Tucatinib Combination Treatment After Trastuzumab-Deruxtecan in Patients With ERBB2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

Importance

Little is known regarding the outcomes associated with tucatinib combined with trastuzumab and capecitabine (TTC) after trastuzumab-deruxtecan exposure among patients with ERBB2 (previously HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Objective

To investigate outcomes following TTC treatment in patients with ERBB2-positive MBC who had previously received trastuzumab-deruxtecan.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study included all patients with MBC who were treated in 12 French comprehensive cancer centers between August 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022.

Exposure

Tucatinib combined with trastuzumab and capecitabine administered at the recommended dose.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Clinical end points included progression-free survival (PFS), time to next treatment (TTNT), overall survival (OS), and overall response rate (ORR).

Results

A total of 101 patients with MBC were included (median age, 56 [range, 31-85] years). The median number of prior treatment lines for metastatic disease at TTC treatment initiation was 4 (range, 2-15), including 82 patients (81.2%) with previous trastuzumab and/or pertuzumab and 94 (93.1%) with previous ado-trastuzumab-emtansine) exposure. The median duration of trastuzumab-deruxtecan treatment was 8.9 (range, 1.4-25.8) months, and 82 patients (81.2%) had disease progression during trastuzumab-deruxtecan treatment, whereas 18 (17.8%) had stopped trastuzumab-deruxtecan for toxic effects and 1 (1.0%) for other reasons. Tucatinib combined with trastuzumab and capecitabine was provided as a third- or fourth-line treatment in 37 patients (36.6%) and was the immediate treatment after trastuzumab-deruxtecan in 86 (85.1%). With a median follow-up of 11.6 (95% CI, 10.5-13.4) months, 76 of 101 patients (75.2%) stopped TTC treatment due to disease progression. The median PFS was 4.7 (95% CI, 3.9-5.6) months; median TTNT, 5.2 (95% CI, 4.5-7.0) months; and median OS, 13.4 (95% CI, 11.1 to not reached [NR]) months. Patients who received TTC immediately after trastuzumab-deruxtecan had a median PFS of 5.0 (95% CI, 4.2-6.0) months; median TTNT of 5.5 (95% CI, 4.8-7.2) months, and median OS of 13.4 (95% CI, 11.9-NR) months. Those who received TTC due to trastuzumab-deruxtecan toxicity-related discontinuation had a median PFS of 7.3 (95% CI, 3.0-NR) months. Best ORR was 29 of 89 patients (32.6%). Sixteen patients with active brain metastasis had a median PFS of 4.7 (95% CI, 3.0-7.3) months, median TTNT of 5.6 (95% CI, 4.4 to NR), and median OS of 12.4 (95% CI, 8.3-NR) months.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, TTC therapy was associated with clinically meaningful outcomes in patients with ERBB2-positive MBC after previous trastuzumab-deruxtecan treatment, including those with brain metastases. Prospective data on optimal drug sequencing in this rapidly changing therapeutic landscape are needed.

Neoadjuvant anthracycline-based (5-FEC) or anthracycline-free (docetaxel/carboplatin) chemotherapy plus trastuzumab and pertuzmab in HER2 + BC patients according to their TOP2A: a multicentre, open-label, non-randomized phase II trial

PURPOSE

Previous studies have reported the benefit of dual HER2-targeting combined to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-amplified breast cancer (HER2 + BC). Moreover, besides the cardiac toxicity following their association to Trastuzumab, anthracyclines chemotherapy may not profit all patients. The NeoTOP study was designed to evaluate the complementary action of Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab, and the relevance of an anthracycline-based regimen according to TOP2A amplification status.

METHODS

Open-label, multicentre, phase II study. Eligible patients were aged ≥ 18 with untreated, operable, histologically confirmed HER2 + BC. After centralized review of TOP2A status, TOP2A-amplified (TOP2A+) patients received FEC100 for 3 cycles then 3 cycles of Trastuzumab (8 mg/kg then 6 mg/kg), Pertuzumab (840 mg/kg then 420 mg/kg), and Docetaxel (75mg/m2 then 100mg/m2). TOP2A-not amplified (TOP2A-) patients received 6 cycles of Docetaxel (75mg/m2) and Carboplatin (target AUC 6 mg/ml/min) plus Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab. Primary endpoint was pathological Complete Response (pCR) using Chevallier's classification. Secondary endpoints included pCR (Sataloff), Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Overall Survival (OS), and toxicity.

RESULTS

Out of 74 patients, 41 and 33 were allocated to the TOP2A + and TOP2A- groups respectively. pCR rates (Chevallier) were 74.4% (95%CI: 58.9-85.4) vs. 71.9% (95%CI: 54.6-84.4) in the TOP2A + vs. TOP2A- groups. pCR rates (Sataloff), 5-year PFS and OS were 70.6% (95%CI: 53.8-83.2) vs. 61.5% (95%CI: 42.5-77.6), 82.4% (95%CI: 62.2-93.6) vs. 100% (95%CI: 74.1-100), and 90% (95%CI: 69.8-98.3) vs. 100% (95%CI: 74.1-100). Toxicity profile was consistent with previous reports.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed high pCR rates with Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab associated to chemotherapy. They were similar in TOP2A + and TOP2A- groups and the current role of neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy remains questioned.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02339532 (registered on 14/12/14).

TROPION-Breast01: Datopotamab deruxtecan vs chemotherapy in pre-treated inoperable or metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer

Improving the prognosis for patients with metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer remains an unmet need. Patients with tumors that have progressed on endocrine therapy and/or are not eligible for endocrine therapy had limited treatment options beyond chemotherapy. Antibody-drug conjugates are a novel and promising treatment class in this setting. Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) consists of a TROP2-directed humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody attached via a serum-stable cleavable linker to a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. TROPION-Breast01 is an ongoing phase III study that is evaluating the efficacy and safety of Dato-DXd compared with investigator's choice of standard-of-care chemotherapy in patients with inoperable or metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer who have received one or two prior lines of systemic chemotherapy in the inoperable or metastatic setting. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05104866 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Taxanes for the treatment of breast cancer during pregnancy: an international cohort study

INTRODUCTION

The addition of taxanes to anthracycline-based chemotherapy is considered standard of care in the treatment of breast cancer. However, there are insufficient data regarding the safety of taxanes during pregnancy. The aim of this study was to describe the incidence of obstetric and neonatal adverse events associated with the use of taxane-containing chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of breast cancer during pregnancy.

METHODS

This is a multicenter, international cohort study of breast cancer patients treated with taxanes during pregnancy. A descriptive analysis was undertaken to synthetize available data.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients were included, most of whom were treated with paclitaxel and anthracyclines given in sequence during gestation (90.1%). The median gestational age at taxane initiation was 28 weeks (range = 12-37 weeks). Grade 3-4 adverse events were reported in 7 of 103 (6.8%) patients. The most common reported obstetric complications were intrauterine growth restriction (n = 8 of 94, 8.5%) and preterm premature rupture of membranes (n = 5 of 94, 5.3%). The live birth rate was 92 of 94 (97.9%), and the median gestational age at delivery was 37 weeks (range = 32-40 weeks). Admission to an intensive care unit was reported in 14 of 88 (15.9%) neonates, and 17 of 70 (24.3%) live births resulted in small for gestational age neonates. Congenital malformations were reported in 2 of 93 (2.2%).

CONCLUSION

Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after taxane exposure during pregnancy were generally favorable and did not seem to differ from those reported in the literature with standard anthracycline-based regimens. This study supports the use of taxanes during gestation when clinically indicated.

Investigating sexual health after breast cancer by longitudinal assessment of patient-reported outcomes

BACKGROUND

Sexual concerns are a major unaddressed need among survivors of breast cancer (BC) with significant negative effects on quality of life. We longitudinally analyzed sexual health over time, using patient-reported outcomes.

METHODS

Patients with stage I-III BC prospectively included from the CANcer TOxicity cohort (CANTO) provided data at diagnosis, then 1, 2, and 4 years afterward. Sexual concerns outcomes included poor body image (score ≤91/100), poor sexual functioning (≤16/100), poor sexual enjoyment (≤66/100), and sexual inactivity (EORTC QLQ-B23). Multivariate generalized estimating equation models assessed associations with sexual concerns after diagnosis, adjusting for age, sociodemographic, tumor, treatment, and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

Nearly 78.1% among 7895 patients reported at least one sexual concern between diagnosis and 4 years' follow-up. Over time, the proportion of patients reporting sexual concerns either increased or remained constant with diagnosis. Less than half (46%, range 11.4-57) of the patients with sexual concerns reported the use of supportive care strategies, including gynecological or psychological consultations (range 11.4-57.4). Factors consistently associated with sexual concerns up to 4 years after diagnosis included already reporting the same concern at diagnosis [odds ratio (OR)poor body image 3.48 [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.11-3.89]; ORsexual inactivity 9.94 (95% CI 8.84-11.18), ORpoor sexual function 9.75 (95% CI 8.67-10.95), ORpoorsexual enjoyment 3.96 (95% CI 3.34-4.69)], endocrine therapy use [ORpoor body image 1.15 (95% CI 1.01-1.31); ORsexual inactivity 1.19 (95% CI 1.02-1.39), ORpoor sexual function 1.17 (95% CI 1.01-1.37), ORpoor sexual enjoyment 1.23 (95% CI 1.00-1.53)], and depression [ORpoor body image 2.00 (95% CI 1.72-2.34); ORsexual inactivity 1.66 (95% CI 1.40-1.97), ORpoor sexual function 1.69 (95% CI 1.43-2.00), ORpoor sexual enjoyment 1.94 (95% CI 1.50-2.51)]. Outcome-specific associations were also identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Sexual concerns seem frequent, persistent, and insufficiently addressed. Pretreatment concerns, endocrine therapy, and emotional distress are commonly associated factors. A proactive evaluation of sexual health across the care continuum is needed, to promptly identify patients suitable for multidisciplinary counseling, referral, and supportive interventions.

