1
|
Graboyes EM, Cagle JL, Ramadan S, Prasad K, Yan F, Pearce J, Mazul AL, Anoma JS, Hill EG, Chera BS, Puram SV, Jackson R, Sandulache VC, Tam S, Topf MC, Kahmke R, Osazuwa-Peters N, Nussenbaum B, Alberg AJ, Sterba KR, Halbert CH. Neighborhood-Level Disadvantage and Delayed Adjuvant Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024:2818081. [PMID: 38662392 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.0424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
Importance For patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), initiation of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) within 6 weeks of surgery is recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines and the Commission on Cancer. Although individual-level measures of socioeconomic status are associated with receipt of timely, guideline-adherent PORT, the role of neighborhood-level disadvantage has not been examined. Objective To characterize the association of neighborhood-level disadvantage with delays in receiving PORT. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study included 681 adult patients with HNSCC undergoing curative-intent surgery and PORT from 2018 to 2020 at 4 US academic medical centers. The data were analyzed between June 21, 2023, and March 5, 2024. Main Outcome Measures and Measures The primary outcome was delay in initiating guideline-adherent PORT (ie, >6 weeks after surgery). Time-to-PORT (TTP) was a secondary outcome. Census block-level Area Deprivation Index (ADI) scores were calculated and reported as national percentiles (0-100); higher scores indicate greater deprivation. The association of ADI scores with PORT delay was assessed using multivariable logistic regression adjusted for demographic, clinical, and institutional characteristics. PORT initiation across ADI score population quartiles was evaluated with cumulative incidence plots and Cox models. Results Among 681 patients with HNSCC undergoing surgery and PORT (mean [SD] age, 61.5 [11.2] years; 487 [71.5%] men, 194 [29.5%] women) the PORT delay rate was 60.8% (414/681) and median (IQR) TTP was 46 (40-56) days. The median (IQR) ADI score was 62.0 (44.0-83.0). Each 25-point increase in ADI score was associated with a corresponding 32% increase in the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of PORT delay (aOR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.07-1.63) on multivariable regression adjusted for institution, age, race and ethnicity, insurance, comorbidity, cancer subsite, stage, postoperative complications, care fragmentation, travel distance, and rurality. Increasing ADI score population quartiles were associated with increasing TTP (hazard ratio of PORT initiation, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.96; 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44-0.77; and 0.54; 95% CI, 0.41-0.72; for ADI quartiles 2, 3, and 4 vs ADI quartile 1, respectively). Conclusions and Relevance Increasing neighborhood-level disadvantage was independently associated with a greater likelihood of PORT delay and longer TTP in a dose-dependent manner. These findings indicate a critical need for the development of multilevel strategies to improve the equitable delivery of timely, guideline-adherent PORT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Joshua Lee Cagle
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Salma Ramadan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Kavita Prasad
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Flora Yan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - John Pearce
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Angela L Mazul
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jean-Sebastien Anoma
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Elizabeth G Hill
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Bhisham S Chera
- Hollings Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Sidharth V Puram
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
- Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Ryan Jackson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Vlad C Sandulache
- Bobby R. Alford Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- ENT Section, Operative CareLine, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Samantha Tam
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Michael C Topf
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Russel Kahmke
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Deputy Editor, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, JAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery
| | - Brian Nussenbaum
- American Board of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Houston, Texas
| | - Anthony J Alberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia
| | - Katherine R Sterba
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Chanita Hughes Halbert
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences and Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Duckett KA, Lee BJ, Chera BS, Puram SV, Sandulache VC, Kahmke R, Nguyen SA, Nussenbaum B, Alberg AJ, Halbert CH, Sterba KR, Graboyes EM. Author Reply to Letter by Topkan et al Regarding Delays in Starting Postoperative Radiotherapy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024. [PMID: 38655738 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey A Duckett
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Byung Joo Lee
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
- Department of Advanced Specialty Sciences, James B. Edwards College of Dental Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Bhisham S Chera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Sidharth V Puram
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
- Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Vlad C Sandulache
- Bobby R. Alford Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
- ENT Section, Operative CareLine, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Russel Kahmke
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Shaun A Nguyen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Brian Nussenbaum
- American Board of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Anthony J Alberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Chanita Hughes Halbert
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Katherine R Sterba
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Moreno MA, Wax MK, Gardner JR, Cannady SB, Graboyes EM, Bewley AF, Dziegielewski PT, Khaja SF, Bayon R, Ryan J, Al-Khudari S, El-Deiry MW, Ghanem TA, Huang A, Patel R, Higgins KM, Jackson RS, Patel UA. Reconstruction for Salvage Laryngectomy With Limited Pharyngectomy. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024:2817764. [PMID: 38635282 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.0103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
Importance Closure technique for optimization of postoperative and functional outcomes following salvage laryngectomy remains an area of debate among head and neck surgeons. Objective To investigate the association of salvage laryngectomy closure technique with early postoperative and functional outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study included patients from 17 academic, tertiary care centers who underwent total laryngectomy with no or limited pharyngectomy after completing a course of definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy with curative intent between January 2011 and December 2016. Patients with defects not amenable to primary closure were excluded. Data were analyzed from February 14, 2021, to January 29, 2024. Exposures Total laryngectomy with and without limited pharyngectomy, reconstructed by primary mucosal closure (PC), regional closure (RC), or free tissue transfer (FTT). Main Outcomes and Measures Patients were stratified on the basis of the pharyngeal closure technique. Perioperative and long-term functional outcomes were evaluated with bivariate analyses. A multivariable regression model adjusted for historical risk factors for pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF) was used to assess risk associated with closure technique. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs were determined. Results The study included 309 patients (256 [82.8%] male; mean age, 64.7 [range, 58.0-72.0] years). Defects were reconstructed as follows: FTT (161 patients [52.1%]), RC (64 [20.7%]), and PC (84 [27.2%]). A PCF was noted in 36 of 161 patients in the FTT group (22.4%), 25 of 64 in the RC group (39.1%), and 29 of 84 in the PC group (34.5%). On multivariable analysis, patients undergoing PC or RC had a higher risk of PCF compared with those undergoing FTT (PC: RR, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.1-4.4]; RC: RR, 2.5 [95% CI, 1.3-4.8]). Undergoing FTT was associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in risk of PCF (RR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-0.9; number needed to treat, 7). Subgroup analysis comparing inset techniques for the RC group showed a higher risk of PCF associated with PC (RR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-3.0) and predominately pectoralis myofascial flap with onlay technique (RR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-3.2), but there was no association of pectoralis myocutaneous flap with cutaneous paddle interposition with PCF (RR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.5-2.8) compared with FTT with cutaneous inset. There were no clinically significant differences in functional outcomes between the groups. Conclusion and Relevance In this study of patients with limited pharyngeal defects, interpositional fasciocutaneous closure technique was associated with reduced risk of PCF in the salvage setting, which is most commonly achieved by FTT in academic practices. Closure technique was not associated with functional outcomes at 1 and 2 years postoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauricio A Moreno
- Division of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock
| | - Mark K Wax
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - James Reed Gardner
- Division of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock
| | - Steven B Cannady
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Arnaoud F Bewley
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Davis
| | - Peter T Dziegielewski
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Sobia F Khaja
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Rodrigo Bayon
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City
| | - Jesse Ryan
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, State University of New York System, Syracuse
| | - Samer Al-Khudari
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Mark W El-Deiry
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory Health Care, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Tamer A Ghanem
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Andrew Huang
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Rusha Patel
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Oklahoma, Norman
| | - Kevin M Higgins
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ryan S Jackson
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Urjeet A Patel
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Graboyes EM, Lee SC, Lindau ST, Adams AS, Adjei BA, Brown M, Sadigh G, Incudine A, Carlos RC, Ramsey SD, Bangs R. Interventions addressing health-related social needs among patients with cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024; 116:497-505. [PMID: 38175791 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Health-related social needs are prevalent among cancer patients; associated with substantial negative health consequences; and drive pervasive inequities in cancer incidence, severity, treatment choices and decisions, and outcomes. To address the lack of clinical trial evidence to guide health-related social needs interventions among cancer patients, the National Cancer Institute Cancer Care Delivery Research Steering Committee convened experts to participate in a clinical trials planning meeting with the goal of designing studies to screen for and address health-related social needs among cancer patients. In this commentary, we discuss the rationale for, and challenges of, designing and testing health-related social needs interventions in alignment with the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 5As framework. Evidence for food, housing, utilities, interpersonal safety, and transportation health-related social needs interventions is analyzed. Evidence regarding health-related social needs and delivery of health-related social needs interventions differs in maturity and applicability to cancer context, with transportation problems having the most maturity and interpersonal safety the least. We offer practical recommendations for health-related social needs interventions among cancer patients and the caregivers, families, and friends who support their health-related social needs. Cross-cutting (ie, health-related social needs agnostic) recommendations include leveraging navigation (eg, people, technology) to identify, refer, and deliver health-related social needs interventions; addressing health-related social needs through multilevel interventions; and recognizing that health-related social needs are states, not traits, that fluctuate over time. Health-related social needs-specific interventions are recommended, and pros and cons of addressing more than one health-related social needs concurrently are characterized. Considerations for collaborating with community partners are highlighted. The need for careful planning, strong partners, and funding is stressed. Finally, we outline a future research agenda to address evidence gaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Simon C Lee
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Stacy Tessler Lindau
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Medicine-Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alyce S Adams
- Departments of Health Policy/Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Office of Cancer Health Equity and Community Engagement, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Brenda A Adjei
- Office of the Associate Director, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Mary Brown
- Adena Cancer Center, Hematology and Oncology, Chillicothe, OH, USA
| | - Gelareh Sadigh
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | | | - Ruth C Carlos
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Scott D Ramsey
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Rick Bangs
- SWOG Cancer Research Network, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sterba KR, Armeson K, Zapka J, Garrett-Mayer E, Scallion ML, Wall TK, Olsen J, Graboyes EM, Alberg AJ, Day TA. A pilot randomized controlled trial to evaluate a survivorship care planning intervention for head and neck cancer survivor-caregiver dyads. J Cancer Surviv 2024; 18:398-411. [PMID: 35761129 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-022-01227-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors and caregivers face significant challenges after treatment. This study's objective was to evaluate the effects of a dyadic survivorship care planning (SCP) intervention on survivor and caregiver outcomes. METHODS This randomized controlled trial enrolled HNC survivors and caregivers within 18 months post-treatment, randomized dyads to SCP (one-session with written SCP and follow-up telephone call) or usual care and administered baseline and 6-month surveys. Multivariable linear regression examined intervention effects on depression and unmet needs in dyads and burden on caregiverss and a set of secondary outcomes. Rating scales and open-ended questions assessed acceptability. RESULTS We randomized 89 survivor-caregiver dyads (42 usual care, 47 SCP dyads). Fidelity to SCP was high for most survivorship domains except discussing care barriers (13%). The most commonly discussed referrals included nutrition (83%) and behavioral medicine (38%), but referral uptake was low. The SCP intervention did not improve depression or unmet needs among dyads or burden among caregivers at 6 months relative to usual care (p's > .05). Nurses and dyads rated SCP favorably with > 80% positive ratings for session length and care plan content. Qualitative findings highlighted that SCP helped consolidate complex clinical information and strengthened survivor-caregiver-clinician relationships. CONCLUSIONS An HNC SCP intervention was acceptable but ineffective in improving dyads' outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Post-treatment SCP in HNC dyads was ineffective in improving outcomes in survivors and caregivers as delivered in this study. More research is needed to understand how to capitalize on the acceptability of the SCP approach and enhance its effectiveness to support dyads.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine R Sterba
