1
|
Fu S, Ke H, Yuan H, Xu H, Chen W, Zhao L. Dual role of pregnancy in breast cancer risk. Gen Comp Endocrinol 2024; 352:114501. [PMID: 38527592 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2024.114501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Revised: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
Reproductive history is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer in women. Pregnancy can promote short-term breast cancer risk, but also reduce a woman's lifetime risk of breast cancer. Changes in hormone levels before and after pregnancy are one of the key factors in breast cancer risk. This article summarizes the changes in hormone levels before and after pregnancy, and the roles of hormones in mammary gland development and breast cancer progression. Other factors, such as changes in breast morphology and mammary gland differentiation, changes in the proportion of mammary stem cells (MaSCs), changes in the immune and inflammatory environment, and changes in lactation before and after pregnancy, also play key roles in the occurrence and development of breast cancer. This review discusses the dual effects and the potential mechanisms of pregnancy on breast cancer risk from the above aspects, which is helpful to understand the complexity of female breast cancer occurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiting Fu
- Human Aging Research Institute (HARI) and School of Life Science, Nanchang University, and Jiangxi Key Laboratory of Human Aging, Nanchang 330031, China
| | - Hao Ke
- Human Aging Research Institute (HARI) and School of Life Science, Nanchang University, and Jiangxi Key Laboratory of Human Aging, Nanchang 330031, China
| | | | - Huaimeng Xu
- Human Aging Research Institute (HARI) and School of Life Science, Nanchang University, and Jiangxi Key Laboratory of Human Aging, Nanchang 330031, China
| | - Wenyan Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Third Hospital of Nanchang, Nanchang 330009, China
| | - Limin Zhao
- Human Aging Research Institute (HARI) and School of Life Science, Nanchang University, and Jiangxi Key Laboratory of Human Aging, Nanchang 330031, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sorouri K, Sella T, Rosenberg SM, Loucks M, Kirkner G, Snow C, Ruddy KJ, Gelber SI, Tamimi RM, Peppercorn JM, Schapira L, Borges VF, Come SE, Warner E, Partridge AH. Conception and pregnancy among women with a live birth after breast cancer treatment: A survey study of young breast cancer survivors. Cancer 2024; 130:517-529. [PMID: 37880931 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy in women of reproductive age. This study sought to explore the postcancer conception and pregnancy experience of young BC survivors to inform counseling. METHODS In the Young Women's Breast Cancer Study (NCT01468246), a multicenter, prospective cohort, participants diagnosed at age ≤40 years with stage 0-III BC who reported ≥1 postdiagnosis live birth were sent an investigator-developed survey. RESULTS Of 119 eligible women, 94 (79%) completed the survey. Median age at diagnosis was 32 years (range, 17-40) and at first postdiagnosis delivery was 38 years (range, 29-47). Most had stage I or II (77%) and HR+ (78%) BC; 51% were nulligravida at diagnosis. After BC treatment, most (62%) conceived naturally, though 38% used assisted reproductive technology, 74% of whom first attempted natural conception for a median of 9 months (range, 2-48). Among women with a known inherited pathogenic variant (n = 20), two underwent preimplantation genetic testing. Of 59 women on endocrine therapy before pregnancy, 26% did not resume treatment. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (20%) was the most common obstetrical condition. Nine percent of newborns required neonatal intensive care unit admission and 9% had low birth weight. CONCLUSION Among women with live births after BC treatment, most conceived naturally and having a history of BC did not appear to negatively impact pregnancy complications, though the high rate of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy warrants further investigation. The prolonged period of attempting natural conception for some survivors suggests the potential need for improved understanding and counseling surrounding family planning goals after BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimia Sorouri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tal Sella
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Shoshana M Rosenberg
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Maggie Loucks
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gregory Kirkner
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Craig Snow
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kathryn J Ruddy
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Shari I Gelber
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rulla M Tamimi
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jeffrey M Peppercorn
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Virginia F Borges
- University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Steven E Come
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ellen Warner
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bateni SB, Sutradhar R, Everett K, Wright FC, Hong NJL. The Association Between Pregnancy Timing and Cumulative Exposure on Survival in Melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:6332-6338. [PMID: 37386307 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13819-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As melanoma is common among young women, the impact of pregnancy on melanoma prognosis is of interest. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to examine the association between pregnancy and survival in female melanoma patients of childbearing age. METHODS We performed a population-level, retrospective cohort study of women of childbearing age (18-45 years) diagnosed with melanoma from 2007 to 2017 using administrative data from Ontario, Canada. Patients were categorized according to pregnancy status (i.e. pregnancy before [conception from 60 to 13 months prior to melanoma], pregnancy-associated [conception 12 months prior to and after], and pregnancy after [conception 12 months after] melanoma). Cox models were used to examine melanoma-specific survival (MSS) and overall survival (OS) associated with pregnancy status. RESULTS Of 1312 women with melanoma, most did not experience pregnancy (84.1%), with 7.6% experiencing a pregnancy-associated melanoma and 8.2% experiencing a pregnancy after melanoma. Pregnancy before melanoma occurred in 18.1% of patients. Pregnancy before (hazard ratio [HR] 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-1.28), associated (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.45-2.97), and after melanoma (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.13-1.11) was not associated with a difference in MSS compared with those who did not experience a pregnancy during these time periods. Pregnancy status was also not associated with a difference in OS (p > 0.05). Cumulative weeks pregnant were not associated with a difference in MSS (4-week HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.92-1.07) or OS (4-week HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.94-1.06). CONCLUSIONS In this population-level analysis of female melanoma patients of childbearing age, pregnancy was not associated with a difference in survival, suggesting that pregnancy is not associated with a worse melanoma prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah B Bateni
- Division of General Surgery, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of General Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Rinku Sutradhar
- Division of Biostatistics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Frances C Wright
- Division of General Surgery, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nicole J Look Hong
- Division of General Surgery, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ramírez-Torres N, Rivas-Ruiz R, Reyes-López A. Breast Cancer in Pregnant Young Women: Clinicopathological Profile, Survival, and Pregnancy Outcomes. Cureus 2023; 15:e47578. [PMID: 38022007 PMCID: PMC10666668 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.47578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Breast cancer is one of the most common cancer types diagnosed during pregnancy; the presence of any neoplasm in pregnant women faces clinical dilemmas and challenges in cancer and pregnancy management. Pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) is defined as breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy or within one year after delivery. The aim of this study was to describe tumor clinicopathological characteristics and pregnancy outcomes in PABC patients. Materials and methods This is a retrospective cohort assessing PABC patients. Qualitative variables were compared using Fisher's exact test. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival. Cox regression and logistic regression methods were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OR), respectively. Results We assessed 16 PABC patients. Women ≤ 35 years of age were mainly diagnosed at advanced stage (88.8%) with ER-negative disease (77.8%). Patients with >4 pathological lymph nodes (25%; p = 0.001) and ER-negative disease (50%; p = 0.646) showed poor five-year overall survival (OS). In the multivariate analysis, nodal involvement was the main predictor associated with poorer OS (HR = 1.4, 90% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14 to 1.8). The following risk factors might influence the risk of preterm delivery: maternal older age, gestational age at diagnosis, and intrauterine exposure to chemotherapy, but an adjusted OR of 0.61 (90% CI: 0.34 to 1), 0.80 (90% CI: 0.66 to 0.9), and 0.013 (90% CI: 0.00 to 0.9), respectively, did not statistically support such an effect. Conclusions Younger women with PABC had a more aggressive pathological profile that might partly explain the poor OS. Obstetrical adverse events related to preterm delivery should be avoided with better planning of specialized strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Ramírez-Torres
- Oncological Gynecology, High Specialty Medical Unit from Gynecology and Obstetrics Hospital No. 3, National Medical Center (NMC) La Raza, Mexico City, MEX
| | - Rodolfo Rivas-Ruiz
- Pediatrics, Clinical Research Division, Clinical Research Training Center, Mexico City, MEX
| | - Alfonso Reyes-López
- General Practice, Center for Economic and Social Studies in Health, Hospital Infantil "Federico Gómez", Mexico City, MEX
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Oprean CM, Ciocoiu AD, Segarceanu NA, Moldoveanu D, Stan A, Hoinoiu T, Chiorean-Cojocaru I, Grujic D, Stefanut A, Pit D, Dema A. Pregnancy in a Young Patient with Metastatic HER2-Positive Breast Cancer-Between Fear of Recurrence and Desire to Procreate. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:4833-4843. [PMID: 37232822 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30050364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most frequent neoplasm among women and the second leading cause of death by cancer. It is the most frequent cancer diagnosed during pregnancy. Pregnancy-associated breast cancer is defined as breast cancer that is diagnosed during pregnancy and/or in the postpartum period. Data about young women with metastatic HER2-positive cancer who desire a pregnancy are scarce. The medical attitude in these clinical situations is difficult and nonstandardized. We present the case of a 31-year-old premenopausal woman diagnosed in December 2016 with a stage IV Luminal HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (pT2 N0 M1 hep). The patient was initially treated by surgery in a conservative manner. Postoperatively, the presence of liver metastases was found by CT investigation. Consequently, line I treatment (docetaxel l75 mg/m² iv; trastuzumab 600 mg/5 mL sq) and ovarian drug suppression (Goserelin 3.6 mg sq at 28 days) was administered. After nine cycles of treatment, the patient's liver metastases had a partial response to the therapy. Despite having a favorable disease evolution and a strong desire to procreate, the patient vehemently refused to continue any oncological treatment. The psychiatric consult highlighted an anxious and depressive reaction for which individual and couple psychotherapy sessions were recommended. After 10 months from the interruption of the oncological treatment, the patient appeared with an evolving pregnancy of 15 weeks. An abdominal ultrasound revealed the presence of multiple liver metastases. Knowing all the possible effects, the patient consciously decided to postpone the proposed second-line treatment. In August 2018, the patient was admitted in the emergency department with malaise, diffuse abdominal pain and hepatic failure. Abdominal ultrasound found a 21-week-old pregnancy which had stopped in evolution, multiple liver metastases and ascites in large quantity. She was transferred to the ICU department where she perished just a few hours later. Conclusions/Discussion: From a psychological standpoint, the patient had an emotional hardship to make the transition from the status of a healthy person to the status of a sick person. Consequently, she entered a process of emotional protection of the positive cognitive distortion type, which favored the decision to abandon treatment and try to complete the pregnancy to the detriment of her own survival. The patient delayed the initiation of oncological treatment in pregnancy until it was too late. The consequence of this delay in treatment led to the death of the mother and fetus. A multidisciplinary team worked to provide this patient with the best medical care and psychological assistance throughout the course of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Marinela Oprean
- ANAPATMOL Research Center, 'Victor Babes' University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
- Department of Oncology, ONCOHELP Hospital Timisoara, Ciprian Porumbescu Street, No. 59, 300239 Timisoara, Romania
- Department of Oncology, ONCOMED Outpatient Unit, Ciprian Porumbescu Street, No. 59, 300239 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Andrei Dorin Ciocoiu
- Department of Oncology, ONCOHELP Hospital Timisoara, Ciprian Porumbescu Street, No. 59, 300239 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Nusa Alina Segarceanu
- Department of Oncology, ONCOHELP Hospital Timisoara, Ciprian Porumbescu Street, No. 59, 300239 Timisoara, Romania
- Department of Oncology, ONCOMED Outpatient Unit, Ciprian Porumbescu Street, No. 59, 300239 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Diana Moldoveanu
- Department of Oncology, ONCOHELP Hospital Timisoara, Ciprian Porumbescu Street, No. 59, 300239 Timisoara, Romania
- Department of Oncology, ONCOMED Outpatient Unit, Ciprian Porumbescu Street, No. 59, 300239 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Alexandra Stan
- Department of Oncology, City Clinical Emergency Hospital of Timisoara, Victor Babes Blvd. No. 22, 300595 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Teodora Hoinoiu
- Department of Clinical Practical Skills, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Sq. Nr. 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
- Center for Advanced Research in Cardiovascular Pathology and Hemostaseology, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Ioana Chiorean-Cojocaru
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Daciana Grujic
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Sq. Nr. 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Adelina Stefanut
- Department of Psichology & Sociology, West University, Timisora, Blvd. No. 4, Vasile Pârvan, 300223 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Daniel Pit
- Center for Advanced Research in Cardiovascular Pathology and Hemostaseology, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Alis Dema
- ANAPATMOL Research Center, 'Victor Babes' University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hoffman A, Denham CJ, Fu S, Mendoza T, Nitecki R, Jorgensen KA, Garcia J, Lamiman K, Woodard TL, Rauh-Hain JA. Assessing gaps in motherhood after cancer: development and psychometric testing of the Survivorship Oncofertility Barriers Scale. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:778-785. [PMID: 37001892 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE With a growing population of young cancer survivors, there is an increasing need to address the gaps in evidence regarding cancer survivors' obstetric outcomes, fertility care access, and experiences. As part of a large research program, this study engaged survivors and experts in co-developing and testing the validity, reliability, acceptability, and feasibility of a scale to assess survivor-reported barriers to motherhood after cancer. METHODS Scale items were developed based on literature and expert review of 226 reproductive health items, and six experience and focus groups with 26 survivors of breast and gynecological cancers. We then invited 128 survivors to complete the scale twice, 48 hours apart, and assessed the scale's psychometric properties using exploratory factor analyses including reliability, known-group validity, and convergent validity. RESULTS Item development identified three primary themes: multifaceted barriers for cancer survivors; challenging decisions about whether and how to pursue motherhood; and a timely need for evidence about obstetric outcomes. Retained items were developed into a 24-item prototype scale with four subscales. Prototype testing showed acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.71) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.70). Known-group validity was supported; the scale discriminated between groups by age (x=70.0 for patients ≥35 years old vs 54.5 for patients <35 years old, p=0.02) and years since diagnosis (x=71.5 for ≥6 years vs 54.3 for<6 years, p=0.01). The financial subscale was correlated with the Economic StraiN and Resilience in Cancer measure of financial toxicity (ρ=0.39, p<0.001). The scale was acceptable and feasibly delivered online. The final 22-item scale is organized in four subscales: personal, medical, relational, and financial barriers to motherhood. CONCLUSION The Survivorship Oncofertility Barriers Scale demonstrated validity, reliability, and was acceptable and feasible when delivered online. Implementing the scale can gather the data needed to inform shared decision making and to address disparities in fertility care for survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aubri Hoffman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Shuangshuang Fu
- Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Tito Mendoza
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Roni Nitecki
- Gynecologic Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kirsten A Jorgensen
- Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jose Garcia
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kelly Lamiman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
| | - Terri L Woodard
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - J Alejandro Rauh-Hain
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Crown A, McCartan D, Curry MA, Patil S, Kamer S, Goldfarb S, Gemignani ML. Pregnancy-associated breast cancer: does timing of presentation affect outcome? Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 198:283-294. [PMID: 36662395 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06833-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) comprises breast cancer diagnosed during the gestational period or within 12 months postpartum. While the incidence of PABC appears to be increasing, data regarding prognosis remain limited. METHODS Here we evaluate clinicopathologic features, treatments, and clinical outcomes among women with stage 0-III PABC diagnosed between 1992 and 2020. Comparisons were made between women who were diagnosed with PABC during gestation and those who were diagnosed within 12 months postpartum. RESULTS A total of 341 women were identified, with a median age of 36 years (range 25-46). The pregnancy group comprised 119 (35%) women, while 222 (65%) women made up the postpartum group. Clinicopathologic features were similar between groups, with most patients being parous and presenting with stage I and II disease. Treatment delays were uncommon, with a median time from histologic diagnosis to treatment of 4 weeks for both groups. Recurrence-free survival was similar between groups: 67% at 10 years for both. While 10-year overall survival appeared higher in the postpartum group (83% versus 78%, p = 0.02), only the presence of nodal metastases was associated with an increased risk of death (hazard ratio 5.61, 95% CI 2.20-14.3, p < 0.001), whereas timing of diagnosis and receptor profile did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION Clinicopathologic features of women with PABC are similar regardless of timing of diagnosis. While 10-year recurrence-free survival is similar between groups, 10-year overall survival is higher among women diagnosed postpartum; however, timing of diagnosis may not be the driving factor in determining survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelena Crown
- Department of Breast Surgery, True Family Women's Cancer Center, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Damian McCartan
- Department of Breast Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Michael A Curry
- Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sujata Patil
- Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sabrina Kamer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Shari Goldfarb
- Breast Medicine Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Mary L Gemignani
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Azizi M, Ebrahimi E, Moghadam ZB, Shahhosseini Z, Modarres M. Pregnancy Health Among Breast Cancer Survivors: Development and Validation of an Educational Package in Iran. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2023:10.1007/s13187-023-02275-y. [PMID: 36856948 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-023-02275-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Reproductive-aged breast cancer (BC) survivors are concerned about their fertility potential after BC treatment. No specific and comprehensive educational and clinical package examines pregnancy health in BC survivors. This study aimed to develop and validate a pregnancy health educational package for BC survivors who intend to experience pregnancy after completing cancer treatment. The present study is a mixed methods study conducted in three phases. The researchers, in phase 1, performed a qualitative content analysis study to explore the perceived needs and experiences of pregnancy among Iranian BC survivors. Then in the second phase, the authors conducted a systematic literature review to search all available packages, guidelines, documents, and published papers on pregnancy or fertility status among BC survivors worldwide. In the third phase, the intervention type was selected according to the opinions of the expert's team during two sessions of online meetings using the Delphi technique. The package quality was assessed by an expert team using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation Instrument II (AGREE II) tool. The pregnancy health package for BC survivors was developed in seven separate chapters based on the qualitative study and literature review findings. The results of the validity or quality assessment of the package according to the six domains of the AGREE II tool were reported as follows: the score for the scope and purpose domain was 95.55%, the stakeholder involvement domain was 89.16%, the score for the rigor of development domain was 92.97%, clarity of presentation domain was 94.44%, the score of applicability domain was 87.06%, and the score of editorial independence domain was calculated 93.75%. The pregnancy health package was designed with high quality and validity and, as an excellent cost-effective resource, is proposed to BC survivors to increase their awareness regarding their fertility issues before attempting to conceive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzieh Azizi
- Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Elham Ebrahimi
- Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Zahra Behboodi Moghadam
- Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Zohreh Shahhosseini
- Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Sexual and Reproductive Health Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Mazandaran, Iran
| | - Maryam Modarres
- Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, Researcher of Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yildiz S, Bildik G, Benlioglu C, Turan V, Dilege E, Ozel M, Kim S, Oktem O. Breast cancer treatment and ovarian function. Reprod Biomed Online 2023; 46:313-331. [PMID: 36400663 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to provide an update on ovarian function and the mechanisms of gonadal damage after exposure to chemotherapy in breast cancer survivors. The alkylating agents are toxic to both primordial and growing follicles. However, anti-metabolite drugs are more likely to destroy preantral and antral follicles. Younger patients are more likely to have a higher ovarian reserve, and therefore, more likely to retain some residual ovarian function after exposure to gonadotoxic regimens. However, there can be significant variability in ovarian reserve among patients of the same age. Furthermore, patients with critically diminished ovarian reserve may continue to menstruate regularly. Therefore age and menstrual status are not reliable indicators of good ovarian reserve and might give a false sense of security and result in an adverse outcome if the patient is consulted without considering more reliable quantitative markers of ovarian reserve (antral follicle count and anti-Müllerian hormone) and fertility preservation is not pursued. In contrast to well-documented ovarian toxicity of older chemotherapy regimens, data for newer taxane-containing protocols have only accumulated in the last decade and data are still very limited regarding the impact of targeted therapies on ovarian function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sule Yildiz
- The Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koç University Hospital, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Gamze Bildik
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX 77054, USA
| | - Can Benlioglu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Volkan Turan
- Istanbul Tema Hospital, Assisted Reproduction Unit, Istanbul
| | - Ece Dilege
- Department of General Surgery, Koç University Hospital, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Melis Ozel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Klinikum Ingolstadt, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Samuel Kim
- Eden Centers for Advanced Fertility, Fullerton CA 92835, USA
| | - Ozgur Oktem
- The Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koç University Hospital, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bajpai J, Pathak R, Shylasree TS, Rugo HS. Management of breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy: global perspectives. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2022; 22:1301-1308. [PMID: 36480337 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2022.2150167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) encompasses breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy (BCP) or postpartum (PPBC). BCP is especially challenging with concerns regarding maternal and fetal safety synchronously. This review provides a comprehensive global view to optimize care of this unique entity. Areas covered Published literature and practices across the globe including real world published data from the first Indian registry are thoroughly reviewed to derive inferences. Diagnostic delays are common with resultant upstaging and inferior outcomes. Sonography-mammography and a biopsy with immunohistochemistry for estrogen, progesterone and HER-2neu receptors is mandatory. Multidisciplinary specialist teams are critical for trimester dependent management. Stage-wise surgical and systemic treatment remains largely similar to that of the nonpregnant women. Anthracyclines- and taxane-based chemotherapy is found to be safe after the 1st trimester. Frequent fetal and maternal monitoring is required to minimize complications. Chemotherapy should stop three weeks prior to the delivery to prevent peripartum infection/bleeding. Anti- Her-2 targeted therapy, endocrine therapy and radiation therapy are administered post-delivery. Iatrogenic premature delivery leads to poor neurocognition and should be avoided. Expert opinion Stage-wise outcomes are similar to that of non-pregnant patients with breast cancer, and underscores the importance of early detection especially in low- and middle-income countries. Global collaborations are warranted. AREAS COVERED Published literature and practices across the globe including real world published data from the first Indian registry are thoroughly reviewed to derive inferences. Diagnostic delays are common with resultant upstaging and inferior outcomes. Sonography-mammography and a biopsy with immunohistochemistry for estrogen, progesterone and HER-2neu receptors is mandatory. Multidisciplinary specialist teams are critical for trimester dependent management. Stage-wise surgical and systemic treatment remains largely similar to that of the nonpregnant women. Anthracyclines- and taxane-based chemotherapy is found to be safe after the 1st trimester. Frequent fetal and maternal monitoring is required to minimize complications. Chemotherapy should stop three weeks prior to the delivery to prevent peripartum infection/bleeding. Anti- Her-2 targeted therapy, endocrine therapy and radiation therapy are administered post-delivery. Iatrogenic premature delivery leads to poor neurocognition and should be avoided. EXPERT OPINION Stage-wise outcomes are similar to that of non-pregnant patients with breast cancer, and underscores the importance of early detection especially in low- and middle-income countries. Global collaborations are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jyoti Bajpai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Rima Pathak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - T S Shylasree
- MD,FRCOG Consultant Gynaecological Oncologist, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary and NHS Grampian North Cancer Alliance United Kingdom, UK
| | - Hope S Rugo
- Professor of Medicine, University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nolan K, Boland MR, Hill AD. Pregnancy After Breast Cancer - Prognostic Safety and Pregnancy Outcomes According to Oestrogen Receptor Status: A Systematic Review. J Breast Cancer 2022; 25:443-453. [PMID: 36479601 PMCID: PMC9807324 DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2022.25.e45] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Breast cancer is the primary cause of cancer-related death in women. Women diagnosed with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer have prolonged treatment durations. Owing to the paucity of research and lack of consensus regarding conception planning and pregnancy for patients with ER-positive breast cancer, we aimed to assess pregnancy and survival outcomes in women with ER-positive breast cancer during and after treatment. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of the available studies on pregnancy after ER-positive breast cancer. The assessed outcomes included overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), hormonal therapy duration, and pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS Ultimately, 2,669 patients from five studies were included in this study. When all breast cancer receptor subtypes were included in the analysis, pregnancy after breast cancer was associated with a time-dependent protective effect on both DFS and OS. This protective effect was not evident when examining ER-positive patients with subsequent pregnancies, and no significant differences in DFS were observed. ER-positive patients who became pregnant received significantly lower rates of hormonal therapy. Hormonal treatment at the time of pregnancy was correlated with increased rates of termination owing to concerns about teratogenic effects. CONCLUSIONS Pregnancy after breast cancer did not significantly affect DFS in ER-positive patients over a follow-up period of 5-10 years from diagnosis, although did significantly affect hormonal treatment duration in the reviewed studies. Further analysis and in-depth studies are required to assess the effects of altered hormonal treatment times, as well as patient management related to pregnancy planning after breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Nolan
- Department of General/Breast & Endocrine Surgery, Beaumont Hospital and The Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Michael R. Boland
- Department of General/Breast & Endocrine Surgery, Beaumont Hospital and The Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Arnold D.K. Hill
- Department of General/Breast & Endocrine Surgery, Beaumont Hospital and The Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gwak H, Woo SS, Lee ES, Park MH, Lee S, Youn HJ, Park S, Suh IS, Kim SH. Survival of women with pregnancy-associated breast cancer according to clinical characteristics: A propensity score matching study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e30831. [PMID: 36221366 PMCID: PMC9542553 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000030831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years, postponing childbearing has increased the prevalence of pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC). PABC has a poorer prognosis than breast cancer not associated with pregnancy (non-PABC) due to delayed diagnosis and aggressive subtype. Additionally, pregnancy itself predicts a poor prognosis; but, this is a subject of debate. Thus, we analyzed the effects of known prognostic factors and pregnancy on the prognosis of PABC. We retrospectively analyzed women aged 20 to 49 years who were diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) between 1989 and 2014. Patients were distributed into PABC and non-PABC groups, and 1:4 propensity score matching was performed to adjust for baseline characteristics. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and BC-specific survival (BCSS). Secondary endpoint was the difference in prognosis according to BC subtype. Of the 34,970 recruited patients with BC, 410 (1.2%) had PABC. Patients with PABC were younger and tended to have triple-negative BC (TNBC) subtype than non-PABC patients. The 1640 matched non-PABC patients showed a significantly worse mean survival rate than the unmatched non-PABC patients. Patients with PABC had a significantly worse OS and BCSS than those with non-PABC. In multivariate analyses, patients with PABC of luminal B (Ki-67 ≥14.0%) and TNBC subtypes had worse OS and BCSS than patients with non-PABC. Patients with PABC had poorer prognosis than non-PABC patients after adjusting for several prognostic factors. This difference was particularly significant in patients with the luminal B and TNBC subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongki Gwak
- Division of Breast and Thyroid Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea
| | - Sang Seok Woo
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun-Sook Lee
- Center for Breast Cancer, Hospital and Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Min Ho Park
