Evaluation of the Implementation of Multiple Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathways Across a Provincial Health Care System in Alberta, Canada

The use of preoperative enteral immunonutrition in patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare adult patients receiving enteral immunonutrition prior to elective colorectal surgery with those receiving conventional preoperative nutrition.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from database inception to March 2024. Articles were included if they were randomized controlled trials or cohort studies evaluating adult patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery comparing preoperative enteral immunonutrition with conventional preoperative nutrition protocols. Main outcomes of interest included surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, overall postoperative morbidity and postoperative length of stay. An inverse variance random effects meta-analysis was performed. Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane risk of bias assessment tools. The GRADE approach was conducted to assess quality of evidence.

RESULTS

After reviewing 2508 relevant citations, 10 studies met inclusion criteria. Overall, 1521 patients (mean age 64.9 ± 10.0 years, 49.4% women) received preoperative immunonutrition and 1816 patients (mean age 64.1 ± 11.0 years, 52.1% women) received conventional preoperative nutrition. Across seven studies, there was a non-significant 30% relative risk reduction of surgical site infection (risk ratio 0.70, 95% CI 0.44-1.11, P = 0.13, I2 = 33%) and a non-significant 44% relative risk reduction of anastomotic leak (risk ratio 0.56, 95% CI 0.28-1.10, P = 0.09, I2 = 0%) in the immunonutrition group. Across eight studies, postoperative length of stay was 0.48 days shorter in the immunonutrition group (mean difference -0.48, 95% CI -0.84 to -0.12, P = 0.01, I2 = 53%). GRADE certainty of evidence was low or very low for all outcomes.

CONCLUSION

While point estimates suggest a likely benefit associated with preoperative enteral immunonutrition, wide corresponding 95% CIs suggest uncertainty remains. Further prospective study is warranted.

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery - Evidence and Practice

AbstractEnhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a global initiative comprised of a series of evidence-based interventions in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative surgical phases. When implemented as a bundle, ERAS interventions both improve clinical outcomes and provide cost savings to the health care system. This review provides an update on the current evidence for individual ERAS elements to improve quality of care as well as practical recommendations for multidisciplinary teams to implement their own ERAS programs.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Compliance and Outcomes for Head and Neck Reconstructive Surgery

Importance

Few studies have examined the association between enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) compliance and postoperative outcomes within head and neck (HN) free flap reconstructive surgery. Doing so may inform future interventions to improve ERAS adoption and improve postoperative outcomes.

Objective

To assess overall compliance with ERAS guidelines and its association with postoperative outcomes among individuals undergoing HN free flap reconstructive surgery.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent ERAS-guided HN major reconstructive surgery in Alberta, Canada between January 2017 and September 2021. Data analysis occurred from May 2024 until August 2024.

Main Outcomes and Measures

ERAS compliance was assessed for 17 ERAS care elements, and the total compliance score for each patient was a sum of the compliance for each ERAS care element. Compliance was categorized as low compliance (<53%), moderate compliance (53%-72%), and high compliance (>72%). Postoperative outcomes included hospital length of stay and hospital readmission and emergency department admissions within 30 days, intensive care unit readmission, complications, and severe complications. Unadjusted and adjusted models (using backward stepwise regression) assessed associations between ERAS compliance (exposure) and postoperative outcomes.

Results

Of 257 patients, 90 (35.0%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 62.4 (13.3) years. Overall, 196 (76.3%) had moderate compliance, 50 (19.5%) had low ERAS compliance, and 11 (4.3%) had high compliance. Preoperative (86%) and intraoperative (73%) ERAS compliance exceeded postoperative compliance (38%). Compliance for ERAS care elements varied widely, with the highest compliance observed for preincision antibiotic prophylaxis (99.6%) and the lowest compliance observed for postoperative early mobilization (10.2%). Postoperative hospital length of stay decreased by 0.71 days (95% CI, -1.34 to -0.08), and the odds of experiencing complications decreased by 28% (odds ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56-0.90) for each 1-unit increase in the total ERAS compliance score.

