Association of Antidementia Therapies With Time to Skilled Nursing Facility Admission and Cardiovascular Events Among Elderly Adults With Alzheimer Disease

Cardiovascular Effect of Drugs Used to Treat Alzheimer's Disease

This review examines the cardiovascular effects of the mainstay drugs used to treat Alzheimer's disease (AD), namely cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) and memantine. ChEIs represent the current first-line treatment for AD. Memantine is typically reserved for moderate to severe AD. Conventionally, ChEIs are thought to increase vagal tone, resulting in an increased risk of cardiac side effects such as bradycardia. However, emerging evidence suggests that ChEIs may offer a protective role on overall cardiovascular mortality in patients with dementia. Similarly, memantine, which is an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, has demonstrated cardioprotective properties in animal studies, raising the question of its clinical applications. Recently, aducanumab and lecanemab, antiamyloid-β monoclonal antibodies that aim to slow the progression of disease, have been Food and Drug Administration-approved for the treatment of AD. This review explores the current evidence regarding potential cardiovascular risks and protective effects of ChEIs and memantine in the treatment of AD, as well as the cardiovascular effects of aducanumab and lecanemab.

Discontinuation of Cholinesterase Inhibitors Following Initiation of Memantine and Admission to Long-Term Care Among Older Adults

Importance

Discontinuing cholinesterase inhibitors when initiating memantine in patients with dementia may be reasonable to reduce treatment burden, costs, and the risk of adverse drug events.

Objective

To assess the association of cholinesterase inhibitor discontinuation on long-term care institutionalization among older adults with dementia who initiate memantine.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study used Medicare claims data from January 2014 to December 2019. Participants included fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with dementia. Data were analyzed from September 2021 to August 2024.

Exposures

Discontinuation vs continuation of cholinesterase inhibitor.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was 1-year long-term care institutionalization-free days. Secondary outcomes include all-cause death and adverse drug events over 1 year. We performed subgroup analyses based on age, sex, dementia type (Alzheimer disease vs other), frailty, and dementia severity (mild vs moderate or severe) based on claims-based algorithms. The primary outcome was analyzed using nonparametric restricted mean survival time analysis.

Results

Among 16 292 beneficiaries who initiated memantine, 1820 (11.2%) discontinued cholinesterase inhibitors. In the propensity score-matched cohort of 3612 beneficiaries, the mean (SD) age was 80.7 (6.7) years, 2261 (62.6%) were female, and 1989 (55.0%) had a diagnosis of Alzheimer disease. Over 1 year, long-term care institutionalization occurred in 51 of 1806 beneficiaries (2.8%) who discontinued cholinesterase inhibitors (3.4 per 100 person-years) and 62 of 1806 beneficiaries (3.4%) who continued (4.1 per 100 person-years). There was no statistically significant difference in the 1-year mean institutionalization-free days between discontinuation and continuation groups (360.6 [95% CI, 359.3 to 362.0] days vs 359.1 [95% CI, 357.5 to 360.6] days; mean difference, 1.5 [95% CI,-0.5 to 3.6] days). The mean difference in the long-term care institutionalization-free days did not differ by age category, sex, dementia type, frailty, or dementia stage. Individuals who discontinued had a lower rate of fall-related injury (0.9 vs 2.0 per 100 person-years; hazard ratio [HR], 0.47 [95% CI, 0.25 to 0.88]). There was no difference between the discontinuation and continuation groups in all-cause death (10.4 vs 11.6 per 100 person-years; HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.72 to 1.10]).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, discontinuing cholinesterase inhibitors upon memantine initiation was not associated with an increased risk of long-term care institutionalization but with a lower risk of fall-related injury among older adults with dementia. These findings offer valuable insights for clinicians aiming to reduce treatment burden in this population.

Comparative Post-Marketing Surveillance of Memantine and Cholinesterase Inhibitors: Cardiovascular Adverse Events With a Focus on Sex Differences Using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to conduct a comparative analysis of the proportion of cardiovascular adverse events (AEs) associated with the utilization of memantine and cholinesterase inhibitors and to highlight the potential impact of sex differences in these AEs.

METHODS

Cardiac and vascular disorders AEs with antidementia medications were obtained from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database. The reporting odds ratio and its corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated. The chi-squared test was used to evaluate differences in categorical variables, and a two-way ANOVA followed by a Bonferroni post-test was used to compare the AEs reported for antidementia medications.