- Chonnam National University Medical School and Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Seokwon Lee
- Department of Surgery, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Jo Youn
- Department of Surgery, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Seho Park
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - In Suck Suh
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Hwan Kim
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- *Correspondence: Seong Hwan Kim, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 1 Singil-ro, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul 07441, South Korea, (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Anderson RA, Lambertini M, Hall PS, Wallace WH, Morrison DS, Kelsey TW. Survival after breast cancer in women with a subsequent live birth: Influence of age at diagnosis and interval to subsequent pregnancy. Eur J Cancer 2022; 173:113-122. [PMID: 35868140 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.06.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There remains a considerable concern among both patients and oncologists that having a live birth (LB) after breast cancer might adversely impact survival. METHODS analysis of survival in a national cohort of women with breast cancer diagnosed at age 20-39 years between 1981 and 2017 (n = 5181), and subsequent LB using Scottish Cancer Registry and national maternity records. Cases had at least one subsequent LB, each was matched with up to six unexposed cases without subsequent LB, accounting for guaranteed time bias. RESULTS In 290 women with a LB after diagnosis, overall survival was increased compared to those who did not have a subsequent LB, HR 0.65 (95%CI 0.50-0.85). Women with subsequent LB who had not had a pregnancy before breast cancer showed increased survival (HR 0.56, 0.38-0.82). There was a progressively greater interaction of subsequent LB with survival with younger age, thus for women aged 20-25 years, HR 0.30 (0.12-0.74) vs. those aged 36-39, HR 0.89 (0.42-1.87). In women with LB within five years of diagnosis, survival was also increased (HR 0.66; 0.49-0.89). Survival following LB was similar to unexposed women by ER status (both positive and negative) and in those known to have been exposed to chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS This analysis provides further evidence that for the growing number of women who wish to have children after breast cancer, LB does not have a negative impact on overall survival. This finding was confirmed within subgroups, including the youngest women and those not previously pregnant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard A Anderson
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queens Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
| | - Peter S Hall
- Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - W Hamish Wallace
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, Royal Hospital for Children and Young People, Edinburgh UK.
| | | | - Tom W Kelsey
- School of Computer Science, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rauh-Hain JA, Zubizarreta J, Nitecki R, Melamed A, Fu S, Jorgensen K, Brady PC, Baker VL, Chavez-MacGregor M, Giordano SH, Keating NL. Survival outcomes following pregnancy or assisted reproductive technologies after breast cancer: A population-based study. Cancer 2022; 128:3243-3253. [PMID: 35767282 PMCID: PMC9378486 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study sought to determine the impact of pregnancy or assisted reproductive technologies (ART) on breast-cancer-specific survival among breast cancer survivors. METHODS The authors performed a cohort study using a novel data linkage from the California Cancer Registry, the California birth cohort, and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System data sets. They performed risk-set matching in women with stages I-III breast cancer diagnosed between 2000 and 2012. For each pregnant woman, comparable women who were not pregnant at that point but were otherwise similar based on observed characteristics were matched at the time of pregnancy. After matching, Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association of pregnancy with breast-cancer-specific survival. We repeated these analyses for women who received ART. RESULTS Among 30,021 women with breast cancer, 553 had a pregnancy and 189 attempted at least one cycle of ART. In Cox proportional hazards modeling, the pregnancy group had a higher 5-year disease-specific survival rate; 95.6% in the pregnancy group and 90.6% in the nonpregnant group (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.24-0.77). In women with hormone receptor-positive cancer, we found similar results (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.2-0.91). In the ART analysis, there was no difference in survival between groups; the 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 96.9% in the ART group and 94.1% in the non-ART group (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.17-1.13). CONCLUSION Pregnancy and ART are not associated with worse survival in women with breast cancer. LAY SUMMARY We sought to determine the impact of pregnancy or assisted reproductive technologies (ART) among breast cancer survivors. We performed a study of 30,021 women by linking available data from California and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System. For each pregnant woman, we matched at the time of pregnancy comparable women who were not pregnant at that point but were otherwise similar based on observed characteristics. We repeated these analyses for women who received ART. We found that pregnancy and ART were not associated with worse survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Alejandro Rauh-Hain
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jose Zubizarreta
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Roni Nitecki
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Alexander Melamed
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States
| | - Shuangshuang Fu
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Kirsten Jorgensen
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Paula C. Brady
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Valerie L. Baker
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Mariana Chavez-MacGregor
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sharon H. Giordano
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Nancy L. Keating
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Balkenende EME, Dahhan T, Beerendonk CCM, Fleischer K, Stoop D, Bos AME, Lambalk CB, Schats R, Smeenk JMJ, Louwé LA, Cantineau AEP, Bruin JPD, Linn SC, van der Veen F, van Wely M, Goddijn M. Fertility preservation for women with breast cancer: a multicentre randomized controlled trial on various ovarian stimulation protocols. Hum Reprod 2022; 37:1786-1794. [PMID: 35776109 PMCID: PMC9340107 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Does ovarian stimulation with the addition of tamoxifen or letrozole affect the number of cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) retrieved compared to standard ovarian stimulation in women with breast cancer who undergo fertility preservation? SUMMARY ANSWER Alternative ovarian stimulation protocols with tamoxifen or letrozole did not affect the number of COCs retrieved at follicle aspiration in women with breast cancer. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Alternative ovarian stimulation protocols have been introduced for women with breast cancer who opt for fertility preservation by means of banking of oocytes or embryos. How these ovarian stimulation protocols compare to standard ovarian stimulation in terms of COC yield is unknown. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This multicentre, open-label randomized controlled superiority trial was carried out in 10 hospitals in the Netherlands and 1 hospital in Belgium between January 2014 and December 2018. We randomly assigned women with breast cancer, aged 18–43 years, who opted for banking of oocytes or embryos to one of three study arms; ovarian stimulation plus tamoxifen, ovarian stimulation plus letrozole or standard ovarian stimulation. Standard ovarian stimulation included GnRH antagonist, recombinant FSH and GnRH agonist trigger. Randomization was performed with a web-based system in a 1:1:1 ratio, stratified for oral contraception usage at start of ovarian stimulation, positive estrogen receptor (ER) status and positive lymph nodes. Patients and caregivers were not blinded to the assigned treatment. The primary outcome was number of COCs retrieved at follicle aspiration. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS During the study period, 162 women were randomly assigned to one of three interventions. Fifty-four underwent ovarian stimulation plus tamoxifen, 53 ovarian stimulation plus letrozole and 55 standard ovarian stimulation. Analysis was according to intention-to-treat principle. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE No differences among groups were observed in the mean (±SD) number of COCs retrieved: 12.5 (10.4) after ovarian stimulation plus tamoxifen, 14.2 (9.4) after ovarian stimulation plus letrozole and 13.6 (11.6) after standard ovarian stimulation (mean difference −1.13, 95% CI −5.70 to 3.43 for tamoxifen versus standard ovarian stimulation and 0.58, 95% CI −4.03 to 5.20 for letrozole versus standard ovarian stimulation). After adjusting for oral contraception usage at the start of ovarian stimulation, positive ER status and positive lymph nodes, the mean difference was −1.11 (95% CI −5.58 to 3.35) after ovarian stimulation plus tamoxifen versus standard ovarian stimulation and 0.30 (95% CI −4.19 to 4.78) after ovarian stimulation plus letrozole versus standard ovarian stimulation. There were also no differences in the number of oocytes or embryos banked. There was one serious adverse event after standard ovarian stimulation: one woman was admitted to the hospital because of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The available literature on which we based our hypothesis, power analysis and sample size calculation was scarce and studies were of low quality. Our study did not have sufficient power to perform subgroup analysis on follicular, luteal or random start of ovarian stimulation. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Our study showed that adding tamoxifen or letrozole to a standard ovarian stimulation protocol in women with breast cancer does not impact the effectiveness of fertility preservation and paves the way for high-quality long-term follow-up on breast cancer treatment outcomes and women’s future pregnancy outcomes. Our study also highlights the need for high-quality studies for all women opting for fertility preservation, as alternative ovarian stimulation protocols have been introduced to clinical practice without proper evidence. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The study was supported by a grant (2011.WO23.C129) of ‘Stichting Pink Ribbon’, a breast cancer fundraising charity organization in the Netherlands. M.G., C.B.L. and R.S. declared that the Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC (location VUMC) has received unconditional research and educational grants from Guerbet, Merck and Ferring, not related to the presented work. C.B.L. declared a speakers fee for Inmed and Yingming. S.C.L. reports grants and non-financial support from Agendia, grants, non-financial support and other from AstraZeneca, grants from Eurocept-pharmaceuticals, grants and non-financial support from Genentech/Roche and Novartis, grants from Pfizer, grants and non-financial support from Tesaro and Immunomedics, other from Cergentis, IBM, Bayer, and Daiichi-Sankyo, outside the submitted work; In addition, S.C.L. has a patent UN23A01/P-EP pending that is unrelated to the present work. J.M.J.S. reported payments and travel grants from Merck and Ferring. C.C.M.B. reports her role as unpaid president of the National guideline committee on Fertility Preservation in women with cancer. K.F. received unrestricted grants from Merck Serono, Good Life and Ferring not related to present work. K.F. declared paid lectures for Ferring. D.S. declared former employment from Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD). K.F. declared paid lectures for Ferring. D.S. reports grants from MSD, Gedeon Richter and Ferring paid to his institution; consulting fee payments from MSD and Merck Serono paid to his institution; speaker honoraria from MSD, Gedeon Richter, Ferring Pharmaceuticals and Merck Serono paid to his institution. D.S. has also received travel and meeting support from MSD, Gedeon Richter, Ferring Pharmaceuticals and Merck Serono. No payments are related to present work. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NTR4108. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE 6 August 2013. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT 30 January 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva M E Balkenende
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Taghride Dahhan
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Catharina C M Beerendonk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Kathrin Fleischer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Dominic Stoop
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, UZ Brussel, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.,Department for Reproductive Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Annelies M E Bos
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis B Lambalk
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roel Schats
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jesper M J Smeenk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Leonie A Louwé
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid E P Cantineau
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Peter de Bruin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine C Linn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fulco van der Veen
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Madelon van Wely
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mariëtte Goddijn
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bae SY, Lee J, Lee JS, Yoon JS, Kim KS, Kim YS, Kim Z, Min JW, Shim EJ, Lee I, Lee MH, Park S. Prognosis of pregnancy after breast cancer diagnosis according to the type of treatment: A population-based study in Korea by the SMARTSHIP group. Breast 2022; 63:46-53. [PMID: 35299034 PMCID: PMC8927839 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds In this study, we evaluated the incidence and outcomes of pregnancy after breast cancer was diagnosed in women of childbearing age. Additionally, we evaluated the prognosis of patients who became pregnant after breast cancer, according to the treatment. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of women aged 20–45 years who were surgically treated for breast cancer between 2004 and 2014 using the Korean National Health Insurance database. The patients were classified into six groups according to the treatment. Propensity score matching was applied to the cohort to analyze the risk of breast cancer-associated mortality after pregnancy and childbirth. Results Of the 45,765 patients who had been newly diagnosed with breast cancer, 1826 (4%) became pregnant after breast cancer diagnosis. Among the pregnant group, the HR of the risk of death was 0.15 (95% CI, 0.06 to 0.36) for patients who became pregnant ≥49 months after the diagnosis. In patients who received endocrine therapy and chemotherapy, the pregnant group had better prognosis than the non-pregnant group. There was no significant difference between the pregnant group and the non-pregnant group in patients who received chemotherapy and trastuzumab with or without endocrine therapy. Conclusion The risk of death was low in women who became pregnant ≥49 months after the diagnosis of breast cancer. The prognosis of pregnant women was non-inferior to that of non-pregnant women, even in women who received trastuzumab. These findings provide reassurance to patients with HER2-positive cancer who are considering future pregnancy. The risk of death was low in women who became pregnant ≥49 months after the diagnosis of breast cancer. In patients who received endocrine therapy and chemotherapy, the pregnant group had better prognosis than the non-pregnant group. The prognosis of pregnant women was non-inferior to that of non-pregnant women, even in women who received trastuzumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soo Youn Bae
- Department of Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Republic of Korea
| | - Jihyoun Lee
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Sung Lee
- Clinical Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Sun Yoon
- Korea University, Department of Biostatistics, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ku Sang Kim
- Department of Surgery, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoo Seok Kim
- Department of Surgery, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
| | - Zisun Kim
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jun Won Min
- Department of Surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun-Jung Shim
- Department of Psychology, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Ilkyun Lee
- Department of Surgery, Catholic Kwandong University International St. Mary's Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Min Hyuk Lee
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sungmin Park
