstrated that the intradermal route is an effective means of immunization for microparticulate vaccine delivery systems, requiring lower doses and resulting in a higher immune response as compared to the traditionally used sc route.

An effective intradermal hepatitis B vaccination

Small dose intradermal (i.d.) inoculation methods of hepatitis B vaccine have been reported to be effective and economical. We determined the best method to obtain high antibody levels within a short period of time and for the long-term maintenance of these levels. A total of 173 female students were randomly allocated to seven groups: six i.d. inoculation groups, to which 6-12 micrograms was administered in three or four divided doses (Groups A-F), and a control group (Group G) which received three 10 micrograms intramuscular (i.m.) inoculations. Serum hepatitis B antibody levels were quantified in weeks 4 and 8, and months 4, 7, and 12. Positivities in all groups were not significantly different at each measurement time. In month 4, geometric mean antibody levels in the three i.d. groups (10-12 micrograms in three divided doses; 79.1-107.0 IU l-1) were significantly higher than in Group G, which had received two of three i.m. injections (17.6 IU l-1; P < 0.01, P < 0.05). In the group which received four 2 micrograms i.d. inoculations, the level was higher than in Group G in month 7, but lower in month 12. It was concluded that three i.d. inoculations, each of 4 micrograms, may be used to obtain high antibody levels within a short period of time. However, it is recommended that a 10 micrograms i.m. injection in month 6 is applied as a booster. Consequently, we could not present an economic and effective low-dose intradermal inoculation method.

Evaluation of tolerability and antibody response after recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF) and a single dose of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine

Recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF) has been shown to augment antigen presentation by macrophages and dendritic cells in vitro, and to increase antibody responses to injected antigens in experimental animals. To evaluate the usefulness of rhGM-CSF as a vaccine adjuvant, 108 healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to receive an injection of rhGM-CSF (n = 81) or placebo (control group; n = 27), followed by an injection with recombinant hepatitis B vaccine into the same site. During the study period of 28 days, protective antibody titers to hepatitis surface antigen (anti-HBs10 mIU ml-1) were observed in 11 of 81 subjects receiving rhGM-CSF, but in none of the controls (P = 0.035). Injections were well tolerated. A single i.m. or s.c. injection of 20-40 micrograms of rhGM-CSF significantly enhances antibody responses when given at the same site as recombinant hepatitis B vaccination.

Intradermal hepatitis B vaccination in a 300-bed primary care hospital: experience with a recombinant vaccine in a four-dose schedule

BACKGROUND

All hepatitis B vaccination programs, regardless of route, must address such factors as primary response rate, additional booster injections for primary nonresponders, antibody persistence, the need for and timing of additional booster injections for primary responders, overall costs, and medical efficacy. A voluntary intradermal hepatitis B vaccination program with postvaccination testing was implemented in a 300-bed primary care hospital with a recombinant vaccine packaged in a concentration of 20 micrograms/ml (Engerix B; SmithKline and French Laboratories, Philadelphia, Pa.).

METHODS

After informed consent was obtained, 460 employees were vaccinated intradermally over the deltoid muscle by a single employee health nurse at months 0 (initial), 1, 2, and 6, followed by testing for serologic response 1 to 2 months after the final dose.

RESULTS

Of 411 employees who completed the entire protocol, 90.5% had seroconversion, as determined by enzyme immunoassay. Twelve of 29 primary nonresponders (41%) had seroconversion after an additional (fifth) intradermal booster injection. Of the primary responders, 84.5% remained seropositive when tested 18 months after the initial vaccination injection. These results are comparable to those of intramuscular vaccination and to the original studies of intradermal vaccination with plasma-derived vaccines that had shown excellent immunogenicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Intradermal and intramuscular hepatitis B vaccination programs must be implemented in somewhat different ways, but both can provide excellent protection against hepatitis B viral infection. Even allowing for the additional expense of postvaccination testing and more frequent booster injections, intradermal vaccination greatly reduces the overall costs of hepatitis B vaccination and may therefore increase compliance in many different settings.

Persistence of antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen after low-dose, intradermal hepatitis B immunization and response to a booster dose

To determine the duration of antibody after low-dose, intradermal (i.d.), plasma-derived hepatitis B vaccination and the response to a booster dose, we studied two classes of medical students who were immunized with 2 micrograms doses i.d. In one class, 73/88 (85%) who had been immunized by skilled personnel at 0, 1 and 6 months, had protective concentrations (greater than or equal to 10 mIU ml-1) of anti-HBs at 20 months after the first dose. Twelve (92%) out of 13 students who received only two doses at 0 and 1 months also had protective concentrations at month 20. At month 27, 11/16 (69%) with antibody less than or equal to 10 mIU ml-1 responded to a fourth dose of 2 micrograms i.d. with protective concentrations of anti-HBs. In the second class, after three doses of vaccine at 0, 1, and 6 months, protective concentrations of anti-HBs were present in 90/93 (97%) at 14 months and in 71/80 (89%) at 25 months. In those who received only two doses, protective concentrations were found in 24/31 (74%) at 14 months and 9/16 (56%) at 25 months. After a booster dose of 2 micrograms i.d. at month 25, anti-HBs concentrations rose from a geometric mean of 78 to 1198 mIU ml-1 in 60 subjects previously immunized with three doses and from 18 to 1054 mIU ml-1 in 16 students previously immunized with only two doses. Overall, 73/76 (96%) of students in the second group had protective concentrations of antibody after the booster dose.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)