Conclusions and Relevance

This results of this cohort study suggest that higher overall compliance with ERAS guidelines was associated with improved postoperative outcomes for individuals undergoing major HN free flap reconstructive surgery. There also appeared to be discrepancies in compliance between preoperative and postoperative phases, suggesting areas for interventions designed to improve adherence to ERAS protocols and underscoring the need for proactive compliance monitoring for optimizing patient outcomes in major HN surgery.

Surgical Recovery Through the Lens of Patients with Colorectal Disease: A Qualitative Study in an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Setting

BACKGROUND

As perioperative care shifts to a more patient-centered model, understanding needs and experiences of patients is vital. Gaining such insight can enhance the alignment of care with patient priorities, encouraging adherence to recovery-oriented interventions. We aimed to explore patient-defined recovery and the elements that modify the recovery process for patients with colorectal disease under enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) care.

STUDY DESIGN

A qualitative study was conducted at an ERAS-participating hospital in Alberta, Canada, between April 2018 and June 2019. A co-design focus group set the research direction, and semistructured interviews were conducted postoperatively in-hospital or within 3 months postdischarge. Diverse patient ages and colorectal conditions were targeted through purposive sampling. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed through manifest and latent content analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty patients with mean age 62 (SD 13) years and 45% with cancer (17 interview, 2 focus group + interview, and 1 focus group only) were enrolled. Recovery was defined by patients as the return to normal routines and four themes were identified. First, phases of recovery: recovery was described as multidimensional phases distinctively as early, late or long-term, and the endpoint. Second, recovery facilitators: recovery was supported through positive mindsets, conscious recovery, and taking an active role. Third, recovery barriers: recovery was hindered by negative mindsets and treatment side effects. Finally, recovery catalysts: communication, autonomy, and expectations facilitated active or passive recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Our patient-oriented recovery model may contribute a new dimension to the ERAS framework by capturing patients' recovery experiences. Further research is encouraged to explore its value in enhancing patient-centered care within ERAS.

Beyond the Operating Room: A Narrative Review of Enhanced Recovery Strategies in Colorectal Surgery

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have significantly transformed the management of patients undergoing colorectal surgery. This comprehensive review explores the key components and benefits of ERAS in colorectal procedures, focusing on preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative strategies aimed at improving patient outcomes. These strategies include preoperative patient education, multimodal analgesia, minimally invasive surgical techniques, and early mobilization. ERAS protocols reduce postoperative complications, shorten hospital stays, and enhance overall recovery, leading to better patient satisfaction and decreased healthcare costs. However, challenges such as patient adherence and managing high-risk patients remain critical areas for further research. Additionally, future research should focus on refining ERAS protocols, integrating novel technologies such as minimally invasive techniques, and evaluating long-term outcomes to further enhance the recovery process.

Impact of structured multicentre enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol implementation on length of stay after colorectal surgery

BACKGROUND

Increased length of stay after surgery is associated with increased healthcare utilization and adverse patient outcomes. While enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been shown to reduce length of stay after colorectal surgery in trial settings, their effectiveness in real-world settings is more uncertain. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of ERAS protocol implementation on length of stay after colorectal surgery, using real-world data.

METHODS

In 2012, ERAS protocols were introduced at 15 Ontario hospitals as part of the iERAS study. A cohort of patients undergoing colorectal surgery treated at these hospitals between 2008 and 2019 was created using health administrative data. Mean length of stay was computed for the intervals before and after ERAS implementation. Interrupted time series analyses were performed for predefined subgroups, namely all colorectal surgery, colorectal surgery without complications, right-sided colorectal surgery, and left-sided colorectal surgery. Sensitivity analyses were then conducted using adjusted length of stay, accounting for length of stay predictors, including: patient age, sex, marginalization, co-morbidities, and diagnosis; surgeon volume of cases, years in practice, and colorectal surgery expertise; hospital volume; and other contextual factors, including procedure type and timing, surgical approach, and in-hospital complications.

RESULTS

A total of 32 612 patients underwent colorectal surgery during the study interval. ERAS implementation led to a decrease in length of stay of 1.05 days (13.7%). Larger decreases in length of stay were seen with more complex surgeries, with a level change of 1.17 days (15.6%) noted for the subgroup of patients undergoing left-sided colorectal surgery. The observed decreases in length of stay were durable for the length of the study interval in all analyses. When adjusting for predictors of length of stay, the effect of ERAS implementation on length of stay was larger (reduction of 1.46 days).