Is controlled ovarian stimulation safe in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy?

INTRODUCTION

Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for oocyte/embryo cryopreservation is the method of choice for fertility preservation (FP) in young patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer (eBC). Nevertheless, some challenges still question its role, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting, where concerns arise about potential delay in the onset of anticancer treatment, and in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) disease, as cancer cells may proliferate under the estrogenic peak associated with stimulation. Therefore, this review aims to examine the available evidence on the safety of COS in eBC patients eligible for neoadjuvant treatment (NAT), particularly in HR+ disease.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify studies evaluating the feasibility and safety of COS in eBC and including patients referred to NAT and/or with HR+ disease. Time to NAT and survival outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Of the three matched cohort studies assessing the impact of COS on time to start NAT, only one reported a significant small delay in the cohort undergoing COS compared with the control group, whereas the other studies found no difference. Regarding survival outcomes, overall, no increased risk of recurrence or death was found, either in patients undergoing COS in the neoadjuvant setting regardless of HR expression or in HR+ disease regardless of the timing of COS relative to surgery. However, there are no data on the safety of COS in the specific combined scenario of HR+ disease undergoing NAT.

CONCLUSION

Neither the indication to NAT nor the HR positivity constitutes per se an a priori contraindication to COS. Shared decision making between clinicians and patients is essential to carefully weigh the risks and benefits in each individual case. Prospective studies designed to specifically investigate this issue are warranted.

Telehealth in breast cancer following the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic

Breast cancer (BC) is the second most diagnosed cancer in 2018 with around 2.3 million cases globally in 2020. In March 2020 and after its worldwide spread, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, a respiratory disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus, a pandemic. During this time, cancer patients were heavily impacted and their treatment plans were changed due to measures to fight the disease and solutions had to be found to maintain their follow-up and management from a distance. Some cancer groups worldwide have recommended then the use of telemedicine for oncology patients to ensure the continuity of medical care during the pandemic. This method was considered effective and clinicians worldwide continued using telehealth even after the cessation of worldwide restrictions. To this end, current up-to-date data on the use of telemedicine in BC patient after the COVID-19 outbreak are summarized in this narrative review.

Pan-cancer analysis of antibody-drug conjugate targets and putative predictors of treatment response

BACKGROUND

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a rapidly expanding class of compounds in oncology. Our goal was to assess the expression of ADC targets and potential downstream determining factors of activity across pan-cancer and normal tissues.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

ADCs in clinical trials (n = 121) were identified through ClinicalTrials.gov, corresponding to 54 targets. Genes potentially implicated in treatment response were identified in the literature. Gene expression from The Cancer Genome Atlas (9000+ cancers of 31 cancer types), the Genotype-Tissue Expression database (n = 19,000 samples from 31 normal tissue types), and the TNMplot.com (n = 12,494 unmatched primary and metastatic samples) were used in this analysis. To compare relative expression across and within tumour types we used pooled normal tissues as reference.

RESULTS

For most ADC targets, mRNA levels correlated with protein expression. Pan-cancer target expression distributions identified appealing cancer types for each ADC development. Co-expression of multiple targets was common and suggested opportunities for ADC combinations. Expression levels of genes potentially implicated in ADC response downstream of the target might provide additional information (e.g. TOP1 was highly expressed in many tumour types, including breast and lung cancers). Metastatic compared to primary tissues overexpressed some ADCs targets. Single sample "targetgram" plots were generated to visualise the expression of potentially competing ADC targets and resistance/sensitivity markers highlighting high inter-patient heterogeneity. Off-cancer target expression only partially explains adverse events, while expression of determinants of payload activity explained more of the observed toxicities.

CONCLUSION

Our findings draw attention to new therapeutic opportunities for ADCs that can be tested in the clinic and our web platform (https://tnmplot.com) can assist in prioritising upcoming ADC targets for clinical development.

Chemotherapy-Related Amenorrhea and Quality of Life Among Premenopausal Women With Breast Cancer

Importance

Younger survivors of breast cancer frequently report more treatment-related symptoms, mostly related to the menopausal transition.

Objective

To assess factors associated with chemotherapy-related amenorrhea (CRA) and to evaluate its association with long-term quality of life (QOL).

Design, Setting, and Participants

The prospective, longitudinal Cancer Toxicities Study, a multicenter French cohort study, includes women with a diagnosis of stage I to III breast cancer and collects data approximately yearly after diagnosis. The current study reports outcomes up to 4 years after diagnosis for participants enrolled from 2012 to 2017. Participants included premenopausal women younger than 50 years treated with chemotherapy and not receiving adjuvant ovarian function suppression. Data analysis was performed from September 2021 to June 2023.

Exposures

Clinical, socioeconomic, tumor, and treatment characteristics assessed at diagnosis (for the analysis of factors associated with CRA) and persistent CRA (for the QOL analysis).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome of interest was CRA at year 1 (Y1), year 2 (Y2), and year 4 (Y4) after diagnosis. Generalized estimating equations assessed associations of exposure variables with CRA. In the QOL analysis, QOL at Y4 (assessed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires C30 and BR23) was the outcome of interest. Multivariable random-effect mixed models assessed the association of persistent CRA (ie, never recovering menses after treatment) with QOL.

Results

Among 1636 women, the mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 42.2 (5.6) years. Overall, 1242 of 1497 women (83.0%) reported CRA at Y1, 959 of 1323 women (72.5%) reported it at Y2, and 599 of 906 women (66.1%) reported it at Y4. Older age vs 18 to 34 years (adjusted odds ratio [OR] for 35 to 39 years, 1.84 [95% CI, 1.32 to 2.56]; adjusted OR for 40 to 44 years, 5.90 [95% CI, 4.23 to 8.24]; and adjusted OR for ≥45 years, 21.29 [95% CI, 14.34 to 31.61]) and receipt of adjuvant tamoxifen (adjusted OR, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.53 to 2.53]) were associated with higher likelihood of CRA. In the QOL analysis, 416 of 729 women (57.1%) had persistent CRA. However, late menses recovery among women aged 18 to 34 years with no menses at Y2 were reported by 11 of 21 women (52.4%) between Y2 and Y4. Persistent CRA was associated with worse insomnia (mean difference vs recovery at any time, 9.9 points [95% CI, 3.2 to 16.5 points]; P = .004), systemic therapy-related adverse effects (mean difference, 3.0 points [95% CI, 0.2 to 5.8 points]; P = .04), and sexual functioning (mean difference, -9.2 points [95% CI, -14.3 to -4.1 points]; P < .001) at Y4.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of premenopausal women with breast cancer, persistent CRA was common, although some women recovered menses late, and was associated with worse long-term QOL. This study can help inform risk communication, personalized counseling, and early supportive care referrals for such patients.

Tucatinib's journey from clinical development to clinical practice: New horizons for HER2-positive metastatic disease and promising prospects for brain metastatic spread

Approximately 20% of breast cancers (BCs) overexpress human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), a transmembrane glycoprotein with tyrosine kinase activity, encoded by ERBB2 gene. Historically, HER2 overexpression has been linked with increased disease recurrence and a worse prognosis. However, the increasing availability of different anti-HER2 compounds and combinations is progressively improving HER2-positive BC outcome, thus requiring expertise to prioritize both overall survival (OS) prolongation and quality of life, without neglecting the accessibility to further treatment lines with a low attrition rate. In this context, tucatinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has recently been granted approval by regulatory agencies based on evidence from the HER2CLIMB, a clinical trial which randomized patients with metastatic BC to receive trastuzumab and capecitabine with either tucatinib or placebo. A distinctive feature of this study was the inclusion of patients with new or active brain metastases (BMs) at study entry, a population traditionally excluded from clinical trials. Thus, HER2CLIMB provides the first solid evidence of an OS benefit in patients with BC and BMs, addressing a long standing unmet medical need, especially given the high incidence of central nervous system metastatic spread in patients with HER2-positive disease. This review provides an overview of the molecular and clinical landscape of tucatinib for the treatment of advanced BC. It focuses on the technological journey that drove the development of this therapeutic innovation, from preclinical data to clinical practice.

Real-World Impact of Adjuvant Anti-HER2 Treatment on Characteristics and Outcomes of Women With HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer in the ESME Program

BACKGROUND

Although adjuvant cancer treatments increase cure rates, they may induce clonal selection and tumor resistance. Information still lacks as whether (neo)adjuvant anti-HER2 treatments impact the patterns of recurrence and outcomes of HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We aimed to assess this in the large multicenter ESME real-world database.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We examined the characteristics and outcomes (overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival under first-line treatment (PFS1)) of HER2+ patients with MBC from the French ESME program with recurrent disease, as a function of the previous receipt of adjuvant trastuzumab. Multivariable analyses used Cox models adjusted for baseline demographic, prognostic factors, adjuvant treatment received, and disease-free interval.

RESULTS

Two thousand one hundred and forty-three patients who entered the ESME cohort between 2008 and 2017 had a recurrent HER2+ MBC. Among them, 56% had received (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab and 2.5% another anti-HER2 in this setting. Patients pre-exposed to trastuzumab were younger, had a lower disease-free interval, more HR-negative disease and more metastatic sites. While the crude median OS appeared inferior in patients exposed to adjuvant trastuzumab, as compared to those who did not (37.2 (95%CI 34.4-40.3) versus 53.5 months (95% CI: 47.6-60.1)), this difference disappeared in the multivariable model (HR = 1.05, 95%CI 0.91-1.22). The same figures were observed for PFS1.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with relapsed HER2+ MBC, the receipt of adjuvant trastuzumab did not independently predict for worse outcomes when adjusted to other prognostic factors.

