Early Nerve Grafting for Facial Paralysis After Cerebellopontine Angle Tumor Resection With Preserved Facial Nerve Continuity

Functional Outcome of Dual Reinnervation with Cross-Facial Nerve Graft and Masseteric Nerve Transfer for Facial Paralysis

BACKGROUND

The combination of cross-facial nerve graft (CFNG) and masseteric nerve transfer (MNT) for reinnervation of facial paralysis may provide advantages of both neural sources. However, quantitative functional outcome reports with a larger number of patients are lacking in the literature. Here, the authors describe their 8-year experience with this surgical technique.

METHODS

Twenty patients who presented with complete facial paralysis (duration, <12 months) received dual reinnervation with CFNG and MNT. The functional outcome of the procedure was evaluated with the physician-graded outcome metric eFACE scale. The objective artificial intelligence-driven software Emotrics and FaceReader were used for oral commissure measurements and emotional expression assessment, respectively.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 31.75 ± 23.32 months. In the eFACE score, the nasolabial fold depth and oral commissure at rest improved significantly ( P < 0.05) toward a more balanced state after surgery. Postoperatively, there was a significant decrease in oral commissure asymmetry while smiling (from 19.22 ± 6.1 mm to 12.19 ± 7.52 mm). For emotional expression, the median intensity score of happiness, as measured by the FaceReader software, increased significantly while smiling (0.28; interquartile range, 0.13 to 0.64). In five patients (25%), a secondary static midface suspension with fascia lata strip had to be performed because of unsatisfactory resting symmetry. Older patients and patients with greater preoperative resting asymmetry were more likely to receive static midface suspension.

CONCLUSION

The authors' results suggest that the combination of MNT and CFNG for reinnervation of facial paralysis provides good voluntary motion and may lessen the use of static midface suspension in the majority of patients.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Task force of the Brazilian Society of Otology - evaluation and management of peripheral facial palsy

OBJECTIVE

To review key evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral facial palsy in children and adults.

METHODS

Task force members were educated on knowledge synthesis methods, including electronic database search, review and selection of relevant citations, and critical appraisal of selected studies. Articles written in English or Portuguese on peripheral facial palsy were eligible for inclusion. The American College of Physicians' guideline grading system and the American Thyroid Association's guideline criteria were used for critical appraisal of evidence and recommendations for therapeutic interventions.

RESULTS

The topics were divided into 2 main parts: (1) Evaluation and diagnosis of facial palsy: electrophysiologic tests, idiopathic facial palsy, Ramsay Hunt syndrome, traumatic peripheral facial palsy, recurrent peripheral facial palsy, facial nerve tumors, and peripheral facial palsy in children; and (2) Rehabilitation procedures: surgical decompression of the facial nerve, facial nerve grafting, surgical treatment of long-term peripheral facial palsy, and non-surgical rehabilitation of the facial nerve.

CONCLUSIONS

Peripheral facial palsy is a condition of diverse etiology. Treatment should be individualized according to the cause of facial nerve dysfunction, but the literature presents better evidence-based recommendations for systemic corticosteroid therapy.

A Novel Approach to Facial Reanimation and Restoration Following Radical Parotidectomies

Background: Parotidectomies are indicated for a variety of reasons. Regardless of the indication for surgery, facial reanimation may be required because of facial nerve sacrifice or iatrogenic damage. In these cases, facial restoration performed concurrently with ablative surgery is considered the gold standard, and delayed reanimation is usually not attempted. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent parotidectomies from 2009 to 2022 in a single institution was performed. Indications, surgical techniques, and outcomes of an algorithmic template were applied to these cases using the Sunnybrook, Terzis scores, and Smile Index. A comparison was made between immediate vs. late repairs. Results: Of a total of 90 patients who underwent parotidectomy, 17 (15.3%) had a radical parotidectomy, and 73 (84.7%) had a total or superficial parotidectomy. Among those who underwent complete removal of the gland and nerve sacrifice, eight patients (47.1%) had facial restoration. There were four patients each in the immediate (n = 4) and late repair (n = 4) groups. Surgical techniques ranged from cable grafts to vascularized cross facial nerve grafts (sural communicating nerve flap as per the Koshima procedure) and vascularized nerve flaps (chimeric vastus lateralis and anterolateral thigh flaps, and superficial circumflex perforator flap with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve). Conclusions: The algorithm between one technique and another should take into consideration age, comorbidities, soft tissue defects, presence of facial nerve branches for reinnervation, and donor site morbidity. While immediate facial nerve repair is ideal, there is still benefit in performing a delayed repair in this algorithm.

Hypoglossal Nerve Transfer for Facial Nerve Paralysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Hypoglossal-facial nerve (12-7) anastomosis can restore symmetry and voluntary movement on the face in patients with facial nerve paralysis. Traditional 12-7 transfer includes direct end-to-end nerve anastomosis, sacrificing the entire hypoglossal nerve. Contemporary, end-to-side anastomosis, or split anastomosis techniques limit tongue morbidity by preserving some hypoglossal nerve. Direct outcome comparisons between these techniques are limited. Objective: To compare reported outcomes of facial movement, tongue, speech, and swallow outcomes among the different types of hypoglossal-facial nerve anastomosis schemes. Evidence Review: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, a comprehensive strategy was designed to search PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Database from inception to January 2021, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis, reporting guideline yielding 383 results. Any participant who underwent 12-7 transfer using any of the three techniques, with or without an interposition graft, and had documented preoperative and postoperative evaluation of facial nerve function with a validated instrument such as House-Brackmann (HB), was considered for inclusion. Secondary outcomes of synkinesis, tongue atrophy, and speech or swallowing dysfunction were also compared. Forty-nine studies met inclusion criteria, representing data from 961 total patients who underwent 12-7 transfer. Results: The proportion of good HB outcomes (HB I-III) did not differ by anastomosis type: End-to-side and end-to-end anastomosis (73% vs. 59%, p = 0.07), split and end-to-end anastomosis (62% vs. 59%, p = 0.88), and end-to-side anastomosis and split anastomosis (73% vs. 62%, p = 0.46). There was no difference in reported synkinesis rates between the anastomosis types. However, end-to-side anastomosis (z = 6.55, p < 0.01) and split anastomosis (z = 3.58, p < 0.01) developed less tongue atrophy than end-to-end anastomosis. End-to-side anastomosis had less speech/swallowing dysfunction than end-to-end anastomosis (z = 3.21, p < 0.01). Conclusion: End-to-side and split anastomoses result in similar HB facial nerve outcomes as the traditional end-to-end 12-7 anastomosis. End-to-side anastomosis has decreased complications of tongue atrophy and speech/swallow dysfunction compared to end-to-end anastomosis. In addition, split anastomosis has decreased rates of tongue atrophy compared to end-to-end anastomosis.

Nerve guide conduits, nerve transfers, and local and free muscle transfer in facial nerve palsy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To highlight the recent literature on reinnervation options in the management of facial nerve paralysis using nerve conduits, and nerve and muscle transfers.

RECENT FINDINGS

Engineering of natural and synthetic nerve conduits has progressed and many of these products are now available on the market. The use of the masseter nerve has become more popular recently as a choice in nerve transfer procedures due to various unique advantages. Various authors have recently described mimetic muscle reinnervation using more than one nerve transfer, as well as dual and triple innervation of free muscle transfer.