RESULTS

Memantine was associated with 544 selected cardiac and vascular disorder AEs. A signal for bradycardia, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation and cardiac arrest has been observed in patients receiving choline esterase inhibitors compared to those receiving memantine. On the other hand, cardiac failure and deep vein thrombosis AEs were found to be more common in patients receiving memantine. The majority of reported cardiac and vascular AEs were reported more frequently in female patients. More cases of cardiac failure, cardiac arrest, and deep vein thrombosis were reported in females than males taking memantine, but bradycardia was more common in males than females.

CONCLUSION

Healthcare professionals should be aware of the potential for cardiovascular AEs during treatment with antidementia medications and the possibility of sex differences in this regard. Memantine differs from cholinesterase inhibitors in terms of cardiovascular AEs, and there may be sex-related differences in the proportion of these AEs.

Pharmacoepidemiology evaluation of bumetanide as a potential candidate for drug repurposing for Alzheimer's disease

INTRODUCTION

Bumetanide, a loop diuretic, was identified as a candidate drug for repurposing for Alzheimer's disease (AD) based on its effects on transcriptomic apolipoprotein E signatures. Cross-sectional analyses of electronic health records suggest that bumetanide is associated with decreased prevalence of AD; however, temporality between bumetanide exposure and AD development has not been established.

METHODS

We evaluated Medicare claims data using Cox proportional hazards regression to evaluate the association between time-dependent use of bumetanide and time to first AD diagnosis while controlling for patient characteristics. Multiple sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the findings.

RESULTS

We sampled 833,561 Medicare beneficiaries, 60.8% female, with mean (standard deviation) age of 70.4 (12). Bumetanide use was not significantly associated with AD risk (hazard ratio 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-1.10).

DISCUSSION

Using a nationwide dataset and a retrospective cohort study design, we were not able to identify a time-dependent effect of bumetanide lowering AD risk.

HIGHLIGHTS

Bumetanide was identified as a candidate for repurposing for Alzheimer's disease (AD). We evaluated the association between bumetanide use and risk of AD. We used Medicare data and accounted for duration of bumetanide use. Bumetanide use was not significantly associated with risk of AD.

Trends of use and characterisation of anti-dementia drugs users: a large multinational-network population-based study

BACKGROUND

An updated time-trend analysis of anti-dementia drugs (ADDs) is lacking. The aim of this study is to assess the incident rate (IR) of ADD in individuals with dementia using real-world data.

SETTING

Primary care data (country/database) from the UK/CPRD-GOLD (2007-20), Spain/SIDIAP (2010-20) and the Netherlands/IPCI (2008-20), standardised to a common data model.

METHODS

Cohort study. Participants: dementia patients ≥40 years old with ≥1 year of previous data. Follow-up: until the end of the study period, transfer out of the catchment area, death or incident prescription of rivastigmine, galantamine, donepezil or memantine. Other variables: age/sex, type of dementia, comorbidities. Statistics: overall and yearly age/sex IR, with 95% confidence interval, per 100,000 person-years (IR per 105 PY (95%CI)).

RESULTS

We identified a total of (incident anti-dementia users/dementia patients) 41,024/110,642 in UK/CPRD-GOLD, 51,667/134,927 in Spain/SIDIAP and 2,088/17,559 in the Netherlands/IPCI.In the UK, IR (per 105 PY (95%CI)) of ADD decreased from 2007 (30,829 (28,891-32,862)) to 2010 (17,793 (17,083-18,524)), then increased up to 2019 (31,601 (30,483 to 32,749)) and decrease in 2020 (24,067 (23,021-25,148)). In Spain, IR (per 105 PY (95%CI)) of ADD decreased by 72% from 2010 (51,003 (49,199-52,855)) to 2020 (14,571 (14,109-15,043)). In the Netherlands, IR (per 105 PY (95%CI)) of ADD decreased by 77% from 2009 (21,151 (14,967-29,031)) to 2020 (4763 (4176-5409)). Subjects aged ≥65-79 years and men (in the UK and the Netherlands) initiated more frequently an ADD.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of dementia remains highly heterogeneous. Further consensus in the pharmacological management of patients living with dementia is urgently needed.