CONCLUSION

Introducing formal ERAS protocols reduces length of stay after colorectal surgery significantly, independent of temporal trends toward decreasing length of stay. These effects are durable, demonstrating that ERAS protocol implementation is an effective hospital-level intervention to reduce length of stay after colorectal surgery.

Implementing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for hysterectomy in a hospital network with audit and feedback: A stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of implementing the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol in patients undergoing elective hysterectomy in a network of regional hospitals, supported by an intensive audit-and-feedback (A&F) approach.

DESIGN

A multi-centre, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04063072).

SETTING

Gynaecological units in the Piemonte region, Italy.

POPULATION

Patients undergoing elective hysterectomy, either for cancer or for benign conditions.

METHODS

Twenty-three units (clusters), stratified by surgical volume, were randomised into four sequences. At baseline (first 3 months), standard care was continued in all units. Subsequently, the four sequences implemented the ERAS protocol successively every 3 months, after specific training. By the end of the study, each unit had a period in which standard care was maintained (control) and a period in which the protocol, supported by feedback, was applied (experimental).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Length of hospital stay (LOS), without outliers (>98th percentile).

RESULTS

Between September 2019 and May 2021, 2086 patients were included in the main analysis with an intention-to-treat approach: 1104 (53%) in the control period and 982 (47%) in the ERAS period. Compliance with the ERAS protocol increased from 60% in the control period to 76% in the experimental period, with an adjusted absolute difference of +13.3% (95% CI 11.6% to 15.0%). LOS, moving from 3.5 to 3.2 days, did not show a significant reduction (-0.12 days; 95% CI -0.30 to 0.07 days). No difference was observed in the occurrence of complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the ERAS protocol for hysterectomy at the regional level, supported by an A&F approach, resulted in a substantial improvement in compliance, but without meaningful effects on LOS and complications. This study confirms the effectiveness of A&F in promoting important innovations in an entire hospital network and suggests the need of a higher compliance with the ERAS protocol to obtain valuable improvements in clinical outcomes.

The effects of anaesthesia and analgesia on short- and long-term outcomes following colorectal cancer surgery: Protocol for an international, pragmatic, cohort study (ENCORE∗)

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most frequent cause of global cancer mortality. Most patients with CRC require surgical tumour resection, with certain stages of CRC (Stage II/III) also requiring postoperative chemotherapy. The timing of postoperative chemotherapy is largely determined by postoperative recovery. Delayed return to intended oncologic therapy (RIOT) by >8 weeks results in worse oncologic outcomes. RIOT is thus an important surrogate marker of outcome for patients with stage II/III CRC. We will test the hypothesis that anaesthetic technique during CRC resection surgery may affect RIOT.

OBJECTIVE

To test the association between anaesthetic and analgesic technique during CRC surgery and RIOT. To document Short-term Secondary outcomes including individual postoperative complications and a composite of all postoperative complications, the Comprehensive Complications Index (CCI) and to measure the time to recurrence (TTR) of cancer at 3 years.

DESIGN

This is a prospective, international, multicentre, observational cohort study.

SETTING

Global healthcare setting, with >140 centres in >30 nations.

PATIENTS

Inclusion criteria: All patients age >18 years, ASA I-III, with CRC stage I-III scheduled for elective CRC surgery (open or minimally invasive).Exclusion criteria: Uncontrolled renal or liver disease, restrictive (limiting mobility) heart failure or ischemic heart disease (ASA IV-V). Speech, language, or cognitive difficulties precluding signing informed consent to participate and Stage IV CRC.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Short -term: The duration from day of surgery to RIOT among patients expected to receive postoperative chemotherapy. Long-term: incidence of recurrence and time to recurrence (TTR) at 3 years after primary curative surgery.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

Postoperative complications within 30 days of surgery, length of hospital stay, Days at Home at 30 and 90 days (DAH-30, DAH-90) after surgery, and adverse events related to oncological treatment. We will also assess the burden of preoperative modifiable comorbid disease in patients. Exploratory endpoints will assess practice variation (including incidence of RIOT by demographic e.g. gender of patient, type of institution, country).