SUMMARY

The ideal nerve conduit continues to be elusive, however significant progress has been made with many natural and synthetic materials and designs tested and introduced on the market. Many authors have modified the classic approaches in motor nerve transfer, as well as local and free muscle transfer, and described new ones, that aim to combine their advantages, particularly the simplification to a single stage and use of multiple reinnervation to the mimetic muscles. These advances are valuable to the reconstructive surgeon as powerful tools that can be tailored to the unique challenges of patients with facial nerve palsy looking for dynamic reanimation options.

Evidence-Based Practices in Facial Reanimation Surgery

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Describe the causes and preoperative evaluation of facial paralysis. 2. Discuss techniques to restore corneal sensation and eyelid closure, elevation of the upper lip for smile, and depression of the lower lip for lip symmetry. 3. Outline treatment goals, surgical treatment options, timing of repair, and other patient-specific considerations in appropriate technique selection.

SUMMARY

Congenital facial paralysis affects 2.7 per 100,000 children; Bell palsy affects 23 per 100,000 people annually; and even more people are affected when considering all other causes. Conditions that impair facial mimetics impact patients' social functioning and emotional well-being. Dynamic and static reconstructive methods may be used individually or in concert to achieve adequate blink restoration, smile strength and spontaneity, and lower lip depression. Timing of injury and repair, patient characteristics such as age, and cause of facial paralysis are all considered in selecting the most appropriate reconstructive approach. This article describes evidence-based management of facial paralysis.

Surgical management and the prognosis of iatrogenic facial nerve injury in middle ear surgery: a 20-year experience

BACKGROUND

Iatrogenic facial nerve injury is one of the severest complications of middle ear surgery, this study aims to evaluate surgical management and prognosis in the era of improved surgical instruments.

METHODS

Patients suffered from facial nerve paralysis after middle ear surgery between January 2000 and December 2019 were retrospectively collected. Demographic characters, primary disease and surgery, details of revision surgery were analyzed.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were collected, of whom 8 were injured at our center and 37 were transferred. For 8 patients injured at our center, seven (87.5%) ranked House-Brackmann (H-B) grade V and one (12.5%) ranked H-B VI before revision surgery; postoperatively, two (25.0%) patients recovered to H-B grade I, four (50.0%) recovered to H-B II, and the other two (25.0%) recovered to H-B III. For 37 patients transferred, thirteen (35.1%) ranked H-B grade V and 24 (64.9%) ranked H-B VI preoperatively, final postoperative grade ranked from H-B grade I to grade V, with H-B I 6 (16.2%) cases, H-B II 6 (16.2%) cases, H-B III 18 (48.6%) cases, H-B IV 5 (13.5%) cases and H-B V 2 (5.4%) cases. The most vulnerable site was tympanic segment (5, 62.5% and 27, 73.0% respectively). Twenty-one (46.7%) patients suffered from mild injury and 24 (53.3%) suffered from partial or complete nerve transection. For surgical management, twenty-one (46.7%) patients received decompression, nineteen (42.2%) received graft and 5 (11.1%) received anastomosis. Those decompressed within 2 months after paralysis had higher possibility of H-B grade I or II recovery (P = 0.026), those received graft within 6 months were more likely to get H-B grade III recovery (P = 0.041), and for patients underwent anastomosis within 6 months, all recovered to H-B grade III.

CONCLUSIONS

Tympanic segment is the vulnerable site. If facial nerve paralysis happens, high-resolution computed tomography could help identify the injured site. Timely treatment is important, decompression within 2 months after paralysis, graft and anastomosis within 6 months lead to better recovery.

Facial Nerve Reconstruction

Facial palsy causes profound facial disfigurement in addition to compromise of eye closure, speech articulation, oral competence, and emotive expression. Facial reanimation is paramount to reduce functional sequelae and improve patient quality of life. This article discusses facial nerve reconstruction focusing on the setting of head and neck reconstruction.

Advances in Facial Reanimation

Facial nerve paralysis is a debilitating clinical entity that presents as a complete or incomplete loss of facial nerve function. The etiology of facial nerve palsy and sequelae varies tremendously. The most common cause of facial paralysis is Bell's palsy, followed by malignant or benign tumors, iatrogenic insults, trauma, virus-associated paralysis, and congenital etiologies.

The evolution of facial reanimation techniques

This review article provides an updated discussion on evidence-based practices related to the evaluation and management of facial paralysis. Ultimately, the goals of facial reanimation include obtaining facial symmetry at rest, providing corneal protection, restoring smile symmetry and facial movement for functional and aesthetic purposes. The treatment of facial nerve injury is highly individualized, especially given the wide heterogeneity regarding the degree of initial neuronal insult and eventual functional outcome. Recent advancements in facial reanimation techniques have better equipped clinicians to approach challenging patient scenarios with reliable, effective strategies. We discuss how technology such as machine learning software has revolutionized pre- and post-intervention assessments and provide an overview of current controversies including timing of intervention, choice of donor nerve, and management of nonflaccid facial palsy with synkinesis. We highlight novel considerations to mainstay conservative management strategies and examine innovations in modern surgical techniques with a focus on gracilis free muscle transfer. Innervation sources, procedural staging, coaptation patterns, and multi-vector and multi-muscle paddle design are modifications that have significantly evolved over the past decade.

Reducing Risk in Facial Reanimation Surgery

Facial reanimation surgery can greatly improve quality of life, but these procedures are not without risk. Important considerations for risk reduction in facial reanimation surgery include preoperative risk-stratification, protecting patients' clinical media, clearly and thoroughly setting expectations, and intraoperative strategies to maximize technical success and minimize operative time.

Long-Term Outcomes of the Electrically Unresponsive, Anatomically Intact Facial Nerve Following Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery

Objective The study aimed to determine long-term outcomes in patients with intraoperative electrical conduction block in an anatomically intact facial nerve (FN).

Methods Single center retrospective review of prospectively collected database of all vestibular schwannoma surgeries between January 1, 2008 and August 25, 2015. Operative notes were reviewed and patients with anatomically intact FNs, but complete conduction block at the end of surgery were included for analysis.

Results In total, 371 patients had vestibular schwannoma surgery of which 18 met inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up was 34.28 months and average tumor size was 28.00 mm. Seventeen patients had House-Brackmann Grade VI facial palsy immediately postoperatively and one patient was grade V. At 1 year, three patients remained grade VI (17%), two improved to grade V (11%), seven to grade IV (39%), six to grade III (33%), and one patient to grade II (6%). On extended follow-up, five patients (28%) had additional 1 to 2 score improvement in facial function. Subset analysis revealed no correlation of tumor size, vascularity, adherence to nerve, operative approach, extent of resection, splaying of FN, and recurrent tumor or sporadic tumors to the extent of FN recovery.

Conclusion Intraoperative conduction block does not condemn a patient to permanent FN palsy. There is potential for a degree of recovery comparable with those undergoing nerve grafting. Our data do not clearly support a policy of same-surgery or early-postoperative primary nerve grafting in the event of a complete conduction block, and instead we favor monitoring for recovery in an anatomically intact nerve.

Contribution and safety of the side-to-end hypoglossal-to-facial transfer in multidisciplinary facial reanimation

BACKGROUND

This study evaluates facial and tongue function in patients undergoing side-to-end hypoglossal-to-facial transfer (HFT) with additional techniques.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients underwent a side-to-end HFT. Twelve had additional cross-face grafts, and 9 had an additional masseter-to-facial transfer. Facial was assessed with House-Brackmann (HB), Sunnybrook Facial Grading Scale (SFGS), and eFACE. Martins scale and the Oral-Pharyngeal Disability Index (OPDI) were used to assess tongue function.