Insights adjusting for non-adherence in randomized clinical trials: a reanalysis of an adjuvant trial of tamoxifen duration in early breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Several randomized clinical trials provide evidence of the survival benefit of extended adjuvant tamoxifen in women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive early breast cancer (BC). However, non-adherence may lead to underestimate treatment effects using intention to treat (ITT) methods. We reanalyzed a randomized trial using contemporary statistical methods adjusting for non-adherence.

METHODS

The TAM01 study was a phase 3 trial including women with early BC, who had completed 2-3 years of adjuvant tamoxifen between 1986 and 1995. Participants were randomly assigned to continue tamoxifen up to 10 years or to discontinue the treatment at randomization. Invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using marginal structural models (MSM) and rank preserving structural failure time model (RPSFTM).

RESULTS

Of 3830 patients enrolled, 2485 were randomized to extended tamoxifen, and 1345 to treatment discontinuation. The 10-year non-adherence rate in the extended group was 27.2%. Among women with ER-positive BC (n = 2402), extended tamoxifen was associated with a 45% and 21% relative improvement in iDFS by MSM and RPSFTM, respectively (Hazard Ratio (HR), 0.55; 95% Confidence Interval (CI), 0.48-0.64 and HR, 0.79; 95%CI, 0.67-0.95, respectively), a considerable greater benefit than in the ITT analysis (HR, 0.90; 95%CI, 0.81-0.99). The OS reanalysis revealed a substantial benefit of extended tamoxifen (MSM: HR, 0.70; 95%CI, 0.59-0.83; RPSFTM: HR, 0.85; 95%CI, 0.67-1.04), compared to the ITT analyses (HR, 0.94; 95%CI, 0.84-1.07).

CONCLUSION

This analysis emphasizes both the importance of adherence to hormonotherapy in hormone-receptor positive early BC and the usefulness of more complex statistical analyses.

Adjuvant endocrine therapy uptake, toxicity, quality of life, and prediction of early discontinuation

BACKGROUND

Many patients receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) for breast cancer experience side effects and reduced quality of life (QoL) and discontinue ET. We sought to describe these issues and develop a prediction model of early discontinuation of ET.

METHODS

Among patients with hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative stage I-III breast cancer of the Cancer Toxicities cohort (NCT01993498) who were prescribed adjuvant ET between 2012 and 2017, upon stratification by menopausal status, we evaluated adjuvant ET patterns including treatment change and patient-reported discontinuation and ET-associated toxicities and impact on QoL. Independent variables included clinical and demographic features, toxicities, and patient-reported outcomes. A machine-learning model to predict time to early discontinuation was trained and evaluated on a held-out validation set.

RESULTS

Patient-reported discontinuation rate of the first prescribed ET at 4 years was 30% and 35% in 4122 postmenopausal and 2087 premenopausal patients, respectively. Switching to a new ET was associated with higher symptom burden, poorer QoL, and higher discontinuation rate. Early discontinuation rate of adjuvant ET before treatment completion was 13% in postmenopausal and 15% in premenopausal patients. The early discontinuation model obtained a C index of 0.62 in the held-out validation set. Many aspects of QoL, most importantly fatigue and insomnia (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL questionnaire 30), were associated with early discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Tolerability and adherence to ET remains a challenge for patients who switch to a second ET. An early discontinuation model using patient-reported outcomes identifies patients likely to discontinue their adjuvant ET. Improved management of toxicities and novel more tolerable adjuvant ETs are needed for maintaining patients on treatment.

Sustainable return to work among breast cancer survivors

PURPOSE

This study assessed sustainable return to work (SRTW) of breast cancer survivors (BCS).

METHODS

We used data from the prospective French cohort, CANTO. We included 1811 stage I-III BCS who were <57 years old and employed at the moment of diagnosis and working 2 years after diagnosis. Using logistic regression, we investigated the role of clinical, health and socio-economic factors, and the work environment on SRTW 3 years after diagnosis. We compared having any sick leave with having worked continuously and being unemployed to having worked continuously between 2 and 3 years after diagnosis.

RESULTS

Overall, 77% (n = 1395) worked continuously after return to work (RTW). Out of the other 416 BCS, 66% had any sick leave period, 33% had been unemployed, 4% had an early retirement, 2% a disability and 1% another status (multiple situations possible). Being on sick leave was associated with age > 50 (OR = 0.59; 95%CI = 0.43-0.82), stage III (2.56; 1.70-3.85), tumour subtype HR+/HER2+ (0.61; 0.39-0.95), severe fatigue (1.45; 1.06-1.98), workplace accommodations (1.63; 1.14-2.33) and life priorities (0.71; 0.53-0.95). Unemployment was associated with age > 50 (0.45; 0.29-0.72), working in the public sector (0.31; 0.19-0.51), for a small company (3.00; 1.74-5.20) and having a fixed-term contract (7.50; 4.74-11.86).

CONCLUSIONS

A high number of BCS have periods of sick leave or unemployment after RTW. The determinants differ between sick leave and unemployment.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

BCS need to be supported even after RTW, which should be regarded as a process.

Current indications and future perspectives for antibody-drug conjugates in brain metastases of breast cancer

Breast cancer is one of the main cause of cerebral and leptomeningeal metastases, the prognosis of which remains poor to this day. Most studies excluded patients with active brain metastases (BM) and particularly with leptomeningeal metastases (LM) explaining the lack of therapeutic innovation in this area. Currently, the standard management of patients with BM of breast cancer is based on the combination of surgery, radiotherapy and systemic treatments. Recently, third-generation of Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs), have revolutionized the management of metastatic breast cancer. Trastuzumab deruxtecan and Sacituzumab govitecan have indeed shown significant improvements of survival outcomes and can now be used in a wide range of breast cancer subtypes. However, few data are available on the efficacy of third-generation ADCs on BM and LM of breast cancer. As the field of ADCs is rapidly evolving, with new constructs entering the late clinical development, in this review we describe the efficacy of approved and novel promising conjugates on patients with BM and LM of breast cancer.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan in metastatic breast cancer with variable HER2 expression: the phase 2 DAISY trial

The mechanisms of action of and resistance to trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), an anti-HER2-drug conjugate for breast cancer treatment, remain unclear. The phase 2 DAISY trial evaluated the efficacy of T-DXd in patients with HER2-overexpressing (n = 72, cohort 1), HER2-low (n = 74, cohort 2) and HER2 non-expressing (n = 40, cohort 3) metastatic breast cancer. In the full analysis set population (n = 177), the confirmed objective response rate (primary endpoint) was 70.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 58.3-81) in cohort 1, 37.5% (95% CI 26.4-49.7) in cohort 2 and 29.7% (95% CI 15.9-47) in cohort 3. The primary endpoint was met in cohorts 1 and 2. Secondary endpoints included safety. No new safety signals were observed. During treatment, HER2-expressing tumors (n = 4) presented strong T-DXd staining. Conversely, HER2 immunohistochemistry 0 samples (n = 3) presented no or very few T-DXd staining (Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.75, P = 0.053). Among patients with HER2 immunohistochemistry 0 metastatic breast cancer, 5 of 14 (35.7%, 95% CI 12.8-64.9) with ERBB2 expression below the median presented a confirmed objective response as compared to 3 of 10 (30%, 95% CI 6.7-65.2) with ERBB2 expression above the median. Although HER2 expression is a determinant of T-DXd efficacy, our study suggests that additional mechanisms may also be involved. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04132960 .).

Real-world clinical and survival outcomes of patients with early relapsed triple-negative breast cancer from the ESME national cohort

BACKGROUND

Early metastatic relapse of triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) after anthracyclins and/or taxanes based (A/T) primary treatment represents a highly aggressive cancer situation requiring urgent characterisation and handling. Epidemio-Strategy-Medico-Economical-Metastatic Breast Cancer (ESME-MBC) database, a multicenter, national, observational cohort (NCT03275311) provides recent data on this entity.

METHODS

All ESME patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2020 with mTNBC occurring as a relapse after a systemic neoadjuvant/adjuvant taxane and/or anthracycline-based chemotherapy were included. Early relapses were defined by a metastatic diagnosis up to 12 months of the end of neo/adjuvant A/T chemotherapy. We assessed overall survival (OS) and progression-free-survival under first-line treatment (PFS1) by early versus late relapse (≥12 months).

RESULTS

Patients with early relapse (N = 881, 46%) were younger and had a larger tumour burden at primary diagnosis than those with late relapses (N = 1045). Early relapse rates appeared stable over time. Median OS was 10.1 months (95% CI 9.3-10.9) in patients with early relapse versus 17.1 months (95% CI 15.7-18.2) in those with late relapse (adjusted hazard-ratio (aHR): 1.92 (95% CI 1.73-2.13); p < 0.001). The median PFS1 was respectively 3.1 months (95% CI 2.9-3.4) and 5.3 months (95% CI 5.1-5.8); (aHR: 1.66; [95% CI 1.50-1.83]; p < 0.001). Among early relapsed patients, a higher number of metastatic sites, visceral disease but not treatment types, were independently associated with a poorer OS.

CONCLUSION

These real-world data provide strong evidence on the dismal prognosis, higher treatment resistance and major unmet medical need associated with early relapsed mTNBC. Database registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT032753.

Implementing a PROACTive Care Pathway to Empower and Support Survivors of Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Optimal comprehensive survivorship care is insufficiently delivered. To increase patient empowerment and maximize the uptake of multidisciplinary supportive care strategies to serve all survivorship needs, we implemented a proactive survivorship care pathway for patients with early breast cancer at the end of primary treatment phase.