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 68 President Street, MSC 955, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
| | - Kent Armeson
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 68 President Street, MSC 955, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - Jane Zapka
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 68 President Street, MSC 955, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 68 President Street, MSC 955, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - Megan L Scallion
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 68 President Street, MSC 955, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - Tiffany K Wall
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 87 Jonathan Lucas Street MSC 955, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - Jama Olsen
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 68 President Street, MSC 955, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 68 President Street, MSC 955, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 87 Jonathan Lucas Street MSC 955, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - Anthony J Alberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street Room 465, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
| | - Terry A Day
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 87 Jonathan Lucas Street MSC 955, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sonawane K, Zhu Y, Damgacioglu H, Garg A, Graboyes EM, Montealegre JR, Brownstein NC, Ford ME, Roberts JR, Sterba KR, Giuliano AR, Deshmukh AA. Factors associated with parental human papillomavirus vaccination intentions among adolescents from socioeconomically advantaged versus deprived households: a nationwide, cross-sectional survey. Lancet Reg Health Am 2024; 31:100694. [PMID: 38500960 PMCID: PMC10945422 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
Background In the USA, HPV vaccine coverage is substantially lower among adolescents from high-income households compared to their low-income counterparts. We examined and compared the factors associated with parental HPV vaccination intentions between socioeconomically divergent groups. Methods Data from unvaccinated and not fully HPV-vaccinated adolescents from the 2017-2021 National Immunization Survey (NIS)-Teen were analyzed. Socioeconomically advantaged vs. deprived groups were identified based on dichotomized income (material capital) and education (social capital). Parental intent to initiate and complete the HPV vaccine series was compared using bivariable analysis and the factors associated with lacking intent were identified. Findings The 2017-2021 NIS-Teen included a total of 212,643 participants; the final analytical sample consisted of 105,958 adolescents (an estimated 10.3 million adolescents) who were unvaccinated or not fully vaccinated. In the advantaged group, 64.7% of parents of unvaccinated adolescents (equating to 2.4 million US adolescents) had no intention to initiate the HPV vaccine compared to 40.9% of parents in the deprived group (equating to 0.2 million adolescents) (P < 0.0001; S > 13.29). The most frequent reason for lacking intent in the advantaged group was 'safety concerns' (25.5%). In the deprived group, 'lack of knowledge', 'not recommended', and 'not needed' were common reasons (nearly 15% each). Lack of intent to complete the HPV vaccine series was higher in the advantaged group (43.9%; 1.1 million adolescents) compared to the deprived group (25.2%; 0.08 million adolescents) (P < 0.0001; S > 13.29). More than half in the advantaged group (58.4%) and over a third (37.1%) in the deprived group cited 'already up to date' as the main reason for not completing the HPV vaccine series. Interpretation Lack of intent to initiate and complete the HPV vaccination series, particularly among socioeconomically advantaged parents is a significant barrier to achieving the national goal in the USA. Funding The US National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, MUSC Hollings Cancer Center Seed funding, and the US National Cancer Institutes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kalyani Sonawane
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- MUSC Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Yenan Zhu
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- MUSC Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Haluk Damgacioglu
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- MUSC Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Ashvita Garg
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- MUSC Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Evan M. Graboyes
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- MUSC Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | | | - Naomi C. Brownstein
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Marvella E. Ford
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- MUSC Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - James R. Roberts
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Katherine R. Sterba
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- MUSC Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Anna R. Giuliano
- Center for Immunization and Infection Research in Cancer, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Ashish A. Deshmukh
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- MUSC Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
de Almeida JR, Su JS, Kolarski MM, Truong T, Weinreb I, Perez-Ordonez B, Smith SM, Hosni A, Patel S, Valero C, Xu B, Ghossein R, Katabi N, Clark J, Low THH, Gupta R, Graboyes EM, Davies J, Richardson M, Pasham V, Jester R, Goldstein DP, Huang SH, Xu W, O'Sullivan B. Development and validation of a novel TNM staging N-classification of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 2024; 130:410-420. [PMID: 37751180 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), extent of extranodal extension (ENE) (minor, ≤2 mm; major, >2 mm) is differentially prognostic, whereas limitations exist with the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer TNM N-classification (TNM-8-N). METHODS Resected OSCC patients at four centers were included and extent of ENE was recorded. Thresholds for optimal overall survival (OS) discrimination of lymph node (LN) features were established. After dividing into training and validation sets, two new N-classifications were created using 1) recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), and 2) adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and were ranked against TNM-8-N and two published proposals. RESULTS A total of 1460 patients were included (pN0: 696; pN+: 764). Of the pN+ cases, 135 (18%) had bilateral/contralateral LNs; 126 (17%) and 244 (32%) had minor and major ENE, and two (0.3%) had LN(s) >6 cm without ENE (N3a). LN number (1 and >1 vs. 0: aHRs, 1.92 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.44-2.55] and 3.21 [95% CI, 2.44-4.22]), size (>3 vs. ≤3 cm: aHR, 1.88 [95% CI, 1.44-2.45]), and ENE extent (major vs. minor: aHR, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.05-1.87]) were associated with OS, whereas presence of contralateral LNs was not (aHR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.81-1.36]). The aHR proposal provided optimal performance with these changes to TNM-8-N: 1) stratification of ENE extent, 2) elimination of N2c and 6-cm threshold, and 3) stratification of N2b by 3 cm threshold. CONCLUSION A new N-classification improved staging performance compared to TNM-8-N, by stratifying by ENE extent, eliminating the old N2c category and the 6 cm threshold, and by stratifying multiple nodes by size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John R de Almeida
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jie Susie Su
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mirko Manojlovic Kolarski
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tra Truong
- Department of Pathology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ilan Weinreb
- Department of Pathology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Stephen M Smith
- Department of Pathology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ali Hosni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Snehal Patel
- Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Cristina Valero
- Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Bin Xu
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ronald Ghossein
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nora Katabi
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jonathan Clark
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, the University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tsu-Hui Hubert Low
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, the University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ruta Gupta
- Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, the University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Joel Davies
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sinai Health Systems, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mary Richardson
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Vishu Pasham
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Rachel Jester
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - David P Goldstein
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shao Hui Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wei Xu
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brian O'Sullivan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de L'University de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Duckett KA, Kassir MF, Nguyen SA, Brennan EA, Chera BS, Sterba KR, Hughes Halbert C, Hill EG, McCay J, Puram SV, Sandulache VC, Kahmke R, Ramadan S, Nussenbaum B, Alberg AJ, Graboyes EM. Delays Starting Postoperative Radiotherapy Among Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024; 170:320-334. [PMID: 37731255 PMCID: PMC10840985 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Initiating postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) within 6 weeks (42 days) of surgery is the first and only Commission on Cancer (CoC) approved quality metric for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). No study has systematically reviewed nor synthesized the literature to establish national benchmarks for delays in starting PORT. DATA SOURCES Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, we performed a systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL. REVIEW METHODS Studies that described time-to-PORT or PORT delays in patients with HNSCC treated in the United States after 2003 were included. Meta-analysis of proportions and continuous measures was performed on nonoverlapping datasets to examine the pooled frequency of PORT delays and time-to-PORT. RESULTS Thirty-six studies were included in the systematic review and 14 in the meta-analysis. Most studies utilized single-institution (n = 17; 47.2%) or cancer registry (n = 16; 44.4%) data. Twenty-five studies (69.4%) defined PORT delay as >6 weeks after surgery (the definition utilized by the CoC and National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines), whereas 4 (11.1%) defined PORT delay as a time interval other than >6 weeks, and 7 (19.4%) characterized time-to-PORT without defining delay. Meta-analysis revealed that 48.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41.4-55.9) of patients started PORT > 6 weeks after surgery. Median and mean time-to-PORT were 45.8 (95% CI, 42.4-51.4 days) and 47.4 days (95% CI, 43.4-51.4 days), respectively. CONCLUSION Delays in initiating guideline-adherent PORT occur in approximately half of patients with HNSCC. These meta-analytic data can be used to set national benchmarks and assess progress in reducing delays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey A Duckett
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Mohamed Faisal Kassir
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Shaun A Nguyen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Emily A Brennan
- MUSC Libraries, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Bhishamjit S Chera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Katherine R Sterba
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Chanita Hughes Halbert
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Elizabeth G Hill
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Jessica McCay
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Sidharth V Puram
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
- Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Vlad C Sandulache
- Bobby R. Alford Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
- ENT Section, Operative CareLine, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Russel Kahmke
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Salma Ramadan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Brian Nussenbaum
- American Board of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Anthony J Alberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Graboyes EM, Kistner-Griffin E, Hill EG, Maurer S, Balliet W, Williams AM, Padgett L, Yan F, Rush A, Johnson B, McLeod T, Dahne J, Ruggiero KJ, Sterba KR. Mechanism underlying a brief cognitive behavioral treatment for head and neck cancer survivors with body image distress. Support Care Cancer 2023; 32:32. [PMID: 38102496 PMCID: PMC10798060 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08248-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Body image distress (BID) among head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors is a debilitating toxicity associated with depression, anxiety, stigma, and poor quality of life. BRIGHT (Building a Renewed ImaGe after Head & neck cancer Treatment) is a brief cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) that reduces BID for these patients. This study examines the mechanism underlying BRIGHT. METHODS In this randomized clinical trial, HNC survivors with clinically significant BID were randomized to receive five weekly psychologist-led video tele-CBT sessions (BRIGHT) or dose-and delivery matched survivorship education (attention control [AC]). Body image coping strategies, the hypothesized mediators, were assessed using the Body Image Coping Skills Inventory (BICSI). HNC-related BID was measured with the Inventory to Measure and Assess imaGe disturbancE-Head and Neck (IMAGE-HN). Causal mediation analyses were used to estimate the mediated effects of changes in BICSI scores on changes in IMAGE-HN scores. RESULTS Among 44 HNC survivors with BID allocated to BRIGHT (n = 20) or AC (n = 24), mediation analyses showed that BRIGHT decreased avoidant body image coping (mean change in BICSI-Avoidance scale score) from baseline to 1-month post-intervention relative to AC (p = 0.039). Decreases in BICSI-Avoidance scores from baseline to 1-month resulted in decreases in IMAGE-HN scores from baseline to 3 months (p = 0.009). The effect of BRIGHT on IMAGE-HN scores at 3 months was partially mediated by a decrease in BICSI-Avoidance scores (p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS This randomized trial provides preliminary evidence that BRIGHT reduces BID among HNC survivors by decreasing avoidant body image coping. Further research is necessary to confirm these results and enhance the development of interventions targeting relevant pathways to reduce BID among HNC survivors. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03831100 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
- Hollings Cancer Center, MUSC, Charleston, SC, USA.
