1
|
Heron MJ, Zhu KJ, Zhu L, Davis AJ, Alahmadi S, Snee IA, Chen AJ, Elhelali A, Mundy LR. Impact of peripheral nerve blocks on opioid use following flap reconstruction involving the lower extremity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2025; 105:230-242. [PMID: 40318361 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2025.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2024] [Revised: 03/12/2025] [Accepted: 04/06/2025] [Indexed: 05/07/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) are recommended by several multimodal pain regimens, but the evidence supporting their use in lower extremity surgery is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the association between PNBs and opioid use for free flap reconstruction involving the lower extremity. METHODS We conducted a systematic review on the use of PNBs in lower extremity surgery, followed by a blind, dual extraction of the study outcomes. Variables of interest included opioid use (intravenous [IV] morphine milligram equivalents [MMEs]), patient-reported pain, length of surgery (hours), and length of stay (days). We then performed meta-analyses using random effects models for mean difference (MD). RESULTS We included 11 studies comprising 417 patients for analysis. PNBs were significantly associated with reduced 24-hour (MD=-15.4 IV MMEs, p<0.05) but not total postoperative opioid use (MD=-80.3 IV MMEs, p>0.05). Patients who received PNBs reported significantly less pain at 24 h (standardized MD=-0.72 IV MMEs, p<0.05) but not 48 h (standardized MD=-0.21, p>0.05). Length of stay was 0.6 days shorter for patients who received PNBs (p<0.05), but length of surgery was not significantly different (MD=0.06 h, p>0.05). When considering the data from only randomized controlled trials, total opioid use was significantly reduced for patients who received PNBs (MD=-19.62 IV MMEs, p<0,05), but there was no difference in the length of stay (MD=-0.28 days, p>0.05). CONCLUSION Peripheral nerve blocks may offer statistically significant reductions in postoperative opioid use, particularly within the first 24-hours postoperatively, but the clinical significance of this reduction is relatively minor (approximately 4 to 6 oxycodone 5-mg equivalents).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Heron
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N Caroline St, 8th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Katherine J Zhu
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N Caroline St, 8th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Lily Zhu
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N Caroline St, 8th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Alexandra J Davis
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N Caroline St, 8th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Sami Alahmadi
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Georgetown University School of Medicine, 3800 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| | - Isabel A Snee
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Georgetown University School of Medicine, 3800 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| | - Alec J Chen
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N Caroline St, 8th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Ala Elhelali
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N Caroline St, 8th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Lily R Mundy
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N Caroline St, 8th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Plonowska‐Hirschfeld KA, Saroya J, Herrera J, Chang JL, Goldberg AN, Seth R, Durr ML. Improving Multimodal Analgesic Use After Otolaryngologic Surgery-A Single-Institution Experience of 9000 Patients. OTO Open 2025; 9:e70106. [PMID: 40196217 PMCID: PMC11973581 DOI: 10.1002/oto2.70106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2025] [Accepted: 03/12/2025] [Indexed: 04/09/2025] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aims to assess a quality improvement intervention to decrease opiate prescriptions at discharge and improve patient access to multimodal analgesics (MMA) after otolaryngologic surgery. Study Design Longitudinal quality improvement initiative with retrospective prescription trend review and prospective patient questionnaire collection. Setting An academic medical center. Methods Opioid, acetaminophen, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) discharge prescriptions after otolaryngologic procedures were reviewed. Two annual department-wide workshops were carried out to review the literature on published MMA protocols and develop standardized post-operative pain medication instructions to reduce opioid use. Concurrently, a patient survey was distributed to evaluate discharge pain medication use and satisfaction with pain control. Results Discharge pain medications were reviewed for 9064 procedures between January 2021 and May 2024. After the interventions above, the percentage of patients receiving opioids at discharge decreased from 61.4% to 46.8% (P < .00001). Concurrently, acetaminophen and NSAID discharge prescriptions increased from 24.3% and 10.2% to 67.4% and 46.1%, respectively (both P < .00001). Among 100 patients surveyed, satisfaction with post-operative pain control was high before and after the implementation of standardized discharge instructions, even though fewer post-intervention patients received opioids at discharge (49.1% compared to 76.6% pre-intervention, P = .007). Notably, 27% of patients prescribed opioids reported not taking them and 23% reported saving unused opioids for future use. Conclusion Implementation of standardized post-operative pain medication instructions at discharge after otolaryngologic procedures led to a substantial decrease in opioids prescribed while maintaining patient satisfaction with post-operative pain management. A significant proportion of patients reported saving unused opioids for future use despite standardized safe disposal instructions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jasmeet Saroya
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Jose Herrera
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Jolie L. Chang
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Andrew N. Goldberg
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Rahul Seth
- Golden State Plastic SurgerySan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Megan L. Durr
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yessaillian A, Reese M, Clark RC, Becker M, Lopes K, Alving-Trinh A, Llaneras J, McPherson M, Gosman A, Reid CM. A systematic review of morphine equivalent conversions in plastic surgery: Current methods and future directions. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2024; 95:142-151. [PMID: 38909598 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Revised: 05/16/2024] [Accepted: 06/01/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Protocols surrounding opioid reduction have become commonplace in plastic surgery to improve peri-operative outcomes. Within such protocols, opioid requirement is a frequently analyzed outcome. Though often examined, there is no literature standard conversion for morphine milligram equivalents (MME) at present, leading to questionable external validity. We hypothesized significant heterogeneity in MME reporting would exist within plastic surgery literature. METHODS Following the PRISMA guidelines, the authors conducted a systematic review of 16 journals. Clinical studies focused on opioid reduction within plastic surgery were identified. Primary outcomes included reporting of morphine equivalents (ME) delivery (IV/oral), operative ME, inpatient ME, outpatient ME, timeline, and method of calculation. RESULTS Among the 101 studies analyzed, 73% reported opioid requirements in the form of ME. Among those that used ME, 3% reported IV ME, 41% reported oral, 32% reported both, and 25% gave no indication of either. Operative ME were reported in 19% of studies. Furthermore, 54% of studies reported inpatient ME whereas 32% of studies reported outpatient ME. Only 19% reported the number of days opioids were consumed postoperatively. Moreover, 27% of the studies reported the actual method of ME conversion, with 17 unique methods described. Only 8 studies (8%) reported using the Center for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for ME conversion. CONCLUSION There is significant variability among the reported ME conversion methodology within plastic surgery literature. Highlighting these discrepancies is an essential step in creating and implementing a single, standard method to mitigate opioid morbidity in plastic surgery and to optimize enhanced recovery protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Yessaillian
- UC San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Dr, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - McKay Reese
- UC San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Dr, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Robert Craig Clark
- UC San Diego Division of Plastic Surgery, 200 W. Arbor Drive M/C 8890, San Diego, CA 92013, United States
| | - Miriam Becker
- UC San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Dr, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Kelli Lopes
- UC San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Dr, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Alexandra Alving-Trinh
- UC San Diego Division of Plastic Surgery, 200 W. Arbor Drive M/C 8890, San Diego, CA 92013, United States
| | - Jason Llaneras
- UC San Diego Division of Plastic Surgery, 200 W. Arbor Drive M/C 8890, San Diego, CA 92013, United States
| | - Mary McPherson
- University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, 20 N Pine St, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States
| | - Amanda Gosman
- UC San Diego Division of Plastic Surgery, 200 W. Arbor Drive M/C 8890, San Diego, CA 92013, United States
| | - Chris M Reid
- UC San Diego Division of Plastic Surgery, 200 W. Arbor Drive M/C 8890, San Diego, CA 92013, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wei L, Li L, Lv X, Yang G. Factors influencing early postsurgical mobilization following Vascularized Iliac Crest Flap for jaw defect reconstruction. Curr Probl Surg 2024; 61:101519. [PMID: 39098336 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2024.101519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2024] [Revised: 05/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 08/06/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Li Wei
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology and National Center of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
| | - Li Li
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology and National Center of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China.