METHODS

Pathway components included (1) a personalized survivorship care plan (SCP), (2) face-to-face survivorship education seminars and personalized consultation for supportive care referrals (Transition Day), (3) a mobile app delivering personalized education and self-management advice, and (4) decision aids for physicians focused on supportive care needs. A mixed-methods process evaluation was performed according to the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance framework including administrative data review, pathway experience survey (patient, physician, and organization), and focus group. The primary objective was patient-perceived satisfaction with the pathway (predefined progression criteria for pathway continuation ≥70%).

RESULTS

Over 6 months, 321 patients were eligible for the pathway and received a SCP and 98 (30%) attended the Transition Day. Among 126 patients surveyed, 77 (66.1%) responded. 70.1% received the SCP, 51.9% attended the Transition Day, and 59.7% accessed the mobile app. 96.1% of patients were very or completely satisfied with the overall pathway, whereas perceived usefulness was 64.8% for the SCP, 90% for the Transition Day, and 65.2% for the mobile app. Pathway implementation seemed to be positively experienced by physicians and the organization.

CONCLUSION

Patients were satisfied with a proactive survivorship care pathway, and the majority reported that its components were useful in supporting their needs. This study can inform the implementation of survivorship care pathways in other centers.

Antibody-Drug Conjugate Revolution in Breast Cancer: The Road Ahead

OPINION STATEMENT

Antibody drug-conjugates (ADCs) have revolutionized the treatment of many types of cancer, including breast cancer. Recently, two new ADCs have been approved, trastuzumab deruxtecan and sacituzumab govitecan; both have demonstrated impressive improvements in overall survival, trastuzumab deruxtecan in all three subtypes of metastatic breast cancer and sacituzumab govitecan in luminal and triple negative metastatic breast cancer. These drugs are the results of significant progress and innovation in the construction of the three components of an ADC, the monoclonal antibody, the payload, and the linker, and of the discovery of new target antigens. ADC engineering has profoundly changed the paradigm of cancer treatment, on one side being effective on tumors considered inherently resistant to the payload class of drugs and on the other side demonstrating activity in tumors with very low target expression. Yet, it is likely that we are just at the beginning of a new era as the identification of new targets and the introduction of new ADC constructs and combinations will expand the field of ADC rapidly over the coming years.

Pattern and risk factors of isolated local relapse among women with hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer and lymph node involvement: 10-year follow-up analysis of the PACS 01 and PACS 04 trials

PURPOSE

We aimed to determine the pattern of isolated local recurrences (ILR) in women with stage II-III hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 breast cancer (HR + /HER2-BC) after 10-year follow-up.

METHODS

UNICANCER-PACS 01 and PACS 04 trials included 5,008 women with T1-T3 and N1-N3 to evaluate the efficacy of different anthracycline ± taxanes-containing regimens after modified mastectomy or lumpectomy plus axillary lymph node dissection. We analyzed the data from 2,932 women with HR + /HER2- BC to evaluate the cumulative incidence of ILR and describe the factors associated with ILR.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 9.1 years (95% CI 9.0-9.2 years), the cumulative incidence of ILR increased steadily between 1 and 10 years from 0.2% to 2.5%. The multivariable analysis showed that older age (subhazard ratios [sHR] = 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.99) and mastectomy (sHR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.17-0.86) were associated with lower risk of ILR, and no adjuvant endocrine therapy (sHR = 2.73, 95% CI 1.32 7-5.67) with increased risk of ILR.

CONCLUSION

In this population of high-risk patients with localized HR + /HER2- BC, the risk of ILR was low but remained constant over 10 years. Younger age at diagnosis, breast-conserving surgery, and adjuvant endocrine therapy were independent risk factors of ILR.

Cognitive change in breast cancer patients up to 2 years after diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Using the large nationwide French, national, multicenter, prospective cancer and toxicities (CANTO) cohort, we assessed cognitive functioning change after cancer treatments in a subgroup of breast cancer (BC) patients.

METHODS

We included patients with newly diagnosed invasive stage I-III BC enrolled in the CANTO substudy focused on cognitive evaluation and healthy control women matched for age and education. Episodic and working memory, executive functions, processing speed, attention, self-report cognitive difficulties (SRCD), fatigue, anxiety and depression were assessed with neuropsychological tests and self-report questionnaires before treatment (baseline) and approximately 1 (year 1) and 2 years (year 2) after diagnosis. We used linear mixed models to study changes in cognition and tested the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

We studied 276 localized BC patients (62% chemotherapy) compared with 135 healthy controls (HC). After adjustment, patients had lower baseline working memory, processing speed, and attention scores than HC (P ≤ .001), and the difference remained statistically significant over follow-up for working memory and processing speed. Executive function scores were similar between groups at baseline but decreased at year 1 among patients compared with HC (Pchange = .006). This decrease in chemotherapy patients was statistically significant compared with HC scores (Pchange < .001). After adjustment, SRCD were similar between BC patients and HC at baseline but increased in patients after treatment at year 1 (Pchange = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Cognitive difficulties are an important concern in BC patients, starting at diagnosis. Cancer treatments induce executive function decline and SRCD, which decrease over follow-up.

Intracranial hypotension in a breast cancer patient treated with epidural blood patches

We report the case of a patient with metastatic breast cancer who presented with an orthostatic headache. After a comprehensive diagnostic workup including MRI and lumbar puncture, we maintained the diagnosis of intracranial hypotension (IH). The patient was therefore treated with two consecutive non targeted epidural blood patches, resulting in the remission of IH symptoms for 6 months. IH in cancer patients is a rarer cause of headache than carcinomatous meningitis. As the diagnosis can be made by standard examination and the treatment is relatively simple and effective, IH deserves to be better known by oncologists.

Disease-free survival does not differ according to fertility preservation technique for young women with breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

To study whether fertility preservation strategies using ovarian stimulation or without using it impact long-term disease-free survival of patients with breast cancer.

DESIGN

Retrospective bicentric cohort study.

SETTING

Two university hospitals.

PATIENT(S)

In this study, 740 women with breast cancer, aged 18-43 years, who received primary fertility preservation between 2013 and 2019 after a diagnosis of localized breast cancer were included.

INTERVENTION(S)

Overall, 328 patients underwent at least 1 ovarian stimulation cycle (STIM group) and 412 had a technique without hormonal administration (no STIM group).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Disease-free survival and overall survival up to May 2021 were compared between the 2 groups by log-rank test. Cox proportional-hazard regression model was used for multivariable analyses.

RESULT(S)

Out of the 740 women who underwent fertility preservation, follow-up data were available for 269 women in the STIM group (82%) and 330 (80%) in the no STIM group. Kaplan-Meier estimates of disease-free survival at 4 years were 87.9% (82.8%-92.2%) and 83.1% (78.4%-87.3%) in the STIM and no STIM groups, respectively. After adjustment on prognostic parameters, no significant difference in breast cancer recurrence rate was observed between the STIM and no STIM groups (hazard ratios, 0.83 [0.64-1.08]). Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival at 4 years was 97.6% (95.3%-99.2%) and 93.6% (90.9%-95.9%) in the STIM and no STIM groups, respectively. Overall survival was higher in the STIM group than no STIM group (log-rank test). After adjustment on prognostic parameters, the risk of death remained significantly lower in the STIM group (Hazard Ratio, 0.55 [0.35-0.85]).

CONCLUSION(S)

In our cohort, STIM for fertility preservation in breast cancer did not significantly impact disease-free survival but was associated with higher overall survival. The disease-free survival and overall survival of young patients with breast cancer were not impacted by fertility preservation techniques irrespective of the timing of chemotherapy (neoadjuvant or adjuvant) and the use of ovarian stimulation. Nevertheless, because death and recurrence were rare events, these results should be taken with caution.

Abstract PD17-02: ctDNA Molecular Response based on breast cancer driver mutations predicts progression in aromatase inhibitor-sensitive first line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+) HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer

Background: The combination of a CDK4/6 inhibitor and an aromatase inhibitor (AI) is the gold standard for AI-sensitive first line treatment of ER+ HER2- advanced breast cancer. Nevertheless, some patients progress rapidly and may benefit from alternative strategies. Early ctDNA dynamics have been shown to predict disease course in several clinical situations. Here, we use samples from the PADA-1 trial to assess this strategy for patients receiving AI and palbociclib as first line treatment. PADA-1 was designed to assess the clinical utility of sequential analysis of ctDNA for emerging ESR1 mutations to trigger an early switch from AI plus palbociclib to fulvestrant plus palbociclib treatment. The study included 1,017 patients and was positive on its primary end-point. The objective of this translational study was to analyze the predictive value of 4-week molecular response (MR) for patient progression. Material & Method: First, a CLIA-validated targeted next-generation sequencing-based test (Guardant360 Response) was used to characterize changes in ctDNA level via detection of somatic single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), insertion/deletion mutations (indels), and gene fusions in 74 genes frequently mutated in cancer. A second analysis was restricted to cancer-associated mutations in 11 genes commonly mutated in breast cancer (PIK3CA, GATA3, TP53, AKT1, ERBB2, BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, ESR1, PALB2 and RB1). The threshold for molecular response was defined as ≥ 50% decrease in ctDNA (MR score &lt; 0.5). Subjects with ctDNA levels below the test’s limit of quantitation (ctDNA-low) were considered molecular responders. Results: 372 subjects with matched baseline and 4-weeks samples were available for analysis. Of these, 134 subjects (36%) were ctDNA-low, and 238 subjects (64%) quantifiable. Among the quantifiable subjects, 183 (77%) were molecular responders (MR+, MR &lt; 0.5), and 55 (23%) were not (MR–, MR ≥ 0.5). PFS was moderately improved for both MR+ and ctDNA-low relative to MR– (HR=0.61 (95%CI 0.44-0.85), p&lt; 0.01) over the full 29 months of follow up. Differential PFS event rate was observed only in the first 8 months following ctDNA assessment; during this time MR+ and ctDNA-low were associated with more significantly decreased risk of progression (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.13 – 0.43, p=0.0001). Limiting ctDNA assessment to genes commonly mutated in breast cancer enhanced the predictive power of MR (HR=0.08, 95% CI 0.04 0.17, p&lt; 0.001, for MR+ and ctDNA-low vs. MR– across 8 months post-assessment); however, fewer samples were quantifiable by this method (169 [45%] quantifiable; 203 [55%] ctDNA-low). Combining MR status with additional molecular features (e.g.tumor mutational burden and maximum mutation allele fraction) did not improve prediction of non-response. Conclusion: Changes in ctDNA fraction during the first weeks of treatment are predictive of long term clinical benefit on an individual patient basis, particularly during the first year of therapy. Adjusting the MR threshold and/or limiting to genes known to be relevant in the specific tumor can tailor the assessment of ctDNA change to specific clinical scenarios where greater sensitivity or specificity may be required. The identification of patients at high risk for early clinical failure at the onset of treatment may allow for therapy escalation and/or change to improve outcome in this population. Funding: Pfizer and Guardant Health