Administration of Huperzine A microspheres ameliorates myocardial ischemic injury via α7nAChR-dependent JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway

Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor (AChEI) is well established as first-line agents for relieving the symptoms of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Injectable sustained-release formulation of AChEI may be suitable for treating AD patients. However, it needs to know whether continuous inhibition of AChE could deteriorate or attenuate myocardial damage if myocardial ischemia (MI) occurs. Huperzine A microspheres (HAM) are a sustained-release formulation releasing sustainably huperzine A (an AChEI) for more than 7 days after a single dose of HAM. This study aimed to investigate the myocardial damage in an isoprenaline (ISO)-induced MI mice model during HAM treatment. The heart injury was evaluated by assaying serum CK-MB, Tn-I and observing histopathological changes. The levels of proinflammatory cytokines in serum were detected. The level of p-P65 and the expression of proteins in the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway were assayed with Western blot. Administration with a single dose of HAM resulted in inhibiting the MI-induced increases of CK-MB and Tn-I, alleviating the damage of heart tissue, and decreasing the levels of TNF-α and IL-6. In addition, HAM decreased the levels of p-P65, p-JAK2, and p-STAT3 in heart tissue. The effects of HAM could be weakened or abolished by the specific α7nAChR antagonist. These findings suggest that continuous AChE inhibition could protect the heart from ischemic damage during administration of sustained-release formulation of AChEI, which is associated with the anti-inflammatory effect of HAM by regulating α7nAChR-dependent JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway.

Analysis on the Effect of the Rehabilitation Intervention-Centered Targeted Nursing Model on the Cardiac Function Recovery and Negative Emotions in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction

Rehabilitation intervention which refers to the functional training by caregivers with the aid of specialized nursing techniques and the progressive promotion of patients' training initiative, with the purpose of improving mobility and quality of life, is of great significance. The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of the rehabilitation intervention-centered targeted nursing model on the cardiac function recovery and negative emotions in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). A total of 120 AMI patients admitted to our hospital between January 2019 and January 2020 were selected as the study subjects and randomly divided into group A (n = 60) and group B (n = 60), in which the group B patients received routine nursing combined with rehabilitation intervention, while based on the treatment in group B, the patients in group A underwent rehabilitation intervention-centered targeted nursing model. Then, the cardiac function indexes, negative emotion score, levels of risk factors for heart failure, complication rate (CR), and the quality of life (QOL) of the patients were compared between the two groups. The cardiac function indexes of the patients after nursing in group A were significantly better than those in group B (P < 0.001); the negative emotion scores of the patients after nursing in group A were significantly lower than those in group B (P < 0.001); the levels of risk factors for heart failure of the patients after nursing in group A were significantly lower than those in group B (P < 0.001); the CR of the patients in group A at 15 d and 30 d after admission was significantly lower than that in group B (P < 0.05); the QOL scores of the patients after nursing in group A were significantly higher than those in group B (P < 0.001). Rehabilitation intervention-centered targeted nursing model can optimize cardiac function, weaken the levels of risk factors for heart failure, reduce the incidence of complications, improve psychological conditions, and enhance the quality of life in AMI patients, which is worthy of application and promotion in clinical practice.

Dementia Care in Diverse Older Adults in the U.S. Deep South and the Rest of the United States

BACKGROUND

Use of specialists and recommended drugs has beneficial effects for older adults living with Alzheimer's disease and related dementia (ADRD). Gaps in care may exist for minorities, e.g., Blacks, and especially in the United States (U.S.) Deep South (DS), a poor U.S. region with rising ADRD cases and minority overrepresentation. Currently, we have little understanding of ADRD care utilization in diverse populations in this region and elsewhere in the U.S. (non-DS), and the factors that adversely impact it.

OBJECTIVE

To examine utilization of specialists and ADRD drugs (outcomes) in racial/ethnic groups of older adults with ADRD and the personal or context-level factors affecting these outcomes in DS and non-DS.

METHODS

We obtained outcomes and personal-level covariates from claims for 127,512 Medicare beneficiaries with ADRD in 2013-2015, and combined county-level data in exploratory factor analysis to define context-level covariates. Adjusted analyses tested significant association of outcomes with Black/White race and other factors in DS and non-DS.

RESULTS

Across racial/ethnic groups, 33%-43% in DS and 43%-50% in non-DS used specialists; 47%-55% in DS and 41%-48% in non-DS used ADRD drugs. In adjusted analyses, differences between Blacks and Whites were not significant. Vascular dementia, comorbidities, poverty, and context-level factor "Availability of Medical Resources" were associated with specialist use; Alzheimer's disease and senile dementia, comorbidities, and specialist use were associated with drug use. In non-DS only, other individual, context-level covariates were associated with the outcomes.