| | - Xiaoming Lv
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology and National Center of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
| | - GuoYong Yang
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology and National Center of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ferri A, Varazzani A, Tognin L, Bellanti L, Pedrazzi G, Bianchi B, Arcuri F, Ferrari S, Poli T. Perioperative pain management after scapular tip free flap harvesting for head and neck reconstruction using mini-catheters to inject the local anesthetic. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2024; 28:819-826. [PMID: 38270706 DOI: 10.1007/s10006-024-01212-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although functional and esthetic results after the use of a scapular tip free flap (STFF) in head and neck reconstruction, and the related donor-site morbidity, have been extensively described, data regarding acute postoperative donor-site pain management are lacking. Purpose of this study is to explore the use of mini-catheters to administer local anesthetics for donor-site pain management after reconstruction using STFF. METHODS Patients who underwent head and neck reconstruction using a STFF were prospectively enrolled and, through a perineural catheter placed in the donor site during the surgical procedure, a bolus of chirochaine was injected before the patient regained consciousness and at 8, 16, and 24 h postoperatively. Before and 40 min after each dose administration, donor-site pain on a numerical rating scale (NRS; 0-10) was evaluated. RESULTS Study population consisted of 20 patients (40-88 years). At 8 h, the pain scores before and after the injection were 0-10 (mean 3.35) and 0-5 (mean 1.25), respectively. At 16 h, the pain scores before and after the injection were 0-8 (mean 2.55) and 0-4 (mean 0.55), respectively. At 24 h, the pain scores before and after the injection were 0-8 (mean 1.30) and 0-4 (mean 0.30), respectively. CONCLUSION Statistical analysis confirmed a significant difference between the pain scores before and after administration at 8, 16, and 24 h (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.003, respectively). Mini-catheters for local anesthetic administration represent an effective strategy for pain control after STFF harvesting for head and neck reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Ferri
- Maxillo-Facial Surgery Division, Head Neck Department, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - A Varazzani
- Maxillo-Facial Surgery Division, Head Neck Department, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - L Tognin
- Maxillo-Facial Surgery Division, Head Neck Department, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
| | - L Bellanti
- Maxillo-Facial Surgery Division, Head Neck Department, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | | - B Bianchi
- Maxillo-Facial Surgery Division, Head Neck Department, University Hospital San Martino of Genova, Genoa, Italy
| | - F Arcuri
- Maxillo-Facial Surgery Division, Head Neck Department, University Hospital San Martino of Genova, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - T Poli
- University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Imai T, Takasago T, Momma Y, Chiba T, Nakanome A, Morita S, Hasegawa K, Ito K, Goto T, Asada Y. Efficacy of an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway to manage pain, nausea and vomiting after head and neck surgeries with free tissue transfer reconstruction. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2023; 53:1038-1044. [PMID: 37534546 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyad094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pain and post-operative nausea and vomiting are the main factors that impair the quality of recovery after surgery. Very few reports have analyzed patient-reported outcomes to investigate the efficacy of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol to alleviate these symptoms after head and neck surgeries with free tissue transfer reconstruction. METHODS We investigated post-operative pain and post-operative nausea and vomiting in 47 patients who underwent head and neck surgeries with free tissue transfer reconstruction with enhanced recovery after surgery support between February 2021 and August 2022. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale and Japanese version of the Quality of Recovery-40. RESULTS Significant increases in the mean visual analog scale scores for pain and post-operative nausea and vomiting were observed only on post-operative Day 1 compared with preoperative values (pain: 3.19 ± 2.78 vs. 1.96 ± 2.42, P = 0.0408; post-operative nausea and vomiting: 1.52 ± 2.09 vs. 0.54 ± 1.37, P = 0.0194). From post-operative Day 2, there were no significant differences between the pre- and post-operative visual analog scale scores, and no significant increases in the incidences of moderate or severe pain and post-operative nausea and vomiting compared with preoperatively. The Japanese version of the Quality of Recovery-40 score for post-operative pain showed no significant deterioration compared with preoperatively, while the Japanese version of the Quality of Recovery-40 score for post-operative nausea and vomiting showed significant deterioration compared with the preoperative value on post-operative Days 2, 4 and 7. CONCLUSIONS The visual analog scale and Japanese version of the Quality of Recovery-40 scores for post-operative pain and visual analog scale score for post-operative nausea and vomiting suggested that the enhanced recovery after surgery strategy favorably controlled pain and post-operative nausea and vomiting after head and neck surgeries with free tissue transfer reconstruction. However, as the post-operative Japanese version of the Quality of Recovery-40 score for post-operative nausea and vomiting was lower than the preoperative value, there is still a need for further improvement of the enhanced recovery after surgery pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takayuki Imai
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Teiko Takasago
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Yumiko Momma
- Department of Nursing, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Tomoyo Chiba
- Department of Nursing, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Ayako Nakanome
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Sinkichi Morita
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Kohsei Hasegawa
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Kazue Ito
- Department of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Takahiro Goto
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Yukinori Asada
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori, Miyagi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Elliott ZT, Mann DS, Fiorella M, Christopher V, Givens A, Martin AM, Zhan T, Curry J. Predictors of opioid requirement among patients receiving free flap reconstruction to the head and neck. Am J Otolaryngol 2023; 44:104000. [PMID: 37499343 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.104000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioids are a part of standard of care treatment of acute, severe postoperative pain. However, increased opioid requirements have been shown to be associated with increased postoperative complications, morbidity, and mortality. The aim of this study was to identify potential predictive factors associated with increased or decreased opioid requirements after free tissue transfer (FTT) to the head and neck. MATERIALS/METHODS A retrospective review was conducted on subjects who underwent head and neck reconstruction (HNR) from 2015 to 2021 at a single tertiary care center. Patients with inpatient stay over 10 days and those receiving fentanyl for sedation purposes were excluded due to EMR limitations and confounding, respectively. The total dose of opioid medication each patient received was calculated and summed using morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Statistical analysis was conducted using poisson regression and multivariable regression models. RESULTS Two hundred and ninety-one patients were included. The mean opioid requirement for all subjects was 228.6 (SD 250.0) MMEs during their entire postoperative stay and the mean length of stay was 6.0 (SD 1.7) days. An established opioid prescription prior to surgical resection was the greatest predictor of increased risk for opioid requirement according univariate and multivariate analysis 2.356 (2.321-2.392), p ≤ 0.0001 and 1.833 (1.802-1.863), p ≤ 0.0001, respectively. Fibula transfers were associated with higher opioid requirements while scapula transfers were associated with decreased opioid requirements compared to other free tissue transfer types. CONCLUSION Preoperative opioid use was associated with higher postoperative opioid requirements. Multimodal pain management (MMPM) was not associated with a decreased opioid requirement; however, further studies are needed to investigate the hierarchy, dosing, and timing of MMPM in relation to opioid requirements and pain control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary T Elliott
- Thomas Jefferson University, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Philadelphia, PA 191071, USA.