RESULTS

N/A.

CONCLUSIONS

N/A.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The Effects of aNesthesia in COloREctal cancer outcome study: ENCORE, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04493905.

Implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for colorectal cancer in a regional hospital network supported by audit and feedback: a stepped wedge, cluster randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are known to potentially improve the management and outcomes of patients undergoing colorectal surgery, with limited evidence of their implementation in hospital networks and in a large population. We aimed to assess the impact of the implementation of an ERAS protocol in colorectal cancer surgery in the entire region of Piemonte, Italy, supported by an audit and feedback (A&F) intervention.

METHODS

A large, stepped wedge, cluster randomised trial enrolled patients scheduled for elective surgery at 29 general surgery units (clusters). At baseline (first 3 months), standard care was continued in all units. Thereafter, four groups of clusters began to adopt the ERAS protocol successively. By the end of the study, each cluster had a period in which standard care was maintained (control) and a period in which the protocol was applied (experimental). ERAS implementation was supported by initial training and A&F initiatives. The primary endpoint was length of stay (LOS) without outliers (>94th percentile), and the secondary endpoints were outliers for LOS, postoperative medical and surgical complications, quality of recovery and compliance with ERAS items.

RESULTS

Of 2626 randomised patients, 2397 were included in the LOS analysis (1060 in the control period and 1337 in the experimental period). The mean LOS without outliers was 8.5 days during the control period (SD 3.9) and 7.5 (SD 3.5) during the experimental one. The adjusted difference between the two periods was a reduction of -0.58 days (95% CI -1.07, -0.09; p=0.021). The compliance with ERAS items increased from 52.4% to 67.3% (estimated absolute difference +13%; 95% CI 11.4%, 14.7%). No difference in the occurrence of complications was evidenced (OR 1.22; 95% CI 0.89, 1.68).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of the ERAS protocol for colorectal cancer, supported by A&F approach, led to a substantial improvement in compliance and a reduction in LOS, without meaningful effects on complications. Trial registration number NCT04037787.

Rethinking postoperative care: same-day ileostomy closure discharge improves patient outcomes

BACKGROUND

The evolution of enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) in colon and rectal surgery has led to the development of same-day discharge (SDD) procedures for selected patients. Early discharge after diverting loop ileostomy (DLI) closure was first described in 2003. However, its widespread adoption remains limited, with SDD accounting for only 3.2% of all DLI closures in 2005-2006, according to the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, and rising to just 4.1% by 2016. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of SDD DLI closure with those of DLI closure after the standard ERP.

METHODS

A retrospective case-matched study compared 125 patients undergoing SDD DLI closure with 250 patients undergoing DLI closure after the standard ERP based on age (±1 year), sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, surgery date (±2 months), underlying disease, and hospital site. The primary outcome was comparative 30-day complication rates.

RESULTS

Patients in the traditional ERP group received more intraoperative fluids (1221.1 ± 416.6 vs 1039.0 ± 368.3 mL, P < .001) but had similar estimated blood loss. Ten patients (8%) in the SDD-ERP group failed SDD. The 30-day postoperative complication rate was significantly lower in the SDD group (14.8%) than the standard ERP group (25.7%, P = .025). This difference was primarily driven by a lower incidence of ileus in the SDD group (9.6% vs 14.8%, P = .034). There were no significant differences in readmission rate (9.6% of SDD-ERP vs 9.2% of standard ERP, P = .900) and reoperation rates (3.2% of SDD-ERP vs 2.4% of standard ERP, P = .650).

CONCLUSION

SDD ileostomy closure is a safe, feasible, and effective procedure associated with fewer complications than the present study's standard ERP. This could represent a new standard of care. Further prospective trials are required to confirm the findings of this study.

Sustainability of enhanced recovery after surgery programmes in gastrointestinal surgery: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is an evidence-based intervention that is well-recognised across multiple surgical specialties as having potential to lead to improved patient and hospital outcomes. Little is known about sustainability of ERAS programmes.

