Rate of Recurrence of Lentigo Maligna Treated With Off-Label Neoadjuvant Topical Imiquimod, 5%, Cream Prior to Conservatively Staged Excision

Lentigo maligna: a comprehensive review on diagnosis and treatment

Lentigo maligna (LM), a form of melanoma in situ, and LM melanoma (LMM), its invasive counterpart, exhibit distinctive epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical features compared to other melanoma subtypes. Notably, LM occurs on chronically sun-damaged skin presenting as a slow-growing, ill-defined patch which makes it difficult to diagnose and to treat. Additionally, while LM generally presents a favourable prognosis, it can also lead to dermal invasion and behave similarly to other melanomas with the same Breslow thickness. Hence, surgery continues to be the cornerstone treatment. Wide excisions are often necessary, but challenges arise when these lesions manifest in cosmetically sensitive regions, limiting the feasibility and desirability of large excisions. Specialized approaches, including margin-controlled surgery and image-guided treatment with reflectance confocal microscopy, have been developed to address these issues. Other non-surgical treatments such as cryosurgery, imiquimod, radiotherapy, or photodynamic therapy, may also be used but commonly present with recurrent/persistent disease. Herein we comprehensively review the existing literature on the management of LM/LMM, and discus the potential new advances on managing this challenging skin cancer.

Intraoperative Immunohistochemistry During Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Staged Excision Decreases Local Recurrence Rates for Invasive Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is increasingly used to treat cutaneous melanoma. However, it is unclear whether intraoperative immunohistochemistry (IHC) improves surgical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether intraoperative IHC during MMS and staged excision is associated with a decreased risk of poor surgical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Search of 6 databases identified comparative and noncomparative studies that reported local recurrence after MMS or staged excision with or without IHC for melanoma. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate pooled local recurrence rates, nodal recurrence, distant recurrence, and disease-specific mortality.

RESULTS

Overall, 57 studies representing 12,043 patients with cutaneous melanoma and 12,590 tumors met inclusion criteria. Combined MMS and staged excision with IHC was associated with decreased local recurrence in patients with invasive melanoma (0.3%, 95% CI: 0-0.6) versus hematoxylin and eosin alone (1.8%, 95% CI: 0.8%-2.8%) [ p < .001]. Secondary outcomes including nodal recurrence, distant recurrence, and disease-specific mortality were not significantly different between these 2 groups. Study heterogeneity was moderately-high.

CONCLUSION

Local recurrence of invasive melanoma is significantly lower after MMS and staged excision with IHC as opposed to without IHC. These findings suggest that the use of intraoperative IHC during MMS or staged excision should strongly be considered, particularly for invasive melanoma.Trial Registration PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42023435630.

Lentigo Maligna Treatment-An Update

Lentigo maligna (LM) is a melanoma in situ that is prevalent in chronically sun-damaged skin. Characterized by a slow growth pattern and high mutation rates due to chronic UV exposure, LM poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, particularly given its tendency to mimic other skin lesions and its occurrence in cosmetically sensitive areas. Its diagnosis is based on an integrated approach using dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM). Despite its slow progression, LM can evolve into lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM), making its treatment necessary. Treatment modalities encompass both surgical and non-surgical methods. Surgical treatments like Wide Local Excision (WLE) and Mohs Micrographic Surgery (MMS) aim for clear histological margins. WLE, a standard melanoma surgery, faces challenges from LM's subclinical extensions, which increase the recurrence risk. MMS, effective for large or poorly defined lesions, is defined by precise margin control while considering cosmetic outcomes. Non-surgical options, including radiotherapy and imiquimod, are alternatives for non-surgical candidates. Radiotherapy has been effective since the 1950s, offering good control and cosmetic results, especially for older patients. Imiquimod, an immunomodulator, shows promise in treating LM, though its application remains off-label. The increasing incidence of LM/LMM necessitates a balance in treatment choices to minimize recurrence and maintain cosmetic integrity. A multidisciplinary approach, integrating clinical examination with dermoscopy and RCM and histological assessment, is essential for accurate diagnosis and effective LM management.