| | - Derek S Mann
- Thomas Jefferson University, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Philadelphia, PA 191071, USA
| | - Michele Fiorella
- Thomas Jefferson University, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Philadelphia, PA 191071, USA
| | - Vanessa Christopher
- Thomas Jefferson University, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Philadelphia, PA 191071, USA
| | - Alyssa Givens
- Thomas Jefferson University, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Philadelphia, PA 191071, USA
| | - Ann Marie Martin
- Thomas Jefferson University, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Philadelphia, PA 191071, USA
| | - Tingting Zhan
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 191071, USA
| | - Joseph Curry
- Thomas Jefferson University, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Philadelphia, PA 191071, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
List MA, Knackstedt M, Liu L, Kasabali A, Mansour J, Pang J, Asarkar AA, Nathan C. Enhanced recovery after surgery, current, and future considerations in head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2023; 8:1240-1256. [PMID: 37899849 PMCID: PMC10601592 DOI: 10.1002/lio2.1126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Review of the current and relevant literature to develop a list of evidence-based recommendations that can be implemented in head and neck surgical practices. To provide rationale for the multiple aspects of comprehensive care for head and neck surgical patients. To improve postsurgical outcomes for head and neck surgical patients. Methods Extensive review of the medical literature was performed and relevant studies in both the head and neck surgery and other surgical specialties were considered for inclusion. Results A total of 18 aspects of perioperative care were included in this review. The literature search included 276 publications considered to be the most relevant and up to date evidence. Each topic is concluded with recommendation grade and quality of evidence for the recommendation. Conclusion Since it's conception, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have continued to push for comprehensive and evidence based postsurgical care to improve patient outcomes. Head and neck oncology is one of the newest fields to develop a protocol. Due to the complexity of this patient population and their postsurgical needs, a multidisciplinary approach is needed to facilitate recovery while minimizing complications. Current and future advances in head and neck cancer research will serve to strengthen and add new principles to a comprehensive ERAS protocol. Level of Evidence 2a.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marna A. List
- Department of Otolaryngology/HNSLouisiana State University Health‐ShreveportShreveportLouisianaUSA
| | - Mark Knackstedt
- Department of Otolaryngology/HNSLouisiana State University Health‐ShreveportShreveportLouisianaUSA
| | - Lucy Liu
- Department of Otolaryngology/HNSLouisiana State University Health‐ShreveportShreveportLouisianaUSA
| | - Ahmad Kasabali
- Department of Otolaryngology/HNSLouisiana State University Health‐ShreveportShreveportLouisianaUSA
- College of MedicineLouisiana State University Health‐ShreveportShreveportLouisianaUSA
| | - Jobran Mansour
- Department of Otolaryngology/HNSLouisiana State University Health‐ShreveportShreveportLouisianaUSA
| | - John Pang
- Department of Otolaryngology/HNSLouisiana State University Health‐ShreveportShreveportLouisianaUSA
| | - Ameya A. Asarkar
- Department of Otolaryngology/HNSLouisiana State University Health‐ShreveportShreveportLouisianaUSA
| | - Cherie‐Ann Nathan
- Department of Otolaryngology/HNSLouisiana State University Health‐ShreveportShreveportLouisianaUSA
- Feist‐Weiller Cancer CenterShreveportLouisianaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Towfighi P, Hill A, Crossley JR, Walsh A, Leonard JA, Giurintano JP, Pierce ML, Reilly MJ. A retrospective analysis of pain and opioid usage in head and neck free flap reconstruction. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 9:153-159. [PMID: 37383327 PMCID: PMC10296052 DOI: 10.1002/wjo2.87] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2022] [Revised: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 09/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives Investigate opioid usage and postoperative pain in patients undergoing head and neck free flap surgery. Methods A retrospective review of 100 consecutive patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction at two academic centers was performed. Data captured included demographics, postoperative inpatient pain, pain at postoperative visits, morphine equivalent doses (MEDs) administration, medication history, and comorbidities. Data were analyzed using regression models, χ 2 tests, and student's t-tests. Results Seventy-three percent of patients were discharged with opioid medication, with over half (53.4%) continuing to take opioids at their second postoperative visit, and over one-third (34.2%) continuing to take them around 4-month postoperatively. One out of every five (20.3%) opioid-naïve patients chronically took opioids postoperatively. There was a poor association between inpatient postoperative pain scores and daily MEDs administered (R 2 = 0.13, 0.17, and 0.22 in postoperative Days 3, 5, and 7, respectively). Neither preoperative radiotherapy nor postoperative complications were associated with an increase in opioid usage. Conclusions For patients undergoing head and neck free flap operations, opioid medications are commonly used for postoperative analgesia. This practice may increase the chance an opioid-naïve patient uses opioids chronically. We found a poor association between MEDs administered and patient-reported pain scores, which suggests that standardized protocols aimed at optimizing analgesia while reducing opioid administration may be warranted. Level of Evidence: 3 (Retrospective cohort study).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parhom Towfighi
- Georgetown University School of MedicineWashingtonDistrict of ColumbiaUSA
| | - Alison Hill
- Georgetown University School of MedicineWashingtonDistrict of ColumbiaUSA
| | - Jason R. Crossley
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryMedstar GeorgetownWashingtonDistrict of ColumbiaUSA
| | - Amanda Walsh
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryMedstar GeorgetownWashingtonDistrict of ColumbiaUSA
| | - James A. Leonard
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryMedstar GeorgetownWashingtonDistrict of ColumbiaUSA
| | - Jonathan P. Giurintano
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryMedstar GeorgetownWashingtonDistrict of ColumbiaUSA
| | - Matthew L. Pierce
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryMedstar GeorgetownWashingtonDistrict of ColumbiaUSA
| | - Michael J. Reilly
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryMedstar GeorgetownWashingtonDistrict of ColumbiaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Castellanos CX, Paoletti M, Ulloa R, Kim C, Fong M, Xepoleas M, Sinha U, Kokot N, Swanson MS. Opioid Sparing Multimodal Analgesia for Transoral Robotic Surgery: Improved Analgesia and Narcotic Use Reduction. OTO Open 2023; 7:e17. [PMID: 36998552 PMCID: PMC10046737 DOI: 10.1002/oto2.17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To compare postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption in patients after transoral robotic surgery (TORS). Study Design Single institution retrospective cohort study. Setting TORS was performed at a single academic tertiary care center. Methods This study compared traditional opioid-based and opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia (MMA) regimens in patients with oropharyngeal and supraglottic malignancy after TORS. Data were obtained from the electronic health records from August 2016 to December 2021. The average postoperative pain scores and total opioid consumption in morphine milligram equivalents were calculated for postoperative days (PODs) 0 to 3. The secondary objectives were to quantify and characterize opioid prescriptions upon hospital discharge. Results A total of 114 patients were identified for this study, 58 patients in the non-MMA cohort and 56 in the MMA cohort. Postoperative pain levels in the MMA cohort were statistically lower on POD 0 (p = 0.001), POD 1 (p = 0.001), and POD 3 (p = 0.004). Postoperative opioid consumption decreased significantly in the MMA cohort from 37.7 to 10.8 mg on POD 0 (p = 0.002), 65.9 to 19.9 mg on POD 1 (p < 0.001), 36.0 to 19.3 mg on POD 2 (p = 0.02), and 45.4 to 13.8 mg on POD 3 (p = 0.02). The number of patients discharged from the hospital with a prescription for narcotics was significantly lower in the MMA cohort (71.4%) compared with the non-MMA cohort (98.3%) (p < 0.001). Conclusion Implementation of our MMA pain protocol reduced pain levels and narcotic consumption in the immediate postoperative period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos X. Castellanos
- Caruso Department of Otolaryngology‐Head & Neck SurgeryKeck Medicine of University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Marcus Paoletti
- Caruso Department of Otolaryngology‐Head & Neck SurgeryKeck Medicine of University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Ruben Ulloa
- Caruso Department of Otolaryngology‐Head & Neck SurgeryKeck Medicine of University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Celeste Kim
- Caruso Department of Otolaryngology‐Head & Neck SurgeryKeck Medicine of University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Michelle Fong
- Caruso Department of Otolaryngology‐Head & Neck SurgeryKeck Medicine of University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Meredith Xepoleas
- Caruso Department of Otolaryngology‐Head & Neck SurgeryKeck Medicine of University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Uttam Sinha
- Caruso Department of Otolaryngology‐Head & Neck SurgeryKeck Medicine of University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Niels Kokot
- Caruso Department of Otolaryngology‐Head & Neck SurgeryKeck Medicine of University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Mark S. Swanson
- Caruso Department of Otolaryngology‐Head & Neck SurgeryKeck Medicine of University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mark M, Eggerstedt M, Urban MJ, Al‐Khudari S, Smith R, Revenaugh P. Designing an evidence-based free-flap pathway in head and neck reconstruction. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022; 8:126-132. [PMID: 35782403 PMCID: PMC9242419 DOI: 10.1002/wjo2.22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The use of autologous free-tissue transfer is an increasingly utilized tool in the ladder of reconstructive options to preserve and restore function in patients with head and neck cancer. This article focuses on the evidence surrounding perioperative care that optimizes surgical outcomes and describes one tertiary center's approach to standardized free-flap care. Data Sources This article examines English literature from PubMed and offers expert opinion on perioperative free-flap care for head and neck oncology. Conclusion Free-flap reconstruction for head and neck cancer is a process that, while individualized for each patient, is best supported by a comprehensive and standardized care pathway. Surgical optimization begins in the preoperative phase and a thoughtful approach to intraprofessional communication and evidence-based practice is rewarded with improved outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Mark