RESULTS

Ninety-four percent of cases reached HB grades III-IV. Mean total SFGS score improved from 16 ± 15 to 59 ± 11, while total eFACE score from 52 ± 13 to 80 ± 5. Dual nerve transfers were a predictor for a better eFACE total score p = 0.034, β = 2.350 [95% CI, 0.184-4.516]), as well as for a higher SFGS total score (p = 0.036, β = 5.412 [95% CI, 0.375-10.449]). All patients had Martin's grade I. Mean postoperative OPDI scores were 84 ± 17 (local physical), 69 ± 16 (simple and sensory motor components), 82 ± 14 (complex functions), and 73 ± 22 (psychosocial).

CONCLUSIONS

The side-to-end HFT offers predictable facial function outcome and preserves tongue function in nearly all cases. Dual nerve transfers appear to improve the final outcome.

A Comprehensive Approach to Facial Reanimation: A Systematic Review

Purpose: To create a systematic overview of the available reconstructive techniques, facial nerve grading scales, physical evaluation, the reversibility of paralysis, non-reconstructive procedures and medical therapy, physical therapy, the psychological aspect of facial paralysis, and the prevention of facial nerve injury in order to elucidate the gaps in the knowledge and discuss potential research aims in this area. A further aim was to propose an algorithm simplifying the selection of reconstructive strategies, given the variety of available reconstructive methods and the abundance of factors influencing the selection. Methodological approach: A total of 2439 papers were retrieved from the Medline/Pubmed and Cochrane databases and Google Scholar. Additional research added 21 articles. The primary selection had no limitations regarding the publication date. We considered only papers written in English. Single-case reports were excluded. Screening for duplicates and their removal resulted in a total of 1980 articles. Subsequently, we excluded 778 articles due to the language and study design. The titles or abstracts of 1068 articles were screened, and 134 papers not meeting any exclusion criterion were obtained. After a full-text evaluation, we excluded 15 papers due to the lack of information on preoperative facial nerve function and the follow-up period. This led to the inclusion of 119 articles. Conclusions: A thorough clinical examination supported by advanced imaging modalities and electromyographic examination provides sufficient information to determine the cause of facial palsy. Considering the abundance of facial nerve grading scales, there is an evident need for clear guidelines regarding which scale is recommended, as well as when the postoperative evaluation should be carried out. Static procedures allow the restoral of facial symmetry at rest, whereas dynamic reanimation aims to restore facial movement. The modern approach to facial paralysis involves neurotization procedures (nerve transfers and cross-facial nerve grafts), muscle transpositions, and microsurgical free muscle transfers. Rehabilitation provides patients with the possibility of effectively controlling their symptoms and improving their facial function, even in cases of longstanding paresis. Considering the mental health problems and significant social impediments, more attention should be devoted to the role of psychological interventions. Given that each technique has its advantages and pitfalls, the selection of the treatment approach should be individualized in the case of each patient.

Multiple Model Evaluation of the Masseteric-to-Facial Nerve Transfer for Reanimation of the Paralyzed Face and Quick Prognostic Prediction

Facial paralysis is negatively associated with functional, aesthetic, and psychosocial consequences. The masseteric-to-facial nerve transfer (MFNT) has many advantages in facial reanimation. The aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of our MFNT technique and define the potential factors predictive of outcome. The authors conducted a retrospective review of 20 consecutive patients who underwent MFNT using the temporofacial trunk of facial nerve. Videotapes and images were documented and evaluated according to Facial Nerve Grading Scale 2.0 (FNGS2.0) and Sunnybrook Facial Grading System (FGS). The quality-of-life was obtained using the Facial Clinimetric Evaluation (FaCE) Scale. Moreover, Facial Asymmetry Index (FAI), quantitative measurement of the width of palpebral fissure, deviation of the philtrum, and angles or excursions of the oral commissure were applied to explore the effect of the transfer metrically. Multivariable logistic regression models and Cox regression were prepared to predict the effect of MFNT by preoperative clinical features. The patients showed favorable outcomes graded by FNGS2.0, and experienced significantly improved scores in static and dynamic symmetry with slightly elevated scores in synkinesis evaluated by the Sunnybrook FGS. The score of FaCE Scale increased in all domains after reanimation. The quantitative indices indicated the symmetry restoration of the middle and lower face after MFNT. Regression analysis revealed that younger patients with severe facial paralysis are preferable to receive MFNT early for faster and better recovery, especially for traumatic causes. The findings demonstrate that MFNT is an effective technique for facial reanimation, and case screening based on clinical characteristics could be useful for surgical recommendation.

End-to-Trunk Masseteric to Facial Nerve Transfer With Selective Neurectomy for Facial Reanimation

OBJECTIVE

To examine functional outcomes following end-to-trunk masseteric to facial nerve transfer in patients with chronic flaccid facial paralysis.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary-care private practice setting.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with complete unilateral facial paralysis of less than 24 months duration.

INTERVENTIONS

Direct end-to-trunk masseteric to facial nerve anastomosis.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcome measures included time to first movement, development of synkinesis, and an objective assessment of the resting tone and dynamic movement that was achieved.

RESULTS

Patient age at the time of transfer ranged from 6 to 61. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 24 months. No patients had any perioperative complications. No patient experienced significant mass movement or synkinetic facial movement with chewing. No patient had worsened chewing or swallowing. Patients have not yet recovered significant resting tone. All patients achieved smile activity when biting down with a median (interquartile range) oral commissure excursion of 7.57 mm (5.19-9.94 mm), starting 3 to 5 months after transfer.

CONCLUSIONS

End-to-trunk masseteric to facial nerve transfer is a safe and effective procedure. Patients had rapid reinnervation with good excursion and achieved a natural appearing smile. The rehabilitated smile appears better than that achieved with hypoglossal-facial nerve transfer. The procedure can be performed coincident with cross-facial nerve grafting, and in some cases may produce dynamic facial movement that obviates the need for free muscle transfer.

[Dynamic procedures for facial nerve reconstruction]

In this article the indications and surgical treatment options for patients with facial nerve palsy are discussed. A distinction is made between static and dynamic surgical procedures. Static reconstructions for example are used to restore the eyelid closure function. For smile reconstruction, which is important for the psychosocial life of the patient, dynamic procedures are used. Depending on the duration of the facial nerve paralysis, there are several possibilities to restore the smile. In this work the masseteric branch transposition to the buccal branch, the hypoglossal-facial nerve anastomosis, the Labbé procedure and the gracilis flap as a free muscle transplant are discussed. The surgical procedures are compared and the advantages and disadvantages of the intervention are presented. A spontaneous smile is aimed, this cannot always be achieved. With the masseteric branch transposition to the buccal branch and the Labbé procedure the smile is initially triggered by chewing. A spontaneous smile is possible through cortical adaptation. With the gracilis flap, however, a nerve anastomosis with the contralateral 'healthy' facial nerve is possible, either directly or via a so-called cross facial nerve grafting, whereby a spontaneous smile can be achieved.

Facial Reanimation and Reconstruction of the Radical Parotidectomy

Radical parotidectomy may result from treating advanced parotid malignancies invading the facial nerve. Survival is often enhanced with multimodality treatment protocols, including postoperative radiation therapy. In addition to the reconstructive challenge of restoring facial nerve function, patients may be left with a significant cervicofacial concavity and inadequate skin coverage. This should be addressed with stable vascularized tissue that is resistant to radiation-induced atrophy. This article describes a comprehensive strategy, includes the use of the anterolateral thigh free flap, the temporalis regional muscle transfer, motor nerve to vastus lateralis grafts, nerve to masseter transfer, and fascia lata grafts for static suspension.