Histologic margin status is a predictor of relapse in lentigo maligna melanoma

BACKGROUND

Most surgical margins for lentigo maligna melanomas reported in the literature are clinical and not histologic.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine whether histologic margin status is an independent predictor of progression.

METHODS

Clinicopathologic information of 268 invasive lentigo maligna melanomas diagnosed from 1990-2019 were analyzed. Statistical analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards model and Boruta method.

RESULTS

A total of 75% of the lesions were located on the head and neck. The range of follow-up for all patients was 0 to 31.8 years (median, 10.2 years). Time to local recurrence ranges from 0 to 20 years (median, 3 years). Progression developed in 54 (20.1%) of 268 patients. Local recurrence was seen only in 36 (13.4%), both local recurrence and subsequent metastasis in 7 (2.6%), and only metastasis in 11 (4.1%) of 268 patients. Histologic margin status (positive and close/<3 mm) and tumor site (head and neck location) significantly correlated with worse progression-free survival.

LIMITATIONS

Single institution and retrospective study.

CONCLUSIONS

Histologic margin status is the strongest predictor of progression for lentigo maligna melanoma. Patients with positive or close/<3 mm histologic margins should consider a re-excision due to the increased risk of relapse.

Topical Treatment of Melanoma In Situ, Lentigo Maligna, and Lentigo Maligna Melanoma with Imiquimod Cream: A Systematic Review of the Literature

INTRODUCTION

The classical management of melanoma is surgery, but this can be challenging because of several factors, such as age, body area, lesion size, among others. Topical imiquimod may be a therapeutic option for the treatment of melanoma in situ and lentigo maligna melanoma due to its efficacy, tolerability, and non-invasiveness. The purpose of this systematic review is to assemble current evidence on the treatment of non-metastatic melanoma with topical imiquimod.

METHODS

The PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases were searched as the primary sources using the main search terms "imiquimod" combined with "lentigo maligna" and "melanoma" with the command "AND." Articles were identified, screened, and extracted for relevant data, following the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 87 studies covering 1803 lesions treated with imiquimod cream were identified and included in this sytematic review. Forty-nine studies were case reports, 16 were retrospective analyses, 3 were open label trials, six were case series; one study was a controlled randomized trial, one was a randomized trial, and one was a single-arm phase III trial. Because of the high number of low-evidence studies, the overall risk of bias resulted high. In 55 studies, imiquimod 5% was used in monotherapy as the primary treatment; only in one study was imiquimod 3.75% introduced. In most cases, the topical treatment was applied once daily, with the exception of nine cases where an increased daily dosage was prescribed. The total duration of the treatment regimen was extremely variable and depended on body area and tolerability, with differences among patients of the same study. In six studies, imiquimod was used as neoadjuvant therapy before the surgical excision, and in 11 studies it was used after surgery as complementary or adjuvant therapy. In total, 1133 of the 1803 (62.8%) lesions were reported to be cleared after the treatment, taking into account that not all of the patients completed the treatment. Of these 1133 lesions, histological clearance was achieved in 645 (56.9%) lesions and clinical clearance only was achieved in 490 (43.2%) lesions; relapse occurred in 107 lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

The heterogeneity of the studies included in this systematic review precludes the drawing of any relevant conclusions regarding the application of imiquimod. Its efficacy in melanoma in situ and lentigo maligna melanoma has been demonstrated, but further evidence from controlled studies concerning the modalities is missing.

Topical and Intralesional Immunotherapy for Melanoma In Situ: A Review

The incidence of in situ melanoma (MIS) has increased over the last decades. The mainstay of treatment for MIS, including lentigo maligna (LM), is complete surgical excision with clear margins (0.5 to 1.0 cm). Nevertheless, MIS lesions often affect elderly patients with comorbidities and involve large lesions in cosmetically sensitive areas, which means surgery is not always appropriate. Non-surgical treatments have a role in these cases, and include radiotherapy, cryosurgery, immunotherapy, laser therapy, and other topical medications. This study aims to review the applications of immunotherapy in MIS, either in monotherapy or in combination with other therapeutic alternatives. The main forms of immunotherapy used are imiquimod and, to a lesser extent, intralesional interferon-α (IL-INF-α) and ingenol mebutate (IM). IL-INF-α and IM have not been studied as extensively as imiquimod, whose results in real-life practice are encouraging. The clearance and recurrence rates reported in MIS treated with imiquimod as monotherapy, or as an adjuvant after surgery with affected or narrow margins, make imiquimod a reliable therapeutic alternative in selected cases. Also, its use as a neoadjuvant therapy before surgery was shown to reduce the final surgical defect size required to confirm negative histologic margins. In conclusion, local immunotherapy is frequently used in clinical practice and experience confirms it to be an excellent option for certain patients.