| | - Emily Kistner-Griffin
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Hollings Cancer Center, MUSC, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Elizabeth G Hill
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Hollings Cancer Center, MUSC, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Stacey Maurer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Wendy Balliet
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Amy M Williams
- Office of Physician Well-Being and Professionalism, Corewell Health, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Lynne Padgett
- Veteran Affairs Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Flora Yan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Angie Rush
- Head and Neck Cancer Alliance, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Brad Johnson
- Head and Neck Cancer Alliance, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Taylor McLeod
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Jennifer Dahne
- Hollings Cancer Center, MUSC, Charleston, SC, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Kenneth J Ruggiero
- College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Katherine R Sterba
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Hollings Cancer Center, MUSC, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Graboyes EM, Chappell M, Duckett KA, Sterba K, Halbert CH, Hill EG, Chera B, McCay J, Puram SV, Ramadan S, Sandulache VC, Kahmke R, Nussenbaum B, Alberg AJ, Paskett ED, Calhoun E. Patient Navigation for Timely, Guideline-Adherent Adjuvant Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: A National Landscape Analysis. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2023; 21:1251-1259.e5. [PMID: 38081134 PMCID: PMC10846494 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aligned with the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Head and Neck Cancers, in November 2021 the Commission on Cancer approved initiation of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) within 6 weeks of surgery for head and neck cancer (HNC) as its first and only HNC quality metric. Unfortunately, >50% of patients do not commence PORT within 6 weeks, and delays disproportionately burden racial and ethnic minority groups. Although patient navigation (PN) is a potential strategy to improve the delivery of timely, equitable, guideline-adherent PORT, the national landscape of PN for this aspect of care is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS From September through November 2022, we conducted a survey of health care organizations that participate in the American Cancer Society National Navigation Roundtable to understand the scope of PN for delivering timely, guideline-adherent PORT for patients with HNC. RESULTS Of the 94 institutions that completed the survey, 89.4% (n=84) reported that at least part of their practice was dedicated to navigating patients with HNC. Sixty-eight percent of the institutions who reported navigating patients with HNC along the continuum (56/83) reported helping them begin PORT. One-third of HNC navigators (32.5%; 27/83) reported tracking the metric for time-to-PORT at their facility. When estimating the timeframe in which the NCCN and Commission on Cancer guidelines recommend commencing PORT, 44.0% (37/84) of HNC navigators correctly stated ≤6 weeks; 71.4% (60/84) reported that they did not know the frequency of delays starting PORT among patients with HNC nationally, and 63.1% (53/84) did not know the frequency of delays at their institution. CONCLUSIONS In this national landscape survey, we identified that PN is already widely used in clinical practice to help patients with HNC start timely, guideline-adherent PORT. To enhance and scale PN within this area and improve the quality and equity of HNC care delivery, organizations could focus on providing better education and support for their navigators as well as specialization in HNC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan M. Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Michelle Chappell
- American Cancer Society National Navigation Roundtable, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Kelsey A. Duckett
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Katherine Sterba
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Chanita Hughes Halbert
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Elizabeth G. Hill
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Bhishamjit Chera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Jessica McCay
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Sidharth V. Puram
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
- Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Salma Ramadan
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Vlad C. Sandulache
- Bobby R. Alford Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- ENT Section, Operative Care Line, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Russel Kahmke
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Brian Nussenbaum
- American Board of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Houston, Texas
| | - Anthony J. Alberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, South Carolina
| | - Electra D. Paskett
- Division of Population Sciences, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
- Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
- Division of Cancer Prevention Control, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Elizabeth Calhoun
- Department of Population Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Graboyes EM, Yom SS. Treatment Delays in Oral Cavity Cancer-Time, Time, Time, See What's Become of Me. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 149:969-970. [PMID: 37422843 PMCID: PMC10775417 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.1942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Sue S Yom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dahne J, Wahlquist AE, Kustanowitz J, Natale N, Fahey M, Graboyes EM, Diaz VA, Carpenter MJ. Behavioral Activation-Based Digital Smoking Cessation Intervention for Individuals With Depressive Symptoms: Randomized Clinical Trial. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e49809. [PMID: 37910157 PMCID: PMC10652199 DOI: 10.2196/49809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Revised: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression is common among adults who smoke cigarettes. Existing depression-specific cessation interventions have limited reach and are unlikely to improve smoking prevalence rates among this large subgroup of smokers. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine whether a mobile app-based intervention tailored for depression paired with a mailed sample of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) is efficacious for treating depression and promoting smoking cessation. METHODS A 2-arm nationwide remote randomized clinical trial was conducted in the United States. Adults (N=150) with elevated depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-8≥10) who smoked were enrolled. The mobile app ("Goal2Quit") provided behavioral strategies for treating depression and quitting smoking based on Behavioral Activation Treatment for Depression. Goal2Quit participants also received a 2-week sample of combination NRT. Treatment as usual participants received a self-help booklet for quitting smoking that was not tailored for depression. Primary end points included Goal2Quit usability, change in depression (Beck Depression Inventory-II) across 12 weeks, and smoking cessation including reduction in cigarettes per day, incidence of 24-hour quit attempts, floating abstinence, and 7-day point prevalence abstinence (PPA). RESULTS In total, 150 participants were enrolled between June 25, 2020, and February 23, 2022, of which 80 were female (53.3%) and the mean age was 38.4 (SD 10.3) years. At baseline, participants on average reported moderate depressive symptoms and smoked a mean of 14.7 (SD 7.5) cigarettes per day. Goal2Quit usability was strong with a mean usability rating on the System Usability Scale of 78.5 (SD 16.9), with 70% scoring above the ≥68 cutoff for above-average usability. Retention data for app use were generally strong immediately following trial enrollment and declined in subsequent weeks. Those who received Goal2Quit and the NRT sample reported lower mean depressive symptoms over the trial duration as compared to treatment as usual (difference of mean 3.72, SE 1.37 points less; P=.01). Across time points, all cessation outcomes favored Goal2Quit. Regarding abstinence, Goal2Quit participants reported significantly higher rates of 7-day PPA at weeks 4 (11% vs 0%; P=.02), 8 (7-day PPA: 12% vs 0%; P=.02), and 12 (16% vs 2%; P=.02). CONCLUSIONS A mobile app intervention tailored for depression paired with a sample of NRT was effective for depression treatment and smoking cessation. Findings support the utility of this intervention approach for addressing the currently unmet public health treatment need for tailored, scalable depression-specific cessation treatments. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03837379; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03837379.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Dahne
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Amy E Wahlquist
- Center for Rural Health Research, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, United States
| | | | - Noelle Natale
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Margaret Fahey
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Vanessa A Diaz
- Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Matthew J Carpenter
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Graboyes EM, Harmon GE, Brown EG. Antibiotic Prescribing Prior to Head and Neck Cancer Diagnosis-Warning, Detour Ahead. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 149:928-929. [PMID: 37615972 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.2462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Gerald E Harmon
- Interim Dean, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, South Carolina
- Immediate Past President, American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Graboyes EM, Kistner-Griffin E, Hill EG, Maurer S, Balliet W, Williams AM, Padgett L, Yan F, Rush A, Johnson B, McLeod T, Dahne J, Ruggiero KJ, Sterba KR. Mechanism Underlying a Brief Cognitive Behavioral Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer Survivors with Body Image Distress. Res Sq 2023:rs.3.rs-3303379. [PMID: 37720013 PMCID: PMC10503855 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3303379/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Body image distress (BID) among head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors is a debilitating toxicity associated with depression, anxiety, stigma, and poor quality of life. BRIGHT (Building a Renewed ImaGe after Head & neck cancer Treatment) is a brief cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) that reduces BID for these patients. This study examines the mechanism underlying BRIGHT. Methods In this randomized clinical trial, HNC survivors with clinically significant BID were randomized to receive 5 weekly psychologist-led video tele-CBT sessions (BRIGHT) or dose-and delivery matched survivorship education (attention control [AC]). Body image coping strategies, the hypothesized mediators, were assessed using the Body Image Coping Skills Inventory (BICSI). HNC-related BID was measured with the IMAGE-HN. Causal mediation analyses were used to estimate the mediated effects of changes in BICSI scores on changes in IMAGE-HN scores. Results Among 44 HNC survivors with BID, mediation analyses showed that BRIGHT decreased avoidant body image coping (mean change in BICSI-Avoidance scale score) from baseline to 1-month post-intervention relative to AC (p = 0.039). Decreases in BICSI-Avoidance scores from baseline to 1-month decreased IMAGE-HN scores from baseline to 3-months (p = 0.009). The effect of BRIGHT on IMAGE-HN scores at 3-months was partially mediated by a decrease in BICSI-Avoidance scores (p = 0.039). Conclusions This randomized trial provides preliminary evidence that BRIGHT reduces BID among HNC survivors by decreasing avoidant body image coping. Further research is necessary to confirm these results and enhance the development of interventions targeting relevant pathways to reduce BID among HNC survivors. Trial Registration This trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03831100 on February 5, 2019.
Collapse
|
15
|
Balakrishnan K, Faucett EA, Villwock J, Boss EF, Esianor BI, Jefferson GD, Graboyes EM, Thompson DM, Flanary VA, Brenner MJ. Allyship to Advance Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Otolaryngology: What We Can All Do. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep 2023; 11:201-214. [PMID: 38073717 PMCID: PMC10707492 DOI: 10.1007/s40136-023-00467-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2024]
Abstract
Purpose of review To summarize the current literature on allyship, providing a historical perspective, concept analysis, and practical steps to advance equity, diversity, and inclusion. This review also provides evidence-based tools to foster allyship and identifies potential pitfalls. Recent findings Allies in healthcare advocate for inclusive and equitable practices that benefit patients, coworkers, and learners. Allyship requires working in solidarity with individuals from underrepresented or historically marginalized groups to promote a sense of belonging and opportunity. New technologies present possibilities and perils in paving the pathway to diversity. Summary Unlocking the power of allyship requires that allies confront unconscious biases, engage in self-reflection, and act as effective partners. Using an allyship toolbox, allies can foster psychological safety in personal and professional spaces while avoiding missteps. Allyship incorporates goals, metrics, and transparent data reporting to promote accountability and to sustain improvements. Implementing these allyship strategies in solidarity holds promise for increasing diversity and inclusion in the specialty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karthik Balakrishnan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Erynne A. Faucett
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of CA-Davis , Sacramento, USA
| | - Jennifer Villwock
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Emily F. Boss
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Brandon I. Esianor
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Gina D. Jefferson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA
| | - Evan M. Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA
| | - Dana M. Thompson
- Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Valerie A. Flanary
- Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Michael J. Brenner
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, University of Michigan medical School, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, 48108 Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Graboyes EM, Kistner-Griffin E, Hill EG, Maurer S, Balliet W, Williams AM, Padgett L, Yan F, Rush A, Johnson B, McLeod T, Dahne J, Ruggiero KJ, Sterba KR. Efficacy of a brief cognitive behavioral therapy for head and neck cancer survivors with body image distress: secondary outcomes from the BRIGHT pilot randomized clinical trial. J Cancer Surviv 2023:10.1007/s11764-023-01454-6. [PMID: 37644354 PMCID: PMC10902187 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01454-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Body image distress (BID) among head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors leads to depression, social isolation, stigma, and poor quality of life. BRIGHT (Building a Renewed ImaGe after Head and neck cancer Treatment) is a brief, tailored cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) that reduces HNC-related BID. This trial examines the effect of BRIGHT on psychosocial outcomes among HNC survivors with BID. METHODS In this pilot randomized trial, HNC survivors with clinically significant BID were randomized to 5 weekly psychologist-led tele-CBT sessions (BRIGHT) or dose and delivery-matched survivorship education (attention control [AC]). Secondary psychosocial outcomes were assessed using validated patient-reported outcomes at baseline and 1 and 3-month post-intervention. RESULTS Among 44 HNC survivors with BID, BRIGHT resulted in a greater reduction in depression relative to AC (mean model-based 1-month difference in Δ PROMIS SF v1.0-Depression 8a score, -3.4; 90% CI, -6.4 to -0.4; 3-month difference, -4.3; 90% CI, -7.8 to -0.8). BRIGHT also decreased shame and stigma relative to AC (mean model-based 3-month difference in Δ Shame and Stigma Scale score, -9.7; 90% CI, -15.2 to -4.2) and social isolation (mean model-based 3-month difference in Δ PROMIS SF v2.0 Social Isolation 8a score, -2.9; 90% CI, -5.8 to -0.1). CONCLUSIONS In this planned secondary analysis of a pilot RCT, BRIGHT improved a broad array of psychosocial outcomes among HNC survivors with BID. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03831100 . IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS These promising preliminary data suggest the need for a large efficacy trial evaluating the effect of BRIGHT on psychosocial outcomes among HNC survivors with BID.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
| | - Emily Kistner-Griffin
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Elizabeth G Hill
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Stacey Maurer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Wendy Balliet
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Amy M Williams
- Office of Physician Well-Being and Professionalism, Corewell Health, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Lynne Padgett
- Veteran Affairs Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Flora Yan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Angie Rush
- Head and Neck Cancer Alliance, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Brad Johnson
- Head and Neck Cancer Alliance, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Taylor McLeod
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Jennifer Dahne
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Kenneth J Ruggiero
- College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Katherine R Sterba
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Graboyes EM, Kistner-Griffin E, Hill EG, Maurer S, Balliet W, Williams AM, Padgett L, Yan F, Rush A, Johnson B, McLeod T, Dahne J, Ruggiero KJ, Sterba KR. Efficacy of a Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer Survivors with Body Image Distress: Secondary Outcomes from the BRIGHT Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. Res Sq 2023:rs.3.rs-3222601. [PMID: 37609318 PMCID: PMC10441452 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3222601/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
Purpose: Body image distress (BID) among head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors leads to depression, social isolation, stigma, and poor quality of life. BRIGHT ( B uilding a R enewed I ma G e after H ead & neck cancer T reatment) is a brief, tailored cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) that reduces HNC-related BID. This trial examines the effect of BRIGHT on psychosocial outcomes among HNC survivors with BID. Methods: In this pilot randomized trial, HNC survivors with clinically significant BID were randomized to 5 weekly psychologist-led tele-CBT sessions (BRIGHT) or dose-and delivery matched survivorship education (attention control [AC]). Secondary psychosocial outcomes were assessed using validated patient-reported outcomes at baseline and 1- and 3-months post-intervention. Results: Among 44 HNC survivors with BID, BRIGHT resulted in a greater reduction in depression relative to AC (mean model-based 1-month difference in Δ PROMIS SF v1.0-Depression 8a score, -3.4; 90% CI, -6.4 to -0.4; 3-month difference, -4.3; 90% CI, -7.8 to -0.8). BRIGHT also decreased shame and stigma relative to AC (mean model-based 3-month difference in Δ Shame and Stigma Scale score, -9.7; 90% CI, -15.2 to -4.2) and social isolation (mean model-based 3-month difference in Δ PROMIS SF v2.0 Social Isolation 8a score, -2.9; 90% CI, -5.8 to -0.1). Conclusions: In this planned secondary analysis of a pilot RCT, BRIGHT improved a broad array of psychosocial outcomes among HNC survivors with BID. Implications for Cancer Survivors: These promising preliminary data suggest the need for a large efficacy trial evaluating the effect of BRIGHT on psychosocial outcomes among HNC survivors with BID. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03831100.