The Experience of a Facial Nerve Unit in the Treatment of Patients With Facial Paralysis Following Skull Base Surgery

: The management of facial paralysis following skull base surgery is complex and requires multidisciplinary intervention. This review shows the experience of a facial nerve (FN) unit in a tertiary university referral center. A multidisciplinary approach has led to the breaking of some old treatment paradigms. An overview of five FN scenarios is presented. For each setting a contemporary approach is proposed in contrast to the established approach. 1) For patients with an anatomically preserved FN with no electrical response at the end of surgery for vestibular schwannoma, watchful waiting is usually advocated. In these cases, reinforcement with an interposed nerve graft is recommended. 2) In cases of epineural FN repair, with or without grafting, and a poor expected prognosis, an additional masseter-to-facial transfer is recommended. 3) FN transfer, mainly hypoglossal-to-facial and masseter-to facial, are usually chosen based on the surgeons' preference. The choice should be based on clinical factors. A combination of techniques improves the outcome in selected patients. 4) FN reconstruction following malignant tumors requires a combination of parotid and temporal bone surgery, involving different specialists. This collaboration is not always consistent. Exposure of the mastoid FN is recommended for lesions involving the stylomastoid foramen, as well as intraoperative FN reconstruction. 5) In patients with incomplete facial paralysis and a skull base tumor requiring additional surgery, consider an alternative reinnervation procedure, "take the FN out of the equation" before tumor resection. In summary, to achieve the best results in complex cases of facial paralysis, a multidisciplinary approach is recommended.

Assessment of eye closure and blink with facial palsy: A systematic literature review

Facial palsy can cause the impairment of eye closure and affect blink, ocular health, communication, and esthetics. Dynamic surgical procedures can restore eye closure in patients with decreased facial nerve function. There are no standardized measures of voluntary and spontaneous eye closure that are used to evaluate the outcomes of blink restoration procedures. The purpose of this systematic literature review was to identify the measures used to assess normal and abnormal eye closure and blinking in patients with facial palsy. A literature search of the PubMed database using the keyword "facial nerve/surgery" was conducted. Only English language articles that pertain to the use of facial paralysis assessment systems published in the past 20 years, which involve eyelid closure were included. There were 57 articles that used a facial paralysis classification system with an eyelid closure component: House-Brackmann Facial Nerve Grading Scale (n = 43, 67%); Sunnybrook Facial Grading Scale (n = 9); palpebral fissure heights (n = 4), and the electronic clinician-graded facial function tool (n = 3) and three additional measures were reported once. Although the Terzis and Bruno Scoring System, blink ratio, and electronic, clinician-graded facial function scale(eFACE) Clinician-Graded Scoring System were valid measures of eyelid closure, there was no one comprehensive eye assessment that demonstrated all aspects of eye closure in facial palsy, which include closure amplitude, spontaneity, and quality of life. For blink assessment, eFACE is the most comprehensive tool currently available and recommended to be used with a patient-reported quality of life supplement that captures the specific domains related to facial nerve dysfunction.

Hypoglossal and Masseteric Nerve Transfer for Facial Reanimation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Hypoglossal and masseteric nerve transfer are currently the most popular cranial nerve transfer techniques for patients with facial paralysis. The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare functional outcomes and adverse effects of these procedures. Methods: A review of online databases was performed to include studies with four or more patients undergoing hypoglossal or masseter nerve transfer without muscle transfer or other cranial nerve transposition. Facial nerve outcomes, time to reinnervation, and adverse events were pooled and studied. Results: A total of 71 studies were included: 15 studies included 220 masseteric-facial transfers, and 60 studies included 1312 hypoglossal-facial transfers. Oral commissure symmetry at rest was better for hypoglossal transfer (2.22 ± 1.6 mm vs. 3.62 ± 2.7 mm, p = 0.047). The composite Sunnybrook Facial Nerve Grading Scale was better for masseteric transfer (47.7 ± 7.4 vs. 33.0 ± 6.4, p < 0.001). Time to first movement (in months) was significantly faster in masseteric transfer (4.6 ± 2.6 vs. 6.3 ± 1.3, p < 0.001). Adverse effects were rare (<5%) for both procedures. Conclusions: Both nerve transfer techniques are effective for facial reanimation, and the surgeon should consider the nuanced differences in selecting the correct procedure for each patient.

Progress in facial reinnervation

Facial nerve injury often results in facial paralysis, which seriously affects the patients both aesthetically and functionally. Facial nerve reinnervation methods, including direct anastomosis, nerve graft, nerve transposition, cross-facial nerve graft, and combined surgeries, have recently become a hot topic with many new procedures being explored. This study summarizes the relevant literatures and discusses the scope of application, advantages, and disadvantages of the different methods. The treatment options or combined surgeries for facial nerve reinnervation should be individualized for specific patients to achieve the best reanimation outcome with good static symmetry, facial tone, and spontaneous, natural, symmetrical, and strong facial movements.

Masseter nerve-based facial palsy reconstruction

Facial paralysis is a devastating disease, the treatment of which is challenging. The use of the masseteric nerve in facial reanimation has become increasingly popular and has been applied to an expanded range of clinical scenarios. However, appropriate selection of the motor nerve and reanimation method is vital for successful facial reanimation. In this literature review on facial reanimation and the masseter nerve, we summarize and compare various reanimation methods using the masseter nerve. The masseter nerve can be used for direct coaptation with the paralyzed facial nerve for temporary motor input during cross-facial nerve graft regeneration and for double innervation with the contralateral facial nerve. The masseter nerve is favorable because of its proximity to the facial nerve, limited donor site morbidity, and rapid functional recovery. Masseter nerve transfer usually leads to improved symmetry and oral commissure excursion due to robust motor input. However, the lack of a spontaneous, effortless smile is a significant concern with the use of the masseter nerve. A thorough understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of the use of the masseter nerve, along with careful patient selection, can expand its use in clinical scenarios and improve the outcomes of facial reanimation surgery.

Masseter-to-Facial Cranial Nerve Anastomosis: A Report of 30 Cases

BACKGROUND

Facial nerve paralysis (FP) is a possible complication of cerebellopontine angle tumor surgery. Several donor nerves have been used in the past for facial reanimation. We report the results of 30 cases of masseter-to-facial anastomosis.

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively evaluate the efficacy of V to VII anastomosis after FP.

METHODS

In a prospective study, we included 30 consecutive patients with FP (20 women and 10 men) whose mean age was 48.8 yr (32-76 yr). In almost all cases, FP developed after cerebellopontine angle tumor surgery (29 patients), whereas in one case, FP occurred after skull base trauma. Pre- and postoperative evaluation of facial nerve function was performed using the House-Brackmann (HB) scale and the Sokolovsky scale, as well as by electromyography. Follow-up ranged from 11 to 51 mo and averaged 22 mo.

RESULTS

All patients achieved functional recovery of the facial nerve from VI to either III or IV HB degree. Patients with short time FP showed significantly better postoperative recovery.

CONCLUSION

The results of the V to VII anastomosis demonstrate a significant improvement of facial nerve function and virtually no complications.