Citation Format: Caroline Bailleux, Thomas Bachelot, Francois-Clement Bidard, Anne-Claire Hardy-Bessard, Ivan Bièche, Anne Pradines, Florian Clatot, thibault DE LA MOTTE ROUGE, Jean-Luc Canon, Barbara Pistilli, Kyle Chang, Katie J. Quinn, Heather L. Gustafson, Florence Dalenc, Cyril Foa, Hanifa Ammarguellat, Chantal Bernard-Marty, Brigitte Lucas, Sophie Barthier, Fabrice Lorchel, Olivier Gisserot, Laurent Arnould, Marjorie Mauduit, Jérôme Lemonnier, Frédérique Berger, Suzette Delaloge, Fabrice Andre. ctDNA Molecular Response based on breast cancer driver mutations predicts progression in aromatase inhibitor-sensitive first line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+) HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD17-02.

Abstract OT1-03-04: Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd), a TROP2 antibody-drug conjugate, vs investigators’ choice of chemotherapy in previously-treated, inoperable or metastatic HR+/HER2– breast cancer: TROPION-Breast01

Background: Chemotherapy is the main treatment in patients with pre-treated endocrine-resistant HR+/HER2– metastatic breast cancer, but has limited efficacy and substantial toxicities. The antibody-drug conjugate Dato-DXd consists of a humanized IgG1 mAb targeting TROP2 attached via a stable cleavable linker to a topoisomerase I (TopI) inhibitor payload. Heavily pre-treated patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer in the TROPION-PanTumor01 (NCT03401385) study of Dato-DXd showed a manageable safety profile and highly encouraging objective response rates (ORR by blinded independent central review [BICR]: 34% in all patients; 52% in patients treatment-naïve to TopI inhibitor-based therapies). The metastatic HR+/HER2– breast cancer cohort of TROPION-PanTumor01 has completed enrollment (n=41); data are currently maturing. Trial design: TROPION-Breast01 (NCT05104866) is an ongoing, global, phase 3, open-label, randomized trial evaluating efficacy and safety of Dato-DXd vs investigators’ choice of chemotherapy (ICC) in patients with inoperable or metastatic HR+/HER2– breast cancer. Patients (n≈700) are randomized 1:1 to Dato-DXd 6 mg/kg IV Q3W or ICC (eribulin, capecitabine, vinorelbine, or gemcitabine) until progression. Adults with an ECOG performance status of 0–1, who experienced progression on or are unsuitable for endocrine therapy, and received 1–2 prior lines of standard-of-care chemotherapy in the inoperable or metastatic setting are eligible. Monotherapy treatment with inhibitors of mTOR, PD-[L]1, CDK4/6 and PARP do not count as prior chemotherapy lines. Patients must have ≥1 measurable lesion per RECIST 1.1 and an archival or fresh formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor sample. Clinically inactive brain metastases are permitted. Dual primary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS) by BICR, and overall survival. Secondary endpoints include PFS per investigator, ORR, disease control rate, patient-reported outcomes, and Dato-DXd pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity. Exploratory endpoints include TROP2 expression and exposure–efficacy relationship. Patients are stratified by number of prior chemotherapy lines, prior CDK4/6 inhibitor use, and region. At the time of writing 236 patients have been enrolled across 19 countries.

Citation Format: Aditya Bardia, Kevin Kalinsky, Junji Tsurutani, Erika Hamilton, Joo Hyuk Sohn, Kyong Hwa Park, Yeon Hee Park, Seock-Ah Im, Keun Seok Lee, Daisy Dastur, Vincent Haddad, Sabrina Khan, Binghe Xu, Barbara Pistilli, Hope Rugo. Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd), a TROP2 antibody-drug conjugate, vs investigators’ choice of chemotherapy in previously-treated, inoperable or metastatic HR+/HER2– breast cancer: TROPION-Breast01 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-03-04.

Abstract OT3-26-02: A Phase 3 study of gedatolisib plus fulvestrant with and without palbociclib in patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer previously treated with a CDK4/6 inhibitor plus a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (VIKTORIA-1)

Background: Gedatolisib is a potent reversible dual inhibitor that selectively targets all Class I isoforms of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR). Two separate pivotal clinical trials demonstrated that PI3K and mTOR inhibitors are active in combination with endocrine therapy and prolong progression-free survival (PFS) among patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) who had previously received endocrine therapy (SOLAR-1, BOLERO-2). CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) therapy has been approved in the front-line setting. However, patients eventually experience disease progression on CDK4/6i based therapy. Available data indicates that resistance to CDK4/6i is a transient adaptive mechanism that may be reversed by adding inhibitors of the PI3K/mTOR pathway (PI3K/mTORi). Thus, combination of PI3K/mTORi and CDK4/6i in patients whose disease progressed on prior CDK4/6i could potentially both restore sensitivity to CDK4/6i and prevent adaptive activation of the PI3K/mTOR pathway. This hypothesis was evaluated in a Phase 1b study (Layman SABCS 2021). Subjects with HR+/HER2- ABC who were CDK4/6i pretreated received gedatolisib (180 mg IV weekly for 3 weeks, then one week off) in combination with standard doses of palbociclib and fulvestrant. Median PFS was 12.9 months, and overall response rate was 63%. Grade 3-4 adverse events (AE) were observed at a low rate, and toxicity was overall easily managed with available standards of care, and few patients discontinued treatment due to treatment-related adverse events (4%). The most common AE was stomatitis; hyperglycemia of any grade occurred in 26% of patients. This preliminary data, dosing schedule, and study population characteristics form the basis for the Phase 3 trial, VIKTORIA-1. Trial design: This Phase 3, open-label, randomized, multinational two-part clinical trial will evaluate the efficacy and safety of gedatolisib and fulvestrant with or without palbociclib in patients with HR+/HER2- ABC previously treated with any CDK4/6i in combination with non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor therapy. Those without tumor PIK3CA mutations will be assigned to Study 1 and those with PIK3CA mutations will be assigned to Study 2. Study 1 will include up to 351 subjects randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to Arm A (gedatolisib, palbociclib, and fulvestrant), Arm B (gedatolisib plus fulvestrant), or Arm C (fulvestrant). For subjects in Arm C whose disease progresses, crossover to Arm A or B is allowed. Study 2 will include up to 350 subjects randomized in a 3:3:1 ratio to Arm D (gedatolisib, palbociclib, and fulvestrant), Arm E (alpelisib plus fulvestrant), or Arm F (gedatolisib plus fulvestrant). Key eligibility criteria include adults with confirmed metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer, any menopausal status for females, radiologically evaluable disease, and prior CDK4/6i treatment with non-steroidal AI. Prior therapy with SERD, including fulvestrant is allowed. Key exclusion criteria include prior treatment with a PI3K, protein kinase B (Akt), or mTOR inhibitor, prior treatment with chemotherapy for advanced disease, more than two lines of prior endocrine therapy, bone only disease with no soft tissue components, active CNS metastases, and type 1 diabetes or uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. The primary endpoint is PFS assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), safety and tolerability, ORR, duration of response, time to response, CBR, quality of life, and pharmacokinetics. This trial is open for enrollment.

Citation Format: Sara Hurvitz, Fabrice Andre, Massimo Cristofanilli, Giuseppe Curigliano, Antonio Giordano, Hyo S. Han, Miguel Martín, Barbara Pistilli, Hope Rugo, Robert Wesolowski, Samuel Suzuki, Sarah C. Mutka, Igor Gorbatchevsky, Sibylle Loibl. A Phase 3 study of gedatolisib plus fulvestrant with and without palbociclib in patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer previously treated with a CDK4/6 inhibitor plus a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (VIKTORIA-1) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-26-02.

Comparative genomic profiling of second breast cancers following first ipislateral hormone receptor-positive breast cancers

PURPOSE

We compared the mutational profile of second breast cancers (SBC) following first ipislateral hormone receptor-positive breast cancers (FBC) of patient-matched tumors to distinguish new primaries from true recurrences.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) using the Oncomine Tumor Mutation Load (TML) Assay. Variants were filtered according to their allele frequency ≥ 5%, read count ≥ 5X, and genomic effect and annotation. Whole genome comparative genomic hybridization array (CGH) was also performed to evaluate clonality.