Collapse
|
18
|
Price SN, Palmer AM, Fucito LM, Graboyes EM, Baker NL, Rojewski AM, Toll BA. Tobacco use and cancer-related symptom burden: Analysis of the US Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. Cancer 2023; 129:2385-2394. [PMID: 37211959 PMCID: PMC10593116 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding the relationship between tobacco use and symptom burden may inform tobacco treatment interventions tailored to the needs of individuals with cancer. METHODS The study included 1409 adult cancer survivors from Wave 5 of the US Food and Drug Administration Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study. A multivariate analysis of variance controlling for age, sex, and race/ethnicity assessed the association of cigarette smoking and vaping on cancer-related symptom burden (fatigue, pain, emotional problems) and quality of life (QoL). Generalized linear mixed models controlling for the same factors were used to assess associations among symptom burden, QoL, and quit-smoking intentions, quit-smoking likelihood, and past 12-month smoking quit attempts. RESULTS Weighted rates of current cigarette smoking and vaping were 14.21% and 2.88%, respectively. Current smoking was associated with greater fatigue (p < .0001; partial η 2 = .02), pain (p < .0001; partial η 2 = .08), emotional problems (p < .0001; partial η 2 = .02), and worse QoL (p < .0001; partial η 2 = .08). Current vaping was associated with greater fatigue (p = .001; partial η 2 = .008), pain (p = .009; partial η 2 = .005), and emotional problems (p = .04; partial η 2 = .003), but not worse QoL (p = .17). Higher cancer symptom burden was not associated with reduced interest in quitting, likelihood of quitting, or odds of past year quit attempts (p > .05 for each). CONCLUSIONS Among adults with cancer, current smoking and vaping were associated with greater symptom burden. Survivors' interest in and intentions to quit smoking were not related to symptom burden. Future research should examine the role of tobacco cessation in improving symptom burden and QoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah N. Price
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Amanda M. Palmer
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Lisa M. Fucito
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Evan M. Graboyes
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Nathaniel L. Baker
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Alana M. Rojewski
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Benjamin A. Toll
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sawaf T, Virgen CG, Renslo B, Farrokhian N, Yu KM, Somani SN, Bur AM, Kakarala K, Shnayder Y, Gan GN, Graboyes EM, Sykes KJ. Association of Social-Ecological Factors With Delay in Time to Initiation of Postoperative Radiation Therapy: A Prospective Cohort Study. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 149:477-484. [PMID: 37079327 PMCID: PMC10119772 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.0308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
Importance Timely initiation of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) is associated with reduced recurrence rates and improved overall survival in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Measurement of the association of social-ecological variables with PORT delays is lacking. Objective To assess individual and community-level factors associated with PORT delay among patients with HNSCC. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective cohort study carried out between September 2018 and June 2022 included adults with untreated HNSCC who were enrolled in a prospective registry at a single academic tertiary medical center. Demographic information and validated self-reported measures of health literacy were obtained at baseline visits. Clinical data were recorded, and participant addresses were used to calculate the area deprivation index (ADI), a measure of community-level social vulnerability. Participants receiving primary surgery and PORT were analyzed. Univariable and multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for PORT delays. Exposures Surgical treatment and PORT. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was PORT initiation delay (>42 days from surgery). Risk of PORT initiation delay was evaluated using individual-level (demographic, health literacy, and clinical data) and community-level information (ADI and rural-urban continuum codes). Results Of 171 patients, 104 patients (60.8%) had PORT delays. Mean (SD) age of participants was 61.0 (11.2) years, 161 were White (94.2%), and 105 were men (61.4%). Insurance was employer-based or public among 65 (38.5%) and 75 (44.4%) participants, respectively. Mean (SD) ADI (national percentile) was 60.2 (24.4), and 71 (41.8%) resided in rural communities. Tumor sites were most commonly oral cavity (123 [71.9%]), with 108 (63.5%) classified as stage 4 at presentation. On multivariable analysis, a model incorporating individual-level factors with health literacy in addition to community-level factors was most predictive of PORT delay (AOC= 0.78; R2, 0.18). Conclusions and Relevance This cohort study provides a more comprehensive assessment of predictors of PORT delays that include health literacy and community-level measures. Predictive models that incorporate multilevel measures outperform models with individual-level factors alone and may guide precise interventions to decrease PORT delay for at-risk patients with HNSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuleen Sawaf
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Celina G. Virgen
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Bryan Renslo
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Nathan Farrokhian
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Katherine M. Yu
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Shaan N. Somani
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Andrés M. Bur
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Kiran Kakarala
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Yelizaveta Shnayder
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Gregory N. Gan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Evan M. Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Kevin J. Sykes
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Graboyes EM, Barbon CEA. Optimizing Function and Appearance After Head and Neck Reconstruction: Measurement and Intervention. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2023:S0030-6665(23)00074-9. [PMID: 37246027 DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2023.04.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Approximately 50% of head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors are left with dysphagia as a result of treatment sequele, and 25% of survivors experience clinically significant body image distress (BID). Both dysphagia and BID adversely affect quality of life and should be tracked using validated clinician- and patient-reported outcome measures such as the Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer, MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory, and Inventory to Measure and Assess imaGe disturbancE-Head & Neck (IMAGE-HN). Subjective and objective evaluation measures are critical to dysphagia workup and management. Building a renewed image after head and neck cancer treatment, a brief telemedicine-based cognitive behavioral therapy, has become the first evidence-based treatment for BID among HNC survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Avenue, MSC 550, Charleston, SC 29425, USA; Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina
| | - Carly E A Barbon
- Department of Head & Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1445, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030-400, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Barnes JM, Graboyes EM, Adjei Boakye E, Schootman M, Chino JP, Moss HA, Mowery YM, Osazuwa-Peters N. Insurance Coverage and Forgoing Medical Appointments Because of Cost Among Cancer Survivors After 2016. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:e589-e599. [PMID: 36649493 PMCID: PMC10530391 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The uninsured rate began rising after 2016, which some have attributed to health policies undermining aspects of the Affordable Care Act. Our primary objectives were to assess the changes in insurance coverage and forgoing medical care because of cost in cancer survivors from pre-enactment (2016) through postenactment of those policies (2019) and determine whether there were subgroups that were disproportionately affected. METHODS The 2016-2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys were queried for 18- to 64-year-old cancer survivors. Survey-weighted logistic regression was used to assess temporal changes in (1) insurance coverage and (2) forgoing medical appointments because of cost in the preceding 12 months. RESULTS A total of 62,669 cancer survivors were identified. The percentage of insured cancer survivors decreased from 92.4% in 2016 to 90.4% in 2019 (odds ratio for change in insurance coverage or affordability per one-year increase [ORyear], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86 to 0.98; P = .01), translating to 161,000 fewer cancer survivors in the United States with insurance coverage. There were decreases in employer-sponsored insurance coverage (ORyear, 0.89) but increases in Medicaid coverage (ORyear, 1.17) from 2016 to 2019. Forgoing medical appointments because of cost increased from 17.9% in 2016 to 20.0% in 2019 (ORyear, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.1; P = .025), affecting an estimated 169,000 cancer survivors. The greatest changes were observed among individuals with low income, particularly those residing in nonexpansion states. CONCLUSION Between 2016 and 2019, there were 161,000 fewer cancer survivors in the United States with insurance coverage, and 169,000 forwent medical care because of cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin M. Barnes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Evan M. Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Eric Adjei Boakye
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI
| | - Mario Schootman
- Department of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | - Junzo P. Chino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Haley A. Moss
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Yvonne M. Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Barnes JM, Graboyes EM, Adjei Boakye E, Kent EE, Scherrer JF, Park EM, Rosenstein DL, Mowery YM, Chino JP, Brizel DM, Osazuwa-Peters N. The Affordable Care Act and suicide incidence among adults with cancer. J Cancer Surviv 2023; 17:449-459. [PMID: 35368225 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-022-01205-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with cancer are at an increased suicide risk, and socioeconomic deprivation may further exacerbate that risk. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) expanded insurance coverage options for low-income individuals and mandated coverage of mental health care. Our objective was to quantify associations of the ACA with suicide incidence among patients with cancer. METHODS We identified US patients with cancer aged 18-74 years diagnosed with cancer from 2011 to 2016 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The primary outcome was the 1-year incidence of suicide based on cumulative incidence analyses. Difference-in-differences (DID) analyses compared changes in suicide incidence from 2011-2013 (pre-ACA) to 2014-2016 (post-ACA) in Medicaid expansion relative to non-expansion states. We conducted falsification tests with 65-74-year-old patients with cancer, who are Medicare-eligible and not expected to benefit from ACA provisions. RESULTS We identified 1,263,717 patients with cancer, 812 of whom died by suicide. In DID analyses, there was no change in suicide incidence after 2014 in Medicaid expansion vs. non-expansion states for nonelderly (18-64 years) patients with cancer (p = .41), but there was a decrease in suicide incidence among young adults (18-39 years) (- 64.36 per 100,000, 95% CI = - 125.96 to - 2.76, p = .041). There were no ACA-associated changes in suicide incidence among 65-74-year-old patients with cancer. CONCLUSIONS We found an ACA-associated decrease in the incidence of suicide for some nonelderly patients with cancer, particularly young adults in Medicaid expansion vs. non-expansion states. Expanding access to health care may decrease the risk of suicide among cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin M Barnes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Eric Adjei Boakye
- Department of Population Science and Policy, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA
- Simmons Cancer Institute, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA
| | - Erin E Kent
- Departments of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jeffrey F Scherrer
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Eliza M Park
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Comprehensive Cancer Support Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Donald L Rosenstein
- Comprehensive Cancer Support Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Departments of Psychiatry and Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Yvonne M Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Junzo P Chino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - David M Brizel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Massa ST, Graboyes EM, Mazul AL. Quantifying Costs Associated With Survival Among Patients With Head and Neck Cancer-Reply. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 149:285. [PMID: 36656590 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.4614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sean T Massa
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, St Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.,Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Angela L Mazul
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.,Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chang K, Akakpo KE, Graboyes EM, Zenga J, Puram SV, Pipkorn P. Free tissue reconstruction in the "vessel-depleted" neck: A multi-institutional cohort study. Microsurgery 2023; 43:205-212. [PMID: 36285983 DOI: 10.1002/micr.30978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2022] [Revised: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Much of the literature on free tissue reconstruction in the "vessel-depleted" neck is focused on identification of vessels outside the pretreated field and data on free flap outcomes when infield microvascular anastomosis is performed remain scarce. We aim to report on free flap outcomes and recipient vessel choice in a large cohort of patients with prior radiation and neck dissection (RTND) to the ipsilateral side of vessel anastomosis. METHODS A retrospective review was performed including patients who received head and neck free tissue transfer following prior RTND to the ipsilateral side of vessel anastomosis. Pretreatment data, free flap type, defect site, and recipient vessel choice were reported. Recipient vessel choice was stratified according to neck dissection level and prior free flap. Primary outcome was free flap survival (total failure, partial failure, success) within 30 days after surgery. RESULTS This study included 72 free flap cases in 68 patients. Free flap success was 94.4%; one case (1.4%) resulted in total flap loss and three cases (4%) had partial flap loss. The facial (35%), external carotid (ECA) (25%), and superior thyroid arteries (16%) were the most common recipient arteries. The external jugular (EJV) (38%), facial (30%), and internal jugular veins (IJV) (15%) were the most common recipient veins. The superior thyroid artery was used less frequently with a prior level 2-3/4 neck dissection compared to a prior level 1-3/4 neck dissection (6% vs. 17%, p = 0.83). The facial artery (7% vs. 67%, p < 0.01) and vein (13% vs. 46%, p = 0.04) were used less frequently when a prior free flap with ipsilateral anastomosis was performed. The superior thyroid, ECA, IJV, and EJV were more commonly used in this subgroup. CONCLUSION Free tissue transfer with infield microvascular anastomosis in a neck with prior RTND can be safely done with comparable outcomes to surgically naïve, non-irradiated necks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Chang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Kenneth E Akakpo
- Department of Otolaryngology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.,Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Joseph Zenga
- Department of Otolaryngology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Sidharth V Puram
- Department of Otolaryngology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.,Department of Genetics, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Patrik Pipkorn
- Department of Otolaryngology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Chaiyachati KH, Krause D, Sugalski J, Graboyes EM, Shulman LN. A Survey of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network on Approaches Toward Addressing Patients' Transportation Insecurity. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2023; 21:21-26. [PMID: 36634609 PMCID: PMC9888481 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Addressing patients' social determinants of health is a national priority for cancer treatment centers. Transportation insecurity is one major challenge for patients undergoing active cancer treatment, and missing treatments can result in worse cancer treatment outcomes, including worse morbidity and mortality. How cancer treatment centers are addressing transportation insecurity is understudied. METHODS In January and February 2022, the NCCN Best Practices Committee conducted a survey of NCCN's 31 Member Institutions (currently 32 member institutions as of April 2022) to assess how centers were addressing patient transportation insecurity: how they screen for transportation insecurity, coordinate transportation, and fund transportation initiatives, and their plans to address transportation insecurity in the future. RESULTS A total of 25 of 31 (81%) NCCN Member Institutions responded to the survey, of which 24 (96%) reported supporting the transportation needs of their patients through screening, coordinating, and/or funding transportation. Patients' transportation needs were most often identified by social workers (96%), clinicians (83%), or patients self-declaring their needs (79%). Few centers (33%) used routine screening approaches (eg, universal screening of social risk factors) to systematically identify transportation needs, and 54% used the support of technology platforms or a vendor to coordinate transportation. Transportation was predominantly funded via some combination of philanthropy (88%), grants (63%), internal dollars (63%), and reimbursement from insurance companies (58%). Over the next 12 months, many centers were either going to continue their current transportation programs in their current state (60%) or expand existing programs (32%). CONCLUSIONS Many NCCN Member Institutions are addressing the transportation needs of their patients. Current efforts are heterogeneous. Few centers have systematic, routine screening approaches, and funding relies on philanthropy more so than institutional dollars or reimbursement from insurers. Opportunities exist to establish more structured, scalable, and sustainable programs for patients' transportation needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Diana Krause