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryRush University Medical CenterChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Michael Eggerstedt
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryRush University Medical CenterChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Matthew J. Urban
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryRush University Medical CenterChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Samer Al‐Khudari
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryRush University Medical CenterChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Ryan Smith
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryRush University Medical CenterChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Peter Revenaugh
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryRush University Medical CenterChicagoIllinoisUSA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Standardized Perioperative Protocol and Routine Ketorolac Use for Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2022; 10:e4318. [PMID: 35572189 PMCID: PMC9094414 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000004318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
No consensus exists on ideal perioperative management or anticoagulation regimen for free flap reconstruction of the head and neck. Perceived benefits from antiplatelet therapy need to be balanced against potential complications. Ketorolac, a platelet aggregation inhibitor and a parenteral analgesic, was introduced as part of a standardized perioperative protocol at our institution. In this study, we aimed to examine the impact of implementation of this protocol as well as complications associated with the routine use of perioperative ketorolac in a diverse group of patients who underwent head and neck free flap reconstruction.
Collapse
|
13
|
Kuan EC, Birkenbeuel JL, Kovacs AJ, Abiri A, Goshtasbi K, Lehrich BM, Golshani K, Chen JW, Cadena G, Hsu FPK. Patterns of Opioid Usage and Predictors of Utilization Following Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery. Laryngoscope 2022; 132:1939-1945. [PMID: 35543275 DOI: 10.1002/lary.30164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 04/02/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pain control is an important topic that has not been extensively studied in patients undergoing endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS). The purpose of this study is to identify opioid requirements after ESBS and the risk factors predictive of increased use. METHODS This study was a retrospective review of all patients undergoing ESBS at a tertiary academic skull base surgery program between July 2018 and August 2020. The primary outcome variable was total morphine equivalent dose (MED) requirements after surgery, calculated as the sum of all morphine milligram equivalents over a 24-h period, and summated across the duration of each participant's hospital course. RESULTS 94 patients were included in this review. Average daily MED requirements were 14.00 ± 6.79 mg. Average total MED requirements were 83.78 ± 92.99 mg during hospitalization. Average length of stay (LOS) was 5.71 ± 4.42 days, with 22 (23.4%) patients not requiring opioid use upon discharge. On multivariate analysis, female sex (β = 49.62; 95% CI [13.53, 85.71], p = 0.008), nasoseptal flap (NSF) reconstruction (β = 49.56; 95% CI [13.51, 85.61], p = 0.008) and LOS (β = 4.02; 95% CI [0.001, 8.04], p = 0.050) were independently associated with higher total MED requirements. CONCLUSIONS We report average total MED requirements of 83.78 mg after ESBS, with female sex, intraoperative use of an NSF, and increased LOS as predictors of higher MED use. This data indicates a subset of patients who may benefit from more aggressive pain control strategies upfront, including consideration of non-opioid, multimodal pain regimens. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 Laryngoscope, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward C Kuan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, U.S.A.,Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, U.S.A
| | - Jack L Birkenbeuel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, U.S.A
| | - Alexander J Kovacs
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, U.S.A
| | - Arash Abiri
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, U.S.A
| | - Khodayar Goshtasbi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, U.S.A
| | - Brandon M Lehrich
- Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Kiarash Golshani
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, U.S.A
| | - Jefferson W Chen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, U.S.A
| | - Gilbert Cadena
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, U.S.A
| | - Frank P K Hsu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
He Y, Chen W, Qin L, Ma C, Tan G, Huang Y. The Intraoperative Adherence to Multimodal Analgesia of Anesthesiologists: A Retrospective Study. Pain Ther 2022; 11:575-589. [PMID: 35275381 PMCID: PMC9098701 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-022-00367-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Multimodal analgesia (MMA) is a critical component of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). However, little research revealed its intraoperative implementation by anesthesiologists, who are on the front line defending against surgical pain. Therefore, the objective of our study is to assess the adherence of anesthesiologists to MMA comprehensively. Methods A retrospective study was conducted involving patients undergoing lung resection, knee arthroplasty, and radical mastectomy from pre/post-implementation year of MMA (Jan 1, 2013, to Dec 31, 2013, vs. 2019). Intraoperative analgesia regimens (analgesic mode) and hourly rated morphine milligram equivalents (MME) were compared. In addition, patient characteristics associated with continued opioid use after surgery, surgical types, and position level of anesthesiologists (attending-junior; above attending-senior) were also analyzed. Results After MMA initiation, the rate of multimodal analgesic regimen (mode ≥ 2) was significantly increased (post- vs. pre-implementation, 31.57 vs. 21.50%, p < 0.05). However, MME did not show significant difference (post- vs. pre-implementation, 0.402 vs. 0.456, p > 0.05). Patient-level predictors of persistent opioid use after surgery were not related to increased analgesic mode. Lung resection [coefficient, − 0.538; 95% confidence interval (CI), − 0.695 to − 0.383, p < 0.001] and knee arthroplasty (coefficient, − 1.143; 95% CI, − 1.366 to − 0.925, p < 0.001) discouraged multiple analgesic mode, while senior anesthesiologists (coefficient, 0.674; 95% CI 0.548–0.800, p < 0.001) promoted it. Conclusions Although anesthesiologists used more analgesics after promoting MMA, the “opioid-sparing” principle was not followed properly. The analgesic mode was not instructed by patients’ characteristics appropriately. In addition, surgeries with cumbersome preparation/process impeded the use of multiple analgesic modes, while senior anesthesiologists preferred multiple analgesic modes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yumiao He
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.,Joint Laboratory of Anesthesia and Pain, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Linan Qin
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Chao Ma
- Joint Laboratory of Anesthesia and Pain, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Gang Tan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
| | - Yuguang Huang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China. .,Joint Laboratory of Anesthesia and Pain, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Go BC, Go CC, Chorath K, Moreira A, Rajasekaran K. Multimodal Analgesia in Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 166:820-831. [PMID: 34372726 DOI: 10.1177/01945998211032910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Postoperative pain after head and neck cancer surgery is commonly treated with opioids, which are associated with considerable side effects. The objective of this study is to analyze the safety and efficacy of using multimodal analgesia (MMA) for patients undergoing head and neck cancer surgery with free flap reconstruction. DATA SOURCES A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov. REVIEW METHODS All studies comparing patients receiving MMA (gabapentin, corticosteroids, local anesthetic, acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs]) vs patients receiving opioids for head and neck cancer surgery with free flap reconstruction were screened. The primary outcome was postoperative opioid usage. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, subjective pain scores, surgical/medical complications, adverse effects, and 30-day outcomes. RESULTS A total of 10 studies representing 1253 patients (MMA, n = 594; non-MMA, n = 659) met inclusion criteria. Gabapentinoids were the most commonly used intervention (72.9%) followed by NSAIDs (44.6%), acetaminophen (44.3%), corticosteroids (25.1%), ketamine (7.2%), and nerve block (3.4%). Eight studies reported a significant decrease in postoperative opioid usage in the MMA groups. Subjective pain had wider variation, with most studies citing significant pain improvement. There were no differences in surgical outcomes, medical complications, adverse effects, or 30-day mortality and readmission rates. CONCLUSION With the rise of the opioid epidemic, MMA may play an important role in the treatment of postoperative pain after head and neck cancer surgery. A growing body of literature demonstrates a variety of effective perioperative regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatrice C Go
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Cammille C Go
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kevin Chorath
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alvaro Moreira
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of Texas Health-San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Karthik Rajasekaran
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Healy DW, Cloyd BH, Straker T, Brenner MJ, Damrose EJ, Spector ME, Saxena A, Atkins JH, Ramamurthi RJ, Mehta A, Aziz MF, Cattano D, Levine AI, Schechtman SA, Cavallone LF, Abdelmalak BB. Expert Consensus Statement on the Perioperative Management of Adult Patients Undergoing Head and Neck Surgery and Free Tissue Reconstruction From the Society for Head and Neck Anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2021; 133:274-283. [PMID: 34127591 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000005564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