- Department of Surgery, Chungbuk National University Hospital, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju-si, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chen Y, Guan Z, Shen G. Naples prognostic score: a novel predictor of survival in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. Future Oncol 2022; 18:2655-2665. [PMID: 35592939 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-0212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The predictive significance of the Naples prognostic score (NPS) in HER2-positive breast cancer is unclear. Hence we sought to evaluate the relationship between NPS and the clinical outcomes in HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Methods: This study retrospectively collected and analyzed data from 173 HER2-positive breast cancer patients between August 2004 and February 2014. The Cox regression model was applied in univariate and multivariate statistical analysis. Results: In multivariate analysis, increased NPS score correlated significantly with poor overall survival (p = 0.001) and disease-free survival (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our findings may point to NPS being a novel and reliable prognostic score system with favorable predictive ability for HER2-positive breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuye Chen
- Department of Oncology, Zhuji People's Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Zhuji, Shaoxing City, 311800, China
| | - Zheming Guan
- Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang City, 261000, China
| | - Guo Shen
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Xiaoshan Hospital, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou City, 311202, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tesch ME, Partridge AH. Treatment of Breast Cancer in Young Adults. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2022; 42:1-12. [PMID: 35580291 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_360970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Although breast cancer is rare and understudied in adults age 40 and younger, recent epidemiologic data show an increasing incidence of breast cancer among young women in the United States and ongoing inferior long-term outcomes. Given breast cancers arising at a young age are more likely to present at advanced stages and to have aggressive biology, multimodal treatments are often indicated. Elevated local recurrence risks and greater propensity for germline cancer predisposition mutations can impact local therapy choices. Recently, escalated systemic therapy regimens for triple-negative breast cancer incorporating immunotherapy, de-escalated anti-HER2 therapy, and emerging targeted agents, including CDK4/6 inhibitors and PARP inhibitors, for early-stage disease may be employed in younger and older patients alike, with some special considerations. Prognostic genomic signatures can spare low-risk young women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy, but management of intermediate-risk patients remains controversial. Ovarian function suppression and extended endocrine therapy are improving outcomes in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, but treatment adherence is a particular problem for young patients. Young women may also face greater challenges in long-term survivorship, including impaired fertility, difficulties in psychosocial adjustment, and other treatment-related comorbidities. Consideration of these age-specific issues through dedicated multidisciplinary strategies is necessary for optimal care of young women with breast cancer.
Collapse
|
19
|
Update on Pregnancy Following Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment. Cancer J 2022; 28:176-182. [PMID: 35594464 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Survivorship has become a crucial component in breast cancer care. For women who have not completed their family planning, conceiving at the end of anticancer treatments should not be discouraged but might be challenging. Oncofertility counseling should be offered at the time of diagnosis to all patients, in order to inform them about the potential treatment-induced gonadotoxicity as well as the available strategies for fertility preservation, thus allowing to increase the chances of a future pregnancy. This article reports an updated overview on the current state of the art on pregnancy in women with prior breast cancer diagnosis and treatment, with a main focus on the issues faced by patients with history of hormone receptor-positive disease and BRCA carriers.
Collapse
|
20
|
Which Has a Greater Impact on the Recurrence in Young Breast Cancer Patients: Recent Childbirth or Recent Breastfeeding? Breast J 2022; 2022:5823867. [PMID: 35711888 PMCID: PMC9187285 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5823867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Revised: 02/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Purpose. This study explored the effects of recent childbirth and recent breastfeeding on the risk of recurrence in patients with postpartum breast cancer (PPBC). Materials and Methods. A bidirectional cohort study was conducted in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. 1013 young female breast cancer patients between May 2003 and October 2019 were enrolled. Breast cancer cases were grouped according to the time between giving birth or weaning and diagnosis. The end point of the analysis was disease-free survival (DFS). Results. Breast cancer patients diagnosed within 2 years after parturition showed more tumor characteristics that represented poor prognosis and remained at an increased risk for recurrence, even after adjusting for confounding factors (HR = 1.83,
). When the analysis was limited to patients with ER positive or histological grades I and II, they had a higher risk of recurrence. When weaning was used as the grouping node, patients diagnosed within 2 years after weaning did not show a higher risk of recurrence after adjustment, even when analysis was nearly limited to ER-positive patients. Conclusion. Recent reproductive history is an independent prognostic factor and seems to have a stronger impact on breast cancer with lower malignancy. In addition, the effect of recent childbirth on the recurrence of young breast cancer is significantly stronger than that of recent breastfeeding.
Collapse
|
21
|
Matar R, Crown A, Sevilimedu V, Goldfarb SB, Gemignani ML. Timing of Presentation and Outcomes of Women with Stage IV Pregnancy-Associated Breast Cancer (PABC). Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:1695-1702. [PMID: 34709494 PMCID: PMC9470501 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10901-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) and concurrent, or early development of, stage IV disease is uncommon. Given this rarity, and complexities surrounding pregnancy, data are limited regarding PABC treatment and outcomes. We evaluated oncologic, obstetric, and fetal outcomes of women with stage IV PABC in relation to presentation timing and treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS Our retrospective review of an institutional database identified women with stage IV PABC from 1998 to 2018. PABC was defined as diagnosis during pregnancy or ≤ 1 year postpartum. Clinicopathologic, treatment, and outcome variables were compared between women diagnosed during pregnancy versus postpartum. RESULTS We identified 77 women (median age 35 years; interquartile range [IQR] 32-37 years): 51 (66%) in the postpartum group and 26 (34%) in the pregnant group, including 9 with therapeutic or spontaneous abortion. Among 17 women who continued pregnancy, no obstetric or fetal complications were noted. Clinicopathologic and treatment variables did not differ between groups. Of 43 women dead from disease, 15 had triple negative (TN) tumors. Median overall survival (OS) of TN tumors was 14 months (range 5-39 months); OS was associated with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive tumors (p < 0.01). At 31 months (range 0-137 months) median follow-up, the 5-year OS was 34% (95% confidence interval 21-46%), and did not differ among pregnant and postpartum groups (p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS Women with stage IV TN PABC had high mortality rates despite multimodality therapy. Timing of presentation did not affect management decisions or OS, even for women who completed pregnancy. Further research to understand PABC biology, focusing on TN tumors, is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Regina Matar
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Varadan Sevilimedu
- Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Shari B. Goldfarb
- Breast Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Mary L. Gemignani
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Breast Cancer in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2022; 49:181-193. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2021.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
23
|
Gynecological Management of the Breast Cancer Survivor. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2022; 82:69-80. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
24
|
Suelmann BBM, Bakhuis CFJ, van Dooijeweert C, Verloop J, Zweemer R, Linn S, van der Wall E, van Diest PJ. Prognosis of pregnancy-associated breast cancer: inferior outcome in patients diagnosed during second and third gestational trimesters and lactation. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 192:175-189. [PMID: 35039951 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06471-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pregnancy-associated breast cancer, although most commonly defined as breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy or ≤1 year following delivery, knows a variety of definitions, likely related to the diversity of reported clinicopathological features and prognosis. More insight into the different breast cancer subgroups during pregnancy, time after delivery and the postpartum period is therefore warranted. METHODS Patients with breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy or ≤6 months postdelivery were included, and subdivided according to gestational trimester, and postpartum patients according to lactational status. Subgroups were compared to matched non-PABC patients, to investigate the influence of pregnancy and lactation on clinical course and outcome. RESULTS Overall, 662 PABC patients were included (median age 34 years, median follow-up 6.5 years). PABC patients showed an advanced stage at diagnosis and an inferior 5-years-OS (75.4% vs. 83.2%, p = 0.000) compared to 1392 matched non-PABC patients. In subgroup analysis, first trimester PABC patients showed a significantly lower tumor size and stage as compared to other trimesters. Patients diagnosed during the first trimester and postpartum non-lactating patients had a relatively good OS (81.3% and 77.9%, respectively) versus patients diagnosed during the second and third trimesters and during lactation (OS 60.0%, 64.9% and 65.6%, respectively, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION In this large (uniquely specified) PABC cohort, an inferior outcome was found for patients diagnosed within the second and third gestational trimesters and during lactation. These findings indicate that PABC is clinically a heterogeneous group of breast cancer patients that should be redefined based on trimester of diagnosis and lactational status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B B M Suelmann
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 95500, 2509 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - C F J Bakhuis
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 95500, 2509 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - C van Dooijeweert
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J Verloop
- Department of Breast Cancer Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R Zweemer
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - S Linn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute (AVL-NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E van der Wall
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 95500, 2509 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zhang M, Zhou J, Wang L. Breast cancer and pregnancy: Why special considerations prior to treatment are needed in multidisciplinary care. Biosci Trends 2021; 15:276-282. [PMID: 34556594 DOI: 10.5582/bst.2021.01187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy poses ethical and professional challenges. Clinical management of that condition should ensure the safety of both the mother and fetus. Clinical trials on breast cancer exclude pregnant women, so sufficient evidence with which to formulate guidelines for the management of these patients is lacking. Failing to undergo a breast examination during pregnancy, breast symptoms explained by physiological changes such as pregnancy, and unnecessary abortions after the diagnosis of breast cancer lead to worse outcomes for these patients. Multidisciplinary teams including breast surgeons, obstetricians, radiologists, pathologists, and anesthesiologists need to make an early diagnosis and comprehensively evaluate patients in different gestational weeks and with different stages of breast cancer in order to optimize outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingdi Zhang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jing Zhou
- Laboratory for Reproductive Immunology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,The Academy of Integrative Medicine of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Female Reproductive Endocrine-related Diseases, Shanghai, China
| | - Ling Wang
- Laboratory for Reproductive Immunology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,The Academy of Integrative Medicine of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Female Reproductive Endocrine-related Diseases, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Yang ZC, Luo MJ, Liu LL, Cai MY, Liang YJ, Chen QY, Tang LQ, Mai HQ. Alpha-fetoprotein-producing recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A case report. SAGE Open Med Case Rep 2021; 9:2050313X211057704. [PMID: 34777811 PMCID: PMC8573489 DOI: 10.1177/2050313x211057704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Alpha-fetoprotein hardly increased due to nasopharyngeal cancer. In this article, we reported a 57-year-old male nasopharyngeal carcinoma patient who had posttreatment subscapular metastasis with high serum alpha-fetoprotein but negative plasma Epstein–Barr virus DNA. Pathology results indicated that the scapular mass was undifferentiated non-keratinizing carcinoma originated in the nasopharynx. Moreover, no liver lesion was detected by imaging examination. In view of the positive alpha-fetoprotein and alpha-fetoprotein messenger RNA staining result in the right scapular mass fine needle aspiration biopsy sample, we considered the diagnosis of alpha-fetoprotein-producing nasopharyngeal carcinoma that had never been reported before.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen-Chong Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mei-Juan Luo
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Li-Li Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mu-Yan Cai
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yu-Jing Liang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qiu-Yan Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lin-Quan Tang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hai-Qiang Mai
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Yotsumoto D, Sagara Y, Kumamaru H, Niikura N, Miyata H, Kanbayashi C, Tsuda H, Yamamoto Y, Aogi K, Kubo M, Tamura K, Hayashi N, Miyashita M, Kadoya T, Saji S, Toi M, Imoto S, Jinno H. Trends in adjuvant therapy after breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ of breast: a retrospective cohort study using the National Breast Cancer Registry of Japan. Breast Cancer 2021; 29:1-8. [PMID: 34665435 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-021-01307-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiotherapy (RT) and endocrine therapy (ET) are standard treatment options after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). We investigated the national patterns of adjuvant therapy use after BCS for DCIS in Japan. METHODS We obtained relevant data of patients diagnosed with DCIS undergoing surgery and treated with BCS between 2014 and 2016 from the Japanese Breast Cancer Registry database. The relationship between the clinicopathologic, institutional, and regional factors, and adjuvant treatment was examined using multivariable analyses. RESULTS We identified 9516 patients who underwent BCS for DCIS. Overall, 23% received no adjuvant treatment, 71% received RT, 32% received ET, and 26% received combination therapy. The percentages of patients who received ET and combination therapy in 2016 were significantly lower [odds ratio (OR): 0.71, 0.77, respectively] than in 2014. The proportion of RT was low among young or elderly patients (OR: 0.75, 0.44, respectively) and in non-certified facilities (OR: 0.56). The proportion of ET was high in non-certified facilities (OR: 1.58) and among patients with positive margins (OR: 1.62). Combination therapy was higher among patients with positive margins (OR: 1.53). CONCLUSIONS Our study found a distinct adjuvant treatment pattern after BCS for DCIS depending on clinicopathologic factors, year, age, which indicate that physicians provide individualized treatment according to the background of the patients and the biology of DCIS. The facilities and regions remain significant factors of influencing adjuvant treatment pattern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisuke Yotsumoto
- Department of Breast Surgery, Sagara Hospital Miyazaki, Miyazaki Hakuaikai Medical Corporation, Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Yasuaki Sagara
- Department of Breast Surgery, Sagara Hospital, Hakuaikai Medical Corporation, 3-28 Matsubara Kagoshima City, Kagoshima, 892-0833, Japan.