Predicting Resting Oral Commissure Tone Outcomes Following Masseter Nerve Transfer in Facial Reanimation

Objective: To quantify the degree of oral commissure resting tone improvement in patients undergoing masseter to facial nerve transfer. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was completed in a tertiary academic medical practice. Consecutive cases of masseter nerve transfer patients within a patient database were evaluated from 6/2012 to 9/2017. Inclusion criteria were patients >18 years of age, with complete unilateral paralysis, receiving a masseter to facial nerve transfer, with at least 12 months of recovery, and possessing complete pre- and postoperative data. Patients were excluded if a simultaneous adjunctive procedure was performed so that tone could not be attributed to masseter transfer alone. The main outcome measure was the facial asymmetry index (FAI): the measured difference in distance between the medial canthus and oral commissure of the healthy and paralyzed sides. Results: Twenty-nine patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria and were further analyzed for this study. The oral commissure symmetry improved from 4.7 ± 2.8 mm preoperatively to 2.2 ± 2.3 mm postoperatively. In multivariate analysis, the preoperative FAI was the only significant predictive factor for improvement in commissure symmetry at rest (r = 0.589). This suggests that for each 1.0 mm of worse preoperatively oral commissure asymmetry, the improvement postoperatively was 0.6 mm. Age, gender, body mass index, side of paralysis, duration of paralysis, and recipient branch of facial nerve were not significant predictors in a multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Masseter to facial nerve transfer yields an estimated 60% correction in the oral commissure asymmetry. This estimation may be helpful in determining if adjunctive procedures should be utilized.

Effects of electrostimulation therapy in facial nerve palsy

Facial palsy (FP) is a functional disorder of the facial nerve involving paralysis of the mimic muscles. According to the principle “time is muscle,” early surgical treatment is tremendously important for preserving the mimic musculature if there are no signs of nerve function recovery. In a 49-year-old female patient, even 19 months after onset of FP, successful neurotization was still possible by a V-to-VII nerve transfer and cross-face nerve grafting. Our patient suffered from complete FP after vestibular schwannoma surgery. With continuous application of electrostimulation (ES) therapy, the patient was able to bridge the period between the first onset of FP and neurotization surgery. The significance of ES for mimic musculature preservation in FP patients has not yet been fully clarified. More attention should be paid to this form of therapy in order to preserve the facial musculature, and its benefits should be evaluated in further prospective clinical studies.

Early Outcomes in an Emerging Facial Nerve Center: The Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU) Experience

OBJECTIVES

Nerve transfer (NT) and free gracilis muscle transfer (FGMT) are procedures for reanimation of the paralyzed face. Assessing the surgical outcomes of these procedures is imperative when evaluating the effectiveness of these interventions, especially when establishing a new center focused on the treatment of patients with facial paralysis. We desired to discuss the factors to consider when implementing a facial nerve center and the means by which the specialist can assess and analyze outcomes.

METHODS

Patients with facial palsy secondary to multiple etiologies, including cerebellopontine angle tumors, head and neck carcinoma, and trauma, who underwent NT or FGMT between 2014 and 2019 were included. Primary outcomes were facial symmetry and smile excursion, calculated using FACE-gram and Emotrics software. Subjective quality of life outcomes, including the Facial Clinimetric Evaluation (FaCE) Scale and Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ), were also assessed.

RESULTS

14/22 NT and 6/6 FGMT patients met inclusion criteria having both pre-and postoperative photo documentation. NT increased oral commissure excursion from 0.4 mm (SD 5.3) to 2.9 mm (SD 6.8) (P = 0.05), and improved symmetry of excursion (P < 0.001) and angle (P < 0.001). FGMT increased oral commissure excursion from -1.4 mm (SD 3.9) to 2.1 mm (SD 3.7), (P = 0.02), and improved symmetry of excursion (P < 0.001). FaCE scores improved in NT patients postoperatively (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Measuring outcomes, critical analyses, and a multidisciplinary approach are necessary components when building a facial nerve center. At our emerging facial nerve center, we found NT and FGMT procedures improved smile excursion and symmetry, and improved QOL following NT in patients with facial palsy secondary to multiple etiologies.

Free Functional Gracilis Flaps for Facial Reanimation in Elderly Patients

Importance: The free functional gracilis flap (FFGF) is a versatile procedure in reanimating the paralyzed face, yet its application in seniors is limited by perceptions of morbidity and inefficacy. Objective: The study objective was to compare the morbidity and effectiveness of FFGF reanimation among senior and younger patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective chart review was performed on 20 consecutive patients aged 60 years and above (seniors) and 35 patients aged 40 years and below (juniors) who underwent FFGF for facial reanimation. Among this group, 16 senior and 22 junior patients with available long-term follow-up data were analyzed for functional outcomes. Main Outcomes and Measures: The length of postoperative stay and postoperative complications were compared with assess immediate results. A second analysis for functional outcomes was assessed by resting and smile facial asymmetry index (FAI), as well as maxillary dental display to compare facial tone and lip excursion. Results: The average age of seniors was 67 ± 5 years and that of juniors was 27 ± 10 years. Mean lengths of postoperative stay were 4 ± 2 versus 3 ± 1 days in seniors versus Juniors, respectively (p = 0.16). There were no intraoperative complications and postoperative complications in one (5%) senior and four (11%) juniors (p = 0.64). There was functional muscle recovery in all cases, with more pronounced correction of both resting (Δ3.0 mm vs. Δ2.4 mm, p = 0.66) and dynamic (Δ5.2 mm vs. Δ4.2 mm, p = 0.37) FAI in seniors than in juniors. Among patients who underwent a multivector FGFF, there was an additional three versus one visualized maxillary teeth (p = 0.03) in seniors versus juniors, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: The FFGF is effective for facial reanimation among seniors and can be performed with minimal morbidity. Age alone should not preclude the application of the FFGF in seniors with a preference for more dynamic options.

Facial paralysis: Clinical practice guideline of the Spanish Society of Otolaryngology

Bell's palsy is the most common diagnosis associated with facial nerve weakness or paralysis. However, not all patients with facial paresis/paralysis have Bell's palsy. Other common causes include treatment of vestibular schwannoma, head and neck tumours, iatrogenic injuries, Herpes zoster, or trauma. The approach to each of these conditions varies widely. The purpose of this guideline is to provide clinicians with guidance on the treatment and monitoring of patients with different causes of facial paralysis. We intend to draft a practical guideline, focusing on operationalised recommendations deemed to be useful in the daily management of patients. This guideline was promoted by the Spanish Society of Otolaryngology and developed by a group of physicians with an interest in facial nerve disorders, including at least one physician from each Autonomous Community. In a question and answer format, it includes 56 relevant topics related to the facial nerve.

Clinician and Automated Assessments of Facial Function Following Eyelid Weight Placement

Importance

Quantitative assessment of facial function is difficult, and historic grading scales such as House-Brackmann have well-recognized limitations. The electronic, clinician-graded facial function scale (eFACE) allows rapid regional analysis of static, dynamic, and synkinetic facial function in patients with unilateral facial palsy within the course of a clinical encounter, but it relies on clinician assessment. A newly developed, machine-learning algorithm (Emotrics) provides automated, objective facial measurements but lacks clinical input (ie, recognizing laterality of facial palsy or synkinesis).

Objectives

To compare the sensitivity of a clinician-based tool (eFACE) to a well-established intervention for facial palsy (eyelid weight placement) with an automated facial-measurement algorithm (Emotrics).

Design, Setting, and Participants

A retrospective review was conducted of the most recent 53 patients with unilateral facial palsy who received an eyelid weight at the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Facial Nerve Center from 2014 to 2017. Preoperative and postoperative photographs were deidentified and randomized. The entire cohort was analyzed by 3 clinicians, as well as by the Emotrics program.