The perioperative care of adult patients undergoing free tissue transfer during head and neck surgical (microvascular) reconstruction is inconsistent across practitioners and institutions. The executive board of the Society for Head and Neck Anesthesia (SHANA) nominated specialized anesthesiologists and head and neck surgeons to an expert group, to develop expert consensus statements. The group conducted an extensive review of the literature to identify evidence and gaps and to prioritize quality improvement opportunities. This report of expert consensus statements aims to improve and standardize perioperative care in this setting. The Modified Delphi method was used to evaluate the degree of agreement with draft consensus statements. Additional discussion and collaboration was performed via video conference and electronic communication to refine expert opinions and to achieve consensus on key statements. Thirty-one statements were initially formulated, 14 statements met criteria for consensus, 9 were near consensus, and 8 did not reach criteria for consensus. The expert statements reaching consensus described considerations for preoperative assessment and optimization, airway management, perioperative monitoring, fluid management, blood management, tracheal extubation, and postoperative care. This group also examined the role for vasopressors, communication, and other quality improvement efforts. This report provides the priorities and perspectives of a group of clinical experts to help guide perioperative care and provides actionable guidance for and opportunities for improvement in the care of patients undergoing free tissue transfer for head and neck reconstruction. The lack of consensus for some areas likely reflects differing clinical experiences and a limited available evidence base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David W Healy
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Benjamin H Cloyd
- Department of Anesthesiology, Michigan Medicine - University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Tracey Straker
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Michael J Brenner
- Department of Otolaryngology, Michigan Medicine-University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Edward J Damrose
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery & Anesthesiology/Perioperative Medicine (by courtesy)
| | - Matthew E Spector
- Department of Otolaryngology, Michigan Medicine-University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Amit Saxena
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Joshua H Atkins
- Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Arpan Mehta
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine & Pain Management, The University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Michael F Aziz
- Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Davide Cattano
- Department of Anesthesiology, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Adam I Levine
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Samuel A Schechtman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Michigan Medicine - University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Laura F Cavallone
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi
| | - Basem B Abdelmalak
- Departments of General Anesthesiology and Outcomes Research, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Vu CN, Lewis CM, Bailard NS, Kapoor R, Rubin ML, Zheng G. Association Between Multimodal Analgesia Administration and Perioperative Opioid Requirements in Patients Undergoing Head and Neck Surgery With Free Flap Reconstruction. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 146:708-713. [PMID: 32556065 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.1170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Importance The opioid epidemic has reignited interest in opioid-sparing strategies in managing pain. However, few studies have focused on opioid use during perioperative care in patients undergoing head and neck surgery with free flap reconstruction. Objectives To examine the association between multimodal analgesia (MMA) administration and perioperative opioid requirements in patients undergoing head and neck surgery with free flap reconstruction and to investigate whether MMA alters the duration of stay in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Design, Setting, and Participants In this retrospective case-control study, data were collected between April 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017. The study was conducted at a single cancer center in the United States. Participants were 357 patients 18 years or older scheduled for head and neck surgery with free flap reconstruction. Exposures Patients in the treatment group received oral celecoxib, gabapentin, and/or tramadol hydrochloride before surgery. Control group patients did not receive any of these medications. Main Outcomes and Measures The amount of opioid administered in the operating room and in the PACU was converted to morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) for comparison between the 2 groups. The duration of stay in the PACU was based on the start time and end time of PACU care recorded by nurses in the PACU. Results In total, 149 patients (mean [SD] age, 60.3 [13.7] years; 104 [69.8%] men) were included in the treatment group, and 208 patients (mean [SD] age, 64.2 [13.6] years; 146 [70.2%] men) were included in the control group. The mean (SD) MEDD of opioid given during surgery was 51.7 (19.8) in the treatment group and 67.9 (24.7) in the control group, for a difference in the means (treatment vs control) of -16.17 (95% CI, -20.81 to -11.52). In the PACU, the mean (SD) MEDD of opioid given was 11.7 (13.3) in the treatment group and 14.9 (15.7) in the control group, for a difference in the means (treatment vs control) of -3.22 (95% CI, -6.40 to -0.03). The MMA treatment remained largely associated with reduced amount of opioid given during surgery, in the PACU, and both combined after controlling for other important factors. Conclusions and Relevance This case-control study found that the patients who received MMA before head and neck surgery with free flap reconstruction required less opioid medication. The treatment group also had shorter duration of stay in the PACU compared with the control group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine N Vu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Carol M Lewis
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Neil S Bailard
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Ravish Kapoor
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - M Laura Rubin
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Gang Zheng
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hinther A, Rasool A, Nakoneshny SC, Chandarana SP, Hart R, Matthews TW, Dort JC. Chronic opioid use following surgery for head and neck cancer patients undergoing free flap reconstruction. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 50:28. [PMID: 33892825 PMCID: PMC8066487 DOI: 10.1186/s40463-021-00508-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physician opioid-prescribing patterns have significant impacts on the current opioid crisis. Patients who use opioids in the postoperative period are at risk of developing chronic postoperative opioid use. This study determined the rate of chronic postoperative opioid use among head and neck cancer patients undergoing primary surgery with free-flap reconstruction. Additionally, this study identified major risk factors associated with the development of chronic postoperative opioid use. METHODS A retrospective chart review was performed for all adults (age ≥ 18 years) undergoing primary head and neck surgical resection with free-flap reconstruction between January 2008 and December 2015. Patients were identified from a prospectively collected database, Otobase™. Data from the provincial drug insurance program were used to capture drug dispensing information to determine chronic opioid use at 3- and 12-months postoperatively. Data extracted from Otobase™ included patient demographics, social habits, clinical stage, pathological stage, type of surgery, and adjuvant treatment. RESULTS The total cohort was comprised of 212 patients. Chronic opioid use at 3- and 12- months postoperatively was observed in 136 (64%) and 116 (55%) patients, respectively. Of the 212 patients, 85 patients (40%) were identified as preoperative opioid users and 127 were opioid naïve (60%). Of the 85 patients who were preoperative opioid users, 70 (82%) and 63 (77%) patients continued to use opioids 3- and 12-months postoperatively, respectively. The proportion of opioid-naïve patients who were using opioids at 3- and 12-months postoperatively was 52% (66 patients) and 42% (53 patients), respectively. Identified risk factors included preoperative opioid use, prior tobacco use, advanced pathologic T-stage, and adjuvant treatment. CONCLUSIONS Among head and neck cancer patients that have undergone major resection with free-flap reconstruction, the prevalence of chronic postoperative opioid users was considerable. Identified risk factors included preoperative opioid use, prior tobacco use, tumor stage, and adjuvant treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Hinther
- Department of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, HRIC 2A02 3280 Hospital Dr NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4Z6, Canada
| | - Alysha Rasool
- Department of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, HRIC 2A02 3280 Hospital Dr NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4Z6, Canada
| | - Steven C Nakoneshny
- Ohlson Research Initiative, Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Shamir P Chandarana
- Department of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, HRIC 2A02 3280 Hospital Dr NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4Z6, Canada
- Ohlson Research Initiative, Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Robert Hart
- Department of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, HRIC 2A02 3280 Hospital Dr NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4Z6, Canada
- Ohlson Research Initiative, Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - T Wayne Matthews
- Department of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, HRIC 2A02 3280 Hospital Dr NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4Z6, Canada
- Ohlson Research Initiative, Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Joseph C Dort
- Department of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, HRIC 2A02 3280 Hospital Dr NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