| | - Hiraku Kumamaru
- Department of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoki Niikura
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Miyata
- Department of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Chizuko Kanbayashi
- Department of Breast Oncology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Tsuda
- Department of Basic Pathology, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yutaka Yamamoto
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Kenjiro Aogi
- Department of Breast Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan
| | - Makoto Kubo
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kenji Tamura
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shimane University Hospital, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
| | - Naoki Hayashi
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Minoru Miyashita
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgical Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Takayuki Kadoya
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Shigehira Saji
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Masakazu Toi
- Breast Cancer Unit, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University Hospital Breast Surgery, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shigeru Imoto
- Department of Breast Surgery, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Jinno
- Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Clinical outcomes and prognostic biomarkers among pregnant, post-partum and nulliparous women with breast cancer: a prospective cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 189:797-806. [PMID: 34318391 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06327-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare clinical-pathologic characteristics and outcomes of pregnancy-associated, post-partum (PP) and nulliparous (NP) breast cancer (BC) patients and explore mediators of the poor prognosis associated with post-partum BC. METHODS A prospective database of 233 women ≤ 40 years of age diagnosed with BC between February 2008 and January 2015 was analysed. Clinical-pathologic characteristics and outcomes among pregnant, PP and NP patients were compared using chi-square or Kruskal-Wallis tests. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate disease-free survival (DFS), distant DFS and overall survival (OS). Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. Univariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate factors that were potentially prognostic for the clinical outcomes of interest; a multivariable Cox model was constructed using a forward stepwise selection process. Androgen receptor (AR), GATA3, PDL1 status and the presence/absence of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were assessed when possible. Pre-treatment neutrophil and lymphocyte counts were abstracted retrospectively. Statistical significance was defined as a p value ≤ 0.05. RESULTS Women ≤ 2 years PP had a numerically higher incidence of lymph node-positive and high-grade disease and were significantly more likely to have estrogen receptor-negative BC compared to NP controls. With a median follow-up of 7.2 years, increasingly poor outcomes were observed among NP (longest OS), > 2 years PP, ≤ 2 years PP and pregnant (shortest OS) patients, but these differences were not statistically significant. The ≤ 2 years PP group had significantly lower AR expression, a strong trend toward higher PDL1 expression and a higher expression of stromal TILs compared to NP women. CONCLUSIONS PPBC patients had numerically lower DFS and OS compared to NP controls. Higher PDL1 and stromal TILs in PPBC suggest that adjuvant immunotherapy may be effective in the post-partum BC subgroup.
Collapse
|
29
|
Lambertini M, Blondeaux E, Bruzzone M, Perachino M, Anderson RA, de Azambuja E, Poorvu PD, Kim HJ, Villarreal-Garza C, Pistilli B, Vaz-Luis I, Saura C, Ruddy KJ, Franzoi MA, Sertoli C, Ceppi M, Azim HA, Amant F, Demeestere I, Del Mastro L, Partridge AH, Pagani O, Peccatori FA. Pregnancy After Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:3293-3305. [PMID: 34197218 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.00535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Many patients and physicians remain concerned about the potential detrimental effects of pregnancy after breast cancer (BC) in terms of reproductive outcomes and maternal safety. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at providing updated evidence on these topics. METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies including patients with a pregnancy after BC (PROSPERO number CRD42020158324). Likelihood of pregnancy after BC, their reproductive outcomes, and maternal safety were assessed. Pooled relative risks, odds ratios (ORs), and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were calculated using random effects models. RESULTS Of 6,462 identified records, 39 were included involving 8,093,401 women from the general population and 112,840 patients with BC of whom 7,505 had a pregnancy after diagnosis. BC survivors were significantly less likely to have a subsequent pregnancy compared with the general population (relative risk, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.49). Risks of caesarean section (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.25), low birth weight (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.31 to 1.73), preterm birth (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.88), and small for gestational age (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.33) were significantly higher in BC survivors, particularly in those with previous chemotherapy exposure, compared with the general population. No significantly increased risk of congenital abnormalities or other reproductive complications were observed. Compared to patients with BC without subsequent pregnancy, those with a pregnancy had better disease-free survival (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.89) and overall survival (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.68). Similar results were observed after correcting for potential confounders and irrespective of patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, pregnancy outcome, and timing of pregnancy. CONCLUSION These results provide reassuring evidence on the safety of conceiving in BC survivors. Patients' pregnancy desire should be considered a crucial component of their survivorship care plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Eva Blondeaux
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Breast Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Marco Bruzzone
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Marta Perachino
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Richard A Anderson
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Evandro de Azambuja
- Department of Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Philip D Poorvu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston MA
| | - Hee Jeong Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Cynthia Villarreal-Garza
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza Garcia, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.,Department of Breast Tumors, Instituo Nacional de Cancerologia, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Barbara Pistilli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Ines Vaz-Luis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Cristina Saura
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital (HUVH), Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Chiara Sertoli
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Marcello Ceppi
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Hatem A Azim
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza Garcia, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
| | - Frederic Amant
- Netherlands Cancer Institute and Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Demeestere
- Fertility Clinic, CUB-Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lucia Del Mastro
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Breast Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston MA
| | - Olivia Pagani
- Geneva University Hospitals, European School of Oncology, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Fedro A Peccatori
- Fertility and Procreation Unit, Gynecologic Oncology Department, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Fertility Preservation and Breast Cancer. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-021-00420-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
31
|
Guérin S, Joste M, Khene ZE, Rousseau C, Brousse S, Nyangoh Timoh K, Levêque J, Lavoué V. [External validation of nomogram for the prediction of recurrences of pregnancy-associated breast cancer]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 49:844-849. [PMID: 33892161 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2021.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Diagnosis and therapeutics are challenging in pregnancy-related breast cancer and a multidisciplinary approach is therefore essential. A nomogram predictive of recurrence at 36 months of PABC has recently been developed, the aim was to evaluate it on an independent cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a monocentric retrospective study including all patients with PABC between January 2004 and March 2018. A Kaplan-Meier method was used for the analysis of recurrence-free survival. Nomogram performance was analysed on 3 indicators: discrimination by a receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC), calibration and net clinical benefit by a decision curve analysis. RESULTS Forty-one patients have been included. The survival rate was 83 % at 3 years. The nomogram showed acceptable discrimination capacities on receiver-operator characteristic analysis (c-index: 0.78). Decision-curve analysis showed a positive net-benefit for relapse probability ranges between 5 % and 35 %. CONCLUSION The performance of this prediction model is acceptable but the net clinical benefit low. In conclusion, prediction of recurrence remains challenging with a continued need for more precise tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Guérin
- Département de gynécologie obstétrique et de la reproduction, centre hospitalier universitaire de Rennes, France.
| | - M Joste
- Département de gynécologie obstétrique et de la reproduction, centre hospitalier universitaire de Rennes, France
| | - Z E Khene
- Centre d'investigation clinique, centre hospitalier universitaire de Rennes, France
| | - C Rousseau
- Centre d'investigation clinique, centre hospitalier universitaire de Rennes, France
| | - S Brousse
- Département de gynécologie obstétrique et de la reproduction, centre hospitalier universitaire de Rennes, France
| | - K Nyangoh Timoh
- Département de gynécologie obstétrique et de la reproduction, centre hospitalier universitaire de Rennes, France
| | - J Levêque
- Département de gynécologie obstétrique et de la reproduction, centre hospitalier universitaire de Rennes, France
| | - V Lavoué
- Département de gynécologie obstétrique et de la reproduction, centre hospitalier universitaire de Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kauffman RP, Young C, Castracane VD. Perils of prolonged ovarian suppression and hypoestrogenism in the treatment of breast cancer: Is the risk of treatment worse than the risk of recurrence? Mol Cell Endocrinol 2021; 525:111181. [PMID: 33529690 DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2021.111181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Revised: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Premenopausal breast cancer is usually estrogen receptor positive, and hence, prolonged ovarian suppression by medical or surgical means to prevent recurrence has become standard of management to improve disease-free survival. Ten-year adjuvant tamoxifen therapy is associated with 3.5% fewer recurrences compared to five years. The SOFT trial demonstrated small but statistically significant incremental improvements in long-term disease-free survival by the addition of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog treatment (triptorelin) to an aromatase inhibitor (exemestane). Profound hypoestrogenism in the premenopausal age group may not be well tolerated due to a host of bothersome side effects (primarily vasomotor symptoms, musculoskeletal complaints, genitourinary syndrome of menopause, and mood disorders). Prolonged hypoestrogenism in younger women is associated with premature development of cardiovascular disease, bone loss, cognitive decline, and all-cause mortality. This paper explores multi-system consequences of prolonged hypoestrogenism in premenopausal women derived from studies of women with and without breast cancer. Pretreatment counseling in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer should emphasize the benefit of prolonged estrogen suppression on breast cancer recurrence and established risks of lifelong hypoestrogenism on quality of life and all-cause mortality. Future genomic research may help identify the best candidates for extended ovarian suppression to avoid treating many women when only a minority benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert P Kauffman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, School of Medicine, 1400 S. Coulter Rd, Amarillo, TX, 79106, USA.
| | - Christina Young
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, School of Medicine, 1400 S. Coulter Rd, Amarillo, TX, 79106, USA
| | - V Daniel Castracane
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, School of Medicine, 1400 S. Coulter Rd, Amarillo, TX, 79106, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Conception after chemotherapy: post-chemotherapy method of conception and pregnancy outcomes in breast cancer patients. J Assist Reprod Genet 2021; 38:1755-1765. [PMID: 33740176 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02133-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE As the paradigm shifts towards improving cancer survivorship, an important concern for reproductive-aged women diagnosed with cancer is how their disease and its treatment will affect their future fertility. We sought to characterize pregnancy attempts and outcomes in breast cancer patients following chemotherapy. METHODS We conducted a prospective cohort study of women diagnosed with breast cancer seen between 2010 and 2019. A questionnaire was administered following cancer treatment with questions regarding oncologic and reproductive history and attempts and method of conception. RESULTS Of 181 participants, 46 (25.4%) attempted to conceive following chemotherapy. Thirty-five patients (76.1%) had return of ovarian function. Of those, 34 patients (mean age 32.8 years) first attempted to conceive by intercourse, and 22 (64.7%) became pregnant, resulting in 17 live births. Of the remaining 12 who did not successfully conceive through intercourse, eight went on to try other methods, resulting in five additional pregnancies and one live birth. Twelve patients (mean age 34.6 years) proceeded directly to ART; of those, eight (66.7%) became pregnant, resulting in six live births. CONCLUSION In breast cancer patients with return of ovarian function after chemotherapy, half were able to conceive by intercourse alone. In order to maximize reproductive potential in patients who have return of ovarian function, providers should offer natural conception as a reasonable option prior to the use of cryopreserved tissue. For those who did not attempt to conceive on their own, the use of pre-treatment cryopreserved eggs or embryos had a high likelihood of success.