RESULTS

Among the 131 eligible patients, 96 paired FBC and SBC were successfully sequenced and analyzed. Unshared variants specific to the FBC and SBC were identified in 71.9% and 61.5%, respectively. Paired samples exhibited similar frequency of gene variants, median number of variants per sample and variant allele frequency of the reported variants except for GATA3. Among the 30 most frequent gene alterations, ARIDIA, NSD2 and SETD2 had statistically significant discordance rates in paired samples. Seventeen paired samples (17.7%) exhibited common variants and were considered true recurrences; these patients had a trend for less favorable survival outcomes. Among the 8 patients with available tissue for CGH analysis and considered new primaries by comparison of the mutation profiles, 4 patients had clonally related tumors.

CONCLUSION

Patient-matched FBC and SBC analysis revealed that only a minority of patients exhibited common gene variants between the first and second tumor. Further analysis using larger cohorts preferably using single cell analyses to account for clonality, might better select patients with true recurrences and thereby better inform the decision-making process.

Long-Term Results with Everolimus in Advanced Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer in a Multicenter National Real-World Observational Study

Everolimus is the first oral targeted therapy widely used in advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer. We sought to evaluate the impact of everolimus-based therapy on overall survival in the ESME-MBC database, a national metastatic breast cancer cohort that collects retrospective data using clinical trial-like methodology including quality assessments. We compared 1693 patients having received everolimus to 5928 patients not exposed to everolimus in the same period. Overall survival was evaluated according to treatment line, and a propensity score with the inverse probability of treatment weighting method was built to adjust for differences between groups. Crude and landmark overall survival analyses were all compatible with a benefit from everolimus-based therapy. Adjusted hazard ratios for overall survival were 0.34 (95% CI: 0.16-0.72, p = 0.0054), 0.34 (95% CI: 0.22-0.52, p < 0.0001), and 0.23 (95% CI: 0.14-0.36, p < 0.0001) for patients treated with everolimus in line 1, 2, and 3 and beyond, respectively. No clinically relevant benefit on progression-free survival was observed. Causes for everolimus discontinuation were progressive disease (56.2%), adverse events (27.7%), and other miscellaneous reasons. Despite the limitations inherent to such retrospective studies, these results suggest that adding everolimus-based therapy to the therapeutic sequences in patients with advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer may favorably affect overall survival.

Facing points of view: Representations on adjuvant endocrine therapy of premenopausal patients after breast cancer and their healthcare providers in France. The FOR-AD study

PURPOSE

Adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) for 5-10 years is the backbone of the therapeutic strategy in patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+) early breast cancer (BC). However, long-term adherence to adjuvant ET represents a major challenge for most patients. According to prior studies, side effects of adjuvant ET are an important reason for poor adherence. In contrast, better communication and relational bond between patients and healthcare providers (HCPs) may improve adherence. The FOR-AD (Focus on non-adherence) study aimed at better understanding the representation of adjuvant ET by patients and their HCPs, in order to improve the care process.

METHODS

Three focus groups of premenopausal women (receiving adjuvant ET for variable amount of time) and two focus groups of HCPs (including oncologists, pharmacists, and nurses) were conducted, each including around ten participants. Thematic analyses using a general inductive approach were constructed to report participants' representations.

RESULTS

Two main themes emerged across groups, and appeared of major importance. Representations on adjuvant ET were often homogenous within each group, but differed between patients and their HCPs. The relationship between both groups was considerably discussed, particularly its importance in facilitating adherence to adjuvant ET. Suggestions on improving the care process were also given, such as systematically including psychologists in follow-up care paths and having a nurse navigator follow patients under treatment with adjuvant ET.

CONCLUSION

The present qualitative exploration may help buildi future tailored interventions to improve adherence to adjuvant ET, in particular regarding the role of nurse navigators.

Impact of Anti-HER2 Therapy Alone and With Weekly Paclitaxel on the Ovarian Reserve of Young Women With HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

The potential gonadotoxicity of anti-HER2 agents remains largely unknown, and limited, conflicting evidence exists for taxanes. Antimüllerian hormone (AMH) is an established biomarker of ovarian reserve that may aid in quantifying anticancer treatment-induced gonadotoxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The present biomarker analysis of the randomized phase III neoadjuvant NeoALTTO trial included premenopausal women aged ≤45 years at diagnosis of HER2-positive early breast cancer with available frozen serum samples at baseline (ie, before anticancer treatments), at week 2 (ie, the "biological window" of anti-HER2 therapy alone), and/or at the time of surgery (ie, after completing paclitaxel + anti-HER2 therapy, before starting adjuvant chemotherapy).

RESULTS

The present analysis included 130 patients with a median age of 38 years (interquartile ratio [IQR], age 33-42 years). AMH values at the 3 time points differed significantly (P<.001). At baseline, median AMH levels were 1.29 ng/mL (IQR, 0.56-2.62 ng/mL). At week 2, a small but significant reduction in AMH levels was observed (median, 1.10 ng/mL; IQR, 0.45-2.09 ng/mL; P<.001). At surgery, a larger significant decline in AMH levels was observed (median, 0.01 ng/mL; IQR, 0.01-0.03 ng/mL; P<.001). Although the type of anti-HER2 treatment (trastuzumab and/or lapatinib) did not seem to impact the results, age and pretreatment ovarian reserve had a major influence on treatment-induced gonadotoxicity risk.

CONCLUSIONS

This NeoALTTO biomarker analysis showed that anti-HER2 therapies alone had limited gonadotoxicity but that the addition of weekly paclitaxel resulted in marked AMH decline with possible negative implications for subsequent ovarian function and fertility.

Final findings from the CONTROL trial: Strategies to reduce the incidence and severity of neratinib-associated diarrhea in patients with HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Neratinib is an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for HER2-positive early-stage and metastatic breast cancer. Diarrhea is the most frequent side effect and the most common reason for early discontinuation. The phase II CONTROL trial investigated antidiarrheal prophylaxis or neratinib dose escalation (DE) for prevention of diarrhea. We present complete study results including final data for two DE strategies.

METHODS

Patients who completed trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy received neratinib 240 mg/day for 1 year. Early cohorts investigated mandatory prophylaxis with loperamide, then additional budesonide or colestipol. Final cohorts assessed neratinib DE over the first 2 (DE1) or 4 weeks (DE2). The primary endpoint was incidence of grade ≥3 diarrhea. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed using FACT-B and EQ-5D-5L.

RESULTS

563 patients were enrolled into six cohorts. All strategies reduced grade ≥3 diarrhea with the lowest incidence in DE1 (DE1 13%; colestipol + loperamide [CL] 21%, DE2 27%; budesonide + loperamide [BL] 28%; loperamide [L] 31%; colestipol + loperamide as needed [CL-PRN] 33%). Diarrhea-related discontinuations occurred early and were lowest in DE1 (DE1 3%; CL 4%; DE2 6%; CL-PRN 8%; BL 11%; L 20%). More patients stayed on neratinib for the prescribed period versus historical controls. Prior pertuzumab use did not affect rates of grade ≥3 diarrhea, diarrhea-related discontinuations, or treatment duration. Early transient reductions in HRQoL scores were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

These complete results from CONTROL show improved neratinib tolerability with proactive management at the start of therapy. Two-week neratinib DE with loperamide as needed was particularly effective.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02400476.

Association of Adherence to Endocrine Therapy Among Patients With Breast Cancer and Potential Drug-Drug Interactions

IMPORTANCE

Suboptimal adherence to endocrine therapy (ET) among patients with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer significantly affects survival outcomes and is associated with higher hospitalization rates and health care costs. Weak adherence to long-term treatments has multiple determinants, including disease characteristics, treatment adverse effects, and patients' attributes, such as age and comorbidities.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether potential drug-drug interactions (PDDI) with tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor were associated with adherence to ET in patients with early and advanced breast cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study used anonymized health record data of women with breast cancer who received ET in a private observational primary care database. Patients eligible for analysis included women aged 18 years or older who had a reported diagnosis of breast cancer and received ET with tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor between 1994 and 2021. Data were analyzed 2021.

EXPOSURES

Adherence to ET during a given year was defined by a medication possession ratio of 80% or greater over 1-year prescription periods. PDDI were categorized into absent, minor (a combination to take into account), moderate (combination requiring precautions for use), major (combination not recommended), and contraindicated according to guidelines in the Claude Bernard Drug Database.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

We used regression models to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for the associations between adherence and age, baseline comorbidities, PDDI, and adherence to ET during the previous year.

RESULTS

A total of 10 863 patients who were prescribed ET for breast cancer were eligible for the analysis (age 70 years or older, 3509 patients [32.3%]). In the tamoxifen cohort (3564 patients), PDDI were reported in 497 of 3670 patients (13.5%) at baseline (moderate, 254 patients [51.1%]; major, 227 patients [45.7%]), 2047 of 4831 patients (42.4%) at year 1, 1127 of 2751 patients (41.0%) at year 2, 761 of 1861 patients (40.9%) at year 3, 376 of 1058 patients (35.5%) at year 4, and 201 of 593 patients (33.9%) at year 5. In the aromatase inhibitor cohort (7299 patients), PDDI were reported in 592 of 7437 patients (8.0%) at baseline (moderate in 588 of 592 patients [99.3%]), which reached 2875 of 9031 patients (31.8%) at year 1 and ranged between 31.4% (1802 of 5730 patients in year 2) and 32.8% (791 of 2411 in year 4) throughout the study period. No association between adherence and PDDI was found in the tamoxifen (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.91-1.08) or aromatase inhibitor (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.95-1.15) cohort.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort of patients with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer, PDDI with tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors were not associated with adherence to ET.