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania
| | - Jessica Sugalski
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Lawrence N. Shulman
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Graboyes EM, Maurer S, Balliet W, Li H, Williams AM, Osazuwa-Peters N, Yan F, Padgett L, Rush A, Ruggiero KJ, Sterba KR. Efficacy of a Brief Tele-Cognitive Behavioral Treatment vs Attention Control for Head and Neck Cancer Survivors With Body Image Distress: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 149:54-62. [PMID: 36454561 PMCID: PMC9716435 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.3700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Importance Although 1 in 4 head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors experience clinically significant body image distress (BID), a psychosocial morbidity that adversely affects quality of life, effective interventions for these patients are lacking. Objective To evaluate the acceptability and preliminary efficacy of BRIGHT (Building a Renewed ImaGe after Head and neck cancer Treatment), a brief tele-cognitive behavioral therapy, at reducing BID among HNC survivors. Design, Setting, and Participants This parallel-group pilot randomized clinical trial recruited adult HNC survivors with BID between August 13, 2020, and December 9, 2021, from the Medical University of South Carolina HNC clinic during a routine survivorship encounter. Data were analyzed from May 3 to June 16, 2022. Interventions BRIGHT consisted of 5 weekly psychologist-led video tele-cognitive behavioral therapy sessions. Attention control (AC) consisted of dose- and delivery-matched survivorship education. Main Outcomes and Measures Change in HNC-related BID was assessed using IMAGE-HN (Inventory to Measure and Assess imaGe disturbancE-Head and Neck), a validated patient-reported outcome (score range, 0-84, with higher scores indicating greater HNC-related BID). Clinical response rate was measured as the proportion of patients with a clinically meaningful change in IMAGE-HN scores. Results Of the 44 HNC survivors with BID allocated to BRIGHT (n = 20) or AC (n = 24), the median (range) age was 63 (41-80) years, and 27 patients (61%) were female. Patients rated BRIGHT's acceptability highly (all metrics had a mean rating of ≥4.5/5), and 19 of 20 patients (95%) receiving BRIGHT were likely or highly likely to recommend it to other HNC survivors with BID. BRIGHT decreased HNC-related BID from baseline to 1 month postintervention relative to AC (mean model-based difference in change in IMAGE-HN score, -7.9 points; 90% CI, -15.9 to 0.0 points) and from baseline to 3 months postintervention relative to AC (mean model-based difference in change in IMAGE-HN score, -17.1 points; 90% CI, -25.6 to -8.6 points). At 3 months postintervention, the clinical response rate of BRIGHT was 6.6-fold higher than AC (model-based odds ratio, 6.6; 90% CI, 2.0-21.8). The improvement in HNC-related BID for BRIGHT vs AC at 3 months was clinically significant, and the effect size was large (Cohen d, -0.9; 90% CI, -1.4 to -0.4). Conclusions and Relevance In this pilot randomized clinical trial, BRIGHT was acceptable, may result in a clinically meaningful improvement in HNC-related BID, and showed a high clinical response rate. These promising preliminary data support conducting a large efficacy trial to establish BRIGHT as the first evidence-based treatment for HNC survivors with BID. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03831100.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan M. Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Stacey Maurer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Wendy Balliet
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Hong Li
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Amy M. Williams
- Department of Family Medicine, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Flora Yan
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Lynne Padgett
- Office of Research and Development, US Department of Veteran Affairs, Washington, DC
| | - Angie Rush
- Head and Neck Cancer Alliance, Charleston, South Carolina
| | | | - Katherine R. Sterba
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Graboyes EM, Chaiyachati KH, Sisto Gall J, Johnson W, Krishnan JA, McManus SS, Thompson L, Shulman LN, Yabroff KR. Addressing Transportation Insecurity Among Patients With Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2022; 114:1593-1600. [PMID: 36130286 PMCID: PMC9745432 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djac134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Health-care-related transportation insecurity is common in the United States. Patients with cancer are especially vulnerable because cancer care is episodic in nature, occurs over a prolonged period, is marked by frequent clinical encounters, requires intense treatments, and results in substantial financial hardship. As a result of transportation insecurity, patients with cancer may forego, miss, delay, alter, and/or prematurely terminate necessary care. Limited data suggest that these alterations in care have the potential to increase the rates of cancer recurrence and mortality and exacerbate disparities in cancer incidence, severity, and outcomes. Transportation insecurity also negatively impacts at the informal caregiver, provider, health system, and societal levels. Recognizing that transportation is a critical determinant of outcomes for patients with cancer, there are ongoing efforts to develop evidence-based protocols to identify at-risk patients and address transportation insecurity at federal policy, health system, not-for-profit, and industry levels. In 2021, the National Cancer Policy Forum of the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine sponsored a series of webinars addressing key social determinants of health including food, housing, and transportation among patients with cancer. This commentary summarizes the formal presentations and discussions related to transportation insecurity and will 1) discuss the heterogeneous nature of transportation insecurity among patients with cancer; 2) characterize its prevalence along the cancer continuum; 3) examine its multilevel consequences; 4) discuss measurement and screening tools; 5) highlight ongoing efforts to address transportation insecurity; 6) suggest policy levers; and 7) outline a research agenda to address critical knowledge gaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Krisda H Chaiyachati
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Jerry A Krishnan
- Population Health Sciences Program, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sapna S McManus
- Chief Diversity Office, Genentech Inc, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Lawrence N Shulman
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - K Robin Yabroff
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Kennesaw, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Massa ST, Chidambaram S, Luong P, Graboyes EM, Mazul AL. Quantifying Total and Out-of-Pocket Costs Associated With Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022; 148:1111-1119. [PMID: 36264567 PMCID: PMC9585466 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.3269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Importance Oncologic treatment is costly to the health care system and to individuals, but patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) also have long-term care needs after treatment. Survivors of HNC require specific consideration given their rapidly growing numbers. This subpopulation of cancer survivors often experiences long-term treatment-associated morbidity. Objective To describe the total and out-of-pocket (OOP) costs associated with HNC survivorship and the risk factors for financial toxicity among this population. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a retrospective review and economic evaluation of a cohort of US adults with a diagnosis of HNC from 2006 to 2018. The study used data the from IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims Database. Data were analyzed from November 2020 to June 2022. Exposures Treatment for HNC. Main Outcomes and Measures Total and OOP medical costs were assessed monthly and reported relative to the date of HNC diagnosis. The primary outcome was the difference between a patient's mean monthly survivorship costs (13-60 months after diagnosis) and mean monthly baseline costs (7-12 months before diagnosis). Univariate and multivariable linear regression models were created for total and OOP costs to generate coefficient estimates with 95% CIs. Results The study cohort of this economic evaluation included 19 098 patients with HNC (median [range] age, 56 [18-64] years; 14 144 [74.1%] men and 4954 [25.9%] women; race and ethnicity were not considered). Throughout the survivorship period, median total and OOP costs were $372 per month and $31 per month higher than baseline costs, respectively, with variation in expenses by demographic information, health plan type, and oncologic variables. In the multivariable model, greater total and OOP excess survivorship costs were associated with female sex ($343/mo; 95% CI, $126 to $560 and $9/mo; 95% CI, $4 to $14). Highest and lowest total excess survivorship costs associated with cancer site were seen for hypopharyngeal ($1908/mo; 95% CI, $1102 to $2714) and oropharyngeal cancers (-$703/mo; 95% CI, -$967 to -$439) vs oral cavity cancers. Compared with surgery or radiation therapy alone, multimodal treatment was generally associated with excess OOP survivorship costs. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this retrospective economic evaluation review suggest that the costs of HNC survivorship remain persistently elevated above baseline costs for at least 5 years after diagnosis. High survivorship costs were associated with female sex, hypopharyngeal tumors, and treatment with multimodal therapy. Practitioners should seek to minimize costs for these patients at higher-risk of financial toxicity after treatment and work to provide directed supportive services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean T. Massa
- Department of Otolaryngology−Head and Neck Surgery, St Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Smrithi Chidambaram
- Department of Otolaryngology−Head and Neck Surgery, St Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
- Department of Otolaryngology−Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Peter Luong
- Department of Otolaryngology−Head and Neck Surgery, St Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Evan M. Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology−Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Angela L. Mazul
- Department of Otolaryngology−Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Howell AV, Gebregziabher M, Thiers BH, Graboyes EM, Paulos CM, Wrangle JM, Hunt KJ, Wallace K. Association of age with survival in older patients with cutaneous melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Geriatr Oncol 2022; 13:1003-1010. [PMID: 35660090 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2022] [Revised: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Several types of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved to treat advanced melanoma, but their effectiveness has not been compared in older patients treated outside of a clinical trial. Moreover, evidence suggests that a patient's response to ICI therapy may vary by age and type of ICI. The purpose of this study was to compare survival by ICI type in older patients with melanoma and to investigate treatment effect modification by age. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using the SEER-Medicare database, we identified patients with cutaneous melanoma (2012-2015) treated with an ICI (CTLA-4, PD-1, or combination CTLA-4 + PD-1 inhibitors). Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for ICI types. We used an interaction term and stratified models to test for treatment effect modification by age. RESULTS Of the 1435 patients included in our analysis, 790 (55.1%) received CTLA-4 inhibitors, 512 (35.7%) received PD-1 inhibitors, and 133 (9.3%) were treated with combination ICIs. Median survival ranged from 13.4 months (95%CI: 10.7-16.3) for CTLA-4 inhibitors to 23.5 months (95%CI: 16.2-30.0) for combination ICIs. In multivariable models, the risk of death was lower with PD-1 inhibitors compared to CTLA-4 inhibitors (HR = 0.78, 95%CI: 0.68-0.89). An age*ICI type interaction term was significant (p < 0.001), and survival gains were greater the older age group (≥80) compared to the younger group (65-79). DISCUSSION In a population-based setting, we identified important differences in survival by ICI type in older patients with melanoma treated with ICIs, with prolonged survival associated with PD-1 inhibitors compared to CTLA-4 inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley V Howell
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
| | - Mulugeta Gebregziabher
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Bruce H Thiers
- Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Chrystal M Paulos
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - John M Wrangle
- Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Kelly J Hunt
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Kristin Wallace
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Wang R, Horwich P, Sandulache VC, Hernandez DJ, Hornig J, Graboyes EM, Liou NE, Skoner J, Haskins AD, Ranasinghe V, Day TA, Sturgis EM, Huang AT. Safety of microvascular free tissue transfer reconstruction of the head and neck in the setting of chronic pharmacologic immunosuppression. Head Neck 2022; 44:1520-1527. [PMID: 35437907 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients on chronic pharmacologic immunosuppressive therapy are at increased risk of wound infection and complications after surgery. There is a paucity of data examining perioperative complications after microvascular free tissue transfer (MVFTT) reconstruction of the head and neck in this patient population. METHODS Retrospective cohort study performed at two tertiary referral centers between August 2016 and May 2020. RESULTS Nine hundred and seventy-nine patients underwent MVFTT during the study period; of these 47 (5%) patients were taking chronic immunosuppressive medications. The most common indications for immunosuppression were solid organ transplant and autoimmune disease. Fourteen (30%) patients had surgical complications within 30 days of surgery: 8 (17%) wound dehiscences, 6 (12%) hematomas, and 2 (4%) surgical site infections. There was one total and one partial flap failure with a 30-day reoperation rate of 4%. CONCLUSIONS MVFTT of the head and neck appears to be safe in patients on chronic pharmacologic immunosuppression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ray Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Peter Horwich
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Vlad C Sandulache
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - David J Hernandez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Joshua Hornig
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.,Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Nelson E Liou
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Judith Skoner
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Angela D Haskins
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Viran Ranasinghe
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Terry A Day
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Erich M Sturgis
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Andrew T Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Graboyes EM, Divi V, Moore BA. Head and Neck Oncology Is on the National Quality Sidelines No Longer-Put Me in, Coach. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022; 148:715-716. [PMID: 35708673 PMCID: PMC9378525 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.1389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.,Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Vasu Divi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Brian A Moore
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Ochsner Health, New Orleans, Louisiana.,Ochsner Cancer Institute, New Orleans, Louisiana
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Beydoun AS, Koss K, Nielsen T, Holcomb AJ, Pichardo P, Purdy N, Zebolsky AL, Heaton CM, McMullen CP, Yesensky JA, Moore MG, Goyal N, Kohan J, Sajisevi M, Tan K, Petrisor D, Wax MK, Kejner AE, Hassan Z, Trott S, Larson A, Richmon JD, Graboyes EM, Wood CB, Jackson RS, Pipkorn P, Bruening J, Massey B, Puram SV, Zenga J. Perioperative Topical Antisepsis and Surgical Site Infection in Patients Undergoing Upper Aerodigestive Tract Reconstruction. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022; 148:547-554. [PMID: 35476816 PMCID: PMC9047735 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.0684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Surgical site infections (SSIs) after vascularized reconstruction of the upper aerodigestive tract (UADT) are associated with considerable morbidity. The association between perioperative prophylaxis practices, particularly topical antisepsis, and SSIs remains uncertain. Objective To assess the association between perioperative topical antisepsis and SSIs in patients undergoing vascularized reconstruction of the UADT. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study included patients from 12 academic tertiary care centers over an 11-month period, from July 1, 2020, to June 1, 2021. Patients undergoing open surgical procedures requiring a communication between the UADT and cervical skin with a planned regional pedicled flap, free flap, or both were included. Patients with an active infection at the time of surgical procedure were excluded. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome measure was an SSI within 30 days of surgery. The association of demographic characteristics, perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, surgical technique, and postoperative care with SSIs was assessed using univariable and multivariable analyses. The relative risk ratio and 95% CIs for developing SSI were calculated for each of the variables based on predetermined categories. Variables for which the relative risk 95% CI did not include the value of zero effect (relative risk = 1.00) were included in the multivariable model. Results A total of 554 patients (median age, 64 years; range, 21-95 years; 367 men [66.2%]) were included. Cancer ablation was the most frequent reason for surgery (n = 480 [86.6%]). Overall, the SSI rate was 20.9% (n = 116), with most infections involving the head and neck surgical site only (91 [78.4%]). The median time to SSI diagnosis was 11 days (range, 1-28 days). Topical antisepsis mucosal preparation was performed preoperatively in 35.2% (195) and postoperatively in 52.2% (289) of cases. Ampicillin and sulbactam was the most common systemic antibiotic prophylaxis agent used (n = 367 [66.2%]), with 24 hours being the most common duration (n = 363 [65.5%]). On multivariable analysis, preoperative topical antisepsis mucosal preparation (odds ratio [OR], 0.49; 95% CI, 0.30-0.77) and systemic prophylaxis with piperacillin and tazobactam (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.21-0.84) were associated with a decreased risk of a postoperative SSI. The use of an osseous vascularized flap was associated with an increased risk of postoperative SSI (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.13-2.75). Conclusions and Relevance Findings of this study suggest that preoperative topical antisepsis mucosal preparation was independently associated with a decreased risk of SSIs in a 12-center multi-institutional cohort. Further investigation of the association between individual perioperative practices and the incidence of postoperative SSIs is necessary to develop evidence-based protocols to reduce SSIs after UADT reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Sam Beydoun