AIMS

This review aimed to describe available evidence evaluating sustainability of ERAS programmes in gastrointestinal surgery to understand: (a) how sustainability has been defined; (b) examine determinants of sustainability; (c) identify strategies used to facilitate sustainability; (d) identify adaptations to support sustainability; and (e) examine outcomes measured as indicators of sustainability of ERAS programmes.

METHODS

This scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute's methodology. Research databases (PubMed, Embase, CINHAL) and the grey literature were searched (inception to September 2022) for studies reporting sustainability of ERAS programmes in gastrointestinal surgery. Included articles reported an aspect of sustainability (i.e., definition, determinants, strategies, adaptations, outcomes and ongoing use) at ≥2 years following initial implementation. Aspects of sustainability were categorised according to relevant frameworks to facilitate synthesis.

RESULTS

The search strategy yielded 1852 records; first round screening excluded 1749, leaving 103 articles for full text review. Overall, 22 studies were included in this review. Sustainability was poorly conceptualised and inconsistently reported across included studies. Provision of adequate resources was the most frequently identified enabler to sustainability (n/N = 9/12, 75%); however, relatively few studies (n = 4) provided a robust report of determinants, with no study reporting determinants of sustainability and strategies and adaptations to support sustainability alongside patient and service delivery outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Improved reporting, particularly of strategies and adaptations to support sustainability is needed. Refinement of ERAS reporting guidelines should be made to facilitate this, and future implementation studies should plan to document and report changes in context and corresponding programme changes to help researchers and clinicians sustain ERAS programmes locally.

Evaluation of a tiered opioid prescription algorithm in an ERAS pathway: exploring opportunities for further refinement

BACKGROUND

Opioid over-prescription is wasteful and contributes to the opioid crisis. We implemented a personalized tiered discharge opioid protocol and education on opioid disposal to minimize over-prescription.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the intervention by investigating opioid use post-discharge for women undergoing abdomino-pelvic surgery, and patient adherence to opioid disposal education.

METHODS

We analyzed post-discharge opioid consumption among 558 patients. Eligible patients included those who underwent elective gynecologic surgery, were not taking scheduled opioids pre-operatively, and received discharge opioids according to a tiered prescribing algorithm. A survey assessing discharge opioid consumption and disposal safety knowledge was distributed on post-discharge day 21. Over-prescription was defined as >20% of the original prescription left over. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.

RESULTS

The survey response rate was 61% and 59% in the minimally invasive surgery and open surgery cohorts, respectively. Overall, 42.8% of patients reported using no opioids after hospital discharge, 45.2% in the minimally invasive surgery and 38.6% in the open surgery cohort. Furthermore, 74.9% of respondents were over-prescribed, with median age being statistically significant for this group (p=0.004). Finally, 46.4% of respondents expressed no knowledge regarding safe disposal practices, with no statistically significant difference between groups (p>0.99).

CONCLUSION

Despite implementation of the tiered discharge opioid algorithm aimed to personalize opioid prescriptions to estimated need, we still over-prescribed opioids. Additionally, despite targeted education, nearly half of all patients who completed the survey did not know how to dispose of their opioid tablets. Additional efforts are needed to further refine the algorithm to reduce over-prescription of opioids and improve disposal education.

Effect of Pharmacoprophylaxis on Postoperative Outcomes in Adult Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Multi-Center Retrospective Cohort Study within an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Framework

BACKGROUND

The application of enhanced recovery after surgery principles decreases postoperative complications (POCs), length of stay (LOS), and readmissions. Pharmacoprophylaxis decreases morbidity, but the effect of specific regimens on clinical outcomes is unclear.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Records of 476 randomly selected adult patients who underwent elective colorectal surgeries (ECRS) at 10 US hospitals were abstracted. Primary outcomes were surgical site infection (SSI), venous thromboembolism (VTE), postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), pain, and ileus rates. Secondary outcomes included LOS and 7- and 30-day readmission rates.