- Ohlson Research Initiative, Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hinther A, Nakoneshny SC, Chandarana SP, Matthews TW, Hart R, Schrag C, Matthews J, McKenzie CD, Fick GH, Dort JC. Efficacy of Multimodal Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Management in Head and Neck Cancer Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13061266. [PMID: 33809273 PMCID: PMC7999688 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13061266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Chronic opioid use is a serious global health problem and surgery is often the point of initial exposure for many chronic opioid users. Multimodal analgesia (MMA) is an approach designed to reduce or eliminate opioid use in surgical patients, but it has not been studied in patients having major head and neck surgery. This study explores the impact of an MMA protocol on opioid prescribing practices in patients having major head and neck surgery with flap reconstruction. The results of this study will provide evidence to inform and guide pain management practice in this important patient population. The results of this study could also be applied to other areas of otorhinolaryngology. MMA is an important tool in the effort to reduce chronic opioid use. Abstract Postoperative opioid use has been linked to the subsequent development of opioid dependency. Multimodal analgesia (MMA) can reduce the use of opioids in the postoperative period, but MMA has not been well-studied after major head and neck surgery. Our goal is to explore the association between MMA and postoperative opioid use and pain control in patients undergoing major head and neck surgery. We performed a retrospective study in adult (age ≥ 18 years) patients undergoing primary head and neck cancer resection with free-flap reconstruction. All patients were treated using an established care pathway. The baseline group was treated between January 2015–December 2015 (n = 41), prior to the implementation of MMA, and were compared to an MMA-treated cohort treated between December 2017–June 2019 (n = 97). The primary outcome was the proportion of opioids prescribed and oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) consumed during the hospitalization. The secondary outcome was pain control. We found that the post-MMA group consumed fewer opioids in the postoperative period compared to the pre-MMA group. Prior to post-operative day (POD) 6, pain control was better in the post-MMA group; however, the pain control lines intersect on POD 6 and the pre-MMA group appeared to have better pain control from PODs 7–10. In conclusion, our data suggest MMA is an effective method of pain control and opioid reduction in patients undergoing surgery for head and neck cancer with free flap reconstruction. MMA use was associated with a significant decrease in the quantity of opioids consumed postoperatively. The MMA protocol was associated with improved pain management early in the postoperative course. Finally, the MMA protocol is a feasible method of pain control and may reduce the adverse side effects associated with opioid use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Hinther
- Section of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada; (A.H.); (S.P.C.); (T.W.M.); (R.H.)
| | - Steven C. Nakoneshny
- Ohlson Research Initiative, Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada;
| | - Shamir P. Chandarana
- Section of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada; (A.H.); (S.P.C.); (T.W.M.); (R.H.)
- Ohlson Research Initiative, Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada;
| | - T. Wayne Matthews
- Section of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada; (A.H.); (S.P.C.); (T.W.M.); (R.H.)
- Ohlson Research Initiative, Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada;
| | - Robert Hart
- Section of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada; (A.H.); (S.P.C.); (T.W.M.); (R.H.)
- Ohlson Research Initiative, Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada;
| | - Christiaan Schrag
- Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada; (C.S.); (J.M.); (C.D.M.)
| | - Jennifer Matthews
- Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada; (C.S.); (J.M.); (C.D.M.)
| | - C. David McKenzie
- Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada; (C.S.); (J.M.); (C.D.M.)
| | - Gordon H. Fick
- Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada;
| | - Joseph C. Dort
- Section of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada; (A.H.); (S.P.C.); (T.W.M.); (R.H.)
- Ohlson Research Initiative, Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada;
- Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-403-220-7268
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Brenner MJ. Commentary on "Opioid Prescribing Patterns Among Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons in the Medicare Population" by Barbarite et al.: Shorter Duration Opioid Prescribing After Surgery-Moving Needles or Goalposts? Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2021; 23:405-407. [PMID: 33650895 DOI: 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Brenner
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Chorath K, Go B, Shinn JR, Mady LJ, Poonia S, Newman J, Cannady S, Revenaugh PC, Moreira A, Rajasekaran K. Enhanced recovery after surgery for head and neck free flap reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Oncol 2020; 113:105117. [PMID: 33360446 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.105117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Revised: 11/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Head and neck free flap reconstruction requires multidisciplinary and coordinated care in the perioperative setting to ensure safe recovery and success. Several institutions have introduced enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols to attenuate the surgical stress response and improve postoperative recovery. With multiple studies demonstrating mixed results, the success of these interventions on clinical outcomes has yet to be determined. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of ERAS protocols and clinical care pathways for head and neck free flap reconstruction. METHODS We searched PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and grey literature up to September 1st, 2020 to identify studies comparing patients enrolled in an ERAS protocol and control group. Our primary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS) and readmission. Mortality, reoperations, wound complication and ICU (intensive care unit) LOS comprised our secondary outcomes. RESULTS 18 studies met inclusion criteria, representing a total of 2630 patients. The specific components of ERAS protocols used by institutions varied. Nevertheless, patients enrolled in ERAS protocols had reduced hospital LOS (MD -4.36 days [-7.54, -1.18]), readmission rates (OR 0.64 [0.45;0.92]), and wound complications (RR 0.41 [0.21, 0.83]), without an increase in reoperations (RR 0.65 [0.41, 1.02]), mortality (RR 0.38 [0.05, 2.88]), or ICU LOS (MD -2.55 days [-5.84, 0.74]). CONCLUSION There is growing body of evidence supporting the role of ERAS protocols for the perioperative management of head and neck free flap patients. Our findings reveal that structured clinical algorithms for perioperative interventions improve clinically-meaningful outcomes in patients undergoing complex ablation and microvascular reconstruction procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Chorath
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Beatrice Go
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Justin R Shinn
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Leila J Mady
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Seerat Poonia
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Jason Newman
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Steven Cannady
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Peter C Revenaugh
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Alvaro Moreira
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health-San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Karthik Rajasekaran
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Reinert J, Parmentier BL. Effect of Perioperative Ketamine on Postoperative Mood and Depression: A Review of the Literature. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2020; 14:25-32. [PMID: 33225765 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2021.1855142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Ketamine is being increasingly utilized in a variety of patient care settings, ranging from high acuity inpatient scenarios to the outpatient management of select mental health diagnoses. Postoperative patients are at an increased risk of developing a depressed state, and though ketamine's ability to improve mood is well documented in the literature, the relationship between perioperative ketamine and postoperative mood has not been fully elucidated. Areas covered: The purpose of this review was to determine ketamine's ability to improve mood and depression scores in the perioperative setting. A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, ProQuest, Web of Science, and CINAHL using the following search terminology: 'ketamine' AND 'perioperative' OR 'surgery' AND 'mood' OR 'depression.' Seven clinical trials are evaluated in this review. Expert opinion: As the use of ketamine continues to expand, clinicians must be cognizant of the fact that many of its desired effects are likely to overlap. Patients outside of the perioperative setting may benefit from using ketamine as an analgesic or sedative, as appropriate, to mitigate mood and depression. Ketamine, when administered as an anesthetic in the perioperative setting, seemingly has effect on postoperative mood and depression. Further studies that are sufficient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Reinert
- Fisch College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Tyler , Tyler, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Enhanced recovery protocol for transoral robotic surgery demonstrates improved analgesia and narcotic use reduction. Am J Otolaryngol 2020; 41:102649. [PMID: 32717682 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No study has evaluated the impact of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol on opioid usage among patients undergoing transoral robotic surgery (TORS). METHODS In this retrospective study, patients undergoing TORS were enrolled in an ERAS protocol and compared to control patients. Primary outcome measures included postoperative mean morphine equivalent dose (MED), Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) pain scores, and opioid prescriptions on discharge. RESULTS The mean MED administered postoperatively was lower in the ERAS group (17.6 mg) than in the control group (65.0 mg) (p < .001). Average postoperative DVPRS scores were 2.9 in the ERAS group vs. 4.2 in the control group (p = .042). Fewer patients in the ERAS group received opioid prescriptions on discharge (31.6%) than controls (96.2%) (p < .001). CONCLUSION The TORS ERAS protocol is associated with reduced postoperative opioid usage, lower pain scores, and reduced opioid requirements on discharge.