Efficacy of imiquimod in the management of lentigo maligna

BACKGROUND

Lentigo maligna (LM) is a melanocytic proliferation occurring on photo-exposed skin that may progress to LM melanoma. Surgery is recommended as first-line treatment. Excision margins of 5-10 mm remain, without international consensus. Several studies have shown that imiquimod, an immunomodulator, induces LM regression. This study investigated the effect of imiquimod versus placebo in neoadjuvant settings.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a prospective, randomized, multicentre, phase III clinical study. Patients were randomly assigned in 1:1 ratio to receive imiquimod or placebo for 4 weeks, followed by LM excision 4 weeks after the last application of imiquimod or placebo. The primary endpoint was extra-lesional excision, with a 5 mm margin from the residual pigmentation after imiquimod or vehicle. Secondary endpoints included the gain on the surface removed between the two groups; number of revision surgeries to obtain extra-lesional excisions; relapse-free time; and number of complete remissions after treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 283 patients participated in this study; 247 patients, 121 patients in the placebo group and 126 in the imiquimod group, accounted for the modified ITT population. The first extralesional extirpation was performed in 116 (92%) imiquimod patients and in 102 (84%) placebo patients; the difference was not significant (p = 0.0743). Regarding the surface of LM, imiquimod reduced the LM surface (4.6-3.1 cm2 ) significantly (p < 0.001) more compared to the placebo (3.9-4.1 cm2 ).

CONCLUSION

Imiquimod reduces the lentigo maligna surface after 1 month of treatment, without a higher risk of intralesional excision and with a positive aesthetic outcome.

Delphi Consensus Among International Experts on the Diagnosis, Management, and Surveillance for Lentigo Maligna

INTRODUCTION

Melanoma of the lentigo maligna (LM) type is challenging. There is lack of consensus on the optimal diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up.

OBJECTIVES

To obtain general consensus on the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up for LM.

METHODS

A modified Delphi method was used. The invited participants were either members of the International Dermoscopy Society, academic experts, or authors of published articles relating to skin cancer and melanoma. Participants were required to respond across three rounds using a 4-point Likert scale). Consensus was defined as >75% of participants agreeing/strongly agreeing or disagreeing/strongly disagreeing.

RESULTS

Of the 31 experts invited to participate in this Delphi study, 29 participants completed Round 1 (89.9% response rate), 25/31 completed Round 2 (77.5% response rate), and 25/31 completed Round 3 (77.5% response rate). Experts agreed that LM diagnosis should be based on a clinical and dermatoscopic approach (92%) followed by a biopsy. The most appropriate primary treatment of LM was deemed to be margin-controlled surgery (83.3%), although non-surgical modalities, especially imiquimod, were commonly used either as alternative off-label primary treatment in selected patients or as adjuvant therapy following surgery; 62% participants responded life-long clinical follow-up was needed for LM.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical and histological diagnosis of LM is challenging and should be based on macroscopic, dermatoscopic, and RCM examination followed by a biopsy. Different treatment modalities and follow-up should be carefully discussed with the patient.

Treatment of periocular lentigo maligna with topical 5% Imiquimod: a review

Lentigo Maligna is a benign subtype of melanoma in situ and can progress to lentigo maligna melanoma, which is invasive. Complete surgical excision is the gold standard of treatment but requires large margins. If affecting the peri-ocular region, surgical excision leads to extensive defects, complex reconstructions, and functional impairment of the protection of the ocular surface. Here we review the reported literature about the use of Imiquimod 5% topical cream for lentigo maligna of the eyelid, the treatment outcomes, side effects and tolerance. In addition, the side effects of imiquimod treatment of non-LM lesions are described to help better inform the decision-making process. Treatment for peri-ocular Lentigo maligna showed a 56-86% complete treatment response and a 90% tolerability rate. However, reported treatment protocols vary and histopathological confirmation of clearance was only obtained in 56%. Further studies are required to determine the optimal treatment protocol to maximise clearance rates. Overall, Imiquimod was well tolerated in the peri-ocular area.