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
| | - Kevin Koss
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
| | - Tyson Nielsen
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Methodist Estabrook Cancer Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Andrew James Holcomb
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Methodist Estabrook Cancer Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Priscilla Pichardo
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Nicholas Purdy
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Aaron L Zebolsky
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Chase M Heaton
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Caitlin P McMullen
- Department of Head and Neck and Endocrine Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Jessica A Yesensky
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - Michael G Moore
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - Neerav Goyal
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Joshua Kohan
- Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington
| | - Mirabelle Sajisevi
- Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington
| | - Kenneth Tan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Daniel Petrisor
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Mark K Wax
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Alexandra E Kejner
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| | - Zain Hassan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| | - Skylar Trott
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| | - Andrew Larson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Jeremy D Richmon
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - C Burton Wood
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis
| | - Ryan S Jackson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Patrik Pipkorn
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Jennifer Bruening
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
| | - Becky Massey
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
| | - Sidharth V Puram
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Joseph Zenga
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Macias D, Hand BN, Zenga J, Pipkorn P, Nilsen ML, Williams AM, Graboyes EM. Association Between Observer-Rated Disfigurement and Body Image-Related Distress Among Head and Neck Cancer Survivors. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022; 148:688-689. [PMID: 35554492 PMCID: PMC9100447 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.0822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David Macias
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Brittany N Hand
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Joseph Zenga
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Patrik Pipkorn
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Marci L Nilsen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Amy M Williams
- Department of Family Medicine, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.,Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Kana LA, Graboyes EM, Quan D, Grauer J, Osazuwa-Peters N, Barnes JM, Cramer JD. Association of Changes in Medicaid Dental Benefits With Localized Diagnosis of Oral Cavity Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:778-780. [PMID: 35357404 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.0149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lulia A Kana
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Daniel Quan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Jordan Grauer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Justin M Barnes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - John D Cramer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Davies JC, Husain Z, Day TA, Graboyes EM, Eskander A. Perioperative Mortality Risk in Patients Undergoing Transoral Robotic Surgery for T1-T2 Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A National Cancer Database Study. Front Oncol 2022; 11:808465. [PMID: 35071012 PMCID: PMC8770260 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.808465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The National Cancer Database is a joint project of the Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons and the American Cancer Society. The American College of Surgeons and the Commission on Cancer have not verified and are not responsible for the analytic or statistical methods used or for the conclusions drawn from these data by the investigators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel C Davies
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sinai Health System, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Zain Husain
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Science Center, Odette Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Terry A Day
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.,Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Antoine Eskander
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Science Center, Odette Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Macias D, Hand BN, Pipkorn P, Williams AM, Chang SS, Zenga J, Nilsen ML, Rhoten BA, Huang AT, Osazuwa-Peters N, Maurer S, Balliet W, Li H, Ruggiero KJ, Sterba KR, Graboyes EM. Association of Inventory to Measure and Assess imaGe Disturbance - Head and Neck Scores With Clinically Meaningful Body Image-Related Distress Among Head and Neck Cancer Survivors. Front Psychol 2021; 12:794038. [PMID: 34956022 PMCID: PMC8702522 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.794038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: The Inventory to Measure and Assess imaGe disturbance – Head and Neck (IMAGE-HN) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure of head and neck cancer-related body image-related distress (BID). However, the IMAGE-HN score corresponding to clinically relevant BID is unknown. The study objective is to determine the IMAGE-HN cutoff score that identifies head and neck cancer patients with clinically relevant BID. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study at six academic medical centers. Individuals ≥18 years old with a history of head and neck cancer treated with definitive intent were included. The primary outcome measure was the IMAGE-HN. A Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis was performed to identify the IMAGE-HN score that maximized sensitivity and specificity relative to a Body Image Scale score of ≥10 (which indicates clinically relevant BID in a general oncology population). To confirm the validity of the IMAGE-HN cutoff score, we compared the severity of depressive [Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)] and anxiety symptoms [Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)], and quality of life [University of Washington-QOL (UW-QOL)] in patients with IMAGE-HN scores above and below the cutoff. Results: Of the 250 patients, 70.4% were male and the mean age was 62.3 years. An IMAGE-HN score of ≥22 was the optimal cutoff score relative to a Body Image Scale score of ≥10 and represents a clinically relevant level of head and neck cancer-related BID. Relative to those with an IMAGE-HN score of <22, patients with IMAGE-HN scores of ≥22 had a clinically meaningful increase in symptoms of depression (mean PHQ-9 score difference = 5.8) and anxiety (mean GAD-7 score difference = 4.1) as well as worse physical (mean UW-QOL score difference = 18.9) and social-emotional QOL (mean UW-QOL score difference = 21.5). Using an IMAGE-HN cutoff score ≥22, 28% of patients had clinically relevant BID. Conclusion: An IMAGE-HN score of ≥22 identifies patients with clinically relevant head and neck cancer-related BID. This score may be used to detect patients who could benefit from strategies to manage their distress, select patients for studies evaluating interventions to manage head and neck cancer-related BID, and improve our understanding of the underlying epidemiology of the disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Macias
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head, and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Brittany N Hand
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Patrik Pipkorn
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head, and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Amy M Williams
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head, and Neck Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Steven S Chang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head, and Neck Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Joseph Zenga
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Marci L Nilsen
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head, and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Bethany A Rhoten
- Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Andrew T Huang
- Bobby R. Alford Department of Otolaryngology, Head, and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Stacey Maurer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Wendy Balliet
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Hong Li
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Kenneth J Ruggiero
- College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Katherine R Sterba
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head, and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.,Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Osazuwa-Peters N, Barnes JM, Okafor SI, Taylor DB, Hussaini AS, Adjei Boakye E, Simpson MC, Graboyes EM, Lee WT. Incidence and Risk of Suicide Among Patients With Head and Neck Cancer in Rural, Urban, and Metropolitan Areas. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 147:1045-1052. [PMID: 34297790 PMCID: PMC8304170 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2021.1728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Importance Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) are known to be at increased risk of suicide compared with the general population, but there has been insufficient research on whether this risk differs based on patients' rural, urban, or metropolitan residence status. Objective To evaluate whether the risk of suicide among patients with HNC differs by rural vs urban or metropolitan residence status. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study uses data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database on patients aged 18 to 74 years who received a diagnosis of HNC from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2016. Statistical analysis was conducted from November 27, 2020, to June 3, 2021. Exposures Residence status, assessed using 2013 Rural Urban Continuum Codes. Main Outcomes and Measures Death due to suicide was assessed by International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision codes (U03, X60-X84, and Y87.0) and the cause of death recode (50220). Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) of suicide, assessing the suicide risk among patients with HNC compared with the general population, were calculated. Suicide risk by residence status was compared using Fine-Gray proportional hazards regression models. Results Data from 134 510 patients with HNC (101 142 men [75.2%]; mean [SE] age, 57.7 [10.3] years) were analyzed, and 405 suicides were identified. Metropolitan residents composed 86.6% of the sample, urban residents composed 11.7%, and rural residents composed 1.7%. The mortality rate of suicide was 59.2 per 100 000 person-years in metropolitan counties, 64.0 per 100 000 person-years in urban counties, and 126.7 per 100 000 person-years in rural counties. Compared with the general population, the risk of suicide was markedly higher among patients with HNC in metropolitan (SMR, 2.78; 95% CI, 2.49-3.09), urban (SMR, 2.84; 95% CI, 2.13-3.71), and rural (SMR, 5.47; 95% CI, 3.06-9.02) areas. In Fine-Gray competing-risk analyses that adjusted for other covariates, there was no meaningful difference in suicide risk among urban vs metropolitan residents. However, compared with rural residents, residents of urban (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.29-0.94) and metropolitan counties (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32-0.94) had greatly lower risk of suicide. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this cross-sectional study suggest that suicide risk is elevated in general among patients with HNC but is significantly higher for patients residing in rural areas. Effective suicide prevention strategies in the population of patients with HNC need to account for rural health owing to the high risk of suicide among residents with HNC in rural areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Editorial Board Member, JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery
| | - Justin M. Barnes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Somtochi I. Okafor
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Adnan S. Hussaini
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Eric Adjei Boakye
- Department of Population Science and Policy, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield
- Simmons Cancer Institute, Springfield, Illinois
| | - Matthew C. Simpson
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, St Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
- Advanced Health Data Research Institute, St Louis University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Evan M. Graboyes
- Editorial Board Member, JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Walter T. Lee
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Chen MM, Mott NM, Miller J, Kazemi R, Stover M, Graboyes EM, Divi V, Malloy KM, Wallner LP, Pitt SC, Dossett LA. Clinician Attitudes and Beliefs About Deintensifying Head and Neck Cancer Surveillance. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 148:43-51. [PMID: 34734995 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2021.2824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Importance Surveillance imaging and visits are costly and have not been shown to improve oncologic outcomes for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). However, the benefit of surveillance visits may extend beyond recurrence detection. To better understand surveillance and potentially develop protocols to tailor current surveillance paradigms, it is important to elicit the perspectives of the clinicians who care for patients with HNC. Objective To characterize current surveillance practices and explore clinician attitudes and beliefs on deintensifying surveillance for patients with HNC. Design, Setting, and Participants This qualitative study was performed from January to March 2021. Guided by an interpretive description approach, interviews were analyzed to produce a thematic description. Data analysis was performed from March to April 2021. Otolaryngologists and radiation oncologists were recruited using purposive and snowball sampling strategies. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcomes were current practice, attitudes, and beliefs about deintensifying surveillance and survivorship as well as patients' values and perspectives collected from interviews of participating physicians. Results Twenty-one physicians (17 [81%] men) were interviewed, including 13 otolaryngologists and 8 radiation oncologists with a median of 8 years (IQR, 5-20 years) in practice. Twelve participants (57%) stated their practice comprised more than 75% of patients with HNC. Participants expressed that there was substantial variation in the interpretation of the surveillance guidelines. Participants were open to the potential for deintensification of surveillance or incorporating symptom-based surveillance protocols but had concerns that deintensification may increase patient anxiety and shift some of the burden of recurrence monitoring to patients. Patient and physician peace of mind, the importance of maintaining the patient-physician relationship, and the need for adequate survivorship and management of treatment-associated toxic effects were reported to be important barriers to deintensifying surveillance. Conclusions and Relevance In this qualitative study, clinicians revealed a willingness to consider altering cancer surveillance but expressed a need to maintain patient and clinician peace of mind, maintain the patient-clinician relationship, and ensure adequate monitoring of treatment-associated toxic effects and other survivorship concerns. These findings may be useful in future research on the management of posttreatment surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle M Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | | | - Jacquelyn Miller
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Ruby Kazemi
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
| | | | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.,Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Vasu Divi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Kelly M Malloy
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Lauren P Wallner
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Susan C Pitt
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Knochelmann HM, Horton JD, Liu S, Armeson K, Kaczmar JM, Wyatt MM, Richardson MS, Lomeli SH, Xiong Y, Graboyes EM, Lentsch EJ, Hornig JD, Skoner J, Stalcup S, Spampinato MV, Garrett-Mayer E, O’Quinn EC, Timmers CD, Romeo MJ, Wrangle JM, Young MRI, Rubinstein MP, Day TA, Lo RS, Paulos CM, Neskey DM. Neoadjuvant presurgical PD-1 inhibition in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Cell Rep Med 2021; 2:100426. [PMID: 34755137 PMCID: PMC8561313 DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is a prevalent surgically treated subset of head and neck cancer with frequent recurrence and poor survival. Immunotherapy has demonstrated efficacy in recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer. However, whether antitumor responses could be fostered by neoadjuvant presurgical immunotherapy remains unclear. Using a Simon's two-stage design, we present results of a single-arm phase-II trial where 12 patients with stage II-IVA OCSCC received 3 to 4 biweekly doses of 3 mg/kg nivolumab followed by definitive surgical resection with curative intent. Presurgical nivolumab therapy in this cohort shows an overall response rate of 33% (n = 4 patients; 95% CI: 12%-53%). With a median follow up of 2.23 years, 10 out of 12 treated patients remain alive. Neoadjuvant nivolumab is safe, well-tolerated, and is not associated with delays in definitive surgical treatment in this study. This work demonstrates feasibility and safety for incorporation of nivolumab in the neoadjuvant setting for OCSCC (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03021993).