Collapse
|
34
|
Lala PK, Nandi P, Hadi A, Halari C. A crossroad between placental and tumor biology: What have we learnt? Placenta 2021; 116:12-30. [PMID: 33958236 DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2021.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2021] [Revised: 02/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Placenta in certain species including the human has evolved as a highly invasive tumor-like organ invading the uterus aned its vasculature to derive oxygen and nutrients for the fetus and exchange waste products. While several excellent reviews have been written comparing hemochorial placentation with tumors, no comprehensive review is available dealing with mechanistic insights into what makes them different, and what tumor biologists can learn from placental biologists, and vice versa. In this review, we analyze the structure-function relationship of the human placenta, emphasizing the functional need of the spatio-temporally orchestrated trophoblast invasiveness for fetal development and growth, and pathological consequences of aberrant invasiveness for fetal and maternal health. We then analyze similarities and differences between the placenta and invasive tumors in terms of hallmarks of cancer, some key molecules regulating their invasive functions, and how placental cancers (choriocarcinomas) or other cancers become refractory or even addicted to these invasion-restraining molecules. We cite in vitro models of human trophoblast and choriocarcinoma cell lines utilized to study mechanisms in normal placental development as well as those responsible for tumor progression. We discuss the pathobiology of hyper-invasive placentas and show thattrophoblastic neoplasias are a unique and heterogeneous class of tumors. We delve into the questions as to why metastasis from other organs rarely occurs at the placental site and whether pregnancy makes the mother more or less vulnerable to cancer-related morbidity/mortality. We attempt to compare trophoblast stem cells and cancer stem cells. Finally, we leave the readers with some thoughts as foods of future investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peeyush K Lala
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Westernat Ontario, London, Ontario, N6A5C1, Canada; Associate Scientist, Children's Health Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6C2V5.
| | - Pinki Nandi
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Westernat Ontario, London, Ontario, N6A5C1, Canada.
| | - Ali Hadi
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Westernat Ontario, London, Ontario, N6A5C1, Canada.
| | - Chidambra Halari
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Westernat Ontario, London, Ontario, N6A5C1, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Li Y, Zhang Y, Wang S, Lu S, Song Y, Liu H. The Effect of Subsequent Pregnancy on Prognosis in Young Breast Cancer Patients (≤35 Years Old) According to Hormone Receptor Status. Cancer Manag Res 2021; 13:1505-1515. [PMID: 33623430 PMCID: PMC7894832 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s290566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose We aimed to examine the effect of pregnancy on prognosis in young breast cancer (YBC) patients with hormone receptor (HR) positive after surgery and the safety of interrupting endocrine therapy (ET). Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed in patients who became pregnant after BC surgery under the age of 35 and were matched (1:4) to nonpregnant patients from 2006 to 2014. The primary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in HR-positive BC patients, and the secondary endpoints were DFS and OS in HR-negative BC patients and the whole population. Subgroup analyses included the DFS of patients who became pregnant within 5 years after surgery and DFS according to the ET interval time (≤ 30 months v > 30 months) in the pregnant group. Results A total of 1323 YBC patients were collected in our study, which included 68 pregnant patients and 264 matched nonpregnant patients. There were no statistically significant differences in DFS and OS among HR-positive patients (P=0.657, P=0.250, respectively) and the whole population (P=0.058, P=0.152, respectively). A BC pregnancy interval ≤ 5 years showed a better DFS (P=0.042), and an ET interval ≤ 30 months had a worse DFS (P = 0.01). Conclusion This study did not observe a worse prognosis in patients with HR-positive disease who became pregnant after BC surgery, and an ET interval less than 30 months in pregnant patients led to a worse outcome. Patients were able to become pregnant within 5 years after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Li
- The Second Surgical Department of Breast Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuhan Zhang
- The Second Surgical Department of Breast Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - Shuaibing Wang
- Oncology Department, China National Petroleum Corporation Central Hospital, Langfang, Hebei Province, 065000, People's Republic of China
| | - Su Lu
- The Second Surgical Department of Breast Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - Yixuan Song
- The Second Surgical Department of Breast Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - Hong Liu
- The Second Surgical Department of Breast Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Dur-E-Shahwar, Irfan S, Islam ZS, Sheikh L. Impact of pregnancy on cancer survival: Experience at a tertiary care hospital. Pak J Med Sci 2021; 37:335-338. [PMID: 33679909 PMCID: PMC7931303 DOI: 10.12669/pjms.37.2.3525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the overall survival of pregnant women diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy or became pregnant thereafter. Methods: A retrospective medical record review of 90 patients who were diagnosed with cancer when pregnant or who became pregnant thereafter between 1996 and 2015 in Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi. Results: A total of 90 patients were analyzed. The malignancies that expectant mothers had were, breast cancer 38 (42.2%), hematological cancers 29 (32.2%), brain cancer 10 (11.1%), and other malignancies 13 (14.4%) that included thyroid cancers, gestational trophoblastic disease and synovial tumor of foot. We observed only four deaths out of 90 patients and mean survival time in pregnant patients with malignancies was 17.98 years [CI 16.35-19.31]. Conclusions: The diagnosis of most cancer types before or during pregnancy does not influence on overall survival of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dur-E-Shahwar
- Dr. Dur-e-Shahwar FCPS. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Sheikh Irfan
- Dr. Sheikh Irfan, Phd Fellow, MPH, MHP, MBBS. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Zaheena Shamsul Islam
- Dr. Zaheena Shamsul Islam, FCPS. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Lumaan Sheikh
- Dr. Lumaan sheikh, FRCOG, FCPS. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Fredriksson A, Rosenberg E, Einbeigi Z, Bergh C, Strandell A. Gonadotrophin stimulation and risk of relapse in breast cancer. Hum Reprod Open 2021; 2021:hoaa061. [PMID: 33501382 PMCID: PMC7810817 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Revised: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Is gonadotrophin stimulation as part of IVF associated with an increased risk of relapse in breast cancer? SUMMARY ANSWER Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in connection with IVF in women with previous breast cancer was not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer relapse. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women worldwide and the leading cause of cancer death among females. The use of COS with gonadotrophins with subsequent cryopreservation of oocytes or embryos in order to enhance the chances of pregnancy after cancer treatment is the current most established fertility preservation method for women with breast cancer. To date, there are only a few small retrospective hospital-based controlled studies evaluating the risk of breast cancer relapse in patients undergoing fertility preservation with or without COS, showing no evident risk of relapse in breast cancer after the use of gonadotoxic agents. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This was a retrospective, population-based cohort study comprising 5857 women with previous breast cancer of whom 337 were exposed to COS. Exposure (COS) and outcomes (relapse and death) were identified for all patients from 2005 to 2014 by assessing the National Quality Register for Assisted Reproduction, the Swedish Medical Birth Register, the National Patient Register, the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register, the Swedish Cause of Death Register, the National Breast Cancer Register and the Swedish Cancer Register. Matching according to set criteria was possible for 334 women, who constituted the control group. A total of 274 women had undergone IVF after completing breast cancer treatment and 63 women had undergone COS for fertility preservation at the time of breast cancer diagnosis. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Women aged 20–44 years previously diagnosed with breast cancer and exposed to COS were matched for age at breast cancer diagnosis ±5 years, tumour size and lymph node involvement with a non-exposed control group, including women with known T- and N-stages. In a subsequent analysis, the matched cohort was assessed by also including women with unknown T- and N-stages. A secondary analysis comprised the entire non-matched cohort, including all women with known T- and N-stages. Also here, a subsequent analysis included women with missing data for T- and N-stages. The risk of relapse in breast cancer was estimated as crude hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CI using Cox proportional hazards models in the primary and secondary analyses where T- and N-stages were known: otherwise the risks of relapse were only given descriptively. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE In the primary matched analysis, relapse occurred in 20 of 126 women exposed to COS (15.9%) compared with 39 of 126 (31.0%) in the control cohort (HR = 0.70; 95% CI 0.39–1.45; P = 0.22). In the subsequent analysis, also including women with unknown T- and N-stages, relapse occurred in 27 of 337 (8.0%) women having undergone COS compared with 71/334 (21.3%) among the non-exposed. In the secondary adjusted analysis, relapse occurred in 20 of 126 (15.9%) exposed women and in 918 of 3729 (24.6%) non-exposed women (HR = 0.81; 95% CI 0.49–1.33; P = 0.70). In the subsequent analysis, including unknown T- and N-stages, relapse occurred in 27 of 337 (8.0%) women in the exposed group and 1176 of 5520 (21.3%) in the non-exposed cohort. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION A substantial degree of missing data on important prognostic variables was a limitation, particularly when analysing the total cohort. Furthermore, data on confounding factors, such as BMI, were not completely covered. Another limitation was that a pre-specified variable for relapse was not in use for the majority of the National Breast Cancer Register. Furthermore, the follow-up time from available register data (2005–2014) is rather short. Finally, we cannot be sure whether the prognostic information from receptor status, showing a lower incidence in the exposed group, is representative. Information on T- and N-stages was missing in more than half of the patients. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS In this large, retrospective, matched cohort study, we found no increased risk of relapse in breast cancer among women who had been exposed to gonadotrophins as part of IVF. This is reassuring but might be confounded by the selection of a group of women with a more favourable prognosis than those not undergoing IVF. The present study strengthens previous findings by being large, national and register based. Its results are applicable to women undergoing fertility preservation as well as to those undergoing regular IVF treatment. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) Supported in part by grants from the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils the ALF-agreement (ALFGBG-720291), The Assar Gabrielsson Fund (FB 15-20), The Breast Cancer Fund and the Swedish Association of Local authorities and Regions, SKR. There are no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION N/A
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Fredriksson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, SE 413 45, Sweden
| | - E Rosenberg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, SE 413 45, Sweden
| | - Z Einbeigi
- Department of Medicine, Southern Älvsborg Hospital, Borås, SE 501 82, Sweden
| | - C Bergh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, SE 413 45, Sweden
| | - A Strandell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, SE 413 45, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Cathcart-Rake EJ, Ruddy KJ, Bleyer A, Johnson RH. Breast Cancer in Adolescent and Young Adult Women Under the Age of 40 Years. JCO Oncol Pract 2021; 17:305-313. [PMID: 33449828 DOI: 10.1200/op.20.00793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
In the United States, one in 196 women is diagnosed with breast cancer under the age of 40 years. Adolescents and young adults (AYAs), of age 15-39 years at diagnosis, experience a number of unique challenges when confronting breast cancer. The incidence of invasive breast cancer has increased among AYA women in the United States since 2004, and most of this change is due to an increase in young women diagnosed with distant disease. AYAs are more likely than older women to present with aggressive subtypes and advanced disease, and they often require systemic staging at diagnosis. Clinical trials should be considered whenever possible, particularly in AYAs with locally advanced or metastatic disease at diagnosis and those with disease progression or recurrence. A significant proportion of AYAs carry germline cancer predisposition mutations, which necessitates prompt genetic testing for all AYAs at diagnosis and may influence choice of local therapy. Suppression of ovarian function, as an adjunct to chemotherapy, may improve breast cancer survival in AYAs. To provide optimal care for AYAs with breast cancer, clinicians should engage multidisciplinary teams that offer fertility preservation, genetic counseling, physical and occupational therapy, nutrition, and psychosocial support, along with medical expertise in tailoring cancer-directed therapy and symptom management toward young women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Archie Bleyer
- St Charles Health System, Central Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Affiliation(s)
- Hatem A Azim
- Hatem A. Azim Jr, MD, PhD, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Centro de Cancer de Mama del Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico; Lieveke Ameye, MSc, PhD and Marianne Paesmans, MSc, Data Centre, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; and Matteo Lambertini, MD, PhD, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova; and Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Lieveke Ameye
- Hatem A. Azim Jr, MD, PhD, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Centro de Cancer de Mama del Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico; Lieveke Ameye, MSc, PhD and Marianne Paesmans, MSc, Data Centre, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; and Matteo Lambertini, MD, PhD, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova; and Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Marianne Paesmans
- Hatem A. Azim Jr, MD, PhD, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Centro de Cancer de Mama del Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico; Lieveke Ameye, MSc, PhD and Marianne Paesmans, MSc, Data Centre, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; and Matteo Lambertini, MD, PhD, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova; and Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Hatem A. Azim Jr, MD, PhD, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Centro de Cancer de Mama del Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico; Lieveke Ameye, MSc, PhD and Marianne Paesmans, MSc, Data Centre, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; and Matteo Lambertini, MD, PhD, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova; and Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