RESULTS

POC rates were SSI (3.4%), VTE (1.5%), PONV (47.9%), pain (58.1%), and ileus (16.1%). Cefazolin 2 g/metronidazole 500 mg and ertapenem 1 g were associated with the shortest LOS; cefotetan 2 g and cefoxitin 2 g with the longest LOS. No SSI occurred with ertapenem and cefotetan. More Caucasians than Blacks received oral antibiotics before intravenous antibiotics without impact. Enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously daily was the most common inpatient and discharge VTE prophylaxis. All in-hospital VTEs occurred with unfractionated heparin. Most received rescue rather than around-the-clock antiemetics. Scopolamine patches, spinal opioids, and IV lidocaine continuous infusion were associated with lower PONV. Transversus abdominis plane block with long-acting local anesthetics, celecoxib, non-anesthetic ketamine bolus, ketorolac IV, lidocaine IV, and pregabalin were associated with lower in-hospital pain severity rates. Gabapentinoids and alvimopan were associated with lower ileus rates. Acetaminophen, alvimopan, famotidine, and lidocaine patches were associated with shorter LOS.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences in pharmacotherapy regimens that may improve primary and secondary outcomes in ECRS were identified. In adult ECRS, cefotetan or ertapenem may be better regimens for preventing in-hospital SSI, while ertapenem or C/M may lead to shorter LOS. The value of OA to prevent SSI was not demonstrated. Inpatient enoxaparin, compared to UFH, may reduce VTE rates with a similar LOS. A minority of patients had a documented PONV risk assessment, and a majority used as-needed rather than around-the-clock strategies. Preoperative scopolamine patches continued postoperatively may lower PONV and PDNV severity and shorter LOS. Alvimopan may reduce ileus and shorten LOS. Anesthesia that includes TAP block, ketorolac IV, and pregabalin use may lead to reduced pain rates. Acetaminophen, alvimopan, famotidine, and lidocaine patches may shorten LOS. Given the challenges of pain management and the incidence of PONV/PDNV found in this study, additional studies should be conducted to determine optimal opioid-free anesthesia and the benefit of newer antiemetics on patient outcomes. Moreover, future research should identify latent pharmacotherapy variables that impact patient outcomes, correlate pertinent laboratory results, and examine the impact of order or care sets used for ECRS at study hospitals.

Temporal trends of failure-to-rescue following perioperative complications in vulvar cancer surgery in the United States

OBJECTIVE

Failure-to-rescue, defined as mortality following a perioperative complication, is a perioperative quality indicator studied in various surgeries, but not in vulvar cancer surgery. The objective of this study was to assess failure-to-rescue in patients undergoing surgical therapy for vulvar cancer.

METHODS

This cross-section study queried the National Inpatient Sample. The study population was 31,077 patients who had surgical therapy for vulvar cancer from 1/2001-9/2015. The main outcomes were (i) perioperative morbidity (29 indicators) and (ii) mortality following a perioperative complication during the index admission for vulvar surgery (failure-to-rescue), assessed with a multivariable binary logistic regression model.

RESULTS

The cohort-level median age was 69 years, and 14,337 (46.1%) had medical comorbidity. Perioperative complications were reported in 4736 (15.2%) patients during the hospital admission for vulvar surgery. In multivariable analysis, patient factors including older age, medical comorbidity, and morbid obesity, and treatment factors with prior radiotherapy and radical vulvectomy were associated with perioperative complications (P < 0.05). The number of patients with morbid obesity, higher comorbidity index, and prior radiotherapy increased over time (P-trends < 0.001). Among 4736 patients who developed perioperative complications, 55 patients died during the hospital admission for vulvar surgery (failure-to-rescue rate, 1.2%). In multivariable analysis, cardiac arrest (adjusted-odds ratio [aOR] 27.25), sepsis or systemic inflammatory response syndrome (aOR 11.54), pneumonia (aOR 6.03), shock (aOR 4.37), and respiratory failure (aOR 3.10) were associated with failure-to-rescue (high-risk morbidities). There was an increasing trend of high-risk morbidities from 2.0% to 3.7% over time, but the failure-to-rescue from high-risk morbidities decreased from 9.1% to 2.8% (P-trend < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Vulvar cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment had increased comorbidity over time with an increase in high-risk complications. However, failure-to-rescue rate has decreased significantly.

Effect of integrated perioperative rehabilitation intervention under the fast-track surgery concept on stress and complications in patients undergoing craniocerebral injury surgery

Objective

To observe the intervention effect of perioperative rehabilitation intervention of integrated medical care the concept of FTS on stress response and postoperative complications in patients undergoing craniocerebral injury surgery.