Main Outcomes and Measures

eFACE scores of the palpebral fissure at rest (0, wide; 100, balanced; 200, narrow), with gentle eyelid closure (0, incomplete; 100, complete), and with forceful eyelid closure (0, incomplete; 100, complete) before and after eyelid weight placement were compared with palpebral fissure measurements by Emotrics.

Results

Of the 53 participants, 33 were women, and mean (SD) age was 44.7 (18) years. The mean (SD) eFACE scores and Emotrics measurements (in millimeters) before vs after eyelid weight placement of the palpebral fissure at rest (eFACE, 84.3 [15.9] vs 109.7 [21.4]; Emotrics, 10.3 [2.2] vs 9.1 [1.8]), with gentle eyelid closure (eFACE, 65.9 [28.0] vs 92.1 [15.4]; Emotrics, 4.4 [2.7] vs 1.3 [2.0]), and with forceful eyelid closure (eFACE, 75.1 [28.6] vs 97.0 [10.7]; Emotrics, 3.0 [3.1] vs 0.5 [1.3]) all significantly improved. Subgroup analysis of patients with expected recovery (eg, Bell palsy) (n = 40) demonstrated significant development of ocular synkinesis on eFACE (83.9 [22.7] vs 98.9 [4.4]) after weight placement, which could also explain the improvement in eyelid function. The scores of patients with no expected recovery (n = 13) improved in both eFACE and Emotrics analysis following eyelid weight placement, though results did not reach significance, likely limited by the small subgroup size.

Conclusions and Relevance

The eFACE tool agrees well with automated, objective facial measurements using a machine-learning based algorithm such as Emotrics. The eFACE tool is sensitive to spontaneous recovery and surgical intervention, and may be used for rapid regional facial function assessment from a clinician's perspective following recovery and/or surgical intervention.

Level of Evidence

4.

Analysis of Facial Reanimation Procedures Performed Concurrently With Total Parotidectomy and Facial Nerve Sacrifice

Importance

Facial reanimation procedures share the same surgical field as a parotidectomy and are most easily accomplished at the time of facial nerve sacrifice. Early reanimation would also reduce the duration of paralysis and may lead to better functional outcomes.

Objective

To assess the incidence and types of facial nerve reanimation performed concurrently with total parotidectomy and facial nerve sacrifice using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) database.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study identified 285 patients who underwent total parotidectomy with facial nerve sacrifice (Current Procedural Terminology code 42425) and evaluated the various types of facial reanimation procedures performed concurrently. Patients were identified from the ACS-NSQIP database encompassing 603 community and academic hospitals and underwent treatment from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2015. Data were analyzed from September 20, 2017, through February 21, 2018.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Comparison of demographics in nonreanimation and reanimation groups and subgroups of nerve- and sling-type reanimation procedures.

Results

Of 285 patients who underwent total parotidectomy with facial nerve sacrifice (61.8% men; mean [SD] age, 64 [15] years), 89 (31.2%; 95% CI, 26.0%-37.0%) underwent at least 1 concurrent facial reanimation procedure. Of the facial nerve procedures performed, 41 (46.1%; 95% CI, 36.0%-56.0%) were nerve-type repairs, 31 (34.8%; 95% CI, 26.0%-45.0%) were sling-type repairs, and 17 (19.1%; 95% CI, 12.0%-29.0%) included both types. Patients treated with nerve-type repairs only were significantly younger than those treated with sling-type repairs only (mean [SD] age, 57.6 [16.0] vs 72.1 [13.8] years; P < .001). Forty-nine patients underwent free tissue reconstruction. Of those, 24 patients (49.0%) had concurrent facial reanimation procedure(s) performed; this proportion was significantly more than those who did not undergo free tissue reconstruction (65 of 236 [28.0%]; P = .003).

Conclusions and Relevance

In patients undergoing total parotidectomy with facial nerve sacrifice, many are not receiving a concurrent facial reanimation procedure at the time of their tumor resection. Those patients who underwent free tissue reconstruction were significantly more likely to receive a concurrent facial reanimation procedure. These findings may reveal an opportunity for earlier facial reanimation in this patient population.

Level of Evidence

NA.

Comparison between VII-to-VII and XII-to-VII coaptation techniques for early facial nerve reanimation after surgical intra-cranial injuries: a systematic review and pooled analysis of the functional outcomes

The surgical injury of the intracranial portion of the facial nerve (FN) is a severe complication of many skull base procedures, and it represents a relevant issue in terms of patients' discomfort, social interactions, risk for depression, and social costs. The aim of this study was to investigate the surgical and functional outcomes of the most common facial nerve rehabilitation techniques. The present study is a systematic review of the pertinent literature, according to the PRISMA guidelines. Two different online medical databases (PubMed, Scopus) were screened for studies reporting the functional outcome, measured by the House-Brackman (HB) scale, and complications, in FN early reanimation, following surgical injuries on its intracranial portion. Data on the VII-to-VII and XII-to-VII coaptation, the surgical technique, the use of a nerve graft, the duration of the deficit, and complications were collected and pooled. The XII-to-VII end-to-side coaptation seems to provide higher chances for functional restoration (HB 1-3) than the VII-to-VII (68.8% vs 60.6%), regardless of the duration of the palsy deficit, the use or not of a nerve graft, and the use of stitches or glues. However, its complication rate was as high as 28.6%, and a second procedure is then often needed. The XII-to-VII side-to-end coaptation is the most effective in providing a functional outcome (HB 1-3), even though it is associated to a higher complication rate. Further trials are needed to better investigate this relevant topic, in terms of health-related social costs and patients' quality of life.

Masseteric-Facial Nerve Anastomosis: Surgical Techniques and Outcomes-A Pilot Indian study

Masseteric-facial anastomosis has gained popularity in recent days compared to the facial-hypoglossal anastomosis. Masseteric nerve has numerous advantages like its proximity to the facial nerve, stronger motor impulse, its reliability, low morbidity in harvesting and sacrificing the nerve and faster re-innervation that is achievable in most patients. The present case series demonstrate the surgical technique and the effectiveness of the masseteric nerve as donor for early facial reanimation. Between January 2017 and February 2019, 6 patients (2 male, 4 female) with iatrogenic unilateral complete facial paralysis (grade VI, House Brackmann scale) who underwent masseteric-facial nerve anastomosis were included in the study. The time interval between the onset of paralysis and surgery ranged from 4 to 18 months (mean 8.5 months). In all patients pre-operative electromyography had facial mimetic muscle fibrillation potentials. All patients underwent end to end anastomosis except for one patient where greater auricular interposition graft was used. In all cases, the facial muscles showed earliest sign of recovery at 2-5 months. These movements were first noticed on the cheek musculature when the patients activated their masseter muscle. Eye movements started appearing at 6-9 months (in 3 cases) and forehead movements at 18 months (in 1 case). According to the modified House-Brackmann grading scale, one patient had Grade I function, two patients had Grade II function, and three had Grade V function. There was no morbidity except one patient who underwent interposition graft had numbness in the ear lobule. None of the patients could feel the loss of masseteric nerve function. Masseteric facial nerve anastomosis is a versatile, powerful early facial dynamic reanimation tool with almost negligible morbidity compared to other neurotization procedures for patients with complete facial nerve paralysis.