[Safe pregnancy after breast cancer treatment in patients carrying BRCA mutations?]. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 197:159-161. [PMID: 33313957 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01726-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
41
|
Li S, Hsu Y, Yen C, Chen Y, Wu P, Chang K, Li C, Chen T. Maternal survival of patients with pregnancy-associated cancers in Taiwan - A national population-based study. Cancer Med 2020; 9:9431-9444. [PMID: 33099894 PMCID: PMC7774740 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Revised: 10/03/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Pregnancy-associated cancer (PAC), defined as cancers diagnosed during pregnancy or the first year after delivery, affects one to two in every 1000 pregnancies. Although PAC is expected to be a growing issue, information about PAC in the Asian population is still scarce. Women with cancer diagnosed at the age of 16-49 years between 2001 and 2015 were selected from the Taiwan Cancer Registry and linked with the National Birth Reporting Database to identify PAC patients. We compared the overall survival of patients with PAC to patients without pregnancy. Among 126,646 female cancer patients of childbearing age, 512 were diagnosed during pregnancy, and 2151 during the first postpartum year. Breast cancer was the most common PAC (N = 755, 28%). Compared with patients without pregnancy in the control group, patients with cancers diagnosed during pregnancy and the first postpartum year generally had more advanced stages (odds ratio 1.35 and 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.77 and 1.18-1.57, respectively). For all cancer types combined and controlled for the stage, age, and year of diagnosis, patients with PAC had similar overall survival with those in the control group, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.07 (95% CI 0.80-1.41) for the pregnancy group and HR 1.02 (95% CI 0.88-1.18) for the postpartum group. The diagnosis of breast cancer during the first postpartum year was linked with shorter survival (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.05-1.72). In contrast, patients with postpartum lymphoma (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.02-0.79) and cervical cancer (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.20-0.82) had better prognosis. In general, the diagnosis of cancer during pregnancy or the first postpartum year does not affect the survival of patients with most cancer types. Exceptions include the worse prognosis of postpartum breast cancer and the better outcome of postpartum lymphoma and cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sin‐Syue Li
- Division of Hematology / Oncology, Department of Internal MedicineNational Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of MedicineNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan
| | - Ya‐Ting Hsu
- Division of Hematology / Oncology, Department of Internal MedicineNational Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan
| | - Chih‐Chieh Yen
- Division of Hematology / Oncology, Department of Internal MedicineNational Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan
| | - Ying‐Wen Chen
- Division of Hematology / Oncology, Department of Internal MedicineNational Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan
| | - Pei‐Ying Wu
- Department of Obstetrics & GynecologyNational Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan
| | - Kung‐Chao Chang
- Department of PathologyNational Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan
| | - Chung‐Yi Li
- Department and Graduate Institute of Public Health, College of MedicineNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan
| | - Tsai‐Yun Chen
- Division of Hematology / Oncology, Department of Internal MedicineNational Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Boudy AS, Ferrier C, Selleret L, Zilberman S, Arfi A, Sussfeld J, Gligorov J, Richard S, Bendifallah S, Chabbert-Buffet N, Touboul C, Daraï E. Prognosis of HER2-positive pregnancy-associated breast cancer: Analysis from the French CALG (Cancer Associé à La Grossesse) network. Breast 2020; 54:311-318. [PMID: 33271423 PMCID: PMC7711283 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Revised: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The prevalence of pregnancy-associated breast cancer is increasing. HER2-positive breast cancers typically have a poor prognosis. The objective of our study was to compare the prognosis of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy (HER2-positive BCP) to young women diagnosed with HER2-positive breast cancer outside of pregnancy (HER2 non-BCP). METHODS Data of patients managed for invasive breast carcinoma between January 2005 and 2020 were retrospectively collected from the database of Tenon University Hospital (Paris, France), part of the "Cancer lié à la Grossesse" network. RESULTS Fifty-one patients with HER2-positive BCP were matched on age at diagnosis with 51 HER2-positive non-BCP patients. Locally advanced disease with axillary lymph node involvement were frequent. Tumors were frequently aggressive with high grade (p = 0.57) and high Ki67 (p = 0.15). Among the HER2-positive BCP patients, the mean term at diagnosis was 19.3 week of gestation (WG). Eighty-four percent of the patients continued their pregnancy with a mean term at delivery of 34.2WG. Chemotherapy modalities differed between the two groups: neoadjuvant chemotherapy was more frequent in the HER2-positive BCP group (p = 0.03) and adjuvant chemotherapy more frequent in the HER2 non-BCP group (p = 0.009). The recurrence rate was 10% (n = 5) and 18% (n = 9) in the HER2-positive BCP and HER2 non-BCP groups, respectively, p = 0.25. Breast cancer-free survival was poorer in the HER2-positive BCP group with earlier recurrence, p = 0.008. No difference in type of recurrence was found between the groups (p = 0.58). CONCLUSION This matched case-control study implies that patients with HER2-positive BCP still have a poorer prognosis than non-pregnant HER-positive patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Sophie Boudy
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne University, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), France; Centre CALG (Cancer Associé à La Grossesse), France.
| | - Clément Ferrier
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne University, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), France; Centre CALG (Cancer Associé à La Grossesse), France
| | - Lise Selleret
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne University, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), France; Centre CALG (Cancer Associé à La Grossesse), France
| | - Sonia Zilberman
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne University, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), France; Centre CALG (Cancer Associé à La Grossesse), France
| | - Alexandra Arfi
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne University, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), France; Centre CALG (Cancer Associé à La Grossesse), France
| | - Julie Sussfeld
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne University, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), France; Centre CALG (Cancer Associé à La Grossesse), France
| | - Joseph Gligorov
- Centre CALG (Cancer Associé à La Grossesse), France; Department of Oncology, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne Université, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), France; UMRS-938 4, Faculté de Médecine Sorbonne Université, France
| | - Sandrine Richard
- Centre CALG (Cancer Associé à La Grossesse), France; Department of Oncology, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne Université, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), France; UMRS-938 4, Faculté de Médecine Sorbonne Université, France
| | - Sofiane Bendifallah
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne University, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), France; Centre CALG (Cancer Associé à La Grossesse), France; UMRS-938 4, Faculté de Médecine Sorbonne Université, France
| | - Nathalie Chabbert-Buffet
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne University, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), France; Centre CALG (Cancer Associé à La Grossesse), France; UMRS-938 4, Faculté de Médecine Sorbonne Université, France
| | - Cyril Touboul
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne University, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), France; Centre CALG (Cancer Associé à La Grossesse), France; UMRS-938 4, Faculté de Médecine Sorbonne Université, France
| | - Emile Daraï
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne University, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), France; Centre CALG (Cancer Associé à La Grossesse), France; UMRS-938 4, Faculté de Médecine Sorbonne Université, France
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Shah AN, Luck M, Goldman K, Gradishar W. Addressing Fertility: an Essential Aspect of Comprehensive Care for Young Patients with Breast Cancer. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-020-00396-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
44
|
Zhang Y, Dian L, Wei X, Huang J, Sun Y, Song X, Yang C, Kang M, Ou A, Chen Q, Xu R. Physicians' attitudes towards reproduction in young patients with early breast cancer in China. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 184:567-583. [PMID: 32779035 PMCID: PMC7599152 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05854-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As more young patients with breast cancer undergo treatments and obtain good prognoses, the issue of postoperative reproduction in breast cancer patients has attracted more attention. METHODS We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional survey of 2000 breast cancer-associated physicians using a 24-items questionnaire adapted from prior guides. Then we used a multivariable linear regression model to confirm independent associations between the propensity of physicians' attitudes toward reproduction and physicians' specific demographic characteristics. RESULTS A total of 911/1249 (72.93%) eligible physicians completed the questionnaire. Regarding the most concerning topic of whether breast cancer patients could conceive, 65 (7.1%) physicians having low and 457 (50.2%) physicians having high propensity for recommending reproduction. For ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) after surgery and radiotherapy, 599 (65.8%) physicians did not agree with the recommendation to conceive. 231 (25.4%) highly agree with the recommendation of reproduction for 2 years after surgery in invasive breast cancer patients with lymph nodes-negative. Only 140 (15.4%) physicians did not agree with the recommendation for 5 years after surgery in invasive breast cancer patients with lymph nodes-positive. A total of 861 (94.5%) physicians stated that they advised the patients to consult experts from other disciplines, such as gynecology, oncology, genetic and psychology disciplines. In multivariable analysis, more positive attitude toward reproduction was significantly associated with male, more than 11 times of participating in academic forum on breast cancer, 1-2 times of consulting about reproduction problems after breast cancer surgery per outpatient service and more than 11 min spending on solving the problem about reproduction in early breast cancer. CONCLUSION This study showed that attitudes towards reproduction of young breast cancer patients from physicians in China. Physicians had a high propensity for recommending reproduction. Compared with the two reproduction guidelines recommendation when to reproduce in different circumstances for breast cancer patients, physicians from China remained a relatively conservative attitude. Most physicians advised the patients to consult experts from other disciplines, such as gynecology, oncology, genetic and psychology disciplines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuzhu Zhang
- Breast Department, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Liping Dian
- Breast Department, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaoqing Wei
- Breast Department, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Junyan Huang
- Breast Department, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yang Sun
- Breast Department, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xue Song
- Breast Department, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chunmin Yang
- Breast Department, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mengling Kang
- Breast Department, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Aihua Ou
- Breast Department, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qianjun Chen
- Breast Department, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Rui Xu
- Breast Department, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
- The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Narod SA, Giannakeas V. In Response to "Pregnancy After Breast Cancer in Patients With Germline BRCA Mutations". J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:4352. [PMID: 33125308 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.02253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Steven A Narod
- Steven A. Narod, MD, and Vasily Giannakeas, MPH, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto; and Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vasily Giannakeas
- Steven A. Narod, MD, and Vasily Giannakeas, MPH, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto; and Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Perachino M, Massarotti C, Razeti MG, Parisi F, Arecco L, Damassi A, Fregatti P, Solinas C, Lambertini M. Gender-specific aspects related to type of fertility preservation strategies and access to fertility care. ESMO Open 2020; 5:e000771. [PMID: 33115753 PMCID: PMC7594356 DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Revised: 07/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Survivorship is an area of paramount importance to be addressed as early as possible after cancer diagnosis by all health care providers. On this regard, cancer care in young patients often poses several age-related considerations among which fertility and pregnancy-related issues have a crucial role. According to the available guidelines on the topic, all patients with cancer diagnosed during their reproductive years should be provided a proper oncofertility counselling before starting anticancer treatments. This is an important step in order to inform patients about the potential treatment-induced gonadotoxicity and the available strategies for fertility preservation so that they can be referred as early as possible to fertility specialists if potentially interested in these options.In this manuscript, we aim to provide an up to date overview on the available efficacy and safety data with the main strategies for fertility preservation in male and female cancer patients in order to help optimising the oncofertility counselling performed by healthcare providers involved in cancer care and dealing with young patients. In male patients with cancer, sperm cryopreservation is the standard technique for fertility preservation. Oocyte/embryo cryopreservation, ovarian tissue cryopreservation and temporary ovarian suppression with luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonists during chemotherapy are the main options in female patients with cancer.A multidisciplinary management building a strong network between fertility and oncology/haematology units is crucial to properly address fertility care in all young patients with cancer, at both diagnosis and during oncologic follow-up. Discussing fertility and pregnancy-related issues with young patients with cancer has to be considered mandatory nowadays keeping in mind that returning to a normal life (including the possibility to have a family and to live with as few side effects as possible) should be considered an important ambition in cancer care in the 21st century .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Perachino