Amelanotic Melanoma Treated as Fungal Infection for Years

This study describes a case of amelanotic lentigo maligna melanoma in a 69-year-old female that had been growing for approximately 5 years. The asymptomatic lesion had been previously diagnosed and treated as a fungal skin infection, an inflammatory rash, and an actinic keratosis that did not respond to standard treatments. Biopsy revealed confluent and nested atypical melanocytes at the dermal-epidermal junction, consistent with melanoma in situ. Excisional biopsy revealed invasive lentigo maligna melanoma, Breslow depth 0.3 mm, with positive melanoma in situ at margins. She is now 3 years post-Mohs surgery without recurrence. When working up a patient with a hypopigmented or inflammatory lesion not responding to standard therapies, physicians should always consider biopsy to rule out unusual neoplastic etiologies, such as amelanotic melanomas.

Margins of Melanoma Excision and Modifications to Standards

Surgery with wide local excision is the mainstay of treatment for primary melanoma. Surgical margins differ depending on the depth of the primary lesion, subtype, and anatomic, cosmetic, or functional considerations. Adjuncts or alternative treatments to wide local excision are limited to specific patient populations and mainly experimental in nature.

Change in lentigo maligna score assessed by in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy after 1 month of imiquimod treatment for lentigo maligna management

BACKGROUND

Treatment of lentigo maligna (LM) is challenging because of the potential functional and esthetic surgical sequelae. Imiquimod has been proposed as a treatment for LM. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a noninvasive method for the diagnosis of LM and margin assessment.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the overall LM score (LMS) assessed by RCM before and 1 month after the start of imiquimod treatment compared to placebo and to define the immunohistochemical (IHC) profile of responders to imiquimod.

METHODS

A controlled randomized study was conducted. Forty patients underwent RCM examination with calculation of the LMS at baseline and after 1 month of treatment. An IHC analysis of excised tissues was performed.

RESULTS

The 1-month LMS was significantly lower in patients treated with imiquimod compared to those treated with placebo (P < .001). The criteria in the imiquimod-treated patients that demonstrated significant decrease were nonedged papillae; large, round pagetoid cells; atypical cells at the dermoepidermal junction; and follicular location of atypical cells. IHC analysis showed a higher level of interferon gamma in the resected specimens of patients responding to imiquimod (P = .04).

LIMITATIONS

Sample size was small.

CONCLUSION

Assessing the LMS by RCM was useful to monitor LM response to imiquimod accurately.

Lentigo Maligna: Clinical Presentation and Appropriate Management

Lentigo maligna (LM) is a type of melanoma in situ that has distinctive characteristics regarding epidemiology, risk factors and clinical features. In addition, LM has a potential to progress to an invasive tumor with potentially aggressive behavior: lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM). Overall, LM has a very good prognosis, whereas LMM has the same prognosis as other invasive melanomas with similar Breslow thickness. LM/LMM represents a challenging entity not only regarding the diagnosis but also regarding the management. Diagnostic criteria are not well established, and there is an overlap of clinical, dermoscopic and pathological features with other benign pigmented skin lesions such as lentigines, pigmented actinic keratoses or macular seborrheic keratoses. LM/LMM's common appearance within photodamaged skin makes lesion border identification difficult. Wide excisions are often required, but since LM/LMM typically appears on cosmetically sensitive areas such as the face, sometimes large excisions are not possible nor desirable. In this sense, specialized approaches have been developed such as margin-controlled surgery or image-guided treatment using reflectance confocal microscopy. Other treatments for LM such as cryosurgery, imiquimod, radiotherapy or photodynamic therapy have been proposed, although recurrence/persistence is common. The current manuscript reviews extensively the published data regarding the diagnosis, treatment and management of both complex entities LM and LMM.