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Aged
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/immunology
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery
- Cohort Studies
- Female
- Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
- Humans
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Mouth Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Mouth Neoplasms/immunology
- Mouth Neoplasms/mortality
- Mouth Neoplasms/surgery
- Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/immunology
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery
- Neoplasm Staging
- Nivolumab/therapeutic use
- Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/antagonists & inhibitors
- Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/genetics
- Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/immunology
- Survival Analysis
- Treatment Outcome
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah M. Knochelmann
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Department of Surgery – Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Joshua D. Horton
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Sixue Liu
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kent Armeson
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - John M. Kaczmar
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Megan M. Wyatt
- Department of Surgery – Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mary S. Richardson
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Shirley H. Lomeli
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ying Xiong
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Evan M. Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Eric J. Lentsch
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Joshua D. Hornig
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Judith Skoner
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Seth Stalcup
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Maria V. Spampinato
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | | | - Elizabeth C. O’Quinn
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Cynthia D. Timmers
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Martin J. Romeo
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - John M. Wrangle
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - M. Rita I. Young
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Mark P. Rubinstein
- Translational Therapeutics, The Ohio State University, The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Terry A. Day
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Roger S. Lo
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Chrystal M. Paulos
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Department of Surgery – Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - David M. Neskey
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Department of Cell and Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Graboyes EM, Sterba KR, Li H, Warren GW, Alberg AJ, Calhoun EA, Nussenbaum B, McCay J, Marsh CH, Osazuwa-Peters N, Neskey DM, Kaczmar JM, Sharma AK, Harper J, Day TA, Hughes-Halbert C. Development and Evaluation of a Navigation-Based, Multilevel Intervention to Improve the Delivery of Timely, Guideline-Adherent Adjuvant Therapy for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer. JCO Oncol Pract 2021; 17:e1512-e1523. [PMID: 33689399 PMCID: PMC8791819 DOI: 10.1200/op.20.00943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE More than half of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) experience a delay initiating guideline-adherent postoperative radiation therapy (PORT), contributing to excess mortality and racial disparities in survival. However, interventions to improve the delivery of timely, equitable PORT among patients with HNSCC are lacking. This study (1) describes the development of NDURE (Navigation for Disparities and Untimely Radiation thErapy), a navigation-based multilevel intervention (MLI) to improve guideline-adherent PORT and (2) evaluates its feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy. METHODS NDURE was developed using the six steps of intervention mapping (IM). Subsequently, NDURE was evaluated by enrolling consecutive patients with locally advanced HNSCC undergoing surgery and PORT (n = 15) into a single-arm clinical trial with a mixed-methods approach to process evaluation. RESULTS NDURE is a navigation-based MLI targeting barriers to timely, guideline-adherent PORT at the patient, healthcare team, and organizational levels. NDURE is delivered via three in-person navigation sessions anchored to case identification and surgical care transitions. Intervention components include the following: (1) patient education, (2) travel support, (3) a standardized process for initiating the discussion of expectations for PORT, (4) PORT care plans, (5) referral tracking and follow-up, and (6) organizational restructuring. NDURE was feasible, as judged by accrual (88% of eligible patients [100% Blacks] enrolled) and dropout (n = 0). One hundred percent of patients reported moderate or strong agreement that NDURE helped solve challenges starting PORT; 86% were highly likely to recommend NDURE. The rate of timely, guideline-adherent PORT was 86% overall and 100% for Black patients. CONCLUSION NDURE is a navigation-based MLI that is feasible, is acceptable, and has the potential to improve the timely, equitable, guideline-adherent PORT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan M. Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC,Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC,Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC,Evan M. Graboyes, MD, MPH, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Ave, MSC 550, Charleston, SC 29425; e-mail:
| | - Katherine R. Sterba
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC,Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Hong Li
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC,Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Graham W. Warren
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC,Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC,Department of Cell and Molecular Pharmacology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Anthony J. Alberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
| | | | - Brian Nussenbaum
- American Board of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Houston, TX
| | - Jessica McCay
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Courtney H. Marsh
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC,Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - David M. Neskey
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC,Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - John M. Kaczmar
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Anand K. Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Jennifer Harper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Terry A. Day
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Chanita Hughes-Halbert
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC,Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Yan F, Li H, de Almeida JR, Kaczmar JM, Pipkorn P, Zenga J, Richardson MS, Neskey DM, Sharma AK, Day TA, Graboyes EM. Microscopic Extranodal Extension in HPV-Negative Head and Neck Cancer and the Role of Adjuvant Chemoradiation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 165:536-549. [PMID: 33618570 PMCID: PMC8380754 DOI: 10.1177/0194599821989637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pathologic extranodal extension (ENE) is an important adverse feature for human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), but the prognostic significance of microscopic ENE (ENEmi) and role of adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) for ENEmi remain unclear. This study evaluates (1) the prognostic significance of ENEmi in HPV-negative HNSCC and (2) whether adjuvant CRT is associated with improved overall survival (OS) for these patients. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Commission on Cancer (CoC)-accredited facilities. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included patients in the National Cancer Database from 2009 to 2015 with pathologic node-positive (pN+) HPV-negative HNSCC with either pathologic ENEmi or no ENE who had undergone margin-negative surgery. The association of ENEmi with OS was evaluated using Cox proportional hazard analyses. Analyses were repeated in patients with ENEmi receiving adjuvant therapy to evaluate the association of adjuvant CRT with OS. RESULTS We included 5483 patients with pN+ HPV-negative HNSCC, of whom 24% had ENEmi. On multivariable analysis, ENEmi was associated with decreased OS relative to no ENE (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.43; 95% CI, 1.28-1.59). Among patients with ENEmi who received ≥60 Gy of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) (n = 617), adjuvant CRT was not associated with improved OS relative to RT (aHR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.66-1.27). CONCLUSION For patients with HPV-negative HNSCC, pN+ with ENEmi is associated with worse OS than pN+ without ENE. However, for patients with ENEmi, concurrent CRT is not associated with improved OS relative to RT. The optimal adjuvant paradigm for ENEmi requires additional investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flora Yan
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Hong Li
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - John R. de Almeida
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John M. Kaczmar
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Patrik Pipkorn
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Joseph Zenga
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Mary S. Richardson
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - David M. Neskey
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Anand K. Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Terry A. Day
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Evan M. Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Walia A, Lee JJ, Jackson RS, Hardi AC, Bollig CA, Graboyes EM, Zenga J, Puram SV, Pipkorn P. Management of Flap Failure After Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 167:224-235. [PMID: 34491852 PMCID: PMC8972962 DOI: 10.1177/01945998211044683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically review management of flap loss in head and neck construction with free tissue transfer as compared with locoregional flap or conservative management. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched up to October 2019. REVIEW METHODS Candidate articles were independently reviewed by 2 authors. Articles were considered eligible if they included adequate reporting of flap management after flap loss and outcomes for survival of reconstruction, length of hospitalization, and perioperative complications. RESULTS A total of 429 patients had acute flap failure in the perioperative period. The overall success with a secondary free flap was 93% (95% CI, 0.89-0.97; n = 26 studies, I2 = 12.8%). There was no difference in hospitalization length after secondary reconstruction between free tissue transfer and locoregional flaps or conservative management (relative risk of hospitalization ≥2 weeks, 96%; 95% CI, 0.80-1.14; n = 3 studies, I2 = 0). The pooled relative risk of perioperative complications following free tissue transfer was 0.60 when compared with locoregional flap or conservative management (95% CI, 0.40-0.92; n = 5 studies, I2 = 0). CONCLUSION Salvage reconstruction with free tissue transfer has a high success rate. Second free flaps following flap failure had a similar length of hospitalization and lower overall complication rate than locoregional reconstruction or conservative management. A second free tissue transfer, when feasible, is likely a more reliable and effective procedure for salvage reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Walia
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Jake J Lee
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Ryan S Jackson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Angela C Hardi
- Bernard Becker Medical Library, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Craig A Bollig
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.,Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Joseph Zenga
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Sidharth V Puram
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.,Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Patrik Pipkorn
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Awan M, Akakpo KE, Shukla M, Graboyes EM, Pipkorn P, Puram SV, Zenga J. The Substantial Omission of Indicated Postoperative Radiotherapy in Patients With Advanced-Stage Oral Cancer in the US-A Call to Action. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 147:907-909. [PMID: 34383035 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2021.1744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Musaddiq Awan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
| | - Kenneth E Akakpo
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
| | - Monica Shukla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Patrik Pipkorn
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, Missouri
| | - Sidharth V Puram
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, Missouri.,Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, Missouri
| | - Joseph Zenga
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Barnes JM, Johnson KJ, Adjei Boakye E, Schapira L, Akinyemiju T, Park EM, Graboyes EM, Osazuwa-Peters N. Early Medicaid Expansion and Cancer Mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 113:1714-1722. [PMID: 34259321 PMCID: PMC8634305 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although Medicaid expansion is associated with decreased uninsured rates and earlier cancer diagnoses, no study has demonstrated an association between Medicaid expansion and cancer mortality. Our primary objective was to quantify the relationship between early Medicaid expansion and changes in cancer mortality rates. METHODS We obtained county-level data from the National Center for Health Statistics for adults aged 20-64 years who died from cancer from 2007 to 2009 (preexpansion) and 2012 to 2016 (postexpansion). We compared changes in cancer mortality rates in early Medicaid expansion states (CA, CT, DC, MN, NJ, and WA) vs nonexpansion states through a difference-in-differences analysis using hierarchical Bayesian regression. An exploratory analysis of cancer mortality changes associated with the larger-scale 2014 Medicaid expansions was also performed. RESULTS In adjusted difference-in-differences analyses, we observed a statistically significant decrease of 3.07 (95% credible interval = 2.19 to 3.95) cancer deaths per 100 000 in early expansion vs nonexpansion states, which translates to an estimated decrease of 5276 cancer deaths in the early expansion states during the study period. Expansion-associated decreases in cancer mortality were observed for pancreatic cancer. Exploratory analyses of the 2014 Medicaid expansions showed a decrease in pancreatic cancer mortality (-0.18 deaths per 100 000, 95% confidence interval = -0.32 to -0.05) in states that expanded Medicaid by 2014 compared with nonexpansion states. CONCLUSIONS Early Medicaid expansion was associated with reduced cancer mortality rates, especially for pancreatic cancer, a cancer with short median survival where changes in prognosis would be most visible with limited follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin M Barnes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Kimberly J Johnson
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA,Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Eric Adjei Boakye
- Department of Population Science and Policy, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA,Simmons Cancer Institute, Springfield, IL, USA
| | - Lidia Schapira
- Department of Medicine (Oncology), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA,Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Tomi Akinyemiju
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA,Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Eliza M Park