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Liguria, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Claudia Massarotti
- Physiopatology of Human Reproduction Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Razeti
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Liguria, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Francesca Parisi
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Liguria, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Luca Arecco
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Liguria, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Alessandra Damassi
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Liguria, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Piero Fregatti
- Department of Surgery, U.O.C. Clinica di Chirurgia Senologica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Integrated Diagnostic Surgical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Cinzia Solinas
- Medical Oncology, Azienda Tutela della Salute Sardegna, Hospital A. Segni Ozieri, Sassari, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Liguria, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Arecco L, Perachino M, Damassi A, Latocca MM, Soldato D, Vallome G, Parisi F, Razeti MG, Solinas C, Tagliamento M, Spinaci S, Massarotti C, Lambertini M. Burning Questions in the Oncofertility Counseling of Young Breast Cancer Patients. BREAST CANCER-BASIC AND CLINICAL RESEARCH 2020; 14:1178223420954179. [PMID: 32952399 PMCID: PMC7476336 DOI: 10.1177/1178223420954179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
The improved prognosis of breast cancer patients makes survivorship issues an area of crucial importance. In this regard, an increased attention is needed toward the development of potential anticancer treatment-related long-term side-effects, including gonadal failure and infertility in young women. Therefore, fertility preservation and family planning are crucial issues to be addressed in all young women of reproductive age with newly diagnosed cancer. Despite a growing availability of data on the efficacy and safety of fertility preservation options and the fact that conceiving after prior history of breast cancer has become more accepted over time, there are still several gray zones in this field so that many physicians remain uncomfortable to deal with these topics. The purpose of this review is to answer some of the most controversial questions frequently asked by patients during their oncofertility counseling, in order to provide a detailed and up-to-date overview on the evidence available in this field to physicians involved in the care of young women with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Arecco
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Marta Perachino
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Alessandra Damassi
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Maria Maddalena Latocca
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Davide Soldato
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Giacomo Vallome
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Francesca Parisi
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Razeti
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Cinzia Solinas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda Tutela della Salute Sardegna, Hospital A.Segni Ozieri, Sassari, Italy
| | - Marco Tagliamento
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Stefano Spinaci
- Division of Breast Surgery, Ospedale Villa Scassi e ASL3, Genova, Italy
| | - Claudia Massarotti
- Physiopathology of Human Reproduction Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Shao C, Yu Z, Xiao J, Liu L, Hong F, Zhang Y, Jia H. Prognosis of pregnancy-associated breast cancer: a meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:746. [PMID: 32778072 PMCID: PMC7418189 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07248-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) is defined as breast cancer that is diagnosed during pregnancy and/or the postpartum period. Definitions of the duration of the postpartum period have been controversial, and this variability may lead to diverse results regarding prognosis. Moreover, evidence on the dose-response association between the time from the last pregnancy to breast cancer diagnosis and overall mortality has not been synthesized. METHODS We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for observational studies on the prognosis of PABC published up to June 1, 2019. We estimated summary-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses based on diagnosis time, PABC definition, geographic region, year of publication and estimation procedure for HR were performed. Additionally, dose-response analysis was conducted by using the variance weighted least-squares regression (VWLS) trend estimation. RESULTS A total of 54 articles (76 studies) were included in our study. PABC was associated with poor prognosis for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and cause-specific survival (CSS), and the pooled HRs with 95% CIs were 1.45 (1.30-1.63), 1.39 (1.25-1.54) and 1.40 (1.17-1.68), respectively. The corresponding reference category was non-PABC patients. According to subgroup analyses, the varied definition of PABC led to diverse results. The dose-response analysis indicated a nonlinear association between the time from the last delivery to breast cancer diagnosis and the HR of overall mortality (P < 0.001). Compared to nulliparous women, the mortality was almost 60% higher in women with PABC diagnosed at 12 months after the last delivery (HR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.30-1.82), and the mortality was not significantly different at 70 months after the last delivery (HR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.99-1.25). This finding suggests that the definition of PABC should be extended to include patients diagnosed up to approximately 6 years postpartum (70 months after the last delivery) to capture the increased risk. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis suggests that PABC is associated with poor prognosis, and the definition of PABC should be extended to include patients diagnosed up to approximately 6 years postpartum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunchun Shao
- Center of Evidence-based Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, 250033 Shandong PR China
| | - Zhigang Yu
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, 250033 Shandong PR China
| | - Juan Xiao
- Center of Evidence-based Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, 250033 Shandong PR China
| | - Liyuan Liu
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, 250033 Shandong PR China
| | - Fanzhen Hong
- Department of Obstetrics, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, 250033 Shandong PR China
| | - Yuan Zhang
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, 250012 Shandong PR China
- Clinical Research Center of Shandong University, Jinan, 250012 Shandong PR China
| | - Hongying Jia
- Center of Evidence-based Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, 250033 Shandong PR China
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Lambertini M, Ameye L, Hamy AS, Zingarello A, Poorvu PD, Carrasco E, Grinshpun A, Han S, Rousset-Jablonski C, Ferrari A, Paluch-Shimon S, Cortesi L, Senechal C, Miolo G, Pogoda K, Pérez-Fidalgo JA, De Marchis L, Ponzone R, Livraghi L, Estevez-Diz MDP, Villarreal-Garza C, Dieci MV, Clatot F, Berlière M, Graffeo R, Teixeira L, Córdoba O, Sonnenblick A, Luna Pais H, Ignatiadis M, Paesmans M, Partridge AH, Caron O, Saule C, Del Mastro L, Peccatori FA, Azim HA. Pregnancy After Breast Cancer in Patients With Germline BRCA Mutations. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:3012-3023. [PMID: 32673153 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.02399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Young women with germline BRCA mutations have unique reproductive challenges. Pregnancy after breast cancer does not increase the risk of recurrence; however, very limited data are available in patients with BRCA mutations. This study investigated the impact of pregnancy on breast cancer outcomes in patients with germline BRCA mutations. PATIENTS AND METHODS This is an international, multicenter, hospital-based, retrospective cohort study. Eligible patients were diagnosed between January 2000 and December 2012 with invasive early breast cancer at age ≤ 40 years and harbored deleterious germline BRCA mutations. Primary end points were pregnancy rate, and disease-free survival (DFS) between patients with and without a pregnancy after breast cancer. Pregnancy outcomes and overall survival (OS) were secondary end points. Survival analyses were adjusted for guarantee-time bias controlling for known prognostic factors. RESULTS Of 1,252 patients with germline BRCA mutations (BRCA1, 811 patients; BRCA2, 430 patients; BRCA1/2, 11 patients) included, 195 had at least 1 pregnancy after breast cancer (pregnancy rate at 10 years, 19%; 95% CI, 17% to 22%). Induced abortions and miscarriages occurred in 16 (8.2%) and 20 (10.3%) patients, respectively. Among the 150 patients who gave birth (76.9%; 170 babies), pregnancy complications and congenital anomalies occurred in 13 (11.6%) and 2 (1.8%) cases, respectively. Median follow-up from breast cancer diagnosis was 8.3 years. No differences in DFS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.23; P = .41) or OS (adjusted HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.56; P = .66) were observed between the pregnancy and nonpregnancy cohorts. CONCLUSION Pregnancy after breast cancer in patients with germline BRCA mutations is safe without apparent worsening of maternal prognosis and is associated with favorable fetal outcomes. These results provide reassurance to patients with BRCA-mutated breast cancer interested in future fertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, UOC Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Lieveke Ameye
- Data Centre, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Anna Zingarello
- Département Médecine Oncologique, Institut Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Philip D Poorvu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Estela Carrasco
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Albert Grinshpun
- Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Sileny Han
- Multidisciplinary Breast Center, Department of Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Alberta Ferrari
- Department of Surgical Sciences, General Surgery III-Breast Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, and Department of Clinical Surgical Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Laura Cortesi
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Gianmaria Miolo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano, IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Katarzyna Pogoda
- Department of Breast Cancer and Reconstructive Surgery, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Laura De Marchis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Ponzone
- Gynecological Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Luca Livraghi
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.,University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Maria Del Pilar Estevez-Diz
- Department of Oncology, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo-Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Cynthia Villarreal-Garza
- Departamento de Investigacion y de Tumores Mamarios, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Mexico City, Mexico.,Tecnologico de Monterrey, Centro de Cancer de Mama del Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
| | - Maria Vittoria Dieci
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.,Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Florian Clatot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Martine Berlière
- Department of Oncology, Breast Clinic, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc UCL, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Rossella Graffeo
- Breast Unit of Southern Switzerland, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Luis Teixeira
- Breast Disease Unit Saint-Louis Hospital, APHP, Université de Paris, Inserm, U976 HIPI Unit, F-75010, Paris, France
| | - Octavi Córdoba
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma, Spain
| | - Amir Sonnenblick
- Oncology Division, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Helena Luna Pais
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte-Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Michail Ignatiadis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marianne Paesmans
- Data Centre, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Olivier Caron
- Département Médecine Oncologique, Institut Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Claire Saule
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Lucia Del Mastro
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,Breast Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Fedro A Peccatori
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Hatem A Azim
- Tecnologico de Monterrey, Centro de Cancer de Mama del Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Labrosse J, Lam T, Sebbag C, Benque M, Abdennebi I, Merckelbagh H, Osdoit M, Priour M, Guerin J, Balezeau T, Grandal B, Coussy F, Bobrie A, Ferrer L, Laas E, Feron JG, Reyal F, Hamy AS. Text Mining in Electronic Medical Records Enables Quick and Efficient Identification of Pregnancy Cases Occurring After Breast Cancer. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2020; 3:1-12. [PMID: 31626565 DOI: 10.1200/cci.19.00031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To apply text mining (TM) technology on electronic medical records (EMRs) of patients with breast cancer (BC) to retrieve the occurrence of a pregnancy after BC diagnosis and compare its performance to manual curation. MATERIALS AND METHODS The training cohort (Cohort A) comprised 344 patients with BC age ≤ 40 years old treated at Institut Curie between 2005 and 2007. Manual curation consisted in manually reviewing each EMR to retrieve pregnancies. TM consisted of first applying a keyword filter ("accouch*" or "enceinte," French terms for "deliver*" and "pregnant," respectively) to select a subset of EMRs, and, second, checking manually EMRs to confirm the pregnancy. Then, we applied our TM algorithm on an independent cohort of patients with BC treated between 2008 and 2012 (Cohort B). RESULTS In Cohort A, 36 pregnancies were identified among 344 patients (10.5%; 2,829 person-years of EMR). Thirty were identified by manual review versus 35 by TM. TM resulted in a lower percentage of manual checking (26.7% v 100%, respectively) and substantial time gains (time to identify a pregnancy: 13 minutes for TM v 244 minutes for manual curation, respectively). Presence of any of the two TM filters showed excellent sensitivity (97%) and negative predictive value (100%). In Cohort B, 67 pregnancies were identified among 1,226 patients (5.5%; 7,349 person-years of EMR). Similarly, for Cohort B, TM spared 904 (73.7%) EMRs from manual review and quickly generated a cohort of 67 pregnancies after BC. Incidence rate of pregnancy after BC was 0.01 pregnancy per person-year of EMR in both cohorts. CONCLUSION TM is highly efficient to quickly identify rare events and is a promising tool to improve rapidity, efficiency, and costs of medical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thanh Lam
- Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Loïc Ferrer
- Institut Curie, U900, Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France
| | | | | | - Fabien Reyal
- Paris 5 Research University, INSERM U932, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Anne-Sophie Hamy
- Paris 5 Research University, INSERM U932, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|