Association of Electronic Prescribing of Controlled Substances With Opioid Prescribing Rates

Experiences and Outcomes of Using e-Prescribing for Opioids: Rapid Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

e-Prescribing is designed to assist in facilitating safe and appropriate prescriptions for patients. Currently, it is unknown to what extent e-prescribing for opioids influences experiences and outcomes. To address this gap, a rapid scoping review was conducted.

OBJECTIVE

This rapid scoping review aims to (1) explore how e-prescribing has been used clinically; (2) examine the effects of e-prescribing on clinical outcomes, the patient or clinician experience, service delivery, and policy; and (3) identify current gaps in the present literature to inform future studies and recommendations.

METHODS

A rapid scoping review was conducted following the guidance of the JBI 2020 scoping review methodology and the World Health Organization guide to rapid reviews. A comprehensive literature search was completed by an expert librarian from inception until November 16, 2022. Three databases were electronically searched: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and Scopus (Elsevier). The search criteria were as follows: (1) e-prescribing programs targeted to the use or misuse of opioids, including those that were complemented or accompanied by clinically focused initiatives, and (2) a primary research study of experimental, quasi-experimental, observational, qualitative, or mixed methods design. An additional criterion of an ambulatory component of e-prescribing (eg, e-prescribing occurred upon discharge from acute care) was added at the full-text stage. No language limitations or filters were applied. All articles were double screened by trained reviewers. Gray literature was manually searched by a single reviewer. Data were synthesized using a descriptive approach.

RESULTS

Upon completing screening, 34 articles met the inclusion criteria: 32 (94%) peer-reviewed studies and 2 (6%) gray literature documents (1 thesis study and 1 report). All 33 studies had a quantitative component, with most highlighting e-prescribing from acute care settings to community settings (n=12, 36%). Only 1 (3%) of the 34 articles provided evidence on e-prescribing in a primary care setting. Minimal prescriber, pharmacist, and clinical population characteristics were reported. The main outcomes identified were related to opioid prescribing rates, alerts (eg, adverse drug events and drug-drug interactions), the quantity and duration of opioid prescriptions, the adoption of e-prescribing technology, attitudes toward e-prescribing, and potential challenges with the implementation of e-prescribing into clinical practice. e-Prescribing, including key features such as alerts and dose order sets, may reduce prescribing errors.

CONCLUSIONS

This rapid scoping review highlights initial promising results with e-prescribing and opioid therapy management. It is important that future work explores the experience of prescribers, pharmacists, and patients using e-prescribing for opioid therapy management with an emphasis on prescribers in the community and primary care. Developing a common set of quality indicators for e-prescribing of opioids will help build a stronger evidence base. Understanding implementation considerations will be of importance as the technology is integrated into clinical practice and health systems.

Opioid Analgesia Compared with Non-Opioid Analgesia After Operative Treatment for Pediatric Supracondylar Humeral Fractures: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Trial

BACKGROUND

Minimal pain and opioid use after operative treatment for pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures have been previously described; however, opioid-prescribing practices in the United States remain variable. We hypothesized that children without an opioid prescription would report similar postoperative pain compared with children prescribed opioids following closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) of supracondylar humeral fractures.