- Comprehensive Cancer Support Program, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA,Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA,Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA,Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA,Correspondence to: Nosayaba (Nosa) Osazuwa-Peters, BDS, PhD, MPH, CHES, Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, 40 Duke Medicine Cir, Duke South Yellow Zone 4080, DUMC 3805, Durham, NC 27710-4000, USA (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Macias D, Hand BN, Maurer S, Balliet W, Ellis MA, Pipkorn P, Huang AT, Nilsen ML, Ruggiero KJ, Williams AM, Marsh CH, Li H, Rhoten BA, Sterba KR, Graboyes EM. Factors Associated With Risk of Body Image-Related Distress in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 147:1019-1026. [PMID: 34236423 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2021.1378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Body image-related distress (BID) is common among head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors and associated with significant morbidity. Risk factors for HNC-related BID remain poorly characterized because prior research has used outcome measures that fail to fully capture BID as experienced by HNC survivors. Objective To assess the association of demographic and oncologic characteristics with HNC-related BID using the Inventory to Measure and Assess imaGe disturbancE-Head & Neck (IMAGE-HN), a validated, multidomain, patient-reported outcome measure of HNC-related BID. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study assessed 301 adult survivors of surgically managed HNC at 4 academic medical centers. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome measure was IMAGE-HN scores, for which higher scores reflect more severe HNC-related BID. Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association of patient characteristics with IMAGE-HN global and 4 subdomain (other-oriented appearance concerns, personal dissatisfaction with appearance, distress with functional impairments, and social avoidance) scores. Results Of the 301 participants (212 [70.4%] male; mean [SD] age, 65.3 [11.7] years), 181 (60.1%) underwent free flap reconstruction. Graduation from college (β = -9.6; 95% CI, -17.5 to -1.7) or graduate school (β = -12.6; 95% CI, -21.2 to -3.8) was associated with lower IMAGE-HN social avoidance scores compared with less than a high school education. Compared with paid work, unemployment was associated with higher IMAGE-HN other-oriented appearance (β = 10.7; 95% CI, 2.0-19.3), personal dissatisfaction with appearance (β = 12.5; 95% CI, 1.2-23.7), and global (β = 8.0; 95% CI, 0.6-15.4) scores. Compared with no reconstruction, free flap reconstruction was associated with higher IMAGE-HN global scores (β = 11.5; 95% CI, 7.9-15.0) and all subdomain scores (other-oriented appearance: β = 13.1; 95% CI, 8.6-17.6; personal dissatisfaction with appearance: β = 15.4; 95% CI, 10.0-20.7; distress with functional impairment: β = 12.8; 95% CI, 8.1-17.4; and social avoidance and isolation: β = 10.2; 95% CI, 5.8-14.6). Higher IMAGE-HN distress with functional impairment scores were found in those who received surgery and adjuvant radiation (β = 7.8; 95% CI, 2.9-12.7) or chemoradiotherapy (β = 6.5; 95% CI, 1.8-11.3) compared with surgery alone. The multivariable regression model accounted for a modest proportion of variance in IMAGE-HN global (R2 = 0.18) and subdomain scores (R2 = 0.20 for other-oriented appearance, 0.14 for personal dissatisfaction with appearance, 0.21 for distress with functional impairment, and 0.13 for social avoidance and isolation). Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study, factors associated with risk of HNC-related BID included free flap reconstruction, lower educational attainment, unemployment, and multiple treatment modalities. These characteristics explain a modest proportion of variance in IMAGE-HN scores, suggesting that other characteristics may be the major risk factors for HNC-related BID and should be explored in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Macias
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Brittany N Hand
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus
| | - Stacey Maurer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Wendy Balliet
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Mark A Ellis
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Patrik Pipkorn
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Andrew T Huang
- Bobby R. Alford Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Marci L Nilsen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Amy M Williams
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Courtney H Marsh
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Hong Li
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | | | - Katherine R Sterba
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.,Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Koss K, Massey B, Graboyes EM, Pipkorn P, Varvares MA, Puram SV, Zenga J. Anastomosis to the Internal Jugular Vein Stump: A Highly Reliable Technique in Head and Neck Reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2021; 24:322-323. [PMID: 34197217 DOI: 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Koss
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Becky Massey
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Patrik Pipkorn
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Mark A Varvares
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sidharth V Puram
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Joseph Zenga
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Fancy T, Huang AT, Kass JI, Lamarre ED, Tassone P, Mantravadi AV, Alwani MM, Subbarayan RS, Bur AM, Worley ML, Graboyes EM, McMullen CP, Azoulay O, Wax MK, Cave TB, Al-Khudari S, Abello EH, Higgins KM, Ryan JT, Orzell SC, Goldman RA, Vimawala S, Fernandes RP, Abdelmalik M, Rajasekaran K, L'Esperance HE, Kallogjeri D, Rich JT. Complications, Mortality, and Functional Decline in Patients 80 Years or Older Undergoing Major Head and Neck Ablation and Reconstruction. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 145:1150-1157. [PMID: 31600390 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.2768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Importance Data regarding outcomes after major head and neck ablation and reconstruction in the growing geriatric population (specifically ≥80 years of age) are limited. Such information would be extremely valuable in preoperative discussions with elderly patients about their surgical risks and expected functional outcomes. Objectives To identify patient and surgical factors associated with 30-day postoperative complications, 90-day mortality, and 90-day functional decline; to explore whether an association exists between the type of reconstructive procedure and outcome; and to create a preoperative risk stratification system for these outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective, multi-institutional cohort study included patients 80 years or older undergoing pedicle or free-flap reconstruction after an ablative head and neck surgery from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2017, at 17 academic centers. Data were analyzed from February 1 through April 20, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures Thirty-day serious complication rate, 90-day mortality, and 90-day decline in functional status. Preoperative comorbidity and frailty were assessed using the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 score, and Modified Frailty Index. Multivariable clustered logistic regressions were performed. Conjunctive consolidation was used to create a risk stratification system. Results Among 376 patients included in the analysis (253 [67.3%] men), 281 (74.7%) underwent free-flap reconstruction. The median age was 83 years (range, 80-98 years). A total of 193 patients (51.3%) had 30-day serious complications, 30 (8.0%) died within 90 days, and 36 of those not dependent at baseline declined to dependent status (11.0%). Type of flap (free vs pedicle, bone vs no bone) was not associated with these outcomes. Variables associated with worse outcomes were age of at least 85 years (odds ratio [OR] for 90-day mortality, 1.19 [95% CI 1.14-1.26]), moderate or severe comorbidities (OR for 30-day complications, 1.80 [95% CI, 1.34-2.41]; OR for 90-day mortality, 3.33 [95% CI, 1.29-8.60]), body mass index (BMI) of less than 25 (OR for 30-day complications, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.91-0.99]), high frailty (OR for 30-day complications, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.10-2.67]), duration of surgery (OR for 90-day functional decline, 2.94 [95% CI, 1.81-4.79]), flap failure (OR for 90-day mortality, 3.56 [95% CI, 1.47-8.62]), additional operations (OR for 30-day complications, 5.40 [95% CI, 3.09-9.43]; OR for 90-day functional decline, 2.94 [95% CI, 1.81-4.79]), and surgery of the maxilla, oral cavity, or oropharynx (OR for 90-day functional decline, 2.51 [95% CI, 1.30-4.85]). Age, BMI, comorbidity, and frailty were consolidated into a novel 3-tier risk classification system. Conclusions and Relevance Important demographic, clinical, and surgical characteristics were found to be associated with postoperative complications, mortality, and functional decline in patients 80 years or older undergoing major head and neck surgery. Free flap and bony reconstruction were not independently associated with worse outcomes. A novel risk stratification system is presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanya Fancy
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown
| | - Andrew T Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Jason I Kass
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Eric D Lamarre
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Patrick Tassone
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Avinash V Mantravadi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - Mohamedkazim M Alwani
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - Rahul S Subbarayan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Andrés M Bur
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Mitchell L Worley
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | | | - Ofer Azoulay
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, New York University Health, New York, New York
| | - Mark K Wax
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland
| | - Taylor B Cave
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland
| | - Samer Al-Khudari
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Eric H Abello
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Kevin M Higgins
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jesse T Ryan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Upstate Medical University, State University of New York, Syracuse
| | - Susannah C Orzell
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Upstate Medical University, State University of New York, Syracuse
| | - Richard A Goldman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Swar Vimawala
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Rui P Fernandes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville
| | - Michael Abdelmalik
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville
| | - Karthik Rajasekaran
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Heidi E L'Esperance
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Dorina Kallogjeri
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Jason T Rich
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Stabenau KA, Akakpo KE, Richmon JD, McMullen C, Holcomb AJ, Graboyes EM, Gross J, Pipkorn P, Puram SV, Zenga J. Postoperative wound infections in head and neck surgery: The current state of antiseptic and antibiotic practices. Oral Oncol 2021; 118:105361. [PMID: 34083128 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kaleigh A Stabenau
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Kenneth E Akakpo
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Jeremy D Richmon
- Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Caitlin McMullen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Andrew J Holcomb
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Methodist Estabrook Cancer Center, Omaha, NE, United States
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States; Department Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Jennifer Gross
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Patrik Pipkorn
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, United States
| | - Sidharth V Puram
- Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, United States
| | - Joseph Zenga
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Akakpo KE, Varvares MA, Richmon JD, McMullen C, Holcomb AJ, Rezaee R, Tamaki A, Curry J, Old MO, Kang SY, Graboyes EM, Gross J, Pipkorn P, Puram SV, Zenga J. The tipping point in oral cavity reconstruction: A multi-institutional survey of choice between flap and non-flap reconstruction. Oral Oncol 2021; 120:105267. [PMID: 33810989 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth E Akakpo
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Mark A Varvares
- Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jeremy D Richmon
- Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Caitlin McMullen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Andrew J Holcomb
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Methodist Estabrook Cancer Center, Omaha, NE, United States
| | - Rod Rezaee
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Akina Tamaki
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Joseph Curry
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Matthew O Old
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Stephen Y Kang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States; Department Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Jennifer Gross
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Patrik Pipkorn
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, United States
| | - Sidharth V Puram
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, United States; Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, United States.
| | - Joseph Zenga
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Yan F, Li H, Kaczmar JM, Sharma AK, Day TA, Neskey DM, Pipkorn P, Zenga J, Graboyes EM. Evaluating Adjuvant Therapy With Chemoradiation vs Radiation Alone for Patients With HPV-Negative N2a Head and Neck Cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 146:1109-1119. [PMID: 32790830 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.2107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Importance The American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system (Cancer Staging Manual, 8th Edition) for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) now categorizes human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative HNSCC in a single positive lymph node smaller than 3 cm with pathologic extranodal extension (ENE) as N2a. The standard of care for pathologic ENE is adjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Whether adding chemotherapy concurrent with adjuvant radiation therapy improves survival in this clinical scenario is unknown. Objective To assess whether adjuvant CRT relative to radiation therapy alone is associated with improved survival among patients with pN2a HPV-negative HNSCC with ENE. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study included 504 patients with pN2a HPV-negative HNSCC with ENE who had undergone margin-negative surgery and adjuvant therapy. The patients were identified from the National Cancer Database from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2015. Statistical analyses were conducted from September 1, 2019, to April 16, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was overall survival. The association of adjuvant CRT with overall survival was analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. Planned subset analyses were conducted in patients younger than 70 years with no comorbidities (the subset most likely to be eligible for a clinical trial of cisplatin-based chemoradiation) and in patients with pT3/T4 disease classification. Results Of 504 patients (mean [SD] age, 60.5 [12.7] years; 319 [63.3%] men; 434 [86.1%] White) with pN2a HPV-negative HNSCC with ENE who had undergone margin-negative surgery and adjuvant therapy, 298 patients (59.1%) received adjuvant CRT. For the overall cohort of patients with pN2a ENE, adjuvant CRT was not associated with improved overall survival relative to adjuvant radiation therapy alone in a multivariate analysis (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.74-1.30). Adjuvant CRT was still not associated with improved overall survival in a subset analysis of 304 patients younger than 70 years with no comorbidities (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.66-1.45) nor in a subset of 220 patients with pT3/T4 disease classification (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.70-1.54). Conclusions and Relevance This study found that for patients with pN2a HPV-negative HNSCC with ENE who underwent margin-negative surgery and adjuvant therapy, adding chemotherapy concurrent with adjuvant radiation therapy was not associated with improved overall survival. Additional research is necessary to identify the optimal treatment paradigm for this clinical scenario.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flora Yan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Hong Li
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - John M Kaczmar
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Anand K Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Terry A Day
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - David M Neskey
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.,Department of Cell & Molecular Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Patrik Pipkorn
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Joseph Zenga
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| |
Collapse
|