Association of Endocrine Therapy for HR+/ERBB2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer With Survival Outcomes

IMPORTANCE

Evidence suggests that patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (ERBB2+ [formerly HER2+]) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have different clinical characteristics and outcomes according to their hormone receptor (HR) status. The place of endocrine therapy (ET) for patients with HR+/ERBB2+ is still not clearly defined in this setting.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of HR status and first-line inclusion of ET with outcomes among patients with ERBB2+ MBC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study was an analysis of clinical data from the French clinical Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) cohort, including patients with MBC who started treatment between 2008 and 2017. The last date of follow-up was June 18, 2020. Data were analyzed from May 2021 to May 2022.

EXPOSURES

Patients were treated with first-line ERBB2-targeted therapy and either chemotherapy (CT) with or without ET or ET alone. For the study of the association of maintenance ET with outcomes, we included patients treated with first-line ERBB2-targeted therapy with CT and with or without maintenance ET.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Median overall survival (OS) and median first-line progression-free survival (PFS) were reported using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards models and a propensity score were constructed to report and adjust for prognostic factors. Multivariable analysis included age at MBC, time to MBC, number of metastatic sites, type of metastases, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status.

RESULTS

Among 4145 women with ERBB2+ MBC, 2696 patients had HR+ (median [IQR] age, 58.0 [47.0-67.0] years) and 1449 patients had HR- (56.0 [47.0-64.0] years) tumors. The median OS for patients with HR+ vs HR- tumors was 55.9 months (95% CI, 53.7-59.4 months) vs 42.0 months (95% CI, 38.8-45.2 months), confirmed in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.26-1.56; P < .001). The median PFS for patients with HR+ vs HR- tumors was 12.2 months (95% CI, 11.5-12.9 months) vs 9.8 months (95% CI, 9.2-11.0 months; P = .01), and the HR was 1.15 (95% CI, 1.06-1.26; P < .001). In multivariable analysis, no significant difference was found in OS or PFS for 1520 patients treated with ERBB2-targeted therapy with CT and with or without ET vs 203 patients receiving ERBB2-targeted therapy with ET, regardless of type of ERBB2-targeted therapy (trastuzumab or trastuzumab with pertuzumab). This result was confirmed by matching patients using a propensity score. Using the time-dependent ET variable among patients with ERBB2-targeted therapy with CT, those with maintenance ET had significantly better PFS (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.60-0.82; P < .001) and OS (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.39-0.57; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These results suggest that ET-containing first-line regimens may be associated with benefits among a subgroup of patients with HR+/ERBB2+ MBC.

Switch to fulvestrant and palbociclib versus no switch in advanced breast cancer with rising ESR1 mutation during aromatase inhibitor and palbociclib therapy (PADA-1): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

In advanced oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, acquired resistance to aromatase inhibitors frequently stems from ESR1-mutated subclones, which might be sensitive to fulvestrant. The PADA-1 trial aimed to show the efficacy of an early change in therapy on the basis of a rising ESR1 mutation in blood (bESR1^mut), while assessing the global safety of combination fulvestrant and palbociclib.

METHODS

We did a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial in 83 hospitals in France. Women aged at least 18 years with oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were recruited and monitored for rising bESR1^mut during first-line aromatase inhibitor (2·5 mg letrozole, 1 mg anastrozole, or 25 mg exemestane, orally once per day, taken continuously) and palbociclib (125 mg orally once per day on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle) therapy. Patients with newly present or increased bESR1^mut in circulating tumour DNA and no synchronous disease progression were randomly assigned (1:1) to continue with the same therapy or to switch to fulvestrant (500 mg intramuscularly on day 1 of each 28-day cycle and on day 15 of cycle 1) and palbociclib (dosing unchanged). The randomisation sequence was generated within an interactive web response system using a minimisation method (with an 80% random factor); patients were stratified according to visceral involvement (present or absent) and the time from inclusion to bESR1^mut detection (<12 months or ≥12 months). The co-primary endpoints were investigator-assessed progression-free survival from random assignment, analysed in the intention-to-treat population (ie, all randomly assigned patients), and grade 3 or worse haematological adverse events in all patients. The trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03079011), and is now complete.

FINDINGS

From March 22, 2017, to Jan 31, 2019, 1017 patients were included, of whom 279 (27%) developed a rising bESR1^mut and 172 (17%) were randomly assigned to treatment: 88 to switching to fulvestrant and palbociclib and 84 patients to continuing aromatase inhibitor and palbociclib. At database lock on July 31, 2021, randomly assigned patients had a median follow-up of 35·3 months (IQR 29·2-41·4) from inclusion and 26·0 months (13·8-34·3) from random assignment. Median progression-free survival from random assignment was 11·9 months (95% CI 9·1-13·6) in the fulvestrant and palbociclib group versus 5·7 months (3·9-7·5) in the aromatase inhibitor and palbociclib group (stratified HR 0·61, 0·43-0·86; p=0·0040). The most frequent grade 3 or worse haematological adverse events were neutropenia (715 [70·3%] of 1017 patients), lymphopenia (66 [6·5%]), and thrombocytopenia (20 [2·0%]). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in step 2 were neutropenia (35 [41·7%] of 84 patients in the aromatase inhibitor and palbociclib group vs 39 [44·3%] of 88 patients in the fulvestrant and palbociclib group) and lymphopenia (three [3·6%] vs four [4·5%]). 31 (3·1%) patients had grade 3 or worse serious adverse events related to treatment in the overall population. Three (1·7%) of 172 patients randomly assigned had one serious adverse event in step 2: one (1·2%) grade 4 neutropenia and one (1·2%) grade 3 fatigue among 84 patients in the aromatase inhibitor and palbociclib group, and one (1·1%) grade 4 neutropenia among 88 patients in the fulvestrant and palbociclib group. One death by pulmonary embolism in step 1 was declared as being treatment related.

INTERPRETATION

PADA-1 is the first prospective randomised trial showing that the early therapeutic targeting of bESR1^mut results in significant clinical benefit. Additionally, the original design explored in PADA-1 might help with tackling acquired resistance with new drugs in future trials.

FUNDING

Pfizer.

Antibody drug conjugates targeting HER2: Clinical development in metastatic breast cancer

The identification of the HER2 alteration as an actionable oncogenic driver in breast cancer has propelled the development of HER-targeting monoclonal antibodies (mAb) such as trastuzumab and pertuzumab, which led to dramatic improvements in survival outcomes. Lately, the great strides made toward developing antibody-conjugation methods have led to the development of a new class of compelling compounds, the antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting HER2 which have profoundly transformed the treatment landscape of breast cancer. HER2-targeting ADCs, trastuzumab-emtansine and trastuzumab-deruxtecan, have improved the overall survival in the second and third-line settings with manageable adverse events. Other HER2-targeting ADCs using novel technological advances in the antibody, linker and/or payload conception have shown promising activity in preclinical and clinical studies and some of them are now being evaluated in larger clinical trials. Multiple challenges still impede the success of ADCs in breast cancer namely the lack of a comprehensive understanding of resistance mechanisms as well as the mechanisms of action of ADCs in special subgroups of patients such as those with low or ultra-low HER2 expression and patients with brain or leptomeningeal metastases (BM). In this framework, we review the approved indications and ongoing trials for HER2-targeting ADCs, across patient subgroups, including those with BM and discuss the associated potential mechanisms of action and resistance. Last, we provide an overview of the future perspectives involving HER2-targeting ADCs in breast cancer.

PROACT: Implementing a PROACTive care pathway to empower and support breast cancer (BC) survivors

221

Background: Optimal comprehensive survivorship care, beyond screening of recurrences and new cancers, and including health promotion, management of physical as well as psychosocial needs and chronic conditions is insufficiently delivered. To increase patient (pt) empowerment and maximize the uptake of multidisciplinary strategies serving all survivorship needs, we implemented a proactive survivorship care pathway offered for pts with early BC at the end of their primary treatment phase (surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy). Methods: The pathway consisted of the following components: 1) receipt of a personalized survivorship care plan (SCP), 2) invitation to attend face-to-face group seminars focused on specific themes and a comprehensive survivorship consultation for multidisciplinary referrals (”the transition day”) 3) access to a mobile application (app) delivering personalized education according to symptoms reported and 4) decision aids for helping physicians to manage prevalent symptoms and side effects related to BC treatment. Administrative data were collected. A pre-specified post-experience survey was sent to all pts four weeks post pathway delivery to inform program implementation with a minimum requirement of 50 responses. BC physicians and members of the multidisciplinary implementation team (MIT) answered a dedicated survey. For the overall pathway and each of its components we descriptively evaluated the following domains: satisfaction (primary outcome), uptake, perceived usefulness, barriers for delivery, and suggestions for improvement. A 70% satisfaction rate would define a positive experience. Results: From October 2021 to April 2022, 241 SCP were delivered, and 98 pts attended the “transition day”. 62 pts replied to the survey, 42 (67%) had received the SCP, 34 (55%) attended the “transition day”, 36 (57%) accessed the app. Only 21 pts (34%) who answered the survey received the full pathway, 81% of whom were very or completely satisfied with it. Perceived usefulness of individual components and for pts that received the full pathway were, respectively: 64% and 90% for the SCP, 91% and 95% for the “transition day”, 72% and 90% for the app. Among 14 BC physicians, agreement regarding the usefulness of the components was: 93% for the SCP, 86% for the decision aids, 93% for the “transition day”, and 86% for the app. The MIT (n = 13) reported high engagement and satisfaction (100%). Main actionable points for improvement included: automated screening and SCP preparation, virtual “transition day”, increase physicians’ awareness. Conclusions: In this pilot phase, pts were satisfied with receiving a proactive survivorship care pathway and the majority reported that the components were useful for supporting their needs. This study informed improvements on program penetration. Evolution towards sustainability phase is ongoing including dissemination to other cancers and centers.