Collapse
|
24
|
Sayal NR, Militsakh O, Aurit S, Hufnagle J, Hubble L, Lydiatt W, Lydiatt D, Lindau R, Coughlin A, Osmolak A, Panwar A. Association of multimodal analgesia with perioperative safety and opioid use following head and neck microvascular reconstruction. Head Neck 2020; 42:2887-2895. [PMID: 32686254 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Revised: 05/05/2020] [Accepted: 05/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study examines the association of multimodal analgesia (MMA) protocol for head and neck microvascular reconstruction with postoperative safety and opioid use. METHODS Retrospective, intention-to-treat analysis of 226 patients undergoing head and neck microvascular reconstruction between January 1, 2014 and August 30, 2018 at a tertiary-care hospital following MMA protocol implementation. Multivariable models examined outcomes of interest. RESULTS There were no differences between groups in frequency of bleeding, return to operating room, complete flap loss, readmissions, wound complications, and 30-day mortality. Patients in MMA protocol experienced reduced likelihood of partial flap loss (OR 0.18, confidence interval 0.04-0.91), meaningful reduction in postoperative opioid use (cumulative inpatient morphine equivalents [64 vs 141 mg; P < .001], daily morphine equivalents [8 vs 22 mg/d; P < .001]; and 22.5% lower frequency of opioid prescription at discharge [55.6% vs 78.1%; P = .001]). CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing head and neck microvascular reconstruction, MMA is safe and associated with reduced postoperative opioid use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Navdeep R Sayal
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Methodist Estabrook Cancer Center, Nebraska Methodist Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
- Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Oleg Militsakh
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Methodist Estabrook Cancer Center, Nebraska Methodist Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
- Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Sarah Aurit
- Division of Clinical Research and Evaluative Sciences, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - John Hufnagle
- Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Lester Hubble
- Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - William Lydiatt
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Methodist Estabrook Cancer Center, Nebraska Methodist Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
- Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Daniel Lydiatt
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Methodist Estabrook Cancer Center, Nebraska Methodist Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
- Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Robert Lindau
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Methodist Estabrook Cancer Center, Nebraska Methodist Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
- Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Andrew Coughlin
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Methodist Estabrook Cancer Center, Nebraska Methodist Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
- Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Angela Osmolak
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Methodist Estabrook Cancer Center, Nebraska Methodist Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
- Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Aru Panwar
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Methodist Estabrook Cancer Center, Nebraska Methodist Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
- Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kiong KL, Vu CN, Yao CMKL, Kruse B, Zheng G, Yu P, Weber RS, Lewis CM. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Head and Neck Oncologic Surgery: A Case-Matched Analysis of Perioperative and Pain Outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:867-876. [PMID: 32964371 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09174-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways are well established in certain surgical specialties because findings have shown significant improvements in outcomes. Convincing literature in head and neck cancer (HNC) surgery is lacking. This study aimed to assess the effect of an ERAS pathway on National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP)-based occurrences and pain-related outcomes in HNC surgery. METHODS The study matched 200 patients undergoing head and neck oncologic surgery on an ERAS pathway between 1 March 2016 and 31 March 2019 with control subjects (1:1 ratio) during the same period. Demographic and perioperative data collected from the NSQIP database were extracted. Pain scores and medication usage were electronically extracted from our electronic medical record system and compared. Risk factors for high opioid usage also were assessed. RESULTS Both groups were statistically similar in baseline characteristics. The ERAS group had fewer planned intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (4% vs. 14%; p < 0.001), a shorter mean hospital stay (7.2 ± 2.3 vs. 8.7 ± 4.2 days; p < 0.001), and fewer overall complications (18.6% vs. 27.0%; p = 0.045). Morphine milligram equivalent requirements over 72 h were significantly reduced during 72 h in the ERAS group (138.8 ± 181.5 vs. 207.9 ± 205.5; p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the risk factors for high opioid analgesic usage included preoperative opioid usage, age younger than 65 years, race, patient-controlled analgesia use, and ICU admission. CONCLUSION The study findings showed that ERAS in HNC surgery can result in improved outcomes and resource use, and that these results are sustainable. The outcomes described in this report can be further used to optimize ERAS pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberley L Kiong
- Division of Surgery, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Catherine N Vu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher M K L Yao
- Division of Surgery, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brittany Kruse
- Institute for Cancer Care Innovation, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gang Zheng
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Peirong Yu
- Department of Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Randal S Weber
- Division of Surgery, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Carol M Lewis
- Division of Surgery, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Banik GL, Kraimer KL, Shindo ML. Opioid Prescribing in Patients Undergoing Neck Dissections With Short Hospitalizations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020; 164:792-798. [DOI: 10.1177/0194599820957980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Objective To evaluate postoperative opioid prescribing in patients undergoing neck dissections with short hospitalizations. Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Tertiary academic hospital. Methods The study population included patients who underwent lateral neck dissections with or without an associated head and neck procedure and required hospitalization for ≤3 days from 2012 to 2019. Interventions to decrease opioid utilization, including preoperative counseling, multimodality pain management, and multidisciplinary collaboration, were implemented in September 2016. Patients were divided into 2 groups: preintervention (group 1) and postintervention (group 2). The mean quantity of opioids prescribed during hospitalization, at discharge, and in refills was calculated in morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Results A total of 407 patients were included in the analysis: 223 patients in group 1 and 184 patients in group 2 (42.3% female, 89.4% white; average age, 55.2 years [95% CI, 53.6-56.9]). The mean opioid quantity prescribed in unilateral neck dissection alone decreased from 353.9 MME (95% CI, 266.7-441.2) in group 1 to 113.3 MME (95% CI, 87.8-138.7) in group 2 ( P < .001; effect size, 1.0). Statistically significant decreases in mean opioid quantity prescribed were also observed in unilateral neck dissection in combination with thyroidectomy, parotidectomy, glossectomy, or tonsillectomy. The percentage of patients requiring opioid prescription refills was not statistically different between the groups. Conclusion This study demonstrates that the quantity of opioids prescribed in patients undergoing neck dissections and associated head and neck procedures with short hospitalizations can be reduced to as low as 100 to 125 MME with preoperative counseling, multimodality pain management, and multidisciplinary collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace L. Banik
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Kristen L. Kraimer
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Maisie L. Shindo