Methods

70 patients with Traumatic brain injury (TBI) admitted to the Department of Neurosurgery of our Hospital from January 2019 to December 2021 were as the research objects and were divided into general group and FTS group according to the random number table method, with 35 cases in each group. The general group was intervened with perioperative basic nursing measures for TBI, and the FTS group was intervened with perioperative rehabilitation model of integrated medical care under the concept of FTS on the basis of the general group. The two groups of patients were compared in hemodynamic indexes (heart rate, mean arterial pressure), stress hormone levels (CORT, GLU, E), changes in motor neurological function (GCS score, NHISS score, FMA score), occurrence of postoperative complications (infection, pressure sores, rebleeding, central hyperthermia), short-term quality of life (SF-36) before and after the intervention.

Results

After intervention, the levels of HR, MAP, COR, GLU, and E were significantly lower in FTS group than in the general group (all P < 0.05). After intervention, the Fugl-Meyer score and Barthel index score of upper and lower extremities in both groups were significantly higher than those before intervention, and the FTS group was higher than the general group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). After the intervention, the NIHSS scores were significantly lower in both groups than before the intervention, and the FTS group was lower than the general group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Short-term physical function, somatic pain, physical function, general health status, social function, energy, mental health, and emotional function scores were significantly higher in the FTS group than in thegeneral group, and all differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The total incidence of infection, pressure ulcers, rebleeding, central high fever and other complications in the FTS group was significantly lower than that in the general group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The implementation of integrated perioperative rehabilitation interventions under the concept of FTS for patients with TBI can significantly alleviate patients' stress, promote recovery, reduce the incidence of complications, and improve short-term quality of life, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

Creating Value Through Learning Health Systems: The Alberta Strategic Clinical Network Experience

Design, implementation, and evaluation of effective multicomponent interventions typically take decades before value is realized even when value can be measured. Value-based health care, an approach to improving patient and health system outcomes, is a way of organizing health systems to transform outcomes and achieve the highest quality of care and the best possible outcomes with the lowest cost. We describe 2 case studies of value-based health care optimized through a learning health system framework that includes Strategic Clinical Networks. Both cases demonstrate the acceleration of evidence to practice through scientific, financial, structural administrative supports and partnerships. Clinical practice interventions in both cases, one in perioperative services and the other in neonatal intensive care, were implemented across multiple hospital sites. The practical application of using an innovation pipeline as a structural process is described and applied to these cases. A value for money improvement calculator using a benefits realization approach is presented as a mechanism/tool for attributing value to improvement initiatives that takes advantage of available system data, customizing and making the data usable for frontline managers and decision makers. Health care leaders will find value in the descriptions and practical information provided.

Perioperative medicine

Perioperative medicine delivers patient-centred, multidisciplinary, integrated care for patients from the contemplation of surgery throughout the surgical pathway to recovery. High-quality perioperative care reduces complications, improves outcomes, and leads to improved patient satisfaction and reduced healthcare costs. This article is based on key findings and recommendations from the Getting It Right First Time (GIRFT) national report on perioperative medicine and outlines key concepts of perioperative medicine; exploring how practice can be transformed to improve care. The GIRFT report was produced using information gathered from 72 visits and 119 surveys from NHS trusts in England. It illustrates examples of exemplary perioperative care across the country but also describes variation in access to and provision of perioperative care. To address this unwarranted variation and to tackle the implementation gap, transformation of perioperative care pathways ensuring a patient-centered approach, multi-professional collaboration and widespread adoption of best practice will be required.

Perioperative acute kidney injury: impact and recent update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in hospitalized patients and is a major risk factor for increased length of stay, morbidity, and mortality in postoperative patients. There are multiple barriers to reducing perioperative AKI - the etiology is multi-factorial and the diagnosis is fraught with issues. We review the recent literature on perioperative AKI and some considerations for anesthesiologists that examine the far-reaching effects of AKI on multiple organ systems.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review will discuss recent literature that addresses the epidemiology, use of novel biomarkers in risk stratification, and therapeutic modalities for AKI in burn, pediatrics, sepsis, trauma, cardiac, and liver disease, contrast-induced AKI, as well as the evidence assessing goal-directed fluid therapy.