METHODS

Children who were 3 to 12 years of age and were undergoing CRPP for a closed supracondylar humeral fracture were prospectively enrolled in a multicenter, comparative study. Following a standardized dosing protocol, oxycodone, ibuprofen, and acetaminophen were prescribed at 2 hospitals (opioid cohort), and 2 other hospitals prescribed ibuprofen and acetaminophen alone (non-opioid cohort). The children's medication use and the daily pain that they experienced (scored on the Wong-Baker FACES Scale) were recorded at postoperative days 1 to 7, 10, 14, and 21, using validated text-message protocols. Based on an a priori power analysis, at least 64 evaluable subjects were recruited per cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 157 patients were evaluated (81 [52%] in the opioid cohort and 76 [48%] in the non-opioid cohort). The median age at the time of the surgical procedure was 6.2 years, and 50% of the subjects were male. The mean postoperative pain scores were low overall (<4 of 10), and there were no significant differences in pain ratings between cohorts at any time point. No patient demographic or injury characteristics were correlated with increased pain or medication use. Notably, of the 81 patients in the opioid cohort, 28 (35%) took no oxycodone and 40 (49%) took 1 to 3 total doses across the postoperative period. Patients rarely took opioids after postoperative day 2. A single patient in the non-opioid cohort (1 [1%] of 76) received a rescue prescription of opioids after presenting to the emergency department with postoperative cast discomfort.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-opioid analgesia following CRPP for pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures was equally effective as opioid analgesia. When oxycodone was prescribed, 84% of children took 0 to 3 total doses, and opioid use fell precipitously after postoperative day 2. To improve opioid stewardship, providers and institutions can consider discontinuing the routine prescription of opioids following this procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Impact of state mandates on electronic prescribing of acute opioid prescriptions for the treatment of pain in Kansas and Colorado

BACKGROUND

Government and health care entities are seeking solutions to optimize safe opioid prescribing practices. Electronic prescribing of controlled substance (EPCS) state mandates are becoming common, but lack thorough evaluation.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate whether EPCS state mandates affect opioid prescribing patterns for acute pain treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective study was designed to assess prescribing patterns via percent change for quantity, day supply, and prevalence of prescribing method utilized for opioid prescriptions 3 months pre- and post-EPCS mandate. Prescription data are extracted from two regional divisions of a large community-based pharmacy chain between April 1, 2021 to October 1, 2021. Relationships of patient geographical locations and prescribing methods were assessed. Likewise, the relationship of opioids prescribed between insurance types were evaluated. Data was evaluated utilizing Chi-Square and Mann-Whitney U tests, with an a-priori alpha of 0.05.

RESULTS

There was an increase before to after state mandate of quantity and day supply (0.8% and 1.3% [P = 0.02; P < 0.001], respectively). There were significant decreases in total daily dose and daily morphine milligram equivalent (2.0% and 1.9% [P < 001; P = 0.254], respectively). A 16.3% increase was seen in electronic prescribing before to after state mandate for prevalence of electronic prescribing versus other prescribing methods.

CONCLUSION

There is a correlation between EPCS and prescribing patterns for acute pain treatment with opioids. The use of electronic prescribing increased after state mandate. By promoting the use of electronic prescribing, the benefit of awareness and caution of opioid use draws attention to prescribers.

The past, present, and future of opioid prescribing: perioperative opioid use in gynecologic oncology patients after laparotomy at a single institution from 2012 to 2021

Objective

To describe the evolution of perioperative opioid management in gynecologic oncology patients after open surgeries and determine current opioid over-prescription rates.

Methods

Part one of this two-part study was a retrospective chart review of adult patients who underwent laparotomy by a gynecologic oncologist from July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2021, comparing changes in clinical characteristics, pain management and discharge opioid prescription sizes between fiscal year 2012 (FY2012) and 2020 (FY2020). In part two, we prospectively surveyed patients after laparotomy in 2021 to determine opioid use after hospital discharge.

Results

1187 patients were included in the chart review. Demographic and surgical characteristics remained stable from FY2012 to FY2020 with differences notable for increased rates of interval cytoreductive surgeries for advanced ovarian cancer and decreased rates of full lymph node dissection. Median inpatient opioid use decreased by 62 % from FY2012 to FY2020. Median discharge opioid prescription size was 675 oral morphine equivalents (OME) per patient in FY2012 and decreased by 77.7 % to 150 OME in FY2020. Of 95 surveyed patients in 2021, median self-reported opioid use after discharge was 22.5 OME. Patients had an excess of opioids equivalent to 1331 doses of 5-milligram oxycodone tablets per 100 patients.