Significance of the Marginal Mandibular Branch in Relation to Facial Palsy Reconstruction: Assessment of Microanatomy and Macroanatomy Including Axonal Load in 96 Facial Halves

BACKGROUND

The marginal mandibular branch (MMB) of the facial nerve provides lower lip symmetry apparent during human smile or crying and is mandatory for vocal phonation. In treating facial palsy patients, so far, little attention is directed at the MMB in facial reanimation surgery. However, isolated paralysis may occur congenital, in Bell's palsy or iatrogenic during surgery, prone to its anatomical course. A variety of therapies address symmetry with either weakening of the functional side or reconstruction of the paralyzed side. To further clarify the histoanatomic basis of facial reanimation procedures using nerve transfers, we conducted a human cadaver study examining macroanatomical and microanatomical features of the MMB including its axonal capacity.

METHODS

Nerve biopsies of the MMB were available from 96 facial halves. Histological processing, digitalization, nerve morphometry investigation, and semiautomated axonal quantification were performed. Statistical analysis was conducted with P < 0.05 as level of significance.

RESULTS

The main branch of 96 specimens contained an average of 3.72 fascicles 1 to 12, and the axonal capacity was 1603 ± 849 (398-5110, n = 85). Differences were found for sex (P = 0.018), not for facial sides (P = 0.687). Diameters were measured with 1130 ± 327 μm (643-2139, n = 79). A significant difference was noted between sexes (P = 0.029), not for facial sides (P = 0.512.) One millimeter in diameter corresponded to 1480 ± 630 axons (n = 71). A number of 900 axons was correlated with 0.97 mm (specificity, 90%; sensitivity, 72%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our morphometric results for the MMB provide basic information for further investigations, among dealing with functional reconstructive procedures such as nerve transfers, nerve grafting for direct neurotization or babysitter procedures, and neurectomies to provide ideal power and authenticity.

Masseteric Nerve Transfer for Facial Nerve Paralysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

A review of the role of masseteric nerve transfer is needed to guide its use in facial reanimation.

Objective

To systematically review the available literature, and, when applicable, analyze the combined outcomes of masseteric nerve transfer to better define its role in reanimation and to guide further research.

Data Sources

Two independent researchers conducted the review using PubMed-NCBI and Scopus literature databases for studies on masseteric nerve transfer for facial nerve paralysis.

Study Selection

Studies that examined masseter nerve transfer with additional cranial nerve transposition/coaptation or muscle flap were excluded.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Literature review and data extraction followed established PRISMA guidelines. Two researchers extracted data independently.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main planned outcomes for the study were quantitative results of facial nerve movement after nerve transfer including oral commissure movement and time to nerve recovery.

Results

A total of 13 articles met inclusion criteria with a total of 183 patients undergoing masseteric nerve transfer. From those studies, there were a total of 183 patients who underwent masseteric nerve transfer. There were 85 men and 98 women with a mean (SD) age of 43 (12.2) years and mean (SD) follow up examination after surgery of 22 (7.6) months. Mean (SD) duration of nerve paralysis was 14 (6) months. Most common cause of paralysis was cerebellopontine angle tumors (81%). Six studies coapted the masseteric nerve to the main facial nerve trunk, whereas 7 used distal branches (buccal or zygomatic). Four studies used interposition nerve grafts with great auricular nerve. Two measures, improvement in oral commissure excursion and length from reanimation to facial movement, were measured consistently across the studies. Pooled analysis showed time from surgery to first facial movement, described in 10 studies, to be 4.95 months (95% CI, 3.66 to 6.24). Distal branch coaptation improved time to recovery vs main branch coaptation, 3.76 vs 5.76 months (95% CI, -0.33 to 4.32), but mean difference was not significant. The use of interposition graft significantly delayed time of nerve recovery, 6.24 vs 4.06 months (95% CI, 0.20 to 4.16). When controlled for main trunk coaptation only, interposition nerve graft delayed recovery but difference was no longer statistically significant, 6.24 vs 4.75 months (95% CI, -0.94 to 3.92). Reported complications were minor and rare occurring in only 6.5% (12 of 183) of patients.

Conclusions and Relevance

The masseteric nerve was found to be a good option for nerve transfer in this patient population, and showed favorable results in both time to nerve recovery and improvement in oral commissure excursion.

Level of Evidence

NA.

The Multivector Gracilis Free Functional Muscle Flap for Facial Reanimation

Importance

A multivector functional muscle flap that closely simulates the biomechanical effects of facial muscle groups is essential for complete smile restoration after facial paralysis.

Objective

To determine the feasibility of a multivector gracilis muscle flap design for reanimation after facial paralysis and to analyze the effect on the smile display zone.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Prospective analysis of patients who underwent a double paddle multivector gracilis flap for complete facial paralysis between June 2015 and December 2016 was carried out in a tertiary hospital.

Interventions

The gracilis muscle was harvested as a double paddle flap and inserted along 2 vectors for facial reanimation.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome measures were: (1) dental display (the number of maxillary teeth displayed on paralyzed vs normal sides), (2) exposed maxillary gingival scaffold width, (3) interlabial gap at midline and canine, (4) facial asymmetry index (FAI), and (5) dynamic periorbital wrinkling.

Results

There were 10 women and 2 men between ages 20 and 64 years (mean [SD], 46 [15] years). Five flaps were reinnervated with facial and masseteric nerves, 5 with masseteric nerve only, and 2 with crossfacial nerve only. There was functional muscle recovery in all cases. On average there was additional 3.1 maxillary teeth exposed posttreatment when smiling (5.5 vs 8.6; CI, 7.9 to 16.6; P < .001). The mean exposed maxillary gingival scaffold width improved from 31.5 mm to 43.7 mm (95% CI, 1.9 to 4.3; P < .001). There was no significant difference in interlabial exposure at midline (7.1 mm vs 7.7 mm; CI, -1.5 to 2.7; P = .56) but a 56.4% improvement at the level of the canines (3.9 vs 6.1; CI, 0.1 to 4.3; P = .04). The mean FAI when smiling was reduced from 9.1 mm to 4.5 mm (CI, -8.0 to -1.2; P = .01). Dynamic wrinkling of the periorbital area with smiling was noted in 4 patients.

Conclusions and Relevance

The gracilis flap can be reliably designed as a functional double paddle muscle flap for a multivector facial reanimation. The multivector gracilis flap design is effective in improving all components of the smile display zone and has the potential for producing periorbital-wrinkling characteristic of a Duchenne smile.

Level of Evidence

4.

Hypoglossal-facial 'side'-to-side Neurorrhaphy Combined with Electrical Myostimulation for Facial Palsy in Rats

Introduction This study investigated the effect of combining hypoglossal-facial nerve “side”-to-side neurorrhaphy and electrical myostimulation in a rat model of facial palsy.

Methods Rats with facial nerve crush injury were subjected to control condition, monotherapy of either neurorrhaphy or electrical myostimulation, or bitherapy of the two treatments. After 1, 3, and 6 months, rats were performed the facial symmetry evaluation, electrophysiological examination and the retrograde labeling of motor neurons.

Results As early as 3 months after injury, face symmetry significantly improved in rats of the bitherapy group. At 3 or 6 months after injury, either the parameters of electrophysiological examination or the number of labeled motor neurons were significantly increased in the bitherapy group than in any other group.

Discussion The combination of neurorrhaphy and electrical myostimulation effectively promoted the functional recovery after facial nerve crush injury.

Hypoglossal-facial nerve "side-to-side" neurorrhaphy for facial paralysis resulting from closed temporal bone fractures

BACKGROUND

Closed temporal bone fractures due to cranial trauma often result in facial nerve injury, frequently inducing incomplete facial paralysis. Conventional hypoglossal-facial nerve end-to-end neurorrhaphy may not be suitable for these injuries because sacrifice of the lesioned facial nerve for neurorrhaphy destroys the remnant axons and/or potential spontaneous innervation.