SUMMARY

Recent studies address the use of risk stratification models and biomarkers, more sensitive than creatinine, in the preoperative identification of patients at risk for AKI. Although exciting, these scores and models need validation. There is a need for research assessing whether early AKI detection improves outcomes. Enhanced recovery after surgery utilizing goal-directed fluid therapy has not been shown to make an appreciable difference in the incidence of AKI. Reducing perioperative AKI requires a multi-pronged and possibly disease-specific approach.

Pharmacotherapeutic prophylaxis and post-operative outcomes within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) program: A randomized retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Pharmacotherapy prophylaxis embedded in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) protocols is largely unknown because data related to agent choice, dosing, timing, and duration of treatment currently are not collected in the ERAS Interactive Audit System (EIAS®). This exploratory retrospective randomized cohort study characterized pharmacologic regimens pertaining to prophylaxis of surgical site infections (SSI), venous thromboembolism (VTE), and post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The records of 250 randomly-selected adult patients that underwent elective colorectal (CR) and gynecologic/oncology procedures (GO) at an ERAS® site in North America were abstracted using REDCap. In addition to descriptive statistics, bivariate associations between categorical variables were compared.

RESULTS

Rates of SSI, VTE, & PONV were 3.3%, 1.1%, and 53.6%, respectively. Mean length of stay (LOS) for CR was 6.9 days and for GO, 3.5 days (p < 0.001). The most common antibiotic prophylaxis was one-time combination cefazolin 2 g and metronidazole 500 mg between 16 and 30 min preoperatively after chlorhexidine skin preparation. The most frequent VTE prophylaxis was tinzaparin 4500 units SC daily continued for at least 7 days after hospital discharge in oncology patients. PONV was related to longer LOS in both groups. Total morphine milligram equivalents (MME) was positively related to PONV and LOS in both CR & GO groups.

CONCLUSION

Guideline-consistent pharmacologic prophylaxis for SSI and VTE for both CR and GO patients was associated with low complication, LOS, and readmission rates. LOS in both groups was highly influenced by total MME, incidence of PONV and multi-modal anesthesia.

Does size matter? Opioid use after laparoscopy for apical pelvic organ prolapse using an 8mm versus 10-12mm accessory port

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine if a change in lateral accessory port (LAP) size from 10-12mm to 8mm among women undergoing laparoscopic native tissue pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery was effective at reducing opioid use after surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort of women taking part in a POP surgical registry.

SETTING

Tertiary academic hospital in Calgary, Canada.

PATIENTS

Women undergoing laparoscopic uterosacral ligament apical suspensions for stage ≥2 POP with either uterine preservation or concomitant hysterectomy. 92 women were included during a 15-month study period from June 2020 to September 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

Laparoscopic apical suspension using either a 10-12mm or 8mm LAP, with the change occurring at the mid-point of the study period. Fascial defects from 10-12mm ports were closed with a fascial closure device. Perioperative care and technique were otherwise unchanged.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Post-operative opioid use was measured by mean morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD), accounting for all oral and intravenous opioids used in the first 24-hours post-surgery. 50 cases (54.3%) used a 10-12mm LAP, 42 cases (45.7%) used an 8mm LAP. Mean MEDD after surgery with a 10-12mm LAP was significantly higher than with an 8mm LAP (35.3 (95% CI 24.9-45.6) vs. 13.6 (95% CI 8.0-19.2), p<0.001). Proportion of women who did not require opioids post-operatively was higher in the 8mm group (45.2%, n=19) than the 10-12mm group (18.0%, n=9) (cOR 3.76, 95% CI 1.47-9.66). Similarly, the proportion of women who did not fill an opioid prescription after discharge was higher in the 8mm group (35.7%, n=15) than the 10-12mm group (16.0%, n=8) (cOR 2.92, 95% CI 1.09-7.81). These results remained statistically significant after adjustment for age, body mass index, race/ethnicity, length of procedure, and concomitant procedures performed.

CONCLUSION

Compared to 10-12mm port, use of an 8mm LAP during laparoscopic native-tissue apical POP surgery is associated with decreased opioid use in the first 24 hours after surgery.