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Drahos AL, Scott AM, Johns TJ, Ashley DW. Multimodal Analgesia and Decreased Opioid Use in Adult Trauma Patients. Am Surg 2020; 86:950-954. [PMID: 32762466 DOI: 10.1177/0003134820942177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is an opioid epidemic in the United States. With the increased concern of over-prescribing opioids, physicians are seeking alternative pain management strategies. The purpose of this study is to review the impact of instituting a multimodal analgesia (MMA) guideline on decreasing opioid use in trauma patients at a Level 1 trauma center. METHODS In 2017, an MMA guideline was developed and included anti-inflammatories, muscle relaxants, neuropathic agents, and local analgesics in addition to opioids. Staff were educated and the guideline was implemented. A retrospective review of medications prescribed to patients admitted from 2016 through 2018 was performed. Patients admitted in 2016 served as the control group (before MMA). In 2018, all patients received multimodal pain therapy as standard practice, and served as the comparison group. RESULTS A total of 10 340 patients were admitted to the trauma service from 2016 through 2018. There were 3013 and 3249 patients for review in 2016 and 2018, respectively. Total morphine milligram equivalents were 2 402 329 and 1 975 935 in 2016 and 2018, respectively, a 17.7% decrease (P < .001). Concurrently, there was a statistically significant increase in the use of multimodal pain medications. A secondary endpoint was studied to evaluate for changes in acute kidney injury; there was not a statistically significant increase (0.56% versus 0.68%, P = .55). DISCUSSION Implementation of an MMA guideline significantly reduced opioid use in trauma patients. The use of nonopioid MMA medications increased without an increased incidence of acute kidney injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew L Drahos
- 5223 Department of Surgery, The Medical Center Navicent Health, Mercer University School of Medicine, Macon, GA, USA
| | - Anthony M Scott
- 5223 Department of Surgery, The Medical Center Navicent Health, Mercer University School of Medicine, Macon, GA, USA
| | - Tracy J Johns
- 5223 Department of Surgery, The Medical Center Navicent Health, Mercer University School of Medicine, Macon, GA, USA
| | - Dennis W Ashley
- 5223 Department of Surgery, The Medical Center Navicent Health, Mercer University School of Medicine, Macon, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lucas JP, Cramer JD. Quality Improvement in Pain Medicine. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2020; 53:905-913. [PMID: 32684287 DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2020.05.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
In the last 30 years, pain control in the United States has undergone several evolutions impacting the care of surgical patients. More recently, safe pain control has been a subject of quality improvement efforts by otolaryngologists focusing on minimizing opioid consumption. This article discusses the rising overprescription of opioids, influenced by legislation and governmental agencies, and the steps taken to correct and reform policies to decrease the amount of opioids prescribed. Lastly, specific institutional examples of quality improvement protocols implemented to help decrease opioid consumption and prescription are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordyn P Lucas
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 4201 St Antoine Street, UHC 5E, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
| | - John D Cramer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 4201 St Antoine Street, UHC 5E, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bobian M, Gupta A, Graboyes EM. Acute Pain Management Following Head and Neck Surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2020; 53:753-764. [PMID: 32682530 DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2020.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Acute pain management following major head and neck (HN) surgery is complex. Multimodal analgesia (MMA) regimens including acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, gabapentinoids, and locoregional anesthetics are safe and effective in this population (including patients undergoing HN free flap surgery). Special considerations for patients undergoing HN free flap surgery include judicious use of steroids and attention to donor site pain. Evidence for specific analgesic regimens following transoral robotic surgery is limited but should include MMA and perioperative dexamethasone. Further study is required to optimize combinations, dosages, and duration of perioperative analgesia medications, opioid and nonopioid, for patients undergoing major HN surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Bobian
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Avenue, MSC 550, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Annika Gupta
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Avenue, MSC 550, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Avenue, MSC 550, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Meraj TS, Bresler A, Zuliani GF. Acute Pain Management Following Facial Plastic Surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2020; 53:811-817. [PMID: 32593429 DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2020.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Facial plastic surgery, including septorhinoplasty, aging face procedures, otoplasty, and oculoplastic procedures, has varying levels of evidence for the management of acute pain after surgery. This article discusses the available evidence in these procedures and discusses the authors' recommendations for the treatment of postoperative pain, with a focus on decreasing the reliance on opioid pain medication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taha S Meraj
- Department of Otolaryngology, Wayne State University, 4201 St Antoine 5E-UHC, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
| | - Amishav Bresler
- Department of Otolaryngology, Rutgers University, 90 Bergen Street, Suite 8100, Newark, NJ 07208, USA
| | - Giancarlo F Zuliani
- Department of Otolaryngology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA; Zuliani Facial Aesthetics, 50 West Big Beaver, #280, Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Rettig EM, Janus JR, Moore EJ, Price DL, Glasgow AE, Marinelli JP, Habermann EB, Van Abel KM. Age Is Associated With Pain Experience and Opioid Use After Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2020; 130:E469-E478. [PMID: 32413165 DOI: 10.1002/lary.28713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2019] [Revised: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe pain experience and opioid use after major head and neck reconstructive surgery. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. METHODS Patients undergoing major head and neck surgery with microvascular free tissue transfer (free flaps) at a tertiary academic center were included. Pain scores (0-10) and demographic and clinical data were ascertained from medical records. Discharge opioid prescriptions and refills obtained within 30 days were recorded. Patient characteristics were compared with pain scores using nonparametric rank-sum tests and with likelihood of refill using logistic regression models to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS The study population comprised 445 patients. Median age was 60 years (interquartile range 50-68). Most patients had cancer (N = 350, 78%). The majority of free flaps were fibula (N = 153, 34%) or radial forearm (N = 159, 36%). Older patients reported significantly lower pain scores, whereas patients with opioid tolerance, anxiety, current smokers, and those undergoing larger volume resections or boney free flaps reported significantly higher pain scores. One-quarter (N = 115, 26%) of patients obtained opioid refills. Patients aged ≥ 60 years had one-half the odds of obtaining a refill compared with patients aged < 60 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.33-0.84), whereas surgical defect volume ≥ 100 cm3 (aOR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.21-3.07) and higher pain score (aOR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.07-1.32 per 1 point increase) increased the odds of refill. CONCLUSION Continued opioid use after discharge is common among patients undergoing major head and neck reconstruction, particularly for younger patients and after more extensive surgery. Older patients reported lower pain intensity and were less likely to obtain opioid refills, highlighting the wisdom of judicious opioid use for this vulnerable population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV Laryngoscope, 130: E469-E478, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleni M Rettig
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A
| | - Jeffrey R Janus
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A
| | - Eric J Moore
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A
| | - Daniel L Price
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A
| | - Amy E Glasgow
- Mayo Clinic, Health Care Policy and Research, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A
| | - John P Marinelli
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A
| | | | - Kathryn M Van Abel
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|