OBJECTIVE

we modified the classical method by hypoglossal-facial nerve "side-to-side" neurorrhaphy using an interpositional predegenerated nerve graft to treat these injuries.

METHODS

Five patients who experienced facial paralysis resulting from closed temporal bone fractures due to cranial trauma were treated with the "side-to-side" neurorrhaphy. An additional 4 patients did not receive the neurorrhaphy and served as controls.

RESULTS

Before treatment, all patients had suffered House-Brackmann (H-B) grade V or VI facial paralysis for a mean of 5 months. During the 12-30 months of follow-up period, no further detectable deficits were observed, but an improvement in facial nerve function was evidenced over time in the 5 neurorrhaphy-treated patients. At the end of follow-up, the improved facial function reached H-B grade II in 3, grade III in 1 and grade IV in 1 of the 5 patients, consistent with the electrophysiological examinations. In the control group, two patients showed slightly spontaneous innervation with facial function improved from H-B grade VI to V, and the other patients remained unchanged at H-B grade V or VI.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that the hypoglossal-facial nerve "side-to-side" neurorrhaphy can preserve the injured facial nerve and is suitable for treating significant incomplete facial paralysis resulting from closed temporal bone fractures, providing an evident beneficial effect. Moreover, this treatment may be performed earlier after the onset of facial paralysis in order to reduce the unfavorable changes to the injured facial nerve and atrophy of its target muscles due to long-term denervation and allow axonal regrowth in a rich supportive environment.

Facial Paralysis Discussion and Debate

This article examines 6 questions about facial paralysis answered by 3 experts in their field of facial plastic surgery. The topics covered include routine assessment, neuromuscular training, nonsurgical management, and the future of this field. All the authors answered these questions in a "How I do it" manner to provide the reader with a true understanding of their thoughts and techniques. This article provides a practical resource to all physicians and practitioners treating patients with facial paralysis on some of the most common questions and issues.

Perfusion maintains functional potential in denervated mimic muscles in early persistent facial paralysis which requires early microsurgical treatment - the histoanatomic basis of the extratemporal facial nerve trunk assessing axonal load in the context of possible nerve transfers

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Early persistent facial paralysis is characterized by intact muscles of facial expression through maintained perfusion but lacking nerve supply. In facial reanimation procedures aiming at restoration of facial tone and dynamics, neurotization through a donor nerve is performed. Critical for reanimating target muscles is axonal capacity of both donor and recipient nerves. In cases of complete paralysis, the proximal stump of the extratemporal facial nerve trunk may be selected as a recipient site for coaptation. To further clarify the histological basis of this facial reanimation procedure we conducted a human cadaver study examining macro and micro anatomical features of the facial nerve trunk including its axonal capacity in human cadavers. Axonal loads, morphology and morbidity of different donor nerves are discussed reviewing literature in context of nerve transfers.

METHODS

From 6/2015 to 9/2016 in a group of 53 fresh frozen cadavers a total of 106 facial halves were dissected. Biopsies of the extratemporal facial nerve trunk (FN) were obtained at 1 cm distal to the stylomastoid foramen. After histological processing and digitalization of 99 specimens available, 97 were selected eligible for fascicle counts and 87 fulfilled quality criteria for a semi-automated computer-based axon quantification software using ImageJ/Fiji.

RESULTS

An average of 3.82 fascicles (range, 1 to 9) were noted (n = 97). 6684±1884 axons (range, 2655- 12457) were counted for the entire group (n = 87). Right facial halves showed 6364±1904 axons (n = 43). Left facial halves demonstrated 6996±1833 axons (n = 44) with no significant difference (p = 0.73). Female cadavers featured 6247±2230 (n = 22), male showed 6769±1809 axons (n = 40). No statistical difference was seen between genders (p = 0.59). A comparison with different studies in literature is made. The nerve diameter in 82 of our specimens could be measured at 1933±424 μm (range, 975 to 3012).

CONCLUSIONS

No donor nerve has been described to match axonal load or fascicle number of the extratemporal facial nerve main trunk. However, the masseteric nerve may be coapted for neurotization of facial muscles with a low complication rate and good clinical outcomes. Nerve transfer is indicated from 6 months after onset of facial paralysis if no recovery of facial nerve function is seen.

Hemihypoglossal-Facial Nerve Anastomosis for Facial Nerve Reanimation: Case Series and Technical Note

BACKGROUND

Hypoglossal nerve injury may result in swallowing and speech problems. To reduce this morbidity and allow the performance of the hypoglossal-facial nerve anastomosis bilaterally, a technique that includes partial splitting of the hypoglossal nerve and skeletonization of the facial nerve within the mastoid process has been applied. The aim of this study is to present clinical results regarding the facial and hypoglossal nerves after the procedure.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data from 56 consecutive patients who underwent hemihypoglossal-facial nerve anastomosis (HHFA) were analyzed. The outcome was correlated with epidemiologic data, initial disease, the presence of neurofibromatosis type 2, previous radiosurgery, and the time between nerve injury and reconstructive surgery.

RESULTS

Forty-eight (84%) patients achieved satisfactory outcomes; 8 of them (14%) showed some improvement, and in 1 patient (2%) there was no improvement during long-term observation. The result at follow-up was not related to the time interval between the 2 procedures. However, recovery times for facial tonicity were statistically significantly longer if the procedure was performed after 12 months (P = 0.044). There was no statistically significant association between patient age (P = 0.96) or sex (P = 0.13) and facial nerve function. HHFA resulted in no or minimal tongue atrophy without deviation in 53 patients (93%), and the remainder had mild hemiatrophy with tongue deviation <30 degrees.

CONCLUSIONS

HHFA is an effective technique for facial nerve reanimation with acceptable morbidity related to tongue function. Patients with a longer duration of facial palsy still have a good chance for restoration of facial movement but require longer recovery periods.

Electrophysiological assessment of a peptide amphiphile nanofiber nerve graft for facial nerve repair

Facial nerve injury can cause severe long-term physical and psychological morbidity. There are limited repair options for an acutely transected facial nerve not amenable to primary neurorrhaphy. We hypothesize that a peptide amphiphile nanofiber neurograft may provide the nanostructure necessary to guide organized neural regeneration. Five experimental groups were compared, animals with (1) an intact nerve, (2) following resection of a nerve segment, and following resection and immediate repair with either a (3) autograft (using the resected nerve segment), (4) neurograft, or (5) empty conduit. The buccal branch of the rat facial nerve was directly stimulated with charge balanced biphasic electrical current pulses at different current amplitudes whereas nerve compound action potentials (nCAPs) and electromygraphic responses were recorded. After 8 weeks, the proximal buccal branch was surgically reexposed and electrically evoked nCAPs were recorded for groups 1-5. As expected, the intact nerves required significantly lower current amplitudes to evoke an nCAP than those repaired with the neurograft and autograft nerves. For other electrophysiologic parameters such as latency and maximum nCAP, there was no significant difference between the intact, autograft, and neurograft groups. The resected group had variable responses to electrical stimulation, and the empty tube group was electrically silent. Immunohistochemical analysis and transmission electron microscopy confirmed myelinated neural regeneration. This study demonstrates that the neuroregenerative capability of peptide amphiphile nanofiber neurografts is similar to the current clinical gold standard method of repair and holds potential as an off-the-shelf solution for facial reanimation and potentially peripheral nerve repair.