CONCLUSION

We did not observe significant gaps in ADRD care in DS and non-DS; however, research should further examine determinants of low specialist and drug use in these regions.

QTc Interval Prolongation with Therapies Used to Treat Patients with Parkinson's Disease Psychosis: A Narrative Review

In addition to the classic motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD), people with PD frequently experience nonmotor symptoms that can include autonomic dysfunction and neuropsychiatric symptoms such as PD psychosis (PDP). Common patient characteristics, including older age, use of multiple medications, and arrhythmias, are associated with increased risk of corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation, and treatments for PDP (antipsychotics, dementia medications) may further increase this risk. This review evaluates how medications used to treat PDP affect QTc interval from literature indexed in the PubMed and Embase databases. Although not indicated for the treatment of psychosis, dementia therapies such as donepezil, rivastigmine, memantine, and galantamine are often used with or without antipsychotics and have minimal effects on QTc interval. Among the antipsychotics, data suggesting clinically meaningful QTc interval prolongation are limited. However, many antipsychotics have other safety concerns. Aripiprazole, olanzapine, and risperidone negatively affect motor function and are not recommended for PDP. Quetiapine is often sedating, can exacerbate underlying neurogenic orthostatic hypotension, and may prolong the QTc interval. Pimavanserin was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2016 and remains the only FDA-approved medication available to treat hallucinations and delusions associated with PDP. However, pimavanserin can increase QTc interval by approximately 5-8 ms. The potential for QTc prolongation should be considered in patients with symptomatic cardiac arrhythmias and those receiving QT-prolonging medications. In choosing a medication to treat PDP, expected efficacy must be balanced with potential safety concerns for individual patients.

Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Events in Patients on Antidementia Medications

OBJECTIVE

To identify characteristics associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events in patients diagnosed with Alzheimer disease (AD) and treated with antidementia medications.

METHODS

Demographics, diagnoses, and medication usage of 30 433 Medicare patients were analyzed using 2006 to 2013 claims data and a combined model of screening, ranking and stepwise logistic regressions to evaluate factors associated with composite outcomes of 6 cardiovascular events.

RESULTS

Incidence rate of at least 1 cardiovascular event was 25.1%. Fifty-five factors were identified from the 10 381 candidate variables by the combined model with a c-statistic of 67% and an accuracy of 75%. Factors associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events include history of heart rhythm disorders, alteration of consciousness (odds ratio [OR]: 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-1.36), and usage of β-blockers (OR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.13-1.27).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should consider the increased risk of cardiovascular events in patients with AD with heart rhythm disorders and on β-blockers.

Pharmaceutical Treatment for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias: Utilization and Disparities

BACKGROUND

Four prescription drugs (donepezil, galantamine, memantine, and rivastigmine) are approved by the US FDA to treat symptoms of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Even modest effectiveness could potentially reduce the population-level burden of AD and related dementias (ADRD), especially for women and racial/ethnic minorities who have higher incidence of ADRD.

OBJECTIVE

Describe the prevalence of antidementia drug use and timing of initiation relative to ADRD diagnosis among a nationally representative group of older Americans, and if there are disparities in prevalence and timing by sex and race/ethnicity.

METHODS

Descriptive analyses and logistic regressions of Medicare claims (2008-2016) for beneficiaries who had an ADRD or dementia-related symptom diagnosis, or use of an FDA approved drug for AD. We investigate prevalence of use and timing of treatment initiation relative to ADRD diagnosis across time and beneficiary characteristics (age, sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, comorbidities).

RESULTS

Among persons diagnosed with ADRD or related symptoms, 33.3% used an approved drug over the study period. Odds of use was higher among Whites than non-Whites. Among ADRD drug users, 40% initiated use within 6 months of the initial ADRD or related symptoms diagnosis, and 16% initiated prior to a diagnosis. We observed disparities by race/ethnicity: 28% of Asians, 24% of Hispanics, 16% of Blacks, and 15% of Whites initiated prior to diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of antidementia drugs is relatively low and varies widely by race/ethnicity. Heterogeneity in timing of initiation and use may affect health and cost outcomes, but these effects merit further study.