Reflectance confocal microscopy and its role in the follow-up of a topical treatment for lentigo maligna

BACKGROUND

In recent years, there has been an ongoing interest in topical treatment for lentigo maligna (LM) as imiquimod 5% cream owing to the localization of this tumor and the advanced age of patients; however, the efficacy of imiquimod 5% cream is controversial, and the rate of local relapses is about 25-53%. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a noninvasive diagnostic tool useful not only for diagnostic purpose but also for monitoring the response to the local treatment of LM. Our aim was to demonstrate the role of RCM in the follow-up of a topical treatment with imiquimod 5% cream in clinical practice.

METHODS

We report three patients with histopathologically confirmed LM who were not candidates for surgery and were successfully treated with imiquimod 5% cream. In such patients, dermatoscopic images and reflectance confocal microscopy were useful to evaluate treatment response and to verify long-term clinical benefits during the follow-up visits.

RESULTS

No relapses were observed in our patients 18 months after the end of treatment; although, continuous follow-up visits are needed in these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In the case series presented herein, we highlight the importance of RCM as a noninvasive tool to monitor the efficacy of imiquimod to treat LM during and after treatment. Detailed confocal images of two of our patients allowed us to establish the persistence of atypical cells and to continue treatment, although clinical and dermatoscopic examinations showed "apparent complete remission" after the first cycle of therapy.

A Distinct Pretreatment Immune Gene Signature in Lentigo Maligna Is Associated with Imiquimod Response

Lentigo maligna (LM) is a common subtype of in situ melanoma on chronically sun-exposed skin, particularly the head and neck of older patients. Although surgery is the standard treatment, there is associated morbidity, and options such as imiquimod cream or radiotherapy may be used if surgery is refused or inappropriate. Complete response rates following imiquimod treatment are variable in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the host immune response both before and following treatment with imiquimod to better identify likely responders. Paired pre- and post-imiquimod treatment specimens were available for 27 patients. Patients were treated with imiquimod 5 days per week for 12 weeks; at 16 weeks, lesions were excised for histological assessment. Of the 27 patients, 16 were responders and 11 failed to clear the disease. PDL1 protein expression was increased, accompanied by a unique gene signature in lesions from patients that subsequently histologically cleared LM by 16 weeks. This comprised 57 upregulated immune genes in signaling networks for antigen presentation, type I interferon signaling, and T-cell activation. This may represent an early responder group to imiquimod, and this unique gene signature potentially can be used as a biomarker of LM response to imiquimod.

Reflectance confocal microscopy and dermoscopy aid in evaluating repigmentation within or adjacent to lentigo maligna melanoma surgical scars

BACKGROUND

Determining whether repigmentation within or adjacent to lentigo maligna or lentigo maligna melanoma (LM/LMM) scars represents recurrence of melanoma is challenging. The use of reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) and dermoscopy may aid in differentiating true melanoma recurrence from other causes of repigmentation.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the characteristics of repigmentation within or adjacent to LM/LMM scars observable on RCM and dermoscopy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed patients who presented with new pigmentation within or adjacent to scars from surgically treated LM/LMM between January 2014 and December 2018. Clinical and demographic characteristics and time to recurrence were recorded. RCM was used to evaluate areas of pigmentation before biopsy. If available, dermoscopic images were also evaluated.

RESULTS

In total, 30 confocal studies in 29 patients were included in the study cohort. Twenty-one patients had biopsy-confirmed recurrent LM/LMM; the remainder had pigmented actinic keratosis (n = 4) or hyperpigmentation/solar lentigo (n = 5). RCM had sensitivity of 95.24% (95% CI, 76.18-99.88%), specificity of 77.7% (95% CI, 39.99-97.19%), positive predictive value of 90.91% (95% CI, 74.58-97.15%) and negative predictive value of 87.5% (95% CI, 50.04-98.0%). The most common dermoscopic feature observed among patients with recurrent LM/LMM was focal homogeneous or structureless areas of light-brown pigmentation (92.8% vs. 37.5% in patients with other diagnoses; P = 0.009). LM-specific dermoscopic criteria were present in only 28.5% of patients with recurrent LM/LMM.

CONCLUSIONS

Reflectance confocal microscopy and dermoscopy are valuable tools for the comprehensive evaluation of repigmentation within or adjacent to LM scars.