Perceived discrimination at work: examining social, health and work-related factors as determinants among breast cancer survivors – evidence from the prospective CANTO cohort

Background

We assessed the prevalence of self-reported perceived discrimination in the workplace after the end of treatment among breast cancer (BC) survivors and studied its association with social, health-related and work-related factors.

Methods

We used data from a French prospective cohort (CANcer TOxicities) including women diagnosed with stage I–III BC. Our analysis included 2130 women who were employed, <57 years old at BC diagnosis and were working 2 years afterwards. We assessed the association between social, health-related and work-related factors and perceived discrimination in the workplace using logistic regression models.

Results

Overall, 26% of women reported perceived discrimination in the workplace after the end of treatment. Women working for a small company, in the public sector or with better overall health status were less likely to report perceived discrimination. Women who benefited from easing dispositions at their workplace, who did not feel supported by their colleagues and those who returned to work because of fear of job loss were more likely to report perceived discrimination.

Conclusions

One in four BC survivors perceives discrimination in the workplace. Health and work-related factors are associated with increased likelihood of reporting perceived discrimination.

Trial registration number

NCT01993498.

Contraceptive Use in Premenopausal Women With Early Breast Cancer

IMPORTANCE

As life span has increased among patients with cancer, survivorship has become an important component of breast cancer care. Among survivorship concerns, adequate contraceptive counseling is needed for premenopausal patients who are not seeking to become pregnant.

OBJECTIVE

To examine contraceptive use and chosen methods and to assess factors associated with contraceptive use over time in patients with early breast cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The Cancer Toxicity (CANTO) study was a multicenter nationwide prospective cohort study that enrolled women diagnosed with stage I to stage III breast cancer in France between March 2012 and December 2017. This analysis included 2900 premenopausal women who were 50 years of age or younger at diagnosis. Data were analyzed from July 2020 to July 2022.

EXPOSURES

Contraceptive use and method at diagnosis, shortly after the end of primary treatment (year 1), and during follow-up (year 2).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Contraceptive use and methods were longitudinally evaluated at diagnosis, year 1, and year 2 after breast cancer diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the associations of clinical, socioeconomic, treatment, adverse effect, and patient-reported outcome variables with contraceptive use after diagnosis.

RESULTS

A total of 2900 patients (mean [SD] age, 43.1 [5.6] years) were included in the analysis; 2050 of 2894 women (70.8%) received chemotherapy, and 2305 of 2880 women (80.0%) received endocrine therapy. After diagnosis, 1182 of 2625 patients (45.0%) at year 1 and 1553 of 2363 patients (65.7%) at year 2 reported consulting with a gynecologist in the previous year. At diagnosis, 1487 of 2744 patients (54.2%) reported contraceptive use, with most patients (921 of 1470 women [62.7%]) using hormonal methods. The use of contraception significantly decreased after diagnosis (911 of 2342 patients [38.9%] at year 1 and 808 of 1961 patients [41.2%] at year 2; P < .001 for trend), when most patients (848 of 900 women [94.2%] at year 1 and 767 of 805 women [95.3%] at year 2) reported use of nonhormonal methods; these methods were primarily reversible mechanical approaches (copper intrauterine devices: 656 of 848 patients [77.4%] at year 1 and 577 of 767 patients [75.2%] at year 2; male condoms: 115 of 848 patients [13.6%] at year 1 and 110 of 767 patients [14.3%] at year 2). In the multivariable model, factors significantly associated with contraceptive use at year 1 included using contraception at diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.02; 95% CI, 3.15-5.14), being younger (aOR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.07-1.13 per decreasing year), having better sexual function (aOR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.07-1.19 per 10-point increment), having children (aOR, 4.21; 95% CI, 1.80-9.86), reporting the presence of leukorrhea (aOR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.03-1.70), receiving tamoxifen treatment alone (aOR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.01-1.92), and consulting with a gynecologist in the previous year (aOR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.02-1.63). Similar factors were associated with contraceptive use at year 2, with the addition of partnered status (aOR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.07-2.44).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Findings from this study support the importance of raising awareness and improving targeted contraceptive counseling for premenopausal women with early breast cancer.

The Molecular Predictive and Prognostic Biomarkers in Metastatic Breast Cancer: The Contribution of Molecular Profiling

The past decade was marked by several important studies deciphering the molecular landscape of metastatic breast cancer. Although the initial goal of these studies was to find driver oncogenic events to explain cancer progression and metastatic spreading, they have also permitted the identification of several molecular alterations associated with treatment response or resistance. Herein, we review validated (PI3KCA, ESR1, MSI, NTRK translocation) and emergent molecular biomarkers (ERBB2, AKT, PTEN, HRR gene, CD274 amplification RB1, NF1, mutational process) in metastatic breast cancer, on the bases of the largest molecular profiling studies. These biomarkers will be classed according the level of evidence and, if possible, the ESCAT (ESMO) classification. Finally, we will provide some perspective on development in clinical practice for the main biomarkers.

Lurbinectedin, a selective inhibitor of oncogenic transcription, in patients with pretreated germline BRCA1/2 metastatic breast cancer: results from a phase II basket study

BACKGROUND

Lurbinectedin, a selective inhibitor of oncogenic transcription, has shown preclinical antitumor activity against homologous recombination repair-deficient models and preliminary clinical activity in BRCA1/2 breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase II basket multitumor trial (NCT02454972) evaluated lurbinectedin 3.2 mg/m² 1-h intravenous infusion every 3 weeks in a cohort of 21 patients with pretreated germline BRCA1/2 breast cancer. Patients with any hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status were enrolled. The primary efficacy endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) according to RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety.

RESULTS

Confirmed partial response (PR) was observed in six patients [ORR = 28.6%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 11.3% to 52.2%] who had received a median of two prior advanced chemotherapy lines. Lurbinectedin was active in both BRCA mutations: four PRs in 11 patients (36.4%) with BRCA2 and two PRs in 10 patients (20.0%) with BRCA1. Median DoR was 8.6 months, median PFS was 4.1 months and median OS was 16.1 months. Stable disease (SD) was observed in 10 patients (47.6%), including 3 with unconfirmed response in a subsequent tumor assessment [ORR unconfirmed = 42.9% (95% CI 21.8% to 66.0%)]. Clinical benefit rate (PR + SD ≥ 4 months) was 76.2% (95% CI 52.8% to 91.8%). No objective response was observed among patients who had received prior poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. The most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were nausea (61.9%), fatigue (38.1%) and vomiting (23.8%). These AEs were mostly grade 1/2. The most common grade 3/4 toxicity was neutropenia (42.9%: grade 4, 23.8%: with no febrile neutropenia).

CONCLUSIONS

This phase II study met its primary endpoint and showed activity of lurbinectedin in germline BRCA1/2 breast cancer. Lurbinectedin showed a predictable and manageable safety profile. Considering the exploratory aim of this trial as well as previous results in other phase II studies, further development of lurbinectedin in this indication is warranted.

Coffee and tea consumption, patient-reported, and clinical outcomes in a longitudinal study of patients with breast cancer

Background

Higher consumption of coffee and tea has been associated with improved health outcomes in the general population and improved breast cancer (BC) prognosis. This study investigated patterns of coffee and tea consumption and association with patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) and clinical outcomes among survivors of BC.

Methods

The authors included survivors of stage I–III BC enrolled in the CANTO cohort (NCT01993498) that provided post‐treatment assessment of coffee and tea consumption from years 1 to 4 after diagnosis. Group‐based trajectory modeling clustered patients according to daily consumption of coffee and tea. Multivariable mixed models and Cox models examined associations between consumption, PROs and clinical outcomes.

Results

Among 3788 patients, the authors identified four stable patterns of consumption: “Low” (25.8%), “Moderate” (37.6%), “High” (25.3%), and “Very high” (11.3%), corresponding to <1, 2, 3, and ≥ 4 cups of coffee and/or tea per day. Patients in the “Very high” group (vs. “Low”), were more likely to be younger, smokers, with higher monthly income and education. PROs and survival outcomes were similar across the four groups.

Conclusions

Over one in three survivors of BC reported high or very high consumption of coffee and/or tea. The authors found no association between higher consumption of coffee and/or tea, worse PROs and clinical outcomes.

More than 30% of survivors of breast cancer report high post‐diagnostic consumption of coffee and tea. In this study, the authors did not find any detrimental association between higher consumption of coffee and tea and patient‐reported or clinical outcomes.

Informing the development of multidisciplinary interventions to help breast cancer patients return to work: a qualitative study

PURPOSE

Return to work (RTW) after breast cancer (BC) can be a major challenge for patients. Multidisciplinary interventions seem to be effective but the role of digital solutions is under-developed and therefore not evaluated. We explored the preferences, needs, and barriers regarding RTW interventions, including opinions about the use of digital approaches to deliver such interventions.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative study based on interviews with 30 patients with BC and 18 healthcare providers in four French regions. Emergent themes were identified using thematic content analysis.

RESULTS

Most providers declared that they did not proactively address RTW with patients, mainly due to having other priorities and a lack of knowledge. The following themes emerged: several development and deployment barriers regarding RTW interventions exist, multidisciplinary interventions are preferred, and there is a need to maintain contact between the patient and workplace during sick leave, including pathways and interlocutors that can facilitate RTW. Participants had mostly positive representations of using digital tools to facilitate RTW; however, fear of loss of human contact and the exacerbation of inequalities were identified as possible risks associated with the development of digital-only interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions blending the needs and preferences of patients with BC and the healthcare system are warranted. A personalized multimodal approach with mixed digital and in-person features has surfaced as a possible solution to address the weaknesses of existing interventions.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Since most women work at the time of diagnosis, it is of particular relevance to build interventions promoting RTW.