Conclusion

Inpatient opioid use in our gynecologic oncology open surgical patients and post-discharge opioid prescription size significantly decreased over the last decade. Despite this progress, our current prescribing patterns continue to significantly overestimate patients' actual opioid use after hospital discharge. Individualized point of care tools are needed to determine an appropriate opioid prescription size.

Exploring perspectives on changing opioid prescribing practices: A qualitative study of community stakeholders in the HEALing Communities Study

BACKGROUND

Community-based perspectives are needed to more broadly inform policy-makers, public health practitioners, prescribers, and pharmacists about community-led and broader efforts to reduce opioid overprescribing, and ultimately reduce prescription opioid use disorder, overdoses and fatalities. The aim of this study is to explore community-based perspectives on efforts to change opioid prescribing practices in their communities.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 388 community stakeholders across four states (Kentucky, Massachusetts, New York, Ohio) from November 2019 to January 2020 about community approaches and goals of community-led responses to the opioid crisis. Data analysis combined deductive and inductive approaches to identify themes and sub-themes related to improving opioid prescribing practices.

RESULTS

Three major themes and different subthemes were characterized: (1) acknowledging progress (i.e., healthcare providers being part of the solution, provider education, and prescription drug monitoring programs); (2) emergent challenges (i.e., physician nonadherence with safer opioid prescribing guidelines, difficulty identifying appropriate use of opioids, and concerns about accelerating the progression from opioid misuse to drug abuse); and (3) opportunities for change (i.e., educating patients about safer use and proper disposal of opioids, expanding prescriber and pharmacist education, changing unrealistic expectations around eliminating pain, expanding and increasing insurance coverage for alternative treatment options).

CONCLUSIONS

Community stakeholders appeared to support specific opportunities to reduce prescription opioid misuse and improve safer prescribing. The opportunities included culture change around pain expectations, awareness of safe disposal, additional provider education, and increased coverage and acceptability of non-opioid treatments.

The Effect of an Electronic Prescribing Policy for Opioids on Physician Prescribing Patterns Following Common Upper Extremity Procedures

Purpose

We evaluated physician prescribing patterns before and after the implementation of a state-mandated opioid electronic prescribing (ePrescribing) program after 4 common outpatient hand surgeries. Specifically, we aimed to answer the following: (1) is there a change in the number of opioids prescribed after the institution of ePrescribing for carpal tunnel release (CTR), ganglion excision, distal radius fracture (DRF) open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), and carpometacarpal (CMC) arthroplasty and (2) what factors are associated with an increased number of tablets or total morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) prescribed.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent CTR, ganglion excision, DRF ORIF, or CMC arthroplasty and analyzed the number of tablets and MMEs prescribed before and after the policy implementation, as well as which factors were associated with an increased total number of opioid tablets and MMEs prescribed.

Results

A total of 428 patients were included. After policy implementation, there was a significant decrease in MMEs prescribed for ganglion excision (68 [SD, 45] vs 50 [SD, 60], P = .03) and CMC arthroplasty (283 [SD, 147] vs 217 [SD, 92], P < .01). There was also a significant decrease in the total number of tablets prescribed for ganglion excision (11 [SD, 5.7] vs 6.8 [SD, 8.0], P < .01), CMC arthroplasty (36 [SD, 13] vs 29 [SD, 12], P < .01), and DRF ORIF (31 [SD, 8.6] vs 28 [SD, 8.5], P = .04). The number of patients receiving any opioid prescription also significantly decreased following CTR (30% vs 51%, P = .03) and ganglion excision (11% vs 53%, P < .01).

Conclusions

The initiation of state-mandated ePrescribing was associated with a decreased number of opioids—both MMEs and tablets—prescribed after surgery by hand surgeons for a variety of common procedures. Furthermore, a greater percentage of patients received no opioid prescriptions after ePrescribing. These findings support the value of ePrescribing as a potential tool to further decrease excess opioid prescriptions.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic III.